Special notice to ALL WHO
DENY two seedline, #9
By: Teacher Clifton A.
Emahiser
1012 North Vine Street
Fostoria, Ohio 44830
Phone (419) 435-2836
This matter of Two Seedline
is of the utmost importance in our day, for we are beginning to see the
culmination of this age-old �enmity� coming to a head. While it has been lying
festering just below the surface for several thousands of years, today it is
reaching its peak. It�s like a giant abscess getting ready to erupt and spill
out all its foul, infectious, corrupt, putrefying poison. And, while these great
evil underground forces are at work, churchianity sits idly on the sidelines
pretending all is well. In fact, the infection from this giant abscess is
seeping into their midst, and they consider it �Christian.� As if this were not
bad enough, the anti-seedliners disavow the cause of the infection. To the
anti-seedliners, it�s just a theological game of words. They simply haven�t done
their homework on the subject. To show you this, I will now quote excerpts from
Dr. Lightfoot in his A Commentary on the New Testament from the Talmud and
Hebraica, volume 2, pages 367-369 concerning Matthew 27:38-46:
�Among the
monsters of the Jewish routs, preceding the destruction of the city, the
multitude of robbers, and the horrible slaughters committed by them, deservedly
claim the first consideration; which, next to the just vengeance of God against
that most wicked nation, you may justly ascribe to divers originals. 1. It is no
wonder, if that nation abounded beyond measure with a vagabond,
dissolute, and lewd sort of young men; since, by means of polygamy, and the
divorces of their wives at pleasure, and the nation�s unspeakable
addictedness to lasciviousness and whoredoms, there could not but continually
spring up
bastards,
and an offspring born only to beggary or rapine, as wanting both sustenance and
ingenuous education. 2. The foolish and sinful indulgence of the council could
not but nurse up all kind of
broods of
wicked men,
while they scarce ever put any one to death, though never so wicked, as being an
Israelite [Jew]; who must not by any means be touched ... All the rout indeed
and force of hell was let loose at that time against Christ, without either
bridle or chain: he calls it himself ...
the power of
darkness,
Luke 22:53. God who had foretold of old, that the
serpent
should bruise the heel of the promised seed,
and now that time is come, had slackened the devil�s chain, which, in regard of
men, the Divine Providence used to hold in his hand; so that all the power and
all the rancour of hell might, freely and without restraint, assault Christ; and
that all that malice that was in the devil against the whole elect of God,
[would be] summed up and gathered together into one head, might at one stroke
and onset be brandished against Christ without measure.�
If you listen to the
anti-seedliners, they will claim there was �no power of hell� at work in the
Crucifixion of the Messiah. They delegate all of that to some kind of
�spiritual� hocus-pocus, making mockery of the foundational tenets of Scripture.
I addressed this subject of the �bruising of Messiah�s heel� in my Research
Papers Proving The Two Seedline Seduction Of Eve. This passage, by Dr.
Lightfoot, vindicates what I said in that article:
�YAHSHUA�S HEEL BRUISED
BY JUDAS!!!
�We have a direct
connection, here, with Judas, and the �serpent� of Genesis 3:14-15! We can see
the connection between Judas and the �serpent�, if we read John 13:18:
�I speak not of
you all: I know whom I have chosen: but that the scripture may be fulfilled, He
that eateth bread with me hath lifted up his HEEL against me.
�The scripture spoken of
here, which was fulfilled in Judas, was Genesis 3:15! Does that sound
�spiritual�?
Judas was a
Kenite-Canaanite �Jew-devil�, a descendant of Cain fathered by Satan! However,
there is a problem here because it says that �he (Judas) hath lifted up his heel
against me� whereas Genesis 3:15 says that �thou (the seed of the serpent) shalt
bruise his (Yahshua�s) heel.� Is it the �heel� of Judas or Yahshua that is
affected? I am quite certain that John 13:18 is referring to Genesis 3:15, as it
is indicating that it is a fulfillment of Scripture. Tell me, what other
Scripture could it be? � there isn�t any. There is another Scripture, Psalm
41:9, that reads similarly to John 13:18, but John 13:18 is not a fulfillment of
Psalm 41:9 � as a matter of fact, Psalm 41:9 is not a prophecy about anything.
The prophecy then can only be Genesis 3:15! � and Genesis 3:15 is definitely a
prophecy. Therefore, there has to be a slight mistranslation in Genesis 3:15!
Let�s try to render it in a manner, which makes some sense:
�And I will put
enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it (her
seed) shall bruise thy head and thy heel shall (rise up and) bruise him (her
seed).
�It�s not the seed of the
serpent that was to bruise the heel of Yahshua, but the seed of the serpent will
lift up his heel and bruise Yahshua (the seed of the woman). Now, Yahshua is not
the only seed of the woman. All of Eve�s descendants are the seed of the woman.
Once we understand that it is the seed of the serpent (in the person of Judas)
that was to lift up his heel against the Messiah, we can better understand
Isaiah 53:5:
�But he was
wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the
chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are
healed.
�One good comment on John
13:18, is from the Jamieson, Fausset & Brown Commentary On The Whole Bible,
page 1058:
�I
speak not of you all
� the �happy are ye,� of vs. 17, being on no supposition applicable to
Judas. I know whom I
have chosen
�in the higher sense.
But that the scripture may
be fulfilled
�i.e., one has been added to your number, by no accident or mistake, who is none
of Mine, but just that he might fulfill his predicted destiny.
He that eateth bread with me
� �did
eat of my bread.�
�It was Judas that raised up
his heel against Him and bruised Him. It probably should be pointed out here
what is meant by �lifting up the heel.� It is described as someone who kicks out
at the person who is feeding him. Judas, planning to betray Yahshua while eating
of the sacrificial supper, did just that, and it is known as �lifting up the
heel.� This �heel� in John 13:18 is the same �heel� as in Genesis 3:15. This
type of action was considered one of the most insulting things a man could do.
Of course, what else would you expect of a devil?
�Just before this �lifting
up the heel� on the part of Judas by partaking of the last supper, some
interesting statements are made. They were having a foot-washing lesson from
Yahshua. Verse 10 says,
�Yahshua saith to
him, He that is washed needeth not save to wash his feet, but is clean
(pure) every whit: and ye are clean (pure), but not all.�
Yahshua is indicating that all the disciples are clean (pure) racially, but no
amount of washing would make Judas clean (pure).
�A second statement in this
18th verse is also interesting. It says,
�I speak not of
you all.�
Again Yahshua is
excluding Judas from the others.
�I know whom I
have chosen.�
I am not deceived
in My choice. I knew what was going to happen from the very beginning of the
enmity of the serpent. I have chosen Judas as a �serpent� and I plainly foresaw
that he would raise up the heel and deliver Me. Did not I foretell this at the
time of the curse upon the �serpent�? Matthew 26:14-16:
�14 Then one of the twelve, called Judas Iscariot, went unto the chief priests,
15 And said
unto them,
What will ye give me, and I will deliver him unto you? And they covenanted with
him for thirty pieces of silver. 16 And from that time he sought opportunity to
betray him.
�If you can�t see �Jew�
written all over this action on the part of this �serpent�, Judas, you have to
be blind. He was only doing his father�s bidding, John 12:4-6:
�4 Then saith one
of his disciples, Judas Iscariot, Simon�s son, which should betray him, 5
Why was not this ointment sold for three hundred pence, and given to the poor? 6
This he said, not that he cared for the poor, but because he was a
thief and had the bag, and bare what was put therein.
�Not only was this
�serpent-Jew� a traitor, he was a thief � just like the �Jewish� IRS and Federal
Reserve of today. Here is more evidence that Judas was the offspring of Satan...
�Like the Spirit that is
within Yahweh�s children (seed of the woman), so there is a counter-spirit
within the �serpent�s� children. That is why it just came natural for Judas to
betray Yahshua. It says here that the devil put it into the heart of Judas to
betray the Messiah. The children of Satan have a certain nature about them, and
under various circumstances, they will react in predictable behavior patterns.
The Messiah understood exactly what the behavior pattern of the �serpent�,
Judas, would be. That behavior pattern is yet more evidence that the �Jews� are
a satanic seedline. You cannot change the nature of a rattlesnake, nor can you
change the nature of a �Jew.� So much for �Jews for Jesus�!� (See also Jeremiah
13:23)
All this is totally
oblivious to the anti-seedliners! Speaking further on page 83 of volume 2,
Lightfoot says of that nation:
�That the nation,
under the second Temple was given to magical arts beyond measure ... That it was
given to easiness of believing all manner of delusions beyond measure. And one
may safely suspect, that those voices which they thought to be from heaven, and
noted with the name Bath Kol, were either formed by the devil in the air
to deceive the people, or by magicians by devilish art to promote their own
affairs ... The very same which I judge of the Bath Kol, is [in] my
opinion also of the frequent appearances of Elias, with which the leaves of the
Talmud do every where abound; namely, that in very many places the stories are
false, and, in the rest, the apparitions of him were diabolical.�
The �magical arts� used by
the �Jews� is called the �Cabala� (sometimes spelled Cabbala, Kabbalah or
Qabbalah). According to Warren Weston in his Father Of Lies, page 51:
�The
four collections of works composing the Dogmatic Kabbalah are: 1. The Sepher
Yetzirah, or �Book of the Formation�: it treats of the cosmogony as symbolized
by ten members and twenty-two letters of the Hebrew alphabet, which it calls the
�thirty-two paths� or symbols, � with the esoteric zero making thirty-three in
all ... The whole Kabbalah is usually classed under four heads: (1) The
Practical Kabbalah. (2) The Literal Kabbalah. (3) The Unwritten Kabbalah. (4)
The Dogmatic Kabbalah ... 2. The Zohar, or book of �Splendour�, itself composed
of five important books (besides other treatises) ... These five are: Siphra
Dtzenioutha, or �Book of Concealed Mystery�; Idra Rabba Qadisha, or �Greater
Holy Assembly�; Idra Zuta Qadisha, or �Lesser Holy Assembly�; Beth Elohim, or
�House of the Elohim�; and the �Book of the Revolutions of the Soul.� 3. The
Sepher Sephiroth, or �Book of Numbers� (or Emanations) ... Sephira, �number�
(singular); Sephiroth (plural). 4. The Asch Metzareph, or �Purifying Fire�,
dealing with Alchemy.�
While a good deal of the
form of the Cabala can be traced to the second century, the substance
appears to originate from remote antiquity, possibly as remote as Cain. In the
book Trail of the Serpent by Miss Stoddard, page 25, the Cabala is
described:
�The Practical or
Magical Cabala with its combinations and correspondences was the astrological,
magical, and magnetic basis used by the Alchemists and Magicians of the Middle
Ages in working their transmutations and conjurations. It was impregnated with
the �fluidic magic� derived from very ancient cults, and still practiced at the
time of the Captivity among the Persians and Chaldeans. To day, all Rosicrucians
and cabalistic sects use this Magical Cabala for their works of divining,
clairvoyance, hypnotic and magnetic healing, making of talismans, and contacting
their mysterious masters. As the Jewish writer Bernard Lazare said: �Secret
societies represented the two sides of the Jewish mind, practical rationalism
and pantheism, that pantheism which, metaphysical reflection of the belief in
One God, ended at times in cabalistic theurgy.��
Let us now see an example of
what is contained in the Cabala. For this, I will now quote from The Esoteric
Tradition by G. de Purucker, volume 1, page 62:
�Turning to the
Jews, one may find in the Zohar � a Hebrew word meaning �splendor�, which
is perhaps the greatest text-book of the Jewish Qabbalah, and which has been
mentioned before � a statement to the effect that the man who understands the
Hebrew Bible in its literal meaning is a fool. �Every word of it�, says the
Zohar in this connexion, �has a secret and sublime sense, which the wise
[that is, the initiated] know.� One of the greatest of the Jewish Rabbis of the
Middle Ages, Maimonides, who died in 1204, writes:
�We should never
take literally what is written in the Book of the Creation, nor hold the same
ideas about it that the people hold. If it were otherwise, our learned ancient
sages would not have been [sic. gone] to so great labor in order to conceal the
real sense, and to hold before the vision of the uninstructed people the veil of
allegory, which conceals the truths that it contains. Taken literally, that work
contains the most absurd and far-fetched ideas of the Divine. Whoever can guess
the real sense, ought to guard carefully his knowledge not to divulge it. This
is a rule taught by our wise men, especially in connexion with the work of the
six days...��
It is true that the Bible is
written, to a great degree, in allegory and symbols, and if we don�t understand
them, we cannot grasp the message contained therein. The �Jews�, on the other
hand, attach an occult meaning to every word and phrase. Their views of
Scripture are so foreign to our perspectives one would not recognize them. In
spite of this, their view is not always entirely incorrect. From the above, it
is obvious that the �Jews� do not believe in a six, twenty-four hour day
Creation, as do some Christian fundamentalists! If we take the same stance as
the anti-seedliners like Ted R. Weiland, Jeffrey A. Weakley, Stephen E. Jones,
Jack Mohr, Charles Weisman, etc., that everything found in �Jewish� writings is
evil, we will have to take the opposite position and start advocating a six,
twenty-four hour day Creation also. Can you see now how absurd some of the
positions taken by the anti-seedliners are?
You will
remember, as I showed you before, if we throw everything out which can be found
in the Talmud and other �Jewish� writings, we will have to pitch out most
of the contents of our Bibles, along with the truth of our Identity. One thing I
have noticed with the anti-seedliners is: they are strangely quiet about
�Jewish� history, and never seem to quote �Jewish� history books. This should
run up a red flag for us, indicating they�re not as knowledgeable on the subject
as they pretend to be. And that hardly qualifies them as students who have
studied to show themselves approved, (2 Timothy 2:15). As I have said oft
before, we need a Bible in one hand and a history book in the other (�Jewish�
history books without exception).
Referring again to A
Commentary on the New testament from the Talmud and Hebraica by John
Lightfoot, volume 2, page 209:
�That nation and
generation might be called adulterous literally; for what else, I
beseech you, was their irreligious polygamy than continual adultery? And what
else was their ordinary practice of divorcing their wives, no less irreligious,
according to every man�s foolish or naughty will?�
PROSELYTES FOR GAIN
Again on Lightfoot, volume
2, pages 295-297 concerning Matthew 23:13-14:
�Under a pretence
of mighty devotion, but especially under the goodly show of long prayers, they
so drew over the minds of devout persons to them, especially of women, and among
them the richer widows, that by subtle attractives they either drew out or
wrested away their goods and estates. Nor did they want nets of counterfeit
authority, when from the chair they pronounced, according to their pleasures, of
the dowry and estate befalling a widow, and assumed to themselves the power of
determining concerning those things...
�Yet in making of
these they used their utmost endeavours for the sake of their own gain, that
they might some way or other drain their purses, after they had drawn them in
under the show of religion, or make some use or benefit to themselves by them.
The same covetousness, therefore, under a veil of hypocrisy, in devouring
widows� houses, which our Savior condemned in the former clause, he here also
condemns in hunting after proselytes; which the scribes and Pharisees
were at all kind [s] of pains to bring over to them. Not that they cared for
proselytes, whom they accounted as �a scab and plague�; but that the more
they could draw over to their religion, the greater draught they should have for
gain, and the more purses to fish in. These, therefore, being so proselyted,
�they made doubly more the children of hell than themselves.� For when they had
drawn them into their net, having got their prey, they were no further concerned
what became of them, so they got some benefit by them. They might perish in
ignorance, superstition, atheism, and all kind [s] of wickedness: this was no
matter of concern to the scribes and Pharisees; only let them remain in Judaism,
that they might lord it over their consciences and purses.�
ARAB PROSELYTES TO JUDAISM
The main index of the
History Of The Jews by Heinrich Graetz is found in volume 6, and on page 512
are listed the various peoples proselyted by the �Jews� during their extended
history. The list is too extensive to elaborate on here. We will key in on
volume 3, pages 60-62 concerning the subtitle �Arabs Become Converted To
Judaism� (approximately 450-500 A.D.):
�Happily, the
Arabian Jews bethought them of the genealogy of the Arabs as set forth in the
first book of the Pentateuch, and seized upon it as the instrument by which to
prove their kinship with them. The Jews were convinced that they were related to
the Arabs on two sides, through Yoktan and through Ishmael. Under their
instruction, therefore, the two principal Arabian tribes traced back the line of
ancestors to these two progenitors, the real Arabs (the Himyarites) supposing
themselves to be the descendants from Yoktan; the pseudo-Arabs in the north, on
the other hand, deriving their origin from Ishmael. These points of contact
granted, the Jews had ample opportunity to multiply the proofs of their
relationship. The Arabs loved genealogical tables, and were delighted to be able
to follow their descent and history so far into hoary antiquity; accordingly,
all this appeared to them both evident and flattering. They consequently exerted
themselves to bring their genealogical records and traditions into unison with
the Biblical accounts. Although their traditions extended over less than six
centuries on the one side to their progenitor Yarob and his sons or grandsons
Himyar and Kachtan, and on the other, to Adnan, yet in their utter disregard of
historical accuracy, this fact constituted no obstacle. Without a scruple, the
southern Arabians called themselves Kachtanites, and the northern Arabians
Ishmaelites. They readily accorded the Jews the rights of relationship, that is
to say, equality and all the advantages attending it.
�The Arabs were
thus in intimate intercourse with the Jews, and the sons of the desert whose
unpoetical mythology afforded them no matter for inspiration, derived much
instruction from Judaism. Under these circumstances many Arabs could not fail to
develop peculiar affection for Judaism, and some embraced this religion, though
the Jews had not thought of their conversion. As they had practiced circumcision
while heathen, their conversion to Judaism was particularly easy. The members of
a family among the Arabs were indissolubly bound to one another, and, according
to their phylarchic constitution, the individuals identified themselves with the
tribe. This brought about, that when a chieftain became a Jew, his whole clan at
once followed him, the wisest, into the fold of Judaism. It is expressly
recorded about several Arabian tribes that they were converted to Judaism; such
were the Benu-Kinanah, a warlike, quarrelsome clan, related to the most
respected Koraishites of Mecca, and several other families of the tribes Aus and
Chazaraj in Yathrib.
�Especially
memorable, however, in the history of the Arabs is the conversion of the
powerful king of Yemen. The princes or kings of Yemen bore the name of Tobba,
and at times ruled over the whole of Arabia; they traced their historical origin
back to Himyar, their legendary origin to Kachtan...�
This is only one example of
the extensive amount of �Jewish� proselytizing in history. This is the kind of
history the anti-seedliners are mute on. Their incompetent, inept commentary
bears record of their immaturity on the subject. You may think it is
out-of-place for me to mention names of the anti-seedliners. Before I wrote one
jot, Jeffery A. Weakley in his The Satanic Seedline, Its Doctrine and
History, wrote this on page 29:
�If you have
encountered an argument and you are sincerely seeking an answer [against Two
Seedline], I suggest that first you completely study it out in God�s Word (look
up definitions, check parallel passages, be sure of the context, etc.). After
that I suggest you contact men such as Pete Peters, Dan Gentry, Earl Jones, Jack
Mohr, etc....�
From Jeffrey A. Weakley�s
comment, here, there can be little doubt where Pete Peters and the three others
mentioned stand on Two Seedline! After Weakley, writing a book against the Two
Seedline doctrine, you surely wouldn�t expect him to recommend someone who
didn�t agree with him, would you? Jeffrey A. Weakley was an anti-seedliner, and
he knew Pete Peters was an anti-seedliner also. To the date of this writing,
there is no pubic evidence that Pete Peters has changed his position on the
subject, and I don�t believe he ever will! He may make all kinds of derogatory
statements about the �Jews�, but he will never say, as our Messiah did, they are
genetically Satanic. If he ever does, he will lose half of his following,
one-way or the other. The only way he can keep them is to talk out of both sides
of his mouth. He must continue to try to please both the Two Seedliners and the
anti-seedliners in his audience to keep the lucre flowing in. With the message
of Two Seedliners, there is little financial support. All this in defense of the
late Bertrand L. Comparet and Wesley A. Swift!
HOME
