With these thoughts in mind, let us examine the beginning of our great Republic. As stated in "Israel Arrives in America," by Destiny, April 1939: "The canon of the Bible is closed, but the work of the God of the Bible goes on. Being of Israel, these forefathers of ours proceeded in all their plans after the pattern of Israel. Let us always remember that the planting of America, in the strain that determined our country's character, was a spiritual planting. The fathers who planted this nation were Christians. They came here as Christians. They came because they were Christians. They came on a specifically Christian venture. Get it fixed in your mind, beyond the power of any false history to erase, that the planting which determined the genius of this nation was A Church ‑‑ not a Town, not a Colony, not a Trading or Exploring Venture, not a Gold Rush, but A Church. A little Pllgrim Church crossed the Sea for the sake of its church life ‑‑ that is the True origin of our United States! And let no Anti-Christ tell you different!"

See how closely the parallels run between Ancient Israel and the United States. There is a striking similarity in the beginnings of both. When Israel of old came out of Egypt; from the continent of Africa to the continent of Asia, in a free parliament of their rulers, and in a free convention of their people held at Mt. Sinai, by individual vote, they elected Almighty God the Head of State. It was a distinct and solemn National Act.

And when American Israel came out of the continent of Europe to the continent of America, they too made a covenant with Jehovah, they drew up national documents of agreement with Almighty God. And, my Christian friends, you and I, as members of the nation, are bound by what our Nation has officially done.

In the book, "The Light and The Glory," by Peter Marshall and David Manuel, they state on page 267: "If you ask an American, who is his master? He will tell you he has none, nor any governor but Jesus Christ [18]. Which may have given rise to the cry which was soon passed up and down the length of America by the Committees of Correspondence: 'No King but King Jesus!. ” [19]

Let us show you the cords by which we are bound, and which will strongly hold us. "There is a little shallop tossing on the Atlantic near the tip of Cape Cod. And there, encompassed by the waters, ere yet a single foot was pressed on Plymouth Rock, our fathers called a solemn convocation in the Mayflower's stuffy cabin and drew up the Mayflower Compact: 'In the Name of God, Amen. We whose names are underwritten, having undertaken for the glory of God and the advancement of the Christian Faith, a voyage to plant the first colony...do by these Presents, solemnly and mutually in the presence of God combine ourselves into a Civil Body Politic.' That was the beginning of our politics, the beginning of our Christian Nation which became known to the world as The United States of America 'In the Name of God, Amen.'" With increasing accessions from the Godly people of the old lands, the number of the colonies grew to four, and federation became desirable.

A man of God drew up the Articles of Federation: "Whereas, we all came into these parts of America with one and the same end, namely, to advance The Kingdom of our Lord Jesus Christ and to enjoy the liberties of the Gospel in purity, we therefore conceive it our bounden duty...that as in nation and religion, so in other respects, we be and continue one."

That declaration made us a People. It was the forerunner of all our government. What a descent we have made since then! Israel rebelled against the Throne of David and declared its independence, setting up a separate government. The same thing occurred with Israel in America. The British government had forgotten that the Colonists were British men, and adopted the strange un‑British policy of taxation without representation. Our fathers were 13 colonies now, as there were 13 tribes in Israel.

And again there came a mighty division in Israel, the Colonies revolted against the rule of England. Determining to do this, they produced another great Covenant Document, The Declaration of Independence; and there once more their allegiance to Almighty God is declared.

We sometimes hear today an agitation toward "putting God in the Constitution" and it is implied that we are a godless nation because He is not mentioned in the Constitution. But the Constitution is Not our greatest National Document.

All of them are based on the people's allegiance to God. Not one of them ever Has Been or Ever can be Amended. The Constitution is a blueprint of our administrative political machinery; it can be and has been amended from time to time; it is a changing instrument; it need not declare so unchangeable a condition as our rightful allegiance to God.

Some wonder how many Americans see the three great characteristics, the three great attributes of God, in our Declaration of Independence. Let us show them to you in three brief passages.

1). The separate and equal station to which the laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them. There we acknowledge God, the Father of Mankind;

2). We therefore, the representatives of the United States, in General Congress assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions. There we acknowledge God the Moral Governor of the earth, beneath whose Awful Hand we hold dominion over the land and the people;

3). And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor. There we fervently acknowledge God, the Providential Guide, and Protector, and Savior of Peoples.

There, my Christian friends, in the Compact, the Articles and the Declaration, is the threefold cord of solemn obligation which binds us to the Law of God. Our patriotism and our religion grow on the same stem. Out of our own mouths are we judged.

When the time came to choose a design for the Great Seal of the United States, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams were selected as the committee. Both Franklin and Jefferson; professedly freethinkers, proposed designs having to do with Israel, Franklin proposing Israel safely crossing the Red Sea while the hosts of Pharaoh were engulfed, and Jefferson proposing Israel being led by the pillar of cloud by day and the pillar of fire by night. And then look at the Seal which finally evolved.

What do you find on it? On the obverse side you find the Eagle with thirteen stars above its head, 13 letters in the motto which flutters on a scroll from its beak, 13 paleways in the shield on its breast, in its right talon an olive branch with 13 leaves and 13 olive fruits, in its left talon 13 arrows fledged with 13 feathers.

Here are seven sets of 13's on one side of our Great Seal. Here we should probably say for the benefit of the superstitious that 13 is the Lucky Number of The United States, and has been so all down through its history. And 13 was the number of the tribes of Israel. And the 13th tribe of Israel was Manasseh, whose name means "forgetfulness," and if there has ever been a people forgetful of all its past, it is this last, this 13th, this Manasseh/Israel people in the United States.

Look at our Great Seal again. Whence do we get the Olive as our national flower? It is the sign of Israel everywhere throughout the Scriptures. turn to the reverse side; you see "a pyramid unfinished." What is a pyramid doing in the United States of America? We thought pyramids belonged in Egypt. Well, here on the Great Seal of the United States is a pyramid of 13 courses of masonry, and above it, floating in the Glory and having emblazoned on it the All‑Seeing Eye, is the capstone of the Great Pyramid which never was set; "The Chief Cornerstone" spoken of by our Lord as the Stone which the builders rejected.

That headstone of the corner, the apex stone, was never set on the Great Pyramid of Egypt, it has not yet been set on our National Pyramid, but it hovers there on our Great seal, it floats there in the Glory, as if awaiting the moment when it shall descend to complete our national structure with a Divine completion.

A pyramid on the United States government Seal? It should occasion no surprise. It was Israel genius that built the Great Pyramid, and set therein its mathematical confirmation of Divine truth for a scientific generation to read.

The Great Pyramid and the Olive, the stone which the builders rejected and the All‑Seeing Eye, the effulgent rays of the Divine Glory, and through it all the number thirteen; my Christian friend, a Bible‑reading Shepherd in the desert of Mesopotamia, who had never heard of the United States, would say on seeing our national emblems, "Surely this is the people Israel!"

And all this came about without knowledge, without intent, on the part of the statesmen who designed it. Truly, it is a most remarkable circumstance. But Israel must be Israel wherever her sons abide.

But we must not forget that along with the birthright comes responsibility. We are to be a blessing to "All" the other races on earth, not a curse or a proverb.

We are to be Priests of the Great and Almighty God; to teach His Laws and Statutes to a Lost and Dying World so they might live and not die. Is it a light thing to be the heir of the wonderful legacy made certain to the Israel people through God's oath to Abraham?

There is no doubt that as the world conditions continue to heat up and move toward their conclusion, there will be a multitude who will rejoice that they live under the provisions of that gracious covenant. As Israelites we are natural born members of the Kingdom of God on earth: Which is such a privilege that even the Lord Himself will take notice when the Kingdom reaches its final completion. “The Lord loveth the gates of Zion more than all the dwellings of Jacob...And of Zion it shall be said, This and that man was born in her: and the highest himself shall establish her. The Lord shall count, when he writeth uf the people, that this man was born there. Selah." [20]

The Kingdom was established by God at Mt. Sinai, and constituting that Kingdom was the Thirteen Tribes of Israel. Matthew 21:43 tells us plainly that God would take the kingdom (From the Jews which had stolen from its rightful people) and turn it over to a "nation" (From the Greek word, "Ethnos" which does not mean church); That that nation would bring forth the fruits of the kingdom which are both political and religious. The Israel Nations: Finland, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Holland, Belgium, Switzerland, Britain, France, Spain, Canada, Australia, Greenland, New Zealand, South Africa and the United States and a few others are the only nations which have established their form of government after the model given at Mt. Sinai with its constitution, laws, statutes and judgments.

Does the fact that a man is Saved Eternally, preclude the possibility of his appreciating the civil blessings which he enjoys under the Abrahamic Covenant in these Israel Countries? A short stay in the Jewish ruled lands of the dictators would show the difference and be quite convincing. As previously stated one of the fruits of the Kingdom of God on earth was religious; and true to Christ's assignment, the Israel nations have led the world in evangelistic works at home and with foreign missions, church extension to the ends of the earth, Bible translations, publications and distribution.

The United States, Germany and Britain are responsible for at least ninety percent of this work. It is possible that all of the civil, religious freedoms and blessings vouched‑safe by a covenant keeping God to these countries have never impinged themselves upon the heart and soul of a man because, by the Grace of God, he was saved? More especially when God said: "But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the Lord, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people." [21]

We believe it is not good Bible Christianity to hug the Covenant of Grace so close to your heart, that there is no room for God's Covenant of Race. There is no way for the man who has his eyes on the skies, in contemplation of a Rapture which will never come, to serve God or Jesus Christ by spurning the honors which God has bestowed upon him as one of His Israel People. God Almighty said: "Hearken to me, ye that follow after righteousness, ye that seek the Lord: look unto the rock whence ye are hewn (Jesus Christ), and to the hole of the pit whence ye are digged. Look unto Abraham your father, and unto Sarah that bare you: For I called him alone, and blessed him, and increased him." [22]

It does not require a great amount of research to find a host of texts in which God reveals the exalted position given to His Chosen White Race. So, a few should suffice: "But now thus saith the Lord that created thee, O Jacob, and he that formed thee, O Israel, Fear not: for I have redeemed thee, I have called thee by thy name; thou art mine...Since thou wast precious in my sight, thou hast been honourable, and I have loved thee." [23] "For thou didst separate them from among all the people of the earth, to be thine inheritance." [24] "For the Lord hath chosen Jacob unto himself, and Israel for his peculiar treasure." [25] "For thou art an holy people (Set apart for God's use)...the Lord thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth." [26] "...the Lord hath chosen thee to be a peculiar people unto himself, above all the nations that are upon the earth." [27]

God has certainly lavished the honors and blessings upon Israel, and in the few texts cited, there is enough to give the Israel Christians abundant reason for joy and thanksgiving. Note the honors conferred: God chose them; redeemed them; claimed them for His own; separated them; calls them precious; called them his peculiar treasure; His special people; and His inheritance above all the peoples of the earth. With this in mind it is almost impossible to conceive of any Christian believer to know this and then reply: What difference does it make?

As we go through the Scriptures, and find the blessings promised by God to Israel, it is remarkable that, in many instances, the blessings foretold are for the last days; the days in which we are now living. However, along with the cataclysmic upheavals which are foretold, there is always a word of cheer, consolation and encouragement to His Israel People.

The blessings promised to Abraham; those promised to Isaac and Jacob/Israel; those promised to Joseph and the rest of the sons of Jacob and those proclaimed upon the thirteen tribes of Israel by Moses were to culminate when Christ returns to take over His Kingdom on the earth.

It is very evident God was anxious for His Israel People should have a clear vision of all that was to come to pass in the days to come, and so, sent prophet after prophet, telling them of world conditions which they would experience throughout the ages. Therefore, as a result, it is the universal testimony of all who have sincerely studied the Israel Truth and accepted it, that there has come upon their minds and hearts an enlightenment to the present world crisis, such as they had never known before.

To list all of the statements God has made to Israel for the last days, would furnish a shield against all that is transpiring, which few Christians know anything about. Today when men's hearts are failing them for fear; leaping from windows; shooting themselves; slashing their wrists; by drugs; alcohol and etc., God in His mercy intended that we should have the benefits of knowing what He is doing in the world; what He plans to do: what the world events actually mean; how He is going to make it all work out to the good of His Israel people (And that does not mean the Jews), and through all that is happening, bring in the Kingdom of God on earth.

The high calling of God is not merely to accept Christ and attempt to build a Christ ‑ like character, but to gain a broad, genuine and comprehensive Biblical knowledge. It is to become obedient to the commission as related in Luke 9:2, which states Christians are to: "...preach the kingdom of God."

The Kingdom of God on the earth, in the hands of the enemies of God Almighty; "Because the Lord hath sworn that the Lord will have war with Amalek from generation to generation." [28] Christ said: "But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them bring hither and slay them before me." [29]

It is to be restored by Christ upon His return. It was the main theme which Jesus preached while He walked among us in the flesh. The laws of the Kingdom of God which was established at Mt. Sinai contain the only answer to the problems which now confront the nations, whether those problems be political, economic or social.

In fact, the Gospel of the Kingdom sweeps the whole field of human relationships, the family, the church, the business world, the social world, the city, the county, the state, the nation and international relationships. There is no phase of human life that it does not cover and command; for His Kingdom ruleth over all.

Therefore, we have no hesitancy in saying that The Israel Truth comprehends the Gospel in its fullness. The Israel Identity movement takes the Bible as it finds it; it has no denominational tenets to promote, and preaches what it finds; without fear or favor.

It declares the whole counsel of God whether men will hear or forbear; the Gospel of Christ in its fullness; the Old Testament Gospel; the New Testament Gospel; the Gospel of Mt. Sinai; of the Prophets; of the Apostles; for the individual and the neglected one; the Gospel of the Kingdom of God on Earth: Not in Heaven.

God chose our White Israel People as His Priestly Race and appointed them His witness to set up the ensign of Divine Truth and establish God's Laws in His Kingdom. And now the climax of the ages is just about to break upon the world!

If we are honest students of history, we can readily see that God's hand of blessing has been upon His people Israel. He created Israel for a special purpose, and we, as Israelites, owe our existence and our blessings to the Covenant God made with Abraham. We are the people of the Covenant, it is our birthright.

If we do not understand that Covenant, we are going to lose our vision of God's plan and purposes for His people and how these people and that Covenant relate to the New Jerusalem. Part of that plan involves our understanding the causes and effects (or blessings and curses) operating in Israel, even the old Jerusalem, when she turned from righteousness to unrighteousness. "How is the faithful city become an harlot! it was full of judgment; righteousness lodged in it; but now murderers. Thy silver is become dross, thy wine mixed with water: Thy princes are rebellious, and companions of thieves: every one loveth gifts, and followeth after rewards: they judge not the fatherless, neither doth the cause of the widow come unto them." [30]

Notice that when Jerusalem executed "Judgment," righteousness lodged within her. However, when they ceased carrying out the judgments, murderers came to roost. As Israelites, can we not identify with this description of our nation today?

In America, our government, our Congress, our President, and our Judicial System have become companions of thieves and murderers. They do not adhere to God's Law nor do they carry out His judgments. Church government needs to hold state government accountable for its alliances, its legislation, and its actions.

No one is holding government accountable today. Civil, and even ecclesiastical leaders today do not seem to care about widows, they, in fact, create widows! But note what the Word of God declares in Isaiah: "Therefore saith the Lord, the Lord of hosts, the mighty One of Israel, Ah, I will ease me of mine adversaries, and avenge me of mine enemies: And I will turn my hand upon thee, and purely purge away thy dross, and take away all thy tin: And I will restore thy judges as at the first, and thy counsellors as at the beginning: afterward thou shalt be called, The city of righteousness, the faithful city." [31]

That is a very interesting Bible passage God says He will take away all of our dross, all of our humanistic reasoning, all of our ways that seem right to a man. This is the tin that He refers to in this passage. Has that purging already occurred in the nations of Israel? Has this purging occurred within our national government today? Has this purging occurred within the churches today? We have not seen it. Has this type of purging process occurred at any time in our history? No, but this purging, a lasting purging, will come to the nations, and the New Jerusalem will play an important role in this process. Revelation confirms this: "Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city." [32]

There are two very important points made in this verse concerning those who obey the commandments of God. The first is that they have a right to the tree of life. In other words, they will have right to eternal life, to that which Adam and Eve forsook when they did not obey God.

The second point is that those who keep God's commandments may enter through the gates into the city. Listen to how the Psalmist David explains the characteristics of these gates: "Open to me the gates of righteousness: I will go into them, and I will praise the Lord: This gate of the Lord, into which the righteous shall enter." [33]

This subject would take us into the various resurrections, and, while this is a very important topic, it is not really germane to the subject at hand. However, the following section will lead us into an interesting study of angels, and the coming of the Son of Man. We think the identity of these angels will surprise you. Matthew mentions the angels who come with the Lord: "When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory." [35]

Who are the angels who accompany Christ? Are they a group of cosmic creatures with wings attached to their backs? David answers that question for us: "Bless the Lord, ye his angels, that excel in strength, that do his commandments, hearkening unto the voice of his word." [36]

You who do His commandments and "hearken" to the "voice of His word" are His angels! What is the "voice of His word?" you may ask. The "voice" is the Spirit of His word. This is a process of the New Covenant which goes beyond mere obedience; it involves the very heart of one's character, which can only be transformed by the power of the Holy Spirit.

Those who hearken to the voice of His word, who follow, His commandments, and who tune into His voice and His Spirit are the ones whom God refers to as His angels. But now let's look at some additional verses, verses which show an interesting allegory referring to those who accompany Christ upon His return: "And the Lord make you to increase and abound in love one toward another, and toward all men, even as we do toward you: To the end he may stablish your hearts unblamable in holiness before God, even our Father, at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ with all his saints." [37]

Paul said our Lord Jesus Christ is coming with His saints, those who are redeemed and have been cleansed. We read earlier that Christ was coming with His angels. Could it be, that the saints and the angels are synonymous? Let's read on and find out: "And to you who are troubled rest with us, when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels." [38]

Who are these angels coming with Christ? They are those who have repented, who obey His commandments, who walk not after the flesh but after the spirit, those who are the Temple of the Living God. His saints and His angels are the clouds of glory that surround Christ at His coming.

The saints and the angels are the city of light He is coming with when He returns. Throughout the ages, we individually comprise those lively stones jointly fitted together to make the whole.

The New Jerusalem is the regathering Jeremiah spoke of, that collective body of saints whom god has been building down through the ages. We, the regathered, redeemed, repentant, and regenerated Israelites are His Temple, His Holy City wherein He dwells.

An additional witness for this is found in Revelation: "Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my God, and he shall go no more out: and I will write upon him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, which is new Jerusalem, which cometh down out of heaven from my God: and I will write upon him my new name." [39]

Being an overcomer means denying our old Adamic nature, and embracing the nature of the last Adam, Jesus Christ. It's coming into the headship of Christ [40], whereby He becomes our perfecting process. Our job is to yield [41] to that righteousness which is not of self, but of the Spirit, bringing down the strongholds of the carnal mind, "which is enmity with God." [42]

The natural, or carnal man, lives by the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life. Overcoming has deeper significance than the "letter" of obedience, and it is not the obedient and punishment that a child understands. It means that as Christians, we have matured in our development and growth to the point where we want to obey.

It is in our heart (mind), and the desires that flow out from our heart, that are the most difficult to change. If our heart is changed so that we desire to obey, by the punishment that is hanging over our heads, and wanting to obey. It begins in the heart (mind) when we learn to love Jesus Christ our Lord with all our heart, with all our soul, and with all our mind.[43] Those who love God will be filled with the Holy Spirit and used of God.

They are those who keep both the spirit and letter of His commandments. In Acts, the Apostle Peter says: "...we are his witnesses of these things; and so is also the Holy Ghost, whom God hath given to them that obey him." [44] If any have doubts that a Christian's life is one of duty, performance, and commitment, please read Revelation 3:15-22 very closely. Note especially phrases such as "I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot," and "To him that overcometh."

The warnings, instructions, and promises contained in these verses should be a source of guidance, challenge, and hope to all of us. Looking back at verse 12, it tells us that this New Jerusalem is coming down out of heaven, that the overcome will be made a pillar in the Temple of God, and that Christ will write God's new name and the name of the city of God upon the overcome.

Why would He write upon the overcomers the name of the New Jerusalem unless they were the New Jerusalem? "For what is our hope, or joy, or crown of rejoicing? Are not even ye in the presence of our Lord Jesus Christ at his coming?" [45]

His saints are His heavenly body, the innumerable company of angels, and the New Jerusalem. Scripture provides ample witnesses to this testimony for those who have eyes to see and hears to hear. "And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea. And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God." [46]

Then in the following we find: "And he carried me away in the spirit to a great and high mountain(kingdom or nation), and shewed me that great city, the holy Jerusalem, descending out of heaven from God, Having the glory of God: and her light was like unto a stone most precious, even like a jasper stone, clear as crystal; And had a wall great and high, and had twelve gates, and at the gates twelve angels, and names written thereon, which are the names of the twelve tribes of the children of Israel." [47]

When we, His saints, are clothed in His righteousness, we are going to shine forth in His light, the glory of the Everlasting Father. "And I saw no temple therein: for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are the temple of it. And the city had no need of the sun, neither of the moon, to shine in it: for the glory of God did lighten it, and the Lamb is the light thereof." [48]

The saints comprise the body of the Lamb (Christ) and become the Temple wherein that the Lord God Almighty dwells. "And there shall be no night there; and they need no candle, neither light of the sun; for the Lord God giveth them light: and they shall reign for ever and ever." [49]

Talk about increasing your vision! Reading and studying the Word of God will increase your vision and understanding of God's Divine purposes. Can you see this special city whose builder and maker is God? Do you understand that He has a select, called out and chosen, innumerable company of saints-angels [50] who will be involved in the greatest restoration process this world has known in age. Those who are in Christ, and do His good will, are the light of the world (The light of New Jerusalem). Remember what Christ said: "Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on an hill cannot be hid." [51]

Is the picture of the New Jerusalem beginning to come together now? Can you not see what Christ was speaking of in Matthew 5? We, Israelite Christians, are that city, and through this many-membered body, Christ's light will shine so that it cannot be hid. But our people have been led astray and blinded to the truth by false shepherds. Just as Christ, through Peter, told us would happen: "...there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them..." [52]

The lying ministers and preachers that teach falsehoods and the doctrines of men for filthy lucre's sake. These same ministers and preachers turn from the truth and in its place, teach our people "Jewish Fables!" Which we have been instructed to beware of: "Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn (our people - Israelites) from the truth." [53] These false ministers have told us that the "great city" is Rome, New York or Moscow. They have told us the "woman" is either the "Roman Catholic Church" or a mystery that we aren't to know or understand.

One of the most dangerous and deceptive doctrines of Roman Catholicism, which has been carried over into our Evangelical and Pentecostal church world, is the theory that the Church is the Bride of Christ. This doctrine can be traced back to the Dark Ages when the Roman superstition was growing and developing. Israel, having become "lost and gentilized," the theologians of the Papal Church decided to make the bold claim that God had rejected His national people Israel, had somehow changed His mind, and that the visible organized church system, headed up by the Bishop of Rome, had become the "New Israel," the Bride of Christ. This spiritualizing school of thought can be traced back to Origen, Tichomnius and Augustine of Hippo.

Regrettably this teaching was not abandoned at the Reformation, but was carried over with certain variations into reformed theology where it was claimed with equal vehemence that the invisible church made up of born-again believers out of all denominations, constitute the bride.

Such teaching persists to this very day in spite of the vast amount of the evidence to prove that the Israel people of the Bible are found today, redeemed and regathered, in the United States and the other Western Christian Nations of the world, as promised to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob/Israel, married to Almighty God at the foot of Mount Sinai and spoken of continually throughout the Bible prophecies. It is these people who constitute the national bride through the pages of God's infallible book: The Bible.

It is amazing how many millions of Christians over the centuries have poured over the pages of the Holy Bible without taking note of a fundamental truth: The Bible is a book written by, for, and about Israelites. And by this we do not mean the Jews for they are no part of Israel. While it is possible that this truth may not send spiritual shock waves through any given congregation, or even any individual, but it should.

How people could read the best selling book of all history and not be more concerned about the subjects of that book remain a mystery. Seldom does one hear any adverse comment when it is made known that the Koran was written by and for Arabians.

It is common knowledge that the Vedas contain the sacred scripture for the Hindu people; yet that book proceeded from their kind and hand is not disputed. People seem to have no trouble relating the Talmud exclusively to the Jewish synagogue and those who profess Judaism, and as such are called Jews.

We have yet to meet a Christian who wanted to claim the Talmud. The historical archives confirm that almost all people have strong links to a particular religious creed. It should not come as a surprise, then, for the Christian to find that his ties and Biblical roots go back to a people called Israel. This study is with the purpose that our Christian community learn and absorb this truth.

The Bible is inseparably linked to the people who comprise the Anglo‑Saxon, Celtic, Germanic, Scandinavian and kindred family in the earth. The spiritual eyes of millions of Christians need to be opened wide to the racial origins of the Bible. The Bible shares a genetic continuity in history from Genesis to the Revelation Letter.

"And he had in his hand a little book opened" was the statement of John, who in a vision saw the people of the Book preparing to take its message overseas. History has since demonstrated the willingness of the White Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, Celtic and kindred people to endure the hardships of the journeys in order to bring others the blessings of the open Book. So long as that Book continues to remain open in the hands of Almighty God's people, they are in possession of the perfect guide and chart which will enable them to follow the course of their God-given heritage to a glorious destiny.

Westward, ever westward, has been the course of Empire as the ships of the People of the Book plowed the seas, bringing our forefathers to the Isles from whence they set sail to the uttermost parts of the earth. In obedience to the prophecy of the Scriptures: "Ephraim(Israel)feedeth on wind, and followeth after the east wind(Always going Westward - ever Westward to the ends of the earth - the West Coast of the United States of America): he daily increaseth lies and desolation; and they do make a covenant with the Assyrians, and oil is carried into Egypt." [54]

And wherever they went, the open Book accompanied them on their journeys. As they colonized, they evangelized: proclaiming the truth out of the Book in their hand! In establishing governments, building cities, organizing communities and administering law, the guiding hand of Almighty God, whose purposes were revealed to them through the open Book, enabled His people to build (Far better than they knew) a type of civilization whose foundation was to rest upon the administration of righteousness.

Familiarity with the open Book and the reason for sailing westward is well illustrated in a statement from the Mayflower Compact of 1620, which began "In the name of God." It proceeded: "Having undertaken for the glory of God, and advancement of the Christian faith, and honour of our King and country, a Voyage to plant the first Colony in the Northern part of Virginia, do by these presents solemnly and mutually in the presence of God and one of another, covenant and combine our selves together into a civil body politic."

It was the knowledge of the teachings of the open Book and the desire to follow these teachings which brought the Pilgrim fathers to our shores to build anew a civilization in conformity with the requirements of the law as set forth in this national document.

Let us turn back to the time before ever the Bible, as we know it, was written. In so doing we will discover that the outstanding men of our Race were pressing forward to a God-given destiny and as they lived, and worked, and labored, they wrote into the record of the Book their faith, while in each succeeding generation men of renown carried on the work of faith as the race continued on towards its destiny.

Thus, in an ever-increasing crescendo the Race of the Book moved forward with the open Book of the Race which, when finally completed was taken by this Race to the less fortunate, that they might also freely read and partake of its blessings.

Amounting almost to a paradox is the fact that the open Book from which we are now to receive counsel, instruction, advice and guidance today is largely the history of our race and an account of God's dealing with our forefathers. But along with the recording of that history the future of the Race was also pre-written and we will do well to follow the Divine instruction!

That Christianity has been the basic historic religion of the Nordic branch of the Caucasian Race for the past two thousand years is something worthy of consideration. Moreover, it should occasion no great surprise to find that the Anglo‑Saxon, Celtic Germanic, Scandinavian, and kindred people of the earth are more closely linked to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob/Israel of Bible fame than any other people in history Research confirms that the Israelites of the Old Testament are directly linked to the Israelites of the New Testament. "Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an Ancient Israelite a 'Jew' or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew." [55]

Moreover, the same blood that links Abraham, Isaac and Jacob to the twelve Apostles and early Christians also flows in the blood of the modern day Anglo‑Saxon, Germanic and kindred people of the earth. There is a racial connection between the subjects of the Bible and the main followers of Christianity.

There is a racial significance to the major religions of the world, and no amount of historical revision will alter this. The religions of Buddhism, Shintoism, Taoism, and all forms of the transcendental worship are linked to the Far East. Certainly none of these religions rose out of the Caucasian world! The Moslem faith arose out of the Arabic world. Judaism arose out of the Jewish mind. "It is highly probable that the bulk of the Jew's ancestors 'never' lived in Palestine 'at all,' Which Witnesses the Power of Historical Assertion over fact." [56]

Hinduism was not born in the Occidental western Caucasian world. Historically, one major religion has been associated with the Western Caucasian world; Christianity. Just as the Moslem faith has followed the Arabs in their migrations over the earth, Christianity has followed the Caucasians in their wanderings.

Voodooism has always found a home in the hearts of the black race, but never within the Western Christian world. There is a positive chemistry between Christianity and the blood of the Caucasian race. That there might be a link between genetics and faith in Jesus Christ is something that has yet to be fully explored by those who major in religious issues.

Judeo-Christian Heritage is a Hoax: It appears there is no need to belabor the absurdity and fallacy of the "Judeo‑ Christian heritage" fiction, which certainly is clear to all honest theologians. That "Judeo‑Christian dialogue" in this context is also absurd was well stated in the author‑initiative religious journal, Judaism, Winter 1966, by Rabbi Eliezar Berkowitz, chairman of the department of Jewish philosophy, at the Hebrew Theological College when he wrote: "As to dialogue in the purely theological sense, nothing could be more fruitless or pointless. Judaism is Judaism because it rejects Christianity; and Christianity is Christianity because it rejects Judaism. What is usually referred to as the Jewish-Christian traditions exists only in Christian or Secularist Fantasy."

That the Holy Bible has always been the Book for historic Christianity no one would deny. And, what people in history have been responsible for the stewardship, printing, and transmission of the Bible? None other than the Caucasian peoples of the Anglo‑Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, and kindred people of the earth! The Bible has Always found a home in the heart of the Caucasian race. Its influence upon the other races has been sparse, sporadic, transient, and meager at best, the claims of the Judeo‑Christian evangelists on television and radio notwithstanding.

The Divine Choice: It is always hard to tell what is the deciding factor in the choice of a marriage partner, for love is indefinable, and this is no less true in the choice that Almighty God made of the people who were to constitute His national bride. He chose them, not because they were a great or a powerful people, nor even because they were a rich and prosperous people, nor even because they were a particularly good or righteous people. In fact, the Scriptures express it this way: "The Lord did not set his love upon you, nor choose you, because ye were more in number than any people; for ye were the fewest of all people: But because the Lord loved you, and because he would keep the oath which he had sworn unto your fathers..." [60]

The Almighty God who knows the end from the beginning, and who had promised our forefathers, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob/Israel that their descendants would become a great and mighty nation, and a blessing to all the earth, looked down upon a race of slaves in Egypt, saw the potential that was in them, freed them from bondage and led them into the wilderness of Sinai to become His Divine Partner. This the Jews have never done, the world has never been blessed by them, they have only been a curse, a thorn in the side of the world since they came back from Babylon and began trying to convince the world of the tremendous lie that they were/are True Israel.

God's purpose in choosing Israel is clearly expressed in the following: "Ye are my witnesses, saith the Lord, and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I am he: before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me. I, even I, am the Lord; and beside me there is no saviour. I have declared, and have saved, and I have shewed, when there was no strange god among you: therefore ye are my witnesses, saith the Lord, that I am God...This people have I formed for myself; they shall shew forth my praise." [61]

The Divine Marriage: Following the miraculous deliverance of the Children of Israel from slavery in Egypt, and the crossing of the Red Sea having been accomplished, Moses led the people to the slopes of Mount Sinai, where, what we might well term a marriage ceremony, was to be performed. We find these events outlined for us in Exodus chapter nineteen. Having rescued the people and brought them safely thus far, God is ready to take them as His very own: "...Thus shalt thou say to the house of Jacob, and tell the children of Israel; Ye have seen what I did unto the Egyptians, and how I bare you on eagles' wings, and brought you unto myself." [62]

The conditions for the marriage contract or agreement are then clearly stated: "Now therefore, if ye will obey my voice indeed, and keep my covenant, then ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto me above all people: for all the earth is mine: And ye shall be unto me a kingdom of priests, and an holy nation..." [63] Just as the modern bride at her wedding ceremony gives her assent with the simple words "I do," so the people of National Israel responded to the Divine Bridegroom: "And all the people answered together, and said, All that the Lord hath spoken we will do. And Moses returned the words of the people unto the Lord." [64]

The ceremony was concluded some three days later when the Israelites, having observed a period of cleansing and sanctification, the Lord came down upon the mountain in a display of awe-inspiring splendor. Lest there be any doubt that the relationship existing between Israel and their God was that of husband and wife, we shall quote some other vital Scriptures which settle the matter once and for all, for honest Bible students: "For thy Maker is thine husband; the Lord of hosts is his name; and thy Redeemer the Holy One of Israel; The God of the whole earth shall he be called." [65]; "But now thus saith the Lord that created thee, O Jacob, and he that formed thee, O Israel, Fear not: for I have redeemed thee, I have called thee by thy name; thou art mine." [66]; "Why shouldest thou be as a man astonied, as a mighty man that cannot save? yet thou, O Lord, art in the midst of us, and we are called by thy name; leave us not." [67]; "Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the Lord." [68]

The descendants of the patriarchs were now truly IS-RA-EL, a people ruling with God. But even at the time of this Divine marriage a warning was given against unfaithfulness and taking His Name in vain. This we find recorded in the third commandment which is more than just an injunction against swearing profane language.

The Divorce: For a short period after their entry into the Promised Land of Canaan the people of Israel were faithful to God. But during the days of the Judges and of the Kings we find an increasing trend to apostasy and unfaithfulness. Repeatedly we find Israel rebuked for the worship of the gods and goddesses of the heathen nations round about Baal, Milcom, Chemosh, and Ashtaroth the Queen of Heaven. The prophets of God compared this falling away into idolatry to the behavior of an unfaithful wife committing adultery with many lovers. Time and time again throughout the Old Testament idolatry is called spiritual adultery and religious whoredom. We find the prophets giving warning on numerous occasions that such conduct can result in one thing only: divorce, the annulment of the Covenant or Marriage Contract agreed at Sinai.

Look carefully at these words of the prophet Jeremiah: "The Lord said also unto me in the days of Josiah the king, Hast thou seen that which backsliding Israel hath done? she is gone up upon every high mountain and under every green tree, and there hath played the harlot...And I saw, when for all the causes whereby backsliding Israel committed adultery I had put her away, and given her a bill of divorce; yet her treacherous sister Judah feared not, but went and played the harlot also. And it came to pass through the lightness of her whoredom, that she defiled the land, and committed adultery with stones and with stocks...Surely as a wife treacherously departeth from her husband, so have ye dealt treacherously with me, O house of Israel, saith the Lord." [69]

The Law of God laid down very strictly the penalty for such adulterous behavior and the rules governing marriage and divorce are given to us in the Book of Deuteronomy: "When a man hath taken a wife, and married her, and it come to pass that she find no favour in his eyes, because he hath found some uncleanness in her: then let him write her a bill of divorcement, and give it in her hand, and send her out of his house." [70]

The refusal of Israel to repent of her wicked ways made just such a punishment inevitable. The final stages of the drama are vividly recorded for us in the Book of Hosea. This prophet was himself commanded by God to marry an unfaithful wife called Gomer. Her subsequent adultery, the names given to her children, her divorce and eventual restoration because of the undying love her husband bore her, were all meant to typify God's love for, and dealings with His own unfaithful wife: Israel.

Thus we read: "...the Lord said to Hosea, Go, take unto thee a wife of whoredoms and children of whoredoms: for the land hath committed great whoredom, departing from the Lord. So he went and took Gomer the daughter of Diblaim; which conceived, and bare him a son." [71] Concerning the children of their union, we read: "Then said God, Call his name Loammi: for ye are not my people, and I will not be your God." [72] This speaks to us of the divine divorce decree, the breaking of the Covenant relationship between God and Israel. Again we read Israel being addressed under the type of Gomer the adulteress: "Plead with your mother, plead: for she is not my wife, neither am I her husband: let her therefore put away her whoredoms out of her sight, and her adulteries from between her breasts." [73]

So it was that God divorced Israel, cast her out of His house, the land of Palestine, never to return. The ultimate penalty was to be loss of, and blindness to their identity, for we read: "Therefore, behold, I will hedge up thy way with thorns, and make a wall, that she shall not find her paths." [74]

Sure enough, when Israel's cup of abominable idolatry and spiritual fornication was at last full to the brim, God permitted the armies of the Assyrian Empire to conquer the Northern Kingdom of Israel, capturing its chief city Samaria in 721 B.C. and deporting the Ten Tribes and some 200,000 from the fenced cities of Judah, into exile by the Rivers of Halath and Habor, near to the modern Caspian Sea. The Scriptures faithfully records that these people never returned to the land of Canaan. Israel, dispersed, rejected, divorced from their God and blind to her true identity, migrated across Europe, coming to the British Isles, North and West of Palestine, and continued on to the west when by the making of the New Covenant their process of restoration could begin.

Now, we are going to give you the truth as to the identity of the "woman" and that "great city" right from the Scriptures themselves. Once you know and understand the identity of them, then (1) you will know who the enemy is and (2) has been right from the very beginning. (3) You will understand that we were/are engaged in a war - a war for the control of the Kingdom. Matthew 11:12 states: "...from the days of John the Baptist until now, the Kingdom of Heaven suffereth violence, and the violent take it by force."

We will now identify that "great city" at the very start of this presentation and then take you to the other Scriptures which reveal the "woman" and the identity of our enemy. As Yahshua said, "You shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free." [75]

Turn to Revelation 11:8 where we read: "And their dead bodies shall be in the street of 'the Great City,' which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also 'Yahshua' was crucified."

Answer!:"Jerusalem." Now you have the identity of that "Great City."It's the city of "Jerusalem!"

Now, turn to Revelation 16:1-2. This tells the story of the vials of wrath being poured out upon the earth by the angels. It would appear, we are currently between the sixth and the seventh vials. Immediately after the seventh vial is poured out, there is to be a great earthquake, such as was not since men were upon the earth.

Next let's read verse 19, where it says: "And the 'Great City' was divided into three parts, and the cities of the nations fell: and Great Babylon came in remembrance before 'Yahweh to give unto her the cup of the wine of the fierceness of his wrath."

We understand this to mean that Jerusalem is to suffer a great earthquake (fight) which will divide her into three parts. Chapter 17 reveals the identity of the "Great Whore" that sitteth upon many waters, "With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication." [76]

You will note in verses 4, 5 and 6, the actual description of her arrayment, her many names she is known by and whose blood is upon her hands.

Verse 4: "And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet color, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication."

Verse 5: "And upon her forehead was a name written, mystery Babylon the great, the mother of harlots and abominations of the earth."

Verse 6: "And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Yahshua (Jesus)."

Verse 7: "I will tell thee the mystery of the woman, and of the beast that carrieth her, which hath the seven heads and ten horns."

Verse 9: "And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth."

At this point we wish to digress and tell you that the false ministers and preachers have tried to tell you that these seven mountains are either the seven hills surrounding either the cities of Rome or Moscow in order to fit it into their falsehoods in identifying that "great city" to be something that the Scriptures clearly show it not to be.

You must, always remember, that throughout Scripture, God has symbolically used the word mountains to represent governments. With that understanding, it become rather simple to identify the seven mountains (governments) the woman sitteth upon. It's the G-7 nations comprising of (1) The United States, (2) Canada, (3) England, (4) Germany, (5) France, (6) Italy (Six Israelite nations) and (7) Japan (one heathen nation). These are the governments that control the monetary policies upon the earth for the woman.

The beast is the anti-Christ system of world Jewry and its twin companions, Communism and Democracy, which are used to enslave mankind. Now comes another key verse as it identifies the "woman." Chapter 17, Verse 18, "And the woman which thou saweth is that Great City which reigneth over the kings of the earth." There you have it! The "great city" and the "woman" are one and the same. Now comes another bombshell for you to gain the understanding of these Scriptures. Chapter 18 of Revelations further identifies that Great City and The Woman as being Babylon The Great!!

Revelation 18:2: "And he cried mightily with a strong voice saying, 'Babylon The Great' is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird."

Verse 3: "For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies."

Verse 6: "Reward her even as she rewarded you, and double unto her double according to her works: in the cup which she hath filled fill to her double."

Verse 8: "Therefore shall her plagues come in one day, death, and mourning, and famine; and she shall be utterly burned with fire: for strong is the Lord God who judgeth her."

Verse 10: "Alas, alas, that Great City, Babylon, that mighty city! for in one hour is thy judgment come."

Verses 11 thru 21 describe the wailing of the merchants of the earth for no man buyeth their merchandise anymore. You will note in verse 13 that the merchandise contained, "...slaves and souls of men."

Verse 19: "...Alas, alas, that 'Great City'...for in one hour is she made desolate."

Verse 20: "Rejoice over her, thou Heaven, and ye holy apostles and prophets; for God hath avenged you on her."

Verse 21: "...Thus with violence shall that 'Great City Babylon' be thrown down, and shall be found no more at all."

Verse 23: "...For thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries (pharmakia-drugs-pharmacy) were all nations deceived."

Another key verse - Verse 24: "And in her was found the blood of prophets and of saints and of all that were slain upon the earth."

To whom was Christ speaking when he said, "And say, if we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets,"[77] "Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets." [78] and "That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Able unto the blood of Zacharias, the son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar." [79]

After Jerusalem was destroyed in 70 A.D., who is it that said, "...We are impoverished, but we will return and build the desolate places: thus saith the Lord of hosts, They shall build, but I will throw down; and they shall call them, the border of wickedness, and, The people against whom the Lord hath indignation for ever." [80]

And, "Thus saith the Lord God; Because the enemy hath said against you, aha, even the ancient high places are ours in possession." [81]

To whom did God declare: "And the house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame, and the house of Esau for stubble, and they shall kindle in them, and devour them; and there shall not be any remaining of the house of Esau; for the Lord hath spoken it." [82]

To what people did the apostle John say Christ was speaking to when He said: "Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it."

And, "...because I tell you(Jews)the truth, ye(Jews)believe me not." [83]; "He that is of God heareth God's words; ye(Jews) therefore hear them not, because ye(Jews) are not of God." [84]; "I told you, and ye believed not;" [85] "But ye(Jews)believe not, because ye(You Jews) are not of my sheep, as I said unto you." [86]

Who are the people who murdered Christ? "...For ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they have of the Jews." [87] "Who both killed Christ, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men." [88]

Who are the people who deny Christ is God come in a flesh body? "Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and Son. Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father." [89]

And, "Hereby know ye the spirit of God: every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God. And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God; and this is the spirit of antichrist." [90]; "For many deceivers are entered into the world who confess not that Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist." [91]

B). Who are the people our false ministers have proclaimed to be God's chosen people?

E). Who are today's money changers and print worthless pieces of paper and steal our people's wealth and eat out the substance of our land?

F). Who are the people that reject the Bible and follow the teachings of the Talmud?

G). What people have declared war upon all Christians as is taught from their beloved Talmud?

The answer to all of these questions is one and the same: The Christ hating, anti-Christ JEWS!!

Citizenship Requirements: Now we come to the last important question in our study; what is the entrance requirements to this City wherein God dwells and which promises a new government, a new existence, and a new way of life?

We know from Scripture that to possess immortality, we must be incapable of sinning (the wages of sin is death), We know of no one who is, or who has been (with the exception of Christ), incapable of sinning. Immortality requires sinlessness, therefore, we cannot inherit the New Jerusalem as long as we are in these mortal bodies.

However, there are some who are teaching that we are in the kingdom now, that Christ is reigning as King in this kingdom, and that the resurrection occurred in 70 A.D. The disturbing thought that the resurrection has occurred and we have been left out brings to mind the following from "The Purpose of the Resurrection," by Stephen E. Jones: "The first resurrection had not occurred when Paul mentioned Hymenaeus and Philetus. There are some teachers today who say that the first resurrection occurred in 70 A.D. at the destruction of Jerusalem. The Jehovah's Witnesses say the resurrection occurred in 1914 A.D. The problem is, no one can point to any resurrected saint and say, 'See, that man died a hundred years ago and is now alive, immortal, and incorruptible. Let's elect him as our president so that he can rule and reign on the earth as the Scriptures say!' If the resurrection is already past, then where are they? Why are they not ruling? Why have they not 'bound Satan' [92]? Why are they not administering true justice and righteousness in the earth by the Law of God? Why do evil men yet flourish?

Once gain, the only explanation we get is that they were 'raised spiritually' in such a manner that no one perceived it. We are asked to see it with 'the eye of faith,' because it all happened in secret, and these saints are all in heaven and have little or no influence in the government on earth.

All these views redefine resurrection in terms of the dead going to heaven in some spiritual state, rather than in the likeness of Jesus' resurrected body. Whenever men say that the resurrection occurred in the past, but they cannot point to resurrected saints to support their view, they have redefined resurrection and adopted the pagan Greek view of resurrection. They are saying that when the dead are raised, they go into a spiritual state that is apart from matter. All these views destroy the doctrine of the resurrection.

So if any man comes teaching that the resurrection is already past, whether they say it occurred in Matthew 27 or in 70 A.D. or in 1914 A.D., it is simply an extension of the doctrine of Hymenaeus and Philetus. Do not be among those whose faith is overturned, by such teachings.

Those who teach that the resurrection occurred in 70 A.D., tell us that Paul's writings about the resurrection were completed before 70 A.D., and therefore he could not have known that the resurrection would occur in so short a time. While on the surface this may sound plausible, we need to remember exactly what is meant by 'resurrection.' The gospels are replete with evidence of the physical resurrection of Jesus Christ.

Additionally, Paul emphasizes the physical resurrection of Jesus the Christ in his first epistle to the Corinthians. He reminds those to whom he is writing that '...if Christ be not raised, your faith is vain; ye are yet in your sins. Then they also which are fallen asleep in Christ are perished. If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most miserable.' Paul is saying that if in this mortal body, this ailing body, this sinful body we have hope, we are most miserable. In other words, if during our life here and how we can worship and believe and have faith in Christ, we are most miserable because that would be the end of it."

Stephen Jones is correct; those teaching that the resurrection has already occurred have redefined resurrection. Do not fall for it!

A Distinction of Words: It appears that those who teach this doctrine fail to distinguish between being "reborn" (or having a "new birth") and being "resurrected." Our English words "born again" mean a "regeneration," not a "resurrection." When we are "born again," we have been drawn to Christ by the Father,[93] and we become "born of God." [94]

We become;"...born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth forever." [95] This is a spiritual regeneration that heralds the replacement of our natural or carnal insight with the insight of the Holy Spirit. It is what is meant by "being led by the Spirit." There are separate and distinct words for "regeneration" and "resurrection" in Greek; the Greek word "anastasis" means "a rising or raising up" and is translated as "resurrection" in English, while the Greek word "anagegennemenoi" means "having been generated again" and is translated as "born again" in English. Thus we can see that there are two processes that we must experience in our walk.

To document further a physical resurrection, let us turn to the ninth verse of Paul's letter to the Romans: "Knowing that Christ being raised from the dead dieth no more; death hath no more dominion over Him." Here we see that Paul pictures Christ as being raised from the dead, and when He was raised from the dead, death had no dominion, or no power, over Him any longer. this is called the resurrection, and it is the hope of you and I who are called according to His purposes. The hope of every believer is in the resurrection, it is this transformation process that we look forward to.

What we have in this life is not that transformation, it is regeneration. Even in regeneration we still experience all the problems of the flesh; the sin, the sicknesses, the worries, and the confusion. Is this, as some are trying to tell us, what we have to look forward to?

We tell you that it is not! Right now we are experiencing the trails of this life whether it be from government, sickness, loss of income, or family problems. In our present bodies, we have neither the power nor the righteousness required to keep a new type of government righteous even if we could put one in place.

There seems to be something always lacking in our lives (as fallen unregenerate men) which has prevented us from establishing and maintaining a righteous government. Perhaps we need to remember the Scripture that tells us that we know in part and we do in part, but until that which is perfect is come [96], we are not going to have the full measure of success that we desire in this life.

That is a major difference between us and those who teach that we are in the kingdom now. Some ministries preach that in the days ahead, man will be able to usher in the Kingdom of god. A feat that we might add, no previous generation of man has been able to accomplish in his present form, state, and existence. They believe that man will somehow get better, become more obedient to God, and that God Almighty will then use them through the leading of His Spirit to establish the Kingdom of God upon this earth.

Well, at least they have the correct location of the kingdom, instead of claiming that it is off in some nebulous outerspace location! However, though we are "Heirs of the Promise," we like Abraham, must live by faith, and look for the promised "country" (kingdom), whose builder and maker is God. These are the promises from the Word of God, TO THE OVERCOMERS. We are not born overcomers without lifting a finger, we become overcomers by yielding to Christ, and dying to self-will.

We will, also have to, like Paul; fight the good fight against Christ's enemies. Christ told us that the Jews are the physical seedline descendants of Satan, through Cain, slew Abel; whom Christ labeled as being responsible for the shedding of all the innocent blood upon the earth; occupy that "Great City" Jerusalem; and who are the enemy of our people (Jacob-Israel) and all of the other races on the earth.

Our position towards this enemy is very clearly shown in the Scriptures, "...Shouldest thou help the ungodly, and love them that hate the Lord? Therefore is wrath upon thee from before God." [97]; "Do not I hate them, O God that hates thee? I hate them with perfect hatred: I count them mine enemies." [98]; "I will lay my vengeance upon Edom (the Jews) by the hand of my people Israel." (Adamic race, the seed of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob - Known to the world today as the Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Celtic and kindred people of the western world).[99]; "The presence of the Jews in the midst of the European nations is a cause of many evils and a serious danger..." [100]

The Jew continues to monopolize money, and he frees or strangles the throat of the state with the loosening or tightening of his purse strings. A veritable Pandora's box has been opened. The small industries and trade of bygone times have been replaced by the vast dealings of the banks, by the monstrous commerce of Finance, where with vertiginous rapidity, the Jew has become the autocrat-king and absolute lord. He has invested himself fully with all the modern freedoms, the better to attack all Christians and Christian Truths; he has empowered himself with the engines of the press, which he uses to batter at the foundations of society. They are found behind all social commotion, as they are at the bottom of all epidemics of immorality. They sell surreptitiously the crowbars and the projectiles that destroy the foundation of faith and morals. They know well that no society can resist the potent degenerative force of immorality administered in adequate doses, bringing the enervation of complete intellectual abasement.[101]

Rue Lafitte (No. 21) was the address of Banque Rothschild, then as now one of the several headquarters of Jewish International Finance. In point of fact, however, something rather graphically opposite to destruction did happen there in the Red Revolution of 1848, when the mob systematically looted and burned much of the rest of Paris, but left all palaces and banks of Rothschild and his cohorts miraculously untouched. This probably had something to do with the fact that James Rothschild was the major financier of the Communists. Liszis observation of Jewish involvement in the smut industry is so self-evident as scarcely to need comment.

Without getting into the very lengthy listing of names and facts that could easily be written, it should suffice merely to point to the early-day "big three" of pornography in America: Samuel Roth, Ralph Ginzburg and Barney Rosset. All were among the first publishers, and all mounted expensive court actions that ultimately culminated in the dropping of effective legal barriers to the filth-tide that now engulf America.

The Jew's Babylonian Talmud enjoys portraying Jesus as a fool in the most humiliating of circumstances. The unedited editions of Sanhedrin 107b say that Jesus was excommuni-cated for the thought of seducing a woman, and in his ensuing grief and confusion fell down and started worshipping a brick. Such degradation was, however, but the beginning of His disgrace. The Jewish Encyclopedia continues: "Jesus is accordingly in the following curious Talmudic legend thought to sojourn in hell. A certain Onkelos B. Kalonilos, son of Tiut's sister desired to embrace Judaism, and called up from hell by magic first Titus, then Balaam, and finally Jesus, who are here taken as the worst enemies of Judaism. He asked Jesus: 'Who is esteemed in that world?' Jesus said: 'Israel.' 'Shall one join them?' Jesus said to him: 'Further their well being do nothing to their detriment; whoever touches them touches the apple of His eyes. Onkelos then asked the nature of his punishment, and was told that it was the degrading fate of those who mock the wise.'" [102]

Expulsions of Jews from Host Nations: 1). A.D. 250, Carthage; 2). 415, Alexandria; 3). 554, Diocese of Clement (France); 4). 561, Diocese of Uzzes (France); 5). 612, Visigoth Spain; 6). 642, Visigoth Empire; 7). 855, Italy; 8). 876, Sens; 9). 1012, Mayence; 10). 1181, France; 11). 1290, England; 12). 1306, France; 13). 1348, Switzerland; 14). 1349, Hielbronn (Germany); 15). 1349, Hungary; 16). 1388, Strasbourg; 17). 1394, Germany; 18). 1394, France; 19). 1422, Austria; 20). 1424, Fribourg & Zurich; 21). 1426, Cologne; 22). 1432, Savory; 23). 1438, Mainz; 24). 1439, Augsburg; 25). 1446, Bavaria; 26). 1453, Franconis; 27). 1453, Breslau; 28). 1454, Wurzburg; 29). 1485, Vincenza (Italy); 30). 1492, Spain; 31). 1495, Lithuania; 32). 1497, Portugal; 33). 1499, Germany; 34). 1514, Strasbourg; 35). 1519, Regensburg; 36). 1540, Naples; 37). 1542, Bohemia; 38). 1550, Genoa; 39). 1551, Bavaria; 40). 1555, Pesaro; 41). 1559, Austria; 42). 1561, Prague; 43). 1567, Wurzburg, Genoese Republic; 44). 1569, Papal States; 45). 1571, Brandenburg; 46). 1582, Netherlands; 47). 1593, Brandenburg, Austria; 48). 1597, Cremona, Pavia & Lodi; 49). 1614, Frankfort; 50). 1615, Worms; 51). 1619, Kiev; 52). 1649, Ukraine; 53). 1654, LittleRussia; 54). 1656, Lithuania; 55). 1669, Oran (North Africa); 56). 1670, Vienna; 57). 1712, Sandomir; 58). 1727, Russia; 59). 1738, Wurtemburg; 60). 1740, LittleRussia; 61). 1744, Bohemia; 62). 1744, Livonia; 63). 1745, Moravia; 64). 1753, Kovad (Lithuania); 65). 1761, Bordeaux; 66). 1772, Jews deported to the Pale of Settlement (Russia); 67). 1775, Warsaw; 68). 1789, Alace; 69). 1804, Villages in Russia; 70). 1808, Villages & Countrysides (Russia); 71). 1815, Lubeck & Bremen; 72). 1815, Franconia, Swabia & Bavaria; 73). 1820, Bremes; 74). 1843, Russian Border Austria & Prussia; 75). 1862, Area in the U.S. under Grant's Jurisdiction; 76). 1866, Galatz, Romania; 77). 1919, Bavaria (foreign born Jews); 78). 1938-45, Nazi Controlled Areas; 79). 1948, Arab Countries.

The degrading fate of those who mock the wise becomes horribly apparent in the actual text of the Talmud. "He said: What is your punishment? They replied with boiling hot excrement, since a Master has said: Whoever mocks at the words of the Sages is punished with boiling hot excrement." [103]

Thrown Out: Jews have claimed over and over at every opportunity that they have been innocent victims of anti-Semitism time and time again. They are always portrayed on television and in the movies as being guilty of no wrong doing, desiring only to practice their faith, and make an honest living. An inquiring mind cannot help but wonder that, if this is the case - that the Jews are innocent - why have the Jews been the brunt of persecution so many times without cause?

If a man were accused of a serious crime and tried and found guilty by a jury of his peers, we would find but little cause to put faith in a claim by him of persecution. However if he insisted that this was exactly the case, and that only because he believed differently than others was he charged of misconduct, then we might grant him a second trial to assure ourselves he had not been the victim of misjustice, believing with confidence that the people would not a second time find an innocent party guilty of crime that he did not commit.

If, at the conclusion of the second trial by another jury of peers, the man is found guilty of an offense against the people, we have no reason to listen to or place belief in continued cries of persecution. What does this have to do with the Jew? Quite simple. Since the year 250 A.D., the Jews have, by their own records and count, been expelled from eighty-one (81) countries, nations, or political entities. Let's see now. Eighty-one countries, eighty-one people's courts, eighty-one guilty verdicts, and eighty-one cries of persecution.

The first time, maybe. The second time doubtful. But eighty-one times to have been found worthy of expulsion for crimes against the people of the countries they were in at the time? Such a claim stretches the limits of human credulity beyond its most liberal bounds of endurance.

It has been said that the Jews protest to much. When one comes to the realization of the fact that these different peoples in most cases did not know of each other, or for that matter had not even heard of the others existence, and yet determined, independently, over a two thousand year span of time that the Jews were committing such serious crimes that it was necessary to uproot them lock, stock and barrel in order to drive them from their homes, many times with loss of life and great destruction of property, it is then and only then, that a true appreciation of the Jewish question is obtained.

If you are a thinking person, consider also the following, for it is just such traitorous actions which has caused their expulsions: "Why should we believe in God? We (Jews) Hate Christianity and Christians. Even the best of them must be regarded as our worst enemies. They preach love of one's neighbor, and pity, which is contrary to our principles. Christian love is a hinderance to the revolution. Down with love of one's neighbor; what we want is hatred. We must know how to hate, for only at this price can we conquer the universe...The fight should also be developed in the Moslem and Catholic countries, with the same ends in view and by the same means." [104]; "The strongest supporters of Judaism cannot deny that Judaism is Anti-Christian!" [105]; "One of the finest things ever done by the mob was the Crucifixion of Christ. Intellectually it was a splendid gesture. But trust the mob to bungle the job. If I'd had charge of executing Christ, I'd have handled it differently. You see, what I'd have done was hah him shipped to Rome and fed him to the Lions. They could never have made a Savior out of mincemeat!" [106]; "Judaism and Christianity are two worlds, between you Christians and us Jews there lies an unbridgeable gulf...There are two life forces in the world: Jewish and non-Jewish...I do not believe this primal difference between Christians and Jews is reconcilable...The difference between us is abysmal...You might say: 'Well, let us exist side by side and tolerate each other. We will not attack your morality, nor you ours.' But the misfortune is that the two are not merely different; they are opposed in mortal enmity. No man can accept both, or, accepting either, do otherwise than despise the other." [107]

The Rabbis of Judaism understand this just as do the leaders in the Christian movement. Rabbi Moshe Maggal of the National Jewish Information Service said in 1961 when the term Judeo‑Christian was relatively new, "There is no such thing as a Judeo-Christian Religion. We consider the two religions so different that one excludes the other." [108]

Methods for controlling society have existed for centuries. Late in the 18th century the Illuminati (Highest Degree of Freemasonry), a European, international secret society, combined many of these ideas into a long range master plan. The new society would be ruled by the Illuminati (Jewish) elite and their associates. Today evidence points to core leaders of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the Bilderbergers and the Trilateral Commission, among others, are using these techniques to bring about elitist control and management of the world. Consider the history and purposes of the CFR founded in 1921 by Colonel Edward Mandel House (Jew) - Advisor to President Woodrow Wilson (Jew) as part of a project begun in the 1880s by the British colonialist Cecil Rhodes (Jew).

The model for the CFR was the Royal Institute of International Affairs, founded in 1919 (for the Rothchild (Jewish) banking interests) with money from the Rhodes Trust. The seeds of both institutions were planted during the Paris peace conference in 1919 (at the end of World War I between Germany and the Allies). Representatives of the British Round Table met with several highly placed Americans. The American group returned to the United States from the meeting and incorporated the Council on Foreign Relations in 1921 under the direction of House. Like the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Council is related to the doctrine bequeathed in the 1877 will of Cecil Rhodes to: "Establish a trust to, and for, the establishment and promotion and development of a secret society, the true aim and object whereof shall be the extension of British rule throughout the world, the perfecting of a system of emigration from the United Kingdom and the colonization by British subjects of all lands...especially the occupation by British settlers of the entire continent of Africa, the Holy Land, the Valley of the Euphrates, the Island of Cyprus, and Candia (Crete), the whole of South America, the islands of the Pacific not heretofore possessed by Great Britain, the whole of the Malay archipelago, the seaboard of China and Japan, the ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of The British Empire..."

The Royal Institute of International Affairs is that "secret society," The Council on Foreign Relations is its parallel in the United States and its goals are the same, the development of an elitist managed, humanistic, global economy and social order (New World Order).

Mandel House espoused Marxism and Communism and he played the same government role for President Wilson as Kissinger (Jew) did for Presidents Nixon and Ford, and Brzezinski (Jew) for President Carter. [109] Both Kissinger and Brzezinski served as head of National Security: They controlled the FBI, CIA, Defense Intelligence, Army and Navy Intelligence, Airforce Intelligence, and State Department Intelligence: Are we safe? Not on your life!

Benjamin Disraeli (Former Jewish Prime Minister of England), who at one time was the most powerful man in Britain and whose real name was Israel, published his book "Coningsby" in which he says: "The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scene."

Then he went on to show that these personages behind the scenes who were governing without the knowledge of the people were Jews! Our President and our Washington Government are completely insulated from the world by Jews in positions of power that control the policies and the operations of our Nation (unelected rulers). There are hundreds and thousands of these Jews within the bureaucratic machinery of our government. Jews hold practically every position of decisive power as follows: Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense, Secretary of Treasury, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, Federal Energy Administrator, Attorney General, Assistants' to the President, National Security Advisor (This sensitive position control FBI, CIA, etc. All Intelligence gathering information). Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, Chairman on Economic Advisers, Federal Insurance Administrator, Press Secretary to the President, Chief Librarian, Library of Congress (All of these under President Ford, and those and many more under all Presidents, so that the President is just a figurehead for Government Operations in the control of "foreign" interests.

The names change little, they only move from one important position to another lest their "scheme" become obvious. At times these posts are held by other than Jews, but you can rest assured that behind them and pulling the strings are Jewish representatives of the Jewish International Bankers).

God is being trampled. Men are perishing from and by decrees from company board-rooms where the destruction of Christian America is being planed and carried out; morality is ridiculed and mocked, while honest citizens have become a laughingstock. And our Judeo-Christian preachers, being the traitors and cowards they are either join the enemy and deny the Christ of the Bible, or hide behind their pulpits cowering like kicked dogs.

Please digest the following Scriptures concerning the promises to the overcomer: "He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; To him that overcometh will I give to eat of the tree of life, which is in the midst of the paradise of God." [110]; "He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; He that overcometh shall not be hurt of the second death." [111]; "He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; To him that overcometh will I give to eat of the hidden manna, and will give him a white stone, and in the stone a new name written, which no man knoweth saving he that receiveth(it)." [112]; "And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations." [113]; "He that overcometh, the same shall be clothed in white raiment; and I will not blot out his name out of the book of life, but I will confess his name before my Father, and before his angels." [114]; "Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my God, and he shall go no more out: and I will write upon him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, which is new Jerusalem, which cometh down out of heaven from my God: and I will write upon him my new name." [115]; "To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne." [116]; "He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my son." [117]

Everyone of these verses of promise to the overcomer, carries with it a future reward, not a present reward. This life is the time of our training, not our reigning.

The only hope we have is in the "blessed hope" of the resurrection, lest our hope be in vain. Jesus' own words to the Pharisees shed more light on "resurrection," "Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up. Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days?" [118]

The Pharisees were astounded and wanted to know how He could have the audacity to make such a claim. They had their minds on this earthly temple, this earthly government, this earthly realm; they did not perceive what Jesus was truly referring to. They did not have the same faith, the same hope, nor the same vision that Abraham had set his heart upon. "But he spake of the temple of his body. When therefore he was risen from the dead, his disciples remembered that he had said this unto them; and they believed the scripture, and the word which Jesus had said." [119]

Notice that His disciples believed, but the Pharisees in the previous verses did not. The Pharisees did not have eyes that could see nor ears that could hear the promise of the great hope of the resurrection that Jesus faithfully fulfilled, that He might redeem that which was lost.

"Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he (serpent) said unto the woman (Eve), Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden." [120]

Snakes are to be feared, and it is not abnormal to fear them. To prove that even such Godly men as Moses were/are afraid of snakes, we present the following from the Book of Exodus. We begin with Moses standing before the burning bush: "...the Lord said unto him, What is that in thine hand? And he (Moses) said, A rod. And He (God) said, Cast it on the ground. And he cast it on the ground, and it became a serpent; and Moses FLED from before it." [121]

So we can see that even Moses fled before a serpent/snake! It scared him and he fled from it. Because man has a natural fear of them. Yet here in Genesis Chapter Three, we have Eve having a discourse with a serpent/snake! With no fear. I do not believe it for a minute. I don't know about you, but I do not believe that Eve was having a conversation with a literal snake! Not for a minute. That is simply to far‑fetched to be believed literally.

If a snake had come up to Eve she would have ran for Adam to protect her from it. She would not have simply stood or sat there and had a casual conversation with it. No! A thousand times No!!! She would not have just sat there and said: "Hello how are you?" or some such nonsense. She simply would not have done that at all.

Serpent is a strange word when we look at it in the scriptures. It is translated from many different words, but it is used 38 times in the Old Testament. And is translated, basically, from four different words. But let's only deal with one #5175 in Strong's Concordance. It appears 31 times and every time it is translated serpent. Now keep in mind there are three other words that are also translated serpent in the Scriptures. And the total words are used some 71 times in all the Scriptures. 38 times as serpent and about 24 times as dragons. What is a dragon, you ask. Well this presentation is about serpents not dragons and to get into a long discussion about dragons would take us away from our intended subject. So we shall leave that for others to contemplate. This is because we have a problem here in Genesis 3:1 with Eve talking with this thing called a serpent.

Now the scriptures say the serpent was more subtil. Well what does this word mean. To arrive at a proper answer we will turn to Strong's Concordance again. Which says the word "serpent" is "Nachas" or "naw‑khawsh" (#5175). Which is a non‑Israelite name according to (#5176) ‑‑ "Nachash;" the same as #5175; the name of two persons appar. non‑Isr. It also means according to #5175 a snake (from its hiss): serpent. From the #5172 which means to hiss, i.e. whisper a (magic) spell; gen. to prognosticate ‑‑ enchanter, learn by experience, diligently observe.

Also, we find the following from the Second College Edition, New World Dictionary of the American Language, p. 1300: 1. A snake, esp. a large or poisonous one. 2. A sly, sneaking, treacherous person. 3. Bible Satan, in the form he assumed to tempt Eve. 4. Music an obsolete, coiled, brass wind instrument of wood covered with leather.

The American Dictionary of the English Language, by Noah Webster 1828, Facsimile First Edition, published by the Foundation For American Christian Education relates that serpent means among others: a subtil or malicious person. The word prognosticate means to: 1. To foretell or predict, esp. from signs or indications. 2. To indicate beforehand.[122]

The 1828 American Dictionary relates: 1. To foreshow; to indicate a future event by present signs. A clear sky at sunset prognosticates a fair day. 2. To foretell by means of present signs; to predict. "I neither will nor can prognos-ticate To the young gaping heir his father's fate." So now we can see that the word "nachash" is linked to foretelling things. Or its linked to witchcraft (whisper a magic spell) and humanism. It's linked to anything, other than the Word of God.

Now let's look again at this word serpent, and we will see that every time it appears in the Bible, it does not mean a serpent/snake. That sometimes it means either a person or a nation. For example when Jacob/Israel was relating the gifts which were given to the various tribes of Israel we find the following: "Dan shall be a serpent by the way, an adder(snake)in the path, that biteth the horse heels..." [123]

Is someone going to try to convince us that Dan was to become a snake. I don't think so. Do you? It is merely a figure of speech. It means that the tribe of Dan would, or the people of the tribe of Dan would display the attributes of being sly, cunning, deceitful.

The wicked are described as serpents/snakes: "The Wicked are estranged from the womb: they go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies. Their poison is like the poison of a serpent: They are like the deaf adder that stoppeth her ear." [124]

Evil and violent men are described as serpents: "Deliver me, O Lord, from the evil man: preserve me from the violent man; Which imagine mischiefs in their heart; continually are they gathered together for war. They have sharpened their tongues like a serpent; adders' poison is under their lips. Selah."[125]Thus we can see by these verses, anyone who is evil or wicked is described as being a serpent or snake.

Now let's examine nations because they are also very important to this presentation. Turn to the Book of Isaiah where we find: "In that day the Lord with His sore and great and strong sword shall punish leviathan the piercing serpent, even leviathan that crooked serpent; and He shall slay the dragon that is in the sea." [126]

We see here that the Leviathan is a crooked and piercing serpent. It appears this is an allegory, talking about the enemies of Israel. The nations that came against Israel are compared to this thing which is also described as a serpent. And it appears that this would be a reference to the Grecian, Turkish and Roman Empires of that day. This is generally accepted when one looks at the narratives of the Bible.

Now let's look at Jeremiah 8:17 for another: "For, behold, I will send serpents, cockatrices, among you, which will not be charmed, and they shall bite you, saith the Lord." Here again we are not talking about actual serpents/snakes. Not at all. We are talking about nations which will becoming against Israel. They will not be charmed and they will bite you. At this point some will ask what do you mean they will not be charmed.

For an answer turn to the Book of Second Kings Chapter Seventeen we find Assyria came against what was left of Israel, and they told the Assyrians they would pay them a ransom if they would not come in and harm them. That's charming them is it not? But if they will not be charmed, then they will not accept their money, gold, silver or other valuables. They will come in and bite you and destroy you. That is what Jeremiah is telling them. So we can clearly see, they are not serpents at all, they are the enemy of Israel, who will come against them.

There is another like story in Amos 9:3 and another in Isaiah 14:29. Those are good stories and you should read them very carefully. We find allegories being used all through the Scriptures. No one has a problem with Juda being called a lion's whelp;[127] Zebulun as a foal and an ass's colt;[128] Issachar as a strong ass;[129] Naphtali as a hind (A red deer ‑‑ one that is fully grown); [130] Joseph as a bough (branch or limb of a tree);[131] Benjamin as a wolf;[132] All the tribes as a lion;[133] Gad as a lion;[134] Dan as a lion's whelp;[135] Jesus as a Lamb;[136] Israel as a speckled bird;[137] A nation of the East as a ravenous bird;[138] Preachers as fishers;[139] Pharaoh King of Egypt as a young lion and a whale [140] and Herod as a fox.[141]

When the word "lion" is used for Judah, we are trying to really emphasize the strength of Judah. And when we use the word "serpent" we think of something sly, wicked, evil, cunning, something that hides from us, has venom, that is strong and dangerous. And that is why the word serpent is used many times as an allegory in the Scriptures.

There are many more allegories which could be presented but we believe this should suffice. Was any of these men such an animal or thing? Of course not! It is simply a description of the characteristics of these separate individuals. Then we have the false doctrine of the Pharisees, Sadducees and Herod described as Leaven [142]. Thus we can clearly see that it is not at all unusual for a word to be used to illustrate something more impressively. And that is what we are talking about.

Most Christians do not have any trouble with any of these in the various verses of Scriptures until we get to Genesis 3:1. For example if we go a little further we find: "...thou shalt bruise His heel."

Everyone knows that Scripture. And we find another one "...It shall bruise thy head..." and no one has any problem relating that to our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ and the evil one (which most people believe to be Satan). Nobody has a problem with that.

Then: Why is it a problem when someone comes along and says The Serpent is Not A Snake! To some people that is a real problem ‑‑ they want that serpent to be a snake!!! And they will scream and rant like a spoiled child if someone disagrees with them. In our opinion that Serpent Never Was A Snake! In my opinion that serpent was a live flesh and blood person. In my opinion it was no spiritual being, and that is not meant to refute the Satan doctrine at all. We are simply saying that this thing we had in the flesh, in the body, in the Garden of Eden, Was not an invisible, negative entity. It was not a snake that walked on two feet. It was a humanoid. Just like you and I.

Let's look at some of the characteristics of this particular serpent in Chapter Three Verse One. One of the things we know, is that it is more wise than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. Is that not what it says? There word is subtil but we will deal with that a little later.

What is wisdom a trait of? Can you show us any animal in the animal kingdom which can be wise, that can be sly, that can be crafty? They only do what they do by instinct, they do not do it from reason. No animal operates from reason. Now one can condition response them, by exposing them to altering good with bad conditions depending upon what they do in response to the stimuli given them. But that is merely training them, that is not teaching them wisdom, that is not teaching them to reason.

Oh, the experiments with monkeys, where some scientists say they have taught a monkey to talk ‑‑ but again that is only the animal being taught to make certain sounds as a result of varying stimuli given them. That is not the same thing. That is not the same thing as being born with the ability to think and reason.

Another thing about this serpent that everybody agrees upon, is that it walked erect like a man. This is a natural human trait. It is not the natural reaction or trait of any animal, much less a snake. You cannot find this ability in snakes. They do not stand up. Oh there may be some species which have small legs or the semblance of legs but more than likely, if the scientists would be honest, they are a species of lizard and not a specie of snake. There are some snakes which can raise their heads up quite a bit, but still, they cannot stand erect.

It has been said that apes are a form of the erectus, but that is simply not true. They spend most of their time moving about on both their (hands) and feet. Oh they can stand erect for short periods of time but their natural position is on all fours. And even when they are standing erect they are bent over, they have a slight hump to their back because that is not their normal stance.

And besides that, can you imagine Eve standing or sitting in the Garden of Eden and a great harry ape suddenly dropping out of a tree beside her and speaking to her. She would have been gone like a bolt of lightening. She would not have stayed there with such an animal.

Now the third thing about this serpent was the ability to talk. To speak like a man. Well things are getting worse all the time for those who want that serpent to be a snake. There has never been a snake with the ability to talk ‑‑ not then and not now, nor at any time in the foreseeable future. They simply cannot do so. They do not even have any vocal cords. Oh some will say what about the ass which spoke to Balaam. Well let's look at it for just a moment. "And Balaam rose up in the morning, and saddled his ass, and went with the princes of Moab. And God's anger was kindled because he went: and the Angel of the Lord stood in the way for an adversary against him. Now he was riding upon his ass, and his two servants were with him. And the ass saw the Angel of the Lord standing in the way..." [143]

According to Strong's Concordance the word "ass" or "attuwn" #860 which is the same as "eythan" or "ethan" which means: "from an unused root (mean, to continue); permanence; hence (coner) permanent; spec. A Chieftain: hard, mighty, rough, strength, strong." So Balaam was riding upon a strong Chieftain. Not a Jackass as we know. We also find that the word "ass" can also mean a #2544 "chamowr" or "Canaanite." As black men were used to carry burdens and people in ancient times; and some of the Canaanites were black, it is quite possible that Balaam was being carried by a strong black Canaanite Chieftain. Which would explain the "ass'" ability to talk.

Now if we are going to attribute the talking in Genesis Chapter Three of a snake, then it would appear that in this respect Satan has more power than God in that he was able to make a serpent, who has no vocal cords, nor any organs capable of making or forming words, speak.

The fourth thing about this serpent, was his gift of reason; which is expressed by his statement "...hath God said." That's reasoning. That's questioning. That's showing an ability to think, to reason. Thus, the serpent had four attributes:

One does not find those things in snakes: Not then and not now. Those traits cannot be found in any animal or snake which has ever existed upon the face of the earth. They are found, only in what we call today, the humanoid species.

Then there is the problem of a snake or an ape coming up to Eve and speaking to her without her running away. It is simply more than we can accept. It could not, it did not happen that way. But he was, whatever he was, more cunning and wiser than any beast of the field. Or any other species of beast.

We can solve all these problems if we recognize that Adam and Eve were the first of the White Race (which we will explain later). Which would not preclude the existence of other so‑called humanoids existing along with them.

With this, the problem simply goes away. It does not exist any more, because it would make it possible for another humanoid to exist at the same time as Adam and Eve. This would also make it possible for someone to appear before Eve and not frighten her away. Because she has seen him before, and has probably talked to him before. It would not be a mystery to her, it would be no surprise either.

Suppose that Adam and Eve were the only two people in the whole world and Eve walks around a tree and there is someone there. And it's not Adam! What is she going to do. She is going to scream for Adam and tell him ‑‑ Adam you are not going to believe what I have found. She would be concerned.

No matter what it was, unless it was someone she had seen before. Now if we assume that the serpent is another humanoid and not a snake, then the problem goes away. Because the other races of the world can walk, talk, think, reason and have wisdom. The only thing left is what does the word "subtil" mean. Once again let's turn to Strong's Concordance for an explanation. It is #6175 "aruwm" or "aw‑room" and means: cunning (usually in a bad sense), crafty, prudent, subtil. This word "aruwm" has been translated only one time as subtil [144] and the other ten times it has been translated as crafty or prudent.

Webster's gives a little different spelling, it spells "subtil" as "subtle" and gives the following definitions:

(2) a) Capable of making or noticing fine distinctions in meaning, etc. (a subtle thinker).

(2) Nice; fine; delicate. "I do distinguish plain Each subtil line of her immortal face."

(4) Sly; artful; cunning; crafty; insinuating; as a subtil person; a subtil Adversary.

Had Eve come into an adversary situation. You bet your boots she did. She had met with a wise adversary; a deceitful and treacherous adversary. What is the actual objective of the Jews? It is certainly not benevolent and peaceful for their utterances and actions prove otherwise. What, then, is their goal? "The two internationals of Finance and Revolution work with ardor, they are the two fronts of the Jewish Internationale. There is a Jewish conspiracy against all nations."[146] The Scriptures are very clear concerning a diabolical conspiracy to destroy the way of peace and enslave mankind. "And the Lord said unto me, A conspiracy is found among the men of Judah, and among the inhabitants of Jerusalem." [147]

This entire program of evil would have been clearly recognized by Christian men and women long ago but for the skillfully prepared, deceptive teachings of those who had everything to gain, materially, thereby which have falsified the facts regarding the identity of the race of the Book and assigned to the Jews the promises and blessings which belong to the House of Israel. "Of course, you do resent us. It is no good telling me you don't. So let us not waste any time on denials and alibis...We understand each other perfectly. I don't hold it against you...We are the stiffnecked people who never accepted Christianity, and we are the criminal people who crucified its founder...your loose, contradictory charges against us are not a patch on the blackness of our proved historic offense.

You accuse us of stirring up revolution in Moscow. Suppose we admit the charge. What of it?...You make much noise and fury about the undue Jewish influence in your theaters and movie palaces. Very good; granted your complaint is well founded. But what is that compared to our staggering influence in your churches, your schools, your laws and your government, and the very thoughts you think every day? 'The Protocols of the Elders of Zion' which shows that we plotted to bring on the late World War. You believe that book. All right...we will underwrite every word of it. It is genuine and authentic. But what is that besides the unquestionable historical conspiracy which we have carried out, which we never have denied because you never had the courage to charge us with it, and of which the full record is extant for anybody to read?

We are intruders. We are disturbers. We are subverters. We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and played havoc with them. We have been at the bottom of not merely the latest great war but of nearly all your wars, not only of the Russian but of nearly every other major revolution in your history. We have brought discord and confusion and frustration into your personal and public life, we are still doing it. And no one can tell how long, we shall go on doing it.

Look back a little and see what has happened...Disporting yourselves on the hillsides and in the valleys of the great outdoors, you took to speculating on the wonder and mystery of life laid the foundations of natural science and philosophy. Yours was a noble, sensual culture, unirked by the prickings of social conscience or by any sentimental questions about human equality.

Who knows what great and glorious destiny might have been yours if we had left you alone. But we did not leave you alone. We took you in hand and pulled down the beautiful and generous structure you had reared, and changed the whole course of your history. We conquered you as no empire of yours ever subjugated Africa or Asia... we did it solely by the irrestible might of our spirit, with ideas, with propaganda. We made you the willing and unconscious bearers of our mission to the whole world, to the barbarous races of the world, to the countless unborn generations. Without fully understanding what we were doing to you, you became the agents of our racial tradition.

In conclusion; you want to deal effectively with the Jewish problem. The go forth teaching, proclaiming, and promoting the great news of Identity and the Kingdom of Christ. Within this message lies the beginning of the Western Christian rule and the death of world Jewry." [148]

Ezekiel also recognized this conspiracy of the inhabitants of Jerusalem:"Moreover the spirit lifted me up, and brought me unto the east gate of the Lord's house, which looketh eastward: and behold at the door of the gate five and twenty men...Then said he unto me, Son of man, these are the men that devise mischief, and give wicked counsel in this city(Jerusalem)...Son of man, thy brethren (Israelites), even thy brethren, the men of thy kindred, and all the house of Israel wholly, are they unto whom the inhabitants of Jerusalem have said, get you (Israelites) far from the Lord (Ba'al #1167 Strong's Concordance): unto us is this land given in possession."[149]

This caused the Jews to brag: "Thus saith the Lord God; because the enemy hath said against you (Israel), aha, even the ancient high places are our's in possession: Therefore prophesy and say, Thus saith the Lord God; Because they have made you (Israel) desolate, and swallowed you (Israel) up on every side, that ye might be a possession unto the residue of the heathen, and ye are taken up in the lips of talkers and are an infamy of the people." [150]

Then we have proof that Ezekiel is talking about the Jews: "Therefore, ye mountains (nations) of Israel, hear the word of the Lord God; Thus saith the Lord God to the mountains (nations) and hills (small nations), to the rivers, and to the valleys, to the desolate wastes, and to the cities that are forsaken, which became a prey and derision to the residue of the heathen that are round about; Therefore thus saith the Lord God; Surely in the fire of my jealousy have I spoken against the residue of the heathen, and against all Idumea (the Jews, Esau/Edom - Esau is Edom[151] Edom is in modern Jewry [152]) , which have appointed my land into their possession with the joy of all their heart, with despiteful minds, to cast it out for a prey." [153]

The result has been to give the Jew an entirely false position of supposed pre-eminence in the light of the prophetic word which actually he will never be able to occupy. Theologians have completely failed to examine the evidence to see whether the Jews are really entitled to the position of the modern Judeo-Christian Church has assigned to them.

The assumption that the Jews are all of Israel today has closed much of the Bible to Christian understanding. Furthermore, it has had far-reaching results in blinding men to the meaning of current world developments and it has materially assisted those who are endeavoring to acquire world rulership by furthering their subversive activities. This Christian leniency in regard to Jewish aspirations has been based upon the expectation that the Jews are to eventually come into world rulership. Thus the Zionists, unsupported by any Scriptural evidence whatever to substantiate their claims, are moving toward the consummation of their plans for world rulership. In doing so they are making world revolution and war inevitable which will climax in a reign of violence and bloodshed bringing the present age to its close. "We will have a world government whether you like it or not. The only question is whether that government will be achieved by conquest or consent." [154]

The pity of it all is that the Christian world is responsible for much of this planned chaos, at least to the extent that they have extolled the Jews as God's people who are chosen to rule the world. Actually, the Zionists are seducing the nations of the world and they have deceived Christian people everywhere into believing they are the Israel of God so that no active protest is made as they boldly pursue their aim to gain world control.

Ample evidence has been furnished demonstrating the fallacy of assigning to the Jews the prophecies and blessings pronounced upon the House of Israel. The present so-called return of the Jews to Palestine is not in conformity with the great prophecies of the restoration of the House of Israel to the land of their forefather, a restoration which is to be accomplished by peaceful means alone after a sincere change of heart and genuine spiritual revival on the part of God's Israel people.

The Zionists, however, are fulfilling ominous prophecies which foreshadow the coming of evil, not the coming of peace. Their move toward Palestine is a harbinger that the Great and Terrible Day of the Lord is very near. Zionist activities in Palestine and the establishment of the new state of the Israelis have led many Christians to assume that Israel is being restored to her land again in fulfillment of the prophecies of the prophets of the Lord.

If such a supposition were true, then all the activities of the Zionist Jews would be found to be in conformity with every requirement set forth by the prophets concerning the marks which were to identify latter-day Israel. Also, they would be following the method by which the prophets predicted the restoration would be accomplished. Actually, the Zionists are not in possession of any of the necessary identification marks; nor are they proceeding to possess the land according to Biblical requirements.

Therefore, they cannot be Israel returning to the land of their forefathers. The mere fact that they undertook to establish a nation in Palestine is in itself no evidence that they are Israel. History abounds with accounts of the activities of people who have undertaken to establish themselves in Palestine, but that did not make them Israel. The activities of the Zionists have a prophetic significance, though they are not fulfilling the prophecies which forecast the return of the House of Israel to the land of their inheritance. It must not be overlooked that the Israeli state was founded upon a systematic program of violence, deceit and murder and this fact alone should place everyone on guard against assigning to the Zionists what rightfully belongs to the House of Israel.

Hosea clearly told us that the House of Israel would never return to Palestine: "Therefore, behold, I will hedge up thy(Israel’s) way with thorns, and make a wall, that she (Israel) shall not find her paths (back to where they came from)." [155]

In order to arrive at an understanding of the significance of current events as they affect Palestine, let us briefly review the history of Abraham and his posterity and the meaning of the promises made to selected individuals of his race.

When God called Abraham from Ur of Chaldees He promised that his posterity would possess the land of Palestine and that this territory would become the inheritance of his "seed" (Notice that it was his "seed" who would possess Palestine forever. Not Abraham's Children!) Isaac, the son of Sarah and Abraham, was the "seed" of promise and he had two sons, Esau and Jacob.

Christ clearly showed the difference between the "seed" of Abraham and the "children" in the following: "They (the Jews) answered him, We be Abraham's seed...Jesus answered them...I know that ye are Abraham's seed...if ye (Jews) were Abraham's Children, ye would do the works of Abraham." [156] Here Christ shows it is true that the Jews are Abraham's "seed" but they are not his "children."

The birthright, with the covenant promises, went to Jacob and his posterity , not to Esau. Jacob had twelve sons, but instead of selecting one son from among the twelve to receive the whole inheritance, Jacob called all of his sons together and divided his inheritance among them all. To Joseph and his two sons, Ephraim and Manasseh, he gave the birthright. By right of descent Reuben should have received this blessing, for he was the first-born son, but the record states: "Now the sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel, (for he was the firstborn; but, forasmuch as he defiled his father's bed, his birthright was given unto the sons of Joseph the son of Israel: and the genealogy is not to be reckoned after the birthright. For Judah prevailed above his brethren, and of him came the chief ruler; but the birthright was Joseph's.)." [157]

It is well to remember these instructions concerning the birthright which was given jointly to the sons of Joseph. It carried with it authority, power and headship over all the other families and tribes. It bestowed all the possessions of the father, which later comprised all the riches of the Kingdom, and, most important of all, the Divine hegemony was vested in the sons of Joseph. The descendants of none of the sons of Jacob apart from the sons of Joseph will be found to possess these blessings in their own right.

When, through strife and contention, others have come into possession of the inheritance that belongs to the sons of Joseph, the turbulence and trouble which followed soon dispossessed them of that which they had acquired by such violence.

Not long before his death Jacob/Israel instructed Joseph to bring his two sons, Ephraim and Manasseh, to him so that he might bless them. As Joseph's father prepared to bestow the blessing, Joseph noticed that his hands were crossed so that his right hand was on the head of Ephraim, the younger, and his left hand on the head of Manasseh, the elder. Joseph remonstrated with Jacob, urging him to reverse his hands: "And his father refused, and said, I know it, my son, I know it: he also shall become a people, and he also shall be great: but truly his younger brother shall be greater than he, and his seed shall become a multitude (fullness) of nations. And he blessed them that day, saying, In thee shall Israel bless, saying, God make thee as Ephraim and as Manasseh: and he set Ephraim before Manasseh." [158]

Just prior to this event Jacob/Israel had adopted the sons of Joseph and said: "...Let my name (Israel) be named on them, and the name of my father Abraham and Isaac; and let them grow into a multitude in the midst of the earth." [159] The blessing given to Joseph, which fell upon his two sons, after he died is recorded in Deuteronomy 33:13-17, "And of Joseph he said, Blessed of the Lord be his land. For the precious things of heaven, for the dew, and for the deep that coucheth beneath. And for the precious fruits brought forth by the sun, and for the precious things put forth by the moon. And for the chief things of the ancient mountains, and for the precious things of the lasting hills. And for the precious things of the earth and fullness thereof, and for the good will of him that dwelt in the bush: let the blessing come upon the head of Joseph, and upon the top of the head of him that was separated from his brethren. His glory is like the firstling of his bullock, and his horns are like the horns of unicorns: with them he shall push the people together to the ends of the earth: and they are the ten thousands of Ephraim, and they are the thousands of Manasseh."

These blessing conferred upon Ephraim and Manasseh, forecasting their future greatness, will be found as marks of identification in the possession of their descendants only. They cannot be expected to be in evidence as a part of the inheritance of the descendants of any of the other sons of Jacob, including the posterity of Judah. But Judah did receive a special blessing, for of him Jacob said: "Judah is a lion's whelp: from the prey, my son, thou art gone up: he stooped down, he couched as a lion, and as an old lion; who shall rouse him up? The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be." [160]

The kingly line and the right to rule were thus to come through Judah, so we will find a royal line among his descendants who will be wielding the sceptre. But this promise of the sceptre, as subsequently shown, was to be exercised by a specially chosen branch of Judah's posterity.

Just as Jacob selected each of his sons to whom he gave certain blessings under the Covenant, so later god selected from the tribe of Judah the particular branch of that tribe the descendants of which were to be the recipients of this special inheritance. It is just as erroneous to expect all the descendants of Judah to come into possession of this blessing as it would be to expect all the sons of Jacob to inherit the birthright which was given to Joseph's two sons alone.

It is essential to an understanding of the Scriptures, without which it would be impossible to properly evaluate current world developments and present activities in Palestine, to recognize the selections which were continually being made by God who rejected some and chose others of the posterity of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob to eventually receive the specific blessings Jacob gave to each of his sons.

When the time came for God to appoint the kingly line to rule over His people, He selected the family of Jesse and chose his youngest son to be anointed King. After all of Jesse's sons except one had been presented to Samuel and had been rejected, Samuel said to Jesse: "Are here all thy children? And he said. There remaineth yet the youngest, and, behold, he keepeth the sheep. And Samuel said unto Jesse, send and fetch him: for we will not sit down till he come hither. And he sent, and brought him in. Now he was ruddy, and withal of a beautiful countenance (with fine eyes and a handsome appearance), and goodly to look to. And the Lord said, Arise, anoint him: for this is he. Then Samuel took the horn of oil, and anointed him in the midst of his brethren: and the Spirit of the Lord came upon David from that day forward." [161]

After Saul's Death David came to the throne, ruling first over Judah and then over all Israel. David's throne was established at that time in perpetuity. At first David was not accepted by the House of Israel, because they had, before God was ready, appointed a king of them. It was one of the sons of Gideon. The story is related in the eighth and ninth chapter of the Book of Judges. "And Gideon had threescore and ten sons...And his concubine that was in Shechem, she also bare him a son, whose name he called Abimelech." [162] Then Abimelech is made king of Israel at Shechem: "And all the men of Shechem gathered together, and all the house of Millo, and went, and made Abimelech King, by the plain of the pillar that was Shechem." [163]

The original covenant God made with David was: "And thine house and thy kingdom shall be established for ever before thee: thy throne shall be established for ever." [164] God promised three unconditional things to David:

God further confirmed the certainty of this covenant which he made with David as set forth in the Psalm: "I have made a covenant with my chosen, I have sworn unto David my servant, Thy seed will establish for ever, and build up thy throne to all generations...I have found David my servant; with my holy oil have I anointed him...My mercy will I keep for him for evermore, and my covenant shall stand fast with Him. His seed also will I make to endure for ever, and his throne as the days of heaven. If his children forsake my law, and walk not in my judgments; If they break my statutes, and keep not my commandments; Then will I visit their transgression with the rod, and their iniquity with stripes. Nevertheless my lovingkindness will I not utterly take from him, nor suffer my faithfulness to fail. My covenant will I not break, nor alter the thing that is gone out of my lips. Once have I sworn by my holiness that I will not lie unto David. His seed shall endure for ever, and his throne as the sun before me. It shall be established for ever as the moon, and as a faithful witness in heaven." [165]

During the darkest period in the history of Judah and Jerusalem, as the Throne of David seeded about to be destroyed, God, through Jeremiah the Prophet, confirmed this promise of the perpetuity of David's Throne. However, the Throne of David was henceforth to be established to reign over the House of Israel forever: "For thus saith the Lord, David shall never want (or lack) a man to sit upon the throne of the house of Israel." [166]

God had sworn to David in a covenant, "Thy seed will I establish forever and build up thy throne to all generations." [167] David's seed would endure forever and his throne as the days of heaven. Even if they sinned, God would keep His covenant (contingent on His Word, not on the party to the covenant beside Himself). He would not lie. "His (David's) seed (offspring progeny, family) shall endure forever, and his throne as the sun before me. It shall be established forever as the moon, as a faithful witness in heaven." [168] "David shall never want a man ('iysh' ‑‑ Hebrew for man or woman, as in [169] to sit one the throne of the House of Israel.' [170] ‑‑ of the fruit of David's body they would sit on the throne...nothing said about male or female) ."

We do not want to forget that this is God's Throne! He abdicated it for Israel to have human kings. Nor should we expect the ruling royal family to be exemplary, for God told us what human kings would be doing to us, And They Do. David and Solomon were sinful men.

The Throne of David was to always have Judah [171] cling to her until Christ returned. God had prepared for this happenstance when Zarah/Judah went to Ireland instead of (staying in) Egypt. In Israel there were female judges, such as Deborah. By God's own laws, he could use the daughters of the king to assure David's continuity. There were two daughters, Tamar (Tea Tephi) and Scota, for whom Scotland was named, so some historians tells us. Because of a family relationship, the care of the girls fell to Jeremiah the Prophet, and Baruch his scribe. God told Jeremiah, "See, I have this day set thee over the nations and over the kingdoms to root out and to pull down, to destroy and to throw down, to build and to plant."

Ezekiel 17 is about the "topmost twig" of the cedar tree (representative of royalty), and Tea Tephi being the princess through whom the House of David could be carried. Jeremiah and Baruch took her and her sister to Ireland where the other line of Zarah-Judah was already involved in sea traffic and mercantile trade.

Tea Tephi married Eochaidh the Heremon, King of Ireland, a descendant of the Zarah line of Judah, thus joining both of Judah's twin sons; heirs in the royal line, from whom have come the kings of Ireland, Scotland and England to this day, and healed the Breach as spoken of by the midwife which delivered Zarah and Pharez. The House of David was in the Holy Place.

They would stay there awaiting the time when the Holy of Holies could come into existence and our King would return to earth. We are assured Tea Tephia married into the tribe of her fathers. She was the twin son, Pharez, and her husband of the Zarah line. We have Tea Tephi's poems and story of her trip, and she names those with her, and Irish history carries the story of their shipwreck at Carrickfergus, off the coast of northern Ireland. Royal records of the arrival of Jeremiah coincide with the scriptural date of their flight to Egypt, and then West.

We can visit Jeremiah's grave in Loch Erne, a land‑locked island in Ireland, and at Meath, north of Dublin, one can visit the spot at TARA where Tea Tephi is interred. Tea Tephi, Scota, Jeremiah and Baruch had taken with them, among other items of interest, the stone on which the Kings of Israel had been crowned. Today, this stone is in the Throne Chair of England, in Westminster Abbey, with a sign that says it is believed to be the stone Jacob slept on! God's Kingdom is called a stone kingdom. This is perfect symbology.

The Bible says the throne would be overturned three times before Christ came for it. Tea Tephi took (the throne and) the stone to Ireland Circa 580 B.C., and for 1083 years Irish Kings were crowned on this stone. In 503 A.D., Fergus (the Great) crossed from Ulster, Ireland to Lona, Scotland with the stone, and around 563 A.D., St. Columbia had Lia Fail (the name by which you find information in the Encyclopedia about this stone), the stone of Jacob, taken to Scotland.

In the Scottish National Library there is a Gaelic manuscript written by Dugaid the Scot, son of Mcphail, in 1467, containing the complete genealogy of Scottish Kings, showing descent from Irish Kings, to Abraham through Judah. The stone stayed in Scone, Scotland until 1296 A.D., when it was transferred to London by Edward I, and a chair was constructed to hold it. All British kings and queens have been crowned upon it.

God has verified Ezekiel's prophecy. The throne did overturn three times, from: (1) Jerusalem to Ireland, (2) Ireland to Scotland, and (3) Scotland to England where it is between Judah's feet until Christ (Shiloh) comes. And it will be given him. The Kingdom (and her King) would come to the daughter of Jerusalem/America.

The Lord shall reign over them in Mt. Zion/America (Jerusalem is where the church is. Zion is the place from where the laws of God go forth). America is spoken of as New Zion, New Jerusalem and daughter Zion, daughter Jerusalem.

The throne will have one more overturn to His Holy of Holies, His Kingdom, when He joins His two sticks into one Kingdom in America. While the royal line of David was being preserved in the West, God was preparing Judah in Babylon to return and rebuild Old Jerusalem and the Temple again. The Assyrian Empire had been conquered by the Babylonians.

Now the great Babylonian Empire was being overcome by the Medes and Persians (modern day Iran and Iraq). While in Babylon, some of these Israelites of Judah did not practice the segregation required always of Israel.

They Mingled the Holy Seed with that of the people of the lands of Babylon, taking their sons and daughters to marry. The people of Babylon are as follows: Canaanites, Hittites, Perizzites, Jebusites, Ammonites, Moabites, Egyptians, Amorites.[172] This is almost an identical list of the nations in [173] that God told Israel to kill...wipe out...destroy, even children. There were many with no (kept) genealogies (only Israelites have ever kept genealogies as a race). They were polluted. They could not show their father's house, nor their seed whether they were of Israel. They separated from Judah (segregation), all the mixed multitude, when they had heard the Law of God.

However, there was a group who did not intermarry with those wicked forbidden races. Zerubbabel, a forefather of Jesus who is found in both the Matthew and Luke genealogy of Jesus, was pure of race, and thus could build the Temple.[174] Abijah, a forefather of John the Baptist [175] was also pure and qualified to build the Temple. This is very Positive Evidence that Neither John nor Jesus, who were cousins, were JEWS.

We have some of the wives of these God‑fearing and obedient men raising a great cry against their "brethren the Jews," Judahites who had married Babylonian seed. They had learned the art of Usury in Babylon, something that the Bible forbids Israelites to have anything to do with. These evil people were "Exacting usury, everyone of his brother."

Nehemiah said for them to leave off the usury, and to return the land, vineyard, olive orchards, houses, corn, wine, oil that they were exacting of them. It sounds much like our modern farm crisis. Assyria took Israel and Judah out of the land and brought in their own people, and Sabeans. The poor of Israel who had been left behind intermarried with them and became known as the "Samaritans." When Babylon moved Judah to Babylon, no people were brought into the land, but it lay idle for 70 years. The Judahites in Babylon did marry the Babylonians and became known as "Jews."

In 1400 B.C., the ten‑tribed Israel had married into the same seven forbidden races, much to God's displeasure. This led to His divorcing them and sending them away into captivity for 2520 years.

When Judah returned to Jerusalem from Babylon, they were two very distinct people. They lived side by side for 400 years. The mixed seed known as Jews was one group, and the pure seed group were the "good basket of figs" or of Judah. The one group would kill Jesus, the other would "return to Him with their whole heart."

From A Pictorial History of the Jewish People we learn the Jews returned with the "synagogue," while the pure devout held to the Temple (God's House of Prayer). They looked forward to the coming of Christ. The Jews brought back the Babylonian Talmud ("halacah" or oral tradition), while the pure‑seeded kept the scrolls of The Holy Scriptures, Christ read from a scroll of.[176] Nehemiah calls our attention to what may be the first history of "Yiddish." Judahites had wed wives of Ashdod, Ammon and Moab.

Their children spoke half in the speech of Ashdod and could not speak the Jews' language, but mixed their tongue according to the language of each people. Paul asked if God had cast away His people? then he quoted from,[177] that God still had 7,000 who had not bowed their knees to Baal. This is how (and why) the writer of Acts could say there were "devout men out of every nation" in Jerusalem at Pentecost.

If representatives of "every nation under heaven" were hearing in their own tongue, or language of the country from which they had come, and they were addressed by Peter as "ye men of Judea/Israel," it is reasonable to believe they had come to the Feast of Pentecost, since it was required of Israel's males to appear before the Lord three times a year: at Passover, at Pentecost and at the Feast of the Tabernacles. This was Pentecost and there were present local residents and some of the "devout" dispersed of Israel. Many nations are mentioned, the first four being of the Persian Empire. Arabians and those in Asia could have been those of India, which the book of Esther mentions. Peter addressed the "strangers scattered abroad" and in the next verse qualified it by saying they were Elect (Israel is God's elect.[178]

Our understanding will be enhanced by considering what the American Encyclopedia says about Gaul, the land of the Galatians. Caesar, in his Gaelic wars, said all Gaul was divided into three parts, one part called Gallic Transalpina (over the Alps to the east just where ten‑tribed Israel had wandered into Romania and Transylvania and on toward Germany).

Another part of Gaul was Cisalpina, running along upper Italy to the Adriatic where much of Judah would pass on their way to Italy and Spain. The third part was from the Pyrenees mountains between Spain and France as we know it, where vast numbers settled. This section of Gaul ran to the Rhine River and Treves (which was settled with Israelites by Assyria.

In 397 A.D., this group of Celts seem to have disappeared. Could these be those Anglo‑Saxons no one seems to know the origin of? The encyclopedia says their kinsmen were British.

The Companion Bible, in "Introductory Notes to Galatians," enlightens us, "It may be added that in Galatia proper, the people spoke in Keltic, a language they used unto at least the time of Jerome, who records hearing the same tongue there as he heard in Treves. The Keltic predominated in Galatia." Paul went over all the country of Galatia! Paul was preaching and telling them of each of the laws which, if they broke, "Ye shall not inherit the Kingdom of God."

Like Peter told the Israelites on the day of Pentecost, Paul and all the disciples were going to be the "other sheep" Christ said he had, not of the fold in Jerusalem. They were telling them to repent, be Baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sons and reception of the Holy Ghost. "For the promise is to you and your children and all that are afar off (meaning we of 1996) even as many as the Lord our God shall call."

Jesus said, "Them (the other sheep) I must bring and they shall hear my voice and there shall be one fold and one shepherd."

From the time that Nebuchadnezzar took Jerusalem to the present day there has been no man of the House of David sitting upon a throne ruling over Judah. Nevertheless, the line of David has been furnishing rulers during the intervening centuries who have been ruling over the House of Israel for God's word has not failed in fulfillment.

In the beginning David reigned for seven years over Judah and afterward over the House of Israel for an additional thirty-three years. Now a man of the line of David is ruling over the House of Israel, with the Jews refusing to accept him as their King just as the Israelites refused to accept David as King during the first seven years of his reign.

It has been established beyond question of successful refutation that the Anglo-Saxon-Germanic-Scandinavian-Celtic peoples are the modern descendants of the northern ten-tribed Kingdom of Israel and, therefore, they constitute the House of Israel in the world today. Furthermore, it has also been definitely established that the throne in Great Britain is the Throne of David which was established over the House of Israel in the Isles.

In the providence of God Jeremiah was instrumental in transferring the throne, following the captivity of the House of Judah, to the British Isles.

While the sceptre belongs in the line of Judah, we find that the House of David alone was selected to receive the sceptre and lawgiver and, lest it be forgotten, There Are No Jews In The House of David, The House of Judah or the House of Israel!

It is well here perhaps to clarify distinctions which should always be made in the use of terms. Judah, as has already been pointed out, was one of the twelve sons of Jacob and, in this use of the term, it merely designates a man whose name was Judah. Later, the families and descendants of each of the twelve sons of Jacob bore the name of that son as a tribal distinction, so the posterity of Judah became known as the tribe of Judah; that is, the families or clan of Judah.

David's father's house was one of the families of this tribe. In selecting David to be anointed King, God chose a family out of the tribe of Judah to be separated from the clan of Judah and to become a Royal House which was to furnish rulers for His people. The remaining families of the tribe of Judah became known later on as the House of Judah.

Thus, we see that the tribe of Judah was divided into two houses: (1) The House of David and (2) The House of Judah. Three houses therefore emerged as the result of the selection, separation and organization of the descendants of Jacob. The ten-tribed Kingdom, or House of Israel, consisted of ten tribes, each named after a son of Jacob. Levi, the priestly (and bureaucratic) tribe, remained separate from all these house, for men of this tribe were scattered throughout all Israel officiating in their priestly capacity among all the tribes.

As will be shown later, Benjamin, one tribe of the House of Israel, was loaned to the House of David and, along with the House of Judah, remained loyal to the Throne of David when the rest of the House of Israel revolted, setting up a government of their own at Samaria. This occurred at the time of the division of the Kingdoms into the northern Kingdom (House of Israel) and the southern Kingdom (House of Judah) in 970 B.C.

The name designating the nation as the Nation of the Nation of the Jews came into being following the return of a remnant of the House of Judah and the tribe of Benjamin from Babylon captivity where they had been taken by Nebuchadnezzar. This nation was so designated because it became the nation of the religion of the Jews and called today Judaism. That is, the term Jew, in addition to designating a descendant of the forefather Judah, from then on applied to all people, regardless of race, who adhered to the Jewish Religion! This nation of the Jews was composed of people who were not racially related to the Israelites.

However, because the term Jew also designated a religious belief which they held before the coming of Christ, they are often referred to as Jews. In the rejection of Christ, it was the Jews who refused to accept Him, while the Benjamintes, or Galileans, became His followers and disciples.

Christian men and women are familiar with the Jewish rejection of Christ and the declaration of the Jews and their leaders that they would not "have this man to reign over them." Christ was of the House of David and God, through Jeremiah, declared that, following the terms of captivity and punishment of both the House of Israel and House of Judah, no man of the House of David would ever again reign over the House of Judah.

Just as the Jews of our Lord's day refused to accept the Kingship of Christ, a man of the House of David, so today the Jews of Palestine have refused to accept the rulership of the House of David and they fought against the Crown, finally compelling Great Britain to withdraw from Palestine.

Had the Jews accepted the British mandate over Palestine, and the administration of law under the Crown, the House of David would then have been ruling over them. But they rejected that rule and furthermore, they disputed the right of the House of Israel to claim the land of Israel. In doing this the Jews fulfilled Ezekiel's prophecy, which we have previously states: "Son of man, thy brethren, even thy brethren, the men of thy kindred, and all the house of Israel wholly, are they unto whom the inhabitants of Jerusalem have said, Get you far from the Lord: unto us is this land given in possession." [179]

Ezekiel is very accurate and uses the correct term in describing modern activities in Palestine as he designates the people who are opposing the House of Israel and seeking to wrest their inheritance away from them. Because The Zionists who are today in opposition to the House of Israel are Not Descendants of Judah at all, some are not even Jews religiously for in actuality they are atheists, he refers prophetically to them as the "inhabitants of Jerusalem."A Zionist is anyone regardless of race who adheres to the principles of Zionism, particularly the principles of political Zionism. Actually, Zionism is now a term describing a secular political movement the purpose of which is to establish a Jewish nation with Palestine as the national homeland.

Not all Jews are political Zionists, nor are all such Zionists Jews. Non-believers, Communists, atheists, and even some make-believe Christians, are Zionists. Dr. Rabinowitch, a prominent Jew, in The Zionist Movement Unmasked, stated: "As political Zionists have repeatedly affirmed, a person, born a Jew, may be an atheist and still be a loyal Zionist. Moses Hess, author of the historic and economic basis of Political Zionism, was an anarchist who, both in writing and on the platform, propagated the theories of the Proudhon school of anarchy. Theodore Herzl was a renegade Jew, who rather suddenly became conscious of his Jewishness when, during his assignment by his newspaper to witness and report upon the infamous Dreyfuss trial, he discovered that, in spite of his so-called 'enlightenment,' he was no more immune than the most observant Jew to the anti-Semitism of his day, and, in Tel Aviv, Palestine, the only almost completely Jewish city in the world, one may see violated, flagrantly and daily, by political Zionists, most fundamental Jewish laws, in complete disregard of the feelings of their orthodox Jewish neighbors. It is not an accident that the majority of the leaders of Political Zionism are Russians or descendants of Russians, for this movement, except for sporadic attempts in the early centuries, had its origin in Russia amongst the so-called 'enlightened' Jews and is a culmination of that which the Haskalah, the so-called Russian-Jewish renaissance started. Leo Pinsker was a Russian (Jew), and Perez Smolenskin, who gave to Political Zionism its philosophy in a nutshell, was a Russian (Jew). There are observant Jews amongst the political Zionists, the Mizrahi, but they are a small group.

The aim of Political Zionism is a Jewish State. Religious Zionism is, thus, motivated by piety, whereas Political Zionism is propelled by a material nationalism, though of different degrees."

Mr. Benjamin Freedman, explains further in Palestine: "Popular ignorance of the real basis of political Zionism is beyond calculation. Vaguely most Christian Americans have the idea that the Jews claim Palestine because it was the 'Promised Land' in which they lived for a period of a few centuries that ended 2000 years ago." Mr. Freeman's presentation of the non-Semitic origin of these people will be found in his statements quoted in the Incredible Hoax,[180] setting forth facts most Americans do not know.

Under Jewish pressure the House of Israel has withdrawn from Palestine, in conformity to the prophecy of Hosea. That withdrawal was inevitable since the House of Israel must come into possession of their heritage as a gift from God, not under a mandate from the United Nations.

"Great Britain is determined to withdraw from Palestine. Her task there has been a thankless one, for the very people whom she has endeavored to protect have done everything in their power to alienate the sympathy of their protectors. Evidently the Jews now feel they are strong enough to face the situation alone and are welcoming British withdrawal. So no we are to witness a further step in the fulfillment of Ezekiel's prophecy as the Jews said to the House of Israel: 'Get you far from the Lord: unto us is this land given in possession.'

The Jews are determined to have their way but the verdict of time will demonstrate the impossibility of their securing complete control of Palestine. Britain proposes to withdraw, but God has also said through His Prophet Ezekiel that He would given that land to Abraham's seed.

Let us analyze the situation. In 1917 Great Britain fulfilled the prophecy given through Ezekiel: 'I will lay my vengeance upon Edom (Edom is in modern Jewry [181]) by the hand of my people Israel.' [182]

When Jerusalem was captured and the Turks were driven from Palestine this prophecy was (partly) fulfilled. The Church in Israel should have proclaimed to God's people the significance of this event but instead, not knowing who Israel (really) is, they have been trying since to assist the Jews (Christ's enemies) to secure territory that does not belong to them. Also, as a signal that the Times of the Gentiles (Israel Nations) had ended, the taking of Jerusalem should have been a trumpet blast to Christendom that the end of the age had come. Christ Himself gave us this event as a sign when He said: 'And Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled.'

With the ending of World War I the House of Israel had come into possession of their ancient homeland. However, because of their blindness, and particularly the blindness of Israel's spiritual leaders to the Israelitish identity of Great Britain, they have failed to recognize that Palestine belongs to her as a gift from the Almighty. In 1919 Great Britain was one of fifty-four nations to become a member of the League of Nations. Great Britain, blessed of God, had won territorial possession of Palestine in battle, but with the formation of the League of Nations she relinquished to the League the right to say to whom Palestine should be awarded.

For thirty years Great Britain has exercised her authority over Palestine under a mandate from heathen nations and not as the rightful possessor of the land of her forefathers. Now, at the end of those thirty years, she is being forced to withdraw...From the inception of this mandate there has been nothing but turmoil and trouble, bloodshed and murder as the Jews challenge the British right to rule in Palestine. The present determination to withdraw is the inevitable end of the course Great Britain has pursued, particularly the refusal to recognize that the land of Palestine belongs to her under Divine fiat.

The League of Nations is defunct, so Great Britain has served notice on the United Nations that Palestine is now to become their responsibility. It is well to note that this withdrawal notification comes just 30 years after the capture of Jerusalem by General Allenby. This 30-year period is most important. Thirty years is the length of the great Year of Months found in Great Pyramid chronology. It is also the number of years beginning with the Elizabethan Period to the destruction of the Spanish Armada, from which era the 'time no longer' period of Revelation dates. At the end of this cycle we have a corresponding period, also of 30 years, dating from 1917-1918 A.D. and expiring in 1947-1948 A.D.

The withdrawal of Great Britain from Palestine will be temporary and within its duration The Jewish Problem will be finally settled..." [183]

The Jews will be totally destroyed: "The vision of Obadiah. Thus saith the Lord God concerning Edom (the Jews); We have heard a rumour from the Lord, and an ambassador is sent among the heathen, Arise ye, and let us rise up against her in battle. Behold, I have made thee small among the heathen: Thou art greatly despised. The pride of thine heart hath deceived thee, thou that dwellest in the clefts of the rock, whose habitation is high (in control of governments from the heights); and saith in his heart, Who shall bring me down to the ground? Though thou exalt thyself as the eagle, and though thou set thy nest among the stars (tribes of Israel [184]), thence will I bring thee down, saith the Lord. If thieves came to thee, if robbers by night, (how art thou cut off!) would they not have stolen till they had enough?...How are the things of Esau (Edom [185] the Jews) searched out! how are his hidden things sought up! All the men of thy confederacy have brought thee even to the border: the men that were at peace with thee have deceived thee, and prevailed against thee; they that eat thy bread have laid a wound under thee: there is none understanding in him. Shall I not in that day, saith the Lord, even destroy the wise men out of Edom, and understanding out of the mount of Esau? And thy mighty men, O Teman, shall be dismayed, to the end that every one of the Mount of Esau may be cut off by slaughter. For thy violence against they brother Jacob shame shall cover thee, and thou shalt be cut off for ever. in the day that thou stoodest on the other side, in the day that the strangers carried away captive his forces,[186] and foreigners entered into his gates, and cast lots upon Jerusalem [187], even thou wast one of them [188]. But thou shouldest not have looked on the day of thy brother in the day that he became a stranger: neither shouldest thou have rejoiced over the children of Judah [189] in the day of their destruction; neither shouldest thou have spoken proudly in the day of distress. Thou shoudest not have entered into the gate of my people in the day of their calamity, nor have laid hands on their substance in the day of their calamity; Neither shouldest thou have stood in the crossway to cut off those of his that did escape [190]; neither shouldest thou have delivered up those of his that did remain in the day of distress. For the day of the Lord is near upon all the heathen: as thou hast done, it shall be done unto thee: thy reward shall return upon thine own head. For as ye have drunk upon my holy mountain, so shall all the heathen drink continually, yea, they shall drink, and they shall swallow down, and they shall be as though they had not been. But upon mount Zion shall be deliverance, and there shall be holiness; and the house of Jacob shall possess their possessions. And The House of Jacob Shall be a Fire, and The House of Joseph A Flame, and The House of Esau (the Jews) for stubble, and they shall kindle in them and devour them; and there shall not be any remaining of The House of Esau; for the Lord hath spoken it." [191]

Through Ezekiel God declared of the House of Israel, not the Jews: "Thus saith the Lord God; Although I have cast them far off among the heathen, and although I have scattered them among the countries, yet will I be to them as a little sanctuary in the countries where they shall come. Therefore say, Thus saith the Lord God; I will even gather you from the people, and assemble you out of the countries where ye have been scattered, and I will give you the land of Israel (another land other than Palestine [192]). And they shall come thither, and they shall take away all the detestable things thereof and all the abominations thereof from thence. And I will give them one heart, and I will put a new spirit within you; and I will take the stony heart out of their flesh, and will give them an heart of flesh: That they may walk in my statutes, and keep mine ordinances, and do them: and they shall be my people, and I will be their God." [193] This is in accord with the statement in Amos: "Behold, the eyes of the Lord God are upon the sinful kingdom, and I will destroy it from off the face of the earth; saving that I will not utterly destroy the house of Jacob, saith the Lord. For, lo, I will command, and I will sift the house of Israel among all nations, like as corn is sifted in a sieve, yet shall not the least grain fall upon the earth." [194] The Nation of the Jews was broken up and destroyed but the people of the House of Israel were sifted among the nations as they moved westward, then gathered in accordance with God's plans into the appointed place and none fell by the wayside.

Answer: In the course of the centuries the House of Israel passed on, moving into the wilderness of central and southern Europe and eventually coming into the Isles of the Sea. Some took the water route, passing through the Mediterranean and sailing by sea to the British Isles, however, the main body of the people trekked overland to the appointed place of which Nathan the Prophet spoke when he told David that the Lord had said: "Moreover I Will Appoint A Place For My People Israel, and will plant them, that they may dwell in a place of their own, and move no more; neither shall the children of wickedness afflict them any more, as before time," [195]; "Also I will ordain a place for my people Israel, and will plant them, and they shall dwell in their place, and shall be moved no more; neither shall the children of wickedness waste them any more, as at the beginning." [196]

That this appointed place includes more than just the Isles of the Sea is clear from the directions given through Isaiah which bound the territory in which latter-day Israel would reside: "Behold, these shall come from far: and, lo, these from the north and from the west..." [197] Also, it had to be a place large enough for a thousand million and more. Prior to this the Lord's message through Isaiah was: "...I will preserve thee, and give thee for a covenant of the people, to establish the earth, to cause to inherit the desolate heritages." [198]

The wilderness of the people, where the House of Israel, in exile from Palestine, were to grow and expand into a great multitude of people and company of nations, and where they were to find grace in the sight of the Lord: "...found grace in the wilderness..." [199]

This is defined by Isaiah as north and west of Palestine. "Thus saith the Lord, In an acceptable time have I heard thee, and in a day of salvation have I helped thee: and I will preserve thee, and give thee for a covenant of the people, to establish the earth, to cause to inherit the desolate heritages; That thou mayest say to the prisoners, Go forth; to them that are in darkness, Shew yourselves. They shall feed in the ways, and their pastures shall be in all high places. They shall not hunger nor thirst; neither shall the heat nor sun smite them: for he that hath mercy on them shall lead them, even by the springs of water shall he guide them. And I will make all my mountains a way, and my highways shall be exalted. Behold, these shall come from far: and, lo, these from the North and from the West..." [200]

In giving a short history of Israel and their Westward trek, I am going to deviate from my usual procedure and am not going to insert the Scripture reference. If you wish the Scripture reference for this get yourself a Strong's Concordance and look them up, it will help you in your studies, which is why I am not giving them to you here. I hope you will try to prove us in error for that way you will become even more convinced that we are correct in our beliefs. Also if we are redundant at times please forgive me, and think about the services you have heard from your "Judeo-Christian Ministers" for they repeat themselves without end and never will reveal as much as you have already received from this book, this combined presentation.

When Joseph was a ruler in Egypt and, due to the famine, had his father and brethren brought to Egypt, they are said to have been seventy souls. Judah had twin sons, Pharez and Zarah. It is notable that Zarah's line is Not a part of the genealogy of those who went into Egypt, as is the Pharez line.

Zarah, whose name means sprout or seed, was the twin whose hand appeared first, at birth, and on which a scarlet thread was placed. Pharez was born, then Zarah. This hand and the red thread are still a part of the heraldic symbolism of Ulster, Ireland today...the very land Zarah's descendants peopled. Zarah's line had wandered away from Judah's family about 220 years before the Exodus (1480 B.C.), from Egypt.

Darda and Calcol, grandsons of Zarah, are said to have moved westward. Camden's "Historia Britannica" tells us Calcol sailed from Egypt to Spain to Ireland where he established Ulster (1600 B.C.). From these men of Israel we have had at least ten American presidents and seven famous inventors, according to The National Geographic Magazine of August, 1964, page 261.

Abraham's descendants, these Judah sons, were still called Heb(e)rews, being descended from Heber, meaning "colonizer." Heber was a great great grandson of Noah. Thus we have them naming the places they went. Iberia (Spain), and upon arriving in Ireland, they were known as Hibernians. In Spain we have Zaragossa on the (H)Ebro River to this day, and for 3600 years Ulster has had the emblem of the red hand. In the meantime, Zarah's son, Darda, moved northward into Asia Minor, founding a nation on the shores of the Dardanelles and establishing a kingdom, the capitol of which was Troy. Troy was founded (1446 B.C.) 34 years before the Exodus of the rest of Israel from Egypt as we learn from Pitavious' "History of the World."

Josephus, the historian, calls Darda "Dardanus." Sharon Turner's "History of the Anglo‑Saxons" mentions in the Langfedgatel Dardanus' descendants from troy, as does Homer's Iliad. Turner further named Troes, a grandson of Dardanus, as having a son whose descendants were Capys, Anchises and Aeneas, the latter a famous hero of Troy. These sons of Judah through Zarah's line never entered the Land of Palestine.

Calcol and Darda were evidently very brilliant men. Solomon is said to have been wiser than all men, even these. They carried the scarlet thread of Zarah...the red branch of Irish history. To this day, a red thread runs through every British rope in the Navy; and each official British paper is wrapped with a red cord.

Geoffrey of Monmouth handed down the British version of a Trojan colony, led by one Brutus, the great great grandson of Aeneas, thus a descendant of Darda, as settling the British Isles not long after the fall of Troy (1185 B.C.). The stone he is supposed to have stepped on is still marked today in Totnes, in the sound of Dart, in Devon, twelve miles inland from Torbay. The English Chronicles list the kings in Britain along with those who ruled in Old Israel. Brutus is said to have ruled when Eli was a priest in Israel (1070 B.C.).

The Trojan War was a struggle between kindred people. Agamemnon, king of the Greek Mycenae, led an expedition against the Trojan Dardanians to rescue Helen, the wife of his brother Menelaus, King of Sparta. The Spartans in many histories are called the Lacedemonians and brethren of the Israelites, as they are in the Apocrypha in [201]. (The books of the Apocrypha were in all Original King James Bibles ‑‑ until the Jews through their influence in the church had them expunged).

Josephus records an exchange of letters. The seal affixed to the Lacedemonian letter bore the Danite emblem, the eagle and serpent. Homer, the poet, also described this seal in the Iliad.

Herodotus (1, 56) says the Lacedemonians were of Doric blood, so called from Dorus, son of Helen. The earliest immigrants to Greece, according to Diodorus Siculus, were Lacedemonians. The greater part of Israel followed Moses. Those who left Egypt settled in Argos and Athens, while some sailed to regions of Italy and Greece. Their descendants, the Young's Concordance, lists under the word "Gentiles," from the word Hellenes, from Hellas the Greek city, named for Helen of Troy. These Israelites were known for their heroic endeavors.

Cadmus introduced letters of the alphabet to Greece, according to Herodotus (11, 49). Tyre was close to Dan and provided the mariners, even in Solomon's time. We know Danites and other Israelites resided in Tyre, which was given to the tribe of Asher but was never occupied by them.

One of the most ancient historians, Sanchoniathon, who lived before the Trojan War, said that the Gods, or deities of Greece, etc., were based on ancestor worship and were of Hebrew origin. Cory's ancient Fragments, 1876, page 21‑22, tells us that Kronus was Jacob (Israel), and he had a son called Judah, Zeus.

Gladstone, in his "Juventus Mundi" page 36‑41, traces the origin of the name Danone to 200 years before the Trojan War (1300 B.C.). he does not identify the Greeks with Dan, but suggests the original tribe of DANaans may have existed with an Egyptian origin, and why not? Dan was in Egypt. And why Did Dan "remain in ships?"

Other writers identify the Danoi as having left Greece and settled in Ireland, these called the "Tuatha De Danaans" (Tribe of Dan). The Irish Chronicles say their coming was opposed by those already in Ireland, which caused a battle to follow. The Danaans were victorious and peace ensued when they found their opponents spoke a language similar to their own.

We have Israelites then in Greece, Italy, Spain, Britain, Ireland and Scotland living active lives and having kings over them before the children of Israel ever left Egypt and had their Red Sea Exodus experience. These children of Judah/Israel were never in Egypt or Palestine but God in His wisdom was preparing for those who would eventually be taken in Assyrian and Babylonian captivity, and brought to these places in their movements westward.

From the Garden of Eden, Adam and Eve were sent east. Cain was sent east to the land of Nod. When Noah was in the ark during the flood, he too was taken east to Ararat. David was told while he stood in Old Jerusalem that God would give His people "a land of their own" [202] and move them into it. We will see the westward migrations of Israel well pre‑figured in the tabernacle which one entered from the east and had to work their way west to the Holy Place, and then to the Holy of Holies.

These in Ireland, Scotland and Britain were preparing the Holy Place. They, in their lands, were the forerunners of what was promised to Jacob, in that he would become a multitude of commonwealth of nations. Jacob passed this blessing to Joseph's sons Ephraim and Manasseh.

Ephraim was to be God's first‑born (nation). This is exactly what we see God working out so long ago. We learn that in our day God would still have His two nations, one the Holy Place and the other the Holy of Holies. They are spoken of as two sticks and such they are today. Two nations - two nations based on the teachings of Jesus Christ. The one stick was to be Ephraim with Judah as we have been reading and Judah we are told would be with the House of David, or the Throne of the Lord that Solomon sat on.

The Queen (of England) claims heritage with the royal Line of David, keeping the Throne between Judah's feet until Shiloh (Jesus Christ) comes in power and glory. We know the other stick is America, the Holy of Holies, His Kingdom place from which He will reign.

God heard when the children of Israel cried because of their bondage and slavery in Egypt. Most people know the stories of Moses and Pharaoh, the escape of Israel through the Red Sea, and Israel's 40 years of wandering in the wilderness. Few, even "Judeo-Christian Ministers," know that at the giving of the Laws and Ordinances, Statutes and Judgements the Israelites told Moses, "All the Lord hath spoken, we will do."

They became husband and wife. Our Father, the God of Israel, tells us: "Thy maker is thine Husband: the Lord of hosts is His name; they REDEEMER the Holy One of Israel. the God of the whole earth shall He be called."

The plan was that they, God and Israel were to conceive a child, The Kingdom of God on earth. The Children of Israel had gone into Egypt as 70 souls but came out as 600,000 men, plus women and children (which would total from one to two million people) not counting the mixed multitude. There were None feeble, None diseased. Being a husband to Israel, He now took complete care of them. As an example, we have God telling them, "Thy raiment waxed not old upon thee...neither did their foot swell these forty years...I have led you forty years in the wilderness; your clothes are not waxen old upon you and thy she is not waxen old upon thy foot...Ye have not eaten bread, neither have ye drunk wine or strong drink, that ye might Know that I am the Lord your God."

God fed his wife (Israel) manna and they did not have to work to eat (demonstrating that it is the husband who is to support the woman, the wife, and not as we do today). This is spoken of as angel's food. They were given water from the rock. There was a mixed multitude among the Israelites, and these caused Israel to become disgruntled, saying they wanted the cucumbers, leeks and onions, meat and fish they had in Egypt. God became very angry with their lusting. He gave them quail...equal to a day's journey on each side of them and two cubits high, which is too deep to be happy in. Before they had their meat out from between their teeth and chewed.

God caused a plague to hit them. He was really wrathful, and He called the place Kibroth Hattaavah (graves of lust) because the ones who lusted after meat all died and were buried there. God had fed them manna so they would learn, "Man does not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of the Lord." He chose these people to walk in His commandments and His ways and to fear Him. It was His plan to greatly bless them and form them into a great Kingdom, and He didn't want them to say in their hearts "my power and the might of mine hand hath gotten me this wealth."

"But thou shalt remember the Lord thy God; for it is He that giveth thee power to get wealth, that He may establish His covenant which He sware unto thy fathers as it is this day." This was the covenant He made with Abraham to bring forth from his Seed a great nation and a commonwealth of nations. They were to be a special Holy people above all the people on the earth. We were to love Him and keep His commandments so He could bless us in every way.

Israel was to live by every word of God. Paul tells us, "Faith cometh by hearing and hearing by the Word of God." He wanted our implicit Trust in all. We shall soon find ourselves in Armageddon (place of no way out); then our people will learn their lesson, for He Shall Save Us. Know therefore the Lord thy God. He is God, the faithful God which keepeth His covenants and has mercy on them that love Him and keep His commandments, to a thousand generations (a generation is accepted to be about 40 years)., so this means 40,000 years (more or less).[203]

From Abraham to Christ was 2000 years...From Christ to the present 2000 years...That means we still have 36,000 years just to fulfill the Abrahamic Covenant! He repayeth them that hate Him to their face to destroy them. When He comes He will miserably destroy those wicked men. "Bring those who would not have Me reign over them and slay them before Me."

An entire generation of Israel died in the wilderness because of their disobedience, even to making of a golden calif to worship while Moses was in the Mount with God. They wanted other gods, an abomination to Yhvy‑God, something He detests! Finally, Joshua led them into the land flowing with milk and honey and, again, most of the stories of the entry into Palestine and their lives there under the judges and finally the kings are known to most people.

Samuel was made to understand the people wanted other gods and human kings. God told Samuel, "They have not rejected thee, but they have rejected Me that I should not reign over them."

God told Samuel to "make them a king," and he then decided that he would Divorce His Adulterous Wife, take His name from her (Israel ‑‑ ruling with El, God) and so their child could not be born.

Shalmaneser, King of Assyria, besieged Samaria, the capitol of northern Israel, for three years. The story tells how Israel now feared other gods and walked in the statutes of the heathen. God was very angry with Israel and removed them out of His sight. They were placed even among the cities of the Medes and in Assyrian towns. Imagine what the feelings of the people must have been to be moved away from their relatives and country and God. Israel was rent from the House of David and taken into Assyrian Captivity. We learn God was very angry with much of Judah as well.

In a few short years, Sennacherib became King of Assyria (702 B.C.) and it was he that came and took 46 fortified cities of Judah and led 200,150 men of Judah also into this captivity. We can see the six‑sided clay prism in the British Museum, and you can study and see that they fought on camel‑back as they laid siege to Jerusalem, and the Assault of Engines and the use of mines. They certainly prove the Bible.

As was the custom of his day, Sennacherib deported masses of people to Assyria. The Judah people he took were totally distinct and separate from Judahites taken one hundred years later to Babylon by Nebuchadnezzar, 42,000 of whom did return to Jerusalem after 70 years. They were permitted to rebuild the Temple for the coming of Jesus Christ. The migrations of ten‑tribed Israel and Judah are not difficult to trace. Josephus, writing in Antiquities of the Jews, said, "There are but two tribes in Asia and Europe subject to the Romans, while the ten tribes are beyond the Euphrates until now and are an immense multitude."

In the [204] (Apocrypha) we read of Christ coming to (New) Zion and gathering to Himself a peaceful multitude: "These are the ten tribes which were carried away prisoners out of their own land in the time of Hoshea the king, whom Shalmaneser, the King of Assyria, led away captive, and he carried them over the waters and they came into another land...But they took this counsel among themselves, that they would leave the multitude of the heathen and go forth into a further country where never man kind dwelt...That they might there keep their statutes, which they had not kept in their own land...And they entered into Euphrates by the narrow passage of the river...Through that country there was a great way to go, namely a year and a half; and the same region is called Arsareth."

Arsareth is a region now known as Romania. The river Sareth is still there. They passed through Transylvania east of Hungary. In Treves, Germany, a tourist booklet tells they were settled by people the Assyrians brought in. The Apostles of Christ were instructed to preach to the Lost Sheep of the House of Israel.

In Treves they have the crypt of Matthew, and a coat they claim to be Christ's. They (lost Israel) would continue westward into Britain, the Holy Place, from where in time a remnant would come to found this great nation America, founded for the unfettered worship of Jesus Christ and Him only.

The most convincing point is that we are here, doing and having done to us, the very prophetic appointments the Bible foretold concerning us, His Israel people, in that Great Nation promised to Abraham so long ago. There are many artifacts in the British Museum and others that give the names of Israel as she was called by each country through which God passed her. She was to pass through Assyria and was there known as "Bet Khumri." Jehu was king of ten‑tribed Israel and he was known as the "Son of Omri" (Khumri). There is a black alabaster obelisk in the British Museum that depicts all this.

The same folk in Babylon were known as Ghimri or Gamir, and as Sacae in Persia. The historian Herodotus (500 B.C.) said the Sakae were led by Darius who married the daughter of Cyrus. the early Greek writers call the Scythians the Sacae, and Ptolomy links the Persian Sakae to the Saxons. So, we have the movement of the Israelite people through the nations they were to pass through in their 2520 years of captivity and punishment. We have the names they were known by in each nation. There is so much proof on the historical stones, obelisks, rocks and clay tablets that it is not hard to locate Israel in her Migration west. She had not really been lost, nor had she ever completely given up the religion of the Temple.

We have at Pentecost those who had come back to keep the feasts: "...devout men out of every nation under heaven..." Parthians (north of Persia), Medes (Iraq of today), Phrygia and other Asia Minor cities, Egypt, Northern Africa (Libya), Rome, Crete, Arabs... all called men of Israel, men of Judah [205]. After Peter preached, the people that were added to the Church that had been in the wilderness [206] were 3,000...They understood it was for them he (Jesus Christ) had died, the Lost Sheep of the House of Israel, and they gladly accepted His gift.

The Israelites and the 46 cities of Judah with their 200,000 citizens (of Judah and Benjamin) were taken into Assyrian Captivity because of their idolatry and sin. The Israelites who had gone into Egypt cried out and were rescued from their bondage by God, who led them out through the Red Sea. They wandered 40 years in the wilderness, again due to sin. An entire generation that God felt was unworthy died during this period, with the exception of two overcomers, Caleb and Joshua.

Finally, they were allowed to enter Canaan. This could be termed the capital of the devils' world. In the gospel of Luke, "Satan" did tell Jesus the kingdoms were delivered unto him, and to whomever he chose he would deliver them. In taking their capital, God was pre‑figuring his eventual taking of the entire earth. Canaan at that time consisted of seven nation: Hittites, Girgasites, Hivites, Canaanites, Jebusites, Amorites, and Perizites.

Israel was told to kill all the men, women and little ones. "Thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth, but utterly destroy them," and the same list of nations is given as in [207]. Instead of obeying, "stiff‑necked" Israel dwelt among them and "look their daughters to be their wives and gave their daughters to their sons, and served other gods." "The children of Israel did evil in the sight of the Lord and forgot the Lord their God." The divorced wife, Israel, He removed from His sight. Ten‑ tribed Israel would never have a king in her again, until her seven times punishment was over, and Jesus Christ became her King.

Was Israel punished seven times; one for each nation, because she had not destroyed them, as God told her to do? So Israel was carried away to Assyria and she began her 2520‑year trek...West...to become that "Great Nation" promised to Abraham...the Kingdom of God on Earth which Christ instructed us to pray for.

To understand the story of these two nations (Israel and Judah) it is advisable to read the entire chapter of Ezekiel 23. Some of Judah was left in the land of Palestine. They committed abominations like the ten northern tribes and God said they had defiled His sanctuary, profaned His Sabbaths, and had committed adultery, and that He would bring up a company upon them that they might come to know Him. These are two sisters (Aholah the elder is Israel, and Aholibah is Judah), the same two that are in the two sticks of Ezekiel, and the same two families which the Lord hath chosen.

Again, we find in our day the enemies of these two countries saying, "These two countries shall be mine," but the Lord says they are not calculating correctly, "Whereas the Lord is there" and He will protect His Children and Save us...we shall Not be theirs.

God said He Himself broke the Brotherhood between Israel (whom He terms Beauty), and Judah (He calls Bands). The Brotherhood between Britain and America is still broken. We are still two nations...two sticks...two sisters...for just a little while longer. We already can read the signs that we shall become one nation with one King over us in the land He chose for His Kingdom, in America. He will be our King.

Micah describes the destroyer (Russia) coming upon Israel, the Judah House of David, and the Ephraim people making a great deal of noise by the movement of men, and the King goes out the gate, with the Lord at the head of them. All being gathered into the barn...the regathering of all Israel into the land of God gave Israel so long ago when He told David He would plant us in a land of our own: America!

We hear so much about "brotherhood" today, but if the brotherhood between Israel and Judah is broken, how can we have brotherhood with the other races and nations which are more divergent than we of Israel and Judah are from each other? Jesus said, "Whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother."

The keeping of God's Laws is the basis for brotherhood. The Israel race is the only people to whom the commandments of God were ever given. It was Abraham's determination to go after the kings of those seven nations, some of whom were taking his nephew Lot captive. No one else would tackle them. After Abraham had overcome them and brought Lot and his wealth back; God, in the person of Melchisidek, came to bless him. God felt the faith and obedience seed in Abraham was useable.

"For I know him, that he will command his children and his household after him and they shall keep the way of the Lord to do Justice and Judgement; that the Lord may bring upon Abraham `that' which He hath spoken of him."

The "that" was the covenant God had sworn, saying Abraham's seed (or offspring) would become a Great and Mighty Nation that would bless all nations of the earth...just as America has been and is doing...foreign aid...rehibilitiating our enemies of war...taking in the outcasts, feeding and clothing the world. Unfortunately, our leaders have not been wise in their Judgements and we find our-selves helping the ungodly and loving them that hate our Savior...therefore is wrath upon us from before the Lord! If our people would learn who they are and that we as Christians should not allow our tithe and tax dollars to be given in support of the Anti‑ Christ religion of Judaism, we would not have the Lebanese situation, nor the taking of hostages. "Many deceivers are entered into the world who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an anti‑Christ...Whosoever transgresseth and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ hath not God. he that abideth in the doctrine of Christ hath both the Father and the Son (`Oh, Lord thou art our Father and Redeemer'). If any come unto you and bring Not this doctrine (personal and national), receive him not into your house (or country); neither bid him God speed, for he that biddeth him God speed is a partaker of his evil deeds." [208]; "If my people (Israel) turn from their wicked ways I will Hear...and forgive...and heal their land." [209]

We are the same Israel people of old which god sent into captivity for their sin...2520 years! Let's be Heard by Him; let us work more earnestly to educate our people and get our nation turned from its wicked ways (helping the ungodly, etc.) so he can heal our nation. The wife, Israel, must make herself ready for the remarriage, the Wedding. As soon as Israel of old would repent and cry out, God would hear immediately and help her! With the brotherhood broken, Judah as sinful as her sister, God brought Nebuchadnezzar, King of Babylon, to take her captive.

The first attack rendered 3000 men of Judah to him; later, Circa 595 B.C., there were 10,832 craftsmen, smiths and the pick of the fighting men led bound to Babylon. The Babylonian army had spent eighteen months laying in siege before Jerusalem.

Josephus the historian records a terrible famine at the time, and a pestilence of distemper. Finally, Babylon won. Jerusalem was demolished and left deserted for 70 years. Zedekiah, the king of Israel‑Judah, had seen his sons killed, then his own eyes were put out. Years later when Christ was on trial in Jerusalem, the people said truthfully, "We have no king but Caesar." From the removal of Zedekiah as King of Judah, there has never been a king in Old Jerusalem. The Zionists today talk of putting a king in power...Now!

Another son of Jacob was Dan, whose family and progeny were noted for their navigational skills; they, too, settled in the British (B(e)rith‑Covenant, I(y)ishman) Isles. Ten of the tribes of Israel are easily traced from 720 B.C., in their captivity in Assyria, to Europe as Celtic speaking people. Further study in this "Migrations of Israel" series finds them in the British Isles, and much later in America...that great nation promised to Abraham wherein they would dwell and "move no more."The other two tribes of Israel were taken in captivity to Babylon Circa 602 B.C. Only 42,360 of these captives returned to Jerusalem after being in Babylon for 70 years.

Cyrus, King of Persia, was the world leader at the time. Cyrus gave the proclamation in 539 B.C., for Judah, at God's command, to return and build the Lord a house in Jerusalem. Cyrus returned 5,400 silver and gold vessels the Babylonians had removed from the Jerusalem temple to their temple to their gods.

Those of Judah who had been brought into Babylon and who did not return as part of the 42,360 are reputed by both Jewish and Christian scholars to have moved on west into Spain and Portugal.

From the return of Judah to Jerusalem under Cyrus, they lived through the period depicted in Nebuchadnezzar's dream that Daniel interpreted: Babylon (the head of gold) had conquered Assyria; Medo‑Persia (the breast and arms of silver) had conquered Babylon during Judah's captivity; Greco‑Macedonia (the belly and thighs of brass) would defeat Persia in 479 B.C.; afterwards, pagan Rome (the legs and feet of iron) would be the world power, and it was when Jesus Christ was born.

These changing empirical powers had their effect of the Judahites who were the "Two Baskets of Figs" as they lived side by side in and around Jerusalem. Leaders in this era, such as Aristobulus II and his brother John Hyrcanus, had a violent quarrel and Pagan Rome had to be called in to arbitrate the dispute.

The Encyclopedia Americana calls Hyrcanus a Jewish high priest (135‑105 B.C.) who forced the Idumeans to become "Jews." Idumea is the Greek for Edomites. In the Bible Esau, Edo, Mt. Seir and Idumea are interchangeable for the offspring of Esau, Jacob's twin brother. Herod the Great (37 B.C. to 4 A.D.), gave the order to kill the babies up to two years of age in the hope of murdering the baby Jesus, and was one of these Edomite Esau Jews. They ruled under the leadership of the roman Caesars.

God had told Abraham He would not hide from him His plans (nor are they hidden from us). Isaac would be born to Abraham and Sarah, and God would establish His Covenant with Isaac and his Seed (Race). The Covenant was that Abraham's seed would become a great and mighty nation. This establishment of God's Kingdom on Earth would not be contingent upon Abraham s offspring, but upon God Himself. God swore by Himself: "When God made promise to Abraham, because He could swear by no greater, he sware by Himself." [210] God told Abraham upon his offering of Isaac, "...In thy seed shall all the nations on earth be blessed, because thou hast obeyed my voice."[211]

This would have a dual fulfillment. Christ would be born of that seed and Would Bless All Nations. The seed of Abraham would become the Great Nation we have become, blessing all nations, feeding and clothing them, taking them in until Christ would come a second time and take Government on His shoulders.

After Abraham's children were formed into a nation (the tribes of "Israel," which means "ruling or prevailing with EL, with God" the same name given to Jacob by God), the Israelites were given the Laws of God. Some of these were on two tablets of Stone.

The people said "All these we will do." Hereby God took the Israelites to be His wife. They conceived their spiritual child, the Kingdom, but Israel became an adulterous wife and God removed her out of His sight into Assyrian captivity, giving her a bill of divorce.[212] Israel had gone after other gods and kings (nations) so when God divorced her. He took His Name "EL"from her, hence she could not bring forth their "child" for it would have been a "bastard" nation.

Or so it would seem to the human mind. Our Heavenly Father, however, had planned for this contingency from the Beginning; He had put in the constellations the Gospel of The Kingdom, and in that plan of Salvation "He was the Lamb, slain before the foundation of the world." He had told the Children of Israel in the wilderness that they would be a peculiar treasure (which expression, in,[213] means a purchased people). he was telling them He would die for them! By God's own Law, given to Israel, once there was a divorce and the wife took another partner, the prior arrangement by the original two partners could never be re‑entered into.

So, there was No Way that God and Israel could be remarried and fulfill His plans to bring forth That Great Nation (His Kingdom Place) with the seed (Race) of Abraham. Our God, our Husband, would leave His heavenly realm and throne, come to earth and be our Savior. He, the Godhead (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit) would become flesh. He would not send another to do this...he would come Himself to take our place. "Forasmuch as the children (of Israel, as sons of Adam) are partakers of flesh and blood, He also Himself likewise took part of the same; that through death He might destroy him that had the power of death, that is the devil."

Our Maker (Creator‑Colossians 1:16), our Husband, our Redeemer, the Holy One of Israel, God of the whole earth...for this woman (Israel), the wife of youth whom he had forsaken and whom He had wrath toward, He would now show mercy and kindness to, and come to die in her place (the death she deserved), so she could be remarried to Him and bring forth His child, the Kingdom. For us, He endured the shame of living in this realm the adversary told Christ "I own;" our Savior took their stripes for our healing, and our God bore the shame of the Cross, the pain and suffering, and he was in agony. "His sweat as it were great drops of blood."

Abraham was called a Friend of God. Yahshua (Yah‑God; Shua‑Savior) will be asked when he comes again about the wounds in His hands and He will say, "I was wounded in the house of my friends." This is Abraham's house, the children of Israel). We are the guilty race, the ones who caused those wounds. Jesus said, "I am not sent but unto the Lost Sheep of The House of Israel." His wife. how grateful we are to our Shepherd.

Caiaphas, the High Priest of the Jews at the time of Jesus' trial, said, "Consider that it is expedient that one man die for the people, and that the whole nation perish not." This is exactly what and why Jesus gave His life for us. Our Iniquity was laid on Him...the sheep had turned every one to his own way. Let us turn from our own ways...to His; ask Him to come and heal us and our nation and to be our God and King. He said we would, in time, ask Him to do it for us. Now is the time to ask!

Two things were accomplished by our Savior's choice. He would offer hope and A WAY of escape (from bondage and death‑ eternally) for Adam's children. In Adam all die...in Christ are all (of Adam) made alive. Also, Christ would fulfill the requirements of the law for His remarriage to his wife, Israel.

One party to the original marriage had to die before there could be a remarriage. He gave Himself to make adulterous Israel a Virgin, a bride‑to‑be, that He ‑ our Bridegroom ‑ could marry and with whom He could bring forth His child, the Kingdom of God on earth [214]...it was the wife who Now made herself ready. Her Past Sins are forgiven her.

Israel was under the Law. God took flesh and was made of a woman ‑ under the Law ‑ to redeem those under the Law. Only Israel was ever given the Law, but Christ very clearly stressed that He did Not destroy the Law (by coming in the flesh). "Think not that I am come to destroy the Law or the prophets; I am not come to destroy but to fulfill," He further said! "...not one jot or one title shall pass from the law, until all be fulfilled."A jot and title were the most minute marks in Hebrew.

All will be fulfilled...all people will someday obey Him and His laws. The day will come when "Every knee shall bow to Him in heaven, on earth and under the earth." [215] "...unto me every knee shall bow, every tongue shall swear" [216] (even angels chained under the earth). "Thy will be done on earth...as it is in heaven" [217] will be realized one day. If our Lord and Master didn't win every soul, He would not be Omnipotent, but He is!

After Christ arose from the dead, he was seen by many. then, there came the day He left the earth and ascended into the heavens in a cloud. The angel said He would return in like manner (nothing said about His returning to the same place). Christians at the time of His Ascension were adding to His Body ‑ "The Church" ‑ and afterwards [218]. The same church (gahal) that was in the wilderness and had ritual service all pointed to Jesus, the Passover Lamb. It was a natural transition from Temple worship to Christianity. In fulfillment of Christ's prophecy.

Titus of Rome destroyed the Temple completely in 68 A.D. It's use was over. While the Christians were adding to the Church daily, the other faction, the "evil figs," (the Jews) who would not turn unto the Lord with their hearts, were busy persecuting the good figs: the Judahite Christians. Paul said he had a thorn (son of Belial) in the flesh (a human), a messenger of Satan buffeting or persecuting him. The bad figs were, like Judas the apostle, being used to further "The Kingdom of God." They were cruel and earnestly attempting to destroy Christianity...even as they are today.

There are many manuscripts to verify the Christians were being driven out of Jerusalem and going as far west in the Isles of Britain as they could, Bishop Ussher, whose datings are used in most Bibles, wrote in the Brittanicarum Ecclesiarun Antiquitates, "The British National Church was founded in 36 A.D., 160 years before Rome confessed Christianity. Britain was officially proclaimed Christian by King Lucius at the national Council at Winchester (in) 156 A.D."

Many times the antiquity of the British Church was affirmed as being the first Christian group: at the Council of Pisa in 1417 A.D., the Council of Constance and the Council of Siena in 1423. It was stated that the representative of the British Church took precedence in seating over the others, the Church having been founded by Joseph of Arimathea immediately after the Passion of Christ in 36 A.D.

Cardinal Baronius, the outstanding historian of the Roman Catholic Church, and curator of the Vatican Library, in his Ecclesiastical Annals, refers to the exodus of these Christians in 36 A.D., "In that year the Jews, in hatred, placed Joseph of Arimathea in a vessel without sail or oar."

Joseph was the uncle of Jesus Christ, burying Him in his own personal tomb, fulfilling the prophecy that; "He (Christ) made His grave with the wicked and the rich in His death." [219]

Cardinal Baronius quoted Mistral in Mireio, and another ancient document in the Vatican Library. He named many of the Christians who accompanied Joseph in his expulsion: Mary Magdalene, Martha and Lazarus (their brother whom Jesus raised from the dead), Mary, wife of Cleophas, Salome, the mother of James and John. James was slain by the sword, and those who were associated with him were thrust into the boat on the coast of Palestine in hopes they would drown.

Our Father had other plans for them! They would carry the Gospel of The Kingdom West to France and the British Isles...who waited upon Him...Using their shirts for sails, the boat drifted to the coast of Provence, France and, following the Rhone river, arrived at Aries. Each of these Christians founded ministries among the Celts of Keltic language...the scattered 10 tribes of Israel. Martha and Marcella, her handmaiden (who was with her when she died), went to Tarascon and Avignon, Martial to Limoges, Lazarus to Marseille, Maximin and Sidonius to Aix, and Mary Magdalene to St. Baume, where even today they show you the cave she lived in. Joseph of Arimathea, with the rest of the Christians, went to Glastonbury in the Isles of West Britain. As prophesied, these early Christians moved to these western areas "to renew their strength." The people already in the isles saw and feared these things. "Fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom." The isles waited for His Law and accepted Him. There is also documentation from early writers that, before the area was called Glastonbury, it was called the "Secretum Domini" (Secret of the Lord), and "Domus Dei" (Home of God).

Alfred the Great (King in 871 A.D.), in the Anglo‑Saxon Chronicles (can be seen in the British Museum) and William the Conqueror, who updated these records of land ownership in 1086 A.D., in what is called the "Domesday Book" (recently published and being sold to the public) states: "The Domus Dei is the great monastery of Glastonbury called the `Secret of our Lord'. This Glastonbury church possesses in its own vills x 11 hides of land (1920 acres) which have never paid tax." [220]

Joseph is said to have arrived with eleven companions, and we read they erected round, thatched dwellings in a circle around a well. This well still flows and is called The Chalice Well. It was from here they reached out and are accredited with winning so many to Jesus Christ, whom they had known in person. Though our Erring Babylonian History tries to teach us that Caesar in 60 A.D., found the inhabitants of these isles, this is not borne out in documentation.

We have St. Augustine's letter to the Pope in contradiction. In 110 A.D., one of the Ptolemys of Egypt wrote, "The Britains of Our Lord's day were not barbarous. Each city had its university and there are 56 large cities."

Chrystom wrote, "With the acceptance of the new order of THE WAY, a great impetus was given to the erection of more seats of learning."

We know that Pontius Pilate attended school in Britain. The slogan over the entry of the Druidic universities was "What is truth?" Likely, this is the reason Pilate asked Jesus that very question. The Druids had a fabulous educational system and in very recent years at Stonehenge, Druid high priests have been found wearing the full regalia of the Hebrew High Priests. No human bones have ever been found, though those of animals have. The tales we have been told about the Druids is another Disinformation Ploy.

These seats of learning had monasteries and libraries. There are many manuscripts with such interesting and proving facts that are copies of material they had in the library at Glastonbury. Unfortunately, in the 1100's it burned. Even before Joseph and his party arrived, if you wanted to be a teacher or missionary, it was required (since they had no printing as we do) that one made their own copy of The Psalms to carry with them. Many went on to copy more of the old Scriptures.

Much later, in the 8th and 9th centuries, we find the Irish Book of Kells which were Scriptures that had been copied in Latin and beautifully and colorfully decorated. They are preserved at Dublin's Trinity College. The reasons for Glastonbury being called the "Horne of God" and "The Secret of The Lord" will be explored. It was from Glastonbury that British missionaries from the newly planted Christian Church soon showed the virility of their church by invading Europe.

The Romans invaded the British Isles in 58 A.D., and took Caractacus, the king, captive to Rome. It was in their palace, the Titulus, that Paul and other disciples of Jesus Christ wrote much of our New Testament and converted these Britishers in Rome.

There was much interchange between Rome, France, Spain, Glastonbury and the rest of the British Isles, and many of the saints of our Bible ended their days in the monastery at Glastonbury, and are buried there. The stone crypt of Joseph of Arimathea can be seen today in St. John's Church in Glastonbury, under stained glass windows. The importance of these revelations, and the reasons they have been concealed from us is due to the fact they prove there is no such thing as "Judeo‑Christianity."

Christianity did Not come out of Judaism as our study has shown, and we as Christians owe nothing to the Jews, except a thanks for pushing us out of Jerusalem, and Palestine on our way West to Britain, the Holy Place, on our way to that Great Nation, that Kingdom place Jesus Christ went away to get, and then return...to the Holy of Holies, in America, where very soon, now, we shall meet our High Priest, face to face.

Jeremiah gives the terms of the New Covenant of which Ezekiel was speaking and both refer to the removal of the stony heart from God's people: "But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the Lord, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people." [221]

That this message is addressed to a people who have remained a nation always is evident from the statement: "Thus saith the Lord, which giveth the sun for a light by day, and the ordinances of the moon and of the stars for a light by night, which divideth the sea when the waves thereof roar; The Lord of hosts is his name: If those ordinances depart from before me, saith the Lord, then the seed of Israel also shall cease from being a nation before me for ever." [222]

The sun and the moon are still shining so Israel is a nation before the Lord. This cannot be said of the Jews, for they ceased to exist as a nation when Titus took Jerusalem in 70 A.D. destroying the city and the Temple. The destruction and dispersion of the Jews was finished in 135 A.D. For nearly two thousand years the Jews remained a scattered people without a king, without a government and without a country of their own, becoming a curse, a hiss and a reproach in all lands where they went as predicted by Jeremiah: "Thus saith the Lord of hosts; Behold, I will send upon them the sword, the famine, and the pestilence, and will make them like vile figs, that cannot be eaten, they are so evil. And I will persecute them with the sword, with the famine, and with the pestilence, and will deliver them to be removed to all the kingdoms of the earth, to be a curse, and an astonishment, and an hissing, and a reproach, among all the nations whither I have driven them: Because they have not hearkened to my words, saith the Lord, which I sent unto them by my servants the prophets, rising up early and sending them; but ye would not hear, saith the Lord." [223]

History has demonstrated how accurately these prophecies have been fulfilled in the life of the Jews. Turning again to Ezekiel, we find that after prophesying of the return of the House of Israel to the land of their forefathers, he declares concerning those who would undertake to dispossess Israel of her inheritance as the Zionists are doing today: "But as for them whose heart walketh after the heart of their detestable things and their abominations, I will recompense their way upon their own heads saith the Lord God."[224]

Ferrar Fenton renders this: "But to those who proceed after their corrupt and depraved hearts, I will bring their own course on their heads, says the Mighty Lord."

Moffatt translates it: "But as for these others, who are devoted to their loathsome practices and detestable impieties, I will make them suffer for their conduct, says the Lord the Eternal."

The New International Version renders it this way: “But as for those whose hearts are devoted to their vile images and detestable idols, I will bring down on their own heads what they have done, declares the Sovereign LORD.”

The American Standard states: “But as for them whose heart walketh after the heart of their detestable things and their abominations, I will bring their way upon their own heads, saith the Lord Jehovah.”

The contrast presented between the House of Israel and those who are undertaking to lay claim to the land of Israel, and in doing so dispossess the House of Israel of their inheritance, is very marked. The House of Israel is represented as being a Christian people at that time, while the usurpers of their inheritance are shown to be addicted to corrupt and perverted methods. In their desire to secure control in Palestine, the Jews have committed atrocities and massacred many Arabs.

Rev. E.J. Springett of Toronto, Canada, a few years ago summed up their activities in that land in one terse sentence when he said of the Jewish Israeli State: "The State of Israeli was conceived in Fraud, Borne in Deceit, and Lives by Violence."

Through Ezekiel God has declared that he will visit upon them the type of suffering they have been instrumental in bringing upon others. Therefore, as the climax of the age approaches, we can expect to see terrible suffering come upon the Jews who have gathered together in Palestine.

Do not overlook the fact that many of the Jews who are today laying claim to the Holy Land, and who are known to the world at large as Jews, are neither Jews by descent nor by faith but are atheistic Communists setting up their control over Palestine. It is no wonder, then, that through His prophet Ezekiel God refers to the Jews as being devoted to loathsome practices and detestable impieties. The Christian world has failed utterly to recognize these Scriptural facts and many sincere but unthinking Christian men and women are undertaking to support the Jews in their unlawful claims to a right to possess Palestine. The present Christian support of the false claims of the Zionists results from a failure to investigate the true nature of what is happening in the Holy Land as every Christian should since his own spiritual welfare is vitally concerned in this matter at this critical time in the world's history. Actually, Christians are assisting in the establishment of the Abomination That Maketh Desolate in their present support of Zionism.

Continuing the history of God's people from the time of the establishment of the Throne of David, when God selected his family out of the tribe of Judah to exercise kingly prerogatives, we find both the House of Judah and the House of Israel eventually united under King David. The unity of this administration continued under David's son Solomon, but when Solomon's son Rehoboam came to the Throne, following the death of Solomon, he offended the House of Israel. This precipitated the revolt of the House of Israel (10 tribes) from the rule of the House of David and they set up their own capital at Samaria.

From that day forward the House of Israel and the House of Judah remained separate and, because Rehoboam knew that the blessings of the Kingdom followed the sons of Joseph, who received the birthright, he realized that the kingdom had been separated from the House of David: "And when all Israel saw that the king would not hearken unto them, the people answered the king, saying, What portion have we in David? And we have none inheritance in the son of Jesse: every man to your tents, O Israel: and now, David, see to thine own house, So all Israel went to their tents...And Israel rebelled against the house of David unto this day. And when Rehoboam was come to Jerusalem, he gathered of the house of Judah and Benjamin an hundred and fourscore thousand chosen men, which were warriors, to fight against Israel, that he might bring the kingdom again to Rehoboam." [225]

The Lord sent word through a prophet to Rehoboam that he was not to make war against Israel, for the Lord declared that "this division was from Him." The King obeyed and from then on only the tribe of Benjamin and House of Judah, with some Levites, remained loyal to the House of David up to the time of the captivities. Thus was fulfilled the prophecy that Ahijah the Prophet made to Jeroboam concerning the Kingdom, which was to be taken from Solomon's son: "But I will take the kingdom out of his son's hand, and will give it unto thee (Jeroboam), even ten tribes. And unto his son will I give one tribe (Benjamin), that David my servant may have a light alway before me in Jerusalem, the city which I have chosen me to put my name there." [226]

Then tribes were given outright to Jeroboam but one Kingdom tribe (Benjamin) was to remain at Jerusalem for the time being. Benjamin, in the providence of God, elected to remain with the House of David and was numbered with the House of Judah until the time of the crucifixion of Christ. It was from this tribe, then called Galileans, that our Lord chose His disciples with the exception of the one who betrayed Him. With the crucifixion the brotherhood between Israel and Judah was broken as Zechariah had prophesied it would be when our Lord was sold for thirty pieces of silver.[227]

The Galileans, or Benjamites, accepted the redemptive work of Jesus Christ and, having become Christians, carried the light westward to the Isles of the Sea. The House of David had already gone before them to the Isles by that time and, when the reunion of all the Kingdom tribes came about, Israel and the House of David in the Isles became acquainted with the word of redemption by Christ, Israel's Redeemer.

The House of Israel forsook the Lord and went into idolatry and for this reason God allowed them to be taken away into Assyrian captivity (740-720 B.C.). One hundred and thirty years later part of the House of Judah and part of the tribe of Benjamin were taken captive to Babylon (603-585 B.C.).

The House of Israel never returned to Palestine from the land of their captors, and after they were joined by the most of the Tribe of Benjamin[228] moved north and west from the land of Assyria in their trek toward the appointed place. Esdras speaks of this migration as follows: "And whereas thou sawest that he gathered another peaceful multitude unto him; Those are the ten tribes, which were carried away prisoners out of their own land in the time of Osea the king, whom Salmanasar the king of Assyria led away captive, and he carried them over the waters, and so came they into another land. But they took this counsel among themselves, that they would leave the multitude of the heathen, and go forth into a further country, where never mankind dwelt. That they might there keep their statutes, which they never kept in their own land. And they entered into Euphrates by the narrow passages of the river. For the most High then shewed signs for them, and held still the flood, till they were passed over. For through that country there was a great way to go, namely, of a year and a half: and the same region is called Arsareth. Then dwelt they there until the latter time." [229]

The latter days refer to the time following the birth and ministry of our Lord and, during the early period of the Christian era, Israel, then in central and Southern Europe, took up their westward trek again. Under different names we find the peoples moving ever westward toward the appointed place, as we have previously shown concern the appointed place. Under different names we find the peoples moving ever westward toward the appointed place. Their king had preceded them when the Royal line of David came to the Isles, Jeremiah being the agency, fulfilling his mission "to build and to plant." [230] Thus, the following prophecy by Micah was fulfilled: "I will surely assemble, O Jacob, all of thee; I will surely gather the remnant of Israel; I will put them together as the sheep of Bozrah, as the flock in the midst of their fold: they shall make great noise by reason of the multitude of men. The breaker is come up before them: they have broken up, and have passed through the gate, and are gone out by it: and their king shall pass before them, and the Lord on the head of them." [231]

Nathan the Prophet informed David of the Appointed Place for the throne when the Lord declared through him: "Moreover I will appoint a place for my people Israel, and will plant them, that they may dwell in a place of their own, and move no more: neither shall the children of wickedness afflict them any more, as before time." [232]

Moses told their fathers that they would not remain long in the Promised Land, but would be driven from it to another land: "When thou shalt beget children, and children's children, and ye shall have remained long in the land, and shall corrupt yourselves, and make a graven image, or the likeness of anything, and shall do evil in the sight of the Lord thy God, to provoke him to anger: I call heaven and earth to witness against you this day, that ye shall soon utterly perish from off the land whereunto ye go over Jordan to possess it: Ye shall not prolong your days upon it, but shall utterly be destroyed (removed from it totally, unlike what our so-called Judeo-Christian preachers teach). And the Lord shall scatter you among the heathen, whither the Lord shall lead you. And there ye shall serve gods, the work of men's hands, wood and stone, which neither see, nor hear, nor eat, nor smell. But if from thence thou shalt seek the Lord thy God, thou shalt find him, if thou seek him with all they heart and will all thy soul. When thou (Israel) art in tribulation, and all these things are come upon thee, even in the latter days..." [233]

When we remember that the latter days refer to the time designated in our calendar as A.D., i.e., in the year of our Lord, and that it was not until then that His disciples were able to bring the knowledge of redemption to the Isles, it is significant that Israel should resume their trek toward the Appointed Place during the early days of the Christian era. This would bring them to the Isles in time to hear the early proclamation of the message of salvation and redemption and there also they found the king of the House of David awaiting their coming.

The House of Israel accepted Christianity and thus fulfilled the intentions of God as prophesied by Jeremiah: "And ye shall be my people, and I will be your God. Behold, the whirlwind of the Lord goeth forth with fury, a continuing whirlwind: it shall fall with pain upon the head of the wicked. The fierce anger of the Lord shall not return, until he have done it, and until he have performed the intents of his heart: in the latter days ye shall consider it. At the same time, saith the Lord, Will I be the God of all the families of Israel, and they shall be my people. Thus saith the Lord, The people which were left of the sword found grace in the wilderness; even Israel, when I went to cause him to rest." [234]

Hosea's statement that in the latter days Israel would seek the Lord and David their King, together with Jeremiah's prophecy that they would find grace, the gift of our Lord and Savior, were fulfilled in the history of the House of Israel, the Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, Celtic peoples, but never in the History of the Jews.

Isaiah refers to the difficulties and punishment which would be upon the Jews for their refusal to hearken to the Lord or accept the Messiahship of Jesus Christ.

He stated: "Therefore will I number you to the sword, and ye shall all bow down to the slaughter: because when I called ye did not answer: when I spake, ye did not hear; but did evil before mine eyes, and did choose that wherein delighted not." [235]

One Would think the Christians would finally realize: All Missionary programs designed to take the White Man's Religion and his book ‑ The Holy Bible ‑ and his relationship with the Lord Jesus Christ to the non‑white races is pure blasphemy before Almighty God! Moreover, this is proven by the record of history which shows that [236] it has been tested and proven by centuries of historical development (the slaughter of the Missionaries recently by the blacks in Africa is what happens all too many times when White Men mistakenly take Christianity to them).

Christianity has been carried in the genes of the White Anglo‑ Saxons since his creation, almost six thousand years ago. Wherever the White Man has wondered over the earth, he has taken his book (his family history) the Holy Bible (the foundation of his faith) with him! With a study of history it will be found: Christianity thrives only in those areas of the world where the White Man lives. And to brand this presentation as Racist, as many will do, is only to deny the Truth being presented.

The observed and verifiable facts of the world about us are not affected by religious faith or the lack of faith. Christians must find themselves in perfect agreement when they affirm that lead is more malleable than steel, that the earth is an oblate spheroid rotating on its axis, that whales are mammals, that Germany was defeated and devastated by the many nations allied against her in 1945, and that the Chinese are Mongolians. About such matters there can be no dispute among Christian men, who instinctively accept the reality of the world about us and cannot believe, as do many Orientals, that it is merely an illusion in the mind of a dreamer.

If we are to salvage and restore our civilization ‑ the Occidental culture that is peculiarly our own and that now seems to be disintegrating and rotting before our very eyes, we must do so as White Christian men, by observing reality objectively and by reasoning from it dispassionately. And when we try to compute what resources remain to us, we need first of all to determine the actual strength of the Christian Traditions at the present time. Just as in our study of Elijah.

It is a fact, which Christians will regard with satisfaction and some atheists may deplore, that Western Civilization in the sense that the great majority of the people belonging to it (Although never, at any time, all of them) believed implicitly in the truth of the Christian Religion. That religious unanimity was for a long time so nearly complete that, after the fall of the Roman Empire and the evanescence of hopes for its restoration, we White Christians of the West regarded our religion as the bond that united us and distinguished us from the rest of the human species.

During the Middle Ages, our Anglo‑Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian and Celtic ancestors occupied the greater part of Europe, and, until they discovered the American Continents, they lived only in Europe, but despite that geographical unity, they did not generally refer to themselves as the Europeans.

For all practical purposes, furthermore, our ancestors belonged to the same division of the White Race: they, like the True Greeks and the True Romans before them, were all members of the great race that we not call Indo‑European or Aryan, but they hand in their languages no word to designate their blood relationship and biological unity, "...and thou (Israel ‑ the White Race) shalt be called by a new name, which the mouth of the Lord shall name." [237]

Isaiah again related: "...and call his servants (Israel ‑ the White Race) By Another Name." [238]

Hosea also relates: "...and they (Israel ‑ White Race) shall no more be remembered by their name." [239]

Thus, when they referred to the unity of which they were always conscious as something transcending the constantly shifting territorial and political divisions of Europe, they called themselves Christendom.

"For, lo, I will command, and I will sift the house of Israel among all nations, like as corn is sifted in a sieve, yet shall not the least grain fall upon the earth." [240]

And for many centuries that word was adequate and misled no one. For many centuries the West was Christendom and its White Civilization was indubitably Christian: that, whether you like it or not, is an historical fact. There is a complementary historical fact that was less obvious at the time and that even thoughtful men overlooked or tried to ignore until the events of the past few decades have made it indubitable: Christianity is a Religion of the West, and, for all practical purposes, only of the West.

It is not, as its polemical adversaries so often charge, a Semitic cult, for it is an adhesion of a considerable number of Semites, and it is not, as Christians once generally believed, a universal religion, for experience has now proven, Christianity cannot be successfully exported to populations that are not Indo-European.

Experience has also proven that it does not do the slightest good to deny ascertained facts. The men of Classical antiquity knew, of course, that the earth was spherical, and Eratosthenes in the third century B.C. calculated its circumference as 24,663 miles. But the early Fathers of the Church, living in the age of growing ignorance that shrouded the last century of the Roman Empire, decided, on the basis of some statements in the Old Testament that the earth ought to be flat, or, at least, no more curved than a shield. Lactantius was the most eloquent and probably, therefore, the most influential of many who assiduously demanded that the earth be flat and so imposed on their contemporaries the conviction that it was.

In the Middle Ages, to be sure, there were some learned men, such as Buridan, who knew that the globe is a globe, but they, like Learned men today, know very well that talk about the Equality of The Races is Utter Nonsense, usually refrained from publicly denouncing fashionable delusions.

It was not until the Fifteenth Century that the truth became again inescapable, but when it did, the White Christians, being men of the West, who do not deny the lessons of experience, surrendered the comfortable error in which they had once generally believed; and since that time, no rational White Christian has doubted that the earth is spherical.

Today, as in the Fifteenth Century, Western men have had to discard a congenial assumption to bring their conception of the world into conformity with observed reality. So long as we of the West held unquestioned dominion over the whole earth, we permitted ourselves to assume that our civilization is general, and our religion in particular, could be exported and made universal.

We did not sufficiently observe that talent for mimicry is common to all human beings and indeed to all anthropoids; that all human beings stand in awe of those who have power over them; and that a genius for dissimulation and hypocrisy is hereditary in the most intelligent of men.

Even with these oversights, the evidence against our assumption was fairly clear, but in the pride of our power we felt that we could indulge an assumption that was so congenial to the romantic generosity that is a peculiarity of our White Race. But the events of the past have shown us, beyond peradventure of doubt, the shape of the world in which we live. We now know what our prolonged missionary effort, cultural as well as religious, accomplished ‑ and how its visible effects were produced.

When Cortez and his small but valiant band of iron men conquered the teeming empire of the Aztecs, he was immediately followed by a train of earnest missionaries, chiefly Franciscans, who began to preach the Gospel to the natives and soon sent home, with naive enthusiasm, glowing accounts of the conversions they had effected. Their pious sincerity and innocent joy still lives in the pages of Father Shagun, Father Torquemada, and many others.

Far, far more persuasive than their sermons and their book had been the Spanish cannon that breached and shattered the Aztec defenses, and the ruthless Spanish soldiers who slew the Aztec priests at their altars and toppled the Aztec idols from the sacrificial pyramids. The Aztecs, Tepanecs, and other natives accepted Christianity, not because their hearts were touched by alien and incomprehensible doctrines of love and mercy, but because it was the religion of the White Men whose bronze cannon and mailclad warriors were invincible.

That was early in the Sixteenth Century and even then there were not wanting indications that should have given pause to a critical mind, but we of the West went on repeating that fond mistake for four centuries, as the missionaries whom we sent to all parts of the world wrote home glowing reports of the number of "hearts" they had "won for Christ."It was only after our enemies' campaign of "anti‑colonialism" really got under way that most of us realized that what had won all those hearts was primarily the discipline of British regiments and the manifest power of the White Man.

We now know what happened. On many a shore of Africa, for example, missionaries eager to "win souls for Christ" ventured to land alone, and the aborigines, after mutilating and torturing them for a good communal laugh, ate them, cooked or raw according to the custom of the local cuisine. Usually, a few weeks or a few months later, a British cruiser hove to off shore and lobbed half a dozen 4.5 shells into the native village, and, if not pressed for time, landed half a company of marines to beat the bushes and drag out a dozen or so savages to hang on convenient trees.

Consequently the tribe, if not very obtuse, took the hint and respected the next bevy of missionaries as some how representing the god of thunder and lightning. And if the men of God distributed enough free rice and medical care with their sermons, they were able to make "converts," as the natives learned to utter the words that Christian Missionaries like to hear.

That is, in essence, the whole history of "winning souls" among the heathens: the non‑white races of the world. There were, of course, many local variations. If the first missionaries were preceded by troops or White Settlers, the Blacks had already been convinced of the virtues of Christian rifles and had learned White Men should not be regarded as esculent comestibles. It often happened, however, that the natives, even after many years of preaching and conversion, rejected the White Man's odd rites very emphatically, and a fresh supply of missionaries were needed.

In 1905, for example, the Maji‑Maji conspiracy in Tangnyika murdered all the missionaries and almost all the White Men and White Women in the entire territory, and it required a German regiment and several companies of marines to restore the teaching of the Gospel. That was done by giving some forty or fifty thousand demonstrations that a Mauser bullet could penetrate even a Black hide that had been carefully anointed with the grease of a boiled baby. This same scenario still happens today in Africa. As can be seen by carefully watching the newspaper stories.

However, the Christian Missionaries did teach a ritual and often inculcated a superstition that had some superficial substance of Christianity, but they might as well have followed the example of St. Francis and preached sermons to the birds. That is why the many, many thousands of devoted Christians who expended their whole lives to "save souls" built only an edifice of cardboard and tinsel that is now gone in the wind.

What the vanishing of that flimsy facade has made obvious was predictable from the first. The religion of the West has Never been comprehensible to the rudimentary minds of the Congoids, Capoids, and Australoids: races so primitive that they were incapable of inventing a wheel and even of using one without supervision races that could not develop for themselves even the first and simplest preliminaries of a civilization.

Even though they pre‑dated the Adamic White Man by thousands of years. When the missionaries invented systems of writing the crude languages of the primitives, they had also to invent words to express such concepts as "God," "soul," "justice," "morality," and "religion" invent them by either creating new words or by perverting to such meanings sounds in the native jargons conveyed impressions that were faintly and remotely analogous.

That fact alone should have made us think. It was clear, furthermore, that the so‑called "converts" even those who had been most thoroughly imbued with an awe of the god of repeating rifles and locomotives, would conform to the White Man's morality only under coercion, and that whenever they escaped from the White Man's supervision they "always" spontaneously reverted, not only to their own mores, but also to whatever form of voodoo they had practiced before the White Man came.

Even if earlier experience had not been conclusive, what happened in Haiti at the very beginning of the Nineteenth Century should have removed the last lingering doubt. But the missionaries did not learn, and the "Ladies' Missionary Society" went on contributing their mites, plying their needles, and glowing with tender emotion for the sweet little savages depicted by their romantic imaginations.

Although it is true that in some places in the former colonial possessions missionaries are still tolerated, if they are obsequious to the natives and pay very well, we have at last learned that the Gospel follows the British regiments in the White Man's ignominious and insane retreat from the world that was his.

The Jews who are returning the Palestine are still under this condemnation for having rejected the Word of the Lord and having despised and crucified His Son. Contrary to the present teachings of Judeo-Christian leaders, they are not going to be able to accomplish the establishment of a permanent kingdom there.

Rather, they are gathering in the land of Palestine for the judgment that is coming upon them during the Great and Terrible Day of the Lord. Then it will be found that Isaiah's prediction will have come to pass in its entirety, for then they will be numbered for the sword and will bow down to slaughter, suffering violence just as the Irgun and Stern gangs, along with the Israeli army, have inflicted suffering and distress upon the inhabitants of the land.

In contrast to this condemnation, Isaiah speaks of the Lord's elect who will inherit His Kingdom, and of His servants who will dwell there. Then follows the contrast between His servant Israel and the Jews in the following remarkable prophecy: "Therefore thus saith the Lord God, Behold, my servants (Israel) shall eat, but ye (Jews) shall be hungry: behold my servants (Israel) shall drink, but ye (Jews) shall be thirsty: behold, my servants (Israel) shall rejoice, but ye (Jews) shall be ashamed: Behold, my servants (Israel) shall sing for joy of heart, but ye (Jews) shall cry for sorrow of heart, and shall howl for vexation of spirit. And ye (Jews) shall leave your name for a curse unto my chosen (Israel): for the Lord God shall slay thee (Jews), and call his servants (Israel) by another name (Christians)." [241]

The very name designating one as a Jew has been a curse to them and so we find many undertaking to disguise their racial background by changing their names and taking a name that would lead others to believe they are not Jews. Little success has followed this method for racial characteristics have a way of making themselves known regardless of the name under which men may try to hide the knowledge of the family background.

Let us now briefly review the history of Judah following the Babylonian captivity. Judah and Benjamin, with some of the Levities, returned to the land of Palestine and were vexed by the Jews. Nehemiah cursed them because of their wickedness: "In those days also saw I Jews that had married wives of Ashdod, of Ammon, and of Moab: And their children spake half in the speech of Ashdod, and could not speak in the Jews' language, but according to the language of each people. And I contended with them (the Jews) and cursed them (the Jews), and smote certain of them (the Jews), and plucked off their hair..." [242]

In the days of Christ, Herod, an Edomite/Shelah/Judah Jew, was on the throne in Palestine. He Was Not An Israelite! The Pharisees and Sadducees were in absolute control of the temple and the Sanhedrin. They were not the lawful descendants of the Tribe of Levi. They did not follow the law of Moses, although they claimed to do so.

Instead they set up their own Babylonian traditions, Traditions of the Elders, later to become known as the Jewish Talmud. Following is how the Pharisees came to be in "Moses' Seat" when Christ was born. They had many enemies at the beginning and the Sadducees were the first of these enemies.

They were the constant opponents of the Pharisees and their imported Babylonian paganism, misrepresented by the Pharisees as the Tradition of the Pharisees as the Tradition of the Elders, the "Oral Law" ostensibly transmitted privately to Moses and on down, superseding anything written in the Bible. In the six years of civil war between the Pharisees and Alexander Jannaeus, King and High Priest of Jerusalem, 50,000 were killed on both sides before this Sadducean ruler succumbed, and his widow Salome turned affairs over to the Pharisees in 79 B.C.

Her brother, Simon ben Shetah, had been waiting for such an opportunity. The continued civil war resulted in the sons of Alexander Jannaeus, Hyrcanus and Aristobulus, in 63 B.C., going hat in hand to Pompey, Caesar's Roman General in Syria, asking him to invade Palestine and slaughter their respective opponents. This is how Rome happened to be in power when Christ was born. The full story can be found in the Jewish Encyclopedia under "Pharisees."

The Jewish nation experienced troublous times and had a precarious existence, but the city of Jerusalem and the Temple were finally rebuilt and our Lord eventually came, presenting Himself to the Temple as their King. The Jews rejected Him and His Kingship and brought about His crucifixion. When Pilate washed his hands, signifying that he would not be responsible for the death of that innocent man, the Jews exclaimed: "His (Christ's) blood be on us, and on our children." [243] In this request the Jews asked for a terrible affliction upon themselves and upon their descendants. This curse has followed the people down through the centuries and the only ones who have escaped its full force have been those who have accepted Jesus Christ as their personal Savior. Here is set forth the crux of centuries of suffering self-inflicted by the Jews in assuming for themselves and their children the responsibility for the shedding of the blood of Christ, the Messiah. Even today they try to justify rather than condemn the acts of the High Priest and the people who condemned Christ and refuse to recognize Him as the Messiah, the Son of God. The curse for the shedding of innocent blood is upon the children of those who condemned Christ and upon all their descendants. Throughout the centuries they have tried to ignore or erase the records of history rather than to admit their guilt and turn to Him who alone can forgive them and save them from the consequences of their act.

Because the Jews rejected Him, Christ declared that all rights to the Kingdom from them (they had stolen it in an attempt to regain the birthright their father Esau had sold to Jacob-Israel) and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof [244]. Prophetically Jeremiah refers to these Jews as the evil or vile figs, to which reference has already been made in commenting on Jeremiah 29:17. But the Prophet also referred to the punishment of the evil or bad figs in the following terms: "And I will deliver them to be removed into all the kingdoms of the earth for their hurt, to be a reproach and a proverb, a taunt and a curse, in all places whither I shall drive them. And I will send the sword, the famine, and the pestilence, among them, till they be consumed from off the land that I gave unto them and to their fathers." [245]

Christ was fully aware of the existence of these prophecies regarding the evil figs. He knew they applied to the Jews so, in the rejection of Himself by the Jews, He used an unfruitful fig tree as the emblem of the Jewish nation: "Now in the morning as he returned into the city, he hungered. And when he saw a fig tree in the way, he came to it, and found nothing thereon, but leaves only, and said unto it, Let no fruit grow on thee henceforward for ever. And presently the fig tree withered away." [246]

This condemnation of the unfruitful fig tree was a condemnation of the Jews for their unfruitfulness, so the Kingdom was to be take from them and given to a nation that would bring forth the fruits of the Kingdom. In "The Verdict of Time" (p. 128) the cause of the troubles of Jewry is given and the reason why the Lord selected a particular fig tree as their emblem is made clear.

With the turn of the century modern Israel, the Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Celtic peoples, had become a company of nations and a great people. They had come into the blessings of Abraham, the promised prosperity, and with material wealth of all kinds and territorial possessions as they spread abroad to the west, to the east, to the north and to the south in conformity with the promise made to Jacob/Israel.[247]

In contrast with Israel, the Jews remained a scattered and despised people, rejected of the Lord in accordance with Daniel's prophecy because they rejected His Son. Daniel states as a result of that rejection in the marginal rendering of Daniel 9:26 (King James version): "And they (the Jews) shall be no more his people: or, and the prince's (Messiah's) future people."

At the close of their seven times (2520 years of) punishment the Jews are still anti-Christ and refuse to accept the Messiahship of Christ. In conformity with the request of their forefathers, the curse for the shedding of innocent blood is still upon them and their children. Their violence and depraved misconception of what is just and righteous has been in evidence in their activities in Palestine. The vengeful slaying of innocent men there, who were guilty of committing no crimes, shows a complete disregard of justice and its administration. The British have executed Jews in Palestine for crimes committed, trying and convicting them in conformity with the administration of law; the Jews executed innocent men in an act of vengeance, demonstrating their unfitness to rule over others. Truly the fig tree is putting forth leaves, but is barren of fruit and under a curse!

Because the Christian world today has failed to understand the distinctions between the Jews and Israel, they have been trying to give to the Jews the blessings promised to the House of Israel. A study of the history of the Jews is most enlightening, for we find they have on many occasions endeavored through their planned activities to fulfill the requirements of prophecies not applying to themselves. The present moves in Palestine are a major attempt to fulfill prophecy and it will be the final move on their part in such an endeavor. It is destined to fail. "The Jews who favored Ptolemy, the King of Egypt, anticipated his success over Antiochus the Great because of Daniel's prophecy [248]. They undertook to assist in its fulfillment with the result that they perished as Daniel's vision showed they would. But this verdict against the Jews at that time had a later and larger fulfillment after they crucified Christ.

During the days preceding the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 A.D. the Jews again moved to bring about the fulfillment of prophecy and in their opposition to Rome they expect that there Messiah would come and save their nation from the Roman armies. Instead of being delivered from destruction, Rome overwhelmed the rebellious Jews and brought about a fuller fulfillment of this prophecy upon the Jewish nation than Antiochus visited upon them when they rebelled against him: 'So the king of the north shall come, and cast up a mount, and take the most fenced cities: and the arms of the south shall not withstand, neither his chosen people, neither shall there be any strength to withstand. But he that cometh against him shall do according to his own will, and none shall stand before him: and he shall stand in the glorious land, which by his hand shall be consumed.' [249] A careful study of this prophecy indicates that Antiochus fulfilled most, but not all, of the requirements. Later, the Romans repeated that fulfillment, but more completely. Still later, the Muhammadans, by their campaigns, fulfilled the predictions of these verses.

But there is an even more complete fulfillment of this prophecy in the activities of the Jews in the crisis period at the end of the age. Today, we find world Jewry undertaking to again bring about the fulfillment of prophecy, spearheading their program through the activities of the Zionists. This also is doomed to complete failure and thousands of Jews will perish for, apart from Christ and His Kingdom, any endeavor to establish world rule cannot succeed. In the final invasion of Palestine this prophecy will have its ultimate and complete fulfillment." [250]

Again quoting from Study in Daniel, paraphrasing a portion of the verses which apply to events in this crisis period, we see the Jews moving on toward a crisis in the history of their people. In their endeavor to establish their rulership of the world, which has been their ultimate goal for thousands of years, they are to bring overwhelming destruction upon themselves. The verdict of the Angel is that they "will fail:" "At the end of years Soviet Russia will advance with a great army and numerous cavalry. At the same time many will arise against Great Britain, while the renegades among the Jews will undertake to accomplish the establishment of a kingdom, but will fail. Then Soviet Russia will come and throw up defenses and capture cities. The armies of Great Britain will not be able to stop her advances, and even all the chosen people (modern Israel), including the United States of America, will be powerless to stop the onrush of the Soviets (and Chinese - Gog and Magog) and prevent the Kremlin from attaining her objectives..." [251]

But Judah, the German nation, will be saved from the onslaught of the armies of Gog and Magog first: "In that day will I make the governors of Judah like an hearth of fire among the wood, and like a torch of fire in a sheaf; and they shall devour all the people round about, on the right hand and on the left: and Jerusalem (America) shall be inhabited again in her own place, even in Jerusalem. The Lord also save the tents of Judah First, that the house of David and the glory of the inhabitants of Jerusalem do not magnify themselves against Judah. In that day shall the Lord defend the inhabitants of Jerusalem (America); and he that is feeble among them at that day shall be as David: and The House of David shall be as God, as the Angel of the Lord before them. And it shall come to pass in that day, that I will seek to destroy all the nations that come against Jerusalem." [252]

Just as surely as the House of Israel today is associated with the name of Christianity, so also are the unregenerate and renegade Zionist Jews associated with evil spawning from the bottomless pit. Two thousand years ago the Jews undertook to destroy the King of the Kingdom and did succeed in bringing about His crucifixion. Because of their evil intent, Christ said of them: "Ye (Jews) are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth." [253]

The Jews refused to accept Christ who was of the House of David, as their King and now, nearly two thousand years later, they have refused to accept the sovereignty of the House of David as represented in the Crown of Great Britain, and through violence they compelled the withdrawal of Great Britain from Palestine. Not content in refusing to allow Israel to exercise her rightful hegemony in the land of her forefathers, the renegade Jew is moving to destroy the people of the Kingdom through the use of subtle and subversive methods of attack.

In his book, From Smoke to Smother, Douglas Reed states: "When the fighting-war ceased the entire wealth and strength of Political Zionism immediately turned again Britain. The thing was foreseeable but the British islander was surprised, as usual, to find that he, who had been told while he was fighting that he was the foremost liberator of the Jews, was portrayed, now the fighting was done. as more depraved than the Nazis, while his country's flag was besmirched, its soldier and servants murdered, and its conduct vilified in advertisements, books and plays...The Zionist mind was as hostile to the British island as the Communist one." [254]

The unfortunate fact is that this type of activity is not confined to the British Isles alone, as evidenced in the subversive activities of the anti-Defamation League in our own country. Our nation is suffering greatly from the impact of Political Zionism in its effect upon our politicians and national leaders at Washington. It has led our government to make major decisions regarding Palestine detrimental to the interests of all concerned, which would never have been made but for the pressure exerted by Political Zionism in high places.

It has been said: "A man who loves another country more than the country he was born in, is like a married man who loves another woman more than his wife!"

How the Jews have repaid the American People for giving them safe refuge from a world that hates them: The Jews have grown so fat and full of parasites from a never ending feed trough, that they have turned into nothing but murders and liars. They could not exist, were it not for the United States, which has given and still does give them safe refuge, from a world that hates them. Now let's look at how the Jews have repaid America:

1). The first traitor to America was a Jew called Benedict Arnold; and his accomplish was Major David Solesbury Franks, a young Jewish merchant of Montreal. Arnold's dealings with the British were investigated in Philadelphia before he was given command at West Point. Franks is described in Benedict Arnold, by Charles Sellers, p. 197 in the following words: "Behind its pretentious white portals, guarded by a smartly presented musket of a Continental soldier, a new commercial establishment came into being. Franks and his chief had already agreed on a partnership, and Franks had been the first in the city, bearing unsigned instructions from Arnold for the purchase of European and East India goods to any amount, a promise to see to the payment, and a strict charge that he preserve the greatest secrecy in the matter...Of the General's staff, Franks was wisely noncommittal...It was the particular duty of Franks to act as escort and guard of honor for Mrs. Arnold. He came to be known among the intimates of the family as 'the nurse.'...There was every reason to believe that the goods brought from Egg Harbor had come by sea from New York, and the pursuers believed they had discovered evidence of a treasonable correspondence. A (Jewess) Miss. Levy, suspected of being an emissary of the enemy, had gone through the lines on a pass from Arnold. Arnold was asked to explain and refused...Franks was living and dining in Army headquarters at West Point with Arnold and his wife, while Arnold was engaged in treasonable activities with (the Jewish) General Sir Henry Clinton, through his aide, Major André." [255] While the soldiers of Washington were starving and naked at Valley Forge, while such patriots as General Washington, Col. Thomas Marshall, and his son Capt. John Marshall, were resolutely throwing their all into the cause of the people, Rebecca Franks was enjoying herself in the lush atmosphere of Philadelphia about twenty miles away. Writing to the wife of an American patriot she says, 'You can have no idea of the life of continued amusement I live in. I can scarce have a moment to myself. I spent Tuesday evening at Sir William Howe's, where we had a concert and dance." [256]

2). The first violation of the Constitution was instigated and placed into effect by a Jew called Alexander Hamilton.

3). President Abraham Lincoln,[257] the first American President to be assassinated, was murdered by a Jew called John Wilks Booth. "John Booth, A Jewish silversmith whose ancestors had been exiled from Portugal because of their radical political views. In London the refugees had continued their trade and free thinking, and John had married Wilkes' cousin. This Wilkes was the 'celebrated agitator John Wilkes of Westminster, London...John Wilkes Booth's father was Junius Brutus Booth." [258]

4). President James Garfield, the second American President to be assassinated, was murdered by a Jew called Charles J. Guiteau.

5). President William McKinley, the third American President to be assassinated, was murdered by a Jew called Leon Czolgosz, an anarchist.

a). Benjamin Gitlow, the son of two Russian-Jewish refugees was born in Elizabeth, New Jersey. He was, perhaps, the First Communist convicted and sent to prison for promoting the violent overthrow of the United States.

He helped to form the Communist Labor Party. He twice ran on the Communist ticket for Vice-President and once for Mayor of New York City. He was a charter member of the powerful Political Committee of the American Communist Party and its dominating Secretariat of Three. He was convicted under the Criminal Syndicalist Law in 1919, of advocating, to quote the Supreme Court decision [259]: "In plain and unequivocal language, the necessity of accomplishing the 'Communist Revolution' by a militant and 'revolutionary Socialism.'" When arrested on the charges for which he was jailed, he said: "The first news of the Tsar's overthrow was received with great rejoicing. It stimulated above all those elements in the party that comprised the Slavic and Jewish federations, because most of their members hailed from Tsarist Russia. These federations were: The Russian Federation, the Jewish Federation, the Ukrainian Federation, the Lithuanian Federation, the Estonian Federation, the Polish Federation, the Lettish Federation and such allied Slavic federations as the Bulgarian and Yugo-Slav. The Slavic language federations began to grow very rapidly. Those who had immigrated from Tsarist Russia began to look forward to the time when they would return to their native land, and as many as could left for Russia immediately. Among the latter were several staff members of the Navy Mir, Russian Socialist paper published in New York, such as, Leon Trotsky, Nicholas Bukharin, Volodarsky, who played stellar roles in the Bolshevik Revolution, and lesser luminaries, like Boris Reinstein... [260]

We openly called for the violent overthrow of the United States Government. We isolated ourselves by attacking the A.F. of L. as an agent of the capitalist government and calling upon the workers to build new unions that would not be afraid to use their economic power for revolutionary purposes. When strikes took place we called upon the workers to turn them into revolutionary channels, the Communist Party actually calling upon them, as it did in the strike of the Brooklyn street car men, to overthrow the government and establish Soviets. We existed in a state of semi-legality, always expecting to be attacked and arrested." [261]

6). America's first international war was declared by a Jewish President called Theodore Roosevelt. "If you will look back at every war in Europe during the nineteenth century, you will see that they always ended with the establishment of a 'balance of power.' With every re‑shuffling there was a balance of power in a new grouping around the House of Rothschild in England, France, or Austria. They grouped nations so that if any king got out of line, a war would break out and the war would be decided by which way the financing went. Researching the debt positions of the warring nations will usually indicate who was to be punished." [262]

7). America was tricked into World War I on the side of England, by the Jews with the aid of a Jewish President called Woodrow Wilson. This was done as payment to England for the Balfour Declaration, which promised Palestine to the Jews for their homeland; if they would use their control of the media (Newspapers, Magazines, Radio and etc.) to get America into the war on the side of England. "The Jews might have had Uganda, Madagascar, and other places for the establishment of a Jewish Fatherland, but they wanted absolutely nothing except Palestine, not because the Dead Sea water by evaporation can produce five trillion dollars of metaloids and powdered metals; not because the sub‑soil of Palestine contains twenty times more petroleum than all the combined reserves of the two Americas; but because Palestine is the crossroads of Europe, Asia, and Africa, because Palestine constitutes the veritable center of world political power, the strategic center for world control." [263]

a). Between World War I and World War II, the Inter-national Jewish Bankers financed, with American taxpayer dollars, through the Federal Reserve - the rebuilding of Germany's military and rearmament as well as her economic recovery. This accomplished they entered into the "Abmachungen" (agreements) with the German High Command. They agreed to have the Soviets secretly supply the German generals with all the arms and munitions they required for a modern army of several million.[264]

They also instructed Stalin to place complete training facilities at the disposal of the Germans to enable them to train the number of commissioned and non-commissioned officers they would require to officer the new army they planned to bring into being when they considered the time was ripe.

The vast building projects required to put the terms of the "Abmachungen" into effect were financed, as we said, by the International Jewish Bankers, through the Federal Reserve in the United States, as it was the only country on earth wealthy enough to finance such a tremendous undertaking in so short a time.

The Jews thus enabled both Communist and Fascist countries to build up their economy and war potentials. The International Jewish Bankers enabled the German High Command to evade ALL the military restrictions placed upon them by the Treaty of Versailles.[265] The vast Krupp Munitions and Armaments Plants built in the Soviet Union behind the Ural mountains were named "Manych." The German armament firms were granted every concession they asked for. International intrigue on such a lavish scale could only be accomplished by one thing, absolute control of the news media around the world, and meant only one thing. Those involved were preparing for World War II. Although it is hard for the average American to understand and believe, Communism and Naziism have several things in common:

2) Both advocate war, hatred, and force and opposed to Christ's policy of peace, love and teaching;

3) Both are totally controlled by the same atheistic-materialistic ideologies of Satan's Disciples;

4) They further the diabolical conspiracy to win the souls of men away from loyalty and obedience to Almighty God;

8). America was again tricked into a war, World War II, by a Jewish President called Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Who allowed over 3,000 American service men to be killed at Pearl Harbor, so that America would enter the war and rescue Roosevelt's Jewish friends, who were and still are in control of Russia.[266] Roosevelt was aided in his deceptions to get America into the war, by his Jewish brothers in England. Which is shown by the statement of the English Captain Liddell Hart: "To persuade her (America) to take our part will be much more difficult, so difficult as to be unlikely to succeed. It will need a definite threat to America, a threat, moreover, which will have to be brought home by propaganda to every citizen, before the republic will again take arms in an external quarrel. The position will naturally be considerably eased if Japan were involved and this might and probably would bring America in without further ado. At any rate, it would be a natural and obvious object of our propagandists to achieve this, just as during the Great War they succeeded in embroiling the United States with Germany." [267]

9). Another Jewish President called Harry S. (Solomon Schiff) Truman allowed between 20,000 and 90,000 American service men and civilians to rot and die in Russian gulags. He was aided and by another Jew called Dwight David Eisenhower.[268] "Wars are the Jews harvest, for with them we wipe out the Christians and get control of their gold. We have already killed 100‑million of them, and the end is not yet." [269]

10). Jewish Presidents Truman and Eisenhower allowed America to be sucked into the Korean War, where other thousands of American service men were allowed to rot and die in Russian and Korean gulags, to aid their Jewish banker and oil friends to expand their operations.

11). On July 20, 1948 a federal grand jury, indicted 12 men who at that time constituted the National Board of the Communist Party of the United States (CPUSA). The indictment charged them with conspiring knowingly and willfully to teach and advocate overthrowing or destroying the Government of the United States by force and violence, and with conspiring to organize the CPUSA for that purpose. One, a Jew, by the name of William Zebulon Foster, National Chairman of the Communist Party was not tried because of illness. Of the other 11 who were tried seven were Jews.

12). America's Atomic secrets were stolen by Jewish spies; two of which were called Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, who then turned over the stolen secrets to their Jewish friends in Russia.

13). America was tricked into the Vietnam War, (where other hundreds perhaps thousands of American service men were left to rot and die in Communist prison camps), which once again aided Jewish banking and oil interests to expand, by the Jewish President called Dwight David Eisenhower.

14). On July 14, 1954, while French‑influenced Egyptians celebrated Bastille Day as a symbol of the overthrow of monarchies both in France and in Egypt, incendiary devices were exploded in U.S. Information Service libraries in Cairo and Alexandria. Nine days later, on July 23, members of the Israeli sabotage network took firebombs to the Cairo and Alexandria. As one of the young Egyptian Jews, Philippe Nathanson, stood in front of an Alexandria theater, the incendiary device he was carrying ignited prematurely. It was later, after questioning, discovered the fire bombings were to be blamed on the Egyptians in an effort to undermine U.S. Egyptian relations.

<<<<<<< On November 22, 1963, The Jewish Mossad Killed President Kennedy! >>>>>>>

Who or what is the Mossad? Most Americans have never even heard of it, and even fewer even know of its existence. It is therefore cogent that we expand this footnote here, briefly, to explain the nature of the Jewish Mossad. The Mossad is, in a way, the Israeli equivalent of our CIA, but it is much more. It is the Jewish intelligence gathering arm, whose headquarters are in Tel Aviv, Israel, but their vast armies are spread into every country of the world. "The Mossad can go to any distinguished American Jew and ask for help," [270] and they also ruthlessly murder people they deem a threat to the Jewish conspiracy. They foment revolutions, hatch political plots, overthrow governments, assassinate key figures, stage commando raids where necessary, or organize revolutionary movements, all in the cause of the Jewish race. The CIA, or the Russian KGB do all these things also, but with this difference.

Since the Jews control practically all the nerve centers of power throughout the United States and the world, so do the intelligence agencies of the United States collaborate with the Mossad. In short, the CIA and the KGB are, in actuality, adjuncts of the Mossad, with the Mossad firmly in control of all. The CIA (which is under almost total control of the Jews) feeds all important information it gathers not only into its own computers in Washington, but also into the huge bank of computers in Tel Aviv. So does the KGB, so does the British Intelligence, the German and the French.

The Mossad gathers all, but it does not give any back. It is a one‑way street. In fact, the CIA and FBI are heavily infiltrated by, and staffed with Mossad agents. The Mossad also makes sure that their own agents are in every agency of the government, on the staff of every congressman and senator, and, in fact, every important nerve center of power. In short, the Mossad is purely Jewish, loyal ONLY to Israel and the Jewish race and the world wide Jewish conspiracy. It is the world's most powerful, most efficient gang of murderers. Although, historically speaking, the name Mossad is of recent vintage, under other names the roots of these murderous brigades go far back in history.

When the Jews describe the killing of 75,000 of their enemies in the Book of Esther, they were describing a typical Mossad operation, and they have been celebrating their Purim every year ever since (This was broadcast to the nation on May 1, 1989 when a Jewess revealed on the Ophra Wenfray show on NBC that she had participated in the killing of young (Christian) children, and preparing their blood for Jewish religious rituals. And that the police in many cities knew this, but would not act upon it because of the power of the Jews).

The persecution and destruction of White Christian people, by Jews, is not a recent thing but reaches far back into history. The Rev. M. Malbert has stated: "I am going to show that real religious persecution is uniquely Jewish...In the time of Justinian, in the sixth century, the Jews massacred Christians in Caesarea and destroyed their churches. When Stephanus, the governor, attempted to defend the Christians, the Jews fell on him and slew him. In 608 A.D., the Jews of Antioch fell upon their Christian neighbors and killed them with fire and sword...About 614 A.D., the Persians advanced upon Palestine and the Jews, after joining their churches. Ninety Thousand Christians perished in Jerusalem alone." [271] Perhaps the greatest act of revenge, treachery and hatred perpetrated by the Jews was their destruction and takeover of the White-ruled and formerly Christian Nation of Russia. Here we have a case of a premeditated and cold-blooded plan to destroy the White Government and people of that nation.

Russia, as a nation, had been populated and ruled by the "White Russians" since about 900 A.D. These hardy settlers being of Germanic and Scandinavian descent, set about to establish a dynasty rich in art and culture. An economic climate developed in which Russia prospered and because the "breadbasket of Europe." With the Red Bolshevik Revolution Jewish revolutionaries had destroyed this stable civilization in a few days. The Jews were free to release their ingrained hatred through mass murders of helpless White Russian victims.

Christians were dragged from their homes, tortured and murdered. Some were chained to the floor and hot lead poured into their mouths. Many were tied to horses and dragged through the streets of the city. Pregnant Christian women were chained to trees and their babies cut out of their bodies. Russia became like a slaughter house with corpses lying everywhere.[272] The bloody massacres continued on and off through the decades of Red rule by the "Soviet Union." The Russian author, Alexander Solzhenitsyn, relates that some sixty-six million "Real Russians" have been murdered since the Jewish Bolshevik Revolution at the hands of the Yiddish revolutionaries.

Before the Revolution, Russia was about 75% White, today the bulk of the population is Asiatic. The Jews took another opportunity to massacre helpless Christians during the Spanish Civil War in the 1930s. The Jew Rosenberg (Moses Isrealsohn) headed murder teams called the "World Revolutionary Movement Purification Squads." Their "purification" consisted mainly of massacres of priests, nuns, choirboys, women and children. Madrid officials estimated that one tenth of the population of Spain was murdered by the Communist Jews by 1939. In the fall of 1939, the Communist Jews had plotted the mass murder of Poland's leading class. The Communist Jews had dossiers of all who might lead the Polish people to resist, and who had been exposing the Jewish-Communist threat. During the first days of the War, 15,000 Polish officers and intellectual leaders, who were the flower of the nation, were captured and taken to Jewish operated Communist camps.

In the spring of 1940, the Polish prisoners were brought to Katyn Forest. With their hands tied behind them, the victims were forced to kneel and then shot in the back of the head and buried in mass graves. Stalin knew full well that even his bloodthirsty Mongolian troops did not have the stomach for such a slaughter, so he hand-picked Jews to do the actual killing. Because he knew the Jews would not only do it, but enjoy every minute of it.

Thus the problem of Polish Patriots was solved. But these slaughters pale in comparison to what will happen in America if the Jews are able to take complete control. It has been estimated by Jewish Rabbis that 150-million Americans will have to be slaughtered to bring the rest under total control. Killing their enemies is what they men by the saying "having a good day." These killers run rampant throughout every county in the world, including, and especially, the United States. Our congressmen are acutely aware, and also deathly afraid of them, and for good reason, as are most of the personnel in the government's employ.

With a study of the existing, written material, on the assassination of John Kennedy, it becomes very clear that it was the Mossad which actually did the job. They had their professional triggermen carry out the execution and do it right. They had their sharpshooters set up behind a stone wall on the grassy knoll in front of the motorcade and when Kennedy was in the proper range they let him have it from front and back; blowing his brains out.

That is why the Warren Commission repeatedly ignored eyewitness reports, about the shots from and the activities on the grassy knoll. At the same time they placed Oswald in the School Book Depository building to play the part of the fall guy, but you can be sure they did not leave the real killing job to a third rate bungler like Lee Harvey Oswald. Thus, on November 22, 1963, John Kennedy, in the company of his wife Jacqueline, was riding in an open motorcade through the streets of Dallas, Texas, ostensibly to shore up his sagging political image. As he was riding by the Dealey Plaza and past the Texas School Book depository Building, at 12:30 PM, shots suddenly rang out.

Governor John Connally, who was riding in the same car in a seat in front of Kennedy was severely wounded. John Kennedy, whose brains were blown out by one of the shots, was pronounced dead on arrival at the Parkland Hospital, to which the car was rushed.

Lee Harvey Oswald, a drifter and nonentity without means, had evidently been carefully coached and set up by the conspirators to play the part of the fall guy. He was seen running out of the Texas School Book Depository Building, and a Dallas policeman by the name of J.D. Tippit, who tried to arrest Oswald shortly thereafter, was shot and killed. Presumably he was killed by Oswald, but even this conclusion is questionable. Shortly thereafter Oswald was captured and taken into custody.

He was promptly questioned by seven FBI agents for 12 hours. Forty‑seven hours after Kennedy was shot, while in the custody of Federal agents and being transferred in a passageway beneath the Dallas police building, Oswald himself was gunned down by a Jewish night club operator named Jack Ruby (A Jew whose real name was ‑ Jacob Rubenstein). This was done in broad daylight in full view of the television cameras, and thereby instantly was destroyed a highly visible but unstable key witness who could have shed considerable light on the conspiracy. He was, however, only one of 29 people who were connected with the conspiracy that were to die prematurely and violently under mysterious circumstances, as we shall see.

Lyndon B. Johnson, then Vice‑President under Kennedy, was quickly sworn in as President during the flight back from Dallas to Washington. Contrary to all legal procedures and to the laws of Texas, Kennedy's body was also flown to Washington and taken out of the jurisdiction of the Texas authorities. So too was the investigation of this crime. Then President Lyndon Johnson quickly curtailed the investigation and bypassed independent Texas authorities who had prime legal jurisdiction by appointing the Warren Commission as the sole authority to do the job. Supposedly this was done because the crime was of such magnitude that the usual authorities who should have had legal jurisdiction (the Dallas police, the Texas Rangers) were too minor to be entrusted with such a major crime. Actually, the real reason, as we shall see, was so that the cover‑up could be contained and controlled in one highly selective package, a package carefully stacked so that it could be trusted to do just what it did do: Not to investigate the crime at all, on the contrary, to cover it up.

The Warren Commission, headed by Supreme Court Justice Earl Warren, took over all aspects of the investigation and barred all other authorities who had prior and legal right to do so. In this it was backed up by the controlled Jewish press, by the FBI, and by the CIA. In fact, it became a willing tool of these latter two federal agencies and did exactly as it was instructed. There is more, much more, thousands of pages of garbage, that is the story put out by the Warren Commission.

It was the conclusion they were determined to foist on the public before they ever even started gathering "facts" and "information," and they stuck with it to the bitter end, either ignoring or twisting any evidence that did not fit their preconceived "conclusion." The story is so wild that it could easily fit into "The Wildest Stories Ever Told."No wonder.

The authors have a common mentor, the Jewish power establishment. Also, no wonder that after 25 years and massive doses of lies and propaganda the overwhelming American public will not buy the lone nut, no conspiracy story, it still remains hopelessly confused as to who did do it, and as to why Kennedy was assassinated.

Following are some of the strange and bizarre antics and episodes that occurred during this blatant crime and fraudulent cover‑up.

1). Although the alleged key culprit, Lee Harvey Oswald, was questioned by seven FBI operatives for 12 hours, the transcripts of the interrogations were burned and destroyed forever.

2). Oswald was murdered within 48 hours of the assassination, by Jack Ruby, a sleazy Jewish pimp and himself a paid operative of the FBI. This he was ostensibly able (allowed) to do while Oswald was in the custody and "protection" of Federal agents.

3). None of Oswald's fingerprints were found on the Mannlicher‑Carcano rifle with which he was accused of shooting the president. Since he supposedly rushed out of the Depository building immediately after the president was shot, he would hardly have had the time to clean it up.

4). Although Oswald was known to be a poor marksman with a rifle (several months earlier, April 6, 1963, to be exact, he had taken a shot at Maj. Gen. Edwin Walker and missed) yet the Warren Commission credited him with the miraculous feat of inflicting eight different wounds on President Kennedy and Governor John Connally within six seconds from a distance of more than 200 feet and at an angle that would have taxed the professional skills of even the world's most expert marksmen. Plus the fact that he would have had shoot through the limbs of a tree.

5). One of the bullets was credited by the Warren Commission as having followed this most amazing route: It supposedly went through President Kennedy's back and came out of his neck, then went through Gov. Connall's back and out of his chest, into the Governor's wrist and out of his wrist into his leg.

Now, man, that is some shooting! Strangely, this same alleged bullet was then accidentally found lying on the floor of the Parkland Hospital where the victims were taken. When "discovered," this magic bullet was found to be clean as a whistle, unscarred and unmashed, even though it supposedly had traversed and shattered ribs, wrists and other bones in its most remarkable trajectory. Would you believe that?

6). The Warren report blandly stated that: "...no credible evidence suggests that the shots were fired from...any other place than the Texas School Depository Building."

This despite the fact that the commission knew the names of at least 266 witnesses present at the scene of the crime. Of these 259 were able to testify before the Dallas police, the Dallas Sheriff's Dept., the FBI or the Secret Service.

In the case of 68 persons interviewed or called as witnesses, the law enforcement interrogators "forgot" to ask where they thought the shots came from. Of the 90 who were asked this important question 58 said that the shots came from the grassy knoll (in front of the motorcade) and not from the Texas Book Depository Bldg. (behind the motorcade).

Strangely, most of the 32 who disagreed about the shots coming from the grassy knoll were government officials., their wives, or aides. Nevertheless, even ignoring coercion affirmed they believed the shots came from the grassy knoll in front of the motorcade, a very important piece of evidentiary information the commission chose to completely ignore.

7). There was one individual spectator, a man by the name of Zapruder who happened to film the motorcade at the time of the shooting, using an 8mm movie camera. Since this was hard evidence that could refute the conclusions desired by the conspirators, the CIA moved quickly to appropriate the film.

8). Life Magazine in its October 2, 1964, issue ran an article by then Rep. Gerald R. Ford (R‑Michigan) who was a member of the Warren Commission. In this article, it ran eight pictures of the critical frames from the Zapruder film.

In one issue frame No. 6 showed blood and brains spurting upward from the head of Kennedy. Evidently Life had committed an unforgivable error that could have run counter to the establishment's directive. The presses were stopped in mid‑run and a new No. 6 picture was submitted, which merely showed the president slumped over. Someone from higher up evidently gave the order. When a Keen Report (who had a copy of both issues) years later tired to obtain an explanation from Life, the management blandly denied that there had been a switch or that there had been two versions.

Allen Dulles, CIA Director, during the Kennedy Investigation is quoted as saying the CIA would lie about anything, at anytime and to any one. That the conspirators were determined to suppress the real information at all costs was evidence by the fact that it was apparently dangerous to know too much about the crime, should such people not be subject to control in cooperating in the cover‑up.

We have already mentioned that two people, Lee Harvey Oswald and Jack Ruby (Jacob Rubenstein), met violent and untimely deaths. Both of them were part of the conspiracy, and neither apparently could be trusted not to blow the whistle. But they were only two out of a string of at least 29 people who had some knowledge of the conspiracy and who, over a period of years, died under mysterious and violent circumstances. These murders, too, had to be covered up in an ever widening circle of complications. That the conspirators, whoever they were, or are, have been able to successfully do so over the last 25 years proves more than anything else that the conspiracy is not only determined and pervasive, but also tremendously powerful. Here are that met with an untimely death because they knew too much.

A). Dorthy Kilgallen, a nationally known syndicated columnist and television personality interviewed Jack Ruby (Rubenstein) during the latter's trial for killing Oswald. She then made the mistake of telling her Jewish make‑up man that she was going to "break the Kennedy assassination wide open within five days." Three days later, November 8, 1965, she was found dead in her apartment.

B). Gary Underhill, a CIA agent, told friends he knew who killed Kennedy, and that he was sure that they would soon get him (Underhill) also. On May 8, 1964, Underhill was shot to death in Washington.

C). William Pitzer, a lieutenant in the U.S. Navy had photographed the military‑performed autopsy of JFK's body. He told friends he had been ordered to keep quiet about what he saw, and, did so for years. Nevertheless, he was found dead with a bullet in his head on October 29, 1966.

D). Carlos Prio Socarras, formerly a sometime president of Cuba and at one time a business associate of Jack Ruby, died on April 15, 1977, of what was declared "a self‑inflicted" gunshot wound to the chest.

E). Joseph A Milder, who was identified by Miami Police as a "right‑wing extremist" was secretly taped by the Florida lawmen in which he accurately described how Kennedy would be assassinated. He died 13 days before the event. On February 9, 1974 a Coleman stove blew up in his bathroom. He died two weeks later, but the mortician who saw the body said the burns were not sufficient to cause his death.

F). David Ferdie was a CIA contract pilot who flew secret missions into Cuba. New Orleans D.A., Jim Garrison, in a trial, questioned the flier, implying that Ferdie had flown the real killers out of Dallas and into Cuba immediately after the assassination. On February 21, 1967, a month after the questioning, David Ferdie was found dead in his apartment, shot in the heart.

There are more detailed stories easily available of people who knew too much and consequently died an untimely, violent death under mysterious circumstances. However, we do not have the space here to further pursue each case. We believe, however, that we have cited sufficient examples, to show that the conspirators, whoever they might be, are powerful, are ruthless killers, and will leave no stone un‑turned in suppressing any evidence which they suspect might surface to blow their conspiracy. "From the days of Adam (Spartacus) Weishaupt, to those of Karl Marx to those of Trotsky, Bela Kun, Rosa Luxemburg and Emma Goldman. This world‑wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstruction of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence and impossible equality, has been steadily growing...There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international, and for the most part, atheistic Jews. It is certainly a very great one: it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders." [273]

We now come to the heart of the story. Who might these conspirators be? "There is a Jewish conspiracy against all nations; it occupies almost everywhere the avenues of power ‑ a double assault of Jewish revolution and Jewish finance, revolution and finance." [274] We have clearly established that there was a widespread conspiracy, planned long before its execution on November 22, 1963. There are any number of individuals or groups who would have had motives to kill Kennedy, and perhaps would also have had the means to do so. After all, any man, no matter how well protected, is vulnerable to the assassin's bullet, as has been proven more recently in that President Reagan was shot at and hit, as also was Pope John Paul II and a number of other highly protected individuals.

From time to time, a considerable number have been mentioned as possible suspects of killing Kennedy, people and parties who had both the means and the motive:

a). Fidel Castro, because there was information out that the U.S. was going to liquidate him.

b). The Anti‑Castro groups, because Kennedy betrayed them at the Bay of Pigs fiasco.

c). The Kremlin and the KGB because of the missile crisis and other frictions, had both motive and means.

Who could possibly have the power to do this? Who could command the whole news media to consistently support a blatant and transparent lie claiming that there was no conspiracy? Who could tell the Mannlicher‑Carcano Corporation and its employees, even in Italy, to keep their mouths shut? Who could possibly murder at least 29 other people who knew too much and get away with it?

When we started this presentation, we stated, it was our belief that the Mossad were the ones responsible. Therefore, we now come to the question of motive. Why would the Jews want to kill Jack Kennedy? When it comes to motives, we confess we do not claim to be mind readers. We can only speculate, look at the ensuing events of history and come up with cogent reasons as to why they did what they did. With that as a basis we can think of several important reasons why they would want to see John Kennedy dead, and will list them in what we believe to be their order of importance.

1). According to the Canadian Intelligence Service of September, 1988, Kennedy committed the most deadly of all crimes in the eyes of the Jewish bankers. He by‑passed the Jewish Federal Reserve and issued government notes. He committed the same unforgivable sin as did President Abraham Lincoln a hundred years earlier and for which he, too, paid the ultimate price.

In the complex cover‑up of the Kennedy murder, history repeated itself and a strangely similar modus operandi was used as in the cover‑up of the Lincoln crime some 98 years earlier. On June 30, 1963, Kennedy signed Executive Order No. 11110, and further amended E.O. No. 10289 of September 19, 1951, thereby giving the President authority to issue the currency.

He thereupon ordered the issue of $4,292,893,815.00. This was almost ten times as much as the $450,000,000.00 printed by Lincoln during the Civil War. He evidently forced then Secretary of Treasury, C. Douglas Dillon, another name changing Jew (whose real name was/is Lapowski?), to sign the United States notes. Shortly thereafter, on November 22, 1963, Kennedy paid the ultimate price and was shot, as was Lincoln.

So John Kennedy was murdered, we believe, by a brigade of professional killers, the Jewish Mossad. Both the execution and the cover‑up were planned months in advance by the only force in the world that had the pervasive power to draw on all its resources in the news media, the government and the judicial agencies, namely the worldwide Jewish network.

Why, who else but the Jewish establishment and the Jewish powerhouse itself. It is they who have the power to not only suppress any information they deem deleterious or harmful to their cause, but they can also spread wholesale all over the world any lie or set of lies they deem beneficial to their cause, and this they blatantly have done for centuries (under other names).

The cover‑up of the Kennedy assassination is one major example, but by no means the only one. That the Jews planned the murder, and had their murderous band of bloodthirsty killers, the Mossad pull the trigger or triggers that killed Kennedy, is beyond question!

15). In 1967 the Israelis, with malice afore-thought, deliberately attacked the U.S.S. Liberty; killing 34 and wounding 171 American service men. Then when the wounded were placed in rubber life rafts because of fear of the ship sinking, Israeli gun-boats came along side the Rafts and Machine-Gunned the Wounded in them and those swimming in the water nearby. This was done, apparently, in an effort to trick America into another Jewish instigated war. The Jews have even been able to keep the attack from being published in encyclopedias including the Encyclopedia Britannica.

16). The most recent admitted‑editor of The American Communist paper, the Daily Worker (which has, for years advocated the violent overthrow of the American Government) is a Jew, called John Gates whose real name is Israel Ragen Streif.

17). With even more readers than the Daily Worker, is the Morgen Freiheit of New York City, A Communist paper printed entirely in Yiddish.

18). The New York Jew, Alexander Bittleman, said in his book, The Jewish People Face the Post‑War World published in 1945, "If not for the Red Army, there would be no Jews in Europe today, nor in Palestine, nor in Africa; and in the United States the length of our existence would be counted in days...The Soviet Union has saved the Jewish people."

19). Every single time our government uncovers a nest of subversive Communists, the majority of those apprehended are invariably Jews. Examples: Eleven Communists, who formed what was called the "American Politburo," were arrested in the much‑publicized "Eugene Dennis Case"; seven of these eleven were Jews. Later taken into custody was the twenty‑one man organization which had been formed to replace the previously arrested and indicted twelve. Of these twenty‑one Communists, fourteen were Jews.

20). Of the famous "Hollywood Ten," who were convicted of contempt of Congress for refusing to explain their Communist connections, nine were Jews.

21). Since World War II, hundreds of Communists have been convicted of espionage activities in the United States. Nine out of Ten have been Jews.

22). In 1971 the Grain merchants: Five companies control the Free World's grain. Of these the Fribourgs own Continental Grain, the Louis Dreyfus family owns a second, and the Hersch family controls a third (Bunge Company). All three families are Jewish, or of Jewish ancestry. In this Great Grain Robbery of 1971‑72 Henry Kissinger (Jew) was at the heart of secret dealings that gave Russia U.S. grain at bargain prices and from which American farmers received little profit.[275] Remember? President Richard Nixon appeared to climb to the top of the political ladder by stating, among others, his opposition to Communism. However, just a few months after his election, he not only admitted changing his hostility toward that ideology, but began a program to establish trade with the enemy and recognize Communist China and abandon Taiwan. While, at that time, our American Soldiers were bring killed by Chinese troops disguised as Viet Cong Regulars.

The Communist countries had been experiencing a growing shortage of food, which was causing a lengthening in the food lines. To forestall a possible revolt, the Communist regimes began tremendous grain purchases. In the past they were heavily supplied by Canada, but that country's surplus had become fully committed. As a result, the Cook Co., Cargill, Continental Grain and the other two large grain companies, through the then Secretary of Agriculture Butz and the Department of Agriculture made some tremendous grain sales to the Soviet Union.

So in November of 1971, Michael Fribourg completed a deal with the Soviet Union, through Nickolai Belousou, the Chief of Exportkhelb, the Russian grain‑purchasing agency; for 900,000 tons of American surplus barley and oats, 2‑million tons of corn, and 282‑million bushels of wheat. The total figure was something in excess of 18‑million metric tons of grain sold to the Soviet Union. This tremendous sale was financed by a combination of U.S. guaranteed credits and U.S. subsidized prices. So the farmers and the taxpayers had been ripped off again.

23). President Carter and his Administration later announced it would permit the Soviet Union to purchase up to 25‑million metric tons of wheat and corn in 1979. Nixon, Carter and other Presidents before and after them, permitted such action because the Communist system is unable to grow enough grain to feed its own people and depends on the United States to bail it out again as we have time and time again. In the grain announcement, no mention was made about how the Soviet Union will pay for this 25‑ million metric tons of grain. But now we know that once again our government leaders failed to live up to the trust our American People had in them by electing them in office, and let the Soviet Union have the Grain free through Credits, issued by the United States Government, for the Soviets to purchase the Grain at American Taxpayer Expense.

24). In 1982 the Jewish Mossad bombed the Turkish Honorary Consulate in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; blaming it on Arab terrorists.

25). A few months later the Israelis, again with prior knowledge, allowed other American service men to be killed in yet another attempt to trick the United States into fighting a Jews war.

a). In 1983, in what appears to be another attempt to trick the United States into a Jewish instigated war, the Israelis allowed 241 Marines to be killed, even though they knew the bombing was to take place, and that our Marines had no ammunition in their weapons; A fact neither the Arabs nor the Palestinians knew.

b). In 1984 agents for the Israelis hijacked Kuwait Airlines Flight 221 during which two American employees of the Agency for International Development were murdered; setting the stage for the later Desert Storm war with Iraq.

c). In 1985 TWA Flight 847 was hijacked by Israeli agents during which a United States Navy diver was murdered; also blamed on the Arabs.

d). In 1985 an American Jew was murdered on the Achille Lauro by Israeli agents, but was heralded by the media as being Arabs.

e). In 1985 four members of the United States Marine Corps were murdered in El Salvador; by Jewish drug agents.

f). In 1986 Pan Am Flight 73 in Karachi, Pakistan, in which 44 Americans were held hostage and two were killed by Israeli agents.

h). In April 1988 the USO Club in Naples, Italy was bombed by Israeli agents, killing one American service-woman and injuring four American servicemen.

j). In 1988 Israeli agents bombed Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockabee, Scotland - resulting in 270 deaths.

k). In 1989 Israeli agents bombed UTA Flight 772 which resulted in 171 deaths, including seven Americans.

l). In 1989 a United States Marine Corps officer assigned to the United Nations Truce Supervisory Organization in Lebanon was murdered by Israeli agents.

m). In January 1991 a United States military helicopter in El Salvador was shot down by Israeli drug agents causing the death of one American military service-man's death and then they subsequently murdered its two surviving United States military crewmen.

n). In February 1992 the United States Ambassador's residence in Lima, Peru was bombed by Israeli agents.

o). In February 1993 a cafe in Cairo, Egypt, was bombed by Israeli agents which resulted in the wounding of two United States citizens.

p). In 1994 two United States citizens were wounded on a crowded street in Jerusalem, Israel by Israeli agents.

q). In October 1994 a Jewish dual citizen of the United States and Israel was kidnapped and murdered by Israeli agents.

r). The theft of nuclear materials, including byproduct materials, high grade uranium, which could, and was used to create radioactive dispersal devices and atomic bombs which are capable of causing serious bodily injury as well as substantial damage to property and the environment by Israeli agents.

All of the following, were either warnings to the U.S. Government Administration, members of Congress, that Israel was not pleased with the actions of the United States or some of its officials or were executed to foster more hatred of the Arabs and Palestinians by the American public.

26). "Our" FBI reported 7 terrorist incidents in 1985, with 2 dead and 10 injured. Of those, Jewish extremists accounted for 4 incidents, 2 murders, and 9 injured. [276] Not one Jew has yet been prosecuted in connection with any of these incidents. Such bombings are samples of "Kosher Justice." Jewish Defense Organization founder Mordechai Levy "approved (the bombing) 100%." [277] He added: "Whoever did it did a righteous act."Also: "Obviously we can't claim credit... (but) there are Jews who will administer Jewish justice."[278]

27). Israel was caught stealing U.S. technology for making cluster bombs and chrome‑plating cannon barrels. Subpoenas against Israeli citizens were dropped by "our"(???) government after Israel pledged to "co‑operate." [279]

28). Gun grabber Senator Howard Metzenbaum (Jew) stated: "Do not let the forces of evil take over to make this a Christian America." [280]

29). It was then discovered that the Jewish spies Pollard and Walker, perhaps the most successful of all, and who did an untold amount of damage the security of the United States was caught. The Jews are still clamoring for their release! Other spies fled to Israel and received protection.

30). The assassination of John Kennedy and the attempt against the life of Ronald Reagan;

(a) President Kennedy, as you know was killed on November 22, 1963. Along with this assassination, that shocked the nation, was the elimination of 175 key witnesses who could have testified as to what actually took place at Dallas. Surely you are not naive enough to believe that all these deaths were accidental or from natural causes.

(b) The assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., in Memphis, Tennessee on April 4, 1968;

(e) The attempted killing of Alabama Governor George Wallace in April 1972, which left him a permanent cripple;

(f) The murder of the head of the FBI, J. Edgar Hoover, and his close associate, Mr. Tolson, in the early 1970s;

(g) The murder of Martha Mitchell, wife of Attorney General John Mitchell in the early 1970s when she threatened to "blow the whistle" on underhanded government tactics she knew about;

(I) The murder of Senator John Heintz, (R-Pa.) when his private plane was destroyed by a missile fired from a helicopter.

(j) The murder of Senator John Tower, (R-Texas), when his private plane was destroyed by a bomb.

(k) The murder of Congressman Ted Weiss (D-NY) in 1992, when he refused to remain silent on the role played by President Bush in the October Surprise and the Iran-Contra scandal.

Apparently the Israeli Mossad or Jewish controlled CIA agents committed the following murderous acts, to turn Americans against the Arab people, and in favor of the Israelis.

1). The actual or attempted assassination of numerous leaders in foreign countries;

2). The numerous Black Panther leaders such as Fred Hampton and Mark Clark, killed in Chicago in the 1960s;

3). The murder of 914 men, women, and children in Jonestown, Guyana in the mid-70s which was foisted off on the American public as a gigantic suicide by a demented religious leader (who was actually a Jewish CIA agent);

5). The murder of 248 American soldiers, plus the air crew, when their plane was blown up on December 12, 1985, and it was, of course blamed on the Arabs.

6). The murder of more than 250 men, women and children on December 21, 1988, when a PAN-AM flight was blown out of the sky over Gander, New Foundland, again blamed on terrorists;

7). The wholesale theft of billions of dollars from the Savings and Loans Associations and banks of America by the intelligence community, with the proceeds going to fund "wet operations" around the world;

8). The murder of 269 persons on August 31, 1983, when Korean flight 007 was blown out of the sky over the sea of Japan, and it was said it was shot down by the Russians (which are under the total control of the Jews). Who did they want to eliminate on that flight? It was outspoken Congressman Laurence McDonald.

9). October Surprise, in November 1980, whereby George Bush, Ronald Reagan, American Jewish Congress and select CIA agents rigged and stole the Presidential election from President Jimmy Carter. Over 50 witnesses over the years, who could have testified against these men, have been terminated.

10). The Inslaw bankruptcy scandal and the "fixing" of the case in the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, and the wholesale theft of PROMIS software by the U.S. Justice and Intelligence community, followed by the elimination of numerous witnesses, including Danny Casaloro;

11). Illegal gun running, illegal drug smuggling, and illegal money laundering, which is being carried out today on a massive scale by the "intelligence community," to fund illegal criminal activities which will not be funded by Congress;

12). The recent murders outside CIA headquarters in Langley, VA and the bombing of the World Trade Center in New York.

All blamed on foreign terrorists, but not proven (although there is a mock trial at the present time to convict a blind Arab religious leader for it, however an FBI agent has been shown to have arranged the entire thing; but it appears the trial is going to completely overlook this evidence in order to place the blame on the Arabs);

13). The wholesale corruption of our government courts, usually to cover up "crooked government" practices;

14). The rigging in Congress and the Justice Department of all attempts to investigate these assassinations, murders, and major scandals. We all know about this!

15). The discouragement in Congress and the Justice Department of all attempts to investigate these murders, assassinations and other major scandals;

16). The rigid control exercised over the years, which allows the media and television to pass on to the American people, only that part of the news which the Shadow Government approves;

17). And finally, the continuous fomenting of rebellions and civil wars, in countries around the world, with the specific purpose of eventually bringing about the intervention of American forces. This pours billions into the coffers of the International Bankers who control all this, and hastens their agenda for the New World Order.

(a) The American Civil War. "The division of the United States into two federations of equal rank was decided long before the Civil War by the High Financial Powers of Europe." [281]

The ways and characteristics of the Jews do not change toward Christianity and White Christians in particular, and this treachery against God's Israel people can and did recur again; in America, in the 1860s, with the American Civil War. Here was a war not only planned and instigated by the Jews, such as the Rothschilds, but both sides were financed by Jewish banks.

When the Southern states laid devastated in the aftermath of the war, the Jewish/Marxist plan of reconstruction was established to further destroy the White rule and culture. The South was put under military government and Whites were deprived of their rights, their Constitutions, and their property. Entire plantations were destroyed, burned and pillaged to deny the White Southerners their inheritance. Entire White Southern families were murdered and their property given to Negroes and to Jewish financiers. Other Jewish carpetbaggers from the North, such as the Lehmans, the "seven liberal-minded" Seligman brothers, the Baruchs, and other special emissaries of the Rothschilds, came to seize from the widows and orphans of the Confederate dead their last savings, their last possessions, and their lands and homes.

Civil war generals including Grant, Ross and Sherman exposed the Jews: The Northern jews apparently presented a serious problem to the Union during the Civil War. On page 330 of Series One, Vol. XVII, Part II, of the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies, there appears a communication from Major General U.S. Grant to Major General Hurlburt, then stationed at Jackson, Tennessee. Writing at La Grange, Tennessee, November 9, 1862, General Grant commanded: “Refuse all permits to come south of Jackson for the present. The Israelites especially should be kept out...”

On November 10, 1862, Grant wrote to General Webster at Jackson: “Give orders to all the conductors on the road that no Jews are to be permitted to travel on the railroad from any point. They may go north and be encouraged in it; but they re such an intolerable nuisance that the department must be purged of them.”

On December 17, 1862, from the Headquarters of the Thirteenth Army Corps at Oxford, Mississippi, Grant addressed the Assistant Secretary of War, C.P. Wolcott: “I have long since believed that in spite of all the vigilance that can be infused into post commanders, the specie regulations of the Treasury Department have been violated and that mostly by Jews and other unprincipled traders. So well satisfied have i been of this that I instructed the commanding officer at Columbus to refuse all permits to Jews to come South, and I have frequently had them expelled from the department, but they come in with their carpet-sacks in spite of all that can be done to prevent it. The Jews seem to be a privileged class that can travel anywhere. They will land at any woodyard on the river and make their way through the country. If not permitted to buy cotton themselves they will act as agents for someone else, who will be at a military post with a Treasury permit to receive cotton and pay for it in Treasury notes which the Jew will buy up at an agreed rate, paying in gold.”

General Grant ultimately lost his patience and issued General Order No. 11, as Commander of the Thirteenth Army Corps, Department of Tennessee. The Order read as follows: “The Jews, as a class violating every regulation of trade established by the Treasury Department and also department orders, are hereby expelled from the Department within twenty-four hours from the receipt of this order.

Post commanders will see that all of this class of people be furniashed passes and required to leave, and any one returning after such notification will be arrested and held in confinement until an opportunity occurs of sending them out as prisoners, unless furnished with permit from headquarters.

No passes will be given these people to visit trade headquarters for the purpose of making personal application for trade permits. By ordre of Maj., Gen., U.S. Grant; Jno. A. Rawlings; Assistant Adjutant-General.”

Organized Jewry was on its way to Washington almost as soon as the Order was posted. Its influence was immediately effective. On January 4, 1863, the General-in-Chief, H.W. Halleck, addressed General Grant as follows: “A paper purporting to be General Order No. 11, issued by you December 17, has been presented here. By its terms it expells all Jews from your department. If such an order has been issued, it will be immediately rovoked.” On January 7, 1863, Grant revoked the order.

Meanwhile other Union generals were complaining of the Jews. Brigadier General L.F. Ross wrote to Major General John A. McClernand: “The cotton speculators are quite clamorous for aid in getting their cotton away from Middleburg, Hickory Valley, etc., and offer to pay liberally for the service. I think I can bring it away with safety, and make it pay to the Government. As some of the Jew owners have as good as stolen the cotton from the planters. I have no conscientious scruples in making them pay libreally to take it away.”

General W.T. Sherman, in a letter written from Memphis, July 30, 1862, says, in part: “I found so many Jews and speculators here trading in cotton, and secessionists had become so open in refusing anything but gold, that I have felt myself bound to stop it. The gold can have but one use; the purchase of arms and ammunition...Of course, I have respected all permits by yourself or the Secretary of the Treasury, but in these new cases (swarms of Jews) I have stopped it.”

This mode of treachery of Edom again surfaced during World War II. When Germany had been defeated at the end of the war, and the Allied forces had suppressed its military and rendered it defenseless, it was the Edomite Jews, with the aid of the Edomite Jew Dwight D. Eisenhower, of the Red Soviet Union that had poured into the nation to rape, plunder, destroy and kill Germans. As with Judah, the Edomite Jews "shed the blood" of Germans "by force of the sword in the time of their calamity." This act was a typical Edomite style of revenge upon God's people (Germany).

The Jews always, whenever possible, attacks and plunders Jacob/Israel only when they are in a weakened and helpless state. In February, 1945, when the war was almost over, the city of Dresden was repeatedly bombed and destroyed to satisfy the hate and revenge of the Jews. Dresden was the culture center of German and not a military or industrial target.

Over 250,000 men, women and children were slaughtered by the half-Jew Churchill [282] (England) and the Jewish President of the United States Franklin D. Roosevelt. The persecution and destruction of White Christian people by the Jews is not a recent thing but reaches far back into history.

Writing in the April, 1921 issue of the "Hebrew Christian Alliance Quarterly," Rev. M. Malbert stated: "I am going to show that real religious persecution is uniquely Jewish...In the time of Justinian, in the sixth century, the Jews massacred Christians in Caesarea and destroyed their churches. When Stephanus, the governor, attempted to defend the Christians, the Jews fell on him and slew him. In 608 A.D. the Jews of Antioch fell upon their Christian neighbors and killed them with fire and sword...About 614 A.D. the Persians advanced upon Palestine and the Jews, after joining their standard, massacred the Christians and destroyed their churches. Ninety thousand Christians perished in Jerusalem alone." [283]

"Napoleon's object was to assure the predomination of the French over the Latin races and to augment the influence of these races in America. Napoleon decided to recognize the independence of the rebellious American States and repeatedly urged the British government to join him in so doing." [284]

Judah P. Benjamin was chosen by the Rothschilds to do their work in the United States and he was the first adviser to Jefferson Davis, the President of the Southern Confederacy. Benjamin has been called "the brains of the revolt." He was also the Secretary of State of the Confederacy under Jeff Davis.

The Confederacy consisted of eleven Southern States bound by a written Constitution, modeled in part after our own Constitution. It was founded on the fundamental principle that each one of its eleven constituted States had the right to secede from the Union, or to separate from the other 23 out of the 34 states of the Union. Nevertheless, at the instigation of Benjamin, and under pressure of Napoleon, Texas and Louisiana were placed on the bargain counter in exchange, presumably, for Napoleon's aid. The latter was supported by Disraeli of England, who had assured the Confederacy of the support of Britain behind the nine remaining States, after Texas and Louisiana were to be ceded to France.

Under the guiding hand of Judah P. Benjamin (a Jew), chosen by the Rothschilds and the Church of Rome to represent the International Bankers to do their work for them in the United States, was also the first advisor to Jefferson Davis, the President of the Southern Confederacy. Benjamin is reputed to be the "brains of the revolt," as he was also the Secretary of State of the Confederacy. Through the hands of this man, huge sums of money were provided to finance the destruction of this great New Christian American Republic flowed.

The Confederacy fell and the men who had fought a valiant fight for what they believed right were thrown into the even greater travail of the Reconstruction; while Judah P. Benjamin, almost alone of the leaders of the South, forsook immediately the suffering people who had honored and enriched him, fled to England and was soon embarked upon a new career of distinction and wealth, reminiscent of others of his race (Jewish) dispossessed of their temporary cause and gains.

While we are talking of the Civil War it behooves us to mention that Abraham Lincoln was assassinated by John Wilkes Booth (A Jew). The plot of Booth, involved not only the assassination of Lincoln, which was accomplished, but also the assassination on the same night of the Vice President, Andrew Johnson, of the Secretary of State, William H. Seward, and of General Ulysses S. Grant. Seward, who was ill at his home, was stabbed, as was also his son, Frederick Seward, by David E. Herold (A Jew), a co‑conspirator with Booth, who was hanged. Vice President Johnson escaped injury, but George A. Atzerodt (also a Jew) was hanged for conspiring with Booth to kill him. General Grant, who was to have attended the theater with Lincoln that night, due to an unexpected departure for Burlington, New Jersey, was unharmed.

Our American school children have been taught that the Civil War was fought over the slavery problem, but this was only a surface issue to hide the intrigue of the Great Red Dragon to foment one side against the other.

After thousands of our choice White Israel sons and one of our greatest Presidents were murdered, our Great God stopped the slaughter of the Dragon: By the intervention of the Czar of Russia, who God sent to our National Rescue, but unknown to most Americans.

Our childrens' history textbooks continue to teach that the American Civil War was fought over the Slavery issue. But if we look behind the scenes we will find that the "slave question" was but the surface issue. Below the surface ran a current of intrigue that ended with the assassination of Abraham Lincoln.

The part the Catholic Church through the Jesuits has already been presented. Now we will present the "Rest of The Story." In 1857, the Rothschild Illuminati bankers ruled Europe.

Disraeli, the late Jewish Prime Minister of England, determined to divide the United States and give one part to Lionel (Rothschild). Thus the North would become a British Colony annexed to Canada. The South would go to Napoleon (Rothschild). In the year 1857, the money power of old Europe was centered in the House of Rothschild. Disraeli represented them in England; Napoleon III in France; Bismarck in Germany and Mazzini in Italy. According to Mr. John Reeves, who wrote on page 228, of an authorized biography entitled "The Rothschilds, The Financial Rulers of Nations," based on research in their own archives, there was a famous meeting in the City of London in 1857.

The Rothschild family was assembled from the countries of Europe for the marriage of Lionel Rothschild's daughter, Leonora, to her cousin, Alphonse, son of James Rothschild of Paris. It was at this time Disraeli is reported to have said: "Under this roof are the heads of the family of Rothschild ‑‑ a name famous in every capital of Europe and every division of the globe. If you like, we shall divide the United States into two parts, one for you, James, and one for you, Lionel. Napoleon will do exactly and all that I shall advise him."

Thus, in London, we see a plan fostered by the money power of Europe, moving in on America, and pitting the North against the South under the old principle of "divide and conquer."

Disraeli and the Catholic Church had already assured the Confederacy of Britain's support. However, this was not to help the South; it was to crush both the North and the South and to conquer and possess both. As a result, English, French and Spanish troops were landed at Vera Cruz in 1862. The French General, Bazaine, occupied the capitol of Mexico at the time. "We shall drive the Christians into war by exploiting their national vanity and stupidity. They will then massacre each other, thus giving room for our own people." [285] So Napoleon was ready to strike and help divide and destroy the United States. The danger was great. The situation looked hopeless. Understanding the situation Lincoln spent long nights in humble prayer to Almighty God. He knew the North, alone, could not withstand such a combination. Moreover, Archduke Maximilian had been induced to accept the throne of Mexico. But God stepped in. Fortunately God in His wisdom exposed this Satanic plot to the Christian Czar of Russia through his Ambassadors in Paris and London; who upon learning of the Rothschild ‑ Disraeli ‑ Catholic ‑ Napoleonic plot immediately dispatched a fleet of ships and men to San Francisco under the command of Admiral S. Lesowsky.

He also rushed a squadron to New York to New York under the command of Admiral A.A. Popoff. Both Admirals had orders from the Czar to be ready to fight any power (nation) on earth, and to take their orders directly from President Abraham Lincoln; and him alone. Needless to say, this quick, generous and vigorous action saved the United States from the intrigue of the International Jewish Bankers. So James Rothschild was left without Mexico and the Southern States, and Lionel could not capture the North through military measures.

But the European Machevillis were determined on financial conquest, if not actual slavery. At the same time, this great and good Christian Czar, who, as the servant of Almighty God and by His Power, saved the United States, lovingly and voluntarily emancipated 47 million serfs on September 19, 1861, and Translated the Entire Bible into the Russian language. For his courageous and benevolent acts, he was murdered by the Atheistic, God‑hating, one‑world, Jewish bankers in 1881. He was another casualty in the conflict of the ages. The conflict between right and wrong, light and darkness, good and evil, Christ and anti‑Christ, God and Satan. The same devils murdered Lincoln on April 4, 1865. The history books lie about why Booth killed Lincoln. Coded messages in Booth's trunk and the key to these codes in Judah P. Benjamin's possession proved that Lincoln ‑‑ was murdered by orders from the Jewish Rothschild Bankers. Their successors are still doing the same today.

The good Czar, after several unsuccessful attempts on his life, was murdered in 1881. Lincoln was murdered in 1865, on April 4th, by an actor, John Wilkes Booth, in whose trunk was found coded messages the key to which was found in Judah P. Benjamin's possession. Benjamin escaped to England where he later died. The Czar, Alexander II, had been responsible on September 19, 1861, by imperial decree, for emancipating the Russian serfs, in number over 47‑million. Serfdom in Russia was ended by the stroke of a pen. But in the United States, it took billions of dollars and oceans of blood to free three million, not serfs, but slaves, because of an infamous plot of English and European Jewish money lords. "The division of the United States into two federations of equal force was decided long before the Civil War by the High (Jewish) Financial Powers of Europe. These bankers were afraid of the United States, if they remained in one block and as one nation, would attain economical and financial independence, which would upset their financial domination over the world. The voice of the Rothschilds predominated. They foresaw tremendous booty if they could substitute two feeble democracies, indebted to the Jewish financiers, to the vigorous Republic, confident and self‑providing. Therefore, they started their emissaries to work in order to exploit the question of slavery and thus to dig an abyss between the two parts of the Republic.

It is thought by many that Lincoln[286] never suspected these underground machinations. He was anti‑Slaverist, and he was elected as such. But his character prevented him from being the man of one party. When he had affairs in his hands, he perceived that these sinister financiers of Europe, the Rothschilds, wished to make him the executor of their designs. They made the rupture between the North and the South imminent! The master of finance in Europe made this rupture definitive in order to exploit it to the utmost. Lincoln's personality surprised them. His candidature did not trouble them; they though to easily dupe the candidate woodcutter. But Lincoln read their plots and soon understood, that the South was not the worst foe, but the Jew financiers. He did not confide his apprehensions, he watched the gestures of the Hidden Hand; he did not wish to expose publicly the questions which would disconcert the ignorant masses.

Lincoln decided to eliminate the international banker by establishing a system of loans, allowing the States to borrow directly from the people without intermediary. He did not study financial questions, but his robust good sense revealed to him, that the source of any wealth resides in the work and economy of the nation. He opposed emissions through the international financiers. He obtained from Congress the right to borrow from the people by selling to it the 'bonds' of the States. The local banks were only too glad to help such a system. And the Government and the nation escaped the plots of the foreign financiers. They understood at once, that the United States would escape their grip. The death of Lincoln was resolved upon. Nothing is easier than to find a fanatic to strike.

Bismark thought that the death of Lincoln was a disaster for Christendom, continues Bismarck. There was no man in the United States great enough to wear his boots. And Israel went anew to grab the riches of the world. I fear that Jewish banks with their craftiness and tortuous tricks will entirely control the exuberant riches of America, and use it to systematically corrupt modern civilization. The Jews will not hesitate to plunge the whole of Christendom into wars and chaos, in order that 'the earth should become the inheritance of Israel.'" [287]

(b) Spanish American War. “In whatever country Jews have settled in any great numbers, they have lowered its moral tone; depreciated its commercial integrity; have segregated themselves and have not been assimilated; have sneered at and tried to undermine the Christian Religion upon which that Nation is Founded by objecting to its restrictions; have built up a state within a state; and when opposed have tried to strangle that country to death financially, as in the case of SPAIN and Portugal. For over 1700 years the Jews have been bewailing their sad fate in that they have been exiled from their homeland, they call Palestine. But, Gentlemen, should the world today give it to them in fee simple, they would at once find some cogent reason for not returning(Even today the Zionists have to force Jews to migrate to the present day state of Israel). Why? Because they are Vampires, and Vampires do not live on Vampires. They cannot live only among themselves. They must subsist on Christians and other people not of their religion. If you do not exclude them from these United States, in this Constitution in less than 200 years they will have swarmed in such great numbers that they will dominate and devour the land, and change our form of government (Which they have done ‑‑ they have changed it from a Republic to a Democracy), for which we Americans have shed our blood, given our lives, our substance and jeopardized our liberty.

If you do not exclude them, in less than 200 years our descendants will be working in the fields to furnish them sustenance, while they will be in the counting houses rubbing their hands. I warn you, Gentlemen, if you do not exclude the Jews for all time, your children will curse you in your graves. Jews, Gentlemen, are Asiatics; let them be born where they will, or how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never be otherwise. Their ideas do not conform to an American's, and will not even though they live among us ten generations. A Leopard cannot change its spots. Jews are Asiatics(Here we have proof that Benjamin Franklin knew that the Jews were Khazars: Not Israelites), they are a menace to this country if permitted entrance and should be excluded by this Constitution."[288]

(c) World War I. "You (non-Jews) resent us (Jews), but you cannot clearly say why...Not so many years ago I used to hear that we were money-grubbers and commercial materialists; now the complaint is being whispered around that no art and no profession is safe from Jewish invasion...

We shirk our patriotic duty in war time because we are pacifists by nature and tradition, and we are the Arch-Plotters of Universal Wars and the Chief Beneficiaries of those wars. We are at once the founders and leading adherents of capitalism and the chief perpetrators of the rebellion against capitalism. Surely, history has nothing like us for versatility!...

You accuse us of stirring up revolution in Moscow. Suppose we admit the charge. What of it?...You make much noise and fury about undue Jewish influence in your theaters and movie palaces. Very good; granted your complaint is well founded. But what is that compared to our staggering influence in your churches, schools, your laws and your government, and the very thoughts you think every day?...

'The Protocols of the Elders of Zion' which shows that we plotted to bring on the late World War. You believe that book. All right...we will underwrite every word of it. It is genuine and authentic. But what is that besides the unquestionable historical conspiracy which we have carried out, which we never have denied because you never had the courage to charge us with it, and of which the full record is extant for anybody to read?

If you really are serious when you talk of Jewish plots, may I not direct your attention to one worth talking about? What use is it wasting words on the alleged control of your public opinion by Jewish financiers, newspaper owners, and movie magnates, when you might as well also justly accuse us of the proved control of your whole civilization...You have not begun to appreciate the real depth of our guilt. We are intruders. We are subverters. We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and have played havoc with them. We (Jews) have been at the bottom of not merely of the latest war (WWI) but of nearly all your wars, not only of the Russian but of every other major revolution in your history. We have brought discord and confusion and frustration into your personal and public life. WE ARE STILL DOING IT. No one can tell how long we shall go on doing it...Who knows what great and glorious destiny might have been yours if we had left you alone.

But we did not leave you alone. We took you in hand and pulled down the beautiful and generous structure you had reared, and changed the whole course of your history. WE CONQUERED YOU as no empire of yours ever subjugated Africa or Asia. And we did it solely by the irresistible might of our spirit, with ideas, with propaganda...Take the three principal revolutions in modern times, the French, the American and Russian. What are they but the triumph of the Jewish idea of social, political and economic justice? And the end is still a long way off. We still dominate you...

Is it any wonder you resent us? We have put a clog upon your progress. We have imposed upon you an alien book (Scofield Bible) and alien faith (Judeo-Christianity, a false Christianity) which is at cross-purposes with your native spirit, which keeps you everlastingly ill-at-ease, and which you lack the spirit either to reject or to accept in full...We have merely divided your soul, confused your impulses, paralyzed your desires...

So why should you not resent us? If we were in your place we should probably dislike you more cordially than you do us. But we should make no bones about telling you why...You Christians worry and complain about the Jew's influence in your civilization. We are, you say, an international people, a compact minority in your midst, with traditions, interests, aspirations and objectives distinct from your own. And you declare that this state of affairs is a measure of your orderly development; it muddles your destiny. I do not altogether see the danger. Your world has always been ruled by minorities; and it seems to me a matter of indifference what remote origin and professed creed of the governing clique is. The influence, on the other hand, is certainly there, and it is vastly greater and more insidious than you appear to realize...

That is what puzzles and amuses and sometimes exasperates us about your game of Jew-baiting. It sounds so portentous. You go about whispering terrifyingly of the hand of the Jew in this and that and the other thing. It makes us quake. We are conscious of the injury we did when we imposed upon you our alien faith and traditions. And then you specify and talk vaguely of Jewish financiers and Jewish motion picture promoters, and our terror dissolves in laughter. The Gentiles, we see with relief, will never know the real blackness of our crimes...You call us subversive, agitators, revolution mongers. It is the truth, and I cower at your discovery...We undoubtedly had a sizable finger in the Lutheran Rebellion, and it is simply a fact that we were the prime movers in the Bourgeois Democratic Revolutions of the century before last, both in France and America. If we were not, we did not know our own interests. The Republican revolutions of the 18th Century freed us of our age-long political and social disabilities. They benefited us...You go on rattling of Jewish conspiracies and cite as instances the Great War and the Russian Revolution! Can you wonder that we Jews have always taken your anti-Semites rather lightly, as long as they did not resort to violence?" [289]

"Wars are the Jews harvest, for with them we wipe out the Christians and get control of their gold. We have already killed 100-million of them, and the end is not yet." [290]

(d) World War II. "The Second World War is being fought for the defense of the fundamentals of Judaism." [291]; "Germany is the enemy of Judaism and must be pursued with deadly hatred. The goal of Judaism of today is: a merciless campaign against all German peoples and the complete destruction of the nation. We demand a complete blockade of trade, the importation of raw materials stopped, and retaliation towards every German, woman and child." [292]; "We are not denying and we are not afraid to confess, this war is our war and that it is waged for the liberation of Jewry...Stronger than all fronts together is our front, that of Jewry. We are not only giving this war our financial support on which the entire war production is based. We are not only providing our full propaganda power which is the moral energy that keeps this war going. The guarantee of victory is predominantly based on weakening the enemy forces, on destroying them in their own country, within the resistance. And we are the Trojan Horses in the enemy's fortress. Thousands of Jews living in Europe constitute the principal factor in the destruction of our enemy. There, our front is a fact and the most valuable aid for victory." [293]; "Whenever an American or a Filipino fell at Bataan or Corregidor or at any other of the now historic spots where MacArthur's men put up their remarkable fight, their survivors could have said with truth: 'The real reason that boy went to his death, was because Hitler's anti‑semitic movement succeeded in Germany.'" [294]; "In death as in life, I defy the Jews who caused this last war (WW II), and I defy the powers of darkness which they represent. I am proud to die for my ideals, and I am sorry for the sons of Britain who have died without knowing why." [295]

(e) The Korean Police Action 1950-1953, with 54,246 American deaths and 157,630 casualties; Korea. U.S. responded to North Korean invasion of South Korea by being ordered to go to its assistance by the United Nations; Congressional authorization was not sought.

The Korean fiasco aroused American voters who were offered, the Jew, Dwight D. Eisenhower for President, a soldier who they thought would surely win that ridiculous war. Eisenhower did end the war, but not by winning which could easily have been done, but by yielding to Communist terms and insults he provided the festering sore of a divided Korea; The beginning of "no win" engagements all over the world, which demonstrates to those who will stop and look: those people who depend upon the United States Government in an alliance, is a kiss of death for their freedom. This because our American Government is under the control of the Jewish-Communist-Zionists the Antichrist Children of Satan!!! This was also the first time in the history of the world, of any nation, when its military command was forbidden to defeat the enemy. President Dwight D. Eisenhower was responsible for sending American troops to fight in Vietnam. This fact has been conveniently overlooked by historians and our children is not told about his compliancy in this. Thus, America lost thousands of America's best because of another Jewish President!

In 1944, the Council on Foreign Relations prepared a confidential memorandum for the State Department that began the process of involving the United States in a war in Korea. It read, in part: "The sovereignty fetish is still so strong in the public mind that there would appear to be little chance of winning popular assent to American membership in anything approaching a super-state organization. Much will depend on the kind of approach which is used to further popular education..."

A review of the memorandum stated: "...a further difficulty was cited, namely that (difficulty) arising from the Constitutional provision that only Congress may declare war. This argument was countered with the contention that a treaty would override this barrier, let alone the fact that our participation in such police action as might be recommended by the international security organization need not necessarily be construed as war." [296]

That treaty was the United Nations Treaty, created in 1945, essentially by the CFR. The Korean War had a unique place in history: "...for the first time, a world organization voted to use collective force to stop armed aggression." [297] The Korean War was made possible at the Potsdam and Yalta conferences, as World War II was ending, when the Allied Governments, represented by Churchill, Stalin and Roosevelt, divided Korea into a North and South. North Korea quickly created an army of 187,000 men, with Russia supplying the military equipment (the artillery, tanks and planes, etc.) necessary to wage the war. The South only raised an army of 96,000 men, with sparse military equipment. One of the reasons for this inadequacy of their military equipment was the fact that, even though the United States had voted $10‑billion in military assistance for South Korea, only a small percentage of it reached that country. [298]

General Douglas MacArthur, who was later to command these forces, wrote in his book Reminiscences: "The south Koreans had four divisions along the 38th Parallel (the dividing line between North and South Korea). They had been well trained, and the personnel were brave and patriotic, but they were equipped and organized as a constabulary force, not as troops of the line. They had only light weapons, no air or naval forces, and were lacking in tanks, artillery, and many other essentials. The decision to equip and organize them in this way had been made by the State Department. The argument advanced by the State Department for its decision was that it was a necessary measure to prevent the South Koreans from attacking North Korea, a curious myopic reasoning that, of course, opened the way for a North Korean attack." [299]

But North Korea's attack should not have come as a surprise as General Albert Wedemeyer had warned President Harry S. Truman that the North Koreans were preparing for an invasion. On June 25, 1950, they crossed the 38th Parallel and started the war. The Russians could have prevented the United nations from getting involved had they wished to do so by vetoing the U.N. efforts: "The Soviet, using the non‑membership of Red China in the U.N. as an excuse, walked out of the Security Council. The Council, with Russia absent, then voted U.N. intervention in Korea. After the vote, and with Red China still not seated in the United nations, the Soviet returned to the Security Council." [300] Some have seen Russia's absence during this crucial vote as an intentional maneuver on their part: "...the Soviet started the war themselves. This means that they knew when it would start. If they wanted to keep us out, Stalin would have told his U.N. delegate, Jacob Malik, to forget the boycott, to take his seat at the Security Council, and vote nyet (no). The very fact that the Soviet didn't do this is proof, not just that they didn't want to keep us out of the Korean War, but that they wanted to trick us in." [301]

Two days after the invasion of South Korea, the Chinese on Taiwan, sensing that the time was ripe for them to move against the Communist Government on mainland China, got severely reprimanded by President Truman: "...I am calling upon the Chinese Government on Formosa (Taiwan) to cease all air and sea operations against the mainland." [302] Not only did Truman declare it was against American policy for the free Chinese to reclaim Communist China, but he also ordered the American 7th Fleet into the Straits of Formosa to insure this.[303]

General Douglas MacArthur later revealed that he saw this action as an intentional act on the part of the American Government to insure the entry of Red China into the war. He wrote: "The possibility of Red China's entry into the Korean War had existed ever since the order from Washington, issued to the Seventh Fleet in June, to neutralize Formosa, which in effect protected the Red China mainland from attack by Chiang‑Kai‑hek's forces of half a million men. This released the two great Red Chinese armies assigned the coastal defense of Central China and made them available for transfer elsewhere." [304]; "This mean that the Communist China leaders need have little worry about a possible Nationalist landing on the mainland opposite Formosa, and that they could move Red troops northward to the Manchurian country above the Yalu River with perfect safety. It gave their Korean war plans a tremendous impetus, because Red China could now enter the Korean War at any time she chose without fear of being attacked on her flank and rear by the nationalist troops on Formosa." [305] But this action by the American government did not deter the Taiwanese Government of Chaing Kai‑Shek, who, less than a week after the North Koreans had crossed the 38th parallel, offered; "...the State Department an advance force of 33,000 troops that could be embarked for Korea within five days after the offer was accepted. The suggestion was refused." [306]

Formosa was, at the time, a member of the United Nations and therefore could have been represented in the United Nations Force, but the American Government would not tolerate such a move. It was a few months later that the results of the State Department's tactics began to show up.

In October, 1950, General MacArthur began sensing that the Red Chinese were building up their troops in Manchuria, just north of the Yalu River. This intelligence report went unheeded by the State Department which advised MacArthur that there was no possibility of their intervening in the war. But the State Department had lied, as the Red Chinese crossed the Yalu river, the river separating North Korea and Red China, on October 15, 1950. As the war against Red China and the North Koreans continued, General MacArthur continued to feel that there had been a leak in his intelligence and that his strategy was known in advance to the enemy. One of MacArthur's senior field commanders, General Walton Walker: "...continually complained...that his operations were known to the enemy in advance through sources in Washington." [307]

The truth is that MacArthur's strategies were indeed falling into the hands of the North Koreans who were being commanded by Russian officers. The chain of command under the United States Constitution for any military officer leads upward through the Executive Branch of the government and ends with the President who is the ultimate authority for military decisions.

MacArthur was, of course, constitutionally required to obey the orders of his ultimate commander, but under the treaty binding the United States to the United Nations, the command chain went past the President into an office in the United Nations known as the under-secretary for political and security council affairs who reported directly to the Secretary General. Because of a secret agreement made by our Secretary of State the Jew Edward Stettinius in 1945, this key position, the official who controlled such things as United Nations "Police Actions," was to be filled by a Communist from some Eastern European Communist Country.

At the time of the Korean War, this post was filled by Constantine Zinchenko, of Russia. The North Koreans had Russian military advisors during the war, and it later became known just who was in charge of the North Korean War efforts. According to a Department of Defense press release dated May 15, 1964, high‑ranking Russian military officers were actually on the scene in North Korea directing military operations. The release stated: "A North Korean major identified two of these Russian 'advisors' as General Vasilev and Colonel Dolgin. Vasilev, he said, was in charge of all movements across the 38th parallel. Another prisoner...said he actually heard General Vasilev give the order to attack on June 25th." [308]

General Vasilev's chain of command went through the U.N. as well. He, "...had been the chairman of the U.N. Military Staff Committee which, along with the office of the Undersecretary General for Political and Security Council Affairs, is responsible for U.N. military action under the Security Council." [309] That meant two Russians shared authority in planning the North Korean war efforts, and one of them planned the efforts of the United Nations. "In effect, The Communists were directing both sides of the war!" [310]

The Russians were not only controlling both sides of the war and supplying technical advisors for the North Korean war effort, they were actually supplying Russian pilots for flights against the Americans: "Lt. Gen. Samuel E. Anderson, commander of the Fifth Air Force, revealed that entire Soviet Air force units fought in the Korean War for over two and a half years..." [311]

General MacArthur, aware that the Red Chinese were about to enter the war, realized that one way to prevent their massive entry was to bomb the bridges crossing the Yalu River. He: "...ordered General Stratemeyer, (Chief of the air Force) to employ B‑29's on the following morning to destroy the Yalu bridges and cut this easy line of communication between Manchuria and North Korea. An immediate dispatch came from Secretary (of State George) Marshall countermanding my order and directing me to 'postpone all bombing of targets within five miles of the Manchurian border.'" [312] In addition, MacArthur was ordered not to pursue aircraft fleeing North Korea into Manchuria, nor could he bomb the supply base in the town of Racin.

MacArthur felt that of these decisions the: "...most incomprehensible of all was the refusal to let me bomb the important supply center at Racin. Which was not in Manchuria or Siberia (Russia) but many miles from the borders, in northeast Korea. Racin was a depot to which the Soviet Union forwarded supplies from Vladivostok for the North Korean Army." [313]

On November 25, 1950, the Red Chinese Army commander, General Lin Piao, launched his full forces across the Yalu River and into North Korea. MacArthur felt: "...information must have been relayed to them, assuring that the Yalu bridges would continue to enjoy sanctuary and that their bases would be left intact." [314]

This was, unfortunately, the truth, as even General Lin Piao later admitted that he: "...would never have made the attack and risked my men...if I had not been assured that Washington would restrain General MacArthur from taking adequate retaliatory measures against my lines of supply and communication." [315] General MacArthur would later write that the order not to bomb the Yalu bridges: "...was the most indefensible and ill‑conceived decision ever forced on a field commander in our nation's history." [316]

One of General MacArthur's generals in the Air Force, George Stratemeyer, said: "We had sufficient air, bombardment, fighters, reconnaissance so that I could have taken out all of those supplies, those airdromes on the other side of the Yalu; I could have bombed the devils between there and Mukden, stopped the railroad operating and the people of China that were fighting could not have been supplied...But we weren't permitted to do it. As a result, a lot of American blood was spilled over there in Korea." [317]

House Minority Leader Joseph Martin also expressed his dismay at the administration's apparent desire not to win the war in Korea by such tactics as not allowing the bombing of strategic military targets: "If we are not in Korea to win, this administration should be indicted for the murder of thousands of American boys." [318]

(f) The Viet Nam War 1954-73 with 58,151 American deaths and a total of 211,324 casualties. War in Vietnam. U.S. military advisers had been in South Vietnam for a decade (10 years); They were first sent to Vietnam by then Jewish President Eisenhower, and their numbers were increased as military positions of the Siagon Government became weaker.

After the attacks on U.S. destroyers in the Tonkin Gulf, President Johnson asked for a resolution expressing U.S. determination to support freedom and protect peace in Southeast Asia. Congress responded with the Tonkin Gulf Resolution, expressing support for "all necessary measures" the President might take to repeal armed attack against U.S. forces and prevent further aggression. Following this resolution, and following a Communist attack on a U.S. installation in Central Vietnam, the U.S. escalated its participation in the war.

Elected in 1968, Richard Nixon continued the Johnson strategy of restrictions and frustrations to our military: It's alright to kill a Communist only after he has killed American Soldiers, in some other part of the world, but here inside the United States, due to the rulings from Anti-American Federal Judges, we must non only coddle these traitors but we must hire them in the Federal Government, and in our Schools, thanks to the Communist Prostitutes in our Federal Courts!

And by confining the bulk of the fighting to South Vietnam, this insured that maximum damage would be inflicted on our ally; while at the same time our military leaders were restricted from attacking certain strategic targets in North Vietnam which would have forced the enemy to surrender. Further our soldiers, were not allowed to fire upon the enemy unless first being fired upon, thus insuring the maximum in casualties on our American Military Men.

Then Henry Kissinger (Jew) started the long "negotiating" process with the North Vietnam and Red China, while our sons, brothers and dads died in Vietnam jungles; Killed with weapons bought and paid for by our income tax money! Kissinger leisurely wined and dined with his Communist friends, while President Nixon "wound down" the war by surrendering billions in our most sophisticated war equipment to the enemy.

Perhaps the most extraordinary example of America's military assistance to the Russian Government occurred during the Vietnamese war. Dr. Sutton has concluded that; "...The Guns, The Ammunition, The Weapons, The Transportation Systems, that killed Americans in Vietnam came from the American subsidized economy of the Soviet Union." [319]

In fact, it Has Been Estimated That 45 Cents of Every Dollar American Taxpayers Paid in Income Tax During the Vietnamese War Went to the Soviet Union and North Vietnam to Finance the War Against American Troops! America's assistance to the cause of the North Vietnamese Government had an early beginning. In an article entitled "When Ho Chi Minh was an Intelligence Agent for the U.S.," author Lloyd Shearer details how the American Government assisted the early efforts of the founder of the revolution against the South Vietnamese Government.

Ho Chi Minh was recruited into the American intelligence apparatus. The article states: "We had a trusted agent whom we regularly supplied with weapons, radio equipment, operators and medicine. All of it served to reinforce his position and status." [320]

So even before the Vietnamese war started, traitors in the American Government were supplying the guerilla army of the man who would ultimately lead the Viet Cong in a war against America. The American people, who were beginning to sense that something was wrong with the conduct of America's efforts in the war, started showing that concern at the polls. The aid and trade being sent to Russia during the war became a campaign issue in the 1968 Presidential campaign.

The Republicans at their convention that year included the following plank in their party platform: "Nations hostile to this country will receive no assistance from the U.S. We will not provide aid of any kind to countries which aid and abet the war efforts of North Vietnam." [321]

Republican Presidential candidate Richard Nixon also addressed himself to this plank when he told the American Legion Convention in September, 1968: "There should be no aid or credits of any kind with any country, including the Soviet Union, that aids the enemy in Viet Nam." [322] Candidate Nixon's campaign literature repeated the Republican Party's concern in this matter. One of his campaign flyers covered this issue: "The United States should not provide anything that could be treated as, or classified as, aid to those (Communist bloc) nations if they persist in trading or aiding the enemy in North Vietnam." [323]

(g) To this we could add Granada, Panama, Desert Storm, Somalia, and now Bosnia. None of these military actions have been for the protection or benefit of the United States, but have poured billions into the pockets of the Shadow Government, while tightening their control over our people and preparing them for the New World Order.

Supporting Pollard: Although former Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger said that he should have been executed, so seriously damaging were his activities, convicted spy Jonathan Pollard has widespread support in the Jewish community...Some of the activity on behalf of Pollard includes: The Central Conference of American Rabbis calling upon the entire Reformed Jewish movement to express support for Pollard; on April 15, 1992 a group of rabbis and others participated in a Passover "freedom seder" in front of the maximum security prison where Pollard is held, with one Rabbi, Avi Weiss, referring to Pollard as a "Jewish Political Prisoner;" and a Justice for the Pollards Committee was formed, which portrays Pollard as a victim of a vindictive and "anti-Semitic" Justice Department (which at the time was run by ultra-Zionist Ed Meese).

According to writer Allan C. Brownfeld, the above is only a portion of the support that a traitor to the United States is receiving in Jewish circles. It was reported on April 17, 1994, p. 2, of the Herald Journal, Logan, Utah that J. Robert Openheimer (a Jew) and other U.S. scientists gave the Soviets information on their efforts to build the first atom bomb, a retired Russian spy said in his memoirs quoted in Time Magazine.

The information passed on during World War II "significantly altered the direction of Soviet nuclear research," says Pavel Anatolievich Sudoplatov, who plotted the assassination of Leon Trotsky for Josef Stalin. Excerpts from "Special Tasks: The Memoirs of an Unwanted Witness a Soviet Spymaster" appear in the April 25 issue of Time Magazine. Sudoplatov writes that members of the American science team who shared information with the Soviets included Nobel laureate Enrico Fermi and Neils Bohr (both Jews), who worked with Oppenheimer on the Manhattan Project. Sudoplatov also had moles working in the Manhattan Project labs in Los Alamos, N.M., Oak Ridge, Tenn., and Chicago, he said.

18). The Jewish state of Israel, demanded and obtained forgiveness for billions of dollars they had received in loans and loan guarantees they had received in the '60s, '70s, and early '80s.

19). In 1991, the Jews were finally successful in tricking America into destroying one of their most feared enemies, Iraq. America had no interest in fighting Iraq but due to the Jewish controlled press, the people of the United States were convinced that Iraq was America's enemy. "Why should we believe in God? We (Jews) hate Christianity and Christians. Even the best of them must be regarded as our worst enemies. They preach love of one's neighbor, and pity, which is contrary to our principles. Christian love is a hinderance to the revolution. Down with love of one's neighbor; what we want is hatred. We must know how to hate, for only at this price can we conquer the universe...The fight should also be developed in the Moslem and Catholic countries, with the same ends in view and by the same means." [324]; "One of the finest things ever done by the mob was the Crucifixion of Christ. Intellectually it was a splendid gesture. But trust the mob to bungle the job. If I'd had charge of executing Christ, I'd have handled it differently. You see, what I'd have done was had him shipped to Rome and fed him to the Lions. They could never have made a Savior out of mincemeat!"[325]; "Judaism and Christianity are two worlds, between you Christians and us Jews there lies an unbridgeable gulf...There are two life forces in the world: Jewish and non-Jewish...I do not believe that this primal difference between Christians and Jews is reconcilable...The difference between us is abysmal... You might say: 'Well, let us exist side by side and tolerate each other. We will not attack your morality, nor you ours.' But the misfortune is that the two are not merely different; they are opposed in mortal enmity. No man can accept both, or, accepting either, do otherwise than despise the other." [326]

International gangsters close entire factories (11 automobile plants were closed by General Motors in November 1987, putting thousands out of work ‑ then General Motors opened NEW plants in Mexico and is now importing cars into the United States, where is the union? For it was strangely quiet; while all this is going on the closed automobile factories are being made unfit for making defensive war equipment and their previous workers are left to subsist on food stamps and other welfare programs). God is being trampled. Men are perishing from and by decrees from company board-rooms where the destruction of Christian America is being planed and carried out; morality is ridiculed and mocked, while honest citizens have become a laughingstock. The J.D.L. (Jewish Defense League), A.D.L (Anti‑Defamation League of B'nai B'rith) have put America, Germany and the Western World on a mind‑depressing guilt trip with their constant barrage of deception and lies.

20). In December 1992 the ADL (Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith) were caught red-handed and were exposed acting as a "Secret Police Force!"

The Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith (ADL) has long been suspected of subversive, criminal and illegal activities. However, up to this time, solid evidence had been minimal. Now Americans are confronted with the evidence, "A National Police Force, operating above the Law, not only in one or two locations, but across the entire country!" It has been discovered that the ADL operates more than 42 regional offices across the United States, in addition to offices in Jerusalem, Paris, Rome and Ontario, Canada. In addition to that, they have a national office at 823 United Nations Plaza, New York City. Testimony has been taken stating that ADL offices across the United State are involved in illegal criminal activity.

It has been reported that illegal files were collected and kept on more than 12-million Americans, with more than 12,000 in the San Francisco area alone. What's more, the files were illegally obtained by bribing police officials in both San Francisco and Los Angels. "We know the powers that are defying the people...Our Government is in the hands of pirates. All the power of politics, and of Congress, and of the administration is under the control of the moneyed interests...The adversary has the force of capital, thousands of millions of which are in his hand...He will grasp the knife of law, which he has so often wielded in his interest. He will lay hold of his forces in the legislature. He will make use of his forces in the press, which are always waiting for the wink, which is as good as a nod to a blind horse...Political rings are managed by skillful and unscrupulous political gamblers, who possess the 'machine' by which the populace are at once controlled and crushed." [327] Court documents released in March (1993) by the San Francisco District Attorney showed the ADL paid a full-time informer $170,000, between 1985 and 1993, for spying on over 10,000 people and 500 political and ethnic groups. The avowed goal of the ADL, American Jewish Congress and other Jewish organizations is as follows:

21). They were instrumental in the passage of the Geneva Law which established a National Bankruptcy Contract under "Silent Judicial Notice" to include all U.S. citizens in a fraudulent Social Security scheme, previously declared illegal under the law of nations.

22). Passage of H.J. Res. 192 which removed the U.S.A. from the Gold standard and made it impossible for the Nation to "pay" its debts. Set up a Credit Commune with "limited liability."

23). "Taxation without Representation" exacted by U.S. officials as an extortion payment to the Federal Reserve (a private Jewish banking syndicate) and other agencies of the U.N., a front organization for the World's Ruling Elite. In other words paying:Tribute.

24). Utilization of taxpayer-supported agencies such as OPIC and AID to export American resources overseas in a - expatriation of jobs and industries.

25). Regionalization of 30 of the 50 states by removing boundary descriptions from the State Constitutions - a destruction of state and national boundaries. The signing of International trade agreements such as GATT (General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs) and NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) to destroy "nontariff trade barriers" and create an economic merger among Pan American Countries. And is doomed to fail.

26). A Welfare State Immigration policy that attracts non-contributing un-desirables to destroy the Standard of Living and provide a future inducement toward a communist type revolution and slavery for all American citizens - especially the promotion of crime and slave labor through alien immigration against Christians.

27). Systematic looting of the Nation's wealth which is considered by the Jews as - a disposition of the spoils of war. They are doing this through international corporate pirates and banking privateers under Admiralty's "Questions of Prize." Privatization of the Nation's infrastructure through sale of Public Assets to foreign principals which was established by Presidential Executive Order No. 12803 (1992).

28). Draconian federal forfeiture laws that violate our civil and constitutional rights on the pretext of a phony "War on Drugs."Bankruptcy and Emergency Powers such as the International Economic Emergencies Act, Title 50 U.S.C. 1701-1706, are used improperly by Jewish sponsored government operatives to justify military "hits" upon political dissenters who are arbitrarily labelled as enemies of the "New World Order" (i.e., Randy Weaver, David Koresh) in an obvious; Siege Mentality in a Police State as we witnessed in Idaho and Waco, Texas.

29). Secretary of the Treasury as an employee of the International Monetary Fund (IMF, a Jewish owned independent foreign corporation) and "Receiver" in the National Bankruptcy.[328]

U.S. District Court Judges are immune from civil torts and are members of an "independent judiciary" paid by the IMF controlled Treasury Department. Disavowal of the Loyalty Oath and Treason - The Civil Service Commission suspended the loyalty oath (See: The Stewart Case, 1970) for all federal employees and many agencies have transferred allegiance to the U.N. through "Service Agreements" and "Memorandums of Understanding" (MOUs). The U.S. Marshals' Oath to the Constitution under 28 U.S.C. 563 was deleted [329] and subverted to interpol et al, by U.N. mandate 22 U.S.C. 263(A). These wholesale repudiations of governmental accountability to the people under Article 6 of the U.S. Constitution should be construed as a hostile takeover and Act of War.

30). Subversion of the Constitution by International Treaty: Passage by Congress of unlawful (i.e., under Color of Law) legislation designed to overturn the Constitution. The following list contains highlights from U.S. legislative history.

31). The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 (Abrogated Article 8, Sec. 8, clauses 5 & 6).

33). Coinage Act of 1965 (Debased the specie coin Article 1, Sec. 10, clause 1).

35). Declaration of INTERdependence (1976) (Nullified national spirit and purpose).

37). U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1992) (Set aside the Bill of Rights).

38). P.L. 102-14 (1992) which will allow the execution of Christians in the future.

The net effect of these seditious legislative changes has been to overthrow the National Spiritual and Common (Biblical) Law heritage of a once Great Republic.

39). The Arms Control and Disarmament Agency under P.L. 87-297 and described in State Department Document 7727.

40). The Savings and Loans, banking, and stock market manipulation of the so-called junk bonds which robbed many elderly (And a lot of them Jewish - but even they were proud of the actions of the Michael Milken, Boskies and etc., because it robbed so many Christians of their life savings.

This is the result of Congress giving the Jewish money powers a virtual monopoly of underwriting the issuance of stocks and bonds by prohibiting regular commercial banks from under-writing them. The investment bankers, almost all Jews, underwrite the issuance of most of the "good" corporations in America today. With that monopoly the Jews have been able to take over more and more of America's wealth and have caused untold numbers of workers, including those in top corporate positions, to lose their jobs. The junk bonds, which is a high yield commercial bond issued by a small corporation; and since it is riskier, it pays much higher interest, as much as five to six percentage points higher than the safer bonds that are usually issued by large corporations.

Even though, it will be pointed out, that Jewish firms like Drexel went into bankruptcy, they have now "recovered," and the Jews who put it into bankruptcy are now richer than ever, because of Jewish judges like Kimba Wood, who reduced Michael Milkens' prison sentence and is involved in various ADL indoctrination programs directed at school children across America.

With this manipulation of the American economy in full swing, who will suffer the most? Pension funds, mutual funds, insurance companies, savings and loan banks and the whole economy will go down the tube. The economy of America is about to collapse because of the Jewish money powers who have loaded corporate America down with so much high interest debt that it cannot pay it off. Our criminal Zionist controlled government will eventually declare martial law so that they can launch a "military enforcement action" to confiscate firearms from all law abiding citizens.

The merger of U.S. and Soviet forces into a "New World Army" which will signal the final step in bringing about total and "Unconditional unilateral disarmament and surrender" of all global peons in preparation for World Totalitarian Rule. "The warning of Theodore Roosevelt has much timeliness today, for the real menace of our republic is this invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy length over the, City, State and Nation. Like the octopus of real life, it operates under cover of a self-created screen. It seizes in its long and powerful tentacles our executive officers, our legislative bodies, our schools, our courts, our newspapers, and every agency created for the public protection. It squirms in the jaws of darkness and thus is the better able to clutch the reins of government, secure enactment of the legislation favorable to corrupt business, violate the law with impunity, smother the press and reach into the courts. To depart from mere generalizations, let me say that at the head of this octopus are the Rockefeller-Standard Oil interests and a small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as the International Jewish Bankers. This little coterie of powerful International Jewish Bankers virtually run the United States Government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both parties, write political platforms, make catspaws of Party Leaders,[330] Use the leading men of Private Organizations and resort to every device to place in nomination for high public office only such candidates as well be amenable to the dictates of corrupt big business. They connive at centralization of government on the theory that a small group of hand-picked, privately controlled individuals in power can be more easily handled than a larger group among whom there will most likely be men sincerely interested in public welfare. These international bankers and Rockefeller-Standard Oil interests control the majority of the newspapers and magazines in this country. They use the columns of these papers to club into submission or drive out of office public officials who refuse to do the bidding of the powerful corrupt cliques which compose the invisible government." [331]

In conclusion we present you with the following actions of the United States on the International and Domestic scene. Each and every one of the following can be traced to Jewish manipulation from behind the scenes. We could provide documentation for each one of these but that would take thousands of pages and I will not spend the time and energy to provide them. Walther Rathenau, the Jewish banker behind the Kaiser, writing in the German Weiner Frei Presse, December 24th, 1912, said: "Three hundred men, each of whom knows all the other, govern the fate of the European continent, and they elect their successors from their entourage." [332] Confirmation of Rathenau's statement came twenty years later in 1931 when Jean Izoulet, a prominent member of the Jewish Alliance Israelite Universelle, wrote in his Paris la Capitale des Religions: "The meaning of the history of the last century is that today 300 Jewish financiers, all Masters of Lodges, rule the world." [333]

If you doubt the accuracy of this statement then look it up for yourself. But be prepared to read thousands of pages of documents in the libraries of some of the largest cities, such as Dallas, Houston, Ft. Worth, Chicago, Los Angeles, New York and the Library of Congress. We have done that but we did not copy the papers simply because we did not have the finances nor the time to do so. So believe it or not, that is for you to decide.

1914: World One began because the International Jewish Bankers did not wish Germany to build a railroad from the middle east to Germany, through most of the Arab countries. But the Jews made it appear that World War One started when the nations went to war to avenge the assassination of the Archduke Francis Ferdinand, the heir to the Habsburg Throne, so on June 28, A joint proclamation of emergency government a neutrality was issued by the American, Japanese, British, French and Czech Commanders in July and our party remained until late August.

In August the project expanded, when 7,000 men were landed in Vladivostok and remained until January 1920, as part of an allied occupation force. In September 1918, 5,000 American troops joined the allied intervention force at Archangel, in support of the Bolshevik Forces, suffered 500 casualties and remained until June 1919. A handful of Marines took part earlier in a British landing on the Murman Coast (Near Norway) but only incidentally.

Max Nordau, a Jew, speaking at the Zionist Congress at Basle in August 1903, made this astonishing "prophesy": "Let me tell you the following words as if I were showing you the rungs of a ladder leading upward and upward: Herzl, the Zionist Congress, the English Uganda proposition, The Future War, the peace conference, where with the help of England a free and Jewish Palestine will be created." [334]

1914: Walter Scott, the secretary of the new England Education League, has a bill introduced in Congress (H.R. 12247) "to create an international board of education and a fund for international or world education."

1917: In January President Woodrow Wilson, re‑elected president in late 1916 on his promise to "keep us out of the war," and maintain strict "Neutrality," told Congress he earnestly wanted to remain at peace with Germany (But a careful study of history proves that, he, like his brother Jew FDR did a few years later worked heaven and earth to get the United States into the war), But on April 2, 1917 America went to war "to make the world safe for Democracy.""But a study of the racial history of Europe indicates that there would have been few wars, probably no major wars, but for the organizing of the Jewish peace‑propagandists to make the non‑Jews grind themselves to bits. The supposition is permissible that the Jewish strategists want peace, AFTER they subjugate all opposition and potential opposition. The question is, whose peace or whose wars are we to 'enjoy?' Is man to be free to follow his conscience and worship his own God, or must he accept the conscience and god of the Zionists?" [335]

All these operations were in support of the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia and were partly supported by Bolshevik elements who participated at times with us, but no war was declared, and ALL operations were under the personal direction of then President Woodrow Wilson [336]. Why? Britain desperately needed help, so the Zionist Jews offered U.S. wealth and manpower in exchange for Britain's promise to give Palestine to the Jews. This promise was engineered by Lord Balfour (a Jew), and thus called the Balfour Declaration.

1919: Dalmatia. U.S. Forces were landed at Trav at the request of Italian authorities to police order between the Italians and Serbs.

1918‑1919: The Treaty of Brest‑Litovsk, signed March 15, 1918, between Russia and Germany removed Russia from the side of the Allies, added to the political chaos within Russia, and caused additional political and military problems for the Allies.

On June 2, 1918, the Allied Supreme War Council voted for military intervention at Murmansk and Archangel in North Russia by a force of mixed nationalities under British command. The original objectives of the expedition were limited: to establish a rallying point for those Czech troops inside Russia who were still loyal to the Allies, to guard the supplies sent to the northern ports for the Imperial Russian Army, and to prevent the establishment of German naval bases at the northern ports. On July 17, 1918, President Woodrow Wilson agreed with his Jewish advisors to furnish American troops for the intervention of this plan. On August 9, 1918, the 339th Infantry Regiment, 1st Battalion of the 310th Engineers, 337th Field Hospital, and 337th Ambulance Company, all elements of the 85th Infantry Division, were officially designated the "Murmansk Expedition."

On August 27 the expedition, consisting of 143 officers and 4,344 enlisted men under the command of Lt. Col. George E. Stewart, sailed from Newcastle‑on‑Tyne in England and arrived at Archangel on September 4 where, with other Allied forces, it became part of the command of Maj. Gen. F.C. Poole, British Army. American troops soon began to deploy along the front 450 miles long, extending from Onega in the west to Pinega in the east, and at some points 200 miles distant from Archangel the site of Head-quarters, AEF, North Russia, and also Allied Headquarters. Between September 1918 and May 1919 troops of AEF, North Russia, suffered over 500 casualties (mostly Americans) in combat against the Russian 6th and 7th Armies.

In addition to the troops composing AEF, North Russia, there were two other American contingents in the area. The American Military Mission to Russia, headed by Col. James A. Ruggles and including several assistant military attaches, reported on significant political and military events to the War Department and to David Francis, U.S. Ambassador to the Provisional (Bolshevik) Government of the Northern Provinces.

The North Russia Transportation Corps Expeditionary Forces, consisting of the 167th (Operations) and 168th (Maintenance) Companies, Transportation Corps, were sent to Murmansk in march and April 1919 to operate and maintain the Murmansk Railway so that a line of withdrawal for the icebound Allied force at Archangel might be kept open. Maj. Edward E. MacMorland commanded this contingent, which operated and maintained the Murmansk Railway from its headquarters at Soroka.

Early in 1919 President Wilson and his chief advisers decided it was time to withdraw all American forces from North Russia.[337] During May 1919 Brig. Gen. Wilds Richardson, who had assumed command of all U.S. forces in north Russia on April 9, began to concentrate AEF, North Russia, around Archangel preparatory to return to the United States via Brest, France. By June 27 the last of AEF, North Russia, had left for Brest. On July 28 the North Russia Transportation Corps Expeditionary Forces left Murmansk for Brest, and on August 5, 1919, Headquarters, AEF, North Russia, was discontinued.

1919‑1920: After many months of prodding by America's Allies and top advisers in the State Department, President Woodrow Wilson agreed in early July 1918 to permit limited U.S. participation in an Allied expedition to Siberia. Among the reasons Wilson gave for this move by the United States were: to extricate Czechoslovak Armed Forces from Siberia who had been attempting to reach the Western Front; to guard allied military stores at Vladivostok; and to aid the Russian (Bolshevik = Jew) people themselves in "self‑government and self‑defense."Soon after Wilson's announcement, the War Department made speedy preparations for the transfer of the 27th and 31st Infantry Regiments from the Philippine Islands to Vladivostok. In addition, Maj. Gen. William Graves, who was designated commander of the expedition, received orders to select an additional 5,000 men and officers from his 8th Division stationed at Camp Fremont, Calif., to supplement these two infantry regiments.

On August 3, 1918, orders were sent from the Adjutant General in Washington to the two regiments in the Philippines and to Graves in California to embark for Vladivostok, where they were to establish American Headquarters. The bulk of the expeditionary forces landed in Siberia between August 15 and September 2. Immediately upon arrival, elements of the 27th and 31st Infantry Regiments took up guard duty along the Ussuri Railroad line from Vladivostok to Nikolsk.

During late August and September the remainder of the 27th Infantry under Col. Henry Styer participated in an Allied offensive that pushed back Russian forces in the Spasskoe‑ Ussuri region. By November most of this fighting had subsided, and the primary tasks of the AEF in Siberia became railroad garrison duty, care of prisoners of war, and guarding Allied supplies at Vladivostok.

In the Spring of 1919, an inter‑Allied agreement on guarding the Trans‑Siberian Railroad resulted in the assignment of American forces to several widely separated sections of the railroad line: Vladivostok to Nikolsk‑Ussuri, Ugolnaya to the Suchan Mines, Spasskoe to Ussuri, and (1,700 miles further west) Verkhne‑Udinsk to Mysovaya.

During the period May through August 1919, the garrisons at Ugolnays, Ussuri, Razodolnoe, the Suchan Mines, and Shkotovo sustained the heaviest casualties of the expedition because of strikes, riots, and Russian guerrilla activity. Conditions were so bad that American forces were removed from Shkotovo and the Suchan Mines in August. Other American garrisons, however, maintained their stations until January 9, 1920, when the War Department ordered the entire AEF in Siberia to assemble at Vladivostok in order to return to Manila.[338] On April 1, 1920, General Graves closed his headquarters, and the last American units departed from Siberia.

1919: Honduras. A landing force was sent ashore to maintain order in a neutral zone during an attempted revolution.

1919: The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) was established to promote Communism and implementation of the evil objectives of the original Illuminati.

1918/1919: Mexico. After withdrawal of the Pershing expedition, our troops entered Mexico in pursuit of bandits at least three times in 1918; in August 1918 American and Mexican troops fought at Nogales. and six times in 1919.

1918/1920: Panama. For police duty according to treaty stipulations, at Chiriqual during election disturbances and subsequent unrest.

1918/1920: Soviet Russia. Marines were landed at and near Vladivostok in June and July to protect the American Consulate and other points in the fighting between the Bolshevik troops and the Czech Army which had traversed Siberia from the Western Front.

1920: Guatemala. To protect the American Legation and other American interests, such as the cable station, during a period of fighting between Unionists and the Government of Guatemala.

1920/1922: Russia (Siberia). An American Marine guard to protect the United States radio station and property on Russian Island, Bay of Vladivostok. Thus prohibiting the use of the Radio Station from being used by anti‑Bolshevik elements.

1921: Panama/Costa Rica. American naval squadrons demonstrated in April on both sides of the Isthmus to prevent war between the two countries over a boundary dispute.

1921: A famine in the Ukraine, where Stalin murdered more than 7‑million kulaks by starvation. This caused famine throughout the Soviet Union and America sent them over $74‑million in food through a so‑called conservative by the name of Herbert Hoover. However, this help was sent under the guise of "Belgian Relief." Which must have been quite a shock to the Belgians who had just made one of the greatest harvests of food in their history.

1922: Turkey. A landing force was sent ashore with the consent of both Greek and Turkish authorities, to protect American lives and property when the Turkish Nationalists entered Smyrna.

1922/1923: China. Between April 1922 and Nov. 1923, marines landed five times to protect Americans during periods of unrest.

1924: China. Marines were landed to protect Americans and other foreigners (Read that Jewish International Banker's interests) in Shanghai during Chinese factional hostilities. "We intend to remake the Gentiles ‑‑ what the Communists are doing in Russia." [339]

1925: China. Fighting of Chinese factions accompanied by riots and demonstrations in Shanghai necessitated landing American forces to protect lives and property in the International Settlement.

1925: Panama. Strikes, riots led to landing of 600 American troops to keep order and protect American interests.

1926: China. The nationalist attack on Hankow necessitated the landing of American naval forces to protect American Citizens. A small guard was maintained at the disposal of the consulate general even after Sep. 16, when the rest of the forces were withdrawn. Likewise, when Nationalist (anti‑Communist) forces captured Klukiang, naval forces were landed for the protection of foreigners.

1926/1933: Nicaragua. The coup d'etat of General Chamorro aroused revolutionary activities leading to the landing of American marines to protect the Interests of the United States and the International Jewish Banking interests. U.S. Forces came and went, but seem not to have left the country entirely until January 3, 1933. Their work included activity against the outlaw leader Sandino in 1928.

1927: China. Fighting at Shanghai caused American naval forces and marines to be increased there. In March a naval guard was stationed at the American Consulate at Nanking after Nationalist (anti‑Communist) forces captured the city. American and British destroyers later used shell fire to protect Americans and other foreigners. Following this incident additional forces of marines and naval vessels were ordered to China and stationed in the vicinity of Shanghai and Tientain.

1928: America sent Russia the money whereby they were able to change from a so‑called "agrarian" to an"industrial" society, Standard Oil contributed over $20‑million, with healthy contributions from General Electric. While at the same time Averiell Harriman, Sr. was sent to Moscow by our government to put their mines back into operation again.

1930: During the 1930's the United States built their automobile industry and the steel industry at Gorki, modeled after our plants at South Bend, Indiana. Only five times as large. While at the same time the American government was using taxpayer dollars built the Russians the world's largest hydro‑electric plant on the Dnepr River.

1932: China. American forces were landed to protect American interests during the Japanese occupation of Shanghai.

1933: Cuba. During a revolution against President Genardo Machado naval forces demonstrated; no landing was made.

1935: The American government sent grain and medical help to Russia during a time of intense famine. It is almost certain that the Communist government would have collapsed at this time without this help, as there were food riots over the entire Soviet Union. “Germany is the enemy of Judaism and must be pursued with deadly hatred. The goal of Judaism of today is: a merciless campaign against all German peoples and the complete destruction of the nation. We demand a complete blockade of trade, the importation of raw materials stopped, and retaliation towards every German, woman and child." [340]

1939: The Communist Government under Stalin's rule, was so shaky the Russian Army was on the verge of being defeated by tiny Finland; one of America's most staunch friends. And with the diversion of just a tiny fraction of the millions of tons of war equipment being shipped to Europe daily, could have saved Finland and dealt a sever blow to Stalin and a death blow to Communism. But due to the efforts of Roosevelt no supplies reached them.

1940: At the beginning of World War II, Franklin D. Roosevelt, along with his Jewish advisors came to the aid of the Soviet Union once again, which was a much greater threat to our safety than the Nazis could ever have become. During the war we sent them over $11‑billion in Lend Lease at a time American men and boys were dying in the Pacific for lack of supplies, because our available ships were transporting some of these war materials to the Soviet Union. The Soviets never returned the"Liberty" ships we loaned them to ship much of this material in.

1941: Netherlands (Dutch Guiana). In November the President ordered American troops to occupy Dutch Guiana, by agreement with the Netherlands Government in exile, while Brazil co‑operated to protect aluminum ore supplies from the bauxite mines in Surinam.

1941: Iceland. Taken under the protection of the United States, with the consent of its government, for strategic reasons.

1941: Germany. Sometime in early spring of 1941, the President ordered the Navy to patrol the shipping lanes to Europe. By July U.S. warships were convoying Allied ships and by September were "Attacking" German Submarines. This was done with no authorization of Congress or Declaration of War. In November, the Neutrality Act was partly repealed to protect and allow military aid to Russia and Britain.

1941: On November 18, the Pearl Harbor tragedy was invited when Hull rejected the Prime Minister of Japan's sincere and humble request to meet personally with President Roosevelt and discuss and adjust the problems confronting the two nations in a mutually satisfactory manner.

1941: December 4, 5, 6, Army intelligence and the United States Navy cipher experts intercepted Japanese code messages that plainly revealed the very time Japan would strike Pearl Harbor! [341] The officials at Washington knew exactly what was going to happen. But no word, no alert, no warning was allowed to be sent to the Commanders at Pearl Harbor until the senders knew the message would be received After the Attack was made.

1941: December 7, at 7:50 A.M., the United States Pacific fleet was anchored, unprotected, unprepared, never warned, never alerted. Result: 200 planes and 5 big battleships were totally destroyed, 3 others wrecked.

1941/1946: President Roosevelt, re‑elected on promises to keep America out of the European war, tried repeatedly to entice German submarine commanders into sinking our unarmed merchant ships which were hauling millions of tons of war supplies to Germany's enemies. "We are not denying and we are not afraid to confess, this war is our war and that it is waged for the liberation of Jewry...Stronger than all fronts together is our front, that of Jewry. We are not only giving this war our financial support on which the entire war production is based. We are not only providing our full propaganda power which is the moral energy that keeps this war going. The guarantee of victory is predominantly based on weakening the enemy forces, on destroying them in their own country, within the resistance. And we are the Trojan Horses in the enemy's fortress. Thousands of Jews living in Europe constitute the principal factor in the destruction of our enemy. There, our front is a fact and the most valuable aid for victory." [342]

1945: On April 26, 1945, representatives of most of the civilized nations of the world met in San Francisco to create an organization of nations which would become a pattern for world government and, it was hoped by its sincere supporters, insure lasting peace to a world long weary of war. The conference was completed on June 26, 1945, with the adoption of the U.N. Charter.

1946: Treaty. President Truman ordered the augmentation of U.S. Troops along the zonal occupation line and the reinforcement of air forces in Northern Italy after Yugoslav forces shot down an unarmed U.S. Army transport plane flying over Venezia Giulia. Earlier U.S. Naval units had been dispatched to the scene.

1948/1949: China. Marines were dispatched to Nanking to protect the American Embassy when the city fell to Communist troops, and to Shanghai to aid in the protection and evacuation of Americans.

1950: January: State Department White Paper issued declaring that the United States would not defend South Korea or Formosa if they were invaded. The bait was accepted: On June 9, 1950, South Korea was invaded. America entered a war that was to cost it 117,000 American lives.

1950/1953: Korea. U.S. responded to North Korean invasion of South Korea by being ordered to go to its assistance by the United Nations; Congressional Authorization was not sought. The Korean fiasco aroused American voters who were offered, the Jew, Dwight D. Eisenhower for President, a soldier who they thought would surely win that ridiculous war. Eisenhower did end the war, but not by winning which could easily have been done, but by yielding to Communist terms and insults he provided the festering sore of a divided Korea; "We will have a world government whether you like it or not. The only question is whether that government will be achieved by conquest or consent." [343]

1951/1955: China. Naval units evacuated U.S. Civilians and military personnel from the Tachen Islands.

1952: In 1952 the Jews had become so powerful at influencing Christian thinking into accepting Jewish teachings that they actually bragged about their power within the pages of the American Jewish Yearbook. Where they stated; "Arrangements have been completed with the National Council of Churches whereby the American Jewish Congress and the Anti‑Defamation League will jointly...aid in the preparation of lesson materials, study guides and visual aids...sponsored by Protestant organizations. You can call these tactics anything you want to. You can even say smear. We prefer to say 'education.'"

1954: Agents of Israel's Mossad firebombed the U.S. Consulate and other facilities in Egypt. They planned to blame it on the Egyptians and thus drive a wedge between that country and America. One of the terrorists was Phillip Nathanson, who let an incendiary device go off in his pocket. That drew the attention of Egyptian authorities, and the resulting scandal was called the "Lavon Affair."

Its political aftermath caused Israel's first Prime Minister (David Ben‑Gurion) to resign. In Brown v. Board of Education the Supreme Court decided segregated schools were unconstitutional. The federal legal brigade aiding Brown and NAACP was heavily Jewish. And the result has been unending racial tension, mind boggling costs for bussing students and remedial programs for Blacks, and trillions of hours lost in the education of White children. "We must realize that our party's most powerful weapon is racial tension. By pounding into the consciousness of the dark races, that for centuries they have been oppressed by whites, we can mold them into the program of the Communist Party. In America, we aim for several victories. While inflaming the Negro minorities against the whites, we will instill in the whites a guilt complex for their supposed exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Blacks to rise to prominence in every walk of life and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and will begin the process which will deliver America to our cause." [344]

God told us that in the latter days He would give our Israel people to the blacks - The Beasts of The Field: “The princes of Judah, and the princes of Jerusalem, the eunuchs, and the priests, and all the people of the land, which passed between the parts of the calf; I will even give them into the hand of their enemies, and into the hand of them that seek their life: and their dead bodies shall be for meat unto the fowls of the heaven, and to the beasts of the earth.” [345]

1954: February 23: U.S. Senator William Jenner of Indiana refers to the Supreme Court's Missouri v. Holland (1920) ruling regarding treaties, and to the High Court's Pink decision, as he speaks in support of the Bricker amendment which would have prevented any treaty from overriding the U.S. Constitution (But the amendment failed to pass by one vote. All the Jewish members of Congress left no stone unturned in their efforts to defeat it).

1956: Egypt. A marine battalion evacuated U.S. nationals and other persons from Alexandria during the Suez crisis.

1958: Lebanon. Marines were landed in Lebanon at the invitation of its government to help protect against threatened insurrection supported from the outside.

1959: Cuba. With the connivance of the Jewish controlled U.S. State Department and the American News Media. Fidel Castro overthrew the government of Cuba and installed a Communist dictatorship ninety miles from our Southern Coast.

1959: January: The New York Bar Association publishes a paper, "Peace Through Law," by Secretary of State (World Brotherhood member) John Foster Dulles, in which he declares: "To accomplish peace through law will take patience and perseverance. It will require us at times to provide an example by accepting for ourselves standards of conduct more advanced than those generally accepted...There is no nobler mission (peace through law and world government) that our nation could perform."

1959/1960: The Caribbean. The 2nd marine ground task force was deployed to protect U.S. Nationals during the Cuban crisis.

1960: February 18: Secretary of State CFR member Christian Herter delivers a speech in which he calls for disarmament, "to the point where no single nation or group of nations could effectively oppose this enforcement of international law by international machinery."

1961: The United States Government trained and transported Cuban exiles for the recapture of their homeland. Then were deliberately abandoned to Castro at the Bay of Pigs. This was just another of the psychological acts performed by our Jewish‑owned traitorous leaders to install, in the American's mind a feeling of helplessness against Communism.

1961: April, Our government understood that Castro would allow Russia to destroy us from Cuban bases. To avert this inevitable destruction, an invasion was planned, financed, and controlled by the United States State Department and Central Intelligence Agency.

The President of the United States approved the plan and promised air support to the invaders. Two United States carriers, loaded with fighter planes stood by in easy striking distance. Secure in the assurance of absolutely necessary air support, 1400 brave, armed men, landed on the shores of Cuba. In the ensuing battle Castro's forces suffered heavy losses. Castro's tanks coming into the battle could have all been completely destroyed by air support. Confidently, the little, patriotic, invading force waited for the promised air support to arrive. Our President had faithfully assured them of that support. It was part of the pre‑invasion planning.

A small but potent force of B‑26's was sitting in readiness on an airstrip 500 miles away waiting to take off to help the brave invaders at the Bay of Pigs. But those planes did not take off. The brave young, freedom‑loving, patriot martyrs were lied to and betrayed and forsaken and allowed to die awful deaths by the most powerful and most highly respected nation on earth. At their darkest hour, our government broke its word, and its sacred honor and allowed those brave men to suffer, bleed and perish. This is one of the dirtiest blotches in American history.

Just before the planes took off ‑‑ we were again informed by our CFR United Nations Communist bosses that: we were not a sovereign nation; that we were no longer living under The United States Constitution, but under The United Nations Charter; that we had no right to yake any military move not even to defend ourselves from invasion or aggression, or even to put down internal rebellion and revolution except upon the orders or with the permission of the "Under-Secretary of Political Security and Military Affairs" of the United Nations; and that he demanded the United States to stop the invasion and to be sure not to allow the planes to leave the ground.

1962: Cuba. President Kennedy instituted a so‑called "quarantine" on the shipment of offensive missiles to Cuba from the Soviet Union. He also warned the Soviet Union that the launching of any missile from Cuba against any nation in the Western Hemisphere would bring about U.S. nuclear retaliation on the Soviet Union. Thus, a negotiated settlement was achieved a few days later.

1962: One of the Rio (CIA) station's main political‑action operations (in Brazil) ...spent during the 1962 electoral campaign at least the equivalent of some twelve million dollars financing anti‑communist candidates,and possibly as much as twenty million. Inside the Company.[346]

By early 1962, Brazilian military commanders had notified Kennedy's Ambassador, Lincoln Gordon, that they were organizing a coup. At JFK's personal initiative, the US began to lend clandestine and overt support to right‑wing political candidates. Another example was President Kennedy's belated discovery that the CIA, at an eventual cost of around half a million dollars, had chemically contaminated part of a cargo of Cuban sugar that was bound for the Soviet Union. Under Cover.[347]

Garrison's Case for Conspiracy: The only person to ever bring anyone to trial for conspiracy in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy was New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison. After serving his country in WWII and winning a landmark case that went to the Supreme Court, giving citizens the right to criticize public officials, Garrison suddenly found himself at the center of a firestorm when he arrested prominent and well‑liked New Orleans businessman Clay Shaw on charges of conspiracy to assassination the president. Longtime residents were shocked, to say the least. The case very much polarized the citizenry. Up until that time, Garrison was a remarkably popular DA, who had never lost a case. After a prelimary hearing at which three judges decided there was enough evidence to bring Clay Shaw to trial, the fires started. The local and national media started innundating the public with stories about the, as the media termed Garrison, "Jolly Green Giant," using the range of options from selective quoting to innuendo and sheer falsehoods. NBC did a one hour hatchet job on Garrison that was so one‑sided Garrison was able, under the then‑existing Fairness Doctrine, to press for "equal time" to respond to his critics.

He was granted a half‑hour which he spent discussing what he could of his case. Garrison believed that a group of anti‑Castro Cubans and the CIA conspired to assassinate President Kennedy in retaliation for his anti‑war policies both in Cuba and Vietnam. Excellent books that give much credence to this claim include Destiny Betrayed: JFK, Cuba and the Garrison Case by James DiEugenio, published by Sheridan Square Press; JFK and Vietnam, by John Newman, published by Carroll & Graff; On the Trail of the Assassins, Jim Garrison's own book of his journey to the center of conspiracy, published by Sheridan Square Press; The Kennedy Conspiracy, by Paris Flammonde (out of print but check your local library); and Newman's new book Oswald and the CIA, published by Carroll & Graff.

The Cia's Interest in Garrison's Case: Once Garrison started looking into the case, people affiliated with the CIA kept popping up over and over. Garrison came to believe the CIA had direct involvement in the assassination. Garrison's interest in the CIA was returned in kind. This file from the Assassination Archives in Washington demonstrates the CIA's keen interest not just in the defendent Clay Shaw, who had covert security clearance to operate with the CIA, but in a man solely called to testify about the impossibility of the "single bullet theory." That Counterintelligence Director for the CIA Jim Angleton would find it necessary not only to spy but to work with Hoover's FBI in an attempt to dig up dirt on this innocent man's background is key to understanding the nature of (and perhaps reason for) the CIA's intense interest in wrecking Garrison's case.

Angleton Spying on Garrison's Witness ; the Perry Russo Story: Perry Russo became a key witness for Garrison. Russo, upon the death of David Ferrie whom he had known and of whom he was afraid, went to the press and told them how David Ferrie had been talking of killing President Kennedy. Russo told Garrison's staff that one of the men involved in this planning was Clay Bertrand. In the Warren Commission evidence, a Clay Bertrand was reported to have telephoned New Orleans attorney Dean Andrews the night of November 22, 1963, asking Dean Andrews to represent Lee Harvey Oswald. When Perry Russo said Clay Bertrand was really Clay Shaw, a monumental effort began to discredit Perry Russo.

Journalist and intelligence asset James Phelan combed through a long memo that young staff attorney "Moo Moo"Sciambra had written after talking to Perry Russo. Phelan noticed one key thing: in the whole "Sciambra Memorandum," there was no reference to Clay Shaw! Sciambra was stunned, as he had already written about Russo in an earlier memo (partially included below) and could not understand what the fuss was about. Each item below references information from Garrison's files on Russo, as well as some of the testimony from the trial.[348]

Garrison Refutes His Critics: the Famous Playboy Interview: Most of the people who attack Garrison won't let his case and his own words speak for themselves. They quote convicts in jail and journalists who tried to bribe Garrison's witnesses in their attempts to discredit Garrison.

Here from Garrison in his own words and decide for yourselves whether this was a crazy man or a man who "had something": Lyndon Johnson's position as Vice President at that time shielded him from possible criminal indictments on charges ranging from the acceptance of political graft to conspiracy to commit murder. His association with Bobby Baker had exposed his Mafia connections and ongoing friendships with those individuals targeted by the Attornet General as key criminal figures in his war on organized crime.[349]

In 1962, direct‑energy weapons were discovered by accident when an Air Force/Atomic Energy Commission nuclear test exploded a thermonuclear device at high altitude. Code‑named Starfish, the test almost caused a major disaster, for it spewed out a vast stream of high‑energy electrons into space, damaging several satellites.[350] President Kennedy sent the United States Air Force to attack rural South Vietnam, where more than 80 percent of the population lived, as part of a program intended to drive several million people to concentration camps (called "strategic hamlets").[351]

1962: Thailand. The 3rd marine Expeditionary Unit landed on May 17, to support that country during the threat of Communist pressure from outside. The Jewish Communist Bosch, with U.S. support, was elected president of the Dominican Republic.

1962/1975: Laos. After years of subsidizing an anti‑Communist Laos, Kennedy ceased all aid. Landed troops supposedly to support the government, but removed and aid restored "only after" the Troika Government was installed including one "Communist" and one so‑called "Neutral" favorable to the Communists.

1963: Dominican Republic. The military seized power from Juan Bosch, the United States immediately severed diplomatic relations.

1963: Under such circumstances, it is hardly surprising that when three young activists ‑ James Chaney, Michael Schwerner and Andrew Goodman; disappeared in Neshoba County, Mississippi on June 21, 1963, the FBI had active "subversive" files open on one of the two whites, Schwerner, as well as Chaney, a 21‑year‑old black man...As a result, on October 27, 1967, seven of the 19 remaining murderers (of the 3) (including klan leader Bowers and Deputy Price) were convicted only of conspiring to deprive their victims of their civil rights and sentenced to serve three‑to‑ten years in federal prison. Charges against the other twelve were dropped or they were acquitted altogether. As U.S. District Judge Harold Cox put it at the time of sentencing: "They killed one nigger, one Jew, and a white man. I gave them what I thought they deserved." [352]

The Jfk Mock Trial: Lyndon Johnson told his former aid Lea Janos, as recounted in a July 1973 Atlantic article, "We had been operating a damned Murder, Inc. in the Carribean." Janos elaborated, "A year or so before Kennedy's death a CIA‑backed assasination team had been picked up in Havana. Johnson speculated that Dallas had been a retaliation for this thwarted attempt, although he couldn't prove it." [353]

During the days and weeks before the Kennedy killing, Ruby was calling and being called by the top aides to Marcello, Florida mobster Santos Trafficante, and Hoffa ‑ all of whom were known to have discussed plans with their associates to murder either John or Robert Kennedy.[354] For instance, on November 23 (1963), according to Bureau documents, the FBI briefed a "Mr. George Bush of the Central Intelligence" on matters relating to the assassination (Bush was in Dallas at the time of the assassination).[355]

Nor did the Bureau tell the Agency about allegations that Santos Trafficante, the key figure in CIA's pre‑Cubela assassination attempts, was also really working for Castro ‑ and that the president's life might be in danger. This information came to the FBI from Jose Alleman, an anti‑Castro exile in Miami...Trafficante had offered to get him a loan from Jimmy Hoffa's International Brotherhood of Teamsters, and while they were on that subject, Trafficante had mentioned, in passing, that because of the Kennedy administration's harrassment of certain individuals, JFK was finished. According to Aleman, Trafficante had said simply, "He is going to be hit." [356]

The George Bush Connection: In this day and age when some people can not even name the president of the United States, it is not the least bit surprising that most have no knowledge of George Bush's possible connections to the Kennedy assassination. The relationship has its roots in Bush's "former" employment with the CIA. As CIA agents have been quoted in the past, you never really leave the Agency.

The CIA Did It! Many researchers place the blame for the murder of John F. Kennedy on the CIA. The easiest way to clear the mafia or other non‑governmental groups is to look at the massive cover‑up that the government has participated in over the years. If mafia boss Carlos Marcello had really ordered the hit, could he have had the CIA and FBI suppress so much evidence from the public for so long? Could he have had the normal security lowered for the assassination? Could he have had the Washington D.C. phone system knocked out of order for an hour right as the shooting took place? Could he have convinced the Warren Commission to release such an idiotic official version of the murder? Of course not. The set‑up and cover‑up had to take place inside of the government, not outside.

The CIA seemed to have the most (and best) motives for the elimination of Kennedy. During the Eisenhower presidency, the CIA came up with a plan to invade Cuba at the Bay of Pigs. The thought was that the citizens would hear of the attack and join in to overthrow Castro. Former Cubans were trained by the CIA and the U.S. government fur‑ nished them with weapons and transportation. Since it was near the end of his administration, Eisenhower put the plan on hold so the new president would not have to deal with any problems which might arise from the mission.

Upon entering office Kennedy decided that the plan's requirement of 16 planes would obviously reveal American backing of the plot. The plan had hoped that American involvement would not become known to the world. The use of 16 planes would make American backing obvious to everyone. Kennedy cut the number of planes down to six. As the date of the invasion neared, Kennedy decided against the plan and announced in the press that the United States would not invade Cuba with the military. The CIA went ahead with the plan and quickly found that things were not going as they had hoped for. They asked for more planes but were told they would have to be held back until the forces captured a Cuban airport. Then, the planes could be sent and the explanation would be that they were captured planes which the rebels had put into use. The CIA‑backed rebels never got that far and were quickly defeated. The citizens of Cuba never joined them in the fight. The CIA, as has been revealed in books by participants, blamed Kennedy for the defeat. The books and papers reveal a deep hatred for the imagined betrayal.

Later, Kennedy formed a panel to keep him informed as to what was going on in Vietnam. American involvement was still low at this point but Kennedy was worried. He has been quoted as saying he could not justify sending American boys half‑way around the world to fight communism when it existed just south of Florida in Cuba. One of the panel's members was Allen Dulles, head of the CIA. Kennedy caught him in various lies and fired him. The fact that the CIA had kept training Cubans for another invasion until Kennedy finally sent in FBI agents to break up their camps and confiscate their weapons was another reason for the dismissal. Other high‑ranking CIA officials were fired, too, including the brother of Dallas' mayor. Kennedy changed the operating procedure of the CIA so they would have to get approval for any future covert actions from Robert Kennedy.

Due to persistent problems with the CIA and their continual involve‑ ment in matters which were not their concern, Kennedy declared that he was going to shatter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter them to the winds. Even former president Truman, who had created the CIA, expressed concerns about their behavior. Kennedy was apparently going to leave their destruction until after the next election but did start withdrawing troops from Vietnam, much to the dislike of the CIA.

One of Johnson's first moves after he replaced Kennedy as president was to increase American involvement in Vietnam. It seems he owned an airline company that was contracted to fly troops back and forth across the Pacific Ocean, but that is another matter.

Later, E. Howard Hunt, on behalf of the CIA, faked cables to implicate John F. Kennedy in the assassination of South Vietnam's president, Ngo Dinh Diem. So, it is apparent that the CIA disliked Kennedy and had the means to set‑up and cover‑up the assassination. Now, it is known that they convinced the Warren Commission that the Soviet Union and Cuba had murdered Kennedy.

They scared the members into believing that revealing this to the American public would result in a nuclear war in which millions would be killed. To further this theory, they produced fake evidence showing that Oswald had visited the Soviet and Cuban embassies in Mexico to arrange the killing and escape. The head of the CIA operations in Mexico has since admitted that no such real evidence ever existed. A Warren Commission investigator has admitted that they acted to save millions by sacrificing one man (Oswald).

The job was not too hard to pull off since former CIA‑head Allen Dulles was a member of the Commission. He was the only one to attend more than half of the hearings and was also in charge of deciding what intelligence data was seen by the other members. President Johnson didn't seem to find it strange to appoint the man that Kennedy had fired to investigate his hated former boss' murder.

So How Does Bush Fit It? Although he denies it, there is a growing body of evidence that George Bush was working for the CIA as early as 1961. Many feel he was actually recruited during his college days (which is when he joined the Skull and Bones Society, a front for the Illuminati). Bush claims to have been working for his own oil company during the early 1960's. It would make for a convenient front since he claims to have been off‑ shore on drilling rigs for weeks at a time. The rigs were located all over the world. Was he really on the rigs or was he running around on CIA business? The various biographies of Bush are all sketchy on this phase of his life.

During this time, Bush had moved to Houston, Texas. His wife was, of course, Barbara. His oil company was Zapata Off Shore Co. (which he named after a communist Mexican revolutionary who would invade towns and murder every man, woman and child. Bush also named an earlier oil company after Zapata, a questionable choice for a hero). The code name for the Bay of Pigs invasion was Operation Zapata! A former high‑ranking Pentagon official, Col. Fletcher Prouty, was the man who secured two Navy ships for the operation. He has told of seeing the two ships repainted to non‑Navy colors for the invasion. The ships were given the new names Houston and Barbara!

Of course, maybe the names were just coincidences, but Bush was living in Houston with Barbara and running Zapata in 1961 during the planning of the invasion. The name "Operation Zapata" was top secret and known only to a very few.

In 1977 and 1978, the government released nearly 100,000 pages of documents on the Kennedy assassination. One which slipped out by mistake was from the FBI to the State Department written a few days after the assassination. The State Department was worried that anti‑Castro groups in Miami might stage another invasion of Cuba in the aftermath of the JFK murder. The FBI informed them that they had questioned both pro‑Castro and anti‑Castro groups and could find no information about such plans. The memo went on to state that the information was passed along to "George Bush of the Central Intelli gence Agency" the day after the assassination.

Why was the information passed along to the CIA? Probably because of their previous invasion attempt and other planned attacks. Why George Bush? Probably because he was involved in previous invasion plans! When the document first surfaced no one paid much attention to it. When the presidential campaigns began for the 1980 election then the name George Bush caught researchers' eyes. When asked about the memo, Bush denied working for the CIA at the time. As evidence built that it was indeed him, the CIA claimed it was a different George Bush although their policy had always been to neither confirm nor deny a person's employment. The other George Bush was tracked down by reporters and said that although he did work for the CIA at the time, he was never involved in that sort of work. The interesting point is that the CIA did not bother to contact the other George Bush and inform him that reporters might soon be calling. Other evidence surfaced that showed the George Bush mentioned in the document was actually George H. W. Bush and had the same address as the famous George Bush.

Another Bush connection involved George de Mohrenschildt, a rich Russian oil man who lived in Texas when Lee Harvey Oswald settled there after his trip to the Soviet Union. De Mohrenschildt was a long‑time CIA agent and quite possibly served as a CIA control officer for Oswald. The Warren Commission described him and his wife as being the two people friendliest to Oswald at the time of the assassination. De Mohrenschildt's son‑in‑law told the Warren Commission that if any‑ one had helped with the assassination it was most likely de Mohren‑ schildt. De Mohrenschildt was also the man who moved Oswald to Dallas.

Shortly before the House Select Committee on Assassinations started meeting in the late 1970's a new doctor appeared in de Mohrenschildt's town. De Mohrenschildt started seeing him and quickly became mentally unstable. His wife convinced him to stop seeing the doctor. The doctor then moved away and left a false forwarding address. The very day the Committee tried to contact de Mohrenschildt about testifying, he was found dead of a gun shot wound. His personal address book was found and it contained the entry "Bush, George H. W. (Poppy) 1412 W. Ohio also Zapata Petroleum Midland." Bush's full name is George Herbert Walker Bush which matches the initials given and his earlier oil company was named Zapata Petroleum Corp. Why was his name in de Mohrenschildt's book? Is "Poppy" his CIA code name?

It is known that in the early 1960's de Mohrenschildt made frequent trips to Houston, which was the location of Bush's home. He told friends he was visiting the Brown brothers, who were close friends and financial supporters of Lyndon Johnson. CIA documents reveal that during the planning phase of Operation Zapata, de Mohrenschildt made frequent trips to Mexico and Panama and gave reports to the CIA. His son‑in‑law told the Warren Commission that he believed de Mohren‑ schildt was spying for the planned Cuban invasion.

A Question of Character: When Bush was picked to be director of the CIA in 1976, he testified to Congress that he had never worked for the CIA before. Of course, it did not make much sense to appoint a director who had no such back‑ ground but Congress approved him anyway. Now it would seem that Bush committed perjury in his congressional testimony.

George Bush was apparently high enough in the CIA to help plan the Bay of Pigs invasion. It would probably be safe to assume that he even named the operation and its two ships. Considering the hatred that the CIA felt toward Kennedy over their failed mission and Bush's involvement in that same mission, it would be quite interesting to know what Bush's feelings toward John F. Kennedy really were and what his full role in the assassination investigation was.

Further information on the George Bush connection may be obtained from Mark Lane's "Plausible Denial" (Thunder's Mouth Press) and James "Bo" Gritz's "Called To Serve." Lane's book is an excellent accounting of the CIA's involvement (especially E. Howard Hunt and Frank Sturgis). Gritz (a 1992 presidential candidate) tells about many of the CIA's questionable ventures and also about his trips to Laos to attempt rescues of American POWs who are still held by Vietnam.

Guatemala: In 1963, there was concern in Washington that there might be another election; and Kennedy therefore supported a military coup. By the late 1960s, the terrorism that we were supporting had aroused resistance, and so we sent Green Berets to lead a counterinsurgency campaign which left many thousands dead, maybe 8,000 to 10,000 people died. It was reported by the vice president of Guatemala that American planes based in Panama carried out napalm raids in Guatemala at that time.[357]

1964: Coup in Brazil: The decision was made, apparently, by President Johnson himself, that an all‑out effort must be made not only to prevent a counter‑coup and insurgency in the short run in Brazil, but also to build up their security forces as fast and effectively as possible for the long run.

Raborn had been CIA director for less than a week when President Johnson elected to dispatch twenty‑five thousand Marines to the Dominican Republic to avert a communist takeover. and not long afterward Johnson followed up by sending in the FBI.[359] In the 1964 election the CIA spent twice as much per Chilean voter to block Allende as the total spent per voter by both parties in the U.S. elections of the same year.[360]

Phoenix Program Begun: Apparently without informing the White House, the FBI initiated electronic surveillance at the Democratic National Convention in August.(1964)...Dr. King was tapped.[361]

On November 21...the FBI mailed an anonymous letter and a tape of the King hotel‑room bugs to King and his wife, Coretta. William Sullivan said in an interview that he had, on orders from Hoover, arranged to have a tape mailed to Mrs. King. He said he received the order from Hoover's assistant, Alan H. Belmont.[362]

Federal Bureau of Intimidation: We thought it would be good to talk about the FBI because they talk about us. They don't like to be talked about. They don't even like the fact that you're listening to them being talked about. They are very sensitive people. If you look into the history of the FBI and Martin Luther King‑which now has become notorious in that totally notorious history of the FBI‑ the FBI attempted to neutralize, perhaps kill him, perhaps get him to commit suicide, certainly to destroy him as a leader of black people in the United States. And if you follow the progression of that treatment of King, it starts, not even with the Montgomery Bus Boycott; it starts when King begins to criticize the FBI. You see, then suddenly Hoover's ears, all four of them, perk up. And he says, okay, we have to start working on King.

!n 1975, the Senate Select Committee investigated the CIA and the FBI and issued voluminous reports and pointed out at what point the FBI became interested in King. In 1961‑62 after the Montgomery Bus Boycott, after the sit‑ins, after the Freedom Rides of '61, there was an outbreak of mass demonstrations in a very little, very Southern, almost slave town of southern Georgia called Albany. There had been nothing like this in that town. A quiet, apparently passive town, everybody happy, of course. And then suddenly the black people rose up and a good part of the black population of Albany ended up in jail. There were not enough jails for all who demonstrated.

A report was made for the Southern Regional Council of Atlanta on the events in Albany. The report, which was very critical of the FBI, came out in the New York Times. And King was asked what he thought of the role of the FBI. He said he agreed with the report that the FBI was not doing its job, that the FBI was racist, etcetera, etcetera. At that point, the FBI also inquired who the author of that report was, and asked that an investigation begin on the author.

We are talking about the FBI and U.S. democracy because here we have this peculiar situation that we live in a democratic country‑everybody knows that, everybody says it, it's repeated, it's dinned into our ears a thousand times, you grow up, you pledge allegiance, you salute the flag, you hail democracy, you look at the totalitarian states, you read the history of tyrannies, and here is the beacon light of democracy. And, of course, there's some truth to that. There are things you can do in the United States that you can't do many other places without being put in jail.

But the United States is a very complex system. It's very hard to describe because, yes, there are elements of democracy; there are things that you're grateful for, that you're not in front of the death squads in El Salvador. On the other hand, it's not quite a democracy. And one of the things that makes it not quite a democracy is the existence of outfits like the FBI and the CIA. Democracy is based on openness, and the existence of a secret policy, secret lists of dissident citizens, violates the spirit of democracy.

There are a lot of other things that make the U.S. less than a democracy. For instance, what happens in police stations, and in the encounters between police and citizens on the street. Or what happens in the military, which is a kind of fascist enclave inside this democracy. Or what happens in courtrooms which are supposedly little repositories of democracy, yet the courtroom is presided over by an emperor who decides everything that happens in a courtroom ‑what evidence is given, what evidence is withheld, what instructions are given to the jury, what sentences are ultimately meted out to the guilty and so on.

So it's a peculiar kind of democracy. Yes, you vote. You have a choice. Clinton, Bush and Perot! It's fantastic. Time and Newsweek. CBS and NBC. It's called a pluralist society. But in so many of the little places of everyday life in which life is lived out, somehow democracy doesn't exist. And one of the creeping hands of totalitarianism running through the democracy is the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

In 1908, under Theodore Roosevelt, his Attorney General, a man named Bonaparte, a grand nephew of Napoleon‑set up the Bureau of Investigation which later became the FBI. One of its first acts was to enforce a new federal law‑ the Mann Act. This law made it illegal to transport women across state lines for immoral purposes. Yes, one of their first acts was to prosecute the black heavyweight champion, Jack Johnson, because he was living with a white woman and they actually crossed a state line. One of the first heroic acts of the FBI. They go way back. Racism goes way back in the FBI and comes way forward, comes right up to now. By the way‑in the film they show a black FBI man. But there was no black person in the FBI in 1964. A chauffeur, maybe. A maid, maybe. No black FBI agents in 1964. But there was this black FBI agent in the film.

There's too much to say about the FBI and racism. It's not just J. Edgar Hoover. Everybody says, oh, J. Edgar Hoover, he really hated black people. He hated the civil rights movement, but it's not just him, of course. It's too easy to pin all this on J. Edgar Hoover, to pin it just on the FBI as if they're wildcards. The president says, oh sorry, we didn't know what they were doing. Well, it's just like Oliver North. A wildcard North was doing these crazy things and his defense was absolutely right: I did it for them. He did. He did it for them and now they have turned on him. He doesn't have to worry, they'll take good care of him. They take care of their own.

When people in the CIA and FBI commit crimes, how do they get handled? They don't. They're forgotten about. Do you know how many crimes have been committed by the FBI and the CIA? How many black bag jobs? Breaking and entering? Try breaking and entering. Really. Try breaking and entering in the daytime, or nighttime, and see what happens to you. Different punishments depending on what hour of the day. The FBI broke and entered again and again and again and again, hundreds and hundreds of times.

There were hundreds of FBI men involved in these breaks. Two men were actually prosecuted. This happens every once in a while. When huge public attention finally gets focused, they pick out two from the pack and prosecute them and they find them guilty and they sentence them. To what? To nothing. Fine, $5,000 for one person. That's FBI petty cash. $3,500 for the other. And then they say that justice has been done and the system works.

Remember when Richard Helms of the CIA was found guilty of perjury in 1976? Hiss went to jail for four years for perjury, Helms didn't go to jail for two hours. And Helms's perjury, if you examine it, was far, far more serious than Alger Hiss's, if Hiss was indeed guilty. But if you're CIA, if you're FBI, you get off.

But North is right; he did it for them. He did what they expected him, wanted him, to do. They use this phrase, plausible denial, a very neat device. You have to be able to do things that the President wants you to do but that he can deny he wanted you to do, or deny he ordered you to do if push comes to shove.

It's not just the FBI. It's the government. It's part of the system, not just a few people here and there. The FBI has names of millions of people. The FBI has a security index of tens of thousands of people‑ they won't tell us the exact numbers. Security index. That's people who in the event of national emergency will be picked up without trial and held. Just like that. The FBI's been preparing for a long time, waiting for an emergency.You get horrified at South Africa, or Israel, or Haiti where they detain people without trial, just pick them up and hold them incommunicado. You never hear from them, don't know where they are. The FBI's been preparing to do this for a long time. Just waiting for an emergency. These are all countries in emergency; South Africa's in an emergency, Chile was in an emergency, all emergencies.

James Madison made the point way back. One of the founding fathers. They were not dumb. They may have been rich and white and reactionary and slave holders but they weren't dumb. Madison said the best way to infringe on liberty is to create an external menace.

What can a citizen do in a situation like this? Well, one thing is simply to expose the FBI. They hate to be exposed, they're a secret outfit. Everything they do is secret. Their threat rests on secrecy. Don't know where they are. Not everybody in a trench coat is an FBI agent. We don't know where they are, who they are, or what they're doing. Are they tapping? Right. And what are you going to do about it?

The one thing you shouldn't think will do anything is to pass a law against the FBI. There are always people who come up with that. That's the biggest laugh in the world. These are people who pay absolutely no attention to the law, again and again. They've violated the law thousands of times. Pass another law; that's funny.

No, the only thing you can do with the FBI is expose them to public understanding‑education, ridicule. They deserve it. They have "garbologists" ransacking garbage pails. A lot of interesting stuff in garbage pails. They have to be exposed, brought down from that hallowed point where they once were. And, by the way, they have been brought down. That's one of the comforting things about what has happened in the United States in the last 30 years. The FBI at one point was absolutely untouchable. Everybody had great respect for the FBI.

In 1965 when they took a poll of Americans; do you have a strong admiration for the FBI? Eight‑five percent of people said, "Yes." When they asked again in '75, 35 percent said, "Yes." That's a big comedown. That's education ‑education by events, education by exposure. They know they've come down in the public mind and so now they're trying to look kinder and gentler. But they're not likely to merge with the American Civil Liberties Union. They're more likely, whatever their soothing words, to keep doing what they're in the habit of doing, assaulting the rights of citizens.

The most important thing you can do is simply to continue exposing them. Because why does the FBI do all this? To scare the hell out of people. Were they doing this because of a Soviet invasion threat or because they thought the Socialist Workers Party was about to take over the country? Are they going after whoever their current target is because the country is in imminent danger, internal or external? No. They are doing it because they don't like these organizations.

They don't like the civil rights organizations, they don't like the women's organizations, they don't like the anti‑war organizations, they don't like the Central American organizations. They don't like social movements. They work for the establishment and the corporations and the politicos to keep things as they are. And they want to frighten and chill the people who are trying to change things. So the best defense against them and resistance against them is simply to keep on fighting back, to keep on exposing them. That's all I have to say.

1964: Congo. The U.S. sent four transport planes to provide an airlift for Congolese troops during a rebellion and to transport Belgian paratroopers to rescue foreigners.

1964: Communist China tested its first A bomb on October 16, 1964, and its first H-bomb on June 17, 1967, because of the treachery and treason of Jewish spies.

1964/1973: War in Vietnam. U.S. military advisers had been in South Vietnam for a decade (10 years); They sent to Vietnam by then Jewish President Eisenhower, and their numbers increased as military positions of the Siagon Government became weaker. War because of rich off shore oil fields Jewish oil companies wanted develop.

1965: It's kind of interesting to look at the Pentagon Papers,which show that in all this elaborate discussion of just how to carry out the bombing of North Vietnam and how to fine tune it, etc., there's virtually nothing about the bombing of South Vietnam, which was much heavier. In 1965 three times the scale of the bombing of the North, and it continued to be much heavier, much more vicious.[363] Torture rooms in Uraguay supervised by CIA[364]: Although it has never officially confirmed the finding, the Central Intelligence Agency has indicated that 200 pounds of enriched uranium that disappeared in 1965 from a Nuclear Material and Engineering Corporation plant at Apollo, Pa., were somehow diverted to Israel.[365]

More on nuclear: We now know from revelations of the Church Committee in the mid 1970's and subsequent investigations into Malcolm's assassination that his death was indirectly caused by the FBI. In 1969, four years after Malcolm's assassination, the FBI took credit for it and called it the result of its successful stimulation of the feud between Malcolm and Elijah Muhammed.[366] Malcolm X was supposedly murdered by former colleagues in the NoI as a result of the faction‑fighting which had led to his splitting away from that movement, and their "natural wrath" at his establishment of a competing entity. However, as the accompanying January 22, 1969 memo from the SAC, Chicago, to the Director makes clear, the NoI factionalism at issue didn't "just happen." Rather, it had "been developed" by deliberate Bureau actions ‑ through infiltration and the "sparking of acrimonious debates within the organization," rumor‑mongering, and other tactics designed to foster internal disputes ‑ which were always the standard fare of COINTELPRO.[367]

More on civil rights: A CIA study of the 1965 Indonesian operation remains secret. Former CIA agent Ralph McGehee, who was custodian of that study but is not permitted to discuss it, states that on the basis of that study "I know the specific steps the agency took to create the conditions that led to the massacre of at least half a million Indonesians." [368]

In 1965, there was a coup by liberal, reformist officers, a constitutionalist coup, which threatened to restore democracy in the Dominican Republic, so we intervened again. This time we simply sent troops. A bloody and destructive war took place, many thousands of people were killed, and we again succeeded in establishing a terror‑and‑tortue regime. The country was also, incidentally, brought totally within the grip of the U.S. corporations. The Dominican Republic was virtually bought up by Gulf & Western and other corporations after the coup.[369]

One of the most horrifying stories of the Cold War received new attention last May, when Kathy Kadane of the Washington‑based States News Service reported that U.S. government officials had abetted the massacre of thousands of Indonesians in 1965‑66. In the massacre, directed by the Indonesian military in an effort to eliminate the Indonesian Communist Party and its perceived sympathizers among the ethnic Chinese minority, an estimated 250,000 to 1 million people died.

In interviews with Kadane, U.S. officials admitted that the U.S. embassy in Jakarta had drawn up lists of some 5,000 suspected Communist leaders. These lists were turned over to the Indonesian military, and were also used by the embassy to keep track of which party members had been killed or captured. "I probably have a lot of blood on my hands, but that's not all bad," one former embassy staffer told Kadane.

Kadane's story originally ran in the Spartanburg, S.C. Herald‑Journal (5/19/90), and was picked up by many other papers, including the Boston Globe, Chicago Tribune and Washington Post. The New York Times, however, ignored the story for nearly two months, then produced (7/12/90) what can only be described as an attack on Kadane's credibility.

Times reporter Michael Wines examined transcripts of Kadane's interviews looking for inconsistencies, and gave her sources the opportunity to retract or reinterpret their statements. What led the New York Times to make this highly unusual attempt to debunk a reporter's story? A clue might be found in the Times' reporting on Indonesia at the time of the massacre. While some of its coverage did invoke the horror of the massive killing (as early as 1/16/66), in general the Times' commentary and analysis viewed the destruction of the Communist party quite favorably. "A Gleam of Light in Asia," was the headline of a James Reston column (6/19/66). "Almost everyone is pleased by the changes being wrought," C.L. Sulzberger commented (4/8/66). The Times itself editorialized (4/5/66) that the Indonesian military was "rightly playing its part with utmost caution."

But perhaps the most enthusiastic of all the Times' writers was Max Frankel, then Washington correspondent, now executive editor. "U.S. Is Heartened by Red Setback in Indonesia Coup," one Frankel dispatch was tagged (10/11/65). "The Johnson administration believes that a dramatic new opportunity has developed both for anti‑Communist Indonesians and for United States policies" in Indonesia, Frankel wrote. "Officials...believe the army will cripple and perhaps destroy the Communists as a significant political force."

After the scale of the massacre began to be apparent, Frankel was even more enthusiastic. Under the headline "Elated U.S. Officials Looking to New Aid to Jakarta's Economy" (3/13/66), Frankel reported that "the Johnson administration found it difficult today to hide its delight with the news from Indonesia....After a long period of patient diplomacy designed to help the army triumph over the Communists, and months of prudent silence...officials were elated to find their expectations being realized." Frankel went on to describe the leader of the massacre, Gen. Suharto, as "an efficient and effective military commander."

Could Frankel's implicit endorsement of the massacre have led him to assign a reporter to discredit Kadane's fresh reporting? When asked whose idea it was to do the story, Wines replied, "I really just don't care to get into it."

1966: The American government sent Russians the IBM equipment which was necessary for their rocketry program. Our American government also sent them the world's largest magnet, which many believe is being used against us in their "weather modification program." It is well known they are engaged in intensive research along this line.

1966: "It would have been professional suicide for us in the AP (Associated Press) to suggest that the Vietcong insurgents and Hanoi's regular forces were generally superbly trained and well motivated and seemed to believe in their revolutionary cause," war correspondent Peter Arnett noted in his book Live from the Battlefield. "We were dissuaded by our editors from suggesting that the Vietnam conflict contained significant elements of a civil war, even though every Vietnamese knew the truth of that description." [370]

In 1966 a B‑52 crash near Paloma, Spain, resulted in dispersal of plutonium over an extensive agricultural area. The United States cleaned up the damage at a cost of $50 million.[371]

On October 5, 1966, the most ambitious of all the American electric utilities' nuclear power projects, Detroit Edison's experimental commercial breeder reactor, named Fermi I, on the shores of Lake Erie, ran into serious trouble. A piece of metal had worked loose at the bottom of the reactor and had partially clogged the flow of the core coolant, the core assembly had become overheated, a tiny part of it melted, releasing dangerous radioactive gases into the containment structures, and, for all the engineers knew, it seemed as though a major disaster was imminent.

At the time, the reactor crew had no idea what had gone wrong, nor how to remedy it. Six months would pass before they could determine the extent of the damage and a full year before they had found the cause. In the early days of the accident, they could only hope the damaged core would stabilize itself without further mishap.[372]

At another unidentified reactor in April 1966, radioactive water was found in one of the plant drinking fountains. Investigators discovered a hose connected from a well‑water tank to a 3,000‑gallon radioactive waste tank. The AEC said that the "coupling of a contaminated system with a potable water system is considered poor practice in general..." [373]

1967: Congo. The U.S. sent three military aircraft with crews to provide the Congo Central Government, which has proven over the years to be Communistic, with logistical support during a revolt.

The U.S.S. Liberty was deliberately attacked in International Waters as it monitored communications during the Six‑Day War. Israel used U.S.‑donated equipment to jam the ship's S.O.S., hoping to sink it and murder all aboard before word could get out. 34 sailors were butchered and 170 wounded in this blatant Act of War. The Liberty was part of the Sixth Fleet, a powerful group of men and ships paid for by U.S. Taxpayers to protect the Israeli's. What do the Jews think of our American Service Men, the descendants of the men who pulled their chestnuts out of the fire in World War II? Read the following for just a sample of the many slaps in the face they give our military!

Israeli's Attempt to Sink The U.S.S. Liberty: An eyewitness report from the U.S.S. Liberty, by John Hrankowski: "June 8, 1967, was a bright, sunny day in international waters off Egypt. A breeze tracked our electronic‑laden vessel, the U.S.S. Liberty, cruising under orders of the U.S. Navy. As an engineer I was not on deck, but when several jets began buzzing us I bounded to the main deck. My shipmates waved, laughed, and joked. Among the planes was a Piper Cub, clearly marked with the Star of David. The plane flew so low and so slowly that we could see its camera turret as it snapped our picture. Over our communications equipment we could hear the aircraft identify our ship as the U.S.S. Liberty. These were our allies, our friends, the Israeli's.

Several hours later, about 2 P.M., the jets returned and made five to seven passes over us, machine‑gunning and rocketing our lightly‑armed ship. More planes arrived, this time Mirage Jets, and loosed bursts of bullets and cannon fire as well as napalm into the ship. In the initial attack, nine of my surprised comrades died, scores more were lying everywhere, wounded, horribly burned, moaning, dead or dying. I was seriously wounded by rocket shrapnel. This, however, was not the end of the two‑and‑one‑half hour ordeal. Israeli torpedo boats streaked toward our stricken ship and fired five torpedoes. One hit home, bringing violent death to 25 more American crew members. Preparing to abandon ship, some of my shipmates dropped rubber rafts into the sea. It seemed like a horrible, slow motion movie as we watched the (Israeli) Torpedo Boats Circle Back and Fire Machine Guns at the helpless survivors on deck and in the Rubber Rafts already in the Sea! One curious torpedo boat skipper even picked up an empty raft, perhaps to keep as a souvenir. To prevent the Liberty from communicating with other vessels and navy communication centers, our radio was jammed. This, we later learned, could only have been accomplished by a 'Friendly' nation who knew our radio frequencies...For 1967 (This report was published in 'The Washington Report on Middle East Affairs,' December, 1986) my shipmates and I have been trying to get out the truth about the attack that killed 34 Americans and wounded 171 others.

All of us agree that the attack could not possibly have been a mistake! The Israeli aircraft that came within 200 feet, the messages giving the ship's name, the two large U.S. Navy Flags billowing in the breeze, the big GTR‑5 stenciled on the bow; characters well known to friend and foe as a U.S. Navy designation ‑‑ all clearly identified us.

For years our crew was puzzled, and incredulous, when Israeli authorities claimed our ship had been mistaken for an Egyptian freighter. Of it all I believe it was No Coincidence that the Israeli Attack took place on June 8, and that the next day Israel invaded Syrian territory, capturing the Golan Heights, an area it still holds years later and which it now says it has annexed for permanent retention.

The Liberty was a navy electronic 'ferret' research vessel, listening to communications from both sides in the Six Day War ...Very little of this information has ever reached the American public. Even Congress, importuned for decades by survivors to at least investigate the reasons behind the attack on a U.S. Military Vessel, up to now has refused to do so. After the attack, when the surviving crew members were still together aboard the ship, we were Officially warned not to talk to reporters. The Navy has never been willing to release, even to us, a list of crew members so that we can mobilize them to tell our story...

I speak frequently in the upstate New York area, and I find people invariably shocked that they have been kept ignorant of this incident. The fact that the American public remains largely unaware of what happened at the hands of a so‑called ally proves that the press has failed to exercise its mandate to keep the American People informed. The American public will believe and support us, when they learn Americans like themselves who joined the Navy to serve their country, when we produce irrefutable evidence that the attack on June 8, 1967, could not have been an error. It was, in fact, an attempt to sink an American Ship that might have alerted the world to an (Senseless and Murderous) Israeli act of Aggression.

Americans should know the facts so they can judge the readability and reliability of a nation that wants us to believe it is 'our closest ally.' The American tax payers should know because they bought the planes, the boats, the bombs, rockets, torpedoes, and napalm that struck us. At one time we surviving crew members hoped official naval inquiries would elicit all the facts. But we have given up on that. Those inquires, we're convinced, were part and parcel of the American Government Coverup: Evidence was Concealed, Key Crew Witnesses were never Interviewed; The Israeli Government's conclusions were never really queried or published...' I just Cannot accept the explanation that the attack was a case of mistaken identity,' Admiral Thomas H. Moorer, said. 'I think, without a doubt, that those 34 Men who were killed in the sneak attack on the Liberty were killed (Murdered) Deliberately.'..."

Is it not strange that on June 8, 1967, Israeli Jews viciously attacked the American ship U.S.S. Liberty, leaving 34 American sailors dead and 171 injured, yet to this day the Jewish owned media has ignored it and the American Congressmen have conventially and wittingly forgotten about it!

The attack was deliberate, lasting almost 2 hours, and due to political orders the U.S. Military would not come to the aid of the U.S.S. Liberty. Even as you read this, the Israeli military is murdering Palestinian women and children with military equipment supplied by American taxpayers and churches.

President Johnson and the U.S.S Liberty Incident: The weekly newspaper "Christian News" is published by the Luthern Church movement. In their issue of June 15, 1987, a very interesting article regarding the U.S.S. Liberty incident was published. The title of the article was, "LBJ gave the order to let the USS Liberty sink and let all hands on board drown." Some very important information was revealed in that article that is very relative to our survival today as a Christian Nation. The article revealed: "In a private interview of U.S.S. Liberty survivor Commander (Ret.) David Lewis, who was in command of the scientific mission of the ship which was the gathering and dissemination of intelligence data. He told me that the order to abandon the USS Liberty and her crew to the attacking Israeli planes and Torpedo Boats came from President Lyndon B. Johnson.

Two days after the rescue of the survivors, and after Commander Lewis had regained his eyesight, he was hit by an exploding torpedo, Admiral and Commanding Officer of the Mediterranean Fleet Larry Geis called him into his quarters and said to him, 'Commander, we received your calls for help, and we attempted to send our planes to the rescue. But in the event that something happens to me, or if I am blamed for not answering your call for help, I want you to know exactly what happened. As soon as we received your radio call for help I deployed our fighter‑bomber planes and radioed the Pentagon of our action. A few minutes later I received a call from Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara ordering me to recall the planes because they were carrying nuclear arms. So I called them back. I immediately rearmed another squadron with conventional weapons, deployed it, and reported to the pentagon. A few minutes later I got another call from McNamara ordering me to recall these planes too. I was angry and mystified, and exercised my prerogative to go to the next highest level of authority so as to have McNamara's order reversed.

Seconds later President Lyndon Johnson was on the radiophone, and I made my case to him. I told him that the USS Liberty had been under attack for an hour, and had radioed for help, and that I had sent out a squadron of fighter‑bombers armed with conventional weapons to the rescue. Then the President said to me, 'I don't care if the ship sinks and every man on board drowns, we are not going to fight against our allies (Israel).”'

1967: CIA advisor (Felix Rodriguez) with the Bolivian army tried to bring Guevara back alive to La Paz for in‑depth interrogations. The Bolivian commander, however, was under orders to execute Guevara.[374] More on Felix Rodriguez: (CIA) its police training...had been going on ...at least since 1967, when Chicago police received instructions at both the agency's headquarters and at "The Farm" in southeastern Virginia.[375]

The Soviets were aware of the Arab nation's (Egypt) poor intelligence capabilities against Israel and manipulated this weakness to their own advantage. By 10 May, 1967 President Nasser had received reports of Israeli troop concentrations along the Syrian border from four friendly intelligence services ‑ Egyptian, Syrian, Lebanese and Soviet. The multitude of apparently independent sources corroborating each other's warnings served to strengthen Nasser's belief in their reliability. He was unaware, of course, that all reports had in fact been fed into the various systems by the Soviets.[376]

1968: In the late 1960's the American government sent the Soviet Union 164 ball bearing machines, which make the ball bearings they use in the guidance systems of their IBM's. This is the only way they could make their intercontinental missiles so accurate. So accurate that they can be fired from Soviet soil, travel 7500 miles, and then split into ten warheads, which can virtually destroy ten cities. They are so accurate, using the technology the American government gave them and that which they have stolen from us through Jewish spies, that they can hit within 100 yards of ground zero after a flight of 7500 miles.

1968: Such ELSURS and informant activity vis `a vis SDS was an integral part of a more generalized FBI "political intelligence" emphasis during the period 1964‑68 which saw the installation of more than 800 wiretaps and some 700 bugs (facilitated by at least 150 surreptitious entries), and an unknown number of informants and infiltrators, all utilized in "non‑criminal investigations." [377]

In 1968 a B‑52 crashed and burned near Thile Air Force Base in Greenland. The bomber carried four nuclear weapons, all of which were destroyed by fire. During a four‑month operation 237,000 cubic feet of radioactively contaminated ice, snow, and water were removed to an approved storage site in the United States.[378]

Copenhaen, Denmark ‑ The Danish government will pay Danes and Greenlanders $14 million in compensation for the 1968 crash of a U.S. nuclear bomber in Greenland, officials said Friday...Danes and Greenlanders helped the U.S. Air Force clean up the radioactive wreckage.[379] There is little doubt that during the final stages of the campaign Anna Chennault passed on a "very important" message from the Nixon camp that was intended to dissuade Thieu from agreeing to attend the Paris peace talks until after the election. According to Clifford, "President Johnson, although furious at Mrs. Chennault, decided not to use the information or make it public in any way." [380] (Hughes) Soon he would pass $50,000 to Nixon through Governor Laxalt and a second $50,000 to Humphrey through Dwayne Andreas, a longtime backer who had no official role in the campaign but handled the "sensitive" contributions.[381]

On March 16, some 570 South Vietnamese civilians were slaughtered in Mylai by the U.S. military.[382] My Lai was part of a major operation, Operation Wheeler Wallawa, which killed nobody knows how many thousands or tens of thousands of people in real massacres.[383]

1969: Black Panther, Fred Hampton, killed with FBI complicity.[384] On the evening of December 3, 1969, shortly before the planned raid, infiltrator O'Neal seems to have slipped Hampton a substantial dose of secobarbital in a galss of kool‑aid. The BPP leader was thus comatose in his bed when the fourteen‑man police team ‑ armed with a submachinegun and other special hardware ‑ slammed into his home at about 4 a.m. on the morning of December 4.

He was nonetheless shot three times, once more‑or‑less slightly in the chest, and then twice more in the head at point‑blank range. Also killed was Mark Clark, head of the Peoria, Illinois, BPP chapter...Despite the fact that no Panther had fired a shot (with the possible exception of Clark, who may have squeezed off a single round during his death convulsions) while the police had pumped at least 98 rounds into the apartment, the BPP survivors were all beaten while handcuffed, charged with "aggressive assault" and "attempted murder"of the raiders, and held on $100,000 bond apiece.

In November 1982, District Judge John F. Grady determined that there was sufficient evidence of a conspiracy to deprive the Panthers of their civil rights to award the plaintiffs $1.85 million in damages.[385]

The most significant was the fire at the Rocky Flats plutonium bomb factory in Colorado in 1969, which caused plutonium contamination in the surrounding countryside.[386]

Through various sources, the president had learned that his brother was meeting secretly with one of Howard Hughes's representatives, John Meir. Richard Nixon had his own deals going with Hughes, as did Attorney General Mitchell, and he was not eager to have them exposed by his brother's free‑wheeling.[387]

The big question was how much more Hoover had ‑ and whether he was aware that approval of the Dune's acquisition was linked to a $100,000 payoff to Richard Nixon from Howard Hughes.[388]

May 9 New York Times reported the U.S. conducting bombing raids in Cambodia. Keeping the Cambodian bombing secret involved an unprecedented form of double bookkeeping. A set of false reports on the bombing raids was sent to the Pentagon through the usual air force channels, while a parallel set of highly classified reports contained the real targets.[389]

From 315,000 tons of air ordnance dropped in Southeast Asia in 1965, the quantity by January‑October, 1969, the peak year of the war, reached 1,388,000 tons. Over that period, 4,580,000 tons were dropped on Southeast Asia, or six and one‑half times that employed in Korea.[390]

During the year of heaviest fighting (1969), the million Communist troops were faced by 1.6 million allied troops (a third of whom were American)...Aircraft dropped more bombs on Vietnam (4.2 million tons) than on Germany and Japan during World War II (3.4 million tons). The impact of this firepower advantage could be seen in the losses both sides suffered. The allies had 260,000 dead (mostly South Vietnamese, about a fifth American) while the Communists lost about a million...Over half a million civilians also died from all that firepower, and many of these noncombatants perished as part of Communist deception efforts to protect their troops.[391]

1970: CIA weapons to a group planning the assassination of Army General Schneider in order to provoke a military coup; ITT's offer of $1 million to the CIA for use against the 1970 Allende campaign and its later spending, with CIA assistance and participation by other U.S. companies , of some $700,000 in the campaign; finally'the revolting but logical CIA support of the Pinochet regime.(after Allende's assassination and Pinochet's coup d'etat).[392] The President failed to mention that he had approved CIA covert action programs costing $400,000 to stop Allende.[393]

Air America helicopter lands at Long Pot village, northern Laos. The local military commander at Long Pot asserts that General Vang Pao's Meo officers have been shipping opium out of the village on Air America helicopters since 1970. Michael Levine discusses heroin trade in Vietnam in an interview at DiNardo Conspiracy. Almost 11 million gallons of Agent Orange were sprayed in Vietnam from 1961 to 1970, even though it was one of the most toxic chemicals known.[394]

For many years, the UN has been blocked by the great powers, primarily the United States ‑ not the Soviet Union or the Third World. Since 1970, the United States has vetoed far more Security Council resolutions than any other country (Britain is second, France a distant third and the Soviet Union fourth).[395]

1971: In November of 1971, Michael Fribourg completed a deal with the Soviet Union, through Nickolai Belousou, the Chief of Exportkhelb, the Russian grain‑purchasing agency; for 900,000 tons of American surplus barley and oats, 2‑million tons of corn, and 282‑million bushels of wheat. The total figure was something in excess of 18‑million metric tons of grain sold to the Soviet Union. This tremendous sale was financed by a combination of U.S. guaranteed credits and U.S. subsidized prices. So once again the Soviet Union was saved and the American formers and taxpayers had been ripped off again.

1971: On April 5, 1971, one of Barberot's employees and a Foccart operative, Roger Delouette, was arrested in Elizabeth, New Jersey, while picking up his car, which contained forty‑nine kilos of heroin. According to an American agent, money from the African diamond traffic of the Foccart network was being reinvested in the heroin trade in America to make big profits and finance further dirty work in Africa.[396] The memo recounted a 1971 conversation with John Mitchell in which the Attorney General supposedly agreed to drop three antitrust suits against ITT, in return for a pledge of up to $400,000 in cash and services to the 1972 Republican National Convention.[397]

On December 22, 1971 Hoffa's prison sentence was commuted by Nixon. Hoffa was released the following day.[398] The payoffs began in 1962, when Agnew became Baltimore County executive and continued when he became governor in 1967; even as late as 1971, when Agnew was vice‑president, he received a payment in the basement of the White House.[399]

1972: America built for the Soviets the worlds largest truck factory on the banks of the Kama River, which produces more trucks than all the American truck factories combined. This plant, built by the American government, with American taxpayer funds, which supplied the trucks to the North Vietnamese and Vietcong during the Vietnam War.

We could have presented another hundred or two instances where the U.S. has sent our military men to defend the interests of the International Jewish Bankers and Oil Interests, but we believe these should suffice to prove our point. And as we said you can accept it or not, it is not for us to try to convince you of anything or to change your mind about the events of history.

You believe what you will. "Zionism was willing to sacrifice the whole of European Jewry for a Zionist State. Everything was done to create a state of Israel and that was only possible through a world war. Wall Street and Jewish large bankers aided the war effort on both sides. Zionists are also to blame for provoking the growing hatred for Jews in 1988." [400]; "Israel won the war (WW I); we made it; we thrived on it; we profited from it. It was our Supreme Revenge on Christianity." [401]

1972: Even before the constitutional convention was aborted by the Marcos coup of 1972, charges had been made that U.S.‑AID and the CIA were training Phillipine police under the public safety program "for eventual para‑military and counterinsurgency operations as part of a global programme designed to militarize and 'merenarize' the police forces of client states." [402]

Of the seven original Watergate burglars, all but two had worked for the CIA. The exceptions were G. Gordon Liddy, who had been an FBI agent, and Virgilio Gonzales, the Watergate team's locksmith. June 17: Second break‑in Democratic National Committee; June 20: 18 minute gap in Nixon tape. When Walter Cronkite tried to do an extraordinary, two‑part series on Watergate on the "CBS‑TV Evening News," before the election, a phone call from the Nixon White House to Bill Paley, a chair of CBS, resulted in Cronkite's scheduled program being reduced.[403]

Prior to his death in 1972, James Angleton, a man I once met in General Cabell's office, confided to me that Nixon had arranged a deal with Gerald Ford. If Ford fulfilled two conditions after Nixon's resignation, Nixon would make Ford president. The conditions were a pardon for Nixon and a promise that he make sure any information held by the CIA concerning Nixon's involvement with the CIA/anti‑Castro operations ‑ specifically Operation Forty ‑ would be actively concealed.[404] On December 17, 1972 the New York Times revealed that the CIA had secretly provided training to fourteen New York City policeman.[405]

The following is what the Jews have in mind for American Christians if they can succeed in disarming them. This is a very brief description of what the Jews did to 50-million Christians in the USSR after they took over Russia in 1917: "The Jews were now free to indulge in their most fervent fantasies of mass murder of helpless victims. Christians were dragged from their beds, tortured and killed. Some were actually sliced to pieces, bit by bit, while others were branded with hot irons, their eyes poked out to induce unbearable pain.

Others were placed in boxes with only their heads, hands and legs sticking out. Then hungry rats were placed in the boxes to gnaw upon their bodies. Some were nailed to the ceiling by their fingers or by their feet, and left hanging until they died of exhaustion.

Others were chained to the floor and left hanging until they died of exhaustion. Others were chained to the floor and hot lead poured into their mouths. Many were tied to horses and dragged through the streets of the city, while Jewish mobs attacked them with rocks and kicked them to death. Christian mothers were taken to the public square and their babies snatched from their arms.

A red Jewish terrorist would take the baby, hold it by the feet, head downward and demand that the Christian mother deny Christ. If she would not, he would toss the baby into the air, and another member of the mob would rush forward and catch it on the tip of his bayonet. Pregnant Christian women were chained to trees and their babies cut out of their bodies. There were many places of public execution in Russia during the days of the revolution, one of which was described by the American Rohrbach Commission: 'The whole cement floor of the execution hall of the Jewish Cheka of Kiev was flooded with blood; it formed a level of several inches. It was a horrible mixture of blood, brains and pieces of skull. All the walls were bespattered with blood. Pieces of brains and of scalps were sticking to them. A gutter of 25 centimeters wide by 25 centimeters deep and about 10 meters long was along its length full to the top with blood. Some bodies were disemboweled, others had limbs chopped off, some were literally hacked to pieces. Some had their eyes put out, the head, face and neck and trunk were covered with deep wounds.

Further on, we found a corpse with a wedge driven into its chest. Some had no tongues. In a corner we discovered a quantity of dismembered arms and legs belonging to no bodies that we could locate.'" [406]; "There is a Jewish conspiracy against all nations; it occupies almost everywhere the avenues of power, a double assault of Jewish revolution and Jewish finance, revolution and finance. If I were God, I'd clean this mess up and I would start with cleaning the Money Changers out of the Federal Reserve." [407]; "When the conspirators get ready to take over the United States they will use fluoridated water and vaccines to change people's attitudes and loyalties and make them docile, apathetic, unconcerned and groggy. According to their own writings and the means they have already confessedly employed, the conspirators have deliberately planned and developed methods to mentally deteriorate, morally debase, and completely enslave the masses. They will prepare vaccines containing drugs that will completely change people. Secret Communist plans for conquering America were adopted in 1914 and published in 1953. These plans called for compulsory vaccination with vaccines containing change agent drugs. They also plan on using Disease Germs, Fluoridation and vaccinations to weaken the people and reduce the population." [408]

The Rabbis of Judaism understand this just as do the leaders in the Christian movement. Rabbi Moshe Maggal of the National Jewish Information Service said in 1961 when the term Judeo‑Christian was relatively new, "There is no such thing as a Judeo-Christian Religion. We consider the Two Religions so different that one excludes the other." [409]

Judeo-Christian Heritage A Hoax: It appears there is no need to belabor the absurdity and fallacy of the "Judeo-Christian heritage" fiction, which certainly is clear to all honest theologians. That "Judeo-Christian dialogue" in this context is also absurd was well stated in the author-initiative religious journal, Judaism, Winter 1966, by Rabbi Eliezar Berkowitz, chairman of the department of Jewish philosophy, at the Hebrew Theological College when he wrote: "As to dialogue in the purely theological sense, nothing could be more fruitless or pointless. Judaism is Judaism because it rejects Christianity; and Christianity is Christianity because it rejects Judaism. What is usually referred to as the Jewish-Christian traditions exists only in Christian or Secularist Fantasy."

There is no doubt this is true! And the fantasy exists in Christian and Secularist minds only because it was implanted there by the persistent propaganda of the masters of intrigue of the ADL-AJC Network. Nevertheless, there can be no doubt that knowledgeable theologians, Jewish and Christians who constantly allude to "our Judeo-Christian heritage" are for their own specious purposes perpetuate a grotesque and fantastic hoax.

Boston: A Harvard Divinity School professor, John Strugnell, was removed this week as chief editor of the Dead Sea Scrolls not only because of his poor health, but because of a tirade against Israel and Judaism, his colleagues said. The remarks, in which he called Judaism "a horrible religion" that "should have disappeared," came as a surprise to some colleagues working with him to decipher the ancient texts of the Old Testament. Strugnell made the remarks in a recent interview published in Haaretz, a Tel Aviv newspaper.

In the Haaretz interview, Strugnell, 60, said he was not against Jews but their religion, according to an account soon to be published in the Biblical Archaeology Review. "I can't allow the word anti-Semitism to be used," he is quoted as saying, "Anti-Judaist, that's what I am."

According to writer Allan C. Brownfeld, the above is only a portion of the support that a traitor to the United States is receiving in Jewish circles. It was reported on April 17, 1994, p. 2, of the "Herald Journal," Logan, Utah that J. Robert Openheimer (a Jew) and other U.S. scientists gave the Soviets information on their efforts to build the first atom bomb, a retired Russian spy said in his memoirs quoted in Time Magazine.

The information passed on during World War II "signifricantly altered the direction of Soviet nuclear research," says Pavel Anatolievich Sudoplatov, who plotted the assassination of Leon Trotsky for Josef Stalin. Excerpts from "Special Tasks: The Memoirs of an Unwanted Witness a Soviet Spymaster" appear in the April 25 issue of Time Magazine. Sudoplatov writes that members of the American science team who shared information with the Soviets included Nobel laureate Enrico Fermi and Neils Bohr (both Jews), who worked with Oppenheimer on the Manhattan Project. Sudoplatov also had moles working in the Manhattan Project labs in Los Alamos, N.M., Oak Ridge, Tenn., and Chicago, he said.

41). The Jewish state of Israel, demanded and obtained forgiveness for billions of dollars they had received in loans and loan guarantees they had received in the '60s, '70s, and early '80s.

42). In 1991, the Jews were finally successful in tricking America into destroying one of their most feared enemies, Iraq. America had no interest in fighting Iraq but due to the Jewish controlled press, the people of the United States were convinced that Iraq was America's enemy. God is being trampled. Men are perishing from and by decrees from company board-rooms where the destruction of Christian America is being planed and carried out; morality is ridiculed and mocked, while honest citizens have become a laughingstock. The J.D.L. (Jewish Defense League), A.D.L (Anti‑Defamation League of B'nai B'rith) have put America, Germany and the Western World on a mind‑depressing guilt trip with their constant barrage of deception and lies.

Throughout history Jews have faced charges of economic exploitation of Gentile communities around the world. Indeed, no single group of people have faced blanket expulsion in so many places around the world as frequently as have the Jews. The patter and the charges are familiar: monopolization, usury "sharp practices," selling "cheap" goods, frequent bankruptcies, etc.

All such claims seem to preface the expulsion orders and are vigorously denied both by those charged and by the Jewish writers of history. But this is not the only charge that is made against Jews. Jews have been conclusively linked to the greatest criminal endeavor ever undertaken against an entire race of people - a crime against humanity - the Black African Holocaust. They were participants in the entrapment and forcible exploitation of millions of Black African citizens into the wretched and inhuman life of bondage for the financial benefit of Jews.

The effects of this unspeakable tragedy are still being felt among the peoples of the world at this very hour. Deep within the recesses of the Jewish historical record is the irrefutable evidence that the most prominent of the Jewish pilgrim fathers used kidnapped Black Africans disproportionately more than any other ethnic or religious group in New World history, with the exception of White slaves who were brought to the Americas at a rate of about 10 Whites to 1 Black, and participated in every aspect of the international slave trade. The immense wealth of Jews...was acquired by the brutal subjugation of Black Africans purely on the basis of skin color, a concept unfamiliar to Moses.

Now compiled for the first time, the Jewish sources reveal the extent of their complicity in Black slavery in the most graphic of terms. Until now, the facts herein were known only to a few. Most have always assumed that the relationship between Blacks and Jews has been mutually supportive, friendly and fruitful, two suffering people bounding to overcome hatred and bigotry to achieve success.

But History tells an altogether different story. This portion of this study will focus on the hidden record of Blacks and Jews from the Jewish historical record. Rabbi Henry Cohen, author of the book, "Justice Justice," makes a telling point. "(T)he parallels between the Nazi terror and the American slave trade are more startling than we may realize. When Negroes were brought from the heart of Africa to the American South, one-third died enroute to the African coast and one-third died in the suffocating prisons on board ship. Once here, families were purposely broken up; husbands, wives, and children forced to go their separate ways. Must we be reminded of the death toll in the suffocating boxcars bound for Auschwitz or of the tearing of children from their mothers' arms." [410]

Furthermore, in Roberta Strauss Feuerlicht's, "The Fate of the Jews: A People Torn Between Israeli Power and Jewish Ethics," she confronts the reality of her people's western development: "(W)hether so many (Southern) Jews would have achieved so high a level of social, political, economic and intellectual status and recognition, without the presence of the lowly and degraded slave (both Black and White), is indeed dubious. How ironic that the distinctions bestowed upon (Jewish) men like Judah P. Benjamin were in some measure dependent upon the sufferings of the Negro slaves they brought and sold with such equanimity." [411] It is a relationship that needs further analysis - one that is not fully known. Hidden and misunderstood, it is indeed time to reopen the files to review and reconsider, "The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jew."

Throughout the history of the practice, Jews have been involved in the purchase and sale of human beings. This fact is confirmed by their own scholars and historians. In his book, "A History of the Jews," Solomon Grayzel states that "Jews were among the most important slave dealers" in European society. [412]

Lady Magnus writes that in the Middle Ages, "The principal purchasers of slaves were found among the Jews...(T)hey seemed to be always and everywhere at hand to buy, and to have the means equally ready to pay." [413]

Henry L. Feingold stated that; "Jews who were frequently found at the heart of commerce could not have failed to contribute a proportionate share of the (slave) trade directly or indirectly. In 1460, when Jews were the masters of the nautical sciences in Portugal, that nation was importing 700-800 slaves yearly." [414]

The success of these medieval merchants was enhanced by their supreme linguistic abilities. They spoke Arabic, Persian, Roman, Frankish, Spanish and Salvonic and "displayed a business acumen far in advance of the times." [415] Over the next centuries the centers of Jewish development moved into the Western Hemisphere were land and commercial opportunities proved the incentives for immigration. The open and ungoverned territory and the docile and vulnerable native population offered an irresistible attraction to the "Maligned race."

They acquired great wealth in their Caribbean and South American enterprises and eventually moved into the American Northeast which became the economic focal point. It started with the forced expulsion of the Jews from the Spanish Empire and with the early explorer and "discoverer" of America, Christopher Columbus. Columbus, Jews and the Slave Trade: "Not jewels, but Jews, were the real financial basis of the first expedition of Columbus." [416] The Jews' participation in the slave trade, particularly their trafficking in non-Jewish slaves, incited the moral indignation of Europe's Gentile population. The Europeans reacted by taxing the Jews and some were expelled from their host countries, for this activity. [417]

The expulsion of the Jews by European governments was not unusual, with most of the complaints centered around economic exploitation, monopolizing, or "sharp practice." By 1500, with the exception of certain parts of Italy, Western Europe had closed its doors to the Jewish people.[418]

The following listing is a partial record of the countries and dates of the Jew's expulsion from various European communities.[419] 1). 250 - Carthage; 2). 415 - Alexandria; 3). 554 - Diocese of Clement (France); 4). 561 - Diocese of Uzzes (France); 5). 612 - Visigoth Spain; 6). 642 - Visigoth Empire; 7). 855 - Italy; 8). 876 - Sens; 9). 1012 - Mayence; 10). 1181 - France; 11). 1290 - England; 12). 1306 - France; 13). 1348 - Switzerland; 14). 1349 - Hielbronn (Germany); 15). 1349 - Hungary; 16). 1388 - Strasbourg; 17). 1394 - Germany; 18). 1394 - France; 19). 1422 - Austria; 20). 1424 - Fribourg & Zurich; 21). 1426 - Cologne; 22). 1432 - Savory; 23). 1438 - Mainz; 24). 1439 - Augsburg; 25). 1446 - Bavaria; 26). 1453 - Franconis; 27). 1453 - Breslau; 28). 1454 - Wurzburg; 29). 1485 - Vincenza (Italy); 30). 1492 - Spain; 31). 1495 - Lithuania; 32). 1497 - Portugal; 33). 1499 - Germany; 34). 1514 - Strasbourg; 35). 1519 - Regensburg; 36). 1540 - Naples; 37). 1542 - Bohemia; 38). 1550 - Genoa; 39). 1551 - Bavaria; 40). 1555 - Pesaro; 41). 1559 - Austria; 42). 1561 - Prague; 43). 1567 - Wurzburg; 44). 1569 - Papal States; 45). 1571 - Brandenburg; 46). 1582 - Netherlands; 47). 1593 - Brandenburg, Austria; 48). 1597 - Cremona, Pavia & Lodi; 49). 1614 - Frankfort; 50). 1615 - Worms; 51). 1619 - Kiev; 52). 1649 - Ukraine; 53). 1654 - LittleRussia; 54). 1656 - Lithuania; 55). 1669 - Oran (North Africa); 56). 1670 - Vienna; 57). 1712 - Sandomir; 58). 1727 - Russia; 59). 1738 - Wurtemburg; 60). 1740 - LittleRussia; 61). 1744 - Bohemia; 62). 1744 - Livonia; 63). 1745 - Moravia; 64). 1753 - Kovad (Lithuania); 65). 1761 - Bordeaux; 66). 1772 - Jews deported to the Pale of Settlement (Russia); 67). 1775 - Warsaw; 68). 1789 - Alace; 69). 1804 - Villages in Russia; 70). 1808 - Villages & Countrysides (Russia); 71). 1815 - Lubeck & Bremen; 72). 1815 - Franconia, Swabia & Bavaria; 73). 1820 - Bremes; 74). 1843 - Russian Border Austria & Prussia; 75). 1862 - Area in the U.S. under Grant's Jurisdiction; 76). 1866 - Galatz, Romania; 77). 1919 - Bavaria (foreign born Jews); 78). 1938-45 - Nazi Controlled Areas; 79). 1948 - Arab Countries.

On August 2, 1492, more than 300,000 Jews were expelled from Spain,[420] ending their five century involvement in the Black hostage trade in that region. In fact, the Spanish Jews amassed large fortunes dealing in Christian (White) slaves and became quite prominent within Spain's hierarchy.[421] They had obtained the most important offices and positions of trust in the cabinets and counting houses of the rulers and had maintained great influence over the regional trade causing many to believe that the Jews exercised an unhealthy domination over the economy of the region.[422] The rulers were convinced enough to order all Jews to either convert to Christianity or leave Spain.

The Marranos; The Secret Jews: The Marranos were those compulsorily converted Jews and their descendants who outwardly became Christians but secretly continued to meet in the synagogue, celebrated feast days and observed the Jewish Sabbath. The name Marrano may be derived from the old Castilian marrano (swine) or perhaps from the Arabic mahran (forbidden).

In 1350, Spain began a series of conversion drives to convert all Jews in Spain to Christianity, and in unprecedented numbers, and with little resistance, the Jews converted.[423] This rush to mass conversion, an event, unparalleled in Jewish history, is perhaps best summed up by Cecil Roth: "It was not difficult for insincere, temporizing Jews to become insincere temporizing Christians." [424] The "Marranos," also called conversos (the converted), or nefiti (the neophytes), or "New Christians," wee simply charged with not being Catholic. The same applied to the Muslims, who were expelled in like manner and in greater numbers than the Jews.[425] Some fifty thousand Jews chose to convert rather than leave their land and their riches.[426]

Contrary to popular notions, those who left were not refugees searching for religious freedom, but entrepreneurs looking for economic opportunities. When they fled, they brought few Torah scrolls and eve fewer copies of the Jewish holy book Talmud with them. When asked what he thought most Marranos knew of Judaism after their flight from Spain and Portugal, Roth answered in one word - "Nothing." [427]

The majority fled south and eastward to North Africa and to centers like Salonika, Constantinople, Aleppo and Damascus,[428] while others sought and found refuge in the Netherlands where they "established synagogues, schools, cemeteries and a high level of wealth and culture." [429]

Most escaped "with considerable sums of money." [430] Though scattered throughout the globe by political, economic and religious circumstances, they would reunite later in a an unholy coalition of kidnappers and slave makers. The day after the Spanish expulsion, Christopher Columbus, whose actual name was Cristobol Colon, took a group of Jewish refugees with him to the New World. [431] Queen Isabella signed the expulsion decree and Columbus' voyage order the very same day. But it was not the queen or the king who funded the voyage. George Cohen, among many Jewish historians, proclaims that wealthy Jews financed the expeditions of Columbus, and adds that the story of Isabella's jewels "is not founded on facts," but rather it was an invention "intended to glorify the Queen." [432] Three Marranos, Luis de Santagel (or Santangelo), [433] a wealthy merchant, Gabriel Sanchez,[434] the royal treasurer and his assistant, Juan Cabrero, influenced Queen Isabella to help them finance the voyage. Cabrero and Santagel invested 17,000 ducats, which would be well over $100,000 today.[435]

Alfonso de la Caballeria and Diego de Deza also provided funds; Abraham Ben Samuel Zacuto provided astronomy and navigation equipment and Isaac Abravanel also assisted. Six prominent Jews accompanied Columbus including Mastre Bernal, a physician; Marco, a surgeon; Roderigo Sanchez, and inspector; Luis de Torres, an interpreter; and sailors Alfonso de la Calle,[436] and Roderigo de Triana, who is claimed to be "the first white man ever to see the new world." [437] Torres settled in Cuba and has been credited with introducing tobacco to Europe from his vast tobacco plantations. [438] Cecil Roth's History of the Marranos: "The connection between the Jews and the discovery of America was not, however, merely a question of fortuitous coincidence. The epoch-making expedition of 1492 was as a matter of fact very largely a jewish, or rather a Marrano, enterprise. [439] Columbus, the Jew? A few scholars, including Roth, present strong evidence that Columbus was himself a Jew. He hid his Jewishness, they say, because ‘no spanish Jew could ever have expected aid from the king and queen of Spain, so the explorer claimed to be an Italian Catholic." [440]

Tina Levitan, author of Jews in American Life, found the first reference to Columbus' Jewishness in print in a diplomatic document dated fifty-eight years after the discoverer's death. The French ambassador to Spain, she reveals, refers to "Columbus the Jew," [441]

Furthermore she states: "From him we learn that Cristobal Colon (who never called himself Christopher Columbus and never spoke of wrote Italian) was the son of Susanna Fontanarossa (also spelled Fonterosa) and Domingo Colon of Pontevedra, Spain, where those bearing such surnames were Jews, some of whom had been brought before the Spanish Inquisition...Letters written by him to strangers have the customary X at the top to indicate the faith of the writer, but of the thirteen letters written to his son only one bears an X, and that letter was meant to be shown to the King of Spain. The others have in the place of the X a sign that looks like the Hebrew characters B and H, initials used by religious Jews meaning in Hebrew, 'With the Help of God.'" [442]

Harry L. Golden and Martin Rywell, authors of Jews in American History: Their Contribution to the United States of America, are quite insistent about the Jewishness of Columbus. They cite where Ferdinand, Columbus' son, writes that his father's "progenitors were of the blood royal of Jerusalem..." [443]

In Columbus' words, "for when all is done, David, that most prudent king was first a shepherd and afterwards chosen King of Jerusalem, and I am a servant of that same Lord who raised him to such a dignity." [444]

One Jewish author insists that; "all existing portraits of the discoverer gave him a Jewish cast of countenance." Another claimed that a "certain soft-heartedess in Columbus is a Jewish trait." [445]

His lineage also pointed to Jewish roots - his mother's maiden name was Suzanna Fonterosa, "daughter of Jacob, grand-daughter of Abraham and a Jewess. His father, Domingo Colon, was a map-seller. Did not Columbus write the King of Spain that his ancestors were interested in maps?" [446]

Columbus, the Slave Dealing Jew? Christopher Columbus was an experienced sailor long before his infamous voyage west. Sir Arthur Helps writes that, "In the course of (his) letters (Columbus) speaks after the fashion of a practiced slave dealer."

In fact, in 1498, his five ship expedition brought 600 Indians to Spain as slaves. Two hundred were given to the masters of the ships and four hundred sold in Spain. [447] Columbus employed slave labor in gold mining even before sailing for the New World. He helped to start the Portuguese West African settlement of San Jorge El Mina (St. George of the Mines) in present-day Ghana, formerly known as the Gold Coast. [448]

When the Spaniards found gold in the New World, reports Eric Rosenthal in his book, Gold! Gold! Gold!: The Johannesburg Gold Rush, they started; "on a gold hunt of such intensity that the natives came to believe the white men suffered from some disease curable only by the limitless application of this metal...(When) Columbus discovered that, apart from some poor alluvial deposits, the gold simply did not exist, he forced the harmless Indian aborigines into slavery...The entire importation of gold from the New World for the first 20 years after 1492 represented in case only $300,000 a year, and the total then recovered, worth about $5 million, cost at least 1 1/2 millon Indian lives. [449] Columbus was anything but a blessing to the New World population. The Europeans, led by Columbus, brought unprecedented brutality to the West leaving the remains of whole communities of Red people in their wake." [450]

On Hispaniola Columbus found gold and a docile Arawak population. He lavished praise on the natives and gained their trust and affection and then proceeded to enslave them. According to Columbus: "They are cowards, a thousand running away from three, and thus they are good to be ordered about, to be made to work, plant, and do whatever is wanted, to build towns and be taught to go clothed and accept our customs." [451] Cities began to spring up all over the island of Hispanola. The traffic in slaves - African and Indian (and Whites) grew rapidly, and some Jews were engaged in this trade as agents for the royal families of Spain and Portugal.[452]

Whether or not Columbus was a Jew, as so many Jewish historian now claim, has not been definitively proven. It is clear that his brutality against and enslavement of the native population was financed by Jewish investors. The history books appear to have confused the word Jews for the word jewels. Queen Isabell's jewels had no part in the finance of Columbus' expedition, but her Jews did.[453] [454] In the Midrash Rabbah, a rabbinical commentary, there is a prediction one day all gentiles will be slaves of Jews.[455]

In the British West Indies much of the early capital to finance White Slavery came from Sephardic Jews from Holland. They provided credit, machinery and shipping facilities. In the 1630s Dutch Jews had been deeply involved in the enslavement of the Irish, financing their transport to slave plantations in the tropics. By the 1660s, this combination of Zionist finance and White Slave labor made the British island colony of Barbados the richest in the empire. The island's value, in terms of trade and capital exceeded that of all other British colonies combined.[456]

Of the fact that the wealth of Barbados was founded on the backs of White Slave labor there can be no doubt. White Slave laborers from Britain and Ireland were the mainstay of the sugar colony. Until the mid‑1640s there were almost no Blacks in Barbados.

George Downing wrote to John Winthrop, the colonial governor of Massachusetts in 1645, that planters who wanted to make a fortune in the British West Indies must procure White Slave labor "out of England" if they wanted to succeed.[457] From their experience with rebellious Irish slaves, Dutch Jews would eventually be instrumental in the switch from White to Black slavery in the British West Indies. Blacks were more docile, and more profitable. The English traffic in slaves in the first half of the seventeenth century was solely in White slaves.

The English had no slave base in West Africa, as did the Dutch Sephardim who were not only bankers and shipping magnates but slavemasters and plantation owners themselves. Jews were forbidden by English law to own White Protestant slaves, although in practice this was not uniformly enforced, Irish slaves were allowed to the Jewish slavers but were regarded by them as intractable.

Hence certain Jews became prime movers behind the African slave trade and the importation of negro slaves into the New World.[458] White Slavery was the historic base upon which negro slavery was constructed. "...the important structures, labor ideologies and social relations necessary for slavery already had been established within indentured servitude...White Servitude...in many ways came remarkably close to the 'ideal type' of chattel slavery which later became associated with the African experience." [459]; "The practice developed and tolerated in the kidnapping of Whites laid the foundation for the kidnapping of Negroes." [460]

President Johnson (under the total control of the Jews) wasted no time capitalizing on this ridiculous guilt feeling, and "in the name of our martyred President," he and congress rushed through one civil rights bill after the other, all designed to mongralize and pump the Black Blood of Africa into the unwilling veins of White America!"When the conspirators get ready to take over the United States they will use fluoridated water and vaccines to change people's attitudes and loyalties and make them docile, apathetic, unconcerned and groggy. According to their own writings and the means they have already confessedly employed, the conspirators have deliberately planned and developed methods to mentally deteriorate, morally debase, and completely enslave the masses. They will prepare Vaccines containing drugs that will completely change people. Secret Communist plans for conquering America were adopted in 1914 and published in 1953. These plans called for compulsory vaccination with vaccines containing change agent drugs. They also plan on using disease germs, fluoridation and vaccinations to weaken the people and reduce the population." [461]

A most serious aspect of all this is the belief on the part of many Jews that they are about to enter an age in which the Messianic promises pertaining to world rule will be fulfilled through them as a race.

The following comment is from Review of World Affairs: "We are told on very high Jewish authority that nearly all the Jewish theologians are convinced that the Messianic age is about to begin, and this conviction is going to spread and create a force, the power of which may prove immense.

Still stranger is the tendency of leading Jews to speak of the prophecies, all that has happened they say was foretold and the actual occurrence of these events now must therefore (they claim) give entirely fresh authority to their old prophets. Our observers think that we are shortly to witness one of the most important waves of national mysticism which the world has yet seen and this will prove a factor of extreme importance in world affairs." It is an understatement to say that this belief will prove to be an extremely important factor in world affairs. it is also an extremely dangerous doctrine that will have a marked effect upon the peace of the entire world in the immediate future. Actually, it is creating a fanatical zeal among Zionist Jews, accelerating a movement that will make World War III inevitable.

As pointed out in "The Incredible Hoax," and in Establishing the Abomination, a close tie exists between Soviet Russia and the present Zionist activities in Palestine. Most interesting is the tacit admission on the part of the Zionists by their political activities that there are indeed glorious Biblical prophecies to be fulfilled. But because they still refuse to acknowledge the whole of God's program, which revolves around His Son Jesus Christ, they have dared to usurp those prophecies for themselves and boldly declare that as a race they have a messianic destiny to fulfill. This, they aver, is to bring about a universal reign in power, with the Jewish race functioning as a composite messiah.

C.E. (A.D. The C.E. is used because of Jewish hatred of the Lord Jesus Christ!)

721. Appearance of the false Messiah Serenus in Syria causes many Spanish Jews to emigrate to Palestine.

1568. Isaac Luria Levi (1534‑72), cabalist, pretends to be the Messiah, son of Joseph.

1991. Menachem Schneerson, the former leader of The Lubavitch Movement in the U.S.

The Bible clearly states that the perfection of such a state is only to be accomplished through Jesus Christ Himself when He returns to take the Throne of David and reign as King. "Judaism and Christianity are two worlds, between you Christians and us Jews there lies an unbridgeable gulf...There are two life forces in the world: Jewish and non-Jewish...I do not believe that this primal difference between Christians and Jews is reconcilable...The difference between us is abysmal... You might say: 'Well, let us exist side by side and tolerate each other. We will not attack your morality, nor you ours.' But the misfortune is that the two are not merely different; they are opposed in mortal enmity. No man can accept both, or, accepting either, do otherwise than despise the other." [462]

Through infiltration the Communists have secured a foothold in the land we know as Israel. Instead of setting up a glorious reign of law and order, there is being established in Palestine under the Jewish Zionist the Abomination That Maketh Desolate, for the Jews there are not only despising our Lord and Savior by claiming His prerogatives for themselves, but they are also spearheading a movement of atheists and unbelievers in an endeavor to take over universal rule. The desolation that will follow will become evident to the world at large when the Israelite Christian World realize that The Russians Have Already Invaded and Conquered Palestine.

The following concerning Senator Joseph McCarthy was taken from Defenders of the U.S.A. Republic, a Compilation of the works of Helen M. Peters, about whom the Preface states: "Time has proven that Helen Peters knew the origin and direction of the conspiracy to destroy the American people and America. She discovered that America is not only being subverted through religion, but is also being used to subvert the whole world in the name of (today's false form of) Christianity."

Statement: "Given by Senator Joseph McCarthy, six months before his mouth was closed forever: George Washington's surrender: 'And many of the people of the land became Jews.' [463] The confession of General Cornwallis to General Washington at Yorktown has been well hidden by historians. History books and text books have taught for years that when Cornwallis surrendered his army to General Washington that American independence came, and we lived happily ever after until the tribulations of the twentieth century. Jonathan Williams recorded in his Legions of Satan, 1781, that Cornwallis revealed to Washington that 'a holy war will now being in America, and when it is ended America will be supposedly the citadel of freedom, but her millions will unknowingly be loyal subjects to the Crown.' Cornwallis went on to explain what would seem to be a self contradiction: 'Your churches will be used to teach the Jew's religion and in less than two hundred years the whole nation will be working for divine world government. That government they believe to be divine will be the British Empire (under the control of the Jews). All religions will be permeated with Judaism without even being noticed by the masses, and they will all be under the invisible all-seeing eye of the Grand Architect of Freemasonry (Lucifer - as Albert Pike disclosed in Morals and Dogma).' And indeed George Washington was a Mason, and he gave back through a false religion what he had won with his army."

Darby and the Plymouth Brethren brought a Jewish Christianity to America. Masons Rutherford and Russell (both Jews) started Jehovah Witnesses' in order to spread Judaism throughout the world under the guise of Christianity. Our so-called Judeo-Christian leaders are so ill-informed regarding the race of the Book, and the many marks of distinction that separate the House of Israel, the House of Judah, the House of David and the Jews from one another, that they are assigning to the Jews an inheritance that does not belong to them. These Christian leaders are so sure that the Jew is Israel now returning to his homeland in accordance with their preconceived expectations of how prophecy is to be fulfilled that they are unaware of the counterfeit role being assumed by the Zionists who have even adopted the name Israeli. A definition of this modern term is given as follows: "Israeli: The term 'Israeli' properly describes the people, citizens and institutions of the State of Israel. 'Israeli' is a term connoting a specific nationality: the nationality confined to the territory now known as Israel. Accordingly, an Israeli may be a Jew by religion, but he may equally be a Moslem, agnostic or atheist."

It would seem that the Christian world would have learned its lesson well when it assigned to Mussolini the task of rebuilding the Roman Empire and he failed to live up to its expectations. Evidently undaunted by this major failure of its prognostications, based as they were upon a false interpretation of prophecy, they are now busily laying out the program the Israeli state is expected to follow in Palestine.

One among many examples of erroneous teaching concerning prophecy through the failure to recognize the distinction between Israel and the Jew is furnished in the following footnote in the Scofield Bible: "In the days when Jerusalem has been made the centre of earth's worship, the Jew will then be the missionary, and to the very 'nations' now called 'Christian'." [464]

Such a statement would never be made except by men who are deliberately attempting to deceive Christendom into accepting prophecies applicable to the House of Israel to apply to the Jew. Many similar misapplications of the prophetic word are found throughout the literature of the futurist school of prophetic interpretation since it has refused to recognize the distinctions between the different branches of the Race of Abraham.

Many of the footnotes in the Scofield (who was himself a Jew) Bible and in the new Pilgrim Edition of the Scriptures are not only misleading but are definitely unscriptural due to the antichrists attempting to deceive Christians.

The Zionists are no more likely to fulfill these present expectations of Christian leaders than Mussolini was able to rebuild the Roman Empire for them. Nevertheless, prophecy is definitely being fulfilled in Palestine and we are witnessing the establishment of the Abomination That Maketh Desolate in that land as prophesied by Daniel. It will not be until the land is cleansed of this detestable and evil thing that the way will be cleared for Israel's return.

The Zionists have not fulfilled these requirements, for not only are they unclean in the sight of the Lord, but in their activities they are far from holy. As Communists and atheists they do not know or reverence the Lord. It is to Israel, Christianized and sincerely repentant, that Zephaniah's message is addressed: "The remnant of Israel shall not do iniquity, nor speak lies; neither shall a deceitful tongue be found in their mouth...The Lord hath taken away thy judgments, he hath cast out thine enemy: the king of Israel, even the Lord, is in the midst of thee: thou shalt not see evil any more...At that time will I bring you again, even in the time that I gather you: for I will make you a name and a praise among all people of the earth, when I turn back your captivity before your eyes, saith the Lord." [465]

This is additional evidence that the Lord will be in the midst of a Christian people, and at that time all nations will be praising them: "And their seed shall be known among the Gentiles, and their offspring among the people: all that see them shall acknowledge them, that they are the seed which the Lord hath blessed."[466]

Near the time of Christ, there once existed a metropolis city, which was a trade center for the then known world. This city of wealth was once destroyed in 146 B.C., and its treasures carried off to Rome. But Julius Caesar restored it a hundred years later, and the Roman colony flourished so much that it soon became one of the most prominent centers in Greece. Some would say that in the 2nd century it was the richest city in Greece.

This city was a city of wealth, of luxury and of immorality. It seemed to have one quality that marked it as a commercial hot spot of its day, for it is said that "Jews flocked to it." That city was ancient Corinth, the chief city in the Roman Province of Achaia. This is the city that Paul spent at least a year and one-half preaching the Gospel and encountering the full force and fury of the "Jews."

Times does not seem to change much do they? The same problem is facing most of the major cities in America today. The commercial cities we have in the United States are fast becoming breeding cesspools of corruption and all manner of evil. Could this be caused by a "Jewish" society and their influence? Many wonder!

Strong's Concordance more or less defines the words "Jew" and "Jews" as: "in the sense of a country, i.e., a Judean." The word "Jew" is used 22 times in the King James Version of the Bible in the New Testament, and the word "Jews" is used 172 times and 170 times of those are from the same #2453 as the above "Jew" definition. There are another 6 times the plural word "Jews'" is used and all but one of these is this #2454. So for the 200 times, the words: "Jew, Jews, and Jews'" are used in the New Testament, at least 197 occasions are referring to a Judean in the sense of from a place, i.e., as from a country.

The question still haunts many and they have often asked just who are these people the Bible calls "Jew, Jews, and Jews'"? Why were these people not just simply called "Judeans," "Israelites," or "Judeans whose religion was Judaism?" This is the age old word problem of society problem that is surrounded with so many, many, lies and deceptions. "The fear of the Jews" syndrome that plagues society today.

Much of it as a result of the so-called holocaust which we have been told 10,000 times 10,000 that the Germans cremated 6-million Jews during WWII. This story has installed a guilt complex in the American people, until the word Jew has become a non speakable word, and if one dares to utter the word except in reverence and humility they will be attacked by both Jews and Christians.

Therefore, we have prepared this study to prove to you and any other thinking American that the bulk of these people called "Jew" or "Jews" in the Bible, were not and are not of the House of Israel or of the House of Judah.

Then who are these people who have plagued the pages of history for so, so very long? The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia defines "Jew" as the same word of Strong's #2453 in the following words: "'Jew' denotes originally an inhabitant of Judah,[467]but later the meaning was extended to embrace all descendants of Abraham."[468] The question which faces us here is who had the authority and the power that: "extended the meaning to embrace all descendants of Abraham?" Mr. Orr goes on to say in his definition that: "'Jews' (always pl.) is the familiar term for Israelites in the Gospel (esp. in John), Acts, Eph. etc."

This definition only serves to confuse the issue even more, who, how, when and why was such confusion entered into society and the Holy Scriptures? Why, if the term "Jew," refers to Israelites, did they not just simply call them Israelites or Judeans, whose religion was Hebrew?

It is an incontestible fact that the word "Jew" did not come into existence until the year 1775. Prior to 1775 the word "Jew"did not exist in any language on earth. The word "Jew" was introduced into the English language for the first time in the 18th century when Sheridan used it in his play "The Rivals," Chapter 2, p. 1, "She shall have a skin like a mummy, and the beard of a Jew." Prior to this use of the word "Jew" the word "Jew" hand not become a word. Contrary to what most people believe Shakespeare never saw the word "Jew" nor did he ever use the word "Jew" in any of his works, the common general belief to the contrary notwithstanding. In his "Merchant of Venice," V, III, I, 61, Shakespeare wrote as follows "what is the reason? I am a Iewe; hath not a Iewe eyes?" You see there was not even a letter "j" or "J" until the middle of the 18th century. Check any encyclopedia you wish for proof of this.

In the Latin Jerome 4th century Vulgate Edition of the New Testament Jesus is referred to by the Genitive Plural of "Iudaeus" in the Gospel by John reference to the inscription on the Cross, "Iudaeorum." It was in the 4th century that Jerome translated into Latin the manuscripts of the New Testament from the original languages in which they were written.

This translation by Jerome is referred to still today, as the Vulgate Edition by the Roman Catholic Church authorities, who use it today. Jesus is referred to as a so-called "Jew" for the first time in the New Testament in the 18th century editions in the English language of the 14th century first translations of the New Testament into English.

The history of the origin of the word "Jew" in the English language leaves no doubt that the 18th century "Jew" is the 18th century contracted and corrupted English word for the 4th century Latin "Iudaeus" found in Jerome's Vulgate Edition. Of that there is no longer any doubt.

The available original manuscripts from the 4th century to the 18th century accurately trace the origin and give the complete history of the word "Jew" in the English language. In these manuscripts are to be found all the many earlier English equivalents extending through the 14 centuries from the 4th to the 18th century.

From the Latin "Iudaeus" to the English "Jew" these English forms included successively: "Gyu," "Giu," "Iu," "Iuu," "Iuw," "Ieuu," "Ieuy," "Iwe," "Iow," "Iewe," "Ieue," "Iue," "Ive," "Iew," and then finally the 18th century, "Jew." The many earlier English equivalents for "Jews" through the 14 centuries are "Giwis," "Giws," "Gyues," "Gywes," "Giwes," "Geus," "Iuys," "Iows," "Iouis," "Iews," and then also finally in the 18th century, "Jews."

With the rapidly expanding use in England in the 18th century for the first time in history of the greatly improved printing presses unlimited quantities of the New Testament were printed. These revised 18th century editions of the earlier 14th century first translations into the English language were then widely distributed throughout England the English speaking world among families who had never possessed a copy of the New Testament in any language.

In these 18th century editions with revisions the word "Jew" appeared for the first time in any English translations. The word "Jew" as it was used in the 18th century editions has since continued in use in all the editions of the New Testament in the English language. The use of the word "Jew" was thus stabilized.

The best known 18th century editions of the New Testament in English are the Rheims (Douai) Edition and the King James Authorized Edition. The Rheims (Douai) translation of the New Testament into English was first printed in 1582 but the word "Jew" did not appear in it.

The King James Authorized translation of the New Testament into English was begun in 1604 and first published in 1611. The word "Jew" did not appear in it either. The word "Jew" appeared in both these well known editions in their 18th century revised versions for the first times.

Countless copies of the revised 18th century editions of the Rheims (Douai) and the King James translations of the New Testament into English were distributed to the clergy and the laity throughout the English speaking world. They did not know the history of the origin of the English word "Jew" nor did they care. They accepted the English word "Jew" as the only and as the accepted form of the Latin "Iudaeus" and the Greek "Ioudaios." How could they be expected to have known otherwise? The answer is they could not and they did not. It was a NEW English word to them.

When one studies Latin they are taught that the letter "I" in Latin when used as the first letter in a word is pronounced like the letter "Y" in English when it is the first letter in the words like "yes," "youth" and "yacht." The "I" in "Iudaeus" is pronounced like the "Y" in "yes," "youth," and "yacht" in English. In all the 4th century to 18th century forms for the 18th century "Jew" the letter "I" was pronounced like the English "Y" in "yes," "young," and "yacht." The same is true of the "Gi" or the "Gy" when it was used in the place of the letter "I."

The present pronunciation of the word "Jew" in modern English is a development of recent times. In the English language today the "J" in "Jew" is pronounced like the "J"in the English "justice," "jolly," and "jump."

This is the case only since the 18th century. Prior to the 18th century the "J" in "Jew" was pronounced exactly like the "Y" in the English "yes," "youth," and "yacht." Until the 18th century and perhaps even later than the 18th century the word "Jew" in English was pronounced like the English "you" or "hew," and the word "Jews" like "youse" or "hews." The present pronunciation of "Jew" in English is a new pronunciation acquired after the 18th century.

The German language still retains the Latin original pronunciation. The German "Jude" is the German equivalent of the English "Jew." The "J" in the German "Jude" is pronounced exactly like the English "Y" in "yes," "youth," and "yacht." The German "J" is the equivalent of the Latin "I" and both are pronounced exactly like the English "Y" in "yes," "youth," and "yacht."

The German "Jude" is virtually the first syllable of the Latin "Iudaeus" and is pronounced exactly like it. The German "Jude" is the German contraction and corruption of the Latin "Iudaeus" just as the English "Jew" is the contraction and corruption of the Latin "Iudaeus." The German "J" is always pronounced like the English "Y" in "yes," "youth," and "yacht" when it is the first letter of a word. The pronunciation of the "J" in German "Jude" is not an exception to the pronunciation of the "J" in German.

The earliest version of the New Testament in English from the Latin Vulgate Edition is the Wiclif, or Wickliff Edition published in 1380. In the Wiclif Edition Jesus is there mentioned as One of the "iewes." That was the 14th century English version of the Latin "Iudaeus" and was pronounced "hew-weeze," in the plural, and "iewe" pronounced "hew-wee" in the singular.

In the 1380 Wiclif Edition in English the Gospel by John XIX.19, reads "ihesus of Nazareth kyng of the iewes." Prior to the 14th century the English language adopted the Anglo-Saxon "kyng" together with many other Anglo-Saxon words in place of the Latin "rex" and the Greek "basileus." The Anglo-Saxon also meant "tribal leader."

In the Tyndale Edition of the New Testament in English published in 1525 Jesus was likewise described as One of the "Iewes."

In the Coverdale Edition published in 1535 Jesus was also described as One of the "Iewes." Also in the Coverdale Edition the Gospel by John, XIX.19, reads "Iesus of Nazareth, kynge of the Iewes." In the Cranner Edition published in 1539 Jesus was again described as One of the "Iewes."

In the Geneva Edition published in 1540-1557 Jesus was also described as One of the "Iewes." In the Rheims Edition published in 1582 Jesus was described as One of the "Ievves."

In the King James Edition published in 1604-1611 also known as the Authorized Version Jesus was described again as one of the "Iewes." The forms of the Latin "Iudaeus" were used which were current at the time these translations were made.

The translation into English of the Gospel by John, XIX.19, from the Greek in which it was originally written reads "Do not inscribe 'the monarch of the Judeans' but that He Himself said 'I am monarch.'" In the original Greek manuscript the Greek "basileus" appears for "monarch" in the English and the Greek "Ioudaios" appears for "Judeans" in the English. "Ioudaia" in Greek is "Judea" in English. "Ioudaios" in Greek is "Judeans" in English. There is no reason for any confusion.

If the generally accepted understanding today of the English "Jew" and "Judean" conveyed the identical implications, inferences and innuendoes as both rightly should, it would make no difference which of these two words was used when referring to Jesus in the New Testament or elsewhere. But the implications, inferences, and innuendoes today conveyed by these two words are as different as black is from white. The word "Jew" today is never regarded as a synonym for "Judean" nor is "Judean" regarded as a synonym for "Jew."

When the word "Jew" was first introduced into the English language in the 18th century its one and only implication, inference and innuendo was "Judean." However during the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries a well-organized and well-financed international "pressure group" created a so-called "secondary meaning" for the word "Jew" among the English speaking peoples of the world. This so-called "secondary meaning" for the word "Jew" bears no relation whatsoever to the 18th century original connotation of the word "Jew."

It is a misrepresentation presented to the world deliberately by this well organized and well financed "pressure group" to deceive Christians.[469] (And to claim a heritage that is not theirs). This sure seems to be the more correct terminology. It appears from all our readings that the Jews of all ages, always do best what their father, the devil does - and that is lie.[470] The Greek words used for "know and knowledge" seem to carry somewhat of a different context or concept than todays English words do. In both the Hebrew and Greek tongue these words carried the connotation - "to know fully.""Knowledge strictly is the apprehension by the mind of some fact or truth in accordance with its real nature...Knowledge is distinguished from 'opinion' by its greater certainty. The mind is constituted with the capacity for knowledge, and the desire to possess and increase it. The character of knowledge varies with its object. The senses give knowledge of outward appearances; the intellect connects and reasons about these appearances, and arrives at general laws or truths; moral truth is apprehended through the power inherently possessed by men of distinguishing right and wrong in the light of moral principles; spiritual sympathy...The highest knowledge possible to man is the knowledge of God, and while there is that in God's infinity which transcends man's power of comprehension, God is knowable in the measure in which He has revealed Himself in creation, and supremely in Jesus Christ who alone perfectly knows the Father, and reveals Him to man..." [471]

The problem with knowledge is that it can "enlarge" a man's ego. St. Paul, who is said to have authored the book of 1st Corinthians, penned these words in the 8th Chapter verses 1 and 2: "...we know that we all have knowledge. Knowledge puffeth up, but charity edifieth. And if any man think that he knoweth any thing, he knoweth nothing yet as he ought to know." In these passages, Paul was addressing, primarily, the pagan ritual of things offered to idols and their influence upon Christian fellowship with the heathen community, but the concepts of knowledge are for general application. Paul shows that a conceited knowledge is not a good thing.

But the man who understands that love is for more important than knowledge has a handle on "knowing" and the limits contained therein. True love for you neighbor (fellow Israelite) has a real concern that consults the interest of others. There can be found a common evidence of ignorance in a person and that evidence is a conceit of knowledge. That is why Paul said, "if any man think that he knoweth any thing, he knoweth nothing as yet he ought to know."

Many believe that Paul used these words here, because of the arrogance and forcefulness of the Jews, whose religion was Judaism (Traditions of the Elders - at that time in history) and their attitudes towards the "goyium," i.e., White Israelites. These Jews always want to be in control and more or less run the show. The person who knows most, is the one who best understands his own ignorance and the imperfections of human knowledge. The vain and conceited person, that "thinks" he knows everything, is drunk on his own imagination, a real Jewish trait.

He should examine himself to see if he really knows any thing alright. It surely is one thing to know truth and another thing to know truth as it ought to be known. When truth is known alright it will duly improve our knowledge. For God said: "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge (why?) because thou (you) HAST(have) rejected knowledge (therefore God will), I will also reject thee..." [472]

The man or woman who truly knows the YHWH of True Israel are taught and guided into knowing truth aright, and so must the living of his/her life accordingly. The man or woman who has a vain and conceited opinion of him/herself is impeding the leadership and/or guidance of the Holy Spirit. This kind of knowledge can not be bought or sold. True wisdom does not come from books or personal experience, but rather from YHWH, His son and His Holy spirit. If the "Jew" word problem and society problem had never been introduced into society things might have been different, but it is there, it is a real live issue of today, for you and I. We have to obtain truth aright from Scripture, history, both secular and Biblical, and from letting the Holy Spirit guide us into all truth, see John 14, "Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them." [473]

Now, let us return to the wicked, commercial and immoral city of Corinth, that according to scholars, "Jews flocked to this trade center." [474] In Acts 18 we find that Paul encountered the Jewish problem first hand.

2). Paul reasoned with them, some opposed him and blasphemed and he said their blood would be on their heads.

3). Some Judeans believed in Christ. Jews lived among Israelites and Greeks in Corinth.

5). The Jews instilled fear and silence in Corinthians, making them afraid to speak the truth.

6). The deceived Jews (Judeans) had to have a teacher (Paul) to show a more perfect knowledge of YHWH and Christ.

There are many people who live in Texas and are called Texans. But all these Texans are not of the same race, region, or religion. There are some True Israelites (Hebrews) in Texas. We are sure that there are some Jewish Texans also. How can one tell one from the other.

There is probably no way one can, unless, they tell you who they are or what they are or we can see their fruits which produce evidence. If a person is asked if he is Jewish or an Israelites, we feel that a true Israelite would tell all he knows about his religion.

But Jews, back then and even today, are almost always afraid of the truth. John 8:44 says that the father of the Jews is the devil and a liar. Apparently the real nature (part of the definition of know, supra) of the Jew is trickery, deception and lies. True Israelites know that it is wrong to lie instinctively.[475]

The children of the promise are the literal descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, whereas the children of the flesh are children from other unions such as the descendants of Ishmael and Esau. It also dealt with the genealogies of Christ and the Pharisees and it was concluded that the Pharisees at the time of Christ, like Ishmael and Esau, while of the seed of Abraham, were not children of the promise.

If the Pharisees, who were also called Jews, were not children of the promise, who then is a Jew and who is an Israelite? We will save the subject of Israelites for another publication and just deal with Pharisees and Jews. However, this story begins with Abraham, who had eight children: Isaac from Sarah; Ishmael from the handmaiden Hagar; and six other from Keturah. Of all these children only one child became the child of the promise and that was Isaac. Isaac only had two children: twin boys named Esau and Jacob.

But again, only one child was the child of the promise and that was Jacob. Later God would change his name to Israel. Jacob/Israel had twelve sons from two wives and two handmaidens and each of these sons, as descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, became children of the promise.[476]

At this time we are only interested in one of those sons named Judah. Judah had five sons, two of whom God killed, but only two of the remaining three were children of the promise. Throughout Biblical history there have been numerous conflicts between the children of the flesh born in juxtaposition to children of the promise, and some are listed below:

These conflicts between the children of the Promise and the children of the Flesh are later described in Scripture as being conflicts between the good seed and the tares.

Scripture records a strange story in the events surrounding the births of each of these children. Without getting into a lengthy discussion, Cain and Abel were born subsequent to the fall and of course Cain slew Abel; Canaanites were cursed because Ham uncovered the nakedness of his father, yet Noah cursed Canaan - not Ham; Moabites/Ammonites due to an incestuous relationship between Lot and his two daughters; Esau is recorded as fighting with his twin brother Jacob in the womb of his mother; Amalakites (of Esau) from the relationship between a concubine and Esau's son born of Esau's Hittite wife; and Shelah born of a Canaanite wife of Judah.

To understand that the Pharisees at the time of Christ and those of Jewry in the 20th century are at least partial descendants of the children of the flesh, we must go back and begin with Judah, Jacob's 4th son of Leah and his descendants. The story of Judah's marriage and descendants is recorded in Genesis, Chapter 38.

Genesis, Chapter 37 ends with Joseph being sold into Egypt and the story of Joseph starts again in Chapter 39. It is both interesting and strange that Chapter 38 should be placed at this particular place in the Scriptures about a subject totally unrelated to the former and latter chapters.

We are told in verse 1 that Judah "went down from his brethren." This appears to have been an act of poor judgement such as later Dinah exhibited and was raped due to her poor judgement. We are not told the reason for Judah's poor judgement but it begins the history of conflict between Judah and his brothers which will continue till the later separation of the nation into the House of Israel and the House of Judah. Judah, being separated from his family ties, could and did fall prey to the women in the land who were not his kinsmen according to the flesh. We are told that Judah: "...saw there a daughter of a certain Canaanite, whose name was Shuah; and he took her, and went in unto her." [477]

This connection was contrary to the will of God and Judah should have known better from his upbringing if not the example of his fathers. His indiscretion or poor judgement in forming an alliance with the people in the land was a crime that produced bastard children. If this bastardization of Israel was to continue the chosen people would soon be assimilated into surrounding heathenism and would no longer be God's chosen people. Thus we see the necessity for God to separate His people from these heathen peoples.

In any event Judah took a Canaanite for a wife and had three bastard sons (sons born from mixed seed): Er, Onan, and Shelah. We say bastard sons because in the Old Testament a bastard was a child born from a mixed marriage with an Israelite and another race.[478] When the time came that Er, Judah's eldest son, was to have a wife, Judah obtained for him a woman named Tamar.

We are not told how or why, but Er was "wicked in the sight of the Lord" [479] and the Lord slew him. We are not told what this wickedness was but the word used here also means evil and mischief and these definitions lead many to believe this evil had something to do with the law. Being raised by his Canaanite mother, he would have become indoctrinated in the ways of the pagan Canaanites - not the ways of the Lord.

According to the law, Onan, Er's younger brother, had to marry Tamar and raise up seed to his elder brother, Er. However, Onan was wicked also, and refused to do this, spilling his seed on the ground [480]. This was probably because of the threat of losing the inheritance (that is, he would be raising up seed for his brother), again, possibly from the training he received from his Canaanite mother.

In any event, God also slew Onan. Once again, according to the law Tamar should have been given to the third son, Shelah, that he might raise up sons for his elder brother. However, by this time Judah must have been just a little bit concerned. After all, Tamar had already been the wife of two of his sons and both had been killed by the Lord. Thus it is easy to understand his reluctance. Scripture tells us that Judah told Tamar to wait until Shelah was older; however, when he got older Judah failed or refused to give Tamar to Shelah. Tamar waited and waited but Shelah eventually took another for a wife, apparently with his father's blessing.

It is recorded in the 45th chapter of the book of Jasher that Tamar was a daughter from the genealogy of Elam, the son of Shem. That she was a daughter of Shem makes sense in view of what Judah said when he found out she was pregnant with child. Scripture records that it was reported to Judah that: "Tamar thy daughter in law hath played the harlot; and also behold, she is with child by whoredom. And Judah said, Bring her forth, and let her be burnt." [481]

Stoning was the normal mode of capital punishment at that time in history - death by fire was not the normal procedure used to execute someone. Therefore it is significant that Judah pronounced death by burning for that was reserved for priests' daughters who brought disgrace upon the sacred office. The law states: "And the daughter of any priest, if she profane herself by playing the whore, she profaneth her father: she shall be burnt with fire." [482] Since Judah pronounced death by fire we are able to conclude that she must have been the daughter of a priest. However, one would think that if she was, she should be aware of the law prohibiting mixed marriages. But perhaps that was not the case. Tamar could have been imported from another geographical area as was Rebecca for Isaac. Thus at the time of her arrival and marriage to Er and Onan she could have been unaware of the covenant God had made with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob/Israel.

Not being aware of the covenant she would not know that the two men she married were half Canaanite and half Israelite and not legitimate heirs to the promise. By the time Shelah had taken another wife, Tamar was probably educated in the covenant relationship with God and realized that even if she was given to Shelah, any sons from that union would not produce a bloodline heir. This is about the only logical reason for her to play the harlot, entrapping Judah to become the father of her children (Pharez and Zerah) at the risk of being put to fiery death. It would also partially explain Judah's response when he found out that he was the father and stated: "She is more righteous than I; forasmuch as I gave her not to Shelah my son." [483]

Although Judah may not have totally understood or admitted that his marriage to a Canaanite was in violation of the law, he is, at least, acknowledging that Tamar should have been the mother of children of the birthright. He must have understood this birthright problem sooner or later, as the scepter was not passed to Shelah, Judah's third and only surviving son from Shuah, but to Judah's firstborn son from Tamar who was named Pharez. This is evidenced by the fact that Pharez's name appears in the genealogies of Christ in Matthew 1:3 and Luke 3:23.

The union of Judah with Tamar produced the twin births of Pharez and Zerah, and once again Judah had three sons: 1). Shelah, who was a bastard (½ Canaanite & ½ of Judah) by his Canaanite wife; 2). Pharez; and 3). Zerah, the latter two both from Tamar. Pharez and Zerah being the sons of Judah, the son of Jacob/Israel, and Tamar the daughter of the genealogy of Shem, were full-blooded Israelites even though they were born out of wedlock. The whole story is recorded in Genesis 38. These births produced three descendant liens from Judah which will be called Pharez-Judah, Zerah-Judah, and Shelah-Judah.

The question now becomes, what happened to the three descendants of Judah: Pharez, Zerah and Shelah? It will simply be stated at this point in the study that Pharez and Zerah were children of the promise whereas Shelah was a child of the flesh and destined to become the father of the Pharisees. This part of the study will not be concerned with Pharez and Zerah - only the family of Shelah will be addressed.

We need to keep in mind the fact that a strict genealogy was kept on each tribe. Even though Shelah was a bastard son of Judah, his genealogy is given in Scripture and his descendants can be traced to the city of Elath. In Chronicles it is recorded: "The sons of Judah; Er, and Onan, and Shelah: which three were born unto him of the daughter of Shua the Canaanite. And Er, the firstborn of Judah, was evil in the sight of the LORD; and he slew him. And Tamar his daughter in law bare him Pharez and Zerah. All the sons of Judah were five. The sons of Pharez; Hezron, and Hamul. And the sons of Zerah; Zimri, and Ethan, and Heman, and Calcol, and Dara: five of them in all. And the sons of Carmi; Achar, the troubler of Israel, who transgressed in the thing accursed. And the sons of Ethan; Azariah." [484]

Verse 3 is unusual, as once a name is dropped from the promised seed line it usually does not appear in later genealogies. For example the descendants of Cain do not appear in the genealogies of Adam in Genesis, Chapter 5, or Matthew 1 or Luke 3. It is difficult to determine exactly when the Book of Chronicles was written, however verse 1 of chapter 9 states: "So all Israel were reckoned by genealogies; and, behold, they were written in the book of the kings of Israel and Judah, who were carried away to Babylon for their transgression." [485]

Since the first 8 chapters deal with the genealogies of Adam to this statement in verse 1 of chapter 9, which refers to the Babylonian captivity, it seems apparent that this portion of Chronicles was not recorded until sometime after the Babylonian captivity (600 B.C.) - perhaps by Ezra or Nehemiah.

Again, all of Judah's sons must be important or they would not be recorded in Scripture, especially since the descendants of Shelah were not children of the promise. It should be noted that verses 5 and 6 list the descendants of Pharez and Zerah, and verse 8 begins with Ethan, a son of Zerah. What is missing here are the sons of Shelah. But verse 7 seems to be completely out of place as it lists the genealogy of a person named "Carmi." Carmi is not one of the five sons of Judah, nor is he listed in the Genealogies of Pharez or Zerah. The name also appears in 1 Chronicles 4:1, but it is still unclear whose son he was. However, it is most interesting that his son "Achar" is referred to as "the troubler of Israel, who transgressed in the thing accursed." (You can read the story about the thing accursed in Joshua 6:18) While it appears impossible to prove it, it is suggested that "Carmi" and his son "Achar," the troubler of Israel, were in the genealogy of Shelah.

We mentioned that these names were also listed in Chronicles, chapter 4, as follows: "The sons of Shelah the son of Judah were, Er the father of Lecah, and Laadah the father of Maresbah, and the families of the house of them that wrought fine linen, of the house of Ashbea, And Jokim, and the men of Chozeba, and Joash, and Saraph, who had the dominion in Moab, and Jashubilehem. And these are ancient things. These were the potters, and those that dwelt among plants and hedges; thee they dwell with the king for his work." [486]

Again there is no mention of "Carmi" nor his son "Achar," but her we do have a reference to these descendants of Shelah being "men of Chozeba." Chozeba was a town in southwestern Judah and is also the town of Chezib of Genesis 38:5 and Achzib of Joshua 15:44. The words Chezib, Achzib or Chozeba mean "lying," "deceptive," "disappointing," or "failing." It is also interesting that Shelah-Judah was born in Chezib [487] and it appears that his descendants centuries later inherited this same city. In Joshua we find that: "This then was the lot of the tribe of the children of Judah by their families; even to the border of Edom the wilderness of Zin southward was the utter most part of the south coast. And Keilab, and Achzib, and Mareshah; nine cities with their villages."[488]

Thus we see that the town of "Achzib" was given to some descendants of Judah. Achzib or Chozeba was located in the valley of Elath. Elath was in old Edom in the valley of Elath and north of Adullum.

The word "Adullum" should ring a bell as that was the place where Judah went down from his brothers and took a Canaanite for a wife. This was on the extreme southern border of the Southern Kingdom of Judah at the northern end of the Gulf of Aquabah. In fact most scholars seem to be in agreement that this area was actually outside the land inherited by Judah. This would make some sense as we know that a bastard could not even enter the congregation, even unto the tenth generation [489]; therefore it would also make sense that these Shelahites, being bastards, could not inherit land belonging to the children of the promise. But this does not mean that they could not be given land on the southern border of Judah.

The city of Elath was next to Ezion-geber, which would later become Solomon's seaport. Remember now that these Shelahites are ½ Canaanite, and the word Canaanite is defined in Strong's Concordance as merchants and traders. Doesn't it seem logical that merchants and traders would congregate in the cities, and especially in and around a busy seaport where they could engage in trade, commerce, and industry? There is another reference to this city named "Achzib" in the Book of Micah where it states: "The house of Achzib shall be a lie to the kings of Israel." [490]

Is it just a coincidence that Shelah was born at "Chezib" which is basically the same word as Achzib? Is it coincidence that the word "Achzib" so closely resembles and has the same meaning as "Achar," the troubler of Israel? Remember these words mean "lying," "deceptive," "disappointing," or "falling." Was it not a lie that Shelah was a true child of the promise? Would not their existence next to and/or as a part of Israel make any claim they would make as being a descendant of Abraham,[491] entitled to receive the promises, a lie or at the least a clever deception?

Elath or Eloth was a part of the land of Edom belonging to the descendants of Esau who were called Edomites an later Idumeans. Apparently Elath and Ezion-geber came under the control of Israel in 1040 B.C. by David's conquest of Edom as recorded in 2 Samuel 8:13-14. This land is also mentioned as being under the rule of Solomon in approximately 1000 B.C.[492] The land passed back into Edomite control in 890 B.C. during the days of Jehoarm, king of Judah.[493] 80 years later in 810 B.C., the city of Elath was rebuilt under the kingship of Azariah or Uszziah.[494] This historical background brings us to the time of the "Jews from Elath" as recorded in 2 Kings, Chapter 16, which states: "In the seventeenth year of Pekah the son of Remaliah Ahaz the son of Jotham king of Judah began to reign. Then Rezin king of Syria and Pekah son of Remaliah king of Israel came up to Jerusalem to war; and they besieged Ahaz, but could over come him. At that time Rezin king of Syria recovered Elath to Syria, and drave the Jews from Elath..." [495]

Keep in mind that the time frame is approximately 750 B.C., which is around 200 years after the split of Israel into the Houses of Judah and Israel in 975 B.C., and just before the beginning of the Assyrian captivity in 721-745 B.C. By this time Jotham was the king of Judah (the two southern tribes of Judah and Benjamin), and Pekah was the king of Israel (the 10 northern tribes).

It is the king of Syria, and Pekah, the king of Israel (not Judah), who formed an alliance and went to war against the House of Judah. During that war they were unable to take Jerusalem, but Rezin, king of Syria, was able to recover the city of Elath and "drave the Jews from Elath."

As previously stated, Elath was far south of the area inherited by Judah and was given to Shelah as an inheritance. Again this was probably done because as a bastard, he could not enter the congregation of Israel nor inherit with the children of Israel. Remember, these people were part Canaanite, and in Strong's Concordance the word "Canaanite" means merchants and traders. Merchants cannot be merchants except in populated areas and therefore would have a propensity to migrate towards the cities, so it is logical to conclude that they were the ones who resided in Elath and were driven there-from. It was from this area called Elath, and this area alone, that Rezin "drave the Jews."

Ahaz, king of Judah (Southern Kingdom), was still in Jerusalem and was never defeated nor was he driven anywhere. Pekah, king of Israel (Northern Kingdom), apparently returned home. Therefore, whatever "Jews" were driven from Elath were only a small portion of people located South of Judah - not all of the House of Judah, and none of the House of Israel.

Therefore, the word "Jews," as used in this verse does not include any people from the House of Israel and probably none from the House of Judah. This limits the use of the word "Jew" in the Old Testament to a very small group of people who resided in the town of Elath, who were most likely descendants of Shelah.

Scripture does not tell us where these so-called "Jews from Elath" went after being driven from Elath, but being traders and merchants they would be city dwellers, and it is probably safe to assume that they moved north to the walled city of Jerusalem. After Rezin "drave the Jews" from Elath the area was again populated but this time by Edomites.

The word "Jews" is used for the first time in Scripture in the King James Authorized (KJA) version in this verse. If you own a 1592 copy of the Geneva Bible, or a 1611 King James version and will open it to this verse you will not find the word "Jew." According to the Jewish Encyclopedia: "Up to the seventeenth century this word was spelled in the Middle English in various ways...Ieue, Ieu, Iwe, Iewe, Iue...corresponding to the Hebrew...a gentile adjective from the proper name 'Judah' seemingly never a;;lied to member of the tribe (of Judah), however, but to members of the nationality inhabiting the South of Palestine. It appears to have been afterward extended to apply to Israelites in the North..." [496]

If you will once again look at 2 Kings 16:6 in an original 1611 KJA version, you will find one of these words - You will not find the word "Jews." And probably more interesting in this quote is the fact that the word "Ieue," etc., was never applied to the tribe of Judah but to a nationality "inhabiting the South of Palestine."

The encyclopedia fails to point out who these people were but it has previously been shown that the land South of Judah was occupied by the Shelah branch of Judah - a bastard son from his Canaanite wife. According to Biblical scholar Alexander Schiffner: "The first reference to any Jews in Scripture is found in 2 Kings 16:6. The name was applied to a remnant of Judah's descendants of the Shelah Branch. Shelah-Judah was born in Chezib [497] and his descendants centuries later inherited his territory.[498]Remember a strict Genealogy was kept of each Tribe and Branch,[499]Chezib,[500]Achzib [501] and Chozeba [502] refer to one and the same place. It was a town in the lowlands of western Judah and was given to the Shelah branch of Judah for their inheritance.[503]'This then was the lot of the tribe of the children of Judah by their families.' The word Chezib, Achzh or Chozeba means 'deceptive' or 'failing' and the place received its name from a winter spring or brook, which failed in the summer heat. (Symbolic of the failing of the Shela branch of Judah under trial). It was the place where Judah was at the time of the birth of his half-breed son, Shelah.[504] In 1 Chronicles 4:21-22 it is called 'Chozeba.' it is in the valley of Elath and north of Addulum. Note 2 Kings 16:6 - the first reference to this branch of Judah; 'the Jews of Elath.' The Jews are the remnant' of 'Yehudim' of Judah. This branch of Judah rejected Christ. They are the open witness, 'The shew of their countenance doth witness against them - their tongue and their doings are against the Lord - they declare their sin as Sodom, they hide it not.' [505] ." [506]

James Fox, the author of several books, wrote of Shelah: "The reason for the divergence of facial appearance between the true Hebrew or Abrahamic White-Race Men, and the Jews, is that the patriarch Judah disobeyed God's will at the outset by marrying a Canaanitish woman called 'Shua' [507], producing descendants all half-castes, later known as 'Jews.'" [508]

According to these authors, the "Jews of Elath" were the "remnant" of "Yehudim" of Judah, and verses 5 and 6 of 2 Kings, chapter 16, are the first reference to the mongrel Canaanite branch of Judah where they are referred to as "Jews" (actually "Ieue," etc., in the 1611 KJA Version).

The use of the word "Jews" in 2 Kings 16:6 rather than "Ieues" has added to the misconception that the Jews are all of Israel, when it is obvious that in this verse only a small group of people were implied - those living in Elath - which omits the entire northern ten tribes and the majority of the House of Judah.

The major problem with the word Jew in Anytown USA's conversations is that the word carries so many definitions and so few seem very want to know fully what he is really talking about or referring to when he uses the term "Jew."

Most so-called (c)hristians of today, even those who are of Israelite stock, and are not aware of it, don't want to hear the words, concepts and truth contained in this study. Those of Israelite heritage may find some fulfillment in Jeremiah's words, found in Chapter 5:30-31 which sound all too familiar: "A wonderful and horrible thing is committed in the land; The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests bear rule by their means; and my people love to have it so; and what will ye do in the end thereof?"

Some think that the King James Version is the only correct version. This version was written in 1611, but it for sure contains some errors. Look at John 4:22, where Christ tells the woman of Samari: "Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship; for salvation is of the Jews." This is a primary script for the problem we face today, for any discerning true Christian Israelite should see this is not a true statement, but rather a false one based on its own merits. Any Christian should realize the truth that Salvation Does Not Come Through any Religion or any Race of People, But Through Jesus The Christ. But we must, also, face the fact that Jesus Christ came so that He could Redeem Israel and make her His bride once again!

The Ferrar Fenton version, which comes from the original Greek text, says: "the salvation comes from among the Judeans." Now which way should we Israelites come to know fully the truth of this verse? If Christ came out of the region of Judea and the Hebrew tribe of Judah, then HE is the way, the truth and the life.[509]

Paul planted the first Christian Church in Corinth, teaching that Christ is the Salvation for HIS people. But we hear the resounding common statement, but Pontius Pilate said that He was "King of the Jews." But did he really say that as most, deceived, Judeo-Christians believe?

There are some who say, "Thank God! My Savior Was Not A Jew!," that there is a historical record found in the Achoko Volume in the Congressional Library in Washington, D.C., containing an official record of one of Pilate's correspondences. He states on pages 137-139: "The Archoko record gives an eye-witness account from Pontius Pilate, who testified that Jesus did not look like, or act like a Jew. Here is the account as it appears in this official record: To Tiberius Caesar, Emperor of Rome Noble Sovereign, Greetings: '...Among various rumors that came to my ears there was one in particular that came to my attention. A young man it was said, had appeared in Galilee, preaching with noble unction a new law in the name of the God who sent him. At first I was apprehensive that his design was to stir up the people against the Romans, but my fears were soon dispelled.

Jesus of Nazareth spoke rather as a friend of the Romans than of the Jews. One day in passing by the place of Siloe, where there was a great concourse of people, I observed in the midst of the group a young man who was leaning against a tree, calmly addressing the multitude. I was told it was Jesus. This I could easily have suspected, so great was the difference between him and those who listened to him. His golden colored hair and beard gave to his appearance an almost celestial aspect. He appeared to be about thirty years of age. Never have I seen a sweeter or more serene countenance. What a contrast between he and his hearers with their black beards and tawny complexions!...

Never have I heard in the words of the philosopher, anything that can compare with the maxims of Jesus. One of the rebellious Jews, so numerous in Jerusalem, asked Jesus if it was lawful to give tribute to Caesar, he replied: 'Render unto Caesar the things which belong to Caesar, and unto God the things which are God's...

I wrote to Jesus requesting an interview with him at the praetorium and he came.' (Think now for a moment on your own, without having some Judeo-Christian preacher tell you that this is fantasy. What would be so strange in this? Even though this meeting is not recorded in the Gospels, we know that most of what Christ did during His three years of public ministry was never recorded). [510]

Pilate's report to Caesar continues: 'You know that in my veins flows the Spanish mixed with Roman blood ...When the Nazarene made his appearance, I was walking in my basilic, and my feet seemed fastened with an iron hand to the marble pavement, and I trembled in every limb as does a guilty culprit, though the Nazarene was as calm as innocence itself. When he came up to me and stopped, and by a signal sign seemed to say to me, 'I am here!' though he spoke not a word. For some time I contemplated with admiration and awe, this extraordinary type of man, a type unknown to our numerous painter...There was nothing about him that was repelling in its character and I felt awed and tremulous to approach him.

Jesus, I said to him at last, 'Jesus of Nazareth, for the last three years I have granted you ample freedom of speech (it is not recorded anywhere, either in the Gospels, or Roman historical records, that the Romans ever attempted to suppress Christ's ministry) nor do I regret it. Your words are those of a sage. I know not whether you have read Socrates or Plato, but this I know, there is in your discourse a majestic simplicity that elevates you above those philosophers...'your blood shall not be spilled,' I said, with deep emotion, 'you are more precious in my estimation on account of your wisdom than all the turbulent and proud Pharisees who abuse the freedoms granted them by Rome. They conspire against Caesar, and convert his bounty into fear, impressing on the unlearned, that Caesar is a tyrant who seeks their ruin...I will protect you against them. My praetorium shall be an asylum both day and night.' I am our obedient servant, Pontius Pilate."

You can accept this letter, as I do, since it makes sense, or dismiss it as most of your Judeo-Christian preachers and church Bible scholars will do. But, think for yourself! Doesn't it make sense to you that the Jews would try and suppress this truth?

There is one point in the forementioned passage of Acts 18 that most folks seem to over look. Paul came to Corinth and planted the first Christian Church with the True Israelite inhabitants who apparently were worshipping Judaism out of ignorance.

With little success at first, but a s a rational, as well as spiritual preacher, Paul reasoned with all Jews (Both non-Israel and True Israel) not with force or violence but by fair arguing he won some over to his own opinion. In verses 9 and 10, Paul had a vision. Each of us ought to know fully this vision and effectively grasp its meaning in our lives, today, as White Israelites. We read in the King James Version: "Then spake the Lord to Paul in the night by a vision, Be not afraid, but speak, and hold not thy peace: For I am with thee, and no man shall set on thee to hurt thee: for I have much people in this city."

We should renew our own commission "be not afraid of the Jews." That means be not afraid of the magistrates of the city, county, state or federal for they have no power against you but what is given them from above. We are pleading, like Paul, the cause of heaven and we need to do it boldly. We should not be afraid of their words, nor dismayed at their quirky looks and fraudulent judgments. At the right times we should speak, and not hold back.

We should let no opportunity slip by without speaking in defense of Christianity and in opposition to the Jews and their hideous Judaism. We should not speak shyly or with caution, but up front, plainly and fully and with courage. We need to speak out in the liberty of the Spirit that becomes an ambassador for Christ.

Paul did speak up and the "Jews" rose up against him, but the Lord went to court with him and threw out his accusers by the hand of a person in high position.

In this city that "Jews flocked to" you must remember that Corinth was a very profane and wicked city, full of impurity of all kinds and idols of all kinds. Yet in this great evil heap, with all its contempt for White Christian Israelites, i.e., the wheat, it sure seemed to human knowledge that the chaff would over come, but in this ore that seems to be all dross, there is gold.

Even in Corinth, Christ had much people. So we need to unseat this "fear of the Jews syndrome" and expose their evil, wicked plot to destroy all Christianity. This needs to be done today, before time runs out. Have you come "to know fully" the truth about Judaism and Christianity?

In verses 12-17 of Acts, Chapter 18, we find another of Paul's many trying times with the Jews (worshipers of Judaism - Traditions of the Elders). Paul is accused by member of this Jewish sect before the Roman Governor, Gallio. Gallio was the deputy of Achaia, that is he was the proconsul for this province of the Roman Empire. In modern words this Jewish sect filed a frivolous complaint in a Roman court against Paul and Gallio was to be the presiding judge. Paul was rudely apprehended with violence and fury in broad day light. These Jews cared little for public peace and justice, so they made insurrection. To me this means that they used disturbance of the public peace and force, i.e., vi et Armis, to apprehend Paul.

They had little concern for his welfare or the safety of others. They, as they do today, already had pronounced Paul guilty in the media of their day. Just as they had at the trials of Christ. These enforcers hurried Paul off, probably in chains, to the judgment seat before Gallio. Paul was allowed no time, whatsoever, to prepare for his trial. Sounds like a familiar patriot scenario of arrest today, does it not?

Paul, much like Christ, is falsely accused before Gallio (v. 13). What was the formal charge? "This fellow persuades men to worship God contrary to the law." My what a crime! Paul must have been "anti-semitic." These Jews could not charge him with persuading men Not to worship God at all or to worship other Gods.[511] So the only trumped up charge they could accuse him of breaking was "that he was attempting to persuade men to worship God in a way contrary to the law (of the Jews)."

Now what in the world would you consider as being "contrary to the law." Does this sound a familiar alarm today? Sure it does! If you act "contrary" to the "law" of Title 26, your state motor vehicle "laws," or your property appraisal and collection "laws," see how fast you will be jerked up before some judgment seat and be made to pay for your "crimes."

The Romans allowed the Jews in all their provinces the observation of their own law. But, remember in verse 2, it is recorded, that Jews had been commanded to leave Rome. I wonder why? Did they have a Jewish problem in the society of that day? But who would enforce Jewish law in such a city of idols and corruption? Should all persons therefore be prosecuted as criminals, who worship God in any other way than that prescribed by the tenets of Judaism? The big question before Gallio is, "Does Roman toleration include a power of imposition?" Could Roman law force Paul or anyone to stop practicing any activity contrary to what the "Jews" call their law?

You must remember that the Jewish religion hates Christ and all goyium, i.e., White People. This is why the Jews of Corinth were so uptight against Paul for he was preaching Salvation through the Blood of Christ. This tenet of Israelite Christianity is unacceptable then and today for the Jews of this Pharisaism, i.e., Judaism. How the so-called (c)hristian of today can use the term Judeo-Christian is a gigantic mystery to many. When will the little "c" Christians come "to know fully" that these are two diametrically opposites. Just like black against white, not verses cold and light verses dark?

Paul was charged unjustly. Are White Israelite patriots ever charged unjustly, for violating some phantom law? Do they have ample opportunity to be tried in courts of certified common law venue where justice, fairness and real law prevails? Rarely, if ever, not since about 1861 have justice been had in such courts. Paul had a different circumstance at this hearing than most patriots are usually afforded today. Gallio had a sweet nature and was sympathetic and apparently a stickler for the letter of the law. For Gallio reasoned that the Jews in their own law, had in it a promise of a Prophet whom God would raise up to them, and they should listen to him and/or hear him. And Paul only persuaded people to believe in this Prophet, who was to come and to hear Him, which was all according "to the law." For this Prophet came not to destroy the law, but to fulfill it. Paul's teaching contradicted Judaism, partially the idea of Christ being the Messiah.

At the first hearing or, perhaps, a better way to put it, is no hearing at all, for Gallio dismisses the cause and states that he will not take any cognizance of the issue, at all (v. 14-15). Paul was just about to make his defense which he apparently became so eloquently accustomed to doing.[512] Paul was about to present evidence that would prove that he did not teach men to worship contrary to the law, when Gallio rules that he will not be troubled with this case and will not pass sentence upon it nor even allow himself the trouble of examining it.

He, Gallio, was very capable of doing the part of a judge in any matter properly placed before him to take cognizance of. He said to the Jews, that were the prosecutors, "If it were a matter of wrong, or wicked lewdness," if you could charge the prisoner with theft or fraud, with murder or plunder or any act of immorality.

We would be bound to hear you with your complaint or accusations. Just because these Jews were loud and noisy and rude petitioners of this court, there was no valid reason to give them a hearing in any obvious unjust case. If the petitioner's cause had been just then it would have been the duty of Gallio or any magistrate to cause justice to be done. That means redress the injured party to be afforded his right(s).

Then Gallio would pass comment and give the court's sentence upon the party causing the injury. If the complaint had merits even though not made with all the decorum of a judicial case, Gallio would have felt bound to hear the petitioner, no matter how rude and noisy they were in presenting it. But Gallio will not and did not allow these Jews a chance to make a complaint to him for something not within his jurisdiction.

Oh, if we had a few judges and magistrates today of the caliber to determine rightful venue and jurisdiction. This Jude would not allow the Jews to burden his patience by hearing it nor would he burden his conscience with passing judgment upon this matter. And when the Jews hollered and screamed more and more, he found them in contempt of "his" court and drove them from the seat of judgment. Then he called the next cause. Bravo, Bravo!!!

This passage makes one think that Gallio conducted himself in a dignified and honorable mode. If only we had judges today who possessed this character. He did not want to, nor even pretend to judge spiritual things that he did not really understand. This judgment would be left to the Jews in matters regarding their religion of Judaism.

Yet he would not allow, the Jews to make him (Gallio) their instrument or tool of malice and pretend to pass judgment against Paul (he was following the example Pilate showed when he washed his hands of the matter concerning Christ, and told the Jews to do what they would, but he would have nothing to do with killing Christ). Gallio looked upon this matter as not within his venue and jurisdiction and he did not intend to meddle in this affair anymore than a dismissal.

Gallio seems to have understood the law better than he did religious and/or worship. Whether Christ was the Messiah and of God, was not the issue before his court and he felt no need to take "judicial notice" of the law of any God.

Whether the Gospel teachings of Christ the Messiah was of divine origin or not as these were not questions of words and names as Gallio scornfully and profanely called them. These are valid concerns for Christianity and Judaism but not for a Roman Court, and he felt because of his ignorance of Judaism and Christianity, he did not want to inquire very far into them. "In 1923, Trotsky (a Jew), and Lunatcharsky presided over a meeting in Moscow organized by the propaganda section of the Communist party To Judge God. Five thousand men of the Red Army were present. The Accused (Almighty God) was found Guilty of various ignominious acts and having had the audacity to fail to appear, He (God) was condemned in default." [513]

Then like today, a great contempt was placed upon the court by the Jews and/or Greeks. For they took Sosthenes and beat him in open contempt of Gallio's dismissal of the case against Paul. Look what happened, recently, in California and other places.

If the Jews of Judaism can't have it their way against Christians, they will take it out in some other manner. They were enraged against not only Paul, but also against Gallio and his court of justice. They wanted to be their own prosecutors and if Gallio would not rule in their favor, they would become their own judges and executioners. Apparently the contempt showed what the Jews did, and it did not come before Gallio's court. Gallio cared for none of those things is a puzzling concept of a man who somehow tried to help Paul for whatever reason. If we can presume that this means that this judge is calloused against the things that bad men do to good men, except when brought into his jurisdiction, we find a flaw in the character of this Roman judge.

As a judge he should have protected Sosthenes as much as he did Paul. But the facts point out that he did not. This kind of indifference carries just-us attitudes that compliments tyranny. His do-nothing attitude is evidence of one of Isaiah's writings: "that truth is fallen in the street, and equity cannot enter, and he that departeth from evil maketh himself a prey." [514] Sounds like modern day news reporting, doesn't it? Our courts today appear to adhere to the concept that justice somehow means just-us and all outsiders (non-Jews) will fall in line under its power to be administered by our controlled and/or deceived judges.

So ask yourself, is there a "Jew" word problem; or a society "Jew" problem? Can one come "to know fully" the difference between Jewish Judaism and real true Israelite Christianity: The mixing of the two religions don't mix anymore than trying to mix oil and water.

Those who are truly seeking truth have at one time or another had a man/woman sent from God to witness of the Identity Movement and usually they simply ignored it the first time. Then God in His wisdom would send another. This time the messenger would be so convincing that the Truth Seeker would set out to prove him (or the material if it were a book or some other written information) wrong. To prove it a false concept. Then they found that the more they studied and learned they found that they have been lied to and deceived by a lot of so-called Christian folks.

They came to believe that this was more out of ignorance on their part than deliberate, for they are deceived and content, most of them, to live therein. But when the Lord reveals much more of His Word to them, they decide to re-educate themselves and find that the process is a never ending one. Because as they learn more, God will reveal more - making the Scriptures "seek and ye shall find" ever more true. They soon found that the Identity teachings were more on line than fundamental Christianity as taught in the churches, on TV and radio today.

It appears to them that the more they study, research and meditate, the more the world pulls at their time just to make ends meet. So they know how the world will pull at you as you attempt to learn the truth. The Jew today still works as they did in the hay-day of Corinth to keep True Israelite Christians so busy that they don't have time to stop and smell the roses and find real truth. It will only be with the help of YHWH (Almighty God) that the financial prison most of us fined ourselves caged in, will open and free us, swinging open the doors of liberty.

Such liberty produces the time and resources needed to wage successful campaigns against the onslaught of deceit, lies and deception in todays (c)hristian parishes or folds. Corinthians were famous for their cleverness, inventiveness and artistic sense. They prided themselves in the embellishment of their city and in the adornment of their heathen temples. But, not a single Corinthian ever distinguished himself in literature. Sound Jewish?

The Adamic Man, White People of Israelites i.e., Hebrew stock, are the chosen seed of Israel's race. They need to come to know fully who they are, and what they are. Their heritage demands fulfillment here in this American land, the New Jerusalem as spoken of in the Scriptures. Jesus the Christ, the Salvation of Israel, did not come to the Jewish people. in fact He came against almost everything they stand for. He came to the White Israelites, Matthew 15:24 states: "I am not sent, but to The Lost Sheep of the House of Israel." [515]

Under the heading of "A brief History of the Terms for Jew" in the 1980 Jewish Almanac is the following: "Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an Ancient Israelite a 'Jew' or to call a Contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew." [516]

The World Book omits any reference to the Jews, but under the word Semite it states: "Semite...Semites are those who speak Semitic languages. In this sense the ancient Hebrews, Assyrians, Phoenicians, and Cartaginians were Semites. The Arabs and some Ethiopians are modern Semitic‑speaking people. Modern Jews are often called Semites, but this name properly applies only to those who use the Hebrew Language. The Jews were once a sub‑type of the Mediterranean race, but they have mixed with other peoples until the name 'Jew' has lost all racial meaning."

Who are the Jews and where is the proof of their existence today? The Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925 edition, Vol. 5, p. 41, says: "Edom is in Modern Jewry."There is only one nation in the world that can prove ancestral ties with Edom, and the Jews themselves claim that dubious distinction.

To help answer this question further, we refer you to the excellent book (which should be required reading) entitled "Who is Esau-Edom?" by Charles A. Weisman, copyright 1991, 2nd Edition: May 1992, paperback 128 pages, approx. $8.00. Order from Weisman Publications, %11751 W. Riverhills Dr. #107D, Burnsville, MN 55337. This little book covers the life, history, genealogy, prophecy, predestination and modern identity of Biblical Esau.

Another excellent booklet by Pastor Bob Hallstrom is entitled "Who Are the Pharisees, and the 'Jew' Are they Israel?" Order from: The Gospel of the Kingdom, % P.O. Box 9411, Boise, Idaho 83707, Phone (208) 375-3425. If you don't understand the information in these two books, you will be unable to properly understand the central focus of the Scripture.

The Dake Annotated Reference Bible, while being a scholarly effort, it provides annotations and perspectives which suffer from the authors lack of an informed basis regarding the true identity of the "Jews," Pharisees, Hebrews, and Israel.

In the last century Bram Stocker wrote the book Dracula and in his book he was describing the Jews from the very beginning of their drive to "occupy" our bodies and souls from the very beginning of the Luciferian infiltration of our society. There are hundreds of books (most of which are Jewish Encyclopedias and history books) available for study, which prove that over 90% of the Jews of the world are not a Semitic People, but few people other than historians ever bother to read them.

The religion practiced by the Pharisees in Jesus' time was based exclusively on the Babylonian Talmud. This, according to Rabbi Morris Kertzer, "The Talmud consists of 63 books of legal, ethical and historical writings of the ancient rabbis. It was edited five centuries after the birth of Jesus. It is a compendium of law and lore. It is the legal code which forms the basis of Jewish Religious Law and it is the textbook used in the training of rabbis."

In his lifetime Michael Rodkinson, the assumed name of a "Jew" who was one of the world's great authorities on the Talmud, wrote "History of the Talmud." This classic on the subject was written by Michael Rodkinson in collaboration with the celebrated Rabbi Isaac M. Wise.

In his "History of the Talmud" Michael Rodkinson, on page 70, states: "Is the literature that Jesus was familiar with in his early years yet in existence in the world? Is it possible for us to get at it? Can we ourselves review the ideas, the statements, the modes of reasoning and thinking, on moral and religious subjects, which were current in his time, and must have been evaluated by him during those thirty silent years when he was pondering his future mission? To such inquiries the learned class of Jewish rabbis answer by holding up the Talmud ...and the question becomes, therefore, an interesting one to every Christian. What is the Talmud? The Talmud, then, is the written form of that which, in the time of Jesus was called the Traditions of the Elders and to which he makes frequent allusions."

Arsene Darmester in the book "The Talmud" states: "Judaism finds its expression in the Talmud, it is not a remote suggestion and a faint echo thereof, but it...has become incarnate, in which it has taken form, passing from a state of abstraction into the domain of real things. The study of Judaism is that of the Talmud, as the study of the Talmud is that of Judaism...they are two inseparable things... they are one and the same...the Talmud, is a complete expression of religious movement, and this code of endless presumptions and minute ceremonials represents in its perfection the total work of the religious idea...The miracle was accomplished by a book, The Talmud...

The Talmud is composed of two distinct parts the Mishna and the Gemara; the former the text, the latter a commentary upon the text...term Mishna we designate a collection of decisions and traditional laws embracing all departments of legislation, civil and religious...

This code, the work of several generations of rabbis...nothing can equal the importance of the Talmud unless it be the ignorance that prevails concerning it...This explains how it happens that a single page of the Talmud contains three or four different languages, or rather specimens of one language at three or four stages of degeneracy...many a Mishna of five or six lines is accompanied by fifty or sixty pages of explanation...is law in all its authority; it constitutes dogma and cult; it is the fundamental element of the Talmud...

The daily study of the Talmud which among Jews begins with the age of ten to end with life itself necessarily was a severe gymnastic for the mind, thinks to which it acquired incomparable subtlety and acumen...since it aspires to one thing: To establish for Judaism a 'Corpus Juris Eccleiastict!'"

There are hundreds of books (most of which are Jewish Encyclopedias and history books) available for study, which prove that over 90% of the Jews of the world are not a Semitic People, but few people other than historians ever bother to read them. Following are just a few:

The History of the Jewish Khazars, by D.M. Dunlop, pp. 4-15: "...Our first question here is, When did the Khazars and the Khazar name appear? There has been considerable discussion as to the relation of the Khazars to the Huns on the one hand and to the West Turks on the other. The prevalent opinion has for some time been that the Khazars emerged from the West Turkish empire.

Early references to the Khazars appear about the time when the West Turks cease to be mentioned. Thus they are reported to have joined forces with the Greek Emperor Heraclius against the Persians in A.D. 627 and to have materially assisted him in the siege of Tiflis. it is a question whether the Khazars were at this time under West Turk supremacy. The chronicler Theophanes who tells the story introduces them as 'the Turks from the east whom they call Khazars.'...

A similar discussion on the merits of the different races is reported from the days before Muhammad, in which the speakers are the Arab Nu'man ibn-al-Mudhir of al-Hirah and Khusraw Anushirwan. The Persian gives his opinion that the Greeks, Indians, and Chinese are superior to the Arabs and so also, in spite of their low material standards of life, the Turks and the Khazars, who at least possess an organization under their kings. Here again the Khazars are juxtaposed with the great nations of the east. It is consonant with this that tales were told of how ambassadors from the Chinese, the Turks, and the Khazars were constantly at Khusraw's gate, (Tabari, I, 899. According to ibn-Khurdadhbih, persons wishing access to the Persian court from the country of the Khazars and the Alans were detained at Bab al-Abwab (B.G.A. vi, 135)) and even that he kept three thrones of gold in his palace, which were never removed and on which none sat, reserved for the kings of Byzantium, China and the Khazars. In general, the material in the Arabic and Persian writers with regard to the Khazars in early times falls roughly into three groups, centering respectively round the names of (a) one or other of the Hebrew patriarchs, (b) Alexander the Great, and© certain of the Sassanid kings, especially, Anushirwan and his immediate successors.

A typical story of the first group is given by Ya'qubi in his History. After the confusion of tongues at Babel (Genesis 10:18; 11:19), the descendants of Noah came to Peleg (Genesis 10:25; 11:16-19; 1 Chronicles 1:19; 1:25), son of Eber (Genesis 10:21; 10:24-25; 11:14-17; Numbers 24:24; 1 Chronicles 1:18-19; 1:25; 8:12; Nehemiah 12:20), and asked him to divide (Genesis 10:5; 10:25; 10:32; Exodus 14:21; Deuteronomy 4:19; 32:8; 1 Chronicles 1:19) the earth among them. He apportioned to the descendants of Japheth (Genesis 5:32; 6:10; 7:13; 9:18; 9:23; 9:27; 10:1-2; 10:21; 1 Chronicles 1:4-5) - China, Hind, Sind, the country of the Turks and that of the Khazars, as well as Tibet, the country of the (Volga) Bulgars, Daylam, and the country neighboring on Khurasan.

Similarly, according to Tabari, there were born to Japheth Jim-r (the Biblical Gomer (Genesis 10:2-3; 1 Chronicles 1:5-6; Ezekiel 38:6; Hosea 1:3), Maw'-' (read Mawgh-gh, Magog (Genesis 10:2; 1 Chronicles 1:5; Ezekiel 38:2; 39:6; Revelation 20:8)), Mawday (Madai (Genesis 10:2; 1 Chronicles 1:5), Yawan (Javan) (Genesis 10:2; 10:4; 1 Chronicles 1:5; 1:7; Isaiah 66:19; Ezekiel 27:13; 27:19)), Thubal (Tubal), Mash-j (read Mash-kh, Meshech (Genesis 10:2; 1 Chronicles 1:15; 1:17; Ezekiel 27:13; 32:26; 38:2-3; 39:1)) and Tir-sh (Tiras (Genesis 10:2; 1 Chronicles 1:5)). Of the descendants of the last were the Turks and the Khazars (Ashkenaz). There is possibly an association here with the Turgesh, survivors of the West Turks, who were defeated by the Arabs in 119/737, (H.A.R. Gibb, Arab Conquests in Central Asia, London 1923, 83ff. Cf. Chapter IV, n. 96) and disappeared as a ruling group in the same century. Tabari says curiously that of the descendants of Mawgh-gh (Magog) were Yajuj and Majuj, adding that these are to the east of the Turks and Khazars. This information would invalidate Zeki Validi's attempt to identify Gog and Magog in the Arabic writers with the Norwegians. The name Mash-kh (Meshech) is regarded by him as probably a singular to the classical Massagetai (Massag-et). A Bashmakov emphasizes the connection of 'Meshech' with the Khazars, to establish his theory of the Khazars, not as Turks from inner Asia, but what he calls a Jephetic or Alarodian group from south of the Caucasus.

The tale of a meeting in Khurasan between the sons of Keturah (Genesis 25:1; 25:4; 1 Chronicles 1:32-33) and the Khazars (Ashkenaz Genesis 10:3) where the Khaqan is Khaqan is mentioned is quoted from the Sa'd and al-Tabari by Poliak.

The tradition also appears in the Meshed manuscript of ibn-al-Faqih, apparently as part of the account of Tamim ibn-Babr's journey to the Uigurs, but it goes back to Hishim al-Kalbi. Zeki Validi is inclined to lay some stress on it as a real indication of the presence of the Khazars in this region at an early date. Al-Jahiz similarly refers to the legend of the sons of Abraham and Keturah settling in Khurasan but does not mention the Khazars. Al-Di-mashqi says that according to one tradition the Turks were the children of Abraham by Keturah, whose father belonged to the original Arab stock. Descendants of other sons of Abraham, namely the Soghdians and the Kirgiz, were also said to live beyond the Oxus..."

Benjamin Freeman, Facts Are Facts:"Chazars: A people of Turkish origin whose life and history are interwoven with the very beginnings of the History of The Jews of Russia...driven on by the nomadic tribes of the steppes and by their own desire for plunder and revenge...In the second half of the sixth century the Chazars moved westward...The kingdom of the Chazars was firmly established in most of south Russia long before the foundation of the Russian monarchy by the Varangians...At this time the kingdom of the Chazars stood at the height of its power and was constantly at war...At the end of the eighth century...the chagan (king) of the Chazars and his grandees, together with a large number of his heathen people, embraced the Jewish Religion."

Encyclopedia Americana (1985):"Khazar, an ancient Turkic‑speaking people who ruled a large and powerful state in the steppes North of the Caucasus Mountains from the 7th century to their demise in the mid‑ 11th century A.D...In the 8th Century it's political and religious head...as well as the greater part of the Khazar nobility, abandoned paganism and converted to Judaism... (The Khazars are the ancestors of most Russian and Eastern European Jews)."

Encyclopedia Britannica (15th edition): "Khazars, confederation of Turkic and Iranian tribes that established a major commercial empire in the second half of the 6th century, covering the southeastern section of modern European Russia...In the middle of the 8th century the ruling classes adopted Judaism as their religion."

Academic American Encyclopedia (1985): "Ashkenazim, the Ashkenazim are one of the two major divisions of the Jews, the other being the Shephardim."

Encyclopedia Americana (1985): "Ashkenazim, the Ashkenazim are the Jews whose ancestors lived in German lands...it was among Ashkenazi Jews that the idea of political Zionism emerged, leading ultimately to the establishment of the state of Israel...In the late 1960s, Ashkenazi Jews numbered some 11 million, about 84 percent of the world Jewish population."

The Jewish Encyclopedia:"Khazars, a non-Semitic, Asiatic, Mongolian tribal nation who emigrated into Eastern Europe about the first century, who were converted as an entire Nation to Judaism in the seventh century by the expanding Russian nation which absorbed the entire Khazar population, and who account for the presence in Eastern Europe of the great numbers of Yiddish‑speaking Jews in Russia, Poland, Lithuania, Galatia, Besserabia and Rumania."

The Encyclopedia Judaica (1972):"Khazars, a national group of general Turkic type, independent and sovereign in Eastern Europe between the seventh and tenth centuries C.E. during part of this time the leading Khazars professed Judaism...In spite of the negligible information of an archaeological nature, the presence of Jewish groups and the impact of Jewish ideas in Eastern Europe are considerable during the Middle Ages. Groups have been mentioned as migrating to Central Europe from the East often have been referred to as Khazars, thus making it impossible to overlook the possibility that they originated from within the former Khazar Empire."

The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia:"Khazars, a medieval people, probably related to the Volga Bulgars, whose ruling class adopted Judaism during the 7th cent. The Khazars seem to have emerged during the 6th cent., from the vast nomadic Hun (Turki) empire which stretched from the steppes of Eastern Europe and the Volga basin to the Chinese frontier. Although it is often claimed that allusions to the Khazars are found as early as 200 C.E., actually they are not mentioned until 627...most Jewish Historians date the conversion of the Khazar King to Judaism during the first half of this century (A.D.)..."

The primary meaning of Ashkenaz and Ashkenazim in Hebrew is Germany and Germans. This may be due to the fact that the home of the ancient ancestors of the Germans is Media, which is the Biblical Ashkenaz ...Krauss is of the opinion that in the early medieval ages the Khazars were sometimes referred to as Ashkenazim...About 92 percent of all Jews or approximately 14,500,000 are Ashkenazim. The Bible relates that the Khazar (Ashkenaz) Jews were/are the sons of Japheth not Shem: "Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth: and unto them were sons born after the flood. The sons of Japheth ...the sons of Gomer; Ashkenaz..." [523]

So the Bible verifies that the Ashkenaz Jews (Khazars) are not the descendants of Shem and cannot be Semite.

The American People's Encyclopedia for 1954 at 15‑292 records the following in reference to the Khazars: “In the year 740 A.D. the Khazars were officially converted to Judaism. A century later they were crushed by the incoming Slavic‑speaking people and were scattered over central Europe where they were known as Jews. It is from this grouping that most German, Polish and Hungarian Jews are descended, and they likewise make up a considerable part of that population now found in America. The term Aschenazim is applied to this round‑headed, dark‑complexioned division."

Academic American Encyclopedia, Deluxe Library Edition, Volume 12, page 66 states: "The Khazars, a turkic people, created a commercial and political empire that dominated substantial parts of South Russia during much of the 7th through 10th centuries. During the 8th century the Khazar Aristocracy and the Kagan(KING) were converted to Judaism."

The New Encyclopedia Britannica, Volume 6, page 836 relates: "Khazar, member of a confederation of Turkic-speaking tribes that in the late 6th century A.D. established a major commercial empire covering the southeastern section of modern European Russia...but the most striking characteristic of the Khazars was the apparent adoption of Judaism by the Khagan and the greater part of the Ruling Class in about 740...The fact itself, however, is undisputed and unparalleled in the History of Central Europe. A few Scholars have asserted that the Judaized Khazars were the remote ancestors of many of the Jews of Eastern Europe and Russia."

Collier's Encyclopedia, Volume 14, page 65 states: "Khazars (kaza'rz), a semi-nomadic tribe of Turkish or Tatar origin who first appeared north of the Caucasus in the early part of the third century...In the eighth century Khaghan Bulan decided in favor of the Jews and accepted Judaism for himself and for his people..."

New Catholic Encyclopedia, Volume VIII, page 173 relates: "The Khazars were an ethnic group, belonging to the Turkish peoples, who, toward the end of the 2d century of the Christian Era, had settled in the region between the Caucasus and the lower Volga and Don Rivers...At the beginning of the 8th century, dynastic ties bound the Khazars more closely to Constantinople, which led to a limited spread of Christianity among them. They also became acquainted with Judaism from the numerous Jews who lived in the Crimea and along the Bosphorus. When the Byzantine Emperor, Leo the Isaurian, persecuted the Jews in A.D. 723, many Jews found refuge in the Khazar kingdom, and their influence was so great that, around the middle of the 8th century, the King of the Khazars and many of the Khazar nobility accepted the Jewish Faith."

The Cadillac Modern Encyclopedia, page 822, states: "Khazars (khah'-zahrz), a S Russian people of Turkic origin, who at the height of their power (during the 8th-10th cent., A.D.) controlled an empire which included Crimea, and extended along the lower Volga, as far E as the Caspian Sea. The Khazar Royal Family and Aristocracy converted to Judaism during the reign of King Bulan (768-809 A.D.) and Judaism was thereafter regarded as the state religion..."

From the above, we can clearly see that the Jews fully understand their Khazarian heritage as the third edition of The Jewish Encyclopedia for 1925 records: "Chazars (Khazars): A people of Turkish origin whose life and history are interwoven with the very beginnings of the history of the Jews of Russia. The kingdom of the Chazars was firmly established in most of South Russia long before the foundation of the Russian monarchy by the Varangians (855). Jews have lived on the shores of the Black and Caspian seas since the first centuries of the common era (after the death of Christ). Historical evidence points to the region of the Ural as the home of the Chazars. Among the classical writers of the Middle Ages they were known as the 'Chozars,' 'Khazirs,' 'Akatzirs,' and 'Akatirs,' and in the Russian chronicles as 'Khwalisses' and 'Ugry Byelyye.'..."

Nathan M. Pollock has a beef with the Israeli government. His elaborate plans to celebrate this September the 1000th anniversary of the Jewish ‑ Khazar alliance were summarily rejected. He has devoted 40 of his 64 years trying to prove that six out of ten Israelis and none out of ten Jews in the Western Hemisphere are real Jews' Jews, but descendants of fierce Khazar tribes which roamed the steppes of Southern Russia many centuries ago. For obvious reasons the Israeli authorities are not at all eager to give the official stamp of approval to Pollock's theories. "For all we know, he may be 100 percent right,' said a senior government official. 'In fact, he is not the first one to discover the connection between Jews and Khazars. Many famous scholars Jews and non‑Jews, stressed these links in their historical research works. But who can tell today what percentage of Khazar blood flows in our veins..." [524]

Following is the story of the conversion of a tribe of people in Russia to Judaism and is the origin of more than 95% of the Jews of Eastern Europe.

Facts Are Facts, By Benjamin Freedman): "Without a complete and accurate knowledge of the origin and history of the 'Jews' in Eastern Europe...it is quite impossible for (Christians) to intelligently understand the harmful influence the Jews have exerted for ten centuries ...You will probably be astonished as many Christians were years ago when I electrified the nation with the first publication by me of the facts disclosed by my many years of research into the origin and the history of the 'Jews' in Eastern Europe.

My many years of intensive research established beyond the question of any doubt, contrary to the generally accepted belief held by Christians, that the 'Jews' in Eastern Europe at any time in their history in Eastern Europe were never the legendary 'lost ten tribes' of Bible lore. That historic fact is incontrovertible.Relentless research established as equally true that the 'Jews' in Eastern Europe at no time in their history could be correctly regarded as the direct lineal descendants of the legendary 'lost Ten Tribes' of Bible Lore. The 'Jews' in Eastern Europe in modern history cannot legitimately point to a single Ancient Ancestor who ever set even a foot on the soil of Palestine in the era of Bible History. Research also revealed that the 'Jews' in Eastern Europe were never 'Semites,' are not 'Semites' now, nor can they ever be regarded as 'Semites' at any future time by any stretch of the imagination. Exhaustive research also irrevocably rejects as a fantastic fabrication the generally accepted belief by Christians that the 'Jews' in Eastern Europe are the legendary 'Chosen People' so very vocally publicized by the Christian clergy from their pulpits..."

The Jewish author, Arthur Koestler, relates the following concerning Jewish history: In his 1976 best seller The Thirteenth Tribe, the Author of Darkness at Noon, Promise and Fulfillment, and The Roots of Coincidence dropped another bombshell by proving that today's Jews were, for the most part, descendants of Khazars, who converted to Judaism seven centuries after the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 A.D. "This, of course, is inspired by the story of the Covenant in Genesis; and it implies that The Khazars too claimed the status of a Chosen Race, who made their own Covenant with the Lord, even though they (Khazars) were not descended from Abraham's seed...He cannot, and does not, claim for them (the Khazars) Semitic Descent; he traces their (Khazars) ancestry not to Shem, but to Noah's third son, Japheth; or more precisely to Japheth's grandson, Togarma, the ancestor of all Turkish Tribes. 'We have found in the family registers of our fathers,' Joseph asserts boldly, 'that Togarma had ten sons, and the names of their off-spring are as follows: Uigur, Dursu, Avars, Huns, Basilii, Tarniakh, Khazars, Zagora, Bulgars, Sabir. We (Khazars) are the sons of Khazar, the seventh...'" [525]

Jewish author Alfred M. Lilienthal (The Zionist Connection II, pages 759‑768) relates the following concerning Jewish history: "...The existence of (The State of) Israel is not founded on logic. It has no ordinary legitimacy. There is neither in its establishment nor present scope any evident justice ‑ though there may be an utter need and wondrous fulfillment.'...Arthur Koestler answers this question with an emphatic 'NO!' In his 1976 best seller The Thirteenth Tribe, the Author of Darkness at Noon, Promise and Fulfillment, and The Roots of Coincidence dropped another bombshell by proving that today's Jews were, for the most part, descendants of Khazars, who converted to Judaism seven centuries after the destruction of Jerusalem IN 70 A.D...Therefore, the great majority of Eastern European Jews are not Semitic Jews at all, and as most Western European Jews came from East Europe, most of them also are not Semitic Jews. Thus, maintains Koestler, the veins of 45 percent of Israelis (save only the Arab and the Sephardic Jews), plus a big majority of Jews around the World, are utterly vacant of corpuscular links to the Tribe of Moses and Solomon...The Koestler thesis, however startling, is in no wise a new one. The genetic Khazar derivation of most Jews, only the Sephardic may be accounted Hebrews by Blood, has been long if not widely known...

The home to which Weismann, Silver, Ben‑Gurion and so many other Ashkenazim Zionists have long yearned to return has most likely never been theirs...(it is an) anthropological fact, many Christian may have much more Hebrew- Israelite Blood in their veins than most of their Jewish neighbors!

Ironically enough, too, Volume IV of the Jewish Encyclopedia (as of the time of research, 1952), because this publication spelled Khazars with a 'C' instead of a 'K,' is titled 'Chazars to Dreyfus.'. And it was the famed trial of Captain Alfred Dreyfus, as interpreted by Theodore Herzl, that made the modern Jewish Khazars of Russia...forget their descent from converts to Judaism...to establish the State of Israel...and with out the hue and cry, 'Anti-Semitism,' pray what happens to the Zionist movement? Khazar conversion was not unique...

Who can say for sure that many Christian readers of this book might not in fact have a better claim, which they do not choose to exercise, to go back 'home' to Palestine than Hannah Semer, Menachem Begin, or Golda Meir? Queen Victoria herself belonged to an Israelite society that traced the ancestry of its membership back to the Lost Tribes of Israel. When the word 'Judaism' was born, there was no longer a Hebrew-Israelite State. The People who embraced the creed of Judaism were already a mixture of many nations, races, and strains, and this diversification was rapidly growing..."

Antiquities of The Jews, by Josephus, Book 13, ch. 9, sec. 1: "...Hyrcanus...took Medaba...Samega, and the neighboring places, and, besides these, Shechem and Gerizzim, and the nation of the Cutheans, who dwelt at the temple which resembled that temple which was at Jerusalem...which temple was now deserted two hundred years after it was built. Hyrcanus took also Dora and Marissa, cities of idumea, and subdued all the Idumeans (Edomite Jews); and...they submitted to the use of circumcision, and the rest of the Jewish ways of living; at which time therefore this befell them, that they were hereafter no other than Jews."

The Conquest of A Continent, by Madison Grant, pp. 224-225: "It was in this period that the Polish Jews began their tumultuous and frantic invasion, a flood which only recently has been checked, and that with the greatest difficulty. The great mass of immigrants from South Poland, Galicia, and Russia were Ashkanazim Jews, descendants in part of Alpine Khozars(Khazars), with a Mongol admixture, who entered the eastern Ukraine from Asia in the early centuries of our era. Many of The Khozars and their Khan were converted by Jewish missionaries and they formally accepted Judaism in 740 A.D. It is doubtful whether there is a single drop of the old Palestinian, Semantic-speaking Hebrew blood among these East European Jews. They are essentially a non-European people. The language they speak, Judisch, or Yiddish, is a corrupt German of the Franconian dialect mixed with Slavic and Hebrew elements, which fact strengthens the tradition of a large migration of German Jews into Poland in the Middle Ages. It may be that the strain of these German Jews has died out, leaving only their language behind, but in any event the Polish Jews are now distinctly Alpine: a mixture of Slavs and of Asiatic invaders of Russia...The German Jews, who also came into this country in smaller numbers at the end of the last century, were of the Alpine type, closely resembling those from Poland, Galicia, and Russia. All of these Jews are in sharp contrast to the Sephardim Jews, a superior group, largely Mediterranean in race, a very few of whom came from Holland to America in Colonial times. These latter had reached Spain by way of North Africa and later fled to Holland to escape the Inquisition."

Perhaps, now, it can be understood why The World Book Encyclopedia by the following, states: "The Jews were once a sub‑type of the Mediterranean race, but they have mixed with other peoples until the name Jew has lost all Racil Meaning.."

As you know the Christian Israel Identity doctrine underlies everything we teach and do and write. Similar, but not to be confused with "British-Israelism," the Christian Israel Doctrine holds that the people generally known as the Caucasian people are the true and literal descendants of the Israel people of the Bible. This knowledge unfolds many wondrous new insights into the Scriptures. At the same time, if we are Israel, then who are these people today called "Jews?" Well, judge them by their fruits, brother and sister Christians! This comes to the meat of our study today, as related, in part by Pastor James Bruggeman of Stone Kingdom Ministries.

Sadly, the Judeo-Christian clergy almost unanimously ignored the facts; and thus most of their flocks were deprived of even hearing of this astounding discovery and its far-reaching implications. However, The Thirteenth Tribe, has not faded away. Instead, it (and other booklets, tracts, etc., about it) have been circulating widely in America's Christian underground for the past two decades. [526] Concurrently, the truth that many Caucasians of European descent are the true Israelites has also been circulating and gaining a growing number of adherents.

Many Jews were undoubtedly displeased to have Koestler pull aside their "God's Chosen People" mask. [527] Fortunately for the Jews, the Judeo-Christian ministers "stayed in line" as their masters directed by ignoring the book. But the proliferation of its message could not be stemmed in the Christian underground.

This has become worrisome to the Jewish/Zionist hierarchy. What could they possibly do to counteract Koestler's exposé? What they needed was "damage control."

Enter:"The Tribes," by Yair Davidy. Not being on the inside of Zionist power circles, we must admit that whether or not "The Tribes," is a consciously-directed piece of damage control, we cannot say with certainty. To us, however, it appears to fit the bill. Our purpose in this short study, therefore, is to provide an extensive review, analysis and commentary of this new 480-page book, should your friends or pastor throw it up into your face, when talking about the True Tribes of Israel. You may simply think to yourself: "But if The Tribes is a book simply meant for damage control, then why take the time to fuss with it at all?"

The answer is that we believe that God is at work through all of this. In His sovereignty, He has apparently chosen to let the false Israelites expose themselves. In fact, God told us in His Word that such would be the case. Before we give you those specific verses, however, some background clarification of terminology is necessary for those new to this concept: Koestler correctly states that most Modern Jews are from Khazar/Mongol/Nun ancestry. What he failed to mention, however, is that among several other admixtures one is from Edom, the descendants of Esau. Jewish authorities, even admit that Edom is in modern Jewry. [528]

Esau was the twin brother of Jacob. Jacob was the father of twelve sons and hence, the Twelve Tribes of Israel (and hence, the title of Davidy's book, The Tribes). By right of creation, God chose Jacob to receive the covenant blessings even before the twins were born. Esau/Edom felt cheated of the birthright, even though he had previously sold it to his brother, and thereafter, as God had foretold, his descendants have hated the Israelite descendants of Jacob and been at war with them. The war continues to this day. The war fare is not always open. The Edomites, being in much smaller numbers (as God foretold), prefer to use cunning and stealth, trickery and deceit, and whenever possible, to have others do their "dirty work" for them. In prophecy, the term, "the daughter of Zion," refers to True Israel at some future time. Similarly, "the daughter of Edom" refers to the descendants of Edom at some future time.

Bible students know that Israel was disobedient to Yahweh, the Almighty God, and thus they were to be punished for a period of "seven times." Our purpose in this study is not directed towards Bible chronology, but let it suffice to say that this meant the punishment would last for many centuries. Now read what God prophesied through Jeremiah in the Book of Lamentation: "The punishment of thine iniquity is accomplished, O daughter of Zion; he will no more carry thee away into captivity: he will visit thine iniquity, O daughter of Edom; he will discover thy sins." [529]

God is telling Israel that at some future time their punishment will be over, and THEN He will punish Edom for their iniquity. In doing so, he says he will "discover" [530] Edom's [531] sins. What is most interesting about all this is HOW God will reveal their iniquities. He says they will do it to themselves! "Rejoice and be glad, O daughter of Edom, that dwellest in the land of Uz; the cup also shall pass through unto thee: thou shalt be drunken, and shalt make thyself naked." [532]

The figurative language here says they will be drunken; they will do things that a person in his right mind would not ordinarily do. [533] They will make themselves naked; in other words, they will remove their covering; they will take off their mask; they will remove their "God's Chosen People" garment and will stand exposed for who they are for all the world, including True Israel, to see! They will truly do it to themselves. And with Koestler's and Davidy's books, they have done it! [534] Koestler has done in The Thirteenth Tribe by admitting that Jews are not Israelites, as well as those books listed in the Footnote. The mask has come off. Now comes Mr. Davidy and in attempting to do damage control, to reclaim Israelite status for the Jews, to put the mask back on, he has admitted and confirmed that many western people are Israelites. The subtitle of his book says just that "The Israelite Origin of Western Peoples." Praise Yahweh the Almighty!

Since Yahweh has caused Davidy and Koestler to expose the truth of who Israel IS and who Israel is NOT, it is only appropriate that a ministry such as our, which proclaims the True Christian Israel Identity Message, examine Davidy's book in depth and to make such use of it as the Lord wills.

The long-time student of Christian Israel identity does not have to wade too far into Davidy's book to discern his purposes. Several of them, he tells in the opening pages; others are never admitted but become clear before one finishes the first hundred pages.

As stated previously, we believe that one of the purposes of the book is to counteract the spreading knowledge among Christians that the modern Jews are primarily descended from the medieval Khazar tribes. Koestler demonstrated from historical facts that Jews are neither Semitic nor Israelites. The History of The Jewish Khazars, by D.M. Dunlop, pp. 4-15; proves the Khazars came from the tribe of Japheth. However, in The Tribes, Mr. Davidy now goes to great lengths in attempting to link the Khazars to Israelite tribes. At the same time, he confirms and even occasionally adds to existing information concerning the tribal migrations of the so-called "lost ten tribes." We will elaborate on this later.

Without Mr. Davidy ever stating it, who could expect him to? It is to us that the overriding purpose of The Tribes is to drive home the alleged fact that modern Jews, though of Khazar descent, are nonetheless, primarily from the tribe of Judah. The very important corollary to that assertion is to deny Judah's identification with the German People.

That Germanic identification has now been generally accepted in Christian Israel circles. With this Jewish author now admitting that most of the Israelite tribes are found in the peoples of Western Europe or their descendants in the USA, Canada, Australia, South Africa, etc., the battle is now joined and headed for the climax in determining who is Judah today: the Germanic people or the Jews. With this as background we can now proceed to systematically review The Tribes.

In his "Introductory Preview" Mr. Davidy states: "The Tribes produces evidence that most of the ancient Israelites assimilated to foreign cultures and forgot their origins. In the course of time they reached the British Isles and north-west Europe whence related nations (such as the U.S.) were founded... Proofs adduced are derived from Biblical, Talmudic, Historical, Archaeological, and Linguistic sources as well as from Folklore, Mythology, National Symbols, and National Characteristics."

As Christians, we have a serious problem in accepting anything using the Jewish Talmud as a reliable source. Most Christians have no idea of the absolute filth and blasphemy in these "holy books" of the Jews. Don't be misled by the sanitized versions now appearing in bookstores and, yes, even through Judeo-Christian book distributors! If you know Freud (who was a Queer) was obsessed with sex (Just like the Jewess Dr. Ruth), then Freud is a choir boy compared to the degeneracy rampant in the Talmud.

Come to think of it, perhaps Freud was only "borrowing" his ideas from the Talmud. For the naive Christian, let him understand that the Talmud teaches that Christ, our Savior, was conceived by a whore, Miriam (Mary), during her menstrual period; and that the father was a Roman soldier. It gets worse, but you get the idea. Thus, unless there is corroborating evidence from other and reliable sources, we place no credibility in any "fact" which cites the Talmud as its source.

Author's Stated Purposes: On page 3, Mr. Davidy states: "Many of the conclusions reached, though sometimes seemingly obviously, are, in effect, potentially revolutionary in their implications."

Oh yes indeed, we will see a most earth-shaking turn of events, political and religious, when most of True Israel wakes up to her identity as the Bride of Christ! [535] This will certainly sweep Edom from their present (mostly hidden) positions of power. "The goal of this work was primarily a study which it was hoped would lead to a deeper and more widely spread understanding of Biblical and Historical truth." (p. 3) We couldn't agree more, the sooner, the better. "So hopefully, at least some amongst the peoples identified within the following pages as descendants of Israelite Tribes will gain a deeper appreciation for themselves and for the Jewish people who are their Tribal brother 'Israelites.'"(p. 3)

Aha! Here is the first occurrence of this theme that the Jews are our brother Israelites. We will prove otherwise from the Scriptures shortly. Just four pages later, he repeats this refrain after giving an accurate statement of the dispersion of the tribes after the Assyrian Captivity; "whence they migrated in several waves to the extreme north and west of Europe from which their descendants settled North America, Australasia (sic), and South Africa. The peoples in these said nations today are thus in the Biblical and historical sense brothers of the Jews who came from the remaining southern kingdom of Judah...The Jews and the Lost Ten Tribes together for the Israelite or Hebrew nation."

On page 228, Mr. Davidy misapplies prophecy to indicate a future joining of the Jews with us, True Israel: "If the theory set forth in this present work is correct, and all the evidence strongly indicates that it is (with two very major exceptions!), it means that the Jews and many of the peoples in northwest Europe are in a Biblical sense of the same stock and have a mutual destiny. The Lost Ten Tribes 'from the north country and...from the coasts of the earth [536] are destined to re-unite with the Tribes of JUDAH: 'They shall be no more two nations, neither shall they be divided into two kingdoms any more at all.' [537]. The unity of origin and destined future union of the Jews with the Lost Ten Tribes of necessity indicates a need for the two bodies even now to evidence a certain empathy towards each other.'"

Over and over again the idea recurs that the Jews are the racial-familial brothers of those of us from northwest European stock. He fails to prove that point historically (which we will discuss further on) and he certainly does not prove it Scripturally, despite his occasional citation of an Old Testament passage. Indeed, the Scriptures prove just the opposite, as we shall now demonstrate.

Bible students will recall that after the death of Solomon, the Kingdom of Israel split into two separate nations. The northern ten tribes seceded and were then known as the House of Israel.

The tribes of Benjamin and parts of Levi and Simeon remained allied with the tribe of Judah and were collectively known as the House of Judah. The northern House of Israel and most of the Southern House of Judah were carried away captive by the Assyrians beginning about 745 B.C. They never returned.

Hence, since the majority of all twelve tribes were deported by the Assyrians, the idea of the "ten lost tribes of Israel" is somewhat of a misnomer. At about 586 B.C. the remainder of the House (or Kingdom) of Judah was carried away to Babylon. Most of them never returned either. Less than 50,000 returned to the old land of Israel at the time of Ezra and Nehemiah. The descendants of these Judahites provided the line from which came Mary, the mother of Yahshua (Christ), and Joseph, his foster father.

By the time Christ came, there were now at least two different types of people in the land of Israel who were called "Jews." Some were Israelites of the tribes of Judah, Levi or Benjamin, or collectively, "Judahites," although called "Jews" in your English language Bible.

Others called "Jews" in your Bible were Edomites who also lived in the land of Judea, and who had adopted the religion of Judaism.

King Herod was of partial Edomite blood, and thus it is not surprising that he would kill a large number of baby Israelite boys in attempting to kill the Christ child. Therefore, when Christ came preaching the Gospel of the Kingdom to "the Jews," it is understandable why some "Jews" believed on him and others believed not and tried to kill Him.

After the death, burial and resurrection of the Savior, the apostles began preaching the good news first to the Judahite Israelites in Jerusalem and Judea, Samaria and Galilee. Those who were truly Israelites responded to the news by becoming Christians. Those who had become "Jews" by religion (Edomites and others) clung to Judaism (Tradition of the Elders, which later became known as Judaism). This religion of Judaism, incidently, was not the true Mosaic/Hebrew religion, but was a perverted form of it which Yahshua denounced as "the traditions of men."

Paul, who was "a Pharisee of Pharisees," (i.e., an expert in Babylonian Judaism), was a True Israelite (of the tribe of Benjamin), and thus converted to Christianity. But the "false Jews" (false Israelites [538] refused to believe in Christ. Yahshua Himself tells us why some "Jews" believed and some "Jews" refused to acknowledge Him as Messiah. Perhaps this passage in the gospel of John has never impressed you before as to its full import. Christ was here speaking to the unbelieving Jews: "But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I said unto you." [539]; "My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me." [540]

Do you see that? First, recall that in every instance where the word "sheep" is used symbolically, it is Always referring to Israel, never to any other people! So the two very important things Christ was stating here were: (1) True Israelites (sheep) would "follow" Christ. They would respond to the Gospel; they would become Christians. (2) The Jews who did not believe (nor follow) Christ because they were not Israelites! It's just that simple [541]

Now, look at world history for the past 2,000 years. Why do you think that it has been predominantly the Caucasian race of people who have by-and-large become Christians? It is for the simple reason that they were the Israelites! They had been dispersed to all four points of the compass, but migrated primarily in a northwesterly direction; i.e., into Europe, Collectively, these nations became known as Christendom.

Conversely, why have the Jews, as a people, rejected Christ for these past 2,000 years, and have always considered attempts to convert them as persecution? Again, because they are not His Sheep! There is much more Scriptural evidence that could be cited, but this alone gives the lie to any such notion that the Jews of today are Israel. They Cannot be; otherwise they would have become Christians centuries ago.

Parenthetically, it is an historical fact that when Jews were forced to become Christians by the overzealous church, those who did "convert" (the Marranos of Spain, for example) generally reverted to Judaism when the threat of persecution was over. No, we do not expect today's Jews to ever convert to Christ.

They are not Israel; they are Israel's ancient enemies. The only redeemer or messiah they look for is one which see the Jewish people collectively as the messiah.[542] In that regard, notice what Rabbi Abraham Feld wrote in his letter commending Mr. Davidy: "Upon reading Mr. Yair Davidy's book on the dispersion of the ten lost tribes, and contemplating on how most people will receive this as startling new information, I was reminded of a law that U.S. President Bush recently endorsed. On March 20, 1992 the President signed a historic joint Resolution of both Houses of Congress recognizing the Seven Noachide Laws as the 'bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization" and urged America to "return the world to the moral and ethical values contained in the Seven Noachide Laws.'...Mr. Davidy's masterly documented and profoundly thoughtful work is helping bring the world forward in the dynamic process of Redemption." (pp. xii-xiii). They refused to acknowledge the only True Redeemer. They are looking for another kind of redeemer: themselves as God.[543]

The epitome of humanism: "I will be like the Most High..." [544] They are proclaiming: "We Jews will be like the Most High." The spurious Noachide Laws are a Jewish fable. They are not found in the Christian Bible. Instead, the Word warns us against such: "...Wherefore rebuke them sharply...Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth." [545] Such are the Noachide laws. Its followers and promoters uniformly reject the deity of Christ, as does Mr. Davidy.

Other Jewish sources could be brought forth to support the above statement that the Jews believe they will corporately be the messiah, the saviors and rulers of the world; but we shall limit ourselves here only to Mr. Davidy's contention for that blasphemous idea.

The 53rd chapter of Isaiah has long been understood by orthodox Christians to a most vivid prophecy of Yahshua the Christ, the savior and redeemer. But Mr. Davidy applies it to the Jews: "Historically, the Jews of Judah were often senselessly hated, persecuted, and despised. This situation (sic) had been predicted by Isaiah: 'He is despised and rejected or men: a man of sorrows...he was despised and we esteemed him not ...he hath borne our griefs and carried our sorrows yet we did esteem him stricken, smitten of God and afflicted...he opened not his mouth, as a lamb to the slaughter...the Lord has laid upon him the iniquity of us all.' [546]; The Jews is the servant of God and the witness to Monotheism: 'Ye are my witnesses...and my servant who I hath (sic) chosen...before me there was no God formed neither shall there be after me' [547]. [548] and deny the Truth of the Biblical Promises and the Oneness of God, he was persecuted: '...For thy sake are we killed all the day long; we are counted as sheep for the slaughter.'" [549]

This is the familiar "We-are-the-persecuted-ones" theme which is answered below. Mr. Davidy then launches right into a warning against anyone who would dare deny to the Jew his usurped position as "God's Chosen People.": "Anti-Semitism [550] is a form of mental sickness...[551] which amongst more intelligent sufferers requires some modicum (sic) of rational justification, this justification is provided by faults, real or imagined, which reflect more on the haters than on the hated. [552] Jewish behavior and attitudes very often are of necessity formed by reaction to the conditions imposed upon them in their HOST [553] country."

Two thoughts in this last sentence require comment: their behavior and the fact that they are aliens in a "host" country. First, notice that he justifies Jews' generally obnoxious, anti-Christian behavior by claiming they have no choice but to act that way. No, they act that way because it is their nature to act that way. God predestined them to act that way for his own purposes.[554] One of their own, Samuel Roth, a well known author and publisher in New York in the 1930s wrote in his book "Jews Must Live:" "America is full of businesses bearing old Christian names, but which are really owned and run by Jews. Most of them have been acquired in the manner I have just described, the way the Jew creates something out of nothing (slow strangling). The Jew, better than anyone else in the world knows how to dispossess the poor and the members of the middle classes. To fit this case, the old P.T. Barnum adage needs only a little changing. A gentile enters business every minute, with two Jews waiting to take him out of it."

Then, concerning the persecution theme and host-alien relationship, Roth wrote: “Have not Jews been admitted from time immemorial, freely, kindly, almost happily by every nation at whose gate they have knocked for admittance...Have the Jews ever had to petition a country for admission - the first time? Read for yourself the story of the progress of Jewry through Europe and America. Wherever they come they are welcomed, permitted to settle down, and join in the general business of the community. But one by one the industries of the country close to them because of unfair practices (by the Jews towards Christians) until it no longer being possible to hold in check the wrath of a betrayed people, there is violence and, inevitably, an ignominious ejection of the whole race from the land. There is not a single instance when the Jews have not fully deserved the bitter fruit of the fury of their persecutors...Jewish history has been tragic to the Jews and no less tragic to the neighboring nations who have suffered them. Our major vice of old, as of today, is parasitism. We are a people of vultures living on the labor (of the host nation) and the good nature of the rest of the world...We come to the nations pretending to escape persecution, we the most deadly persecutors in all the wretched annals of man."

British/Israel Distinguished from Christian Israel Identity: Much of Mr. Davidy's material and conclusions reflects or parallels standard "British-Israel" doctrine. This is to be distinguished from what we teach. In the United States, the most popular exponent of "British-Israel" has been Herbert W. Armstrong, his Worldwide Church of God, and its offshoots. Undoubtedly, Armstrong "borrowed" the basics of his theology from earlier "British-Israel" teachers and scholars such as Professor Charles Totten of Yale at the turn of the century.

Bishop J.H. Allen, Howard Rand of Destiny Publishers and others whose work we admire in many respects. The current growing acceptance of what is variously called "Christian Israel Identity," "Kingdom Identity," "Israel Identity," or other similar terms is to a great extent an outgrowth of "British-Israelism." However, it is distinguished from it primarily by one VERY MAJOR difference, namely: Who constitutes Judah in the world today? British-Israel proponents claim the Jews do. Christian Israel Identity claims that the Germanic peoples are Judah, with some of Judah in other western nations as well.

The Christian Israel movement further claims that today's Jews are descended from Israel's ancient enemy, the Edomites, who are now intermingled with the Khazars of Ashkenaz, Tograman, and Japheth. Because of the admission by the Jews themselves in recent decades that they are indeed of Khazar and Edomite ancestry, the position of British-Israel adherents in that regard has become almost untenable.

Nevertheless, it is instructive to learn something about the roots of British-Israelism. Before we commence that brief historical overview however, we hasten to add that God has always had a tiny remnant who knew Israel's identity. Among these would be the Waldensians, the Hussites and the Puritans. This is why Paul, writing to Israelite Christians at Rome, wrote in Romans 11:25: "...blindness in part has happened to Israel." This knowledge of True Israel's identity did not originate with British-Israelism. Space prevents further elaboration on its earlier adherents in this study.

Recall from the above listing that the English had expelled the Jews in 1290 A.D. For over 350 years they were kept out. In the mid-1600s, Oliver Cromwell had led a successful revolution against the English monarchy. As did many of his fellow Puritans, Cromwell was already inclined to believe he was a literal Israelite descended from the "lost Ten Tribes." In fact, during his reign as "Lord Protector of the Commonwealth," a number of his close advisors pressed Cromwell to appoint 70 elders (after the manner of ancient Israel under Moses) to his Privy Council.

Meanwhile, after the Jews had been expelled from Spain in 1492, many of them had fled to Holland as their next host country. Here lived one, Rabbi Manasseh ben Israel, who saw an opportunity. Two factors made Cromwell susceptible to the scheme of Rabbi ben Israel. First, his Israel identity conviction and secondly, the fact that revolutions cost money. "(An) unpublished motive for the readmission of the Jews was of an economic and political nature. For not only were so many Jews very successful merchants but others of their number were International Financiers and Bankers. And England needed the money." [555]

One of the unsung heroes of Jewish Law and the Jewish cause was Manasseh ben Israel (1604-1657), scholar, Rabbi, and legal philosopher, who abandoned his life's work of religious pursuit in order to frame the magnificent legislation which, when presented forcefully and logically to Cromwell, bespoke its own purpose so well that it left the government with no recourse other than that of enacting it into British statute, allowing for the readmission of the Jews into England.[556] Because King Edward I of England had been the first to expel the Jews, the Jewish Money-Barons in France, Holland and Germany decided it would be poetic justice if they tried out their planned revolutionary technique in England first. They used their underground agents, or Cells, to cause trouble between the king and his government; employers and labor; ruling class and workers; Church and State.

The plotters injected controversial issues into politics and religion, to divide the people into two opposing camps. First they divided the people in England into Catholics and Protestants, then they divided the Protestants into Conformists and Non-Conformists. When King Charles I was brought into disagreement with his Parliament a Jewish Money-Baron in Holland, named Manasseh Ben Israel, had his agents contact Oliver Cromwell. They offered him large sums of money if he would carry out their plan to overthrow the British throne. Manasseh Ben Israel, and other German and French money-lenders financed Cromwell.

Fernandez Carvajal of Portugal, often referred to in history as "The Great Jew," became Cromwell's Chief Military Contractor. He re-organized the Round Heads into a model army. He provided them with the best arms and equipment money could buy. Once the conspiracy was under way, hundreds of trained revolutionaries were smuggled into England and were absorbed into the Jewish Underground. The same thing is going on in America today.

The head of the Jewish underground in England at that time was a Jew named De Souze. The Great Jew, Fernandez Carvajal, had used his influence to have De Souze appointed Portuguese Ambassador. It was in his house, protected by diplomatic immunity, that the leaders of the Jewish revolutionary underground remained hidden and worked out their plots and intrigue.[557] Once the revolution had been decided upon, the Jewish plotters introduced Calvinism into England to split Church and State, and divide the people. Contrary to general belief, Calvinism is of Jewish origin.

It was deliberately conceived to split the adherents of the Christian religions and divide the people. Calvin's real name was Cohen! When he went from Geneva to France to start preaching his doctrine he became known as Cauin. Then in England it became Calvin. History proves that there is hardly a revolutionary plot that wasn't hatched in Switzerland; there is hardly a Jewish revolutionary leader who hasn't changed his name.

In addition to the religious controversy, the revolutionary leaders organized armed mobs to aggravate every situation injected into politics and labor by their masters. Isaac Disraeli, 1766 - 1848, a Jew, and father of Benjamin Disraeli who afterwards become Lord Beaconsfield, deals with this angle of the British Revolution in detail in his two volume story "The Life of Charles II."

He remarks that he obtained considerable information from the records of Melchior de Salem, a Jew, who was the French Envoy to the British Government at that time. Disraeli draws attention to the great similarity, or pattern, of the revolutionary activities which preceded both the British and the French revolutions. In other words the handiwork of the secret and real directors of the World Revolutionary Movement could clearly be seen in both.

The evidence which absolutely convicts Oliver Cromwell of participating in the Jewish Revolutionary Plot was obtained by Lord Alfred Douglas, who edited a weekly review "Plain English" published by the North British Publishing Co.

In an article which appeared in the issue of September 3, 1921, he explained how his friend, Mr. L.D. Van Vlackert of Amsterdam, Holland, had come into possession of a missing volume of records of the synagogue of Muljeim. This volume had been lost during the Napoleonic wars. The volume contains records of letters written to, and answered by the Directors of the Synagogue. They were written in German. One entry, dated June 16, 1647 read: "In return for financial support will advocate admission of Jews to England; This however impossible while Charles living. Charles cannot be executed without trial, adequate grounds for which do not at present exist. Therefore advise that Charles be assassinated, but will have nothing to do with arrangements for procuring an assassin, though willing to help in his escape." [558]

In reply to this dispatch the records show E. Pratt wrote a letter dated July 12, 1647, addressed to Oliver Cromwell. "Will grant financial aid as soon as Charles removed, and Jews admitted. Assassination too dangerous. Charles should be given an opportunity to escape. [559] His recapture will then make trail and execution possible. The support will be liberal, but useless to discuss terms until trial commences."

On November 12th that same year Charles was given the opportunity to escape. He was of course recaptured. Hollis and Ludlow, authorities on this chapter of history, are both on record as considering the flight as the stratagem of Cromwell. After Charles had been recaptured events moved ahead. Cromwell had the British Parliament purged of most members he knew were loyal to the king. Notwithstanding this drastic action, when the House sat all night on December 5, 1648, the majority agreed: "That the concessions offered by the king were satisfactory to a settlement."

Any such settlement would have disqualified Cromwell from receiving the Blood-Money promised him by the International Money-Barons through their agent E. Pratt, so Cromwell struck again. He ordered Colonel Pryde to purge Parliament of those members who had voted in favor of a settlement with the King. What then happened is referred to, in school history books, as "Prude's Purge." [560] When the purge was finished fifty members remained. They are recorded as "The Rump Parliament." they usurped absolute power.

On January 9, 1649, "A High Court of Justice" was proclaimed for the purpose of putting the King of England on trial. Two thirds of the members of the Court were "Levellers" from Cromwell's Army. The conspirators couldn't find an English lawyer who would draw up a criminal charge against King Charles. Carvajal, instructed an alien Jew, Isaac Dorislaus, Manasseh Ben Israel's Agent in England to draw up the indictment upon which King Charles was tried. Charles was found guilty of the charges levelled against him by the International Jewish money-lenders, not by the people of England.

On January 30, 1649, he was publicly beheaded in front of the Banqueting House at Whitehall, London. The Jewish money-lenders, directed by the High Priests of the Synagogue of Satan, had had their revenge because Edward I had expelled the Jews from England. Oliver Cromwell received his Blood-Money just as Judas had done.

History proves that the International Jewish money-lenders had a purpose other than revenge for getting rid of Charles. They removed him to obtain control of England's economy and government. They planned to involve many European countries in war with England. Great sums of money are needed to fight wars. By loaning the Crowned Heads of Europe the money required to fight wars they fomented, the Internationalists were enabled to rapidly increase the National Debts of all European Nations.

The chronological sequence of events from the execution of King Charles in 1649 to the institution of the Bank of England in 1694 shows how the National Debt was increased. The International Bankers used intrigue and cunning to throw Christians at each others' throats.

1649: Cromwell financed by Jews, waged war in Ireland. Captures Drougheda and Wexford. British Protests blamed for persecution of Irish Catholics.

1661: Truth revealed regarding intrigue entered into by Cromwell and his cohorts Ireton, and Bradshaw, causes serious public reaction. Bodies are exhumed and hung from gallows on Tyburn Hill, London.

1662: Religious strife is engendered to divide members of the Protestant denominations. Non-Conformists to the established Church of England are persecuted.

1665: A great depression settles over England. Unemployment and shortages of food undermine the health of the people and the Great Plague breaks out.[561]

1674: England and Holland make Peace. The men directing international intrigue change their characters. They become match-makers. They elevate Mr. William Stradholder to the rank of Captain-General of the Dutch Forces. He became William Prince of Orange. It was arranged that he meet Mary, the eldest daughter of the Duke of York. The Duke was only one place removed from becoming King of England.

1677: Princess Mary of England married William Prince of Orange. To place William Prince of Orange upon the Throne of England it was necessary to get rid of both Charles II, and the Duke of York, who was slated to become James II.

1683: The Rye House Plot was hatched. The intention was to assassinate both King Charles II and the Duke of York. It failed.

1685: King Charles II died. The Duke of York became King James II of England. Immediately a campaign of L'Infamie was started against James II. The Duke of Monmouth was persuaded, or bribed, into leading an insurrection to overthrow the king.

On June 30, the Battle of Sedgemoor was fought. Monmouth was defeated and captured. He was executed July 15th. In August Judge Jeffreys opened, what historians have named, "The Bloody Assizes." Over three hundred persons concerned in the Monmouth Rebellion were sentenced to death under circumstances of atrocious cruelty.

Nearly one thousand others were condemned to be sold as slaves. This was a typical example of how the Secret Powers, working behind the scenes, create conditions for which other people are blamed. They in turn are liquidated. King James still had to be disposed of before William of Orange could be placed on the throne to carry out their mandate.

Every person in England was bewitched and bewildered. They were not allowed to know the truth (the people are never allowed to know the truth, and when it is presented to them they will not believe it). They blamed everyone, and everything except the "Secret Powers" who were pulling the strings (the same thing that is happening at the present time in America). Then the conspirators made their next move.

1688: They ordered William Prince of Orange to land in England at Torbay. This he did on November 5th. King James abdicated and fled to France. He had become unpopular by reason of the campaign of L'Infamie, intrigue and his own foolishness and culpability.

1689: William of Orange and Mary, were proclaimed King and Queen of England. King James did not intend to give up the Throne without a fight. He was a Catholic, so the Secret Powers set up William of Orange as the Champion of the Protestant Faith. On February 15, 1689, King James landed in Ireland. The Battle of The Boyne was fought by men of definite, and opposing, religious convictions. The Battle has been celebrated by Orangemen on the 12th of July ever since. There is probably not one Orangeman in ten thousand who knows that all the wars and rebellions fought from 1640 to 1689 were fomented by the Jewish International money-lenders for the purpose of putting themselves in position to control British politics and economy.

The Jews were permitted back into England and from that time we can trace the cozy relationship between the Jews and the British which developed much of the "British/Israel" doctrine. Their first objective was to obtain permission to institute a Bank of England and consolidate and secure the debts Britain owed them for loans made to her to fight the wars they instigated. History shows how they completed their plans.

By 1694, the Bank of England was established; it was the English equivalent of "our" Federal Reserve System, the Jews controlled the money system which creates paper "money" out of thin air, and fastens every dollar or British pound of it on the people as debt. Truly did God warn us in his word about being "unequally yoked together with unbelievers."

In the final analysis, none of the countries and people involved in the wars and revolutions obtained any lasting benefits. No permanent or satisfactory solution was reached regarding the political, economic, and religious issues involved. The only people to benefit were the small group of Jewish money-lenders who financed the wars and revolutions, and their friends and agents, who supplied the armies, the ships, and the munitions.

It is important to remember that no sooner was the Dutch General sitting upon the throne of England than he persuaded the British Treasury to borrow £1,250,000 from the Jewish Bankers who had put him there. The school book history Informs our children that the negotiations were conducted by Sir John Houblen and Mr. William Patterson on behalf of the British Government with money-lenders whose identity remained secret. A search of historical documents reveals that in order to maintain complete secrecy the negotiations regarding the terms of the loan were carried on in a church. In the days of Christ the money-lenders used the Temple. In the days of William of Orange they desecrated a church.

The International Jewish money-lenders agreed to accommodate the British Treasury to the extent of £1,250,000 providing they could dictate their own terms and conditions. This was agreed to. The terms were in part:

1). That the names of those who made the loan remain secret; and that they be granted a Charter to establish a Bank of England.[563]

2). That the directors of the Bank of England be granted the legal right to establish the Gold Standard for currency by which;

3). They could make loans to the value of £10 for every £1 value of gold they had on deposit in their vaults.

4). That they be permitted to consolidate the national debt; and secure payment of amounts due as principal and interest by direct taxation of the people.

Thus, for the some of £1,250,000, King William of Orange sold the people of England into economic bondage. The Jewish money-lenders gained their ambitions. They had usurped the power to issue and control the currency of the nation. And, having secured that power they cared not who made the laws. The International Jewish Bankers never intend that England be allowed to pay off the national indebtedness. The plan was to create international conditions which would plunge ALL nations concerned deeper and deeper into their debt.[564]

The Secret Power behind the World Revolutionary Movement pulled the necessary strings and brought about "The Wars of the Spanish Succession."

In 1701 the Duke of Marlborough was made Commander-in-chief of the armed forces of Holland. No less an authority than the Jewish Encyclopedia records the fact that for his many services the Duke of Marlborough received not less than £6,000 a year from the Dutch Jewish Banker, Solomon Medina.

British/Israel became quite popular in certain circles in England by the Nineteenth Century and much of its teaching is still valid today for the simple reason that it fits the Bible, which we will demonstrate from the 1886 book: "Lost Israel Found in the Anglo-Saxon Race." However, the "Jews are Judah" aspect had to fall sooner or later, as all falsehoods do. That has been the task and joy of Bible teachers in the past decades. From British/Israel's initial belief that only England constituted the Lost Ten Tribes, the understanding gradually broadened to include many of the other nations of northern and western Europe. Here let Mr. Davidy summarize, which is mostly accurate, but please remember to take careful note his placement of the "Jews-as-Judah lie" buried in the middle of the various tribal identities: "The patriarch Jacob (Israel) had four wives and twelve sons. His firstborn was Reuben whom he begat from Leah, his first wife. Leah also bore (to Jacob) Simeon, Levi, Judah, Issachar, and Zebulon. The handmaiden of Leah was Zilpah who bore to Jacob, Gad and Ashier. Indications are that the above Tribes became significant formative elements amongst the following nations: Reuben in France, Simeon in Brittany, Ireland and Wales; Simeon and Levi in Lombardy (northern Italy); Judah amongst the Jews; Issachar in Switzerland; and Zebulon in Holland. Gad was important in Sweden, and Asher in Scotland. Rachel was the sister of Leah and Jacob's second wife. She gave birth to Joseph and Benjamin."

In pathetically trying to link the Khazars with dispersed Israelites, primarily with the tribe of Judah, it was necessary for Mr. Davidy to dissuade his readers of any possible notion that any other modern nation or people, such as the Germanic people, could be Judah. This he attempts in a number of ways, and an undiscerning reader could very well be persuaded by the "appearance" of scholarliness when dealing with the German question. The discerning reader, on the other hand, will notice the fatal flaw in Davidy's theory regarding both the Germanic peoples and the Khazars: there is no proof for either! Again, the critical question is: Who is Judah?

Treatment of the Germanic Peoples: The first thing the discerning reader might notice is that Germany and the Germanic people are virtually ignored for about the first hundred pages. Once, on page 74 the northern German region of Thuringia is mentioned as a "temporary" abode of the Angles. The one prominent mention of Germany in its modern history is in a very negative light, concerning, Surprise! the Nazis. On page 10, Mr. Davidy gets in his lick about how the Germans, not specifically the Nazis, but the Germans, allegedly exterminated more than six million Jews, even though this decades-long propaganda lie is being gradually exposed by honest scholars such as England's top historian, David Irving. Then, in a classic example of the Jewish tactic of accusing your enemy of what you yourself have done, he asserts on page 11: "The Germans in the Second World War had attempted to conquer Britain. They had plans, if successful (sic), to deport all of the male population as slave labor to the Continent. They were developing means of mass-sterilization and in effect meant to exterminate the British people as we know it."

No documentation of this outrageous charge is given. However, that precise program was proposed to be applied "against" the Germans by an American Jew, Theodore N. Kaufman, in his book "Germany Must Perish!"Following are pertinent extracts: "For quite patently, to fight once more in democratic defense against Germany with any goal in view save that country's extinction constitutes, even though it lose the war, a German victory. To fight, to win, and not this time to end Germanism forever by exterminating completely those people who spread its doctrine is to herald the outbreak of another German war within a generation. (p. 11); And so it is with the people of Germany. They may respond for a while to civilizing forces; they may seemingly adopt the superficial mannerisms and exterior behaviorism of civilized peoples but all the while there remains ever present within them that war-soul which eventually drives them, as it does the tiger, to kill. And no amount of conditioning, or reasoning, or civilizing - past, present or future - will ever be able to change this basic nature. (p. 15); There is in fine, no other solution except one: That Germany must perish forever from this earth! And, fortunately, as we shall now come to see, that is no longer impossible of accomplishment. (p. 83); Quite naturally, massacre and wholesale execution must be ruled out...There remains then but one mode of ridding the world forever of Germanism - and that is to stem the source from which issue those war-lusted souls, by preventing the people of Germany from ever again reproducing their kind. This modern method, known to science as Eugenic Sterilization, is at once practical, humane and thorough." (p. 86)

Makes one wonder how Planned Parenthood or their equivalent is dong in Germany, doesn't it? Kaufman predicted that if his plan were fully implemented, there would be no more Germans after two generations. Again and again, Mr. Davidy's technique vis à vis the Germanic people and the land of Germany is first to ignore them. When that option is not possible, since history clearly records those tribes whom he identifies (correctly) as Israelites as actually being located in modern Germany, he then adopts the "just passin' through" scenario.

Mr. Davidy provides source documentation for many of his identifications of tribes through history and with modern nations, but with Germany, well - see the following. On pages 86 and 87 the author (Davidy, The Tribes) mentions the Goths (Ostrogoths and Visigoths), Lombards, Suebi (Swabians), Franks, Gauls, Vandals and many other tribes in relation to Italy, Switzerland, Spain, France, Belgium, Holland, England and Scotland, Denmark, and the other Scandinavian countries - but no Germany. Take a map of Europe and notice how he almost encircles it without ever mentioning it.

This is typical in the book whenever he is discussing the many nations of Israel in Europe today. "The Galatians were identifiable in Europe with both part of the Celts and Belgae and with early groups in Germany. The area of Germany played a similar role to that of Scandinavia and received Tribes coming from Scythia often via Scandinavia and about to continue westward into Gaul and Britain." (p. 98).

Elsewhere and at great length, he shows how, though some portions did move on from Scandinavia, that Israelites Tribes remained to constitute the vast bulk of those nations today. Not so with Germany, he maintains, and no documentation for his assertion is given. "Just as the Scythians were leaving Scythia, new peoples began to appear in the west largely passing through Scandinavia, Pannonia (Hungary), and Germany." (p. 110) No source given regarding Germany. "After the Scythian Barbarians evacuated 'Germany,' going to France, Holland, Britain, Switzerland, and elsewhere, the native 'Germans' re-asserted themselves and participated in the forcible 'Germanicisation' of hordes of Slavonic and other peoples who had swept into Germany in the 500's c.e. to fill the vacuum left by the evacuating Scythian/Israelites." (p. 111) [565] "Most of these peoples, like the Franks and Anglo-Saxons, who invaded the west had sojourned for some time in Germany and Scandinavia before evacuating the German area." (p. 295) Again Davidy's assertion-opinion, gives no source. "Tacitus (Roman historian, c. 100 A.D.) ('Germania' 2) wrote concerning the 'Germans' of his time, meaning largely Anglo-Saxon, Scandinavian, and Frankish groups who were ultimately to evacuate the geographical region of Germany." (p. 359)

Again a Davidy assertion; with no source given that they evacuated Germany completely. "The Anglo-Saxons, especially the Saxons, present a particularly difficult problem for Mr. Davidy since any historian worth his salt knows of the Anglo-Saxon connection with present Germany. The great British historian, Mr. Sharon Turner, proved the connection definitively. Nor was the Saxon presence limited to the northwest portion of Germany. Witness that Saxony less than a century ago was in central Germany bordered on the south by Bavaria and on the east by Prussia. Here is how the author denies the Anglo-Saxon-German bond: '(R)ecent archaeological and related reappraisals of the invaders of Britain in the period of Anglo-Saxon invasions reveal very little connections with German culture which has led some modern authorities to begin to doubt that they even came from Germany!" (p. 111)

What authorities have decided this astounding rewrite of history? He cites one Jewish author who wrote a magazine article about ancient DNA. But just in case that little subterfuge is ineffective, on page 301 Mr. Davidy uses the no relation approach: "(In England) South of the Mercians and Angles were the Saxons who had no relation to the people later known as 'Saxons' in Germany." Baloney! This is simply another bald and straight-faced assertion with no proof offered. Such arrogant audacity is what in Yiddish they call Chutzpah.

On the same page, though, Mr. Davidy correctly explains that: "The Saxons were descended from the Sacae of Scythia, and their name means 'Sons-of-Isaac.' Abraham, the forefather of the Hebrew (sic: wrong: Heber was) race, had been Divinely assured, 'In Isaac will your seed be called' [566], which may be understood as a promise that that portion of his seed which would most blatantly fulfill the worldly aspect of his hereditary mission would bear a name recalling his own, as the Anglo-SAXONS, 'Sons-of-Isaac,' indeed do!"

The Teutonic Peoples: Another little complication in Mr. Davidy's scheme of isolating any Israelite tribes from being tied to the modern Germanic people is the matter of the Teutonic tribes. He identifies them being either or both of the That of the Goths of the tribe of Gad, or with Tahat [567], of the tribe of Ephraim and Tahan, son of Ephraim, son of Joseph. He has the Teutons also evacuating Germany for England. With no proof, of course, just another chutzpah assertion.

Then on page 305 he claims: "The appellation 'Teuton' is sometimes misapplied to the Germans who are mostly unrelated to them." Need we say it? No proof or support for that statement. He reiterates the same prevaricating theme on page 383: "The Teutons and Teutonarii were to be swept up in the Anglo-Saxon host moving westward (Just passin' through, you see). The name 'Teuton' applied to the modern Germans is apparently a misnomer of very recent date and is historically misleading since this people did not remain (as far as can be determined) on German soil." Again no documentation.

No, the misleading is by Mr. Davidy in his patent attempt to continuously denigrate the Germanic people. Among numerous other standard sources, the Scholar's Edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica, Eleventh Edition, in volume 26, under Teutonic declares they are Germanic.

All these obfuscation by Mr. Davidy are reminiscent of the British-Israel teachings about the Germans; namely, that they are descended from the ancient Assyrians! Again, foremost among the publicizers of this nonsense has been the Worldwide Church of God, now rapidly declining in influence. The late Herbert W. Armstrong, founder of the sect, was especially ardent in promoting it. He did not originate the idea though, for it is found in the writings of Edward Hines, a famous British/Israel author (ca. 1870). But the German/Assyrian connection also pre-dates Hines.

In support of their theory of the German/Assyrian identity, various proofs are brought forth to show that indeed the modern German people came from ancient Assyria...We agree! Their proofs prove that they came from Assyria, not that they were Assyrians!

Recalling Bible history, it is a fact that millions of Israelites (of all twelve tribes, not just ten) were taken into captivity into Assyrian lands in the eighth century B.C. Thus, our logical contention is that Israelite Judahites came from Assyria and are the predominant tribe of the Germanic peoples today. Let us now subject both theories to the standard of truth: the Word of God. Are the Germanic people Assyrians or Judahites? The Biblical test is very simple: bring back the Gospel of John again, and chapter ten in the passages referred to earlier. The sheep (Israelites) will hear His voice and follow Him (I.e., become Christians). Did they?

The record of Christian history is clear. Mr. Davidy correctly makes the case for England and France as territory of modern Israel. Yet, if we consider the era from Martin Luther and the Protestant Reformation forward, we observe that Germany was a primary source in the movement to break the hold of corrupted Roman Catholicism over Christendom.

In the centuries following, England gradually became the primary source, but France - although a contributor to Protestantism, certainly did not have as great an impact as Germany. Germany is certainly every bit as much a major component of Christendom as France. Yet, Mr. Davidy welcomes France into the modern Israelite fold, but denies Germany. Why?

The Answer is Very Clear: If the modern Jews admit that modern Germany is representative of Judah, then who are the Jews? They are left in outer darkness, so to speak. So from the time of Rabbi Manasseh ben Israel whispered into the ears of Oliver Cromwell about the Jews being Judah and England being the regathered "lost ten tribes," we suspect that the question of Germany was at first not an issue.

Later, however, when the truth began to be recognized by some that other nations in Europe were also of Israelite stock, that is when it became necessary for the Jewish brothers of the British/Israel proponents to feed them with the lie that Germany was Assyria...or Gomer, or any other people. But at all costs, from the Jews' perspective, the true identity of Germany with Judah must be prevented! The Scofield Bible notes that Gomer is modern Germany originates from the Talmud, as Scofield was Jew.

An interesting parallel is evident here: In the Gospels we read how the evil High Priest, Caiaphas (probably of mixed Edomite-Israelite stock), convened a council of the chief priests and his Pharisee buddies in order to plot the murder of Yahshua (Jesus) the Christ. In John 11, verse 48, one participant outlined their desperate situation, saying that if they did nothing, then "all men will believe on him, and the Romans will come and take away our place and our nation." In other words, these men who were at the pinnacle of religio-political power in Judea under the authority of the Romans were greatly fearful that the Romans might give them pink slips and install Yahshua and His disciples in their place.

The Caiaphas, even though an evil man, is impelled by the Holy Spirit to say in verse 48 and 50: "Ye know nothing at all, nor consider that it is expedient for us, that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation perish not."

So, according to Divine predestination, they arranged the execution of the King of the Universe, whose human lineage came from the Israelite Tribe of Judah. Caiaphas then went to warn his brother Jews, that if Christ was not stopped: "And not for that nation only, but that also he (Christ) should gather together in one the children of God that were scattered abroad." [568]

He was afraid that Christ would gather together the True Tribes of Israel and come and destroy them.

Likewise, in recent centuries we see a similar situation has developed on a national scale. From the Jewish perspective, they have achieved near world domination, although the control is still somewhat hidden to the masses. Their plans along these lines, which were summarized in "The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion," were exposed by the great American patriot, Henry Ford, in his incomparable book, "The International Jew."

Consequently, in the decades since Ford's death, the Jews have gained control of the Ford Foundation and it is one of the largest funders of programs and projects inimical to the best interests of Christian America. But that's another story.

The True Judahites, the Germanic peoples, as long as they exist will always pose the most dangerous threat to the Jews' desire to rule the world. Remember the Huns' desire to rule the world? Huns=Khazars=Edomites=Jews. It all fits.

Thus, Theodore Kaufman proposes that it is expedient for the Jews that the whole nation of Germany die, lest the Jews be exposed as usurpers and lose their fragile hold on near-global domination.

By God's sovereign plan, Kaufman's proposal was not executed. But has the reader ever wondered why the national news and entertainment media, now fifty years after the defeat of Germany are still, and as loudly as ever, driving into the minds of the Western people two things: the poor, persecuted Jews (Holocaustmais); and those wretched, evil, brutish Germans?

It is beyond the scope of this study to judge or analyze herein the actions of Hitler, but we are simply pointing out the slanderous and hateful propaganda against the Germanic peoples to his day which continuously spews forth from the electronic toilets (TV and movies) of Hollywood. You see the Jews know something that the Judeo-Christian ministers, pastors and etc., are very careful not to point out: "In that day will I make the governors of Judah like an hearth of fire among the wood (among the Jews), and like a torch of fire in a sheaf; and they shall devour all the people round about, on the right hand and on the left: and Jerusalem shall be inhabited again in her own place, even in Jerusalem. The Lord also shall save the tents of Judah first, that the glory of the house of David and the glory of the inhabitants of Jerusalem (America) do not magnify themselves against Judah." [569]

The Ultimate Insult: We have discussed the attempts of the Jews in the past few centuries to link Germany with Assyria or Gomer. Mr. Davidy, however, is perhaps breaking new ground in his identification of Germany. He nearly always has the Israelite tribes just passin' through or evacuating for points west or north.

Nonetheless, he doesn't identify Germans with Assyria though either. Then who are the modern Germans? Like Kaufman, Mr. Davidy reverts to the classic tactic of labeling your enemy what you yourself are. According to Mr. Davidy, the Germans are Esau/Edom! His sources? Why, the Talmud, of course! "The name (Edom) applied to a certain physical type (the so-called 'Nordic' one) as well as to the later inhabitants of Germany in Europe. The appellation has importance in connection to the Lost Israelites as well as to several other peoples and it is these latter ones who became ancestors to some of the present-day Germans." (p. 132).

Correction: The only modern Germans whose ancestors sprang from Edom are those who have names like Goldberg, Epstein, Blumentah., Rothschild, etc., i.e., the Khazar Jews living in Germany, and elsewhere, for that matter. "Esau became ancestor to the founder-settlers of early Rome, to part of the German people, and to part of the ruling elite in Continental Europe. 'And Esau hated Jacob because of the blessing where with his father blessed him.'" [570] (p. 352)

We have no problem with the accuracy of the portion of this statement which is from the Book of Genesis. We merely demonstrate that Mr. Davidy is falsely identifying who is Jacob (Israel) and who is Esau/Edom, for in truth Esau/Edom have been assimilated with the Khazars [571].

His sources for the above statement are again the Talmud, along with a Jewish author named Eisenstein. Sorry, maybe it is something genetic, but we simply cannot trust those sources.[572] "Most Italians are not Israelite however (True, but some undoubtedly are) but are of mixed origins with a stock related to the Greeks in ascendancy and including a constituent from Edom.

Esau, the twin brother of Israel (Jacob) was the forefather of the Edomites and became the arch-enemy of Israel. Descendants of Edom are in addition numerous amongst the Germans and in the European ruling classes. Even in those nations herein proved to be basically Israelite in many respects, there exist Edomite and Canaanite elements." (p. 431)

The last sentence is true: The Khazar-Canaanite-Edomite Jews are found in nearly every modern nation, any nation that will host [573] them! The previous concerning Edom in Germany we have answered. The reference to the ruling classes needs explanation, however. In Jacob's deathbed prophecies (Genesis 48) over his twelve sons, he gave Judah the blessing of being the tribe from whence would come the rulership. This, of course, had its singular fulfillment in the birth of Yahshua (Jesus) the Messiah. But it also has its national fulfillment in the Germanic/Saxon people, not the Jews! A study of European history will reveal that nearly all the monarchies of European history will reveal that nearly all the monarchies of Europe sprang from the Saxon/Germanic peoples.

For example, at the time of World War One, the Kaiser of Germany, the Czar of Imperial Russia, and King George V of England were all first cousins. The British monarchy, though, being very public relations-minded, realized that it did not help their public image to be known as "The House of Coburg-Saxe-Gotha" while at the same time, their British subjects were dying in trenches fighting the boys from Coburg-Saxe-Gotha (Germany). Thus came the name change to "The House of Windsor."

Despite his fervent denial of any permanent German association with Israelite tribes, Mr. Davidy allows the following:

* "The Hessians are descended from the Chatti, who descend from the Franks who were of the tribe of Reuben." (p. 162).

* "Franks and Gauls were associated with the Westphalia area of Germany. 'Phalia,' he states, is 'most likely derived from that of Phalui, the second son of Reuben." (p. 163)

* "Saxons in the West Holstein region came from the Scythians (Israelites)." (p. 360).

Mr. Davidy's final assault on the German/Judah/Israelite identity is another baseless assertion somehow distinguishing between Germans who emigrated to America in the 1800s (Perhaps true Israelites, accord to him) and those who remained in Germany, "Peoples belonging to the Lost Israelite Tribes sojourned in regions now known as Russia, Poland, Central Europe, and Germany, and throughout the European Continent. In the course of time all identifiable bodies moved into western Europe mostly evacuating their previous habitats. In some cases segments of these entities may have remained behind and from their descendants perhaps emerged many of the Continental immigrants to North America, etc. A separate study, in the case of Germany at least would seem to indicate that those who went to the U.S.A. in the 1800s were somehow different from those who stayed behind..." (p. 430).

In an appendix to "The Tribes" dealing with his sources, Mr. Davidy acknowledges "the debt to Senstius." This is not to be passed over lightly. Mr. Davidy gives a bibliography of some 23 pages of source materials. Of all those works cited, he singles out only two, S.G. Olsen and Parl Senstius, for a separate section in this appendix. Senstius published a book in Leipzig, Germany, in 1931: "Die Stamme der Israeliten und Germanen," (The Races of Israel and Germany) demonstrating numerous connections of various migrating Israelite tribes with the modern German people.

Those connections that don't upset Mr. Davidy's anti-German theory, he accepts from Senstius. But then he lists many other connections (Which would upset his theory) and these Mr. Davidy acknowledges that he either "did not consider" or he simply declares that he "does not accept" them. "Historically, most of the said Tribes whose identification was accepted by us (emphasis in original) did not remain in Germany but moved out. Those Israelites who did stay in Germany later emigrated en masse to the U.S.A. and elsewhere - this migration having been a specific one entailing whose religious groups, social classes, villages, and even localities with the adjacent neighborhoods and groups remaining almost untouched..." (p. 451)

Although there may have been such cases, it was certainly not universally true. When many of our ancestors came to America, only part of the family came; the rest remaining in Germany. Mr. Davidy's desperate attempts to somehow evacuate Germany of all Israelite connections fails utterly. Both the Bible and history are clear that Germany, like Britain, has contingents from virtually all twelve tribes. But whereas Britain is identified primarily as Ephraim (Mr. Davidy agrees), Germany primarily represents Judah.

The "Khazars-Are-Israel" Fantasy: That latter connection is so intolerable to Mr. Davidy that not only does he have to negate it "by hook or by crook," but thanks to Koestler's "The Thirteenth Tribe," he must now also invent a Khazar/Israelite connection. This he has no reluctance to tackle. But the same methods are applied here as with the anti-German statements. Chutzpah! Simply assert the lie often enough and it will gradually be accepted. Now, where have we heard that before? Thus, as early as page 5, we find: "From inhabitants of the Kingdom of 'Judah' are descended the modern Jews..." We don't accept that at face value, Mr. Davidy; prove it! He, of course, cites no documentation for it. Over and over again throughout "The Tribes," this theme-and-variations is repeated. "The modern day Jews descend from Judah, Simeon, Benjamin, Levi, and some portions of the other tribes." (p. 226)

No documentation here either. "The State of Israel and The Jews: The Jews are descended from those Children of Israel who were not taken into exile by the Assyrians in addition to some of those who were, but later re-attached themselves to those who had remained. Most Jews come from the Tribe of Judah followed by the Tribes of Benjamin and Simeon together with Levi, as well as important contingents from Joseph (Ephraim and Manasseh) and Issachar. - Judah is the determining factor." (p. 433)

Documentation, you have to be kidding; only CHUTZPAH here. "These remaining two tribes became the Jews of history." (p. 8) No documentation. On page 294, he states that "Some modern Jews may descend from the Khazars..." Huh? Like about 95+ percent of them? He attempts to link the Khazars with Benjamin, Ephraim and Asher on pages 127, 285 & 300 with no proof whatsoever offered in support.

On page 71, he states that the tribes of Simeon and Manasseh settled in the Khazar Kingdom. Aha! Finally, here a source is cited; but alas, the source turns out to be a Jewish encyclopedia. Novices to the information in this study may wonder why we are not more trusting of Jewish sources. Our answer is that we are simply taking Christ at His word in John 8:44 where He described the unbelieving Jews (Edom converts to Judaism) in these blunt terms: "Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." If Christ said they were liars, why should we believe their descendants about anything, unless there is outside corroborating evidence? We shouldn't; and we don't. Now here is a tricky statement. Notice the sentence construction: "It will be later shown that certain evidence indicates the Naphtalites as having ultimately migrated to Scandinavia, on the whole, apart from small splinter groups, one of which amalgamated with the Khazars." (p. 64)

The casual and uninformed reader would undoubtedly assume that the initial clause "It will be later shown that certain evidence indicates..." applies to all the rest of the sentence. Not so. The later evidence does show the tribe of Naphtali going to Scandinavia, but no evidence shows Naphtalites "amalgamated with the Khazars." Another interesting but ultimately baseless claim is made regarding some of the modern Scots: "Some groups of Sacae-related Israelites including bands of Goths and Naphtali remained in the Caucasus region of Scythia and elsewhere. These were eventually to amalgamate and form the Khazar nation (no source) which converted to Judaism and some of whose descendants are to be found today among the modern Jews. The real core of the Khazar nation federation was centered on the Akatziri or 'Agathyrsy' as the Greeks called them...the Agathyrsi sent a contingent across the sea to Scotland where it became identified as the Picts." (pp. 106-107); "South of the Sali were the Agathyrsi who became the nucleus of the Khazar nation in Scythia and from whom a portion migrated to Scotland where they became known as the Picts. One portion (at least) of the Agathyrsi were black-haired and may be represented in the tall dark Scotts (sic) still apparent today." (p. 269); "The Agathyrsi, Khazars in the south of Scythia were attributed descent from Manasseh and Simeon." (p. 367).

In the three excerpts above, the weak link is the Khazar-Agathyrsi connection. It is backed up by only one source, a certain Jewish author named Abraham Epstein. Here again we will apply John 8:44. Mr. Davidy cites Lempriere's Classical Dictionary of 1788 identifying the Picts as being from the tribe of Judah. We agree. Just identify Judah correctly and not as the Khazars. Of further interest is this excerpt from the Scottish Declaration of Independence in 1320 A.D.: "Most Holy Father and Lord, we know and from the chronicles and books of the ancients we find that among other famous nations, our own, the Scots, has been graced with widespread renown. They journeyed from Greater Scythia by way of the Tyrrhenia Sea and the Pillars of Hercules, and dwelt for a long course of time in Spain among the most savage tribes, but nowhere could they be subdued by any race, however barbarous. Thence they came, twelve hundred years after the people of Israel crossed the Red Sea, (i.e., circa 250 B.C.) to their home in the west where they still live today." [574] We also have the following, as further proofs of the errors of Mr. Davidy: "...Our first question here is, When did the Khazars and the Khazar name appear? There has been considerable discussion as to the relation of the Khazars to the Huns on the one hand and to the West Turks on the other. The prevalent opinion has for some time been that the Khazars emerged from the West Turkish empire.

Early references to the Khazars appear about the time when the West Turks cease to be mentioned. Thus they are reported to have joined forces with the Greek Emperor Heraclius against the Persians in A.D. 627 and to have materially assisted him in the siege of Tiflis. it is a question whether the Khazars were at this time under West Turk supremacy. The chronicler Theophanes (died circa A.D. 818) who tells the story introduces them as 'the Turks from the east whom they call Khazars.'...

It is consonant with this that tales were told of how ambassadors from the Chinese, the Turks, and the Khazars were constantly at Khusraw's gate, [575] and even that he kept three thrones of gold in his palace, which were never removed and on which none sat, reserved for the kings of Byzantium, China and the Khazars.

In general, the material in the Arabic and Persian writers with regard to the Khazars in early times falls roughly into three groups, centering respectively round the names of (a) one or other of the Hebrew patriarchs, (b) Alexander the Great, and© certain of the Sassanid kings, especially, Anushirwan and his immediate successors.

In another passage Ya'qubi gives a kind of sequel to this. Peleg (Genesis 10:25; 11:16-19; 1 Chronicles 1:19; 1:25) having divided the earth in this fashion (Deuteronomy 32:8), the descendants of 'Amur ibn-Tubal (Genesis 10:2; 1 Chronicles 1:5; Isaiah 66:19; Ezekiel 27:13; 32:26; 38:2-3; 39:1), a son of Japheth, went out to the northeast. One group, the descendants of Togarmah (Genesis 10:3; 1 Chronicles 1:6; Ezekiel 27:14; 38:6), proceeding farther north, were scattered in different countries and became a number of kingdoms, among them the Burjan (Bulgars), Alans, Khazars (Ashkenaz Genesis 10:3), and Armenians. Similarly, according to Tabari, there were born to Japheth Jim-r (the Biblical Gomer (Genesis 10:2-3; 1 Chronicles 1:5-6; Ezekiel 38:6; Hosea 1:3), Maw'-' (read Mawgh-gh, Magog (Genesis 10:2; 1 Chronicles 1:5; Ezekiel 38:2; 39:6; Revelation 20:8)), Mawday (Madai (Genesis 10:2; 1 Chronicles 1:5), Yawan (Javan) (Genesis 10:2; 10:4; 1 Chronicles 1:5; 1:7; Isaiah 66:19; Ezekiel 27:13; 27:19)), Thubal (Tubal), Mash-j (read Mash-kh, Meshech (Genesis 10:2; 1 Chronicles 1:15; 1:17; Ezekiel 27:13; 32:26; 38:2-3; 39:1)) and Tir-sh (Tiras (Genesis 10:2; 1 Chronicles 1:5)). Of the descendants of the last were the Turks and the Khazars (Ashkenaz). There is possibly an association here with the Turgesh, survivors of the West Turks, who were defeated by the Arabs in 119/737, (H.A.R. Gibb, Arab Conquests in Central Asia, London 1923, 83ff. Cf. Chapter IV, n. 96) and disappeared as a ruling group in the same century. Tabari says curiously that of the descendants of Mawgh-gh (Magog) were Yajuj and Majuj, adding that these are to the east of the Turks and Khazars. This information would invalidate Zeki Validi's attempt to identify Gog and Magog in the Arabic writers with the Norwegians. The name Mash-kh (Meshech) is regarded by him as probably a singular to the classical Massagetai (Massag-et). A Bashmakov emphasizes the connection of 'Meshech' with the Khazars, to establish his theory of the Khazars, not as Turks from inner Asia, but what he calls a Jephetic or Alarodian group from south of the Caucasus.

Evidently there is no stereotyped form of this legendary relationship of the Khazars to Japheth. The Taj-al-Artis says that according to some they are the descendants of Kash-h (? Mash-h or Mash-kh, for Meshech), son of Japheth, and according to others both the Khazars and the Saqalibah are sprung from Thubal (Tubal). Further, we read of Balanjar ibn-Japheth in ibn-al-Faqih and abu-al-Fida' as the founder of the town of Balanjar. Usage leads one to suppose that this is equivalent to giving Balanjar a separate racial identity. In historical times Balanjar was a well-known Khazar center, which is even mentioned by Masudi as their capital. It is hardly necessary to cite more of these Japheth stories. Their Jewish origin is priori obvious, and Poliak has drawn attention to one version of the division of the earth, where the Hebrew words for 'north' and 'south' actually appear in the Arabic text. The Iranian cycle of legend had a similar tradition, according to which the hero Afridun divided the earth among his sons, Tuj (sometimes Tur, the eponym of Turan), Salm, and Iraj. Here the Khazars appear with the Turks and the Chinese in the portion assigned to Tuj, the eldest son. Some of the stories connect the Khazars with Abraham. The tale of a meeting in Khurasan between the sons of Keturah (Genesis 25:1; 25:4; 1 Chronicles 1:32-33) and the Khazars (Ashkenaz Genesis 10:3) where the Khaqan is Khaqan is mentioned is quoted from the Sa'd and al-Tabari by Poliak. The tradition also appears in the Meshed manuscript of ibn-al-Faqih, apparently as part of the account of Tamim ibn-Babr's journey to the Uigurs, but it goes back to Hishim al-Kalbi. Zeki Validi is inclined to lay some stress on it as a real indication of the presence of the Khazars in this region at an early date. Al-Jahiz similarly refers to the legend of the sons of Abraham and Keturah settling in Khurasan but does not mention the Khazars. Al-Di-mashqi says that according to one tradition the Turks were the children of Abraham by Keturah, whose father belonged to the original Arab stock. Descendants of other sons of Abraham, namely the Soghdians and the Kirgiz, were also said to live beyond the Oxus..."[576]

Now let us turn our attention to a number of the positive aspects of Mr. Davidy's book. Actually, in its 480 pages, there is much confirmation of what both the British/Israel and Christian/Israel Identity movements have been teaching.

* On pages 79 & 80, he discusses the fact that there were two land regions known in ancient days as Cush/Ethiopia. Much confusion has resulted from the fact that many modern Bible students do not realize that Cush also referred to the area of modern Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan. This is especially important in recognizing the fact that Moses did not marry a Negro Cushite.

* On pages 98-102 Mr. Davidy notes the migrations of the Galatians (Gauls) were not only westward across Europe, but some contingents of them went back eastward to Asia Minor. Now you know to whom Paul was writing in his epistle to the Galatians. They were Israelites, of course. Mr. Davidy confirms that the Scandinavian gods, Odin and Thor, were in fact great war leaders of the Goths. The Greek god, Bacchus, was an historical personage who came from ancient Israel according to the author quoting the ancient Greco-Roman historian, Diodorus Siculus.

* Another interesting theory about which we would need further confirmation concerns Zoroaster: “Also at this time, in the region of Hara and Bactria (to where the northern House of Israel had been deported), there arose a religious reformer named Zarathustra (Zoroaster) whose original doctrine was monotheistic and even Biblical in character. After Zoroaster's death, his religion was paganized by the Median tribe of Magi, even though the original message had been Hebraic. (We can fully understand that as a possibility. Look at modern teachings of mainline Protestant denominations compared to the teachings of Luther, Calvin, Wesley, etc. Not much difference) Zoroaster, according to Iranian tradition had been taught by the prophet Jeremiah or by one of Jeremiah's pupils."

* ON several occasions, Mr. Davidy cites sources which showed ancient Chinese records as describing Israelite migrations as far east as northern China. The Danites, for example, were described as blond-haired, blue-eyed and fair-complected. Eventually, though, they reversed course and headed west.

* Another speculative possibility is that the land of Sinim referred to in Isaiah 49:12 is Australia! Bullinger's note suggests China, but that is only a guess on his part. China would not appear to fit the prophecy but Australia certainly would. Mr. Davidy notes that the Latin Vulgate Bible translates sinim as Australis. A Latin dictionary confirms that australis means southern. Australia, the great continent in the southern hemisphere is one of the desolate heritages which True Israel now possess. Mr. Davidy is also a breath of fresh air when it comes to countering the liberal, politically-correct nonsense floating about in recent years. He accurately avers on page 15: "The nations identified in this book as being of the Israelite-seed of Abraham were those who mainly conducted European colonialist policies from the eighteenth to twentieth centuries. The overall effects of colonialism, in most cases, were very beneficial, despite claims to the contrary. French, British, and Dutch colonialism put a stop to internecine warfare, ended human sacrifice and slavery, founded and/or improved irrigation systems, reformed agricultural practices and public hygiene, built bridges, roads, public words, and so on. Wherever they ruled the local population greatly increased in numbers, in health, and in respect for basic human dignity. The colonial powers also often (but not always) made large profits for their own citizens and helped themselves by exploiting opportunities for investment which the subject countries offered. This investment usually benefited all parties. This was part of the blessing of Abraham, the power was given and it was used of good, even though, more often than not, the initial conscious motivation in colonization was a lust for power and material gain. The overall effect was beneficial...Even today these people (Israelites) remain the only real morally motivated advancers of international justice in this world...Millions of people throughout the world (if not tens of millions) have not starved to death or massacred each other only because the 'Anglo-Saxon' nations saved them. The only real restraint on tyranny anywhere today is that exercised by these countries." (pp. 15, 345-355).

When embarking upon a study such as this, one will find that there are archeological discoveries that have been made which show a strong correlation to the Bible. For when people think of Israel in the Bible they assume that all the events which happened to Israel did so in the little country known as Palestine; today it is called Israel. And therefore the Israelites could not have been very important in the ancient world.

However, Daniel told us that knowledge would increase in the latter days: "But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased." [589]

Also, Daniel tells us that many things will be kept secret until the latter days: "And he said, Go thy way, Daniel: for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end." [590]

Many of these recent archeological discoveries combined with secular and Biblical history give us a shockingly different perspective of the ancient world in general and ancient Israel in particular. In this chapter we will attempt to show you evidence which will prove ancient Israel was an empire. It had a homeland in Palestine, and a far-flung empire much the same as Britain did until just a few decades ago. Britain once ruled over a far-flung empire from a small homeland, located in the British Isles.

In the years from about 1050-850 B.C. Israel was the dominant power of the world with an empire that rivaled and perhaps exceeded that of the Caesars. The empire included areas of the world now inhabited by the Israelite people and that included portions of North America. We full well understand this is a bold statement, but the evidence will follow. In this study we will examine the real extent of Israel's power and empire in the ancient world; the Israelite presence in North America with considerable specifics.

The impact of the drought of Elijah's day on the weakening of Israel and the rise of Cartage, which we will show was an Israelite colony. Cartage continued Israel's presence in the New World, very possibly even during Christ's lifetime here on earth.

The time of Israel's greatness really began with King David and its rise to empire status. This happened in about the year 1050 B.C. 2 Samuel 8 discusses David's defeat of the Philistines, Moab, Amalek, Edom, and the Syrians for example lost more than 80,000 men in just three battles.[591] That is more men than the United States lost in the 14 years of the Vietnam War. To give you a perspective of the ferocity of the battles.

1 Chronicles 21 shows that David could mobilize over 1½ million men. With an army of that size you are not insignificant, not even in this age, this day and time. In 1 Chronicles 18:3 it states the border of his dominion went to the Euphrates River which bordered the area of Assyria and Babylon; or Mesopotamia who viewed David as an upstart rival.

The Phoenicians were the city states of Tyre and Sidon, and had a far flung empire on land and sea. They were the best sailors in the ancient world at that time, and they saw the rise of David and Israel and made an alliance with them. They were a common race of Semitic people; they also had a common language. There are only dialectic differences between Hebrew and the Phoenician tongue. 1 Kings 17:9-16 relates where Elijah met with a Phoenician or Zidonan widow, and they had immediate discourse, with no difficulty at all in communication.

King Hiram the king of Tyre made David a palace and they became very close allies as 1 King 5:1 shows. The Israelite Phoenician alliance was an ancient super power, with all twelve tribes of Israel united they sat astride the area where three continents met; they had the world's greatest navy in the Phoenicians combined with David's one and one-half million man army. And David was not the least bit reluctant to use it. They were challenged by Assyria and Mesopotamia, which is almost totally unknown by most and yet it is related in the Bible. There was a revolt in Amon which is a pretext for war between many nations and the Israelites.

It is discussed in 1 Chronicles 19 and 20 in some detail. There were 32 thousands chariots from Mesopotamia alone [592] that came to fight David's army in this battle. There was also an unknown number of men from Mesopotamia and Syria which included a number of different people which fought with Ammon against Israel. In verse 9 we can see it was a national effort with a number of different nations to destroy Israel as it states their kings came to watch the battle. "And the children of Ammon came out, and put the battle in array before the gate of the city: and the kings that were come were by themselves in the field." [593] So, we can clearly see, this was not just a mercenary effort, this was a matter of national commitment against Israel. Israel won the first round and also the second which left them with no one in the area to challenge them.

If you will look at Psalm 83, which was likely written by David at this time where he lists many nations that come to help the children of Lot, which also included Ammon to destroy Israel from off the face of the earth. "Keep not thou silence, O God: hold not thy peace, and be not still, O God. For, lo, thine enemies make a tumult: and they that hate thee have lifted up the head. They have taken crafty counsel against thy people, and consulted against thy hidden ones. They have said, Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation; that the name of Israel may be no more in remembrance. For they have consulted together with one consent: they are confederate against thee: The tabernacles of Edom, and the Ishmaelites; of Moab, and the Hagarenes; Gebal, and Ammon, and Amalek; the Philistines with the inhabitants of Tyre; Assur also is joined with them: they have holpen the children of Lot. Selah. Do unto them as unto the Midianites; as to Sisera, as to Jabin, at the brook of Kison: Which perished at Endor: they became as dung for the earth. Make their nobles like Oreb, and like Zeeb: yea, all their princes as Zebah, and as Zalmunna: Who said, Let us take to ourselves the houses of God in possession. O my God, make them like a wheel; as the stubble before the wind. As the fire burneth a wood, and as the flame setteth the mountains on fire; So persecute them with thy tempest, and make them afraid with thy storm. Fill their faces with shame; that they may seek thy name, O Lord. Let them be confounded and troubled for ever; yea, let them be put to shame, and perish: That men may know that thou, whose name alone is JEHOVAH, art the most high over all the earth." [594]

Secular history has recorded that Assyria's Empire went into eclipse or confusion, some encyclopedias call it, between 1100-900 B.C. Halley's Bible Handbook comments on it also, and states that ancient Israel was much stronger than Assyria, Babylon or Egypt. This is the same period as Israel's golden age under David and Solomon. And is glossed over in almost all historical texts, if they even cover it at all.

What happened to Assyria? It was defeated badly in a war against Israel's army, as we learn from 1 Chronicles and Psalm 83. The texts of ancient history will not tell you this nor will it give great credibility as the Bible is the Word of God. Assyria and other nations had provoked Ammon to start this war, and this will give you a little indication of how large an area that David ruled. In Psalm 83 he named the nations that became a part of this war, which included Assyria and in all likelihood became a vassal state to David. It included the Ishmaelites, which included the Arabian Peninsula and people we don't know where they lived in the east, so we really don't know how large an are David actually ruled. But he did rule from Egypt to somewhere about the middle of the modern nation of Iran. Ether directly or through vassal states as a result of that war. But Israel was the dominant super power of the ancient world at this time.

Is there evidence of an Israelite Empire? The answer is Yes! But the secular historians will rarely call it an Israelite Empire, they will call it a Phoenician Empire. Most people who do not realize the difference between Judah and Israel balk at this major role for Israel because they think the Jews were the Israelites and the Jews have always been few in number, but they don't realize that the men from Judah were only a small part of David's army at this time. It is true that David was of the tribe of Judah but he, also, had eleven other tribes to provide manpower.

The Phoenician Empire is credited by historians as being dominant in the Mediterranean Sea; as being present in substantial numbers in the British Isles, the West Coast of Europe and Africa in the period of about 1100-800 B.C. and they are not at all bashful in calling it a Phoenician Empire. This coincides with the exact time that Assyria was put down and the Bible tells us that David had defeated the Assyrians. It coincides with Israel's greatness and the allegiance of the Phoenician city Israelites; show Phoenicia took pains to join with them because they did not wish to be their enemy.

1 Chronicles 22 relates that David accumulated for the Temple of God iron and brass beyond calculation.[595] Warrner Keller in his book "The Bible is History" states: "Israel was using the Bessemer system of smelting, which was nor re-discovered until recently in the modern era...Essian Gebar was the Pittsburgh of ancient Palestine." That nowhere else in the fertile crescent which includes Mesopotamia could such a large smelting facility be found. We see by this that Israel was not just an agriculture only nation but they were also the industrial power house of the ancient world.

Dr. Berry Fells book "Bronze Age America" cites evidence that ½ billions of copper ore was taken from mines near Lake Superior in North America, in roughly 2000-1000 B.C. The dates include the time of David's reign, at the tail end of it, as the ore apparently ran out for they have no evidence that it was mined after that. It could be that the Israelites simply worked the mines to death, or to where they could not be mined economically at that point. Which Fell states that this New World copper mine output there is no evidence what became of it. There is no evidence it was used in this hemisphere at all. And they have no idea where the copper came from which was smelted in Palestine during this time.

Putting this evidence together and one comes up with the assumption that this copper was shipped from North America to Palestine by boat and was used by Israel in its huge smelting facilities in Palestine. The Phoenician/Israelite presence in America has abundantly shown to be real.

At this point, we must, in all fairness, present just one of the many stories which abound which make reference to our Israel ancestors coming to America thousands of years before Columbus. The following is taken from an article in National Geographic, December 1977: "The New Word: Who, from the Old first touched its shore? Historians held for centuries that it was Christopher Columbus. By current consensus, it was Norse voyagers of a thousand years ago. But perhaps it was a group of shadowy, yet very real, Irish seafaring monks who predated even the Vikings by more than four centuries. In the great pantheon of New World explorers no name is more intriguing, or more clouded in controversy, than that of Ireland's St. Brendan. His legend, today more tantalizing than ever, has persisted through the centuries in the form of a Christians imram, an Irish saga: Navigatio Sancti Brendani Abbatis, Voyage of Saint Brendan the Abbot. With 17 fellow monks, it relates, Brendan sailed to Terra Repromissionis Sanctorum, the land promised to the Saints, somewhere beyond the far reaches of the Western Atlantic. Was the Promised Land North America? Did St. Brendan actually reach it in the sixth century? Neither history nor archeology offers proof." [596] This statement is totally untrue, and I believe the publishers of National Geographic knew it at the time of the publication.

Most of us have read (from reputable history books) of the adventures of Lief Eriksson and his party in the founding of Vinland circa A.D. 800-1400 in the area of the St. Lawrence River in the North-eastern United States and Canada. Although they predated the Columbus voyage by many centuries, were the expeditions of Lief Eriksson the first discovery of what is now known as the United States?

There were Christians living in America over 1000 years before Columbus arrived in the Caribbean. The official historians of this country have known this for many, many years. Yet, none of this is discussed as a national heritage. Why is this? Those of us who are interested in finding petroglyphs, or ancient symbols and pictures engraved on stones, have wondered about the meaning of them. All we could do was wonder and speculate until the science of deciphering ancient and unknown languages was developed. The science is called Epigraphics and it has been developed into a rather sophisticated science. Symbols, for example, mean something, but what?

Epigraphics. Until a few years ago geologists told us that the numerous short and repetitive lines inscribed on rocks found in the Northeastern United States and Canada were simply scratches made from the movement of ice and rocks during the recent ice-age. Because of Epigraphics, we now know that it was a language and it has been deciphered.

The Celts. This language is that of the Celts from Ireland, Scotland, England, France and the Rhineland country of Germany. The language dates from long before Christ and was in use in Ireland and England at the time of Celtic Druids. It is called Ogam script and has been found all over America, from the West Indies to Newfoundland and west into Oregon and British Columbia.

We know that Julius Caesar described the vessels that the Celts had built and used. In Book III of his De Bello Gallico he described these vessels against which his small, puny (by comparison), ships of the Roman fleet fought. He described them as being capable of sailing "upon the vast open sea."This is exactly what they did. It appears that there were many different expeditions and migrations by the Celts during the period of many centuries before Christ until circa 400-800 A.D. They came, not only just once to colonize, but they came and returned to Europe on a repetitive basis.

The Vikings. The Vikings were here in America when King Woden-lithi sailed the Atlantic seventeen centuries before Christ and entered the St. Lawrence River. He established a trading post at a site near where Toronto now stands. It became a religious and commercial center that is now known as Petroglyph Park at Peterborough, Canada. King Woden-lithi's home was in Norway. He remained in Canada for five months, from April to September and traded his woven fabrics for copper ingots obtained from the European settlers. He called these people Wal, which is a word cognate with Wales and Welsh. He gave these Celts his religious beliefs, the ability to measure woven cloth and an astronomical observatory for measuring the Nordic calendar and for determining the dates of the pagan Yale and Ishtar festivals. Remember, this was seventeen centuries (1700-years) before Christ!

Ogam Script. The Celts were already here when King Woden-lithi arrived. What was their written language like? We have already shown that they wrote with the Ogam script which can be described simply as an alphabet, comprising fifteen consonants and five vowels, together with a few other signs representing double letters such as diphthongs. The letters are made by inscribing single parallel strokes placed in sets of one to five, in position above, across, or below a guide line.

The Languages. But what words were made from this Ogam alphabet? Here again the science of Epigraphics gives us the answer. We know that there is no language of any of the American Indians that is made up of the Greek language. And yet the ancient Celts in the area of the St. Lawrence River spoke a language that was directly derived from the Greek! As we shall see, the different Celts in America spoke yet other languages! The type of Greek that was spoken by the Celts of the area is known as Ptolemaic which means that it is a dialect of Greek that was spoken in Egypt, Palestine and the other countries in the area that Alexander conquered.

Alexander forced upon the area his idea of one-world government, one-world people, one-world religion and one-world language. It was this Ptolemaic dialect that Alexander forced upon the citizens of the area. The dialect was composed of Greek, Egyptian and Aramaic. This is why Jesus spoke Aramaic and Greek, instead of Hebrew. We will study the effect that Alexander had on Israel and Christianity in a future lesson.

The obvious question from the previous paragraph is, who were the Celts? Did the Celts from Iberia (The Spanish Peninsula) and the Rhineland go to Egypt and Palestine and learn the Greek spoken language at the time of Alexander or did the Israelites (not Jews) learn the Greek and Aramaic when they were in Palestine and then go to the new world to escape the dictatorship of Alexander? Remember, Israel lost the knowledge of ancient Hebrew (not modern Yiddish) before and during the time of Alexander.

The language of the Celts who were already here in the St. Lawrence River Valley when King Woden-lithe arrived has since been lost. Why has the language disappeared? This is probably at least partly because through the subsequent years they intermixed with other peoples and in the process the language was lost.

It doesn't take much to lose a language. Notice the difference between American English and the English language spoken in England. But that doesn't account for the fact that a grace of people totally vanished from the continent. Some of the Ogam Script is with the Gaelic influence. The Gaelic language came from the highlands of Scotland. In the New England area, artifacts such as grave headstones have been found, all with Ogam script in Gaelic script. [597] The Celts with the Gaelic dialect came from the highlands of Scotland. According to the Scottish Declaration of Independence written by Robert Bruce and his noblemen, the Scotland people came from ancient Israel through the Rhineland area of France and Germany and then through Iberia or Spain.

The Mariners from Tarshish. Tarshish was thy merchant by reason of the multitude of all kind of riches; with silver, iron, tin, and lead, they traded in thy fairs.[598] The Celts were well established in foreign trade. In 1780, Ezra Stiles, who later became the president of Yale College, found and recorded a Tartessian inscription on a rock along the seashore near Mount Hope Bay, Rhode Island. The deeply cut inscription clearly shows the outline of a typical high-sterned ship from Tarshish. Under the outline of the ship are the words in Tartessian (Tarshish) Punic, "Mariners of Tarshish this rock proclaims." Near Union, New Hampshire, another Tartessian inscription was found with a similar Tarshish ship hull and the words, "Voyagers from Tarshish This Stone Proclaims."

On Mohegan Island, off the coast of Maine, is, in Ogam script in Gaelic dialect, an inscription showing that the Celts traded with the traders from Tarshish. It is obvious that the mariners from Tarshish were not residents of the area as were the Celts. They were trading with the Celts for their furs and raw materials from the mining done by the Celts. Thus, there was a lively trade being conducted between the Japhetic sons of Tarshish [599] and the Celtic sons of Shem.

Some of the trading was done with goods in exchange for the furs and metals of the Celts. But there was also an exchange for coins. It seems that modern historians won't believe the facts of history such as the Ogam inscriptions. They only like to see the money! Well, there is that, too!

Coins. From about the fourth century B.C. the ancient mariner traders brought coins in addition to goods. In the year 1787, Pastor Thaddeus Madson Harris came upon a group of men working on a road known as the Cambridge-Malden road (now Route 16) in Massachusetts. The workers had uncovered a flat stone underneath the surface. Under the stone was a cache of ancient coins, nearly two quarts of them. The coins were square pieces made of a copper-silver alloy. Each coin was stamped on both sides with an unknown script.

Pastor Harris recorded the incident in a letter to John Quincy Adams. The inscriptions were taken to the Harvard Library for translation but with no success. The letter was then buried in the archives for nearly two hundred years until James Whittall, of the Early Sites Research Society, re-discovered the letter with the inscriptions and researched them with the American Numismatic Society and with Epigraphic scientists.

The inscriptions proved to be that of Kufic origin which is a form of Arabic. Undoubtedly, one of the trading mariners brought the coins to America to purchase the Celtic goods which were for sale. After the newly designed steel plow was invented by Charles Newbold in 1797, the earth could be turned over to a much greater depth. The furrow that the plow made opened up the soil and there, by the thousands, were found Roman coins!

In days of early America, the extensive study of Latin and Roman history was required for a college degree. Thus, the people of America readily knew that Europeans came to America and lived in America much earlier than Christopher Columbus. But later, from American history books, our school children were taught the Columbus mystique and they were taught that the world was considered flat by all educated people until Columbus discovered America! All of those Roman coins that were discovered were ignored and it has remained that way until very recently. As we continue our studies, we will realize why the truth was buried.

In 1961, Frederick J. Pohl raised the nagging question of the Roman coins in his book Atlantic Crossings Before Columbus. He describes notable finds of Roman coins in the United States. Other scientists have carried on the task of proving the European travels to this continent long before Columbus. One of the notable men in this field is Professor Cyclone covey of Wake Forest University. Much will be discussed about his investigations later in this lesson. Roman coins are not the only money found in America. Carthaginian, Celto-Iberian, Greek, Libyan and Norse coins have been found in locations all over the United States.

Near Castle Gardens, Wyoming a petroglyph was found, written in Celto-Gaelic, describing the location of what would be the description of a bank. Yes, the petroglyph says that this was the first money-changing location to reach the area and that the bank operated with no usury! Undoubtedly, this was a location for exchanging the value of one coin for another for the purpose of trading and traveling. The petroglyph written in Celto-Gaelic undoubtedly means that the Celts were located in Wyoming and the fact that they operated in Wyoming and the fact that they operated with no usury is significant. We will shortly discuss the type of law the Celts exercised.

From 400 B.C. to 1100 A.D., the Western world realized six maritime powers. They all came out of the Mediterranean area except for the last one. They are, in order of their appearance, (1) the Carthaginians of Tunisia; (2) the Greeks and Libyans of North Africa; (3) the Romans; (4) the Byzantine Greeks who succeeded Rome; (5) the Islamic powers of North Africa and Asia; and (6) the Norse sea-rovers.

Although the Celts were never realized as a maritime power, since they were a people scattered over many countries, their ocean-going ships were among the best. These ships were huge in comparison to the Roman ships. They were two thousand tons in capacity as compared to about four hundred tons of the average Roman ship.

The ships that the uncle of Jesus, Joseph of Aramathea, used to haul lead and tin from the Glastonbury area of England for sale to the Romans were Celtic in design and operation. Again, Julius Caesar spoke very highly of the sea-going prowess of the Celts and their ships. Throughout this period, each of these maritime powers sent ships all over the high seas and to America.

But it was the Libyans who transcended all of the others in the span of their voyage. A Libyan, named Eratosthenes of Cyrene, accurately calculated the earth's circumference. He reasoned that the earth's oceans had to be continuous and consequently a ship could sail around the world in either direction and return to the starting point. The date was approximately 239 B.C.!

Eratosthenes developed the system of the meridian circles of the map of the globe. The meridian circles are simply the points on the globe where the USN is directly overhead at noon at the local time. He set these meridian circles in a grid in such a way that a mariner could accurately locate his position. He drew the primary meridian circle to pass through Alexandria.

The Libyans then set sail in their ocean-going vessels to prove that Eratosthenes was right. Their ships were equipped with magnetic compasses. Their compass consisted of a ceramic bowl with the compass points engraved around the edge. A lodestone (a strongly magnetic variety of the mineral magnetie) was floated on the water in the bowl.

Sometimes, a magnetized iron strip was suspended in the bowl. They also had a device for navigation that was the forerunner of the modern sextant. The Libyans traveled eastward, through the Suez Canal that King Darius had built, then sailed down the Red Sea, and then around the tip of India, through the Indonesian straits and then into the Pacific Ocean. They arrived on the West Coast of America, disembarked and traveled inland to Nevada. These ancient Libyans settled in the arid Nevada country because it was very similar to their own home country. In various locations in Nevada are petroglyphs, written in Aramaic-Libyan and Celto-Gaelic which reflect their mariner skills.

There is a map of North America, showing the outline of both coasts from the Hudson Bay country of Canada to Panama in the South. It was obviously taken from one of their meridian circle navigation charts that Eratosthenes developed. In addition, examples of their mathematics is displayed along with oceanography. Their alphabet was written in stone for us to see. Astronomy as a science is displayed. Remember, before the fall of the Roman Empire, the Center of Western Civilization rested along the shores of the Mediterranean Sea.

The modern day epigraphic scientists are puzzled as to what happened to all of these people, from the Celts, to the Carthaginians, to the Libyans and all the other original settlers who have come to this land. Certainly educated people in the sciences and mathematics lived here many years ago, that is now obvious. But when the American colonists arrived, the natives had no written language nor any knowledge of higher education.

For example, the Paiute and Shoshone tribesmen of Nevada were asked where all of the petroglyphs we now know to have been scribed by the Libyans came from, they could tell the archaeologists and epigraphists nothing except that neither they nor their forebears had cut them. However, some of the methods and style of living that were taught by these ancient settlers have come down through the centuries by the indigenous peoples who were here and then remained after the mysterious disappearance. For example, in the modern, Libyan North African region there are two Distinct ecological groups.

1). The first is the modern Berber who is of lighter skin with obvious and European features with many having blond hair and blue eyes. He prefers to live in the mountainous regions where there is more water and better soil. He is an agriculturist and he builds his home pueblo style out of sun-dried mud which he calls in Arabic attobi which in America is called adobe. Their buildings are multi-level with the floors and ceilings strengthened with wooden beams which project beyond the outer walls. His dress code calls for the women not to wear the face veil but to tattoo their chins. The men had the custom of covering their heads and faces with a scarf-like cloth, showing only their eyes to strangers. Even today, these modern Berbers still speak the Berber language which came to them from their Celto-Iberian background.

2). The second ecological group is the Arabs. They are nomadic, moving their herds from place to place in the lowlands. They live in tents. The women cover their heads with veils and are not tattooed. The men do not veil the face. Their language is Arabic.

In the Peabody Museum of Harvard University are ancient bowls made by these Libyan mariners who built their temporary colonies in the Southwestern United States. The bowls very clearly show a man and woman painted on the sides of each. The women have no veil but have their chins tattooed. The men have the Berber type of scarf covering their faces with only the eyes showing! Beyond a doubt, these people were a part of the Libyan expeditions into the Western United States. They, too, suddenly disappeared in the 10th to 12th century A.D., after having been here from about 500 B.C. All of these people abandoned their towns and simply vanished.

The ancient Berbers were of Celto-Iberian origin. They spoke a Gaelic Celto-Iberian language. When we again return to the Scottish Declaration of Independence and read that they travelled through Iberia (The Spanish Peninsula) on their way to Scotland and Ireland, it would account for the Celto-Iberian-Gaelic dialect. It is in this language that the great majority of the petroglyphs are written.

It is obvious that the Libyan Berbers associated with the Celts of the Eastern and Northern United States during the apex of their civilization here. It is apparent that they had a flourishing trade with their home countries of Europe. Not only did they travel to and from Europe on occasion in their own ships, they conducted commerce with the traders from Tarshish and Cartage.

Just as the Celts in the Glastonbury and Avalon areas of England mined for tin and lead and shipped the finished metal to Rome in Joseph of Aremathea's ships, the same Celts conducted mining operations in America and either sold or traded their metal with Europe. But it all vanished around the end of the first millennium A.D.

Christianity and the American Celts. When the first Celts arrived in America, they were as pagan as their brothers in Europe. Many of the earlier inscriptions in America depicted Baal worship and classical Phallic worship. Then, all of sudden, there came the appearance of Christian inscriptions.

In fact, whenever it was possible, the later Christian inscriptions were inscribed over the top of the earlier pagan writing. This was obvious to the epigraphic scientists because the later inscriptions were cut deeper and partially obliterated the earlier work. In Cripple Creek, Colorado there is a memorial in Greek that states, "Herein is the last resting place of Palladis (a priest), the servant of God."

At Oak Island, Nova Scotia is found an inscription in Libyan dialect of the North African Coptic Church, which states, "To escape contagion of plague and winter hardships, he is to pray for an end or mitigation, the arif: The people will perish in misery if they forget the Lord, alas.”[600]

Wherever Christianity has gone, the Laws of God have been adapted into the legal system of the community. The Christian Celts of Iberia, Ireland, Scotland as well as the Christian Celts of America had a legal system that reflected the teachings of the Christian Bible. The system was called the Tanistry which means the administration of law by deputies of the king. The system as it is preserved from ancient times is rather lengthy so here are just a few examples to show the influence of the Christian Bible:

1). "In the obscurity of the mists of olden time a desire would arise to replace armed combat by arbitration.”[601]

2). And it would seem a desirable thing that land boundaries should be fixed without recourse to moats.[602]

3). Henceforth cases involving wrongdoing are to be made over to the wisest men.[603]

5). Henceforth in any case involving false utterances let amends be paid in compensation for the harm.[604]

6). Henceforth if a complainant be merciful, let the judges also be merciful.[605]

7). If a malicious man utter lying words that another declares to be slanderous, to the measure of his tongue-loose recklessness shall he transport heavy burdens for the other man.[606]

8). The common people may eat corn, together with game bird but they may not hunt bears. They may kill stags, goats and red deer." [607]

There is much more to the Tanistry but this gives you information that the early Celts became Christian and this was imparted to those Celts living in the United States long before Columbus "discovered" America.

The Norsemen. The Columbus mystique has been so impressed on the American people that we are blinded to facts. Such again is the case of the colonists from Norway. When Thormod Torfason wrote his authenticated works titled Historia Vinlandae Antiquae in 1705, very few historians and other scholars knew anything of the many trips to America by the Norse mariners and colonists. For over two more centuries, nearly everyone continued to disbelieve Torfason's studies. The American's minds were made up, don't confuse us with facts! We will understand why we have been misled by the conclusion of the next lesson in history.

On May 24, 1934, a mining prospector named James Edward Dodd was blasting in the Great Lakes region of Canada and his dynamite uncovered a sword and a shield. These artifacts were taken to the royal Ontario Museum and they were accurately dated to the first quarter of the eleventh century, about 1025 A.D. It was at this time that Leif Eriksson began his first ventures to the land that he called Vinland. The name itself was given to the St. Lawrence River area because of the abundance of wild grapes that the Norsemen found to make a very good grade of wine. Because of the find of the sword and shield, along with much other evidence, we Americans began to believe that the Norsemen did, indeed, predate Columbus' discovery.

In the 1930's, we began to learn about the tremendous amount of European travel and commerce predating Eriksson by many centuries. Then in 1940, we were re-convinced that Eriksson didn't exist and that there was absolutely nobody who proceeded Columbus. Admiral Samuel Eliot Morison was an author who appeared to be "puffed" by the establishment. His style of writing was light and airy and he was very capable of mixing legends in with archaeological and historical facts in such a way that it became easy to question the technical analysis.

In 1940, from his Harvard position, he was adamant in his position that Columbus was the first and in 1942 he wrote Admiral of the Ocean Sea: A Life of Christopher Columbus to prove his point. By 1961 the Royal Ontario Museum was obliged to re-evaluate their analysis of the sword and shield by stating that it "was not possible to authenticate the story of the alleged discovery."

In Admiral Morison's book The European Discovery of America, he refutes the Vinland story by stating that nearly all of the seacoast towns from Newfoundland to the Virginia Capes boast in their histories that Lief Eriksson was there. But he says that there have been no artifacts to prove his presence. He states that the Newport stone tower which is cherished as the first Christian Church in America is a fake and that it was built around 1675 by a colonial governor of Rhode Island. Yet, in 1946 an authenticated inscription was found on one of the rocks of the tower. The inscription is in Nordic Runes and simply declares the lower to be the "cathedral church" and the "Bishop's Seat."

The Newport Tower is a part of the church that the Norsemen built in the early 1300's. To further authenticate this, the Italian explorer Giovanni de Verrazano in 1524 sailed up the East coast of the United States from Florida to labrador.

He rediscovered Long Island Sound and the Hudson River. He drew a map, which is officially shown in the Archives, of the Narragansett coast and in his writings he described the stone' built "Norman Villa." He went ashore and found friendly Indians who knew nothing of the building of the villa. Verrazano recognized it to be Norse because of the style of architecture and other evidence. An English document (of the period of the Pilgrims) proposed a settlement in Rhode Island. The document gave the location of the Norman Tower as the place where the settlement should be made.

In Rhode Island today, the local name for the tower is often given as "Governor Arnold's Mill," because the first governor made use of the tower as a flour mill. Here is an example of how a historian can take partial facts, along with legend, and make it fit the "politically correct thing to say." There is evidence now being discovered that shows the Norsemen to have sailed South, along the Eastern seashore, into the Gulf of Mexico and then up the Mississippi River.

Not only have Viking Battle Axes been found but more inscriptions to prove their presence. The Heavener runestone inscription in the Oklahoma State Park on Poteau Mountain has been definitely judged to be Nordic script of the Viking Age of not later than 1350 A.D. Viking inscriptions have also been found in Colorado. No longer can we deny the presence of the Norsemen in America several hundred years before Columbus.

We have left for last what is perhaps the most striking evidence of pre-Columbus Europeans in America. In the Southwestern part of the United States the climate is generally arid or semi-arid and the soil is more alkaline. As a result of these conditions artifacts, including human remains, are left intact for a very long time.

There is mounting evidence that Europeans, in significant numbers, colonized a portion of the Southwestern United States during the period from approximately 700 A.D. until about 1300 A.D. It is very significant that all of the colonies in North America, including this one under discussion, appeared to simply vanish within an approximate 100 year time frame. We may never know the exact reasons and there could have been several.

We know that the Europeans transmitted diseases that were specific to Europe to the indigenous natives who were vulnerable to them. Conversely, the natives gave the Europeans specific diseases to which they were vulnerable, such as some of the social diseases. Or, there could have very easily been a universal uprising and this is even probable. Whatever the reasons were, we must believe that the ventures did not please God. There had to be things that were done that were seriously breaking some of His Laws.

About 700 A.D. there appeared in the area of West Texas, New Mexico, Colorado, Arizona and Nevada, a literal empire apparently made up of a city-state system. The empire was Christian and they had succeeding kings. The people came from the British Isles, Gaul (France), Germany, Rome and apparently North Africa. Undoubtedly, the North Africans were the Berbers who had already arrived from Libya and had previously taught the natives to build the pueblo style structures and to irrigate for farming.

Some of the ancient ruins that were very skillfully built of stone masonry that are dotted over the Southwest are probably associated with the empire. Some of these ancient ruins have been rebuilt with later construction over the top of the original. The modern Amerindian knows nothing about the builders of these ancient cities. However, they have given a name to these earlier inhabitants. They call them the Hohokam, which means "Those who have gone" or "The old ones."

After the Spaniards occupied Mexico in the early 1500's, they headed north to investigate the persistent stories of the fabulously wealthy "Seven Cities of Cibola." Of course they never found them because the empire had simply vanished a couple of hundred years earlier. Even in 1300 A.D. the empire had already waned in its importance as a kingdom so there wasn't much left.

In New Mexico, south of Albuquerque and west of Los Lunas about 14 miles, is a huge Basalt (volcanic) boulder. The rock is nestled in a small draw on the side of a group of hills which overlooks the stream called Rio Puerco. The front side, protruding from the soil, is very flat and provides a perfect place for an inscription. On this boulder, inscribed in old Hebrew with a Greek influence, is the Decalog or The Ten Commandments!

As early as 1850, when New Mexico became a territory, people knew of the inscription but it was not until a century later when Professor Robert Pfeiffer of Harvard University, an authority on the Old Testament, determined it to be The Ten Commandments. The inscription was then re-authenticated as being The Ten Commandments by Dr. Barry Fell, the country's foremost epigraphic scientist.

The most revealing discoveries of this ancient kingdom came from the Tucson, Arizona area. Along the Santa Cruz River, in the vicinity of Tucson, beneath six or more feet of undisturbed cliché soil, were found many artifacts that unquestionably prove that European people lived in the area. Cliché soil is made up of crusted calcium carbonate mixed with ordinary dirt.

Through many years, water mixes with the combination and turns it into a very hard, concrete like, soil. After it is once formed, if it is then removed, the soil never returns to the original configuration. Thus, when the artifacts were found, it is certain that they are of ancient origin and not a recent fraud.

The artifacts included lead swords, spears, a patriarchal monstrance or shrine used in the religious ceremonies, and eight heavy crosses. All of the artifacts were made of molded lead which was mined in the area. This is known because some of the molds were also found. Each of the crosses was actually two thin lead crosses which were riveted together with lead rivets. When the two halves were separated, it was found that the inner sides were protected with wax in order to preserve the inscriptions which were on the inside parts.

It became obvious that the crosses were made for the purpose of a permanent recording of events that were taking place at the time. The swords were not to be used for combat. They were made of lead and also contained inscriptions. They were for ceremonies of some sort. The inscriptions contained words in Hebrew, Latin and Greek. Following are some of the translations: On one of the crosses, at the top are the words "In Memoriam."

On the cross arm at the left is a profile of a head with the words "Britain, Albion, Jacob." In the center is another head profile with the words "Romans, Actim, Theodore." On the right is another head profile with the words "Gaul, Seine, Israel."On the vertical beam of the lead cross is this inscription. "Counsels of great cities together with seven hundred soldiers A.D. 800, Jan. 1." "We are borne over the sea to Calalus, an unknown land where Toltezus Silvanus ruled far and wide over a people. Theodore transferred his troops to the foot of the city Rhoda and more than seven hundred were captured. No gold is taken away. Theodore, a man of great courage, rules for fourteen years. Jacob rules for six. With the help of God, nothing has to be feared. In the name of Israel, OL."

The inscriptions on these artifacts is a sort of history of one of the city-states of the European migration to this country. The first inscription reveals that Theodore was the ruling king over the city-state of Rhoda. The Toltecs (which history shows existed in Mexico in this time frame) were under Chief Toltezus Silvanus who ruled over a very large area and people.

Theodore was a Roman and he moved his troops to the foot or outskirts of the city Rhoda for defense against the Toltecs. Apparently the troops could not hold against the Toltecs and 700 troops were captured but the Toltecs did not take any gold. Theodore must have been killed in that battle.

The second cross has the following inscription which, of course, has been translated from the Latin and Greek. "Jacob renews the city. With God's help Jacob rules with mighty hand in the manner of his ancestors. Sing to the Lord. May his fame live forever. OL."Jacob a native of Britain and he succeeded Theodore for six years while counterattacking the enemy. He personally fought at the font lines and it appears that he died in battle.

The third cross yielded this inscription. “From the egg (the beginning) A.D. 700 to A.D. 900. Nothing but the cross. While the war was raging, Israel died. Pray for the soul of Israel. May the earth lie light on thee. He adds glory to ancestral glory. Israel, defender of the faith. Israel reigns sixty-seven years."Israel I was born on the Seine River in France and must have been just a boy when he assumed the throne in 785. These dates are known because of other inscriptions but there are too many of them to include here.

The year 790 under Israel I's reign was important because of his decisive victory over the Toltecs. He subjugated them to be under his rule. On January 1, 800 he presided over a council of allied city-states. Because of the present peace, he turned his attention tot he priesthood.

The next inscription. "Israel II rules for six. Israel III was twenty-six years old when he began to rule. Internecine war. To conquer or die. He flourishes in ancestral honor day by day."

The next inscription. "A.D. 880. Israel III, for liberating the Toltezus, was banished. He was first to break the custom. The earth shook. Fear overwhelmed the hearts of men in the third year after he had fled. They betook themselves into the city and kept themselves within their walls. A dead man thou shall neither bury nor burn in the city. Before the city a plain was extending. Hills rung the city. It is a hundred years since Jacob was king. Jacob stationed himself in the front line. He anticipated everything. He fought much himself. Often smote the enemy. Israel turned his attention to the appointment of priests. We have life, a people widely ruling. OL."

The next inscription. "A.D. 895. An unknown land. Would that I might accomplish my task to serve the king. It is uncertain how long life will continue. There are many things which can be said while the war rages. Three thousand were killed. The leader with his principal men are captured. Nothing but peace was sought. God ordains all things. OL."

The author of the book Calalus is a history professor at Wake Forest University. He mistakenly describes the people of Rhoda as Roman Jews. This is undoubtedly because of the names of the individuals. But again, Dr. Berry Fell, the nation's foremost expert epigraphist shows them to be Christians from England, France, Rome and North Africa.

The crosses would have been unacceptable if they were Jews. The use of the chronological term A.D., which was started by Dionesius in 532 A.D., would certainly have been unacceptable to the Jews. To this day they term the present chronological time the "Christian Era" instead of A.D.

The Toltecs went on to totally destroy these people. Why didn't these European Christians survive? Why did all of the other Europeans mysteriously vanish with the last of them having been gone since the 1300's? It was for several reasons, all of which are distasteful to God for His Celto-Saxon people. The Apostle Paul summed it all up when he said: "Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you." [608]

For one thing, they had to interbreed themselves out of existence, at least in part. They also apparently came for the riches of gold and silver. In nearly all cases, there appears to be mining as a principle purpose for being here. They also apparently tried to subdue the native population. In other words, use them as slave or cheap labor.

If we will look back into history, all of the great civilizations of the Celto-Saxons fell when they brought in cheap labor or slaves and then mixed with them. The process destroys both cultures. If we will but look at our own history we will see a lesson. That part of our culture that came from the Pilgrims and then moved westward as the needs required used their own labor. They had large families and the children worked in their enterprises, be it farming or a shop in town. They remained separated from other peoples and they were told in their churches that gold would be used for street paving in the future! As long as our forefathers stayed separate, feared God, loved their neighbor as themselves and did not love mammon more than their gifts form God, they were a peculiar people to Him. Look around us in modern America and what we see speaks for itself. But it is not too late. It is not too late. Not yet. [609]

Now back to where we left off in our story, as related in National Geographics. "Early mapmakers and explorers gave credence to the legend. Place-names from the Navigatio appear on later charts, and early navigators sought vainly for 'St. Brendan's Isle.' Fact or fantasy, the Navigatio had incalculable impact on the great European voyages of discovery, including that of Columbus.

According to the legend, St. Brendan and his fellow monks set sail from Ireland in a leather-hulled curragh; this same type of boat, now covered with tarred canvas, is still used by Irish fishermen. The voyage lasted seven years and introduced the monks to such wonders as demons who hurled fire at them, a floating crystal column, and a sea creature as great as an island. Scholars wonder today: Mighty they have been volcanic eruptions...an iceberg...a whale? Finally, Brendan and his shipmates reached the Promised Land, a huge, lush island divided by a mighty river.

Soon afterward they sailed home to Ireland, where Brendan died. There the legend of St. Brendan ends, to be given new vitality in the 1970's by a real-life sequel. In the following article, British author and explorer Timothy Severin recounts his epic Atlantic crossing aboard a leather boat. In proving that such a long-ago voyage could have been made, Tim Severin and his crew have brought one of history's most intriguing takes a giant step closer to the realm of possibility. -- THE EDITOR." [610]

When David died as the world emperor, he was ruling over the Mediterranean Sea in conjunction with the Phoenicians; he ruled over conquered territory from Egypt somewhere in the interior of Asia. And Israelites were present in Britain and America. During the reign of King Solomon he inherited a huge domain, great power and he devoted himself to wisdom and good rule during the first part of his reign.

1 Kings 4:20-25 related that Israel dwelt safely all the days of Solomon, indeed, how could they not, there was no one left in that area to challenge them. 1 Kings 5:12 show King Hiram and the Phoenicians were allied to Israel. "And the Lord gave Solomon wisdom, as he promised him: and there was peace between Hiram and Solomon; and they two made a league together."

1 Kings 4:31-34 makes some statements which the world's historians hate. It states that Solomons' wisdom was known to all the nations of the earth. "For he was wiser than all men; than Ethan the Ezrahite, and Heman, and Chalcol, and Darda, the sons of Mahol: and his fame was in all nations round about. And he spake three thousand proverbs: and his songs were a thousand and five. And he spake of trees, from the cedar tree that is in Lebanon even unto the hyssop that springeth out of the wall: he spake also of beasts, and of fowl, and of creeping things, and of fishes. And there came of all people to hear the wisdom of Solomon, from all kings of the earth, which had heard of his wisdom."

2 Chronicles states all the kings of the earth sought the presence of Solomon and brought their tributes year by year and presents to hear his wisdom. "And all the drinking vessels of king Solomon were of gold, and all the vessels of the house of the forest of Lebanon were of pure gold: none were of silver; it was not any thing accounted of in the days of Solomon. For the king's ships went to Tarshish with the servants of Huram: every three years once came the ships of Tarshish bringing gold, and silver, ivory, and apes, and peacocks. And king Solomon passed all the kings of the earth in riches and wisdom. And all the kings of the earth sought the presence of Solomon, to hear his wisdom, that God had put in his heart." [611]

Is this just some imagination exaggeration of some Hebrew writer? He couldn't actually mean it could he? Well 2 Chronicles 8, 18:9-10 and 1 Kings 9 also show that Israel and Phoenicia joined their navies into one navy, and it mentions they mingled the crews on the same ship.

Berry Falls book "America B.C." has some remarkable revelations of the real extent of just how much the Israelites and the Phoenician alliance was in the area which consists of the United States today. He states in his book "America B.C." that the Phoenicians had a regular port of call of the coast of Maine. Where an old inscription was found which he translates: "Ships of Phoenicia cargo platform." Fell states: "It is obvious that the flat topped island would not have been set aside for the loading and unloading of Phoenician ships were they not regular visitors to America, with a predictable time table of ports of arrival and departure and expected dates."

He adds: "These inscriptions suggest that international maritime commerce was well established in what he calls the late bronze age. That North American ports were listed on a sailing timetable of the overseas vessels of the principle Phoenician shipping companies. And that the same information was circulated to customers in America."

This, along with the above information, gives us an entirely different perspective on just how wide spread was international commerce in the ancient world, and just how intelligent these people were. These people were not cavemen or Neanderthals or some people evolutionary revolving from some primitive background, they were intelligent. How permanent were these settlements in the new world? The book "America B.C." also shows the evidence that the Phoenicians had a twenty acre temple site to Baal and pagan deities in New Hampshire. This is not the evidence of people who were just coming for just a few years to trade with the Indians and go. They had very substantial settlements here. Israel, as we know, quickly joined itself to the Baal worship of the Phoenicians, so it is not surprising that the Baal worship was dominating the old world colonies of the Israelites and the Phoenicians.

There were, also, worshipers of the True God of Israel were present in the new world. In "Saga America" another book by Berry Fell in two issues of the occasional publications of the Uppergrafic Society of which he was president, showed that the Ten Commandments were written in the ancient Hebrew and they were carved into the rock in New Mexico, as we have shown above.

A tablet which contained the Ten Commandments was also found in Ohio; this was found in 1860 at the opening of the Civil War or it very likely would have gotten much more attention. So, obviously, there were Israelites who were serving the True God in America. How many is very difficult to guess, since the worshipers of the True God did not build pagan temples or leave monuments to the pagan gods, as the Phoenicians did.

Soon after Solomon became king, Egypt joined the Israelites Phoenician alliance, which is discussed in 1 Kings 3:1. "And Solomon made affinity with Pharaoh king of Egypt, and took Pharaoh's daughter, and brought her into the city of David, until he had made an end of building his own house, and the house of the Lord, and the wall of Jerusalem round about."

The Pharaoh of Egypt conquered a city it states: "For Pharaoh king of Egypt had gone up, and taken Gezer, and burnt it with fire, and slain the Canaanites that dwelt in the city, and given it for a present unto his daughter, Solomon's wife." [612] Which was dowry for his daughter who was Solomon and was apparently his first wife.

So, we can see that both King Hiram and Egypt's Pharaoh took the classic action of lesser powers toward a greater power, initiating the efforts to try to bind themselves to a superior power. Egypt's sailors were a fair skinned group of maritime people who settled in the area of ancient Lybia. This is covered in "America B.C." and "Bronze Age America" where he goes into the classical writers, and it is not his own idea.

There is evidence of ancient Egyptians found in Maine, they were known as the Knickknack Indians which Dr. McDonald states was the Algonquian or Iroquois Race. There have also been Egyptian hieroglyphics found on Long Island. While the ancient Libyan language of their sailors has been found in Quebec, Canada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Oklahoma, California, Texas and New York.

This may sound like a roll call for a lot of people in these areas but we highly recommend these books so that you can see for yourself. There are other states where a person by the name of Gloria Sally has found evidence of inscriptions left by the Celts, the Libyans and the Phoenicians who ascended the Mississippi, Cimmeron and Arkansas Rivers.

The Bible does tell us that the Israelites, Phoenicians and the Egyptians were allied in the first millennium B.C. so we should not be shocked to find that these groups were the ones found in the North American Continent. Is it any coincidence that the Archeological discoveries of America's past have shown these three groups were working together and exploring what has become the territory called the United States?

There is a smoking gun to show that these groups were working together, the new world equivalent of the Rosette Stone has been sitting, largely unappreciated in a Davenport, Iowa museum. Its a trilingual parallel ancient inscription recording a pagan ceremony which looked very much like a May Pole or May Day celebration. It had joint inscriptions of Egyptian hieroglyphics, the ancient Libyan, which was the language of their sailors and what is now called an Iberian Tunic. This is a language which was descended from the Hebrew Phoenicians.

It was found in 1874; so it was not found just yesterday, it has been here and ignored for a long time. But it proves these groups were working together in the new world and it was in inscriptions that could be understood by anyone in those three groups of people.

Another artifact found in Oklahoma refers to the Phoenician god Baal and the Egyptian god Ra, and is dated by Fells to be about 800 B.C. Comment has to be made on the closeness of the Israelite Hebrew and the Phoenician language of Tyre and Sidon to show that the Phoenician inscriptions are also Hebrew or Israelite.

George Wellington a famous British historian of the late 1800s comments in his book "Phoenicia:" "The words most commonly in use, particles, the pronoun, the forms of the verb, the principle inflections and we may add the numerals in Phoenician are identical or near identical to the pure Hebrew. Many other sources comment on the similarity as well; and many sources reflect that the English language came from the Hebrew."

In the book "Short History of the Near East" by Philip Piffy, he states: "The Phoenician trade on an international scale on textiles, metals, glass, pottery and etc., gave the country three centuries, beginning around 1000 B.C. a prosperity unmatched in its history."

Now the world recognizes the Phoenicians had an empire at that time, but they do not wish to acknowledge that in 1000 B.C. which was the time that David and Solomon rose to power and three centuries later when the Phoenician power seem to disappear was when the Israelites left the area of Palestine. The Phoenicians did not have them around to be allied to.

Ecclesiastes Two mentions that Solomon collected the best that the world had to offer in architecture, music, art, etc., and there was no bounds to his wisdom. The Bible says that God had given him a heart as big as a sea-shore. It also states that the kings when they brought their gifts to Solomon year by year, included animals, gold, silver, many types products and artwork. Which very likely occurred during the feast of tabernacles, which Israel was keeping at that time.

There were several types of the millennium that parallel the prophecies at that time. For the world was at peace during the time that Solomon was a righteous king living by God's Laws. He was a peaceful king of kings, living in Jerusalem, and the rest of the world was flowing to Israel; he was preceded by an era of great wars, just like the millennium will be, when he and David his father put down many enemies.

So we can see that Solomon ruled an area greater than the Caesars of Rome. The Mediterranean was an Israelites lake; it was ruled by Israel and its allies the Phoenicians and Egyptians; he was in charge of the Mid-East and the Mesopotamians were ruled by Israel; but we don't know how far that went into Asia; Egypt was his ally and he had extensive presence in the new world; America was extensively explored and colonized.

Historians also record that Cadez, a city in Spain that is called Cadez now, was founded by the Phoenicians about 1000 B.C., which, again, was during the reign of David and Solomon. When on looks at the historic records of the Phoenicians the period of 1000 B.C. is very common when they mark their ascension to greatness, which the Bible also identifies as the time when David and Solomon began their golden age.

Early British historians record that the Phoenicians were heavily involved in colonizing and mining in the British Isles. In Raymond Capt's book "The Traditions of Glastenbury" mentions some of the early historical accounts of the Tribe of Asher of Israel overseeing the mining operations in Britain. Now when Israel split into Israel and Judah this alliance weakened. Wars were fought between the Israelites and the Judeans, and yes at times they were allied. But Israel went very deep into the Baal worship of Phoenicia and around 870-850 B.C. Israel was ruled by King Ahab, who was married to a Phoenician princess by the name of Jezebel from the city state of Sidon. Which shows that the Phoenician/Israelites alliance was still followed.

When God sent a prophet name Elijah in the middle of the ninth century B.C. Israel's King Ahab had gotten to a point where he was so evil that Elijah had prayed for a drought on the land of Israel. James 5 shows that it lasted 3½ years. "Elias (Elijah) was a man subject to like passions as we are, and he prayed earnestly that it might not rain: and it rained not on the earth by the space of three years and six months." [613]

1 Kings 17 and 18 show that the drought was so severe that the creeks dried up, and there was no vegetation was left for the animals. Starvation was prevalent in both Israel and the Phoenician city states as we can see from the example of Elijah when he was sent to the home of the Sidonian widow. 1 Kings 18 states that King Ahab had searched for Elijah in all the nations. "As the Lord thy God liveth, there is no nation or kingdom, whither my lord hath not sent to seek thee: and when they said, He is not there; he took an oath of the kingdom and nation, that they found thee not." [614]

Now that we know those international maritime routes included the area now known as the United States in the new world, that takes on new meaning as it was not just in the mid-east where the search took place. For Israel was still among the great nations of the earth with a large population. During this drought, they had one choice, they could either stay and starve or they could migrate elsewhere and live.

Now Israel had a colonial empire that was quite large, and they had many places to go. However, when one has women and children you do not want to put them on a boat and cross the ocean to America, or Great Britain or even to Spain, you wanted to take them somewhere as close to home as possible, to avoid the rigors of distant travel, yet was away from the drought.

History records that Cartage was founded by the Phoenicians in the middle of the 9th century B.C. Which coincides, roughly with the same time that Israel was experiencing its drought.

Alfred Church's book called "Cartage" written in 1890 shows that the name Cartage was the Roman name for the city but that is not the name the Carthagenians called themselves. They called the city, according to Alfred Church's book, the Carthegians called themselves Cherjaf-habashaf, which Hebrew meaning "new town." A very appropriate name for a new colony, which was being started. Now several historians of Cartage records the magistrates were called the Saphetes by the Romans, but again, that is not the name they called their own magistrates.

In the Carthagenian language when looking at their artifacts, they called them the Shepheta, which is also Hebrew for the word judges. The name of one of the Books of the Bible - Judges. One of their early kings was named Marcus, a Hebrew name, still present during the time of Christ, when the High Priests servant was named Marcus. Remember, he's the one who had his ear cut off, when Peter tried to cut off his head but got his ear instead. Also they had a reference to the Hebrew El, which is depicted in Carthagian artifacts as sitting between the Cherubims.

In the book "Daily Life in Cartage" it states the priestly laws of Cartage was: "A very significant resemblance to the Book of Leviticus, and many of the sacrifices corresponded exactly to those of the Hebrews." Many historians have noticed the similarity of the Carthagenians or as the Romans called it the Tunic tongue, to Hebrew. As late as the fourth century A.D., which was many centuries after Cartage fell, remnants of the Tunic culture were recognized by early church writers such as St. Augustine and St. Jerome as having their roots in the Hebrew language.

The Encyclopedia Judicia, when it talks about the fall of Samaria, to the Assyrians it mentions that the Africans, which was their word for the Carthagenans contested with the Jews over the rights of Arab/Israel, or the land of Israel.

Now this would make no sense at all if Cartage did not consist of the descendent of the Tribes of Israel. Who had gone into captivity, or had left that area. But they clearly recognized that the land of Palestine was a cultural heritage to the people of Cartage, since they claimed that land as their own at that time.

Cartage became very powerful in the middle of the first millennium B.C. In their early days they were much stronger than Rome and imposed a treaty on Rome, which basically forbade them from sailing in the Western Mediterranean and telling them where they could sail their ships.

They were the enemies of Greece and Rome, they kept them out of the Atlantic Ocean with the Carthagenian Navy. But the Greeks did record some information about what Cartage had found in their Atlantic voyages. And a lot of this will probably be quite new to you. The Greeks records: "In the sea outside the pillars of Hercules, that's Gibraltar, an island was found by the Carthagians, a wilderness having wood of all kinds, and navigatable rivers; remarkable for various kinds of fruit, many sailing distance day away. When the Carthagenians, who were the masters of the western ocean, observed that many traitors and other men were attracted by the fertility of the soil and the pleasant climate, they frequented it. And some resided there. They feared that knowledge of the land would reach other nations."

You can check the historical accounts and see that Cartage at that point became very protective of what was going on west of the Atlantic Ocean, and did not allow the sailors of other nations past Gibraltar.

A Greek, in the first century by the name of Diatrous, wrote: "Over against Africa, on the other side of Africa lies a very great island in the vast ocean. Many days sail westward of Libya or from Libya westward, the soil is very fruitful, a great part is mountainous and much likewise is a plane. It has several navagatable rivers, it has very large woods, fresh water and all sorts of wild beasts to hunt."

If one will take a globe of the earth and go westward from Libya to that part of the globe, you will come right into the heartland of what is now called the United States. This land was obviously America; and it stayed in the hands of the Israelite Carthageians for many many years after Cartage fell. It was the secret of Cartage's wealth, and Cartage is acknowledged as a very wealthy city at that time. In giving America's land to the Carthagians God was passing on to them the promises to Abraham's seed. Also they inherited the promise of possessing the gates of their enemies. And they held a lock-hold on Gibraltar during much of this time.

Heroticus a Greek historian records that, "the Carthagenians sent an expedition westward from Gibraltar, which included 30,000 men and women, sixty ships, in a time frame of 500-480 B.C. that was when Cartage was much stronger. Westward through the pillars of Hercules to a destination he did not know." Think for a moment, 30,000 men and women; that's a colonizing expedition, in 60 ships: by doing a little math that is 500 people per ship. Which will give you an idea of the size of the vessel, which even the Greeks acknowledge the Carthagenians were sailing. This also gives us an idea of the size of the ships the Phoenicians and Israelites had during the reign of David and Solomon's time.

Carthagian coins and artifacts have been found in North America, which is a story that is basically not told anywhere. It is in Berry Fells book, but the typical academic writers do not want to really deal with what he has discovered. These coins have been found in Colorado, New York, Alabama, Connecticut and Nevada. You can even take some of the Carthagenan inscriptions which Fell discusses in his book; you can get a Hebrew Lexicon out of your Concordance and you can come to the exact same translation that Fell does by using those Hebrew Lexicons.

Most people do not realize this because history has been taught from the Greco-Roman perspective but America was long known about, in ancient history. And that Cartage was Israelite in it inception.

However, in later years they became a pyelograph people, they became very degenerate. How long they had worshipers of the True God we do not know. But they became extremely evil; indulging in child sacrifice, mass sacrifices of human beings - they became extremely violent.

When Rome in the second Tunic war, finally won that war it was actually God's judgment against Cartage and its Israelite people as punishment for their sins. But even in that second Tunic War Cartage came very close to exterminating Rome from off the face of the earth.

When Hannibal, who was named after Baal, took an army into the Italian area and was therefore years waging war against the Romans, conquering city after city trying to start a revolt but they were not blessed with victory.

Cartage fell in the middle of the 2nd century B.C., where did its people go? Since some of the historians talk about the population of Cartage being some 600,000, it also relates that only a few thousand stayed to fight the Romans to the bitter end. Some of them probably sought a new life in Cartage's secret territories in America. For America has been a land of refuge for a long time before the Pilgrims came. These people which came at that time, were Baal worshipers as the remains in America shows. They had gotten degenerate also, and likely died out in wars, intermarriage with the Indians and possibly from VD from their wild sexual practices; which their monuments testify to. The Carthagenian Israelites in their empire had Southern Spain including the area of Gibraltar, parts of West Africa, and America in their domain. They traded exclusively in the British Isles.

The book "Judah's Scepter and Joseph's Birthright," goes into the story of how Dan and Simeon arrived in Wales and Ireland. The Carthagenians traded extensively with these people, but there is no evidence that those areas were part of Cartage Empire, they were only mercantile contacts.

Let's repeat, America was given to the Israelites by God in the 1600 and 1700s as the British and European Israelite settlers came again. Historians ignore this part of history because it proves their ideas of evolution as a bunch of bologna. Now, with these historic data before us, let's return to E.P. Ingersolls' presentation. It is strange that Dan and Simeon, having been left by Shalmaneser, undisturbed in their own lot, yet cut off from all connection with the Kingdom of Israel, to which they belonged, from which they were now separated eternally, so far as they knew, that they should flee to some far-distant land beyond the reach of their oppressors, where thy might form for themselves a kingdom of their own, beyond all fear, and beyond for all knowledge of their enemies?

Digressing a little here, we will demonstrate from the Scriptures that God had foretold this happening, and that Israel would travel to the isles of the sea, which would, also included America because it would have been considered an isle at that time in history. "Keep silence before me, O islands; and let the people renew their strength: let them come near; then let them speak: let us come near together to judgment." [615]; "Listen, O isles, unto me; and hearken, ye people, from far; The Lord hath called me from the womb; from the bowels of my mother hath he made mention of my name. And he hath made my mouth like a sharp sword; in the shadow of his hand hath he hid me, and made me a polished shaft; in his quiver hath he hid me; And said unto me, Thou art my servant, O Israel, in whom I will be glorified." [616]; "My righteousness is near; my salvation is gone forth, and mine arms shall judge the people; the isles shall wait upon me, and on mine arm shall they trust." [617]; "Surely the isles shall wait for me, and the ships of Tarshish first, to bring thy sons from far, their silver and their gold with them, unto the name of the Lord thy God, and to the Holy One of Israel, because he hath glorified thee." [618]; "And I will set a sign among them, and I will send those that escape of them unto the nations, to Tarshish, Pul, and Lud, that draw the bow, to Tubal, and Javan, to the isles afar off, that have not heard my fame, neither have seen my glory [619]; and they shall declare my glory among the Gentiles." [620]; "Hear the word of the Lord, O ye nations, and declare it in the isles afar off, and say, He that scattered Israel will gather him, and keep him, as a shepherd doth his flock." [621]; "The men of Dedan (Tribe of Dan) were thy merchants; many isles were the merchandise of thine hand: they brought thee for a present horns of ivory and ebony." [622]

Returning to E.P. Ingersoll: Accordingly, we find this the very resolution they adopted. Having been long acquainted with the (to them) far-western lands, and having ships of their own, it is found that, having embarked with whatever of their effects they could carry, they set sail, (about 720 B.C.) and going westward,[623] by the way of Tarshish, now Tartessus; thence through the straits of Hercules, and around the great Atlantic, northward.

What their ultimate destination was is not known (not known to Mr. Ingersoll, but as we have demonstrated above, it has been since been discovered what their destination was), but being far out at sea, they were driven by a storm far to the north, and landed somewhere upon the coast of Norway. But here they did not remain; sailing away from here, they directed their course south towards the sun, and finally landed on the northern coast of Ireland; where Dan made his camp, placing Simeon, the meantime, directly over on the coast of Scotland, where it is said he remained a while, and then migrated down south into Wales, where he is today. But Dan established himself permanently, in the north of Ireland, where we shall find him hereafter, with a regularly organized government.

The Other Dan: It has been stated that the colony of Dan, which settled in the extreme north of Canaan, was carried off by Shalmaneser, with the rest of his brethren. What now shall he do? It would seem that the perpetual separation from the parental stock of his own tribe was far from agreeable to him. What shall he do, therefore? Whether he may have learned of Dan's and Simeon's escape to the islands for west, is not known.

But Dan being naturally a kind of pioneer, soon starts off in his wanderings to find his brother Dan, yet not knowing whiter he should direct his course; but some unseen guide points his way westward. On and on he goes, following his unknown guide, yet leaving his track behind him, and that, too, so permanent that it is seen today bearing his own name. This is found at his encampments, in crossing rivers, and in his final resting place. His first course, located as he was between the Caspian and Black seas, was northward, for if he went south of the Baltic Sea he would expose himself to the Assyrians, and thus his flight be cut off. To the north, then he goes, and the first river he crossed he gave his own name, Dan (now the Don). The next he called Daniester (now Dniester).

The next he crossed he named Danieper (now Dnieper). The next great river was Danube which name the philologists tell us means "the settlements of Dan." Here he seems to have made a longer tarry than at any former encampment. But that unseen hand still beckoned him onward, for this was not his rest. On he goes, therefore, up the Danube, making no known settlement till he reaches the very source of the great river.

Here, it is said, he made a circuit in search of a place to rest, but finding none, he was led by the same unseen Guide northward, whither he directed his steps, wandering hither and thither like Israel of old in the wilderness, till finally his Guide marked his camping ground in Danemarsch (Denmark). Here Dan fixed his camp, from which he spread out into Holland, into Norway and Sweden, peopling all that country by the help of some other tribes, which came hence afterwards.

In reviewing the ground now gone over we find that Dan and Simeon have both been located, Simeon in Wales, where he made his permanent abode, and Dan, the elder, on the north coast of Ireland, while Dan, the younger, is fixed in Denmark.

Jeremiah's Flight To Ireland:"See I have this day set thee over the nations and over the kingdoms, to pluck up and to break down, to destroy and to overthrow; to build up and the plant." [624]

Again: "Thus saith the Lord God; I will also take of the highest branch of the high cedar, and will set it; I will crop off from the top of his young twigs a tender one, and will plant it upon an high mountain and eminent." [625] These passages of Scripture are believed to teach what Jeremiah is about to do in Ireland. It is necessary to refer not to Judah. Judah was still left in Jerusalem, after Israel was carried away captive into Assyria, for Judah's cup of bitterness had not yet become full. But he was fast following on the same course of idolatry practiced by Israel.

Yet the "long suffering" of God endured for an hundred and thirty years after Israel's captivity, when Judah's cup being full, God sent Nebuchadnezzar, who utterly destroyed Jerusalem, burned the temple, and carried all the principal people to Babylon. The account of the Babylonish captivity is contained in 2 Kings 25:1-20, and in the last chapter of Jeremiah; a brief account of which it may be well to look at.

By consulting the prophecy of Jeremiah,[626] it appears that he had been charged with a message to Judah, the sum of which was, that the iniquities of that nation had become so great that they were to be all sent to Babylon, where they would be cured of their idolatry. This was their great sin, and this sin Jeremiah charged home upon them with great power. But they would not listen to the preaching of that prophet of God, but declared that they would not go to Babylon; and in their wrath thrust Jeremiah down into that deep pit, where it was found he would soon die, being sunk down in the mire. He was therefore taken out and placed in the court of the prison, where he remained until the temple was destroyed.

Now it was this, the first attack, made on Judah by Nebuchadnezzar (most of Judah had already been taken captive by the Assyrians - leaving only a small remnant in Judea for Nebuchadnezzar). In this battle, the army of the Judahites, was defeated and the king, Zedekiah was taken, his eyes put out, his sons slain, and his daughters delivered into the care of Jeremiah. We find also that the king of Babylon charged Nebuzaradan, his chief captain, to look well to Jeremiah; to administer to all his wants; to give him liberty to dwell and to go wherever he might wish; and that nothing should be withheld. Also it is found that the temple was sacked by Nebuchadnezzar at that time, and all the sacred vessels taken out and carried to Babylon. These vessels are all numbered and specified, but no mention is made of the "Ark of the Covenant"[627]

So also, when Cyrus, some seventy years after this, ordered all these vessels which Nebuchadnezzar had taken from the temple, to be returned to Jerusalem, no mention is made of the "Ark of the Covenant!" [628] Josephus also mentions the same things, but is silent respecting the Ark of the Covenant! Now why this silence? This sacred vessel, the most highly prized of all the vessels of the temple, has no mention made of it. Why is this? If it had been in the temple, would it not most surely have been taken by Nebuchadnezzar, being an object of priceless value? There seems but one answer possible to these questions; Jeremiah, we know had full liberty of the temple, which Nebuchadnezzar had given him on his first approach to Jerusalem.

Furthermore, Jeremiah knew that the temple was to be destroyed utterly; therefore it is believed, though it cannot be proved here, that he went into the temple before it was sacked by Nebuchadnezzar, and took from thence the Ark of the Covenant, and Jacob's stone on which he had rested his head at Bethel, which he had erected as a witness, and anointing it, said "this is Bethel," (God's House). These Jeremiah took to himself, he and Baruch, and preserved them for future use, of which mention shall be made hereafter.

At the second invasion of Jerusalem, the temple was burnt - the king's house, and the very walls of the city destroyed, and all the principal people carried to Babylon. But Jeremiah with Baruch and a few others were left. These soon determined to go down to Egypt, although Jeremiah had told them that death would surely be the result. But all went down, yet none ever returned save Jeremiah and Baruch and the women. [629]

This is the last account the scriptures give of Jeremiah. But what shall he do now? Judah is carried away captive to Babylon; the beautiful temple is burned up with fire, and Jerusalem itself deserted and laid waste! What shall he do? Whither shall he flee? Stay in Jerusalem he cannot, for all is gone! The kingdom is utterly subverted, and all the tribes of Israel are gone, utterly swept from the land given them by God, and the whole land its desolate. But has Jeremiah finished his whole work assigned to him? What was that work? "See, I have this day set thee over the nations and over the kingdoms, to root out, and to pull down, and to destroy, and to throw down, to build, and to plant." [630] Here, then, is his commission. He is God's minister plenipotentiary, and as yet he has been employed only in rooting up and throwing down; now he must finish by "planting" and "building up." But where shall he go and how is this great work to be done?

Jeremiah must certainly know where Dan is; and he knew, too, that he has in his own possession, Tephi, the daughter of King Zedekiah, the only living heir to the throne of David; and as we shall find, the "coronal stone" he has in his possession. Now we shall find soon after this, according to the Irish records, that "a wise, holy man from the East came to Dan, bringing with him his scribe, Brugsch (Baruch), also a beautiful princess, daughter of a king." (about 525 B.C.) Dan had now a regularly organized government, and Eochaid II was the reigning prince. This prince, when he beheld that beautiful damsel, said to Jeremiah: "I must marry that beautiful princess." Well, replied Jeremiah, on this ground alone: your government must be purged of all Baalism, and based on the divine law which I have here. To this Eochaid assented, and so the marriage was ratified by Jeremiah, and Tephi was crowned on Jacob's Stone.

Then this stone was given to them, to be transmitted down through every reigning family, as the "title-deed" to the land of Canaan. In obedience to this injunction, the stone was transmitted down through every succeeding reign in Ireland to Fergus I, who took it over to Scotland (320 B.C.), and thence down through every reign to James VI of Scotland (who became) James I of England, and thus down through every reign to Victoria, the last who was crowned upon it; and this identical stone is now in Westminster Abbey! (Queen Elizabeth II was also crowned on it in 1953)

In Ireland, Jeremiah established the "School of the Prophets," the supreme judgeship, and several other Hebrew institutions, according to the Mosaic ritual. Thus did Jeremiah fulfill his commission, by "planting and building" for here was certainly established the throne of David himself, and then laying the foundations of the government in strict accordance with the divine requirements.[631]

But what became of this Queen Tephi? It is said that she died a few years after, leaving a family of young children, and that her death was mourned by all the people, in prose, in verse and in song, as none other has ever been mourned for.

As for poor Eochaid, his heart was so torn he said, "I must make a great mausoleum for my beloved queen;" and he do so, building a tomb in the center sixty feet square, in which the body of Tephi was placed, and over it was constructed a great mound, which he named "Tara," a pure Hebrew word, meaning "two tables." And here, it is believed by some, was placed the Ark of the Covenant, no one knows definitely what became of it. It seems to be acknowledged by all that it was known to have been in the temple before the invasion by Nebuchadnezzar, as also Jacob's stone; and that there is no mention made, in the enumeration of the articles taken from the temple by Nebuchadnezzar, of the Ark of the Covenant, nor of Jacob's stone. The great inquiry, for a long time has been, "What became of the Ark?" But no answer has as yet been given which seems entirely satisfactory..."But whatever became of the ark, can we think for a moment that it was destroyed? For myself, I cannot but believe it will yet be found, brought to light in God's good time, and in this I rest with utmost confidence."

The Encyclopedia Americana calls Hyrcanus a Jewish high priest (135‑105 B.C.) who forced the Idumeans to become "Jews." Idumea is the Greek for Edomites.

The works of Josephes relates how the Idumeans were forced to accept Judaism. In the Bible Esau, Edo, Mt. Seir and Idumea are interchangeable for the offspring of ESAU, Jacob's twin brother.

So you see the people known as "Jews" today are not the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob; but are usurpers trying to gain an inheritance that is not theirs. Please accept this letter for what it was meant to be, one of providing you with information that you probably did not know and had never heard before. It was not meant to hurt your feelings, nor to cause you any uncomfortable at all; it is simply my attempt at fulfilling the calling that the Lord God Almighty has given me as a Watchman. Thank you for your time and consideration.

The Encyclopedia Americana calls Hyrcanus a Jewish high priest (135‑105 B.C.) who forced the Idumeans to become "Jews." Idumea is the Greek for Edomites. The works of Josephes relates how the Idumeans were forced to accept Judaism.

In the Bible Esau, Edo, Mt. Seir and Idumea are inter-changeable for the offspring of ESAU, Jacob's twin brother. Between the time of Nehemiah and the birth of Christ, the problem of intermarriage increased. The climax of the problem came about a century and a half before the birth of Christ, when the Judean, John Hyrcanus, conquered the heathen cities in Palestine and forced the Canaanites to become Judeans ("Jews"). Josephus, the Judean historian, writing in about 95 A.D. wrote of this: "Hyrcanus took also Dora and Marissa, cities of Idumea (Greek form of Edom), and subdued all the Idumaeans; and permitted them to stay in that country, if they would be circumcised, and make use of the laws of the Judeans; and they were so desirous of living in the country of their forefathers, that they submitted to the use of circumcision, and the rest of the Judean ways of living; at which time therefore this befell them, they were hereafter no other than Judeans." [632]

A footnote in Josephus quotes Ammonius, an ancient grammarian, who says further: "The Judeans are such by nature, and from the beginning, whilst the Idumaeans were not Judeans from the beginning, but Phoenicians and Syrians; but being afterward subdued by the Judeans and compelled to be circumcised, and to unite into one nation, and be subject to the same laws, they were called Judeans."

This same footnote also quotes Dio, the ancient historian: "That country is also called Judea, and the people Judeans; and this name is given also to as many as embrace their religion, though of other nations."

Josephus continues his history of how the Judahites incorporated the Edomites and Canaanites and a history of the son of Hyrcanus named Aristobulus: "He was called a lover of the Grecians; and had conferred many benefits on his own country, and made war against Iturea, and added a great part of it to Judea, and compelled its inhabitants if they would continue in that country, to be circumcised, and to live according to the Judean laws [633]; "Now at this time the Judeans were in possession of the following cities that had belonged to the Syrians, and Idumeans, and Phoenicians: (Here he lists 23 non‑Israelite cities); which last (city) they utterly destroyed, because its inhabitants would not bear to change their religious rites for those peculiar to the Judeans. The Judeans also possessed others of the principle cities of Syria, which had been destroyed." [634]

This all took place at least a century before Christ. It is obvious, then, that by the time Christ was born a great host of the people living in Judea were Canaanites and Edomites by race, although they were Jews by religion and Judeans by citizenship. Even the ruling dynasty of the Herods were Edomites. Josephus speaks of: "Herod, who was no more than a private man, and an Idumean, i.e., a half‑Judean." [635]

A footnote here says: "Accordingly, Josephus always esteems him an Idumean, though he says his father Antipater was of the same people with the Judeans, and a Judean by birth, as indeed all such proselytes of justice as the Idumeans, were in time esteemed the very same people with the Judeans."

The Esau‑Edomite nation ("Idumea") ceased to exist as a separate nation at this point in history. And yet the Bible is clear that Edom would be the enemy of Israel in the latter days. How could these prophecies be fulfilled, if there are no Edomites left in the world? There is only one nation in the world that can prove ancestral ties with Edom, and the Jews themselves claim that dubious distinction. The Jews have thus adopted the materialistic and anti‑Christ attitude that characterized the father of the Edomites, Esau.

As judgment for their sins, including that of the Crucifixion of Christ, God cast them out of Palestine in 70 A.D. whereupon they fled to North Africa and Spain. We find what happened to them in The American People's Encyclopedia for 1954, page 15‑492, under "The Jews." "Following their dispersal many spread across North Africa to Spain and during this movement converted many of the Berber tribes to Judaism. This had little effect on physical type, since most of the Berbers were likewise of that Mediterranean Race. That portion which moved into Spain and later northward achieved considerable wealth and prestige and became known as Sephardim Jews."

The Outline of History. H. G. Wells, "It is highly probable that the bulk of the Jew's ancestors 'never' lived in Palestine 'at all,' which witnesses the power of historical assertion over fact."

In Genesis 3:15 we are told: "And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed..."The important thing to note is that there are two lines of descent here - the seed or descendants of the serpent (Satan), and the other, the descendants of Eve (the woman). The word "woman" is used later in Scripture to describe those who comprise God's Kingdom. Satan, also, has a kingdom, for it says in Luke 11:18: "If Satan also be divided against himself, how shall his kingdom stand?" The subjects of his kingdom are obviously the seed of the serpent or Satan. Christ recognized the existence of this evil line when he blamed them for all the blood shed beginning with the slaying of Abel.[636]

There are two kingdoms in the world today - the kingdom of good and the kingdom of evil; the Kingdom of God and the Kingdom of Satan. We know that believers in Christ, or Christians, comprise God's Kingdom, but who are Satan's subjects? Let us see if we can identify them from the Scriptures. There are a people or race which the Bible speaks of in various places as "enemies" of God, "filthy dreamers," "devils," "serpents," "enemies of all righteousness," "princes of this world," "those that are lost," "vipers," and "contrary to all men."

The blood of the true Judahite, who originally numbered little more than 40,000 had become thoroughly obliterated by the amalgamation of the people of Ashdod, Moabites, Ammonites, Perizzites, Jebuzites, Canaanites, Egyptians, Hittites, Amorites, Amalekites and finally Idumeans. It was the Idumeans who took control of the country of Judea and furnished the Herodian line of rulers. Following is how the Pharisees came to be in "Moses' Seat" when Christ was born. They had many enemies at the beginning and the Sadducees were the first of these enemies.

To see a "small" portion of the distortions of the Pharisees on the Bible, in eliminating the Chief Engineer, the God of Intelligence, planning, approachability is seen under the caption "History of the Pharisees," pages 665‑666, of the Jewish Encyclopedia.

The full story can be found in the Jewish Encyclopedia under "Pharisees." "It is difficult to state at what time the Pharisees, as a party, arose, Josephus first mentions them in connection with Jonathan, the successor of Judas Maccabeus.[637]

Under John Hyracanus (135‑105 B.C.) they appear as a powerful party opposing the Sadducean proclivities of the king, who had formerly been a disciple of theirs, though the story as told by Josephus is unhistorical [638]. The Hasmonean dynasty, with its worldly ambitions and aspirations, met with little support from the Pharisees, whose aim was the maintenance of a religious spirit in accordance with their interpretation of the Law. Under Alexander Jannaeus (104‑78 B.C.) the conflict between the people, siding with the Pharisees, and the king became bitter and ended in carnage.[639] Under his window Salome Alexander (78‑69 B.C.), the Pharisees, led by Simeon ben Shetah, came to power; they obtained seats in the Sanhedrin, and that time was afterward regarded as the golden age, full of the blessing of heaven. But the bloody vengeance they took upon the Sadducees led to a terrible reaction, and under Aristobulus (69‑63 B.C.) The Sadducees regained their power.[640] Amidst the bitter struggle which ensued, the Pharisees appeared before Pompey asking him to interfere and restore the old priesthood while abolishing the royalty of the Hasmoneans altogether.[641] The defilement of the Temple by Pompey was regarded by the Pharisees as a divine punishment of Sadducean misrule. After the national independence had been lost, the Pharisees gained in influence while the star of the Sadducees waned.

Herod found his chief opponents among the latter, and so he put the leaders of the Sanhedrin to death while endeavoring by a milder treatment to win the favor of the leaders of the Pharisees, who, through they refused to take the oath of allegiance, were otherwise friendly to him.[642] Only when he provoked their indignation by his heathen proclivities did the Pharisees become his enemies and fall victims (4 B.C.) to his bloodthirstiness.[643]

But the family of Boethus, whom Herod had raised to the high‑priesthood, revived the spirit of the Sadducees, and thenceforth the Pharisees again had them as antagonists; still, they no longer possessed their former power, as the people always sided with the Pharisees.[644]

In King Agrippa (41‑44 A.D.) the Pharisees had a supporter and friend, and with the destruction of the Temple, the Sadducees disappeared altogether, leaving the regulation of all Jewish affairs in the hands of the Pharisees. Henceforth Jewish life was regulated by the teachings of The Pharisees; the whole history of Judaism was reconstructed from the Pharisaic point of view, and a new aspect was given to the Sanhedrin of the past. A new chain of tradition supplanted the older, priestly tradition. Pharisaism shaped the Character of Judaism and the life and thoughts of the Jews for all the future."

Any Human characteristic such as Intelligence or Love is "obnoxious verbiage" when attributed to God, and was eliminated, explained away, and the shell kept for the Jews "shell game" of cheating the gullible Christian. Attributing Intelligence to God, is to the Jew an "anthropomorphism," a big word for a pagan idea, the idea that humans alone are intelligent.

Judaism would best be described as a rite or compendium of rites, for, if one lends belief to the presentations of the Jewish lawgivers, one must bear in mind that they studied among the initiates of Babylon, and become the pupils of Chaldean magic who were the fathers of Voodooism, a name given to the magic practices and rites taught to the Babylonians by Saragon (Cain).

The closer one studies the history of the Jews, the more clear it appears that they are neither a religious entity nor a nation. The absolute failure of Zionism which has been a desperate effort on the part of certain international Jewish leaders to bind all the Jews of the world into a national entity, whose territory would have been Palestine, proves the futility of such an effort. Judaism is not a religion and the Jews are not a nation, but they are a sect with Judaism as a rite.

The obligations and rules of the rite for the Jewish masses are contained in the Talmud and Schulchan Aruk, but the esoteric teachings for the higher initiates are to be found in the Cabala. Therein are contained the mysterious rites for evocations, the indications and keys to practices for conjuration of supernatural forces, the science of numbers, astrology, etc. Thus, all the vestiges of the ancient religion of Israel had been destroyed except certain ceremonial rites which were still allowed by the Idumeans. At this point the Jews and Idumeans merged and became as one. The Jewish Encyclopedia 1925 - edition; under "Edom" states, "from this time the Idumeans ceased to be a separate people..."

Kol Nidre: It is the prologue of the Day of Atonement services in the synagogues. It is recited three times by the standing congregation in concert with chanting rabbis at the alter. After the recital of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer the Day of Atonement religious ceremonies follow immediately. The Day of Atonement religious observances are the highest holy days of the "Jews" and are celebrated as such throughout the world. The official translation into English of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer is as follows: "All vows, obligations, oaths, anathemas, whether called 'konam,' 'konas,'or by any other name, which we may vow, or swear, or pledge, or whereby we may be bound, from this Day of Atonement unto the next, (whose happy coming we await), we do repent. May they be deemed absolved, forgiven, annulled, and void and made of no effect; they shall not bind us nor have power over us. The vows shall not be reckoned vows; the obligations shall not be obligatory; nor the oaths be oaths."

The implications, inferences and innuendoes of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer are referred to in the Talmud in the Book of Nedarim, 23a‑23b as follows: "And he who desires that none of his vows made during the year shall be valid, let him stand at the beginning of the year and declare, every vow which I make in the future shall be null (1). (His vows are then invalid) providing that he remembers this at the time of the vow." (Emphasis in original) A footnote (1) relates: "(1)...The Law of revocation in advance was not made public." (Emphasis in original text)

The greatest study of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer was made by Theodor Reik, a pupil of the (I)nfamous Jewish Dr. Sigmund Freud. The analysis of the historic, religious and psychological background of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer by Professor Reik presents the Talmud in its true perspective. This study is contained in "The Ritual, Psycho‑Analytical Studies." In the chapter on the Talmud, page 163, he states: "The text was to the effect that all oaths which believers take between one Day of Atonement and the next Day of Atonement are declared invalid."

The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia confirms that the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer has no spiritual value as might be believed because it is recited in synagogues on the Day of Atonement as the prologue of the religious ceremonies which follow it. The Secular significance of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer is forcefully indicated by the analysis in Vol. VI, page 441: "The Kol Nidre has nothing whatever to do with the actual idea of the Day of Atonement...it attained to extraordinary solemnity and popularity by reason of the fact that it was the first prayer recited on this Holiest of Days."

Being amazed at this revelation on about the Kol Nidre, I happened to notice in the index the "Star of David." So I decided to look it up and see what the Jewish Encyclopedia had to say about it and found the following.

Non‑Jews have been drenched with propaganda that the six‑ pointed "Star of David" is a sacred symbol of Jewry, dating from David and Solomon, in Biblical times, and signifying the pure "monotheism" of the Jewish religion. In actuality, the six‑ pointed star, called "David's Shield," or "Magen David," was only adopted as a Jewish device in 1873, by the American Jewish Publication Society, it is not even mentioned in rabbinical literature.

Magen Dawid ("David's Shield"):"The hexagram formed by the combination of two equilateral triangles; used as the symbol of Judaism. It is placed upon synagogues, sacred vessels, and the like, and was adopted as a device by the American Publication Society in 1873, the Zionist Congress of Basel, hence by 'Die Welt (Vienna), the official organ of Zionism, and by other bodies. The hebra kaddisha of the Jewish community of Johannesburg, South Africa, calls itself 'Hebra Kaddisha zum Rothn Magen David,' following the designation of the 'red cross' societies...

It is noteworthy, moreover, that the shield of David is not mentioned in Rabbincial Literature. The 'Magen Dawid,' therefore, probably did not originate within Rabbinism, the official and dominant Judaism for more than 2,000 years. Nevertheless a David's shield has recently been noted on a Jewish tombstone at Tarentum, in southern Italy, which may date as early as the third century of the common era. The earliest Jewish literary source which mentions it, the 'Eshkol ha‑Kofer' of the karaite Judah Hadassi (middle of the 12th cent.) says, inch. 242: 'Seven names of angels precede the mezuzah: Michael, Garield, etc...Tetragrammation protect thee! And likewise the sign called 'David's shield' is placed besides the name of each angel.' It was therefore, at this time a sign on amulets. In the magic papyri of antiquity, pentagrams, together with stars and other signs, are frequently found on amulets bearing the Jewish names of God, 'Sabaoth,' 'Adonai,' 'Eloai,' and used to guard against fever and other diseases. Curiously enough, only the pentacle appears, not the hexagram. In the great magic papyrus at Paris and London there are twenty‑two signs sided by side, and a circle with twelve signs, but neither a pentacle nor a hexagram [645], although there is a triangle, perhaps in place of the latter.

In the many illustrations of amulets given by Budge in his 'Egyptian Magic' (London, 1899) not a single pentacle or Hexagram appears. The syncretism of Hellenistic, Jewish, and Coptic influences did not therefore, originate the symbol. It is probable that it was the Cabala that derived the symbol from the Templars. The Cabala, in fact, makes use of this sign, arranging the Ten Sefirot, or spheres, in it, and placing in on Amulets. The pentagram, called Solomon's seal, is also used as a talisman, and Henry thinks that the Hindus derived it from the Semites (Here is another case where the Jews admit they are not Semites. Can you not see it? The Jew Henry thinks it was derived originally from the Semites! Here is a Jew admitting that the Jews are not Semites!) ('Magic dans l'lude Antique,' p. 93, Paris, 1904), although the name by no means proves the Jewish or Semitic origin of the sign. The Hindus likewise employed the hexagram as a means of protection, and as such it is mentioned in the earliest source, quoted above. In the synagogues, perhaps, it took the place of the mezuzah, and the name 'Shield of David' may have been given it in virtue of its protective powers. The hexagram may have been employed originally also as an architectural ornament on synagogues, as it is, for example, on the cathedrals of Brandenburg and Stendal, and on the Marktkirche at Hanover.

A pentacle in this form, (a five pointed star is shown here), is found on the ancient synagogue at Tell Hum. Charles IV, prescribed for the Jews of Prague, in 1354, A Red Flag with both David's Shield and Solomon's seal, while the Red Flag with which the Jews met King Matthias of Hungary in the fifteenth century showed two pentacles with two golden stars. The pentacle, therefore, may also have been used among the Jews. It occurs in a manuscript as early as the year 1073. However, the six‑pointed star has been used for centuries for magic amulets and cabalistic sorcery." [646]

Since Jerusalem was destroyed in A.D. 70, the Jews have continued to absorb proselytes from all races. The ancient monuments presenting a physiognomy characteristic of the Hittites reveals the total eradication of Israelitish features.

History proves that neither literally or spiritually can the modern Jew claim to be Abraham's descendants, and their claim to the Holy Land is therefore without foundation. The Pharisees and the Sadducees were Jews as we know. John recognized them for what they were when he said in Matthew 3:7: "Oh generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?"

Our Lord enlarges on this when He excoriates the Jews in the 23rd chapter of Matthew and calls them hypocrites; "Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?" [647] Here we find Christ confirming John's description of these people. In John 8:44 Jesus describes the Jews in these words, "Ye (Jews) are of your father the devil and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning and abode not in the truth because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own for he is a liar and the father of it."This statement rules out any attempt to establish brotherhood or unity between Christians and Jews as there cannot be "brotherhood" where there are different fathers. Christians have God as their father and Jesus Himself says the Jews have Satan as their father.

We are told in 2 John 7, 9, 11: "For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and antichrist...Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son. If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed; for he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds." Note this text well. It refers to the Jews who reject Christ. If we so much as wish them good luck, we are as bad as they are in the sight of God.

In Galatians 2:4 we are told, "And because of false brethren brought in unawares, who came in privily to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage..."

Jude 1:4, 8 tells us: "For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ...Likewise also these filthy dreamers defile the flesh, despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities."

Someone, at this point, will always ask, "Doesn't the Bible say we are to love our enemies?" Yes, it does. We must be careful, however, not to love God's enemies, for God will not hold us guiltless if we do. "Shouldest thou help the ungodly, and love them that hate the Lord? therefore is wrath upon thee from before the Lord." [648]

Being mindful of the fact that Jesus informs us in John 8:44 that these people are the progeny of Satan, it is amazing how some so-called Christians go out of their way to cultivate their good will. We are told in Acts 13:6,9, "And when they had gone through the Isle of Pathos, they found a certain sorcerer, a false prophet, a Jew, whose name was Bar-Jesus...Then Saul, filled with the Holy Ghost, set his eyes on him, and said, 'O, full of all subtility and all mischief, thou child of the devil, thou enemy of all righteousness, wilt thou not cease to pervert the right ways of the Lord?'"

Here Saul (Paul) identifies the Jew as a child of the devil and an enemy of all righteousness. We can further identify them as "princes of the world" in John 14:30, "...for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me." John 16: 11, "...the prince of the world is judged." John 12:31, "Now is the judgment of this world, now shall the prince of this world be cast out."

These texts refer to Satan as the Prince of this world and both Jesus and Paul refer to the Jews as children of the devil, therefore they are princes in Satan's realm. The Jews, because of their hatred for Christ, made it difficult and dangerous for Him to carry on His work in Judea. John 11:7-8, "Then after that, saith He to His disciples, Let us go into Judea again. His disciples say unto Him, Master, the Jews of late sought to stone thee and goest thou thither again?"

In Luke 4:43-44, Jesus said, "I must preach the Kingdom of God to other cities also for therefore am I sent. And He preached in the synagogues of Galilee." In John 6:70-71; 7:1 we find these words, "Jesus answered them, Have I not chosen you twelve and one of you is a devil? He spake of Judas Iscariot, the son of Simon, for it was he that should betray Him, being one of the twelve. After these things Jesus walked in Galilee, for He would not walk in Jewry because the Jews sought to kill Him."

The only Judean Jew among Christ's disciples was Judas. The rest were Galileans. Judas came from a small town in Judea called Kerioth, and he was known as Ishkerioth or Iscariot meaning "man of Kerioth." It is plain that His disciples did not consider themselves Jews of the type found in Judea or they would not have remonstrated with Him against going again to Judea because of fear that the Jews would stone Him.

Indeed, the Jews themselves knew that Peter was not a Jew but a Galilean because of his accent for they said in Matthew 26:73, "surely thou art also one of them for thy speech betrayeth thee." Also Mark 14:70, "surely thou art one of them for thou art a Galilean and thy speech agreeth thereto." It is clear that the Benjamites or Galileans were the ones who accepted Jesus and became Christians while the badly mongrelized people who called themselves Jews who resided for the most part in Judea, refused to accept Him.

Let us now take up the astounding admission by the Jews themselves that they are not of the chosen seed, or the "children of promise," which line descended from Abraham through Isaac and Jacob. John 8:33, "They (Jews) answered Him, We be Abraham's seed and were never in bondage to any man, how sayest thou that we shall be made free?"

Here they plainly state they were never in bondage. God's elect, His Chosen People, were in bondage in Egypt. The House of Israel, or the ten tribes comprising the Northern Kingdom, were in bondage to Assyria and the House of Judah was in Bondage to Babylon, yet these Jews say they were never in bondage to any man! Jesus replied to their claim that they were of the seed of Abraham in the 37th verse which says, "I know that ye (say ye) are Abraham's seed but ye seek to KILL ME because my word hath no place in you."

This presents us with a dilemma. If these people were of the seed of Abraham as Jesus says, how does it happen that they were not in bondage in Egypt with all of the Israelites? The solution to this apparent contradiction is found in the 39th verse, "If YE (Jews) WERE Abraham's CHILDREN, ye would do the works of Abraham."

Here we have a distinction between the children of Abraham and the seed of Abraham. If the Jews had been of the chosen line and the "children of promise," they would have descended from Jacob Israel and would have been in bondage in Egypt, but since they deny they were ever in bondage, their descent must necessarily have been through Jacob's brother, Esau, whose descendants were never in bondage. Genesis 36:8-9, "thus dwelt Esau in Mount Seir: Esau is Edom and these are the generations of Esau, the father of the Edomites, in Mt. Seir." The name of the Edomites at the time of Christ was Idumeans. About 125 years before the time of Christ, war broke out between the Judahites of Judea and the nation of the Idumeans.

The Judahites under Hyracanus triumphed over the Edomites, as a condition of peace, they demanded that the Edomites or Idumeans must be circumcised and accept the religion of Israel, or face annihilation. The Edomites accepted the terms and were absorbed into the nation of Judea. In time they completely dominated their erstwhile conquerors so that by the time of Christ, traces of the descendants of the House of Judah had all but vanished. In Romans 9:13 it says, "As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated."

Romans 9:7-8 clarifies the matter a little more, "Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, in Isaac shall thy seed be called." That is, they which are the children of the flesh (Esau), these are not the children of God: but the children of promise (Isaac) are counted for the seed. The children of the promise are of the righteous line extending from Adam through Isaac and Jacob, while the children of the flesh are those of the Satanic line who trace their ancestry from Cain.

David asked that the Lord blot the Jews out of the Book of the Living. Psalm 69:21, 24, 27-28: "They gave me also gall for my meat and in my thirst they gave me vinegar to drink. Pour out thy indignation upon them and let thy wrathful anger take hold of them. Let them be blotted out of the Book of the Living and not be written with the righteous." We would do well to follow David's example when he says in Psalm 139:21-22, "Do I hate them, O Lord, that hate thee? Am I not grieved with those that rise against thee? I hate them with a perfect hatred, I count them my enemies." There are some who will say that it was not the Jews who killed Jesus, but the Romans. Paul pins the crime squarely on the Jews when but Peter, John, Luke and Paul pins it squarely on their shoulders [649] It is true the Romans soldiers cast lots for His garments, but of those, Jesus said in Luke 23:34, "Father forgive them for they know not what they do."

Here Christ was speaking of "the children of the promise" the SEED of Abraham because they had been deceived by the Jews into helping them; for the Jews well knew what they were doing, for they said to Pilate, "Let His blood be upon us and on our children."

There is no record in all of the Scriptures where Jesus ever forgave the Jews. Because of their very nature, it is difficult to see how they can be included in God's great plan of redemption. Someone says this is not true, and they will quote John 12:32 in support of their position. "And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me."

Does this mean that Jews will be drawn to Jesus at some future date? The answer is found in 1 Thessalonians 2:15, where Paul says, "Who hath killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men (Adamites)."

The Jews, then, being contrary to all men (Adamites) are not apparently classed as men (Adamites) but are evil spirits in human form which cannot be drawn to Jesus. Our Lord spoke in parables solely for the purpose of keeping the truth from them. It was not part of His plan that they should understand and be converted. (Given equal rights with us and be allowed all of the privileges given to the Adamic race, including intermarrying with our race). We find this record in the following text, Matthew 13:10-11, "And the disciples came and said unto Him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables? He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you (Adamites) to know the mysteries of the Kingdom of Heaven, but to them (Canaanites - Jews) it is not given."

Mark 4:11-12, "And He said unto them (Adamites), Unto you (Adamites) it is given to know the mysteries of the Kingdom of God but to them (Canaanites) without, all these things are done in parables that seeing they may see and not perceive and hearing they may hear and not understand lest at any time they should be converted and their sins should[650] Be forgiven them." [651]

Other authors have estimated that the "mixed multitude" Adamites who had lost their first estate by mixing with the Canaanites (Cainites) and were in Palestine at the time of Christ totaled no more than 20,000 out of the entire population. The number of all the Jews, descendants of the mating of Lucifer with Eve and his descendants mating with pre-Adamites and later Adamites, could not have been more than a few hundred thousand at the time of Christ.

According to the Jews in their own Talmudic and Zohar writings these bodiless fallen Angels roam the earth without bodies until those of them who have mated with pre-Adamites or Adamites (mixed seed of fallen Angeles and others) until those of their kind with physical bodies produce offspring into which their evil spirits can enter into and reside within. To these "vampires" who still had enough of the spirit of God in them so they could still understand what Jesus had to say, this presented a unique opportunity.

Christ was preaching to the "Lost Sheep of the House of Israel" or Adamites who had lost their psychic abilities when they were transferred from their first birthplace in "heaven" into the Earth or were "born again" of water (woman) into physical forms here as part of the Adamic race. The message of Christ was to these "Lost" Adamites to restore their lost memory of what they had been and what they had been taught before being transferred her onto the earth (terrestrial plane) from "heaven" or the (celestial plane).

If the Canaanites who still had some of the genes of Eve (Adamic) in them still functioning could understand even part of the message of Christ which was not meant for them but for the Adamic race, they could feign being the true Adamites and even though they would be rejected by the early Church they could use their ill gotten knowledge to the point where they could use their "conversion" to become familiar with Adamic men and women wherein they could seduce their minds or bodies or both.

Their mating with the unsuspecting Adamites would give them even more receptacles into which their Satanic spirits could be injected into and therefore they would produce new "Jews" (Cainites) to work towards the day when all 133,000,000 of them would inhabit physical bodies which would then be the time when their leader the antichrist (Lucifer) would again appear to lead them and their cohorts (pre-Adamites and Adamites who were mentally seduced and were made into "Jews of the spirit" their bodies were under the control of evil spirits.

In 1955 the late Major General George Van Horn Moseley wrote an open letter to The New York Times stating that he believed that there were not 6-million Jews in the United States at that time, but approximately 30-million. He said that he had studied the Talmud and other Jewish writings and was aware of the fact that the World Almanac in reporting the number of "Jews" who participate in Satanic services at those synagogues or are registered contributors and members.

He noted that according to Jewish religious practices Jews who are under 13 and have not received their Bar Mitzvah are not counted, non-religious Jews are not counted and the Jews do not consider women to be equal and "human" and thus female Jewesses are also not counted in the figures.

Of course, those who have "Jewish" genes but mixed with other races or attend churches of other religions are also not counted in the official World Almanac totals. Thus, the number of Jews in any given country can be conservatively figured at four times the official number reported by the World Almanac. How many half Jews, quarter Jews, eighth Jews, etc., are possessed by Satanic (evil spirits) and are carrying out the Luciferian program whether they realize it or not?

How many non-Jews by race have been conditioned by "Christian" televangelists and their local "Judeo-Christian" ministers and priests to view the Luciferian Jews as "God's Chosen People" and have more love and loyalty in their hearts for the Jews than they do for those of their own Adamic race?

How many of those "Christians" have been conditioned to the point where the Satanic spirits of the Jews have been able to enter into their bodies and take control of their lives? The World Almanac has put the number of Jews in the world at around 17-million for the past 50 years and Jewish publications keep complaining that the numbers of Jews in the world is decreasing not increasing. What these Jewish leaders are talking about is that the number of Jews who attend the synagogues and observe every Jewish ritual are decreasing but in reality Jews who are Jews by race but don't participate in any synagogue but carry on either knowingly or unknowingly the war of Lucifer against Christ.

To help clarify the meaning of some parts of this presentation, we have a comments to help establish a basis for our mutual understanding. We are using Webster's Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language 1989, to define "victim, snare, and infest" as follows:

* Victim: "1. a person who suffers from a destructive or injurious action or agency. 2. a person who is deceived or cheated, as by his own emotions or ignorance or by some impersonal agency. 3. a person or animal sacrificed, or regarded as sacrificed. 4. a living creature sacrificed in religious rites."

* Snare: "2. anything serving to entrap, entangle, or catch unawares; trap. 5. to catch or involve by trickery or wile..."

* Infest: "to haunt or overrun in a troublesome manner, as predatory bands, destructive animals, or vermin do."

* America: The word "America" means "The Kingdom of Heaven." Did our school teachers and our Judeo-Christians preachers ever explain to us the true meaning of the word "America?"

Wouldn't it be considerate if we were to be informed as to the true meaning of the name of our beloved homeland? Has the Establishment been hiding something from us relating to our true identity? Corporate public schools (government controlled) teach us that this Continent was named after Amerigo Vespucci. However, these corporate government schools neglect to teach our children the meaning of Amerigo Vespucci's name. Professor Miskovsky (Oberlin College) brought out some interesting facts about the word "America." The Latin masculine singular for the word "Amerigo" is "Americus" and the feminine singular is "America." The old Gothic form for the word "America" is "Amel Ric." "Amel" means "heaven" and "ric" means "kingdom." "Amel Ric" is found in the German language as "Emmerich" or "Himmelreich." Thus "Amel Ric," "Emmerich," "Himmelreich," "Amelukah," "Amerucah," and "America" became words for "The Kingdom Of Heaven!" The word "kingdom" means government or governmental jurisdiction. the government of Heaven (from outer space) is to be fully implemented on earth as we are told in the "Lords Prayer."

Strong's Concordance gives the word "Meluwkah" for "kingdom," "Amelukah" and "Meluwkah" are related. A professor by the name of Odlum indicates that the letter "l" and "r" are sometimes interchangeable. The Hebrew "Meluwkah" became "Merukah" and "Amelukah" became "Ameruch," the later being the Latin form of the word "America." Who is America that she would be blessed above every other nation along with the other Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Celtic and kindred peoples in the world (Isaac's Sons - Saxon's) "Christian" nations, today are prophetically carrying out exactly what Israel is supposed to do in the last days.

We (the White Anglo-Saxon, Germantic, Celtic and kindred people are the descendants of the Ten Tribed Northern Kingdom of Israel which included people of the Southern Two Tribes. We migrated North and west beyond the Caucuses Mountains into Asia and on to the America's. Information about this migration over time is plentiful and well documented. We are the House of Jacob and we are suffering Jacob's troubles.

The Encyclopedia Americana calls Hyrcanus a Jewish high priest (135‑105 B.C.) who forced the Idumeans to become "Jews." Idumea is the Greek for Edomites. The works of Josephes relates how the Idumeans were forced to accept Judaism. So now we are aware that the story of America does not begin with Columbus, but with Abraham who "looked for a City (system) which hath Foundations, whose Builder and Maker is God." [652]

References for the information about America was from: Ewing Curtis Clair; Kingdom Digest; March, 1968 and Basics of National Identity by M.O. Andrews. The Voice of Liberty, % 692 Sunnybrook Drive, Decatur, Georgia 30033, 2nd printing 1979. "And to the woman (the true seed remnant of Israel - not the Jews) were given two wings of a great eagle, that she might fly into the wilderness (North America) into her place, where she is nourished for a time and times, and half a time, from the face of the serpent." [653]

* Serpent: For the identification and definition of our use of the word "Serpent" we will quote Scriptural passages attributed to the sayings of Jesus, the Christ, but first we need to put you on the trail of the "Pharisees" and the "Sadducees" to whom Jesus frequently speaks directly in the flesh. And Christ speaks about their generation (serious study will reveal their mixed racial lineage, hence the attention their "generation"). The mixed mongrel generation (race) of people who today call themselves Jews, from their own publications, clearly lay claim and trace their identity to being the physical flesh and blood descendants of the Scriptural Pharisees and the Sadducees.

One account published by the Jewish historian Louis Finkelstine in his two volume History of the Jews. In this work, he explains that the Pharisees and Sadducees were (are) Jews. Finkelstine also speaks of Jews making slaves of Christians. In another work by Louis Finkelstine; we find the following quote: "The apogee of Pharisaism is the Talmud of Babylonia... Pharisaism became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism. But throughout these changes of name...the spirit of the ancient Pharisees survives unaltered." [654]

From the Epilogue section chapter 9 subtitle Character Roles & Identity from the book Who is Esau-Edom, quoting the entire chapter: "There is one thing that is unmistakably evident regarding the Bible and that is, it is about a particular race of people, the direct descendants of Adam later called Israel. They are the main characters in God's Script - the Holy Bible. Esau-Edom is secondary character in this Script. Only when we know and identify the white European people as the Israel people, and the Jews as the Edomites, do things in the world make complete sense. When the roles of Jacob and Esau are identified, we see that everything is happening exactly as written in the Scriptures.

The problem the world has been plagued with is a case of mistaken identity and unknown identity regarding the roles God has assigned to Esau and Jacob. Esau does not like the role he has been assigned (or shall we say the role that he has earned). He thus has been trying to rewrite the Scriptures and alter in the minds of Christians their identity and the identity of the Jews in the Scripture. Thus it is believe that Esau (Jews) is Jacob (God's Chosen People), and Jacob (the White Race) is just a 'gentile.'

No one can deny that the Jews are a most unique and unusual people. That uniqueness exists because of their Edomite heritage. No other people fit the characteristics and follow the role of Esau-Edom so completely as do the Jewish people.

The Jews follow the role that their ancestors the Edomites had followed. The Jew, however, is not just the descendant of Esau-Edom, but also of the other individuals and tribes that have intermarried with Esau. This would include the Hittites, the Canaanites, the descendants of Japheth through Gomer, Togarmah, Magog, and Ashkenaz, and the descendants of Ham through Canaan, Cush, and Nimrod, as well as the Israelites and Judahites that mixed with them (contrary to God's Law).

Thus, in a sense, the Jews do not have a heritage in the Bible, and yet they do not. As mongrels or hybrids, the Jews do have some biological roots extending back to Abraham and the patriarchs. But as mongrels, they can never possess the birthright or claim true heritage of the original or pure Adamic race. For it is written: 'A mongrel shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord.' [655] 'Now it came to pass, when they had heard the Law, that they separated from Israel all the mixed multitude.' [656]

Mixed Adamites, those possessing both Adamic and non-Adamic blood, can no more be a part of heir of the Adamic race that one who is entirely of another race. The law will not allow the Jews to inherit the birthright or the kingdom regardless of the fact that they have Adamic blood in them. These same mongrels and 'mixed multitude' tried to tell Christ that Abraham was their father, but Christ said: 'I know that you are Abraham's Seed; but you seek to kill me because my word has no place in you...I speak that which I have seen with my Father; and you do that which you have seen with your father...If you were Abraham's Children, you would do the works of Abraham. You do the deeds of your father.' [657]

Christ made the implication that these 'Jews' had another father aside from Abraham, and their response was 'We be not born Of fornication; we have one Father, even God.' But Christ said; 'If God were your Father you would love me.' Can you think of anyone that hates Christ more than these people known as Jews today?

The Jews cannot represent the Adamic line, they can only claim to be of those lines from Adam that were either rejected by God or who had violated the law through interracial marriages. Esau-Edom falls under both of these classes. The Edomites were a mongrelized and rejected people throughout the entire Bible.

Conspiracy and Conflict: It should by now be seen why talk of an 'International Jewish Conspiracy' makes no sense to the general public. They don't see or understand anything of the kind because they do not know the identity of the characters in the Scriptures of God-the Bible-or their roles in that Scripture. Why would the Jews, which the entire church world holds up as the apple of God's eye, want to harm or destroy White Christians?

As heirs of Esau, the Jews are destined to act according to an assigned role. The Jews need not be part of a conspiracy to dominate the world, or a plot to kill Christians or to destroy their civilization. The Jews, or some of them, are used by God to execute His plans in the earth. Jews follow this role in God's Scripture and have been doing these things and will continue to do them whether or not they have any plans or knowledge of doing them. A lion kills to eat because God had assigned such attributes to its ancestors (race) when He created them. They cannot help what they are or what they do, they act in such a manner because it is ingrained within their constitution to do so. Likewise (you will note upon study and observation that) the Jew is hostile, abrasive, hateful, ungodly, a destroyer, and a usurer because such attributed and roles (or prophecies) were assigned to the ancestors of the Jews - Esau/Edom. A Divine Plan for Evil: All of Christendom is united in the belief that all of the ills and troubles of this world are the result of an invisible, spirit, a devil or Satan, which is in competition with God for control of this world.

We must always remember to mistrust the obvious and that which is popular, for such things are often the opposite of what they appear. The Bible supplies us with scores of illustrations in support of this hypothesis. Many biblical messages reveal that the popular belief and ways of the people are contrary or opposite to the ways of God. As Jesus Christ stated: 'For that which is highly esteemed among men is an abomination in the sight of God.' [658] Likewise, that which is exalted by man, God will make low, and that which is of low degree, God will exalt. [659] There is perhaps nothing that is more highly esteemed and exalted by the church world than these God-cursed heathen mongrels called 'Jews' today. There could be no greater evidence that these Jews are not God's people than the universal belief that they are.

Thus the organized church world, which has been influenced by Jewish indoctrination, had to have a scapegoat for certain evil things that happen. They teach that our adversary is either something spiritual, such as an invisible devil, or is something yet to come, such as the future antichrist. In other words, our foe is something we cannot fight against because it is not physical or not yet physically here.

The result is that the Jew, our real physical enemy, the one we can fight, or expel out of our land, or kill, is free to assail us at will because the Judaized churches say they are God's Chosen People.

In a speech, 'Given by Senator Joseph McCarthy, six months before his mouth was closed forever: George Washington's surrender: 'And many of the people of the land became Jews.' [660] The confession of General Cornwallis to General Washington at Yorktown has been well hidden by historians. History books and text books have taught for years that when Cornwallis surrendered his army to General Washington that American independence came, and we lived happily ever after until the tribulations of the twentieth century.

Jonathan Williams recorded in his Legions of Satan, 1781, that Cornwallis revealed to Washington that 'a holy war will now being in America, and when it is ended America will be supposedly the citadel of freedom, but her millions will unknowingly be loyal subjects to the Crown.' Cornwallis went on to explain what would seem to be a self contradiction: 'Your churches will be used to teach the Jew's religion and in less than two hundred years the whole nation will be working for divine world government.

That government they believe to be divine will be the British Empire (under the control of the Jews). All religions will be permeated with Judaism without even being noticed by the masses, and they will all be under the invisible all-seeing eye of the Grand Architect of Freemasonry (Lucifer - as Albert Pike disclosed in Morals and Dogma).' And indeed George Washington was a Mason, and he gave back through a false religion what he had won with his army.'

Cornwallis well knew that his military defeat was only the beginning of World Catastrophe that would be universal and that unrest would continue until mind control could be accomplished through a false religion. What he predicted has come to pass!!! Of that, there is no longer any doubt. A brief study of American religious history will show that Masonry and Judaism has infused into every church in America their veiled Phallic Religion. Darby and the Plymouth Brethren brought a Jewish Christianity to America. Masons Rutherford and Russell (both Jews) started Jehovah Witnesses' in order to spread Judaism throughout the world under the guise of Christianity. Also we have: 'As Jewish Maurice Samuel in his 'You Gentiles,' (1924) p. 13 stated, 'there are essentially two peoples as spiritual forces in the world - Jews and White Christian people.' It is not a conflict between God and a supernatural devil which Judaized theologians invented. Jewish 'scholars' have promoted both the devil and future antichrist concepts. They know that as long as the Christians believe that imaginary spooks are the 'evil forces' which are to blame for their problems., conflicts, wars, etc., they will never see that it is the Jew who God has assigned as an evil force here and now.

The result is that Christians will never lift a finger against the menacing Jew as their European ancestors had done occasionally. Our adversaries are whoever God assigns to that role or who He has made with an evil, ungodly disposition. Thus throughout all Biblical history the adversaries of God's people were always 'flesh and blood people, usually those of some other race. Yes, the evil, destructive and hostile Edomite Jews were made that way by God: 'I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the Lord do all these things.' [661] 'Behold, I have created the smith who blows the coals in the fire...and have created the waster to destroy.' [662] 'The Lord has made all things for himself, yes, even the wicked for the day of evil.' [663]

Evil, wicked persons are a part of God's plan of this world, persons who would be against His order, His law and His people. No supernatural devil exists in this plan. 'but could we not preach the word of God to these wicked (Esau) Edomite-Canaanite Jews converting them to righteousness? No, for God says they are born that way and will not turn: 'The wicked are estranged from the womb; They go astray as soon as they are born, speaking lies.' [664] These Edomite-Canaanites are born with un-Godly traits. God didn't tell Joshua to convert them. He told Joshua to slay them. God promises their destruction not their conversion [665]. Even if raised in a righteous environment the Edomite will still be wicked. [666] Thus Esau-Edom and his Canaanite brethren are not an extinct and no longer existing people (as they would have you believe). They are in the world today, and they are still at their ancient task of defying God today, and attempting to corrupt and destroy God's true Israel people. They are still in God's Script acting out their role in the world. But their final scene draws near and their time of destruction is at hand."

From: Adam and Cain, former Governor of Oklahoma (1951): "Mr. W. Smith, who was for many years private secretary to Billy (William Ashley) Sunday, the Evangelist, makes a statement on oath before a Notary Public of Wayne, Michigan.

The statement is to the following effect: President Coolidge shortly before his term of office expired, said publicly that he did not choose to compete again for the Presidency of the United States. Shortly afterwards, Billy Sunday interviewed him. Coolidge told him that after taking office, he found himself unable to carry out his election promises or to make the slightest move towards clean government. He was forced and driven by threats, even murder threats, to carry out the orders of the Jews. Billy Sunday made public this statement of Coolidge. There followed a general attack upon the Evangelist. Then his son was framed and committed suicide, whilst the father's death was hastened in sorrow for the loss." [667]

With this background in mind, we can better understand our use of the definition of the word "Serpent" as used by Jesus Christ. From the Scriptures then, Esau-Edomite Jews (Pharisees and Sadducees) are identified as "Serpents" by Jesus The Christ.

a). Speaking to the scribes, Pharisees (Esau-Edomite Jews), Jesus said: "Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets." [668]

b). Speaking to the scribes, Pharisees (Esau-Edomite Jews) Jesus said: "Ye Serpents, ye generation (race) of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?" [669]

c). And in John 8:44 Jesus said of the Pharisees and other Esau-Edomite Jews: "Ye are (descendants) of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning and abode not in the truth because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it..."

d). And in verse 47 Jesus relentlessly continues to identify the Pharisees and other Esau-Edomite Jews for exactly what they are by telling them and us, as students of the Word of God, that they are definitely not of God: "He that is of God hearth God's words: ye therefore hear them not; because ye are not of God."

e). "Then took they (Esau-Edomite Jews) up stones to cast at him: but Jesus hid himself, and went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed by." [670]

From Dakes's Annotated Reference Bible, 19th printing 1988, we become aware of the following interesting information, all on page 104 of the New Testament section: That Jewish Claims that the Jews (identified above as Serpents by Jesus) were somehow befitting of the "Chosen People" category is absolutely and consistently refuted by Jesus the Christ as shown below:

I). "Jewish claim of His nationality and source of power refuted by Jesus." [674]

The Dake's Annotated Reference Bible is the product developed from Finis Jennings Drake's approximately 100,000 hours and over a period of 43 years of searching the Scriptures. The very short Scriptural Book of Obadiah deals with the future destruction and sin of Edom. The Day of the Lord, the restoration of Israel (Anglo-Saxon's; Isaac's Sons a hidden treasure) and the Messiah's Eternal Kingdom (Government). In referring to the "extermination of Edom" [675]

j). Obadiah 18 states: "And the house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame, and the house of Esau for stubble, and they shall kindle in them and devour them; and there shall not be any remaining of the house of Esau; for the Lord hath spoken it."

k). And we read in Romans 9:13: "As it is written, Jacob I loved, but Esau have I hated." [676]

l). And from the Book of Jasher 26:17 we read that "Esau was a designing and deceitful man."

m). Question: If the house of Jacob (descendants) and the house of Joseph (descendants) are to "devour" (destroy) the house of Esau (descendants) in The Day of The Lord, which is Yet to happen, then there must be, today, here and now, literally physical descendants of all three "houses" living here physically on earth - is this not correct? Consequently, it would appear that it is vitally important for each of us to know which house (descendants) to whom we belong or to whom we don't belong - we don't want to be lining up with the losers do we?

Do you want to be among the house of fire, so as to devour the stubble or do you prefer to be a supporter of the house of stubble? Jesus Christ was not a Jew. He is a Divine Creation sharing lineage from the tribe of Judah (the pure seed branch). A Jew is not an Israelite and a Jew is not a Hebrew. And a Jew is not a Judean as you have been lead to believe. But this is another study which requires detailed examination. We hope to be able to provide you at another time. We know this is a very touchy subject but the truth is the truth. Yet the Bible says He was accused of being "King of the Jews." But this was Pilate mocking the Jews. Also remember the Jews were mocking Jesus. The translators should have put the word "Judean" in this passage. If you will study this issue, you will find mistranslations which tend to be misleading. Following is an expose on Jewish Ritual Murder which is currently being conducted just as it has for centuries.

At the dawn of civilization, the blood rite, in which human blood is drunk from the body of a still-living victim, was known to many tribes. However, only one people, that has never progressed beyond the Stone Age, has continued to practice the blood rite and ritual murder. This people are know to the world as Jews. Arnold Toynbee, a noted scholar, has called the Jews "a fossil people."

In so doing, he must have been aware of the fact that they still practice ritual murder and the drinking of human blood (especially Christian blood). As a scholar, he could not have failed to note the many attested incidents of this practice of the Jews, for hundreds of example of ritual murder by the Jews are cited in official Catholic books, in every European literature, and in the court records of all the European nations.

It is the official historian of the Jews, (Josef Kastein, in his History of the Jews, who gives the underlying reason for this barbaric custom. On page 173, he says, "According to the primeval Jewish view, the blood was the seat of the soul." Thus it was not the heart which was the seat of the soul, according to the stone-age Jews, but the blood itself. They believed that by drinking the blood of a Christian victim who was perfect in every way, they could overcome their physical short comings and become as powerful as the intelligent civilized beings among whom they had formed their parasitic communities. Because of this belief, the Jews are known to have practiced drinking blood since they made their first appearance in history.

Civilized people find this practice so abhorrent that they cannot believe it, despite the hundreds of pages of evidence against the Jews which are found in court records. Historical records for five thousand years have provided irrefutable proof of the blood guilt of the Jews. As other people became more civilized, the blood rite became a symbolic one, and a symbolic form of blood, usually wine, was drunk during the ritual, while the barbaric practice of killing a victim was given up altogether. Only one group, the Jewish cult, has continued to practice the blood rite in modern times.

Authorities on the blood rite, such as the noted Catholic scholar, James E. Bulger, state that the Jews practice the blood drinking rite because they are a parasitic people who must partake of the blood of the gentile host if they are to continue to survive. Bulger also states that the drinking of blood is a rite of black magic which enables the Jewish rabbis to predict the future as the blood of their non-Jewish victim courses through their veins.

Therefore, Jewish leaders from time to time entice a non-Jewish child, preferably male, and from six to eight years old. According to Jewish ritual, the non-Jewish (preferably a Christian child) child must be perfectly formed, intelligent, and without blemish. He also must be younger than the age of puberty, because the Jews believe that the blood becomes impure after the beginning of puberty.

When the (Christian) child is enticed into the synagogue, or, if the Jews are under observation, into some more secret gathering place, the kidnapped child is tied down onto a table, stripped, and its body pierced with sharp ritual knives in the identical places where the nails entered the body of Christ on the stake.

As the blood is drained into cups, the Jewish leaders raise the cups and drink from them, while the child slowly expires in an atmosphere of unrelieved horror. The Jews call down curses upon Christ and on all the non-Jewish people, and celebrate their symbolic victory over them as they continue to drink the blood of the dying child. Only by performing this rite, so the Jews believe, can they continue to survive and prosper among their non-Jewish host. The ancient Khazar Jews along with others of that Near East era followed a common custom of human sacrifice. The practice was to burn a young person upon an altar called a Tophet. The Old Testament of the Bible mentions this practice and condemns it. Around the Tophet altar, drums would be beaten loudly to drown out the cries of the children being burned alive.

In the days of Ancient Israel the Priests of Baal would blow trumpets to drown out their screams. The Carthaginians also were worshipers of Baal and sacrificed children on a massive scale. When faced with defeat in Syracuse in 310 B.C., they cast the sons of 500 nobles into a fiery pit, or Tophet, from a scaffold shaped in the likeness of the god Baal. In other words, the Jews have a god which finds blood pleasing. In the words of Mr. Leese, "What sort of a people is this whose god finds the blood obtained from mutilation of human genital organs as 'pleasing?'"

Even though God commanded circumcision, there is no way a reading of Scripture shows that God intended that the procedure turn into a bloody ritual. Besides that, it seems apparent that when Christ nailed the blood ordinances to the cross, he also nailed the circumcision to the cross. "Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing." [677]

Make no mistake about it, The God of the Jews is not the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel. And if it were the same God ‑‑ the manner in which the Jews worship is administered is an abomination in the eyes of the Lord our God. Many people think this sort of thing may have happened in the past but did not exist after the Babylonian captivity. However, from the account of Dio Cassius in the 78th Book of his history, Chapter 32, written in 117 A.D. comes the following: "Then the Jews in Cyrene (on the modern Tripoli coast of North Africa) choosing as their leader one Andreas, slew the Romans and Greeks, and Devoured (ate) their bodies, drank the blood, clothed themselves in the flayed skins, and sawed many in half from the head downwards; some they threw to wild beasts and others were compelled to fight in single combat, so that in all 220,000 were killed. In Egypt they did many similar things, also in Cyprus, led by one of them named Artemion; and there another 240,000 were slain."

Following is an expose on Jewish Ritual Murder which is currently being conducted just as it has for centuries.

On May 1, 1989, the Oprah Winfrey show had as its guest a person who, as a young girl, was forced to participate in a ritual in which a Christian infant was sacrificed. The amazing thing about this guest is that she was not affiliated with some unknown radical blood letting cult, but that She was a Jew.

According to an article on the show in the Chicago Tribune, the woman was "undergoing long‑term psychiatric treatment," apparently because of her horrible experience. The news paper article is quoted below in its entirety.

"Hundreds of television viewers and the leaders of several Jewish and civil liberties organizations have protested allegations on a popular talk show last week that some Jews practice ritual killing of children. The allegations were made by a guest using the pseudonym Rachel on 'The Oprah Winfrey Show,' a widely viewed syndicated talk show. During the program, broadcast Monday, Winfrey introduced the guest as someone who was undergoing long‑ term psychiatric [678] treatment for a multiple personality disorder. The woman told Winfrey that she had witnessed the ritual sacrifice of children and had been a victim of ritualistic abuse.

The guest also said of such practices: 'there's other Jewish families across the country. It's not just my family.' The assertions were made during a program that focused on the cult murders of at least 13 people whose bodies were found last month near Matamoros, Mexico. The woman's comments provoked hundreds of angry phone calls and letters to Jewish and civil liberties groups, spokesmen for the groups said in interviews late last week. Jeffrey Jacobs, the chief operating officer of Winfrey's production company, Harpo Productions Inc., denied Winfrey had acted irresponsibly in broadcasting the interview since she had emphasized on the show that the guest spoke only for herself. He added that Winfrey and her producers would meet with representatives of the Jewish and civil liberties groups next week in Chicago, where the show is taped. Winfrey was traveling Friday, Jacobs said, and was unavailable for comment. Early in the interview Winfrey said, 'This is the first time I have heard of any Jewish people sacrificing babies, but anyway ‑‑ so you witnessed the sacrifice?'

The woman responded: 'Right. When I was very young, I was forced to participate in that, and which I had to sacrifice an infant.' The guest was repeatedly identified by Winfrey as being Jewish. At one point, the woman asserted that (Jewish) ritual sacrifices occurred in other Jewish families around the country and that they were known to the Police."

Although all Jews are aware of the blood rite and its importance to the Jewish cult, only the most important Jewish leaders, the rabbis and the wealthiest members of the Jewish community, are allowed to participate in the blood-drinking rite. Kastein states, on page 173, that the ordinary Jews are forbidden to participate in the rite. One reason for this is the fact that the practice of ritual murder is fraught with danger for the entire Jewish Community. Most uprisings against the Jews during the past two thousand years have stemmed from the discovery of this practice, and the resulting attempts of the non-Jews to punish the Jews for murdering non-Jewish children.

The principal reason that this crime is so often discovered, is that the naked, pierced body of the child, once it has been drained of blood, must be thrown on a trash heap. The Jewish rite forbids burial of the body, even though this would conceal all evidence of their crime. The Talmud, the Holy Book of the Jews, defines all non-Jews as beasts, and by Jewish law, the burial of beasts is forbidden.

Therefore, the Jews try to conceal their crime by throwing the corpse of the murdered child down an abandoned well, where it may not be discovered, or by hiding it in some manner which will not constitute burial. In many cases, the body is discovered, and then the Jews either are attacked by the non-Jews, or they spend thousands of dollars bribing witnesses and officials, and attempting to frame some gentile as a "sex murderer." Bribery and intimidation of public officials and newspapermen is always the first step in this campaign.

In the United States, since many of these are Jews, no bribery is necessary, as every Jew knows that it is his first duty to conceal the evidence of ritual murder. It is also customary for the Jews to pay off the murdered child's parents with a large sum of money, which in many cases means that they will not prosecute.

At one time or another the Jews have been expelled from every country in Europe. And in almost every case it was over the charge of Ritual Murder. The most objective book on this subject available is "Jewish Ritual Murder" by Arnold Leese is available from The Truth At Last, P.O. Box 1211, Marietta, Georgia 30061, for $3.50 per copy.

The accusation was that during the Jewish feasts of Purim and/or Passover extremist Hassidic Orthodox Jewish sects would sacrifice a Christian youth for his blood. It was then dried and the powder mixed into triangular cakes or bread for eating in order for the Jews to gain atonement in the eyes of God. It is possible that Purim blood might sometimes have been held over for the Passover.

The ancient Khazar Jews along with other of that Near East era followed a common custom of human sacrifice. The practice was to burn a young person upon an altar called a Tophet.

The Old Testament of the Bible mentions this practice and condemns it. Around the Tophet altar, drums would be beaten loudly to drown out the cries of the children being burned alive. In the days of Ancient Israel the Priests of Baal would blow trumpets to drown out their screams.

The Carthaginians also were worshipers of Baal and sacrificed children on a massive scale. When faced with defeat in Syracuse in 310 B.C., they cast the sons of 500 nobles into a fiery pit, or Tophet, from a scaffold shaped in the likeness of the god Baal.

In Excavations at Gezer, the archeologist R.A.S. Macalister notes that the bodies of sacrificed young children are found in every strata of Jewish remains from the earliest times. Photographs of the children's bodies are published in Macalister's book, although the book itself, like most works which attest to the criminal nature of the Jews, is now almost unobtainable. It is classified as a rare book, and most rare book dealers are Jews.

In the Bible, Isaiah 57:3-5 the prophet, talking of the Jews of his day says: "But draw near hither, ye sons of the sorceress, the seed of the adulterer and the whore. Against whom do ye sport yourselves? against whom make ye a wide mouth, and draw out the tongue? are ye not children of transgression, a seed of falsehood, Enflaming yourselves with idols under every green tree, slaying the children in the valleys under the clefts of the rocks?"

By the phrase, "ye sons of the sorceress," Isaiah calls attention to the fact that Jewish ritual murder is a black magic rite. It is customary for the rabbi, as he drinks blood, to invoke the presence of Satan, who will then presumably carry out the wishes of the Jews. The drinkers of blood also swear eternal obedience to Satan during the blood rite. Isaiah also calls attention to the fact that here the children are slain "under the cleft of the rocks." This refers to the Jewish ban against burying the slain gentile child, and to hiding the body in the rocks in the hopes that the gentiles will not discover their crime.

The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. VIII, page 653, published in 1904, says, "The fact, therefore, now generally accepted by critical scholars, is that in the last days of the kingdom, human sacrifices were offered to Yhwh (Yahu, or Jehovah), as King of Counsellor of the Nation, and that the Prophets disapproved of it."

Yahu also is interchangeable with Baal, the Golden Idol, and Satan, who is thought to have been a minor god of the Jews, and an instrument of Baal. The two themes of Jewish history are blood and gold, and every practice of the Jews is inextricably bound up with these two factors.

One expose of the subject of Ritual Murder was written in great detail by Arnold S. Leese, entitled My Irrelevant Defense on Jewish Ritual Murder, London, 1938. Addressing the issue of sacrifices, Mr. Leese states: "Let a Jew speak for us here: 'Bernard Lazare, a Jew who was stated [679] to be 'without any religious convictions.' wrote what he himself described as 'an impartial study of the history and sociology of the Jews.' calling his book L'Antisemitisme; in the 1904 edition of this, Vol. II, p. 215, he writes, after mentioning the accusations against the Jews of Ritual Murder: 'To this general belief are added the suspicions, often justified, against the Jews addicted to magical practices. Actually, in the Middle Ages, the Jew was considered by the people as the magician par excellence; one finds many formulae of exorcism in the Talmud, and the Talmudic and Cabalistic demonology is very complicated. Now one knows the position that blood always occupies in the operations of sorcery. In Chaldean magic it had a very great importance...Now, it is very probable, even certain that Jewish magicians sacrificed children; hence the origin of the legend of ritual sacrifice.'"

Thus Lazare tries to absolve the Jews of the ritual murder charge by saying that they were guilty, but that it was done from motives of sorcery, rather than as a key element in the practice of the Jewish religion. He apparently had not read the Bible, or noted Isaiah's denunciations of the Jews as sorcerers and murderers of children. Of course the Jews killed children during their rites of sorcery, as Lazare admits, but these horrors were committed as essential rites of the Jewish religion.

Dr. Eric Bischoff, a famous German Jewish scholar, has found the explicit authorization of the practice of Jewish ritual murder in the Thikunne Zohar, Edition Berdiwetsch, 88b, a book of cabalistic ritual, as follows: "Furthermore, there is a commandment pertaining to the killing of strangers, who are like beasts. This killing has to be done in the lawful (Jewish) method. Those who do not ascribe themselves to the Jewish religious law must be offered up as sacrifices to the (Jews) High God (Satan)."

Murders of Christian children by the Jews usually occur during the important feast-days, Purim, one month before Easter, and Passover, at Easter. Jewish law prescribes that the gentile victim at Purim, a Jewish holiday as the Jewish victory over the gentiles, may be an adult.

Also if no gentile victim can be obtained, dried blood from a previous victim may be used. However, a Jewish law is quite specific that the victim at Passover must be a White Child (as the Whites are the True Israelites, and the Jews know it) under seven years of age, who must be bled white, crowned with thorns, tortured, beaten, stabbed, and finally given the last blow by being wounded in the side, the dagger prescribed to be in the hands of a rabbi, in a complete re-enactment of the crucifixion of Christ.

This vindicative ceremony reassures the Jews that even if a few of the gentiles are alerted to the nature of this people, as Christ talked against them, the Jews will always win out by murdering the critic. Consequently, many critics of the Jews are slain in these terrible ceremonies. In the United States, perhaps the most famous victim of Jewish ritual murder was the son of Charles Lindbergh, on March 1, 1932, during the time of the annual Jewish celebration.

Lindbergh's son was chosen because Lindbergh himself was the most logical person to lead the gentiles against the Jews. His son was slain as a warning to him to decline this service. Lindberg's father, a Congressman, had led the fight against Paul Warburg of Kuhn, Loeb Co., when Warburg succeeded in getting a subservient Congress to pass the Federal Reserve Act.

The elder Lindbergh had published a book which was burned by Federal agents during World War I, even though he was a Congressman at the time. He was well aware of the nature of the Jewish problem. Now that his son was a world-famous man, after his feat of flying alone across the Atlantic, the Jews feared that he might be persuaded to lead a gentile revolt against their power.

They had already planned World War II, in which Germany was to be the sacrificial victim, and now they brought in an almost illiterate German, Gerhart Hauptmann, and convicted him of the killing. Symbolically, Hauptmann, like Christ, was also a carpenter, a profession which made him a logical victim for the Jews.

Hauptmann's defense was that a Jew named Isidor Fisch had hired him to do some carpenter work, and had paid him with the bills which proved to be from the Lindbergh ransom money. Although the existence of Fisch was proven, he could not be located during the trial. The court was like the one which had convicted Jesus, for it only accepted evidence which the Jews allowed to be presented. In reality, of course, one cannot believe anything which is accepted as evidence in an American court, due to the facility of the Jews for manufacturing evidence and due to the prevalence of Jewish lawyers and judges in all American court rooms. This was also the first of many efforts of the Jews to vilify the Germans so that America would be more easily deceived into fighting a Jew's war.

A book entitled The Jew, the Gypsy, and El Islam, indicates that the Talmudic god of the Jews (Not the God of Christians) is a blood loving god: "The Talmud declares that there are two kinds of blood pleasing to the lord, viz: (1) that of Paschal holocaust (Easter sacrifice & the Feast of Purim); (2) that of circumcision."

According to The Jewish Encyclopedia, 1903, Vol. IV., p. 90, when performing the operation of circumcision on children, the mohel (Jewish Rabbi who does the circumcision): "takes some wine in his mouth and applies his lips to the part involved in the operation, and exerts suction, after which he expels the mixture of wine and blood into a receptacle provided."

Among the Jews themselves, the blood rite is an integral part of the ceremony of circumcising Jewish males. According to The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. VI, page 99, when performing the circumcision, the mohel, or circumciser, "takes some wine in his mouth and applies his lips to the part involved in the operation and exerts suction, after which he expels the mixture of wine and blood into a receptacle provided."

What The Jewish Encyclopedia does not tell us is that this mixture of wine and blood is then drunk by the rabbi, as a great delicacy. No other people in the world today enacts such a weird blood rite, save, perhaps, some Stone-Age natives in the deepest jungles of the Congo or New Guinea.

Hatred of Christianity is a tradition among the Jews. One of the principle feast-days is that of Purim. This feast is an orgy of hate against Haman, the story of whom is found in the Book of Esther of the Old Testament, the only Jewish book in the entire Bible.

The story, is that Xeroxes, King of Persia, became enamored with a Jewess, Esther a prostitute, and made her Queen in place of his rightful wife. Haman, the King's minister, complained to him of the conduct of the Jews who, he said, did not keep the laws of the land, and obtained from the King an order to slay them.

Esther pleaded with the King and prevailed upon him to summon Haman to a banquet. There, Queen Esther further prevailed upon the King to spare the Jews and hang Haman on a gallows prepared for the execution of her guardian. Instead of the Jews being destroyed, their enemies were slaughtered, including Haman's ten sons, who were hanged.

This feast is often celebrated by an exhibition of gluttony, intoxication, and curses on the memory of Haman; and even to this day the Jewish bakers make cakes, laced with dried Christian blood, in the shape of human ears which are eaten by the Jews on this day, and are called "Haman's Ears," revealing once again the inherent hate and barbarism of the Jews in our midst.

When a Ritual Sacrifice occurs at Purim, it is usually that of an adult Christian who was murdered for his blood; the blood is then dried and the powder mixed into triangular cakes for eating; it is possible that the dried blood of a Purim Sacrifice might sometimes be used for the following Passover.

When a Ritual Sacrifice is done at Passover, it is usually that of a Christian child under seven years old, as perfect a specimen as possible, who is not only bled white, but crucified, sometimes circumcised and crowned with thorns, tortured, beaten, stabbed, and sometimes finished off by wounding in the side in imitation of the murder of Christ. The blood taken from the child is then mixed either in the powdered state or otherwise into the Passover bread.

Another festival at which Ritual Sacrifice has sometimes been indulged in is Chanucah (Which is called Hanukkah today) which occurs in December, commemorating the recovery of Jerusalem under the Maccabees in B.C. 165.

Although hate is the principal motive, superstitious traditions are also involved, one being the association of blood-sacrifices with the idea of atonement; some Jews have confessed that Jewry cannot be saved unless every year the blood of a Christian is obtained for the purpose of ritual consumption.

The Jewish Encyclopedia, 1903, Vol. III, pp. 266-267, gives a list of Accusations of Ritual Murder (Sacrifices) made against the Jews through the centuries; 122 cases are listed in chronological order, and no less than 39 of them were made in the 19th century! There were far more than double the number of Blood Accusations made in the 19th century than in any previous century, according to this authoritative Jewish list.

The list of Ritual Murder Accusations made by a converted Jew, Cesare Algranati, in 1913, and published in Cahiers Romains; there are listed 101 accusations, or which 28 were made in the 19th century and only 73 for all the eight preceding centuries! Even the Jew Roth gives the argument away, for he says: "The nineteenth century proved little less credulous than those which proceeded it." [680]

The fact that the charges increase in number as the age becomes more and more enlightened is particularly significant, because the Jewish Money Power and its silencing activities are more developed than ever before and has been instrumental in reducing the number of charges by covering them up.

It is absolutely amazing that there are always influential Judeo-Christian men/women who can be induced, when Jewish interests are at stake, will declare to all the world that there is nothing improper in not attempting to examine these charges of Ritual Sacrifice by the Jews; and to declare them as lies by "Anti-Semitic" authors.

Yet the record is clear if one is inclined to study and learn. Following are few such examples: "Then the Jews in Cyrene (on the modern Tripoli coast of North Africa) choosing as their leader one Andreas, slew the Romans and Greeks, and devoured their bodies, drank the blood, clothed themselves in the flayed skins, and sawed many in half from the head downwards; some they threw to wild beasts and others were compelled to fight in single combat, so that in all 220,000 were killed. In Egypt they did many similar things, also in Cyprus, led by one of them named Artemion; and there another 240,000 were slain."[681]

The second: "Baena (Cordoba Province): Ninety-one assassinations, mostly by shooting, hatchet blows, or strangling. Others were burned alive. Two nuns who had been dragged from the convent of the Mother of God, had their religious medals, with the figure of the Virgin, nailed into the sockets of their eyes.

La Campana (Seville): Reds, led by a woman, Concepcion Velarde Caraballo, who either killed or was responsible for killing 11 persons in prison. The prisoners were fired on until they fell, covered with petrol, and set on fire. Some were still writhing in the flames when the city was entered.

Lore del Rio (Seville): 138 assassinated. They were dragged to the cemetery, lined up, and shot in the legs, being burned alive as they fell in a trench. When the town was entered hands could still be seen writhing above the ground." [682]

From The Magick, in Paris, France: "...it was the theory of the ancient (Jewish) magicians that any living being is a storehouse of energy varying in quantity according to the size and health of the animal (non-Jews), and in quality according to its mental and moral character. At the death of the animal this energy is liberated suddenly. The animal should therefore be killed within the Circle, or Triangle, as the case may be, so that its energy cannot escape...For the highest spiritual working one must accordingly choose that victim which contains the greatest and purest force. A (Christian) male child of perfect innocence and high intelligence is the most satisfactory and suitable victim." [683] A footnote on p. 95 says: "(4) It appears from the Magical Records of (the Jew) Frater Perdurabo that he made this particular sacrifice on an average about 150 times every year between 1912 and 1928."

Even today the Jewish sects who keep the Passover by solar computation, indulge in these bloody sacrifices of Christians on that feast-day; an account is given of a visit to the scene of sacrifice on Mount Gerizim in this century, and these words were used: "I have heard the wild, primitive scream of triumph as the knife is withdrawn from the neck of the (Christian) lamb of sacrifice."

A paragraph from The B'nai B'rith Messenger, 1936: "The sophisticated Pharisee (Jew) of the 20th century unceasingly gives thanks that he has outgrown the fables and rituals of the Ancients. The worldly-wise man loves the evident and is exasperated by that which is not evident. Plutocrat and proletarian alike regard themselves a victimized by that person whose words or actions they do not understand. We love the obvious because it flatters us, and hate the mysterious because it damns our intelligence with faint praise. Riddles are irksome.[684] The modern cry is for facts. Yet, with facts for his fetish, the modernist is more foolish than his forebears. Decrying superstition, he is most superstitious; rejecting fancies, he is the fanciful product of a fictitious age. The modern world is bored with its own importance; life itself has become a botheration. Suffering from chronic ennui, how can a world ever become interested in anything but itself? Smothered in their self-complacency, these all-sufficient ones ask for facts. But what facts are there that fools can understand? How can the helpless superficial grasp the hopelessly profound, for are not realities reserved for the wise (Jews)?"

Although this paragraph is clothed in nonsense it is a picture of a Ritual Sacrifice, with the victim crucified. And is merely showing the contempt the Jew has for Christians because they cannot understand this type of wording.

Following in chronological order, where the death of the victim is perpetrated by the Jews; and in light of the show by Ophra Winfry in 1989 we can clearly see that there many cases of Ritual Sacrifice by Jews have been unsuspected and undiscovered up to today, 1995, and will continue for years to come.

A converted Jew, called Theobald of Cambridge, confessed that the Jews took blood every year from a Christian child because they thought that only by so doing could they ever obtain their freedom and return to Palestine; and that it was their custom to draw lots to decide whence the blood was to be supplied; Theobald said that last year the lot fell to Narbonne, but in this year to Norwich. The boy was locally beatified and has ever since been known as St. William. The Sheriff, probably bribed, refused to bring the Jews to trial. [685]

There is an illustration of an old painted rood-screen depicting the Ritual Murder and Sacrifice of St. William; the screen itself is in Loddon Church, Norfolk, unless the Power of the Jewish Money has had it removed. No one denies this case as a historical event, but the Jews of course say it was not a Ritual Sacrifice. [686]

The Jew, C. Roth stated, in reference to this case: "Modern enquires, after careful examination of the facts, have concluded that the child probably lost consciousness in consequence of a cataleptic fit, and was buried prematurely by his relatives." [687]

How these so-called enquires arrived at a conclusion like that after all those years, Mr. Roth does not say; nor is it a compliment to the Church to suggest that its ministers would allow the boy's death to be celebrated as a martyrdom of a saint without having satisfied themselves that the wounds on the body confirmed the crucifixion and the piercing of the side.

John Foxe's Acts and Monuments of the Church records this Ritual Sacrifice, as did the Bollandists and other historians. The Prior, William Turbe, who afterwards became Bishop of Norwich, was the leading light in insisting that the crime was one of Jewish Ritual Sacrifice.

in The Dictionary of National Biography (edited by a Jew) it is made clear that his career, apart from this Ritual Sacrifice, is that of a man of great strength of character and moral courage.

We could go on and on with case after case for hundreds of pages, but we believe this should suffice to show that the Jews did and still do sacrifice Christian children for their ceremonies. In other words, the Jews have a god which finds blood pleasing. In the words of Mr. Leese, "What sort of a people is this whose god finds the blood obtained from mutilation of human genital organs as 'pleasing?'"

Quoting from writer Charles A. Weisman's Book "Who is Esau-Edom?": "During the Middle Ages Jews were found guilty of ritual murder of Christians in England; at Norwich in 1146, and Lincoln in 1225; in France at Blois in 1171; and in northern Italy at Trent in 1475. The Jewish Encyclopedia lists 121 Ritual Murder cases from 1146 to 1900, which were tried in courts. Many of the listings show convictions and the mode in which guilty Jews were executed." [688]

Continuing from "Who is Esau-Edom?": "From 1900 to 1939's there have been about another twenty cases of ritual murder by Jews. Even to this day there are reports of ritual murder of (Christian) children by certain extremist Hasidic Orthodox Jewish sects." [689]

Continuing from "Who is Esau-Edom?": "Abortion has become an overt means of child sacrifice which Jews have instituted under their de facto law. A more covert means of (Christian) child sacrifice has been by their infamous 'ritual murders, which Jews have been accused through the ages.' In this practice 'the blood of the sacrificed gentile (Christian Child) is mixed with flour to make the unleavened bread eaten at Passover.'" [690]

Make no mistake about it, as we have already stated The god of the Jews is not the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel!!! And if it were the same God ‑‑ the manner in which the Jews worship is administered is an abomination in the eyes of the Lord our God. According to Leese there are two specific periods of time for Ritual Murders by the Jews.

"The two principal feast days associated with Ritual Murder have been (1) Purim, and (2) Passover, the latter at Easter and the former about one month before it. When a Ritual Murder occurred at Purim, it was usually that of an adult Christian who was murdered for his blood...the blood was dried and the powder mixed into triangular cakes for eating; it is possible that the dried blood of a Purim murder might sometimes be used for the following Passover. When a Ritual Murder was done at Passover, it was usually that of a (Christian) child under seven years old, as perfect a specimen as possible, who was not only bled white, but crucified, sometimes circumcised and crowned with thorns, tortured, beaten, stabbed, and sometimes finished off by wounding the side in imitation of the murder of Christ.

The blood taken from the child was mixed either in the powdered state or otherwise into the Passover bread. Then eaten - A type of Jewish Blood ritual was apparently still common even in 1903, as the Jewish Encyclopedia for that year, in discussing the method of performing a circumcision, states that the person performing the ritual: "...takes some wine in his mouth and applies his lips to the part involved in the operation, and exerts suction, after which he expels the mixture of wine and blood into a receptacle provided." [692]

The Jewish circumcision rite requires that this mixture of the mohel's sputum, wine and blood from his mouth be mixed into a larger batch of wine. From this, all the Jewish guests drink and celebrate by singing and dancing) [693]

There is little doubt that the Jews and other historians who are possessed by the spirits of the Jews claim that the "Dark Ages" were from 493 A.D. to 711 A.D. What they mean by the "Dark Ages" is that the Christian Church kept the Jews under control and countered their every move to put their Satanic battle plan into motion.

During the "Dark Ages" (the dark ages got its name from the Jews; because they were driven out of almost every country in Europe at the time, for their wickedness and ritual murders) they were countered by brave Christian souls like St. Bernard and others who led forces which confined them to their own ghettoes where they could not mix their blood with those of our Adamic people or killed them outright.

Following is quoted from "Mullins' New History of the Jews." In the United States, Jews have been able to practice ritual murder of gentile children with impunity, because they control the press, and because they hold so many high public offices. It has been estimated by a leading police official that four thousand children disappear in the United States each year. There is no question that the majority of them are victims of Jewish ritual murder. So prevalent has the custom become in this country that Jews are able to ship large quantities of the children's blood to Israel for use in their ceremonies there.

One of the problems of the Jewish homeland in Israel has been a shortage of Christian children who could be used in the ritual ceremony, and the Unite States, which has also furnished most of the money to Israel, has also provided much of the required children's blood.

Because most of these children are taken from poor families, no mention is ever made of their disappearance in the press. Only in rare instances do the Jews dare to take the child of a well-known public figure, as they did in the Lindbergh case, and then it is done for a specific political purpose, and as part of a larger policy.

Because of the terror that strikes the Jewish community when the body of a Christian child is found murdered in the ritual manner, and the public outcry from the Christians, many have found fame and sudden fortune by siding with the Jews in these instances. Typical was the case of Jan Masaryk, the President of Czechoslovakia.

Masaryk was an obscure lawyer when the body of Agnez Hruza was found in Bohemia in 1899. A Jew named Hilsner confessed to the murder and implicated two other Jews. Nevertheless, a new trial was ordered. Dr. Baxa, attorney for the murdered girl's mother, who was seeking justice in this case, made a speech in the Bohemian Diet, or Parliament, December 28, 1899, accusing the Government of having shown extreme partiality to the Jews in this case. A second body was found, that of Maria Klima, who had also been murdered with a ritual knife which was found in Hilsner's possession.

Hilsner's defending counsel at this trial was Jan Masaryk. At the Versailles Peace Conference, twenty years later, the Jews showed their gratitude by making a new nation, Czechoslovakia, and appointing Masaryk President, with the title, founder of Czechoslovakia. Throughout his life, Masaryk was an eager and willing tool of Jewish leaders.

In the United States, many gentiles have found large sums of money suddenly available to them for campaign purposes, after they have aided in hushing up some new scandal of Jewish ritual murder. The path to the Governor's mansion, the Senate, and the White House has been magically eased when the candidate proves that he is willing to cover up for the Jews in their murders of gentile children.

The director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, J. Edgar Hoover, annually conducts a scare campaign warning children in the United States never to talk to strangers, or to get into a strange car. It is not generally known that Hoover has to do this because of the prevalence of Jewish ritual murder. Hoover's campaign is ostensibly directed at molesters of children, although only a dozen such cases are reported annually in the entire country.

The real reason behind Hoover's campaign is that Jewish leaders fear the recklessness of some of the lesser Jews, who try to seize Christian children for ritual purposes without covering their tracks. Therefore, J. Edgar Hoover spends hundreds of thousands of dollars annually of taxpayers' money to warn children against all strangers, although he should only be warning them against Jews. He does not dare reveal the true purpose of this campaign, which is intended solely to prevent children from falling into the hands of unauthorized Jewish murderers.

Not only does this cause the American child to be brought up in an atmosphere of fear and horror, so that it is taught to mistrust all adults, and causes much neurosis in later life, but it also refuses to face the real issue, the taste of the Jews for Christian blood.

Some journalists suppose that J. Edgar Hoover performs this annual task, and many other favors, for the Jews because he is grateful to the Anti-Defamation League for having ghostwritten a book for him called Masters of Deceit, and for having peddled hundreds of thousands of copies for him. The book was written by a Jewish communist name Jay Liebstein, who claims to have shocking personal information about the Great Deceiver himself. The real reason why Hoover uses the FBI to harass all non-Jews who know the truth about Jews may lie in Liebstein's hold over him.

Because the city of Chicago is a center of Jewish financial power, and is completely controlled by the Jews, some of the most flagrant cases of ritual murder of Christian children have occurred there in recent years. Chicago is said to have become one of the world centers of the supply of children's blood used in Jewish rites. The Chief of Police admitted that three hundred children disappear each month in Chicago, but he claims that they are all "runaways." it is odd that these runaways never turn up, either in Chicago or anywhere else. In October, 1955, the rash of ritual murder cases was at a height when the bodies of two Schuessler boys, a Peterson boy, and the two Grimes girls were discovered.

Police officials immediately labeled these killings "sex crimes," as the Jews had taught them to do. Frantic efforts were made to railroad several poverty-stricken and ill-educated gentiles to the electric chair, but no evidence could be manufactured against them which would hold up in court, and they were released. As in the trial of Christ, the lies of the Jews conflicted with each other.

Although these murders occurred in the heart of a great city, Not One Clue Has Ever Been Discovered In These Cases! Or rather, we should say that no clue was ever announced to the public. Although hundreds of police and detectives worked day and night, due to the public horror over these crimes, nothing was ever admitted to have been found. There were many charges that there had been a coverup, and that Chicago officials had destroyed or concealed all the evidence that was uncovered.

Due to this public interest, the Chicago press published many stories about the killings, which were seen at once to be typical Jewish ritual murders. In these cases, the bodies had been stripped and thrown onto garbage heaps. Pathologists agreed that not one of them had been sexually molested.

However, there were many strange punctures on the bodies, which could not be explained. The Daily News published an early afternoon edition in which a diagram of the Peterson boy's body showed puncture marks in each of the places where the body of Christ had been wounded on the Stake. Within ten minutes, the edition had been taken off the newsstands and rushed back to the News building, where it was burned.

However, eight copies of this issue were obtained by Mrs. Lyrl Clark Van Hyning, the courageous publisher of a patriotic journal called Women's Voice. When she called the News office to ask why the edition had been taken off the stands, she was told that there had been complaints about it, and that it was likely to cause "racial unrest." During this entire episode, Mrs. Van Hyning printed the truth about the murders.

Police reports showed that the bodies of the Grimes girls bore puzzling wounds on their chests, which were to shallow to cause death. Also, no cause of death could be agreed upon. It was even claimed that they had died of fright! Actually, as Mrs. Van Hyning pointed out in her paper, they died from a very simple cause, loss of blood, for the News had already published the strange fact that there was no blood in their bodies, when they were found.

A copy of Arnold Leese's definitive work, Jewish Ritual Murder, was sent to Arnold Schuessler, father of the murdered boys. He read it, and began to ask questions of the police. The Jewish Sheriff of Chicago, Lohman, had assigned a Jewish deputy, Horwitz, to stay with the Schuesslers night and day in case they raised the question of ritual murder.

When Mr. Schuessler asked Horwitz if his boys had been killed for their blood, in a Jewish religious ceremony, the Jew immediately accused him of murdering his own sons! He was taken to police headquarters and given a lie detector case, which completely cleared him. Instead of releasing him, the Police turned him over to a Jew named Dr. Steinfeld. He was spirited away to a "sanitarium" operated by Steinfeld in the nearby town of Des Plaines, Ill. Mr. Schuessler was given electric shock treatments and died that same afternoon.

An inquest was held, and Dr. Steinfeld was forced to testify. He claimed that Mr. Schuessler had been suffering from "hallucinations," but he refused to describe these visions. He also refused to give any further information, and it was obvious to Dr. Thomas McCarron, the City Coroner of Chicago, that Steinfeld was concealing the truth. McCarron denounced Steinfeld, and told the newspapers that the case was very strange. Patients were never given shock treatments immediately upon being admitted to a sanitarium. McCarron knew that Schuessler had been murdered, but he could do nothing about it, and city officials ordered him to say nothing further about the case. For a few days, there was a very real danger that he too would be murdered. He has since refused to discuss the case with anyone.

Dr. McCarron knew Steinfeld's sinister history. During World War II, Dr. Steinfeld had been convicted of giving special drugs to Jewish boys in the Chicago area which caused their hearts to flutter. They were exempted from military service as 4-F. Steinfeld received $2000 fee for each of these cases. After the war, Steinfeld opened his sanitorium in Des Plaines, which became the production center for Jewish ritual murder in the Midwest.

It was ironic that Mr. Schuessler, supposedly being protected by the police, was murdered in the same place his boys were killed, and his murder, like that of his sons, went unavenged, except for one later development.

Several patriots went to Des Plaines the next afternoon and distributed five hundred copies of a pamphlet charging Dr. Steinfeld with the murder of Mr. Schuessler, and accusing him of operating a Jewish ritual murder center.

One of the pamphlets was handed to the chief of police, yet nothing was done. The distributors of these pamphlets could have been arrested and charged with criminal libel, with a possible ten-year sentence, yet Steinfeld refused to make any charge against them.

A few days later, he flew to Switzerland, and it was announced that he was taking a "rest cure." The next day, his body was found hanging in a closet in his hotel room. The verdict was "suicide," although he may have been a reluctant one. Strangely enough, no Chicago newspaper carried the notice of this well known local figure's death.

A few weeks later, Arnold Leese, who had been preparing a book about the Schuessler case as a classic example of Jewish ritual murder, died suddenly. He had been airmailed copies of all newspaper accounts of the case during the long investigation, some one hundred pages of newspaper clippings, but these were not found in his effects after his death. Meanwhile, a Jewish columnist for The Sun-Times, Irv Kupcinet, whose daughter died a drug addict in a Hollywood pad, raised $100,000 among the Jewish community and presented it to Mrs. Schuessler.

The Jewish deputy had continued to stay with her, and a few days later Mrs. Schuessler revealed to a reporter that he had taken all the money and gone to Las Vegas. Sheriff Lohman also left Chicago, being given a $20,000 sinecure as consulting criminologist at the University of California. [694]

It is the duty of every American parent whose child disappears to make every effort to find it. However, many poor families with too many children to feed take it for granted that a child has gone out into the world to make his own way, and they are unaware of the probability that the child has been murdered by the Jews for his blood.

Consequently, no effort is made to investigate these Jewish crimes, despite the fact that they have been going on for many centuries. It is necessary for us to use every weapon to arm ourselves against the Jews, and to observe the divinity of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, in Whose Name Salvation awaits us.

Another horrible involvement of an official American agency in the wide-spread practice of Jewish ritual murder was hushed up recently. A deputy chief of the Central Intelligence Agency committed suicide in Washington. The verdict was "over-work," thereby concealing a terrible tragedy. This official had been off from work for three months, following a nervous breakdown. He had suffered a fit of remorse over discovering that he had inadvertently been responsible for the murder of many Christian children in the Jewish religious ceremonies. This man, a gentile had become known for a special talent in an agency that was sixty percent Jewish. Most of the Jewish agents travelled around the world with unlimited expense accounts, staying at the best hotels, a la James Bond, while they carried out spy missions for Israel, with the American taxpayer footing the bill.

The Christian's special talent was a gift for picking up boys who could be used as homosexuals for the pleasure of foreign officials. At least, that was what he had been told, and he saw no reason to suspect otherwise, for the use of boys in international espionage was an old story, and most governments employed them at one time or another in order to blackmail high-ranking officials of other governments.

In the early evening hours, this CIA official would stroll about downtown until he saw a handsome lad. He would strike up a conversation, and if the boy was not otherwise engaged, he would take him to a hotel room, where he would turn him over to another agent. This CIA official would then leave, after promising the boy a sum of money, usually about twenty dollars.

During the period from 1947 to 1952, this CIA official picked up eighty-six boys on the streets of Paris and Vienna in this manner. He heard nothing further from any of them although it must have seemed odd that he never saw any of them again after leaving them in the hotel room. In 1963, a Jewish agent in CIA headquarters in Washington, who had learned of this official's former specialty, asked him if he would pick up a boy for him. By this time, the gentile had risen much higher in the hierarchy of the CIA, and he refused, saying that he did not have to engage in such activities any longer.

The Jew then astounded him by saying that since he already had eighty-six murders on his conscience, one more wouldn't hurt him. He could not believe that the gentile did not know that every one of the boys had been used as a victim of a Jewish ritual murder, and he described for him the entire ceremony.

The Jew ended up by threatening him, saying that if the gentle did not get him a boy for a ceremony planned for the approaching Passover holiday, he would be exposed. The gentile went home that evening, and collapsed with a complete nervous breakdown, from which he never recovered. Some months later, he committed suicide.

"Moreover, the Beast 666 adviseth that all children shall be accustomed from infancy to witness every type of sexual act, as also the process of birth, lest falsehood fog, and mystery stupefy, their minds, whose error else might thwart and misdirect the growth of their subconscious system of soul-symbolism. When, where, and with whom ye will.

The phrase 'with whom' has been practically covered by the comment 'as ye will.' One need no more than distinguish that the earlier phrase permits all manner of acts, the latter all possible partners. In real life, we have seen in our own times Oscar Wilde, Sir Charles Dilke, Parness, Canon Aitken and countless others, many of them engaged in first-rate work for the world, all wasted, because the mob must make believe to be 'moral.' This phrase abolishes the eleventh commandment, 'Not to be found out,' by authorizing incest, adultery, and pederasty, which every one now practices with humiliating precaution, which perpetuate the schoolboy's enjoyment of an escapade, and made shame, slyness, cowardice and hypocrisy the conditions of success in life.

The misunderstanding of sex, the ignorant fear like a fog, the ignorant lust like a miasma, these things have done more to keep back humanity from the realization of itself, and from intelligent cooperation with its destiny, than any other dozen things put together. The vileness and falseness of religion itself have been the monsters aborted from the dark womb of its infernal mystery.

The anacephalepsis of these considerations is this: 1). The accidents of any act of love, such as its protagonists and their peculiarities of expression on whatever plane, are totally immaterial to the magical import of the act. Each person is responsible to himself, being a star, to travel in his own orbit, composed of his own elements, to shine with his own light, with the color proper to his own nature, to revolve and to rush with his own inherent motion, and to maintain his own relation with his own galaxy in its own place in the universe. His existence is his sole and sufficient justification for his own matter and manner. 2). His only possible error is to withdraw himself from this consciousness of himself as both unique in himself and necessary to the norm of nature...

Whatever your sexual predilections may be, you are free, by the Law of Thelema, to be the star you are, to go your own way rejoicing. It is not indicated here in this text, though it is elsewhere implied, that only one symptom warns that you have mistaken your True Will, and that is, if you should imagine that in pursuing your way you interfere with that of another star. It may, therefore, be considered improper, as a general rule, for your sexual gratification to destroy, deform, or displease any other star. Mutual consent tot he act is the condition thereof. It must, of course, be understood that such consent is not always explicit. There are cases when seduction or rape may be emancipation or initiation to another. Such act can only be judged by their results." [695]

Today for people to really understand the (Jewish) Satanic Philosophy on Jewish Ritual Human Sacrifice, one should read the following excerpts from Aleister Crowley's book Magic [696] in Theory and Practice.

"Of the Bloody Sacrifice: and Matters Cognate: It is necessary for us to consider carefully the problems connected with the bloody sacrifice, for this question is indeed traditionally important in Magick. Nigh all ancient Magick [697] revolves around this matter. In particular all the Osirian religions - the rites of the Dying God - refer to this. The slaying of Osiris and Adonis; the mutilation of Attis; the cults of Mexico and Peru; the story of Hercules or Melcarth; the legends of Dionysus and of Mithra, are all connected with this one idea. In the Hebrew religion we find the same thing inculcated. The first ethical lesson in the Bible is that the only sacrifice pleasing to the Lord is the sacrifice of blood; Abel, who made this, finding favor with the Lord, while Cain, who offered cabbages, was rather naturally considered a cheap sport. The idea recurs again and again. We have the sacrifice of the Passover, following on the story of Abraham's being commanded to sacrifice his firstborn son, with the idea of the substitution of animal for human life. The annual ceremony of the two goats carries out this in perpetuity. And we see again the domination of this idea in the romance of Esther, where Haman and Mordecai are the two goats or gods; and ultimately in the presentation of the rite of Purim in Palestine, where Jesus and Barabbas happened to be the Goats in that particular year of which we hear so much, without agreement on the date. [698]

Enough has now been said to show that the bloody sacrifice has from time immemorial been the most considered part of Magick. The ethics of the thing appear to have concerned no one; nor, to tell the truth, need they do so. As St. Paul says, 'Without shedding of blood there is no remission;' and who are we to argue with St. Paul? But, after all that, it is open to any one to have any opinion that he likes upon the subject, or any other subject, thank God! At the same time, it is most necessary to study the business, whatever we may be going to do about it; for our ethics themselves will naturally depend upon our theory of the universe.

If we were quite certain, for example, that everybody went to heaven when he died, there could be no serious objection to murder or suicide, as it is generally conceded - by those who know neither - that earth is not such a pleasant place as heaven.

However, there is a mystery concealed in this theory of the bloody sacrifice which is of great importance to the student, and we therefore make no further apology. We should not have made even this apology for an apology, had it not been for the solicitude of a pious young friend of great austerity of character who insisted that the part of this chapter which now follows - the part which was originally written - might cause us to be misunderstood. This must not be.

The Blood Is The Life: This simple statement is explained by the Hindus by saying that the blood is the principal vehicle of vital Prana.[699] There is some ground for the belief that there is a definite substance [700], not isolated as yet, whose presence makes all the difference between live and dead matter. We pass by with deserved contempt the pseudo-scientific experiments of American charlatans who claim to have established that weight is lost at the moment of death, and the unsupported statements of alleged clairvoyants that they have seen the soul issuing like a vapor from the mouth of persons in articulo mortis but his experiences as an explorer have convinced the Master Therion that meat loses a notable portion of its nutritive value within a very few minutes after the death of the animal, and that this loss proceeds with ever-diminishing rapidity as time goes on. It is further generally conceded that live food, such as oysters, is the most rapidly assimilable and most concentrated form of energy. [701] Laboratory experiments in food-values seem to be almost worthless, for reasons which we cannot here enter into; the general testimony of mankind appears a safer guide.

It would be unwise to condemn as irrational the practice of those savages who tear the heart and liver from an adversary, and devour them while yet warm. In any case it was the theory of the ancient Magicians, that any living being is a storehouse of energy varying in quantity according to the size and health of the animal, and in quality according to its mental and moral character. At the death of the animal this energy is liberated suddenly.

The animal should therefore be killed [702] within the Circle, or the Triangle, as the case may be, so that its energy cannot escape. An animal should be selected whose nature accords with that of the ceremony - thus, by sacrificing a female lamb one would not obtain any appreciate quantity of the fierce energy useful to a Magician who was invoking Mars.

In such a case a ram [703] would be more suitable. And this ram should be virgin - the whole potential of its original total energy should not have been diminished in any way. [704] For the highest spiritual working one must accordingly choose the victim which contains the greatest and purest force. A male child of perfect innocence and high intelligence,[705] is the most satisfactory and suitable victim.

For evocations it would be more convenient to place the blood of the victim in the (Jewish) Triangle - the idea being that the spirit might obtain from the blood this subtle but physical substance which was the quintessence of its life in such a manner as to enable it to take on a visible and tangible shape. [706]

Those magicians who object to the use of blood have endeavored to replace it with incense. For such a purpose the incense of Abramelin may be burnt in large quantities. Dittany of Crete is also a valuable medium. Both these incenses are very catholic in their nature, and suitable for almost any materialization.

But the bloody sacrifice, though more dangerous, is more efficacious; and for nearly all purposes human sacrifice is the best. The truly great Magician will be able to use his own blood, or possibly that of a disciple, and that without sacrificing the physical life irrevocably." [707] [708]

In October 1980, P.E. Beasley, a retired Fayetteville, North Carolina police officer, and Ted Gunderson obtained a signed confession from Helena Stoeckley who stated that she and members of her (Jewish) satanic cult had murdered Dr. Jeffrey R. MacDonald's wife and their two children at Fort Bragg, North Carolina on February 17, 1970. The murders were Stoeckley's initiation into the group. Stoeckley advised that Dr. MacDonald was the victim of an Army drug frame up. During the late 1960s and early 1970s drugs were flown into United States Army bases from Vietnam in plastic bags concealed in the body cavities of dead GIs.[709] Dr. MacDonald was convicted and is serving three consecutive life sentences for these murders. He lost an appeal which was based on the concealment of evidence by the government during the 1979 trial.

As an outgrowth of the MacDonald investigation Ted Gunderson became involved with a civilian network in investigating (Jewish) satanic cults. He has developed extensive information which establishes that a loose-knit (Jewish) satanic cult/drug network is active in the United States. Members of this network finance their operation through the sale of marijuana, cocaine, heroin, amphetamines and barbiturates, as well as prostitution, pornography, snuff films and other illegal activity. The drugs are normally sold by street gangs. This network kidnaps and sacrifices children and others to Satan. We have information concerning numerous homicides and human sacrifices committed by this group. Some of the victims were working in our mini-civilian task force at the time of their deaths.

We [710] have interviewed numerous adult survivors. [711] The survivors come from different areas of the country, and none have been in contact with or know each other. Each of the survivors I have interviewed furnished me with similar details concerning ceremonies they witnessed in which humans and animals were sacrificed. Often, the victims were infants or young children.

Under torture, the body's production of endorphins increases dramatically, raising the level of Adrenalin and other body chemicals. Occultists torture their victims to death and cannibalize their bodies just before death in order to ingest these chemicals, which they believe gives them power. Similarly, some Satanist eat their victims' brains because they believe the victim's intelligence will thus pass into their own brain.

Members of the (Jewish - although they are not all Jews, most of them are however) cult network are operating child day schools throughout the country. Children from different states who have never met are telling authorities similar stories concerning their experiences in these schools. There has been successful prosecution in North Carolina, Florida, Massachusetts, Nevada and California of pre-school owners and operators. A psychiatrist in Los Angeles interviewed children from eight different day schools. All these children told similar stories about witnessing rituals satanic in nature, as well as extensive sexual child abuse by teachers and others. One adult survivor told me that when she was a young girl, her father made her hold a knife to the chest of a live infant. He then placed his own hand over hers and lunged the knife into the heart of the victim.

The occultists often force preschool children to participate in human sacrifices and then tell them they and their parent or parents will be murdered if the children reveal any secrets or talk about these activities. The psychological effect on the child is that the child believes he or she id guilty of murder. I know of one instance where a Satanist held a gun to a child's head and told her he would shoot her if she didn't shoot another child that was tied to a post. She shot the other child.

Sexual molestation of children during their preschool years is part of the ritual. It is also used to indoctrinate them. Children are indoctrinated between the ages of 2 and 4, when they are at a critical stage of development. These children acquire many of their values while under the supervision of Satanist before being returned to their parents and entering the public school system.

Satanist convince the children that their parents don't love them but that they, the Satanist, do. Even after they leave the day school and enter kindergarten, children's activities are followed by Satanist and continually reminded that they are being watched. When the children enter junior high and high school, the Satanist will attempt to actively recruit them. At this age, youngsters fall easy prey to peer groups who involve them through music, neighbors, drugs, sex, etc.

Mind control and discipline are an important part of Satanism. The application of mind control techniques starts during the child's preschool years in day school and continues through junior high and high school. Games such as Dungeons and Dragons are used to teach the unaware child (Jewish) satanic philosophy.

In the McMartin child day school case in California, more than 500 complaints of sexual molestation were filed with the police before the district attorney decided to prosecute. The D.A. indicted seven defendants. After a grand jury and pretrial, they were all held over for trial. The D.A. dropped the charges on five of the seven. Virginia McMartin was found not guilty, Raby Buckey was tried twice, with both trials resulting in a hung jury. The children had stated that they were taken into tunnels under the school and molested.

Some said they were taken out of the tunnels into the yard of the house next door to the McMartin school, placed in vans, and taken to various places in the community, where they were used for prostitution. Many prominent citizens were identified by the children as having been involved, including politicians, professional athletes and actors.

In May 1990, one of the McMartin victims' parents gained access to the school. She hired an archeologist. He and his associates found the tunnels at the time of the second trial of Ray Buckey, but the district attorney refused to use the evidence in the trial .

More than 5000 students attended the McMartin preschool during the 28 years it was in operation (two schools, 1956 to 1984). We know a 34 year old woman who recalls being sexually molested, along with her schoolmates, at the McMartin school during her preschool days, more than 30 years ago.

Many prosecutors are reluctant to prosecute preschool sexual molestation cases because they believe children cannot be competent witnesses. A three-year study by Gail S. Goodman, Ph.D., State University of New York at Buffalo, and Karen Sawitz, Ph.D., UCLA, examined the testimony of children who were actively involved in an event and who interacted with an unfamiliar person. These are laboratory studies involving recall about (1) playing a game (low-stress situation), (2) having blood drawn at a clinic (high-stress situation), and (3) being inoculated (high-stress situation).

The findings included: (1) There were not significant age differences in the children's ability to recall the event, and their recall did not deteriorate over time. The children's reports were 98% accurate. (2) The older children (5 to 6 years) answered more objective questions correctly than the younger ones, (3 to 4 years) and the younger children showed a decline, after a delay, in their ability to answer questions about the actions involved. (3) Children did not make up false stories of abuse even when asked questions that might foster such reports.

It is common for (Jewish) satanic groups to kidnap their victims, usually infants and young children, from hospitals, orphanages, shopping centers and off the streets. We have information that Satanist operate not only child day schools but foster homes as well. This is a source for children who often cannot be traced. It is also a way of obtaining children for ritualistic child molestation and recruiting children into Satanism. We have received information that interment camps are located throughout the U.S. where they hold their victims until they are ready to be sacrificed or sold to foreigners as sex slaves. We have information that the Satanist operate internment camps throughout the United States where they keep their captives. We have been told that some of the camps are on government reservations. We have been told about a landing strip in the Nevada desert where foreign jet airplanes with no tail markings land and take off after buying kidnapped children at auctions.

Another source of baby victims are "breeders," female Satanist whose families have been involved in Satanism for generations. We have interviewed numerous breeders. The Satanist impregnate the breeders and use the babies for sacrifices. Since there is no birth record, there is no missing-person report. The Satanist also use breeders for prostitution and sexual favors to politicians, law enforcement officers, judges, etc. These officials are then blackmailed and as a result do not enforce laws broken by Satanist and often do not prosecute them. Thus, in some areas, (Jewish) satanic crimes are being overlooked or covered up because Satanist control law enforcement and the judicial system.

We have information that a child kidnaping network is active in the United States that furnishes children to (Jewish) satanic cults for human sacrifices. We recently identified two missing children ages 1 and 3 who, according to our witness, were victims of (Jewish) satanic sacrifice on the West Coast. One of these children was from the East Coast and the other from the Southwest. The child from the Southwest was identified by two witnesses on the West Coast the day after he was kidnapped. Both children were sacrificed in a satanic ceremony. The Satanist prefer to sacrifice Christian infants and children. The younger the child, the less it has sinned and thus the "purer" it is deemed to be. There is a preference for pregnant women. They kill the mother and cannibalize the fetus.

We have information about four individuals who were informants for U.S. Government intelligence agencies and were involved in the satanic cult/drug network. By using such individuals, satanic cult/drug informants place disinformation in government files, thereby influencing in some instances action taken by government officials. In two cases, the informant worked for the FBI. This may be one of the reasons the FBI refuses to investigate the satanic cult movement in the United States today. I suspect another reason is that the FBI's consultants are providing them with disinformation about satanic, activity, philosophy and beliefs. The satanic network utilizes specialists for surveillance, photography, contract killings, wiretaps and other techniques in its efforts to stay continuously aware of the activities of its adversaries. In 1984, I discovered that my telephones were tapped. I sued GTE and collected an out-of-court settlement.

Although there are numerous books available on Satanism, most of the teachings are passed orally from one generation to the next. During a trip to Washington, D.C., in June 1987, I was identified at a church service as a visitor to that city. The pastor informed the congregation that I was attempting to alert Congress to the satanic cult missing children problem in this country. After the service, a mother and her 15 year old daughter, a student at a local high school, advised me the daughter had been approached by a classmate the previous week and asked to join a satanic cult. The classmate described herself as a witch and stated that a recent meeting of Satanist in Washington, D.C., was attended by hundreds of people from all over the U.S. I have heard of other such meetings involving Satanist from other sections of the country.

Several years ago I visited an abandoned satanic ceremony site, located on the side of a mountain in Southern California. The site is approximately 250 by 80 feet in size and can only be seen from the air. The house on the property had burned down shortly after the McMartin preschool scandal made the headlines and it became public knowledge the McMartin children said that they had been taken to the mountains in an airplane. The children had also told authorities they witnessed infant sacrifices. I was reminded of this when I saw a concrete bunker approximately 20' x 20' in size. A source once active in the satanic movement told me that this type of structure was where Satanist keep their kidnapped victims until they sacrificed them. Also at that site I saw two satanic altars and a small room with steel hooks embedded in the concrete walls. My source said this was probably a torture room.

We have information that police officers, prosecutors, morticians, ministers, teachers, doctors, lawyers and others of all ages, in all walks of life, are practicing Satanist. Many of these individuals lead double lives. To some they appear as leading citizens of the community, and to their fellow cult members they are dedicated evil worshipers.

We have been told that a superintendent of schools in California is a Satanist. Michael Acquino, head of the Church of Set in San Francisco was a lieutenant colonel in the Army Reserves in charge of records for all Army Reserve personnel. Acquino has top secret clearance and lectures at Fort Bragg, N.C. as well as other Army bases. He reportedly is presently involved in mind control experiments at the University of Arizona. He was twice under investigation for ritualistic sexual child abuse at the Presidio in San Francisco. No charges were ever filed against him. An adult survivor once told me the U.S. Army is Satan's army. She made this statement because of the numerous Satanist in the Army. Her father was in the Army at the time. There have been ritualistic child sexual molestation cases at West Point as well as the Presidio in San Francisco.

A Boise, Idaho police officer believes 50,000 to 60,000 Americans who disappear each year are victims of human sacrifices by satanic cults. The bodies of some victims are buried but most are cremated so there is no body and no evidence. I know of an occult supply store in Los Angeles that sells portable crematories. Reliable sources estimate there are more than three million active Satanist in the United States.

The FBI reports the number of automobiles stolen in the United States each year, but they do not keep a record of the number of persons who disappear. It is unbelievable that there is more concern for automobiles than for missing persons. Some estimate the number of missing persons as high as 1.8 million per year. Only about half are believed to be located and returned within a year. I have alerted FBI, the U.S. Department of Justice and members of Congress to this and suggested that these matters be investigated by the federal government. My requests have been ignored.[712]

Mr. Ken Lanning, Superior in Charge of the FBI Behavioral Science Unit, Quantico, Virginia, states that since there are no bodies, there are no human sacrifices. He claims Satanism is a religion which is protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. He has publicly stated there are more crimes in the name of Christianity than there are committed in the name of Satan.

Many local law enforcement agencies recognize this problem and are actively investigating. However, local law enforcement is not equipped to coordinate this at a national level. A national clearing house is needed, as well as training and seminars.

The FBI already received monthly crime statistics from every law enforcement agency in the country. It would be a simple matter for the local law enforcement agencies to add a column to their report for missing children.

"Prosecution of child molestation cases is being derailed around the country because young victims are lacing their testimony with macabre tales of satanic rites, authorities say...But investigators are curious about similarities they're hearing in such testimony form youngsters in unrelated and geographically separate cases. 'The main thin in the stories I've heard is the great consistency in the types of things the kids were reporting - all across the country the descriptions were very similar.' Gallant said, 'In the last three years there have been about 60 to 70 solid cases...ones where investigations were actively pursued.'...An 11-year-old Pico Rivers boy, who prompted the arrest of neighbors after he accused them of molesting him, startled officials with claims the neighbors forced him to participate in ritual killing. Charges of kidnaping, conspiracy, false imprisonment and sexual assault of several neighborhood children were dropped before trial when another child witness recanted testimony and physical evidence was inconclusive. 'They always said nobody would believe us if we told,' said the 11-year-old...A professed occultist who agreed to be interviewed because he said he was a victim of such abuse and opposes it, confirmed the existence of satanic practices recounted by children. 'Those who worship evil are trying to appease or arise a spirit or deity, and some believe children are the key to doing this.' said Damion Jade Blood VII, an Australian living in New Jersey. 'I can certainly explain what kids are saying as being part of some occult religions. Outsiders won't believe this stuff, and that's something insides count on. Our whole lives are covert operations.'" [713]

And: "...Says Sandi: 'Too often I hear seasoned police officers say it simply cannot be true, that some kid must have made up the whole thing, that this just does not happen in a civilized world.' 'That is precisely what Satanist count on. They depend on disbelief or fear and ignorance.' The most conservative estimates place the number of devil worshipers in America at more than four million. A report by the Adam Walsh Center, the nation's leading investigative agency into ritual abuses, says that last year some 10,000 pre-teen American children were involved in crimes which included sacrificing animals and other demonic cult activities. The center says last year there were 200 Ritual Murder in the U.S. Says Sandi: 'Just look at my case files. Wizards, witches, Satanist, sorcerers and voodooists have come out of the closet and are on the march.'" [714]

An Associated Press release: "Last year, a psychologist testifying in a 16-year-old boy's trial said the boy admitted praying to Satan for guidance before shooting his father nine times 'because he knew God would not help him.' A Laguna Hills youth was sentenced to 25 years to life in prison for sneaking up behind his father and shooting him in the back of the head. A subsequent search of the boy's bedroom turned up pentagrams and hexagrams (a Star of David), satanic drawings and a pact he had made with Satan and signed in blood. Alleged 'Night Stalker' defendant Richard Ramirez, accused of murdering 15 people and assaulting 17 others, has a pentagram, a five-pointed star associated with Satanism, tattooed on the palm of his hand. 'Satanism usually isn't a motive in murder, rather murder is a symptom of Satanism,' said Dick Fredrickdson, an Orange Country deputy attorney..." [715]

From Boston we find: "South Shore police are considering charges against a group of alleged devil worshipers after the discovery of their 'church' inside an abandoned munitions bunker buried deep in the woods at Wompatuck State Park in Hingham. The bizarre find was made by Cohasset and state environmental police last week when officers tumbled upon a dozen satanic worshipers dressed in black cloaks who were seen leaving the bunker. Police confiscated numerous swords, machetes and knives, an animal skull and a silver chalice, according to John Comeau of the state Department of Natural Resources...'The whole thing is strange to me...It's kind of bizarre,' Comeau said yesterday as he sifted through items seized from the group. 'I think this group was really into it.'" [716]

The Record Searchlight stated: "A reward of $10,000 is offered for the arrest and conviction of a man who allegedly abducted a Red Bluff attorney at gunpoint in a child custody case that may be linked to Satanism and ritualistic abuse.

'That's the only motive we can see,' Red Bluff police Detective Ted Wiley said today of the February 2 kidnaping of Cynthia Angeil, 32... The man told Ms. Angell that she was investigating something that she shouldn't and showed her a photograph of a baby whose skin had been partially removed, Wiley said. 'It looked like it could have been an autopsy photo, but the man said it was a child who had been killed during a Satanic ritual,' Ms. Angell told police..." [717]

Following is Children's Allegations of Abuse Warrant Examination of Occult Theology: "Preschool children in numerous parts of the country have made bizarre and unusual statements concerning what they allegedly have experienced. As allegations of child abuse in day care centers emerged, it was clear to me that the bizarre elements the children described possibly were connected to the occult. In 1979 I was involved in a child custody case. Due to the unusual circumstances surrounding this case. I developed an interest and concern involving the occult. As a result, I began a file on occult practices and beliefs.

This article addresses those who attempt to discredit the children by stating publicly that the bizarre elements in the children's statements lack credibility. The following information was obtained by researching the occult and comparing that research to statements made by the children.

Children in almost all of the cases where ritual abuse is suspected stated that the adults involved undressed, the children and while of them were nude, danced in circles. Certainly this allegation is one of the more innocent in light of other allegations made by the children. However, documentation for adults and children dancing together in the nude is available. For example there is a photograph published in an occult book giving the explanation that what can be seen in the photograph represents a dance and spell. In this photograph it is clear there are six adults and one child. At least three of the adults appear to be female. All are nude and all are dancing in a circle [718]

Children in several cases made the allegation that they were sexually abused with sticks while being forced to take part in what appears to be some sort of ritual. When the children were asked what kind of sticks were used, the majority of the children responded that the sticks were the kind that come off of trees.

The children are clear in their descriptions. They are not describing a kite stick or a yard stick or any kind of finished wood, but rather the type of stick that would resemble a twig or small branch that is left in its natural state. In occult practice, the practitioner who is preparing a magic circle for ritual magic would have a piece of equipment called a wand or rod. The wand or rod cut from a tree is left in a natural state and is considered to have supreme magical power. It is also considered to be a phallic symbol.[719]

Several children in one case stated that they were sexually abused by a perpetrator who had a blue mark on his genitals. Another independent group of children stated that the perpetrator who sexually abused them had a red mask on his genitals.

A Witches Mark (sometimes referred to as the Devil's Mark) can be either red or blue in color.[720] This mark is placed on the body of the practitioner, in an area not usually seen, such as under the arm or on the genitals.[721]

In some of the other cases the children expressed a fear of the power they believed was acquired through occultic practice. One of these cases involved a group of children from the same family. These children felt that they were being spiritually threatened and asked for something to put in their rooms that would protect them. Their mother consulted with someone who had some knowledge of occult theology. The recommendation was to give the children some salt to sprinkle around the room. The mother felt the children would respond better to glitter, so she offered them a choice between gold glitter and table salt to throw around their rooms. The children chose the salt. They took the salt and carefully sprinkled it around their rooms. The children appeared to have absolute confidence that the salt would keep them safe.

Documentation for the use of salt is available in many of the books written on the occult. It can be purchased in stores that specialize in selling occult paraphernalia. The purpose of salt is purification. It is also an occult belief that salt can be used to control devils by keeping them away from a person or an area.[722]

In yet another case a parent found an unusual piece of fabric tied in intricate knots in her home. When she asked her child if she knew what it was the child became extremely upset and she insisted that it had to be untied immediately. She became even more upset when she experienced difficulty untying the knots. Documentation for a Witch's Ladder can be found in several books written on the occult. The description given for a Witch's Ladder is a piece of fabric tied in knots and hidden. If the person is intended for does not find the Witch's Ladder and untie it, the occult belief is that the person will die.[723]

Not only do the children seem to demonstrate a belief in the more sinister side of occult theology and appear to have some understanding of the purpose of some of the occult paraphernalia, but they also appear to be familiar with some of the occult symbolism. The children draw the well known symbols of the upside down cross and the numbers 666, but they also draw symbols a more sophisticated nature. Children from many independent cases have displayed some knowledge of the symbols described in the Lemegeton, or the Lesser Key of Solomon as well as those used by Eliphas Levi, a famous Jewish occult practitioner who lived and wrote many books on the occult in the early to mid 1800s.

In one particular case the children consistently draw an equal armed cross and are clear that this particular cross was a symbol used by the adults during rituals in their case. The equal armed cross of the occult represents the four elements and cardinal points. Research further reveals that this cross is also used in ritual magic. [724] In another independent case, the children consistently draw the shape of a 'T.' They insist that the 'T' is a cross. [725] This 'T' shape is a pre-Christian cross. The children in this particular case also are adept at drawing runes. Runes are known to be used in the occult and date back to the Nordic deities.[726]

In several other cases the children appear to have been exposed to the Nazi belief system, or at least the occultic side of the Nazi beliefs. These children talk of a master race and are familiar with some of the Nazi symbols.

Adolph Hitler was closely associated with the occultic. Thule Society, and filled many of his key positions with Thule Society members.[727] The belief of the Thule Society is to establish a super race of men and to eliminate inferior races.[728] The Thule Society was linked to the Brotherhood of the Golden Dawn in England. Madame Blvatsky and Aleister Crowley.[729] The symbol that best reflects Nazi beliefs is their own swastika. The Nazi swastika, chosen by Adolph Hitler, is a left handed swastika, which usually represents darkness, black magic and destruction.[730]

One of the frequent allegations made by the children in the majority of cases concerns the use of human feces, urine and blood. The children allege that feces, urine and blood have been smeared on their bodies and that they have been forced to eat and drink all three body products. The use of feces, urine and blood is well documented in most occult books. All three body products are used in various recipes for any number of reasons. The purpose of using these body products is the occult belief that feces, urine and blood retain the power and energy of the person they came form, which is then transferred to the person who consumes the product.

Arthur Lyons, who has authored books on the occult and has appeared on radio and television discussing the subject, writes that one way to celebrate a black mass is to use water, human urine or menstrual blood and the host or communion wafer offered during the black mass is to be made of human feces. During the service the host is either eaten or smeared on the face.[731] The children talk of experiencing both aspects of this ritual.

Children in many independent cases where ritual abuse is suspected have stated that they have witnessed the cooking of babies. If this allegation were true, what would be the purpose for cooking a baby? Researching books on the occult, I discovered a recipe for Flying Ointment. This ointment likely produces the sensation of flight. Flying Ointment is made up of various substances, some of which are hallucinogenic (deadly nightshade, henbane, aconite & Belladonna) and then blended with an oil to be rubbed into the practitioner's skin. One oil is suggested in the traditional recipe is baby fat. [732] To my knowledge the only certain way to obtain baby fat is to cook a baby.

Another element the children have talked about is cannibalism. A reference to cannibalism can be found in the writings of Arthur Lyons. Lyons describes a lecture held at the home of Anton LaVey, founder of the Church of Satan. The subject of this lecture was cannibalism. Mr. Lyons states that a human leg was brought to the home of Anton LaVey and, after being basted in Triple Sec, was eaten by several people in the group attending the lecture. The person who provided this tasty morsel was, according to Lyons, a physician at East San Francisco Bay Hospital who was also a member of the Church of Satan.[733]

While Lyons offers no explanation for the practice of cannibalism in his writings, an explanation can be found in the writings of other authors on the occult.[734]

Many children allege they have witnessed the killing of other children or babies during what appears to be a ritual. There is ample documentation in many occult books about the need for doing this to acquire the things that a baby's body would supply to accomplish a particular goal. Flying Ointment is only one of many goals.

In 1667 the Marquise de Montespan became interested in Louis XIV of France. In an attempt to become his mistress, de Montespan was responsible for at least two murders. The victims of these murders were children. The children had their throats cut during separate occult rituals. Their blood was sued in potions to insure that de Montespan would not be replaced in the King's affections.[735] One of the more interesting stories I have read was written by Arthur Lyons. Lyons wrote that he had attended a meeting conducted by a man who claimed he was a Satanist.

As Lyons describes what takes place at the meeting, he also gives chilling description of this man's altar. The altar was acutely some sort of tank filled with formaldehyde where a dead baby was kept. Lyons describes a male child with horns attached to his body. Lyons further states the child was probably stillborn.[736] Lyons may be an astute man, but I question his ability to make a determination concerning the cause of this childs death. One can only hope Lyons' assumption of a still born birth is correct. The question that must be asked is, did Mr. Lyons notify law enforcement? The foregoing information is not conclusive proof of infant murder by a Satanist. However, it is my opinion that it certainly raises the point that it is possible in today's world that a person could murder a child for a religious belief or need, and that this type of thinking was not necessarily left behind in the historical world of the occult. The foregoing information does however, point to one undeniable fact; there are people today who will use the body of a dead baby for occultic purposes.

Children in numerous cases across the country have described what appear to be several different rituals that require the use of both human and/or animal bones.

On October 14, 1986, the Orange County Register, a large, well respected newspaper in Southern California, published an interview with Ruth Ann Anderson, an occult practitioner. In this interview, Ms. Anderson explains that the bones she uses for her rituals during the full moon are a female pelvic bone, bird skull and the vertebra of a small animal. Ms. Anderson states that these bones represent 'a connection to the cycle of life and death.' [737]

This interview lends possible explanation to what the children describe, but it also realizes the question, 'How did Ms. Anderson acquire a female pelvic bone?'

Ceremonial swords and knives, body painting, masks, human body parts, human and animal sacrifice are just a few of the topics that I discovered during the course of my research which are documentable as essential to various occultic rituals. When confronted with statements made by those who choose not to believe that occult practices involving black magic, black witchcraft, Satanism or voodoo presently exist and that the only validation that is available for these practices is historical documentation, I would ask one question, 'At what point in time did these types of occultic practices stop?'

Some people stated that they believe the children were exposed to occult beliefs through Saturday morning cartoons or fairy tales such as Hansel and Gretel. To my knowledge, there are no fairy tales that teach the kinds of occultic beliefs of which these children have knowledge.

Some of the people who have the Saturday morning cartoon theory also put forth the theory that the children were brain washed by their therapists. My repose to that is the children were disclosing to their parents prior to being taken to a therapist.

What I find unbelievable is that the people who disbelieve are sometimes our best witnesses. Arthur Lyons claims to be a staunch disbeliever and yet he is an eye witness to a man who used a dead baby for an occultic purpose, and gives an account of a lecture on cannibalism where a human leg was eaten. If the children's statements could not be validated in any way, a reasonable person would have to disregard what they were saying. But to disregard their allegations without investigating is unreasonable. It has never been my intent to prove or disprove the allegations made by these children. However, to completely disregard the children's statements or to label them as fantasy or lies is simplistic and does not give ample explanation as to how these children acquired the knowledge they possess in terms of occult beliefs." [738]

Missing: 100,000 Children A Year: The figures are estimates, but the few known facts are appalling; thousands are murdered annually; their blood drained in many cases, and shipped all over the world for Murder Rituals and the number is rising and no one is keeping an accurate count. Why? Because of the political, economic, and media control of the most powerful group in the world.

"About 8:30 a.m. on January 7, 1980, Katheleen Mancil drove her daughter Marian Batson to school in Inverness, Florida. 'See you tonight,' Kathleen called as the petite, blue-eyed 16-year-old stepped from the car. But she did not see Marian that night. Or the next. Or the next. No one remembers seeing Marian after she left her mother's car. The day after her disappearance, her purse was found in a trash can about 25 miles form the school. She had joined the swelling ranks of children simply labeled missing.

Sheila and Katherine Lyon, ages 13 and 11, journeyed to a suburban shopping center on March 25, 1975, and were never seen again. In early October 1980, two-year-old Brandy Barlow vanished from her front yard. The list goes on.

May 25, 1979, Etan walked alone for the first time to his Manhattan school-bus stop and has not been seen since. Methodical searches with bloodhounds, helicopters, psychics, and phalanxes of police have failed to turn up any clues.

These are not isolated cases. Everyone close to the missing-child problem agrees that it is a large one - and growing. Statistics, however, are tough to come by. Boundaries between runaways, parental kidnap victims and children stolen by strangers tend to blur.

The best estimates are that about a million American youngsters leave home each year, with 90 percent returning in two weeks. Approximately 100,000 children are thus unaccounted for. Add another 25,000 to 100,000 stolen by divorced or separated parents, and the total hecomes significant. 'Kids who just disappear present a big problem that people had better start opening their eyes to,' says Det. Sgt. Dick Ruffino of the Bergn County, New Jersey, Sheriff's Office.

Yet no single U.S. agency concerns itself exclusively with missing children on a national scale. Automobiles, handguns and silverware can be registered, traced and recovered more easily than children. 'Our priorities are mixed up,' says Ken Wooden, director of the National Coalition for Children's justice. 'If someone steals a car, he can be traced and caught because we have a computer system for tracing stolen cars. But children apparently aren't that important to us.'

Each missing-child case has its own poignant drama and irony. In July 1976, 12-year-old Dee Scofield disappeared while running an errand at a Florida shopping center. Two days later, a classmate reportedly saw Dee looking out a van window, desperately forming the word 'help' over and over with her lips. Dee Scofield has never been found.

On October 18, 1981, Jimmy Rogers, 14, left his Hanson, Mass., home for a friend's house. He may have hitched a ride. He has not been seen or heard from since.

'Child snatching, kidnapping and the ugly things that happen to these kids are so horrendous that people refuse to deal with them,' explains Stan Patz, father of missing Ethan. 'Trying to handle cases like ours on a local level is a tremendous impediment. We need a centralized, national clearinghouse with information about which children are missing and how they can be identified.'

But most cases fall to local police, against whom some parents of missing children raise a litany of complaints. Because so many children do run away from home, police label most missing children runaways. And unless the child is very young or evidence of foul play exists, police commonly will not act on a missing-child report for 24 hours. The reason: sheer work volume. A surfaced of violent crimes; most with injured victims and plenty of evidence, takes priority over the 'maybe' crime of a missing youngster.

The heart-rending tragedy, of course, occurs when the child is not a runaway and could possibly have been helped if immediate action had been taken. On the morning after Christmas 1974, 13-year-old Janna Hanson went to a friend's house. A short time later, Doreen Hanson drove by to pick up her daughter; Janna wasn't there. Doreen immediately went to the police, but they wouldn't search for 24 hours. When police did finally begin an investigation, it was too late. Janna's body was found after several months, and evidence indicated she had been murdered on December 26.

Parents also complain bitterly about the FBI's refusal to help find missing children. The FBI becomes involved in a missing-child case only when there's proof of a kidnapping; such as a ransom note, or evidence that the child was taken across state lines. 'The first-time disappearance of a minor should be prima facie evidence that a kidnapping has taken place,' says John Clinkscales, whose son Kyle disappeared six years ago. 'The FBI could then become immediately involved, and there might be a chance of finding some of these children. We need help.' And answers. Parents always ask the inevitable: Why? Why would someone steal a child? Why my child? There are many answered, yet no answers. A million couples a year divorce in the United States, and many of these cases result in child snatchings. For love, hate, spite or revenge, one parent steals a child from the other.

In December 1974, Gloria Yerkovich said goodby to her four-year-old Joanna as the girl left to spend the weekend with her father. She didn't want to go, but a court order had said she must. Joanna never returned. The separation that was to last a weekend has stretched to 7½ years.

Despicable as parental kidnapping is, these children may be more fortunate than others. At least there's a chance they will go to school, grow up and lead a more or less normal life. When a stranger steals a child, anything can happen. Parents of missing children hope that their child will end up in a loving, caring family, perhaps through black-market adoption. The cruel truth is that a missing child stands a fair chance of being murdered. Each year an estimated 2500 children in the United States disappear and later are found murdered (with their blood drained, in an apparent Ritual Murder case).

While the abduction and murder of a child is a senseless, psychotic act, many children are used for much more calculated reasons. Says Ken Wooden. 'Kids are constantly being sought for the lucrative child-prostitution business. Most police departments and public officials aren't doing anything about it.' If fear about what may be happening to a missing child is the parents' primary emotion, frustration is the second. Often, little more is done once local police exhaust all leads. Teleprinted missing-child reports from one city do not carry a high priority in another. Verbal descriptions alone are often useless."

March 19, 1982: Has anyone seen Kevin Collins? Kevin is 10 years old and 4 feet y inches tall, with brown hair, green eyes and a cheerful disposition. When he vanished without a trace after basketball practice at St. Agnes School in San Francisco on February 10, the assumption was that he had been abducted.[739]

September 5, 1982: John David Gosch, vanished from his paper route on the morning of September 5, 1982, in Des Moines, Iowa.[740]

July 27, 1981: Adam Walsh, six disappeared from a Sears store in Hollywood, Florida on July 27, 1981; two weeks later his severed head was found in a canal 100 miles away.[741]

May 5, 1982: Two-and-a-half-year-old Russel Mort disappeared on May 5, 1982, some time between 12:20 p.m., when his mother sent him to play outside their trailer in a Wheatfild, N.Y., mobile-homes court.[742]

Ritual Murder is still going on today, July 1, 1996. There is no doubt about it, and the state and federal government does nothing because most, if not all, the highest officials in the State and Federal Governments, as well as Congress, the Courts are up to their neck in this terrible crime against humanity. But nothing is done because of the economic, political, and absolute control of the national media by the Jews. Following are some more recent cases.

Robbing The Innocents:"The little girl didn't like garbage, which is why her mother doesn't believe the story of her death. Andrea Parsons of Port Salerno, Florida, disappeared on her way home from the corner store with some candy. Claude Davis, a roadworker living across the street from the Parsons home, claimed that he saw her being forced into a car by four Hispanic men. Then last month he changed his story: Andrea had been helping him look for aluminum cans in a Dumpster. She fell, hit her head and died, he said. Yet no body has turned up, and Andrea's mother Linda doesn't believe Davis: 'Andrea would rather be founded than take out the trash.' Linda and the local authorities think somebody made away with her daughter; and with her life's joy. 'It's like we're stuck in a vacuum, with no beginning and no ending,' she says.

If that state of limbo seems grimly familiar, it is because as winter falls, the country seems seized by a spate of child abductions. The FBI is investigating nine cases of kidnapping in which homicide is known or suspected. A stalker haunting the Los Angeles suburb of Van Nuys raped a girl and fondled about 20 other schoolchildren. In St. Louis, Missouri, two young girls fell prey to a kidnapper-killer, and police have just arrested a suspect in the would-be abduction of a third. The second girl, Cassidy Senter, 10, was the object of a massive helicopter-and-roadblock search. Her body was found in an alley, her head beaten, several fingers missing, her pants pulled down.

The public reaction has been outrage. In St. Louis callers swamped radio talk shows demanding the death penalty and, in one case, disembowelment for the killer. At the Adam Walsh Center, a missing-children organization in West Palm Beach, Florida, calls for advice are up 50%. Its director, Nancy McBride, echoes a popular sentiment: 'Don't let your children go anywhere alone. Our society is breaking down, and you can't expect kids to watch themselves anymore.'

Social scientists, however, advise against hysteria. 'while this kind of incident is every parent's worst nightmare, like most nightmares it's not likely to happen,' says Steven Nagler (of course he would say something like this, because he is a Jew and damn well knows what is happening to most of the murdered children - that they are being used in a Jewish Ritual Murder orgy) of the Yale Child Studies Center. Adds Ernie Allen, president of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC): 'There are going to be outrageous acts that even the most cautious of families will not be able to prevent.'

The specialists stress two things: there is little protection against kidnapper-murderers, but fortunately thee are few of them. The vast majority (several hundred thousand a year) of child snatchings are perpetrated by family members in custody disputes. According to the well-respected 1990 Justice Department report National Incidence Studies on Missing, Abducted and Thrown-Away Children in America, far fewer; 3200 to 4600 minors (see the lies told about the number of murdered and tortured children) a year, are seized by strangers. Most victims are teenagers; contrary to media coverage, a disproportionate number are black or Hispanic. Only 300 of the abductions are classic kidnappings involving overnight captivity, transport of more than 50 miles, and ransom or murer. The number of kidnap-murders has fluctuated between 50 and 150 a year for at least 17 years. Allen estimates that 1993 will be on the low end." [743]

Members of Satanic Cult 'Gave Children Away': Tallahassee, Florida (UPI): "Police said six filthy and confused young children, taken from two men charged with child abuse, had been given away by their parents says part of a satanic cult ritual member.

Authorities in Tallahassee and Washington were trying today to learn the identities of the six children, locate their parents and learn more about an unidentified 'satanic cult' apparently based in Washington.

Meanwhile, two men who identified themselves as Michael Houlihan and Doug Ammerman; names police believe are phony, were being held in lieu of $100,000 bond on child abuse charges. The men were arrested in a city park Wednesday after someone called police about two well-dressed men in a blue van watching over six 'filthy' children.

'It is our belief these kids were not kidnapped, but that their parents gave them away because one of the rites of passage into this satanic organization is that you have to give up your rights to your children, and that the leaders of this organization can do what they want to with your children,' police spokesman Scott Hung said Friday. 'I believe what you're going to find when this all shakes down is that the kids' parents belong to this organization.' 'Until we can figure out where everything is, we can't say a whole lot,' said Walt Ferguson, a police spokesman in Washington.'

The Washington Post reported today that the U.S. Customs Service is helping with the investigation and that pictures found at a Washington, D.C., warehouse linked to the group include those of children engaged in what appeared to be 'cult rituals.' The newspaper said; 'the group was known as The Finders and was made up of about 40 people who lived in the District of Columbia and a farm in rural Virginia, the remains of a popular 1960s hippie refuge that evolved into a Satanist society.' Hunt said a 6-year-old girl in the group showed signs of sexual abuse. The children; four boys and two girls ranging in age from 2 to 6, were put in state custody." [744]

The story does not end here, it will continue until Christian Americans become enraged and act to stop these terrible crimes. However, most gentiles who aid the Jews in committing ritual murders, covering up for them in police departments, on newspapers and in government offices, are not so squeamish. It has been estimated that at least one-third of all officeholders in the United States are well aware of the prevalence of Jewish ritual murder of children, and that their continuing to hold office depends on aiding and abetting the Jews in the practice of these crimes.

During a conversation with Father Bulger in 1956, he related that he had been working all his life on a book which was to be the definitive work on Jewish ritual murder. Father Bulger furnished much of the information contained herein. However his superiors had forbidden him to have his own book published. In former years, most of the information about this type of crime had been published in Catholic encyclopedias and official parochial works, but further writings on the subject of Jewish ritual murder had been banned because of Jewish pressure on the Vatican.

Father Bulger said that according to his estimates, six million gentile children had been done to death in the ritual manner by Jews since the crucifixion of Christ. These six million victims have not only gone unavenged, but each one of them, deserving to be elevated to sainthood for their sufferings at the hands of the Jews, has died without gentile society making the slightest effort to protect other children from becoming victims in the same manner. Father James E. Bulger said, "The blood lust of the Jews and their hatred of Jesus Christ are combined in this horrible ceremony." Not only have six million innocent souls been done to death in ritual murder by the Jews, but each of us must ask himself, What kind of Christian, what kind of human being, am I, if I do nothing to protect children from such horrible sacrifice in a supposedly Christian and modern society?

Allusions To Blood Libel Made By Prominent Italian Newspaper: Rome, June 20 (JTA)‑‑A newspaper article that appeared to link the unsolved murder of an Italian child last year with ancient blood libel slander against the Jews has prompted concern among Italian Jewish leaders.

The article, which appeared May 30 in a provincial edition of the Rome daily Il Messaggero, drew parallels between the murder of 4‑year‑ old Simone Allegretti, near the central Italian town of Foligno, and two ritual murder cases in 15th‑century Italy. The article theorized that Simone's murderer was a mentally unbalanced person who, knowing the ritual murder stories, may have committed a sort of copycat crime. But, as Tullia Zevi, the president of the Italian Union of Jewish Communities, pointed out in a June 8 letter to the editor of Il Messaggero, the article's conclusions were so ambiguous that they could be "potentially dangerous."

The Messaggero article was headlined: "From History, Chilling Similarities with the Murder of Simone." A subhead read: "Monster of Foligno, the Hypothesis of Ritual Murder."

The article mentioned the 15th‑century cases of Simon of Trent, in northern Italy, and Antonuccio of Bevagna, a town near Foligno, in Umbria. "The first (victim), later beatified, was kidnapped the evening of Good Friday and died drained of blood during a macabre rite," the article declared. "The other, instead, is said to have been seized and wounded," the newspaper said.

The blood libel, or accusation that Jews murdered Christian children and drained their blood for use in ritual, particularly in making matzot for Passover, dates back to medieval times and has been one of the most persistent and irrational anti‑Semitic superstitions over the centuries.

The accusations have sparked mass persecutions, anti‑Semitic hysteria and other horrors, down into this century. Perhaps for this reason, the Jewish community here has been quick to respond to any apparent attempt to revive or lend credence to this superstition.

The Messaggero article, by Gilberto Scalabrini, described in detail the story of Simon of Trent, a 2‑year‑old who was found horribly murdered on Easter Sunday 1475. "How was Simon of Trent killed? To reread this story gives one goose pimples, because the details have a terrible resemblance to the fate of the little boy from (Foligno)," he wrote. But while he noted the "popular superstition of the time" and described the Jews who were executed for the murder as "presumed criminals," he went on to gave a blow‑by‑blow description of the crime, citing "documents" detailing how the Jews of Trent, supposedly in the synagogue itself, carried out the murder.

He then quotes a Jewish historian as recounting the case of Antonuccio of Bevagna, in 1485, in which a child accused a family of local Jewish bankers of kidnapping him and trying to drain his blood. That story, however, appeared to have been linked to attempts at the time to close down the Jewish bank. The case was dismissed. "Surely they do not have any precise analogy to the murder of Simone Allegretti," Scalabrini wrote. "But 'a sick mind” could have read them and codified them in order to commit a ritual murder. "The blood of Simone, in fact, was never found, even though he lost about 3 liters," the reporter wrote.[745]

Kielce's pogrom: The last blood libel in Poland: Today marks the 50th anniversary of the infamous pogrom in the Polish city of Kielce. The pogrom, in which thousands of ordinary people took to the streets and massacred their neighbors on the charge that the latter were guilty of ritual murder, was a result of a blood‑libel accusation against the Jews. The pogrom's anniversary is by and large ignored in Poland.

Ritual murder charges against Jews are a frequent occurrence in Polish history. The first anti‑Jewish pogrom caused by ritual murder accusations after Poland's liberation from the Nazis occurred in August 1945. Leaflets on the streets of Cracow proclaimed: "The Jews are our eternal enemies. They kill our children in their synagogues."

Responding to such propaganda, a Polish mob attacked the synagogue on Miodowa Street during the Shabbat service. The synagogue was set on fire and the Torah scrolls desecrated. The riots spread to Sosnowiec and Lublin. The number of victims is not known as the riots were never officially reported.

But the Kielce pogrom was the worst consequence of blood‑libel charges. A nine‑year‑old Christian boy, Henryk Blaszczyk, the son of a local laborer, disappeared from home. For two days he stayed with relatives in a nearby village, but when the boy came back and was asked where he had been, he said that he was kidnapped by Jews and kept in a cellar where he saw 15 other Christian children already murdered. It was, he said, at the house on 7 Planty Street.

Among the occupants of this house was the Kielce Jewish Committee, a group of young Jews who were getting ready to leave Poland for Palestine, survivors of the Nazi camps and some returnees from the Soviet Union.

As soon as the story became known among the local population, crowds began to gather around the building. Before the police had time to consider what action to take, the crowd had grown to several thousand. In a wild fury some broke into the building and any Jew they were able to drag outside was beaten or trampled to death. Some of the victims were thrown out of the windows.

A unit of the internal security forces sent to the scene of the pogrom joined the killers. The attackers received further assistance from a group of miners.

The carnage was only stopped late in the afternoon when a large army unit arrived from Warsaw. But even when the wounded were being taken to hospital, the open wagons in which they were transported became the target for stone‑throwers. According to some estimates, half the Kielce population of 50,000 took part in this, a pogrom reminiscent of the Dark Ages.

While the carnage was taking place on Planty Street, other parts of the town and its surroundings were the scene of more murders. Jewish passengers on trains arriving at Kielce were murdered. Altogether the pogrom resulted in 42 deaths and more than 80 injured.

Representatives of the government, the Central Jewish Committee, and the foreign press were present at the funerals. While the caskets with the bodies of the victims were lowered into the ground, a Polish professor named Gorecki expressed his sorrow. After beating his breast several times he cried out: "Polish Christians, our hands are stained with the blood of innocent Jews. We are all responsible for this crime. Never, never must we forget. The burden of this crime will weigh forever on our conscience."

The Catholic Church officially refrained from commenting. A letter read in churches after the pogrom failed to condemn the violence, but rather obscured the issue of Polish antisemitism.

The archbishop of Kielce refused to condemn the pogrom. And the archbishop of Lublin, who later became a cardinal, had this to say on blood libels: "During the trial of Beilis (in Tsarist Russia) many Jewish scriptures were submitted to deny the practice of using Christian blood for ritual purposes, but there was no proof that it wasn't practiced."

An exception was the archbishop of Chestochowa, who had the courage to condemn not only the violence but the accusations of ritual murder. It was only in 1981 that an article in Tygodnik Solidarnosci by Prof. Krystyna Kersten broke the silence on the Kielce pogrom. Further investigation to find out who was behind the pogrom was undertaken by Jerzy Slawomir in 1986.

In 1990, Gazeta Wyborcza a leading Warsaw daily published an extensive analysis of the events in Kielce entitled "Kill a Jew." Since then, the anniversary of the Kielce pogrom has received only a passing mention in the Polish press.

What is significant about all the published material in Poland regarding the pogrom is the variety of theories on the identity of the instigators. Among the suspects are the Communists, the Polish underground, the Polish government in exile, the Zionists and finally the Jews themselves. The former head of the province of Wislicz said in 1986: "Today I would like to forget about (the pogrom), but if you insist on going back 40 years... I can consider that the Jews themselves are partly responsible."

Not one Polish historian has investigated the antisemitism that caused the pogrom. Until recently, any public admission of Poland's guilt was met by a hostile reaction from those Poles who considered such admissions as denigrating the honor of the Polish nation.

In 1990, on the 44th anniversary of the pogrom, a commemorative plaque for the victims of the pogrom was unveiled on the initiative of then‑ president Lech Walesa. On the day prior to the unveiling, the victims' graves in the Kielce cemetery were desecrated, and during the night the plaque was defaced.

There were also numerous, albeit feeble, attempts by some Polish personalities and by members of the Catholic clergy to express regret for past behavior. And the Catholic Church, which historically has been responsible for so much Polish antisemitism, has been quite active in trying to change the attitudes of the Polish masses toward Jews.

A letter of the Polish Episcopate, read in all Polish churches on January 21, 1981, contained expressions of regret "for all acts of antisemitism which have taken place on Polish soil at any time and by anyone." The letter also begs for forgiveness for the Church's position during the Nazi occupation of Poland.[746] Baby‑smuggling accusation causes blood libel to surface: The blood‑libel myth surfaced in Romania after police there held an Israeli and three Romanians accused of smuggling babies to Moldova and Israel, police said last week.

A Romanian police spokesman identified the Israeli citizen as Mahmud Asadi, a Palestinian who converted to Judaism and claims to have been a personal secretary to slain Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, according to the World Jewish Congress.

Resurrecting the centuries‑old anti‑Semitic blood libel, the Bucharest weekly Baricada reported last month that there was no chance of ever seeing the smuggled children alive because "as is well‑known, Jewish matzah demands kosher, young Christian blood."

But involved in "collecting kosher blood" is protected by the Mossad, the Israeli intelligence service, it is "unlikely" that proof of the horrible deed can be produced, the weekly said. [747]

The day they stopped believing : The Ethiopian immigrants came to Israel all wrapped up in a package deal. The rabbinate agreed to their coming in exchange for the letting of a drop of blood from the sexual organ of each adult male (a confirmation of their Jewishness, which incidentally has still not been fully recognized); and with the proviso that their children would attend religious schools. The Ethiopians agreed.

Most of them underwent the bloodletting ritual, a physically, spiritually and collectively humiliating business, and their children go to state religious schools. They were told it was for their own good, and they believed it.

They were all, in a bundle, placed in absorption centers, and the children were put into absorption classes. They were told it was for the sake of their advancement and their integration, and they really wanted to believe it.

All of them were given blood tests, and it was explained to anyone who enquired that "they" had many contagious diseases. They were given preventive pills en masse, which caused horrendous stomachaches. These they suffered stoically ‑ or threw away the pills secretly ‑ and didn't understand why Israelis were being warned not to come near them for six months.

Their rabbis were dispatched like a pack of fools to a course at the "real" rabbinate given by Israeli rabbis, and the children were sent away to religious boarding schools. They were told that this would make them equal in the eyes of "kosher" Israeli Jews, and that their children would have an equal opportunity to go on to higher education.

And if their kesim hadn't been barred from the rabbinate, and if most of their children hadn't failed their bagrut, they might almost have believed it. And then they were all branded with the mark of AIDS, and it was even explained to them that it had nothing to do with racism.

And then, like Ahad Ha'am's Jews faced with blood‑libel, they couldn' t believe any longer. This latest blood‑libel was the straw that broke the camel's back.

Had there been some differentiation made, for example, between Ethiopians who came here in the '80s and those who came in the '90s; or between the young generation (which tends to have an active sex life) and older people (who are generally less sexually active) the immigrants might have played along. They might have kept quiet had they been told openly that they couldn't donate their blood and been given a reason, valid or not. That they might well have accepted.

But they found themselves treated like some blighted, primitive group, like a bunch of lepers, and that even the Ethiopians couldn't take.

What the authorities are now saying is that they were only trying to preserve the Ethiopian immigrants' sense of honor ‑ but the immigrants have stopped believing either the facts as presented, or in the authorities' good intentions. So have I. "There's an optical illusion here about the proportion of HIV carriers among Ethiopian immigrants,"said Dr. Ronny Shtarkshall, of the Hebrew University‑Hadassah School of Public Health and Community Medicine in a Ma'ariv interview two years ago, during the previous wave of rumors. "There has been no general check for HIV carriers among the Israeli population.” The estimate is 3,000, but the real figure cannot be known. "And in any case," the doctor said, "the incidence of AIDS among Ethiopian Jews is far lower than in Western countries like the US, Switzerland and France. This is chiefly because sexual promiscuity and homosexuality, the most frequent causes of HIV transmission, simply don't exist. "

Shtarkshall remarked that he would be more wary of Israelis who had backpacked abroad and come into contact with people they didn't know than Jews from Ethiopia.

But this stand, explicit as it was, didn't prevent the reporter from continuing to treat AIDS among Ethiopian immigrants as an established fact. The doctor then went into great detail in the interview about a Joint Distribution Committee‑funded project he was involved in to educate the Ethiopians about AIDS.

For a project of this type you need a severe social or medical problem. And now the doctor had a problem ‑ he seemed to be contradicting himself. Is there or isn't there a huge risk, above the average, of AIDS in the Ethiopian community here? I have a theory: There are various interested parties here, and all of them want to preserve the Ethiopians as a mass to be manipulated, concentrated in absorption centers (which need a reason to go on receiving funds for existing), and dominated.

Once it has been "established" that the Ethiopians as a community pose an AIDS danger, they can be smeared with mud, tricked, their children isolated, and their blood tossed into the garbage bucket. For long years to come, the Ethiopians will go on filling a mystical, much‑needed role for researchers, absorption organizations, and the media.[748]

The Day Yeltsin Praised the Art of Blood Libel: Russian Prexy Tours. Retrospective of Ilya Glazunov and Finds It “Patriotic”: Moscow ‑‑ For Boris Yeltsin, paintings filled with caricatures of long‑nosed Chasidic Jews bearing gold coins and drinking chalices of Russian blood while ape‑like black men abscond with naked white women are "optimistic and patriotic."

At least that's the impression the Russian president gave as he toured the vast retrospective exhibition of the nationalist painter Ilya Glazunov. Mr. Yeltsin listened raptly as the artist explained his massive tableaux, which fault communists, Jewish devils, blacks and foreign opportunists for all of Russia's ills; afterward, the Russian president remarked that the paintings possessed "very deep and philosophical meanings."

Mr. Yeltsin's appearance at the show, which drew thousands of eager Muscovites, suggests that radical nationalism, once the province of fringe extremists, is being openly espoused even by the country's president. In the past six months since the surprise parliamentary victory of neo‑nationalist Vladimir Zhirinovsky, Yeltsin reformers, most visibly Foreign Minister Kozyrev, have been quick to take more strident positions, particularly defending Russian interests abroad and the cause of ethnic Russians living in former Soviet republics. With 150 extreme‑nationalist publications now circulating widely in Russia, politicians are also stressing the inherent greatness of ethnic Russian traditions and beliefs.

Mr. Yeltsin's visit to the Glazunov exhibit marks the first time that Mr. Yeltsin has acted in a way that could be construed as endorsing anti‑Semitism. Yet the significance of the visit may lie in the fact that he, too, sees a need to court the nationalist vote and is not above resorting to sycophantic gestures to get it. "Almost every painting shows that out of dreadful human torments, battles and killings, a new Russia is emerging. Russia is being reborn," the Russian president said of the exhibit, which includes starkly anti‑Semitic imagery.

At a time when many Russians are feeling humiliated over the country's infrastructural breakdown, moral chaos and loss of diplomatic influence abroad, paintings that pay homage to the country's past greatness are certain to be popular. In particular, Mr. Glazunov's monumental canvases present a panoply of Russian mythical, historical, royal and religious figures, including great Russian writers, artists, politicians and saints. As one gallery‑goer, a 60‑year old grandmother named Natalia Aluyeva, observed: "We have lost our illusions of a future happy society and are seeking consolation in our history."

Sanctions Violence: The paintings' darker sides, however, brimming with sinister allusions to devils, masons and so‑called cabalistic symbols, raise the troubling question: At what point has the artist crossed the line where patriotism ends and is replaced by a rabid nationalism that sanctions violence against ethnic minorities. "The Grand Experiment (1990)," a behemoth tableau that focuses on Russian history in the 20th century, is a case in point.

In the Glazunov iconography, Russia's pre‑Soviet period is invariably portrayed in idyllic terms. There, in the top left‑hand corner, blue skies hover over a whitewashed gold‑domed Russian Orthodox church; church bells are ringing and the beatific Slavic tsar and tsarina reign above the slogan "God, Tsar and Church." Everywhere else, the canvas is blood red with the chaos of the Bolshevik revolution.

Caricature of Trotsky: In the center of the canvas, a red five‑pointed star; a reference both to the communist star and the "Masonic" star; frames the enormous head of Karl Marx, the Jew who within the painting clearly is to blame for all the bloodshed of "the Grand Experiment," namely communism. In front of Marx's face is a tetragram that the exhibition catalogue describes as "the five‑pointer star, ancient cabalistic symbol ‑‑ the symbol of evil. Marxism is connected to Satanism." To the left of the red star, there is a tomato‑red caricature of Trotsky, depicted as a long‑nosed Jewish devil with black claws, scaling the Kremlin walls. Below him, Mr. Glazunov invokes the blood libel, painting in a thick‑bearded Chasid sipping a cup of Russian blood. There is yet another long‑nosed Chasid with gold coins in one outstretched hand and, under his other arm, Russia stamped with the Soviet hammer and sickle; nearby, a smiling black man makes off with a bare‑breasted white woman who is for sale for two dollars; Stalin, Churchill and Roosevelt are there with the Israeli flag hanging behind them.

Although the painting is complicated, crammed with several hundred historical faces, the message is clear: Outsiders, among them Jews in particular, are responsible for the revolution that destroyed the paradisiacal period of Christian tsarism, bringing waves of bloodshed on the Russian people. Those outsiders are also seen as clearly to blame for the current invasion of Russia of foreign commercial goods, capitalist ideas and such decadent culture as punk music and jazz. As the catalogue to the exhibit explains, "the painting shows that the revolution was not a natural historical event but prepared, organized and brought by persons from outside. Russia has been a field for social experiment...Yakov Schiff, an American banker, a Marx supporter, a fanatic Russophobe, an enemy of Russian Orthodoxy financed various terrorist organizations in Russia."

Appeal to Fascists: The Glazunov exhibition appeals particularly to radical nationalists and fascists, who propagate the idea of a foreign conspiracy out to destroy Russia. "You look around you with horror, wondering who is with you against this Satanic horde...(Mr. Glazunov) has created paintings of great significance and mystical force," says Alexander Nevzorov, a television host and Duma member. "When I saw this painting I cried."

The fact that such an openly racist exhibition was attended and praised by the country's president indicates the current political sway of the ethnic Russian idea and the political impotence of minorities in Russia, who have trouble even gaining an audience with their representatives. A spokesman for Mr. Yeltsin insisted that the stroll around the exhibit was innocent: "He is interested in painting and is especially interested in the reaction of the public to this exhibit," remarked Anatoly Krasikov, Mr. Yeltsin's press spokesman. "(Mr.) Yeltsin, like any other democratic president, can afford to go to art exhibits without taking political sides."

The exhibit at Moscow's Manezh central exhibition hall, however, was sponsored by several state agencies, including the Mayoralty of Moscow, the Russian Ministry of Culture and the state's Academy of Russian Painting and Architecture ‑‑ which is headed by Mr. Glazunov. The painter has been using the show as a weekly soapbox, preaching his ideas ‑‑ about politics, not art ‑‑ to an eager public. "This is a chance to express the feelings of Russian people through art in ways that ordinary simple people can understand," commented Raisa Ivanova, a Muscovite straining in the crowd to hear Mr. Glazunov speak. "He is a very great, nationalistic painter with emotional impact. This is a patriotic exhibit. He loves his motherland and he is showing us how our soul is sick." [749]

Following Spain's New‑Found Philo‑Semitism: In 1987 I lived in Madrid for a year, and every time I return, more of my friends turn out to be "Jewish." These are not the famous Marranos, the "secret Jews" who preserved their customs through five centuries of oppression. Rather, they are Catholics who remember a cryptic comment grandmother once made.

In the country where people now in their 30s learned in school that Jews made matzahs with Christian blood, Judaism has become all the rage. Teenage punks wear the Star of David as jewelry and tattoos. An order of nuns, Nuestra Señde Zion, purges anti‑Semitic references from textbooks. Archaeologists are digging up Jewish remains that were neglected for centuries.

Meanwhile, Jews have never been more interested in Spain. Visit New York's Jewish Museum, where paintings by an Italian Sephardic artist are on view. Check out the bookstore for the latest publications devoted to Sephardic achievements in poetry, philosophy and scholarship. Or pass by one of the events in the ninth annual Semana Sepharad, a week‑ long celebration of Spanish Jewry and its diaspora sponsored by Yeshiva University, the Tourist Office of Spain and Iberia Airlines (please see schedule at right). This event, at the suggestion of the Spanish government, is dedicated to a little‑known Spanish diplomat, Angel Sanz‑Briz.

Sanz‑Briz, who worked at the Spanish Embassy in Budapest and saved thousands of non‑Spanish Jews from deportation to camps by claiming they were Spanish, is being promoted as the "Spanish Schindler.""His story is not that well‑known anywhere in the world," says Rabbi M. Mitchell Serels, director of Sephardic community programs at Yeshiva University and one of the organizers of Semana Sepharad.

It is at the very least ironic that Spain, responsible for the most spectacular expulsion of Jews in medieval Europe, is now promoting a home‑grown Holocaust hero. But what better way to atone for the Inquisition? As Howard Sachar writes in his new, highly readable book, "Farewell Españ The World of the Sephardim Remembered" (Knopf), there were practical reasons behind royal visits to synagogues, meetings with important rabbis and other attempts at outreach that culminated in the establishment of diplomatic relations with Israel in 1986. These included fomenting trade, tourism and, not least, membership in the European Economic Community.

Not that Spain's new‑found philo‑Semitism is mere public relations. With the emergence of democracy following Franco's death in 1975, former taboos were embraced with a near‑hysterical mania to catch up with the rest of the West. Among those taboos was Spain's Sephardic heritage, which had been erased from the history books with the same rigor the country had applied to ridding itself of Jews and their descendants. That ethnic cleansing happened years ago, so you don' t find the collective guilt that characterizes Germany's obsession with Judaism, for example. Nor do you find anti‑Semitism, representatives from Spain's small Jewish community insist, if you are talking about officially sanctioned anti‑Semitism, like restrictive laws. The popular attitude toward Judaism is based more in folklore than in fact: equal parts attraction and ambivalence, curiosity and ignorance. Jewish culture is seen as hermetic, exotic and mystical ‑‑ and sometimes, still, a little sinister, which may explain why true Marranos continue to maintain deep secrecy.

Consider the experience of Trudi Alexy, a Prague‑born Jew who fled with her family to Barcelona at the outbreak of the war and immigrated to the United States in 1941. Ms. Alexy's recent book, "The Mezuzah in the Madonna's Foot: Marranos and Other Secret Jews" (Harper‑Collins), is somewhat misleadingly titled, for the first half describes her own experience as a secret Jew in Spain, her childhood dalliance with Catholicism and her efforts to reclaim her heritage, which included tracking down other Jews who fled through Spain as well as the Catholics who risked their lives for them.

Some of the most fascinating passages in Ms. Alexy's book concern her encounters with Marranos, who are outwardly Catholic but practice some form of Judaism at home. More are turning up all the time ‑‑ most recently in Puerto Rico ‑‑ and those who have sought to integrate with the Jewish community have encountered all sorts of difficulties in asserting their Jewishness, as one who tried to become a rabbi poignantly recounted to Ms. Alexy. But most don't want to. An American Jewish doctor told Ms. Alexy of his experience visiting an Andalusian colleague almost 50 years after they had worked together during the Spanish Civil War. Citing his friend's surname; which sounded Jewish, the American asked the Spaniard if he had Jewish ancestors. "We are as Catholic as Catholic can be," the Spaniard replied. Then he led his guest to a dark, windowless room. "Whenever I am troubled or need help, I pray to the Virgin Mary or to Our Savior Jesus Christ or to the saints. I say the rosary and go to Mass," he said. "But if all else fails, I come here." He opened a door with an old key and removed an ancient tallis and a set of phylacteries. Then he prayed.

Like the phylacteries, most things Jewish in Spain survive because they were well‑hidden (or, in the case of the few standing synagogues, because they were converted into churches). Recently, a clerk in Gerona, home of Nachmanides, came across a cache of Jewish documents stuffed in a book binding. Among the papers; which are particularly significant because they are written in Hebrew ‑‑ are synagogue tax records, a personal diary and a dowry list, the type of ephemera of which little remains. Rabbi Serels, whose book on these documents will be published next year, notes that the significance of the event lies as much in the documents' historical value as in the fact that the government of Gerona ‑‑ where no Jews live now ‑‑ is financing the restoration and ultimate exhibition of the papers in a museum dedicated to the city's Jewish heritage.

Segovia, home of the Grand Inquisitor Torquemada, is another place where non‑Jewish scholars are digging deep into the Jewish past. Currently no Jews live in this Castilian city, better known for its monumental Roman aqueduct and the Disneyesque Alcá or fortress, but in the middle ages it housed a Jewish community probably numbering in the low thousands. Archeologists are excavating the Jewish cemetery, located in a pine forest outside the city walls. What is left of the Jewish slaughterhouse is being converted into a provincial museum that will include Jewish objects in its exhibitions. A center for Sephardic studies is planned, along with one for Sephardic art.

Of the five synagogues that served Segovia, one remains ‑‑ sort of. It is currently the Church of Corpus Christi, occupied by an order of cloistered Carmelite nuns. Badly damaged in a fire in 1899, the white, light‑filled structure still retains its original Moorish‑style arches. No one knows exactly how the Sinagoga Mayor became a church, though there is a local legend that explains it. In 1410, my guide recounted, a Jewish doctor loaned a priest money ‑‑ in return for a holy wafer, which he intended to desecrate in a vat of boiling water. But the wafer didn't boil. Instead, the building caught fire, and the wafer, emitting blood, sailed across town into the hands of a priest. A crack behind the altar, supposedly made by the ricocheting wafer, has proved impossible to repair, the guide pointed out. "It' s only a legend," she said. "But I believe it because it's pretty. "

The infamous blood libel story ‑‑ pretty? She grew up with the story. It's depicted on a 19th‑century painting right there in the church ‑‑ wafer gleaming in mid‑air, terrified Jews scurrying in all directions.

A few years ago, a friend told me about a "Jewish" family living in Granada. It turned out that they were Catholic ‑‑ though their surname, Carnicero (butcher), may well have been Jewish once. The father had become obsessed with his roots and was studying Hebrew.

They couldn't have been more hospitable. They introduced me to Granada' s three other Jews; they fed me; they invited me to stay the night in an unused bedroom. As I prepared for bed, I spotted a large flag hanging in the closet. It had a swastika on it.

Upon questioning, my host's son explained that the flag was "left over from my brother's youth." So was evidence of other phases the boy passed through: buttons of hammer and sickle, marijuana leaves, Mickey Mouse. Dalliance with fascism was just one of those post‑Franco adolescent attempts to be as offensive as possible. "Frankly, until recently, I didn't know the swastika had anything to do with the Jews, " he added.

This ignorance, willful or not, is rooted in the same mind‑set that finds the blood libel believable. Judaism is appealing to Spaniards because it is ancient and arcane, not because it is a living culture. The folkloristic conception of "the Jew" has nothing to do with contemporary Jews or Judaism, with which the vast majority of Spaniards have no contact.

About 12,000 Jews live in Spain now; mostly, they are bemused observers of the Jewish revival. Jacques Laredo, former president of Madrid' s synagogue, told me that he was besieged with letters from Spaniards having names possibly of Jewish origin ‑‑ names of towns, plants, flowers, professions. "But they show their Jewish origin five centuries ago," he said. "So the only thing we can tell them is, yes, this is a name that could be a Jewish name, but obviously you're a Catholic and there's nothing we can do about it." [750]

UK weekly's blood libel: One of the more persistent themes of Arab propaganda is "Israel's persecution of Christians."The charges are almost always identical: Christian Arabs in the Holy Land (who, with unbounded contempt for history, are often described as descendants of the first Christians) are not only religiously harassed but often killed by the Israelis who want to drive them out of the country. That Christian Arabs have been leaving "the territories" is, of course, true.

The most recent example of such propaganda, penned by William Dalrymple, appeared in the London weekly The Spectator of October 22. It begins with dramatic horror stories, which contain most of the article's charges against Israel.

First, a monk (Fr. Alexandros), whom Dalrymple meets in Greece, tells him that he had been forced to leave the West Bank after receiving death threats from "extreme Israeli zealots" who established a settlement nearby. "Then one day in the winter of 1979," Dalrymple continues, "his spiritual father and distant neighbour, a Greek monk named Philloumenous, was hacked to death in his cell at Jacob's Well; a settler had poisoned his dogs, attacked him with an axe, then incinerated the remains with a grenade. Shortly afterwards, Fr. Alexandros returned from a trip to Jerusalem to find his cave chapel desecrated and his books and possessions scattered and burned. The pulpit in the chapel had been axed into a hundred pieces. The hermit fled..."

Dalrymple then allows that Fr. Alexandros is, like many hermits, "deeply eccentric," but the cleric's story, he says, checked out. "At the Greek Orthodox patriarchate in the Old City I was shown a file full of reports and correspondence about the desecration of the cave of St. Chariton and the violent murder of Fr. Philloumenous; I was even directed to the Martyrion at the Orthodox seminary on Mount Zion where Philloumenous's shattered skull and cleaved bones lay on permanent display awaiting potential canonization...Checking the incident in the more sober archives of the Jerusalem Post," Dalrymple continues, "I found that during the same period two Jerusalem churches and one Christian bookshop had been burned to the ground by ultra‑orthodox Jewish fanatics, while students from a nearby yeshiva had committed serious vandalism at the Dormition abbey. There had also been a series of unsuccessful arson attacks on the Anglican church in West Jerusalem, two churches in Acre (a Greek Orthodox church in the Old City and a Protestant chapel in New Acre) and one other Anglican church in Ramleh. On top of this, two Russian nuns had been killed by a zealot in a knife attack on their Ein Karem nunnery, while the Christian cemetery on Mount Zion ‑ already damaged during the years of Jordanian rule ‑ had been further desecrated no fewer than eight times...'Had we been Jews and our churches been synagogues, desecration like this would have caused an international outcry,' said the monk at the Martyrion."

Even the most indifferent reader would be shocked by such horrors. Only savages murder monks and nuns, desecrate holy places and threaten innocent men of the cloth. "The Jews" and "settlers" of the story are indeed despicable. There is little resemblance, however, between Dalrymple's story and the facts. There is no record of a Fr. Alexandros in Israel, but a hermit who fits his description had to leave the country because residents of an Arab village complained of his sexually harassing young boys.

The monk Philloumenous was indeed murdered, not by a fanatic "settler" (the current euphemism for villain), but by a deranged, newly religious Green Line Israeli who also killed a Tel Aviv abortionist and a Ramle fortune‑teller, both Jewish, in the name of God. He is now in a mental institution.

There were two cases of arson, in 1973 and 1974, in which Jews, members of the Jewish Defense League (later the Kach movement), were implicated. The attacks were aimed at alleged missionary activity. Furniture and books were damaged, but nothing was burned to the ground.

Ten JDL members, mostly teenagers, were arrested. At least two served time. In apparent retaliation, a Jewish religious bookshop was torched.

In 1982, the chapel of a Jerusalem Baptist church was burned to the ground. This time neither the JDL nor any other Jewish organization claimed responsibility.

The Jerusalem Post reported that: "Police said last night it was possible the chapel was burned by extremist Jews. However they did not rule out the possibility that a Moslem or a Christian arsonist started the flare to spoil relations between faiths in Jerusalem." Two men were arrested, one a Colombian tourist, the other a Jerusalem Jew. Both were released for lack of evidence. All the other cases of attempted arson were minor acts of vandalism.

The most striking aspect of these occurrences was the Israeli reaction. Not only did the government and municipal authorities immediately pay for damage not covered by insurance; large sums from individuals and organizations poured into special bank accounts opened for donations. The Jerusalem Rotary, for example, made a substantial contribution.

The prime minister, mayor, chief rabbis and cabinet ministers all condemned the acts in the most outspoken terms. The 1982 arson was called by then‑premier Menachem Begin "a malicious crime." Arab Baptists from Nazareth scrubbed the blackened walls of the chapel alongside their Jewish neighbors. The Sunday evening prayer meeting of the Baptist church following the fire was held in the neighboring Har El synagogue.

To state that Dalrymple's article amounts to a blood libel is to be charitable. Blood libels in the Middle Ages were usually propagated by ignorant, fearful people. Dalrymple knew the truth: He himself states that he used the Post's archives as his source.

Nor is it surprising that the article was published in The Spectator. This is the weekly which recently ran an article about Hollywood Jews which, as Jerusalem Post reporter Tom Tugend put it (November 14), "revives the well‑known stereotype of a 'cabal' of vulgar, clannish Jews dominating the American entertainment industry." Nor should it be too surprising that the editor of this would‑be neo‑Nazi publication is Dominic Lawson, a Jew.[751]

The main war of the "Jews" against the Adamites began in Russia when the Avars (Khazars), a pre-Adamic, Esau-Edom, Japeth, Canaanite and several other races, invaded the country about the year 560. The Avars would have completely overrun Europe and mixed their mongol seed with those of the Adamites had not been for the Adamic Slavs and their Allies. The Adamic Slavs drove the Avars back and then shored up the defenses in the Balkans with the allies the Bulgars.

About 700 A.D., the Khazars, after "converting" to Talmudism (Judaism) overwhelmed the Adamic Slavs in Russia while Mongols who had been won over to Islam also attacked Russia and Europe.

The Mongols occupied Russia from 1241 to 1300 and only due to the persistence of the Slavs were the Mongols kept from completely over running all of Adamic Europe.

The first "conversions" of the Russians to Christianity is estimated to be in 867 A.D. and the full "conversion" of (White) Russia in the year 898 A.D. From that point on it was more or less a Christian millennium wherein all the nations of Europe kept the Luciferian-antichrist Jews under control for 900 years until the Illuminati and other secret societies the Jews had formed were able to make temporary gains through the French and other revolutions in Europe.

The Christian Adamic Tzars of Russia fought back and this started the first "Russian" invasion of America and Europe from 1800 to 1914 when 2-million Canaanite/Khazars invaded America and another 260,000 invaded England and Palestine.

The so-called "Russian" invasion of America that the televangelists and other so-called "Christian" preachers rant and rave about took place from 1800 to 1914 and then in 1917 the Jewish Khazar Luciferian terror was launched against the Adamic Russian people by the agents of Lucifer who were funded, transported and supported by the pseudo "Christian" government of America which had a satanic spirit cast over it and a blindness which drove it on to exterminate the Adamic ruling class of Russia.

"Who is blind, but my servant? or deaf, as my messenger that I sent? who is blind as he that is perfect, and blind as the Lord's servant? Seeing many things, but thou observest not opening the ears, but he heareth not." [752]

The United States has been built, ruled and governed by Satanic doctrines and secret societies almost from its very beginning when the Puritans were driven from England because of their opposition to the pro-Jewish revolutionary activities. These same pro-Jewish advocates also landed on our shores to begin undermining Christianity in America.

Satanic Freemasonry also was established before the Revolution and many of the "Christian" leaders such as George Washington, were Masons and even Benjamin Franklin was in league with the Mason and subversive forces in Europe which were "hell bent" on destroying the Christian monarchies of Europe and establishing "Democracy" (mobocracy) in America.

Franklin later came to his senses and wrote his famous letter attacking the assault of the Jews on America while still remaining a member of revolutionary and secret societies imported into the United States from the Jewish control "Democracies" of Europe. The second and last "Russian" revolution in America has been taking place since 1965 and since that time over 1-million Jews from Russia have invaded America and another 700,000 have "invaded" Palestine.

Even as this is being written the Canaanite-Esau-Edomite-Khazars have the upper hand in Russia and Eastern Europe because of the unlimited financial and political backing they have from their co-religionists living in the United States, France and England. The "Russian" invasion of the Middle East and the United States is already taking place, now, not in the future.

The question is, whether it will be re-enforced by the Canaanites-Esau-Edom-Khazars in the Soviet Union and their Yeltsin's or will it be Crushed by the remaining Adamites in Eastern Europe, denying it the aid of the Jews and their spiritual allies in those countries?

In the 3rd century A.D. the Jews in Jerusalem perpetrated a number of massacres against Christians whom they used to kill under church lights.

In 608 A.D. the Jews of Antioch attacked Christians and burned them in the streets including Bishop Anstas. In 614 A.D. the Jews, led by Benjamin of Tiberias, burned Christian churches and monasteries.

When Emperor Heraclius reconquered Palestine and brought the Jewish murder for investigation, he asked him why he had committed such atrocities against Christians, whereupon the latter repled, "Because they are enemies of my faith."

St. Justian, who was killed by the Jews in 615 A.D. said, "The Jews were behind all the persecution of the Christians, they killed Christians whenever they could, and wandered through the country everywhere hating and undermining the Christian faith."

St. Basil, who died in the fourth century, said, "In the past, heathen and Jews used to fight, but now they both fight Christianity."

St. Clement warned the Christians of Corinth against the intrigues of Jews which caused the death of thousands of Christians.

Someone says that all Jews cannot be bad and the fact that Paul was a Jew prove it. Let us see what the Scriptures say about it. Paul tells us in Romans 11:1 that he was an Israelite of the tribe of Benjamin.

Yet we find him saying in Acts 22:3, "I am verily a man which am a Jew..." Why did Paul say that? Because the Jews were beating him and would have liked to kill him. Acts 21:27-32, By saying that he was a Jew and one of them, Paul hoped they would desist and leave him alone. He explains this further in 1 Corinthians 9:20, where he says, "And unto the Jews I became as a Jew." Note that he did not say "became a Jew" or "was a Jew" something entirely different. Paul says he became "as a Jew" so that he might GAIN the Jew.

Did Paul mean that he hoped to "gain the Jew" for Christ? Oh, No Paul knew the Jews were "contrary to all men" and that they were responsible for the death of Christ. He knew that it was impossible to make Christians of them. Paul had only one reason for claiming to be "as a Jew" and that was to bring an end to their abuse of him, as his very life was in danger. Knowing that Jews always stick together, he felt that by claiming to be one of them they would not be so apt to kill him.

On page 66 of the book, "The True Sabbath," by Cottrell, are these words: "According to the celebrated historian, Neander, the writings of the early fathers such as Origen, Polycarp, Irenaeus, Tertullian, Justin Martyr, Eusebius and others were so counterfeited and adulterated that no confidence can be placed in them."

Just who is this authority, Neander, whom certain religionists love to quote. For the answer, we turn to the book, "Waters Flowing Eastward" by I. Fray. On page 99 are these words, "Neander, the founder of Spiritual Christianity, is a Jew." It is obvious that his attacks on early Christians and their leaders is motivated by their statements concerning Jews of that day. The many sects, denominations, creeds, and what not of today owe their existence to the pernicious habit of spiritualizing or phantomizing the Scriptures. By so doing, the Bible can be made to say anything they want it to say.

Thus, we have constant bickering, proselyting and squabbling among the various groups and churches which make up our Christian community. All this confusion can be traced to one man, Neander. He was of the race John calls a generation of vipers. Jesus calls them vipers and sons of Satan and asks them how can they escape the damnation of hell.

John tells us they are deceivers and antichrist. Jude called them ungodly men, filthy dreamers, ordained of old to be condemned. Paul calls the Jew a children of the devil, enemy of all righteousness and contrary to all men. David says he hated them with a perfect hatred and asked that they be blotted out of the Book of Life. We are forewarned in Acts that some of these people would infiltrate our churches and seek to subvert us.

In Spain, Jews who feigned "conversion" to Christianity were known as Marranos. These were welcomed into the Christian community until it was discovered that their Christianity was all a sham. When Jewish holidays came around, these Marranos secretly observed the rituals in their homes as laid out by Judaism. They had, in fact, never given up their Jewish practices but had joined Christian churches for, as the Bible says, purposes of subversion Revelation 2:9, "...know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews (Judeans), and are not, but are of the synagogue of Satan." Revelation 3:9, "Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews (Judeans) and are not but do lie."

As we pursue our study of this mysterious people comprising the "synagogue of Satan," it may be helpful to consider the opinions of prominent historical persons to aid us in properly evaluating them. Mr. A.H. Ramsey, in his book, "The Nameless War," records these following statement:

World Famous Men of the past accused the Jews of founding Communism: This charge is well founded. The Communist philosopy was drawn up by Karl Marx who descended from a long line of Rabbis. His ideology of anti‑Christian and Socialist thought is outlined in the Jewish "Talmud" which is the "bible" of the Jews. “Of the four political groups which overthrew the Christan Czar of Russia two were 100% Jewish. They were the Mensheviks and The Jewish Bund. The other two were the Socialist Revolutionary Party and the Bolsheviks. Both were headed by Jews but had some Gentile members. Today we now know that Lenin was Jewish and all of the leaders of his first government were Jews. They were Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev and Sverdlow. The wealthiest Jewish banker in the world at that time, Jacob Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb investment bank of New York City, gave Trotsky and Lenin $20 million to overthrow the Czar and establish the Soviet tyranny.” [753]

Winston Churchill: 20th century British politician: In 1920, he wrote a long newspaper article of the recent Bolshevik seizure of Russia. After praising what he called the "national Jews" of Russia, he said: "In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish efforts rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world.”

Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxemburg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States): This world‑wide revolutionary conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster has ably shown, a definite recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworlds of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of the enormous empire.

There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creating of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews. It is certainly the very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews.

Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders... In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astounding. And the prominent if not the principal part in the system of terrorism applied by the extraordinary Commissions for combating Counter Revolution has been take by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many nonJews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.[754]

Mikhyl Bakunyin: 19th century Russian revolutionary: "Marx is a Jew and is surrounded by a crowd of little, more or less intelligent, scheming, agile, speculating Jews, just as Jews are everywhere, commercial and banking agents, writers, politicians, correspondents for newspapers of all shades; in short, literary brokers, just as they are financial brokers, with one foot in the bank and the other in the socialist movement, and their arses sitting upon the German press. They have grabbed hold of all newspapers, and you can imagine what a nauseating literature is the outcome of it.

Now this entire Jewish world, which constitutes an exploiting sect, a people of leeches, a voracious parasite, Marx feels an instinctive inclination and a great respect for the Rothschilds. This may seem strange. What could there be in common between communism and high finance? Ho ho! The communism of Marx seeks a strong state centralization, and where this exists there must inevitably exist a state central bank, and where this exists, there the parasitic Jewish nation, which speculates upon the labor of the people, will always find the means for its existence...

In reality, this would be for the proletariat a barrack regime, under which the workingmen and the working closely and intimately connected with one another, regarless not only of frontiers but of political differences as well ‑ this Jewish world is today largely at the disposal of Marx or Rothschil. I am sure that, on the one hand, the Rothschilds appreciate the merits of Marx, and that on the other hand, women, converted into a uniform mass, would rise, fall asleep, work and live at the beat of the drum; the privilege of ruling would be in the hands of the skilled and the learned, with a wide scope left for profitable crooked deals carried on by the Jews, who would be attracted by the enormous extension of the international speculations of the national banks...” [755]

This startling piece of prediction is particularly impressive to those who have observed the Soviet scene and notice its strange relationship with capitalist financiers ‑ overwhelmingly Jewish ‑ since the revolution. The line runs from Olof Aschberg, self‑described "Bolshevik banker" who ferried to Trotsky the huge sums raised for the revolution by financiers in Europe and America, to Armand Hammer in the 1970s, who has specialized in multimillion‑dollar trade concessions with the now supposedly 'anti‑Semitic' commissars.

German Kaiser Wilhelm II:"A Jew cannot be a true patriot. He is something different, like a bad insect. He must be kept apart, out of a place where he can do mischief ‑ even by pogroms, if necessary. The Jews are responsible for Bolshevism in Russia, and Germany too. I was far too indulgent with them during my reign, and I bitterly regret the favors I showed the prominent Jewish bankers." [756]

Cardinal Mindszenty: Of Hungary quoted in B'nai B'rith Messenger, January 28, 1949: "The troblemakers in Hungary are the Jews...they demoralize our country and they are the leaders of the revolutionary gang that is torturing Hungary."

Adrueb Arcand: New York speech, October 30, 1937: "When it came to Mexico, the promoters of Communism were the Jews Calles, Hubermann and Aaron Saenz; in Spain we saw Azaña and Rosenberg; in Hungary we saw Bela Kun, Szamuelly, Agoston and dozen other Jews; in Bavaria, we saw Kurt Eisner and a host of other Jews; in Belgium Marxian Socialism brought to power Vadervelde alias Epstein, and Paul Hymans, two Jews; in France, Marxian Socialism brought forth the Jews Leon Blum (who showed so well his Jewish instincts in his filthy book Du Mariarge), Mandel, Zyromsky, Danain and a whole tribe of them; in Italy we had seen the Jews Nathan and Claudio Treves. Everywhere, Marxism brings Jews on the top ‑ And this is no hazard."

Hillire Belloc: Renown historian in G. K.'s Weekly, February 4, 1937: "The propaganda of Communism throughout the world, in organization and direction is in the hands of Jewish agents. As for anyone who does not know that the Bolshevist movement in Russia is Jewish, I can only say that he must be a man who is taken in by the suppression of our deplorable press."

A. Homer: "History shows that the Jew has always been, by nature, a revolutionary and that, since the dispersion of his race in the second century, he has either initiated or assisted revolutionary movements in religion, politics and finance, which weakened the power of the States wherein he dwelt. On the other hand, a few far‑seeing members of that race have always been at hand to reap financial and political advantage coincident with such upheavals." [757]

Captain Montgomery Schyler: American Expeditionary Forces, Siberia, in a military intelligence report dated March 1, 1919, to Lt. Col. Barrows in Vladivostok: "It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the United States but the Bolshevik movement is and has been since its beginning guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest type, who have been in the United States and there absorbed every one of the worst phases of our civilization without having the least understanding of what we really mean by liberty."

Mrs. Clare Sheridan: Traveler: Lecturer in New York World, December 15, 1923: "The Communists are Jews, and Russia is being entirely administered by them. They are in every government office, bureau and newspaper. They are driving out the Russians and are responsible for the anti‑Semitic feeling which is increasing."

Major Robert H. Williams:"B'nai B'rith, the secret Jewish fraternity, was organized in 1843, awakening world Jewish aspirations, or Zionism, and its name, meaning ‘Sons of the Covenant,’ suggests that the 12 men who organized the fraternity aimed at bringing about the fulfillment of ‘the Covenant,’ or the supposed Messianic promise of rulership over all peoples. To rule all peoples, it is first necessary to bring them together in a world federation or world government ‑ which is the avowed aim of both Communists and Zionists." [758]

Lenin Vladimir: Founder of Bolshevik Communist "There the great universally progressive features of Jewish culture have made themselves clearly felt: its internationalism, its responsiveness of the advanced movements of our times (the percentage of Jews in democratic and proletarian movements is everywhere higher than the percentage of Jews in the general population)...Those Jewish Marxists who join up in the international Marxist organizations with the Russian, Lithuanian, Ukrainian and other workers, adding their might (both in Russian and in Jewish) to the creation of an international culture of the working class movement, are continuing the best traditions of Jewry." [759]

Joseph Stalin:"Anti‑Semitism is dangerous for the toilers, for it is a false track which diverts them from the proper road and leads them into the jungle. Hence, Communists, as consistent internationalists, cannot but be irreconcilable and bitter enemies of anti‑Semitism. In the U.S.S.R., anti‑Semitism is strictly prosecuted as a phenomenon hostile to the Soviet system. According to the laws of the U.S.S.R. active anti‑Semites are punished with death." [760]

Henry Ford:"Jews have always controlled the business...The motion picture influence of the United States and Canada...is exclusively under the control, moral and financial, of the Jewish manipulators of the public mind." [761]

M. Oudendyk:"...I consider that the immediate suppression of Bolshevism is the greatest issue before the World, not even excluding the war which is till raging, and unless, as above stated, Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole World, as it is organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things." [762]

A. N. Field: In Today's Greatest Problem: "Once the Jewishness of Bolshevism is understood, its otherwise puzzling features become understandable. Hatred of Christianity, for instance, is not a Russian characteristic; it is a Jewish one."

Father Denis Fahey:"The real forces behind Bolshevism is Russia are Jewish forces, and Bolshevism is really an instrument in the hands of the Jews for the establishment of their future Messianic kingdom." [763]

A. N. Field:"The World today, however provides a spectacle of a great concentration of Jewish power. In New York there is a concentration of Jewish financial power dominating the entire world in its material affairs, and side by side with it is the greates physical concentration of the Jews ever recorded. On the other side of the globe, there has taken place in Russia the greatest concentration of the Jewish revolutionary activity in all history...

The enormously significant thing in the world today is that both this power of the purse (Theodor Herzl's ‘terrible (Jewish) power of the purse’) and revolutionary activity are working in the direction of destroying the entire existing order of things, and not only are they working in a common direction, but there is a mass of evidence that they are working in unison." [764]

H. H. Beamish:"Communism is Judaism. The Jewish Revolution in Russia was in 1918." [765]

Adrien Arcand:"There is nothing else in Communism ‑ a Jewish conspiracy to grab the whole world in their clutches; and no intelligent man in the world can find anything else, except the Jews.’ Jews are eager to bring Communism. Communism has not been fought for what it really is ‑ a Jewish scheme invented by Jews, it has progressed against all opposition to it. We have fought the smoke‑screen by Jewish dialecticians and publicists, refusing to fight the inventor, profiteer and string‑puller. Because Christians and Gentiles have come to fear the Jews, fear the truth, and they are paralyzed by the paradoxical slogans shouted by the Jews."[767]

Rev. Kenneth Goff:"The Frankenstein of Communism is the product of the Jewish mind, and was turned loose upon the world by the son of a Rabbi, Karl Marx, in the hopes of destroying Christian civilization ‑ as well as others. The testimony given before the Senate of the United States which is take from the many pages of the Overman Report, reveals beyond a shadow of a doubt that Jewish bankers financed the Russian Revolution." [768]

Pope Benedict XV: Warned, in 1920, against "the advent of a Universal Republic which is longed for by all the worst elements of disorder." This is resented by some Jews because of their active sponsorship and direction of such projects as the League of Nations and United Nations. ‑ And in effect, all Popes who have issued editions of the Index Expurgatorius, in which Jewish genocidal and anti‑Christian writings are condemned, according to the instructions of the Council of Trent.

Grant, Usysses S.: 19th century American general, politician. While in command of the 13th Army Corps, headquartered at Oxford, Mississippi, he became so infuriated at Jewish camp‑followers attempting to penetrate the conquered territory that he finally attempted to expel the Jews: "I have long since believed that in spite of all the vigilance that can be infused into post commanders, the special regulations of the Treasury Department have been violated, and that mostly by Jews and other unprincipled traders. So well satisfied have I been of this that I instructed the commanding officers at Columbus to refuse all permits to Jews to come South, and I have frequently had them expelled from the department, but they come in with their carpet‑sacks in spite of all that can be done to prevent it. The Jews seem to be a privileged class that can travel anywhere. They will land at any woodyard on the river and make their way through the country. If not permitted to buy cotton themselves, they will act as agents for someone else, who will be at military post with a Treasury permit to receive cotton and pay for it in Treasury notes which the Jew will buy up at an agreed rate, paying gold. [769]

1). The Jews, as a class, violating every regulation of trade established by the Treasury Department, and also Department orders, are hereby expelled from the Department.

2). Within twenty‑four hours from the receipt of this order by Post Commanders, they will see that all of this class of people are furnished with passes and required to leave, and anyone returning after such notification, will be arrested and held in confinement until an opportunity occurs of sending them out as prisoners, unless furnished with permits from these headquarters.

3). No permits will be given these people to visit headquarters for the purpose of making personal application for trade permits. By order of Major Gen. Grant Jno. A. Rawlings, Assistant Adjutant General.” [770] The expulsion order was immediately countermanded by the general‑in‑chief, H. W. Halleck, in Washington. Apparently the expelled Jews had immediately contacted their kinsmen there and had pressure brought to bear.

William T. Sherman: 19th century American soldier. In a letter from Union‑occupied Memphis, July 30, 1862, he wrote: "I found so many Jews and speculators here trading in cotton, and secessionists had become so open in refusing anything but gold, that I have felt myself bound to stop it. The gold can have but one use ‑ the purchase of arms and ammunition...Of course, I have respected all permits by yourself or the Secretary of the Treasury, but in these new cases (swarms of Jews), I have stopped it." [771]

L. F Ross: 19th century American military man. As did Generals Ulysses S. Grant and William T. Sherman, Ross confronted Jewish 'carpetbagging' cotton traders preying upon captured Confederate areas during the Civil War. In a letter to General John A. McClernand, he wrote: "The cotton speculators are quite clamorous for aid in the getting their cotton away from Middleburg, Hickory Valley, etc., and offer to pay liberally for the service. I think I can bring it away with safety, and make it pay to the Government. As some of the Jew owners have as good as stolen the cotton from the planters, I have no conscientious scruples in making them pay liberally to take it away."

Grederick Law Olmsted: 19th century American architect, historian. "A swarm of Jews has, within the last ten years, settled in every Southern town, many of them men of no character, opening cheap clothing and trinket shops, ruining or driving out business many of the old retailers, and engaging in an unlawful trade with the simple Negroes, which is found very profitable.”[772]

Twain, Mark (S. L. Clemens): 19th century American writer. "In the U.S. cotton states, after the war...the Jew came down in force, set up shop on the plantation, supplied all the Negroes' wants on credit, and at the end of the season was the proprietor of the Negro's share of the present crop and part of the next one. Before long, the whites detested the Jew.[773] The Jew is being legislated out of Russia. The reason is not concealed. The movement was instituted because the Christian peasant stood no chance against his commercial abilities. The Jew was always ready to lend on a crop. When settlement day came, he owned the crop; the next year he owned the farm ‑ like Joseph. [774] In the England of John's time everybody got into debt to the Jew. He gathered all lucrative enterprises into his hands. He was the King of Commerce. He had to be banished from the realm. For like reasons, Spain had to banish him 400 years ago, and Austria a couple of centuries later. In all ages Christian Europe has been obliged to curtail his activities. If he entered upon a trade, the Christian had to retire from it. If he set up as a doctor, he took the business. If he exploited agriculture, the other farmers had to get at something else. The law had to step in to save the Christian from the poor‑house. Still, almost bereft of employments, he found ways to make money. Even to get rich. This history has a most sordid and practical commercial look. Religious prejudices may account for one part of it, bit not for the other nine.

Protestants have persecuted Catholics ‑ but they did not take their livelihoods away from them. Catholics have persecuted Protestants ‑ bit they never closed agriculture and the handicrafts against them. I feel convinced that the Crucifixion has not much to do with the world's attitude toward the Jew; that the reasons for it are much older than that event...I am convinced that the persecution of the Jew is not in any large degree due to religious prejudice.

No, the Jew is a money‑getter. He made it the end and aim of his life. He was at it in Rome. He has been at it ever since. His success has made the whole human race his enemy. You will say that the Jew is everywhere numerically feeble. When I read in the Cyclopedia Britannica that the Jewish population in the United States was 250,000 I wrote the editor and explained to him that I was personally acquainted with more Jews than that, and that his figures were without doubt a misprint for 25,000,000. People told me that they had reasons to suspect that for business reasons, many Jews did not report themselves as Jews. It looks plausible. I am strongly of the opinion that we have an immense Jewish population in America. I am assured by men competent to speak that the Jews are exceedingly active in politics.” [775]

Twain's opinion on the Jews is probably the best‑kept secret in American literary history. Immediately after his death, his eccentric daughter Clara married ‑ or was married by ‑ the Jewish piano player, Ossip Galbrilowitsch. Twain's publishers were given speedy instructions to delete "Concerning the Jews" from the collected works, where it had appeared in the book The Man that Corrupted Hadleybury & Other Stories.

Ernest Renan A French historian:"The Jews are not merely a different religious community, but ‑ and this is the most important factor ‑ ethnically an altogether different race. The European felt instinctively that the Jew is a stranger, who immigrated from Asia. The so‑called prejudice is natural sentiment. Civilization will overcome antipathy against the Israelite who merely professes another religion, but never against the racially different Jew...In Eastern Europe the Jew is the cancer slowly eating into the flesh of other nations. Exploitation of the people is his only aim. Selfishness and a lack of personal courage are his chief characteristics; self‑sacrifice and patriotism are altogether foreign to him."

Goldwin Smith: Professor of Modern History at Oxford, wrote in Nineteenth Century, October 1881: "The Jew alone regard his race as superior to humanity, and looks forward not to its ultimate union with other races, but to its triumph over them all and to its final ascendancy under the leadership of a tribal Messiah."

Mencken, H.L.: 20th century American writer: "The Jews could be put down very plausibly as the most unpleasant race ever heard of. As commonly encountered they lack any of the qualities that mark the civilized man: courage, dignity, incorruptibility, ease, confidence. They have vanity without pride, voluptuousness without taste, and learning without wisdom. Their fortitude, such as it is, is wasted upon puerile objects, and their charity is mainly a form of display." [776]

The fact that what are commonly spoken of as rights are often really privileges is demonstrated in the case of the Jews. They resent bitterly their exclusion from certain hotels, resorts and other places of gathering, and make determined efforts to horn in. But the moment any considerable number of them horns in, the attractions of the place diminish, and the more pushful Jews turn to one where they are still nicht gewuenscht...("not wanted.") "I am one of the few Goyim who have ever actually tackled the Talmud. I suppose you now expect me to add that it is a profound and noble work, worthy of hard study by all other Goyim. Unhappily, my report must differ from this expectation. It seems to me, save for a few bright spots, to be quite indistinguishable from rubbish...

The Jewish theory that the Goyim envy the superior ability of the Jews is not borne out by the facts. Most Goyim, in fact, deny that the Jew is superior, and point in evidence to his failure to take the first prizes: he has to be content with the seconds. No Jewish composer has ever come within miles of Bach, Beethoven and Brahms; no Jew has ever challenged the top‑flight painters of the world, and no Jewish scientist has equaled Newton, Darwin, Pasteur or Mendel.

In the latter bracket such apparent exception as Ehrlich, Freud and Einstein are only apparent. Ehrlich, in fact, contributed less to biochemical fact than to biochemical theory, and most of his theory was dubious. Freud was nine‑tenths quack, and there is sound reason for believing that even Einstein will not hold up: in the long run his curved space may be classed with the psychosomatic bumps of Gall and Spurzheim. But whether this inferiority of the Jew is real or only a delusion, it must be manifest that it is generally accepted. The GOY does not, in fact, believe that the Jew is better than the non‑Jew; the most he will admit is that the Jew is smarter at achieving worldly success. But this he ascribes to sharp practices, not to superior ability." [777]

George Bernard Shaw: 20th century British dramatist: "This is the real enemy, the invader from the East, the Druze, the ruffian, the oriental parasite; in a word: the Jew.[778] This craving for bouquets by Jews is a symptom of racial degeneration. The Jews are worse than my own people. Those Jews who still want to be the chosen race (chosen by the late Lord Balfour) can go to Palestine and stew in their own juice. The rest had better stop being Jews and start being human beings. ” [779]

Richard Wagner: 19th century German composer: "The Jew has never had an art of his own, hence never a live of art‑enabling import...So long as the separate art of music had a real organic life‑need in it, down to the epochs of Mozart and Beethoven, there was nowhere to be found a Jew composer: it was utterly impossible for an element quiet foreign to that living organism to take a part in the formative stages of that life. Only when a body's inner death is manifest, do outside elements win the power of judgment in it ‑ yet merely to destroy it. On one thing am I clear: that is the influence which the Jews have gained upon our mental life, as displayed in the deflection and falsification of our highest culture‑tendencies. Whether the downfall of our culture can be arrested by a violent rejection of the destructive alien element, I an unable to decide, since that would require forces with whose existence I am unacquainted.” [780]

Werner Sombart: 20th century German economist: "Capitalism was born from the money loan. Money lending contains the root idea of capitalism. Turn to the pages of the TALMUD and you will find that the Jews made an art of lending money. They were taught early to look for their chief happiness in the possession of money. They fathomed all the secrets that lay hid in money. They became Lords of Money and Lords of the World...”

F. Scott Fitzgerald: 20th century American novelist: "Down a tall busy street he read a dozen Jewish names on a line of stores; in the door of each stood a dark little man watching the passers from intent eyes ‑ eyes gleaming with suspicion, with pride, with clarity, with cupidity, with comprehension. New York ‑ he could not dissociate it from the slow, upward creep of this people ‑ the little stores, growing, expanding, consolidating, moving, watched over with hawks' eyes and a bee's attention to detail ‑ they (were Jews).”

Ralph Waldo Emerson: 19th century American philosopher, poet: "The sufferance which is the badge of the Jew has made him, in these days, the ruler of the rulers of the earth.” [781]

Sir Richard Francis Burton: 19th century British diplomat, writer. After a term as consul at Damascus, Syria, where some years before, a Catholic priest was allegedly murdered in a blood ritual by Jews, Burton took an interest in the matter. His investigations satisfied him that such killings actually were performed by certain sects of Jews. "The Jew's hand was ever, like Ishmael's, against every man but those belonging to the Synagogue. His fierce passions and fiendish cunning, combined with abnormal powers of intellect, with intense vitality, and with a persistency of purpose which the world has rarely seen, and whetted moreover by a keen thirst for blood engendered by defeat and subjection, combined to make him the deadly enemy of all mankind, whilst his unsocial and iniquitous Oral Law contributed to inflame his wild lust of pelf, and to justify the crimes suggested by spite and superstition."

Theodore Dreiser: 20th century American writer: "New York to me is a scream ‑ a Kyke's dream of a ghetto. The Lost Tribe has taken the island.”[782] "Liberalism, in the case of the Jew, means internationalism. If you listen to Jews discuss Jews, you will find they are mone‑minded, very sharp in practice. The Jews lack the fine integrity which at last is endorsed, and to a certain degree followed, by lawyers of other nationalities. The Jew has been in Germany for a thousand years, and he is still a Jew. He has been in America for all of 200 years, and he has not faded into a pure American by any means ‑ and he will not.”[783]

H.G. Wells: 20th century British writer:"The Jews looked for a special savior, a messiah, who was to redeem mankind by the agreeable process of restoring the fabulous glories of David and Solomon, and bringing the whole world at last under the firm but benevolent Jewish heel." [784] "Zionism is an expression of Jewish refusal to assimilate. If the Jews have suffered, it is because they have regarded themselves as a chosen people." [785] "A careful study of anti‑Semitism prejudice and accusations might be of great value to many Jews, who do not adequately realize the irritations they inflict." [786] Wells was in the habit of referring to Karl Marx as "a shallow third‑rate Jew," and "a lousy Jew" in private correspondence.[787]

Charles Lindbergh: 20th century American aviator, writer. Wednesday, August 23, 1939: "We are disturbed about the effect of the Jewish influence in our press, radio and motion pictures. It may become very serious. (Fulton) Lewis told us of one instance where the Jewish advertising firms threatened to remove all their advertising from the Mutual system if a certain feature were permitted to go on the air. The threat was powerful enough to have the feature removed."

Thursday, May 1, 1941: "The pressure for war is high and mounting. The people are opposed to it, but the Administration seems to have 'the bit in its teeth' and is hell‑bent on its way to war. Most of the Jewish interests in the country are behind war, and they control a huge part of our press and radio and most of our motion pictures. There are the 'intellectuals' and the 'Anglophiles,' and the British agents who are allowed free rein, the international financial interests, and many others." [788]

General George Van Horn Mosely:"The war proposed is for establishing Jewish influence throughout the world." [789]

Johann Gottfried Herder: 18th century German philosopher: "The Jewish people is and remains in Europe an Asiatic people alien to our part of the world, bound to that old law which it received in a distant climate, and which, according to its confession, it cannot do away with...How many of this alien people can be tolerated without injury to the true citizen? A ministry in which a Jew is supreme, a household in which a Jew has the key of the wardrobe and the management of the finances, a department or commissariat in which Jews do the principal business, are Pontine marshes which cannot be drained.[790] For thousands of years, since their emergence on the stage of history, the Jews were a parasitic growth on the stem of other nations, a race of cunning brokers all over the earth. They have cause great evil to many ill‑organized states, by retarding the free and natural economic development of their indigenous population. ”[791]

Napoleon Bonaparte: French statesman, general: "The Jews provided troops for my campaign in Poland, but they ought to reimburse me: I soon found that they are no good for anything but selling old clothes...Legislating must be put in effect everywhere that the general well‑being is in danger. The government cannot look with indifference on the way a despicable nation takes possession of all the provinces of France. The Jews are the master robbers of the modern age; they are the carrion birds of humanity...They must be treated with political justice, not with civil justice. They are surely not real citizens." “The Jews have practiced usury since the time of Moses, and oppressed the other peoples. Meanwhile, the Christians were only rarely usurers, falling into disgrace when they did so. We ought to ban the Jews from commerce because they abuse it...The evils of the Jews do not stem from individuals but from the fundamental nature of this people." [792] "Nothing more contemptible could be done than the reception of the Jews by you. I decided to improve the Jews. But I do not want more of them in my kingdom. Indeed, I have done all to prove my scorn of the most vile nation in the world." [793] (1) Every big and small Jew is the peddling trade must renew his license every year. (2) Checks and other obligations are only redeemable if the Jew can prove that he has obtained the money without cheating.[794]

Charles De Gaulle: 20th century French politician. Addressing the Zionist imbroglio in the Mideast in a news conference of November 27, 1967, he observed: "The Jews remain what they have been at all times: an elite people, self‑confident and domineering."

George Sand (Amantine Dupin Dudevant): 19th century French novelist: "I saw in 'the wandering Jew' the personification of the Jewish people, exiled in the Middle Ages. Nevertheless, they are once again extremely rich, owing to their unfailing rude greediness and their indefatigable activity. With their hard‑heartedness that they extend toward people of other faiths and races they are at the point of making themselves kings of the world. This people can thank its obstinacy that France will be Judized within fifty years. Already some wise Jews prophesy this frankly." [795]

Community of Strasbourg, France: In an address to the Assemblee in 1790, the city's revolutionary leaders opposed citizenship for Jews, because: "Everyone knew the inherent bad character of the Jews and no one doubted they were foreigners... Let the 'enlighteners' stop defaming the Gentiles by blaming them for what is wrong with the Jews. Their conduct is their own fault. Perhaps the Jews might eventually give up every aspect of their separation and all the characteristics of their nature. Let us sit and wait until that happens; we might them judge them to be worthy of equality.”[796]

Stephen H. Roberts: 20th century Australian historian. Though hostile on almost every point to National Socialism, his The House that Hitler Built does admit that Jews were a menace in Germany: "It is useless to deny that grave Jewish problems existed in Germany. The nation was in the unfortunate geographical position of being the first stage in the perennial push westward of the Polish Jews. Unless forced on, they tended to stop in Berlin and Hamburg, where they obtained an unduly share of good professional positions. In Berlin, for example, when the Nazi came to power, 50.2 percent of the lawyers were Jews. In medicine, 48 per cent of the doctors were Jews, and it was said that they systematically seized the principal hospital posts. The Jews owned the largest and most important Berlin newspapers, and they had made great inroads on the educational system."

Francisco Franco: 20th century Spanish statesman. In his victory speech in Madrid, on May 19, 1939, he declared: "Let us be under no illusion. The Jewish spirit, which was responsible for the alliance of large‑scale capital with Marxism and was the driving force behind so many anti‑Spanish revolutionary agreements, will not be got rid of in a day."

Jose Primo de Rivera: 20th century Spanish political reformer (assassinated by the Communists). He stressed that the instruments of Jewish domination in the modern world are money and the press, and that communism is an instrument of international Jewish capitalism used to smash and afterwards rule the nations.[797]

H. H. Beamish, in a New York address, October 30 ‑ November 1, 1937:"In 1848 the word ’anti‑Semitic’ was invented by the Jews to prevent the use of the word ‘Jew.’ The right word for them is ‘Jew’...I implore all of you to be accurate ‑ call them Jews. There is no need to be delicate on this Jewish question. You must face them in this country. The Jew should be satisfied here. I was here forty‑seven years ago; your doors were thrown open to the Jews and they were free. No he has got you absolutely by the throat ‑ that is your reward."

Patriarch Christea: 20th century Romanian prelate. "The Jews have caused an epidemic of corruption and social unrest. They monopolize the press, which, with foreign help, flays all the spiritual treasures of the Romanians. To defend ourselves is a national and patriotic duty ‑ not anti‑Semitism. Lack of measures to get rid of the plague would indicate that we are lazy cowards who let ourselves be carried alive to our graves. Why should we not get rid of these parasites who suck Romanian and Christian blood? It is logical and holy to react against them." [798]

Houston Stewart Chamberlain:"The revelation of Christ has no significance for the Jew!...I have searched through a whole library of Jewish books in the expectation of finding ‑ naturally not belief in the Divinity of Christ, nor the idea of redemption, but the purely human feeling for the greatness of suffering Savior ‑ but in vain. A Jew who feels that, is, in fact, no longer a Jew, but a denier of Judiasm. And while we find, even in Mohammed's Koran, at least a vague conception of the importance of Christ and profound reverence for His personality, a cultured leading Jew of the nineteenth century (Graetz) calls Christ ‘the new birth with the death mask,’ which inflicted new and painful wounds upon the Jewish people; he cannot see anything else in Him. In view of the Cross he assures us that ‘the Jews do not require this convulsive emotion for their spiritual improvement,’ and adds, ‘particularly not among the middle classes of inhabitants of the cities.’ His comprehension goes further. In a book, republished in 1880, by a Spanish Jew (Mose de Leon) Jesus Christ is called a ‘dead dog’ that lies ‘buried in a dunghill.’ Besides, the Jews have taken care to issue in the latter part of the nineteens century several editions (naturally in Hebrew) of the so‑called ‘censured passages’ from the Talmud, those passages usually omitted in which Christ is exposed to our scorn and hatred as a ‘fool,’‘sorcerer,’‘profane person,’‘idolater,’‘dog,’‘bastard,’‘child of lust,’ etc.: so, too, His sublime Mother." [799]

Adrien Arcand, Canadian political leader of the 1930s:"Through their (Jew's) international news agencies, they mold your minds and have you see the world not as it is, but as they want you to see it. Through their cinema, they are the educators of our youth ‑ and with just one film in two hours, can wipe out of a child's brain what he has learned in six months in the home, the church or the school."

Nesta Webster:"England is no longer controlled by Britons. We are under the invisible Jewish dictatorship ‑ a dictatorship that can be felt in every sphere of life." [800]

Henry Wallace, Secretary of Commerce, under President Harry Truman, wrote in his dairy that in 1946 :"Truman was ‘exasperated’ over Jewish pressure that he support Zionist rule over Palestine. Wallace added ‘Pres. Truman expressed himself as being very much 'put out' with the Jews. He said that 'Jesus Christ couldn't please them when he was here on Earth, so how could anyone expect that I would have any luck?' Pres. Truman said he hand no use for them and didn't care what happened to them."

William Jennings Bryant, three times the Democratic Party candidate for President said:"New York is the city of privilege. Here is the seat of the Invisible Power represented by the allied forces of finance and industry. This Invisible Government is reactionary, sinister, unscrupulous, mercenary, and sordid. It is wanting in national ideals and devoid of conscience...This kind of government must be scourged and destroyed."

Henry Asams (Descendant of President John Adams), in a letter to John Hay, October 1895:"The Jewish question is really the most serious of our problems."

Sir Cecil Spring‑Rice. 20th century British politician:"One by one, the Jews are capturing the principal newspapers of America.” [801]

Truman Capote: 20th century American writer. In an interview, he assailed "the Zionist mafia" monopolizing publishing today, and protested a tendency to suppress things that do not meet with Jewish approval.[802]

Voltaire (Francois Marie Arouet) 18th century French philosopher, writer:"Why are the Jews hated? It is the inevitable result of their laws; they either have to conquer everybody or be hated by the whole human race...The Jewish nation dares to display an irreconcilable hatred toward all nations, and revolts against all masters; always superstitious, always greedy for the well‑being enjoyed by others, always barbarous ‑ cringing in misfortune and insolent in prosperity...You seem to me to be the maddest of the lot. The Kaffirs, the Hottentots, and the Negroes of Guinea are much more reasonable and more honest people than your ancestors, the Jews. You have surpassed all nations in impertinent fables in bad conduct and in barbarism. You deserve to be punished, for this is your destiny." [803] "You will only find in the Jews an ignorant and barbarous people, who for a long time have joined the most sordid avarice to the most detestable superstition and to the most invincible hatred of all peoples which tolerate and enrich them." [804] "I know that there are some Jews in the English colonies. These marranos go wherever there is money to be made...But whether these circumcised who sell old clothes claim that they are of the tribe of Naphtali or Issachar is not of the slightest importance. They are, simply, the biggest scoundrels who have ever dirtied the face of the earth." [805] "They are, all of them, born with raging fanaticism in their hearts, just as the Bretons and the Germans are born with blond hair. I would not be in the least bit surprised if these people would not some day become deadly to the human race." [806]

E. Cannot: 19th century French reformer: In La Renovation, journal of the socialist school of Charles Fourier: "Jews! To the heights of your Sinai...I humbly lift myself. I stand erect and cry out to you, in behalf of all my humble equals, of all those whom your spoliation has brought to grief, who died in misery through you and whose trembling shades accuse you: Jews! for Cain and Iscariot, leave us, leave us! Ah, cross the Red Sea again, and go down there to the desert, to the promised land which is waiting for you, the only country fit for you; o you wicked, rude and dishonest people, go there!!!” ("Israel")

Seneca 4 B.C.:"The customs of this accursed people have grown so strong that they have spread through every land."

St. Justin 116 A.D.:"The Jews were behind all the persecution of the Christians. They wandered through the country everywhere hating and undermining the Christian faith."

Mohammed 570 A.D.:"It is incomprehensible to me why one has not long ago expelled these death-breathing beasts...are these Jews anything else but devourers of men?"

Martin Luther 1483 A.D.:"How the Jews love the book of Esther, which is so suitable to their bloodthirsty, revengeful, murderous appetite and hope. The sun has never shown on such a bloodthirsty and vindictive people who cherish the idea of murdering and strangling the heathen. No other men under the sun are more greedy than they have been and always will be as one can see from their accursed usury. They console themselves that when their Messiah come, he will collect all the gold and silver in the world and divide it among them."

Voltaire, 1694:"The Jews are nothing but an ignorant and barbaric people, which for a long time combined the most loathsome avarice with the most abominable superstition and inextinguishable hatred of all peoples by whom they are tolerated and through whom they are enriched."

Napoleon:"I decided to improve the Jews; but I do not want any more of them in my kingdom; indeed I have done all to prove my scorn of the vilest nation in the world."

Benjamin Franklin, 1789:"There is a great danger for the United States of America. This great danger is the Jew. Gentlemen, in every land which the Jews have settled they have depressed the normal level and lowered the degree of commercial honesty. They have remained apart and unassimilated. They have created a state within a state, and when they are opposed, they attempt to strangle the national financially as in the case of Portugal and Spain.

For more than 1799 years they have lamented their sorrowful fate - namely that they were driven out of the motherland. Gentlemen, if the civilized world should give them back Palestine and their property, they would immediately find pressing reasons for not returning there. Why? Because they are vampires, they cannot live among themselves; they must live among Christians and others who do not belong to their race.[807] If they are not excluded from the United States by the Constitution, within less than two hundred years, they will stream into this country in such numbers they will rule and destroy us and change our form of government for which we Americans shed our blood and sacrificed our lives, personal property and freedom. If the Jews are not excluded within two hundred years, our children will be working in the fields to feed the Jews while they remain in the counting houses gleefully rubbing their hands. I warn you Gentlemen, if you do not exclude the Jews forever, your children's children will curse you in your graves.

Their ideas are not those of Americans, even when they have lived among us for ten generations. The Leopard cannot change his spots. The Jews are a danger to this land and if they are allowed to enter, they will imperil our institutions - They should be excluded by the Constitution."

How deadly accurate Benjamin Franklin's words are as we see the creeping paralysis of Jewish communism undermining American traditions, changing our laws and corrupting our institutions. According to the King James Charter, the Mayflower Compact and several Supreme Court decisions, this country is a Christian Nation, yet we permit as appointees, bureaucrats, department heads and advisors, hordes of antichristians who have swarmed into government service and are busily enforcing their unamerican ideologies on our national way of life.

We have now examined these people in light of the facts derived from historical records as well as the Holy Writ. Let us now call upon science for confirmation of the fact that Jews are not as other people. The Scientific American for March 1957 recorded the results of a study conducted by Stephen P. and Leslie C. Dunn of the inhabitants of the Jewish Ghetto of Rome where, for more than 2000 years, they have been more or less segregated from the rest of the city. Comprehensive blood tests of this group, which has been genetically isolated in the midst of the metropolis, reveals the following startling facts:

1). The blood of the Jewish community of Rome discloses a mysterious RH gene which is not present in White Christians.

2). Blood typing laboratories are puzzled by the unusual serological reaction it produces.

4). The Ghetto population shows definite biological differences from Roman Christians.

5). Tests are now being conducted in Israel on Jews from all parts of the world in an attempt to find the cause for these differences.

We have news for them. If they want to know the cause of these differences, they need only read John 8:44 and find out who their father is. Obviously, the blood of the "children of the devil" will be different from that of the Christians.

A report from Copenhagen, Denmark, written by John Hilliby of the New York Times, a fingerprint study by two Jewish scientists. The researchers are Dr. Leo Sachs of the Weizman Institute in Israel and Dr. M. Bat-Miriam of the Israeli Institute for Biological Research. Following are excerpts from that Dispatch: "The problem, Dr Sachs said, was to decide how widely scattered members of the race could be subjected to the same physical tests. He chose fingerprinting because the characteristic pattern of loops, whorls and arches was not subjected to what evolutionists call selective forces; that is, they are not adaptable. They also gave statistically valid evidence of hereditary similarities in otherwise widely different populations."

By examining all ten fingerprints of each of 4,000 Jews now resident in Israel, but who originally lived in Poland, Germany, Iraq, Egypt, Morocco, Yemen, Bulgaria and Turkey, Doctors Sachs and Bat-Miriam considered that they had got 40,000 characteristic "dabs" of the many migration streams. "The frequency of the relationship of the loops, whorls and arches of the prints to one another gave the researchers a series of numerical factors that, when compared with the samples of non-Jews, showed that these were unique qualities in the Jewish prints..."

There was, Dr. Sachs said, an unmistakable "Mediterranean component" in the eight population samples studied, and its character was unlike the prints of non-Jewish people among whom the Jews had been living often for centuries!

The Bible record designating these people as a serpent Race and different from their Christian neighbors is upheld and corroborated historically and scientifically. It seems like a miracle and almost unbelievable, but the facts speak for themselves, and we Christians can be great comforted in the fact that the Book of Books is once more vindicated and proven true.

The B'nai B'rith Messenger on June 17, 1955, carried the following message on page 26: "There must be rewriting of the Christ story for Christians which will for all time eradicate the myth that the Jews killed Christ."

We can clearly see that this is happening today with a blasphemous bible being presented to Christians today. One which is the perversion of the Scriptures by the politically correct twisted, Satanic and perverted version of Scripture for the modern man (and woman).

The title of this new revelation is The New Testament and Psalms: An Inclusive Version, published by Oxford University Press. This is a tabloid version of Scripture; the Religious Inquirer if you will. It would be funny if it weren't for the sad fact that millions of weak Christians will eat up the lies and grow even more fat and passive.

The editors of this blasphemy say they are proud of the way they handled the anti-Semitic overtones of the New Testament. They simply eliminated all references to the Jews killing Jesus Christ, as in 1 Thessalonians 2:14-15, which in standard translations says: "...for you suffered the same things from your own compatriots as they did from the Jews who killed both the Lord Jesus and the prophets."

They substituted an insidious lie: "...for you suffered the same from your own compatriots as they did from those who killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets." They don't want to hear the truth if it offends someone. The fact is the truth always offends someone.

The Jews claim they don't believe Jesus Christ was/is the Messiah but they sure get offended when you take Scripture at its word and accuse them of the murder of our Lord and Savior. They claim they don't eat port either, but they'll sell you the hog.

This version neuters the gender of God and Christ, the roles of women and men, so God is "father/mother," and the Lord's Prayer now begins "Our Father/Mother in heaven." Christ is the "human one" or "child of God." The human one dying on the stake says, "Father/mother, into your hands I commend my spirit." Neither the word "human" or the term "human race" appears in the Scriptures. Perhaps that's why they have added it to this tabloid bible.

Children should no longer "obey" their parents, but rather "heed" them in this version, and wives are no longer "subject" or "submissive" to their husbands, but rather "committed" to them. This version also neuters references offensive to people of color and people with disabilities: "Darkness" is no longer a metaphor for evil, because of possible racist overtones, and the disabled are not identified solely by their afflictions, as in "the blind."References to the "right" hand of God are also deleted. In deference to left-handed people, it becomes God's "mighty" hand.

The editors deny they have spent the last five years producing a "politically correct" bible. But according to Susan Brooks Thistlewaite of the Chicago Theological Seminary, who is one of the six editors, "This translation is aimed at churches and Christians who are thoughtful about the way the bible includes everyone. I think political correctness is a pejorative term which is used by people who want the bible to produce obedience, not thoughtfulness."

This no doubt will have traditionalists yowling, some with anger, others with laughter. And USA Today asks, "if some people prefer this latest version, why should anybody be concerned?"

We can only draw the conclusion they are not the least interested in truth. Then to add insult to injury, can you imagine opening up a bible and seeing an illustration of a black Jesus surrounded by a group of black disciples? Or turning to the beginning of the Book of Genesis and being told that Eve, the mother of all nations, "was black, liken unto the source from which she came."

Another new bible, published by Winton-Derek of Nashville, has done just that. It is called The Original African Heritage Study Bible, and according to publisher James Peebles, "It should reshape the 21st-century church into a more biblical understanding of unification and brotherhood." No mention there of truth!

A group of black scholars (read that propagandists) spent seven years on this version, which uses the King James translation but contains more than 1,000 footnotes to explain the African contribution to Judaism and Christianity. "I think it's an excellent idea. It's got some commentary in the front and it talks about the myths of the Bible with a blond and blue-eyed Jesus," said Tim Way, senior buyer at Zondervan, adding "your guess is as good as mine as to what Moses looked like."

The new Bible highlights what it claims are verses about Africa and biblical people of African descent from Abraham to Simon of Cyrene, and is filled with annotations interpreting passages of relevance to what Peebles refers to as "the African diaspora," black Christians living elsewhere in the world. Interspersed throughout the book are pictures of biblical events taken in the Holy Land using black models, and original art reproductions taken form the Mafa tribe of Cameroon.

Cain Hope Felder, a New Testament professor at Howard University, and also the editor of Stony the Road We Trod: African-American Biblical Interpretation, said he is not arguing that it is a historical certainty all the major biblical figures were black. He then contradicts himself, saying "It's certainly more plausible that they look like the images we are presenting than someone from Sweden or someone from Great Britain."

So it would appear that "scholarship" these days is defined as the talent to rewrite history to suit the current political climate. The fact that a major publisher of Christian books like Zondervan will lend it's name and endorsement to such books reveals how very much they are controlled by the enemies of Christ. It might also suggest concern that our people are learning the truth of our heritage from the not-so-controlled media - shortwave radio and internet.

We, Christians, can assure these people that the Christ story is already written. It is called the Holy Bible. We Christians will fight to the death to defend it.

"the kingdom of heaven suffereth violence, and the violent take it by force." [808]

The meaning of the word "church" - which most English-speaking churches wrongly use to replace the word "ecclesia." Churches have led people to drop the word "ecclesia" and replace it with the word "church." The reason for this become obvious after one realizes the mission of the churches and their master, the state. Thus, the people have lost the original concept of the ecclesia. This subject is crucial! The more one learns about the Gospel of the Kingdom, the more they realize the importance of rediscovering the meaning and purpose of Christ's ecclesia system.

There is yet much to be uncovered; much to understand and put into action concerning the ecclesia system of God. The Bible refers to the ecclesia system of God, i.e., the Reign of Christ, many times in definite terms. But, church people have been blind to it in the past due to mistranslation, mis-education and brainwashing. For instance, in the New Testament writings, were you read the phrase translated in the King James Version (KJV): "before the foundation of the world," you are actually reading about the "ecclesia system."

In Greek, it comes across more clearly, as: "before the founding of the system," - meaning Christ's ecclesia system. This verse is not referring to the time before the earth was created, but to a time before the Kingdom System was established in Christ (i.e., the New Covenant (New Testament) age with its ecclesia system). It simply means, before Christ was raised from the dead and given the throne over Israel. This example is just the tip of a huge iceberg. There is much more to uncover on this subject.

The ecclesia system is the system of Christian Freedom given to us in the Scriptures, established by Christ and His apostles, and still viable today to anyone who understands it.

There are no "Right" Judeo-Christian churches! The Church System is the great Counterfeit System. It has been shoved off on us to keep us blind to the loss of freedom we've suffered from losing sight of Christ's ecclesia system. The churches have obscured this simple truth with their lies and religious flim-flam. The Church-State establishment has staged a coup, giving the appearance of having overthrown the ecclesia system and replacing it with the Church-State duo.

The wine of religion and politics has done its work on the minds and hearts of the people. The spiritually drunken condition of church people usually prevents them from discerning the subtle, but immense, changes. Church people simply cannot generally understand and appreciate the monstrous changes that have occurred - changes which have swallowed them up, and of which they are now a part.

If you are a church person reading this, you likely think of yourself, and your church, as "a different sort." You may read my comments and summarily agree with me, thinking I am referring to those other churches, and not to your own particular church. This mentality is common, and we understand it, having gone through it ourselves. It is very easy for a church person to view it this way. You may even subscribe to the theory that yours is "the only true church," and it alone has God's approval. But understand - the difference of one, or a few, doctrines is not the criteria by which churches are unacceptable. Churches must be rejected for their very nature. They are not what they purport to be! Any organization which supports and/or subscribes to the common concept of "church" in general, whether it calls itself a church, a synagogue, a fraternity, or any other name, is unacceptable regardless of its particular name or doctrinal peculiarities. Churches, like synagogues and psychiatrists, must be avoided! They confuse, pervert, and dissipate.

Get out of the Judeo-Christian churches in America today! They are not of God! They are not of the ecclesia system of Christ! They may incorporate the name "Christ" in their title, but without his authority it means nothing. Christ didn't institute churches! He doesn't want churches! He instituted a civil system of independence and liberty, called "The Christian Ecclesia System."

In opposition to Christ's ecclesia was the church system, as represented by Simon Magus: "But there was a certain man, called Simon (Magus), which before time in the same city used sorcery, and bewitched the people of Samaria, giving out that himself was some great one: To whom they all gave heed, from the least to the greatest, saying, This man is the great power of God. And to him they had regard, because that of long time he had bewitched them with sorceries. But when they believed Philip preaching the things concerning the kingdom of God, and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women. Then Simon himself believed also: and when he was baptized, he continued with Philip, and wondered, beholding the miracles and signs which were done...And when Simon saw that through laying on of the apostles' hands the Holy Spirit was given, he offered them money. Saying, Give me also this authority that on whomsoever I lay hands, he may receive the Holy Spirit. But Peter said unto him, Thy money perish with thee, because thou hast thought that the gift of God may be purchased with money. Thou hast neither part nor lot in this matter: for thy heart is not right in the sight of God. Repent therefore of this thy wickedness, and pray God, if perhaps the thought of thine heart may be forgiven thee. For I perceive that thou art in the gall of bitterness, and in the bond of iniquity." [809]

Another noted church father was Elymas the sorcerer; "And when they had gone through the isle unto Paphos, they found a certain sorcerer, a false prophet, a Jew, whose name was Barjesus: Which was with the deputy of the country, Sergius Paulus, an intelligent man: who called for Barnabas and Saul, and desired to hear the word of God. But Elymas the sorcerer (for so is his name by interpretation) withstood them, seeking to turn away the deputy from the faith. Then Saul (who also is called Paul), filled with the Holy Spirit, set his eyes on him. And said, O full of all subtility and all mischief, thou son of the devil, thou enemy of all righteousness, wilt thou not cease to pervert the right ways of the Lord?" [810]

The sorcery described in the above verses is the basis and mode of the church system. People entrenched in the church system generally cannot see this, but churches, by their very nature, are products of Babylon. They stifle intelligence, independence and liberty. Therefore, we must learn more about the ecclesia system, expose the church system for the harlot that she is, and hopefully encourage people to develop a sincere dislike for churches and church functions.

We shall fan the fire of contempt against central government and churches, and encourage everyone to read the Bible for themselves, as a manual for life, rather than a formula for sorcery and superstition. People must, sooner or later, realize that the commandment to "come out of her my people," refers also to the churches. "For the vineyard of Yahweh of hosts is the house of Israel, and the men of Judah his pleasant plant: and he looked for judgment, but behold oppression; for righteousness, but behold a cry. Woe unto them that join house to house, that lay field to field, till there be no place that they may be placed alone in the midst of the earth!" [811]

Christians who have suffered under years of brainwashing from the churches will find the ecclesia concept a little hard to grasp. So, as an illustration to help get the idea across, we'll use the plantation analogy - an example familiar to most people. This should help clear up some points.

For the purposes of this illustration, just think of The United States as The Big Plantation. Think of Washington, D.C. as the plantation manor, and Congress as the master ("massah"). And remember, the International Bankers are the mortgage-holders and true behind-the-scenes owners and controllers of the Plantation. Lastly, you are the slaves (regulated residents) on the Plantation.

Now, we have all the elements for a plantation system: 1). Slaves, 2). Land, 3). Master and 4). Financiers. This illustration fits according to Isaiah 5 (quoted above) where a nation is called "a vineyard." A plantation, then, is a vineyard with a central government. Vineyards grow well and flourish in God's natural environment - as long as central government doesn't take over and abuse the land.

The ecclesia system can be likened to a system of husbandry and preservation of the vineyard of Yahweh. Caring for the vineyard includes being on guard against any kind of central government taking root and spreading throughout the garden - a purpose forgotten by most of our race, thanks to the brainwash of the churches.

As Isaiah said, it is wrong to "join houses and fields" together until one person, or one corporation, has control of large areas of land. The largest corporate monopoly in America is the U.S. Government. It owns and controls the whole nation. No private ownership has existed in the U.S.A. since the Constitution was ratified over 200 years ago. U.S. citizens are tenants on government land. We can use the land, for a fee (taxes), but we cannot own it.

The Bible gives clear warnings against the sin of monopolies of property and power. For instance, Micah tells the people that their acceptance of central monopolies has brought them slavery: "Woe to them that devise iniquity, and work evil upon their beds! when the morning is light, they practice it, because it is in the power of their hand. And they covet fields, and take them by violence; and houses, and take them away; so they oppress a man and his house, even a man and his heritage. Therefore thus saith Yahweh; Behold, against this family do I devise an evil, from which ye shall not remove your necks; neither shall ye go haughtily; for this time is evil. In that day shall one take up a parable against you, and lament with a doleful lamentation, and say, We be utterly spoiled: he hath charged the portion of my people: how hath he removed it from me! turning away he hath divided our fields." [812]

Again, Micah explains that corrupt government and religion have brought poverty in the land: "Hear this, I pray you, ye heads of the house of Jacob, and princes of the house of Israel, that abhor judgment, and pervert all equity. They build up Zion with blood, and Jerusalem with iniquity. The heads thereof judge for reward, and the priests thereof teach for hire, and the prophets thereof divine for money: yet will they lean upon Yahweh, and say, is not Yahweh among us? none evil can come upon us. Therefore shall Zion for your sake be plowed as a field, and Jerusalem shall become heaps, the mountain of the house as the high places of the forest." [813]

Habakkuk warns that a nation which builds with blood and oppression will be overthrown: "Because thou hast spoiled many nations, all the remnant of the people shall spoil thee: because of men's blood, and for the violence of the land, of the city, and of all that dwell therein. Woe to him that coveteth an evil covetousness to his house, that he may set his nest on high, that he may be delivered from the power of evil! Thou hast consulted shame to thy house by cutting off many people, and hast sinned against thy soul. Woe to him that buildeth a town with blood, and stablisheth a city by iniquity!" [814]

One cannot read these scriptures without thinking of the evil central government in America. The only difference between the beast powers of the Old Testament times, and the central beast of America, is that today's beast is many times larger and more powerful.

Looking at a map of the Big Plantation (The United States), you can see little lines here and there marking the state boundaries (which have been clandestinely removed, in recent years). Just think of those lines as fences. As any good farmer or rancher knows, it is important to maintain good fences on the plantation to properly manage the cattle and keep them in their proper areas (until it became known to the conspirators that by removing the boundaries of states and countries, in other parts of the world, the destruction of the white race could be speeded up). The plantation master (Congress) must keep close track of the cattle, which includes branding them for identification and keeping records on them.

Or, perhaps more correctly, you could think of the state borders as marking off smaller sections of the Plantation - each section containing its own group of slaves. The boundaries between each section of slaves are there to help each section manage its slaves and keep them from getting mixed up with the slaves of other section - so they could be more easily controlled. Dividing the land into smaller sections is for the purpose of keeping better local records, keeping the slaves working and producing, and avoiding rebellion. This is called "political science."

Of course, there have been other Big Plantations. In the Bible, we read about The Garden of Eden - a godly vineyard to start with, but eventually spoiled by the serpent system of central government. All it took was a slick politician (serpent) showing man how he could "become wise," and "be as a god," creating his own laws. Thus, the first central government is recorded in the Bible. Of course, the well-known epitome of central government was Babylon with its central tower.

We also read of the ancient kingdoms of Egypt, Assyria, Persia, Greece and Rome. These were Bib Plantations with forced slavery. They built their plantations on the blood of the common people - the same as the United States has done.

There is nothing new under the sun. Slavery continues today under the guise of central government. But, today's slavers understand the business better than the old plantation masters did. They've always known that incentive was needed to keep the slaves on their plantations "where they belong."

The slaves need to know that they'll get regular meals and clothes as long as they behave themselves, and that they'll be severely punished if they break the rules or try to escape. (This is "one" of the reasons the government destroyed the Weaver family in Idaho in 1992 and the Branch Davadians in 1993).

But, political engineers discovered long ago that this kind of incentive alone is not enough. The threat of beatings and the loss of regular meals has never been enough to keep healthy slaves from rebelling. The need to be free was still there; burning in their hearts, bursting forth at times in the form of rebellion, even though it cost them dearly. The urge is just uncontrollable.

The masters knew they needed more control. They needed something that would break that spirit of freedom so it could not surface. In other words, they must have reason to want to stay put, and shut up, and do their work for the big massah. They must be made to peacefully accept their circumstances. The only thing that could accomplish this was a system of brain-washing that would actually convince the slaves that they did not Want to escape.

They needed a system of control that would actually inoculate the minds of the slaves against rebellious thoughts. This would eliminate the potential or rebellion - nipping it in the bud, so to speak. The had to convince the True Israel people to worship a false god and christ, and destroy the worship of the True God. Because: "Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty." [815]

The Plantation masters needed a propaganda mill that would brainwash the people and make them docile and dull of mind, like cattle. That propaganda mill, that stupefier and pacifier, was The Church System. It is truly "the opium of the people."Christ brought liberty, but the churches counter attacked with ignorance, confusion, religion and slavery. The masses accepted the churches. But, the true followers of Christ cannot accept them once they see the truth and so withdraw from them.

Thus, a brilliant plan was conceived and implemented. In their scheme to keep on top, to stifle the ecclesia system of Christ, the Plantation masters set up the propaganda and brainwash mill called "church," and declared it a full partner of the "State." The institution was accepted by the people because they were told that it was instituted by Christ, and that it had approval of the central government.

The church system was put into place by the masters (Washington, D.C.) more than 200 years ago. Over the years, the people came to accept the "church system," and the church system killed their spirit of freedom. All this was accomplished in the name of religion. Thus, the true ecclesias were forgotten, along with freedom. Central government enjoys sovereignty over the people. The churches re-defined freedom and stupefied the people.

But, the thing we must keep in mind is that the "church," as we know it, has absolutely no scriptural authority. The "church" is not the "ecclesia." The ecclesia is an entirely different concept from a church. The "church," as we know it, is Not in the Bible. The closest thing to it is the Jewish synagogue.

Furthermore, the word "church" is like the word "Jew." It is a misnomer used only to confuse and neutralize Christians. As the word "Jew" has been used wrongly to replace the word "Israelite," so also the word "church" has been used wrongly to replace the word "ecclesia" all for a pre-determined purpose. And, just as the Israeli state is rightly called an illegitimate entity, so also is the institution of "church." Church, combined with State, has been usurping the Christian Community System ("the ecclesia") all these years.

Jesus gave us His system as a political alternative to Babylonian "states" and "churches." In the book of Acts, the ecclesias were in the process of undermining the church-and-state complex (i.e., "The Beast"). The efficiency and workability was undeniable. The success was unstoppable. Indeed. prophecy indicates that eventually it will completely destroy the Beast System!

When Christ told Peter that His ecclesia would be built upon the rock, and that the gates of hell would not prevail against it, He was talking about His Kingdom as it was to be expressed in Christian civil communities, Not Churches! Those independent communities were/are the mortal enemies of the centralized church-state complex. Central governments cannot allow independent, autonomous communities to exist. It would break their power to tax, plunder, and control the people. Christ set up His Kingdom, and dispersed it in the ecclesias. The apostles carried this vital message: "the good news of the reign of Christ."

As they traveled, they set up independent civil ecclesias (communities) here and there, based upon Christ's reign. Man could make no law. Only God could make law. Christ's ecclesias met immediate hatred and violence from the plantation masters and their local officials of that day. They knew that the ecclesias would destroy them if allowed to continue. All central-government systems were at risk if the ecclesia system survived. The ecclesia system was designed by Christ to make the Plantations obsolete, and remove the "massahs" from power.

In Revelation 12, John describes the great struggle between the beast and the man child (i.e., between the central-government system and the ecclesia system). "And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars (12-tribed Israel): And she being with child cried, travailing in birth, and pained to be delivered. And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon (central government), having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads (kingdoms under his central control)...and the dragon (central government) stood before the woman (Israel) which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child (the ecclesia system) as soon as it was born. And she brought forth a man child (Christ's reign manifested in the ecclesia system) who was to shepherd nations with a staff of iron: and her child (the ecclesia) was caught up unto God, and to His throne. ('Upon this rock I will build my ecclesia, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. And I will give you the keys to the kingdom of heaven.') And there was war in heaven (struggle for control at the government level): Michael and his angels (Christ and His disciples) fought against the dragon (central government); and the dragon fought and his angels. And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven (Christ became the undisputed king of Israel, and the ecclesia system replaced the central government system in the hearts and minds of informed Christians)...And when the dragon saw that he was cast unto the earth, he persecuted the woman (the Israel people scattered throughout the world) which brought forth the man child (Christ's reign). And the serpent (central government) cast out of his mouth water as a flood (propaganda; brainwashing via the churches) after the woman, that he might cause her to be carried away of the flood (confuse and conquer the rest of the Israel people located in the various nations by preventing them from understanding the ecclesia system and the gospel of Christ's reign)." [816]

What our people need today, more than anything else, is to rediscover the real meaning of freedom. Freedom is the purpose and hope of Christ's kingdom, i.e., the ecclesia system. But, here we are today, on the Big Plantation. Americans are conquered slaves, and most of us are so brainwashed that we actually imagine that we are somehow free. If we are ever to get off the Plantation, or if the Plantation is ever going to be forced to relinquish its control, there is only one path we can take.

We must learn how God would have us live in freedom with one another! We must re-learn the simple truths about the ecclesia system of Christ. This will require that we, first of all, stop affiliating with, listening to, supporting, and most of all depending upon, churches! We must stop our church idolatry! When we begin to view church, and state, with equal contempt, then we will be ready to progress into the free ecclesia system under Christ. "Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto your souls." [817]

"Yoke" was an expression for taxation and other burdens which an over-lord levied on his subjects. Just as the neck of an ox bends under the weight of a heavy yoke, so a man felt crushed under heavy duties and taxes.

In some cases, when very heavy taxes were exacted, men revolted because they felt they could no longer carry the yoke of their lord. One could hear people say to one another, "Our yoke has become unbearable."When a new leader ascended the throne, the first thing he did, if he was kindly and merciful, was reduce the taxes and lighten the burdens accrued from the former government.

When Christ made this statement, in Matthew 11, the people were heavily burdened with taxes. There were imperial, state and temple levies. The people maintained the state and its officials, as well as the temple and its extravagant priests. Both temporal and spiritual rulers lived in luxurious palaces at the expense of the poor.

However, Jesus (the new King) had no palaces, temples and sacred shrines. The God He preached was a loving father who expected no sacrifices and gifts from His people. He could be approached with a simple prayer. His demands were honesty, a contrite heart, and rejection of other gods. Thus, in taking on Christ's light yoke (i.e., accepting His reign), men were freed from their heavy yokes of tyranny, and allowed to keep and enjoy the produce of their own lands.

What is often called "anarchy," the Bible calls "the Kingdom of Heaven." Independence, liberty, and self-government is usually called "anarchy" by those in government. They cannot agree to anything that might remove them from their coveted positions of power over the people.

However, what few of them fail to realize is that when the Beast falls, they are going to fall with it. Their worst fear (freedom for the people) will be realized. They try to label it "anarchy," but it is liberty. To the central politicians, "anarchy" means "any situation where central government is not in control."

But, Scripture describes central government in less than friendly items, and promises retribution and an ignominious end to the corrupt system. "And I hear another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye not be partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities. Reward her even as she rewarded you, and double unto her double according to her works: in the cup which she hath filled, fill to her double. How much she hath glorified herself and lived deliciously, so much torment and sorrow give her; for she saith in her heart, 'I sit a queen, and am no widow, and shall see no sorrow.' Therefore shall her plagues come in one day, death, and mourning, and famine; and she shall be utterly burned with fire: for strong is Yahweh God who judgeth her...The merchants of these things, which were made rich by her, shall stand afar off for the fear of her torment, weeping and wailing. And saying, 'Alas, alas, that great city, that was clothed in fine linen, and purple, and scarlet, and decked with gold, and precious stones, and pearls! For in one hour so great riches is come to nought.' And every shipmaster, and all the company in ships, and sailors, and as many as trade by sea, stood afar off. And cried when they saw the smoke of her burning, saying, 'What city is like unto this great city?' And they cast dust on their heads, and cried, weeping and wailing, saying, 'Alas, alas that great city, wherein were made rich all that had ships in the sea by reason of her costliness! for in one hour is she made desolate.' Rejoice over her, thou heaven, and he holy apostles and prophets; for God hath avenged you on her." [818]

Thus, far, we've described the United States as a huge plantation - with us as the slaves, and congress as our masters. The bankers (i.e., the money merchants), of course, hold mortgage on all the land. They control the congress. Thus, they are the true owners of the plantation.

We've touched upon the Bible laws forbidding this form of government - and any form of monopoly. We've done our best to convince you that you should hate this evil government system of enslavement (called "Mystery Babylon" in the Bible), just as we hate it.

We will probably manage to convince a few. And, we know that there are a good number who already despise this central-government system and the hired church system which serves as the propaganda tool for keeping the slaves pacified. Remember one thing - if a church has a 501-C3 tax exemption from the government it is a creation of government, Not a Creation of Almighty God.

A century ago, America was experiencing a mass migration westward. Families, by the hundreds, were leaving the eastern states and moving west. What prompted this mass migration? The answer is simple. It was caused by central government! Washington, D.C. was on the east coast. The old establishment, with its oppressive corporate network, was on the east coast.

A century ago, the Eastern Establishment was synonymous with "central government." Families who yearned for freedom fled the east to settle in the wild, but free, western territories. They preferred the risk of hostile elements, the lack of conveniences, and the hard work of survival in the wilds, to the oppression of the Eastern Establishment and its central government.

Fortunately, most of the Indians were friendly and quite helpful, except when the "massahs" of the Eastern Establishment began doing to them what was already being done to our own race in the Eastern states. Some of the Indians, eventually realized that the Eastern Establishment meant to conquer them, steal their land, and put them on God-forsaken reservations; and they fought the new plantation owners. Would-to-God that our own race would have done the same! But instead, we allowed the Eastern Establishment to move in, rout the Indians, and continue enslaving us.

The alternative to Babylonian (central) government is the Christian ecclesia system, which is the system that Christ and His apostles began setting up immediately after Christ announced His reign. It was that system that Paul and Barnabas were setting up in their travels to Asia Minor and Europe.

They were not building churches! They were sharing the good news of Christ's reign, and showing how to live free within an ecclesia community system, independent from central, state rulership. It was the same ecclesia system of Christ's reign that the apostles took to their scattered kinsmen in the nations of the world.

That message was called "the gospel of the kingdom." And, it was this message which caused the disciples to be beaten, imprisoned, persecuted, and murdered by the central governments of those nations. The disciples were spreading "sedition" in those lands because they were declaring a different king and a different government. The new King was Jesus, and that government was the ecclesia system Jesus told Peter about in Matt. 16:18: "Upon this rock I will build my ecclesia (i.e., my kingdom via communities all over the world), and the gates of hell (i.e., destruction) will not prevail against it."

Obviously, churches are not ecclesias. The churches pander pacifism among the slaves, worship the U.S. Constitution which put the central rulers in place, and preach conformity to the collectivist policies. Churches do not support freedom. There is no similarity between churches and ecclesias.

Central Government needs the churches! It even gives them preferred tax status over other institutions and those who do not accept government dictates. The ecclesia system, on the other hand, is hated by central government. The church system pacifies people through mythology, brainwashing, hypnosis, priestcraft, social events, emotion catharsis, parties, committees, organizing.

But, the ecclesia system avoids all that, deals in the real world of honest work and accomplishments, allowing Christians to live natural, wholesome, self-governed lives. People who have been "properly churched" become apathetically dissipated. They have no energy left, nor any desire, to face the real problems of their day. They only think about the unreal mythologies of the church world. In fact they lose the ability to even see the real problems. They cannot rise above the weekly routines, the religious rituals and the endless organized activities of church. If they have any potential for concern it gets wasted on non-sensical rituals and church programs.

Liberty is yet a mystery to most people. How could society function if people were left to make their own decisions, handle their own affairs and provide for their own safety and welfare?

Even those who claim to be free cannot contemplate such drastic measures. Like the Israelites of old, who thought they wanted liberty (until they experienced it firsthand there in the Egyptian wilderness), church people of today have little, if any, understanding of real liberty. They don't really dislike central government. They don't really mind living as a slave and let government take care of them from cradle to grave.

Central government is considered a necessary feature of civilized society by most church people. Here are three arguments we often hear from them when told they don't need central government.

1). "But don't we need some form of central government over such a large country? How could we coordinate and run this nation, and its commerce, without central government to keep things in order?"

2). "How could we defend against foreign invasion without central government to raise an army?"

3). "But the Constitution is God-inspired, and our government is the best in the world."

First, let's look at the weakness of these arguments. Then, look at the strength of real Christian liberty and the ecclesia system.

1). No! We do not need a central government over us. 200 years of central government here in America has done nothing to help us, and everything to hurt us. In controlling commerce, the central government has proven itself to be the greatest enemy of free trade and honest labor. It certainly has not protected and helped us in this area.

2). In terms of military protection against foreign invasion, the central government has done absolutely nothing to help us. In fact it has done just the opposite. It has,

a). Turned brother against brother during the Civil War (War between the States).

b). Started and/or has gotten us involved in nearly every war you can name, forcing us to pay higher taxes, and forcing our young men (and now women also) to waste their lives fighting a Jewish Bankers' war on foreign soil for reasons the soldiers don't understand or have the slightest idea of why the war happened.

3). The United States Government is no longer based on Christian ideals, it has been taken over by antichrists and does indeed teach the Jew's religion. This can be proven in easy steps:

a). "Where the spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty?" [819] Therefore, freedom and Christ are inseparable.

b). The central government has ruled, centrally, and gotten ever more powerful since 1787.

c). The central government has enslaved people, ruined the economy, murdered our sons & daughters, aborted (murdered) our babies, demoralized our youth, brainwashed the population and destroyed the heritage of our race. In short, Central Government has destroyed our Freedom.

d). Therefore, since a central government, destroys liberty, it can not be inspired by God.

And, contrary to the common claim that "our government may not be perfect, but it is the best in the world." The fact is the U.S. Government, as it is today, may very well be the worst in all the World and possibly in all of History! It has certainly caused more misery than any other in the world except for the Jewish controlled Soviet Union. The point is this: there is no benefit whatsoever in central government, except to those who are IN the government, and to the Jewish bankers who profit from it.

International wars are nothing more than bankers squabbling over investments and property disputes. Central Governments are tools of the International Bankers to keep watch over their investments and loans. Anyone who wants central government is either an enemy or a buffoon. Tyrants! Know that the rights of man are inherent and inalienable, and therefore not to be forfeited by the failure of any form of government, however democratic.

Let the American Union perish; let these allied States be torn with faction, or drenched in blood; let this republic realize the fate of Rome and Carthage, or Babylon and Tyre; still, those rights would remain undiminished in strength, unsullied in purity, unaffected in value, and sacred as their Divine Author.

If nations perish it is not because of their devotion to liberty, but for their disregard of its requirements. Man is superior to all political compacts, all governmental arrangements, all religious institutions. As means to an end, these may sometimes be useful, though never indispensable; but that end must always be the freedom and happiness of man, individual man.

The time for the overthrow of any government, the abandonment of any alliance, the subversion of any institution, is whenever it justifies the sacrifice of the individual to secure the general welfare; for the welfare of the many cannot be hostile to the safety of the few.

In all agreements, in all measures, in all political or religious enterprises, in all attempts to redeem the human race, man, as an individual, is to be held paramount. The doctrine, that the end sanctifies the means, is a maxim of profligates and impostors, of usurpers and tyrants.

Nothing in all history impacts the human race like the death and resurrection of Christ. But this generation, for the most part, fails to see the heart of the matter, and few seem to make the connection between the blood of Christ and their own eternal destiny. The Christian who has fathomed the meaning of the blood of Christ has seen the heart of God as He is touched by our sin, in both His judgment and His mercy. Christ told us: "For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins." [820]

Paul said: "...being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him." [821]

And John wrote that Christ: "...and washed us from our sins in his own blood." [822]

In the fifth chapter of Revelation (vs. 1-5) John describes his vision in which no one is able to open the book sealed with seven seals. Then he is told that the Lion of the tribe of Judah has overcome, to open the book, but when John looks for a lion, he sees a lamb (vs. 6), a lamb that has been slaughtered, to which the four and twenty elders sing a "new song" saying: "Thou art worthy to take the book, and to open the seals thereof: for thou wast slain, and hast redeemed us to God by thy blood out of every kindred, and tongue, and people, and nation." [823]

The Blood of the Lamb: When God determined to slay the first born in Egypt. He provided a way of escape for the sons of Israel, who dwelt there as slaves. They were to slay a lamb and put some of its blood around the doorways of their houses. The blood was the evidence that a lamb had been killed and the first born in those homes would be saved from death. The issue here was life and death, and the shedding of blood was the means by which the animal was put to death. "For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul." [824]

Wherever blood was used in sacrificial offerings, it signified that death had taken place. However, the death of animals was not sufficient for meeting the penalty of man's sins, as is explained in Hebrews. "For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins." [825] The needed sacrifice was found in Christ. "Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same; that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil; And deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage." [826]

When the prophet Isaiah described the coming of a suffering servant to redeem God's people, he pictured Jesus as a lamb, led to the slaughter, dying for the people "to whom the stroke was due." [827] Just as the lamb was put to death to save the first born Israelites from death, Jesus was slain that we might be saved from death in the day of judgment. John the Baptist, therefore, introduced Jesus by saying, "Behold the lamb of God that takes away the sin of the world." [828]

Expressions such as "the cross of Christ" and "the blood of Christ" are euphemisms that always signify Christ's death. We are cleansed, washed, sanctified, and justified by His blood only in that His blood means His death. Paul could write that: "For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him." [829] He underwent God's judgment on our behalf, so that in the day of judgment we might receive a favorable verdict, and thus be justified. In effect, the judgment has already take place on the stake for believers, who "by faith" are "justified by His blood." [830]

Some Twisted Ideas: The principle of Jesus undergoing judgment on our behalf by dying our death is simple enough, but many kinky ideas have been derived from expressions referring to His blood. Some hold that the blood of Jesus saves us because it was special and divine. A gospel song has as its theme the idea that "just one drop of His blood" will cleanse you from all sin. If that were true, there would have been no need of Jesus' Death. One can lose a lot of blood without dying! The fact is, the blood of Christ was ordinary human blood, as stated in Hebrews 2:14, that He shared the same kind of flesh and blood as those He came to save. There was nothing magic about His blood; it served the same purpose for Him as it does for all mankind. The giving of His blood meant the giving of His life. It was not the blood that was different, but The Person: Jesus was the Sinless Son of God, thus He could pay our penalty for our sins.

Sometimes heard is the statement that we are baptized in order to "meet the blood of Christ." This sounds as though it is the blood of Jesus, and not His death, burial and resurrection that really counts. Scripture does not suggest this, but does say: "Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death?" [831]

Baptism (immersion) is somewhat similar to a death, burial and resurrection, as Paul writes: "Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life." [832]

The significance here is not in "meeting the blood" but in being united with Christ in His death (vs. 5). Others misunderstand Jesus' statement that we are to eat His flesh and drink His blood,[833] interpreting this to mean that in the communion the wine (or grape juice) actually becomes His blood. Of course, it doesn't. Jesus explained, "It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life." [834]

It is in a spiritual sense that we fill ourselves with the body and blood, the very life, of Jesus, as expressed by Paul: "Christ lives in me." [835]

We are told about baptism: "...preach the baptism of repentance for the remission of sins." [836]; "...Preaching the Baptism of repentance for the remission of sins." [837] Therefore, baptism is very very important and every Christian should be baptized.

Some of the most popular hymns give the praise to the blood of Christ. We sing of being "washed in the blood of the Lamb," of the One "whose blood can cleanse each spot," and "There is power, power, wonder-working power in the precious blood of the lamb."

Such expressions would be ridiculous were they meant in the natural sense. But when taken in the spiritual and Biblical sense, they express wonderful and mighty truth. By His death Jesus cleanses us and performs the wondrous work of redeeming us from sin and thus from death at the final judgment.

The Lion: Like a lamb being led to the slaughter, Jesus willingly submitted to crucifixion that the final penalty for our sins might be met. His death demonstrates that God's laws are important, a life and death matter. While it may be politically correct to make no discrimination between moral values, and even ignore Biblical standards altogether, the fact is that Christ died because God takes His Laws very seriously.

His death also demonstrates God's tremendous love and mercy, in that He would give His Son that we might not suffer the final death at judgment (for our sins), but might have life and immortality. By sacrificing Himself Jesus gained a great victory over the world, sin and death, making Him worth to "take the book and open the seals thereof." [838] But in John's vision Jesus is also identified as the Lion of the tribe of Judah.[839]

After Jesus, the lamb, was obedient even unto death, God raised Him up, exalted Him, and gave Him all authority in heaven and on earth. No longer is He the lowly lamb, submitting to the abuse of evil men who oppose God. Now He is the King, reigning on the throne of God until it is time for Him to take the throne of David, and will return at that time to judge the world in righteous judgment. [840] It is fitting for us to sing about the blood of Christ, if by this we have in mind the value of His death for us. To acknowledge His death, burial and resurrection is also to acknowledge our debt to Him.

Following the example of Christ, Christians are to humbly obey the Father, and be willing to suffer tribulation and the persecution of the oppressor in patience. "Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new." [841] To glory in His death is a sham unless we put ourselves at God's disposal, to be used as His servants to please Him.

And to allow the Judiazed Judeo-Christians to blaspheme Christ with the pagan celebration called "Easter" is a shame we will never be able to live down. We will be forgiven for it, but the shame we will have to bear forever, because we would not protect the name of our Savior and give the proper honor to His death, burial and resurrection as we should have done.

They call it Holy: South African evangelist Rodney Howard-Browne has introduced Charismatics to what he calls "laughing revivals," in which people may roll on the floor and laugh hysterically. At Oral Roberts University at a recent Howard-Browne meeting, OUR President Richard Roberts "ended up on the floor laughing." His father, Oral Roberts, said the phenomenon signaled the arrival of "another level in the Holy Spirit." [842]

In reporting on "holy laughter" at a camp meeting in 1994, Warren Smith, writer for SCP Newsletter, said that pastors were stumbling around the church stage "drunk" with "holy" laughter, which was considered "proof" of the "power of the spirit" over them. Both Trinity Broadcasting Network (TBN) and Pat Robertson of the 700 Club have endorsed "holy laughter." But Smith suggests that Christians should examine it very closely, as it just might be from Satan rather than from God.[843]

Immigrants Recruited: According to the St. Petersburg Times, as confirmed in the Washington Times. The U.S. is secretly recruiting more immigrants in more than 100 countries. The secret recruitment is part of a program in which the United States tries to encourage immigrants from places that are "under represented in the current cultural mix." This report, from Criminal Politics (Feb. 95) says that the object of the plan, out of the offices of the Jew Henry Kissinger is to "diversify" all non-Jewish races.

Beginning in January 1995, 55,000 foreigners, from such places as Mongolia and various African countries, are to be awarded visas for permanent resident status. Suzanne Lawrence, a spokeswoman for the State Department, is quoted as saying, "it is to diversify the existing pool of immigrants." Criminal Politics points out that it is no longer possible for White Gentiles to identify themselves as such without being accused of racism and bigotry, and children may be conditioned so that they will never identify themselves with their heritage.[844]

Culture Change:"Ethnic conflict is a worldwide phenomenon." Donald Horowitzx. "Plural societies" (with culturally divergent ethnic groups) are "defined by descensus and pregnant with conflict." Authoritative population projection indicates that within the lives of some people now living, the United States is destined to become a thoroughly multiracial, multi cultural society in which non-Hispanic Whites will constitute only a minority of the population. The largely unconsidered result of past and present immigration policies is that the United States is in the process of changing the racial and cultural composition of its population to a degree probably unprecedented in human history, except for situations involving the military conquest of a society by a foreign aggressor. [845]

A New Threat: Dr. Alvin J. Schmidt, professor of sociology at Illinois College, Jacksonville, IL, writing in The Lutheran Witness, of December 94, describes how multi-culturalism threatens the church and the Gospel. For example, he says, grade-school books present pagan beliefs of American Indians as valid religious practices, because all religions are of equal value, and the Ten Commandments are held as merely the reflection of a certain culture, and thus no better than any other culture's code of moral behavior.

Multi-culturalists argue that all cultures are morally relative, and not to be criticized. We are not to brand as immoral the Hindu practice of suttee, which required burning alive the husband's widow on his funeral pyre, nor the bloody human sacrifices practiced by the Aztec, Mayan Indian or the Jewish Ritual Murders. Many multi-culturalist writings present pagan religions in a favorable light while denouncing Western (Christian) culture.

Even witches are presented positively. The anti-Bias Curriculum encourages grade-school teachers to tell their children that witches were not "bad," but women "who really helped people." It also tells teachers to instruct pupils in holidays other than Christmas and to support the children who do not celebrate Christmas. "The message is clear," Schmidt writes. "Christ's Great Commission of going into all the world (cultures) and making disciples is politically incorrect. Christianity has no greater claim to God's truth than any other culture's religion ...multi-culturalism will further erode our nation's morality, largely derived from Biblical norms." [846]

Child Slavery: Levi's is using "thousands of children (who) toil like robots in Bangladesh sweatshops that churn out Levi's and other garments for the blue jeans barons," according to a reporter for a British newspaper who recently toured the factory. He discovered children working 16-hour days, six days a week, children who were fired if they got sick and were working and living in squalor. The marketing efforts of Levi Strauss have met with great acceptance among homosexuals. American Family Association began promoting a boycott of Levi Strauss products (Levi's, Dockers, Britannia clothing) when the company cut off financial support of the Boy Scouts of America because they would not allow homosexuals and atheists to be scoutmasters. [847]

Land of the Free: A compassionate man who was telling the Gospel message on the street was arrested by State police, handcuffed and taken to jail. A judge sentenced him to six months probation and ordered him not to witness on that street. His case is being appealed by the Christian Law Association. Attorney David Gibbs III says, "It is a frightening thought that...telling another person about Jesus Christ could be classified and punished as criminal activity by a court in the United States of America." [848]

But it is just such false teachings as that above which has caused our people to miss the True Doctrine of Christ!

Whenever anyone mentions "Doctrine" today, it brings up a negative image to the mind, because of the manipulation of the media and its never ending drive to destroy Christianity. But Christians MUST ask themselves the question: "Is Doctrine Important?" "How important is doctrine?" If you ask that question of most Christians, they will emphatically say, "It is very important!" However, they will, then, go on to say, "Well, it depends." And then they justify their answer to some extent by saying, "We shouldn't be so dogmatic in our doctrines that we break or intrude on Christian fellowship among other Christians and people."

We have what we call an "ecumenical" movement in the United States, which has been going on for some time, where a number of professing Christians are attempting to unite all of the different churches and faiths into some sort of a fellowship. They are trying to convince the people that the only important thing is that they use the Bible and profess Jesus Christ. That any other differences should be subdued or forgotten because we must get together for fellowship! This carries down all the way to individual Christian families saying, "I don't agree with the doctrines preached in this church, but it's the only one in my neighborhood, so I'm going to go there anyway."

This is strictly unscriptural and is, in fact, a direct violation of the Lord's instructions; where He said: "Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?" [849]

Then we are told: "Be not carried about with divers and strange doctrines..." [850] So to attempt to unite with Buddhism, Muslims, Judaism and etc., is strictly unscriptural. Otherwise the "Doctrine of Christ" will be compromised at all levels. Some of the argument is, "Doctrine is not important if you have disagreement with others, because after all we are all Christians! We are all brothers and sisters, etc."

And we, as "Identity Christians," do get criticism from people who say, "You emphasize doctrinal differences too much and antagonize people by insisting that certain doctrines are true and that certain other doctrines are false. Doctrines should not be made that important. The important thing is to keep from antagonizing others. Be nice to them and get them to listen, and we especially need cooperation among the members."

Well, all of that sounds very good, but let us read what Webster's Dictionary and the Bible have to say about "Doctrine." In Webster's Dictionary there is about four inches of very fine print about doctrine, so we will just briefly summarize what it says. Webster says that doctrine is "that which is taught. The body of principle in any branch of knowledge." Then Webster gives some other words: "Tenet, dogma in relation to religion, principle of faith, learning, knowledge." Mr. Webster also uses the following phrase: "a dogma is a doctrine laid down with authority."Remember that, because we will repeat it later on.

Doctrine is used 45 times in the New Testament: 28 times as #1322; 15 times as #1819 and 1 time as #1319.

Greek #1322: didache, did-akh-as'-ko; from 1321 (to teach); instruction (the act or the matter):-doctrine, hath been taught.

Greek #1819: exapina, ex-ap'-ee-nah; from 1537 (origin) and a der. of the same as 160; of a sudden, i.e. unexpectedly:-suddenly. Comp. 1810.

Greek #1319: didaskalia, did-as-kal-ee'-ah; from 1320 (teacher); instruction (the function or the information):-doctrine, learning, teaching.

Matthew five is the first place that the word "doctrine" is used in the New Testament. So let's begin reading in the first two verses which is the introduction of this long teaching by Jesus Christ: "And seeing the multitudes, he went up unto a mountain: and when he was set, his disciples came unto him: And he opened his mouth, and taught them, saying, Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the Kingdom of heaven." [851]

Then follows the teaching of Christ, sometimes, called the sermon on the Mount in Chapters five, six and seven. And at the very end it closes: "And it came to pass, when Jesus had ended these sayings, the people were astonished at His Doctrine: For he taught them as one having authority, and not as the scribes." [852]

This was foretold in the Old Testament: "My Doctrine shall drop as the rain, my speech shall distill as the dew, as the small rain upon the tender herb, and as the showers upon the grass." [853]; "For thou hast said, My Doctrine is pure, and I am clean in thine eyes." [854]; "For I give you Good Doctrine, forsake ye not my law." [855]; "Whom shall he (Christ) teach knowledge? and whom shall he (Christ) make to understand Doctrine? them that are weaned from the milk, and drawn from the breasts." [856]; "They also that erred in spirit shall come to understanding, and they that murmured shall learn doctrine." [857]

Not only do we have the word "doctrine" here, but we have other verses which, in effect, says He taught with "authority." According to Webster and Strong's, Matthew 5, 6 and 7 would be Dogma - Doctrine Taught with Authority.

Verse 28 of Matthew seven says, "the people were astonished at his doctrine." This indicates that it apparently was new and/or different than they had heard before; yet they did recognize that He spoke with authority.

Now let's turn to John 7: "Now about the midst of the feast Jesus went up into the temple, and taught. And the Jews marveled, saying, How knoweth this man letters, having never learned?" [858]

In other words, how can Christ know all these things if He had never gone to the Jews schools? The Jews were surprised at His wisdom. Some thinking Christians have problems when they try to point out an unpopular truth from a particular Scripture passage to some Judeo-Christian minister or Judeo-Christian lay person; the minister will not specifically address the issue brought up, but instead, comes back and attacks with, "Well, I graduated from the seminary after studying 4 or 7 years and I've been studying the Scriptures for 25 or 30 years and therefore I have more authority to interpret this than you do."

If you ever encounter such a minister, you might point out that these verses in John seven, where the scribes and the Pharisees admitted that Jesus taught with "Doctrine" and truth; but they could not figure out why; because He had never gone to their schools. He had not gone to the accepted schools which they had set up for teaching the teachers in their religion, which today is known as Judaism.

Jesus answered in the next verse as to where He got His "Doctrine": "Jesus answered them, and said, My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me." [859]

Thus, we have it from Jesus Christ, Himself, that what He taught that astonished the scribes and Pharisees was "God's Doctrine." This is the same word translated "doctrine" in other places, as we have shown. It is the Doctrine of God: "If any man will do his will, he shall know of the doctrine, whether it be of God, or whether I speak of myself." [860]

Christ is, in effect, saying that if a man will obey God, he will know whether the "Doctrine" is true or not. Now think about that for awhile. We are sure you know of many people who read the same verses and the same chapters out of the same translations that you do and yet you have a disagreement with them over what it actually means. They do not understand it the way you do; and here, Jesus is saying that if a man will do God's will, he shall know whether the "Doctrine" is of God or not. In some way, he will have a verification from God that this is Bible Truth; but it is predicated upon him doing God's will first. It is not predicated upon his reading the Bible ten hours a day, or going to certain schools, or attending a certain church or churches. It is predicated on obedience: "If you will obey God, He will reveal His truth to you!"

Here is a warning on how to listen to the MAN who is preaching the "Doctrine" to see whether his "Doctrine" is true: "He that speaketh of himself seeketh his own glory: but he that seeketh his glory that sent him, the same is true, and no unrighteousness is in him." [861] In other words, if one seeks God's Glory, he is true and righteous. To put it another way, a man who preaches the true "Doctrines" of God will not preach anything that glorifies himself. When he gets all through preaching, if you, having listened to him, glorify and praise God, then he is preaching the truth.

But if, after listening to him, you glorify and praise the speaker, then be careful; be careful if he builds up some sort of an emotional feeling in you that makes you think, "Boy, isn't he a great preacher! Boy, he is something!" Be careful if you go out praising the man, because then he is NOT preaching the truth!

Most of the television evangelists create a tremendous loyalty among their listeners, and the people really believe that their favorite evangelist is some great man; they will continually shower him with money and praise him something like: "Oh, I heard Oral Roberts (or Rex Humbard, Jimmy Swaggart, Jerry Falwell, Mike Evans, Jack van Impte, V.C. Grant, James Haggard, Richard Copeland, Pat Robertson and etc.), and he was terrific and he was wonderful!" Never giving God and the Lord Jesus Christ any praise and glory.

If you want to give them an interesting thought, ask them just an hour or a day after they have heard his latest sermon, what their favorite preacher said; and do you know, nine times out of ten they do not know what he said! One person did this using Robert Schuller as the television evangelist, and they wrote a letter about what happened. A friend of his who worked with him was a tremendous fan of Robert Schuller, and had often made the remark that Schuller was probably the greatest preacher that he had ever heard.

The man's friend said: "Well, I'd be interested in knowing more about Bob Schuller, when you listen to him the next time, would you write down the verses out of the Bible that he uses in his sermon and then show them to me?" The friend said he would and the next Monday at work the fellow said, "He never read the Bible!"

His friend had discovered for the first time, after listening to this man, he thought was such a great preacher, that Schuller did not use any Bible passages! That he said exactly what the audience was wanting him to say; by praising them and raising them up and not Almighty God and the Lord Jesus Christ.

And if you have ever listened to him, you know he very seldom uses the Bible at all. Many television evangelists are the same way; they preach in such a way that when they are through, the glory goes to the speaker, not to God Almighty. Remember Christ told us: "Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves." [862]; "And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many." [863]; "For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect." [864]

There was a book, published some years ago, titled "How To Be A Bishop Without Being Religious." If you were to read this book, you would realize that the title really meant "How to be a Minister without being a Christian." And one of the things in the instructions was what kind of sermons to preach to build a large ministry. This book was an instruction to men either going into the ministry or who had already been in the ministry. The author of that book, in one chapter, stated at least three times in three different ways: Do not exalt God; Exalt the people! Praise the people; make them feel good; but do not exalt God Almighty, of the Lord Jesus Christ!

And he made it very plain in the book that if you exalted God Almighty, or the Lord Jesus Christ, you would not have this thousand or two thousand or five thousand people in your church, because people like to come and hear themselves praised. They like to be make to feel emotional about themselves and about the church. That is why they keep coming back in great numbers.

But Christ teaches the very opposite! If, after you hear the minister preach, you praise the minister, then there is something wrong about the man's preaching. There is something wrong because what he should preach is that which praises and exalts God Almighty and the Lord Jesus Christ. And if some vehemently attack him, and not his teaching that is clear evidence he is probably preaching true "Doctrine."

Many television evangelists claim to be healers, but we are told in the Scriptures: "For false Christs and false prophets shall rise, and shall shew signs and wonders, to seduce, if it were possible, even the elect." [865] Therefore, we would advise to be very careful when dealing with these so-called Judeo-Christian ministers who appear to heal.

For most have been found to be fakes, yet the media will not say much about them, because they are out to destroy Christianity not to build it up. Peter told us: "But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction." [866]

Try the spirits and see if the minister, television evangelist and etc., is telling the truth. "Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world." [867] And you can bet that so-called Judeo-Christian ministers who are Jews preach to you, then you are being preached to by a deceiver. Among these are those like Mike Evans, Billy Graham and many others.

Now, let's look at the passages in the Old Testament where the word "Doctrine" is used. One passage is found in the Song of Moses and it is introduced in the last verse of Deuteronomy 31: "And Moses spake in the ears of all the congregation of Israel the words of this song, until they were ended." [868]

And then it goes on into the Song of Moses: "Give ear, O ye heavens, and I will speak; and hear, O earth, the words of my mouth. My Doctrine shall drop as the rain, my speech shall distill as the dew, as the small rain upon the tender herb, and as the showers upon the grass." [869]

This "Doctrine" that he was going to preach was going to do something good for the people. By the way, the word "Doctrine" in the Hebrew, according to Strong's Concordance, means the same as it does in the Greek; and means "Instruction received." Doctrine is instruction received or learning.

In the very next verse, he says: "Because I will publish the name of the Lord: ascribe ye greatness unto our God. He is the Rock, his work is perfect: for all his ways are judgment: a God of truth and without iniquity, just and right is he." [870]

Why would doctrines or the instructions that Moses taught the people be as the rain? Why would his speech distill as the dew - as the small rain on the tender herb? In other words, why would Moses' doctrine make the people grow and bless them and instruct them and teach them? Because he praised God immediately!

He said, "He is the Rock," "ascribe ye greatness unto our God," "I will publish the name of the Lord."Whatever it was that he was going to teach the people would be a benefit to them because it came to them with the praise and glorification of God - not of Moses. You should read all of the Song of Moses, which is 43 verses long. Many Christians do not even know there is such a thing in the Bible in spite of the fact that in Revelation 16 it tells of the saints who have "over come the beast and his mark" who sing the Song of Moses. There has been a world full of preaching about the mark of the beast, but there is never heard a minister talk about the mark of the beast and The Song of Moses in the same breath. Yet they are tied together in the book of Revelation.

There are five places in Proverbs where Solomon used this same word, as we have already shown, but let's review them. The Hebrew word is "legach" (Strong's #3948) and is translated "doctrine" or "learning," meaning instruction received. In Proverbs, it is translated "doctrine" once, and "learning" four times. "The proverbs of Solomon the son of David, king of Israel; To know wisdom and instruction; to perceive the words of understanding; To receive the instruction of wisdom, justice, and judgment, and equity; To give subtilty to the simple, to the young man knowledge and discretion." [871]

After giving the reason why he is writing this book of Proverbs, he says in verse five: "A wise man will hear, and will increase learning (legach); and a man of understanding shall attain unto wise counsels." [872]

The Hebrew word for "learning" is also translated "doctrine" in other places. In effect, he is saying that a wise man will hear these instructions or proverbs, which were from God through Solomon, of course, and he will Increase in doctrine. The emphasis is on a wise man wanting more doctrine and increasing in wisdom.

Proverbs four beginning in verse one: "Hear, ye children, the instruction of a father, and attend to know understanding. For I give you good doctrine, forsake ye not my law." [873] This is Solomon speaking, of course, through the Spirit of God, so Solomon is not referring to his own law; he is referring to God's Law. Therefore, good doctrine has something to do with hearing God's Law. Remember, Jesus said if you attempt to do His will, then He will reveal to you whether the doctrine is the truth or not. "Give instruction to a wise man, and he will be yet wiser: teach a just man, and he will increase in learning." [874]

The word "just" also means "righteous." The last phrase could just as well have read "teach a Righteous man and he will increase in Doctrine." Notice again, he is righteous; THEN he increases in Doctrine (learning). This is the same pattern that Jesus taught. Remember, Jesus said: "If any man will do his will, he shall know of the doctrine, whether it be of God, or whether I speak of myself." [875]

If a man does God's will, that makes him a righteous man. In Proverbs, Solomon correctly put the horse before the cart, instead of the other way around. The implication is that obedience is rewarded with learning, whereas we may have incorrectly thought that learning was rewarded with obedience. To illustrate this, many Christians have run across a person who knows the Bible probably a lot better than he; and yet, he is a very vicious, wicked person and may even use the Bible to his own personal advantage while he teaches it wrongly. Jack van Impe, by the way, is one of those who can quote the entire Bible from memory! But, if you will investigate Jack van Impe's doctrine, it does not fit what the Bible teaches.

Another example was a man who was on the radio some years ago, whose nickname was "The Walking Bible." He would preach at various churches around California, Arizona and other places in the country demonstrating his memory of the Bible by having members of the audience give the chapter and the verse and then he would quote it for them. Or they would quote the verse and he would give the chapter and the verse. You see, he had memorized the entire Bible - all 66 books!

And yet he taught that the Jews were Israel; that we (the White Race) were Gentiles; that the rapture was going to come soon; that there were seven years of tribulation coming before Jesus Christ would return. He taught all the false doctrines of the Pentecostals, Evangelists, and Fundamentalists, and yet he knew every work in the Bible by heart and could tell you chapter and verse where it was! Thus, it is not a case of simply knowing, and then the obedience coming later. Solomon said [876] obey God and THEN He will open up His treasures to you. He will open up His wisdom and His learning to you. "The wise in heart shall be called prudent: and the sweetness of the lips increaseth learning (Doctrine)." [877]

Those who are wise against related doctrine. "The heart of the wise teacheth his mouth, and addeth learning (Doctrine) to his lips." [878] The only time you would say false doctrine is when you put the word "false" in front of the word. When it says "Doctrines" it means God's True Doctrines.

Let us look at one more passage in the Old Testament. Isaiah 29 and 30 are end-of-the-age prophecies - some of which have not yet come to pass, and some of which are just now coming to pass. But anyway, he is summing up an end-of-this-age prophecy. "Therefore thus saith the Lord, who redeemed Abraham, concerning the house of Jacob, Jacob shall not now be ashamed, neither shall his face now wax pale." [879] This is after Jacob/Israel's deliverance in the end of the age. He is not going to be frightened or ashamed of his God. "But when he seeth his children, the work of mine hands, in the midst of him, they shall sanctify my name, and sanctify the Holy One of Jacob, and shall fear the God of Israel. They also that erred in spirit shall come to understanding, and they that murmured shall learn doctrine." [880]

Now think about that; he sums up the correcting, the turning, the redeeming and the saving of Israel in the end of the age by saying that even those who are in error will get understanding and Learn Doctrine. They will come to the correct understanding of God's Word as He saves them in the end of the age. Evidently, it means, very simply, that teaching correct doctrine will be done to those who are in error. They will have to be taught by God, or by someone, to correct their error. Now, here are three questions; think upon them very carefully and we will find the answers to our study:

1). If a man or a nation is in error (that means in sin and in disobedience to the true doctrines of God), which of the following will tend to correct the man or nation?

A). An agreement among ministers not to contend about differences so they can have fellowship.

B). A knock-down drag-out fight as to which doctrine is true, forcing the people to listen to both sides of the question.

As Elijah the prophet spoke: "And call ye on the name of your gods, and I will call on the name of the Lord: and the God that answereth by fire, let him be God. And all the people answered and said, It is well spoken." [881] In other words, should we speak out and preach what we know to be the truth, or should we simply be quiet and attempt to have fellowship? Which will teach them true doctrine? Which will convert them from error? You think about that when you hear the false Judeo-Christian ministers say, "Well, let's just keep things quiet here. We know we have a lot of disagreements, but we shouldn't fight because, after all, we're all brothers."

2). Would the people even hear the true doctrine of God if the ministers who knew it backed off from preaching it for fear of offending the other ministers or Christians?

3). How many of you have ever heard of a minister who preaches false doctrine backing off from the True Doctrine for fellowship?

You see, The Compromise is Always Expected to Come from the Side that has Truth! And make no mistake about that. We have had some specific, definite criticism by people who say; "Oh, you keep preaching against the Rapture and all you're doing is antagonizing all of these wonderful pro-rapture ministers, preachers and Christians out there who don't know any better. And who made you an expert anyway?"

The implication is that we should not show people it is a false doctrine because we might hurt their feelings and then they will not cooperate with, or listen to us. No one ever suggests that they quit preaching the rapture doctrine and the false Judeo-Christian doctrine so they do not antagonize us! Now you think about that.

We think it is done in ignorance by Christian people who know it is the truth, but they have been trained to think by the false Judeo-Christian ministers to think that fellowship is more important than Christ's Doctrine. There are many isolated families, and we feel for them, and understand their situation who will say, "Well, we know the church is teaching false doctrine, but our children need fellowship."

And so they will go to some false Judeo-Christian church where the ministers preaches false doctrine, because they want their children to have fellowship with other Christians. And what happens as a result? Their children grow up believing false doctrine because they compromised with falsehood, attempting to get fellowship instead of true doctrine and disobeying God's instructions in the process. "Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?" [882]

You can begin to see the possibility that True Doctrine is much more important than fellowship; and you will see this more as we go back to the New Testament again.

Acts two; this is the chapter perhaps best known, especially among the Pentecostal people and among most fundamentalists, or people who have been in churches for some time. It is generally taught that this was the beginning of "the church age" or "the Christian era" when the Spirit was poured out at Pentecost. And the people were converted, becoming, eventually, Christians, beginning what we call the Christian era or the era of the Christian church.

We who understand that we are the Israel people recognize it as the beginning of the calling out of Israel from paganism. Israel was being turned away from the false religions into the true doctrines of Jesus Christ. Peter finished preaching the sermon about Jesus to these men: "Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly, that God hath made that same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ." [883]

The summing up of the very first sermon preached by this disciple to those people at Pentecost at what we call the beginning of the Christian era was that God had made Jesus both Lord and Christ. Therefore, we must accept that a basic doctrine of our Christian faith is that Jesus is the Lord, or the Redeemer, or the Savior or the Messiah.

You cannot turn away from that or you will throw out Peter's whole sermon in Acts two! Now read Acts 2:37-41; the pouring out of the Spirit on this day of Pentecost was a marvelous thing in the history of Christendom. Along with it came the preaching of the doctrine establishing the basis that Jesus Christ was Lord and Christ over The House of Israel, and it began this new era of the turning of the hearts of the people back to the fathers. The people received the doctrine gladly and many of them were added to the group. "And they continued steadfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers." [884]

Did they abandon doctrine for fellowship or did they fellowship under the doctrine? Do you see the difference here? It says "they continued steadfastly In the Apostles' Doctrine and fellowship." The Doctrine "was" the basis of the Fellowship; Not the other way around.

We do not think that the people who try to convince us that we should nullify or cancel our doctrinal teachings so we can have "fellowship" are all evil or wicked people. It is simply that they have heard this theme of "fellowship" and it sounds good to them. After all, we are not a loner type of people to any great extent. We love other people; we enjoy other families and children, and we are a gregarious and generous people. It would seem that fellowship is a great goal. Therefore, many people think, that we should compromise on our Christian Doctrines a little bit. And ask, "What does that hurt?"

The answer to that question is that it hurts doctrine! As we have so often seen, if we insist on having fellowship with other churches that do not agree with all of our doctrines, pretty soon the same thing happens there that we see in the denominations. And those members are most often Jews. So it is clearly obvious, that fellowship can destroy doctrine, whereas doctrine will build true fellowship. Here, in Acts two, is the beginning of our Christian faith. This is the day when it all began. It follows up by saying that they then had both doctrine and fellowship. What happened when they continued steadfast in the Apostles' doctrine and fellowship? "And fear came upon every soul: and many wonders and signs were done by the apostles." [885]

You see, they stayed true to the doctrine of Christ and THEN God blessed what they did. We would say that very few churches or ministers who compromise with their doctrines, on the basis of needing fellowship, ever have any great work other than gathering a lot of people around them, and a big bank account. And they probably consider that a great work. But, you see, that does not get the doctrine of God and Christ preached to Israel!

In Acts five, the apostles have been out preaching for a while and some miracles have happened. Then we read: "Now when the high priest and the captain of the temple and the chief priests heard these things, they doubted of them whereunto this would grow. Then came one and told them, saying, Behold, the men whom ye put in prison are standing in the temple, and teaching the people. Then went the captain with the officers, and brought them without violence: for they feared the people, lest they should have been stoned. And when they had brought them, they set them before the council: and the high priest asked them, Saying, Did not we straightly command you that ye should not teach in this name? and, behold, ye have filled Jerusalem with your doctrine (Christs' doctrine), and intend to bring this man's blood upon us." [886]

What happened in a matter of a very short time with these people who remained steadfast in the doctrine? They filled the city with Christs' Doctrine! And they brought upon themselves the anger and the ire of the Pharisaic religious and political leaders of their day; just as the True Preachers of Christs' Doctrine do today. These leaders said, "We told you not to preach in Jesus Christ's name, and here you have filled the whole city with your doctrine."

Then Peter and the other apostles answered;"...and said, We ought to obey God rather than men. The God of our fathers raised up Jesus, whom ye slew and hanged on a tree. Him hath God exalted with his right hand to be a Prince and a Saviour, for to give repentance to Israel, and forgiveness of sins. And we are his witnesses of these things; and so is also the Holy Ghost, whom God hath given to them that obey him." [887]

Many Christians watched three preachers, during the fall of 1982, interview Menahem Begin (then Israeli Prime Minister) in Israel during the height of the slaughter in Lebanon. Those preachers fawned over him, telling him what a wonderful man he was and how wonderful his people were and so on. This has been repeated many times with different Israelis since that time, until it is sickening, watching Christian, followers of Christ fawn over those that hate Him with everything in their being. This went on for about an hour with talk back and forth between he and these three Judeo-Christian preachers. At the very end of the interview one of the ministers asked Begin, very apologetically, if he could close in prayer and pray for Begin and for his people; and of course Begin nodded his head affirmatively and the three Judeo-Christian ministers bowed their heads in prayer. While the minister prayed, Begin sat on the couch and just looked at him.

He never bowed his head or closed his eyes or anything. He just watched them during the prayer; and the minister prayed a very long prayer, asking for God's blessing upon his people, the Jews, and for Begin, and so on. When he ended the prayer, he ended it without the name of Jesus Christ being mentioned!; He simply said, "Amen."

Now what did that man do? He obeyed men instead of God. In Acts five the Pharisees told Peter and the rest of the apostles in verse 28, "Did not we straightly command you that ye should not teach in this name?"

In other words, "You're not to use the name of Jesus Christ. We told you that and here you've been using it right here in Jerusalem among this people." And Peter did not just answer, "We ought to obey God rather than men."

Do you realize what he did? He did much more; he preached a sermon about Jesus Christ to those Jewish Pharisees! He did not tell his other fellow ministers and disciples that they should obey men instead of God. He preached a sermon TO the Jewish Pharisees. It is only three or four verses long, but he preached to them about Jesus Christ.

Now if these three ministers in that interview with Menahem Begin had wanted to do what God intended them to do, when they finished their conversation about the situation over in Lebanon and Israel, regardless what they thought about Begin and the people, they should have given a witness and a sermon about Jesus Christ to those people. But, when they showed complicity to the anti-Christs they demonstrated that they fear men more than they exalt and fear God, that is evidence that there must be something wrong with their preaching.

Do you wonder what one of the reasons these men acted in this way? And why evangelists never conduct a crusade in Israel? It is because of a law used frequently in the Zionist country known as Israel, which became common with the passage on December 25, 1977, of Israel's infamous "Anti-Missionary Law,"which the Knesset passed on Christmas Day so it would be perfectly clear against whom it was directed. It is a statute which decrees a prison term of up to five years for "Anyone" attempting to proselytize a Jew away from his faith.

Anti-Missionary Law 5738‑1977: Strictly speaking, "proselytizing" under this law involves a gift, no matter how small (such as a tract) given to a Jew by a Christian. Under Israeli law it is a crime to "give or promise to give money, the equivalent of money or any other material benefit in order to entice a person to change his religion."

Yet realistically, the word "proselytize" is much more loosely interpreted. As a case in point, evangelical Christians showed a film about the second coming of Christ in Jerusalem's largest hotel, the Shalom. This outraged Israel's chief rabbi, Yitzhak Kolitz, who forbade them to further "proselytize." However, the manager reassured the Christians that "they are welcome if they do not violate the law." [888] Such ambiguity keeps Christians in Israel on edge, vulnerable to accusations that they violate the law.

Speaking in defense of evangelicals, Charles Kopp, Chairman of the United Christian Council in Israel, said such Christians "do not engage in proselytizing...we do not give out leaflets in the streets or witness at our job (in Israel)." [889] The government remains suspicious, and Anti‑Christian! Daniel Rossing, head of the Department of Christian Churches for the Israeli Ministry of Religious Affairs, summarized his government's position: "The government, by all available means, discourages missionary activity." [890]Proponents say this law is vital to the survival of Israel because so many young Jews are being seduced away from the fold, largely by Christianity.

The severity of the sentence, they argue, is warranted because such a theft of a Jewish soul is tantamount to genocide, or the extinction of a (sic) race. Yet Judaism resents the encroachment of Christianity not just in Israel, but throughout the world. With 40% of American Jewish boys marrying Christian girls, and the Jewish birth rate not keeping up with the rest of humanity, Jewish leaders are desperate that the physical and spiritual unity of Jews be preserved.

They are concerned that apathy, secularism, and materialism, coupled with intermarriage and conversion to other religions, could do more to threaten Judaism than all the pogroms of history. Considering such a mind set against Christianity, we may understand why Christian evangelists have never held a crusade in the State of Israel. They have held many meetings throughout the Soviet bloc and even in Russia, yet not in Israel. Despite the feinted friendliness, and appearance of almost worship of such Christian leaders and the Israeli tourist industry, the fact remains that all religious affairs of the state of Israel are controlled by the chief rabbinate in Jerusalem, who enforces the strictly orthodox Jewish point of view.

The result: Although Israel proclaims itself the only real democracy in the Middle East, in matters of religious liberty it is more inflexibly Anti-Christian than even hardened Communist Countries! Is it not probable that their followers will do the same thing? Will not their followers also fear men above the fear of God? Those preachers are cowards and traitors to Almighty God and the Lord Jesus Christ; and as such they will not be allowed to enter into the Kingdom of God: "But the fearful (cowards, those who are afraid to speak the truth), and unbelieving (those who preach for money and power), and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars (those who teach that the Jews are God's people), shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death." [891]

Peter and the apostles, of course, preached about Jesus. They said "the God of our fathers raised up Jesus whom ye (Jews) slew and hanged on a tree." In other words, they preached the resurrection. "Him hath God exalted with his right hand to be a prince and a savior."

They preached that Jesus was the Savior and the Redeemer through His death and resurrection. They also told the reason for it: "Him hath God exalted with his right hand to be a Prince and a Saviour, for to give repentance to Israel, and forgiveness of sins. And we are his witnesses of these things; and so is also the Holy Ghost, whom God hath given to them that obey him. When they heard that, they were cut to the heart, and took counsel to slay them." [892]

The apostles knew these doctrines to be true and they would risk their lives to preach them right tot he people who had threatened them with death for preaching such doctrines. This is a very short sermon, but everything is in there. It is a composite of the whole story of Jesus Christ and Israel in just three or four verses. Acts 17 beginning in verse 16: "Now while Paul waited for them at Athens, his spirit was stirred in him, when he saw the city wholly given to idolatry. Therefore disputed he in the synagogue with the Jews, and with the devout persons, and in the market daily with them that met with him. Then certain philosophers of the Epicureans, and of the Stoicks, encountered him. And some said, What will this babbler say? other some, He seemeth to be a setter forth of strange gods: because he preached unto them Jesus, and the resurrection. And they took him, and brought him unto Areopagus, saying, May we know what this new doctrine, whereof thou speakest, is? For thou bringest certain strange things to our ears: we would know therefore what these things mean." [893]

There is quite a lot in that passage. First of all, Paul saw the city given over to paganism; to the worship of false gods. Did Paul compromise with this in any way? He did not just acquiesce to them and say, "Oh, it sure is wonderful to have fellowship with you people!" NO! A thousand times No! It says that he "Disputed" in the synagogues with them. He actually got into arguments with them to show them they were wrong according to the true doctrine.

Secondly, the philosophers of the Epicureans and Stoics recognized that the doctrine Paul taught was new. It certainly was not like what they had been hearing from the Jews. Why was it new? Because Paul preached to them Jesus and the resurrection! That is a new doctrine to any religion; no other religion except the Christian faith teaches Jesus and the resurrection.

Paul did not try to fellowship with these people. If you try to fellowship with the Jews and the pagans and get along with them, one of the things you would have to leave out would be the doctrine of the resurrection of Jesus Christ. You might even have to do that with some of the modernist so-called Judeo-Christian churches. We understand that some percentage of even the United Methodist, Unitarians and etc., church ministers have that they not only DO NOT believe that Jesus was born of a virgin; they DO NOT believe in His resurrection either.

Can you think of the ultimate compromise between those who preach Jesus and the resurrection and those that they might fellowship with, if it is not fellow shipping with the people who follow the religion of Judaism? Most Jews absolutely, totally deny that Jesus was resurrected from the dead. In fact, they even write books to claim that there was deceit and trickery surrounding Jesus' resurrection. They contend that the disciples stole the body of Jesus and hid it in order to trick the people into believing that Jesus was resurrected from the dead. And yet we have, in America, a tremendous number of ministers who say they believe in Jesus Christ and the resurrection, but they turn right around and tell their flock that if they did not applaud, obey and help those people who deny Christ and the resurrection, then one way or another God is going to curse them.

How insane can one get in relation to doctrine? These Judeo-Christians go to the ultimate to have fellowship in absolute, total opposition to the true doctrines that are in the Bible! The question is, of course, should we have fellowship at all in any way, with those who deny Christ and His Resurrection?

Turn to Romans 15, Paul is beginning to close his letter to Roman Christians: "And I am sure that, when I come unto you, I shall come in the fullness of the blessing of the gospel of Christ. Now I beseech you, brethren, for the Lord Jesus Christ's sake, and for the love of the Spirit, that ye strive together with me in your prayers to God for me; That I may be delivered from them that do not believe in Judaea; and that my service which I have for Jerusalem may be accepted of the saints." [894] Paul is really saying, "You pray not that I will fellowship with these people who do not believe, but that I be delivered from them." [895]; "That I may come unto you with joy by the will of God, and may with you be refreshed. Now the God of peace be with you all. Amen." [896]

Think of this; How important was this fellowship with the unbelievers to Paul? He actually asked to be delivered "from them that do not believe in Judea."

Now, we have a lot of people over the ancient land of "Judea" who do not believe! Should we not, as Paul did, pray that we be "delivered from them that do not believe in the land of Judea?" Instead we have Judeo-Christian ministers who say, "Oh, those people who do not believe in the land of Judea are the most important people on the face of the earth. They're special. They are the apple of God's eye. And if you don't do everything you can to help them, God will curse you."

That is the Exact Opposite of What Paul Prayed For, and what we just read in the New Testament. Whom did Paul want to fellowship and be refreshed with? He said "with you," referring to the people he was writing to. And who were they? Well, let us read Paul's own definition at the beginning of the letter to the Romans, as he addressed them and described what kind of people he believed they were that he was writing to: "Among whom are ye also the called of Jesus Christ" [897]

And then he addresses the letter: "To all that be in Rome, beloved of God, called to be saints: Grace to you and peace from God our Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ. First, I thank my God through Jesus Christ for you all, that your faith is spoken of throughout the whole world." [898] Paul wanted to be delivered from those who did not believe and he wanted to come to Rome to be refreshed in fellowship with those whose faith was spoken of throughout the whole world.

Should it not be true that we, as Christians, would also want to fellowship with those who believe in Jesus Christ, His resurrection, and the truths of the Holy Scripture instead of trying to fellowship with those who compromise and justify all sorts of evil that is in opposition to the Word of God? It is for you to decide. Not anyone else, but give Almighty God and the Lord Jesus Christ all the glory and blessings.

From listening to the Judeo-Christian preachers, ministers, evangelists, and etc., which I will refer to from here on to save space and time, as Judeo-Christian teachers; preach and teach lies about the Lord Jesus Christ that I am presenting the following for your review and study. Key Questions which we will try to answer are as follows:

First let's take a look at the word Jew. If you will take any good encyclopedia you will find that there was no such thing as a Jew at the time Christ was on the earth. Second that the letter "J" did not become part of the English Alphabet until some time around 1500. Then Strong's Exhaustive Concordance in the Greek Dictionary of the New Testament relates the following:

Greek #2453. 'Ioudaios, ee-oo-dah'-yos; from 2448 (in the sense of 2455 AS A COUNTRY); Judean, i.e. belonging to Jehudah:-Jew (-ess), OF JUDEA.

Greek 2448. Iouda, ee-oo-dah'; of Heb. or (3063 or perh. 3194); Judah (i.e. Jehudah or Juttah), A PART OF (or place in) Pal.:-JUDEAN.

In the 4th chapter of the Gospel according to the Apostle John we find the record of some astounding teachings of Jesus. In His conversation with the Samaritan woman at the well near the town of Syhchar, He made it plain that salvation was very different in character from that which the Jews (Pharisees) had been teaching the people.

But He also said that salvation is of the Jews. This makes the passage puzzling in the English language, and it has led too many people astray: Causing them to believe a lie; and it needs careful study if it is to be correctly understood, as we shall see. Why is it so important to understand this particular portion of the Bible? It is important for Christians to understand ALL of the Bible.

This passage is of special significance because of the current, but erroneous, opinion among many that Christianity arose out of Judaism, that there exists a Judeo-Christian value system, that Jews have their own covenant with God which circumvents Jesus Christ and His atonement, and that the United States has a special obligation to the religious political Zionist state of Israel. In short, a correct understanding of this Scripture helps to place the above issues in their proper perspectives.

We are faced with the impossible task of making this clear to those who have little desire to study details, and those who demand a more scholarly explanation. We hope this presentation will meet the needs of everyone. For those who dislike details, please make an effort to "hang in there;" for we believe the results will be worth while.

We hear a great deal these days about the "brotherhood of man." There is an organization of Christians and Jews which promulgate this theory. In associating themselves with Jews, Christians are indirectly promoting atheism, for to advocate brotherhood without Christ is to advocate atheism.

If a Jew can be brother to a Christian without accepting Christ, it means that God can be his father without accepting Christ. If access to God without Christ is possible then Christ is unnecessary. If we believe that Christ is unnecessary, then we are atheists.

It is deplorable that Christian dupes cannot see through this devilish scheme. The union of Christians with the seed of the serpent, the synagogue of Satan, is an abomination in the sight of God. Some ask, "If the brotherhood of Man is unscriptural, why does the Bible say we are all of one blood as in Acts 17:26?"

People who quote this verse know, or should know, that the word "blood" does not occur in the original and is omitted from the authorized version. Also the neuter gender is used. If man was meant, it would have been in the masculine gender.

The text should be rendered "and hath made of one species all nations of men to dwell..." Homo Sapiens. The same way we refer to the dogs belonging to the canine species. The Jews, as we know, are not included or referred to in this text, as they come under a different classification, the Serpent Race, and are contrary to all men.

Jewish author Maurice Samuel, in his Book, "You Gentiles," page 155 says: "We Jews, we the destroyers, will remain the destroyers forever. Nothing that you will do will meet our needs and demands. We will destroy because we need a world of our own."

The "Jewish World" of Feb. 9, 1883, stated: "The great ideal of Judaism is that the whole world shall be imbued with Jewish teachings, and that in a Universal Brotherhood of Nations ‑‑ a greater Judaism, in fact ‑‑ all the separate races and religions shall disappear." [911]

At this point it is well for us to be reminded of the following excerpt from a report delivered by Mr. Oudendyke, Netherlands Minister at Petrograd, Russia, on Sept. 6, 1918, concerning the situation in Russia. At that time the Netherlands Minister was acting for the British Ambassador and the report was presented to parliament in London. "The foregoing report will indicate the extremely critical nature of the present situation. The danger is now so great that I feel it my duty to call the attention of the British and all other governments to the fact that if an end is not put to Bolshevism in Russia at once, the civilization of the world will be threatened. This is not an exaggeration, but a sober matter of fact; and the most unusual action of German and Austrian consuls-general, before referred to, in joining in protest of Neutral legations appears to indicate that the danger is also being realized in German and Austrian quarters.

I consider that the immediate suppression of Bolshevism is the greatest issue now before the world, not even excluding the war which is still raging, and unless, as above stated, Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to spread in one farm or another over Europe and the whole world, as it is organized and worked by the Jews who have no nationality, and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things. The only manner in which this danger could be averted would be the collective action on the part of all powers.

I am also of the opinion that no support whatever should be given to any other socialistic party in Russia, least of all to social revolutionaries, whose policy is at the moment to overthrow the Bolsheviks, but whose aims in reality are the same, visavis, to establish proletariat rule throughout the world. Social revolutionaries will never right nay foreign power, and any profession which they may now make in this sense is merely a tactical move in their struggle with the Bolsheviks."

In the confrontation between the Arabs and the Jews, President Nixon has bluntly informed the American people that we are deeply committed to the Jews. In California and across the nation, tens of thousands of our youth are being brain-washed into taking the mind-destroying drug LSD; and many of these young people are committing suicide, attempting to gouge out their eyes or otherwise maim themselves. And it has been shown that LSD is manufactured in Israel and smuggled into this country. So why should we be deeply committed to the protection of our worst enemy, an enemy that is not so-secretly destroying us with biochemical warfare? As the result of the study of excerpts from the Talmud, evidence from the Bible, statements from noted non-Jews throughout history, statements from Jews themselves and their leaders, and finally evidence developed by their own scientists in the field of Biology, we are justified in arriving at the following conclusion, namely:

1). That the Jews in their capacity of being "contrary to all men" are in a category not commonly associated with the Biblical concept of the family of man.

2). Christians, by virtue of their acceptance of the sacrifice our Lord Jesus Christ made on the stake, are assured of eternal life. The Jews, being of their "father, the devil," have no such assurance, hence their only concern is with enjoying the "good life" which they now have.

3). That the Jews have a deep and undying hatred of Christians and Christianity in general. Note the hate programs of TV against the Christian people of Germany. It is unceasing and unrelenting. Indeed, it was the Jewish hatred of Christian Germany which brought World War II.

Samuel Untermeyer, president of the World Jewish Economic Federation, upon returning from a world wide meeting of Jews in Amsterdam, Holland, made a speech on radio station WABC, Columbia Broadcasting system in N.Y.C. on Aug. 6, 1933, in which he said the Jews of the world had declared war on Germany and would starve them to death. That was six years before any Jew had been punished and before military war was initiated in 1939. "The Second World War is being fought for the defense of the fundamentals of Judaism." [912]

The founder of the Irgun terrorist organization, Vladimer Jabotinsky, Jewish Communist who wrote in the January issue of Natcha Retch, 1934: "The fight against Germany has been carried on for months by every Jewish community, conference, congress, trade organization, by every Jew in the world. There is reason to believe that our part in this struggle will be of general value. We shall let loose a spiritual and material war of the whole world against Germany's ambition to become a great nation again, to reconquer her lost territories and colonies. Our Jewish interests on the other hand, demand the complete destruction of Germany. The German nation is collectively and individually a danger to us Jews."

Rabbi M. Perizweig, head of the British section of the World Jewish Congress, speaking in Canada, stated: "The World Jewish Congress has been at war with Germany for seven years." [913]

In Walter Winchell's column in The Los Angeles Herald-Examiner on Dec. 7, 1966, appeared these words: "Merchants report a boycott of German goods in the U.S." Despite the fact that Germany and the United States has contributed billions of dollars to keep the economy of Israel alive, there is no gratitude in the breast of the Jews.

4). That upon their heads has come "all the righteous blood shed upon the earth from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar." [914]

Terms: The Geneva Law which established a National Bankruptcy Contract under "Silent Judicial Notice" to include all (corporate) U.S. citizens in a fraudulent Social Security scheme previously declared illegal under the positive law of nations.

The First Act of Surrender Passage of H.J. Res. 192 which removed the U.S.A. from the Gold Standard and made it impossible for the Nation to "pay" its debts. Setup a Credit Commune with "limited liability."

1). Tribute: Taxation without Representation exacted by (corporate) U.S. officials as an extortion payment to the Federal Reserve (a private (Jewish controlled) banking syndicate) and other agencies of the United Nations - front organization for the World's Ruling Elite.

2). Expatriation of Jobs and Industries: Utilization of taxpayer supported agencies such as OPIC and AID to export American resources overseas.

3). Destruction of State and National Boundaries: Regionalization of 30 of the 50 states by removing boundary descriptions from the State Constitutions. The signing of International Trade Agreements such as GATT (General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs) and NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) to destroy "non-tariff trade barriers" and create an economic merger among Pan American countries.

4). Promotion of Crime and Slave Labor through Alien Immigration: A Welfare State Immigration policy that attracts non-contributing undesirables to destroy the Standard of Living and provide a future inducement toward communist revolution and slavery for all citizens.

5). Disposition of the Spoils of War: Systematic looting of the Nation's wealth by (Jewish controlled) International Corporate pirates and (Jewish controlled) banking privateers under Admiralty's "Questions of Prize." Privatization of the Nation's infrastructure through sale of Public Assets to foreign principals was established by Presidential Executive Order No. 1203 (1992).

6). Siege Mentality in a Police State: Pillaging of U.S. citizens through Draconian federal forfeiture laws that violate their civil and constitutional rights on the pretext of a phony "Drug War." Bankruptcy and Emergency Powers such as the International Economic Emergencies Act, Title 50 USC 1701-1706, are used improperly by U.N. sponsored government operatives to justify military "hits" upon political dissenters whom are arbitrarily labeled as enemies of the "New World Order." (i.e., Randy Weaver, David Koresh, Ralph Daigle, Gordon Kahl and many others).

7). Unilateral Disarmament: The creation of an Arms Control and Disarmament Agency under P.L. 87-297 and described in State Department Paper 7727, along with the non-incorporation of the 2nd Amendment into the 14th Amendment protections against the states, indicates that our (their) criminal government will eventually declare martial law so that they can launch a "military enforcement action" to confiscate firearms from all law abiding citizens.

105 STAT. 44 Public Law 102‑14 March 20, 1991 Joint Resolution To designate March 26, 1991, as "Education Day, U.S.A."

Whereas Congress recognizes the historical tradition of ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded;

Whereas these ethical values and principles have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization, when they were known as the Seven Noahide Laws;

Whereas without these ethical values and principles the edifice of civilization stands in serious peril of returning chaos;

Whereas society is profoundly concerned with the recent weakening of these principles that has resulted in crises that beleaguer and threaten the fabric of civilized society;

Whereas the justified preoccupation with these crises must not let the citizens of this Nation lose sight of their responsibility to transmit these historical ethical values from our distinguished past to the generations of the future;

Whereas Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, leader of the Lubavitch movement, is universally respected and revered and his eighty‑ninth birthday falls on March 26, 1991;

Whereas in tribute to this great spiritual leader, "the rebbe," this, his ninetieth year will be seen as one of "education and giving," the year in which we turn to education charity to return the world to the moral and ethical values contained in the Seven Noahide Laws; and

Whereas this will be reflected in an international scroll of honor signed by the President of the United States and other heads of state: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, that March 26, 1991, the start of the ninetieth year of Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, former leader of the world‑wide Lubavitch Movement, is designated as "Education Day, U.S.A." The President is requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe such day with appropriate ceremonies and activities. [915]

It is apparent that the "Seven Noahide Laws" are the real purpose of the Resolution and Public Law 102‑14. The Seven Noahide Laws themselves were not included in the Resolution nor in the Law itself, and for good reason.

And since they are not commonly known to the average citizen, we should endeavor to learn what they are; and more about the so‑called "Rebbe" Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the leader of the Lubavitch Movement; and what effect, if any, these laws will have upon Christian Americans in general. Particularly now that we have a new"law of the land."

They are not easy to find, but some encyclopedias mention them briefly. Noahide Laws, also called Noachian Laws, A Jewish Talmudic designation for seven (so‑called) biblical laws given to Adam and to Noah before the revelation to Moses on Mt. Sinai and consequently on all mankind (There is no Biblical Proof for this Statement).

Beginning with Genesis 2:16, the Babylonian Talmud (supposedly) listed the first six commandments as prohibitions against idolatry, blasphemy, murder, adultery, and robbery and the positive command To Establish Courts of Justice (with all that this implies). After the flood a seventh commandment given to Noah, forbade the eating of flesh cut from a living animal.[916]

Though the number of laws was later increased to 30 with the addition of prohibitions against castration, sorcery, and other practices, the 'seven laws,' with minor variations, retained their original status as authoritative commandments and as the source of other laws.

As basic statutes safe‑guarding monotheism and guaranteeing proper ethical conduct in society, these laws provided a legal framework for alien residents in Jewish Territory (When did the United States become Jewish territory?).

Maimonides thus regarded anyone who observed these laws as one 'assured of a portion in the world to come.' throughout the ages scholars have viewed the Noahide Laws as a link between Judaism and Christianity (Which is totally false. Judaism and Christianity are total opposites and are deadly enemies), as universal norms of ethical conduct, as a basic concept in International Law, or as a guarantee of fundamental human rights for all.

The following is a summary of the Seven Noahide Laws from Institute of Judaic-Christian Researcher, Jan. 1992; The Talmud, Sanh. 56a-59b; Yad Melakhim 8:10, 9, 10.

3). Thou shalt not shed innocent blood of any human nor fetus nor ailing person who has a limited time to live.

4). Thou shalt not engage in bestial, incestuous, adulterous or homosexual relations nor commit the act of rape.

6). Thou shalt establish Laws and Courts of Law to administer (enforce) these Laws, including the Death Penalty.

As we make a cursory examination of the "Seven Noahide Laws" one would see nothing objectionable. In fact, one would applaud any effort to remove the evil from among us; because that is what the Laws, Statutes and Judgments of God directs us to do. But there is more, much more, to these laws than first meets the eye!

The Jews say these "Seven Laws of Noah" known as the "Noahide Laws" or "Noachian Laws," (actually there are only six laws with one provision for enforcement which makes up the "Seven Noahide Laws"). So, how does the resolution passed by Congress relate to these laws? The United States is considered by many Jews as "THEIR" stronghold and "Their" headquarters for eventual world domination. In a recent article published in "Wellsprings" the head rabbi of Hasidic Jewry stated: "...America has become the focus and fountainhead of Jewish survival. Providence has prepared a new home for Torah and Yiddishkeit in this country...The largest concentration of our best elements are in America. We must lead the smaller Jewish communities in other countries and continents, even in Erety Israel (Israel-Palestine), which must learn heavily on American support for its economic and spiritual survival."

The "Seven Laws of Noah," according to Hasidic Jews, should be enforced upon all non-Jews (this means the Blacks, Mexicans, Chinese, Japanese, Arabs, and etc., as well as Christians) by the Jews themselves: "...the entire context of the Talmudic discussion of the Noachide Laws is that of actual enforcement by Rabbinic Courts."

The Jews say these laws were given to Noah by their god for the orderly government of all people, but Jews were given another set of Laws at Mount Sinai much later, so they are not subject to the Noahide Laws but rather to the later ones, except, of course, for those Noahide Laws that were repeated at Sinai. Also the Jews would not pay the same penalty for violating these laws.

The Jewish Encyclopedia, page 649 states: "In the case of murder, if the Noachide slay a child in its mother's womb, or kill a person whose life is despaired of ('terefah'), or if he cause the death of a person by starving him or putting him before a lion so that he can not escape, or if he slay a man in self‑defense, the Noachide is guilty of murder and must pay the death penalty, although under the same circumstances an Israelite (Jew) would not be executed."

According to the Encyclopedia Judaica the death penalty would be: "...violation of any one of the seven laws subjects the Noachide to capital punishment by decapitation."

Notice Congress and the President are giving acclamation to a Talmudic Jewish Rabbi called "the rebbe." Menachem Mendel Schneerson, whom the "Current Biography Yearbook 1983" states on page 355: "(Born) April 18, 1902 (Not March 26 as stated in Public Law 102‑14); leader of Habad (Lubavitch) Hasidim...' As Rebbe, or spiritual head, of the Lubavitch Hasidim, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson is one of the most important figures in American and world Jewry...Hasid and the hasidic community from his own all‑pervasive radiance, attained through his mystic union with God. This union and the ensuing enrichment of his soul are used for the sake of the people, to lead them lovingly to their creator.

The zaddik IS A MYSTIC who employs his power within the social community and for its sake. A wonder‑healer and miracle‑worker, in the eyes of his followers he is a combination of confessor, moral instructor, and practical adviser. Also a theoretical teacher and exegetical preacher, with a style of preaching peculiar to zaddikim, he expounds his hasidic torah (Hebrew for the teaching of the zaddimim) at his table (in hasidic parance der tish) surrounded by his followers, generally during the third meal on the Sabbath (se'ndah shelishit). For the individual Hasid, joining the court of his zaddik is both a pilgrimage and a revitalizing unification with the brotherhood gathered at the court, united around and through the zaddik.

The Hasid journeyed to his zaddik's court at least for the High Holidays (although this practice later weakened) to seek his blessing, which was also entreated from afar. He submitted a written account of his problems (known as a kvitl), usually accompanying this with a monetary contribution (pidyon, short for pidyon nefesh, 'Redemption of the Soul')...

Basic ideas of Hasidism: Creator and Universe. While it is true that many of the basic ideas of Hasidism are grounded in earlier Jewish sources, the Hasidim did produce much that was new if only by emphasis. With few exceptions, hasidic ideas are not presented systematically in the hasidic writings, but an examination of these writings reveals certain patterns common to all the hasidic masters. Central to hasidic thought is an elaboration of the idea found in the Lurianic Kabbalah, that God 'withdrew from Himself into Himself' in order to leave the primordial 'empty space' into which the finite world could eventually emerge after a long process of emanations. The redemption of the 'holy sparks' was one of the reasons given for hasidic fondness for tobacco. Smoking a pipe served to release subtle 'sparks' not otherwise accessible.

Jewish Zaddik said to bring Jews closer to their god!: Kavannah and Zaddikism. Is this program of sustained contemplation, attachment, and utter devotion to God really possible for all men? The hasidic answer is generally in the negative. This is why the doctrine of zaddikism is so important for Hasidism. The holy man, his thoughts constantly on God, raises the prayers of his followers and all their other thoughts and actions. In the comprehensive work on zaddikism, R. Elimelech of Lyzhansk's No'am Elimelekh, the zaddik appears as a spiritual superman, with the power to work miracles.

He is the channel through which the divine grace flows, the man to whom god has given control of the universe by his prayers. The Zaddik performs a double task: he brings man nearer to god and he brings down god's bounty to man. (In other words, on every hand the so-called Zaddik is trying to replace the Lord Jesus Christ. Thus denying the Word of God) The zaddik must be supported by his followers. This financial assistance is not for the sake of the zaddik but for the sake of those privileged to help him. By supporting the zaddik with their worldly goods his followers become attached to him through his dependence on them, which he readily accepts in his love for them.

Jewish Zaddik has power over life and death (We know this is a lie, because he died just like all other men; except the Lord Jesus Christ): Their welfare thus becomes his and his prayers on their behalf can the more readily be answered.

The Zaddik even has powers over life and death. God may have decreed that a person should die but the prayers of the Zaddik can nullify this decree. This is because the Zaddik's soul is so pure and elevated that it can reach to those worlds in which no decree has been promulgated since there only mercy reigns. But if such powers were evidently denied to the great ones of the past how does the Zaddik come to have them? The rationale is contained in the parable attributed to the Maggid of Mezhirech [917] Rabbi Michael Katz, a well known student of the Talmud, states that it is the considered opinion of acclaimed Talmudic Scholars that there are actually thirty commandments that are Noadic and apply to all non‑Jewish people but that only the 'Seven Noahide Laws' are punishable by execution of Christians by Jews through Jewish 'Noahide' Courts!

The Talmud says that the first six of these precepts were given originally by God to Adam, and the seventh afterward to Noah. These precepts were designed to be obligatory on all the Noachide, or descendants of Noah, and consequently, from the time of Moses, the Jews would not suffer a stranger to live among them unless he observed these precepts, and never gave quarter in battle to an enemy who was ignorant of them."

Now we turn once again to the Jewish Encyclopedia: Hadad:"Name of an Aramaic...Edomitish, Deity..." The following is taken from the 1971 edition of The Encyclopedia Judaica, Vol. XII, pp. 1189‑1191; "Noachide Laws, the seven laws considered by rabbinic tradition as the minimal moral duties enjoined by the Bible on all men [918]...The seven Noachide laws as traditionally enumerated are; the prohibitions of idolatry, blasphemy, bloodshed, sexual sins, theft, and eating from a living animal, as well as the injunction to establish a legal system.[919] Except for the last, all are negative, and the last itself is usually interpreted as commanding the enforcement of the other.[920] They are derived exegetically from divine demands addressed to Adam [921] and Noah,[922] i.e., the progenitors of all mankind, and are thus regarded as universal.

The attempt of Finkelstein (op. cit.) to date the formulation of the seven Noachide commandments during the Hasmonean era would also suggest a rabbinic concern with the actual legal status of the non‑Jew in a sovereign Jewish state. It might even be the case that the substitution by the tanna of the school of Manasseh of emasculation and forbidden mixtures of plants for the establishment of a judicial system and blasphemy[923] itself reflects a concern with the regulation of the life of the resident alien already under the jurisdiction of Jewish courts. Of course, the seven commandments themselves are subject to either interpretation; e.g., the establishment of courts of justice can mean either an independent non‑Jewish judiciary and legal system or can simply bring the non‑Jew under the rubic Jewish civil law and its judicial system.

Liability for Violation of the Laws. While committed to the principle that 'There is nothing permitted to an Israelite yet forbidden to a heathen,' [924] the seven Noachide Laws were not as extensive as the parallel prohibitions applicable to Jews, and there are indeed situations in which a non‑Jew would be liable for committing an act for which a Jew would not be liable. As to the latter point, as a general rule, the Noachide is criminally liable for violation of any of his seven laws even though technical definition limitations would prevent liability by a Jew performing the same act. Thus a non‑Jew is liable for blasphemy ‑‑ even if only with one of the divine attributes; murder even of a foetus (Embryo): robbery ‑‑ even of less than a perutah; and the eating of flesh torn from a living animal ‑‑ even of a quantity less than the size of an olive. In all these cases a Jew would not be liable.[925] One additional element of greater severity is that violation of any one of the seven laws subjects the Noachide to capital punishment by decapitation. ”[926]

The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. 8, pages 648‑649, describes the Noahide Laws as follows: "Laws, Noachian: Laws which are supposed by the Rabbis to have been binding upon mankind at large even before the revelation at Sinai and which are still binding upon non‑Jews. The term Noachian indicates the universality of these ordinances, since the whole human race was supposed to be descended from the three sons of Noah who alone survived the flood...The Noachide are required to establish courts of justice in every city and province; and these courts are to judge the people with regard to the six laws and to warn them against the transgression of any of them. In the case of murder, if the Noachid slay a child in its mother's womb, or kill a person whose life is despaired of ('terefah'), or if he cause the death of a person by starving him or by putting him before a lion so that he can not escape, or if he slay a man in self‑defense the Noachid is guilty of murder and must pay the death-penalty, although under the same circumstances a Jew would not be executed.”[927]

The Standard Jewish Encyclopedia, by Massa DGH, p. 1178 relates: "Laws of Noah: Seven laws which the rabbis hold binding upon all mankind, derived from early chapters of Gen. (e.g., 9:4‑7). Six of these laws are negative, prohibiting idolatry, blasphemy, murder, adultery, robbery, and the eating of flesh cut from a living animal. The single positive commandment is that requiring the establishment of courts of justice. The 'Noachide Laws' were much discussed by European scholars in the 17th century in connection with the Laws of Nations."

When we study the Lubavitch Movement we can begin to understand the depths of the conspiracy. We can now understand why the understanding of the Millennium had to be changed. We can now more completely understand the true meaning of the multitude of quotes made by famous Rabbis and other Communists. We can now understand the true meaning of the term Judeo‑Christianity. The Lubavitch Movement is one of the guiding influences in the concept of the Jewish Millennium and their messiah.

The Lubavitch Movement, as we have shown, teaches that the Seven Noahide Laws are applicable to all non‑Jews and that the Jews of the world are obliged to enforce those laws. The penalty for breaking those laws is Death by Decapitation. At the same time, the Jews themselves are under Talmudic Laws and not the Noahide Laws they say. Thus, they can violate the Noahide Laws without punishment.

Now we can understand why it was so important for the doctrines of the Christian church to be changed to declare that the Laws, Statutes and Judgments of God were done away with by the advent of Christ. For the longest period of time during the Christian Kingdom, we believed and practiced the Mosaic Laws. It was imperative that they relegate us to the Noahide Laws while only the Jews will keep the Talmudic Laws. The Lubavitch Movement under Rabbi Menachem Schneerson teaches from the Talmud that any Jewish man can be the messiah.

Further, they teach that the Jewish Millennium is to be ushered in at any moment with the naming of their messiah. If we combine the works of the Lubavitch Movement with the final drive for the one world movement that is now being pushed, we are seeing the final preparations for the Jewish utopia or millennium.

Do not underestimate the power of Rabbi Manachem Mendel Schneerson. He is not just another religious quack. He is one of the most powerful men in the entire world. When he speaks, people jump. Our Congress and President jumped, didn't they, when it was time to pass Public Law 102‑14?

Now we can understand what the term Judeo-Christianity means: The submission of Christianity to the social, economic and religious precepts of Judaism. The Economic Factor in the Conspiracy. The proposed Jewish Millennium must have an economic system. The Christian Kingdom of God here on Earth had an economic system and it was called money capitalism. There is a vast difference between the two systems.

They speak of high and lofty morals but where are they? How did we wind up with sex execution in schools; with Queers and perverts handing out Condoms in the schools; pornographic stores; filthy movies on the screen and on television; free love; etc.? Why do we have fourth generation families on welfare? where is this "motovating impulse for the welfare of the common man?"

Yes the preachers of today are cowards. They are afraid to speak the truth so they lie every Sunday morning and night. They cowardly hide behind such statements as; "He/She is a radical," "a right-wing fanatic," "a neo-Nazi," "an anti-Semitic" or some other such stupid nonsense because they are afraid to even look upon the Truth! Some of the greatest philosophers of recent times, and those the Talmudic system hates with a passion, give us the clues.

Oswald Spengler, Francis Yockey and Hegel all tell us of nationalism. That means ethnic, morality, racial and tribal. Each of them taught of the one great folly of the White, Celto‑Saxon, Teutonic Christian West. As a people we have gone to the four corners of the world and brought other cultures to live with us and we have tried to make them over in our own image. We have tried to play God.

Lubavitch sect claims its leader is the messiah: The followers of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, claim that he is the "Messiah." As evidence of this claim, followers cite Schneerson's predictions of the fall of Communism, the exodus of Soviet Jews to Israel, and the relatively little damage suffered by Israel during Iraq's Scud attacks on the Zionist State during the so‑called Gulf War.

The fact that the "Rebbe" as Schneerson is called, has recently suffered a stroke has not diminished his appeal as the "Messiah" in the eyes of his followers. This is not surprising as the Jews trout out a new "Messiah" every 200‑300 years, as can be seen by an examination of the Jewish Chronology in the Jewish Encyclopedia.

721. Appearance of the false Messiah Serenus in Syria causes many Spanish Jews to emigrate to Palestine.

1568. Isaac Luria Levi (1534‑72), cabalist, pretends to be the Messiah, son of Joseph.

1991. Menachem Schneerson, the leader of The Lubavitch Movement in the U.S. Government's hidden agenda to kill off the hard-core Christian conservative has now been revealed by the Randy Weaver incident in Idaho and the Waco burn-out and the following information from the "Citizen's Claw" (Citizens For Constitutional Law (CLAW) P.O. Box 441 Morongo Valley, CA 92256 makes that charge a valid one.

Make no mistake an American Holy War has begun in America: It is very hard for anyone to seriously believe there could be a deliberate program in this country designed to destroy a specific religion. But all of the evidence of recent years bears it out, such as: prayers forbidden in schools, abortion on demand, padlocking of Christian churches for refusing to take a license from the state, the jailing of Christian home-schoolers, making it a hate crime to speak out about homosexuals and its jail-time for anyone refusing to hire or to house same. Then we have the effort by the NEA to destroy the family relationship and turn children against their parents and to charge child abuse if scolded or punished for misbehavior.

The passing out of condoms in schools to encourage all forms of perverted sex and to destroy the Christian Morals. Anyone with eyes to see should see that the Christian way of life is being deliberately targeted for extinction and the Idaho murders and the Waco burn-out is apparently the beginning of open Christian persecution in this country. When it becomes the "policy" of a government to target or to destroy a long-established religion (genocide), those who practice that religion have the moral and legal right to declare a Holy War in progress so as to save themselves.

Christians at the Elim Mission Station in Rhodesia were such convinced pacifists that, even within a few kilometers of Marxist Mozambique during a vicious war they refused to be armed. They had neither a fence nor dogs to protect them.

They refused to allow the security forces to station some guards for their protection. When terrorists visited Elim the missionaries provided them with food and medical supplies. Then one fateful night the Black terrorists (ZANLA) guerrillas, as their way of saying thank you and because of the pacifism of the Christians, herded the 9 men and women missionaries and 4 children into one of the fields. In front of the parents they hacked the children to death.

Then in front of the husbands they raped and tortured the women to death. Finally they brutally murdered the men. Yet so effectively had their pacifist doctrine neutralized them that there was no attempt at resistance. The men stood by and watched ruthless Black Terrorists butcher their loved ones. (Don't you think for a moment the Jews and the Blacks in this country will not do the same for White Christians in America if they get the chance!)

Again in November 1987 a similar massacre took place at New Adams Farm in Zimbabwe (Rhodesia). Their sincere belief in pacifism disarmed these 16 Christians and made them helpless victims to a slaughter by Black Terrorists.

Never forget this. Whenever a government sends its agents to disarm you, it is the universal signal to shoot with a clear conscience, needing no one's permission but your own. The example set for at Lexington perfectly illustrates a fundamental principle of Americanism, which is: Never give up your guns. Never! Your gun is the great equalizer. Better to have one and not need it, than to need one and not have it. In his oft-repeated speech in the Roman Senate, Cicero, in 42 B.C. spoke these words: "A nation can survive its fools and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banners openly. The traitor moves among those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor - he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and garments, and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation - he works secretly and alone in the night to undermine the pillars of a city - he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resists. A murderer is less to be feared."

The Jew has been a traitor in every country he has lived in. He is the great traitor people of the world!

Every period of upheaval and destruction, recorded in the Biblical history, was preceded by an era of blindness in regard to Divinely-related truth and its inherent obligations. It was so in the days of Noah. It was so in the days of Solomon.

Noah's contemporaries were not in darkness as to the will of God, for it had been made known to them just as it had to Noah. The total blindness and depravity which characterized their era was due to the delusion that they could defy God's specific commands with impunity. Such laws as non-mixing of the various races. This fateful error spread until the day of reckoning, then there was no other recourse. The Lord said, "I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth." [952]

Another blind age of far-reaching consequences began during King Solomon's reign over all Israel. Solomon received from his father David a kingdom already united and prosperous. For a time he not only maintained the standard of his father but, by the genius of his own personality, his wisdom and dedication, he led the kingdom to still greater heights of wealth and renown: "So king Solomon exceeded all the kings of the earth for riches and for wisdom. And all the earth sought to Solomon, to hear his wisdom, which God had put in his heart." [953]

Although the division of the Kingdom and the scattering of its people did not occur until after Solomon's death, it was he who undermined the foundation of Israel's Divine Law and faith for generations to come. First Solomon defied God's basic law of segregation in Israel. Read the sordid story in 1 Kings 11, and note that it begins only five sentences after the remarkable tribute to the king quoted above from the tenth chapter of 1 Kings.

The proximity of two such contrasting pictures of a man seem to emphasize the short span which may lie between an hour of triumph and the day of ignominious defeat. Solomon's violation of God's law of racial segregation is recorded in the first two verses, and reads as follows in Dr. James Moffatt's translation: "Now king Solomon was a lover of women; he had seven hundred royal wives, and three hundred mistresses. He married many foreign women - Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Phoenicians, and Hittites - belonging to nations against whom the Eternal had warned the men of Israel, 'You must not mix with them, nor let them mix with you, for they will be sure to seduce you to follow their gods.' Solomon clung to these women in love." [954]

Next, Solomon is charged with departing from faith in the true God to whom he had prayed with such fervor and devotion at the dedication of the temple. The record of Solomon's defection continues with facts so shocking as to seem almost incredible.

The Moffatt version reads: "When he grew old, he had no undivided mind for the Eternal, his God, as his father David had; his wives seduced him to follow foreign gods. Solomon did what was evil in the eyes of the Eternal; he did not follow the Eternal faithfully, as his father David had done. For he put up shrines for Astarte, the goddess of the Phoenicians, and for Milkom, the detestable idol of the Ammonites, and for Kemosh, the detestable idol of Moab, on a hill to the east of Jerusalem. He did the same for all his foreign wives, burning incense and offering sacrifice to their gods." [955]

It is written, furthermore, that the Lord was angry with Solomon for his defiance of the God of Israel, "who had twice appeared to him and given him this order, that he was not to follow foreign gods." Nevertheless, Solomon continued his rebellious course and unwittingly sealed the fate of his beloved kingdom; for God said of his evil decision: "Since this is your mind, since you have not obeyed my compact and the rules I laid down for yon, I will tear the kingdom from you and give it to your servant." [956]

What madness possessed the soul of Solomon! What blindness engulfed his mind and heart as he dared to defy God's racial law and build altars for the worship of false gods! Solomon's one-man "united nations" and "fellowship of faiths" led to his own undoing and, eventually, to the breakup of the once glorious Kingdom of Israel.

When Jesus came to visit and redeem His people, He found them scattered and steeped in spiritual blindness. At that time a small segment from the former Judah kingdom occupied Palestine. This fact is generally known. But it is equally important to know that the main body of the covenant race, from both Judah and the northern kingdom of Israel, had been in the process of migration from their captive lands, and were then living in various centers all the way from Babylon to Asia Minor, and on westward across the mainland of Europe to the British Isles.

In the thirteenth chapter of his Gospel, Matthew tells how Jesus sat by the seaside and spoke to great multitudes in parables. Then the disciples came and asked why He spoke to the people in parables. Jesus replied: "This is why I speak to them in parables, because for all their seeing they do not see and for all their hearing they neither hear nor understand. In their case the prophecy of Isaiah is being fulfilled: 'You will hear and hear but never understand, You will see and see but never perceive. For the heart of this people is obtuse, Their ears are heavy of hearing, their eyes they have closed, Lest they see with their eyes and hear with their ears, Lest they understand with their heart and turn again for me to cure them.'" [957]

The most scathing language in all the Scriptures was used by Jesus in His denunciation of the blind Jewish leaders who opposed His every word and step. Let those who think He spoke only soft, sweet words read all of Matthew's twenty-third chapter and note the authority and finality in His statements. Here are a few of them, lest we forget: "But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees (Jews), hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men...ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation...Woe unto you, ye blind guides, which say, Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the temple, he is a debtor! Ye fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gold, or the temple that sanctifieth the gold?...Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell (Ferrar Fenton: 'the fury of hell')?...Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation...Behold, your house is left unto you desolate."

Thus ended the generation that sought to put out the Light of the world by crucifying the Lord of life and glory, sinful man's only Savior and wandering Israel's Redeemer. Fortunately for us, the atrocious deeds of evil men are powerless to stop the onward march of God's plan for His people.

The death of Jesus ended, not in defeat, but in the wonder of His Resurrection and the inauguration of a new, world-changing Christian Age. This marvelous era is to culminate in the personal return of Christ as King, according to the angel Gabriel's statement to Mary: "And the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David: and he shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of his kingdom thee shall be no end." [958]

What, now, shall we say of the present state of affairs in the modern house (or nations) of Jacob, to whom Christ gave the custody of the Kingdom of God when He took it from official Jewry [959]? Despite the Gospel's shining light for almost twenty centuries, the condition is blindness, deplorable blindness. In fact, Christians of the Western world are so blind today that they do not even suspect that they are God's chosen Israel. They are wholly ignorant of plain statements in Jeremiah, Hebrews, and elsewhere, which declare that the New Covenant, like the Old, was made with the House of Israel.[960] One must be blind indeed when he cannot see that, if we were not the true Israel of the covenants, we would not be the leading Christian peoples of the world today.

Jesus, the Savior and Redeemer, came to a remnant of Israel in Judea, as the prophets had written centuries before. To the faithful few who received Him, Jesus gave the great commission to go forth as His witnesses and take the Gospel to all the world. But note particularly that He had already laid upon His disciples the necessity of taking the Gospel first to the wandering Israelites in other lands, the beloved sheep of His pasture. For love of them, Jesus said to His disciples: "But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel...I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel." [961]

The apostles understood what Jesus meant by "the lost sheep." He was not referring to Jewry, but to the dispersed multitudes of all the Israelitish tribes. That they so interpreted His meaning is evidenced by the fact that soon after His Resurrection and Ascension, when the great missionary enterprise began, they went immediately to various centers in Asia Minor and Europe, where the "twelve tribes" were "scattered abroad." [962] These people never returned to Palestine after the Captivities. They were never called Jews. They were so blinded by their pagan surroundings that they had forgotten they were Israel,[963] and sometimes referred to themselves as Gentiles, exactly as their Christian descendants are doing now.

It was customary in the time of the apostles to call any uncircumcised person "a gentile." In that sense the twelve tribes scattered abroad were "gentiles," for they were them, and remain to this day, an uncircumcised people. Paul's Epistle to the Romans cannot be elucidated until one learns that it was written to Israelites who, in the main, had lost their identity and became paganized. Doubtless Paul and Barnabas had this meaning in mind when they said to the Jews at Antioch in Pisidia: "It was necessary that the word of God should first have been spoken to you (a Judah segment of Israel, he is not talking to the Israelites, but to Jews): but seeing ye put it from you, and judge yourselves unworthy of everlasting life, lo, we turn to the Gentiles." [964]

The woeful plight of the Anglo-Saxon-Germanic peoples at the preset time is the direct result of ignorance concerning their Israel lineage and heritage. For some years now the two great Christian nations, the United States and Britain, have been surrendering their leadership in world affairs to Zionist Jews, in the foolish belief that these anti-Christian schemers are God's chosen people. What a break for international gangsters who are taking full advantage of the situation! Masquerading as the holy people of the Bible, and recognized as such by the leaders and laity of Christian Churches, they are getting away with every conceivable type of lying propaganda and usurpation all over the globe. Unless Christians wake up and wrest control of government and finance from the hands of these destroyers, they will soon be writhing in the coils of a worldwide satanic dictatorship.

Isaiah gives a vivid picture of conditions in Christian Israel lands at the present moment: "Who is blind, but my servant? or deaf, as my messenger that I sent?...But this is a people robbed and spoiled; they are all of them snared in holes, and they are hid in prison houses: they are for a prey, and none delivereth; for a spoil, and none saith, Restore. Who among you will give ear to this? who will hearken and hear for the time to come? Who gave Jacob for a spoil, and Israel to the robbers? did not the Lord, he against whom we have sinned? for they would not walk in his ways, neither were they obedient unto his law." [965]

Make no mistake about it, the circle of the serpent is about ready to close on free men and Christian civilization. Have we waited too late to join hands in resistance to this deadly peril? Only the intervention of God can save us now, though He will not hold us guiltless if we make no effort to save ourselves.

The oppressed people of all nations have looked hopefully to the Christians of the United States for wisdom and guidance, but our so-called Judeo Christian leaders have failed them as totally as Solomon failed the kings of the earth his time.

Christ, Himself, has warned us about the Judeo-Christian teachers of today: "And he said, Take heed that ye be not deceived: for many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and the time draweth near: go ye not therefore after them." [966] Moreover, they have missed the mark on the same issues that led to Solomon's downfall; namely, departure from the true faith in God, which led, inevitably, to the repudiation of His unchanging fundamental laws.

Jesus did not revoke any of the basic laws which God ordained for His Kingdom in Israel. One of these laws is racial separation. It has not been altered "one jot or one tittle" by Christ and His Gospel. "Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill," Jesus declared. Only the old ordinances of worship through animal sacrifice were abolished by the New Covenant - the New Testament. God's Laws for the Nations of Christian Israel stand impregnable, awaiting our recognition, obedience and fulfillment. Accepting Christ as Savior does not license one to violate any of God's established laws or commands; on the contrary, a Christian is all the more obligated to obey them, as Christ explained in Matthew 5:17-22.

Sometimes people wonder why the educated and well-to-do are always in the forefront of socialistic projects. It is to be expected, if one judges by the past history of our race. In every period of decline in Israel, the officials, the prominent, the educated, have been notoriously blind and stupid. Isaiah, writing of an evil time, disclosed the root of their troubles: "For the leaders of this people cause them to err; and they that are led of them are destroyed." [967]

Malachi also reveals treachery on the part of the leaders in his time: "For the priest's lips should keep knowledge, and they should seek the law at his mouth: for he is the messenger of the Lord of hosts. But ye are departed out of the way; ye have caused many to stumble at the law; ye have corrupted the covenant of Levi, saith the Lord of hosts. Therefore have I also made you contemptible and base before all the people, according as ye have not kept my ways, but have been partial in the law." [968]

The utter confusion which prevails among our people, rich, poor, educated, unlearned, politician, preacher, teacher, cannot be more aptly described than in Isaiah 29:9-12: "Stay yourselves, and wonder; cry ye out, and cry: they are drunken, but not with wine; they stagger, but not with strong drink. For the Lord hath poured out upon you the spirit of deep sleep, and hath closed your eyes: the prophets and your rulers, the seers hath he covered. And the vision of all is become unto you as the words of a book that is sealed, which men deliver to one that is learned, saying, Read this, I pray thee: and he saith, I cannot; for it is sealed: And the book is delivered to him that is not learned, saying, Read this, I pray thee: and he saith, I am not learned." [969]

Paradoxically, this present age, which has received the greatest light, is also the age of greatest darkness and blindness. "The earth shall quake before them; the heavens shall tremble: the sun (Jacob) and the moon (Rachel) shall be dark, and the stars (tribes of Israel) shall withdraw their shining...The sun and the moon shall be darkened, and the stars shall withdraw their shining." [970]

Consequently the warning words of Jesus the Christ should be of special significance to our generation: "If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness!...Can the blind lead the blind? Shall they not both fall into the ditch?" [971]

A Spiritual Thread........................................................................................................................................................ 1

The Bible.................................................................................................................................................................. 17

Serpent.................................................................................................................................................................... 33

Abraham and His Seed.............................................................................................................................................. 41

The Birthright............................................................................................................................................................ 41

Ephraim and Manasseh............................................................................................................................................. 41

Judah's Blessing....................................................................................................................................................... 42

Selections and Rejections.......................................................................................................................................... 42

Samuel Anointed David.............................................................................................................................................. 42

David's House........................................................................................................................................................... 42

Established Forever................................................................................................................................................... 43

The Throne................................................................................................................................................................ 43

Throne Over Israel...................................................................................................................................................... 46

Throne In Israel.......................................................................................................................................................... 46

Use Of Terms............................................................................................................................................................ 46

Jews Reject Christ..................................................................................................................................................... 47

Political Zionism........................................................................................................................................................ 47

Israel's Withdrawal..................................................................................................................................................... 48

Prophecy Regarding The House Of Israel..................................................................................................................... 49

Where Is The "Appointed Place"?............................................................................................................................... 49

Assyrian Captivity ..................................................................................................................................................... 53

Babylonian Captivity 604 B.C...................................................................................................................................... 54

Now, God Had A Problem.......................................................................................................................................... 56

Israel A Nation Always............................................................................................................................................... 59

A Curse and A Reproach............................................................................................................................................ 60

Judgment Upon Zionism............................................................................................................................................. 60

Promised Retribution................................................................................................................................................. 60

Israel Revolts............................................................................................................................................................ 61

Kingdom Taken From David........................................................................................................................................ 61

Benjamin Remained................................................................................................................................................... 61

The Captivities........................................................................................................................................................... 61

The Westward Trek.................................................................................................................................................... 62

The Latter Days......................................................................................................................................................... 62

Israel Christianized.................................................................................................................................................... 63

Christianity - Religion Of The West.............................................................................................................................. 63

West and Christianity Synonymous............................................................................................................................ 63

Established Facts Are Undeniable.............................................................................................................................. 64

Western Civilization Unexportable............................................................................................................................... 64

Transformation By Cannon......................................................................................................................................... 65

Military Force - Not Love............................................................................................................................................ 65

White Missionaries Murdered..................................................................................................................................... 65

Jews Under A Curse.................................................................................................................................................. 66

Israel and The Jew..................................................................................................................................................... 67

Name As A Curse..................................................................................................................................................... 67

The Return From Babylon........................................................................................................................................... 67

Jews Condemn Themselves........................................................................................................................................ 67

Herod Was On The Throne In Palestine....................................................................................................................... 67

Evil Figs................................................................................................................................................................... 68

The Fig Trees............................................................................................................................................................ 68

Condemned For Unfruitfulness.................................................................................................................................... 68

Modern Israel............................................................................................................................................................ 68

Not His People.......................................................................................................................................................... 68

The Verdict Is Failure................................................................................................................................................. 69

From The Bottomless Pit........................................................................................................................................... 69

Evil Machination........................................................................................................................................................ 70

Division of U.S. Plotted In London............................................................................................................................... 87

Intervention of the Czar of Russia Saved The United States........................................................................................... 87

Booth's Code Found In Benjamin Trunk....................................................................................................................... 87

The First No-Win War In History................................................................................................................................. 91

Israeli's Attempt to Sink The U.S.S. Liberty:............................................................................................................... 115

President Johnson and the U.S.S Liberty Incident:...................................................................................................... 115

Messianic Complex................................................................................................................................................. 126

A Jewish Chronology of Jewish Messiahs.................................................................................................................. 126

A Major Blunder....................................................................................................................................................... 127

Misapplication of Prophecy....................................................................................................................................... 127

Malignant Evil.......................................................................................................................................................... 128

Unholy Zionism........................................................................................................................................................ 128

Origin of the Word Jew............................................................................................................................................. 129

Who Are The Pharisees? Are The "Jews" Israel?........................................................................................................ 135

The Shelah Connection............................................................................................................................................ 135

Shelah-Judah.......................................................................................................................................................... 137

Jews From Elath...................................................................................................................................................... 138

What The Jews Teach About Christ........................................................................................................................... 146

References to Christians.......................................................................................................................................... 146

What Difference Does Israel TheIdentity Truth Make?.................................................................................................. 173

North America Was Inhabited By Israelites 1000 Years or More Before 1492................................................................. 176

The Kol Nidre.......................................................................................................................................................... 197

The "Sacred" Star of David........................................................................................................................................ 198

Jewish Ritual Murder................................................................................................................................................ 207

Jews Protest Sacrifice Tale on Oprah Show............................................................................................................... 207

Could Jewish Ritual Murder Still Exist?...................................................................................................................... 208

The History of Jewish Human Sacrifice...................................................................................................................... 208

The Church Is A Creature Of The State...................................................................................................................... 251

The Lion, The Lamb and The Blood............................................................................................................................ 259

The Doctrine Of Christ.............................................................................................................................................. 263

The Brotherhood Of Man........................................................................................................................................... 281

America Is A Conquered Nation................................................................................................................................ 283

Public Law 102-14 and Its Implication To Christian Americans..................................................................................... 283

Jewish Zaddik has power over life and death............................................................................................................... 286

The Bride Of Christ.................................................................................................................................................. 291

This Blind Age......................................................................................................................................................... 296

[1] Genesis 3:15.

[2] Proverbs 29:10.

[3] The Light and The Glory, Peter Marshall and David Irving, p. 266. Quoting William Livingston as related in a New York Newspaper.

[4] 2 Samuel 7:10; 1 Chronicles 17:9.

[5] 1 Corinthians 3:22‑23.

[6] Genesis 17:6, 16.

[7] Genesis 17:7.

[8] Isaiah 62:2.

[9] Jeremiah 31:31.

[10] Hebrews 9:8‑13.

[11] Hebrews 12:24.

[12] 1 Corinthians 14:15.

[13] Proverbs 25:2.

[14] Genesis 48:5.

[15] Genesis 48:20.

[16] Genesis 48:19.

[17] Deuteronomy 33:17.

[18] Principles and Acts of the Revolution in America, p. 198.

[19] The New Heavens and the New Earth, p. 59.

[20] Psalm 87:2‑6.

[21] Jeremiah 31:33.

[22] Isaiah 51:1‑2.

[23] Isaiah 43:1‑4.

[24] 1 Kings 8:53.

[25] Psalm 135:4.

[26] Deuteronomy 7:6.

[27] Deuteronomy 14:2.

[28] Exodus 17:16.

[29] Luke 19:27.

[30] Isaiah 1:21-23.

[31] Isaiah 1:24-26.

[32] Revelation 22:14.

[33] Psalm 118:19-20.

[34] Revelation 22:15.

[35] Matthew 25:31.

[36] Psalm 103:20.

[37] 1 Thessalonians 3:12-13.

[38] 2 Thessalonians 1:7.

[39] Revelation 3:12.

[40] Ephesians 4:15.

[41] Romans 6:6-19.

[42] Romans 8:7.

[43] Matthew 22:37.

[44] Acts 5:32.

[45] 1 Thessalonians 2:19.

[46] Revelation 21:1-3.

[47] Revelation 21:10-12.

[48] Revelation 21:22-23.

[49] Revelation 22:5.

[50] Hebrews 11:12-13; 12:22-29.

[51] Matthew 5:14.

[52] 2 Peter 2:1.

[53] 1 Titus 1:14.

[54] Hosea 12:1.

[55] 1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3.

[56] H. G. Wells, The Outline of History.

[57] Isaiah 49:6.

[58] Genesis 48:16, 19.

[59] Exodus 23:20-23.

[60] Deuteronomy 7:7-8.

[61] Isaiah 43:10-12, 21.

[62] Exodus 19:3-4.

[63] Exodus 19:5-6.

[64] Exodus 19:8.

[65] Isaiah 54:5.

[66] Isaiah 43:1.

[67] Jeremiah 14:9.

[68] Jeremiah 31:32.

[69] Jeremiah 3:6, 8-9, 20.

[70] Deuteronomy 24:1.

[71] Hosea 1:2-3.

[72] Hosea 1:9.

[73] Hosea 2:2.

[74] Hosea 2:6.

[75] John 8:32.

[76] Rev. 17:2.

[77] Matthew 23:30.

[78] Matthew 23:31.

[79] Matthew 23:30-35 and Luke 11:49-51.

[80] Malachi 1:4.

[81] Ezekiel 36:2.

[82] Obadiah 18.

[83] John 8:4

[84] John 8:44-47.

[85] John 10:25.

[86] John 10:26.

[87] 1 Hessalonians 2:14.

[88] 1 Thessalonians 2:14-15; John 19:14-18; Acts 2:26; 4:8-10; 5:30; 10:39; 13:27-29; Luke 24:20.

[89] 1 John 2:22-23.

[90] 1 John 4:2-3.

[91] 2 John 7.

[92] Revelation 20:2.

[93] John 6:44.

[94] 1 John 3:9.

[95] 1 Peter 1:23.

[96] 1 Corinthians 13:10.

[97] 2 Chronicles 19:2.

[98] Psalm 139:21-22.

[99] Ezekiel 25:14.

[100] Liszi, Franz, 19th century Hungarian Musician.

[101] Die Israeliten - Editor William Grimstad's comments.

[102] Git. 56b-57a.

[103] Git. 56b.

[104] Rabbi Lunat Charski, quoted in The Jewish Assault on Christianity, page 44.

[105] Jewish World, March 15, 1924.

[106] Rabbi Ben Hecht.

[107] Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, pages 9, 19, 23, 30 and 95.

[108] National Jewish Information Service, 6412 W. Olympic Blvd. L.A. CA.

[109] Rocky Mountain News, Tuesday, December 9, 1980.

[110] Revelation 2:7.

[111] Revelation 2:11.

[112] Revelation 2:17.

[113] Revelation 2:26.

[114] Revelation 3:5.

[115] Revelation 3:12.

[116] Revelation 3:21.

[117] Revelation 3:21.

[118] John 2:19-20.

[119] John 2:21-22.

[120] Genesis 3:1.

[121] Exodus 4:2‑3.

[122] Second College Edition, New World Dictionary of the American Language, p. 1135.

[123] Genesis 49:17.

[124] Psalm 58:3‑4.

[125] Psalm 140:1‑3.

[126] Isaiah 27:1.

[127] Genesis 49:9.

[128] Genesis 49:11.

[129] Genesis 49:14.

[130] Genesis 49:21.

[131] Genesis 49:22.

[132] Genesis 49:27.

[133] Numbers 23:24; 24:9.

[134] Deuteronomy 33:20.

[135] Deuteronomy 33:22.

[136] Throughout the Book of Revelation.

[137] Jeremiah 12:9.

[138] Isaiah 46:11.

[139] Jeremiah 16:16.

[140] Ezekiel 32:2.

[141] Luke 13:32.

[142] Matthew 16:12.

[143] Numbers 22:21‑23.

[144] Genesis 3:1.

[145] New World Dictionary of the American Language, Second College Edition, p. 1420‑21.

[146] Rene Groos, Le Nouveau Mercure, Paris, May, 1927.

[147] Jeremiah 11:9.

[148] So said the Jew Marcus Eli Ravage, Century magazine 2/1928.

[149] Ezekiel 11:15.

[150] Ezekiel 36:2-3.

[151] Genesis 36:8.

[152] Jewish Encyclopedia.

[153] Ezekiel 36:4-5.

[154] Jewish Banker Paul Warburg, February 17, 1950, as he testified before the U.S. Senate.

[155] Hosea 2:6.

[156] John 8:34-39.

[157] 1 Chronicles 5:1-2.

[158] Genesis 48:19-20.

[159] Genesis 48:16.

[160] Genesis 49:9-10.

[161] 1 Samuel 16:11-13.

[162] Judges 8:30‑31.

[163] Judges 9:6.

[164] 1 Samuel 7:16.

[165] Psalm 89:3-4, 20, 28-37.

[166] Jeremiah 33:17.

[167] Psalm 89:4.

[168] Psalm 89:37.

[169] Genesis 1:27.

[170] Psalms 132:11.

[171] 1 Kings 12:20.

[172] Nehemiah 13:1.

[173] Deuteronomy 7:1.

[174] Matthew 1:12, Luke 3:27.

[175] Luke 1:5.

[176] Isaiah 61:2.

[177] 1 Kings 19:18.

[178] Isaiah 45:4.

[179] Ezekiel 11:15.

[180] The Incredible Hoax, p. 133.

[181] Jewish Encyclopedia.

[182] Ezekiel 25:14.

[183] Study in Revelation, Howard B. Rand, pp. 280-281.

[184] Genesis 48.

[185] Genesis 25:30; 32:3; 36:1; 36:8; 36:19; 36:43.

[186] Isaiah 21:11.

[187] Psalm 137:7.

[188] Ezekiel 25:12.

[189] Psalm 137:7.

[190] Amos 1:6.

[191] Obadiah 1-18.

[192] 2 Samuel 7:10; 1 Chronicles 17:9.

[193] Ezekiel 11:16-20.

[194] Amos 9:8-9.

[195] 2 Samuel 7:10.

[196] 1 Chronicles 17:9.

[197] Isaiah 49:12.

[198] Isaiah 49:8.

[199] Jeremiah 31:2.

[200] Isaiah 49:8‑12.

[201] 1 Maccabees 12:2, 6.

[202] 2 Samuel 7:10; 1 Chronicles 17:9.

[203] 1 Chronicles 16:15-16.

[204] 2 Esdras 13:39.

[205] Acts 2:14, 22.

[206] Acts 7:38.

[207] Deuteronomy 7:1.

[208] 2 John 1:7.

[209] 2 Chronicles 7:14.

[210] Hebrews 6:13.

[211] Genesis 18:18; 22:18; 26:4; Psalm 72:17; Galatians 3:8.

[212] Jeremiah 3:8.

[213] 1 Peter 2:9.

[214] Revelation 21:9, 12‑14, 19:7.

[215] Revelation 5:13.

[216] Isaiah 45:23.

[217] Matthew 6:10.

[218] Acts 2:47, 5:15, 14:21, 24.

[219] Isaiah 53:9.

[220] Folio page 2492.

[221] Jeremiah 31:33.

[222] Jeremiah 31:35-36.

[223] Jeremiah 29:17-19.

[224] Ezekiel 11:21.

[225] 2 Chronicles 10:16-19; 11:1.

[226] 1 Kings 11:35-36.

[227] Zechariah 11:12-14.

[228] Jeremiah 6:1.

[229] 2 Esdras 13:39-46.

[230] Jeremiah 1:20; 18:9; 24:6; 31:28.

[231] Micah 2:12-13.

[232] 2 Samuel 7:10; 1 Chronicles 17:9.

[233] Deuteronomy 4:25-30.

[234] Jeremiah 30:22-24; 31:1-2.

[235] Isaiah 65:12.

[236] Genesis 5:1‑2.

[237] Isaiah 62:2.

[238] Isaiah 65:15.

[239] Hosea 2:17.

[240] Amos 9:9.

[241] Isaiah 65:13-15.

[242] Nehemiah 13:23-25.

[243] Matthew 27:25.

[244] Matthew 21:43.

[245] Jeremiah 24:9-10.

[246] Matthew 21:18-19.

[247] Genesis 28:14.

[248] Daniel 11:15-16.

[249] Daniel 11:15-16.

[250] Study in Daniel, Howard Rand, pp. 281-283.

[251] Study in Daniel, pp. 310-311.

[252] Zechariah 12:6-9.

[253] John 8:44.

[254] Smoke to Smother, pp. 213-214.

[255] Benedict Arnold, by Charles Sellers, pp. 197-240.

[256] Life of John Marshall, p. 109, Beveridge, Vol. I.

[257] Little has been published about the early life of Abraham Lincoln. However, during a search of some old property records and will in a small courthouse in central North Carolina, Alex Christopher the author of "Pandora's Box,"; in one of the old will books dated around 1840, he found the will of one A.A. Springs. Upon reading the will he was shocked and amazed at the secret that it disclosed, but one must remember that it is a known fact that wills, even though they are classified public records the same as property and corporation records, they are rarely combed through as he was doing at the time, and these records hold many dark secrets that can be hidden in public view, but are never uncovered because there are very few who research these old records.

This practice of hiding secrets in public view and the conspirators can say, when faced with the facts and accused of concealing the records; they can reply "Well it was there in the public record in plan view for any and all to find." In the will of A.A. Springs was the list of his property. it went into detail to whom the property was to be dispersed and it included his children. Mr. Christopher and others were looking to find what railroads and banks this man might have owned and had left to his son Leroy Springs. He didn't find anything like that, but he did find the prize of the century. On the bottom of page three of four pages was a paragraph where the father, A.A. Springs, left to his son an enormous amount of land in the state of Alabama which amounted to the land that is today known as Huntsville, Alabama and then he went into detail to name the son and at first Mr. Christopher and the others with him couldn't believe what they were seeing, but there it was the name of the son and it was "Abraham Lincoln!"

This new information that they had about the Springs (real name Springstein) family, this was just another twist to add to the already manipulative family. This new information about Lincoln built a fire under them to see where this new lead would take them, because everything they had found in the railroad and banking saga had been areal mind-bender. They figured this one would be the same; so they inquired at the local archives and historical records on families and found a reference to one Abraham Lincoln in the family genealogy of the family of the Carolina by the name of McAdden, in a published genealogy on the family. The family members in the Carolinas were in a limited edition that at one time could be found in the public libraries. The section on Lincoln and the story went something like the following: "In the late spring of the year of 1808 Nancy Hanks, who was of the family lineage of the McAdden family was visiting some of her family in the community of Lincolnton, North Carolina. While on her stay with family in the Carolina', she vistaed with many of the neighboring families that she had known for many years; one such visit was the Springs family. The sordid details had been omitted but obviously the young Nancy Hanks had found herself in a compromised position and was forced to succumb to the lust of A.A. Springs. She became pregnant as a result. There were no details of a love affair or an act of violence on a helpless female. Abraham Lincoln was the result of that act, which leads one to wonder if the name Lincoln was real or a fabricated name for the are of conception was Lincolnton. Was there really a Thomas Lincoln? Since the Spring were of the race that called themselves Jewish, that made Lincoln part Jewish and as part of the Springs family, he also became a relative of the Rothschild family by blood."

The following information was derived from information that exists in the Smithsonian, National Archives, the Congressional Library, Courtroom Police files, public and private libraries and storage vaults across the United States and Europe: "Abraham Lincoln was slapped three times with a white glove by a member of the Hapsburg royal family of Germany (Payseur family relatives) during a White House reception in 1862. The German royal family member demanded a pistol duel with the, then, President of the United States, Abraham Lincoln. The blows to the face stunned Lincoln but he non-verbally refused to participate in the duel by bowing his head before walking out of the reception room. What had ol' honest Abe done to so enrage and up-set the royal European personage?

It seems that the practice of promiscuity was running rampant in many families in those days and the German King Leopold had, had an illegitimate daughter named Elizabeth who was sent to America, where she lived in a very comfortable manner. Although Leopold could not recognize her position, he was very interested in her life.

In the early or mid 1850s, Abraham Lincoln and Elizabeth began having sexual liaisons that produced twin daughters named Ella and Emily in 1856. The regal German father who was so royally up-set with ol' honest Abe probably had full knowledge of what the true blood line of Lincoln really was. Abraham's wife, Mary Todd Lincoln, did not find out about Elizabeth, Ella and Emily until 1865. Previous to being informed about Elizabeth and the twins, Mrs. Lincoln had developed a ravaging dependency on opium. Her main supplier of the drug was a former member of the Confederate Intelligence community, he was a former member because the Southern gentlemen did not approve of his drug pushing and unreliable behavior. It was because of his involvement with the Souther Intelligence Community, Mary's supplier - John Wilks Booth - knew about the lover and the illegal twins.

After being spurned by the Confederate intelligence community, Mary's 'candy man' approached and became involved with the Rothschild Empire of Europe, for he realized the European banking moguls would be very interested in his pipeline to the White House.

(At this time) Abraham was searching for an issue that would unite the North and South AFTER the Civil War ended. The issue needed to be popular to all levels of American citizenry so they could 'rally around the Stars and Stripes' thus rapidly healing the wounds of the bloodiest war in history. Lincoln was seriously considering one major movement or event that would galvanize his fellow Northern and Southern patriot countrymen into cutting loose the United States of America from the dictatorial grip of the Hapsbergs bloodline of banking control in Europe. All the time, the Rothschilds were trying to take control of the entire world monetary system, and at that time the Rothschilds were trying to get a foot-hold in America and find a way around the British, Virginia Company, and French Bourbon family that were gaining control in this country through government help...

Lincoln found himself in real hot water, because under the Virginia Company covenant the 48 families that formed it were all of the Holy Grail Bloodline. This country was to be an extension of what all the royal families of Europe controlled. The royalty of Europe is Hapsburg, no matter what their name is. The royal family of England is one such example. Now what Lincoln did is he wanted to become independent of the cogenant (in favor of his family) on the Rothschild side...the Rothschilds and their family bloodline have always been undermining the affairs of the Hapsbergs and stealing the monetary control away from them. No matter what the history books say, the Rothschilds didn't get (total) real control on things in America and the Federal Reserve until the Springs usurped the Payseur family companies in the early 1920s...

(But Lincoln had fallen from Rothschild grace also and so, due, in part to his Executive Order to print United States Greenbacks, thus interfering with the Jewish International Banks profits) It appears that the Rothschild family wanted Lincoln embarrassed to the maximum degree. (So) Mary Todd's drug dealer (John Wilks Booth) was hired to kidnap the President of the United States. Abraham would be put on a boat for a two month cruise of the Atlantic where he would be injected with and addicted to opium and then dumped on the streets of Washington. While the forcefully addicted President was stumbling around our nation's capital, the press would be informed of Elizabeth, Ella and Emily.

The drug pusher (Booth) and collaborator (agent) of the Rothschilds had his perfect accomplice in the plot to kidnap and discredit the leader of the North American continent in the First Lady Mary Todd Lincoln. After being informed of Abe's lover and the twins and the kidnap plot by her drug supplier, Mary was promised that after her husband resigned or was impeached, she and Abe would be moved to Europe to live happily ever after with plenty of opium. Superficially Mary expressed a desire to live in Europe with plenty of opium and no Civil War or politics to distract her husband or family. But her drug suppler had totally underestimated the confusion, desperation and anger of Mary Todd Lincoln.

The plotters decided the Presidential snatch needed to take place in a public, yet discreet location where minimum witnesses would be present. There were too many potential witnesses at the White House. Two hours before the capture was to take place, Mary Todd had on the floor, a tantrum, because Abe had decided not to go out of the White House that night. Mary's outrageous outburst caused Abe to change his mind and the First family departed. Several minutes after arriving at the kidnap location, Mary instructed the family bodyguard to take a position that placed the First Family out of his visual sight. The position also required the bodyguard to traverse several flights of stairs to reach Abe and Mary should he be needed for any reason...A wagon with a wooden cover arrived at the back entrance of the kidnap location with several men including Mary's opium supplier. The plan was for the drug pusher to traverse the backstairs entrance, silently move down a hallway, and open an unlocked door to a darkened room where Mary and Abe were sitting.

After entering the room, Mary's drug man (Booth) would tell the President an urgent message was waiting for him at the War Department. Before descending down the backstairs, Abe would be knocked out with a chloroform loth. The kidnappers would load the limp body into the covered wagon and swiftly stow Lincoln on an opium boat for a novel 'cruise' of the Atlantic Ocean. When Booth actually opened the door to the darkened room where Abe and Mary were sitting, he went into a panic and shock. Abe was asleep with his head on Mary's left shoulder and the First Lady had her head turned toward the left looking at the door...When she was sure the man who opened the door was Booth, she turned and looked at the President to be sure the pistol she was pointing would explode beneath the lower left earlobe of her husband.

Before Mary pulled the trigger, John Wilkes Booth, drug supplier to the First Lady, realized he was the patsy in all this mess. But he did not know if he was only Mary's patsy or also a chump for the Rothschild family. Were the men hiding around the back door of Ford's Theater there to help Booth with the kidnaping or there to point the false finger at the 'innocent' Booth? Booth was not about to run into the hallway or down the backstairs to find out the answer to that question. The only escape route was to jump the balcony and crash onto the stage during the performance. That night, Booth gave a literal interpretation of the theatrical phrase 'brake a leg' as he fractured one of his during his leaping act from 'lethally looney Mary' and the men lurking around the back entrance of Ford's Theater.

In a novelty case on a wall in Ford's Theater is 'The Gun That Shot Abraham Lincoln.' If anyone (assassin) were to kill a head of state, they would use a revolver, because several bullets might be needed to accomplish the murder and stop any guards during the escape. One would only use a one-shot pistol if they were absolutely sure they had intimate access to the victim. The gun on the wall of Ford's Theater is a derringer-the perfect weapon for the left handed female assassin who did not attend her husbands funeral. Mary Todd was not hiding in her room due to overwhelming grief and sorrow; she was imprisoned in her room with two armed guards for two weeks after killing her husband.

In the 1860s, an act of Congress mandated the compensation of widows of former and active Congressmen, Senators, Vice Presidents and Presidents. The mouth and duration was ratified by both Houses of Congress for each widow. Mary Todd Lincoln applied for her widowers compensation three times and was denied the mandated compensation three times by both Houses of Congress. An unknown benefactor paid for Mary's passage to Europe where she died in small cottage in Germany.

In 1867, the Secret Service was founded so that drunken municipal law enforcement could not unwittingly participate with drug-addicted First Ladies or Gentlemen in vengeful high-brow killings of philandering Presidents of the United States. (To cover up the murders committed which would reflect a bad light for the presiding Administration, such as the Foster murder is doing at the present time).

Before Booth jumped out of the balcony of the Presidential Box of the Ford Theater, he shouted at General Riley and his wife who were sitting to the right-front of the Lincolns. Booth's words expressed his innocence but also sealed the fate of the Rileys. Within a week of the shooting, General Riley and his wife were packed off to an insane asylum where they both died of 'unknown causes' within 30 days of being committed." (Pandora's Box, by Alex Christopher, pp. 282-286).

[258] The Mad Booths of Maryland.

[259] Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652.

[260] I Confess, p. 22.

[261] I Confess, p. 60;.

[262] Economist Stuart Crane.

[263] Nahum Goldman, President World Jewish Congress.

[264] Victor Serges wrote "The evolution of Soviet Communism was completed in 1936...from revolutionary internationalism to a nationalism of great military power served, in various countries, by parties which it subsidized. After July 1936 the Stalinites formed the unified Socialist Party affiliated with the Third International...and the object of Stalinism is to establish the new power of a Fascist nature to encircle France, the probably ally of Russia, IN THE WAR THAT IS BEING PREPARED."

[265] It is proven with a study of history that the German Generals and top-level officials who negotiated the 'Abmachungen' were the ones condemned to death at the Nuremberg Trials as War Criminals because they knew too much, and the names of those conspirators who plotted World War II, Korea and Vietnam.

[266] For proof of that, order my book titled "Communism Is Jewish."

[267] Propaganda in the Next War, by Sidney Rogerson, p. 148

[268] Eisenhower's West Point Yearbook, the year he graduated from West Point.

[269] Chief Rabbi in France, in 1859, Rabbi Reichorn.

[270] ex‑CIA official, 9/3/1979, Newsweek.

[271] The International Jew, Vol. IV (1922) pp. 171, 173.

[272] "The Jews were now free to indulge in their most fervent fantasies of mass murder of helpless victims. Christians were dragged from their beds, tortured and killed. Some were actually sliced to pieces, bit by bit, while others were branded with hot irons, their eyes poked out to induce unbearable pain. Others were placed in boxes with only their heads, hands and legs sticking out. Then hungry rats were placed in the boxes to gnaw upon their bodies. Some were nailed to the ceiling by their fingers or by their feet, and left hanging until they died of exhaustion. Others were chained to the floor and left hanging until they died of exhaustion. Others were chained to the floor and hot lead poured into their mouths. Many were tied to horses and dragged through the streets of the city, while Jewish mobs attacked them with rocks and kicked them to death. Christian mothers were taken to the public square and their babies snatched from their arms. A red Jewish terrorist would take the baby, hold it by the feet, head downward and demand that the Christian mother deny Christ. If she would not, he would toss the baby into the air, and another member of the mob would rush forward and catch it on the tip of his bayonet.

Pregnant Christian women were chained to trees and their babies cut out of their bodies. There were many places of public execution in Russia during the days of the revolution, one of which was described by the American Rohrbach Commission: 'The whole cement floor of the execution hall of the Jewish Cheka of Kiev was flooded with blood; it formed a level of several inches. It was a horrible mixture of blood, brains and pieces of skull. All the walls were bespattered with blood. Pieces of brains and of scalps were sticking to them. A gutter of 25 centimeters wide by 25 centimeters deep and about 10 meters long was along its length full to the top with blood.

Some bodies were disemboweled, others had limbs chopped off, some were literally hacked to pieces. Some had their eyes put out, the head, face and neck and trunk were covered with deep wounds. Further on, we found a corpse with a wedge driven into its chest. Some had no tongues. In a corner we discovered a quantity of dismembered arms and legs belonging to no bodies that we could locate.'" (Defender Magazine, October 1933).

"The Red Terror became so wide‑spread that it is impossible to give here all the details of the principal means employed by the (Jewish) Cheka(s) to master resistance; one of the most important is that of hostages, taken among all social classes. These are held responsible for any anti‑Bolshevist movements (revolts, the White Army, strikes, refusal of a village to give its harvest etc.) and are immediately executed. Thus, for the assassination of the Jew Ouritzky, member of the Extraordinary Commission of Petrograd, several thousands of them were put to death, and many of these unfortunate men and women suffered before death various tortures inflicted by cold‑blooded cruelty in the prisons of the Cheka.

I have in front of me photographs taken at Kharkoff, in the presence of the Allied Missions, immediately after the Reds had abandoned the town; they consist of a series of ghastly reproductions such as: Bodies of three workmen taken as hostages from a factory which went on strike. One had his eyes burnt, his lips and nose cut off; the other two had their hands cut off.

The bodies of hostages, S. Afaniasouk and P. Prokpovitch, small landed proprietors, who were scalped by their executioners; S. Afaniasouk shows numerous burns caused by a white hot sword blade. The body of M. Bobroff, a former officer, who had his tongue and one hand cut off and the skin torn off from his left leg.

Human skin torn from the hands of several victims by means of a metallic comb. This sinister find was the result of a careful inspection of the cellar of the Extraordinary Commission of Kharkoff. The retired general Pontiafa, a hostage who had the skin of his right hand torn off and the genital parts mutilated.

Mutilated bodies of women hostages: S. Ivanovna, owner of a drapery business, Mme. A.L. Carolshaja, wife of a colonel, Mmo. Khlopova, a property owner. They had their breasts slit and emptied and the genital parts burnt and having trace of coal.

Bodies of four peasant hostages, Bondarenko, Pookhikle, Sevenetry, and Sidorfehouk, with atrociously mutilated faces, the genital parts having been operated upon by Chinese torturers in a manner unknown to European doctors in whose opinion the agony caused to the victims must have been dreadful.

It is impossible to enumerate all the forms of savagery which the Red Terror took. A volume would not contain them. The Cheka of Kharkoff, for example, in which Saenko operated, had the specialty of scalping victims and taking off the skin of their hands as one takes off a glove...At Voronege the victims were shut up naked in a barrel studded with nails which was then rolled about. Their foreheads were branded with a red hot iron FIVE POINTED STAR. At Tsaritsin and at Kamishin their bones were sawed...At Keif the victim was shut up in a chest containing decomposing corpses; after firing shots above his head his torturers told him that he would be buried alive. The chest was buried and opened again half an hour later when the interrogation of the victim was proceeded with. The scene was repeated several times over. It is not surprising that many victims went mad." (S.P. Melgounov, p. 164‑166; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 151‑153).

[273] Winston Churchill, Sunday Illustrated Herald, London, England, February 8, 1920.

[274] La Nouveau Mercure, Paris 1917, Rene Groos.

[275] Merchants of Grain, by Dan Morgan, pp. 31, 39, 157.

[276] 7/5/86, Washington Post.

[277] New York Post, 8/16/86.

[278] North New Jersey Herald News.

[279] Chicago Tribune 11/24/86.

[280] In a speech before a Jewish audience 11/6/86.

[281] Bismarck, 1876.

[282] This will be difficult for many to believe, one can hear them say, what:, England do that to this country? Why they are our greatest ally, we could not do without them. Let us look at the record and see just how much love there is for us in this pretended friendship.

To begin with, when we were at war with Spain, this great Churchill, "Churchill entered British Army 1895, serving with the Spanish forces and fired on the American forces. It was a little embarrassing when the Honorable William Langer of North Dakota made this announcement on the floor of the United States Senate. Mr. Churchill was in this country, because you know, we never hit a man behind his back, he was going to speak in Boston, a little more of the Churchillian propaganda. Learning that this statement had been made by the patriotic Senator Langer, Mr. Churchill was a little upset, he sent a telegram to the Honorable Tom Connally denying the fact. Good Friend, as he was, Senator Connally rose to his feet and read the telegram to the Senate.

Little did they realize that the records were available, that already these facts had been read to the Senate and were in the Congressional Record. Once again Senator Langer read the record to the Senate. Mr. Churchill is a brilliant man, but how stupid to try to deny what he has sanctioned in his biography, for you will find the record in World's Who's Who and a very good account in International Who's Who. The preface to these books states "This volume contains an authentic record of notable men and women throughout the world, page 114, 1940 edition: 'Winston Churchill...He entered the British Army 1895, serving with the Spanish forces against the American forces in Cuba."

International Who's Who, page 158, published by Europe Publications Ltd. London, 39 Belford Square, W.C. 1 the 13th edition, states: "Churchill entered the army in 1895, served in Cuba with Spanish forces against the Americans. The preface in this book states, 'We wish to express our thanks to all those who, by completing questionnaires or by correcting proofs sent to them have enabled us to bring information up to date and to remind others that unless proofs are returned, no responsibility can be accepted for the accuracy of their biographical records."

In 1946, the Biographical Encyclopedia of the World repeats: "Churchill entered the British Army 1895, serving with the Spanish forces in Cuba."

Webster's Biographical Dictionary, 1st edition by G. & C Merriam, publishers, Springfield, Mass., also states that "Churchill served in Cuba with the Spanish forces."

Current Biography, 1940 edition, published by H.W. Wilson Co., 950 University Avenue, New York City also states: "Churchill: He was with the Spanish forces in Cuba." It was repeated in 1942. It is here that we find Churchill quoted: "He had always thought it a pity that it all had to be so make believe, and that the age of wars between civilized nations had come to an end forever, now he, at least had an opportunity to join civilized Spain in a war against uncivilized Cuba."

Robert's account of Winston Churchill, 1928, Robert H. McBride, publishers, page 32, through Sir Henry Drummond, ambassador at Madrid, (Spain) Churchill: He joined the Spanish forces in Cuba in 1895. Spain conferred the 'Order of Military Merit, 1st class.'"

While the New York Times, which prints "all the news that is fit to print," in their issue of September 19, 1945 states: "Churchill fought with Spain in Cuba." (And Men Wept, by Catherine Palfrey Baldwin)

[283] The International Jew, Vol. IV (1922), pp. 171, 173.

[284] Mackenzie in his historical research entitled, The Nineteenth Century.

[285] Rabbi Reichorn, in Le Contemporain, July 1st, 1880.

[286] Little has been published about the early life of Abraham Lincoln. However, during a search of some old property records and will in a small courthouse in central North Carolina, Alex Christopher the author of "Pandora's Box,"; in one of the old will books dated around 1840, he found the will of one A.A. Springs. Upon reading the will he was shocked and amazed at the secret that it disclosed, but one must remember that it is a known fact that wills, even though they are classified public records the same as property and corporation records, they are rarely combed through as he was doing at the time, and these records hold many dark secrets that can be hidden in public view, but are never uncovered because there are very few who research these old records.

This practice of hiding secrets in public view and the conspirators can say, when faced with the facts and accused of concealing the records; they can reply "Well it was there in the public record in plan view for any and all to find." In the will of A.A. Springs was the list of his property. it went into detail to whom the property was to be dispersed and it included his children. Mr. Christopher and others were looking to find what railroads and banks this man might have owned and had left to his son Leroy Springs. He didn't find anything like that, but he did find the prize of the century. On the bottom of page three of four pages was a paragraph where the father, A.A. Springs, left to his son an enormous amount of land in the state of Alabama which amounted to the land that is today known as Huntsville, Alabama and then he went into detail to name the son and at first Mr. Christopher and the others with him couldn't believe what they were seeing, but there it was the name of the son and it was "ABRAHAM LINCOLN!"

"Abraham Lincoln was slapped three times with a white glove by a member of the Hapsburg royal family of Germany (Payseur family relatives) during a White House reception in 1862. The German royal family member demanded a pistol duel with the, then, President of the United States, Abraham Lincoln. The blows to the face stunned Lincoln but he non-verbally refused to participate in the duel by bowing his head before walking out of the reception room. What had ol' honest Abe done to so enrage and up-set the royal European personage?

(At this time) Abraham was searching for an issue that would unite the North and South After the Civil War ended. The issue needed to be popular to all levels of American citizenry so they could 'rally around the Stars and Stripes' thus rapidly healing the wounds of the bloodiest war in history. Lincoln was seriously considering one major movement or event that would galvanize his fellow Northern and Southern patriot countrymen into cutting loose the United States of America from the dictatorial grip of the Hapsbergs bloodline of banking control in Europe. All the time, the Rothschilds were trying to take control of the entire world monetary system, and at that time the Rothschilds were trying to get a foot-hold in America and find a way around the British, Virginia Company, and French Bourbon family that were gaining control in this country through government help...

Lincoln found himself in real hot water, because under the Virginia Company covenant the 48 families that formed it were all of the Holy Grail Bloodline. This country was to be an extension of what all the royal families of Europe controlled. The royalty of Europe is Hapsburg, no matter what their name is. The royal family of England is one such example. Now what Lincoln did is he wanted to become independent of the cogenant (in favor of his family) on the Rothschild side...the Rothschilds and their family bloodline have always been undermining the affairs of the Hapsbergs and stealing the monetary control away from them. No matter what the history books say, the Rothschilds didn't get (total) real control on things in America and the Federal Reserve until the Springs usurped the Payseur family companies in the early 1920s...

(But Lincoln had fallen from Rothschild grace also and so, due, in part to his Executive Order to print United States Greenbacks, thus interfering with the Jewish International Banks profits) It appears that the Rothschild family wanted Lincoln embarrassed to the maximum degree. (So) Mary Todd's drug dealer (John Wilks Booth) was hired to kidnap the President of the United States. Abraham would be put on a boat for a two month cruise of the Atlantic where he would be injected with and addicted to opium and then dumped on the streets of Washington. While the forcefully addicted President was stumbling around our nation's capital, the press would be informed of Elizabeth, Ella and Emily.

The drug pusher (Booth) and collaborator (agent) of the Rothschilds had his perfect accomplice in the plot to kidnap and discredit the leader of the North American continent in the First Lady Mary Todd Lincoln. After being informed of Abe's lover and the twins and the kidnap plot by her drug supplier, Mary was promised that after her husband resigned or was impeached, she and Abe would be moved to Europe to live happily ever after with plenty of opium. Superficially Mary expressed a desire to live in Europe with plenty of opium and no Civil War or politics to distract her husband or family. But her drug suppler had totally underestimated the confusion, desperation and anger of Mary Todd Lincoln.

After entering the room, Mary's drug man (Booth) would tell the President an urgent message was waiting for him at the War Department. Before descending down the backstairs, Abe would be knocked out with a chloroform loth. The kidnappers would load the limp body into the covered wagon and swiftly stow Lincoln on an opium boat for a novel 'cruise' of the Atlantic Ocean. When Booth actually opened the door to the darkened room where Abe and Mary were sitting, he went into a panic and shock. Abe was asleep with his head on Mary's left shoulder and the First Lady had her head turned toward the left looking at the door...When she was sure the man who opened the door was Booth, she turned and looked at the President to be sure the pistol she was pointing would explode beneath the lower left earlobe of her husband.

Before Mary pulled the trigger, John Wilkes Booth, drug supplier to the First Lady, realized he was the patsy in all this mess. But he did not know if he was only Mary's patsy or also a chump for the Rothschild family. Were the men hiding around the back door of Ford's Theater there to help Booth with the kidnapping or there to point the false finger at the 'innocent' Booth? Booth was not about to run into the hallway or down the backstairs to find out the answer to that question. The only escape route was to jump the balcony and crash onto the stage during the performance. That night, Booth gave a literal interpretation of the theatrical phrase 'brake a leg' as he fractured one of his during his leaping act from 'lethally looney Mary' and the men lurking around the back entrance of Ford's Theater.

In a novelty case on a wall in Ford's Theater is 'The Gun That Shot Abraham Lincoln.' If anyone (assassin) were to kill a head of state, they would use a revolver, because several bullets might be needed to accomplish the murder and stop any guards during the escape. One would only use a one-shot pistol if they were absolutely sure they had intimate access to the victim. The gun on the wall of Ford's Theater is a derringer-the perfect weapon for the left handed female assassin who did not attend her husbands funeral. Mary Todd was not hiding in her room due to overwhelming grief and sorrow; she was imprisoned in her room with two armed guards for two weeks after killing her husband.

[287] La Vieille France, No. 216, March, 1921.

[288] by Benjamin Franklin, who was one of the six founding fathers designated to draw up The Declaration of Independence. He spoke before the Constitutional Congress in May 1787, and asked that Jews be barred from immigrating to America. The above are his exact words as quoted from the diary of General Charles Pickney of Charleston, S.C.

[289]Marcus Eli Ravage (Big Destruction Hammer of God), member of the staff of the New York Tribune, "A Real Case Against the Jews," in Century Magazine, January-February, 1928.

[290] Chief Rabbi in France, in 1859, Rabbi Reichorn.

[291] Statement by Rabbi Felix Mendlesohn, Chicago Sentinel, October 8, 1942.

[292] Jewish professor A. Kulischer, October, 1937.

[293] Chaim Weizmann, President of the World Jewish Congress, in a Speech on December 3, 1942, in New York City.

[294] The American Hebrew, July 24, 1942.

[295] William Joyce's (Lord Ha Ha) last words just before Britain executed him for anti‑war activism in WW II.

[296] American Opinion, December, 1980, p. 35.

[297] Tragedy and Hope, by Caroll Quigley, p. 972.

[298] The Untold Story of Douglas MacArthur, by Frazier Hunt, p. 447.

[299] Reminiscences, Douglas MacArthur, pp. 373‑374.

[300] What's Wrong With the United Nations, by Reed Benson and Robert Lee, in Review of the News, September 9, 1970, p. 9.

[301] American Opinion, December, 1980, p. 36.

[302] The Fearful Master, by G. Edward Griffin, p. 174.

[303] The Untold Story of Douglas MacArthur, by Frazier Hunt, p. 459.

[304] Reminiscenes, p. 408.

[305] The Untold Story of Douglas MacArthur, p. 459.

[306] The Untold Story of Douglas MacArthur, p. 459.

[307] The Untold Story of Douglas MacArthur, p. 459.

[308] The Fearful Master, p. 176.

[309] The Fearful Master, p. 176.

[310] The Fearful Master, p. 177.

[311] The Fearful Master, p. 172.

[312] Reminiscences, p. 419.

[313] Reminiscences, p. 415.

[314] Reminiscences, p. 426.

[315] Reminiscences, p. 426.

[316] Reminiscences, p. 423.

[317] The Forgotten War in Korea, by William P. Hoar, American Opinion, November, 1977, p. 18.

[318] The Forgotten War in Korea, p. 18.

[319] National Suicide, p. 46.

[320] Parade, March 18, 1973, p. 15.

[321] U.S. News & World Report, August 19, 1968, p. 79.

[322] U.S. News and Report, November 18, 1968, p. 35.

[323] The Review of the News, September 3, 1969, p. 35.

[324] Rabbi Lunat Charski, quoted in The Jewish Assault on Christianity, page 44.

[325] Rabbi Ben Hecht.

[326] Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, pages 9, 19, 23, 30 and 95.

[327] John Swinton, Former Chief of The New York Times, in his book "A Momentous Question: The Respective Attitudes of Labor and Capital.

[328] See: Reorganization Plan No. 26, 5 U.S.C.A. 903, Public Law 94-564.

[329] Congressional Record, H7935, 9/22/88 - House.

[330] "Israel controls the Senate...around 80 percent are completely in support of Israel; anything Israel wants. Jewish influence in the House of Representatives is even greater." (They Dare to Speak Out, Paul Findley, p. 66, speaking of a statement of Senator J. William Fulbright said in 1973)

[331] Former New York City Mayor John Haylan speaking in Chicago and quoted in the March 27 New York Times.

[332] Waters Flowing Eastward, p. 108.

[333] Waters Flowing Eastward, p. 108.

[334] Waters Flowing Eastward, p. 108.

[335] The Ultimate World Order, Robert H. Williams, page 49.

[336] A Marrano Jew. When the family lived in Germany and were openly Jewish, they spelled the name Wolfson. Then when they moved to England they followed the Jewish custom of altering their name occasionally, to make it sound more Western, and it became Wohlson. And, then, when they moved to the United States, they changed it again, and this time it became Wilson.

[337] Their mission had been completed and to prevent an international scandal they were withdrawn.

[338] The Bolshevik takeover was complete.

[339] Rabbi Lewish Brown in "How Odd of God," New York, 1924.

[340] Jewish professor A. Kulischer, October, 1937.

[341] Saga of Hog Island.

[342] Chaim Weizmann, President of the World Jewish Congress, in a Speech on December 3, 1942, in New York City.

[343] Jewish Banker Paul Warburg, February 17, 1950, as he testified before the U.S. Senate.

[344] Jewish Playwright Israel Cohen, A Radical Program For The Twentieth Century. Also entered into the Congressional Record on June 7, 1957, by Rep. Thomas Abernathy.

[345]Jeremiah 34:19‑20.

[346] CIA Diary ‑ Philip Agee p.325

[347]Thirty‑Five Years of CIA Deception ‑ Darell Garwood.

[348]Sequence of Events Relating to Perry Russo ×Text and Testimony relating to the two Sciambra Memos ×Text culled from the transcript of Russo's first hypnosis session ×Text culled from the transcript of Russo's second hypnosis session.

[349] First Hand Knowledge ‑ Robert D. Morrow, p. 199.

[350]Warriors of the Night ‑ Ernest Volkman, p. 311.

[351]The Chomsky Reader ‑ Noam Chomsky, p. 224.

[352]TheCointelpro Papers ‑ Ward Churchill & Jim Vander Wall, p. 169.

[353]The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence ‑ Victor Marchetti and John D. Marks p.260.

[354] Dark Victory ‑ Dan E. Moldea, p. 234.

[355]Wedge ‑ Mark Riebling, p. 201.

[356] Wedge ‑ Mark Riebling, p.170.

[357] The Chomsky Reader ‑ Noam Chomsky, p. 327.

[358] CIA Diary ‑ Philip Agee.

[359] Wedge ‑ Mark Riebling, p. 227.

[360] Deterring Democracy ‑ Noam Chomsky, p. 395.

[361]J. Edgar Hoover: The Man and the Secrets ‑ Curt Gentry.

[362]The American Police State ‑ David Wise p.306.

[363]Chronicles of Dissent ‑ Noam Chomsky and David Barsamian p.316.

[364]CIA Diary ‑ Phillip Agee.

[365]Radwaste ‑ Fred C. Shapiro.

[366]My Life As a Radical Lawyer ‑ William M. Kunstler, p. 382.

[367]The COINTELPRO Papers ‑ Ward Churchill & Jim Vander Wall, p. 103.

[368]The Chomsky Reader ‑ Noam Chomsky, p. 305.

[369]The Chomsky Reader ‑ Noam Chomsky, p. 333.

[370]Inside The White House ‑ Ronald Kessler, p. 252.

[371]Russian Roulette ‑ Arthur Macy Cox.

[372]The Nuclear Barons ‑ Peter Pringle and James Spigelman, p. 280.

[373]Nugget File ‑ Stephen H. Hanauer.

[374]The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence ‑ Victor Marchetti and John D. Marks, p. 111.

[375]The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence ‑ Victor Marchetti and John D. Marks, p. 188.

[376]Deception Operations ‑ David A. Charters and Maurice A. J. Tugwell, p.163.

[377]The COINTELPRO Papers ‑ Ward Churchill & Jim Vander Wall, p. 166.

[378]Russian Roulette ‑ Arthur Macy Cox, p. 4.

[379]October 14, 1995 ‑ Associated Press.

[380]For the President's Eyes Only ‑ Christopher Andrew, p. 349.

[381]Citizen Hughes ‑ Michael Drosnin, p. 265.

[382]Censored : The News That Didn't Make the News ‑ And Why ‑ Carl Jensen & Project Censored 1995, p. 201.

[383]Chronicles of Dissent ‑ Noam Chomsky and David Barsamian, p. 322.

[384]Turning the Tide ‑ Noam Chomsky.

[385]The COINTELPRO Papers ‑ Ward Churchill & Jim Vander Wall, p. 140.

[386]The Nuclear Barons ‑ Peter Pringle and James Spigelman, p. 360.

[387]J. Edgar Hoover: The Man and the Secrets ‑ Curt Gentry, p. 625.

[388]J. Edgar Hoover: The Man and the Secrets ‑ Curt Gentry, p. 649.

[389]For the President's Eyes Only ‑ Christopher Andrew, p. 361.

[390]Elite Deviance ‑ David R. Simon & D. Stanley Eitzen, p. 277.

[391]Victory and Deceiy ‑ James F. Dunnigan and Albert A. Nofi, p. 273.

[392]Dirty Work : The CIA in Western Europe ‑ Ed. by Philip Agee and Louis Wolf, p. 267.

[393]The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence ‑ Victor Marchetti and John D. Marks, p. 252.

[394]Elite Deviance ‑ David R. Simon & D. Stanley Eitzen, p. 279.

[395]What Uncle Sam Wants ‑ Noam Chomsky, p. 62.

[396]Dirty Work: The CIA in Africa ‑ Ed. by E.Ray. W. Scharp, K. van Meter and L. Wolf, p. 31.

[397]J. Edgar Hoover: The Man and the Secrets ‑ Curt Gentry, p. 715.

[398]Dark Victory ‑ Dan E. Moldea, p. 260.

[399]Elite Deviance ‑ David R. Simon & D. Stanley Eitzen, p. 215.

[400] The Toronto Star, March 31, 1988.

[401] Jewish Ambassador Austria to London, Count Mensdorf, 1918.