Part 2 of 8

Brig. Gen. Gordon "Jack" Mohr

To Concerned American Christians: The American Sunbeam Guest Editorial by Lt. Col. Gordon "Jack" Mohr, U.S. Army Ret.

During the past few months, I have received numerous requests for a "follow up" message on my Letter to the Pastor's, which was printed in the fall of 1980. I have been led, after a great deal of prayerful thought, to make the further explanation, hoping that our Lord will use it to help other Christians who are trying to make up their mind about the same question.

As I pondered on the contents of this message, I came across these words in Proverbs 12:15 - "He that justifieth the wicked, and he that condemneth the just, even they both are an abomination to the Lord."

In the fall of 1980, after having been a member of the American Opinion Speaker's Bureau of the John Birch Society for twelve years, I resigned. At this time, I had been a fundamentalist evangelist for eighteen years. But I had come face to face with a disturbing truth; I had to make a decision. It was not something I wanted to do, since I knew it would mean immediate alienation from many who had called me friend. It also meant doing a 180 degree reverse, in a thought process which had been built up over many years.

One morning, as I read in my daily devotions, I came across these familiar words from James 4:17 - "Therefore, to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth it not, to him it is sin." This told me very plainly, that if I did not share the truth with Christians, I was committing a deliberate sin.

From the time when I had miraculously escaped a Communist firing squad in Korea in 1948, one of my favorite Scriptures was found in Ezekiel 33:1. I guess it was because it applied tome in a very special way: "...if the people of the land take a man of their coasts, and set him for their watchmen: if when he seeth the sword come upon the land, he blows the trumpet, and warns the people, then whosoever heareth the sound of the trumpet, and taketh not warning: if the sword come, and take him away, his blood will be upon his own head... But, if the watchman see the sword come, and blow not the trumpet, and the people be not warned; if the sword come, and take away any person from among them ... his blood will I require at the watchman's hand."

This was a plain message to me: "When you know the truth, you better warn the people, even if they don't like to hear it."

For a number of years now, I have been disturbed by what has happened in Palestine, and with the Interference of Zionist influences in our own Government. I knew all the fundamental arguments about the Jews being God's Chosen People. I had been told many times, that unless we helped the Jews, God would curse us. But the truth of the matter, was that God's wrath has fallen on America more severely since 1948, when we recognized the Israeli Government in Palestine, than at any time in our nation's history. Something must be wrong with this theory!

So what I am going to try and do in this letter, is explain more in detail, what I tried to express in my letter of 1980.

One of the most disturbing things I had seen during my eighteen years as a fundamental evangelist (and I traveled the length and breadth of America, speaking in every state except Maine) was their tendency towards an unbending prejudice towards anyone who disagreed with them in the religious field. (I use this term for want of a better one. The dictionary defines "prejudice" as, "preconceived judgment or opinion; an opinion made without sufficient knowledge.") This I found was almost universally true, in the fundamentalist camp.

If you disagree with a fundamentalist about the mode of baptism, speaking in tongues, divine healing, closed communion, you name it - you are immediately placed on their "black list," and often they refuse to associate with you. They base this stand on 2 John 10, 11 - "If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him Godspeed." Of course, this always refers to their "pet doctrine," whatever that may be - it varies from one group to another. But heaven forbid that you apply this to the Jews, who are one of the most atheistic, anti-God groups in America, or maybe I should say "anti-Christ." These verses, in fundamentalist theory, are to be applied only to other Christians, or heathen.

Now there is absolutely nothing wrong with this theory of separation, when it is used within spiritual, Biblical meaning. The Apostle John is very plain about this, he says: "If any come unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed, for he that biddeth him God speed, is partaker of his evil deeds." Then, so there is no chance of misunderstanding what he means, he explains it. It has to do with belief in the Divinity of Jesus Christ. The evil doer He speaks about, is the one who refuses to accept Him as the Son of God. Of course, if you are honest about this, it refers to the Jews among others, who refuse to accept Christ as the Messiah. This theory of separation has absolutely nothing to do with feet washing, speaking in tongues, Divine healing, pre, post, or A-Millennialism, or belief that the Jews are, or are not the Chosen People.

Yet today, in a majority of fundamental churches, if you do not accept their religious "shibboleth," (and this simply is a theological term meaning: "language which is regarded as distinctive to their special group.") they will immediately label you as an apostate and you are anathematized. (That's another two-dollar word meaning "blacklisted.")

If you do not use their terms of "rapture," "born again," "dispensationalism," etc., and some of these terms are not even found in the Bible, you sometimes get the idea that they believe you might not be a Christian.

Now I make this charge, on the basis of having been a fundamentalist for 45 years. I was a militant, ardent "pre-millennialist," and a "Pre-Tribulationist." In case you don't understand these terms, a pre-millennialist is one who believes the Lord will return prior to the Millennium (I still believe this,) while a pre-tribulationist, is one who believes the Church will be "raptured," "caught up out of this world," before the Great Tribulation begins.

I believed this for at least three reasons. First, I'm quite sure it was because this is what I had been taught for 45 years. As far as I can remember, I never made any effort to check this out against what the Bible said, I accepted what I had heard from the pulpit.

Second, I believe that like most Christians who accept this theory, it gave me a wonderful feeling of safety and security, to believe that I would not have to go through the terrible times which would come to this old world. Third, it was a wonderful tool for an evangelist to use, since it became a powerful warning to recalcitrant individuals to "straighten up and fly right, for you won't get another chance after the rapture."

But I will have to be honest with you and say that for a number of years, I have had some misgivings about this theory. I have found this same mis-giving in the minds of quite a number of fundamentalist preachers. I was disturbed by what I saw happening in many fundamentalist churches across America.

I saw a people, who for the most part, had become so complacent about their freedom, they were perfectly ready to hide in their spiritual foxholes, while the country literally went to hell. Oh, they were willing to go out and knock on doors once in a while. They were willing to tell about the love of God. They were great on getting up in some church service to tell what the Lord had done for them, and they often prayed beautiful prayers, but the proof of their Christianity often was missing in their everyday life.

This "religious neutralism," and again I use this term for want of a better one, can be illustrated by an incident which happened to me in a large Mid-Western church. After preaching one Sunday morning about the Communist threat to Christianity and the need of Christians to become involved in the defense of our religious freedom, a very nice lady came up to me and said: "Brother Mohr, I liked your message, but it was not for me. You see, I've been born again, and that means that I don't have to worry about such things as the Communists. The Lord is going to come back and take me out of this mess before it gets too bad." You talk about being wrapped up in a sheet of self-righteousness; that old sister was literally bound up in a shroud.

My blood pressure went sky high. I asked her if she had ever thought about the Christians, by the tens of thousands, who had been persecuted in Russia and China, and the one's who were murdered during the Third Century persecution and during the inquisition. Don't you think they might have thought Jesus would come back and rescue them?

Then I told her: "It could be that you are so tightly wrapped up in your shroud of self-righteousness, you won't get unzipped in time to go along with the Lord when He does come back." You might be inclined to believe that was a terrible thing for me to say, but in essence that was what Jesus said in Matthew 7:21 -"Not everyone that saith unto me Lord! Lord! will enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven." He went on to say: "There will be folks who will ask me, Lord, don't you remember how we healed people in your name? Lord, don't you remember how I cast out evil spirits in your name? and others would say, Lord, we preached in your name! And the Lord said, verse 23 - "And I will profess unto them, I never knew you."

Those are mighty sobering words and it would be well for a lot of professing Christians to take time and think about them. Listen, my fundamentalist friend, if you really believe that Jesus is l TAng back soon, why aren't you out doing something about it? Your churches should be crammed to overflowing; you should have to put up loud speakers in the parking lots, to take care of the crowds. I'm afraid many of you can be classified with the folks Isaiah spoke about in 29:13, when he said: "This people do honor me with their lips; but their hearts are far from me."

I was disturbed by the apathy I saw. They would criticize me when I told them, you better prepare for hard times ahead. They would criticize me when I told them to store food and ammunition, so they could protect their family during the troublesome times ahead. They would tell me: "God will take care of us, if we trust Him." But they still bought more life insurance, even while telling me they thought Jesus might be back this year. You see, what they said about Christ's return, just didn't shape up with what they were doing. There were a lot of preachers in this group.

One young Baptist preacher told me: "My job is to preach the Gospel; the Lord will take care of the Communists." I asked him where he got his authority to preach and he got indignant and marched me over to Matthew 28:19, 20, where it says: "Go into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature." I asked him if he was doing that and he said: "I can't go everywhere; but my church sends missionaries." When I asked him how many missionaries the Baptists had sent to Russia and China in the last twenty years, he got angry and said: "You know they won't let us go there." Well I handed him my Bible and asked him to show me one verse of Scripture where it said: "Go if it's convenient; go if they don't persecute you." And of course, he couldn't, because there are no such verses. That's one of the reasons we are in this mess, the Church hasn't done what her Lord told her to do. If we had sent missionaries to China fifty years ago, as we were supposed to do, there is every reason to believe China might have been a Christian nation. We didn't and today they are our enemies, no matter how nice they speak to us.

Well I began to study about some of the things I had been taught and which I had taught to others. I went into an intensive study of both the Scriptures and history; a study, which in six months, entailed over 600 hours of study and the reading of over 6,000 pages of material. It was a prayerful study; there wasn't a time when I sat down to study, that I didn't ask God, through the Holy Spirit, to enlighten my mind to the truth. Then I said: "Oh Lord, when I know the truth, don't let anything stop me from proclaiming it." That's what I'm trying to do today. I know people don't like it, but there's nothing I can do about it. I am constrained to tell the truth.

I can't make a living from telling the unpopular truth. I have had an almost 100% blackout among fundamentalists, since my letter was sent to their leaders. They don't want their people to know what's going on. They told me in essence: "Either love the Jews, or get out!" But then it wasn't pleasant for me to tell the American people that some of our leaders were traitors, and that for over fifty years, our leaders have been selling us into slavery. I've been called all kinds of names, both within and without the church. Recently a TV moderator called me a "pornographer of paranoia," because I said we needed to take a close look at Zionist influence in Washington.

But as I studied, I learned some things I had never heard in any fundamental church. I learned that the people we now call Jews, are not now, nor never have been the Chosen People of the Bible, and that from Jewish sources, there is proof that a vast majority of the Jewish people have no relationship to Abraham and their ancestors never set foot in Palestine. When I began to speak about this, the garbage "really hit the fan."

Listen to this letter, I recently received from CHRIST FOR THE NATIONS, Dallas, Texas. February 17,1981, Dallas, Texas.

Dear Mr. Mohr:

It is one of the saddest things in the world when one of our brothers turns from the faith which is taught in the Bible and embraces the doctrine of man which is contradictory. The men who teach what you have embraced are naturally very persuasive men, as they have the charisma of the devil to back them up.

"The Bible is not hard to understand... A Jew is a direct physical descendant of Abraham, and that is all there is to it. Nothing can change that, and any other interpretation is not of God...

"SIGNED: Linda Fletcher." (Another illustration of fundamentalist prejudice.)

I learned that the pre-tribulation doctrine skates on "mighty thin ice." I guess the final blow to my previous belief, came as I studied Christ's "end time" message in Matthew 24. You may remember how His disciples came to Him privately and asked: "Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of Thy coming, and of the end of the world." (This would have been more accurately translated: "end of the age.")

If you will honestly study this portion of Scripture and compare it with Luke 21, you will notice that Jesus did not even hint of anything like a "rapture" to take place during this period. Doesn't it seem strange to you, that our Lord, in explaining these very important last days, would leave anything as important as the rapture to speculation?

Now maybe you are going to say, as a lot of preachers do: "Christ was speaking to the Jews. These chapters deal with the Jews and with the 'Time of Jathe s trouble.' " But they do not! Look at this Scripture again, very carefully. Jesus was not speaking to the Jews. We read in verse three, that He sat down with His disciples, privately. This was not a message to Jews. He was speaking to Christians, even though they were not called by that name at this time.

As He talked to His followers in verse nine, He mentioned wars, rumors of wars, famines, pestilence, and earthquakes; all of which would come to this earth during the tribulation. He said: "THEN (This means: "following next in order,") shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall kill you, and ye shall be hated of all nations for my name's sake." Who do you think that word "They" referred to? They were the enemies of Christ. He was telling them in essence: "The Jews will deliver you up to be afflicted, and they shall kill some of you, and ye shall be hated for my name's sake." This could not refer to the Jews, for they have never been hated for the sake of Christ. They blaspheme Him in their synagogues, and in their religious writings. They have been among the worst persecutors of Christians in the history of the Church. The International Zionist-Communist leaders have been responsible for the deaths of over 100-million people in the past 65 years, including millions of Christians. We keep hearing about the "holocaust in Germany," where six-million Jews were supposed to have perished (This has been proven to be one of the greatest hoaxes in world history), but when have you seen our news media, or our TV, or movies make a documentary film telling the truth about Christian deaths at the hands of Jewish Communists? Why hasn't someone built a museum to commemorate Christian deaths at the hands of the Zionist-Communists? You can't answer that, can you?

Not once in Matthew 24, or Luke 21 does Jesus say: "Don't worry about these days; I'll come back and gel you out before they get too bad!" Instead, He warns in Luke 21:16 - "And ye shall be betrayed, both by parents, and brethren, and kinfolks, and friends; and some of you shall be put to death."

In Matthew 13, Jesus tells the story of the WHEAT AND TARES, and then goes on to explain its meaning in verse 30. "The tares are wicked persons," He explains, "they will be gathered out of this world at the end of this age." To all appearances, the wheat will remain to set up our Lord's kingdom on this earth.

Later in this same chapter, verses 47-50, He gives the illustration of the GOOD AND BAD FISH. Notice verse 48 - "And gathered the good into vessels, but cast the bad away; so shall it be at the end of the world" (age); NOTICE VERY CAREFULLY NOW: "The angels shall come forth and sever the wicked from among the righteous." Haven't you been taught the other way around? Jesus taught, quite clearly, that the wicked would be taken out of the world and the good wdere remain to set up His kingdom.

Now I know that some of you who read this message are going to be very upset with what I have said. There is no doubt in my mind, that some of you won't be honest enough to read any further. I can tell you I was mighty upset, when this truth first dawned on me. The rapture is something everyone would like to believe in. It gives you a sense of false security. It's nice to feel that you don't have to be concerned with the corruption all about you. In fact this teaching has made a lot of Christians "so heavenly minded, that they are no earthly good."

If I was an unsaved man or woman, I'd like to believe the theory that since God is a God of love, He's going to fix it so that everyone is saved in the end! That's a lovely theory, but it's poison out of the pits of hell! It's the same kind of warped thinking that makes you say: "Sure, we know the Jews are a bad bunch now, but one day God is going to save all of them." That promise wasn't even made to the Jews, it was made to the Israelites and they are a completely different crowd.

A young Baptist preacher in Pennsylvania, with whom I had scheduled a Crusade, recently wrote to me and said: Dear Brother Jack, I've put off writing you long enough. I'm really not sure how to put on paper how I feel about the Jew issue ... I have not studied this thing for 600 hours, but frankly, 600 hours of study don't prove anything. I'm inclined to go with church tradition when the Bible does not clearly say otherwise. Can you prove to me that the church traditionally hasn't accepted the Jews as God's Chosen People?

Well, I could do it. But you aren't going to make very much headway with a man whose mind is as closed as that.

When I first began my study, I went to my pastor, whom I considered a very close fr INT. I took him some material, very carefully documented and asked him to look at it. I said: "I don't expect you to accept this, but I think you should know about it." He glanced at it and when he saw it was critical of the Zionists, he threw it away and pronounced me an apostate. He said: "You know, if you persist in this foolishness, the doors of every Baptist church in America will be closed to you."

I had suspected for some time, that there were some Baptists who believe that if you don't agree with them you are headed for hell, but this is as close as I've every come to having it put into words. But one thing I learned a long time ago, the majority is usually wrong. That's why Moses told the Israelites: "Thou shalt not follow a multitude to do evil."

Well I felt so strongly about my newfound knowledge, I wanted to share it with my Christian friends, for their safety depended on what they did about it. That was when I wrote my 1980 letter, which was sent out to 200 fundamental preachers and laymen. I never liked to sail under a false flag, and I wanted them to know what I had learned, before they invited me into their churches. As I said, the result was an almost 100% cancellation of all my scheduled meetings for 1981.

Why? I preach the same messages, with the same fervor. I'm stronger in the fundamentals of the faith than at any time in my life. I'll put my preaching up for comparison with any of the fundamental greats like Bob Jones, Jr., Jack Hyles, or Jack Van Impe. I don't have to be ashamed of what I'm preaching, for I preach straight out of the Word of God and I'm not one bit afraid of what other preachers say about me.

But there is a difference. Now I'm getting to the heart of the moral and spiritual problems which are strangling us. I'm going behind the scene of the problems the Moral Majority claims to be fighting. The only problem is, they want to cut off the arms of the monster, when what we need to do is get to its heart.

I can't see how any honest person can do less that change their views, when they find out they are wrong. That's what Saul of Tarsus did on the Road to Damascus. It turned him from being a persecutor of Christianity, to its greatest defender. It's better to tear down what you one time built up - if it is contrary to the Word of God - than it is to rebuild the "inner wall of partition," which God has taken such pains to break down through Jesus Christ.

Unless Christians are willing to accept the New Testament, using the Old as the key to open Bible prophecies, we will never understand the truth. We will follow the Judaizers, who attempted to bring their heathen, Talmudic philosophy into the New Testament Church. Paul said of these in Acts 13:27 - "...they knew Him not (the God of Abraham), nor yet the voices of the prophets which are read every Sabbath day, they have fulfilled them in condemning Him (Christ)."

It would seem to me, from a careful study of Scripture, that aside from the Gospel of Christ, there is nothing special in the future for those people who go by the name of Jew. (This will cause opposition from some of you, who don't believe a Jew can be saved, but I'm not about to argue about it.)

You can go back as far as you want to during the 6,000 years of written history and find that mankind has always hoped for a "Golden Age," of peace and prosperity. Many religions predict this for their followers. The schemers have aimed at world domination, whether it was the thousand years reign of Hitler's Third Reich, the dream of International Communism, or the one-world, Jewish controlled empire of Zionism. The United Nations was a dream of a great, one-world government, with a one-world church, where all men would live in peace and brotherhood, and where poverty and disease would be conquered for all time. But let me tell you my friends, it is not going to come during a 1,000 years reign of Jewish supremacy, such as the fundamentalists visualize.

Zionism, is a man-made scheme which is doomed for failure, because they have left God out of their calculations. I am not trying to tell you that the Christians who hold this theory are un-Christian, but they have allowed themselves to be fooled by Jewish propaganda, which has cost this world countless billions of dollars and much suffering.

The non-Christian ideas of world-Jewish supremacy are going to fail, because they are founded on the false premise of the inherent goodness of mankind. Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., a well-known Jew has said: "We do not believe in a heaven in heaven as the Christian do; we do not believe that the salvation of mankind will come through a Christ on a cross. We believe it will come through the unfolding of technology and the inherent goodness of mankind. These ultimately, will bring about heaven on earth." This my friend is Jewish teaching and is contrary to everything our Lord stands for.

Some teachings will fail because they are nowhere promised in the Scriptures. Christ was completely silent about any reign of Jewish power, centered in Jerusalem. Neither the Gospels, nor the Book of Acts, nor the Epistles, speak of a Jewish dominated world power, inhabited by mortals and immortals, at the end of this age.

The Epistles give no hint of a Jewish return to Palestine, and the setting up of a mighty world kingdom, with its capitol city in Jerusalem. Many of the Epistles were written to counteract these Judaizing influences in the early church.

A careful study of the Epistles, will show you how very foolish it is to use the term Judeo-Christian, which we hear spoken so glibly from our fundamental pulpits. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Judaism and Christianity are at the opposite ends of the religious pole. The Mohammedans are closer to Christianity in their religious belief, than the Jews, for they believe Jesus Christ was a great prophet, while the Jews call Him a bastard and spit on His name. (If you don't want to believe this, I challenge you to do a bit of studying into Jewish beliefs.)

It is true that the early disciples had been "brainwashed" by Jewish teachings concerning an earthly kingdom and they even fought with each other to see who would be chief in that kingdom. But they never received any encouragement from their Master, and by Pentecost, they had been delivered from this false belief.

It was this Judaizing influence which caused the Apostle Paul to warn Titus in (1:14) not to "give heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of man, that turn from the truth."

If Christ had offered the Jews of His day a literal political kingdom, with all the pomp of Solomon, they would have flocked to His standard. But when He told them: "My kingdom is not of this world," they turned away from Him. It was then that He told their leaders, "Ye can not know me, because ye are not of my sheep." So the Jews not only turned their backs on Christ, they killed him.

To believe that the restoration of a heathen, basically atheistic religious group like the Jews will take place in Old Palestine, under God's banner, would be a reversal of the natural order of events and carry us backwards instead of forwards. It would take us from Jesus Christ, back to Cain, the murderer of his brother. It would take us from the Church and true Israel, to the counterfeit Israel we call the Jews. It would be a horrible, anti-climatic thing, Christian-Israel, superseded by heathen, Talmudic Judaism. You can rest assured that God will not let this happen.

In God's plan of the ages, the superior is never replaced by the inferior. The Law of God has always been: "First, that which is natural; then that which is spiritual," (1 Corinthians 15:46).

Now that the Sun of Righteousness has risen with healing in His wings, we will not go back to the dismal, guttering candle of heathen Babylon, which is what Judaism is all about.

A literal resurrection of the righteous, a thousand years before that of the wicked, as most fundamentalists are taught, contradicts the clear teaching of the account given by Jesus in John 5:28, 29 - "Marvel not at this: (He was speaking of His resurrection from the dead) for the hour is coming in which ALL that are in the graves shall hear His (God's) voice, and shall come forth; (Not just believer, but ALL) they that have done good (believers) unto the resurrection of life; and they that do evil (unbelievers) unto the resurrection of damnation." Absolutely nothing here about a rapture, which will take believers first; nothing about Christians being resurrected a thousand years before sinners. But we see one resurrection, all at the same time! How could this be explained any plainer?

During the past sixty years, the Rapture teaching has been spread far and wide, by the use of the Scofield Reference Bible, which also teaches that the Jews are God's Chosen People. Unfortunately, many fundamentalists seem to believe the footnotes, written by Dr. Scofield, have the same authority of Holy Writ. They do not! To such a naive individual, the Scofield Reference Bible can be a danger.

When Paul spoke before King Agrippa in Acts 26:6, 7, he declared: "Now I stand and am judged for the hope of the promises made of God unto our fathers: Unto which promise our twelve tribes, instantly serving God day and night, hope to come. For which hope's sake, King Agrippa, I am accused of the Jews." Now some of you may say: "See there, Paul was speaking about the hope of the Jews in a return to their land." But that was not what Paul said. He was not a Jew. He was a member of the tribe of Benjamin and was a Roman by birth. The hope Paul spoke about, was not in a return to Palestine, but in the hope of the resurrection, found in verse eight. Paul was persecuted by the Jews, because he preached Christ, risen from the dead!

In Psalm 80:6, we read, "...our enemies laugh among themselves." How they must, as they see Christians neutralized by preaching coming from their own pulpits. How they must laugh, as they see the worst enemies of Christ, dignified with the title of God's Chosen People. How they must laugh, as they see Christian soldiers seduced from being "front line warriors" for Jesus Christ, to become sniveling, spiritual cowards who huddle in their spiritual foxholes, while the battle for Christian civilization rages all about them.

When I was a boy, we used to sing a great stirring hymn, which needs to become our battle cry now:

"Must I be carried to the skies.
On flowery beds of ease;
While others fought to win the prize,
And sailed through bloody seas?
No I MUST FIGHT, if I would reign,
Increase my courage, Lord,
To bear the toil, endure the pain,
Supported by Thy Word."

This should be your prayer. Not "Lord take me out of this world because things are so hard!" In 1 Corinthians 16:13, the Apostle Paul gives us the watchword of the Christian soldier: "Watch ye, stand FAST in the faith; QUIT YE LIKE MEN, BE STRONG!" The English word "Quit," comes from the Greek word "andrisomai," which means: "to be manly, act like men."

In chapters two and three, of the Book of Revelation, we read at least seven times: "To him that overcometh, I will give a crown." Not to those who hide and pray; not to those who "knock on doors," but to those who overcome. That word "overcome" comes from the Greek word "nikae," which literally means: "to conquer; to get the victory over," it is a military term, a soldier's word; it means "front line" duty for your Lord.

In Revelation 2:10, the Lord tells His faithful Israel-Christian followers: "... be ye faithful unto death, and I will give you a crown of life." In other words: "Die on the battlefield if that is necessary, but be faithful." In Hebrews 12:4 we are told: "Ye have not yet resisted unto blood, striving against sin." (The word "sin" does not have the theological concept of sin, but refers to the vast, overpowering evil which Satan has brought into the world.)

Unfortunately, many people who go by the name of Christian have become traitors, not only to the cause of Christ, but to their country. I say this, because they are engaged in "giving aid and comfort to the enemy." If you belong to a church that contributes to the National Council of Churches, you have been supporting the Zionist-Communist enemies of America for many years. When you find a clergyman, or a politician who gives aid to the enemies of America, and this includes International Zionism, which is dedicated to the destruction of Christian America, then that person is a traitor, no matter how cleverly they conceal their motives.

To those of you who have been "seduced" by our enemies, knowingly or unknowingly, we must apply the same term, for you too have given aid to the enemy and did not care enough to learn the truth about who our enemies really are.

What we need in America today, more than any other thing, are Christian men and women who know who they are. We need white Christian Americans who understand their Israel heritage and the promises of God to our people. Men and women who recognize their duty to God and country and will allow nothing to stand in their way of doing it.

I remember hearing a story about a rebel chief, who was fighting against a tyrant king. The king sent an emissary into the mountain stronghold of the rebels, offering them amnesty if they would pledge fealty to the king. The rebel chief called one of his men and said: "Leap off that cliff!" and without a word, the young man saluted and jumped to his death. He called another and said: "Plunge your dagger into your heart," and without a murmur, he saluted and killed himself. Then the chief turned to the king's emissary and told him: "Go back to your master and tell him that I have 998 more men like those two, and that within a week I will have him penned up with my dogs." As the story goes, the king with his force of 20,000 fled

In 480 B.C. a Persian army, numbering over three million men, advanced down the coast of Greece from the north. They threatened the very existence of Greek civilization. They were stopped by a little band of 7,000 men, who had been given the order: "Stand or die!" They did just that and they held long enough for the Greeks to rally to the defense of their country.

We know there are traitors at work in our Government, and in our churches. They are seeking to destroy white Christian civilization and everything our forefathers fought and died for. Most of our people are more interested in playing games than they are defending our civilization. So those of us who know the truth, face an awesome responsibility. Will we continue to enjoy the benefits and comforts God has given to us, or will we too be destroyed by the "synagogue of Satan," (Rev. 2:9) which has risen up among us?

The answer will be up to us who go by the name "Christian." We must always remember: "Our freedom was not 'bought and paid for at Valley Forge. That was only the 'down payment' on freedom. Every generation of concerned Christians, must be willing to make a payment on the account, if we are to remain free."

The outcome of this war we are in; the fate of civilization and Christianity rests in our hands. I do not apologize for changing my mind about the Jews. I believe God led me to this truth. It was He who said: "If ye would know the truth, the truth will set you free!" Before Him today, and with you as witnesses, I make this renewed pledge. "I will do everything within my power, as far as my strength, money, talent, and time will permit, to see that America will have a rebirth of freedom; that the Government of the people, by the people, and for the people; a government under God, shall not perish from this Earth."


Jack Mohr 3/31/81

Will you join me in this Holy War for our survival?

I have often been asked since then. Aren't you sorry for the decision you made? To which I can honestly reply: "I am more sure now that I made the right decision, than when it was first made."

Today, I am convinced that I am doing what God wants me to do. For some strange, unknown reason, God picked me to be a "watchman on the walls of Israel-America." Why, I will never understand! But I believe that what I am doing is right. I believe it is Scriptural, and I believe the day will come when I will be able to stand before my God with a clear conscience. THIS IS MY GOAL IN LIFE! Today, (1985)I am undergoing the greatest smear campaign of my life. The enemy is trying to tie me in with all sorts of evil enterprises, even indirectly accusing me of the murder of a Jewish Talk Show host, who was shot after I was on his show. But I will not give up! They will never get me to surrender!

I feel as Gerald L. K. Smith must have felt, when he wrote in January 1955: "I began to pursue this inquiry to its roots. The superficial reader, the prejudiced observer will quickly say: 'Now Smith is getting ready to blame the Jews for everything." That is over-simplification! That is an illogical analysis of what I am about to say. I submit the following facts, and I defy any honest reader, or intelligent patriot to ignore these facts. I am going to give you these facts without conclusion, and then I dare the reader who is skeptical, to follow these facts, add them up and make your own conclusion:"

Here is the argument Smith used and the one I want to adhere to:

The leading Jewish Journal in the United States, THE AMERICAN HEBREW, said on Sept. 10, 1920: "The Bolshevik Revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal was to create a NEW ORDER in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way in Russia, thanks to Jewish brains, and because of Jewish dissatisfaction, and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the same Jewish mental and physical forces, BECOME A REALITY OVER ALL THE WORLD!"

The literature of the Jewish community during the entire lifetime of the Un-American Activities Committee; during the lifetime of the McCarran Committee and during the lifetime of the Internal Security Committee; has shown a consistency with this statement.

Here are some inescapable facts: The history of opposition to the Communist Party and the Communist movement in the United States has centered around certain committees and personalities. (Remember this was written in 1955 - ED).

1. - The House Un-American Activities Committee;

2. - The McCarthy Committee;

3. - The McCarran - Waither Immigration Act;

4. - The Internal Security Act;

5. - Loyalty oaths;

6. - Gen. Douglas Mac Arthur;

7. - Dean Acheson and his policies, and,

8. - Outlawry of the Communist Party.

This great conflict has embraced many more issues and personalities, but the above are enough to identify the issues.

Now here's the dynamite! Here is the discovery that brought persecution against Gerald L. K. Smith, not only from Jewish sources, but from the Judeo-Christians in the churches.

In 1955, there were something like 320 national and local Jewish organizations in the United States. These represented the Jewishes imunity in their towns, cities, counties, states and the nation. They concentrate under the leadership of powerful, highly financed organizations such as the AMERICAN JEWISH CONGRESS; the AMERICAN JEWISH COMMISSION; the ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE; the B'NAI B'RITH lodges; the JEWISH WELFARE SOCIETY, and numerous Women's youth and veteran organizations. These organizations probably represent 98% of the Jews in the country.

You may be shocked to know, that all of these organizations, plus a careful monitoring of all newspapers and magazines published by Jews, including stories, editorials and official columns have all opposed the following:

1. - All Jewish organization have fought against the taking of loyalty oaths.

2. - All Jewish organizations have fought any effort to outlaw the Communist Party.

3. - ALL Jewish organizations have fought efforts of any government security organization to expose communist agents in the U.S. government or business.

4. - ALL Jewish organizations have joined in the effort to defame Gen. Mac Arthur.

5. - ALL Jewish organizations supported the traitor, Dean Acheson.

6. - ALL Jewish organizations favored the censure of Sen. McCarthy.

This list could go on at length. But as an intelligent reader, you must either prove these statements wrong, or accept them at face value.

The reason the CHRISTIAN PATRIOTS DEFENSE LEAGUE, THE CRUSADE FOR CHRIST AND COUNTRY, THE ARYAN NATIONS, and many other anti-Communist organizations are being attacked by organized Jewry, is because we are fighting the efforts of TALMUDIC JUDAISM to take over control of our country. We know who the enemy is, because we can follow these smears back to their TALMUDIC sources.

The reason any Christian patriot can be smeared overnight; the reason a Congressman can be smeared, is because these Jewish organizations have always been on the side of the "left." They are completely united in their campaign to stamp out white Christian Civilization.

We hear a lot these days in the Jewish controlled media about the "hate campaign" being carried out against the poor Jews. But when Congressional Committees begin to investigate these allegations, I would respectfully suggest that they first read an article which appeared in the JEWISH VOICE, the largest Jewish newspaper west of Chicago. It was written by a Milton Friedman. In this article Friedman deplores the fact that after many years of Jewish effort to silence him, Gerald L. K. Smith was still enjoying his liberties. The typical Jewish attitude can be seen in Friedman's words: "Although the Jewish defense agencies have spent many years and millions of dollars to destroy Smith, he and his henchmen now emerge stronger than ever. Smith has never been in a more powerful position than today."

When Jewish organizations are willing to spend millions of dollars and countless hours of work to destroy one man and his organization, you can bet your bottom dollar that he is doing a superb job of exposing their Satanism. This effort in itself should tell an intelligent Christian how dangerous these Christ haters really are.

America has always been by tradition a Christian nation, no matter what Jerry Falwell may say to the contrary. We are not ridiculous enough to imply that you must be a Christian in order to be an American, although it would make you a better one. No religious dogmas should be imposed on our people by anyone. But we have the right to insist that our leaders be Christian in its Biblical concept. It is honorable for Christian men and women to determine the destiny of a Christian nation. It should not be determined by some heathen cult who hates the very founder of Christianity and all it stands for. We have no business putting aliens like Henry Kissinger and Zignew Brezinski into positions of power in our government and we should have learned by now, that this will bring us nothing but extreme grief. Any fool should know that a Jew in a place of political power will not vote for the good of a Christian.

Should we be required to surrender to the anti-Christ's who would remove the name of Jesus Christ from our official prayers? Should we be expected to capitulate to those who would take Christ out of our religious holidays like Easter and Christmas and turn them into heathen business holidays? I think not!

Should we as Christians meekly surrender to those who want to "brainwash" our most precious source - our children - in the cesspool of secular humanism in our government schools?

Today, all over America, there is a concerted Jewish campaign to "de-Christianize" Christian America. They want to remove the crosses from our military cemeteries. They want to erase every vestige of Christianity from our public life, while they infilter our churches with their poison.

They have the right, under American law to campaign for these issues. But they do not have the "moral right" to brand me and others like me as "hate mongers," and call for government investigations of our activities, because we insist that America respect the name of Jesus Christ which brought us into existence.

Anyone who has ever made a study of early American history, knows this nation would never have come into being, if it had not been for men and women who believed and practiced - not "Judeo-Christianity" - but Bible Christianity. I believe that America's tradition is that of a Christian nation and we will fight to the death any alien who tries to change it to fit their nefarious desires.

"Except the Lord keep the city the watchman waketh in vain," (Psalm 127:1).

From Canada, thirty years ago, came this article written by Ron Gostick, Canadian patriot and head of the CANADIAN LEAGUE OF RIGHTS. It appeared in the CANADIAN INTELLIGENCE SERVICE: "The order has gone out from our Defense Department in Ottawa that members of our armed forces may not take part in REMEMBRANCE DAY observances which contain religious content." (Canadian REMEMBRANCE DAY, is similar to our MEMORIAL DAY.)

Then follows this column in the August 6, column of the TORONTO TELEGRAM, written by Judith Robinson:

"Canada's... Minister of National Defense has decided to boycott the Deity come November 11th. The decision deserves a special place in the annals of national lunacy, for it is official. If men who fought to save this country, persist in praying God's blessing on this country, when they gather on Remembrance Day to salute the memory of their fellows who died in battle for Canada, Canadian soldiers, sailors and airmen now serving must not gather with them.

"The CANADIAN LEGION will have to remove all religious content from Remembrance Day observances. Otherwise members of Canada's armed services cannot be permitted to attend. Canada's Minister of National Defense says so. It is not a slanderous invention of Canada's enemies. It is official out of Ottawa.

"Yesterday the Canadian Legion unanimously refused to remove religious contents from Remembrance Day services. So Canadians now serving in Canada's armed forces will have no part in them in the future."

Mr. Gostick said: "If true religious content is to be purged from the Remembrance Day observances, then what is left which one could not find on May Day in Moscow's Red Square."

This happened thirty years ago in Canada. If true spiritual values are purged from any country, whether it be Canada or the United States, by government officials, then any remembrance of those men who died to protect us becomes a mockery. For they died not for God, country and freedom, but for an atheistic, materialistic, humanist concept and the enemies of Christianity will reign supreme.


Co-existence means getting along with gangsters. It means that America has confessed to the world that we have given up trying to protect our White Christian civilization. It is a propaganda campaign which comes from the heart of Zionist-Communism and causes us to recognize and aid the International gangsters. In other words, if you can't or won't try and save your city from the criminal element, try cooperating with them. Before you know it, they run the city. The same goes for the country.

However, this has been official policy in Washington, D.C. since at least 1918. As has been mentioned before, on at least 14 major occasions when the Soviet Union has been on the verge of economic collapse, it has been Old Uncle "Sucker" using our tax money, who has put them back on their feet. Now they are stronger than we and we are in a constant state of worry because of it. But has that changed the mental attitude of the idiots who run this country? Not at all! They acknowledge that aiding the Soviet Union was a bad mistake, so now they are doing the same thing with Red China. Could these leaders be classified in the words of the Apostle Paul, as found in 2 Timothy 3:7, when he talked about those who were "ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth?"

This coddling of Communists by our government has been the official policy since at least the time of F.D.R. and it hasn't mattered whether Republicans or Democrats have been in the seat of power. Today we have a so-called conservative administration under President Reagan. He talks conservative, while the same old policy of "giving aid and comfort to the enemy" continues. WHEN WILL WE WAKE UP?

* * * * *

There are men who pose as patriots and belong to that strange breed who fight communism while refusing to get to the root of the problem. They seem to take delight in attacking those of us who "go all the way." An excellent example of this breed is Evangelist Jerry Falwell of Moral Majority. He hates all the evils which are destroying America, so he says. In fact he rails against them. With this I have no argument. But never, not even once, can you find where he attempts to identify the people and organizations which are behind the effort to destroy everything he claims is sacred.

You cannot study communism without using the word "JEW". It is absolutely impossible! But whenever you use this word, and show their connection, brother, you are in "hot water."

So to escape the wrath of modern Jewry, men like Falwell indulge in the luxury of attacking Christian patriots who tell the "whole truth."

When the American Jewish Congress or the Anti-Defamation League prattle about anti-Semitism, they actually mean: "anything which is critical of Jews or Judaism." You can attack Catholics, Protestants, Seventh Day Adventists, Mormons, but heaven help you if you dare to criticize a Jew for any reason.

Now the Jewish people, in spite of recent efforts to appear friendly, have never had any love for Christians. They may hold their convocations of Christians and Jews but they still hate Christians with a virulent hatred which is difficult for ordinary folks to understand. They don't even love Moslem Semites, who have a much more legitimate claim to the land of Palestine than do the Israelis.

If some Christian millionaire patriot were to offer a large sum of money to a college that would restrict its membership to white Aryan Christians, all hell would break loose and the Jews would be in the forefront of the fight. The donor would immediately be classified as a "hate monger," and most assuredly "anti-Semite" and he would probably be called a "neo-Nazi." So what? It's the man's money and he has the right to interfere with this freedom. No law has been broken. Yet the Jews continually endow schools, colleges and universities, exclusively for Jews and no one else. That's their right! But when have you heard anyone scream about this? Does the media have the right to say they are being "anti-gentile?" Of course not! There are exclusive Black colleges and that's their right. But such is the stuff with which the AJC and the ADL is made of, that they will automatically smear anyone who does anything exclusively for Whites.


"When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation ... stand in the holy place ... Let them that be in Judea flee into the mountains," (Matthew 24:15,16.)

We hear a great deal in the news about the World Council of Churches and its national affiliate the National Council of Churches. Just about every radical, pro-communist, anti-American effort receives some backing from this "irreligious religious" organization. So for the information of those who do not know much about this monstrosity which calls itself Christian, here is some early chronological data from its early days (1907-1953) - it has not changed for the better in recent years.

1907 - The Methodist Foundation for Social Services was organized by a group of socialist, Marxist clergymen in the Methodist church. (Notice I did not say Christian clergymen, for in spite of all you have read, it is impossible for a communist to be a Christian.) This organization was headed by Dr. Harry F. Ward, twelve years before the Communist Party of the U.S. was formed in 1919. (This information comes from page 2084 of the House of Representatives document, INVESTIGATION OF COMMUNIST ACTIVITIES IN THE N.Y.C. AREA, JULY 7,1953.)

Dr. Ward was identified under oath by a number of witnesses, as a top policy maker in the American Communist Party.

1908 - The Social Creed of the churches, adopted first by the Methodist Episcopal church, is dated 1908. (From P.74 of PERSONALITIES IN REFORM, by Bishop G. Bromley Oxnam.) The Federal Council of Churches of Christ in America was founded and Walter Raushenbuah, a socialist, was the guiding light in its founding.

Sharp, the historian for the F.C.C. says about Rauschenbush: "He not only taught history, he made history. The stream of American Christianity has broken from the old bottom of individualism and has channeled a new course through the social bad lands of poverty, slums, and economic injustice. Rauschenbusch changed both the emphasis and direction of American Christianity."

Bishop Oxnam states on P. 75 of his PERSONALITIES IN SOCIAL REFORM, that Rauschenbush came under the teachings of the Webb's during a visit to England in 1907. These were the same Fabian Socialists teachings which nearly destroyed the English economic system. He identifies Rauschenbush as a Socialist and quotes him as saying in 1893: "The only power that can make Socialism succeed is religion. It cannot work in an irreligious country." (Of course this is the same secular humanist, Judeo-Christianity that is being taught and preached today in most N.C.C. churches.)

1914 - The Church Peace Union was founded by Andrew Carnegie with Federal Council officers in leadership positions. Carnegie subsidized this organization with a gift of $2-million. The Church Union in turn, organized the World Alliance for International Fellowship. This laid the groundwork for the later formation of the World Council of Churches.

1919 - A conference held at the Hague by the Federal Council leadership began the World Ecumenical Movement.

1920 - A series of conferences were held in Geneva and Stockholm.

1942 - The Federal Council of Churches issued a pamphlet titled SOCIAL CREED OF THE CHURCHES, which stated that its member churches should stand for: "subordination of the profit motive to create a cooperative spirit; social planning and control of the credit and monetary systems and the economic systems and the economic processes for the common good; a wider and fairer distribution of the wealth; drastic reduction of armaments; participation in international agencies for the peaceable settlement of all controversies: THE BUILDING OF A COOPERATIVE WORLD ORDER."

The Federal Council's just and durable Peace Commission met at Delaware, Ohio and advanced 13 principles for peace which had been submitted by its chairman John Foster Dulles. Among these principles were strong limitations on national sovereignty, world wide freedom to immigrate, international control of all armies and navies, an international monetary system, elimination of tariff and quota restrictions and an international bank." In other words, INTERNATIONAL GOVERNMENT.

Mr. Dulles was a leader in the World and National Council of Churches before he was appointed as Secretary of State.

P. 13503 of the Congressional Record of the House of Representatives contains a portion of an Office of Naval Intelligence Report which had to do with the Federal Council of Churches. It said in part: "Organizations which while not openly advocating the force and violence principles of the Communists, give aid and comfort to the Communist movement and party. Among the strongest of these are:

The Federal Council of Churches of Christ in America. This is a large radical pacifist organization. It probably represents 20-million Protestants in the U.S. However, its leadership consists of a small radical group which dictates its policies. It is always extremely active in the matter of national defense."

Note that the F.C.C. must bear a great share of the responsibility for the un-preparedness of the U.S. at the time of the Pearl Harbor attack because of its consistent lobbying efforts against national defense.

1946 - P.240 in the F.C.C. 1946 report carries a statement regarding Soviet-American relations. For the first time it was revealed by Bishop Oxnam, during the hearing on July 21,1953, before the Committee on Un-American Activities, that the author of this statement was John Foster Dulles, then Secretary of State. Here are part of Mr. Dulles comments on Communism and Capitalism: "Moreover, communism as an economic program for social reconstruction has points of contact with the social message of Christianity as in the avowed concern for the under privileged and its insistence on social and racial equality.

"The Free Enterprise System has yet to prove that it can assure steady production and employment. It has yet to prove that it can continuously provide industrial workers with that sense of individually creativeness which gives greater satisfaction than mere personal possessions."

Of course these statements are "stupid and irresponsible in the extreme", since at this time and since, it has been the Free Enterprise System of the United States which has continually "bailed out" the floundering economies of every nation which has ever tried the socialist experiment. The Free Enterprise System has given more blessings, to more people in a shorter period of time, than any other system which has ever been tried. As to Dulles' statement concerning "individual creativeness," let this be answered by the great American industrialist Henry Ford, Sr., writing. in his monumental book THE INTERNATIONAL JEW, he says: "when the American idea of 'make' was superseded by the Jewish idea of 'get', American business began its slide downwards."

1948 - According to the Biannual Report of the F.C.C., p.105, under the section heading: INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE AND GOODWILL, it is revealed that Mr. William Z. Foster, of the American Communist Party headed a Department committee on policy. Serving with him was the traitor Alger Hiss. On page 107 of this same report is seen the following statement: "That evening an impressive demonstration of Christian concern was shown at the Washington Cathedral, Bishop Stamm presided; Bishop Dunn, Secretary of State George C. Marshall and Mr. Dulles gave the addresses. The audience of more than 2,000, included the President and many members of Congress." (Do I need to remind you that it was Secy. of State George Marshall who sold Nationalist China into the hands of the Communists?)

On p. 108 - "At its April meeting, the Executive Committee authorized the Department to present testimony to Congress in behalf of the principles of reciprocal trade agreements legislation. This testimony was subsequently presented to Mr. Taft." The June Committee adopted a resolution supporting the United Nationals Convention on the crime of genocide and later joined with some 123 organizations and 23 countries in presenting this petition to the United Nations."

1948 - August - Federal Council leadership went to Amsterdam to form the World Council of Churches.

TIME MAGAZINE, September 13,1948 had several interesting remarks about this array of theologians, many from the Soviet Union and the Iron Curtain Countries: "This greatest church meeting since the Reformation could not agree on the definition of the word church. What the world heard here was very much like a United Nations session. The assembly's major message was given by a Czechoslovakian theologian, Joseph Hromadka (a Soviet mouthpiece) who said: 'It won't embarrass me at all in returning to Prague. Of course, its pretty negative and doesn't offer much in the way of action."

The most important resolution passed was one condemning the capitalistic system of the United States. This condemnation was written by the Socialist theologian Dr. John C. Bennett of Union Theological Seminary in New York City. The New York State joint Legislature labeled Union Seminary as "a dangerous center of revolutionary socialist teaching."

1948 - SEPTEMBER - The F.C.C. Executive Committee put out a statement labeled; BASIC CHRISTIAN PRINCIPLES AND ASSUMPTIONS. It was a pious, vicious attack on the Free Enterprise System of the United States. The writers were clever enough to use the Latin phrase "status quo," when describing our economic system and then proceeded to tell us that we must not have a passive attitude towards this evil system. At no time did they hint that our economic system was under International Jewish control. The F.C.C. writers declared that "revolutionary social criticism is implicit in the teachings of the church." Of course, they offered no Scripture to back this erroneous contention.

1950 - NOVEMBER - The F.C.C. met in Cleveland to consolidate with its allied agency the United Council of Church Women, the International Council of Religious Education, etc., They changed their name to the NATIONAL COUNCIL OF CHURCHES OF CHRIST IN AMERICA.

It should be noted that the average church member in this organization, the ones who pay the bills, have never had the opportunity to vote on whether or not their church should join the N.C.C. A small group of radical, socialist-pacifist, world-government minded clerics have left out the masses of decent, patriotic Christians and have arrogantly claimed that they speak for all members of this organization. This policy has never changed.

1953 - JUNE - The Rev. William Spafford, magazine editor of WITNESS MAGAZINE, was invited to lecture at a seminar given for the N.C.C. missionaries going to the foreign field. Spafford had been cited at this time at least fifteen times by the House Un-American Activities Committee for Communist affiliations.

So what has happened 32 years later? The trend towards one worldism, socialism, radicalism and the "liberation theology" has increased and we see the N.C.C. sending huge sums of money to subsidize Marxist revolutionaries in Africa and Central America, while making "folk heroes" out of such revolutionaries as Bishop Tutu from South Africa. When will our brainwashed Christian majority wake up and see what is being done to destroy them?

Continue on to Part 3 of 8:-  The Enemy Within

Return to Jack Mohr's Web Page