EXPLODING THE "CHOSEN PEOPLE" MYTH

Christ or Communism Which Will It Be

By LT. COL. GORDON "JACK" MOHR

HAVE YOU ever wondered why, in the twentieth century, when all subjects can be intelligently examined, there is only one subject that remains forbidden fruit? You can discuss Communism, sex, Protestantism, Catholicism, Mohammedanism or Metaphysics, quite freely, but it is considered not only bad manners, but downright sinful to discuss the Jewish situation.

If you want information on the Mormons, you can go to most any bookstore and purchase The Book of Mormon, The Doctrine of The Covenants, or The Pearl of Great Price. If you wish to learn more about Christian Science, you can purchase Science and Health by Mary Baker Eddy. If you wish to discuss the "I Am" movement, the books of Dr. Ballard are available. You can even find out about the religion of the Muslims, by purchasing a copy of the Koran, translated into English.

There is not one single existing faith that you cannot study, with the exception of Judaism. But if you try and find out what the Jews believe, an immediate screen of secrecy is drawn and, if you try and penetrate this, you are in trouble. If you don't believe this, go to some Jewish bookstore and try to acquire the 63 volumes of the Talmud, which is the Jewish Bible. You are either routed to a limited edition, some excerpts, or are told that it is forbidden for a Gentile to have it. In fact, the Talmud itself boldly states that a Gentile should be put to death if he reads the Talmud. In the Sanhedrin Volume (59A), page 400, we read:

"Moses commanded us a law for an inheritance, it is OUR inheritance, not theirs (Gentiles)."

The second tumult, which arises when you want to discuss the Jews, is that you, as a Christian, must always praise them and never say anything which is critical about what they say, write, or do, because if you do, God will curse you. In other words, you can criticize a Catholic for what he believes; you can say that a Mormon is wrong, or a Jehovah Witness, or a Christian Scientist, or a Baptist, or any other sect, except a Jew. That is "verboten!" This superstitious nonsense has been sown so deeply in the minds of most Christians, especially Fundamentalists, that they fear to raise a single objection, or question anything the Jews do.

The leaders of great, nation-wide Christian Movements, such as the Moral Majority, who will stand behind their pulpits and appear on national television, to thunder against the evils of corruption in government, the liquor industry, the murder of unborn babies by abortion, pornographic literature on our news stands, sex education in the school, and other assorted ills; these men are afraid, or refuse to mention publicly, that it is Jewish promoters who are behind most of these ills they are fighting.

I have had outstanding Fundamentalist leaders who admitted to me in private that they know that Jews control the media; that they put out the anti-Christian filth of Hollywood; that they operate the dope and prostitution rackets; that Jewish doctors man the abortion centers of America. They will admit this in private, but I have yet to see one with "guts" enough to admit this publicly from their pulpits and to tell their parishioners that Jews are behind these troubles. For you see, once again the bugaboo arises:

"I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee." (Genesis 12:3.)

I have often wondered why our modern-day clergy has propounded the idea that Christians must bless those who curse the very name of our Lord and who, by their own confession, are the bitterest enemies of Christianity. This seems to me to be treason in the best Constitutional definition of this crime: "Giving them aid and comfort; adhering to their enemy." I have often wondered why Christians must bless those who seek to take Bibles and prayer out of our schools and stop the singing of Christmas carols. It doesn't make very much sense!

It is "common sense" to believe that God will place a blessing upon those who have organized to destroy the teachings of His blessed Son? Does it make sense to believe that God will bless those who are dedicated to the destruction of the Church for which He died? Yet this grave misconception is taught to millions of unsuspecting, gullible Christians and is flung in the face of those of us who have been honest enough to study the subject and know whereof we speak.

When I first came to an understanding of this vital subject, it became necessary for me to leave my church, for my pastor accuses me of being an apostate. My ideas about the fundamentals of the faith have not changed; my sin was that I had my eyes opened to the Satanic doctrine that the Jews are His Chosen People, therefore anything they do is all right and must be accepted.

Our ministers tell us that only those nations which bless the Jews will prosper. But you don't have to be much of an historian, or look very deeply into modern history to put the lie to this myth. The nations of both ancient and modern times, which have been destroyed, have been destroyed because they turned their backs on God and His laws. They have rotted out from within, by moral and spiritual subversion, often aided and abetted by the Jews, and have been destroyed, long before the barbarians swarmed over their walls, or battered down their gates. In Psalm 33:12 we read:

"Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord; and the people whom He hath chosen for His own inheritance."

Who is this God referred to as "the Lord?" It is none other than Jesus Christ, the King of Kings, and Lord of Lords, who is spoken of in John 14:6:

"I am the way, the truth and the life: NO MAN cometh unto the Father, but by Me."

How can it be any plainer? No man, be he Jew, Gentile, Mohammedan, Hindu - no one, can reach God, unless they first come to Him through Jesus Christ.

Many nations in the history of the world have prospered, but every one, without fail, that has allowed the Jews to enter with their Talmudic teachings, have been demoralized and destroyed. Once the evil of Talmudic teachings begins to rot the morality of a country; once the "money changers" get in control of a nation's finances, then that country is on the "downhill slide" to oblivion. Don't argue with me about this, look at history!

England has declined as an Empire, ever since they allowed the influx of Jewish immigrants and allowed them to seek places of importance in finance and government. They tell us that America has been blessed by God, because we were kind to the Jews, yet our moments of greatest decline have come since we recognized the Israeli State as a nation and allowed Jewish control in our finances and government. This has been the constant lesson of history.

If this blessing should have been upon any nation or ruler, it should have fallen on Napoleon. He forced people in many communities to participate in Jewish holidays and caused the erection of synagogues, at taxpayer expense in many cities which his armies captured. Yet he and his army were destroyed; he was betrayed as always, by the people he had tried to befriend.

According to the teaching of many pastors, the Soviet Union should have been blessed above any nation on the earth, for they are the only known nation which has forbidden "anti-Semitism," by law. A quotation from the Daily Worker in 1939 said:

"In the USSR, anti-Semitism is strictly prosecuted as a phenomenon profoundly hostile to the Soviet system. According to the laws of the USSR, active anti-Semites are punished with death."

Is this law so strange, when you consider that more than 90% of the top Communist leaders have been and still are Jews?

Yet Russia has not been blessed. Oh, they have a tough military machine, built up with the blood of the Russian people. They scare the daylights out of the "milquetoasts" in our churches and government, but they are beset by constant internal troubles, which could destroy them overnight. They can control their vast, imperial empire, only through fear and terror.

The second lie, which throws fear into the hearts of anyone who seeks to become enlightened concerning the position of the Jews in the world, is the bugaboo of "anti-Semitism." Have you ever stopped to ask yourself, "Who is a Semite?" History proves that the Semites descended from Noah's son Shem. This takes in the white, Anglo-Saxon, Celtic, Germanic, Scandinavian and related people. However, it does not include the people who call themselves Jews. They are the greatest "anti-Semites" of all time, since they constantly harass the true descendants of Abraham, the Arabs, whose land they have stolen. Yet no one would think of calling a Jew "anti-Semitic" because he harasses an Arab.

The third lie, which has been sold to American Christians by the Jewish propagandists, is that our heritage is "Judeo-Christian"; in other words, that Christianity is a direct derivative of Judaism. The New Testament is not now, nor ever has been a product of Judaism. Judaism is built on the Talmud, which is the antithesis of the Bible. Most of our pastors know this. Biblical Christianity is built on the teachings of Jesus Christ and Divine revelation as it was given to His Apostles. It has absolutely nothing in common with Judaism as anyone can see, who has taken the time and effort to read any of the Talmud.

Jesus Christ, speaking to the Judaic religious leaders of His day in Matthew 15:9, and quoting from the Prophet Isaiah said:

"In vain they do worship Me [God], teaching for doctrines the commandments of men."

In Mark 7:13, Christ again harshly criticizes the Pharisees, accusing them of "Make the word of God of none effect through your traditions." This same general idea is carried over in the teachings of the Apostle Paul. He warned the church at Colossae (Col. 2:22):

"Which all are to perish with the using; after the commandments and doctrines of men."

Again in 1^st Timothy 4:1, Paul warned of a time which will come on this earth, when men will depart from sound doctrine to "give heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils." Oh how the fundamental preachers love this text, but none of them will tell their parishioners that this is what we find in the Jewish Talmudic teachings; they are heavily laced with the occult, in direct disobedience to the instruction of God, as given to Moses.

In Titus 1:14, Paul gives us a final warning about Jewish doctrine, when he says:

"Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth."

So you see, my friends, if a Christian is honest, there is no way you can truthfully use the term "Judeo-Christian." They are at opposite ends of the pole. The Old Testament was compiled by Holy men of God who were Israelites. They believed in the one God, as shown in Isaiah 45:5:

"I am the Lord, and there is none . . . beside Me!"

They looked forward to the coming Redeemer of Israel, the Savior of the Christians. The Holy men of God wrote the sacred Book we call the Bible, as they were moved by the Spirit of God. The Old Testament is therefore the product of God, working through His servants, the prophets. Christianity predates the Jewish religion, for this came into being during the Babylonian captivity, when Israelites got away from God and brought back to Jerusalem a heathen book called the Talmud.

The Judaism of today is not the Law and the Prophets of the Old Testament, but the heathen occult religion of ancient Babylon. The Talmud, therefore, contradicts the teachings of Moses in almost every aspect. Moses was a Christian. This can be seen in a careful reading of Hebrews 11:24-26:

"By faith [the same faith which saves men and women in the Twentieth Century] Moses, when he was come to years, refused to be called the son of Pharaoh's daughter; choosing rather to suffer affliction with the people of God, than to enjoy the pleasures of sin for a season: Esteeming the reproach of Christ [notice this part very carefully,] esteeming the reproach of Christ greater riches than the treasures in Egypt: for he had respect unto the recompense of the reward."

But you may say: "Abraham and Moses were Jews; our pastor teaches this all the time." Oh, my friend, I beg to differ with you. They were not Jews. This term was not used until 2^nd Kings 16:6, more than 1100 years after the death of Abraham and 700 years after the death of Moses. To call these men Jews is to engage in intellectual dishonesty. The Jewish writer, Benjamin Freedman, writing in 1954 to Dr. David Goldstein, a Jew who had been converted to Catholicism and who had become outstanding in his defense of the Catholic faith, said:

"It is a well-known fact that many counterfeit recent conversions [that is, of Jews to Christianity] have often proved hut infiltrations of latent traitors with treasonable intentions."

In one place in the Talmud, I forget where at the moment, Jews are advised to "become Christians for the sake of infiltrating their ranks." Then Mr. Freedman goes on to say:

"The Divine and sacred mission of the Christian faith is in jeopardy today to a degree never witnessed before in its long history of almost 2000 years. . . When the day arrives that Christians can no longer profess their Christian faith as they profess it today in a free world, the Christian faith will have seen the beginning of the end."

Freedman then goes on to show how the Christian faith has been put on the defensive throughout the world and mentions that a conspiracy is underway to destroy this faith. He goes on to prove to any honest mind that this is a Jewish conspiracy.

It is unfortunate, indeed, that Christian clergy seem to be ignorant, or apathetic to this plot to destroy everything they say they stand for as Christians. In fact, in many instances, they stand behind their pulpits and defend and support the very people who are pledged to destroy them.

There is no doubt in my mind that thousands of Christian pastors are deeply disturbed by the mysterious pressures from above, which often prevent them from exercising sound judgment. One outstanding Fundamentalist pastor, a leader in the Moral Majority, recently admitted to me:

"I am deeply disturbed by the Jewish influence behind the efforts to destroy the Moral Majority, even though we have been strongly pro-Jewish. But all the great Bible scholars and preachers of the Twentieth Century have said they were God's Chosen People, so I will have to go along with them."

God have mercy oh us when we use this as the criteria for whether we are right or wrong!

The greatest spiritual teacher of all time, our Lord Jesus Christ, spoke to the Jewish religious leaders of His time in no uncertain terms in John 8:44. He said:

"Ye are of your father the devil and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, be speaketh of his own; for be is a liar, and the father of it."

Then he goes on in verse 47, speaking to the Pharisees once more:

"He that is of God beareth God's words: ye therefore hear them not, BECAUSE YE ARE NOT OF GOD."

Does this sound much like "Chosen People" theology to you? These same Jews had already admitted they were not Israelites in verse 33, when they told Jesus:

"We be Abraham's seed, and were never in bondage to any man."

If they had been true Israelites, they could not have said this, since any Bible scholar knows the Israelites spent over 400 years in bondage in Egypt. Yet their leaders told Jesus: "We have never been in bondage to any man." In John 10:26-28, Jesus spoke again to a crowd of Jewish hypocrites:

"Ye believe not, because YE ARE NOT OF MY SHEEP . . . My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me: and I give unto them eternal life; and they will never perish."

Then in Revelation 2:9 and 3:9, we hear the final word of our Lord concerning these pseudo-Israelites, as He warns the church at Smyrna concerning them. He warns of:

"The blasphemy of them which say they are Jews and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan."

How can our preachers designate these blasphemers, whom Christ has cursed as "God's Chosen People"?

Most of the confusion in the minds of Christians is unwarranted and unjustified. It would not exist if the Christian clergy had not aided and abetted the deceptions responsible for it. Many clergymen are allies with their enemies and it is no wonder that we see spiritual sabotage on every hand. It is no wonder that millions of potential "front line" soldiers for Jesus Christ have become spiritual cowards; who hide in their spiritual foxholes, praying for Christ to return and rapture them out of the mess they are responsible for.

I'm convinced that many in this category will be in for the "shock of their lives," for they will be so tightly zipped up in their "shroud of self-righteousness" that they will not get unzipped in time to go with their Master when He does come. Remember how Jesus once said:

"Not everyone that saith unto me, Lord! Lord! will enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which Is in heaven."

The will of God goes a lot farther than knocking on doors and inviting someone to attend church; it goes farther than telling them about the love of God and the way to salvation. It means "front line duty" in the battle that rages.

To stop this spiritual surrender, we are going to have to have an "about face" on the part of our clergy. Christian organizations, such as the Moral Majority, will never reach their full potential, until their leaders will willingly and honestly point out who their enemies really are.

Mr. Freedman puts his finger squarely on one of the major church problems, when he tells Dr. Goldstein:

"The utterances by the Christian clergy, which confuses Christians the most, is the constantly repeated utterance that 'Jesus was a Jew.' This appears to be your favorite theme. It is a misrepresentation and distortion of an incontestible historic fact. . . . Informed, intelligent Christians, cannot reconcile this unwarranted misrepresentation and distortion of facts."

Most competent Bible historians will admit that at no time in the new Testament is Jesus ever called a Jew and that, during His sojourn on earth, He was called a "Judean" by His contemporaries. The great Hebrew historian, Josephus, wrote many times concerning Jesus, but never once called Him a Jew. The church historian, Theoplylact, writing in 1080 A.D. says:

"The city of the Judeans was taken, and the wrath of God was kindled against them: as also Josephus witnesses, that this came upon them on the account of the death of Jesus."

When Pontius Pilate, the Roman Governor of Judea, crucified Jesus, he had inscribed on the cross the Latin words: "lesus Nazarenous Rex ludeorum." He was expressing his sarcasm for the Judean religious leaders who had pressured him into executing a man he knew was innocent. Authorities on Latin will tell you this inscription means: "Jesus the Nazarene, ruler of the Judeans." By no stretch of the imagination does this read: "King of the Jews," and it was not so translated in the 1611 printing of the King James Version of the Bible.

During His lifetime, Christ was never known as the "King of the Jews." Pilate knew that Jesus had been denied by the religious leaders of these people we now call Jews and that they were responsible for the false testimony they had brought against Him. Christ was crucified because it was politically expedient for Pilate to do so, not because of any guilt on His part. With the exception of a few of His followers, most of the Judeans abhorred His teachings. There were only 120 faithful ones in the "upper room" on the Day of Pentecost (Acts 1:15).

The fact that Jesus was never called a Jew, or was known by this name, cannot be erased by the "wishful thinking" of our theologians, no matter how hard they try to back the Jews. There is no factual foundation in history or theology, which would allow the word used by Pilate to describe Jesus as a Jew. The Greek word is "budais;" the Latin "Iudaeus," and the English translation can be nothing but "Judean." There is no way you can come up with a religious connotation for this word. During the time of Christ, at no place in the world, was there a religion known as "Jewish."

It is an acknowledged fact that the word "Jew" did not appear in the English language until 1775. Prior to that time, it did not exist in any language. It was introduced into the English language in a play written by an English playwright named Sheridan. It was unknown to Shakespeare and, as I mentioned, to the translators of the King James Version of the Bible in 1611. Contrary to popular opinion, Shakespeare wrote in his "Merchant of Venice," (V. III, i. 61) "I am an Iewe: hath not an Iewe eyes."

To go back a bit further, the word "Jew" does not appear in the 1582 version of the Douay Bible, the official translation of the Roman Catholic church. But it does in both that version and the King James Version, when they were revised later in the 18th Century.

The intellectual dishonesty of our clergy comes when they use the word "Jew" as a religious term, for this is a rank misrepresentation. The secondary meaning of the word "Jew" today has as little relationship to its original, as the word "camel" has to the cigarette which bears its name. It is the secondary meaning of the word "Jew" which has been used to confuse Christians. We should demand that our clergy be absolutely honest in the pulpit, not only in their use of the Word of God, but also in other matters. When the pulpits of Christian churches become a "propaganda platform" for the worst enemy of Christianity, then Christianity is in deep trouble.

It is a fact, proven from both the Scriptures and history, that the race, religion, nationality and culture of Jesus, was not the race, nationality and culture of the self-styled Jews of this 20th Century. There are very few so-called Jews, who can trace their bloodlines back to Abraham. The Jewish writer, Alfred Lilienthal, in his book, The Controversy of Zion, states:

"I have no doubt that some of my Christian readers have as much right to the land of Palestine as Menachem Begin."

It should become obvious to any honest student of history that those people who call themselves "Jews" have spent countless millions of dollars to manufacture the fiction that "Jesus was a Jew," and that the Judeans of His time can be identified with the Jews of today, and that the Christian religion is an offshoot of Judaism. This is blasphemy, straight from the "pits of hell."

Jesus did not practice the "religion of the Jews." He abhorred it. The religious beliefs taught in the synagogues of Judea during Christ's lifetime were not the religion of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and Moses. It was a heathen religious belief known as Pharisaism, which was soundly condemned by our Lord on many occasions. As I have already shown, from Scriptural sources, Jesus condemned these as being "children of Satan."

The eminent Jewish Rabbi, Louis Finkeistein, head of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America, in the Foreword of his first edition, The Pharisees, The Sociological Background of Their Faith, says on p.21:

"Judaism . . . Pharisaism . . . Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became modern Rabbinism. But throughout these changes in name . . . the spirit of the ancient Pharisee survives, unaltered."

In other words, the Jewish rabbinate of the 1980's is the same religious crowd to which Jesus spoke in Matthew 12: 34, when He said:

"O generation of vipers, how can ye, being evil, speak good things?"

The religion practiced by the Pharisees in Jesus' time was based exclusively on the Babylonian Talmud. This, according to Rabbi Morris Kertzer, "consists of 63 books of legal, ethical and historical writings of the ancient rabbis. It was edited five centuries before the birth of Jesus."

Another well-known Rabbi, Michael Rodkinson, in his book, The History of the Talmud, wrote:

"The source from which Jesus of Nazareth drew the teachings which enabled Him to revolutionize the world . . . is the Talmud . . . the written form of that which, in the times of Jesus, was called the tradition of the elders."
But the Word of God gives the lie to this statement. In Mark 7:13, Jesus snid to the Pharisees:

"Ye make the Word of God of none effect through your traditions.''

So Jesus' teaching could not have possibly come from this blasphemous book.

Are you naive enough to believe that a religious book which encourages incest, such as the Sanhedrin volume of the Talmud does, or unnatural intercourse; or rape of non-Jews; or bestiality, as found in this filthy volume; do you believe this could be the basis of Jesus' teaching? If you do, then you are guilty of the vilest form of blasphemy. Are you willing to believe that statements found in the Talmud, such as those which follow, are the basis for Christianity? Listen closely, I will give you chapter and verse:

KALLAH, lb, (18b) - "Jesus was illegitimate and was conceived during menstruation."

SCABBATH XIV - "Jesus is referred to as the son of a Roman soldier and a Jewish prostitute."

SANHEDRIN, 103a - "This passage suggests that Christ corrupted His morals and dishonored Himself."

SANHEDRIN, 107b - "This passage states that Christ seduced and destroyed Israel."

HILKOTH MELAKHIM - Suggests that Christians sin by worshipping Jesus Christ.

HILKOTH MAAKHALOTH - This states that Christians are idolaters.

ORACH CHAIIM (20, 2) - Says that Christians disguise themselves as Jews in order to kill them.

ABHODAH ZORAH (1 Sb) - Suggests that Christians have sex relations with animals.

CHAGIGAH, (1 Sb) - States that a Jew is considered to be good in the eyes of God, in spite of any sins he may commit.

BABHA KAMA (1 13b) - States that the name of God is not profaned, if a Jew lies to a Christian.
 

And on and on, and on it goes, for 63 volumes of filth and blasphemy. This is what the Jews are taught in their synagogues. Do any of you Christians reading these words, believe the Christian religion got its start from this kind of blasphemy? This is what your pastor teaches, when he tells you that we have a Judeo-Christian culture.

If I had the time, I could cover several hundred pages, proving that 90% or more of the people in the world today, who go by the name of Jew, do not have one drop of Abraham's blood in their veins and that none of the their ancestors ever placed foot on the ground of Palestine. Most of the Eastern Jews came from a completely heathen background, a heathen tribe called the Khazars of Western Russia. They were not Semites, but were Turco-Mongoloid. They were converted to Judaism en masse in the 7th Century. If you want further Jewish confirmation of this, I suggest you read Vol. IV, pages 1 to 5 in the Jewish Encyclopaedia.

Most Americans, especially those who go by the name Christian, are deeply disturbed by our economic collapse. But have you been honest enough to recognize that our money system in the United States has been under the control of evil, International Jewish bankers since the Civil War? Benjamin Franklin, addressing the First Continental Congress in 1789, warned them:

"Gentlemen, if you do not exclude the Jews from our shores, in less than a hundred years, every man, woman and child will be toiling in the fields as slaves to the Jewish debt money system."

His timing was off a bit, but otherwise he was correct. Our monetary system today is controlled by the Federal Reserve System, a Marxist principle which was slipped into our Constitution in 1913, at the instigation of the International Jewish bankers. Now this nation is in hock, up to its ears, to this same ungodly crowd; they could ruin us financially, at any time, with the snap of their fingers.

As a Christian, are you not grieved at the subversion of our youth and the degeneration of our nation's morals? You should be! If you are a member of the clergy, you should be even more concerned, for you have been called to be "watchmen on the walls" of this nation, to warn them at the approach of danger (see Ezekiel 33:1-3). Have you heeded this call? Have you told your people the whole truth, or are you like those pastors of Jeremiah's time (6:14) who cry: "Peace! peace! when there is no peace!"?

Too often today, American pastors have become "male prostitutes" for the International Zionists. Thousands of these "pseudo-pastors" are pandering to self-styled Jewish interests, as they literally sell this country "down the river," into the hands of those who will destroy Christianity and make us slaves.

I do not advocate hatred for the Jews, as some do. I believe that many of the "rank and file" Jews in America do not understand the plotting of their international leaders. Some do, and have been violently opposed to it! But I do say that we cannot, we must not allow the International Jews to control our government, our economics, our media and our churches, as they do today. Probably our first priority must be to get rid of the false prophets who stand in our pulpits crying: "It is your Christian duty to support the Jews; they are God's Chosen Ones." God forbid!

Now, as during the Revolutionary War, our motto needs to be: "Tonight, put only Americans on guard!" Let's take our country out of the greedy clutches of the international leeches. Let's once again raise the flag of Jesus Christ over this nation. Let's recognize Anglo-Saxon and kindred Christian Americans for what they are: the people who have been ordained to glorify Christ's name. Then, with this knowledge, let us go out to battle with the enemy: for in His strength, we can conquer every foe and be free again.

Let us once more remember those stirring words, from the stanza of "The Battle Hymn of the Republic," which have been removed from our song books:

"I have read a fiery Gospel,
Writ in burnished rows of steel,
As ye deal with my condemners,
So with you my grace will deal.
Let the hero born of woman,
Crush the Serpent with His heel,
Since God is marching on!"

---