To Seduce the Elect
Part 5 of 7
An in depth look at some of the falsehoods which have invaded the Christian world and the danger they pose to Christ and His church, with apologies to none.

By Lt. Col. Gordon "Jack" Mohr AUS Ret.

An in-depth study of your church, the Roman Catholic church will show that for at least the first six centuries of it's existence this doctrine of Mary worship was never taught in the Catholic church.

The church teaching about the power that Mary has with Cod in heaven, and her love for sinners, were concoctions of Catholic theologians that came about, hundreds of years after the founding of the church. Much like aberrations found in the Judeo-Christian church such as the teachings on the "rapture", and the "Jews Chosen people theory".

One of the things which has proven difficult for many studying for the priesthood, is that he is bound by a solemn oath, to never interpret the scriptures, except through the unanimous consent of the Holy Fathers. Yet the fact remains, that a little historical study will confirm that there is a decided lack of agreement on the part of the Church Fathers over most important subjects. The "immaculate conception of Mary" was one of them that caused deep church divisions and much deadly conflict!

In fact, a study of church documents will prove that a great deal of Catholic literature was written and used by those in power, to prove that some other Holy Father was wrong or a heretic. Very few have been in agreement on important issues. Often they confess to having been mistaken on some issue or other, while now holding to what they consider "saving faith," that which they originally condemned. I can see the appropriateness of this, when it is proven to them by the scriptures that they are wrong. This is what I-did, when I discovered the fallacies in the Judeo-Christian teachings which were leading men and women astray. Believe me, it's not easy to do! But it must always be on a scriptural basis, not on what some church leader, be he Pope or otherwise says it is.

There are apostolic liturgies of Saint Peter, Saint Mark and Saint James to prove that the sacrifice of the mass, purgatory, prayers to the dead, the changing of the consecrated elements of the communion into the body and blood of our Lord, were taught in the time of the Apostles. But a little study into church history, will prove that these liturgies are nothing but audacious forgeries which have been presented to the world by different Popes as gospel truths.

Most Roman Catholics are taught from a very early age, that Mary is the "mother of God", and many times when praying they say: "Holy Mary, mother of God, pray for us sinners, now, and in the hour of our death. Amen

But read these words, written by the Catholic St. Augustine, in his TREATISE ON THE FAITH AND CREED: "When the Lord saith, 'Woman what have I to do with thee? My hour is not yet come?' (John 2:24), He rather admonishes us to under-stand that, in respect to his being God, there is no mother for Him.

During the first six centuries of the existence of the Catholic church, nothing can be found in church writings, about the dogma of the supreme power and infallibility of the Pope, or of the power of the Bishops over the Christian world.

A look into church history will prove that Origen, a prominent theologian of the Second Century A.D. never believed in the eternal punishment of the damned; St. Cypria denied the supreme authority of the Pope; St. Augustine said that no Catholic was obliged to believe in purgatory; St. John Chrysostom, theologian of the 3rd and 4th Century A.D. publicly denied the obligation of "auricular" (spoken) confession and the real presence of the body and blood of Christ in the eucharist.

One of the most learned of the Popes, Gregory the Great, called by the name of "Anti-Christ", all his successors who took the name of Supreme Pontiff, while teaching that they had Divine authority and supreme jurisdiction over the church.

So to whom does the good Catholic go, if there is this disagreement among church leaders? They must do the same as the Protestant, who sees thousands of disagreements among his church leaders, all of whom profess to be Christian, while differing in doctrine. Any normally intelligent person knows this is wrong. So to whom must the Christian world go for the truth?

Christianity has only one source of truth and that is found in the Holy Scriptures, and even that has been tampered with by the enemy, in recent years, to where much of the modern translations are aberrations of the Word. This base in under vicious attack in both the Catholic and Protestant church world.

No institution in society can long survive if its structure is not built on a solid foundation of truth. The reason the Christian faith has survived 2,000 years of battering by a vicious enemy, is because it was based, not on what some Pope or Bishop taught, but on the solid foundation taught by it's founder, Jesus the Christ.

If Christianity is to survive, and the open testimony of the anti-Christ enemy of Talmudic Judaism, is that they mean to destroy White Christian civilization, it must return to this un-movable foundation.

This is why I have written this controversial book. It was not to agitate so-called Christians, but to wake them up to efforts of the enemy to destroy everything they say they believe.

You are not going to be saved through membership in any church, Roman Catholic or otherwise. But through belief in and acceptance of Christ as Savior. Jesus said, John 14:6- "I am the way, the truth, and the life; no man cometh unto the Father but by Me". There is no other way, no matter what church leaders may tell us to the contrary.

The deterioration, disintegration and final destruction of Christianity has been in the enemy's battle plans since the very beginning. It has been accelerated today, in direct ratio to the distortion and misrepresentation which has been allowed in the church, which is a distortion of Scriptural truth. Truth is absolute!

It either exists or it does not! There are no degrees of truth. To be "half-true" is as incredible as to be "half-loyal", or for a woman to be "half-pregnant". It's impossible!

Dr. Benjamin Freedman, a noted advisor to seven U.S. presidents, and a convert from Judaism to Christianity, in his latter years said: "Whether authorities (political or religious) are guilty of ignorance or indifference is beside the point. A duplication of this exists today with respect to the crisis which confronts Christianity. We are living in the 'Zero Hour' of the Christian faith. No institution in modern society can long survive if its structure is not created on the foundation of truth. The Christian faith began on the solid foundation of its Founder, Jesus Christ. To survive, it must remain on that solid foundation. The deterioration, disintegration and final destruction of the Christian faith will be accelerated in direct ratio to the distortion and misrepresentation which is allowed to become the substitute for truth".

"In their attempts to do an ounce of good in one direction, many well-intentioned persons have done a ton of harm in the other direction".

"Regardless of what anyone, anywhere and any time may say, events of recent years everywhere, have established beyond the question of reasonable doubt, that the Christian faith stands with one foot in the grave, and the other on a banana peel, figuratively speaking. (Consider this. As the number of "born again" people have increased in America, this nation has moved faster into oblivion. Something is terribly wrong here! What has become of their Christian influence? Crime, corruption and evil of every kind is running rampant, and taken a stranglehold on American life. Could it be that Christians have become the "salt that has lost it's savor; its ability to act as salt and hold back corruption"? [Matt. 7:15] -Why have Christians for the most part failed in their mission? Could it be that they have failed to strike at the root of the problem, possibly because it is a Jewish root? Could ft be that our Christian people fulfill the words of Isaiah 29:13 - "This people draw near Me with their mouth, and with their lips do honour Me, but they have removed their heart far from me, and their fear towards Me is taught by the precept (traditions) of men" - (Author Mohr).

"The Christian faith stands at the crossroads of its destiny. The Divine and sacred mission of the Christian faith is in jeopardy today, to a degree never before witnessed in its 2,000 year history.

"If the day ever arrives that Christians can no longer profess their faith, as they are allowed to do in the Free World, then we will see the beginning of the last days". (UNQ).

Dr. Freedman did not live to see these days when our own government, has become the enemy of "true Christianity". It is useless to attempt to deny that Christianity is on the defensive throughout the world. This realization should stagger the imagination of those of us who know what is going on and understand the situation.

The history of the world for the past several centuries and current events at home and abroad, confirm the existence of a conspiracy (and yes, Virginia, there is a conspiracy; which comes into being when two or more persons gather in an attempt to destroy something worthwhile; government or religion). The world-wide plot of these diabolical conspirators has been implemented while the Christian church, of all branches, has been asleep. The Christian clergy, Catholic and Protestant alike, for the most part have been indifferent to this plot. They have buried their collective heads in the sands of indifference, like the proverbial ostrich. Their ignorance and indifference has dealt a severe blow to the Christian faith. We need a spiritual Paul Revere, to ride throughout Christendom, warning that our enemies are closing in on us, and rallying them to the defense. This is another reason this book was written.

But I have wandered a bit afield from our subject, so let's get back to our discussion of Catholicism and take a FURTHER LOOK AT THE SUBJECT OF PURGATORY

The following incident is true and was recorded by Mr. Chiniquy in his personal memoirs as a Catholic priest in Canada

"I was coming from the church with the curate, when we were met by a poor man, covered with rags. His pale and trembling lips indicated the last degree of human misery. Taking off his hat, he addressed Rev. Primeau: 'You know sir, that my poor wife was buried ten days ago. I fear she is now in Purgatory, for every night in my dreams, I see her wrapped in flames, she cries to me for help and asks me to have a high mass sung for the rest of her soul. Will you help me?"

The curate said: "Of course your wife is suffering the unspeakable tortures of Purgatory, which can only be relieved by the offering of the holy sacrifice of the Mass. Give me five dollars and I'll say the mass tomorrow morning!"

The man replied: "You know, Mr. Le Cure, that my wife has been sick a long time and I don't have five dollars to my name

The curate replied, rather harshly I thought: "If you cannot pay, you cannot have the mass sung. That is the rule and I can't change it!"

I knew this priest. He was well-off, the head of one of the richest parishes in Canada, with money in the bank. I had hoped that he would sing the mass without pay, but he refused.

My first thought was to give the poor man five dollars, but I did not want to insult the priest who was older than I.

While I was feeling ashamed of his actions he said to the man: "That woman was your wife, not mine. It is your business, not mine, to get her out of Purgatory".

The priest then suggested that he would say five low masses for a dollar, but the man replied: "I can no more give you one dollar than five, as I don't have anything."

The priest said: "What about those two beautiful suckling pigs I saw at your house? Give me one of them and I'll say the high mass

The man replied: "A neighbor gave them to me so I could raise them to feed my three children. They will surely starve if I give them to you

"I left that 'greedy merchant of souls', in shame and disgust, and locked myself in my room. I wept most of the night. I said: 'My God! My God! Is it possible that in my dear church of Rome, there can be such an abomination as I saw today? How cruel and merciless are thy priests. Is it not blasphemous to call ourselves priests, when we will not sacrifice anything to save a poor lost soul, her husband and their starving children? What right has the church to extort money from Thy children to help them out of Purgatory? Did not the apostles say that Thy blood alone can purify men's souls?"'

Several of the early Catholic Fathers considered Purgatory to be of heathen origin. (Remember that this teaching was not accepted in the church until the late Middle Ages.)

Tertullian spoke of it only after he had joined the sect of the Montanists, and he confessed that he could find no teaching regarding Purgatory in the Holy Scriptures.

St. Augustine, possibly the most pious and learned of the Holy Fathers, could not find Purgatory mentioned in the Bible and positively said that its existence was dubious; that every-one may believe what he thinks proper about it.

Isn't it sad, that if Purgatory is a reality, and priests can help people out of its torture, by prayer and masses, that they rush to the bereaved family and offer to do it for money?

"Later at that curates table", Chiniquay said, "I sat down to a delicious meal, of roast pork, which is my favorite food.

But before I ate the first bite I said: "Is this the suckling pig of that poor man of yesterday?"

The priest laughed and said: "Yes, it is. If we can't take the soul of that poor soul out of purgatory, we will at least eat her pig".

The other priests at the table laughed, but I stood up in a fit of anger and said: "I would rather starve than eat of that execrable (cursed) dish, for I see in it the tears of that poor man and the blood of his starving children".

The curate, stunned by my words, could only lisp an excuse and the suckling pig remained untouched. The dinner had turned into a funeral service.

The Immaculate Conception of Mary!

I have already briefly mentioned the meeting in St. Peter's Cathedral in Rome, on Dec. 9, 1884, where Pope Pius IX declared that: "We must believe that the blessed Virgin Mary was immaculate (without sin) in her conception? There is no salvation to them who do not believe this dogma!"

As an intelligent Christian, no matter what church you attend, doesn't it seem strange to you that 1854 years of Roman church history passed, before this doctrine was accepted by the church?

Incredibly, some of the large cities in Europe, particularly in Spain, were drenched with blood by supporters and opponents of this un-scriptural doctrine of the Church. In an attempt to resolve this conflict, deputation after deputation was sent to various Popes, asking for their infallible beliefs on the subject. Philip III and Philip IV, Kings of Spain, made efforts to force Popes Paul V, Gregory XV and Alexander III into stopping the shedding of blood within the church, by giving a Papal opinion on the immaculate conception. But they failed, as these popes refused to make such a decision.

The infallible heads of the Church of Rome, by their own admission) have stated time and time again: "that the dogma of the Immaculate Conception of Mary was not revealed in the Holy Scriptures, had never been taught by the Apostles, nor by the church Fathers, and had never been believed or preached by the church of Rome as Catholic faith".

The only thing these popes did to stop the bloodshed, was to forbid parties from calling each other heretics: and to forbid them from declaring this dogma to be an article of faith which must be believed in order to be saved. Which is what Pius IX did!' It was reserved for Pope Pius IX, to drag the church into an un-scriptural folly which is today preached as infallible doctrine.

A monk called Father Leonard, was supposed to have had a vision, in which the Virgin Mary came to him, stating that there would be an end to wars in the world, heresies and division in the church, if all the faithful were to believe that she had been immaculately conceived without sin.

Many Catholics, including Pope Pius IX, believed this was a genuine revelation from heaven and vowed to promulgate this new dogma, which had never been preached before. Doesn't it seem strange to you, that if this was truth, why God had not revealed it to the church hundreds of years before?

But Pius IX, instead of securing the peace of the church and destroying heresies, did more to shake the faith of Catholics than all her enemies in Protestantism could accomplish. For by forcing this new article of faith on the consciences of the Catholic people, he pulled down one of the strongest sup-porting pillars of the church.

With supreme contempt, the priests of Rome have been castigated by men like Martin Luther (who had himself been a priest), Knox and Calvin, for stating: "In the Holy Catholic Church, there is no change, no innovations, no novelties, no new dogma. We believe today as the Apostles believed and taught".

Yet it immediately becomes obvious that this is not true, for suddenly in 1884, the church proved that new dogmas and articles of faith were being accepted by it's head, the supposedly infallible pope.

Mr. Chiniquay tells of his dismay in receiving a letter from his Bishop, decreeing that he must preach this new dogma as an article of faith. Being a brave man, he read the decree to his congregation, along with the Pope's statement damning anyone who refused to accept it.

A few days later, a rich and respectable farmer visited the rectory and asked the priest: "Father, does the pope tell us in his letter that we can find the' new dogma of the Immaculate Conception of the Virgin in Scripture? Has it been taught and believed by the Holy Fathers, since the day of the Apostles?"

The priest had to reply: "That's what the Pope's letter said".

The farmer said: "Father, would you be so kind as to read the Scriptures that teach this dogma?"

Of course the priest couldn't do this, since they don't exist. He had to honestly tell his inquirer: "I'm sorry to say, I have never found this teaching in the Holy Scriptures, but I have found many words which indicate the contrary."

"I hope you will excuse my next question" said the farmer. "There has been a great deal of talk about this new article of faith among us since last Sabbath; I want to know a little more about it. The Pope said we had to believe, didn't he?"

And the priest replied: "Yes, the Pope said this in his Encyclical (papal document), but these last nine hundred years, many popes have declared that the church never believed it. Several even forbade Catholics to say this was an article of faith."

"If this is true", the farmer stated, "how do we know that the other dogmas of the church, such as confession, purgatory, etc., are true?"

How do you answer an honest inquiry such as this. And today, millions of Catholics are asking them.

The Confession Box

There are two types of women in the world we should feel sorry for. The Brahmin women of India, who have been so deceived by their priests, that they will throw themselves on the funeral pyre of their husband, as an offering to her gods; and the Roman Catholic woman, who has been no less deceived by her priests, as she is required to undergo the mental tortures of the confession box.

Does an honest and godly priest not have a twinge of conscience, when he, as an unmarried man, is required to draw out the most intimate thoughts of a young girl, or a wife? Is he not promoting sin in that immature girl, by suggesting things to her which she may never have thought of even in her fantasies?

If a young husband or father heard some of the intimate questions asked by the priest in the confessional of his wife or daughter, would he inclined to blow that priest's brains out? He would if any other man had done the same!

Here is an true example: A beautiful young woman approached her priest with these words: "Father, I am a desperate sinner and I fear that I am lost. But before I begin my confession, let me ask that you do not pollute my mind by questions which confessors are in the habit of asking female penitents. I have already been destroyed by these questions. Before I was seventeen, God knows, I was as pure as one of His angels; but the chaplain at the nunnery where my parents sent me for an education, although a much older man, asked me questions that I did not understand. Later it was explained to me by one of my classmates."

"This was the first unchaste conversation of my life and plunged my mind into a sea of iniquity I had never known before. For the first time in my life, I was assailed by sensual temptations, they overwhelmed me day and night and I was struck with terror over the dangers they posed to my immortal soul."

"Covered with shame" I went to the old confessor, whom I respected as a saint, and confessed my innermost thoughts. Only one, which was so base I could not bring myself to confess, was kept from him."

"He spoke kindly to me and encouraged me to fight against my bad inclinations. But when he finished, before I left the confessional, he posed two new questions of such a polluted nature, that I fear not even the blood of Christ, or my fear of hell, will ever blot it from my mind. Those questions invited me into new realms of darkness and were deadly arrows which filled my veins with new sexual poison."

"At first, his suggestions filled me with the utmost disgust, but as I became accustomed to them; they filled me with an unholy longing and have been the source of criminal thoughts and desires ever since."

"A month later, I was so lost in sinful thoughts, that I had a tete-a-tete with my confessor, and found that he was as depraved in his actions, as I was in my thoughts". God alone known how many times this has been repeated in Catholic circles.

I don't know how this story effects you, but it brings to my mind the words of our Savior in Matthew 18:6 - "But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in Me, it were better for him that a millstone was hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea". I would not want to stand in the place of that depraved priest, when he stands before the Judge. God will not hold any man; preacher, priest or pope, guiltless, who pollutes the innocent.

When the priest who heard the above confession went to his Superior about this, he was told: "Such cases of the destruction of female virtue by the questions of the confessors are unavoidable evils. It cannot be helped: for such questions are absolutely necessary... since the greater part of girls and women make false confessions regarding their impurity. It requires the greatest zeal and prudence on the part of the confessor when dealing with these matters." Evidently, there are attempts to cover up these incidents when they happen in the church, rather than prevent them.

All this seems to be begging the question: since no where in the Scripture, or in early church history do we find evidence of the confessional box, which has often been the breeder of sins in women. How can the church venerate something which destroys the souls of many? It was never endorsed by Christ, or His Apostles, or the early Church Fathers.

There is much documented evidence available that the Roman Catholic Church has had plans for world-wide conquest, that often runs parallel to that of International Zionism in it's quest for power. Like Zionism and Freemasonry, the plans of the Vatican are not just spiritual, but are for the takeover of physical assets everywhere, for the church leaders know that with money goes world power.

While I sincerely doubt that few Catholics in America would approve of this, or even have an inkling of what is happening in high places, it needs to be brought to your attention. One of the attributes of Christian Identity, is liberty for the individual, under God's law.

A rather remarkable article appeared in THE FREEMAN'S JOURNAL, in 1851. This was the official Journal of the Catholic Bishop of New York. The editor of this paper, a Catholic Irishman named D'Arcy McGee, was determined to head a colonization project aided by fellow Irishmen, as the living conditions of Irishmen arriving in our large cities was often appalling.

A large assembly, mostly of priests, met in Buffalo, N.Y. in the spring of 1852. D'Arcy was disappointed in that most of them were sent by a Bishop in the U.S. to oppose his plans. They answered his plans with this statement:

"We are also determined to take possession of the United States; but we must proceed with the utmost secrecy and wisdom. What does a skillful general do when he wants to conquer a country? Does he scatter his soldiers over the farm lands, and spend their energies plowing fields? No! He keeps them close to his flanks and marching towards the enemy strongholds; the rich and powerful cities. The farming countries then submit and become the price of this victory without moving a finger to subdue them!

"So it is with us (the hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church), we must mass our Roman Catholics in the great cities of the U.S., remembering that the vote of a poor journeyman, though he be covered with rags, has as much power as the millionaire Astor and that if we have two votes against his one, he will become as powerless as an oyster." (This shows their naivete regarding how Jewish political power operates). "Let us multiply our votes; let us call one poor but faithful Irish Catholic from every corner of the world, and gather them into the hearts of the cities of Washington, New York, Boston, Chicago, Buffalo, Albany, Troy and Cincinnati.

"Under the shadow of these great cities, the Americans consider themselves to be an unconquerable race. They look upon poor Irish Catholics with supreme contempt, as only fit to dig their canals, sweep their streets, and work in their kitchens. Let no one awake these sleeping giants today. Let us pray that they continue to sleep a few years longer, waking only to find their votes outnumbered as we will turn them forever, out of every position of honor, profit and power! When not a single judge, or policeman will be elected if he is not a devout Irish Catholic. What will the so-called giants think then? What will they think when not a single senator or member of Congress will be chosen, unless he first submits to our Father the Pope?"

"We will not openly elect the President, but fill and command the armies, man the navies, and hold the keys of the public treasury. It will then be the time for our faithful Irish people to give up their grog shops, in order to become the judges, and governors of the land".

"Then we will rule the United States, and lay them at the feet of the Vicar of Rome, that he may put an end to the god-less system of education, and the impious laws of liberty of conscience, which are an insult to both God and man".

Empty word, you may say! Rhetoric spoken with religious fervor! Not so! For this has been the Roman road of conquest in every country they now control and as I have mentioned before, under the hierarchy of the church, who is not so much interested in the souls of men, as it is in money and power, these countries have all lost their God-given natural freedoms, and have developed into Third World poverty cases.

This may seem as a needless worry to many, but when one takes time to study the absolute abject submission on not only the Roman Catholic Irish, but of all Catholics of all countries, to one man in the Vatican, one can see how their mind, soul and will is tied to the feet of their priests and the church.

One needs only to visit a strong Catholic country such as Mexico, to see this story re-enacted. The priest in most cases rules the country town, dictating to its mayor, and police chief. The wealth of the church, often is more than the combined value of the town. But this wealth is not used for the welfare of the people who supply it. Hardly! While the local priest often lives well indeed, his people are often on the verge of starvation, while the church continues to fatten off them through their payment for masses and other church trivia.

Most priests, if they were honest, would have to admit that the Roman Church is the implacable enemy of our Republic. (By this I am not referring to a Democracy, or the Welfare State we have become, but to the Constitutional Republic this country was meant to be). The professors in the Catholic Seminaries are almost unanimous in teaching that the Constitutional government of this one-time Republic is contrary to the principles and law of the Roman church.

What are the principles the church denies?

1 - The equality of our citizens under law; the fundamental principles. That all citizens are created with an equal opportunity in life, not that they are created physically equal.

2 - That the liberty of conscience, as proclaimed by our Republic, (Or at least its Founding Fathers who formed this Republic) is the most sacred principle which each American MUST uphold if we are to remain free!

Liberty of conscience, has been declared by all popes of the Roman church as a godless, diabolical thing, which they seek to destroy. To control people, you must first have full control of their wills, and this is what the church seeks through the teaching of it's priests.

Today, the issue of "separation of church and state" has reached the absurd level, where some people want no Christian influence in government at any cost. This is not what the First Amendment seeks, nor is it its meaning, contrary to what critics may tell you.

America was born as a Christian nation, a nation "under God's Law". It was not under the Pope, for many Christians fled to America, to escape his influence. It was not under the command of a State church, as had been the case in England.

It was set up to be run by the Natural Laws of God, as revealed in His recorded Law, the Ten Commandments!

It might be of value to mention here, that America was not set up to be a "multi-cultural" state, as it is now becoming. She was born out of religious persecution, and was formed as a refuge where men and women might come and worship God according to the dictates of their conscience. It was not set up for freedom of worship for the Jews, or the Moslems, or the Brahmins, or all the other religions who have flocked to this country, to take advantage of our freedoms. It was strictly a Christian nation. You can readily see this by reading the Constitutions of every one of the Thirteen original states. Many state that their colony was set up "for the glory of God, and the propagation of the Christian faith." Nothing said about freedom for heathen religions.

In no way was this country set up as a "religious haven" for any religion other than Christianity!

4 - While our Constitution allows every man, woman and child to serve God according to the dictates of their conscience, the church of Rome declares that no man or woman has this right to worship God, other than under the control of the Pope.

5 - Our American Constitution denies the right of anyone to punish another who disagrees with him over a religious issue. The Roman church, through the Pope, declares that the church has the ultimate right to confiscate goods, and even take the life of those who refuse to bow to the authority of the Pope. Millions of people, including many who went by the name of Christian, have been so eliminated under Roman authority.

6 - The Constitution of the United States is based on the principle that the people are the source of all civil power, while the church of Rome, over and over again, during the last 20 centuries of history, has proven that "All civil government must be based on the foundations of the Roman Catholic Church, and be subject to it Vicar".

There have been many well known and respected men in American history, who have known of this Roman conspiracy to rule the world, and whether you want to accept it or not, it is as real and dangerous as that of International Zionism. (Sometimes it appears that the big three which suppress freedom, Freemasonry, the Roman Church and International Zionism, are all working "hand in hand" towards the New World Order, with it's one world religion, which most certainly will not be Christianity, either of the Roman Catholic or Protestant variety. The present Pope has become notorious for his cooperation with International Zionist interests).

Former Secretary of the Navy, Richard Thompson, in his book titled THE PAPACY AND THE CIVIL POWER, said: "Nothing is plainer than that, if the principle of the Church of Rome prevails here, our Constitution will necessarily fall. The two cannot exist together. They are in open and direct antagonism with the fundamental theory of our government and of all popular governments".

A highly respected Spanish Catholic leader stated in 1869: "There is not a single progressive principle which has not been cursed by the Catholic church. This is true in England and Germany, as well as all Catholic countries... Not a single constitution has been born, not a single step towards progress has been made, not a solitary reform effected, that has not come under terrific anathemas of the church".

You may not want to accept these harsh but true facts about the church you have been taught to revere. But you need to know about them. What have your own church leaders said about them?

Here is one statement written during the middle of the 19th Century, which is as true now as when it was written: "The church is of necessity intolerant. Heresy she endures when and where she must, but she hates it, and directs all her energies to destroy it.

"If Catholics gain a sufficient numerical majority in this country, religious freedom will end. So our enemies say and so we believe". (Official Journal of the Bishop of St. Louis, in 1851).

"No man has the right to choose his religion," (Official Journal of Bishop Hughes, New York, 1870).

"The church... does not, and can not accept, or in any degree favor, liberty in the Protestant sense, (freedom of conscience)" (The Catholic World, 1870).

"Religious liberty is merely endured until the opposite can be carried into effect without peril to the Roman Church," (Bishop of Pittsburgh).

"It was proposed that all religious persuasions should be free and their worship publicly exercised. But we have rejected this article as contrary to the canons and councils of the first Catholic Church", (Encyclical in 1808, by Pope Pius VII).

Cardinal Manning, speaking in the name of the Pope, declared that the pope was "the supreme judge over the peasants in the field, over the prince on his throne, over the legislator who makes the laws."

"We declare and affirm, define and pronounce it to be necessary to salvation to every human creature, to be subject to the Roman Pontiff. (Note carefully that this obedience is to the Pope, not to God)

"It is the intention of the Pope to possess this country (America). In this intention he is aided by the Jesuits, all prelates, and priests". There you have it my Catholic friend, straight from the "horse's mouth".

I could go into detail about some of the bloody massacres decreed by the Catholic church against those they declared to be heretics. But it is not my intention to inflame anti-Catholic feelings in those who read this book, for there have been crimes committed against Catholics, by so-called Protestants. (Our atheistic critics love to point to these so-called religious wars, and show how Christians have been responsible for much bloodletting. May I say, that regardless of who they were, or what they claimed to be, those who perpetrated these atrocities showed by their fruits that they were not Christian!)

You may ask why I have written this criticism about the church that many of you adore?

I can assure you it was not for the sake of sensationalism. I do not covet your disfavor, or even your hatred. I love all Christians, whether they are "brainwashed" Judeo-Christians, Romans Catholics, Protestants, or some of the poorly taught brethren of my Identity faith. Jesus Christ died for all of you. He gave His body to be broken and defiled to save you from the result of your sins and disobedience.

He loved you enough to die in your place, the "just for the unjust", that He might bring us to God. We come to Him under no man's authority, other than of His Word.

Beloved, of whatever Christian religious profession you may be, this land of ours is in dire danger! Worse than anything most of you can possibly imagine, or which we have ever encountered in the past. I have seen the results of this Satanic hatred, for God's people, and I am not referring to those we call Jews. This personal knowledge is why I do not want Satan to seduce you in any way.

We cannot place our liberty in the hands of any man, Pope, International Jewish Banker, or head of a New World Order. Our King MUST be only Jesus the Christ. Our American watchword MUST be: "WE HAVE NO KING BUT JESUS!" and we MUST do more than give mere "lip service" to Him. It is to Him, and Him alone that we owe full allegiance.

Continue on to Part 6 of 7

Return to Jack Mohr's Web Page