![]() |
![]() |
|||||
Previous Folio /
Niddah Directory /
Tractate List / Navigate Site
Babylonian Talmud: Tractate NiddahFolio 65athe objection would arise: Have we not learnt, UNTIL THE WOUND IS HEALED?1 If, however, it is suggested that he allowed her all the nights during the period of her na'aruth2 the difficulty would arise: Does na'aruth ever extend over twelve months, seeing that Samuel had stated: The period intervening between the commencement of na'aruth and maturity is only six months? And should you suggest that the meaning is that the period is not shorter but may be longer3 it could be retorted: Did he not in fact state 'only'?4 If, however, it is suggested that he allowed her two nights during the days of her minority and two during her na'aruth, the difficulty would arise: Did not R. Hinena b. Shelemya once ask Rab, 'what is the ruling where her age of menstruation arrived when she was already under the authority of her husband?' and the other replied: All acts of intercourse which one performs5 are regarded as one act only and the other6 make up the four nights?7 Consequently this must be a case where he allowed her one night during her minority, two nights during her na'aruth period and one night during the days of her maturity. Now if you grant that a woman of mature age generally is allowed8 more than one night9 one can well see the justification for the ruling;10 for, as intercourse during minority has the effect of reducing one night11 during her na'aruth period, so intercourse during the na'aruth period has the effect of reducing one night12 during her maturity;13 but if you maintain14 that a woman of mature age generally8 is not allowed more than one night, should he15 not have allowed her16 but one act of the obligatory marital intercourse and no more?17 — The fact is that he15 allowed her one night during her minority and three nights during her na'aruth period,18 but19 it was not as you think20 that every three months represented a period; every two months rather represented a period.Menjamin of Saksanah was embarking on a journey21 to the locality of Samuel where he intended to act22 according to the ruling of Rab,23 even where the woman had observed a discharge, assuming that Rab drew no distinction between one who did and one who did not observe a discharge, but he died while he was underway. Samuel accordingly applied to Rab24 the Scriptural text, There shall no mischief befall the righteous.25 R. Hinena b. Shelemya observed: As soon as a person's teeth fall out26 his means27 of a livelihood are reduced; for it is said: And I also have given you cleanness of teeth26 in all your cities, and want of bread in all your places.28 IF SHE OBSERVED A DISCHARGE WHILE SHE WAS STILL etc. Our Rabbis taught: If a girl observed a discharge while she was still in her father's house, Beth Hillel ruled: She is permitted marital intercourse all the night29 and, moreover, she is allowed a full 'onah. And how long is a full 'onah?30 — R. Simeon b. Gamaliel explained: A night and half a day. But do we require an 'onah to be so long?31 Is not [such a requirement] rather incongruous with the following: If a person's winepresses or oil-presses were unclean and he desired to prepare his wine and oil respectively32 in conditions of cleanness, how is he to proceed? He rinses the boards,33 the twigs34 and the troughs;
Niddah 65band as for the wickerwork, if it is made of willows and hemp it must be scoured, and if of bast or reeds it must remain unused;1 and for how long must they remain unused? For twelve months. R. Simeon b. Gamaliel ruled: One must leave them from one period of wine-pressing to another2 and from one period of oil-pressing to another.2 (But is not this ruling3 identical with that of the first Tanna?4 — The practical difference between them arises in the case of early or late ripening fruit.)5 R. Jose stated: If a person desires to obtain cleanness forthwith he pours over them boiling water or scalds them with olive water. R. Simeon b. Gamaliel citing R. Jose ruled: He puts them under a pipe through which runs a continuous stream of water or in a fountain with flowing water. And for how long? For one 'onah. (As these provisions were applied to yen nesek so were they applied to matters of cleanness. But is not the order6 reversed, seeing that we are here dealing with the laws of cleanness? — Rather say: As these provisions were applied to matters of cleanness so were they applied to yen nesek.) And how long is an 'onah? R. Hiyya b. Abba citing R. Johanan replied: Either a day or a night. R. Hana She'una or, as some say, R. Hana b. She'una citing Rabbah b. Bar Hana who had it from R. Johanan replied: Half a day and half a night. And in connection with this R. Samuel b. R. Isaac explained: There is no real difference between them,7 the former referring to the spring and autumn equinoxes8 and the latter to the summer and winter solstices?9 — Here also, in the case of the menstruant woman,10 read: Half a day and half a night. But did he not say 'a night and half a day'? — Rather say: Either 'a night' in the spring or autumn equinox or 'half a day and half a night' in the winter or summer solstice. And if you prefer I might reply: The case involving a kethubah11 is different12 since protracted negotiations take place13 before it is signed.14Both Rab and Samuel laid down: The halachah is that15 one performs the obligatory marital act and withdraws forthwith. R. Hisda raised an objection: It once happened that Rabbi allowed a woman intercourse on four nights in twelve months!16 — Said Rabbah17 to him: What need have you18 for repeating the same objection? Rather raise one from our Mishnah?19 — But he was of the opinion that a practical decision20 is weightier.21 At all events,22 does not a difficulty arise against Rab and Samuel?23 They acted in agreement with our Masters; for it was taught: Our Masters decided by a second count of votes24 that one only performs the obligatory marital act and withdraws forthwith. 'Ulla stated: When R. Johanan and Resh Lakish were engaged in the discussions of the chapter on the 'Young Girl'25 they carried away from it only what a fox carries away from a ploughed field,26 and concluded it27 with this statement: One performs the obligatory marital act and withdraws forthwith. Said R. Abba to R. Ashi: Now then,28 should a scrupulous man29 not even finish his act? — The other replied: If that were to be the rule30 one would be ill at ease31 and would withdraw altogether. Our Rabbis taught: But all these women if they32 were continually discharging blood during33 the four nights and after the four nights or34 during the night and after it, must without exception35 examine themselves;36 and in the case of all these R. Meir imposes restrictions in agreement with the view of Beth Shammai.37 In regard, however, to other observations of blood,38 concerning which a difference of opinion exists between Beth Shammai39 and Beth Hillel,40 he is guided41 by the colour of the blood; for R. Meir ruled: The colours of the various kinds of blood are different from one another. In what manner? Menstrual blood is red, the blood of virginity is not so red; menstrual blood is turbid, the blood of virginity is not turbid; menstrual blood issues from the source, the blood of virginity issues from the sides. R. Isaac son of R. Jose citing R. Johanan stated: This is the ruling of R. Meir alone, but the Sages maintain: All the colours of the various kinds of blood are the same. Our Rabbis taught: A woman who observes a discharge of blood42 as a result of marital intercourse may perform her marital duty the first, second and third time. Henceforward,43 however, she may not perform it until she is divorced - To Next Folio -
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |