two seedline taught
in dead sea scrolls, #2
As I said in Two Seedline Taught In Dead Sea Scrolls, #1,
should you desire more insight on the Scriptures, I highly recommend you
investigate the Dead Sea Scrolls. One should never go about making remarks on
a subject unless they have thoroughly studied the issues involved. Sadly, many
in the Identity Message today do just that, on a variety of subjects,
especially the antichrist, anti-seedliners and those preaching universalism
(that is, to attempt to bring the other races, termed "heathen" in the Bible,
via the backdoor of the Kingdom under our Covenant). To all the apologists for
the other races, I say this: It is high time to either get fully into Israel
Identity or get entirely out. Should you decide on the latter, I
suggest you return to the Jew-deo-unchristian churches, from where you came,
to preach your anti-seedline and universalist doctrines. Astonishingly, there
are so-called Identity "teachers" who erroneously call themselves "pastors"
who are advocating that even the impostor "Jews" can be saved if only they
will accept "Jesus Christ" as their personal Savior. In Detroit, at a small
Identity church, they have a "Jew" in the congregation. There could be nothing
more out-of-place than a black, Mongolian or "Jew" at an Israel Identity
meeting. When Identity starts bringing such people into its meetings, they
cease to be "Identity" gatherings.
Our people must start to understand that we are in a RACE
WAR, and have been for over 7,000 years. That RACE WAR started in Genesis 3:15
and 4:1, and has continued until this very day. The antichrist, anti-seedliners
falsely claim that RACE WAR is a "flesh war." Yes, there are problems with the
"flesh", but this RACE WAR is an entirely different and far more serious
matter. This RACE WAR is a genocidal war designed to completely destroy an
entire race of people, that being the White Anglo-Saxon Race. One need
only look around himself to observe it happening right before his very eyes on
a daily basis. I highly recommend that those so-called "Identity pastors" who
are apologizing for the other races start preaching "segregation" and
"separation" from them as the Bible so loudly proclaims. When I hear
those so-called "Identity ministers" apologize for the other races, saying we
should be ashamed of such an attitude, I realize they are actually helping the
enemy�s cause. Ted R. Weiland is one of them. I am fully persuaded that when
Weiland stands before the Almighty in judgment, Yahshua will ask him, "Why did
you give aid and comfort to My enemies?"
On one of his audiocassette tapes entitled Some Basics,
Weiland apologizes for the other races by saying:
"... but that doesn�t mean that a
non-Israelite cannot join himself to Yahweh, and partake � and why wouldn�t we
want them to? Why wouldn�t we want the nations around to be serving our God?,
and under His Laws? � so we could have commerce with those nations.... not
only for my race but for their race as well ... I have come to appreciate the
other races and their individuality more since understanding this [Identity]
message than before I understood it. God created everything to be good ...
have you ever noticed the media always says we call the other races �mud
people�? I have never in my life ever heard the term except in the media. Not
amongst the people I preach to ... so why wouldn�t we want to embrace others
into this message? ... If anything, we should be absolutely ashamed of
ourselves because of our past reputation and our past history as a people and
what we have squandered because of who we are. We should be ashamed of
ourselves and our forefathers more than the rest of the races. They are
wallowing in their sin because of our sin. Let�s just face it. And again, it
wasn�t the Jews of today who crucified our Lord and Savior � it was us."
Then Weiland had the guts to ask Yahweh to bless his
message! What ever happened to the passage, "Wherefore come out from among
them, and be ye separate, saith Yahweh, and touch not the unclean thing;
and I will receive you ...", 2nd Corinthians 6:17. The other races
are "unclean" to us, and Yahweh commands total "separation." To endeavor to
bring in the foreign heathen is tantamount to trampling Yahweh�s Covenant
underfoot and spitting in His face. Additionally, the other races have never
"sinned" as they were never under Yahweh�s Law. So where does Weiland get off
saying, "They are wallowing in their sin because of our sin." Our sins have
nothing to do with the behavior of other races!
This is an example of one of Weiland�s many personally
contrived doctrines. He surely doesn�t get it from Scripture, and noticeably
he didn�t quote chapter and verse. Therefore, it�s not Christianity; it�s
Weiland-ism! Truthfully, the behavior of the heathen rubs off on us, and that
is the best reason in the world to keep separate from them! Where in the Bible
are we commissioned to take our Law to the non-Israelites? Maybe Weiland
should move his whole operation from Nebraska to the Congo.
Attempting to spiritualize and take a figurative view of
the "tares" in Matthew 13, Weiland, in his Eve, Did She Or Didn�t She?,
rebutting a statement by James E. Wise, makes this comment:
"Furthermore, if the seedliners�
interpretation of the wheat and tares parable is accurate, and if the tares in
Matthew 13 represent all the seed line of Satan through Cain, then
there is no alternative but to accept that the wheat represents all the
physical seed line of Eve through Seth. The wheat in this parable depicts
the sons of the kingdom, and by this interpretation, the wheat would
automatically be sons of the kingdom by their heritage, that is, they would be
saved by their race or lineage. If this is true, then Yahshua�s death, burial
and resurrection were wholly unnecessary. Of course, this hypothesis flies in
the face of the entire Bible ..."
To show how inconsistent Ted R. Weiland is, concerning the
racial issue, I will quote from his audiocassette tape entitled The Real
Significance Of Pentecost, #2. Notice how he reverses himself and decides
that Israel can be saved by race after denying it in the quote from his
book above: "... however, and this is
where I�ll pick it up with, however we need to understand, and I think we
probably all do, and if we don�t, we should � it was not automatic. What I
mean by that is that no longer � at this point, now that we are talking New
Covenant, and we�re into Acts 2, and after Israel has been divorced, God has
proposed marriage again to her, but her coming to Him is not automatic. Again,
what I mean by that is, no longer did Israel have automatic genetic
privileges. In other words, there�s no salvation by race.
Now there was at one time.
Is [stutter] is that [stutter] was not [stutter] is that not so, if we talk of
salvation in context of Exodus 19, 5 and 6? � of the marriage and the Kingdom,
and becoming a people, and all that came with that? We talked of salvation in
that sense, There was salvation by
race. It was automatic in the sense that
it was all Israel. Now she still had to say �I will.� But it was [stutter]
it�s no longer as a nation of people for Israel � even though God makes His
[stutter] His proposal, or presents His proposal to all � it�s no longer
simply by the leaders saying �I will�, become automatic for Israel as a whole
� no salvation by race ..." When, then, did
Yahweh�s salvation by race change? Contrary to Weiland, there is no salvation
without race, for He is our Kinsman Redeemer. How can Weiland delete
race from the equation? Yet he tries. Notice how Weiland said, "but her
coming to Him is not automatic." Weiland hasn�t learned yet that it is
impossible for us to "come to Him", for we are dead in trespasses and sin.
Therefore, He had to come to us, and we have no choice in the matter, as
Hebrews 11:6-10 proclaims, He can chastise us until we obey. The choice is
His, not ours. How does Weiland sidestep the fact that it is the Shepherd who
brings back all His sheep? (Matthew 18:11-14). I ask you: did the sheep, in
that case, seek out his Shepherd? Yet that is what Weiland is implying must be
done. We should never forget, it is the sheep that do the wandering and the
Shepherd who does the finding! Weiland has the Shepherd doing the wandering
and the sheep doing the finding! Well, let�s read Matthew 18:11-14 and see who
did the finding:
"11 For the Son of man is come to save [Gr.
#1482, save; rescue; deliver; protect; make whole; preserve safe from danger,
loss or destruction; restore] that which was
lost. 12 How think ye? if a man have an hundred sheep, and one of them be gone
astray, doth he not leave the ninety and nine, and goeth into the mountains,
and seeketh that which is gone astray? 13 And if so be that he find it, verily
I say unto you, he rejoiceth more of that sheep, than of the ninety and nine
which went not astray. Even so it is not the will of your Father which is in
heaven, that one of these little ones should perish."
Who was "lost" but Israel? How dare Weiland invite the
"unclean" heathen in among us?! How dare he say we should be ashamed of our
forefather�s racial background?! How dare he elevate the heathen while
demeaning our forebears in the same breath?! How dare Weiland falsely
proclaim that we Israelites were responsible for our Redeemer�s Crucifixion?!
How dare Weiland, like the Pope, pardon today�s "Jews" for His
Crucifixion?! It was the impostor "Jews" who said: "... His blood be on us,
and on our children" (Matthew 27:25). Weiland still doesn�t comprehend that
Genesis 3:15 proclaims the "seed of the serpent", NOT "US", would bruise the
heel of the "seed of the woman." Please, notice how Weiland is getting
everything backwards. The next thing Weiland will be saying is: "the seed of
the serpent" will bruise the "head of the seed of the woman", and that would
make Satan the victor. I hope you are becoming aware of how dangerous this
turkey in Israel Identity really is!
You are probably wondering what all this has to do with Two
Seedline being taught in the Dead Sea Scrolls. For that, I will demonstrate
how the "enmity" of Genesis 3:15 worked its way into their discovery and
translation. I will use the book Understanding The Dead Sea Scrolls,
edited by Hershel Shanks. Even though it was edited by a "Jew", I still
recommend this book to get an all-around view of the Scrolls� findings and
translations. Shanks is only the managing editor of several other authors�
writings. Besides Hershel Shanks, other contributing authors were Harry Thomas
Frank, Frank Moore Cross, Lawrence H. Schiffman, James C. VanderKam, Raphael
Levy, Yigael Yadin, Magen Broshi, Hartmut Stegemann, Ronald S. Hendel, Otto
Betz, P. Kyle McCarter and Avi Katzman. You, no doubt, already notice several
"Jewish" names among these writers. For our purpose we will start at the back
of the book, first in chapters 20 and 21 of its 22 chapters. These chapters
are entitled "Interview With Chief Scroll Editor John Strugnell" by Avi
Katzman, and "Silence, Anti-Semitism, And The Scrolls" by Hershel Shanks. Both
Katzman and Shanks are "Jews." The following will be a critical review of
those two chapters, and the object is to show the "enmity" of the two seeds of
Genesis 3:15 in action:
Chapter 20 shows the motive for the demotion and final
dismissal of the former directing editor on the Dead Sea Scrolls, John
Strugnell. It all started when Avi Katzman interviewed Strugnell for the
newspaper Ha-Aretz in Tel Aviv, October 28, 1990, and it became known
as the "Dead Sea Scroll scandal." Katzman claims that Strugnell was the first
to bring up the subject of anti-Semitism. You can decide for yourself, as
Katzman asked Strugnell whether he was anti-Israel. Upon this Strugnell
replied: "That�s a sneaky way of coming
at the anti-Semite question, isn�t it?"
Continuing, reportedly, Katzman asked Strugnell if he were anti-Semitic.
Strugnell retorted: "I can�t allow the
word anti-Semitism to be used. I think it�s a sort of mixed-up, messed-up term
that was introduced in Germany, a country of muddle-headed philosophers. It�s
a cover word for: Are you against Jews? Are you against Israelis? Are you
against the state of Israel? Are you against Zionism? [It has] nothing to do
with being against Semites. I�m not an anti-Semite. I�ve spent my life
studying various Semites from Ethiopia to Baghdad. I don�t know anyone in the
world who�s an anti-Semite."
Katzman then claims Strugnell told him he was an
"anti-Judaist." Continuing, Katzman continues to quote Strugnell:
"Judaism ... is originally racist ... it�s a
folk religion; it�s not a higher religion. An anti-Judaist, that�s what I am.
There, I plead guilty. I plead guilty in the way the Church has pleaded guilty
all along, because we�re not guilty; we�re right. Christianity presents itself
as a religion which replaces the Jewish religion. The correct answer of Jews
to Christianity is to become Christian. I agree that there have been
monstrosities in the past � the Inquisition, things like that. We should
certainly behave ourselves like Christian gentlemen. But the basic judgment on
the Jewish religion is, for me, a negative one."
Katzman then claims that Strugnell denied that his feelings
toward "Judaism" affected his work [on the scrolls]. According to Katzman,
Strugnell allegedly said: "Unless someone
talks to me about the subject [of Judaism], I don�t when I�m working on a
Qumran text, think how stupid and wrong the Jews were. I�m concerned with
trying to find out what a document is saying in its context."
Supposedly, Katzman asked Strugnell what there was that
"annoyed" him about Judaism. Allegedly Strugnell was to have replied:
"The fact that it has survived when it should
have disappeared. Christianity now uses much more irenic [conciliatory]
language for this. These are brutal terms; I�m putting it in harsh terms. For
me the answer [to the Jewish problem] is mass conversion."
Katzman pressing Strugnell for more, he allegedly
continues: "It�s the subsistence of the
group, of Jews, of the Jewish religion. It�s a horrible religion. It�s a
Christian heresy, and we deal with our heretics in different ways. You are a
phenomenon that we haven�t managed to convert � and we should have managed ...
I believe that the answer for Islam, and Buddhism, and all other religions is
to become Christian. Judaism disturbs me in a different sense, because,
whereas the others became Christians when we worked hard on them, the Jews are
stuck on an anti-Christian position."
Then, Strugnell allegedly expressed himself regarding the
state of Israel by indicating to Kaztman, in so many words, his first love was
for Jordan, and continued: "That�s
where the scrolls were found; the Jordanian government collected the scrolls.
I worked with the Jordanians and I got to know and like them. I dislike Israel
as an occupier of part of Jordan. And it�s quite obvious that this was part of
Jordan." Supposedly,
Katzman claims that Strugnell indicated that some of his friends were Israeli,
and continued to quote Strugnell: "You
know what the anti-Semites say: �some of my best friends are Jews.� Well, some
of my friends are Israelis. But the occupation of Jerusalem � and maybe the
whole state � is founded on a lie, or at least on a premise that cannot be
sustained. That�s putting it crudely as I can. The occupation of Jerusalem
cannot be sustained ... Just look at the Crusaders ... We couldn�t maintain
it. We � the English and the French � couldn�t maintain the Crusaders even
though we had immense military superiority at the start and we did great
things in the country. One of the great building periods was the Crusades;
but, basically, they were unsustainable. That�s me on Israel."
Allegedly, Katzman claims that Strugnell didn�t suggest
dismantling the "Jewish state", saying:
"The question whether I�m against the state of Israel is a political
question, just like whether I�m against Kuwait or Iraq. I think I answered
that." Katzman, egging Strugnell on, claims that
Strugnell found Israel�s position untenable and recommended the dismantling of
the Jewish state as follows: "At the
moment I find your position untenable, but I don�t think that the maintenance
of an Israeli state or a Zionists� state is impossible. In the future. It will
require certain negotiation, but I see no reason why it ..." ... "But you�re
not in favor of it?"... "Well it�s a fact. You�ve got four million people
here, even though the Zionists based themselves on a lie. But they�re here
now; you�re not going to move populations of four million. Not even the Nazis
managed that ... I disapprove of the present state of Israel but I�m not
opposed to a �Jewish national home�, in the old language [of the Balfour
Declaration], which could well be a state, or which could well be a canton or
federation ... Am I opposed to Zionism? I think we�ve had enough of it, but
you can�t say it�s not there. It would�ve been nice if it hadn�t existed, but
it has, so it�s covered by a sort of grandfather clause."
You can see that Strugnell is falling right into the
serpent�s trap with Katzman. Had Strugnell understood that he was up against
one of the children of Satan himself, he shouldn�t have given him the time of
the day, but Katzman egged him to continue. At this point Katzman asserts that
Strugnell claims that four other scrolls which were found, somehow, are
missing: "I�ve seen, with my own eyes
too." Then Katzman alleges that Strugnell claims
that one of the two is a complete book of Enoch, and that Israeli archeologist
Yigael Yadin is the reason for their not coming into the hands of scholars.
According to Katzman�s account of Strugnell, after the Six-Day War,
archaeologist Yadin had confiscated the famous Temple Scroll from a Bethlehem
antiquities dealer known as Kando, paying him $250,000. But according to Yadin
the sum was $105,000. Strugnell is alleged to have said:
"Yadin gave Kando two hundred fifty thousand
dollars where we�d offered Kando one million five weeks earlier. When the
owners of the manuscripts heard that, they just crossed the Jordan River."
Then Strugnell is alleged to have indicated the Temple
Scroll came from Cave 11 at Qumran. [The manuscripts are now]
"somewhere in Jordan. Various people own them.
Several of them have been sold to big bankers. They�re investments for these
people ..."
Another interesting remark that Strugnell is alleged to
have said at that Katzman interview, showing his lack of concern that the
scrolls might deteriorate, is as follows:
"They�re [the scrolls] all being kept very carefully; no one need worry
about them. They�re a better investment than anything on the Israeli or New
York stock exchanges." Strugnell is also alleged
to have blamed Israelis� Antiquities Authority for the loss of millions of
dollars in research funds in delaying his own confirmation as chief editor for
the scrolls, following the death of P�re
Pierre Beniot in 1987, when he is claimed to have said:
"The Israeli Department of Antiquities took
such a long time about it [confirming Strugnell as chief editor] that we lost
quite a large amount of money. People who were wanting to give money wanted to
make sure that I was in charge, so we lost one very handsome gift of some two
hundred fifty thousand dollars."
Then, allegedly, Katzman was able to sucker out of
Strugnell some "racial" jokes, and Strugnell is supposed to have said:
"Racial stereotypes are one of the greatest
things in our humor � where would we be without Armenian jokes, Jewish jokes?
This may be taken to mean that I detest a whole class of people, but that�s
not true." Had Strugnell had the foresight to
see that, in the future, the "Jews" would be the leading proponents of
"political correctness", he could have avoided that trap. He would later pay a
large price for this. Then Katzman contends that Strugnell claimed that many
"Jews" were able to see the Dead Sea Scrolls while they were still in
Jordanian hands. Allegedly, this is what Strugnell said:
"Although tourists had to get a certificate of
baptism [to enter Jordan], I saw the most Jewish-looking people come into the
museum [in Amman] with [these certificates]."
We can be very sure that all of this was immediately
reported back at "Jewish headquarters" by Katzman. It is their
Satanic-genetic-nature to always be in everyone else�s business and they don�t
miss a thing. They are always calculating their evil stratagems to deceive,
just as Satan deceived Eve into giving up her chastity and conceiving Cain. If
you don�t believe Satan is capable of such a thing, observe all the Eves who
are being deceived into giving up their chastity to another race today, which
happens to be the primary evil stratagem of the Satanic "Jews", and then there
are people like Ted R. Weiland and company who are claiming the "Jews" are not
a genetic, Satanic people, but that all evil is a problem with the "flesh." By
doing this, Weiland and company lend assistance to the "Jews" in their evil
plot. Weiland talks like a man who has had "Jewish" designed racial
"sensitivity training."
As I am running short on space, I will have to save chapter
21 of Understanding The Dead Sea Scrolls for another paper. As I was
preparing this paper, something struck me, and I am going to use the remaining
space for that flicker of intuition. I have noticed, that when speakers are
misrepresenting an issue, sometimes they will stutter, as Weiland did in the
previously-cited quotation where he was extolling the other races. The very
same phenomena, which I will demonstrate shortly, happened when Charles
Weisman was lying about Two Seedline doctrine. For those who are not aware of
it, Weisman is a hard-core antichrist, anti-seedliner. The following is some
stuttering which he did on a presentation entitled Satanic Seedline
made at the behest of Pete Peters in an attempt to discredit that important
doctrine:
"... and thus His seedline is metic [stutter] meticulously
spelled out in the Gospel ... thus the curse em [stutter] enmity that�s on the
serpent, and it�s Satanic tra [stutter] traits were carried on in Cain it�s
[stutter] and his descendants ... but mm [stutter] many people believe ... in
this chapter of Ezekiel is doubtful to bb [stutter] be ... neither sh
[stutter] shall ye touch it ... the problem with not [stutter] with touching
[stutter] touching the tree ... Now it�s interesting that some supporting this
doctrine have made ah [stutter] great [stutter] have gone to great length ...
it says hrt [stutter] it shall brr [stutter] the King James has it shall
bruise thy head ... concerning Christ, one, His Incarnation that He should be
the sse [stutter] seed of the woman ... or by His death. He had victory over
th [stutter] iss [stutter] entity, sometimes called Satan ... We also have a
victory over ch [stutter] over a political power structure ... as is the word
sa [stutter] serpent ... these cursed pe [stutter] people naturally have
enmity ... and they also say that Cain is not listed gnn [stutter] genealogy
... now there is unn [stutter] other interesting statements here ... now also
in John 6, Christ sut [stutter] speaks of the bread of God ... now some
opponents of the Satanic Seedline doctrine says that the devil [stutter] it
means that the devil is their spiritual father. Well that�s not true. It�s jes
[stutter] nn [stutter] what�s he dn [stutter] what Christ was just barely
do-in when he �you are the father the devil�, he was implying ... and the same
when Christ used the term serpent, called them serpents, er [stutter] gnn
[stutter] generation of vipers ... and dd [stutter] that he is a liar
and-so-forth. And they [stutter] people will say ... now 1stJohn
3:12 is also quoted which exhorts us to be not as Cain who was of the
[stutter] that wicked one. Here, again, we jus [stutter] it�s just same thing
�you are of father the devil�, it�s just employing metaphors. And verse 10
compares the children of God with the children dv [stutter] the devil ...
there all just types of [stutter] mt [stutter] use metaphorical phrases ... So
they are going to be judged. Alla [stutter] alla [stutter] all the shed blood,
the in [stutter] innocent blood is going to become on this people ... an
[stutter] and therefore, if you tell somebody about a falsehood ... nn
[stutter] in conclusion ..."
It�s my own personal theory that much of this stuttering is
caused by the "Spirit of Truth" and the "spirit of error" at war within a
person�s mind. From what I have presented here, you can see that both Ted R.
Weiland and Charles Weisman were doing it. I am reminded of the Scripture
which says: "A double minded man is unstable in all his ways", James
1:8. Also, Matthew 6:22 & Luke 11:34 requires that "thy eye be single", and
that is speaking of the mind�s eye, not the physical eye. Romans 12:2 speaks
of a "renewing" of our "mind", which for many, has never happened!
Clifton A. Emahiser�s Teaching Ministries
1012 N. Vine Street, Fostoria, Ohio 44830
Phone (419)435-2836
Please Feel Free To Copy, Or Order:
10 for 2.00; 25 for 3.00; 50 for 5.00 or 8.00 per 100
HOME
