To Seduce the Elect
Part 7 of 7
An in depth look at some of the falsehoods which have invaded the Christian world and the danger they pose to Christ and His church, with apologies to none.By Lt. Col. Gordon "Jack" Mohr AUS Ret.
Probably the most divisive teaching in Identity, and the one which has distanced us the most from other Christians, is that of the TWO SEEDLINES. What makes this subject particularly difficult to deal with is that there are TWO LITERAL SEED-LINES in the world, which MUST be dealt with from a strictly Scriptural context if we are to know the TRUTH.
This controversy revolved around an understanding of Genesis 3:15, which follows the account of the "serpent (adversary) after he has seduced Mother Eve into disobeying God's Law, and is confronted by God Himself with these words: "I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed (offspring) and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shall bruise his heel".
Those in Identity circles who are known as SEEDLINERS, adhere to the heathen philosophy, actually taught in the Jewish Talmud, that the "original sin of mankind", began when Mother Eve was sexually seduced by the arch-demon Satan himself, and that her son from this unholy union was Cain, who was actually a physical "son of Satan" and that Cain became the physical father, of the anti-Christ's we today know as Jews. Their pet Scripture is John 8:44, where in speaking to the Jewish authorities Jesus told them: "Ye are of your father the devil, and the lust of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning and abode not in the truth, because there is no in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own; for he is a liar and the father of it".
This teaching has its beginning in Jewish mythology that states that while Mother Eve was being seduced by Satan, whom she thought was God; Adam was having a sexual affair with Satan's beautiful demon mistress Lilith. Of course you will find no account of this anywhere in the Bible. That Adam and Eve were guilty of the same act of disobedience is a given", as Gen. 3:6 says that "...when the woman (Eve) saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit and did eat, and gave also unto her husband and he did eat." They partook of the same sin, whatever it may have been. If Eve's sin was sexual, so was Adam's for he partook of the same fruit.
The question we MUST resolve is: "What was Eve's sin other than disobedience of God?"
It is not my purpose here to poke fun at or belittle those who teach this theory. I do not wish to show disrespect towards those who believe this. My purpose is to show you what God's Word really teaches, and then let your God given intelligence, with the help of His Holy Spirit, lead you to the truth. The purpose of this part of the book is not to prove my contention, but to clarify your mind as to what the Book teaches. Some brilliant minds have written long and sometime mind confusing books to prove this theory, but I'm not interested in what man believes, or wants to believe, but in "What saith the Scripture?"
The main argument of the SEEDLINERS is that God is speaking to Satan in Gen 3:15, although no where is he identified as such. Gen. 3 calls him a "serpent", (small "S") It refers to him as a "beast of the field". Nowhere is he called Satan or the devil. Those who follow this doctrine are inclined to be the most divisive in the Identity ranks, and many will break fellowship with you, if you do not believe as they do. I have lost many friends and supporters over this issue alone.
If you will read God's condemnation of the "serpent", whoever he may have been, in Gen. 3:14, you will notice that he said:- "...because thou hast done this thing, (caused Adam and Eve to disobey God), thou art cursed above all cattle, and beasts of the field: (Notice how once again God classifies this adversary as being of the "beast order"), upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life". There is absolutely no indication that God is speaking to some super-natural being, for he speaks and addresses him as a common animal.
I know of no place in Scripture, where the arch-angel Satan is ever indicated as going about on his belly, eating dust. In many places he is pictured as a powerful being, not a humbled one. (See Job 1:6,7; 1 Peter 5:8).
The word SERPENT, as used here, comes from the Greek NACHASH, which simply means "a snake from it's hiss". If the word had referred to Satan, it would have been capitalized.
The word SEED, as used in Gen. 3:15 is the Hebrew ZERA, which has many meanings: "fruit; plant; seed time; posterity; carnally; sowing time". So it can easily refer to "children" or "posterity", and I believe that is it's meaning here. The same word is used for the "seed of the serpent", as is used for the "seed of the woman", so evidently has the same meaning.
There is absolutely no indication here that the Scripture is speaking racially.
Just as today, no one can say with absolute certainty: "I am of the seed of Abraham," for all old records have been destroyed. So no one can say "The seed of the serpent refers to the Jews, the Cannanites, the Khazars, or the Edomites".
When SEEDLINERS indicate that Gen 3:15 means that Satan would have literal physical children like those of Eve, they are assuming, since there is no Scripture which so indicates.
To say that Eve was to have "literal seed", culminating in Jesus Christ who would ultimately crush Satan's head, does not infer that Satan would also have "literal children who would be the Jewish people", who would fight against the children of Eve. There is no justification for this theory other than by twisting Scriptures and taking them out of context to say something they do not mean.
Already some of my readers will be mad at me for telling the truth!
SEEDLINERS say that a careful study of the first six verses in Gen 3 will identify the act committed by our original White parents, which has caused the world to turn from the perfection of Gen 1:31, to the corruption of Gen. 6:5, 12.
But the fact stands out clearly, that the alienation between God and His FORMED beings, came through DISOBEDIENCE, not some sexual act with a super-angel.
While Adam had been told by God in Gen. 2:17, that he could eat freely from all the trees in the Garden; God placed a restriction oh Adam and Eve, which said: "Hands off the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, for in the day ye eat of it, ye shall surely die!"
We can be sure that Adam had passed this warning on to Eve, since she told the "tempter" of this in verse 3. It was Eve who added the bit about "touching it".
SEEDLINERS surmise that the trees in the Garden of Eden, were not really trees, since trees cannot discern between good and evil. Yet nothing in this scripture indicates that these trees were supposed to do any discerning. The word TREE, as used here is the Hebrew word ETS, which means "TREE". There is no indication of any kind that it might refer to a "person", or a being of any kind such as a "serpent", or Satan. They also believe that these trees could speak, although I find no Scripture indicating such action.
I freely admit that Eve's adversary, whoever he may have been, and I'm inclined to believe he might have been one of the Pre-Adamite men who helped Adam care for the Garden. It is very doubtful that it was a snake as we know it today.
James E. Wise, in his book THE SEED OF THE SERPENT, mentions that the Apostle Paul uses "race", and trees , when he speaks about the Gentiles (non-Jewish races) in Romans 11:27. Here he refers to the Gentiles as a wild olive tree Then in Gal. 3:13, he quotes from the Old Testament:
"Curseth is everyone who hangeth on a tree", (quoting from Deut. 21:23). Here the word for TREE is XULON meaning: "timber; by implication a stick; club; a tree". But in James 3:12, where the Apostle asks the question: Can a fig tree bear olive berries?" The word for TREE is SUKE, which simply means a fig tree". The word TREE has three different meanings in the Old Testament and five in the New, but none of them refers to "races or people."
In Ezekiel 31:3, where the Assyrians were described as a "cedar in Lebanon", it did not have a racial or a national meaning, but was merely a means of comparing greatness.
In Jeremiah 11:19, these words were not written about Jesus, as Wise contends, but are about Jeremiah himself, see vs. 21 for an explanation. The word TREE as used here was merely a "figure of speech".
In Matt. 3:10 and Luke 3:9, where reference is made to the axe being "laid to the root", of the tree, the word used was the Greek DEDRON, which means; "an oak; a tree", once again a "figure of speech".
Wise makes some positive statements in his book which cannot be backed by Scripture, and which therefore have no merit. He says: "Therefore, because of the explanation he has given) that which was called the 'Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil' was the devil; in other places called Belial."
But the idea that Satan sexually seduced Eve in the Garden, while it may fit a warped theological concept, does not conform to what Scripture says.
Wise mentions other TREES in the Garden and says: "In Gen 2:9, God mentions the stationary trees, pecan, peach, apricot, etc.," (I don't for the life of me know what translation he uses, for the King James Version, and all I know of, say nothing about these kind of trees Even the proverbial apple tree, is not mentioned.) If Wise assumes that these trees were in the Garden, when they aren't mentioned, could it be that he also assumes, when he says Satan was there too? Once a man begins to "assume", he can never stop, and he can't be believed! He is actually being "intellectually dishonest"; a malady many Judeo-Christian pastors suffer from.
There may be some basis for his belief in Ezekiel 28: 13, here the Prophet speaks to a man who is identified as the "Prince of Tyrus", (vs 2). Many Bible scholars believe he is also speaking of Satan, when he says in vs. 13- "Thou hast been in, Eden the garden of the Lord... Thou art the anointed cherub". But nowhere is he identified as being Satan.
When Wise arrives at the "Tree of Life, and the Tree of the Knowledge of God and Evil" he indicates that instead of being TREES, as the Word states, they were actual personalities of some sort.
He keeps supposing as he develops his Jewish "fairy tale". "Eve looked from one tree to the other," he said, "and was captivated by the beauty of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil and repulsed by the Tree of Life.." The Bible says "when the woman (Eve), saw that the TREE was good for FOOD, and that it was PLEASANT to the eyes, and a TREE desired to make one WISE; she took of the FRUIT, and did EAT, and gave to her husband with her, and he did EAT," (Emphasis mine - Mohr).
Wise attempts to explain that when Eve looked at the Tree of Life, which represents the Messiah, she saw Him, as spoken of in Isaiah 53:2 - "He had no form or comeliness, and when we see Him, there is no beauty that we should desire Him". So she chose the beauty of Satan, over the marred form of the Savior.
He furthers his "pipe dream" by stating that the "Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil" had been in the Garden from the beginning, quoting Ezekiel 12:12-15 to prove this.
Although these verses are addressed to the King of Tyre, see vs 2, there are some things about it which make it appear that the "man" or "being", who is addressed is a "super-natural" being of some sort, although he is not identified as Satan, nor is it hinted that he might be Satan. One must allow their imagination to "run amok", to come up with this idea.
It appears that this "being" had been in heaven, God's abode, and that he had been a powerful being until he revolted against God and got "booted out". Jesus said in Luke 10:18 -"I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven". But he is still not identified as Satan in the Ezekiel passage.
So Wise, as many other SEEDLINERS do, takes a verse here and there, and assumes that since Scripture doesn't say other-wise, that when Eve looked at the two TREES in the Garden, she picked the SATAN TREE because of the characteristics the serpent said it had. FOOD, GOOD LOOKS, and WISDOM.
I have no argument with Wise, when he refers to Jesus as being the Tree of Life, since He is the only One who can bring spiritually dead people back to life. But to say that Eve turned away from the Savior who had been so marred by torture, that He could not be recognized, millenniums before this event took place, is really stretching the imagination.
Wise indicates that up to this point Eve alone had partook of the Forbidden Fruit, which he has not Scripturally defined. He says that shortly thereafter, no indication of how long, she gave of the FRUIT to Adam, and he did eat. The Scriptural account indicates that they both committed the same sin of disobedience at the same time: (Gen 3:6) - "she took of the FRUIT and did EAT, and gave also to her husband with her, and he did EAT". This indicates to me that Adam was with Eve when she disobeyed God arid then talked him into sinning also. 1 Timothy 2:14 indicates that "Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression". In other words, Adam knew exactly what he was doing when he sinned, while Eve had sinned through deception by the adversary. Wise implies here that Eve's disobedience was through a sinful sexual act, that changed Adam and Eve from "sinless purity" to where they were "ashamed of their nakedness".
He makes this very positive statement which cannot be found in the Scriptures: "A careful study of Scripture will definitely prove that the sin (original sin) of our first parents was a sexual sin, and that Eve became a 'fallen woman' after she partook of the Forbidden Fruit". I refuse to believe that our Savior came from a BLOODLINE that had been contaminated by adultery. It could not be and I will defend His pure bloodline against all comers. Identity or not!
When God told His people to be "fruitful and multiply and replenish the earth", babies were riot found under "cabbage leaves". I'm convinced that if the sexual act had been sinful in itself, as Wise infers, that God would have warned Adam and Eve against it. There is no indication that He did. This is not the manner in which the God of the Bible operates. It may fit the Talmudic concept of God, but not the Holy GOD of Scriptures.
Wise compounds his error by saying that the sorrows Eve would face in childbearing, was a sign of the "sexual nature of her sin". If this is true, why wasn't Adam punished in like manner, as he committed the same sin and partook of the same FRUIT. Does Wise want us to believe that Adam had a homosexual relation with Satan?
Both of them partook of the death penalty. That began the moment they disobeyed. But Adam was condemned to "live by the sweat of his brow".
When the Apostle Paul admonished the church at Corinth not to become partaker in Eve's sin, he was not warning them about lawful cohabitation between a man and his wife. He said: "For I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent (if it was Satan, why didn't he say so, as he was usually outspoken in such matters), beguiled (enticed; entrapped) Eve, (no hint of a sexual act here), through his subtlety (trickiness), so your minds would be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ". He was not warning about "sex", but about those who would come "preaching another false Gospel".
In no way does Gen 3:16 indicate that God was telling Eve that she was carrying TWO SEEDS in her womb, one Satan's child and the other Adam's. He was telling her in essence; "Woman, you sinned by disobeying me and this is the penalty you WILL pay".
The simple statement of Gen 4:1 should lay at rest the contention of the SEEDLINERS. It says very clearly that Adam had sexual relations with Eve, she got pregnant as a result, arid gave birth to a son they named Cain. There is not the slightest hint of any third party involvement. Sometimes the SEEDLINERS use the statement by Eve in vs. 1 - "I have got-ten a man from the Lord," to claim that she though she had a sexual relation with God, when it was actually Satan in disguise. I do not believe this, for it is a statement that has been made by millions of Christian women when they gave birth to their first son: "See, God gave me a boy!" Not one of them believed that God was involved other than to bless them with a son.
In Gen 4:25, when Eve gave birth to a son after the death of Able and called him Seth, (which in Hebrew means APPOINTED), when she said: "God hath appointed another seed instead of Able, who Cain slew", she was merely making a statement that God had given her another son, to replace the one that had been killed.
The SEEDLINERS love to quote from 1 John 3:12 - "Not as Cain who was of that wicked one and slew his brother. And wherefore slew he him? Because his works were evil, and his brother's righteous". The words "OF", as used here, does not necessarily refer to progeny. The Bible dictionary says that the name CAIN means ACQUISITION, which is the "act of having one's own; to get or gain things for one's self". The son who was given to Adam and Eve to replace Able, SETH, means TO COMPENSATE, it has nothing to do with being a "substitute for Able".
Wise tries to convey the idea that Able was the "promised seed" of Gen. 3:15, but this "promised seed" was Seth.
The fact that Cain was a rebellious son who refused to obey God's Law against miscegenation, in no way conveys the idea that he was Satan's son. It seems logical to me to believe that if this were true, somewhere in the Scriptures it would have plainly said so.
Cain was the "son of Satan", in the same manner as many Israelites are today, when they refuse to accept the Kingship of Jesus Christ, their Kinsman Redeemer. John 3:18 says that they are condemned already when this unbelieving condition exists.
The Apostle John tell us very clearly in 1 John 3:8 - "He that committeth sin is of the devil (not progeny of, but of a devilish kind under his control)". He goes on to say that the "manifest purpose" of Jesus Christ, (the reason He was made known was to) destroy the works of the devil." He goes on in vs. 9 to say that the evidence of salvation is that you no longer sin, because you are "born of God", and that everyone who "doeth not righteousness is not of God..." That doesn't leave much leeway for those the Christian world so glibly calls "backsliders", (see Heb. 6:4-6).
John was not speaking of the Talmudic Doctrine of the "Brotherhood of all men under the Fatherhood of God," which is false teaching. He is speaking of the "brotherhood men and women have when they have accepted the Kingship of Jesus Christ, and can honestly call God, ABBA FATHER! We are to love and protect these at all costs!
Sometimes the argument is used that Cain's name is not found in the lineage of Adam. By like token neither is that of Able. This is not due to the fact that they were not Adam's sons. Able was left out because he had no seed; while Cain was purposely eliminated when he not only murdered his brother, but broke God's Law against inter-racial marriage, and married Pre-Adamic women. Cain became the first Adamite to break this Law, (see Gen. 4:16,17). This automatically cut off his heritage and as a result, the first son we find in the Adamic seedline, is Seth, THE APPOINTED.
The SEEDLINERS would have us believe that Satan, a spiritual being, had human sex relations that made Eve pregnant, even though Jesus indicated that angels, (and Satan is the fallen-angel) do not have sexual relations, (see Mark 12:24,25).
Yet every Christian I have ever known, would revolt at the insane idea that the Holy Spirit had sexual relations with the Virgin Mary in order to produce Jesus. This would be blasphemy. To say that the Mother of our race, and therefore our Lord, was an adulteress is in this same category of blasphemy I believe.
Wise then jumps to the Parable of the Tares to prove his theory. He says this Parable shows God sowing good seed in the field of the world, which is correct, and Satan sowing the Tares, which are a poisonous plant that looks like wheat. This is also true, since Christ said so. But here he departs from reality when he assumes again, that the "nasty serpent Satan" did his sowing in the body of mother Eve, and that this produced Cain. But you can find no Scripture that indicates that the "body of Eve" was the world Jesus spoke about. A honest, prayerful study of this Parable, will show you no such ridiculous idea!
The Bible clearly states that Cain's offering to God was refused, not because he was the son of Satan, but "because sin lieth at the door", (Gen 4:6,7). God even indicates in chapter four that Cain could have been forgiven, which would have been impossible if he was the actual son of Satan.
Some preachers speculate and say the reason Cain's offering was not accepted was because it was not a "blood offering", but we have no indication at this point in history,, that the "blood offering" had yet been instituted, and nothing is said about Able offering a sacrifice for his sins, he merely brought an offering from his flock. Wise states that the only way we can understand Christ's Parable of the Wheat and Tares, is to accept his theory and go back to the Garden of Eden.
Apparently Christ's disciples were disturbed at the meaning of this parable too, so Jesus explained it to them in clear language, in terms any farmer could understand. The Tares, called ZIZANION are a false grain called "darnel", whose seed is poisonous. During the growing period, it looks like wheat and is difficult to pick out from the real thing. When harvest comes, the wheat heads droop over with the weight of their grain, while the darnel heads stand high. Thus it is easy to separate them at this point. When Jesus explained this Parable, he said the "wheat, the good seed, represented His sheep". The "tares", which were planted by Satan, are his evil followers. When His disciples recognized the danger posed by the "tares", they asked permission to pluck the weeds out of the wheat. Jesus refused saying: "If you try and pull them up now, you will harm the roots of the wheat. Wait until the harvest time, and I will have my angels (not some Phineas Priesthood, as some in Identity try and tell us) gather them into bundles and burn them
When Jesus speaks about "children" here, he refers to kinship, either remote or figurative. The SEEDLINERS claim that it is a "literal kinship".
Wise says this Parable agrees in every way with 1 John 3:8 which says: "He that committeth sin is of the devil". I agree with this verse also. But in this case the "tares" represent those evil people who show by their actions that Satan is their spiritual father. They are his spiritual children, whether Jew, Gentile, or Israelite, when they obey him rather than God.
Many Bible students will tell you that Cain's progeny was destroyed in the flood. But this Parable has nothing to do with Cain's progeny, but with those who willingly follow Satan and reject Christ. The "harvest" will take place at the "end of this Age", and will be conducted under Christ's supervision, and will not be done by human hands. This is I believe at the core of the SEEDLINE THEORY, these people want to handle the job Christ has given to His angels, and destroy the enemy in their own way, and at a time of their own choosing. It won't happen that way!
It is apparent that these people are more concerned with "pulling up the tares", which they say are the Jewish people, then they are in setting their own house in order, so that Christ will return and do the "rooting out". It was God who said: "If MY people, which are called by My name (Christian), will HUMBLE themselves, and PRAY, and SEEK My face, and TURN from their wicked ways; THEN will I HEAR from heaven and will FORGIVE their sin, and will HEAL their land". (2 Chron. 7:14). Nothing is said here about destroying the enemy, it is God's people who MUST first get into a right relationship with Him, before He will act on our behalf.
Because these people refuse to follow Christ's advice, we see them often hurt God's Israel people, in their futile attempt to "root out the tares". The battle MUST be run His way, and under His supervision, not according to the weak wisdom of men. Don't get me wrong! I believe in fighting if it is necessary, and it very well may become necessary, (I believe I have proved this without having to "toot my own horn"), but I also know that without His approval, we will be defeated.
Wise gets to the "nitty gritty" of SEEDLINE fallacy when he states: "We see an abundance of evidence which proves that Satan has literal, physical seed who are in constant friction with the Adamic race." (He would have been more accurate if he had said "Israel") as the greater part of the ADAMIC/ARYAN people have been and are now a heathen people. It was only the tiny family of Abraham, that was picked out for a "special purpose". They were chosen, not because of their "super-intelligence or goodness", but because of the "Obedience and FAITHFULNESS" of their Father Abraham when it came to OBEDIENCE and FAITHFULNESS TO GOD. For this reason the prophet Amos could write (3:2) - "You only have I known of all the families of the earth; therefore will I punish you for your iniquities". Because of this OBEDIENCE, Abraham's family that became known as ISRAEL under his grandson Jacob / Israel, were picked to become God's "servant people", first learning to serve", before they "rule and reign" with Him. Many in Identity believe this becomes automatic if you are an Israelite. Not so! Study Revelation chapters two and three and see for yourself. There are going to be many Israelites who only make it into the kingdom by the "skin of their teeth," (see 1 Cor. 3:13-15).
While it is true that the Apostle Paul accused the Jewish people of "killing the Lord Jesus, their own prophets, and persecuting Christians; and they please not God, but are contrary to all men", at no place does he refer to them as physical children of Satan.
It should be obvious to anyone with common intelligence that the Jewish people cannot be traced back to pre-historic times and the Garden of Eden. That Cain was the first Adamite to break God's law against inter-racial marriage is obvious, but how can you equate folks like Sammy Davis, Jr., and Marilyn Monroe who converted to Judaism, plus the vast host of Persians in Esther 8:17 about A.D. 510 B.C. and say with certainty they were physical seed of Cain and Satan. It can't honestly be done!
In the 8th Century A.D. the pagan Knazar people of Southeastern Russia converted to Judaism enmasse at the order of their king Bulan and today, modern Jewry according to their own leaders, is made up of at least 90% Ashkenazi, Turco-Mongolian Russians. All the Prime Ministers of the Israeli State have come from this heathen background. They have nothing in common with ancient Palestine, including the bloodline of Abraham. The well-known Jewish author, Alfred Lilienthal, in his book THE ZIONIST CONNECTION says: "I would not be surprised if many Gentiles do not have more of the blood of Abraham flowing in their veins than their Jewish neighbors".
While 1 John 2:22,23 gives us a clear definition of the anti-Christ which fits the Jewish people more nearly than any other group on earth, it still doesn't mean they are physical descendants of Satan and Mother Eve.
I know some Identity people, even among the SEEDLINERS who fit John's description of the anti-Christ. That doesn't mean they are literal "sons of Satan", although they may act like it. I know many in the Judeo Christian world and those who are atheists or agnostics who fit this definition. None of them can honestly claim Satan as their physical father, even those who worship him outright.
1 John 3:10 does not confirm the existence of physical "seed"; when it says: "In this the children of God are manifest (made known), and the children of the devil". The children of God, did not become His children through a physical union between God and a human woman, any more than the Jews became "son's of Satan", because of the sexual sin of Mother Eve.
When Jesus said: "Every plant which my Heavenly Father hath not planted shall be rooted up", common sense tells us he was not speaking about actual plants, but that it was a "figure of speech". Unless God instills TRUTH in a person through the Holy Spirit, that life will be useless, no matter what his ancestral line may be and in the end, he will be destroyed.
Jesus told the Pharisees that they worshiped God in vain, because they taught a man-made doctrine in place of God's Word. (See Matt. 15:3,6,9). God will eventually "root out" these false doctrines. It's as simple as that!
Wise states that when Jesus told the Pharisees: "Ye are from BENEATH; I am from above," He was confirming their physical origin. He claims the word BENEATH is synonymous with HELL. It actually has three different meanings. In Gen. 35:8, we read where Deborah, Rebecca's nurse, was buried BENEATH an oak tree. Here the word is TSCHATH which means "underneath, or below". In Deut. 28:18, we read: thou (Israel) shall be ABOVE only; thou shalt not be BENEATH". Here the Hebrew word is MATTACH which means "downward; below; underneath", and refers to Israel's world position if she is obedient.
The word BENEATH is only used three times in the New Testament and in every place comes from the Greek word KATATERO, which means: "downward; beneath; bottom". In John 8:23, it says: "...and Peter was BENEATH in the palace." In Acts 2:19, it says: "And I will show wonders in the heavens above, and signs in the earth BENEATH". At no place, in either Old or New Testament, does the English word BENEATH have anything to do with HELL.
When Jesus rebuked Peter in Matt. 16:23 and said: "Get thee behind me Satan," He was using a "figure of speech", as He did in Luke 13:32, when he called Herod a "fox". Any intelligent person can see what He meant by these words.
In John 8:31, Wise said that the Jews who believed in Jesus, claimed to be descendants of Abraham, and Jesus admitted they were in vs 37. But in vs 33, you will see that these Jews were related to Abraham, not through their Israel blood, but because their father was Esau/Edom. Anyone who knows anything about Israel history, knows Israel was in captivity in Egypt. A question to ponder: "If the Jews in this chapter were the seed of Abraham, as Jesus said they were how could they have come from the SEEDLINE of Satan?" When Jesus accused the Pharisees in Matt. 23:32 and referred to them as "serpents," and a generation (BLOODLINE) of "vipers," He was again obviously using a "figure of speech".
Jesus' "figures of speech" were like us calling a wicked man a "dirty rat", or a "skunk". They really aren't a rodent, but have the characteristics of one.
If Jesus were to speak to some of the religious charlatans on TV today. He could accurately use the same terms He did to describe the Pharisees.
Wicked men and women, whether they are Jew, Israelite, or heathen are "children of the wicked one", figuratively speaking, when they do the will of their Spiritual Father. Even the SEEDLINERS know this to be true!
Wise assumes again when he states that the word GENERATION should be translated as RACE. At no place in the Bible, Old or New Testament is it so used. It actually has several meanings:
1 - DAUR - Meaning "An age; dwelling; posterity", and is used in this manner in Gen 7:1, where God speaking to Noah said: "...for thee have I seen righteous (without fault), before Me, in this Generation". It had nothing to do with race, but with BLOODLINE.In the New Testament three Greek words are used:2 - DAR - meaning GENERATION, in Dan 4:3- "...His dominion is from GENERATION to GENERATION".
1 - GENESIS - used in Matt 1:1 - The Book of "the GENERATION of Jesus Christ..." Here the word means "nativity; or a specific Age".This last word is the only possible one which might mean RACE, but from it's context we can see it does not.2 - GENNEMA, meaning: "offspring; produce; fruit". John the Baptist told the Pharisees: "Ye generation (OFFSPRING) of vipers; who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?"
3 - GENEA - meaning: "a generation; an age; nation; time." "The men of Ninevah shall rise up in judgment with this GENERATION (nation) and condemn it", (Matt 12:41).
In one place Wise says: "In many instances the children of Israel married and had children by Cannanitish women... Simeon, a son of Jacob/Israel had a son named SHOUL by a woman from this "devil race".
Yet while there are numerous incidents of Israelites breaking God's Law on inter-racial marriage, there are no records anywhere which trace the Canaanites back to some sexual-union between Satan and Eve.
You see, once a man begins to "suppose" in his study of God's Word, it becomes exceedingly difficult to stop. To ASSUME, means: "to imagine; think; guess; presume; accept as true that which lacks proof".
This is true of most SEEDLINE arguments. When a man makes his mind about something assuming it's true without Scriptural proof, he is "skating on mighty thin ice," and almost without fail, will fall in and drown in his own ignorance.
Wise says that Solomon took wives of, and the Judahites committed fornication on their return from Babylon with these "devil sired people". He is correct until he tries to prove the devil sired allegation".
There is no Scriptural reference to the Canaanites being "devil sired". Wicked beyond belief, without a doubt according to Scriptural description, but never referred to by any Israelite prophet or leader as "devil sired".
The term Canaanite is used twelve times in the Old Testament and twice in the New, but on no occasion are they even hinted at as being "devil sired".
The word Canannites is used 54 times in the Old Testament, and Cannanitish twice. Nowhere does it say "devil sired".
To strengthen their argument the SEEDLINERS state that all the early Israel Identity leaders taught this doctrine. This simply is not true, for it was not taught in Identity circles until in the 1930's.
Wise says that in Deut. 7:1, God mentions seven Cannanitish nations and "knowing them to be the seed and progeny of the devil" commanded Moses to destroy them. But this is not what Deut. 7:1 says at all, read it and see for yourself. It merely states: "When the Lord thy God shall bring thee into the land whither thou goest to possess it, and hath cast out many nations before thee..." Then he names the "Hittites, and the Girgasites, and the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Perrizzites, and the Hivites, and the Jebusites; seven nations greater and mightier than thou". He then gives the reason in verse 2 - "And when the Lord thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor show mercy unto them: Neither shall thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son. nor his daughter shalt thou give unto thy son." Further reasons in verse 4 - "For they shall turn away thy son from following me, that they may serve other gods: so will the anger of the Lord be kindled against you, and destroy thee suddenly".
Read all this chapter and I challenge you to find one statement which says that these seven wicked nations should be destroyed because they were "Satan's kids!" It just isn't there!
We can assume that from the way they enticed the Israelite men with their daughters, that the Cannanite women were exceedingly beautiful, as is often true of a dangerous snake.
There are many instances in the Old Testament which tell about Israel men who were seduced by Canaanite temptresses. (Read the story of Samson and Delilah in the book of Judges). But none were ever called "devil sired". There is much evidence that the Canaanites were White Aryans/Adamites and their women were often fatally attractive to the Israelites.
Wise insists that the Jews were known as Canannites before they first appear in the Bible in 2 Kings 16:6, fighting against Israel about 742 B.C. This is possibly true, but as far as I have been able to ascertain, it cannot be proven from Scriptural history.
The people we know as Jews, were from their beginning a nation of "usurpers; vampires, if you will" who lived off the hard work of others. This can be seen in Malachi 1:2-4 where we have a clear picture of what is happening in Palestine today, and what God intends to do about it. Some Jewish leaders know this Scripture and are concerned about it. A number of years ago, I saw a full page ad in the Toronto Daily News, where over forty Canadian Rabbis were warning the Jewish people not to migrate to Palestine for as they said: "The Zionist Movement is a false Movement which G-d will destroy". There is little doubt, that the Jewish people today, are the ones our risen Savior was speaking about in Rev 2:9; 3:9, when He referred to "Them that say they are Jews, and are not; but are of the synagogue (meeting place) of Satan".
Jesus referred to them again in Matthew 11:12, when He stated that the Kingdom of heaven, His Kingdom on this earth, suffered violence at their hands. When Jesus walked the shores of Galilee, the Edomite Jews sat in Moses seat (see John 8:33), and controlled Jewry. But nowhere are they referred to as a "devil sired people!"
God's true purpose for Israel is seen in 1 Peter 2:9 - where Peter said they were a "chosen generation (bloodline from Adam), a royal priesthood, (so ordained by God), a holy nation (not a church), a peculiar (set aside for a special purpose) people; that ye (true Israel) should show forth the praises of Him who hath called you out of darkness, (Greek SKOTOS, meaning: "obscurity. It does not refer to spiritual dark-ness") into His marvelous light".
This darkness was what was referred to by the Prophet Hosea in 1:10 - "....and in the place where it was said unto them (Israel), Ye are not My people, (they lost their identity as Israelites in Assyrian captivity), there it shall be said unto them, Ye are the sons of the living God", (Christians). Both the Jewish and Judeo-Christian world call us Gentiles, the Word of God says we are His sons.
It is our willingness to show forth His praises, that identifies us as "true Israel". No other people in modern history bears this "fingerprint" of Israel Identity, most certainly the Jews do not.
"True Israel" was to be a nation of Ambassadors, carrying the "Good News" of the Gospel to all men everywhere. God knew that Israel would not remain true to Him and would inter-marry with the heathen Canaanites, so He set up strict guidelines dealing with inter-racial marriage. Today, the enemy is striving by every means to discourage this, and thus bring God's wrath against His people. But nowhere are these subverters called "literal children of Satan".
Wise makes a statement that destroys his entire SEEDLINE argument, when he says: "Anyone can read a pedigree, or a bill of sale, and unmistakably know what it means!"
He uses the illustration of a BILL OF SALE for a "thoroughbred horse". But he doesn't go far enough, for anyone who knows anything about these matters, knows that once a "thoroughbred mare" is bred to a common stallion, she can never bear "thoroughbred offspring." Yet he would have us believe that our pure Savior and King, the Lord Jesus, came from a bloodline that had been contaminated by adultery with Satan.
While Wise states that Cain was a "murderer from the beginning", his other teachings show that he doesn't believe this, for he believes the CREATED beings of Gen. 1:27, were on earth for thousands of years before Adam was FORMED in Gen 2:7 There is no Scriptural proof that Cain's murder of Able was the first murder committed on earth. It was the first in the Adamic line. It is not logical to believe that men and women were not killed in the Pre-Adamic era, as anthropologists and archeologists show that this was an extremely dangerous age to live in.
Scripture give us no indication that there was a Garden of Eden atmosphere in the world outside of the Garden itself. In fact, Cain was banished from his family area, not for killing his brother, but for inter-racially marrying with pre-Adamites. Have you ever wondered why Cain was afraid to go out into the world as a murderer, if there were only three Adamites on earth? In Gen. 4:11-16, Cain complains to God: "My punishment is too great, for everywhere I go, men will try and kill me." What men, if only Adam and Eve were alive at the time? So God placed a special mark on Cain, to protect him from the vengeance of Pre-Adamite men. Do you honestly believe He would have done this if Cain were Satan's son?
In Gen. 6:5 we read that the people who had "increased and populated the earth" were exceedingly wicked. Yet even here, there is no hint of a Satanic ancestry.
Jesus did not accuse Cain of being a "murderer from the beginning", He made this accusation against Satan, who had been on earth a long time before Cain was born.
Wise, like some other SEEDLINERS, makes a flat false statement when he says: "It is now confirmed that those who have usurped the title of Israel, and God's Chosen People, are in reality, the "seed of the serpent, or children of perdition". This statement is false and therefore a presumption rather than a Scriptural fact.
Knowing how Jewry acts; knowing something about their outspoken hatred of Christ and Christianity, and their openly declared intention to destroy "White Christian civilization", it would be easy for me to accept SEEDLINE teaching. I have read parts of their Talmud that literally sickened me, but this does not prove that they are Satan's literal seed. That they are controlled by him, oh my yes! But they are not his literal seed. This teaching has been used against "true Identity", by both the Jewish world and that of their Judeo-Christian stooges. This is one reason it must be met "head on" and discredited! If it helps the enemy, it cannot be of God!
Abraham had many seeds through Ishmael and other sons. These produced the millions of Arab people. Isaac had many sons, but the "promised seed" of Gen 3:15, that would crush Satan's head, came only from Jacob/Israel. This was the seed from which our Savior came on His human side. He had to be of pure lineage, to be God's Son.
Wise explains that the reason we don't see many Jewish farmers is because God cursed the soil of Cain and his descendants, and that the "mark of Cain" still rests on the Jewish people. He doesn't explain what this mark is, for it is described nowhere in Scripture. He is in error on several points. If you read your Bible carefully you will see in Gen 3:17-19, that God "cursed the ground for Adam and his seed". Cain is not even mentioned. I've known a few Jewish farmers, and they didn't seem to have any more farming problems than their Christian neighbors. Their soil still had to be worked by the "sweat of their brow", and had a tendency to bring forth "thorns and thistles", just like Christian ground. He also errs when he speaks of a "Jewish race". There isn't any such thing as a Jewish race, any more than there is a Christian or Moslem race. There are only four races on earth Black, White, Yellow and Brown. Judaism is a false religion, not a race.
If I was a gambling man, I'd be willing to wager that most SEEDLINERS could not identify a Jew if they saw him on a crowded street. Many of the older ones bear that distinctive thing called the "Jewish look," many do not.
There is little doubt that the Esau/Edomite/Pharisees who harassed Jesus and His followers were forerunners of the modern rabbis. In fact they readily admit this. There is also ample proof that they have been guilty of the deaths of millions of righteous men and women world-wide, (see Matt. 23:35). They also brag about this! We KNOW that they were the "moving force" behind International Communism, which has killed over 140-million people in the last seventy years and we KNOW from reports from organizations such as AMNESTY, INT., that they are still killing an estimated 350,000 people per year, which is not counting the more than- 2-million unborn babies who are slaughtered annually in mostly Jew run, Jew owned Abortion Clinics. This evil is ingrained in the Jewish people through the religious teachings of their Talmud. But this does not prove they were "sired by Satan".
The SEEDLINE DOCTRINE is a direct insult to "true Israel Identity" people, since it infers that our Savior and King, comes from an impure source.
I agree with Wise when he says: "Any idea, thought, or concept that is adverse to the Bible, or the teachings of God is a dangerous thing, so this study MUST bear the image of TRUTH. A further study of the Bible should reveal it as a new and meaningful book". I agree 100%. But we MUST under-stand what Wise means when he speaks about "image". The dictionary says that this is "a copy; an imitation; a mental picture of an idea or impression". The image of truth is not Scriptural truth.
I do not ask that you believe what Jack Mohr, or James Wise teaches, for being "fallible" men we can be wrong. I do ask that you be honest enough to find out for yourself if we are right, and this can only be done as we conform to Scriptural correctness. Sincerity means little in a case like this, for there are many false teachers who are "sincerely wrong", and hell will be filled with sincere people who thought they were right.
Don't be impressed by the teachings of men like Jack Mohr, James Wise, George Udvary, or Dan Gayman because they may have written books, or may even have degrees behind their names. They are still fallible men and all of them can be wrong. The only basis we MUST have for truth is "Thus saith the Scriptures", and if any man fails to conform with these, he is a "false teacher".
To some of you who may be somewhat biased, it may appear on the surface that I am defending the Jews. I am not! I have reason to distrust them and have found little good in them as a national group. In 1 Thessalonians, the Apostle Paul, an Israelite (Romans 11:1), who was raised in the Jewish religion, studied under the most renowned Jewish teacher of his time, Gamaliel and who had earnestly persecuted the young Christian church, until God knocked him off his horse on the Road to Damascus and changed his life, said of these people he was intimately acquainted with: "Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and persecuted us (Christians); and they please not God, but are contrary to all men". This is a good word picture of International Jewry.
I know about the International Jewish plans for a One World Government controlled by them. Their leaders have warned us of their plans over and over again. Figuratively speaking, I would have no problem in believing that such power mad people" were devil sired, but that doesn't make it so. I knew a Jack Mohr one time that if you had seen him in action you might have accused him of being "devil sired", for he sure acted like the devil. That is why now, in my Prison Ministry, I can look at the "toughest, meanest, wickedest, most ornery man behind bars", and honestly say: "Thank God! There but for the grace of God is Jack Mohr!"
Many of us know from sad personal experience that a Jewish trait is the sly characteristic of a snake as it charms it's victim into it's coils and to it's death! We know from a study of history and their own words, that they make and revel in war.
Oscar Levy, a well-known Jewish author in the preface to his book THE WORLD SIGNIFICANCE OF THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION, says: "There is scarcely an event in modern European history that cannot be traced back to the Jews. We Jews are today nothing else but the world's seducers, it's executioners, it's incendiaries, it's destroyers!"
While Goldwyn Smith a Jewish Professor in Modern History at Oxford University said: "We Jews regard our race as superior to humanity; and look forward, not to its ultimate union with others, but to it's triumph over them". I could go on and on.
Satanic, yes indeed! They have imposed themselves in every government in the Christian world, through their clever control of finance, the media, and today even the church. But all these things do not make them "literal children of Satan!"
Some Christians in the Judeo-Christian church call Christian Identity a "cult". But it is not! A "cult is a system of religious worship built around the teachings of a charismatic leader which does not conform to Scripture".
True Israel Identity, on the other hand is more fundamental than most Fundamental and Evangelical churches in the church world, for we accept both the Old and New Testament as God's inspired Word and believe we should live by it, while many in the "church world" today boast about being "New Testament Christians". True Israel Identists are "Bible Christians"! We agree with the Apostle Paul when he wrote in 2 Tim. 3:16 - "ALL scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness".
I would like to point out to you New Testament Christians, that every great revival in the early Christian world was preached under Old Testament scripture. When men like the Apostles Peter and Paul preached, they preached from the "Law and the prophets". There were no altar calls; "Just As I AM" was not sung over and over again for forty minutes while the evangelist exhorted men to get saved; there were no Sinner's Prayer handed to the seeker; there were no Commitment Cards to be signed. The evangelist preached from the Word; men came under conviction and came to the evangelist and asked what they must do.
In Acts 2:37,38 we read that as Peter preached from the Law and the Prophets, "...when they heard this, they were pricked in their heart, and said unto Peter and the rest of the apostles, Men and brethren, what MUST we do? Then Peter said unto them, 'Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost". Vs. 41 tells us that 3,000 were baptized that day. No religious rock bands; no high powered evangelist; no altar call; no gimmicks; just plain preaching of the Word of Truth.
It is useless for us to deny that our Christian faith is now on the defensive, worldwide! We can see the evidence in the edition of every daily newspaper, and on the twisted news we receive on our TV screens. Yet it is difficult for us to imagine what is behind it all, for it would stagger our imagination to know the truth. Yet the truth is the only thing which will keep us free! Truth and the application of truth!
Our enemy is anyone who seeks to thwart the righteous plans of God as revealed in His Word. We need no other guide! We can no longer afford to allow our Christian leaders to remain indifferent to the diabolical plot which seeks to engulf and destroy us! It has been implemented while Christians for the most part have been asleep! We can no longer afford to bury our heads in the sand, hoping it will go away!
In Isaiah 30:9,10 we see an indication that so-called Christians in America have become "rebellious, lying children, who will not (even) hear the Law of God". So we now say to our preachers and priests: "Prophesy (preach) not unto us right things; speak unto us smooth things, prophesy (preach) unto us deceits (falsehoods)".
Then in Jeremiah 5:31, we see the results of this stupidity and can see how it is taking place in America today: "A wonderful and horrible thing is committed in the land: The prophets (pastors) prophesy falsely, and the priests (political leaders) bear rule by their means; and my people love to have it so: and what will ye do in the end thereof?"
Yes indeed, what will we do when this evil comes to fruitation?
For years now, the White Christian people of America have been dancing, all unknowingly to the music of the Babylonian Symphony. They have received little if any warning from their church leaders, many of whom knew what was happening. As a result the time has come when we must "pay the band" and the price is horrendous. It could well be the loss of our hard won freedom, and to some it may mean loss of life.
Today, as never before, we need a spiritual Paul Revere, who will ride across America with a message of warning. This is what I have attempted to do in this book.
My idea was not to make Judeo-Christian or Roman Catholic Christians angry. It was not to attack your beliefs. It was to show you the truth from God's Word, without any outside varnishing, hoping that as intelligent persons, you will accept God's Word as the authority in your life. I don't ask you, or even expect you to accept what I have written. But I do expect you, as intelligent, professing Christians, to check me out against God's Word, and when you find I have been telling you the truth, take a firm stand on it!
I did not write this book to win a popularity contest, for I knew it would make many people angry, both Judeo-Christians, Catholic and some in Identity. It was written with concern, as a warning to my people whom I love, that the hatred of the anti-Christ against us who love God, is about to be unleashed in all his Satanic fury. The signs are all about us. The question is: "Will we accept what God says. Believe His Word, and turn to Him in OBEDIENCE," for our salvation, or will we suffer the fate of those who insist on "doing their own thing", and get "shot down in flames". For as the Christian goes, so goes America; so goes our freedom; so goes decency, justice and safety. Our faith in the One God, is the cornerstone of our safety as a country and as a race.
Our problems will end in America, when we discover who we are, why we are here, and what our responsibilities are before God and to our fellowmen. When it finally dawns on us, (and I'm speaking primarily to the White Christian majority now) that we are God's special servant people, put on earth for a very special purpose - not to be RACIAL SUPREMISTS, not to rule as dictators over others, but to be God's Ambassadors to mankind, showing them what is God's will for their lives. (See 1 Peter 2:9) When we realize that His Kingdom will take place on this earth, not in some nebulous heaven, then we will see the change we so longingly desire.
If White Christian Americans, will return to their God and fulfill the requirements of His FORMULA FOR SURVIVAL, as given in 2 Chronicles 7:14, and recognize our responsibilities before Him, then we will see the results. This FORMULA is God's promise to His Israel people if they will obey: "If My people, which are called by my name (Israel-Christian), will HUMBLE themselves, and PRAY, and SEEK My face, and TURN from their wicked ways; then will I HEAR from heaven, and will FORGIVE their sins, and will HEAL THEIR LAND". (Emphasis added!)
If we are willing to follow this God given FORMULA, we will see America's status restored as:
(1) as the world's leading nation, not in military, but in moral and spiritual power;This promise has most surely never been fulfilled by those we call Jews and never will be. But it has been fulfilled by "true Israel" made up of the White nations of Christendom, and will be fulfilled again, when we have sense enough to KEEP HIS LAW AND WALK IN HIS WAY!(2) we will see the blessings of White increase in our population which is now destroying itself;
(3) we will have the blessings of plenteous food for ourselves and the world's hungry;
(4) we will not have to worry about military might, for we will be beyond the touch of wars, and moral defeats such as Korea, Vietnam, Panama, Desert Storm, Somalia and Bosnia. Above and beyond all this, we would see God perform His promise: "The Lord shall establish thee, an holy people unto Himself, as He hath sworn unto thee, IF THOU SHALT KEEP THE COMMANDMENTS of the Lord thy God, and walk in His ways. And all the people of the earth shall see that thou art called by the name of the Lord; and they shall be afraid of thee", (Deuteronomy 28:9).
When will the Christian people of America, Catholic and Protestant alike, wake up? Must we wait until God has driven us to our knees and rubbed our nose in the dirt? Must we wait until we see our wives and daughters raped in our streets by the enemy? When we see our youth once more die in a Jew planned war? Will we wait until our great cities lie in smoking ruins?
You are not going to be RAPTURED out of this mess which has been caused by Christian apathy and disobedience. For we are plainly told in the Scriptures, that we will be glorified with Christ, only as we suffer with Him, (Philippians 1:29; Romans 8:17).
In Revelation 2:26, we read that it those who "OVERCOME, who will rule and reign with Him". You don't rule and reign by cowering in a spiritual foxhole, folding your holy hands in prayer, as you ask God to Rapture you out of the mess you are responsible for. No indeed!
OVERCOMING is a front line military duty. It means hating "evil and evil men," (see Psalm 139:21, 22). It means turning away from falsehood of all kinds, even if they are taught in the church.
This is why this book has been written. It is a reminder that the only thing we can trust and rely on in this world is God's Holy and Eternal Word.
There is no "half-way" point in this war for Christian survival, for you are either for Jesus Christ, or you are on the enemies side. You cannot sit on the sideline and remain neutral!
The day is coming, very soon I believe, when all of us, regardless of our status in life, will stand before Almighty God and answer for the choice we have freely made. Then we will have no pope, or bishop, or priest, or preacher who can answer for us. What will your answer be?
Soon this war will be ending. Soon our God will rule triumphant over all! Why not get in on the winning side now? Will you be happy, or ashamed, when you meet Him face to face?
The End