�������������������������������� The Largest Group of Thieves,
������������� Deceivres, and Murders the World Has Ever Known
And the worst of the lot are the so-called Christian Zionists that are both Jewish and non-Jewish, men and women; people such as Binny Hinn; Bill Bright; Billy Graham; Brother Stair; David Lankford; Hal Lindsey (Jew); Jack van Impe; James Robison; James Dobson;� Jerry Falwell (A so-called Christian Zionist); Jim Bakker (Jew); Jimmy Swaggart; John Hagee; Joyce Meyers; Kenneth Copelan; Kenny� Hagin; Marilyn Hickey; Marlin Maddoux; Mike Evans; Oral Roberts; Pat Robertson; Paul Crouch; Robert Schuler; Dr. Wolf (Jew); David Pilinger; Berst Beach; Rod Parsley; Tom Bambley; James Kennedy; J.W. Williams (nigger), Doug Batchler; Jack Graham; Bill Gather; J.K. Halilton (nigger), Allan Lane, Gilbert Graham, T.D. Jakes (nigger), Wanda David (nigger woman), Fredrick K.C. Price (nigger). These are a perfect description of what Yahshua told the Jews:
�Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.� (Matthew 23:15)
For it is a direct result of their teachings and those like them that the Jews have been able to get away with the murder of over 100 million Christians in the last 100 years alone. �����������
It is these and those like them that the Prophet was speaking of when he said:
�His watchmen are blind: they are all ignorant, they are all dumb dogs, they cannot bark; sleeping, lying down, loving to slumber. Yea, they are greedy dogs which can never have enough, and they are shepherds that cannot understand: they all look to their own way, every one for his gain, from his quarter. Come ye, say they, I will fetch wine, and we will fill ourselves with strong drink; and to morrow shall be as this day, and much more abundant.� (Isaiah 56:10-12)
Winston Churchill certainly left his mark. There are few who question the indomitable spirit of this half‑Jew; that in their eyes he exemplified the so‑called British spirit during some of the darkest days of World War II as the English responded to his rallying cry. It is an unfortunate fact of history that it was his insistence upon the destruction of Dresden (his so‑called "thunderclap of victory") which resulted in the death of literally hundreds of thousands of women and children in that open city. All this was in strict contradiction to any concept of warfare as conducted by civilized nations. Therefore, do not, by any stretch of imagination construe what is to follow as any endorsement of Winston Churchill, but he did go through some interesting phases.
������������������������ Churchill and Britain Will Not Recognize
������������������������������������������ Hitler Saved Britain!
"The real story of any great event in history is apt to be very different to what appears at the time. That is especially the case in war. The fate of millions of people turns on decisions that are taken by one man, who may be influenced by the most curious of motives in reaching a decision that changes the whole course of history.
�The way he makes up his mind is known only by a few men behind the scenes, who usually have good reason for keeping it quiet. The truth sometimes leaks out later; sometimes never. When it emerges it often bears out the saying that 'truth is stranger than fiction.' A novelist has to appear plausible, and would hesitate to make use of such� astounding contradictions as occur in history through some extra ordinary accident or twist of psychology.
�Nothing could be more extraordinary than the way that the decisive events of 1940 were shaped.� France was overcome by an offensive in which few of the higher executants had any faith, and the invasion only succeeded through a belated change of plan on the German side that happened to fit the situation produced by rigidity of plan combined with over‑confidence on the French side.� Stranger still was the way that the British Army escaped, and Britain herself was preserved from invasion.� The truth here runs quite contrary to the popular picture.
�It would have seemed incredible to most of Hitler's ardent followers in Germany.� Little indication of it emerged in the revelations at Nuremberg.� [But then Nuremberg was so that the Jews could enrich themselves� even more through lying holocaust propaganda!]. The bare facts were known to a small circle at the top of the German Army, but the essential clue was held by only a few, not the topmost, who were present one day at Rundstedt's headquarters when Hitler disclosed the way his thoughts were running.
�The escape of the British Army from France has often been called 'the miracle of Dunkirk.'� For the German armored forces had reached the Channel coast behind the back of the British Army while this was still deep in the interior of Flanders.� Cut off from its own bases, and from the bulk of the French Army, it seemed likely also to be cut off from the sea.� Those who got away have often wondered how they managed to do so.
�The answer is that Hitler's intervention saved them...A sudden order from him over the telephone stopped the armored forces just as they were in sight of Dunkirk, and held them back until the retreating British had reached the port and slipped out of their clutches. Rundstedt and other generals concerned, as executive commanders or on the higher staffs, gave me accounts from their different angles of this staggering order and it effects.
�But although the British Army thus escaped from the trap in France, it was in no state to defend England.� It had left most of its weapons behind, and the stores at home were almost empty.� In the following months Britain's small and scantily‑armed forces faced the magnificently‑ equipped army that had conquered France, with only a strip of water between them.� Yet the invasion never came.
�At the time we believed that the repulse of the Luftwaffe in the 'Battle over Britain' had saved her.� That is only part of the explanation.� The last part of it.� The original cause, which goes deeper, is that HITLER DID NOT WANT TO CONQUER ENGLAND.� He took little interest in the invasion preparations, did nothing to spur them on, and cancelled them at the first plausible excuse...(The German Generals Talk, by B.H.� Liddell Hart, pp.� 105‑107)
����������������������������������������� Hitler�s �Halt� Order
"On wheeling north, Guderian's Panzer Corps headed for Calais while Reinhardt's swept west of Arras towards St.� Omer and Dunkirk. On the 22nd, Boulogne was isolated by Guderian's advance, and next day Calais.� That same day Reinhardt reached the Aire‑St. Omer Canal, less than� twenty miles from Dunkirk; the only escape port left to the B.E.F. The German armored forces were much nearer to it� than the bulk of the B.E.F.
�'At that moment,' Rundstedt told me, 'a sudden telephone call came from Colonel von Grieffenberg at O.K.H., saying that Kleist's forces were to halt on the line of the canal.� It was the Fuhrer's direct order and contrary to General Halder's view.� I questioned it in a message of protest, but received a curt telegram in reply, saying: 'The armored divisions are to remain at medium artillery range from Dunkirk' [a distance of eight or nine miles].� 'Permission is only granted for reconnaissance and protective movements.'
�Kleist said that when he got the order it seemed to make no sense to him. 'I decided to ignore it, and to push on across the Canal.� My armored cars actually entered Hazerbrouck, and cut across the British lines of retreat.� I heard later that the British Commander‑in‑Chief, Lord Gort, had been in Hazebrouck at the time.� But then came a more emphatic order that I was to withdraw behind the canal.� My tanks were kept halted there for three days.'
�Thoma, who was chief of the tank side of the General Staff, told me that he was right up forward with the leading tanks, near Bergues, where he could look into the town of Dunkirk itself.� He sent back wireless messages direct to O.K.H., begging for permission to let the tanks push on. But his appeal had no effect.� Referring to Hitler's attitude, he bitingly remarked: 'You can never talk to a fool.� Hitler spoilt the chance of victory.'
�Meanwhile the British forces streamed back towards Dunkirk, and cemented a defensive position to cover their reembarkation.� The German tank commanders had to sit and watch the British slipping away under their very nose.� 'After three days the ban was lifted,' Kleist said, 'and the advance was resumed; against stiffening opposition.� It had just begun to make headway when it was interrupted by a fresh order from Hitler, that my forces were to be withdrawn, and sent southward for the attack on the line that the remainder of the French Army had improvised along the Somme.� It was left to the infantry forces which had come down from Belgium to complete the occupation of Dunkirk � AFTER THE BRITISH HAD GONE.'" (The German Generals Talk, by B.H.� Liddell Hart, pp. 132‑133)
������������������������������������������������� *************
"WE ARE NOT DENYING AND ARE NOT AFRAID TO CONFESS, THIS WAR IS OUR WAR AND THAT IT IS WAGED FOR THE LIBERATION OF JEWRY...Stronger than all fronts together is our front, that of Jewry.� WE {Jews} ARE NOT ONLY GIVING THIS WAR OUR FINANCIAL SUPPORT ON WHICH THE ENTIRE WAR PRODUCTION IS BASED, WE ARE NOT ONLY PROVIDING OUR FULL PROPAGANDA POWER WHICH IS THE MORAL ENERGY THAT KEEPS THIS WAR GOING.� The guarantee of victory is predominantly based on weakening the enemy forces, on destroying them in their own country, within the resistance. WE ARE THE TROJAN HORSES IN THE ENEMY'S FORTRESS.� THOUSANDS OF JEWS LIVING IN EUROPE CONSTITUTE THE PRINCIPAL FACTOR IN THE DESTRUCTION OF OUR ENEMY.� THERE, OUR FRONT IS A FACT AND THE MOST VALUABLE AID FOR VICTORY." (Chaim Weizmann, president of the World Jewish Congress, in a speech on Dec.� 3, 1942; New York).
Thus, we can easily see that International Jewry has not only overstepped the "bounds of propriety" but that it stands exposed, "hoist on its own petard" so to speak and is presently coming under public scrutiny as never before.
As more and more information is being passed out to the general public by newsletters such as this one. So new let me share with you, some of the thinking of this half‑ Jew before he learned the realities of politics, and sold his soul for public recognition, by accommodating the wishes of International Jewry.
To begin, let us turn back the clock to November 5, 1919, where Sir Winston Churchill is standing before the� British Parliament, addressing his colleagues:
"No sooner did Lenin arrive on his return to Russia than he began beckoning a finger here and there to obscure persons in sheltered retreats in New York, in Glascow, in Berne, and in other countries, and he gathered together the leading spirits of a formidable sect, the most formidable sect in the world, of which he was the high priest and chief.� With these spirits around him he set to work with demoniacal ability to tear to pieces every institution on which the Russian State depended.� Russia was laid low. Russia had to be laid low."
Later, in a famous article in the Illustrated Sunday Herald, London, February 8, 1920, page 5, Churchill described in the following words, "the most formidable sect in the world" and explained why "Russia had to be laid low."� This article was in part reproduced by the B'nai B'rith News, Chicago, in its issue of May 1920 under the heading of Some Indirect Compliments, Churchill wrote:
"The conflict between good and evil which proceeds unceasingly in the breast of man nowhere reaches such an intensity as in the Jewish race. The dual nature of mankind is nowhere more strongly or more terribly exemplified.� We owe the Jews in the Christian revelation for a system of ethics which, even if it were entirely separated from the supernatural, would be incomparably the most precious possession of mankind, worth in fact the fruits of all other wisdom and learning put together.�
�And it may well be that this same astounding race may at the present time be in the actual process of producing another system of morals and philosophy, as malevolent as Christianity was benevolent, which if not arrested, would shatter irretrievably all that Christianity has rendered possible. It would almost seem as if the gospel of Christ and the gospel of anti‑Christ were destined to originate among the same people; and that his mystic and mysterious race had been chosen for the supreme manifestations, of both the divine and the diabolical...
�There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by those international and for the most part atheistical Jews.� It is certainly a very great one: it probably outweighs all others.� The majority of the leading figures are Jews.� Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from Jewish leaders.�
�Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek; all Jews.�
�In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing.� And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter Revolution has been taken by Jews. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary.
�The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. In all these countries the part played by the Jews in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing."
In the same article Churchill commented on the Jewish role in revolutionary movements as follows:
"This movement among the Jews is not new.� From the days of Spartacus‑Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world‑wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing.�
�As a� modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, it played a definitely recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution.� It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld (criminal elements; the so‑called Costa Nostra or Mafia is totally controlled by Jews) of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed master of that enormous empire."
Realizing that the foregoing utterances by Sir Winston will come as a surprise to many, we should mention the support given to these allegations by one Maurice Samuel, himself a member of the tribe, in his amazing frank You Gentiles (Harcourt Brace & Co. New York, Aug. 1924, page 155), where he states the following:
"WE JEWS, WE THE DESTROYERS, WILL REMAIN THE DESTROYERS FOREVER, NOTHING THAT YOU DO WILL MEET OUR NEEDS AND DEMANDS.� WE WILL FOREVER DESTROY BECAUSE WE NEED A WORLD OF OUR OWN, A GOD‑WORLD, WHICH IT IS NOT IN YOUR NATURE TO BUILD."
It would not be difficult to document an endless array of such assertions but let us get on with the "rest of the story." First however, and in light of so much that is happening, we wish to give credit where credit is due and share some remarkable insights with you given by Robert H. Williams in his final (early 1958) issue of the highly informative Williams Intelligence Summary:
"I can assure you that millions more of our people today are aware that we are in great danger, millions more are at least suspicious of the identity of the revolutionaries than ever before.� Like all power movements of our time, both Communism and Zionism are racial...Communism was launched as a destructive gangster apparatus for the cult of Jewish bankers who also finance and use Zionism in the conquest of governments.� It was not for Jews, but to destroy the races and governments, cultures and religions, making way for the Zionist program.
�It is the most motley mongrelization of races.� Zionism, being purely Jewish, must depend on non‑Jews or reveal its identity.
�Eventually, it must expose itself anyway.� It is impossible for it to carry on the program of Communist‑like propaganda and terrorism without eventually becoming conspicuous...This racial character of Zionism is our guarantee that the Zionist masters cannot go on forever with their destructive program.� They will eventually be called to account."
May we dare suggest that America today is witnessing the approach of the final accounting? Bear with us for one more quote and then we'll get down to the nitty gritty, so to speak.
The setting for this amazing revelation goes back a few years and involves Norman Dodd, the individual who in large measure, implemented the inquiries of the famous Reece Committee.� In an experience which rather paralleled that of Senator Jack B. Tenney of the California State Fact Finding Subcommittee, Norman Dodd was offered invaluable help by members of the Anti‑Defamation League; UP TO A POINT.�
That point being an investigation that appeared dangerous to International Jewry.� Thereafter, they quite brazenly made it clear they would (and did) destroy the Committee. But prior to that event, a certain intellectual tie had developed between Norman Dodd and a certain person, which we will document and describe in the following, in November 1953:
"My position was director of Research for the Reece Committee. The setting (for this experience) was the cocktail bar of the Mayflower (hotel) in Washington.� I was there by invitation.� My host was Herman Edelsberg; the Washington Representative of the Anti‑Defamation League of B'nai B'rith. Our visit lasted more than two hours during which in response to the interest I showed in his "work," so to speak, he towards its end told this to me: 'We have a problem.� It is this. Because of the power which we have amassed, the best thing we should do is to dissolve, to liquidate.� But; this we will not ever do. Therefore, the power which we have amassed will; as such a power always does, ultimately destroy us.� This we know.� But the trouble is that in the process it will destroy everything else.� This too we know.'"
After this astounding pronouncement, Norman Dodd states that Herman Edelsberg went on to say the following:
"'We have an Achilles heel. As we succeed we get closer and closer to the surface. This means our 'surfacing'� is bound to be picked up by someone who will treat it like the end of a loose string by following it to where it leads.� We think we will be able to spot such a person before he gets too far and that we have enough power to stop him going on.'"
That will have to suffice for the moment but it is becoming quite clear that the "loose string" is clear to any who have eyes to see! And of course to top it all we have David Ben Gurion, at that time Prime Minister of the Israeli state happily proclaiming in an interview granted to Look Magazine, January 6, 1962, that within twenty five years (make that 1987) he anticipated that:
"...With the exception of the USSR as a federated Eurasian state, all other continents will become united in a world alliance (That he knew about, what President Bush calls the 'New World Order' in 1962 there is no question), at whose disposal will be an international police force (the United States Military). All armies will be abolished and there will be no more wars.� In Jerusalem, the United Nations (a truly United Nations; and his timing was a little off but we can see what he said is now quickly coming to pass) will build a shrine of the Prophets to serve the federated union of all continents; this will be the seat of the Supreme Court of Mankind, to settle all controversies among the federated continents, as prophesied by Isaiah."
Think of the implication of this, if you will. A Prime Minister of "Israel," a nation with whom we are told we have a "special relationship" (it appears to be one of slave and master) can't resist the temptation to "show off" and brag a little.� He also anticipated that the United States would be turned into a "...welfare state with a planned economy," an eventuality that no longer seems remote, but is in fact a reality!, but more pointedly, he pictured our nation being ruled from "Israel!"� Yet the President of the United States and bought‑and‑paid for Congress never dare say a word!
Let's see if we can put the picture together and bring it to current date.� Because we know the ball of string is beginning to unravel.
It is our contention that "Israel" comes very close to not having a friend in the world, except the United States and Russia which the Jews rule totally.� Of course we must recognize, the fact, that "Israel" has captured the means of mass communications throughout the civilized world but there is a distinct undercurrent indicating that those who had submitted to the pressures applied by the ADL and their various Zionist masters, are deserting the ship.�
Thus� we find the New York Times, the Washington Post, Time, U.S. News and World Reports, and Newsweek Magazines, all carrying spectacular stories highly critical of "Israel."� Also we have recently seen a documentary on CNN that was highly critical of the bastard, murderous state of Israel.� Having been an ardent "Israel/Zionist/Jew" watcher for over a quarter of a century we are hardly a disinterested party.� But we assure you, the signs are there.�
Let us share an extremely revealing article from the New York Times of July 11th, 1986.� Which shortly before his criticism, or rather admission that "Israel" was slipping from grace, would have been unthinkable!
��������������������������� New Tack on Cases Against Israel?
By Stephen Engleberg: Special to The New York Times:� WASHINGTON, July 10:
"There was once a time when allegations that the Israeli Government had violated American law were handled with an eye to preserving the close relationship between the United States and Israel.
�Suspicions of misconduct by Israel typically did not end up in front of grand juries but were resolved quietly through talks between diplomats.
�Matters are somewhat different now.� In the last year, the Israelis have been the subject of a series of well‑ publicized investigations involving allegations of espionage and illegal export of American technology.
�At no time in the history of the state of Israel have the United States authorities been investigating more visibly embarrassing cases involving charges of crimes by the Israeli government or its representatives.
�Senior Administration officials deny that this sudden spurt of cases reflects a change in policy toward Israel.� Some observers contend, however, that the investigations are a sign that the White House has failed to maintain discipline over the Government's law‑enforcement agencies.� Pro‑Israel lobbyists are privately asking whether mid‑level officials in the Justice Department or United States Customs Service have been disclosing the investigations as part of an unauthorized vendetta against Israel.
�Whatever the case, the relationship between Israel and the United States does appear to be moving in several different directions at once.
�On Sunday, for instance, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral William J. Crowe Jr., was at the Israeli Embassy for a ceremony honoring the departing military attache.� Just a few days later, Administration officials disclosed that the Customs Service and the Justice Department were investigating a possible plan for illegally exporting equipment used in making cluster weapons.
�In a statement that suggested a longing for the days when such cases were handled through diplomatic channels, the former Israeli chief of staff, Rafael Eitan, said, 'If there was any substance to these allegations, the Americans could have approached us quietly and discreetly and clarified matters.'
�The Israelis were particularly angry that the case had been disclosed to the news media by unnamed officials before they were notified of its existence.
�Another case involving the possible illegal export of technology for tank cannon barrels broke last December, and in that instance camera crews from 'The NBC Evening News' accompanied the Customs Service agents as they executed search warrants in upstate New York.
�Steven Green, who has written critically of the Israeli‑ American military relationship, said that he was finding increasing numbers of middle‑level officials in Washington who were willing to discuss what they believe is a pattern of Israeli misconduct.� 'I find that people are more and more frequently willing to be cooperative to find informal channels to get the word out,' Mr.� Green said.� 'It's from a feeling of frustration.'
�Supports of Israel contend that this willingness to disclose information about investigations of the Israelis springs largely from lower‑level officials.� At the highest levels, they contend, the Reagan Administration remains a staunch supporter of Israel.
�'There has never bee a period with this much friendliness and trust,' said Hymen Bookbinder, the Washington representative of the American Jewish Committee. 'This is an unprecedented period of friendship and there are a few people who don't like this.'
�An official Israeli statement on Wednesday, however, suggested that that the raising of the cluster weapon case caused 'serious astonishments' that cloud 'overcloud the good relations prevailing between the U.S. and Israel.'
�The most prominent of the cases related to Israel involved Jonathan Jay Pollard, the former Navy analyst who recently pleaded guilty to spying for Israel.� Former Justice Department officials say they know of previous instances in which cases of Israeli spying in the United States were handled without criminal proceedings.� But Mr. Pollard's behavior immediately before his arrest; a dash into the Israeli Embassy with F.B.I.� agents trailing him, made it impossible to dispose of the incident quietly.� Additionally, the justice Department has taken a hard‑line stand against all espionage, and was loathe to avert its eyes from Mr.� Pollard just because he was working for the Israelis.
�The situation worsened when Justice Department officials concluded they had been misled by the Israelis about the number of people involved in the case.� 'That whole thing left an extremely bad taste in people's mouths,' said one official familiar with the case.
�Mr.� Pollard is now cooperating with the investigation and a grand jury in Washington, D.C., is continuing to investigate.
�Customs officials and the Justice Department have been looking into allegations that American companies shipped technology for tank cannon barrels to Israel in violation of export laws. That case is still under investigation.� Finally, a grand jury last year indicted a California businessman, Richard Kelly Smyth, on charges of illegally exporting to Israel 800 devices of the type used to trigger nuclear explosions."
Space limitations preclude offering other than a cursory glance at much of the material that has been amassed. But a sample follows:
Time, No Whitewash: Pressures for a Probe, and we find a relentless pressure being brought to bear on "Israel," due to the murder of two Palestinian prisoners! What's so unusual about that!� But it was hung out on the clothesline in public view!
Next, the ongoing multi‑level exposure of the "Israeli" government in the notorious Pollard affair! Were it any other country in the world, by now we would be breaking off diplomatic relations but even so, from the "Israeli" standpoint, there is no way they can put the lid on the entire sordid affair.� Why this reaches back to the 1960's and the "Pennsylvania ripoff" of vast quantities of uranium that ended up in "Israel."� The same military officers involved at the time, were operating as "controls" in the Pollard affair.� Someone is going to write a book on this business and it appears that it will be like "Rambo" with parts one through four.� Heads continue to roll and no one in our government dares try to cover up the affair.
Newsweek gives us detailed and substantial information under the heading "Israel: Leaders on the Spot; a coalition in trouble" (of that there can be no doubt, the country is splintered and virtually ungovernable) and this also is about two murdered Palestinians!� The Israeli's bragged openly about his murder of hundreds of men, women and children in the Deir Yassin affair, yet our President invited the Prime Minister to Camp David to determine how to continue to occupy Palestine, in what they dare term "Israel!"� Now, suddenly, this orchestration of criticism for a government that is only doing what it does best and naturally, that is to say, MURDER AND TORTURE, ON AN UNPRECEDENTED SCALE.
Finally in Newsweek, in a full page article including a photograph of an Israeli (retired?) general in handcuffs, we find: "A FRIENDSHIP UNDER PRESSURE; New charges that Israel is swiping (the word should be stealing) U.S. secrets."� The article deals with cluster bombs which the Israeli government has proven it will use on helpless civilian refugees!� ISRAEL IS A GANGSTER NATION AND IS RULED BY IDENTIFIED TERRORISTS WHO RICHLY DESERVE HANGING.�
The manner in which the Zionists and the Anti‑ Defamation League have blackmailed our Congress is simply beyond belief.� However, at long last there is every sign that what was suggested by Robert Williams and outlined above is actually beginning to happen.� That it will be a slow process, goes without saying, because the Jews have almost absolute control of the news media.� FOR AMERICAN JEWS HAVE PROVEN TO BE JUST AS TRAITOROUS AS THEIR ISRAELI COUNTERPARTS, OTHERWISE THEY WOULD PUT A STOP TO IT.
We suggest that were it not for the incalculable harm done to our government's ability to serve its American people through our foreign policy; this harm being directly traceable to the false doctrine espoused by such fiends of "Israel" as Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson. We further suggest the William's "prophecy" would be happening faster. Having correctly assessed the fact that the Zionists would end up exposed to public scrutiny, he could not possibly have imagined the sinister distortion of scripture that would lead untold millions to put "Israel" above loyalty to either Christ or country.
What a travesty! The blood soaked Israeli leaders are truthfully able to say, "...We have the Christians of America!"� And Jerry Falwell urging eighty thousand preachers associated with the so‑called Moral� Majority, "To stand against Israel is to stand against God."� And as Ruth Mouly pointed out in her article in the Humanist, May/June 1982 entitled "The Religious Right and Zionism;"
"The degree of commitment which characterizes many Christian Zionists is illustrated by the words of a pro‑Israeli Kansas journalist, 'As a gentle American, as a Christian who considers loyalty to God above all human commitments, if the choice ever comes between loyalty to an American government and loyalty to Israel, I have no choice.� I must stand by Israel.'"
There are few men in the entire world more dangerous to your liberties than Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell!
We close with the words of Richard Cotten who said: "FREEDOM IS NOT FREE, FREE MEN ARE NOT EQUAL, AND EQUAL MEN ARE NOT FREE!"
�������������������������������������������� Entity in Palestine
On May 1949, the General Assembly of International Security Council recognized Israel as a state established on Palestinian land. Israel's first government was headed by David Ben Gurion. As a consequence, Palestine, particularly, and Middle East region, generally, entered in a bloody conflict which continues till the present day. The declaration of Israel's State was not a sudden result of 1948‑War, but has much deeper roots dating back to the old British imperialist� movement.
The idea of establishing the State of Israel emerged in the wake of what was later known by as the Balfour Declaration, in which Arthur James Balfour, the British Prime Minister,� promised in 1917 that Britain will do its best to establish a Jewish national home in Palestine. This ill‑omened Declaration was the starting point for all events which preceded the Declaration of the Israeli State.
Early this century, Britain's policy had been going towards settling down the British presence in India, Egypt and vast parts of Africa to protect the roads leading to these� settlements. However, Palestine had a strategic position for it is essential to protect the Sinai and the Suez Canal. Additionally, it is located on the road between India and Africa.
As a result, Britain concluded that it is very necessary to put this region under its control, through settling foreign people, which would serve as a buffer zone. At the same time, the Zionist Movement was seeking to establish a state. On the other hand, in the Zionist First Summit, held in Basel, Switzerland in 1897, 23 Jewish leaders announced that Jews should establish a Jewish state in Palestine and remove all the current inhabitants.
As a result, the Zionist and the British interests had intersected, and consequently, an alliance between these two imperialistic powers had formed.
It is very obvious that the real dimensions of this alliance was represented in statements and attitudes of Jewish and British leaders. For instance, Ben Gurion said:" Britain is protecting� us, so we must not be at the back ranks. We have to form Jewish Militia to protect ourselves and destroy Arabs. This will not, simply, be achieved unless we received support and aid from Britain." While Azar Weizman said in his memories:"
There was a confidential agreement in which Britain had engaged itself to hand over Palestine without Arab people to us in 1934." Churchill, British Prime Minister, said in response to Arabs' demand of revoking Balfour Declaration:" They ask for me to reject Balfour Declaration and haul Jewish immigration. I can't do that, and I don't wish also. I think it is much better for world, Jews, Britain and Arabs also to� implement this Declaration. Establishing Jewish state on Jordan's River bands with 4 or 5 million Jews will be in Britain's interest."
Prime Minister Churchill did not concern himself about the fairness of removing an entire population from their homeland but was more concerned about what is in Britain's interests. This is not democracy or liberty but racism and colonialism. In this way Britain, then Palestine's Mandatory Power, sought to establish a Jewish state in the colony of Palestine.
On April 5th, 1920 the League of Nations decided that Britain is going to be the mandatory power in Palestine, In its turn, Britain had appointed the Jewish Herbert Samuel as its high Commissioner who accepted the cooperation with the Jewish� organization. On the other hand and in spite of the protests, Balfour said:" Zionism is more important than 700,000 Arab Palestinians."
Thus, Mandatory Power started to bring Jews from all over the world and settled them in Palestine. Furthermore, the British government had granted the Jewish Organization vast powers to bring ten thousands of Jewish people a year. Also, Mandatory Power helped Jews on dominating strategic positions inside Palestine for establishing settlements. On the other hand, this Power had forced the Arab farmers to sell their lands because of their incapability to pay back the debts and loans.
The Jews began to surge into Palestine. So, while their number was 58 thousand in 1918, this number increased to 92 thousand between 1939 to 1945, then to 161 thousand between 1946 and 1948 to reach to 4.2 million in 1992.
The British‑Jewish coordination continued until the Jews knew that, unlike American Power, Britain's imperialistic power was about to collapse. So, Jews went to the side of United States which completely supported them. Rejecting U.S.A. to interfere in the Palestinian issue, British government decided to refer the subject to Security Council.
����� ���
In 1947, Security Council issued its Resolution of Dividing Palestine into two regions: Arab (11500 km.squar) and Jewish (14100 km.sq.). As a result of Military clashes inside Palestine, Security Council froze its Resolution on March 1948. The Jews began, on April 1948, their aggressions. As a result, the Jews conquest most of Arab cities and villages after they had evacuated them from Arab population. At this time, Argon's gangs headed by Minahim Beigen committed a terrifying massacre at Dair Yassin killing about 250 women, children and old men. After the massacre, Beigen said:" Were it not For victory of Air Eosin, Israel would not had been ever." John Kimchi, Jewish writer, commented:" It is an ugliest shameful stain in Jews' history."
Thus, we can see that the conspiracy was created by Zionism, supported by Britain and sponsored by U.S.A. So, killing, terrorism and displacing peoples are basic elements on which Israel State established and grew in addition to claim on an alleged religious right to Palestinian� and.
Before Zionist occupation, number of Jews in Palestine was about 58 thousand who were living in peace with 642 thousand Arab citizens, both Moslems and Christians.
In fact, not all Zionists, now presented in Palestine, are Semitics. As Jewish sources say that about 82% of Zionists who are, now, staying and governing Israel, are non‑Semitic Jews.
On Nov. 25, 1940, a boat carrying Jewish refugees from Nazi Europe, the "Patra," exploded and sank off the coast of Palestine killing 252 people.
The Zionist "Haganah" claimed the passengers committed suicide to protest British refusal to let them land. Years later, it admitted that rather than let the passengers go to Mauritius it blew up the vessel.��
"Sometimes it is necessary to sacrifice the few in order to save the many," Moshe Sharett, a former Israeli Prime Minister said at a memorial service in 1958.
In fact, during the Holocaust, Zionist policy was that Jewish life had no value unless it promoted the cause of the creation of Israel. "One goat in Israel is worth more than the whole Diaspora," Yitzhak Greenbaum, head of the Jewish Agency's "Rescue Committee" said.
Rabbi Moshe Shonfeld accuses the Zionists of collaborating in the Nazi slaughter of European Jewry directly and indirectly.� The charges are contained in his book, "Holocaust Victims Accuse" (1977) which is readable on line. http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/books.htm(Download it by right‑clicking on the red Acrobat PDF link. Then left‑click "Save Target.")
Rabbi Shonfeld calls the Zionists "war criminals," who usurped the leadership of the Jewish people, betrayed their trust, and, after their annihilation, reaped the moral capital.
Shonfeld states: "The Zionist approach that Jewish blood is the anointing oil needed for the wheels of the Jewish state is not a thing of the past. It remains operable to this very day."
Other books on this theme by Jews include: Edwin Black, "The Transfer Agreement"; Ben Hecht, "Perfidy," M.J. Nurenberger "The Scared and the Damned"; Joel Brand, "Satan and the Soul"; Chaim Lazar, "Destruction and Rebellion"; and Rabbi Michael Dov Ber Weismandel "From the Depth."
The implication, which I will explore later, is that Zionism, at the top, is not a Jewish movement. In the words of veteran Israeli politician Eliezar Livneh, "The Zionist heritage had in it something flawed to begin with."�
���������������� Shocking �Highlights� of Rabbi Shonfeld�s Book
While European Jews were in mortal danger, Zionist leaders in America deliberately provoked and enraged Hitler. They began in 1933 by initiating a worldwide boycott of Nazi goods.� Dieter von Wissliczeny, Adolph Eichmann's lieutenant, told Rabbi Weissmandl that in 1941 Hitler flew into a rage when� Rabbi Stephen Wise, in the name of the entire Jewish people, "declared war on Germany". Hitler fell on the floor, bit the carpet and vowed: "Now I'll destroy them. Now I'll destroy them." In January 1942,� he convened the "Wannsee Conference" where the "final solution" took shape.
Rabbi Shonfeld says the Nazis chose Zionist activists to run the "Judenrats" and to be Jewish police or "Kapos."� "The Nazis found in these 'elders' what they hoped for, loyal and obedient servants who because of their lust for money and power, led the masses to their destruction." The Zionists were often intellectuals who were often "more cruel than the Nazis" and kept secret the trains' final destination. In contrast to secular Zionists, Shonfeld says Orthodox Jewish rabbis refused to collaborate and tended their beleaguered flocks to the end.
Rabbi Shonfeld cites numerous instances where Zionists sabotaged attempts to organize resistance, ransom and relief. They undermined an effort by Vladimir Jabotinsky to arm Jews before the war. They stopped a program by American Orthodox Jews to send food parcels to the ghettos� (where child mortality was 60%) saying it violated the boycott. They thwarted a British parliamentary initiative to send refugees to Mauritius, demanding they go to Palestine instead. They blocked a similar initiative in the US Congress. At the same time, they rescued young Zionists. Chaim Weizmann, the Zionist Chief and later first President of Israel said: "Every nation has its dead in its fight for its homeland. The suffering under Hitler are our dead." He said they "were moral and economic dust in a cruel world."
Rabbi Weismandel, who was in Slovakia, provided maps of Auschwitz and begged Jewish leaders to pressure the Allies to bomb the tracks and crematoriums. The leaders didn't press the Allies because the secret policy was to annihilate non‑Zionist Jews. The Nazis came to understand that death trains and camps would be safe from attack and actually concentrated industry there. (See also, William Perl, "The Holocaust Conspiracy.')
None of the above is intended to absolve the Nazis of responsibility. However, the holocaust could have been prevented or at least alleviated had the Zionist leadership behaved honorably.
������������������������������������������ What is �Zionism�'?
Lord Acton said, "The truth will come out when powerful people no longer wish to suppress it." Since Sept. 11, more and more people are turning to the "conspiratorial" or "suppressed" view of history for explanations.��
In 1891, Cecil Rhodes started a secret society called the "Round Table" dedicated to world hegemony for the shareholders of Bank of England and their allies. These priggish aristocrats, including the Rothschilds, realized they must control the world to safeguard their monopoly on money creation) as well as global resources. The same folks control the U.S. Federal Reserve and other major central banks. http://www.savethemales.ca/260602.html
They were united also by a commitment to freemasonry, which at the top, is dedicated to the destruction of Christianity, the worship of Lucifer, and the building of a pagan temple in Jerusalem. They see most of humanity as "useless eaters" and they pioneered eugenics to decrease population and weed out inferior specimens. The eventual annihilation of non‑Zionist Jews was rooted in this English movement.
In 1897, the first Zionist Congress took place in Basle. In 1904, the founder of Zionism Theodore Herzl died at age 44 under suspicious circumstances. The movement was taken over by the Round Table. The purpose was to use it and Communism to advance their plan for world hegemony. During the same week in November 1917, the Bolshevik Revolution took place and the Balfour Declaration promised Palestine to the Jews.
The Round Table group planned three world wars to degrade, demoralize and destroy mankind, rendering it defenseless. The Third World War, now beginning, pits the Zionists against the Muslims. http://www.savethemales.ca/071002.html
The purpose of Zionism is to help colonize the Middle East, subvert Islam, and control the oilfields. For this reason Israel continues to receive blank checks. (One analyst estimates the US taxpayer has spent $1.7 trillion on Israel.) This is why the founding of Israel took precedence over the welfare of the Jewish people.
Israel has little to do with the Jewish people. Zionism, Communism, Feminism, Nazism, are creations of the same satanic cabal. These 'isms are means to the final goal, a neo feudal global dictatorship.� FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover referred to this when he said: "The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists."
As unwitting overseers, Israelis will continue as victims of "compulsory suicide." Americans too are being fitted for this role. Sept. 11 was an example.
Arab terrorism is also backed by this cabal. (http://www.savethemales.ca/251102.html) Osama Bin Laden made more than 260 phone calls to England between 1996‑1998. http://www.afgha.com/viewtopic.php?topic=748&forum= The aim is to contrive a "war of civilizations" as an excuse to grind down both Muslim states and the West to create a global police state.�
What I have been calling "compulsory suicide" is satanic "culling." The constant reference by Zionist and other leaders to "blood sacrifice" refers to the practice of human sacrifice. Apparently energy is released when people are slaughtered. Recently U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage said the Hezbollah owes the U.S. a "blood debt.") (http://www.yellowtimes.org/article.php?sid=673)�
Our rulers design wars as offerings to Lucifer. They find slaughter and mayhem exhilarating, as long as it is someone else who is sacrificed.
��������������������������� Where Does This Leave The Jews?
For millennia, Jews owed their survival to their devotion to "Torah."� In the last century they have forsaken this portable spiritual home, and placed their faith in a tangible one, Israel. Unfortunately, they have been duped.
Israelis are becoming unwitting overseers in the global plantation. American Jews, prominent in media, education, government and finance, are also unwitting instruments. They will end up taking the blame for the real culprits, the shareholders of the world's major central banks.
Mankind has been betrayed by its leadership. Of Jewish leadership, Israeli journalist Barry Chamish writes: "The richest appoint themselves to the highest posts. Thus the greediest and most unscrupulous run the show. [They] ...will sell their souls and those of their people for power and acclaim." See Barry Chamish "Just as Scared, Just as Doomed."http://www.redmoonrising.com/bc15.htm
There are a few hundred thousand orthodox Jews like Rabbi Shonfeld who have always understood Zionism. They have always rejected the state of Israel and remained faithful to the Torah. They could form a core for a genuine Jewish revival. Their websites are www.jewsagainstzionism.com, http://www.jewsnotzionists.org. and www.netureikarta.org.
In conclusion, a satanic cult governs the world. These people hate God and hate mankind. They want to destroy it. They believe the end justifies the means and are ruthless. They use the Jews, and everyone else, as cannon fodder. We are "children of the matrix," duped, distracted, stunted and sacrificed. Without the vision provided by God, we are lambs being led to slaughter.