Watchman Willie Martin Archive

                     The Effects of The Talmud on Judeo-Christianity

                                    by Col. Jack Mohr, USA, Ret.

                                           TABLE OF CONTENTS


1. Lighting a Candle

2. Recognizing the Enemy

3. Talmudic Influence

4. History of Judaism in the New World

5. The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

6. Biblical History of Israel and Judah

7. The Babylonian Talmud: An Instrument to Destroy Christianity

8. What is the Answer


From the time He was a mere infant until His death, our Redeemer and Savior, Jesus the Christ, was hated by the Jews. Herod, the Edomite king of Judea, attempted to kill Him by ordering all children to be killed who were up to two years of age who lived in Bethlehem and the surrounding country. (Matthew 2:16) On different occasions the Jews attempted to trap Him by their questioning, hoping He would violate some point of Law. They demanded His execution before Pilate. The New Testament bears witness to their undeniable hatred.

Once the Christ began preaching of the Kingdom of God, most of the people who heard Him were indifferent. A mere handful believed Him. In Acts 1:15, we find only 120 people were gathered together when Peter addressed them. Even today, while millions gather in His name, most are indifferent. Few there are who are willing to meet the requirements He set forth in order to qualify as being His brothers and sisters. (Matthew 12:50; John 15:14)

Yet in spite of their indifference and lukewarm condition, these people don't hate Jesus enough to want Him killed; they just don't love Him enough to follow His instructions.

(John 14:15)

During the Christ's ministry, His most ardent and vehement opposition came from the Pharisees and their companions, the lawyers (scribes)! These people were known as JEWS, or more correctly JUDEANS. It was these JUDEAN Pharisees and scribes who sought to kill the Christ (Luke 22:2; John 5:18). It is recorded that the conspiracy became so intense that Jesus would not walk in JEWRY (JUDEA) because the Jews sought to kill Him (John 7:1).

The people we know today as JEWS are descendants of those ancient enemies of Christ, the JUDEANS. Whether or not they are racial descendants of those Pharisees is irrelevant, just as whether they are racial descendants of Abraham is irrelevant. The point is, these modern‑day lawyers and Pharisees, who say they are JEWS, are the SPIRITUAL descendants of the ancient Jews who sought to kill Jesus.

The evidence presented by Brother Mohr in this book establishes this hatred by quoting from their own "holy book," The Babylonian Talmud. Brother Mohr lays out the facts for all to see. I believe it is inevitable that indifferent Christians will do all they can to distort the evidence brother Mohr presents and attempt to discredit him. Additionally, those who call themselves Jews today will be angered by it and will increase their assaults upon him and against the King he serves. Brother Mohr and I expect this, so let it come! We are ready.

This book deserves and requires more than a mere reading by Christians. It should be thoroughly studied, and where possible, shared with brainwashed brothers in the Christian churches.

Before you turn to page one, let me give you a starting point from THE WORD of our King. Turn to John 15 and read very carefully, beginning with verse 18 through verse 21. Then continue on through verse four of Chapter 16.

Harry L. Werner, Jr.

Assistant Editor ‑ Christian Patriot Crusader

June 26,1991

                                          LIGHTING A CANDLE

                                                 Chapter One

This book is about the Jewish Talmud which is to the Jewish world what the Bible is to the Christian world. In the words of Jewish author Herman Wouk, it is the "heart's blood of the Jewish religion."

The purpose of this book is not to downgrade the Jewish people, or stir up resentment against them. Its purpose is to explain, often in their own words, how they feel about you, the "goyim" (a Yiddish word meaning "non‑Jew animal"), and about your religion, Christianity. It is written as a means of protecting ourselves from the greatest threat to ever face Christianity in our two thousand years of history. We cannot, we dare not, over look this threat if we are to survive as a free people.

Someone has said, "It is better to light one candle than to sit in darkness." For over twenty‑five years I have attempted to light many candles. Where I may have failed during this period of time, I hope to see the day when one of these candles of truth will burst into flame and, like a long smoldering spark, start a conflagration which will sweep across America like a prairie fire and illuminate vast areas with truth for the first time.

It has been contended for centuries that in the end, truth will always prevail. We know that "truth in action can prove itself a dynamic force of unlimited power." But, truth has never been a self‑starter. Truth has never been able to get off dead‑center, and unless its apostle is willing to give it the necessary push to overcome inertia, "truth will die a‑borning!"

On the other hand, truth has often been blacked‑out by repeated, contradictory and conflicting misinformation. The world's history provides many examples of this sobering fact. Treason toward truth is treachery to mankind.

There are no degrees of truth. Truth is absolute! It can never be relative! Truth either exists, or it does not. There is no such thing as a half‑truth, any more than there can be a person who is half‑honest, or half‑loyal. In their attempts to do an ounce of good in one direction, many well‑intentioned people have done a ton of harm in another direction.

Regardless of what anyone says to the contrary, Christian faith stands today with one foot in the grave and the other on a banana peel. It is distasteful to admit it, but it is true. While Christian churches have been increasing their membership rolls, Americans have been on a downhill, degenerate slide to ruin. Morally, we are in the sewer, and the churches have been unable to stop the destruction. In fact, they seem bent on greasing the slide. They offer "Christian rock," a contradiction in terms if there ever was one. They offer Bingo in the basement and live lavishly on other peoples' money. The exposure (pun intended) of the TV pulpiteers indicates the moral climate of this country. And what is the reason behind this degeneracy? There is a reason, and this book will reveal that reason. What is the hidden power which has such a powerful effect on the Christian world in 1991 ? What is the anti‑Christ force which has turned the twentieth‑century church into the Laodicean church of Revelation 3:14‑18; a church which knows it is rich and influential and yet which cannot, or will not, see that it is "wretched, miserable, poor, blind, and naked?" What can bring this wretched

church back to its place of greatness where it can carry out Christ's plan of salvation?

Today, the Christian church stands at the crossroads of destiny. The divine and sacred mission of the Christian faith faces a danger at this juncture in history which is greater than any it has faced in 2,000 years. If the day ever comes when Christians cannot profess their faith as they do today in America, then we will see the beginning of the end.

The history of the world for the past several centuries, and current events at home and abroad confirm to the intelligent person that there is indeed a conspiracy afoot to destroy Christian civilization. The world‑wide plot of these diabolical conspirators has been instituted while most Christians have been asleep in front of their pulpits and their TV's. For the most part, the Christian clergy, who should have been in the forefront of exposing this danger, have been indifferent or ignorant and have been the ones who assisted the enemies of Christ in their efforts to destroy us. This ignorance and indifference have dealt a blow to the Christian faith from which many will never recover.

Today, more than ever before, Christians need a "spiritual Paul Revere" who will ride across this land, warning that the enemy is closing in on them. This book is such an effort.

                                        Recognizing The Enemy

                                                 Chapter Two

It is important for a soldier in time of war to be able to identify his enemy. He cannot be successful in his efforts to conquer his opponent unless he readily recognizes him. Today, the souls of millions of Christians are uneasy about the state of the Christian faith. The minds of thousands of Christian clergy are troubled about the mysterious pressures from those above them which often prevent them from exercising sound judgment. If these forces can be identified, then Christianity will stand on its feet, face its enemies as firmly as the Rock of Gibraltar and stop them in their tracks. But unless this is done soon, the faith of many will "wax cold and begin to crumble away."

In Jeremiah 23:22, we read these words: But if they (the pastors of Israel) had stood in My (God's) counsel, and had caused my people (Israel) to hear my words, then they (the pastors of Israel) should have turned them (Israel) away from their evil way and from the evil of their doings.

This indicates to me that the message coming from the majority of Christian pulpits in America is not the unadulterated Word of God. For if the truth were being preached according to God's own Word, our people would have turned to Him. This is one of the major reasons we have undertaken this study of one of the major textbooks of the anti‑Christ enemy, The Babylonian Talmud.

The Christian clergy are primarily, if not solely, responsible for the internal forces within the Christian faith which are fighting against its best interests. If we are to survive, we can no longer pussyfoot around with the truth because it offends someone or makes them uncomfortable. At this late hour there is very little time left for us to begin to mend the fence. Only the courageous will endure the present crisis, and both figuratively and literally, we will see live heroes and dead cowards when the dust of this battle settles. The Christian faith is the only anchor to windward which will stand against the universal savagery of the enemies of Christianity. They have willingly shown us the depths to which they will descend to gain their end of world control.

There need be no confusion in the minds of Christians when it comes to the fundamentals of the faith. This confusion would not exist if it were not for those of the clergy who are allies with the enemy who seeks to destroy them. There are countless Christians who are standing on the sidelines watching as their faith withers on the vine, and their freedom is about to drop into the laps of their enemies like overripe fruit. This cup will become more bitter when they realize that it is the ignorance and indifference of their spiritual leaders which has caused the deplorable condition of Christianity today. When Christians see their leaders in defeat on every front, they too will become confused and afraid. To stop this surrender, the clergy MUST make an about‑face, no matter how painful it may be. They must take a stand against the

invisible and intangible ideological war which is being waged against the Christian faith.

The utterance from the clergy which confuses Christians most and which is repeated from the pulpit and the printed page without ceasing is: "Jesus was a Jew. We must protect and help the Jews, no matter what they do because they are God's chosen people and if we do not help them, God will curse us." This is the teaching from the majority of Christian pulpits in 1992. They completely ignore the definition of an "anti‑Christ" as given in I John 2:22‑23: Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is anti‑christ, that denieth the Father and the Son. Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father. but he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also.

This couldn't be more clear, and it is certainly an accurate portrayal of Jewish thought today. In II John 10‑11, Christians are given a stern admonition as to their attitude toward these anti‑christs:

If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, (that Jesus is the Christ.) receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed: For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds. This leaves no room for argument!

Christians who know the Scriptures and history cannot reconcile the pulpit claim that Abraham was a Jew. They know this was impossible because Abraham lived more than 1200 years prior to those who became known as Jews. The Christian clergy of America is in bad repute today, and the only way they can redeem themselves is by telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth no matter how painful it may be to themselves or to their denominational leaders. They can begin by refuting the claims that Abraham was a Jew, Christ was a Jew, and that God's chosen people are the Jews.

With this as an introduction, let's take a closer look at those whom I identify as the enemies of Christ and Christianity: the International Talmudic Jews. Before you become angry and throw this book away, I dare you to read on and, as an honest man or woman, compare what I have written with the Word of God.

Following is a comparison of the Jewish holy book, The Babylonian Talmud, with the Christian Bible. Most Christians believe that the Jews follow the TORAH or the Old Testament. Not so! According to Theodore Hertzl, father of modern Zionism, The Babylonian Talmud supersedes every other instruction. It is the center and foundation of Jewish belief and directs their behavior toward non‑Jews whom they call "goyim."

THE EVIDENCE: We will begin our study by reviewing the book, Invitation to the Talmud. (a teaching book) written by Jacob Neusner (a Jew) and published by Harper and Row in 1973. Neusner was a university professor and Ungerleider Distinguished Scholar of Judaic Studies at Brown University. He is author of Invitation to Midrash and has written or edited over 250 books on Judaism. He is known as one of the world's preeminent Judaic scholars and can be considered an expert on the Jewish religion. Excerpts from the Introduction to Invitation to the Talmud follow:

p. XVI It (The Talmud) is the revealed word of God.

p. XVII It (The Talmud) is the revealed teaching ‑ from heaven down to earth and conversely, to make the pro fane sacred. (Profane: not sacred; common, not connected with religion; not initiated into the inner mysteries for esoteric knowledge of something. Ed.)

p. XVI II They (the Jews) rightly see The TALMUD as TORAH, God's revelation to Israel, the Jewish people, and they study it because it is TORAH.

What is the TORAH? The New World Dictionary of the American Language states that it is; The whole body of Jewish religious literature, including the Scripture and The TALMUD. In some instances it refers to the Pentateuch which are the five books of Moses; Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy.

p. XXII  Jewish intellectualism without Jewish faith proves wanting. For divorced from the soul of TALMUDIC being, secular reason among Jewish intellectuals remains formless and formal, producing on the one side the grotesque and absurd and, on the other side, an empty formalism.

p. XXIV Why does the Judaic tradition find God in the thrust and parry of argument as it does when it claims that God Himself studies the TORAH?

The basic text on which The TALMUD is constructed, is the MISHNAH, a philosophical law code brought to closure at about 200 A.D. The TALMUD then draws together the MISHNAH and yet another argumentative text which is called the TOSTEFA, meaning supplements.

p. XXV The TALMUD is really two TALMUDS, for there was one systematic commentary for the MISHNAH, composed by Rabbis in the land of Israel (Palestine ‑ hence called The PALESTINIAN TALMUD) or the TALMUD OF THE LORD OF ISRAEL, or the YERUSHOLOMI or the TALMUD OF JERUSALEM. The other was composed by the Rabbis of Babylonia. The YERUSHOLOMI reached its conclusion at about 400 A.D. and the BOOLI or BABYLONIAN TALMUD, a century or two later.

p. XXVII  From it (The TALMUD) flows whatever truth Jews have to offer the world of Judaism.

(The BABYLONIAN TALMUD is the work most often used by Orthodox Judaism, therefore it is the point of our interest.)

p. XXX When The TALMUD raises an ethical question it speaks of "the good way in which a person should walk, not necessarily in which a Jew should walk. " (Emphasis added. Ed.) When it treats dilemmas of social conflict, all parties to the conflict are assumed to be plain men and women ‑ Jewish men and women to be sure...the discipline of the TORAH is the revealed will of God given to the people of Israel(Jews), and while the Rabbis are well aware that some people are Jews and many are not, The TALMUD is essentially interested in Jews.

(As we go along, we will be able to determine whether this statement is true or not.)

At this point, we look into the main body of the book.


It might be well for us to realize at this point that Judaism did not exist as a religion until the Babylonian captivity, about 590 B.C. The Judahites went into captivity in Babylon as Hebrews, but returned seventy years later as Jews with a heathen occult religion which became known as JUDAISM. Theodore Hertzl, the father of the modern Zionist Movement once said: "It was during the Babylonian captivity that Israel (The majority of the tribes of Judah and Benjamin, along with the ten tribes of Israel, had been taken into captivity by the Assyrians some 150 years earlier and no longer lived in that area. Those who remained of the tribes of Judah and Benjamin were subsequently captured by the Babylonians and moved to Babylon to live and became known as Jews. Ed.) found itself. It not only rediscovered the TORAH, and made it their rule of life, but under its influence new religious instructions, such as the synagogues... came into existence."

Christians need to remember, as we look closely at The TALMUD, that the JUDAISM which today follows TALMUDIC teachings is the PHARISAISM of Jesus' day. You will recall that Jesus said to the Pharisees in Matthew 15:6 .... . Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition." And, in verse nine, He accused them of: "... teaching for doctrines the commandments of men."

The famous Jewish Rabbi, Louis Finklestein, in the foreword to his book The Pharisees. The Social Background of Their Faith, said:

...Judaism ... Pharisaism became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism. But Through all these changes in name ... the spirit of the ancient Pharisees survived unaltered.... From Palestine, to Babylonia; from Babylonia to North Africa, Italy, Spain, France and Germany; from there to Poland, Russia, and Eastern Europe generally, ancient Pharisaism has wandered.... (Demonstrating the enduring importance which is attached to Pharisaism as a religious movement. Ed.)

In order for us to better understand The Talmud, we must first look at the men who were responsible for compiling and writing this reference work over a span of some 1,000 years. The Talmud is the product of a small group of Jewish sages ("profoundly wise counselors" ‑ The Reader's Digest Great Encyclopedic Dictionary) who lived in the land of Israel, which is called the Holy Land, and in the land of Babylonia.

Four facts emerge regarding the "wise men" who contributed to The Talmud and about the social environment at the time:

1.  They saw themselves as men of wisdom. This view of themselves led to the emphasis of two instructions:

    A.   Learning what was already known.

    B.   Understanding the new in terms of the old.

2.  These wise men perceived that the land they dwelt in, Palestine, was holy.

3.  They lived in a time of religious ferment in which religions were coming into being and fading away. The first century marked the beginning of Christianity.

4.  They we re comprised exclusively of men. This should come as no surprise since men of antiquity had a low opinion of women. The Christian Apostle Paul taught that they should be silent in the church. Philo, a Jewish philosopher, taught that sexual relations were permissible only to produce children. Hyrcanus, a first century Rabbi said that a Jew should not teach his daughter the TORAH.

The rabbis were not the ones who held power in the Jewish community. In the first century A.D., Judea, and those who lived there who had become known as Jews, were under Roman control, and Babylonia was a province in the Persian (Iranian) Empire. But the day‑to‑day governing of the Jewish people was left in the hands of a Jewish authority who, when holding the title, was called the EXILARCH. This meant he was the ruler of the Jewish community while they were in exile from the Holy Land. He was recognized by the Romans because he served the purposes of Rome. When these Judahites lived in their own land, the leaders were called "PATRIARCHS" and they ran the country to maintain the peace and well‑being of the people.

Both the EXILARCH and the PATRIARCH had one thing in common; they both claimed Davidic descent. This did not mean they could trace their genealogy back to David, but each supposed his family was one of those who might produce the coming King‑Messiah.

The Maccabees claimed this as did King Herod, who was an Edomite. The rabbis formed the religious and political movements of the land. There were two major political parties, the Sadducees and the Pharisees. They served in the government of the EXILARCH or PATRIARCH. The rabbi taught that when all Jews did as he did, then the Messiah would come. One of them was quoted as saying: If all the Jews will keep the Sabbath for one time only, the Messiah will come.

The rabbis stood apart from the regular Jewish populace and encompassed the myths revealed in The BABYLONIAN TALMUD which centered on Moses and the story of his piety. They teach that due to the piety of Moses, God gave him the Law twice; once orally and the other in God's own handwriting. And, they hold that just as God had given Moses the Law, or the TORAH, they would teach it to their disciples in the same manner.

The rabbis taught that Moses was a rabbi, and for the rabbis, God dons ecclesiastical garb and wears the phylactery which is two small leather cases holding slips inscribed with Scripture passages. One is fastened to the forehead and one to the left arm. The rabbis teach that they study the TORAH on earth as God and the angels study it in heaven. These heavenly school teachers are aware of the Babylonian discussions and enjoy the exceptional grace of heaven. They want to transform the entire Jewish community into an academy where the TORAH is studied and kept because they believe Jews will be redeemed by keeping the TORAH (Law). This is one of the major dividing points between Judaism and Christianity for Christians are taught: For by grace are ye saved; through faith....(Ephesians 2:8)

The Jew is taught that he merits God's favor by obeying the Torah. Thus each Jew becomes a rabbi as he practices the commandments and does good deeds. When all Jews become rabbis, then the Messiah will come.

The rabbinical religion consists of two elements. One is the esoteric, secret doctrines pertaining to the very essence of God, and the second is an often self‑centered view of man's relationship to God. If a Jew sins by omission (by not doing something), he will be held responsible and punishment will follow here and now through physical suffering. If people who are wicked prosper, or if they do not sin and suffer, the rabbi always has an easy explanation for it.

Other elements of rabbinical theory center on demons, witchcraft and incantations; revelations through omens, dreams and astrology; the value of prayer and magic formulas; rabbinical blessings and curses and the merit gained through study of the TORAH.

The rabbis believe in invisible beings which populate space and carry out Divine orders. The prayers of the rabbis center on four major themes:

1.   The temple and its cult.

2.   The wrath of God.

3.   The humility and helplessness of men.

4.   The ideas and sacred symbols found in the TALMUD.

A world of difference separates the ordinary Jew from the rabbi. The rabbi is separated because his social life is completely alien to that of outsiders, and because of his study.

The Jewish people listen to the Scriptures and to the TORAH as it is read in the synagogue. They observe the Sabbath and most of the ritualistic laws, but they understand the TORAH and The Talmud about as much as the average Christian understands the Bible. When a question arises, just as in the Christian realm, instead of searching for the answer themselves, they go to the rabbi just as the Christian goes to his pastor. The rabbis teach that what the average Jew does not understand about God, they, the rabbis, do understand. This is really not so much different from the dogmas of some preachers.

The Hebrew word MISHNAH is from a root word which means "to repeat." The TALMUD teaches that Moses received the TORAH on Mt. Sinai; once in written form on stone by God Himself and the other by oral instructions which were to be passed on by repetition, or through memory. These have been handed down for many generations.

The MISHNAH is divided into six major sections entitled, "Orders," or, in Hebrew, SEDER. The first deals with agricultural law and is the ZERAIM, meaning "seeds." The second is the Sabbath and festival law, called MOED, meaning season." The third deals with the family, various vows, oaths, marriage, divorce and inheritance and it is called NASHIM, meaning "women." The fourth concerns civil law, torts, damages, criminal law and punishments and is called NEZIKIN meaning "damages." The fifth deals with sacrifices and things pertaining to the temple in Jerusalem, such as the order and cult of animal sacrifices. It is called KODASHIM, meaning "holy things."

The MISHNAH orders are sub‑divided into sections called TRACATES of which there are 63. The six major sections of the Orders, are divided as follows: ZERAIM, 11 tracates, with 74 chapters;  MOED has 12 TRACATES with 88 chapters; NASHIM, seven tracates with 71 chapters; NEZIKIN, ten tracates with 73 chapters; KODASHIM, 11 tracates with 91 chapters, and TOHAROT, with 12 tracates and 126 chapters. It is obvious we are dealing with a book a good deal larger than our Holy Bible.

The MISHNAH is comprised principally of the sayings of the rabbis who lived in the first and second centuries. There is very little written before the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem in 70 A.D. (That can be explained by the fact that prior to the Babylonian captivity, the Judahites were under a patriarchal system and worshiped God as prescribed by their forefathers and the Scriptures. During the captivity, those Judahites who were taken captive by Babylonia adopted much of the mysticism and occultism of their captors and mixed it with the belief structure they had at the time. That is when The Talmud came into existence, and following the destruction of the Temple, the opinions of the rabbis began to be written down as "law." These opinions were largely the "traditions" they had gleaned from their captors by mixing God's Law with man's mysticism and occultism.) It is a document of imagination and fantasy, describing how things are using but shreds and remnants of reality. It tells how things were or how the rabbis wanted them to be. It is an orderly document, narrow‑minded, dull and very routine.

No wonder Judaism has so little comfort to offer its adherents. It lacks hope of sins forgiven, no hope for the future; their god is money, and their holy city is not old Jerusalem, but New York City. More Jews are leaving old Palestine to come to America than there are migrating to it.

The aftermath of the Jewish rebellion against Rome in 132‑135 A.D. was that the temple site was permanently prohibited to Jews, and Jerusalem became a closed city to them.


This is a capsule introduction to The Talmud. Only the surface has been scratched, but you now have a working knowledge of its origin. In the coming chapters, we will examine the book itself. First, we will discuss Dr. Jacob Neusner's comments from his book, Invitation to the Talmud. which can be purchased at many Christian book stores. Then we will allow The Talmud to reveal itself. From an in‑depth study done by Elizabeth Dilling entitled, The Plot to Destroy Christianity, you will see some reproduced pages from The Babylonian Talmud.

Dr. Neusner admits that The Babylonian Talmud is a vast compilation of Jewish law and fairy tales. At this point it is appropriate to read what our Holy Scriptures have to say about fables.

As I urged you upon my departure for Macedonia, remain on at Ephesus, in order that you may instruct certain men not to teach strange doctrines, nor to pay attention to myths and endless genealogies, which give rise to mere speculation rather than furthering God's provision which is by faith. (I Timothy 1 :3‑4)

But have nothing to do with worldly fables fit only for old women. On the other hand, discipline yourself for the purpose of godliness;.... (I Timothy 4:7)

For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but wanting to have their ears tickled, they will accumulate for themselves teachers in accordance to their own desires; (II Timothy 4:3‑4)

This testimony is true. For this cause reprove them severely that they may be sound in the faith, not paying attention to Jewish myths and commandments of men who turn away from the truth. (Titus 1:13‑14)

For we did not follow cleverly devised tales when we made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but we were eyewitnesses of His majesty. (II Peter 1:16)

This latter verse indicates that Christians are not to follow "cunningly devised fables (tales)." Unfortunately, many Christians have overlooked this admonition in their eagerness to accept Jewish teachings as the truth.

The vast work of The Babylonian Talmud was put together by Jewish rabbis from Palestine and Babylonia between the first and seventh centuries A.D. The Talmud attempts to compel interest by approaching all problems from a "rational," rather than a "spiritual" perspective. Neusner states that a study of The Talmud allows a disciplined intellect to exercise itself through clean, sustained, and vigorous argument. How clean this argument is will be clearly seen when we delve into The Talmud itself.

The Talmud is not an ordinary document of antiquity. It is the "heart's blood of the Jewish religion." To understand the Jewish mind, you must know something about his Talmud. The ability to enter a discussion on the issues and arguments of these learned rabbis is, to the Jews, a measure of intellect, piety and the virtue of holiness.

My Christian friends, wake up and realize that we are engaged in a struggle for the souls of men and women and for their freedom. It is a struggle between those who, as Dr. Neusner says, put their faith in the "traditions of men" and those of us who believe in "faith" which, according to Hebrews 11:1, is: ...the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.

Neusner claims that while Gentile (who, according to Jews, are non‑Jews) skepticism yields corrosive and negative results, that of the Talmudic skeptic produces "measured, restrained, limited insight." (Such as the restraint that is being shown to thousands of Palestinian Christians by the Israeli.)

For The Talmud, the alternative is not faith, as the Christian knows it, but a blind reliance on the arguments of rabbis, thousands of years dead, few of whom can agree on anything.

The Talmud, unlike the Holy Bible, conforms to the social pressures of the community. When the Bible says in Exodus 23:2: Thou shalt not follow a multitude to do evil,....

The Talmud says: Let's see what the ancient rabbis have to say about it then we will decide.

Where the Christian Bible says: Thus saith the Lord!

The Talmud says: Thus saith rabbi so‑and‑so.

The Talmudic rabbis, like their liberal counterparts today, believed that "environment, or society, forms the individual." So they teach that in order for man to be righteous in the eyes of God, he must give strict observance to the rabbinical laws not as laid down by God, but as interpreted by the ancient rabbis. So the Jew concentrates on such things as racial issues and uses the other races whom he despises and calls "goyim" (non‑Jew animals) for his ulterior purposes in changing society to conform to his ideas and his one‑world objectives.

He is willing to use the black man as cannon fodder in a racial conflict if it will further his desired changes in the world. You will come to understand this more fully as The Talmud itself reveals beliefs and practices toward the goyim. In his review, Dr. Neusner adheres closely to the positive aspects of Talmudic teaching and makes no references whatsoever to the unnatural teachings toward the non‑Jew.

The Talmud teaches that among the Talmudic sages there were literal miracle workers, sort of Jewish Oral Roberts, I guess. But while the so‑called miracle workers of Christianity are usually found in the realm of physical healing and the casting out of demons, in the world of The Talmud they are the lawyer‑magicians of Babylonia, skilled in the occult practices of the CABALA. This is the occult philosophy of the Talmudists based on mystical interpretation of Scripture.

While the Talmudists make much of their appeal to reason and human deduction, the religion of Judaism is actually rooted and grounded in the mystic occult superstitions of ancient Babylonia. This approach to life is that of the secular humanists which is directly opposed to everything which is taught in the Bible. We read in Jeremiah of the Christian concept of man. The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it? (Jeremiah 17:9)

The Talmudists say that man's actions are governed by his environment and his obedience to the rabbinical laws. James 4:1 says that, wars and fightings of mankind come because of their lusts and goes on to warn in James 1:1 4‑15: But every man (or woman, Ed.) is tempted when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed. Then when lust has conceived, it bringest forth sin: and sin, (which Scripture defines as "transgression of God's Law" ‑ I John 3:4, Ed.) when it is finished, bringeth forth death.

Can you see the difference between the two avenues of thinking? One excuses man for anything he does, while Christianity holds him accountable since he is capable of knowing the difference between right and wrong and has the power to choose which path he will take.

The Talmudists say: Put men and women in the proper environment and they will become as God.

Christians say: There must be a change of heart. Ye MUST be born again! (John 3:3)

Dr. Neusner makes a remark on page 287 which cannot be substantiated in Jewish life. He states that the teaching of The Talmud brings about a: renunciation of brute power, affirmation of the force of ideas and reason ... these represent the Jewish discovery.

Tell this to the Palestinians who have been driven from their homes by the Israeli and who are now being subject to as much brutality as Hitler ever exhibited against the Jews. This idea is prevalent in Jewry. Not so long ago I listened to a radio talk show broadcast from Atlanta, Georgia. A caller was decrying the suffering of the Palestinians when a woman called in to the show. She identified herself as a Jewess. With supreme arrogance she said: Why are you so concerned about the Arabs? After all, they are only animals!

On page 291 of Neusner's book he represents the Jewish attempts to neutralize and eventually destroy Christianity, by saying:

The Talmud raised abiding skepticism about what people offered as salvation as the final solution to the problems of the human condition. The Talmudists did not expect final solutions and were trained to ask devastating questions about their finality. The Talmud readied the Jews for the modern situation of doubt, of provisional truths, and hypotheses subject to testing and revision.

It is for this reason that Judaism is built upon the foundation of shifting sand. It can be revised in any age, to fit the whims of the people. It fits Paul's admonition in II Timothy 4:3‑4: For the time will come when they (the people) will not endure (put up with) sound doctrine; but after their own lusts (desires for material things) shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; and they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned into fables.

Have you ever wondered why Santa Claus and the Easter bunny have become more important to many so‑called Christians than Jesus Christ? Think about it.

Dr. Neusner's comments on page 292 show why the Apostle Paul said these strange alien people are "contrary to all men" (I Thessalonians 2:15). Dr. Neusner states: The best proof of the duty to make reasonable decisions among unreasonable alternative was the Jews themselves, who, because of their international character and their memories of many lands and empires, saw the world in all its complex plurality (this is the Jewish one‑world mentality, Ed.) but they chose to form the most vivid and intense of all groups, to sustain what is after all the most particular (and peculiar, Ed.) of all literary traditions, the Talmud itself. Yet they did so in full knowledge that their group (Jews, Ed.) was not co‑extensive (having extent with time and place, Ed.) with society ....

This is one of the reasons Jews were expelled from every country in Europe at one time or other. It was not because they were "God's chosen people whom Satan hated," as Baptist evangelist Jack Van Impe implies, but because of their anti‑social, treasonous efforts against every people who tried to help them. This is one of the major reasons that American Jews, citizens of this country who have pledged their loyalty to America, will nevertheless give their first loyalty to world Judaism and its international government. This is why we have seen so many Jews tried for treason in America since World War II. Their first loyalty is to World Zionism and any program, or political persuasion, which will further its purpose.

A completely reliable English translation of The Babylonian Talmud was published in England by the Soncino Press between 1935 and 1948 in thirty‑five volumes. These translations were accompanied by brief notes which explained the passages. A close perusal of Neusner's book will reveal that he deliberately avoided mentioning any part of it which might be repulsive to the Christian. There are many examples of these passages, and we will look at a few as we progress in our study. These are often morally reprehensible and full of outright hatred of Jesus Christ and anything pertaining to His church.

                                        TALMUDIC INFLUENCE

                                             CHAPTER THREE

Many people have remarked about the propensity of the Jew, both men and women, to use filthy language. They have an inborn love of dirty jokes, the filthier the better. The Jewish comedian earns his living from the brainwashed goyim by telling filthy stories. My wife and I took a recent cruise from Argentina to the Barbados and this fact became increasingly obvious. About a third of the approximately thousand passengers were Jews. During the passenger's Talent Night, two Jews, an elderly man and woman, took part. They told dirty jokes, the man telling some which were so dirty that I would have been embarrassed to have heard them in an all‑men audience. Where do the Jews get this bent toward mental filthiness? It comes straight from this literary work, the Babylonian Talmud, which Dr. Neusner praises as "clean, brilliant, complete, elegant ... a thing of splendor." You can make this determination for yourself as we progress further into this study.

Neusner claims that the writers of The Talmud were not only forerunners of the German "rational professors," but they were holy men. It was "rational German‑Jewish professors" who took the Christian world down the road from faith to doubt as they attempted to rationalize the spiritual truths in our Christian Bible with their higher criticism. Neusner claims that the Jewish rabbis lead men to reason, where our finite mind becomes a counterpart with the infinite, omniscient mind of God Himself.

This type of thinking was reflected in the teaching of the German‑Jew, Ludwig Fuerbach, over one hundred years ago when he stated: Man will finally be truly free when he realizes there is no god of man but man himself.

This idea became so deeply ingrained in the mind of a young Jewish radical named Karl Mordecai Marx that it became the foundation of modern Communism.

The Jewish faith is reflected in the Talmudic myth which teaches that God Himself studies the Torah, with Moses and the heavenly academy, and that He reads it standing up so great is His respect for it. This myth goes on to state that when a problem arises in heaven, God asks the earthly rabbis for advice on how to handle it. This transcends some of the arrogance even seen in the Christian pulpits.

The Babylonian Talmud begins with page two, since the rabbis teach there is "no beginning." A page from The Talmud is called a FOLIO which in Hebrew means "tablet." The obverse is called "a" side, while the reverse is "b." Therefore, when you see the designation BERAKHOTH, 51 b and 52a, you know what section of The Talmud to look in and the portion of each page that is referenced. The comments in these sections are usually made by some well‑known rabbi of the past. In the case of BERAKHOTH, the commentary is by Rabbi Solomon bar Isaac, known as Roshi Abbi Clomo Benishag, who lived in Troyes, France, from about 1040 to 1105 A.D. Roshi is one of the major figures in the history of Judaism because of his commentaries on The Talmud.

The GEMERA section of The Talmud serves as a commentary on the MISHNAH and is the product of about three centuries of Jewish teaching. It comes from an Aramaic word which means "the learning," or "commentary" on the MISHNAH.

The Babylonian Talmud covers a "tracate" of some 63 volumes which will fill a 12 foot bookcase. It is huge. It takes for granted that its students have a full knowledge of Jewish "cultic purity."

Cultic impurity is acquired by coming into contact with what is called a "Father, child or offspring of uncleanliness." For instance, contact with a dead body, contact with a person having a transmittable disease, objects made of metal, wood, bone or cloth are also believed to be "fathers of uncleanliness," if they have been touched by a dead body.

Food and liquids also can be considered unclean. But unclean food does not render dishes or eating utensils unclean. A liquid that has been made unclean by coming into contact with a "father of uncleanliness" will make a vessel unclean if it touches the inside of the vessel. If food touches a person or vessel which is unclean, it automatically becomes unclean. It is not always necessary to wash your hands before eating to prevent uncleanness, but do as Rav taught and cover them with a napkin.

It is this Pharisaical nit‑picking over uncleanliness which Neusner calls "literary greatness," but which caused Jesus to address the Pharisees in Matthew 23:25‑27 in the following manner: "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye make clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess. Thou blind Pharisee, cleanse first that which is within the cup and platter, that the outside of them may be clean also. Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness."

In Mark 7:3‑9 the Christ said: For the Pharisees, and all the Jews, except they wash their hands oft, eat not, holding the tradition of the elders. And when they come from the market, except they wash, they eat not. And many other things there be, which they have received to hold, as the washing of cups, and pots, brasen vessels, and of tables. Then the Pharisees and scribes asked him, Why walk not thy disciples according to the tradition of the elders, but eat bread with unwashen hands? He answered and said unto them, Well hath Esaias prophesied of you hypocrites, as it is written, This people honoureth me (God) with their lips, but their heart is far from me. How be it in vain do they (the Jews) worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men. For laying aside the commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men, as the washing of pots and cups: and many other such like things ye do. And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition.

This is the stupidity of Judaism as it is taught by The Babylonian Talmud.

The rabbis reveled in nit‑picking. For example, they wrote that any common food which they deemed unclean would be unfit for the Temple heave offering. They even went as far as to declare "four removes," which were stages of uncleanliness.

The rabbis who wrote these purity rules ("commandments of men" as Jesus called them) were common folks in Babylon who pretended they were priests. They were the remainder of the Judahites from the House of Judah who were in exile for their sins. They pretended that they were eating a meal in the Temple in Jerusalem at the table of God. At this time, the Temple had been destroyed and there was no such thing as a Jewish nation in existence anywhere. The bulk of the House of Judah had been carried away by the Assyrians who scattered them among the House of Israel so that they, too, (just as the northern tribes of Israel) lost their identity as a kingdom. The rabbis taught that by adhering to the rules they laid down, one could change the commonplace into the holy. This captured the puzzling notion that if one preserved the purity of a slice of bread, for instance, you somehow changed it into "holy shew bread." As a result of these nit‑picking rules of men, which became the "traditions of men" Jesus spoke about, the Jews were taught to eat their meals in an atmosphere of "cultic purity." Uppermost in their minds was that every aspect of ritualistic eating must be fulfilled. To their way of thinking, that began with the traditional grace before meals which said: Blessed art thou, Lord our God, King of the world, who brings forth bread from the earth.

Therefore the food they ate had to be prepared with special ritualistic procedures. We are not speaking here of the foods forbidden by the Scriptures such as pork or shell fish, but of Kosher food which had to be approved by the rabbi to be clean.

The following example will illustrate the ridiculous trivia they mandate and require of their congregations. The rabbi of the House of Shammai will say, "He wipes his hands with the napkin and lays it on the table, for if you say 'non the cushion' it is a precautionary decree lest the liquids which are on the napkin become unclean because of the cushion and when the napkin is used, it makes the hands unclean."

Another interesting observation is that a Jew may eat "unconsecrated" food without washing his hands, but it becomes a sin if "consecrated food" is eaten with unwashed hands. Talk about splitting hairs!

The Babylonian Talmud was originally written in both Hebrew and Aramaic, and most of The Palestinian Talmud was written in Hebrew. The use of these languages is not accidental. Therefore, we find that part of The Babylonian Talmud known as the TANNAIM, which is comprised of "statements of standard law" are in Hebrew, while the comments and analysis of the AMORAIN, are in Aramaic. The editor's remarks are normally in Aramaic. Those parts written in Hebrew will appear in normal type, while the Aramaic bits will be in Italics. Boldfaced type is used for portions of the MISHNAH and the TOSEFTA.

The idea that the "canon" (body of law) was completed at Mt. Sinai is not accepted by the rabbis. They say that later teachings of the rabbis, including that which was taught by themselves, are revelations from God. This means that the basis for Judaistic belief is constantly open to new canonical authoritative doctrines on both the law and Jewish theology. One group of rabbis holds the position that: "You must first clean your house and then wash your hands," while the other adamantly states: "If you say wash the hands first, it turns out that you spoil the food." On the Sabbath, an orthodox Jew is not supposed to move something from the private to the domestic domain. The arguments between the rabbis surge back and forth as the various houses vie for supremacy until the ordinary Jew is uncertain of what course he should take.

The religious Jew takes for granted that he may make decisions regarding the Gentiles, or more accurately, the "goyim." Now most of the goyim could care less whether or not the Jews say a blessing over their candles; or the manner in which they sniff the incense, or sip their wine.

What difference does it make to us how the Jews do these things? However, the orthodox Jew believes it makes a great deal of difference. Since the Jews in most ages had very little control over the outside world, the world of the Gentiles, the rabbis made a grand issue of enormous consequences the simplest actions on the part of the Jew. When a man sat at the table to eat, his napkin had to be placed in the correct position or it would become unclean. In this, he thought he was the priest in the holy Temple.

The rabbis managed to take the common things of life and turn them into things of great importance. So the Jews were taught that if they obeyed God, no one would ever rule over them, but if they disobeyed, the heathen would get the upper hand. This, by the way, is the belief of most Kingdom Movement people, and for once, the Jewish rabbis were right.

Another Talmudic rule has to do with spices and incense. One rabbi says that if a Jew is walking outside a village in which most of the inhabitants are non‑Jews and he smells a scent, he does not bless the smell. However, if most of the people who live in the village are Jews, he blesses it. Another rabbi says that even if most of the villagers are Jews, the Jew may not bless the smell because Jewish women use incense for witchcraft. Another rabbi says: "If a Jew is walking in a Gentile market and is pleased with the scent of their spices, he is a sinner." And on and on it goes!

These teachings are utterly inconsistent with the teachings of Moses, and they are constantly arguing over non‑essentials just as Christian monks once did during the Middle Ages when a great argument raged over how many angels could dance on the head of a pin.

Arguments over whether to say "Amen!" over a blessing when you have only heard part of it; whether to say "Amen!" after the blessing given by children in a schoolhouse; whether to say a blessing when there is no oil available; whether a physically dirty person is unfit to say grace; these are all part of the nit‑picking that goes on between the rabbis.

An interesting, yet completely nauseating aspect of The Babylonian Talmud is the robust sexuality of its laws concerning sex and women in particular. For instance, the rabbis love to refer to a couple who have intercourse all night long and they promise blessings to those who have sex two or more times in a night. In fact, the more often the better as far as the rabbis are concerned. But the sex act must be done properly according to their ritualistic law.

In their theory, if an unmarried man is legally engaged and has sexual relations with an unmarried woman, the couple are considered to have consummated a legitimate marriage union and are recorded as being legally married. This is somewhat contrary to any law Moses ever recorded from God!

The Torah prevents a woman from having sex during her menstrual cycle. Then the discussion arose among the rabbis over whether it was better to have sex in the light, or in the dark. Was it all right to have sex in any other than a private condition? The pious could have sex in the dark, while the ultra‑pious cleared the bedroom of flies and mosquitoes before they engaged in the act. Nothing was said about whether this was for religious purposes, or for the comfort of the couple so engaged.

The rabbis seemed to believe that a shy, modest person could not learn, so they minced no words when it came to graphic description of the sex act. Much of it was so filthy that it would not do to include it in this book. If you want to know why the average Jewish person seems obsessed with sex, just read The Talmud.

Dr. Neusner freely admits on page 279 in his Invitation to the Talmud, that The Talmud is "peculiarly modern in its systematic skepticism, its testing of each proposition.... The Talmudist's first question is 'What is the reason?"' He goes on to say that the Talmudic approach is to reason things out, rather than accept them on faith. It was this Jewish thinking that came close to destroying 20th century Christianity through the "higher criticism" of German‑Jewish scholars.

Dr. Benjamin Freedman, a converted Jew, in his extraordinary book, Facts are Facts! said: For every ounce of good you accomplish through the conversion of a self‑styled Jew to the Christian faith, you do a ton of harm in another direction. Regardless of what anyone, anywhere and anytime may say, events of recent years, everywhere, have established beyond the question of doubt, that the Christian faith stands with its foot in the grave and the other on a banana peel, speaking figuratively.

The Christian faith stands at the crossroads of its destiny. The Divine and Sacred mission of the Christian faith is in jeopardy today to a degree never witnessed before in its 2,000 years of history.

If the day ever arrives when Christians can no longer profess their faith, as they profess it now in the Free World, then it will see the beginning of its last days.

The history of the world for the past several centuries and in current events at home and abroad, confirms the existence of a conspiracy to destroy Christian civilization. The world‑wide plot of these diabolical conspirators has been implemented while most Christians have been asleep. The Christian clergy seem to be more ignorant, or indifferent to this plot than other Christians. They seem to bury their heads in the sands of indifference and ignorance. This has dealt a severe blow to the Christian faith.... Christians need a spiritual Paul Revere to ride across the land, warning that their enemies are closing in on them.

                              History of Judaism in The New World

                                                Chapter Four

The history of Judaism in the New World actually began with Columbus' trip to the West Indies. On August 2, 1492, over 300,000 Jews were expelled from Spain under royal edict because of their treacherous dealings with the invading Moors from North Africa and for their unscrupulous business practices. In many instances during the height of the Moorish invasion, cities which were under attack by the Moslem hordes had their gates opened from within by Jews who had been befriended by the city's inhabitants. On August 3,1492, Christopher Columbus set sail to the west in an attempt to find a short‑cut passage to China. He took a group of five Jews with him. These were not refugees by any definition, but were wealthy, prominent businessmen who hoped to make a financial killing on the gold they expected to find.

The old wives'  tale that Queen Isabella sold her jewels to finance this trip will not stand up under historical research. These Jews, who were known as "maranos," had converted to Catholicism because it was to their advantage to do so. At this time they wielded great influence in the Spanish court. Luis de Santagel, who was an important Valencian merchant and the royal tax collector, was one of these men who went with Columbus. Another was Gabriel Sanchez, a relative of Santagel who was the royal treasurer of Spain. Their mutual friend, the Jew Juan Cabero, the royal chamberlain in charge of the royal house accompanied them also.

There were four other Jews associated with this epic journey. Columbus' interpreter, Luis de Torres; his surgeon, Marco, Benal, a physician; and Alonzo de Ia Calle. Luis de Torres was the first European to set foot ashore in the New World and the first to discover the use of tobacco.

These Jews worked on Queen Isabella's imagination by telling her that Columbus would discover unheard of riches, and that they would be able to convert thousands to Catholicism. Isabella, being a very devout Catholic, was moved by this to give her consent to the voyage. Santagel himself advanced 17,000 ducats, equal to about 50,000 pounds in modern money.

All of the Jews who accompanied Columbus were richly rewarded for the part they played in this work, and they repaid Columbus by betraying him through a conspiracy engineered by the ship's doctor, Benal. Columbus landed in a Spanish prison.

From the very beginning, Jews gravitated to the New World, many settling in what is now Brazil. But due to expected Jewish conduct, they were forced to emigrate and headed north where they ended up in the Dutch colony under Peter Stuyvesant, in what is now New York state. Stuyvesant had experience dealing with the Jews in Holland and was reluctant to allow them into the colony, but allowed them to remain because of the large sums of money they invested in the Dutch East Indies Company. It is the same old story of greed on the part of so‑called Christians.

From their base in New York, they became the backbone of the African slave trade, owning most of the slave ships which plied the waters between Africa and the New World with their pitiful passengers. Records in the public library in Boston, Massachusetts, show the names of the Jewish owners of these slave ships. They also owned most of the distilleries in the area which distilled the rum that became a media of exchange for slaves in Africa.

Jews were at first forbidden to enter public service, or open retail stores in the thirteen colonies so they went into foreign trade. They made New York City the principle port in the New World and this city has been their paradise of gain ever since. To the International Jews, it is their capital city. Some Jewish leaders in recent years have boldly declared that the United States is their "Promised Land," and that New York City is their "New Jerusalem."

By the time of the American Revolution, there were about 4,000 Jews in the colonies, most of them well‑to‑do traders. They helped the revolutionary cause by lending large sums of money at exorbitant interest rates to the revolutionists.

By 1850, the Jewish population had increased to over 3,300,000. It would be impossible today to list all the businesses controlled by American and International Jews in this country, or to intelligently estimate the enormous power they have over our government.

From the height of their economic pinnacle, they control the entire Babylonian money system of finance and industry. There is not a citizen among us, man or woman, rich or poor, who does not in some way pay tribute to Jewish money power. You can count on your fingers the preachers, politicians, industrialists and educators who are not debtors to the Jews and therefore not under their power.

Jewish financial power resembles an "imp" which one cannot see, yet he has his fingers in every pocket. He is especially experienced in the art of seduction, having received his training from the "master seducer" of all. (See John 8:44) He speaks to the captive Christian world and sneeringly says: Worship me, and I will give you all of this; I will lead you to happiness. This is the same tempting promise his spiritual father made to Christ in Matthew 4:8 and 9. While he promises happiness, his promises lead to slavery and horrible death.

At the end of the Napoleonic Wars, a Jew from Frankfort, Germany, by the name of Rothschild, borne on the wave of the power of gold, rose to phenomenal prominence in Europe. He became the visible head of this Jewish world power. All other Jews bowed to him. He was the king of world finances and commanded the masses of world Jewry, as sure as Adolf Hitler ever commanded the army of the Third Reich. It is impossible to calculate the influence of this family for they had countless billions of dollars in wealth and, at their beck and call, presidents and kings cringed at their spoken word. They were as much the ruler of the world as any crowned head of state, and their subjects were the countless millions who toiled in every country to add to

their power and wealth.

In the twentieth century this European Jewish family was challenged in the New World by another Jewish dynasty, that of the Rockefeller clan. These people hid their Jewishness under the facade of Protestantism and engaged in a life and death financial struggle for world supremacy.

The profits acquired by these international Talmudist bankers were used to improve their social standings. They mingled with and intermarried into some of the most prominent families of Europe and America, even into the royal family of Britain. Their longing for supremacy in the Arts and Sciences was part of their longing to be recognized by the cream of society. This meant that they had to acquire power in literature, medicine, and public education while controlling the professions of Law and Journalism. This they set out to do.

Today, Jewish journalists form a closely connected, powerful combine composed of the most clever and industrious minds of Jewry who are dedicated to the furtherance of International Talmudic Judaism. They have appropriated the right to intervene in foreign affairs to the point where their Anti‑Defamation League of the B'nai B'rith (an unregistered agent of the Israeli government, operating illegally yet with impunity in American affairs) controls the American Congress. Powerful politicians, such as Senator J. William Fulbright of Arkansas and Senator Percy of Illinois have learned to their sorrow the price of bucking Zionist interests in Washington, D.C.

As Jews attained social status, they invaded the Christian world and brainwashed Christians of various religious hues into accepting a false theology that placed the Christ‑haters in the position of being God's Chosen who can do no wrong. Blinded by Jewish cries of "world brotherhood," and from the cries of the National Council of Churches who epitomize apostate Christianity, the clergy of America are befuddled by the humane appearances of Jewish theories and seem incapable of perceiving the danger which threatens the Christian world with extinction. Samuel Untermeyer, who arranged for the International Boycott Conference in Amsterdam, Holland, in July 1933, stated: ... the holy war ... in which we (Jews) are embarked, is a war which must be waged unremittingly... the Jews are the aristocrats of the world... this boycott must be against all German goods and services... we will drive the last nail in the German coffin. This was long before there was any sign of pressure against the Jews in Germany.

During World War II, the Administration of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt was literally overrun by Zionist Jews. There is mounting evidence which has been surfacing over the years which proves that America was deliberately led into World War II by the Zionist interests in Roosevelt's Administration.

The Hon. Henry L. Stimson, Secretary of Defense during world War II, wrote in his daily diary for November 21,1941, two weeks prior to Pearl Harbor: The President called a cabinet meeting this morning and told us that he wanted us to be at war with Japan, but that he did not want it to appear to the public that the United States had fired the first shot. Roosevelt then went ahead to knowingly provoke the Japanese into an overt attack on Pearl Harbor. This intrigue, better known as treason, came at a time when Roosevelt was mesmerizing the American public with his "Fireside Chats," in which his theme was, "Ah hate wah! And we'll nevah send American boys to fight on fawen soil. Nevah! Nevah! Nevah!" All this while he was actively engaged in plans to do just that!

When Harry Truman succeeded F.D.R. in the seat of power in Washington, he carried on in Roosevelt's footsteps and on May 15,1948, gave official recognition to the terrorist government of the bandit State of Israel in Palestine. Truman called these terrorists a "peace loving nation," which had come into being through terrorist methods. Since that day, we have poured countless billions of tax dollars into shoring up this little bandit state, and by doing so have completely alienated the Moslem world which was at one time our staunch ally.

The pathway to Talmudic subservience has continued ever since, through the Administrations of: Harry Truman; Dwight David Eisenhower, who was of Swedish Jewish extraction; Lyndon Baines Johnson; Richard Milhouse Nixon; Gerald Rudolph Ford; James Earl Carter; Ronald Wilson Reagan, and now George Herbert Walker Bush. In actuality, President Bush has been the only president since WW II who has ever said "No!" to the Zionists.

Rather than endure the smears which they knew would come their way if they bucked Zionist interests in Washington, the vast majority of Congress have been willing to sell future generations of Americans into virtual slavery to the Talmudic internationalists. They have become, for the most part, spineless, egotistical people so taken up with the importance of their political positions, that they believe they can do no wrong. They have become guilty of the grossest hypocrisy of all times, as they deliberately evade the one and all‑important issue of who is controlling America. They are willing to cooperate in the destruction of their own white race for a little momentary security, popularity and power.

There is no need in this book for me to provide the details of Communism's Jewish origin, both of its brains and its financing. Suffice to say that leading Jews have boasted for years of the part they played in its establishment and success. It can be summed up in two statements; one made in The London Jewish Chronicle, April 4,1918:

... there is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself; in the fact that so many Jews are Bolshevists; in the fact that the ideals of Bolshevism are consonant (in agreement) with the finest ideals of Judaism and a statement made by the Red Rabbi, Stephen S. Wise some years later. When asked his opinion of Communism, he said: Some call it Communism; I call it Judaism.

We will see the finest teaching of Judaism as they come into agreement with the teachings of International Communism in The Talmud. The Jewish plan for world conquest is not new. It was begun in the dusty halls of ancient Babylon and has been carried on, secretly for the most part, until today it stands on the verge of success. In 1902, the Grand Sanhedrin of Constantinople laid down their Vengeance Protocol which called for them to corner the control of the world's wealth. The Jewish Council which met at Basile, Switzerland in 1879, drew up a far‑reaching plan for world conquest which has become known as the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion which contains the "blueprint" for a world conquest. World Jewry, and their stooges in the Christian world, call this work a counterfeit. But we must remember that before there can be a counterfeit there must first be an original, and one accomplished at forgery makes his copy as close to the original as possible. So the question is not whether the Protocols are a forgery, but whether world‑Jewry is following their plan. "By their fruits ye shall know them" and since the turn of the twentieth century, World Zionism has marched to the plan of the Protocols.

I will not go into the long and fascinating account of how World Jewry gained control of American economics. This account is fully documented in my book, The Great Conspiracy ,$3.00 pp. which details how the Talmudists gained control over the economy of America.

The Jewish writer, Maurice Samuels, in his book, You Gentiles, on page 23 states: I do not believe the primal difference between Gentiles and Jews is reconcilable. You and we may come to an understanding, but never a reconciliation. There will be irritation between us as long as we are in intimate contact.

The Apostle Paul termed it: Contrary to all men.. (I Thessalonians 2:15)

On page 155 of this same book, Samuels says: We Jews, we the destroyers, will remain the destroyers. Nothing you can do will ever meet our demands.

Jeremiah, the Old Testament prophet, said in Jeremiah 9:5 and 6: And they will deceive every one his neighbor, and will not speak the truth: they have taught their tongue to speak lies, and weary themselves to commit iniquity. Thine habitation is in the midst of deceit; through deceit they refuse to know me, saith the Lord.

While the brainwashed preachers of America have told their people that the Jews are the Chosen People, the risen Son of God, Jesus our Lord and king said to them in Revelation 2:9 and 3:9: "...I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are of the synagogue of Satan."

Our Fundamentalist and Evangelical Christian churches are inspiring the enemy of Christianity by putting a cloak of respectability around the Talmudic enemy. If the truth were known among Christians at large, the Talmudists would come tumbling down from their lofty perch. How the Talmudists must laugh in secret as they see national religious leaders such as Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson glorify God's worst enemies.

The plan of the Talmudists to control the world press, and with it the thinking (and I use the term loosely) of Christians everywhere was broken down into three phases:

1. Journals which are under Jewish control, either by outright ownership or through their control;

2. Journals bearing the banner of a specific nationality, such as German, Irish, Spanish, Greek, Italian, etc.;

3. Journals printed specifically under the Talmudist banner.

The first class is made up, for all intents and purposes, by those important newspapers and magazines which are controlled or owned outright by Jews, but often under the editorship of Gentiles. Today, over 47 weekly magazines, with a circulation of well over 79 million, are owned or controlled by the Talmudists.

               MAGAZINE                 OWNERSHIP AND/OR CONTROL

TV. Guide                     Walter H. Annenberg

McCall's                      Robert Stein, Editor

Good Housekeeping             Harrison Aaron Mitnich

Time                          Andrew Heiskell, Chairman

Newsweek                      Katherine Meyer Graham, Chairman

Sports Illustrated            Andrew Heiskell, Chairman

U.S. News & World Report      Lester Tanzer, Editor

Esquire                       Stanley Spregel, Vice Pres.

Sports Afield                 Harrison Aaron Mitnich, Treasurer

In the even more important field of daily newspapers, over 909 major daily newspapers are Talmudist owned and/or controlled. Following are the top eleven:

              NEWSPAPER                OWNERSHIP AND/OR CONTROL

Wall Street Journal           Walter Henry Phillips, President

New York Daily News           I.W. Gold, Advertising Manager

Los Angeles Times             Simon Ramo, Director

New York Times                Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, President

Chicago Tribune               Edward Engle, Vice Pres.

Detroit News                  G. Gingold, Vice Pres.

Detroit Free Press            John Livingston Weinberg, Director

Chicago Sun Times             Howard A. Seitz, Director

Philadelphia Bulletin         Herbert Shugar, Director

Washington Post               Katherine Meyer Graham,Chairman

New York Post                 Byron S. Greenberg, Vice Pres.

All the above newspapers are Jewish controlled. In addition, there are at least 17 daily newspapers with circulation between 250,000 to 500,000 which are Jewish owned and/or controlled. Examples are:

San Francisco Chronicle            Miami Herald

Atlanta Journal                    Indianapolis Star

Boston Globe                       Kansas City Times

St. Louis Globe‑Democrat           Omaha World Herald

All of the major TV networks are under the control of the Talmudists:

ABC                      Leonard H. Goldenson, Chairman

CBS                      William S. Paley, Chairman

NBC                      Robert W. Sarnoff, Chairman

Metro‑Media T.V.         Herbert G. Klein, Vice Pres. and Director

There is much more, but this will suffice for now.

This same control can be traced in the media, Hollywood, the stage, the sugar industry, the tobacco industry, the liquor industry, professional sports, banking, the American Bar Association, the National Education Association, pornography, prostitution, music, drugs and more. In other words, by following the procedures laid down in The Babylonian Talmud, this alien people, who make up less than 3% of our population, exert almost complete control over once Christian America.

Today, it is said that America is to blame for most of the ills which afflict the world. It could much more accurately be said that the International Talmudic financiers are the effect of our troubles. The cause, as anyone who has read Deuteronomy 28 knows, is the disobedience of God's people which always brings oppression from their enemies.

So today, we see the confusing and frightening sight of a nation of 235 million people being controlled largely by a minority of less than 3%. Deuteronomy 28:43 and 44 says: The stranger (alien) that is within thee (Israel) shall get up above thee very high; and thou shalt come down very low... he shall be the head, and thou shalt be the tail. This has happened because our white Christian people have allowed it to happen.

While Christians in America have been willing to open our doors and share our freedoms with the Jewish people, they in turn do not want to share America with Christians. They want it all! Whenever they are thus accused, and their international plot exposed, they dredge up the plaintive cry of "anti‑Semitism," and publish another dreary account of what they call the "holocaust." Anyone who commits crimes against our people should be tried and punished. It does not matter who they are, minority or majority, Israelite or Gentile, Jew or Christian.

There will always be apologists for the Jews, especially among the brainwashed forces of fundamentalism and evangelicalism. They will say: "Why accuse all Jews for the crimes of the few?" It is because the Jewish communities of America collectively cooperate with the Internationalists in their crimes, and there are very few Jewish voices who speak out against this. One who did a few years ago was Oscar Levy, who in the foreword of his book, The Historical Significance of the Russian Revolution. stated that while the Jews came to the world as our saviors, they were in essence its "seducers and destroyers."

The Talmudists for centuries have practiced the art of deception until it has become a second nature to them. They have waged war on this earth for over 25 centuries and are taught the art of deception from birth. This means that every Jew, potentially, is a combat‑ready intelligence expert.

International Talmudic Jewry has always had a four‑pronged strategy:

1.  Manipulate the members of the host nation into helping the Jews, no matter how  dangerous this assistance is to their own country.

2.  If individuals refuse to cooperate, bypass them and take care of them in the "mopping " operation.

3.  If they actively resist, mark them for destruction and then destroy them through    defamation of character which can be achieved through controlled press, or even by using a nation's due process of law.

Listen to their own words from their textbook Psychopolitics, page 52 (available from this ministry for $2.50 pp.): Recruit every agency of the nation marked for slaughter into a foaming hatred of Christianity ... You must subort district attorneys, and judges into an intense belief...that Christian practice is vicious, bad, insanity‑causing, and publicly hated and intolerable. Just as in Russia, we destroyed, after many years, the Church, so we must destroy all faiths in nations marked for conquest. (Emphasis added.)

The only faith which is inviolate, is the Talmudic faith of Judaism, and:

4.  Never let any individual or organization in the host nation use the media or the courts to counterattack Talmudism.

This has become so successful in America that when a Jew attacks a Christian, or some Christian practice, it is considered "freedom of speech and the press," but if the Christian does the same thing, it immediately becomes a "hate crime," with the horrible label of "anti‑Semitic" attached.

If I, as an Anglo‑Saxon writer, were to charge openly that my writings were not accepted, not because they were untrue, but because they exposed Talmudism and could not pass Jewish censorship, there would be an immediate hue and cry spearheaded by fundamental Christian leaders who would label me an "apostate." Not because I had departed from Biblical truths, but because I turned the spotlight of God's Word on His enemies! They would immediately classify me as being prejudiced, although most of them do not even understand the meaning of the term. The word "prejudice" comes from the Latin word, "praejudicium" which means: "to form an opinion without knowing the facts."  But even when truths are painstakingly documented, both from Scriptures and history, the prostitutes of Talmudism scream "apostate."

Talmudism has one major flaw. It must work in secret in order to be successful. So when people know the truth about this foe of mankind, they will successfully defend themselves against it. The victims must not know what is happening! They must either be lied to, or become so confused that they refuse to accept the truth. This truth is self‑evident: If Talmudism can be exposed, it can be defeated! Jesus said, "Ye shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free." Truer words were never spoken. This is why all attempts at exposure are greeted with howls of anguish from the Jewish leaders who try to label the truth seekers as "kooks," "dangerous extremists," "haters," "fascists," "neo‑Nazis," and "anti‑Semitics." They cannot allow our white Christian citizens to know their plans. This is the reason that books such as this are printed and why they are hated by the Talmudists.

When Jesus spoke to the Talmudist leaders in John 8:32‑33, they revealed the fact that they were not Israelites when they boastingly said: "We be Abraham's seed, and were never in bondage to any man;...."

What more proof do you need that these Talmudist Pharisees were not of Israel? Here they openly admit it. They are openly boasting of the fact that they were never in bondage to anyone, which means they could not be Israel since anyone who has ever studied the Bible knows that Israel had been in bondage in Egypt for hundreds of years. (Try this one on your minister and see how he will wiggle around this fact.)

Since we are assured that "the truth shall set you free," we see the Jewish world go to any lengths to keep the truth from our brainwashed people. No matter what the rabbi at an ecumenical meeting may say to the goyim who listen to him, rest assured that he is not seeking the kingdom of God on this earth, but a material Jewish kingdom where he will be the master in control. The desire of the Talmudists, according to their own writers, will be fulfilled when the wealth of the word lays at their feet and all mankind bows down before them.

I believe that Henry Ford, Sr. understood this truth when he stated in his book, The International Jew: If the Jews were fully understood by the Gentiles (non‑Jews), if the Christian churches, for example, were freed from their delusions that the Jews are Old Testament people, and if the churches really knew what the Talmudic religion was all about, this policy of misrepresentation would die. This policy succeeds because there is a feeling strongly entrenched in Christians by their religious leaders to the point where their people believe it is dangerous to oppose the Jews in anything; for whoever opposes a Jew, damns himself! The "fear of the Jews" is a very real element in our life. It is as real among Jews as among "non‑Jews " since the Jew is bound by fear of his own leaders, and he exercises the fear of the curse throughout all the sphere of his religion.

If Jews were really Old Testament people, if they were really conscious of a "mission for the blessing of all mankind," (which is our Israel heritage, Ed.) the very things in which they offend the Christian world would disappear. If the Jew is being attacked, it is not because he is a Jew, but because he is the source and life of certain tendencies and influences which, if they are not checked, will mean the destruction of moral society.

In his book, The Writings of Benjamin Franklin. New York, 1905‑1907, author Albert H. Smythe writes: As the American colonies rose in revolt against political oppression occasioned by the attempt of Jewish banking houses in Europe to consolidate their economic foothold in the New World, no man among the Founding Fathers was more alert to their designs than that shrewd elder statesman of the American Revolution, Benjamin Franklin. Writing to John Adams from Passy, France, November 26, 1781, Franklin declared: "I think that keeping us out of possession of fifty thousand pounds sterling worth of good for securing the payment of a demand for damages is not only dishonorable treatment but a monstrous injustice. It seems to me that it is principally with John Neufville of Amsterdam, Holland, we have to do; and although I believe him to be as much a Jew as any in Jerusalem, I did not expect that, with so many and such constant professions of friendship for the United States with which he heads his letters, he would attempt to enforce his demands by a procedure so abominable. His proposition of terms on which he would borrow money for us stamped his character on my mind with an impression so deep that it is not yet effaced."

De Neufville was a Dutch‑Jewish international banking house that wanted to make a loan to the Continental Congress on the modest security of the entire Thirteen States, with the stipulation that all American trade and exchange would go through them. This is exactly what the International Talmudists are attempting to do today with the Third World countries.

Many of Franklin's letters revealed his utter loathing for these alien, anti‑Christ people who were attempting to get rich off the suffering of Americans. His most damning indictment of Jewry was contained in his famous prophecy before the Constitutional Convention of 1787 in Philadelphia. He declared: I fully agree with General Washington, that we must protect this young nation from an insidious influence and penetration. That menace, gentlemen, is the Jews!

In whatever country the Jews have settled in any great number, they have lowered its moral  tone; depreciated its commercial integrity; have segregated themselves and have not been assimilated; have sneered at and tried to undermine the Christian religion upon which this country was founded by objecting to its restrictions; have built a state within a state; and when opposed have tried to strangle that country to death, as in the case of Spain and Portugal.

For over 1700 years, the Jews have bewailed their sad fate in that they have been exiled from their homeland, as they call Palestine. But gentlemen, did the world give it to them in fee simple, they would at once find some reason for not returning.  Why? Because they are vampires and vampires do not live on vampires. They cannot live among themselves. They must subsist off Christians and other peoples not of their race.

If we do not exclude them from these United States in the Constitution, in less than 200 years they will have swarmed here in such numbers that they will dominate and devour the land, and change our form of government for which we Americans have shed our blood, given our lives, our substance and jeopardized our liberty!

Jews, gentlemen, are Asiatics, let them be born where they will, no matter how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never be otherwise. Their ideas do not conform to an American's and will not, even though they live among us for ten generations. A leopard cannot change his spots. Jews are Asiatics and are a menace if permitted entrance, and should be excluded by this Constitutional Convention.

For many years, this speech was found among the diaries of Charles Cotesworth Pickney, of South Carolina, who attended the Constitutional Convention as a delegate. Then mysteriously, it disappeared from the Philadelphia City Museum in the 1930's and all references to it were withdrawn. Immediately, the Jewish leaders in America gleefully pounced on this as proof that the "Franklin prophecy" was a forgery, just as they said the same for The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. The Communist Rules for Bringing About a Revolution, and The Communist Textbook on Psychopolitics. (I have this latter book available for $2.50 pp.)

But whether Franklin's prophecy was fake or not, regardless of whether it was an elaborate hoax, what he foresaw has come to pass. It is a painful fact!

If Benjamin Franklin was alive today, you can be assured that he would be in the forefront of those who are trying to save this Christian nation from Talmudic control. White Christian Americans must remember this fact, for it is all important to our survival! The Talmudists are not the cause of our overwhelming problems. They and the aliens in our midst, are merely the effects of Israel's disobedience. (Deuteronomy 28 will graphically explain it to you.) When Israelites become more concerned with "doing their own things," than in obeying their God, we can expect these things to happen. In Jeremiah 22:21 we read: I spake unto thee in thy prosperity; but thou saidst, I will not hear. This hath been thy manner from thy youth, that thou obeyest not my voice.

In Deuteronomy 28, we get a clear picture of what will happen to Israel if they obey their God. But, beginning with verse 15, we read dire warnings of the price we will pay for disobedience. Think about Korea and Vietnam, as you read verse 25: The Lord shall cause thee to be smitten before thine enemies: .... In both of these wars, we were whipped by nations smaller than most of our states. We did not have a "peace with honor" in either of them, no matter what charlatans like Henry Kissinger said to the contrary.

Verse 33 continues: The fruit of thy land, and all thy labours, shall a nation which thou knowest not eat up;... (Emphasis added)

Think about this as you ask what has happened to our strategic food supply since 1985. We have none now. In case of a national emergency this nation would be hungry in less than thirty days.

In verses 43‑44 we read: The stranger that is within thee shall get up above thee very high and thou shalt come down very low ... he shall be the head, and thou shalt be the tail.

Ask yourself what has happened to Anglo‑Saxon leadership in America in the last fifty years? Who controls our economy? It is not our own people. America's economy is at the mercy of International Jewish Banking families, eight of them in this order:

1.   ROTHSCHILD BANK of London and Berlin



4.   WARBURG BROTHERS BANK of Amsterdam and Hamburg

5.   LEHMAN BROTHERS BANK of New York City

6.   KUEHN‑LOEB BANK of New York City

7.   CHASE MANHATTAN BANK of New York City (As you know, Chase  Manhattan is controlled by the international Rockefeller interests.)

8.   GOLDMAN‑SACHS BANK of New York City

Each of these banks is Jewish controlled and today approximately 300 Jewish businessmen who are closely associated, often by intermarriage, control the money system of the world. They control an interlocking, international banking cartel of unimaginable wealth and power which has stolen billions of dollars from the American taxpayer since the Federal Reserve Act became law in 1913. All by the application of Talmudic banking practices.

According to Theodore Hertzl, father of modern Zionism, the Talmudic question arises whenever Jews appear because they bring it with them. It is not their large numbers which causes the problem, but their Talmudic business principles and practices of which they love to boast. We will see when we get into The Talmud itself how these Jews are allowed by their own laws to cheat any goyim with a clear conscience.

Jewish power has become so strong in America that we see a turning away from the Christian principles of our founding fathers to the heathen philosophies of Babylonia.  This is being accomplished by Jewish propaganda. The Jews have always been known as "propagandists." They initiated the idea of brainwashing, or thought control as it is more accurately titled. This was the technique used against our fighting men in Korea and Vietnam, it is being used to seduce millions of youth in our government schools, and it is used in the Judeo‑Christian churches of this nation. These are not Christian ideas, or American ideas, but the ideas of a heathen, alien philosophy which is contrary to everything we say we believe in as Christians.

The Talmudists insist over and over again that they "gave us our Scripture," "gave us our God," "gave us our religion," and gave us our Savior!" None of the claims are valid since none of these things have a Jewish origin.

Few Jewish leaders claim any spiritual mission for Jewdom. Theirs is a mission to control a one‑world government under the wise men of Jewdom. As far back as 1881, a Jewish spokesman, Goldwin Smith, professor of Modern History at Oxford University, boastingly said:  We Jews regard our race as superior to humanity, and look forward, not to its ultimate union with other races, but our triumph over them.

In 1858, the head rabbi of Europe stated: Wars are the Jews harvests, for by them we kill off the Christians and harvest their gold. We have already killed a hundred million of them, and the end is not yet!

This was before the inter‑family American Civil War and the fratricidal WWI and WWII. Samuel Roth, a noted Jewish author, stated to a fellow Jew: We came to the world pretending to escape persecution, and we are the most deadly persecutors in all the wretched annals of man.

In The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion which I have mentioned before and which the Jewish world calls a forgery, we read in Article II, Par. 5: ... Through the press we gained power to influence while remaining ourselves in the shade; thanks to the press, we have the gold of the world in our hands, notwithstanding that we have had to gather it out of oceans of blood and tears. But it has paid us, though we have sacrificed many of our own people. Each victim on our side is worth, in the sight of God, a thousand goyim.

If an intelligent being from another planet were to visit this world, they would react with shock if they were told that the greatest source of strength of our enemies rested in, and emanated from, the Christian church. Thinking Christians should read I John 2:22‑23 which provides a perfect word description of an anti‑Christ. This description fits the Talmudists more closely than any other group on the surface of this planet. Then in II John 10 and 11, we are told that anyone who gives these anti‑Christs aid and comfort in any way, even by word of mouth, "becomes partakers of their evil deeds." The Babylonian Talmud calls our Savior and King, Jesus the Christ, an "illegitimate bastard," (SANHEDRIN, 67a). In another place it says that Christ is the "illegitimate son of a Roman soldier and a Jewish prostitute named Mary, and that he was conceived during menstruation."

How in God's name can those who go by the name of Christian support those who by their own admission are anti‑Christs, who hate everything Christians are supposed to stand for and who openly advocate the destruction of the same? If the libraries in our seminaries were required to identify the books which were written by anti‑Christ Jews, there would be a drastic reduction in those pastors who have been brainwashed by the equally brainwashed seminarians. The fiction that Abraham, Isaac and Jacob were Jews will not stand up to even the scantest Biblical research any more than the words of Genesis 12:3 pronounce a curse against anyone who takes a stand against these evil people.

One of the pressing issues in the Christian world today should be an effort to liberate our white Christian people from what the Scriptures call, "Fear of the Jews." The pastors of our churches should be required to tell our people the truth that the Jews today are not Israelites, and that most certainly they are not all of Israel. This is readily proven by the obvious conclusion that they do not carry any of the fingerprints necessary to establish their claim. Following are but a few of the Scriptural fingerprints of Israel:

1.  Israel was to glorify Jesus the Christ, Messiah, who was prophesied by the Hebrew prophets. Do the Jews demonstrate this glorification?

2.  Israel was commissioned by Jesus the Christ to carry the message of God's salvation to all men, everywhere (Matthew 28:18‑20). For centuries, who has carried out this commission? The Anglo‑Saxon,. Celtic and Scandinavian peoples. At any time since the birth of Christ, have the Jews witnessed to anyone of God's salvation through Jesus?

3.  Israel was to lose her identity as a people after God divorced them. They were to be scattered among the nations and forget who they were. (Hosea 1:9‑10) Have the Jews ever lost their "identity?" Even though most Jews today are of Turko‑Mongol racial extraction and have no racial heritage to the tribes of Israel, they never stop shouting from the housetops that they are the "Chosen Ones."

4.  Israel was designated by God to be a Holy People because they were His servants. They were to spread the word of God, His kingdom and His salvation. The Jews certainly boast of being a "holy people," and a "superior people," they never admit to being servants.

5.  Israel was to bring forth Kingdom fruits. The Anglo‑Saxon peoples have, in varying degrees, been exhibiting these fruits. Can we point to a time in the centuries  since the Christ where the Jews have done so?

6.  Israel was to become known as "Sons of the Living God" following their captivities and dispersion among the nations. Born‑from‑above Anglo‑Saxons have this distinction. The Jews have never been known by this description.

7.  Israel was to become a "company of nations," and a "great nation." The United Kingdom and America certainly fulfill this prophecy. While the Israelis can today claim to be a powerful military force in the Middle East, it is only because America has pumped in billions of dollars and resources to keep it afloat. Even their leaders admit that if we withdrew our support, they would collapse. Reaching back into history from the time of Christ, where have the Jews ever been a "great nation," or a "company of nations?" History is silent.

8.  Who are known as Isaac's Sons, or Sax‑sons? Certainly not the Jews.

9.  Israelites were to be great colonizers, taming the vast wildernesses and establishing colonies which became nations wherever they went. The Jews have been a scourge to all nations wherever they went and, in many cases, those nations expelled them. They were not hated for "His namesake," but for their Talmudic practices.

Does your pastor teach that the Jews comprise all of Israel? The truth is, they are not even a part of it! If you would like Scriptural and historical facts to support this statement, write for my books, The Mystery of True Israel. $7.50 pp and Who Are the Jews?. $2.50, pp. I challenge you to read these two books, compare them with Scripture and history, and discover for yourself what the Bible really says about the Jews as it contrasts with the teachings of your pastor.

As mentioned earlier, the flaccid, milquetoast condition of most American Christian churches was not brought about by science, or by scholarship, but can be traced to German‑Jewish Higher Criticism. This trend in thinking became popular during the nineteenth century when it was believed that to have a full‑rounded theological education, one must attend a seminary in Europe. The defenders of our Bible and the Christian faith have been sadly handicapped in the defense of their faith because they have not been shown the origin and purpose of the Talmudic Jewish attack against Christianity. It was not a Christian attack, nor a German attack, but a Talmudic Jewish attack perfectly tuned to Talmudic teachings which were not discussed by Dr. Neusner in his book about The Talmud. In fact, he was very careful to avoid reference to them.

The majority of economic and social mush which comes from our pulpits today was prepared by Jewish professors who have infiltrated most Christian seminaries, even those of the evangelicals and fundamentalists. It is no wonder that concerned Christians refer to these apostate schools as "religious cemeteries." Very little comes out of them except Talmudic corruption. If there is any place where the Jewish question should be honestly approached it should be in the Christian church. Instead, in their "approved blindness," they are often champions of the very enemies who have taken an oath to destroy them.

I am not now, nor have I ever, counseled radical reaction against Jews. But, we do need an objective examination of what has happened in the modern church which has caused her to lose her power. Ask yourself. Where do the harmful influences come from which are destroying Christian America? Who are the people who protest the use of Christian symbols in public places (and now they are objecting to these symbols in privately funded areas) where, as a Christian nation, we have displayed them for hundreds of years? Who protests the use of a city park for an Easter sunrise program? Or protests the performance of a high school presenting the Messiah each year at Christmas? Who would deny your child the right to read his, or her, Bible in school during their free time? They can read some pretty violent comic books, or books from the school library depicting sex scenes, but God forbid if they read their Bibles. The Bible has been made verboten by one group only.

I dare you to read objectively the controlled news. If you decide to be objective, you will readily see that 90% of the complaints made against anything Christian, many of which are downright stupid, come from Jewish sources. Whenever you see an article in the news pertaining to some right‑wing Christian action, nine times out of ten you will see a statement from some big‑shot, Anti‑Defamation League spokesman trying to explain that action.Yet this agency is anti‑Christian, anti‑American and an unregistered agent of a foreign country, operating illegally on American soil. Why is this allowed? Why does our government allow the A.D.L. to act as an unlicensed office of the Justice Department? They are the ones who are pushing for hate legislation while operating as America's foremost haters and persecutors.

The attempt to take Christ out of Christmas and replace Him with Santa Claus is Jewish backed. The attempt to replace Christ with the Easter bunny during the Lenten season is another attack against what we have held sacred. It is not prejudice or bigotry when I state these facts. It is truth and you must recognize it as such. Ask yourself why is it allowable for a Christian to criticize most anyone else; Catholic, Mormon, Moslem, Buddhist, etc., but under no circumstances may you tell the truth about the Jews? Please don't offer up that phony God's Chosen People bit, or misapply Genesis 12:3 as the basis for your answer.

We have seen the sad spectacle in our colleges and universities of the radicals who have sought to disrupt our educational process. It does little good to attack these radicals when they are mostly immature youths. But, is it wrong to show that most of this social radicalism comes from Jewish sources, and that almost 100% of these radical college groups are run by young Jews from wealthy Jewish families? This acknowledgment comes from sad experience with them during the Vietnam War. See who it is that burns the American flag, or uses it to wipe their feet. Who is it that immerses an image of Christ on the cross in a bottle of his own urine? Why are a vast majority of the more than 40,000 Marxist college professors also Jews?

During the Vietnam War, I worked the college circuit as I lectured for the John Birch Society. I had 25 confrontations during that period with radical groups, some serious physical confrontations which included an attack against me at Kansas State University in Lawrence, Kansas, in April 1972. In 100% of these cases, these radicals were led by young Jews from wealthy Jewish families. Was there a reason behind this? I believed there was, and in the summer of 1979, I set aside all my scheduled activity to try and find out what that reason was. I went to Jewish sources to gather information and found that it was Jewish Higher Criticism, in both the church and school, which had been responsible for the destruction in our youth of a sense of respect for their Christian heritage of freedom. Additionally, I learned it was the Jewish revolutionary social doctrine which went hand‑in‑glove with Higher Criticism which was bringing about the long planned Jewish social revolution. These two ideas cannot exist apart from each other as they are mutually dependent, and they are the fulfillment of Talmudic teachings which seek to split the goyim society by means of ideas.

Verification of this plan can be seen in the writings of the Jewish author, Marcus Eli Ravage, in the January 1928 issue of Century Magazine. I quote: We Jews are at the bottom of nearly all your wars; not only of the Russian Revolution, but of every other major revolution in your history ... We did it solely with the irresistible might of our spirit, with ideas and propaganda.

Oscar Levy, another Jewish writer, in the preface to the book, The World Significance of the Russian Revolution. said: There is scarcely an event in modern Europe that cannot be traced back to the Jews. We Jews today are nothing else but the world's seducers; its destroyers; its incendiaries; its revolutionaries.

The Jewish Chronicle, a leading Jewish newspaper in the United States, in its April 4,1918, issue stated: there is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself, in the fact that so many Jews are Bolshevists, in the fact that the ideals of Bolshevism (the forerunner of Communism, Ed.) are consonant(in agreement with, Ed.) the finest ideals of Judaism (Talmudism, Ed.)

The American Hebrew, the leading Jewish newspaper in the United States in 1920 said: What happened in Russia shall also, through the same Jewish mental (Talmudic, Ed.) and physical forces, become a reality over all the world.

The Christian world has known of these threats ever since Jewish radicals in Thessalonica (see Acts 17:6) hauled Jason and other Christian leaders before the civil authorities, accusing them of "turning the world upside down."

The Jewish system of procedures, or Talmudic System, is known by educators and seminarians, yet such is the power of the Talmudists, that few are willing to put forth a warning of the destruction which awaits a sleeping Christianity.

The Talmudic principle is simplicity itself. First, secularize and humanize the public schools. Prepare the mind of the goyim children to accept one‑world propaganda. This can be vividly illustrated by a teacher's handbook, published by a radical Jewish child psychologist by the name of Paul Brandwein. In its opening statement, Brandwein said:

Remember every child comes to school insane because of what they have learned at home and in their church. It is your task as teacher to heal this insanity and prepare the child to become one of the international children of the future.

This book was in the Texas school system for a short time, but due to the efforts of the Mel Gabler family, it was removed.

Ask yourself why it is that in our public (government) schools much is made of "Black Studies Week," while much of the history that points to the white Christian heritage of America has been withdrawn? Could it be that one principle being used is to discourage our culture of patriotism, love of country and its connection to the Christian faith? This is the liberalism which is applauded by Jewry, the Jewish‑controlled labor unions, the National Education Association and many of our clergy and politicians. One of these boldly declared: If the Jews can get away with it, more power to them. If the Jewish idea is stronger than that of the Christian, let it win!

This is how Christian nations are destroyed! And, the fight is not being waged fairly. How can children, or their parents, make proper judgments regarding the best course of action for their families, or their nation, when the media which is filling their living rooms daily with trash and lies, is under the control of the very enemy they have need to fear. The great ideals of Christian Anglo‑Saxondom are kept from white people under the guise that these ideals constitute "racism." It is not a fair fight when our white Christian youth are offered Jewish‑Talmudic ideas and ideals in place of Christian American ideas and ideals. Let the Anglo‑Saxon heritage of our people have free course among their Anglo‑Saxon sons and daughters and we will see Christian ideas and ideals triumph 100% of the time. This is why there is such an intensive drive on the part of world Jewry to keep the truth from our white Christian people.

It was Judaism that began this struggle. They invaded this fair country, not in order to make it a better place to live, but for their own gain. Let no man or woman of the white race fear them. But let this fight be fought on a fair basis. That is all that will be necessary for the truth to triumph! We need not fear world Jewry, or the evils of Talmudism, as long as our people are allowed to know the truth.

Today, our white society is confronted over and over again with the horrid term, "anti‑Semitism." Yet there can be no such thing unless "Semitism" first exists. The Jews love to complain how they were forced by Christians to live in the ghettos of Europe, yet the ghettos were a Jewish invention! The Jews have always desired to separate themselves because they have always despised Christians. They are taught by The Talmud, that "contact with the goyim contaminates them."

Yet strangely enough, it is not the Gentile who says that Jewish Talmudism is incompatible with white Christianity. This separatism is practiced by the Jews themselves! The Jew looks upon the Christian as a "Johnny‑Come‑Lately," and since Americanism is of Christian origin and invention, they are taught to despise it. The idea that America was founded as a Republic is repugnant to the Jewish mind so they have set about to change us into a socialist, democratic welfare state with them in control, of course.

The Jew from the earliest times had gloried in religious persecution. It is the thing which has kept their hatred alive, and the brainwashed minions of Christianity have aided them in their deception. In his book, Israel's Final Holocaust, Baptist Evangelist Jack Van Impe says that the Jews have been persecuted throughout history because they were "God's chosen people and Satan hated them." But this is not true! Scripture and history prove otherwise. Jews have been run out of every country in Europe, not because of their religion in itself, but because of their unscrupulous use of usury and their immoral practices. There is no religious persecution of Jews in America. There is religious prejudice brought about by the intolerable Talmudic resentment for everything non‑Jewish and practiced by Jews against Christians. If the truth concerning Talmudic teachings were made known to the majority of Christians, the Jews would be forced to leave America.

Religious prejudice is totally contrary to Anglo‑Saxon genes. We have always regarded a man's religion as a matter of conscience and allowed others to believe as they will as long as they do not infringe on the rights of others. This has always been an integral part of the American dream. But it is interesting to note that the cry of "bigot," in America is raised by the very people who are the world's worst bigots, the Jews.

One of the world‑wide undertakings of the Roman Catholic church which has received world‑wide acclaim from Catholics, Protestants and even non‑Christians, has been the magnificent Passion Play of Obberramagau. Hundreds of thousands flock to view the depiction of Christ's passion. Yet the Jews see this as a vicious, anti‑Semitic plot against them and have forced the directors to change portions to conform, not to the truth, but to Jewish demands.

Yet recently when a blasphemous movie was filmed in Hollywood under the direction of the Jew, Lou Wasserman, entitled The Last Temptation of Christ, and Christian anger rose to a new height against this blasphemy, Wasserman went to Jerry Falwell, then head of the Moral Majority, asking him to temper Christian protests. When Falwell suggested to this Jew that they remove the movie from the market, Wasserman reacted with anger. Many of the liberal pulpits of America praised this anti‑Christ Jewish movie which made our Lord out to be a whoremonger. This is the Talmudic mentality.

There is no politician in recent years who has been able to give evidence of his Christian faith without coming under Jewish attack. As early as June, 1921, the Jewish press in America raised a clamor when it stated that Christian churches were not competent to teach Americanism because the churches held that Christian teachings and good citizenship were synonymous.

The parallel between the Protocols and Talmudism is so pronounced that world‑wide Jewry believes in the common  Jewish prophecy that "Christianity is doomed to perish." Or, as one communist leader said, "We will banish God from the skies." If Christianity should perish, it will be because it becomes Judaized as is happening in a majority of our churches.

Have you ever wondered why with 45‑million born‑again Christian Americans, according to their own estimates, our beloved country has been sliding into hell at a faster rate in the past fifty years than at any time in our history? Could it be that these professing Christians are the "salt which has lost its savor" which the King talks about in Luke 14:34‑35? He said: Salt is good: but if the salt has lost his savour (its ability to act as salt) wherewith shall it be seasoned? It is neither fit for the land, nor yet for the dunghill (garbage dump); but men cast it out...

The main characteristic of salt is to stop corruption. Too much salt when making bread stops the action of the yeast. Remember back before the days of the deep freeze, when we salted our meat to preserve it? When salt loses this property, it is good for nothing. How many Christians do we see these days who fit this characteristic? When you find Christians who have lost their salt, you will find he or she has probably come under the influence of Judaism.

Throughout all of this, remember one thing: It is the "Jewish idea," the Talmudic teaching which is the question at issue. It is not the Jewish people themselves.

                        The Protocols of The Learned Elders of Zion

                                                 Chapter Five

I have briefly mentioned The Protocols which were a draft, or copy, of the original anuscript. Many Jews, and their Christian Zionist cohorts, contemptuously attempt to shrug the Protocols aside as being counterfeit. But, as we pointed out earlier, in order to have a counterfeit, there must have been an original. The more valuable the original, the more care the counterfeiter uses to make the copy as exact as possible.

There is no proof I can offer which will settle the question. Much greater minds than mine have argued the pros and cons. However, if "the proof is in the pudding," and "by their fruits ye shall know them," I take the position that for over 90 years we have been witnessing their fulfillment. They have used it as a blueprint for their world conquest and have followed its every instruction. If these documents were an anti‑Jewish forgery as the Talmudists claim, there is no doubt they would have made supposed Jewish authorship as clear as possible. Instead, they have taken great pains to cover up any Jewish connections. Only once or twice, in the entire lengthy document, does the word Jew appear. However, there is little doubt that the document was directed against those people the Jews call Gentiles, or in the more picturesque Yiddish, "goy" (in the singular) and "goyim" in the plural. With the exception of a few instances, the only distinctive racial term used is "Gentile."

If a forger had written this during the last decade, there might have been reason to believe it was anti‑Semitic malice (even though very few of the people we now call Jews can qualify as Semites). But take note that this document was written over 90 years ago, before the term anti‑Semitic was coined by the Talmudists.

The Sixth Protocol states: That the true situation shall not be noticed by the Gentiles prematurely, we will mask it by a pretended effort to serve the working classes and promote great economic features for which an active propaganda will be carried out by our economic theories.

The Protocols were very probably never written in manuscript form, but were notes taken from the minutes of the World Zionist Conference held somewhere in France or Switzerland near the end of the nineteenth century. The secret power of the Talmudists has developed as they have manipulated world governments into placing the secret government of a country in the hands of a few men of Jewish faith. No nations in the world are so completely under Zionist power as those of England, Canada and America; the three leading true Israelite nations.

The Protocols, in agreement with international Zionist leaders look on the dispersion of the Jews as a blessing in disguise. In The Protocols they say: This has brought us to the threshold of universal rule.

In the Ninth Protocol, they explain in detail how they have taken over the control of one Israel nation after another. I quote: In order not to destroy prematurely the Gentile institutions, we have laid our efficient hands on them and grasped the springs of the mechanisms they formed in a strict and just order, but we have replaced them with a liberal disorganized and arbitrary administration. We have tampered with jurisprudence (their justice system), the franchise (right to vote), their press, freedom of the person and most important of all, education and culture which is the cornerstone of their free existence.

We have misled, stupefied, and demoralized their youth by means of education in the principles and theories patently false, but which we have inspired above existing laws, without actually changing them, but by distorting them through contradictory interpretations. We have created something stupendous in the way of results.

Let's take a moment to analyze this Protocol. As an intelligent person, answer if you can the question of how this document, if it were a forgery as the Jews and their allies claim, could so accurately describe what is happening now, over 90 years after it was written?

The laws of Anglo‑Saxondom, the foundation of the modern Israel nations known as Christendom, have always been laid on the strict and just order of God's Ten Commandments. These have indeed been replaced by a teaching in both education and religion which says there are no absolutes. There is no such thing as "black" or "white," only shades of gray. In other words, situation ethics which makes a thing right or wrong according to the circumstances. This teaching has released a Pandora's box of evils upon our society, not the least of which is our modern acceptance of homosexuality as an alternate life style when we know that the Word of God says all those who practice this aberration are worthy of death.

A close look at the Anti‑Defamation League of the B'nai B'rith, which acts as an unlicensed agent of a foreign government (the State of Israel) and is allowed to operate unhindered in the United States, has for all intents and purposes become unofficially an arm of the U.S. Justice Department. If you do not want to accept this fact, then ask yourself why every time you read about government action against a Christian patriot, you will find the thoughts of some official from the A.D.L. This Talmudic organization has been responsible for most of the para‑military laws enacted in many of our states which are aimed at Christian patriot groups. The Jewish Defense League, the armed branch of the A.D.L., is allowed to operate unhindered in most of these states.

A close look at the courts of our land will show a preponderance of Jewish judges, although Jews make up less than 3% of our population. They also have almost complete control of the American Bar Association, and lawyers who do not operate under their control are regularly blackballed in America's courts. Under Talmudic jurisdiction, America's courts have become noted for their protection of criminal rights, while the law abiding citizen is often persecuted on the slightest pretext.

We have already discussed Jewish control of the media. Analyze education and see the stranglehold the Talmudists have on the National Education Association and on our culture. Ask yourself why Christian Americans have been forced to subsidize pornography in the arts through the National Endowment for the Arts. This is a Jewish controlled organization which seems to specialize in downgrading Jesus Christ and Christianity at our expense.

We witness this same downgrading of morals in the music industry which is almost 100% Talmudic controlled. And, it has produced stupendous results. If you don't want to believe this, look at the screaming hordes of teenagers and college youth who are completely mesmerized by these so‑called musical Pied Pipers.

By changing the meaning of the Constitution, we now find it acceptable for protestors to burn the American flag. But we must never say anything derogatory about the State of Israel and its ambitious reign of terror in the Mid‑East regardless of their threat to the Moslems or our Christian way of life. By the time this book is in print, we may even have "hate laws" which will hinder you from telling the truth about those who seek to destroy America.

The method of the Protocols can be summed up in one word: DISINTEGRATION; the undoing of everything worthwhile in order to create chaos and thereby gain control of the people. So The Protocols teach that in order to gain control of public opinion it is first necessary to confuse it. This is successfully done through control of the media.

Truth is not confusing, but the liberalism which has been sown in this country by the Talmudists is confusing because it is based upon a foundation of man's shifting values. There are no absolutes: there is no truth. Take a nation, a church, or a family in which liberalism has been sown and you can split it into fractions which will ultimately destroy it. There was a time in America when the family unit was strong and America was strong. But the enemy cleverly led both parents and children into believing that Humanism was the way to go. As a result, in both children and parents, Christian and non‑Christian, we have developed the idea of "doing our own thing," "if it feels good, do it," and "there is no tomorrow, so live for today," no matter the consequences. This has led our Israel people into the almost unsolvable mess we find ourselves in today. Regardless of whether we like it or not, there is only one answer and that is returning to doing things God's way. (Again, I call your attention to Deuteronomy 28.) White Christian Americans need to learn quickly that "secularization" is preparation for "Judaization." That is the Talmudic Way!

The Talmudic program almost always starts off with flabby tolerance of anything and everything. The phraseology used is a dependable Talmudic weapon. Protocol V states: In all times people have accepted words for acts.

This is the basis on which they operate. Men and women like to be believers in something, and if you can convince them that being broad‑minded is good, you can control their thinking in other liberal channels. As a result of this thinking, we have seen in the business world the prostitution of service into profit. There was a time when the American businessman was interested in putting out a top quality product, and he would often work long hours and put forth great effort to reach this goal. Then the Talmudic rationale of "the gelt is, the thing!" (Gelt is Yiddish for profit or money.) "Get what you can with the least amount of effort and time." Since American business has assumed this thinking, quality and pride of workmanship have taken a back seat and we are witnessing a decline in the profit picture. This is one of the major reasons the American automobile industry has had difficulty coping with that of Japan's where the worker is still taught pride in workmanship. The Talmudic principle is, "How much profit can we squeeze out of this product," not, "How can we make it better?"

This thinking causes the enviable art of good management to degenerate into the exploitation of those whom they employ in order to gain more profits. It means reckless confusion among managers and dangerous unrest among workers. It results in the breakdown of our Anglo‑Saxon work ethic and the substitution of a foreign ideology. And the genealogy of this foreign ideology is rooted in The Babylonian Talmud as we shall see.

Protocol X states: We will wear everyone out by dissensions, animosities, feuds, famine, inoculations of diseases and want, until the Gentiles have no way of escape except by an appeal to our power and money.

The Kehillah is the most potent power in the American Jewish community. It is an organization which wields worldwide power and intimidates Jews into doing its bidding. The Kehillah in New York City constitutes the essential part of the Jewish government in the United States, which in recent years has often been referred to as Z.O.G. (Zionist Occupational Government) and is the center of American Jewry. It is the whispering gallery of American Jews where whispering drives are set in motion to break and destroy those Christian goyim who do not bow to their will.

Under the Babylonian governmental system, the Kehillah was the power and protectorate of the Jewish community. It operates under the laws of The Talmud. With the conversion of the Turko‑Mongolian Khazars to Judaism in the 8th century A.D., they immigrated heavily into Eastern Europe. The Kehillah moved with them to that area and eventually on to the United States centering in New York City in the 19th century. Today, New York is to world Jewry what Mecca is to the Moslem.

The Kehillah has its representatives in all Jewish organizations such as the Central Conference of American Rabbis; Eastern Council of Reformed Rabbis; Independent Order of B'nai B'rith, with its harlot daughter the Anti‑Defamation League; the Independent Order of the Free Sons of Israel; the Federation of American Zionists, and many others. It encompasses all Jews orthodox, liberal, reformed, and atheistic ‑ apostate Jews, poor Jews, rich Jews, law‑abiding Jews, communist revolutionaries, criminal Jews, all come under its control. They are banded together, so they claim, to protect Jewish rights! But what rights are the Jews deprived of in America? There are none! This expression is nothing but a substitute for a campaign which seeks to deny Christian rights, in Christian America. Again, this is a central teaching of The Talmud.

The American Jewish Committee has divided the United States into twelve regions, and every state belongs to a district, which has as its head the most powerful Jewish representative in that region. The capital of the world, and that of the United States as far as Jewish affairs are concerned, is New York City which just happens to also be the seat of the United Nations government. It is the home of most of the anti‑American, anti‑Christian propaganda and pro‑Jewish hysteria that sweeps this nation periodically.

The Jews have a free reign to handle their own affairs in the United States. They have their own calendar, they keep their own holidays, observe their own form of worship, exist on their own dietary laws (which are now in the process of being forced on an unwilling Gentile population), and they do all of the above, and much more, without molestation from our government and without the slightest question of whether they are right or wrong.

But the non‑Jew, especially the Christian, must act according to Jewish dictates or he is immediately accused of infringing on Jewish rights. This is borne out by Christ being removed from Christmas and Easter, the cross being removed from our public buildings, prayers taken out of our schools and morality out of our government. Examine the upcoming hate laws which are being foisted on our Congress by Jewish organizations. Canada already has hate laws, and you must not say or do anything which will hurt the feelings of a Jew or other alien. But it is not considered a crime for a black man to degrade a white, or for a Jew to blaspheme our Savior Jesus Christ. That is their right under this one‑sided law.

There is no such thing as anti‑Semitism in America, except as it applies to the Jew against the Arab. But, there is a tremendous amount of anti‑Gentilism and anti‑Christianity which is deliberately being employed by the Talmudists in their drive for world power. Most American Christians fail to realize that most public disturbances,  strikes and political confusion do not just happen out of a clear blue sky. They are planned that way. A few years ago the Jewish community of Skokie, Illinois, was thrown into a total frenzy by a Nazi group who applied for a permit to parade through town. Nothing was ever said on national TV, or in the news, when it was discovered that the "thug" who paraded in Nazi uniform as the leader of the Nazi group was a young Jew from the Jewish Defense League. It has been proven that many incidents described as vicious anti‑Semitism, such as desecration of synagogues and Jewish cemeteries, have been committed by Jewish thugs. This is a means they use to keep the little Jew in line with orders from the Kehillah, and to keep the general public softened up over the ugliness being perpetrated against the noble, innocent Jew.

A close check of the FBI's annual crime report will show that acts of violence by the Jewish Defense League and other militant Jewish groups out number those of the far right fringe by eight‑to‑one. In most cases where Jews are involved, the authorities have strange lapses of memory when it comes to justice. Most of the violence on college campuses during the Vietnam War were communist planned and were carried out under Jewish leadership. Most of the anti‑nuclear demonstrations and the violence of certain environmentalist groups is planned violence under Jewish leadership. I saw this from personal experience as I worked the lecture circuit of the colleges during the 1970's.

The vast amount of communist propaganda literature being produced and distributed in the United States amounts to hundreds of millions of dollars annually. It is the work of Jewish authors who describe in glowing terms the throngs of liberty‑loving aliens who want to come to the United States. The problem is, once they are here they do not want to abide by our laws, but desire to set up their own systems within our system. In Southern California we see little Mexicos, little Hong Kongs, Vietnamese villages, Iranian communities and East  Indian communities. The billboards, advertisements and signs are in their native languages, and just try to understand their employees if you are found in need of gas or other services in their ghettos.

It was the Jewess Emma Lazarus who penned the propaganda we find engraved on the base of the Statue of Liberty in New York harbor: "Give me your poor, your tired, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free." And American idiots, especially those of the Christian faith, opened the doors to the refuse of the world and today we are paying for it in the degeneration of our youth and the degrading of our educational system. We are paying for it through diseases which have been hitherto unknown in this country and through rampant crime and poverty among our people. We are paying for it through the nose with our tax dollars which provide welfare to these people who either cannot, or will not, work. The financial burden is breaking our backs.

An honest look at America's problems will show that it is the Talmudic element which offers the most violent resistance to the Christian American way of life. The term "melting pot" was given to us by the Jew Zangwill and was something our founding fathers never envisioned for this country which had been founded as a refuge for white Christians seeking freedom to worship God. Other religions were allowed to come here and receive protection, but they were never given the lawful right to change our way of life to conform to their heathen ideas. It is very possible that there are more Jewish communists in America today than there are in the USSR since they are all controlled from their one‑world Kehilla center in New York.

Most of our modern‑day church leaders have succumbed to the Scriptural confusion of mistaking Judah and the Jews for Israel. They completely reject the words of our risen Lord in Revelation 2:9 and 3:9 where He warned: "...them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan."

These church leaders, often acting from motives of self‑interest, have misinterpreted the ancient writings that relate to Israel and Judah, and have made Judah, the hub around which their prophetic teachings rotate. They have, for all intents and purposes, forgotten or discarded their own roots and prefer to idolize those who are imposters. These churchmen fail to consider the fact that  Judah has been in constant warfare with Israel for at least 2500 years. When they first came on the Scriptural scene in II Kings 16:6, about 742 B.C., lo and behold they were fighting against Israel.

To confuse the matter even more, most religionists fail to take the fact into account that at least 80% of the modern‑day Jews are not of Judah at all, but are of Turko‑Mongolian racial background from Eastern Europe. According to their own historians they were converted to Judaism in the 8th century A.D. Every leader of the modern State of Israel has come from this heathen background and is known as an Ashkenazi Jew.

People often ask why Jewry, which on the economic front is international capitalism in disguise, should favor Bolshevism, which is the announced enemy of capitalism. Why would a New York City Jew such as Jacob Schiff pour millions of dollars into the coffers of the Bolsheviks during the Russian Revolution?

With every fact of history against them, there are still hordes of political and religious leaders in America who insist that Communism was not Jewish in origin and that the Jews have been persecuted in the Soviet Union. The USSR is the only nation in the world where anti‑Semitism is punishable by death! Today we find these intellectual idiots attempting to make hay for their warped ideas by stating Premier Gorbachev is violently anti‑Semitic. Yet the facts prove that under Gorbachev, international Jews have become the only millionaires in Russia and that international communism in Russia, as well as the remainder of the world, is nothing but a facsimile of international Jewish Talmudism. If you are one of those who refuses to accept this truth, then explain why the only openly wealthy class in Russia, who have elaborate dachas on the shores of the Black Sea at Odessa, are Jews.

As late as 1983, under the guidance of Premier Andropov, a Jew, 23 out of 25 members of the Politburo (the Soviet ruling clique) were Jews. Every top member of the military and of the Soviet police, were Jews. What the present composition is, I do not know, but I do know that in spite of all the propaganda to the contrary in the American media, Russian Jews have received favored treatment over Baptists and Pentecostal Christians.

Why is it that we have been kept in darkness in America? Could it be because all our information comes to us through the Jewish telegraph service which is the Associated Press of worldwide Zionism. It might be worthwhile to think about this for a bit.

The illegal method by which the Zionists in Palestine forcibly confiscated Arab land has been approved by our Zionist Occupational Government and by the wolves in sheep's clothing who stand behind America's pulpits declaring these bandits to be God's Chosen People. Instead of giving honor to the men who fill these pulpits, patriotic Christians should hold them in the utmost contempt because they are traitors not only to their country, but of more importance, to their God. They have become paid prostitutes of Zionism who, according to Isaiah 56:11: .. all look to their own way, everyone for his gain ... These include national TV favorites such as Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, Jimmy Swaggart, Jack Van Impe, etc.

Palestine has often been called the "center of the earth" because the power which has controlled Palestine in the past has been the one which controlled the world. Palestine has been the key to world military strategy and trade. It is located strategically between three continents, and it lends itself to dreams of future glory, as the almost unlimited mineral and oil reserves of this area are astronomical.

The native Arabs of Palestine were promised protection from Jewish expansion first by British General Allenby when he liberated Jerusalem from the Turks in 1918, and then by the Balfour Declaration, the San Remo Conference and by President Wilson in his Fourteen Points. But the Talmudists said: "Let the Arabs go. Let them give up their land to us. We want it!" Oh, what a delightful Jewishness there is in this declaration. But today, the world is becoming alarmed at the seeds of Jewish aggression in Palestine and are beginning to realize that this could well be the catalyst which would set up Armageddon. In the meantime, the fundamentalists and evangelicals say they would welcome this catastrophe, not even comprehending the consequences of their words. Not one fundamentalist leader in a thousand understands the vastness and terror of Armageddon. Of course they don't worry about this because they teach that they will not be here, but will be transported by Jesus to some place in the sky where, from the battlements of heaven, they will watch as the rest of us are destroyed. They teach this without the slightest Scriptural authority, and woe be to them when their church members discover they have been lied to!

I could fill more pages speaking about Talmudic control of the media, TV and Hollywood. As was pointed out in detail in a previous chapter, all major newspapers, TV networks, nine out of ten studios in Hollywood, the major magazines ‑ all are Jewish owned and/or controlled. What it boils down to is almost complete control over the news which is spoon‑fed daily to the American people.

Add to this the control of the publishing houses and the National Education Association and you have the makings of a confused America, just as the Talmudists said it would be. The Talmudic idea of education can be seen in the following remark made by Terry Herndod, former Executive Director of the National Education Association: The ultimate goal of the NEA is to tap the legal, political and economic powers of the U.S. Congress. We want leaders and staff with sufficient clout that they may roam the halls of Congress and collect votes to re‑order the priorities of the U.S.A.

The propagandists of Hollywood are free to make Christian clergymen anything from seducers, to safe crackers, to village idiots and get away with it. But a Jew must never be depicted in a critical light, no matter how dastardly his acts. Their viciousness towards Jesus Christ and Christianity can be seen in the recent blasphemous movie, The Last Temptation of Christ, which depicted our Lord and Savior as an immoral man. This movie was made successful by the hordes of so‑called Christians who have made Talmudism successful in America. It has been Christianity that has supported the movie industry, the Jew liquor monopoly, the Jew tobacco industry, Jewish pornography and prostitution ‑ everything which has been used to tear down our

Christian heritage.

In Protocol IV, we read: This is the reason why it is indispensable for us to undermine all faith, to tear out of the minds of the goyim the very principle of Godhead, and the spirit, and to put in its place arithmetical calculations and material needs.

Protocol XVII: We have long past taken care to discredit the priesthood of the goyim and thereby to ruin their mission on earth which in these days might still be a great hindrance to us. Freedom of conscience has been declared everywhere, so that now only years divide us from the moment at the complete wrecking at that Christian religion.. ..(Emphasis added)

In the communist textbook Psychopolitics, which was written in the USSR in 1933 and was the blueprint for the takeover of America, we read on page 52: We have battled in America since the century's turn to bring to nothing any and all Christian influences, and we are succeeding. While we today seem to be kind to the Christian, remember we have yet to influence the Christian world to our ends. When this done, we will have an end to them everywhere.

You must work until religion is synonymous with insanity. You must work until the officials of city, county and state governments will not think twice before they pounce upon religious groups as public enemies. You wonder why hate laws which discriminate against Christians are being passed by a Zionist‑dominated Congress? Here is your answer. >It is the Talmudic principle in operation.<

I could go into the jungle music of modern rock and roll which is controlled by Jews. We often wonder why our modern youth have degenerated into savagery, yet Christian leaders have refused to attack the Jewish source of this savagery. They are hamstrung by the teaching of their church that these imposters are God's Chosen and must be protected at all cost and that to confront a Jew is to bring God's curse upon them. Maybe these clergy and their parishioners should read II Chronicles 19:2 which says: ... Shouldest thou help the ungodly, and love them that hate the Lord? Therefore is wrath upon these from before the Lord.

Sixty years ago, Werner Sombart, a pro‑Jewish author in his book, Jews and Modern Capitalism. predicted: If conditions in America continue to develop along the same lines as in the last generation, if the immigration statistics and the same proportion of births among the nationalities in the U.S. remain the same, our imagination can picture the United States in 50 or 100 years hence, as a land inhabited only by the Slavs, negroes, and Jews, wherein the Jew will naturally occupy the position of leadership. How accurate his predictions have become. Whites are about to become a minority in the country they founded and brought to greatness. Why? Because they have been led to compromise with, and bow down to, the heathen attributes of Talmudism.

Professional sports in America have come completely under Jewish control to the point where they are pricing themselves out of existence. At the same time they fulfill the Talmudic ambition to get the goy occupied by sports so that he has little time or energy in which to do the important things. This is a Talmudic principle.

In Protocol XIII we read: In order to distract the people who may be too troublesome from discussions of questions of the political... In order that the masses themselves may not guess what they are about we further distract them with amusements, games, pastimes, passions, people's palaces... Soon we shall begin through the press to propose competitions in art, in sport of all kinds: these interests will finally distract their minds from questions in which we should find ourselves compelled to oppose them.

Why this mad emphasis on sports? It is to take our minds off essential issues and prepare us for Talmudic takeover!

The Jewish element has completely controlled boxing for years, and has taken the sport of clean wrestling, which was a test of skill and strength, and turned it into a disgusting orgy. We now see mud wrestling spectacles between near nude members of the female sex and the orgy of painted heathens groping and grunting their way in and out of the ropes.

When anyone exposes the Talmudic control over any segment of our existence, the Jew becomes an inflamed zealot because the Jew cannot tolerate anything he considers to be criticism. You may criticize a Christian of any denomination with impunity, and until recently, most nationalities, but the Jew is sacrosanct (sacred and above criticism). There is not a major newspaper in America, or a major politician, who dares admit that there is a Jewish problem. Any discussion, or the laying out of facts, immediately draws the label of "anti‑Semitism," or "hate monger."

The Jew can call your Lord and Savior a bastard and few will complain, but show the Jew in his true colors and your expose' will be labeled as "full of lies, insinuation, prejudice and hatred to instigate suicide."

As I wrote earlier, the term "anti‑Semitic" is a misnomer when applied to Jews today since the people we now know as Jews have very little, if any, connection to the forefathers of true Israel. Very few of the people we know as Jews, with the possible exception of a few Sephardim Jews, can qualify as being Semites. The vast majority, according to their own historians, are Ashkenazi Jews of Turko‑Mongolian background. Their forebears never set foot in Palestine, they have not one drop of Semitic blood in their veins, and they have no legal or moral title or right to the land they claim is theirs by right of birth.

When one recognizes the problems caused in our society by Talmudic Judaism, it does not mean they have joined a campaign of hatred and enmity against all Jews. It is not hatred or prejudice to tell the truth about someone. Very few of our people even understand the meaning of the word prejudice, and as we said before, it comes from the word "praejudicium," which means 'to form an opinion without knowing the facts," or pre‑judging. There is no prejudice involved when one speaks the truth about anyone or any subject. It is probably fortunate that Jewish periodicals do not circulate freely among the non‑Jew since they are composed of two dominant themes ‑ Gentile unfairness towards the Jew and Christian prejudice! If Gentiles read Jewish writers, there would be a concerted effort to rid this country of Talmudism of all kinds.

It is not anti‑Semitism to proclaim the truth known to many that there is an international Jewish conspiracy to rule the world. For in spite of Jewish efforts to deny this, which is supported by their Christian Zionist sympathizers, Jewish literature abounds with their plans and designs. The Protocols boast about it, The Talmud teaches it, and Jewish authors have gloried in the power which will be theirs when they have taken over world control. The Protocols are the operating instructions to carry out the programs of The Talmud.

The idea of a one‑world government has been a Jewish dream from its inception and many Jewish authors boast about it in their writings. (My book, Behold the International Jew, $5.00 ppd. has many examples of this.) One example of this assertion is a recently received letter from a Jew. It was written to a patriotic Christian American leader and reads as follows: Sir: Your people are so paranoid it is obvious we can no longer permit you to exist. We cannot allow you to spread your filthy, immoral Christian beliefs to the rest of the world. Naturally, you are opposed to the World Government ... unless it is under the grip of American fascism. You who proclaim the Christian American Way of Life is best it is obvious you have never been exposed to the superiority of the communist culture. World Government will bring world peace and this will not become a reality until American nationalism and imperialism is (sic) smashed! When your nationalism is smashed, I will personally be there to firebomb your church, burn your Bibles and confiscate your firearms, and take away your children. We will send them to Eastern Bloc schools for redemption, as future leaders of the newly formed Soviet Socialist Republic of Amerika. We are taking over your world and there are not enough of you to stop us. I am prepared to fight you and all other enemies of the communist state.

Sincerely your enemy,

Signed: Gregory Paul Brookbank

Seattle, Washington

This is the Talmudic mind at work.

Protocol XIV states: When we come into our kingdom it will be undesirable for us that there should exist any other religion than ours... with whom our destiny is bound up by our position as the Chosen People and through whom our same destiny is united with the destinies of the world.

Samuel Roth, a Jewish author in his revealing book, Jews Must Live!, said; A goyim neighbor of mine, a Mrs. Harlan, asked me one day: 'Do you actually think that a whole nation such as Germany, would stand aside while Hitler eliminated all the Jews, unless there were some real abuses on the part of the Jews which might justify it?'

In trying to answer this perplexing question, he wrote: Suddenly it dawned on me, blindingly, about all the evils for a long time that have been perpetrated by the Jews ... The scroll of my life spread before me, and reading it, in the glare of a new, savage light, it became a terrible testimony against my people. He remembered how as a Jew he had been cheated by other Jews; how he had been libeled by Jewish journalists and sent to prison because they didn't like what he wrote.

He said: I have never stretched out my hand to help a Jew, or Jewess, without having had it bitten! I have never entrusted a Jew with a secret, which he did not instantly sell cheap to my enemies ... with subtle scheming and heartless seizure which is the whole of the Jew's fearful leverage in trade; they drove me from law office to law office, from court to court, until I found myself bankrupt. It became so that I could not see a Jew approaching me without my heart rising up to mutter, "There goes another Jew robber; stalking his prey."

On page 81 of his book he says; Every synagogue we Jews build in a Christian country is a finger of scorn we point at our hosts; a sore finger we stick into their eyes, like the leering of a senile old woman who does all sorts of foul mischief before you, and feels safe in the knowledge that you will not lay hands on her for fear of contamination. This, my Christian friends, is Jewish Talmudism!

The Jew, Bernard Lazare, in his book, Antisemitism, page 350, said: The Jew is not satisfied with de‑Christianizing, he Judaizes and destroys the Christian faith; he provokes indifference, but he imposes his ideals on the world, of morals and of life, upon those whose faith he ruins; >he works tirelessly at his age‑old task, the annihilation of the religion of Christ<. (Emph. added) This is Jewish Talmudism!

I began this book by discussing the story of The Babylonian Talmud as told by the Jew, Jacob Neusner. Then we looked briefly at the problems which have existed between the Jews and the Christian world, using as a background the book, The International Jew, by Henry Ford, Sr. Now we will take a closer look at The Talmud itself under the magnifying glass of truth and see what it tells us about itself. Many of the comments in this section, as well as the actual quotes from The Talmud, are actual reproductions from pages of the English translation of The Talmud, Soncino Edition, and are taken from Elizabeth Dilling's book, The Plot to Destroy Christianity.

                                Biblical History of Israel and Judah

                                                  Chapter Six

In 1931, Elizabeth Dilling, then a girl in her teens, was taken by her parents on a visit to Russia. She saw for herself the appalling scenes of forced labor and squalid living conditions which had been brought about by the socialist system. She heard the public tirades over loud speakers in the city squares which vilified Jesus Christ and made the sacrament of Holy Communion into a cannibalistic orgy.

In the Museum of the Revolution she was shown a huge world map and as the guide switched on the lights all over the world where communism was then in control, he said: "Our world revolution will start with China and end with the United States."

At her hotel, Elizabeth talked with a representative of a foreign country who told her about the police terror which had descended on the Russian people and how people were dragged from their homes never to be seen again. Behind the backs of careless guides, Miss Dilling took movies, and on her return to the United States, began to show them to concerned, patriotic Americans everywhere. Articles were written in small, local newspapers, and the story spread until she was lecturing full time, from coast to coast.

She managed to get a copy of her full report on communism, written in 1938 under the sponsorship of Henry Ford, Sr., into the hands of Senator Royal Copeland, who then passed it on to Vice President Garner. As a result, Congressman Martin Dies of Texas, directed the Dies Committee on Un‑American Activities to look into this matter.

Mrs. Dilling discovered the hub of Jewish power in America was in the American Jewish Committee with its Masonic brotherhood of the B'nai B'rith, and its secret police force. Its  "smear and ruin arm," the Anti‑Defamation League, as we have stated before, is operating illegally on American soil but with full approval of the United States government.

After pushing a reluctant American people into World War II, international Judaism had to crush all opposition by labeling it as "fascist," "Nazi," or "anti‑Semitic." By the stigma of these labels, innocent but informed patriots were ruined by the wrath of well‑intentioned but brainwashed Christians. By using these brainwashed people to destroy the patriots, it has furthered their goals of world conquest.

A series of indictments were brought by the government of Franklin Delano Roosevelt against thirty out‑spoken anti‑communists. One of these anti‑communists was Elizabeth Dilling. The indictments began in 1942 and ran through 1944 under the direction of the American Jewish Committee. The 1943 indictment was dismissed, but the one in 1944 had Christian patriots being tried before Jewish Judge Eicher. It was staged without any legal basis whatsoever. Judge Eicher died during the trial, and the case was dismissed by Judge Dolitha Laws with the scathing denunciation that it was a crime to hold people on trial for such a lengthy time without one single bit of evidence against them. Of course, the pro‑communist press which is owned or controlled by Jews, gloated over this staged trial.

Goaded on by International Zionist pressure, this brave lady from Chicago went on to write, "The Plot to Destroy Christianity" from which most of the following information was taken. She also wrote: "Red Network," a who's who and handbook on radicalism for patriots; " The Roosevelt Red Record and It's Background": and "The Octopus" which is an in‑depth look into international Jewish power. As you read her powerful and well‑documented expose's, you will understand why International Zionism hated her.

There is a missing link in Christian understanding regarding this entire subject. The average Christian is totally unaware of a Zionist problem, or of Zionist influence in their daily church, political and social activities. That is proof that the American Jewish Committee has been largely successful in their smear tactics and labeling of those who would dare expose them. This missing link is best expressed when looking into the subject of the Pharisees as found in the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia of 1943. It states: The Jewish religion, as it is today, traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries from the Pharisees. Their leading ideas and methods found expression in a literature of enormous extent of which a great deal is still in existence. The Talmud (Babylonian, Ed.) is the largest and most important single piece of that literature ... and the study of it is essential for any real understanding of Pharisaism.

It would be reasonable for the Christian Bible scholar to recall here that it was against the Pharisees that Jesus Christ leveled His most devastating criticism, calling them "hypocrites," "poisonous snakes," and even "children of the devil." In John 8:44, He indicated that they were spiritual children of Satan, ever willing to do the dirty work of their father. He said that they went to extreme measures to gain a convert, then proceeded to turn them into "twofold more of a child of hell than themselves." (Matt. 23:15) He said they deliberately nullified the commandments of God by teaching the doctrines of men. (Mark 7:13 and Man. 1 5:6‑9) It is no wonder they wanted to kill Him.

Everywhere He went during His years on earth, we find the Son of God in conflict with the Pharisees, who The Word says: And consulted that they might take Jesus by subtlety (trickery, deceit), and kill Him. (Matt. 26:4) Although Jesus admitted that the Pharisees were the children of Abraham (at least some of them were through Esau/Edom ‑ John 8:37), He told them that spiritually they were of their father the devil (John 8:44).

The Scriptural believers of Jesus' time were mostly from Galilee, as can be seen from Bible accounts. These people were called "gentiles" by the Jews, which equates to "non‑Jews." (The most misunderstood word in Scripture is "Jew," with "Gentile" running a close second.) The Galileans were hounded and persecuted by the Talmudic Pharisees from the very beginning. In Acts 12:3, we read that King Herod, who was an Edomite/Jew,.. because he saw it pleased the Jews, he proceeded further to take Peter also... (He had already incarcerated and beheaded James, the brother of John). In I Thessalonians 2:15, the Apostle Paul, speaking of these Talmudists said: Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; (Christians) and they please not God, and are contrary to all men...... So you see how the people of that day felt about them.

The Babylonian Talmud, according to the top Jewish authorities, is the sole authority of Judaism. Rabbi Louis Finklestein was chosen in 1937 by the Jewish Committees (Kehillas) of the world as one of the top 120 Jews living at the time. In a two‑volume literary work entitled, The Pharisees. Finklestein says: Pharisaism became Talmudism. But the spirit of the ancient Pharisees survived unaltered. When the Jew ... studies the Talmud, he is actually repeating the arguments used by the Palestinian academies. From Palestine to Babylonia, from Babylonia to North Africa, Italy, Spain, France, and Germany; from these to Poland, Russia, and Eastern Europe, generally ancient Pharisaism had wandered.

Finklestein says in his book, "The Jews ‑ Their History. Culture and Religion." Vol.4, p.1332: Any decision regarding the Jewish religion MUST be based on The Talmud, as the final resume of those authorities when they existed.

In the November 17, 1950, installment of a best selling book by the Jewish author Herman Wouk, we read: The Talmud is to this day the circulating heart's blood of the Jewish religion.

As far as I have been able to determine, there was no English translation of The Talmud prior to the Soncino Edition of 1934‑48. Why was it that in Europe, when the contents of The Talmud became commonly known, it was burned by the orders of both the Pope and Protestant clergy? It was not because of hatred for the Jews, but because of its contents.

Some Jewish apologists, such as David Webber of the Southwest Radio Church, Oklahoma City, OK, and Jack Van Impe, a popular Baptist evangelist and writer, say it is because the Jews are God's Chosen People and therefore Satan has a special hatred for them. If this is true, then why did our Savior tell their leaders that they were of "their father the devil"? (John 8:44)

No, my Christian friend, you who have been brainwashed by Jewish propaganda in your so‑called Judeo‑Christian churches of America. The Jews have not been persecuted down through the centuries because they are God's special people; but because of their Talmudic teachings which they have put into operation everywhere they go. They have been hated because The Talmud teaches that only the Pharisees rank as men ‑ all others are animals. The Talmud says "the people who are like an ass ‑ slaves who are considered the property of their Jewish masters." It has been because of teachings such as this that the asses in every country have raised up in rebellion and expelled them.

Moses, in contrast to Talmudic teaching, was insistent upon one law for the stranger and the homeborn and taught that the stranger must not be oppressed. (Exodus 12:49) The Talmud on the other hand, teaches the Jew that the stranger in his midst is fair game for the Jews. (The word "stranger," as used in this Exodus passage comes from the Hebrew word "gehr," and means by implication a foreigner, or alien.)

Was Jesus being fair when He denounced the Pharisees in such scathing terms? It is impossible to know unless you know what The Talmud teaches. Irrefutable exhibits from Jewish authorities show beyond the shadow of a doubt that The Talmud reverses every one of the Ten Commandments of God, the teachings of Moses and the prophets and enshrines their own obscene opposites as the "whited sepulchres" Jesus spoke about in Matt. 23:27 which were beautiful on the outside, but full of stench and corruption within.

Murder of non‑Pharisees is permitted by Talmudic law, as is theft, sodomy, incest and rape. The righteousness of grown men violating a little girl under the age of three is one of the favorite topics of discussion in book after book of The Talmud. (Dr. Neusner fails to mention this in his defense of The Talmud.)

The word "Babylon" in the Bible refers to everything that is foul and pagan. The word means "confusion." Most commentaries on the curses pronounced on Babylon in Isaiah chapters 13 and 14 and Jeremiah 50 and 51 refer not only to ancient Babylon, but to the spiritual Babylon which exists today. In the Book of Revelation, this mystery power is called BABYLON THE GREAT, MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH. She is pictured as being "drunk with the blood of the saints and martyrs of Jesus Christ." It is the vast, powerful, one‑world government (called the New World Order by the conspirators) that is being pushed by our political leaders today which will eventually make war with the Lamb and be destroyed. While Talmudic literature goes overboard in its praise of Babylon, it is a term of reproach in both the Old and New Testaments.

It was during the Babylonian captivity of the southern Kingdom of Judah that the priests discovered how the Torah (the Mosaic Law) could be used as "whited sepulchres," to cover up the degeneracy of Babylon. Many of those Judahites became racially mixed with their captors and became a bastardized people. Both these racially mixed Jews and those who were racially still pure, returned to Jerusalem. They deserted their temple worship for synagogues; they deserted their Levitical priesthood for that of the Pharisees; they left the true worship of their Hebrew forefathers and substituted the heathen ideology of Judaism.

While in Babylonia, the seeds of world conquest were sown among the Judeans in Babylon. They intermingled with the heathen culture of Babylonia and became successful in the use of usury which was forbidden under God's Law. They changed the worship of the true God and adopted the heathen, occult practices of the Babylonians.

Some Christian leaders will be quick to point out that there was also a Palestinian Talmud which is not nearly as violent in its relationship to Christianity as The Babylonian Talmud. But the noted Jewish Rabbi Hertz said: ...The Palestinian Talmud ... was for many centuries almost forgotten by Jewry. Its legal decisions were at no time deemed to posses the validity of The Babylonian Talmud.

Hertz lauds the ancient Rabbi Akiba for being able to find a "Biblical basis for all the oral laws." Think about this. What an achievement! They took Biblical laws such as those forbidding sodomy, theft, passing children through the fire of Molech and twisted them into oral laws which permitted these degenerate un‑Godly acts. This is what brought destruction to the Judahites. This is Gnosticism (a system of belief which stresses salvation through an intuitive knowledge or recognition of right and wrong) at its best. It has been defined as, "a system of merging the opposites and contradictory tenets of a system into accord." Yet Christ Himself once said, "...Ye cannot serve God and mammon." (Matt. 6:24)

The modern Pharisees are masters of Gnosticism and are attempting to blend Christians, Jews and heathen into one great brotherhood of man under their control, of course. Christ was not fooled by the Gnosticism of the Pharisees of His day. He knew The Talmud allowed them to curse their parents as long as they did not use the Jewish four letter word for Jehovah. He knew the Pharisees taught that they could beat their parents as long as they did not draw blood. Both of these acts drew the death penalty under Mosaic Law.

God commanded Moses to instruct the priests not to marry a woman who had been a prostitute. But The Talmud contradicts this by saying that if a woman has had sex with her own son, if he is under the age of eight years and one day, she may marry a priest. And, the noted Rabbi Hillel, who many Jews consider the sage of all Jewish sages, said her son could be nine years old and it would still be O.K.

The Babylonian born Hillel has been honored by having a Jewish College Foundation named after him and by the Jewish Masonic Lodge of B'nai B'rith. Yet, Hillel was one of the most putrid‑minded of all the ancient sages according to his own writings. Maybe this is why the Jews honor him so. They seem to revere filthy minded individuals as can be seen in Jewish comics.

It is interesting to note that the Babylonian influence was so strong on Judaism that they adopted the Babylonian calendar. Many of the Jewish feasts and festivals are not from a Mosaic origin, but have come straight from the heathen observance of Babylonia. Isaiah, 760 ‑ 698 B.C., the Israelite prophet (who was not Jewish) begins his book with accusations against Judah and Jerusalem: Ah sinful nation, a people laden with iniquity ... children that are corrupters:.... (Isaiah 1:4) Bring no more vain oblations (sacrificial offerings) ... the new moons and sabbaths.. and it is iniquity.... (Isaiah 1:13).. your new moons and your appointed feasts my soul hateth:... I am weary to bear them. (Isaiah 1:14)

There are two new moon days celebrated monthly in the Jewish synagogue, and Rabbi Joshua Trachenberg, who is listed in the Jewish Who's Who in America, states in his book, "Jewish Magic and Superstition," page 256:  The pagan veneration of the new moon, which had by no means disappeared in Biblical times, has no direct connection with the ceremony blessing the new moon which is outlined in The Talmud and is observed until this day. But certain superstitious practices are still associated with this rite, pointing to its continued occult importance in human affairs.

In the first group are the practices of skipping three times at the close of the blessing and addressing the moon three times.... The ceremony, as well as the three fold repetitions are typical of magical acts. In the latter group are the practices of shaking one's clothes to cast out evil spirits, and the belief that one who performs the full rite need not fear death during the ensuing months.

The Feast of Tammuz, celebrated by Jews from the 17th of Tammuz until the 9th of Ab, is a feast in honor of the Babylonian heathen goddess of prostitution. The worship of this heathen goddess was practiced during the Babylonian captivity and returned to Judea with them as another regular festival of this "Babylonian synagogue of Satan."

Another regular Babylonian festival is the "New Year for trees." Tree worship is one of the oldest forms of paganism and is based on the belief that trees are inhabited by the spirit of fertility. In the Jewish Encyclopedia (1905) is an article about this festival. It quotes from The Talmud, Gittin 57a, on the Jewish custom of planting a cedar tree for every newborn male and a cypress tree for each female. When a marriage is about to take place, the trees were cut down and used as bedposts for the nuptial canopy. This same article relates how the Cabalists, when they settled in Palestine in the 16th century, instituted the practice of eating fruits on that day instead of planting trees.

The Christian reader may be perplexed by the Biblical denunciation against trees until you realize that the Babylonians fertility rites, and the mass prostitution of Judean women were carried out under these trees which were planted in groves for this purpose. Two Judaic kings, Hezekiah and Josiah, were commended in the Bible because they cut down these groves (see II Kings 18:4 and 23:14). God promised His people in Egypt that He would bless them only as they drove the pagan abominators, the Canaanites, out of the land. Instead, the Israelites often intermarried with them in direct opposition to God's commands. Intermarriages of this type were taking place in Babylon among the captive Judahites and their captors. It became so obvious that God states that their very looks would be a testimony against them.

In Exodus we see where God tells Israel: But ye shall destroy their altars, break their images, and cut down their groves:... (Exodus 34:13)

And in Deuteronomy 12:2‑3: Ye shall utterly destroy all the places, wherein the nations which ye shall possess served their gods, upon the high mountains, and upon the hills, and under every green tree: And ye shall overthrow their altars, and break their pillars, and burn their groves with fire;...

The Judahites did not do this in Babylon. Instead, they joined in this heathen practice and then brought it back into modern Judaism.

Can you understand why the Apostle Paul said of the Jews in I Thessalonians 2:15: ...They please not God, and are contrary to all men:

Since the Babylonian Talmudists acquired Old Palestine in 1948, formal tree planting has taken place at a feverish rate with Holiday Tree Planting Events to honor various State of Israel personages. Thousands of these trees have been planted by brainwashed Christians who do not know the religious significance behind it. In view of the billions of dollars we have given the State of Israel, they even designated a forest which was to be planted in honor of the U.S. Government. We will see more groves planted than Joshua and the prophets ever cut down.

Following are two pages taken from an article in the Jewish Encyclopedia about Babylonia which illustrates the devoted attitude modern day Pharisees have towards Babylon, the source of their Talmud.

Following the quotes from the Jewish Encyclopedia is an article taken from the Jewish newspaper, The American Hebrew, March 1, 1946, in which Rabbi Leon Spitz urges Jews to eliminate anti‑Semites as their ancestors did. (Keep in mind that 80% of the Jews today are not Semitic.)

"After an interval of a few years, a nephew of the deposed Ukba, David b. Zakkal (920‑940), was made exilarch, and Cohen Zedek II. was forced to recognize him. Foiled as this ambitious Pumbeditan thus was in regard to the exilarchate, he was in addition compelled to witness the rise and development of the Academy of Sura, also strongly opposed by him, but which under Saadia reached a point of unprecedented splendor. Saadia, who had been called to Sura from Egypt because there was no scholar of sufficient Talmudic authority there, had already made himself famous by his translation of the Bible into Arabic, and by his commentary upon it. His activity as gaon of Sura (928‑942) was even more meritorious than this accomplishment. His battles with the Karaites form but one side of the general polemic activity which ruled at this time in Irak among the professors of the various religions. There was a Parsee controversy ("shikand gumanik Vijar") against Jews and Christians in the ninth century  (Darmesfeter, "Rev. Et. Juives," xxviii 4). Sabaryeshu, a Jacobite presbyter of Mosul in the tenth century, waged a discussion with a Jewish sage (Assemani, i.c. iii. 1, 541; compare Steinschneider, "Polemische Literatur," p.85); and Mahammedan writers like Al‑Kindi were continuous in their attacks, from the ninth century on, against Jews and Christians alike (Steinschneider, l.c. p. 112). Two califs, Al‑Muktadir and Kahir, interfered in the disputes between the exilarchate and the gaonate, with the result that both institutions suffered in influence. David had successfully maintained himself against his brother Joshua, whom Saadia had declared exilarch, and had there after made friends with the gaon, who had in the interval been banished to Bagdad. He left a son, Judah, to succeed him; but he ruled only seven months. Saadia then took affectionate charge of Judah's infant son, until the latter was slain in a Moslem riot The exilarchate had to be suspended (about 940) until quieter times permitted its artificial revival. There are some faint traces that a certain Hezekiah, a grandson of David's son Judah, was exilarch for a time; but, according to other authorities, he was only gaon of Pumbedita‑a post which, with his violent death in 1040, also passed away after an existence of 800 years.

The Academy of Pumbedita flourished for a century longer. Aaron ibn Sargado, a wealthy merchant of Bagdad and an opponent of Saadia, acted as gaon of Pumbedita(943‑960) and very effectively.

Of less importance was Nehemiah, son of Cohen Zedek; but in Sherira (968‑1000) and his son Hai or Haia, the Jews of Babylonia possessed two incumbents of the gaonate who shed unrivaled brilliancy upon their office. Yet both these respected dignitaries found themselves the victims of calumnious representations made to the calif Al‑Kadir, probably through the instrumentality of scholars who felt themselves slighted. The two geonim were for a time imprisoned, but ultimately were set at liberty, and the now aged Sherira resigned his office in favor of Hai, who discharged the duties of the gaonate until 1038. Upon his death the above mentioned Hezekiah ruled for two years longer and with his murder the gaonate of Pumbedita came to an end.

The gaonate of Sura was extinguished less suddenly. About 970 a certain R. Jacob b. Mordecai is said to have written to the Jewish communities on the Rhine on the matter of a false Messiah (Mannheimer, "Die Juden in Worms, "p.27); this is however, considered to be a fabrication. The last gaon of Sura was Samuel b. Hophni, the father‑in‑law of Hai, he was distinguished for his literary activities. When he died in 1034, the gaonate of Sura retrograded more and more, until at last it expired quietly and unnoticed.

A special intervention of Providence, according to lbn Daud, was arranged in order that Babylonian learning should be transplanted to Europe. Four scholars, sent to the West to gather funds for the academies, were captured on the Mediterranean by an admiral of the calif of Cordova; and after many experiences these four became the founders of rabbinical academies in Alexandria, Kairwan, Cordova, and perhaps Narbonne. Babylonia thus lost its central importance for Judaism; it was, however, replaced by the rising communities of Spain, whither the two sons of the unfortunate Hezekiah above mentioned had also migrated.

This forms an appropriate point at which to consider the general influence of Babylonia upon European Judaism. Luzzatto ("Hebraische Briefe," p.865) thus, in substance, describes it: The West received both the written and the oral Law from Babylonia. Punctuation and accentuation were begun in Babylonia ; so also the plyyut, rime, and meter. Even philosophy had its origin here: for the frequently mentioned by little‑known David ha‑Babli or Al‑Mukammez, who lived before Saadia, is the oldest known Jewish philosopher. The greatest if not also the earliest payyetan, Eleazar Kalir, of the eighth century, was apparently a Babylonian. It is true indeed, adds Luzzatto, that heresy is also a Babylonian product; for, in addition to the Karaites, Hiwi al‑Balki, Saadia's opponent, was a Persian ‑ in a broader sense a Babylonian. [The Talmudic usage survived for a long time of calling all Western Jews (ma 'arbaye ) "Palestinians" and all Eastern Jews ("madinhaye") "Babylonians."] One peculiarity of the Babylonians, however, made no headway among the Jews of other lands: this was the system of supralincal punctuation (see Pinsker, "Emleitung in das Babylonisch‑Hebraische unctuationssystem "), called the Babylonian or Assyrian, and said to have been invented by the Karaite, R. Aha of Irak (see Margoliouth, in "Proc. Soc. Bibi. Archaeology." 1893, p.190). To Babylonian literary activity, in addition to the Babylonian Talmud, must be ascribed possibly the Targum Onkelos, together with some Midrashic works ("Rab'bot"). "Halakot Gedolot," and the well‑known works bearing the names of the geonim Aha of Shabha, Amram, Saadia, Sherira, Hai,

Hophni, and others. Babylonian learning, always great from Rab's time, expressed itself in independent works only toward the close of the period, and then disappeared altogether."‑The Jewish Encyclopedia, Funk and Wagnall Co., NY and London,1905.  pg.413.

                                      Glamorous Purim Formula

Exterminate Anti‑Semitic Termites As Our Ancestors Did 2,500 Years Ago "The Purim festival offers a formula to combat anti‑Semitism. And no wonder, since it was during those Purim days, just about twenty‑five hundred years ago that Jews lived for the first time in their history in Galuth. And it was then that Jews met the anti‑Semite face to face ‑ and triumphed over him.

To the question, how did he do it? a rereading of the Book of Esther will afford the answer. No, there was no miracle about it at all. Fact is, the Purim festival is unique in this respect that nothing supernatural is mentioned in its connection. It is also unique in that the name of God does not occur in the entire story. It presents just this one problem, the problem of anti‑Semitism and affords a realistic solution, which seems to have a substantial amount of merit.

And yet it is this holiday about which poets have composed songs and ditties beginning with the Mediaeval Shoshanat Yakob to "Haman was a Wicked Man" and "In Shu Shu shu shu" so popular in our American Sunday schools. It is this festival which has evoked not a few of the great masterpieces by the master‑painters of Christendom which are exhibited in the finest National Museums and Galleries in many a European Capital. These Purim paintings are to be found even among the priceless objects d'art which Goering and his hoodlums have looted and hidden away, now to be rediscovered one by one by American art experts. Purim launched the Yiddish Theatre with Esther as the charming heroine, Mordecai the popular hero, and Haman the villain par excellence. In the sunny climates of Italy and Southern France Purim carnivals were in vogue while in German and Hollandish Synagogues Haman was burnt in effigy and with unrestrained glee. To this very day in a thousand Synagogues his name is hissed and mimicked on Megillah night to the accompaniment of haman klappers and every other variety of festive noisemaker.

Dealing as it does with the most serious problem of Jewish life, the perennial curse of anti‑Semitism, the festival has yet become the merriest and the gayest in the Jewish calendar.  The Order of the Day includes wine drinking, the Purim Seuda or Banquet to top off the holiday which has been launched on Megillah night by the public reading of the Story of Esther. It by no means neglects the giving of charity to the poor and it stresses the practice of Shalach Mones or the Exchange of Presents among relatives and friends. Every ear mark of festivity lends its bit of gaiety to make this the most glamorous of Jewish holidays. And so it goes.

But why all this? For the very simple reason that the Purim festival spelled to Every Jew of Every Generation the call to fight the good fight with a pretty definite assurance that victory and triumph were just right around the corner. The Purim story mirrored the precariousness and the uniqueness of Jewish Life in Exile. Withal it reemphasizes the story‑book formula that all's well that ends well, and every Jew lived happily ever after.

In every way Jewish life as lived in the Purim story mirrors Jewish life outside of Palestine in every age and epoch of Jewish history. Mordecai and Esther had Persian names, they spoke the language of the country of their adoption, they participated in the life about them, they attained posts of honor and of prestige. And simultaneously they had their own organized Jewish life and they adhered to their faith and to their traditions. And then anti‑Semitism struck.

The causes were the perennial causes: jealousy, race hatred, the Jews were aliens, they were ‑ that greatest of unforgivable crimes ‑ they were DIFFERENT. In the words of the Megillat Esther, "Their laws are diverse from those of every people; neither keep they the king's laws." Haman too alludes to the loot which would be poured into the Royal Treasury by confiscating Jewish property, "I will pay ten thousand talents of silver to bring it into the king's treasuries. There is too the genuine Hitlerian touch. Hitler resentful of certain individual Jews, determined to revenge himself upon the entire Jewish nation. Likewise Haman in his day, resented Mordecai and sought to massacre all the Jews.

The Purim formula demands the following elements: Self‑respect, Unity, Faith, Courage and Sacrifice.

Self‑respect ‑ The Megillah is crystal clear on this point Mordecai the Jew did not kneel nor did he prostrate. No matter what the price, his Jewish self‑respect permitted no compromises.

Unity! Esther's counsel to Mordecai was, Go forth and assemble all the Jews of Shushan. American Jewry must present a united front in combating its enemies. This is a first essential prerequisite before the ranks can be closed. It is a Must technique which every battle in human experience prescribes. Jews of every religious denomination and of every sort and manner of theoretical grouping, the maximum and the minimum Jews are duty bound to keep well in mind Ben Franklin's revolutionary bonmot, If we don't hang together we shall hang separately. Jews must learn to get along together and to embark on common action, to achieve their goals and to protect their rights.

Faith! A people must have faith both in its destiny and in its own power to achieve that destiny. " Enlargement and Deliverance will arise unto the Jews from another source."

Sacrifice! Yes, there must be those who, more alive to the problems of Jewry and placed strategically where they can help their people, must be willing to render the needful service even to the point of personal sacrifice. Noblesse oblige. They who are endowed with health, or prestige or influence, or talent ‑ with the ammunition that plays a determining role in a Democracy ‑ must be induced to make use of their ammunition in the protection of their fellow‑Jews. For in the security of the entire Family of Israel is assured the peace and the security of every individual Member of that Family.

And lastly, Courage. The kind of courage that Mordecai and the Jews of Shushan displayed was to meet the enemy in physical combat. It was the kind of courage which the Allied soldier displayed when he met Nazi and Jap in battle. It was the kind of courage the flower of the Jewish Youth of Palestine exhibits in its battle for free entry to Palestine. For too many thousand of years The Voice has been The voice of Jacob and the Hand was the Hand of Esau forever raised against his brother. Perhaps the time has come when roles should be changed. Let Esau whine and wail and protest to the civilized world, and let Jacob raise his hand to fight the good fight.

For the anti‑Semite has no morality, and he has no conscience. He understands but one language, and he must be dealt with on his own level. The Purim Jews stood up for their lives American. Jews too must come to grips with our contemporary anti‑Semites. We must fill our jails with anti‑Semitic gangsters, we must fill our insane asylums with anti‑Semitic lunatics, we must combat every alien Jew‑hater, we must harass and prosecute our Jew baiters to the extreme limits of the laws, we must humble and shame our anti‑Semitic hoodlums to such an extent that none will wish to dare to become 'fellow‑travelers.'" ‑ "American Hebrew," March 1,1946.

When you read this article, remember that it is the story of a Jew by the name of Mordecai who deliberately prostituted his niece to the king in order to gain the king's favor. It is not a story about God's protection of these anti‑Christs as our pastors would have us believe.

Some of my Christian readers may ask: "What was Babylonia's influence on Judaism in Europe? How did it affect European Jews?"

The answer is that the Jews in the east and west received both the written and oral law of Babylonia. It is still looked upon with deep reverence by religious Jews everywhere. It might be worthwhile to point out here that the vast majority of modern‑day Jews are not religious at all, and many of them are declared atheists or agnostics. This is especially true in the State of Israel.

While the Christian world, for the most part, abhors the concept of Babylon, world Jewry adores it. In some parts of the world, in Ethiopia for example, the Falasha Jews (black Jews), place the rabbis of Babylon first in their daily prayers.

The existence of a spirit world inhabited with evil spirits is mentioned throughout the New Testament and we find numerous incidents where Christ and His disciples drove out the possessing spirits. There is one hard, fast rule observed throughout the entire Bible when dealing with evil spirits and that is to leave them alone. Do not try and invoke them (call on them for help), or even attempt to communicate with them. The gangster elements of the spirit world will deceive the finite reasoning of human beings, if given a chance, so leave them alone. No horoscopes! No ouija boards! No fortune telling!

Where the Bible represents God as the Supreme Intelligence, Creator and Ruler, the pagan and atheistic concept is that of "pantheism." Pantheism is the belief that there is a great natural essence (something that exists), about which the individual can know nothing. In pantheism, man is the big shot. The Bible prophesies that the anti‑Christ will be a personification of this nature (see Isaiah 14:12‑19; Daniel 11:36‑38; Matthew 24:15 and Mark 13:14).

This idea was expressed by the German Jewish philosopher Ludwig Feurbach, over 100 years ago when he said:" Man will finally be truly free when he realizes there is no god of man, but man himself."

This idea took root in the diseased brain of a young Jewish radical named Karl Mordecai Marx and became the foundation of modern communism.

                                                THE CABALA

No book on Zionism would be complete without mention of the Cabala. "The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia" (1943) says of it: Although Palestine was the birthplace of Jewish mysticism, the land where the Cabala was conceived and in which it attained its greatest importance was Babylon.

The Cabala is a library of Jewish literature based on magic, spiritism, and sheer pantheism. Rabbi Aaron ben Samuel is credited with bringing these mysterious doctrines from Babylon to Italy about the middle of the 9th century A.D. From there, it spread to most of the Christian countries of Europe. The word CABAL, sometimes spelled KABBALAH, is Yiddish and means, "tradition." It is a compilation of the traditions of paganism brought back by the Jews on their return from Babylon.

The ZOHAR, which complements The Talmud and is called the "book of splendor," has been translated into several large volumes and is more degenerate, if possible, than The Talmud itself.

The world is explained by a chart which represents three copulating triads (a group of three persons); male, female and offspring. The EN SOF surrounding these is the god‑essence which percolates through these three, back into itself.

"The Jewish Encyclopedia," p.472, under the heading of "Cabala," explains it like this: "God is the infinite, unlimited being, to whom one can neither make or ascribe any attributes (human, Ed.) whatsoever; who can be merely described as EN SOF" (without end, Ed.)

While the Talmud‑Cabala explains life as a series of blind emanations, the stooge of the Talmudists, the evolutionist Darwin, explains life as "self development from matter, equally blind and without a Chief Engineer or Designer." Karl Marx, in his Talmud formula for world power, calls this same Cabalistic process "dialectical materialism," the very essence of Talmudic communism.

According to The Jewish Encyclopedia, the Cabala taught the exalted position of man, "the true Jewish view of life, and one that appealed to Talmudic Judaism." The Jew is recognized in the Cabala ... and it was the Cabalists who developed Jewish magic, the casting of lots; (does that ring a bell at the crucifixion?) necromancy (foretelling the future through communications with the dead.); exorcism (the formula used for the casting out of evil spirits) and astrology. These were all legitimized in Jewry, although the Law of Moses demanded the death penalty for anyone who practiced them. (Leviticus 20:27, Deuteronomy 18:10‑12)

The prophet Jeremiah foretold the destruction of this mighty Babylonian system which now controls the world (Jeremiah 51:63‑64), and our Lord Jesus Christ added His own words in Revelation 18. Here we find that this world system is held accountable before God for the blood of the prophets, the saints and all that were slain upon the earth.

In Matthew 23:31‑35, as Christ faced the Pharisees eye to eye, He said to them: "... Ye are the children of them which killed the prophets. Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. Ye serpents,... how can ye escape the damnation of hell? Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes; and some of them ye shall kill and crucify... and persecute them from city to city: that upon you (the Pharisees, Ed.) may come ALL the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel..."

In this scathing manner, Christ linked the Pharisees of His time with the Babylonian Red World Power to come and which He will ultimately destroy. A reading of the foolishness and utter blasphemy of The Talmud will throw new light on Christ's bitter denunciation of the Jewish leaders of whom He said in Matthew 23:13‑15: "...for ye shut up the kingdom of Heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves,...."

But Christ's bitter denunciation of the Pharisees reached even deeper than the Pharisees themselves. In Matthew 23:15, Christ clearly states that their converts become "twofold more the child of hell" than their convertors. This can be clearly seen in the attitude of the so‑called Christian Zionists who are hell‑bent on defending Zionism, no matter how evil it may be. Men such as Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, Jimmy Swaggart, Jack Van Impe, to name a few.

It can also be seen today in world affairs where the prostituted converts of the great Pharisee banking and industrial czars are key men who are often better fronts and more zealous than their masters in building up the Red anti‑Christ world. More and more we see so‑called Christian leaders enter the Zionist movement of World Brotherhood which is designed to destroy the Christian world. Jesus clearly warned us in Matthew 6:24: "No man can serve two masters...."

Yet well‑known Christian leaders such as those just mentioned give credence and honor to the enemies of Christ who are clearly defined in I John 2:22‑23. Then they turn their backs on the admonition given in II John 10‑11 and encourage their people to do the same. Here, the Apostle John states that anyone who gives aid and comfort in any way to the anti‑Christs, becomes a partaker in their evil deeds.

At the time (approximately 96 A.D.) when the Spirit of Christ prompted the Apostle John to write the book of Revelation, He had him mention the ...blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, (Judeans) and are not, but are of the synagogue of Satan (Revelation 2:9 and 3:9).

According to The Jewish Encyclopedia, the Jewish political party of the Sadducees disappeared and the Pharisees were in complete control of Judaism. In fact, the word Judaism is synonymous with Pharisaism.

Whether these Jewish leaders were lineal descendants of Judah, was not the issue. They had access to the Word of God, but instead of adhering to it, they readily and eagerly adopted the pagan traditions of Babylon which nullified the Commandments of God (See Matthew 15:3‑9 and Mark 7:5‑9).

The Apostle Paul made it clear over and over again that the promise of blessing to Abraham and his seed was to come, not through his "blood line," but through Christ. (This is a lesson many Identity Christians need to learn.) Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not,... seeds, as of many; but as of ... ONE... which is Christ... And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise. (Galatians 3:16,29)

You may be of pure Abrahamic lineage, (I sincerely doubt that any such man or woman exists) but you cannot enter the Kingdom or obtain to the promises made to Abraham except through Jesus Christ. Maybe this truth is one of the reasons that some people in Identity hate the Apostle Paul. In his own words he said: Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth? (Galatians 4:16)

The question should rise in the mind of any discerning Christian whether the Jewish boasts that they are the " seed of Abraham" has any genealogical substance. Jesus repudiated this idea when He said,".... If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham. But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham." (John 8:39‑40)

Are the present‑day Jews the lineal descendants of the patriarch Judah? The Zionist apologists such as Falwell and Robertson would say, "Yes, of course!" But, the Holy Word of God gives us a different answer ‑ a resounding "NO!"

According to the 1964 Jewish‑American Press, over half of the Jews in Palestine at that time were either Negroes or Orientals and, ever since, there has been a constant war of  discrimination against these ethnic groups and against Western or Sephardim Jews.

Mrs. Dilling tells of attending a conference and sitting next to a blue‑eyed lady with a German accent. This lady boastingly said: "I am Jewish." When Mrs. Dilling asked her, "How do you know you are Jewish? How far back can you trace your ancestry?" the woman had no answer. She stated that she had been trained in The Talmud in her synagogue before she had been converted (?) to Christianity. When Mrs. Dilling told her, "I have spent twenty years studying The Talmud," a terrible silence fell, and the woman left during the singing of the next hymn. Apparently the Jewess had never met a goy who knew what her Jewishness meant and was unable to cope with the situation. She had posed as a "star" among Christians who assumed that she was a "cousin of their Savior," when in reality she was an alien to the Commonwealth of Israel.

Most of the Christian people in America and Canada are similarly misinformed. Their pastors do not give them facts, but constantly propagandize them with the oft‑repeated, "Jesus was a Jew," the "Jews are God's Chosen People," and "either bless and help the Jews or you will come under a curse from God." This latter is the one Falwell loves to quote.

Shem, Ham and Japheth were the three sons of Noah. To be a Semite, one must be a descendant of Shem. Just because a man or woman claims to be Jewish does not mean they descended from Shem. The Negro comedian, Sammy Davis, Jr., claimed he was a Jew, yet I know of no Christian Zionist who is stupid enough to claim that he descended from Shem. The same goes for Liz Taylor and many other white people who have been seduced into Judaism.

In Esther 8:17, approximately 510 B.C., we learn that many people of the Persian Empire, which covered 127 provinces stretching from the Indian to the Atlantic Ocean, became Jews for fear of the Jews." This did not mean that these thousands, or possibly millions, of people were descendants of the Tribe of Judah.

When Moses died, approximately 1451 B.C.,Joshua led the Israelites into Canaan, or Palestine as we‑know it today. God warned him to drive out ALL the inhabitants of the land lest the sexual abominations of the Canaanites, who were descendants of the son of Ham, would cause Israel to sin (Genesis 10:15‑18 and I Chronicles 1:13‑16). A study of the books Joshua and Judges will reveal that instead of driving out these heathen abominators, the Israelites intermarried with them and adopted many of their abominable ways. This is why we find the prophets thundering their denunciations against both the House of Israel and the House of Judah. Finally in 721 B.C., God, in His wrath against the northern ten tribed House of Israel, purposed that they be taken into captivity east of the Euphrates River by the Assyrians. For all intents and purposes, these people became lost to human history, but not to God.

The consequences of the prophets' dire warnings against the southern Kingdom of Judah finally took place between 600‑586 B.C. These people, following in the footsteps of their brethren from the north, became even more evil in their works. They were taken captive into Babylon, all except the very poorest and basest of the people. Remember, most of this kingdom had been carried away by the Assyrians at the time of the northern invasion. Among those that were left, the cream of the crop was taken into Babylon. There were only approximately 49,000 who eventually made their way

back to Palestine.

Jacob, later called Israel, had twelve sons who fathered twelve tribes who became known as the Children of Israel, or Israelites. Three of these started their tribal history by marrying non‑Israelite women. Judah married a Canaanite woman, a descendant of Ham (Genesis 38). His offspring were Hamatic as well as Semitic. Four hundred years later, around 1300 B.C., his descendants through his half‑Hamatic son, Shelah, were weavers and potters (I Chronicles 2:3 and 4:21‑23). Simeon, another of Israel's founding fathers, married a Canaanite woman (Genesis 46:10).

Egypt had been settled and peopled by the Mizrain, the descendants of Ham. It was known as "the land of Ham" (Numbers 12:1; Psalm 78:51; Psalm 105:23; Psalm 106:22) Contrary to public belief, these people were white, not black!

Over and over again, in monotonous repetition, we read in the books of Joshua and Judges how Israel triumphed over the Canaanites. Yet many Israelites disobeyed God by allowing the Canaanite gods to remain in the land, and eventually these Israelites intermarried with these captured peoples. In Numbers 33:55, we read Moses' warning to Israel: But if ye will not drive out the inhabitants of the land from before you; then it shall come to pass, that those which ye let remain of them shall be pricks in your eyes, and thorns in your sides, and shall vex you in the land wherein ye dwell. Israel did not believe God then and they paid the price for their disobedience. Modern Israel today, the white nations of Christendom, refuse to obey God and are suffering the same penalties for their disobedience.

The sins of the Northern Kingdom of Israel were those of inter‑marriage with the Canaanites and the making of altars of sin. They began to follow after the abomination of those heathen people which God knew they would do if they allowed them to remain in the land. One of those sins was the offering of their children to the god Molech, just as we, their offspring, are offering our unborn on the altars of "legalized abortion." Ephraim, the dominant tribe of the Northern Kingdom, "hath mixed himself among the people," (Hosea 7:8; 8:9‑11). Isaiah called them the "drunkards of Ephraim " (Isaiah 28:1‑3). The charges against them were mixing with abominators and whoring under every green tree (Isaiah 57:5 and Deuteronomy 12:2). This hardly makes for a generation of purity.

It is exceedingly difficult to understand how the modern‑day Pharisees have convinced the Christian world that the Jews stem from a pure Judah‑Israel stock, since Christians have access to Scriptural records which prove otherwise. In Christ's time, when the Pharisees boasted of being Abraham's children, He threw their boast back in their faces (Matthew 3:7‑10; John 8:33‑44).

When the Jews of today say: "We are the children of Abraham and are therefore entitled to the land of Palestine," our answer should be, "So what! Millions are!" After all, God told Abraham that he would someday be the father of many nations (Genesis 17:5) and that his descendants would be as the sand of the sea (many in number). Abraham did not father only the Tribe of Judah from whom the Jews claim they come. He had sixteen offspring by his wife Keturah from whom came the Midianites and hordes of mid‑eastern peoples. Through his son Ishmael, born of Hagar, he fathered twelve separate nations. However, the great promise to Abraham was Jesus the Christ, not the Jews.

Furthermore, Moses was not a Jew. He was a Levite on both sides of his family (Exodus 2:1). Abraham, Isaac and Jacob were not Jews. There were no people called Jews anywhere in the world until almost 1200 years after the time of Abraham when they first appeared in II Kings 16:6, fighting with the king of Syria and the king of Israel against Ahaz, the king of Judah. To call Moses, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob Jews is a sign of ignorance at best, and intellectual dishonesty at worst.

Only one tribe, the tribe of Judah, has provided any possible ancestry to the people known as Jews. This would comprise only a tiny minority today since most modern‑day Jews are Ashkenazim, who, according to The Jewish Encyclopedia. are Turko‑Mongolian by racial and family background and whose ancestors never set foot in Palestine. Grabbing the entire Old Testament and claiming it to be their own, as the Pharisees do today, is false and misleading since the religious book they follow is The Babylonian Talmud (according to their own leaders). It is also false and degrading for Christians, whether in the denominational world, among evangelicals or fundamentalists, or among the Kingdom Identity people, to deny Christ's descent through Judah as was prophetically foretold.

                             Why Do The Jews Often Look Jewish?

The Jewish Encyclopedia (1905), has a long article, with charts and pictures, which seeks to answer the question: "Why is there a special look in so many self‑styled Jews?" Some of these Jews are blonde and blue‑eyed. The Encyclopedia says: "What is popularly known as the Jewish type ... consists primarily in a peculiar expression of face, which is immediately and unmistakably recognized as Jewish in large numbers of cases ... It has also been remarked that Jewish persons who do not have this expression in their youth, acquire it more and more as they grow from middle to old age... There is seemingly some social quality, not connected with race, which stamps the features of Jews as distinctly Jewish."

The Anti‑Defamation League of the Jewish Masonic Lodge B'nai B'rith, published a series of leaflets for Jewish discussion groups. Leaflet #7 was entitled: "

Three Questions Jews Must Answer!"

1.   Are the Jews a race?

Answer:   Jews are part of a general admixture of races.

2.   Are Jews a nation?

Answer:   Jews are parts of all nations.

3.   Are Jews a religion?

Answer:   There are hundreds of thousands of Jews who are             unbelievers, yet they consider themselves to be Jews. They need     not fear to be represented by Judaism. On this they may be sure,      Judaism will not misrepresent them.

Pharisaism‑Judaism‑Talmudism teaches that only Jews are human beings. This is their basic law. We will see this later in one of the Exhibits from The Talmud. Pharisaic‑Talmudic brotherhood is actually atheistic communism, a world which has no nationalism, except Talmudism. It is built on a Satanic plan for world conquest known as PAX JUDAICA.

The final world of the Pharisees is bound for destruction (Malachi 1:2‑4 and Micah 4:4) where we read the final results when Jesus Christ, King of Kings, returns to this earth to rule over that which rightfully belongs to Him, but which has been usurped by Satan through the disobedience of God's creation, man. When Christ returns, there will be no more prison collectives for the world tormentors, no more concentration camps, no more government political prisoners, no torture of Christians.

When we observe the beautiful exterior of the whited sepulchres of Talmudic‑Pharisaism‑Judaism, and then look at their stinking interior which denies every teaching of the Bible, it is no wonder that Jewish institutes such as the Hillel Summer Institute seek to classify the twisted thinking of Jewish leaders. They ask the question: "Is God necessary for morality?" Their answer is peculiarly twisted Jewish logic: "Since according to philosophy, God's existence cannot be proven, how then can a Jewish student, after being exposed to philosophical thought, get the necessary faith to believe in God?"

The Bible tells us in Proverbs 23:7: For as he thinketh in his heart, so is he:.... So the gangster on the street, the prostitute, the pornographer, all acquire a certain look which was not evident when they were born. A glance at the photos of the Who's Who in Judaism will reveal a predominance of that special Talmudic look which comes with

long association with its filth and blasphemy. Isaiah 3:9 states it this way:

The shew of their countenance doth witness against them; and they declare their sin as Sodom, they hide it not. Woe unto their soul for they have rewarded evil unto themselves.

                             RABBINICAL MODIFICATION OF LAW:

" 1. >The Pharisees<, interpreting the spirit of the Law, and acting under the elastic rule that "there is a time to serve the Lord by relaxing his law "(Ps. cxix. 126, Hebr.; Yoma 69a), permitted the desecration of the Sabbath in besieging a Gentile city "until it be subdued', (Deut. xx. 20), in accordance with Shammai's interpretation (Shab. 19a). This definition was not new, as already the Maccabeans had taken advantage of it in fighting the enemy unceasingly, putting aside the observance of the Sabbath for the sake of God and of their national existence (I Macc. ii. 43, 44).  Probably for the same reason (to facilitate war with the Gentile enemy), the Rabbis modified the laws of purification so as not to apply when one comes in contact with a corpse or human bones. or when one enters an enclosure containing a dead body. With regard to the text "This is the law when a man dieth in a tent"(Num. xix. 14), >they held that only Israelites are men quoting the prophet, "Ye my flock, the flock of my pasture, are men" (Ezek. xxxiv. 31); Gentiles they classed not as men but as barbarians (B.M. 108b)<.  The Talmudic maxim is, "Whoever has no purification laws can not contaminate" (Naz. 61b),  Another reason assigned is that it would have been utterly impossible otherwise to communicate with Gentiles especially in the post‑exilic times Rabinovitz, "Mebo ha‑Talmud," p.5, Wilna, 1894).  Patriotism and a desire to regain a settlement in the Holy Land induced the Rabbis, in order not to delay the consummation of a

transfer of property in Palestine from a Gentile to a Jew, to..."

Taken from the Jewish Encyclopedia, Funk and Wagnalls Co., N.Y. and London, 1905. page 619.

(Sections marked with >these< denote Col. Mohr's emphasis)

                                        The Babylonian Talmud:

                              An Instrument to Destroy Christianity

                                               Chapter Seven

                                    TALMUDISM IS COMMUNISM

One of the greatest difficulties of the Talmudic Pharisees has been that of bringing communism into power while trying to conceal its Talmudic origin. This may seem contradictory to my readers since I have already mentioned how Jewish authors have openly boasted about their influence in bringing communism into the world. However, it is an observable fact that when this connection is pointed out by a goy, especially if they happen to be a white Christian patriot, Jewish leaders immediately bring up their pet propaganda terms and scream "hate crime," "anti‑Semitic," and "Fascist." The prostitutes standing behind the pulpits of the Judeo‑Christian churches will do everything in their power to keep this truth from their parishioners and keep their people from knowing that Judaism fathered communism. This was one of the first things that caused me to take a close look at Judaism. I had been brought up in the Baptist church to consider them as God's Chosen. Yet when I was lecturing for the John Birch Society, and spoke against communism, the Jew‑owned media immediately labeled me as  anti‑Semitic although I had not mentioned Jews, Judaism or Zionism.

These brainwashed Christian stooges who stand behind the pulpits of most of our churches will defend the very force which is attempting to destroy everything they say they believe in as a Christian. Not only is that very stupid, but very sad and very fatal!

In Washington, D.C. today, it is a known fact that world‑wide Talmudic Judaism has a strangle hold on our American government. They control Canada as well and have been in control of England and most of Europe for decades. The following copies of U.S. State Department papers relating to the Russian Revolution in 1918 prove that International Zionist Jews were prominent in the communist leadership that took over Russia at that time and slaughtered millions of Russian Christians.


NOTE:In the following excerpts Col. Mohr's comments are denoted in two ways: comments which were originally hand written into the articles by him are denoted as [ >this<], portions of the articles which he underlined for emphasis are denoted as >this<. Further excerpts from the Talmud and other sources will enclosed with a double row of asterisks (*) this will indicate the beginning and the end of the excerpt.  Should more than one page be in the excerpt there will only be one row of asterisks (*) dividing these pages.


>Schiff, Jacob Henry<, was born in 1847, at Frankfort‑on‑the‑Maine, Germany.  He received his education in the schools of Frankfort. In 1865 he came to America, where he settled in New York City.  Here, he joined the staff to a banking house.  In 1873, he returned to Europe where he made connections with some of the >chief German banking houses<.  Upon returning to the United States he entered the banking firm of >Kuhn, Loeb and Company<, New York of which he later became  the head.  His firm became the financial reconstructors of the Union Pacific Railroad, and since then is strongly Interested in >American railroads<.  Mr. Schiff's principle of "community of interests among the chief railway combinations led to the formation of the Northern Securities Company, thus suppressing ruinous competition.  The firm of Kuhn, Loeb & Co., >floated the large Japanese War Loans of 1904‑5<  thus making possible the >Japanese Victory over Russia<. Mr. Schiff is director of numerous financial companies, among them the Central Trust Company, Western Union Telegraph Company, the Wells Fargo Express Company. He has been several times vice‑president of the New York Chamber of Commerce.

7Mr. Schiff is widely known for his many philanthropic activities and for his interest in education. Of his numerous philanthropies only a few can be mentioned here.


                             PHILANTHROPIC AGENCIES

[>Financed 1905‑1917 Red Revolutions<] He founded the >Chair in Social Economics at Columbia University<; he presented the fund and the building for >Semitic studies at Harvard<, he has been Chairman of the East Asiatic Section of the Museum of Natural History of New York, which has sent out many expeditions for the study of Eastern history and conditions; he has made donations to the various museums of the city, and presented the >New York Public Library< with a large number of works dealing with >Jewish subjects<; he has presented to >Barnard College< the recently erected students' social hall.

Mr. Schiff is >the Jewish philanthropist par excellence<. His philanthropies embrace every phase of Jewish life. He is intensely interested in hospital work and is the president of the Montefiore Home, and a contributor to Mount Sinai Hospital and all other important Jewish hospitals of the city. He is profoundly interested in Jewish education and took a leading part in the reorganisation of >the Jewish Theological Seminary< of America; he is also the founder of the Bureau or Education. In addition Mr. Schiff is trustee of the >Baron de Hirsch Fund< and the Woodbine Agricultural School.  He has provided the building and funds for the Young Men's Hebrew Association of New York City.

Mr. Schiff has always used his wealth and his influence in the >best interest of his people<. >He financed the enemies of autocratic Russia< and used his financial influence to keep Russia from the money market of the United States.

When last year, Mr. Schiff celebrated his seventieth birthday, all the factions of Jewry in the United States and elsewhere >united in paying tribute to him<.


1378                             COMMUNAL REGISTER

[>Red Revolutionaries ‑ world organization<] ...who was banished by the Turkish Government to Brousa, and, later, >J. Ben‑Gorion<, who is now in America.

The Poale‑Zion began their career in Palestine with a Yiddish paper, "Der Anfang."  Later, in 1909, at their sixth conference, they adopted Hebrew as their official language, and as soon as the Turkish constitution was adopted, they began to publish their Hebrew paper "Ha‑achduth" ("Unity"). This paper appeared until Tammuz 1914, when it was suppressed by the Turkish Government, and its editor, Zerubabbel, condemned to life imprisonment.  In Palestine, the Poale‑Zion have had a severe struggle with another workmen's party, the Ha‑poel Ha‑zoir (The Young Workmen) which is not Socialistic, and is opposed to strikes.  The >Poale‑Zion were, however, recognized as a part of the Socialist party in Turkey, which gave the party the

possibility of influencing the international Socialist movement in favor of Zionism and the Jewish national aims<.

The most important achievement of the Poale‑Zion in Palestine was the organization of >Ha‑Shomer< (The Watchman), an organization of heroic young guards who protect the property of the colonies with their lives. against thieving Arabs. They have aroused the respect of the Arabs for the Jewish name, and have awakened the spirit of heroism in the Jewish youth of Palestine.

>In 1907<, during the Zionist congress at The Hague. delegates of the >Poale‑Zion parties< of various countries assembled at a conference and >organized the Poale‑Zion Weltverband ("World Organization"), which watches over the international interests of the Poale‑Zion in the Zionist and the Socialist worlds<.  It organizes constructive work in Palestine.  A "Palestine Workers'


     CENTRAL AND NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS                               1379

Fund," which is >collected from Jews all over the world<, is administered by the  >"World Organization<."  [>Influence on England, etc.<] This "Palestine Workers' Fund" is used for the support of >cooperative undertakings<, educational and other work‑men's enterprises in Palestine.  During the war the "World Organization," which is at the present time directed by J. Kaplansky, L. Chazanowitch and B. Locker, at >The Hague<, has done much in the interest of the Palestinian workingmen.>Through its propaganda in the Socialist International and the English Labor Party<, the "World Organization" has succeeded in securing a favorable attitude towards Zionist aims on the part of Socialists and labor leaders. >As a result, a Jewish home in Palestine is one of the points in the peace program of the "International" and of the English Labor Party<.

The Poale‑Zion in America In the far‑reaching work of the international Poale Zionist movement, the "Jewish Socialist Labor Party Poale Zion" of >America plays the most important role< after the Palestine party. [>U.S.A. supplies money<]

The >Russian reaction of 1906‑1917 caused the centre of the movement to shift to America<, and since the war the American party has been joined by all of the important founders and spokesmen of the party from Russia, Austria and Palestine. The >American party has collected larger sums of money than any of the others for Palestine and for the work of the Poale‑Zionist Bureau at The Hague<. With the help of the American party, the "World Organization " presented a Memorandum ("The Red Book") to the >Socialist International<.


1380                              COMMUNAL REGISTER

This appeared in a number of languages. It is a declaration of the Jewish nationalist working classes to the workmen of all nations concerning Jewish misery and Jewish aspirations in all lands, as also in Palestine.

>Gompers was a Socialist Jew< >Thanks to the American Poale‑Zion, the Federation of Labor at its convention in Buffalo<, and the meeting in Minneapolis, >adopted resolutions favoring< of workers the creation of a Jewish home in >Palestine< as a point of their peace program.

>U.S. network of Red schools< But even more important has been the recent role of the Poale‑Zion in American Jewish life itself, and particularly among the American Jewish working classes.

>This was 32 years ago‑1968< The number of members in the party is small, in all from three to four thousand, but its strength lies, first, in its broad international relations, which give the party the possibility of thoroughly informing itself on all Jewish questions and, second, in the parallel movements which the party has created. The party brought into life a new insurance order for workers, the >National Workers' Alliance<, which has become well known among the workers because of its idealism and power of self‑sacrifice. Its president is Prof. I. A. Hourwich. >The movement for national radical schools has been created by the initiative of the Poale‑Zion, and is growing from day to day<. The chief strength of the party in the Zionist camp, is that it has a better understanding than general Zionist circles of the conditions needed for immediate work, and of local interests. In the labor world, the party is strong because it is very loyal to the Jewish interests of the worker. For that reason, when the Poale‑Zionists begin


        CENTRAL AND NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS                            1381

a movement here, >they carry along< with them >a large number of the Zionists< on the one hand and of the workers on the other, because the masses do not find answers to all their questions either in Zionism, which lives almost exclusively with the thought of Palestine, nor in the labor movement which is absorbed exclusively with economic interests.[>N.Y. East Side rules<]

The strength of Poale‑Zionism lies in this: that it builds the future upon the present, and for that reason its relation to Yiddish, to Jewish life in Golus, to the "Golus values," is more respectful and more tender than that of either Zionists or workmen. It is a party not for Palestine alone. but also for the Golus and its interests. For this reason, >Poal‑Zionism is, the centre of the East Side from which come forth almost all Jewish American movements, or without which no movement can prosper<. The Poale‑Zion created the Peoples' Relief; >they started  the [>Jewish<] Congress movement<; and they have always had about them much larger masses than the number of their members would indicate.

In the New York Kehillah, the Poale‑Zion were the first of the Jewish working classes to recognize the necessity of the Kehillah and to participate in it. Unfortunately, due to numerous causes, the relations between the Kehillah and the Poale‑Zion were broken off too soon.

The Poale‑Zion have made their best record in the >Congress movement<, where they forced the >whole Jewish laboring class< on the one hand, and >the Zionists< on the other hand, >as well as the better‑to‑do‑elements<, to participate. During the Congress movement, they united


1382                                  COMMUNAL REGISTER

all of the >national radical elements in the National Socialist Workmen's Committee<, [>Pinchus Rutenberg and Kerensky<] which published a weekly,"The Jewish Congress." >They found a capable worker in P. Rutenberg, the well known Socialist Revolutionary, who later became the right hand of Premier A. F. Kerensky in the position of Vice Commandant of the Petrograd Military District<.  Rutenberg, together with Dr. Schitlowsky, and a large number of other intellectuals, later officially joined the party as members.

The Poale‑Zion are carrying on a bitter struggle with the Provisional Zionist Committee, whose undemocratic conduct they refuse to sanction. They withdrew from the Provisional Committee because of the autocracy of the Committee, and they refused to take part in the conference of the Committee recently held in Baltimore.

On the other hand, the Poale‑Zion are carrying on a life‑and‑death struggle with the official labor leadership which is centered in the Jewish Daily Forward, because of its indifference to the Jewish interests of the workmen, to the historical interests of the Jewish people. But the opponents in both camps respect the Poale‑Zion; it is known that they are not fighting for their own benefit, nor for prestige, but that they are rather a party of idealists, of self‑sacrificing champions of a better Jewish future here, in every other land, and in Palestine.

The party publishes a weekly, "Der Yiddisher Kaempfer," which is edited by the gifted Jewish author, David Pinski. In addition, the Palestine Committee of the Poale‑Zion issued this year an important book, "Yiskor," in memory of the fallen guards (Shomerim) in Palestine; also book "Erez Israel," containing comprehensive data on


CENTRAL AND NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS                                     1383

the economic, political and social life of Palestine. They have also issued a number of  smaller publications. There are about  >one hundred Poale‑Zionist societies in America and there are also more than one hundred societies in the National Workers' Alliance, which cooperates with the Poale‑Zion.<  The >National Socialist Labor Committee< has also a number of societies, as does the  >Alliance of the National Radical Schools<.  All of this constitutes a >strong national‑Socialist movement in America under the spiritual leadership of Poale‑Zionism<.


1384                            COMMUNAL REGISTER

JEWISH SOCIALIST LABOR ORGANIZATION: POALE ZION, 266 Grand St. Sec., H. Ehrenreich, 266 Grand St. Established 1905; incorporated, 1909. Budget for 1917, $12,000. Membership, 4,700. Branches in N. Y. C. 14.

PURPOSE:    "The restoration of the Jewish people in Palestine; the >establishment of a socialistic commonwealth<; the organization of the Jewish labor class for its economic and political interests in America; the organization of the Jewish workmen ready to settle in >Palestine in cooperative groups< for the creation of better living conditions; the >education of the Jewish masses in America<; the issuing of literature devoted to the interests of the Jewish workmen and of books treating the life of the new Jew developing in Palestine; the organization of the Jewish labor classes into trade unions."

ISSUES:     "Der Yiddisher Kaempfer."

Poale Zion of Williamsburg, 385 Bedford Ave., B'klyn. Org. 1917. Membership, 25. Sec'y, S. Sarnotsky, 114 So. 2nd St., B'klyn.

The Poale Zion of Boro Park, 1302 40th St,. B'klyn. Org.1916. Membership, 30. Sec'y. Herman Yarmowsky, 4315 14th Ave. [>etc., etc.<]


[>American Jewish Committee. (Rich Jews)<] Officers: President, >Louis Marshall<; Vice‑Presidents Cyrus Adler, Julius Rosenwald: Treasurer, Isaac W. Bernheim.

Executive Committee: Cyrus Adler, Philadelphia, Pa. Isaac W. Bernheim, Louisville, Ky.; Harry Cutler, Providence, R.I.;Samuel Dorf, New York, N.Y.; Jacob H. Hollander Baltimore. Md.; Julian W. Mack, Chicago, Ill.; >Judah L. Magnes<, New York, N.Y.; Louis Marshall, New York, Julius Rosenwald, Chicago, Ill.; >Jacob H. Schiff<, New York, N.Y.; Isador Sobel, Erie, Pa.; >Oscar S. Strauss<, New York, N.Y.; >Cyrus L. Sulzberger, New York, N.Y.; Mayer Sulzberger, Philadelphia, Pa.;A. Leo Weil, Pittsburgh, Pa. Assistant Secretary, Harry Schneiderman, 31 Union Square.

New York Members: Isaac Allen, Joseph Barondess, S. Benderly, Louis Borgenicht, Elias A. Cohen, Julius J. Dukas, Samuel Dorf, Mrs. William Einstein, Harry Fischel, Abraham Erlanger, Israel Friedlaender, H. M. Goldfogle, Jacob Kohn, David Kornblueh, >Herbert H. Lehman<, Leo Lerner, Adolph Lewisohn, William Fischmann, H. Pereira Mendes,  >Eugene Meyer, Jr.<, >Leon Moisseiff<, S. Neumann, S. Rottenberg, Leon Sanders,  >Jacob H. Schiff<, Bernard Semel, P. A. Siegelstein, Joseph Silvermann, L. M. Stettenheim, Cyrus L. Sulzberger, Israel Unterberg, >Felix M. Warburg< and Jacob Wertheim. Members at large for N. Y. C.: Herman Bernstein, Nathan Bijur, Lee K. Frankel, Samuel C. Lamport, >Oscar S. Strauss<.

>Marshall, Louis<, was born in Syracuse, New York, on December 14,1856. He attended the public school and the high school of his native city, and later he entered the Law School of Columbia University. He began practicing law at Syracuse in 1878, removing to N.Y. City in 1894. where he became a member of the law firm >Guggenheimer,.Untermeyer & Marshall<. As a member of the bar, he has attained a distinguished position. He has argued in many important cases in higher courts, and earned a reputation as an authority on constitutional and corporate law. A public‑spirited


              INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS.                                  1427

[>He brought Henry Ford to his knees<] citizen, >Mr. Marshall< served his city and State in many capacities. He is the first citizen in the State to have served in three constitutional conventions‑‑‑‑those of 1890, 1894, 1915‑‑in 1894, serving as chairman of the Committee on Future Amendments.  He was active in the Convention of 1915, and was the chairman of the Committee on Bill of Rights and On the Judiciary Conservation Committee. In 1905, Mr. Marshall was appointed by Mayor Low of New York City as one of a commission to Investigate East Side conditions.  In 1908, he served as Chairman of the New York State Immigration Commission appointed by Governor Hughes.  He has been for many years chairman of the Committee on the Amendment of the Law of the Bar Association.  His protocol of the Cloakmakers' Strike of 1910 served as a basis for numerous strike adjustments since effected. Mr. Marshall was instrumental in procuring reform legislation in many directions, such as the regulation of foreign and private bankers. As a legal authority, Mr. Marshall was called upon to deliver a series of lectures on constitutional law at the Law School of the University of Syracuse, and at the New York Law School.  Besides law, Mr. Marshall is interested in many scientific pursuits. He is a member of the Historical Society of New York, Museum of Natural History, Metropolitan Museum of Art, Botanical Society, Zoological Society and of the Academy of Science. He has since its organization been President of the New York State College of Forestry. He is also one of the trustees of Syracuse University, which bestowed upon him the honorary degree of Doctor of Laws.  He is Vice‑President of the Jewish Agricultural Experiment Station in Palestine. He is now serving as a member of the District Board under the Conscription Act.

In addition to his manifold activities for the general welfare, Mr. Marshall has devoted >a great part of his life  to the  interests of the Jewish people<. He is interested in every phase of Jewish life. He is the acknowledged >champion of Jewish rights<. As the president of the >American Jewish Committee he has watched over Jewish interests the world over<, and was particularly prominent as the leader in the movement >for the abrogation of the treaty with Russia<. He is a ranking member of the Executive Committee of The Jewish Community (Kehillah) of New York City. He is the president of Temple Emanu‑El and founder and a director of the Jewish Protectory and Aid Society. He is profoundly interested in Jewish education and has

endowed the Florence Marshall Memorial Fund for the pur‑ [end of excerpt]


Circular February 23, 1915.  Press division of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to all Ambassadors, Ministers, and Consular Officers in neutral countries:

You are hereby advised that in the country to which you [are] now accredited special offices are established for the organization of propaganda in the countries of the coalition of powers which is in a state of belligerency with Germany. The propaganda will be connected with the stirring up of >social< unrest and strikes; of revolutionary outbreaks' resulting >from it<; of separatism among the component parts of the state; practically >civil war<; and will also comprise agitation for disarmament and the discontinuation of the war butchery. You are requested to cooperate and to favor in every way the managers of said offices. These persons will present to you proper certificate.


Note: Here is the exact German [>Jewish<] formula for the incitement to war "from the rear": strikes, efforts towards revolution, the use of humanitarianism appeals to weaken arm of its forces.

            DOCUMENT NO.5

From president of Kirdorff's >Rhenish Westphalian Industrial Syndicate< to the central office of >Nya Banken in Stockholm<. To Svenson Baltzer, representative of >Diskonto Gesellschaft in Stockholm<, and to Mr. Kirch, representative of >Deutsche Bank in Switzerland<.

The Rhenish Westphalian Industrial Coal Syndicate charges you with the management of the account of which you have been apprised >for the support of Russian emigrants desirous of conducting propaganda amongst Russian prisoners of war and the Russian Army<.


Note that this document already figures in the [omission] several governments having been intercepted in the correspondence of Prince [end of excerpt]



Note: Kronstadt, the navy base, was the nerve center from which L.'s activities radiated during the summer, both before and after he fled from Petrograd. He was not always there but it was Bolshevik domain.  Sailors were, and still are, his first dependence. >Hansen & Co.< are named in document 1.

            DOCUMENT NO.7

                                                                                     STOCKHOLM, September 8, 1917.


      KRONSTADT (via Helsingfors).           [>More Lenin Funds<]

Carried out your commission:  passports and the indicated >sum of 207.000 marks as per order of your Mr. Lenin< have been handed to persons mentioned in your letter. The selection >met with approval of his excellency the ambassador.  Confirm the arrival of said persons and separate receipt of your counter receipts.


Note: Ambassador is probably Von Lucius, a complimentary reference.

             DOCUMENT NO.8

Kontrerazvedka, Geneva, June 16, 1917.

>Mr. Furstenberg<


Please note that at the request of Mr. (Jullias?)  >francs 32,000<  have been paid for the publication of  >Maximalist socialist pamphlets.< Advise by telegram address to Decker of the receipt of the consignment of pamphlets,  number of bill of lading and date of arrival. [>Maximalist means Bolshevik<]

                      >KETEK, DEUTSCHE BANK<

Note: >Furstenberg is named in document 1 and is Ganetski in St. Petersburg.<




We have discussed The Talmud from the Jewish perspective of Dr. Neusner. We have spoken briefly concerning Jews and Judaism. Now it is time for us to look at The Babylonian Talmud itself. We can study it in depth from the photostatic copies of its pages and keep in mind that what you see here is only a tiny portion of an enormous work whose 63 volumes fill a twelve‑foot bookshelf.

The following pages are taken from Elizabeth Dilling's book, "The Plot Against Christianity", as are the photostatic copies from The Talmud and "The Jewish Encyclopedia."

The Babylonian Talmud is composed of "Mishnah" (or "Halacha"), or laws formulated by the Pharisees whose teachings comprise the Talmud, and "Gemara," or argumentative teachings about these laws. There are 63 books in the Babylonian Talmud, largely divided without topical organization.

All Talmud books have "Mishnah" (plural "Mishnaim"). Some lack a "Gemara."

The Talmud is divided into six main divisions called "Sedarim" (orders), but each volume is a hodgepodge of every subject imaginable. The main and overall characteristics of the Talmud are: pomp, silliness, obscenity and more obscenity, a setting up of laws seemingly for the purpose of inventing circumventions, and evasions; delight in sadistic cruelty; reversal of all Biblical moral teachings on theft, murder, sodomy, perjury, treatment of children and parents; insane hatred of Christ, Christians and every phase of Christianity.

The six Divisions of the Babylonian Talmud, called "Seder" (plural Sedarim), are:

1. ZERAIM (seeds), composed of the following books:

a. Berakoth. The name of this book supposedly means benedictions, but is as foul a collection of obscenity as one could find, with 405 pages of what is nothing but "privy talk."

The following 10 books occupy one 406‑page volume in the Soncino edition:

b. Pe'ah (corner)

c. Demai (doubtful)

d. Kil'ayim (mixtures)

e. Shebi'ith (seventh)

f. Termuah (heave offerings)

g. Ma'aseroth (tithes)

h. Ma'aser Sheni (second tithe)

i. Hallah (dough)

j. 'Orlah

k. Bikkurim (first fruits)

There are 11 books in Zeraim.

2.SEDER MOED (festivals):

a. Sabbath (laws of; endless silly regulations and their evasions)

b. Erubin (mingling)

c. Pesahim (passover)

d. Shekalin (shekels)

e. Yoma (Yom Kippur)

f. Sukkah (booths)

g. Yom Tob (feast day)

h. Rosh Hashona (New Year)

i. Ta'anit (fasting)

j. Megillah (Scroll of Esther, read on Purim)

k. Moed Katan (half feasts)

l. Hagigah (feasting)

The Megillah is a sadistic celebration of drunkenness and bloodlust, the Talmudic admonition being that it is the duty of the Jew to be so drunk on Purim he doesn't know the difference between "Blessed be Mordechai" and "Cursed be Haman."

There are 12 books in Moed.

3. SEDER NASHIM (women). This section includes a 13 page introduction to the Soncino edition by Rabbi J. H. Hertz. These books are principally distinguished by their sub‑sewer filth and obscenity:

a. Yebamoth (the dead brother's widow) occupies 2 volumes, 871 pages in the Soncino edition.

b. Kethuboth (on the sum due a wife who is divorced) occupies 2 volumes and 728 pages of Talmudic sex filth (e.g. a baby girl being fair prey for adult men).

c. Nedarim (vows); 282 pages of filth and immorality, illustrative of what Christ denounced when attacking the Pharisees.

d. Nazir (more vows); 253 pages in the Soncino edition, hairsplitting, immoral twaddle, and including the Kol Nidre.

e. Sotah (the suspected woman), 271 pages in the Soncino edition.

f. Kiddushin (betrothal)

g. Gittin (on getting the "Get" or divorce) with space allotted for such things as placing Christ and all Christians in Hell, 439 pages in the Soncino edition.

There are 7 books in the Nashim.

SEDER NEZIKIN (damages):

a. Baba kamma (the first gate): 719 pages of Talmudic ramblings, a general law of damages being that hurting Gentile property is permissible; injuring Jewish property is like assaulting the Divine, for only "Jews" are men and non‑Jews rank as animals. This is "brotherhood" as advocated in the Talmud.

b. Baba Mezia (Middle gate): 676 pages in Soncino edition and of similar import.

c. Baba Bathra (last gate): 779 pages in two volumes, and replete with anti‑Gentile preachings.

d. Sanhedrin (781 pages): States the introduction in the Soncino edition of the Talmud: "It forms, along with Makkoth, the chief repository of the criminal law of the Talmud."

This section includes the most virulent calumnies of Jesus, including His imaginary stoning, burning in dung, His decapitation, His strangling in dung, His hanging, or crucifixion for "blaspheming" the Pharisee "sages."

e. Makkoth (beatings), 175 pages in the Soncino edition.

f. Shebuoth (oaths ‑ more vows), 309 pages.

g. Eduyyoth (testimonies)

h. Abodah Zarah on treatment of the presumably non‑human non‑Jew, 366 pages.

i. Aboth (sayings of the fathers of Talmudism).

j. Horayoth (rulings)

There are 10 books in Seder Nezikin.

5.SEDER KODASHIM (sacrifices):

a. Zebahim (bloody sacrifices)

b. Menahot (meal offering)

c. Hullin (killing)

d. Bekorot (first born)

e.`Arakin (estimation)

f. Temurah (exchange)

g. Keritot (extermination)

h. Me'ilah (trespass)

i. Tamid (daily offering)

j. Middot (measures)

k. Minnim (birds' nests)

There are 11 books in Kodashim.

6.SEDER TOHOROTH (cleanness)

a. Niddah (the menstruant woman) is the prize part in this alleged religious section, devoting 509 pages to discussing smell, color, and examination by the rabbis of menstruation, without apparent medical or any other purpose except wallowing in the repulsive; pomp and asininity also abound; urinating off of roofs, etc., occupy the Pharisee "sages" in this only book of uncleanness in the section on cleanness which has a Gemara, of argumentative passages. The other 11 books occupy one 589‑page volume in the Soncino edition.

b. Kelim (vessel, utensil cleanness) illustrates through "nit‑picking" rules the "straining at a gnat" cited by Christ (Matthew 23:24); also; "Pharisees make clean the outside of the cup and the platter; but your inward part is full of ravening and wickedness." (Luke


c. Oholoth (tents)

d. Nega'im. (plagues)

e. Parah (young cow)

f. Tohoroth (purification)

g. Mikawaoth (ritual bath ‑ such as the menstruant woman should take before having intercourse with her husband, thus ridding her of the evil eye).

h. Makshirin (kosher, proper)

i. Zabim (flux)

j. Tebul Yom

k. Yadayim (hands) The drizzling of water alternately on the hands, to carry off demons, who presumably live in water, a Pharisee custom in Christ's time, is still in force. The "Code of Jewish Law" (Schulchan Aruch), or boiled down Mishna of the Talmud, holds that an evil spirit takes over a sleeping person: 'When he rises from his sleep the evil spirit departs from his entire body excepting from his fingers. From there the unclean spirit does not depart unless he spills water on them three times alternately One is not permitted to walk four cubits without having his hands washed. This... rite... formed one of the chief breaches between Jesus and the Pharisees"

l. The last book of Tohoroth is Ukzin (stems). There are 12 books in Tohoroth. The last 11 of these (excepting Niddah) occupy one 589‑page volume in the Soncino edition. The 1,098 pages on "cleanness," filled with the foulest obscenities of thought, once again justify Christ's disdain for this hypocrisy and serve to illustrate the justification for his attitude toward the Talmudic Pharisees.

Keep in mind that this is a religious book ‑ religious in the sense as "defining and setting moral and character values." It covers articles in the MEGILLAH which is the sadistic celebration of the drunkenness and bloodlust of the Purim Celebration when Jews worldwide are admonished by The Talmud to become so drunk on the Day of Purim that they will relish the destruction of the goyim. (See Esther 9, especially verses 26 and 27.) This subject has been covered previously.

The KETHUBOTH volume of The Talmud, which occupies two volumes and 728 pages of typical Talmudic sex‑filth, instructs the reader as to how a baby girl becomes a sex toy of grown men.

The NEDARIM fills 282 pages with silly dirt and immorality.

The NAZIR contains vows of hair splitting and the immoral KOL NIDRE oath. The KOL NIDRE oath is made on the Day of Atonement and allows the Jew who is making that oath to break any promise or oath he may make during the coming year.

The GITTIN covers divorce procedures with time out for placing Christ and all Christians in hell.

The SEDERNEZIKIN, which begins with the BABAKAMMA volume of 719 pages and contains rabbinic ramblings on general Jewish law, has as its essence the legal permission for Jews to harm Gentile property while asserting that Gentile injury to Jewish property is like an assault on God, since only Jews are human beings.

The BABA MEZIA contains 676 pages of the S.O.S. (Same Old Stuff)

The BABA BATHRA contains 779 pages, in two volumes, and is typically anti‑Gentile diatribes.

The SANHEDRIN has 781 pages which forms the chief repository of the criminal law of The Talmud, including the choicest slanders against Jesus Christ. In this volume they assert that He deserves "stoning to death," "burning in dung," "decapitation," "strangling in dung," and "crucifixion" because of His blasphemy against the Pharisees. Notice it is not for blasphemy against God, but blasphemy against the Pharisees that they hate Him.

These are the major books of The Talmud which deal with Christians and non‑Jews, whom they call Gentiles.

The SEDER TOHOROTH section of The Talmud, has 12 volumes and we will briefly touch on only three. The NIDDAH has 509 pages and devotes itself to discussing the smell, color and examination by the rabbis of a woman's menstruation cloth. There is absolutely no medical purpose for this examination but they are intent on dabbling in the repulsive. They even discuss urinating off the roof. (I apologize to my lady readers for speaking of these subjects, but they must be mentioned in order for you to understand what The Talmud is all about.)

The MIKAWAOTH deals with the ritual bath the menstruant Jewish woman must take before having sexual intercourse with her husband in order to protect her from the "evil eye, etc."

The YADAYIM consists of instructions on how to drizzle water alternately on the hands to carry off demons who presumably might live in the water. This was a Pharisee custom at the time of Christ and is probably what Jesus referred to in Mark 7:3‑4;

For the Pharisees, and all the Jews (Judeans), except they wash their hands oft, eat not, holding the TRADITION (Talmudic) of the elders. And when they come from the market, except they wash, they eat not. And many other things there be, which they have received to hold, as the washing of cups, and pots, brasen vessels, and of tables. They must rid themselves of those demons, you know!

The SCHULCHAM ARUCH which is a condensed MISHNAH of The Talmud holds that an evil spirit takes over when a person goes to sleep. SCHULCHAN ARUCH,

Volume I, Chapter II says: When he rises from his sleep the evil spirit departs from his entire body excepting his fingers. From there, the evil spirit will not depart, unless he spills water on them three times alternately. A Jew is not permitted to walk four cubits on rising, without washing his hands.

The last book of this section is the UKZIN. There are a total of twelve books in the TOHOROTH and all with the exception of the NIDDAH are found in one volume of 598 pages.

Following are some of the Talmudic gems, with exhibits from the Jewish books.

ABODAH ZARAH: Adultery is permitted with the wife of a minor, and the wife of a non‑Jew.


GEMARA. Our Rabbis taught: [And the man that committeth adultery with another man's wife, even he that committeth adultery with his neighbour's wife, the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death).(4) 'The man' excludes a minor; 'that committeth adultery with a,, other man's wife' >excludes the wife of a minor<; 'even he that >committeth adultery with his neighbour's wife' excludes the wife of a heathen<; 'shall surely be put to death', by strangulation. You say, by strangulation; but perhaps one of the other deaths decreed by the Torah is meant here?‑I will answer you: Whenever the Torah decrees an unspecified death penalty, you may not interpret it stringently but leniently: (5) this is R. Josiah's view. R. Jonathan said: Not because strangulation is the most lenient death, but because by every unspecified death in the Torah strangulation is meant., Rabbi [proceeding to demonstrate this] said: Death by God is mentioned in Scripture;' and death by man is also

(I) Deut. XXI, 9. (2) Lit., 'the heifer, the neck of which is broken.' (3) Lev. XIX, 18. (4) Ibid. XX, 10. (5) Lit., 'attract it to stringency etc'. Hence strangulation, the easiest of deaths, must be meant.  (6) E.g., God's slaying of Onan, Gen. XXXVIII, 10.


[>Baby boys may always be used as objects for‑<]

sodomy by grown men......................................................................Exh. 54

The Pharisaic subterfuge here is that until a child reaches sexual maturity, capable of sexual intercourse, he or she does not rank as a person, hence Biblical laws against sodomy (pederasty) do not apply. Throughout the Talmud "nine years and one day is the fictitious age of male maturity.

Likewise, under "nine years and one day," the "first stage of intercourse" with the mother, or any grown woman, is harmless, Biblically. Shammai (see HILLEL) to seem more "strict,"lowers the age to eight years in some cases (Sanh. 69b).........................................Exh. 82

A long harangue about the amount of the Kethubah (payment if divorced) a woman gets if her virginity was removed by a young boy, fills Kethuboth 11b............................Exh. 186‑7

And the foul mother is reckoned pure, depending on the age of the child. Such degrading use of children was typical of paganism thruout the ancient world.

BABY GIRLS: "When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this‑that is, less than three years old‑it is as if one puts the finger into the eye‑tears come to the eye again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years." (Keth, 11b)....................................................Exh. 180

This is the standard doctrine of the whole Talmud on baby girls. Sodomy and intercourse with babies is the prerogative of the adult Talmudic man, in contrast to Christ's beautiful words on little children.

The fictitious age of sexual maturity of baby girls set by the Pharisee "sages," is three years and one day." This is typical: "A maiden aged three years and one day may be acquired in marriage by coition . . ." (Sanh. 55b; Sanh.69a‑69b; Yebamoth 57b‑58a; Yeb. 60b......Exhs. 55, 81, 156, 159, etc.


But, in the case of a baby girl who is not Jewish‑born, a "proselyte," she may be "married" thus by a grown priest: "A proselyte who is under the age of three years and one day is permitted to marry a priest;" altho "one who is fit for cohabitation," as stated on the same page, is "one who has attained the age of three years and one day" (Yeb. 60b), Exh.159. There is nothing worse in degrading Hindu child‑marriages than this.

This Yebamoth passage continues with the ruling on the case of a baby under three married to a grown man priest, and declared eligible to continue as his wife ......... This baby girl was a "proselyte," of course, so age did not matter. But "under eleven years and one day" a little girl "carries on her marital intercourse in the usual manner" (Yeb. 12b)................Exb. 152


The Jew values Babylon above all other places, even Jerusalem, and states that it will be free from suffering in spite of the many Israelite prophecies concerning its destruction. The KETHUBOTH states: We have a tradition that Babel will not witness the sufferings that will precede the coming of the Messiah. This is followed by this note:

...usually rendered 'Babylon', ... travail, ...but the more correct reading is..frequent in modern Christian books is fictitious... These are the throes of Mother Zion which is in labor to bring forth the Messiah ‑ without metaphor, the Jewish people.


    111a              KETHUBOTH

[>Misuse of Scripture<] >Ho, Zion, escape, thou that dwellest with the daughter of Babylon(1)< Abaye stated: We have a tradition that >Babel(2) will not witness the sufferings(3) [that will precede the coming] of the Messiah(4)<.  He [also] explained it(5) to refer(6) to Huzal(7) in Benjamin which would he named(8) the Corner of Safety.(9)

R. Eleazar stated: >The dead outside the Land(10)< will not he resurrected; for it is said in Scripture. And I will set glory(11) in the land of the living.(12)  [implying] the dead of the land in which I have my desire(13) will be resurrected. but the dead [of the land) in which I have no desire will not be resurrected.

R. Abba b. Memel objected: Thy dead shall live, Thy dead bodies shall arise;(14) does not [the expression] 'Thy dead shall live' refer to the dead of the Land of Israel, and 'My dead bodies shall arise' to the dead outside the Land;(15) while the text,(16) And I will give glory(19) in the land of the living(12) was written of Nebuchadnezzar concerning whom the All‑Merciful said. 'I will bring against them a king who is as swift as a stag?(18)‑The other replied: Master, I am making an ex‑[end of excerpt] [>Babylon fall, in Bible, fictious<] (1)Zech. II, 11. (2)>usually rendered Babylon<' but v. infra notes 6 and 7. (3)>Or 'travail<'. (4)[Heb. Text] 'but the more correct reading is [Heb. Text] (Moore, G.F., Judaism II, 361, n. 2) >frequent in modern Christian book is fictious< (loc. cit). The  sufferings   or travail' are more fully described in Sanh. 97b, Sonc. Ed p.654. These are the  throes of mother Zion which is in labor to >bring forth the Messiah<‑>without metaphor, the Jewish people<' (Moore'. loc. cit. text). (5) >The tradition as to the immunity of Babel<.  (6) Not, as might be assumed, to the well known Babylon (cf. supra note 2:). (7)[Heb. text] a village to the north of Jerusalem between Tel Al‑Ful and Nob the city of the priests'. It was known by many names including that of [Heb. Text] (v. Horowitz, I.S., Palestine, p.73 nn. 3ff. s.v.[Heb. Text]). Neubauer, (Georg. p. 152:) describes it as an old fortress in Palestine (v. Jast.). There was also a Huzal in Babylonia between Nehardea and Sura. Cf. Sanh. 194, Sonc. ed. p.98. n. 3 and Berliner, Beitr. z. Georg. v. p.32. (8)[Heb. Text].lit., and they would call it'. The pronoun according to Rashi refers to the days of the Messiah', but this is difficult. (9)The noun [Heb. Text] is regarded here as the Hof. of [Heb. Text],'to save'. (10)>Of Israel< (11)[Heb. Text] Cf. infra notes 13 and 18. (12) Ezek. XXVI, 20. (13) [Heb.

text] containing the three letter [Heb. Text](cf. supra notes 11). God's care for Palestine is taken for granted. Cf. e.g.A land which the Lord thy God careth for; the eyes of the Lord thy God are always upon it. (Deut. XI, 12)'  (14) Isa.' XXVI, 19.  (15) Of Israel. (16) Lit., 'and what'. (17) V.supra notes 11. (18)[Heb. Text] also means 'stag' (cf. supra  note 11).



Although Moses was most specific regarding Israelite women having intercourse with beasts (Leviticus 20:16), and that priests may not marry women who had been prostitutes (Leviticus 21:7), The Talmud contradicts this by stating that: unnatural intercourse does not cause a woman to be forbidden to marry a High Priest, since then, you would find no women eligible for marriage.


as R. Eleazar.(8) If [Rab holds the same view] as R. Eleazar, what was the object of pointing to her previous carnal intercourse(9) when [her prohibition] could have been inferred from the fact that she was a harlot.(10)  R. Eleazar having stated that an un‑married man who cohabited with an unmarried woman with no matrimonial intention renders her thereby a  harlot!(10)‑‑R.Joseph replied:(12) >When for, instance, the woman was subjected to intercourse with a beast<, where the reason of >'previous carnal intercourse may be applied but not that of harlot.(13)< Said Abaye to him: Whatever you prefer [your reply cannot be upheld], If she is a be' ulah(14) she must also be a harlot; and if she is not a harlot (15)  she cannot be a be' ulah either! And were you to reply: This case is similar to that of a wounded woman.(16) [it may be pointed out] that  >if [the disqualification should be extended to] unnatural intercourse also,(17) you will find no woman eligible to marry a High Priest [since there is not on] who has not been in some< [end of excerpt]

[>Intercourse with beast<] (1) With the High Priest himself, who is forbidden to marry an outraged or seduced woman even if he himself had committed the offence.   (2) Lit., yes ‑(3) To the High Priest. >(4) Which proves that unnatural intercourse does not cause a woman to be forbidden to marry a High Priest<. How then could Rab state that a woman in such circumstances is forbidden.  (5) The Baraitha cited by Raba.  (6) Lit., 'this, according to whom'?  (7) Cf. supra p.395, n. 7. (8) Cf. supra p. 395' n. 10.  (9) As a reason for prohibition.  (10) Who is forbidden not only to a High Priest but also to a common priest (v. Lev. XXI, 7). Why, then, did Rab refer to a High Priest only?  (11) Infra 61b, 76a, Sanh. 51a, Tem. 30a.   (12) Rab's reason of 'previous carnal intercourse' was necessary.>(13) A term which is not applicable to bestial intercourse<. V. infra. (14) [Heb. Text] one who had experienced carnal intercourse.  (15) Presumably because her act cannot be regarded as 'sexual intercourse'. (16) V. supra p.394. n. 8. As in her case marriage with a High Priest is forbidden (v. our Mishnah), though she is no harlot, so also in the case of bestial intercourse. (17) I.e., if >injury to the anus is to be subject to the same restrictions as to the hymen.



The ancient rabbis stated: A woman who had intercourse with a beast is eligible to many a priest ‑ even a High Priest, unless specifically warned in advance, and the act had been seen by two witnesses. (What is meant by "beast" we are not quite sure since this may not have referred to four‑footed beasts, but to those humans who were known as "goy" and were considered to be human beasts.) This can be explained by the incident we mentioned earlier in which a woman posing as a Jewess during a talk show answered a horror stricken woman who had protested against the indiscriminate slaughter in Iraq. The Jewish woman said: What difference does it make; they are nothing but animals anyway.

If the woman had intercourse with a dog while sweeping the floor, she was likewise accepted as pure. (What sweeping the floor has to do with sexual purity is anybody's guess!) But the rabbis reasoned:

The result of such intercourse being regarded as a mere wound, and the opinion that does not regard an accidentally injured hymen as a disqualification does not so regard such an intercourse either.


                     YEBAMOTH                                             59b

wounded(1) by a splinter! No, said R. Zera,(2)  in respect of a minor who made a declaration of refusal.(3)

R. Shimi b. Hiyya stated: >A woman who had intercourse with a beast is eligible to marry a priest.,(4) Likewise it was taught: A woman who had intercourse with that which is no human being.(5)< though she is in consequence >subject to the penalty of stoning, is nevertheless permitted to marry a priest.(7)

When R. Dimi came(8)  he related: >It once happened at Haitalu(9) that while a young woman was sweeping the floor(10) a village dog(11) covered her from the rear (12)< and >Rabbi permitted her to marry a priest. Samuel said: Even a High Priest<. But was there a High Priest in the days of Rabbi?(13)‑Rather, [Samuel meant]: Fit for a High Priest.


[>Intercourse with beast<] Raba of Parzakaia (14) said to R. Ashi: Whence is derived the following statement which the Rabbis made: >Harlotry is not applicable to bestial intercourse?<‑‑It is written. Thou shalt not bring the hire of a harlot, or the price of a dog,(15) and yet we learned that the hire of a dog (16) and the price of a harlot (17) are permitted(18) because it is said, Even both these,(15) two only but not four.

(1) Cf. supra p 394. n. 8. (2) Rab's reason of previous carnal intercourse was necessary, (3) Mema' eneth, v. Glos. Unnatural intercourse with her by her husband places the minor in the status of be'ulah (v. Glos.) but not in that of harlot, while her refusal to live with him does not give her the status of divorcee or widow but that of mema'eneth. Hence the necessity for Rab's statement that such a minor also is forbidden to marry a High Priest >(4) Even a High Priest. The result of such intercourse being regarded as a mere wound, and the opinion that does not regard an accidentally injured hymen as a disqualification does not so regard such an intercourse either.(5) A beast(6) If the offence was committed in the presence of witnesses after due warning. (7) In the absence of witnesses and warning.<  (8) From Palestine to Babylon (9) [Babylonian form fur Aitalu, modern Aiterun N.W. of Kadesh, v. S. Klein, Beitrage p.47].  (10) Lit., 'house.'  (11) Or big hunting dog' (Rashi) ferocious dog' (Jast.). 'small wild dog' (Aruk). >(12) A case of unnatural intercourse<. (13) Judah ha‑nasi (the Prince or Patriarch) I, who flourished 170‑217 C.E.,about a hundred years after the destruction of the second Temple  (14) So. Bomberg ed.; M.S.M., 'Parazika' (cf. Golds.); Cur. edd., 'Parkin'   (15) Deut XXIII, 19.  (16) The beast which a harlot receives >for her intercourse with a dog. (17) A beast received as the price of a harlot who has been sold. (18) To be consecrated to the altar.


These examples, directly from pages of The Talmud, will give you some faint idea why the Lord called the Pharisees "whited sepulchres, beautiful on the outside, but filled with stench and decay within." (Matthew 23:27)

To the Talmudic rabbi, the Bible is considered to be a mere collection of simple folk tales, fit only for women and children. They find alternate meanings to almost everything found in the Old Testament, using letter and number tricks which often reverse the plain meaning and create permission for the Jew to commit otherwise forbidden acts.

Stealing for themselves the title of "Israelites," they teach that God made a covenant with Israel which was transmitted only orally. The Bible basis for this is Exodus 34:27 which says: And the Lord said unto Moses, write thou these words: for after the tenor of(according to) these words I have made a covenant with thee and with Israel. But in The Talmud, GITTIN 60b, we find the Pharisee rabbis reversing Moses' term "written words," and have translated them to have been oral only.


60b                              GITTEN

mouth of these words'?‑That implies that they are difficult to master.(1) R.Judah b. Nahmani the public orator(2) of R. Simeon b.Lakish discoursed as follows: It is written, Write thou these words,(3) and it is written. For according to the mouth of these words.(4) What are we to make of this?‑lt means: The words which are written thou art not at liberty to say by heart, and the words transmitted orally thou art not at liberty to recite from writing. A Tanna of the school of R. Ishmael taught: [It is written] These,.(5) these thou mayest write, but thou mayest not write halachoth.(6) R. Johanan said: >God made a covenant with Israel only for the sake of that which was transmitted orally<, as it says, For by the mouth of these words I have made a covenant with thee and with Israel (7) [>The Babylonian Tradition of the Pharisees<]

AN ERUB SHOULD BE PLACED IN THE ROOM WHERE IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN PLACED IN THE INTERESTS OF PEACE. What is the precise reason?(8) Shall we say, it is out of respect for the owner of the room? Then what of the shofar(9) which at first was in the house of Rab Judah and later in that of Rabbah and then in the house of R. Joseph and then in the house of Abaye and finally in the house of Raba?‑‑The real reason is, so as not to excite suspicion.(10)

THE PIT WHICH IS NEAREST THE HEAD OF THE WATERCOURSE. It has  been stated: [Where fields] adjoin a river, Rab says that the owners lower down have the right to draw off water first. while Samuel says that the owners higher up have the right to draw off water first. So long as the water is allowed to flow, both agree that no problem arises.(11) Where they differ is on the question of damming for the purpose of watering. Samuel says that those above can draw off water first, for they can say  We are nearer to the source' while Rab holds that those below can draw off first.

(1) As if they had not been written down. (2) The so‑called meturgeman. V. Glos. (3) Ex. XXXIV,  27.(4) Ibid. (5) Ibid (6) I.e., the Oral Law.(7) Ex. XXXIV, 27 [>"write these words...", More misuse of Scriptures<] (8) I.e. What  reason have we for thinking that this promotes peace and good fellowship?  (9) Which was used for announcing the advent of the Sabbath. According to another explanation, it was a receptacle in which were placed the contributions sent on behalf of the students of the Yeshibah. (10)  Lest, if  people come into the room where they have been used to see the erub and miss it, they will think that the residents of the court have neglected to make an erub. (11) All having an equal right to draw it any time.


Remember that the Pharisees were the teachers of the Laws of Moses. Jesus said of them: "...the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat: All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not" (Matthew 23:2,3)

When a Jewish rabbi speaks of the Torah in its narrow sense, they refer to the Pentateuch, the first five books of the Christian Bible which we know as the Books of Moses. But we must remember, that The Babylonian Talmud ranks above this Torah in every way. See exhibit below:



GEMARA. R. Eleazar said in R. Oshaia's name: He is liable only for a matter of which the fundamental law is Biblical, whilst its Interpretation is of the Scribes, and in which there is room for addition, which addition, however, is the equivalent of subtraction. Now, the only precept [fulfilling these conditions] is that of tefillin.(6) Now, this statement was made according to R. Judah.(7) But is there not the lulab,(8) the fundamental law of which is Biblical.(9)

(1) Cf. supra p.p. 494‑5. (2) Since he is punished not for actually committing  the offence, but for flouting Beth din.>(3) if he acted as an inciter to idolatry<[>That was Jesus "crime."<], but maintained that his words did not purport thus, and the Great Beth din ruled that they did, it is shewn that >he was liable to death< even before, and without a warning, which is unnecessary for anasith (4)Since all know that the Bible commands the wearing of tefillin, the words of the elder will be ineffective. >(5) Who required only four in the head‑tefillin . (6) The fundamental law of wearing tefillin  is Biblical. By Rabbinic interpretation, the head must [end of excerpt]


Typical of the misuse of the Old Testament for the purpose of inventing obscenity and giving it a Biblical coating, is the story of Sisera, the commanding general of the Canaanite army as told in Judges 4. At the end of the day's fighting, the Canaanite army had been defeated and only Sisera remained alive. He fled to the tent of Heber, the Kenite, who was supposed to have been his friend. Heber's wife, Jael, welcomed him into the tent and gave him some milk to drink, but when he fell asleep, she drove a tent nail through his temple and then boasted of this to his Israelite pursuers.

Deborah, the prophetess of Israel, made up a song in Jael's honor in which she said:... when she had pierced and stricken through his temples. At her feet he bowed, he fell, he lay ......... there he fell down dead. (Judges 5:26 and 27)

The verbs "bowed," and "fell" are used three times in this verse and "lay" is used only once. This makes seven verbs used in this one verse. But according to the Talmudic rabbis, here is what it really meant as taken from the YEBAMOTH volume 103a‑103b: The profligate Sisera had seven sexual encounters with Jael that day. The footnote explained that on each of these occasions, he sunk and fell, this occurring three times each, and he lay once. See following exhibit.


                                                                                                                        YEBAMOTH                                      103a‑103b

[>Misuse of Bible<] R. Johanan said: That profligate(1) had seven sexual connections on that day(2); for it is said, >Between her feet, he sunk, he fell, he lay; at her feet he sunk, he fell; where he sunk, there he fell down dead.(3) But, surely, she(4) derived gratification from the transgression!< ‑R. Johanan replied in the name of R. Simeon b. Yohai: All the favours of the wicked(5) [103b] are evil for the righteous.(6) For it is said, Take heed to thyself that thou speak not to Jacob either good or evil.(7) Now, as regards evil, one can perfectly well understand [the meaning],(8) but why not good? From here then it may be inferred that the favour of the wicked(5) is evil for the righteous.

There,(9) one can well see the reason,(10)  since he(11) might possibly mention to him the name, of his idol;(12) what evil, however, could be involved here?(13) ‑That of infusing her with sensual lust. For R. Johanan stated: >When the serpent copulated with Eve,(14) he infused her  with lust. The lust of the Israelites who stood at Mount Sinai,(16) came to an end, the lust of the idolaters who did not stand at Mount Sinai did not come to an end.<[>Exh.175<]

IF THE WOMAN PERFORMED THE HALIZAH WITH A SANDAL THAT DID NOT BELONG TO HIM etc. Our Rabbis taught: [From the expression.] His shoe(17) I would only know that his own (18) shoe [is suitable];(19) whence, however; is it deduced that anybody's shoe is suitable?(20) Hence was the term 'shoe' repeated,(21) thus indicating the suitability of anyone's shoe.(22) If so, why was the expression. His shoe', at all used? ‑ 'His shoe' implies one which he can wear, excluding a large one in which he cannot walk, excluding a small one which does not cover the greater part of his foot and ex‑[end of excerpt]

[>Standard Filth<] >(1)Sisera.<[>A Dying Man<] (2) When he fled from Barak and Deborah >(3) Judges V, 27.Each of the expressions he sunk [Heb. Text] and he fell [Heb. Text] occurs three times and he lay [Heb. Text] occurs once<. (4) Jael. (5) Which they do for the righteous. (6) Cf. Hor.10b, Naz.23b. (7) Gen. XXXI, 24. (8) [Heb. Text] adv. or interr. (lit.. 'for life'), very well',  (9) In the warning to Laban. (10) Why even good should not be spoken. (11) Laban. (12) Cf. Gen. XXXI, 30. (13) In the incident with Jael. (14) In the Garden of Eden, >according to a tradition<. (15) I.e.. the human species. . (16) And experienced the purifying influence of divine Revelation. (17) Deut. XXV, 9. (18) The levir's. (19) For his own halizah. (20) For the halizah of any other person. (2:) Lit., 'it was stated shoe'(bis)'. (22) Lit., 'from any place'.


             YEBAMOTH                                           55b

would be subject to the same restrictions as any other] negative precept;(1)if [one follows] him who holds that it(2) is a positive precept(3)  [it would be subject to the same restrictions as any other] positive precept.(1) Whence, however, [its(4) force(5) in respect of] the yebamah and the levir?‑It is arrived at by the analogy between the two expressions of 'coming'(6)

Whence [its(4) force(7) in respect of the kinyan]. between husband and wife?‑It is arrived at by comparison between the expressions of 'taking'.(8) [>Intercourse with Relatives<] Raba said: For what purpose did the All Merciful write  carnally' in connection with the designated bondmaid,(9) a married woman,(10) and a sotah?(11) That in connection with the designated bondmaid [is required] as has just been explained.(12) >That in connection with a married woman excludes intercourse with a relaxed membrum.(13)< This is a satisfactory interpretation in accordance with the view of him who maintains that >if one cohabited with forbidden relatives with relaxed membrum he is exonerated;(14)< what, however, can be said, according to him who maintains [that for such an act one is] guilty?‑>The exclusion is rather that of intercourse with a dead woman(15)<  Since it might have been assumed that, as [a wife], even after her death, is described as his kin(16), one should be guilty for [intercourse with] her [as for that] with a married woman, hence we were taught [that one is exonerated). [>And with a dead woman‑Incest<] (1)And, as has been shewn supra, the first stage is included in the restrictions. (2) The marriage with a stranger before halizah had been performed. (3) From Deut. XXV, 5, it follows that the levir shall marry her (positive); hence no (negative); and a negative precept derived from a positive one has the force of the positive.  (4) Of the first stage.  (5) To constitute levirate marriage as if actual cohabitation had taken place. (6) Cf. supra p.370. n. 10. The expression of 'coming' is also used in respect of the levir (v. Deut. XXV, 5). (7) Cf. supra note 5. (8) Used in the case of husband and wife (Deut. XXIV, I) as well as in that of those whose penalty is kereth. Cf. supra  p.370. n. 10. (9) Lev. XIX. 20. (10) Ibid. XVIII, 20.  (11) Num. V, 13.  (12) Supra 55a.. >(13) Since no fertilisation can possibly result.  (14) Shebu. 18a, Sanh. 55a. >(15) Even though she died as a married woman.<  (16) In Lev. XXI, 2, where the text enumerates the dead relatives for whom a priest may defile himself. As was explained. supra 22b, his kin refers to one's wife.


If you want to know where "Seedline" teaching is derived, see this same exhibit which is nauseating. Again, let me apologize to my lady readers. But you must see these milder examples of The Talmud in order to understand what it is all about.

According to the teachings of The Talmud, a non‑Jew who studies this book or even reads it, deserves death. According to Talmudic rabbis: Moses commanded the law for our (Jew) inheritance; it is ours, not theirs.

Of course the fact that there were no people called Jews at the time the Law was given, or for 750 years thereafter, means very little to them, or to the brainwashed Christians who have accepted their Jewish fables. Rabbi Johanna objected strenuously to any Gentile (non‑Jew, and at that time this referred to the ten tribes of Northern Israel who were held in contempt) having knowledge of Jewish jurisprudence since this could be used against the Jews when they were taken into a Gentile court.

All Talmudic laws discriminate against the non‑Jew, ranking them as human animals. This thinking, of course, can become dangerous to the Jew. The Jewish Encyclopedia mentions SANHEDRIN 59a which threatens death to any Jew who reveals the Talmudic Law to a goy. This order follows a discussion on cheating and getting the best of a Gentile in business dealings. (See following exhibit.):

The Jewish law against overcharging one‑sixth or more above the current price of marketable merchandise ‑ a violation of which affected the validity of the sale ‑ applied only to a Jew or domiciled alien, not to a Gentile. "If thou sell ought unto thy neighbor, or buyest ought of thy neighbor's hand, ye shall not oppress [overcharge] one another" (Hebr. = "his brother"; Lev. xxv. 14), was contrary to the Gentile legal maxim, "A bargain is a bargain." For this the Gentile was paid in his own coin, so to speak. Samuel declared legal a transaction in which an error has been made by miscalculation on the part of a Gentile. Following out his theory, Samuel was unscrupulous enough to purchase from a Gentile a gold bar for four zuz, which was the price of an iron bar; he even beat down the price one zuz. Such transactions while regarded as perfectly proper and legitimate among the Gentiles, were not tolerated among the Jews themselves.

Inasmuch as the Jews had their own distinct jurisdiction, it would have been unwise to reveal their laws to the Gentiles, for such knowledge might have operated against the Jews in their opponents' courts. Hence the Talmud prohibited the teaching to a Gentile of the Torah, "the inheritance of the congregation of Jacob" (Deut xxxiii, 4) R. Johanan says of one so teaching; "Such a person deserves death" (an idiom used to express indignation). "It is like placing an obstacle before the blind" (Sand. 59a; Hag. 13a). And yet if a Gentile study the Law for the purpose of observing the moral laws of Noah, R. Meir says he is as good as a high priest, and quotes: "Ye shall therefore keep my statutes, and my judgments, which if a man do, he shall live in them." (Lev. xviii. 5) The text does not specify an Israelite or a Levite or a priest, but simply "a man" ‑ even a Gentile (Ab. Zarah 26a).

Resh Lakish (d. 278) said, 'A Gentile observing the Sabbath deserves death." (Sanh. 58b). This refers to a Gentile who accepted the seven laws of the Noachide, inasmuch as "the Sabbath is a sign between God and Israel alone" and it was probably directed against the Christian Jews, who disregarded the Mosaic laws and yet at that time kept up the observance of the Jewish Sabbath. Rabbina, who lived about 150 years after the Christians had changed the day of rest to Sunday, could not quite understand the principle underlying Resh Lakish's law, and, commenting upon it, added: "not even on Mondays [is the Gentile allowed to rest].":intimating that the mandate given to the Noachide that "day and night shall not cease" should be taken in a literal sense (Gen. viii. 22) ‑ probably to discourage general idleness (ib. Rashi), or for the more plausible reason advanced by Maimonides, who says; "The principle is, one is not permitted to make innovation in religion or to created new commandments. He has the privilege to

become a true proselyte by accepting the whole Law" ("Yad," Melakim, x. 9). R. Emden, in a remarkable apology for Christianity contained in his appendix to "Seder 'Olam" (pp. 32b‑34b, Hamburg, 1752), gives it as his opinion that the original intention of Jesus, and especially of Paul, was to convert only the Gentiles to the seven moral laws of Noah and to let the Jews follow the Mosaic law ‑ which explains the apparent contradictions in the New Testament regarding the laws of Moses and the Sabbath.

One can better understand why Jesus called the Pharisees "fools and blind" in Matthew 23:17 and 19, when you read some of the remarks in The Talmud which is recorded as the "wisdom of the Jewish sages."

In the case of Adam, for instance, the Bible tells us in Genesis 2:23 that when Adam saw his helpmate Eve who had been taken from his own body, he said: This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man. Remember that Adam had been given the task, by God Himself, of naming all the living things in the Garden of Eden. (Genesis 2:19‑20)

But The Talmud changes this beautiful account to say that:

... This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh? This teaches that Adam had intercourse with every beast and animal but found no satisfaction until he cohabited with Eve. (See following exhibit.)


R.Eleazar stated: >What is meant by the Scriptural text, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh?(5) This teaches that Adam had intercourse with every beast and animal but found no satisfaction until he cohabited with Eve.<

R.Eleazar further stated: What is meant by the text, And in thee shall the families of the earth be blessed(6).  The Holy One, blessed be He, said to Abraham, 'I have two goodly shoots to engraft(7) on you: Ruth the Moabitess and Naamah the Ammonitess'(8) >All the families of the earth<.(6) even the other >families who live on the earth are blessed only for Israel's sake. All the nations of the earth(9) even the ships that go from Gaul to Spain are blessed only for Israel's sake.<

              [>Adam libeled<]

R.Eleazar further stated: There will be a time when all craftsmen will take up agriculture;(10) for it is said, And all that handle the oar, the mariners, and all the pilots

of the sea, shall come down from their ships; they shall stand upon the land.(11) [>Agriculture and...<]

R.Eleazar further stated: No(12) occupation is inferior to that of agricultural labour; for it is said, And they shall come down (13).

R.Eleazar once saw a plot of land that was ploughed across its

[>Misuse of Scripture<]

(1)[Heb. text](rt. ,[Heb. text], 'to strike'). (2) [Heb. text] meet for him. (3)Gen. II, 18. (4) Obviously not. His wife grinds the wheat and spins the flax. (5) Gen. II, 23, emphasis on This is now. >(6)< Ibid. XII, 3 [Heb. Text] (7) [Heb. Text] in Hif. is of the same rt. ([Heb. text]) as [Heb. Text] in Nif.  (8) >Both belonged to idolatrous nations and were grafted upon the stock of Israel. The former was the ancestress of David (V. Ruth IV; ff), and the latter the mother of Rehoboam< (v. I Kings XIV, 31) and his distinguished descendants Asa, Jehoshaphat and Hezekiah. (9)Gen. XVIII, 18 (10) Lit., 'they shall stand upon the land'. (11) Ezek. XXVII, 29 (12) Lit., 'not to thee'.  (K)) V.supra note 11, emphasis on down.



In Psalm 6:6, David asks God's forgiveness for his sin of adultery with Bathsheba. He cries: I am weary with my groaning: all the night make I my bed to swim; I water my couch with my tears. This touching description of his sorrow is twisted around by the filthy minded rabbis to mean: Even during his illness, he fulfilled the conjugal rights of his eighteen wives, as it is written, "all night I make my bed to swim."

Somehow or other, these evil minded men have an unnatural obsession with sex.

Baby girls of three have savage punishments inflicted on their little bodies if they must share intercourse when they are in "niddah" (menstruation) according to the rabbis. But anyone acquainted with feminine physiology knows this is a physical impossibility in a three year old girl. (See following exhibits.)



                                                SANHEDRIN                                      54b‑55a

treated as an old one.(1) What is meant by this ‑Rab said:>Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. Samuel said: Pederasty with a child below three years is not treated as with a child above that.<(2) What is the basis of their dispute?‑Rab maintains that >only he who is able to engage in sexual intercourse, may<, as the passive subject of pederasty >throw guilt [upon the active offender]; whilst he who is unable to engage in sexual intercourse cannot be a passive subject of pederasty [in that respect].(3) But Samuel maintains: Scripture writes, [And thou shalt not lie with mankind] as with the lyings of a woman.(4)

It has been taught in accordance with Rab: Pederasty at the age of nine years and a day; [55a] [he] who commits bestiality, whether naturally or unnaturally; or a woman who causes herself to be bestially abused, whether naturally or unnaturally, is liable to punishment.(3)

R. Nahman, son of R. Hisda stated in an exposition: In the case of a woman, there are two modes of intimacy, but in the case of a

[>Sodomy with children‑not guilt for adult<]

(1) The reference is to the passive subject of sodomy. As stated supra 54a., guilt is incurred by the active participant even if the former be a minor, i.e., less than thirteen years old. Now, however, it is stated that within this age a distinction is drawn(4) >I.e., Rab makes nine years the minimum; but if one committed sodomy with a child of lesser age, no guilt is incurred. Samuel makes three the minimum (3) At nine years a male attains sexual matureness (4) Lev. XVIII, 22. Thus the point of comparison is the sexual matureness of a woman, which is reached at the age of three.< (5) [Rashi reads [Heb. Text] instead of the [Heb. Text] in our printed texts. A male, aged nine years and a day who commits etc.] There are thus three distinct clauses in this Baraitha. The first‑a male aged nine years and a day‑refers to the passive subject of pederasty, the punishment being incurred by the adult offender. This must be its meaning: because firstly, the active offender is never explicitly designated as a male, it being understood, just as the Bible states' Thou shalt not lie with mankind, where only the sex of the passive participant is mentioned; and secondly, if the age reference is to the active party, the guilt being incurred by the passive adult party, why single out pederasty: in

all crimes of incest the passive adult does not incur guilt unless the other party is at

least nine years and a day? Hence the Baraitha supports Rab's contention that >nine years (and a day) is the minimum age of the passive partner for the adult to be liable.


55b                                           SANHEDRIN

Even as R. Hamnuna propounded: What if a Jew committed bestiality in ignorance; must there have been both a stumbling block and degradation [for the animal to be stoned] and in this case there is only degradation, but no sin; or perhaps for degradation alone without there having been a stumbling block [the animal is stoned]?'‑R. Joseph said‑ Come and hear! >A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband's brother cohabits with her, she becomes his<. The penalty of adultery may be incurred through her; [if a niddah] >she defiles him who has connection with her, so that he in turn defiles that upon which he lies, as a garment which has lain upon [a person afflicted with

gonorrhoea]<.(2)  If she married a priest, she may eat of terumah; if any unfit person(4) has a connection with her, he disqualifies her from the priesthood.(5) >If any of the forbidden degrees had intercourse with her, they are executed on her account,(6) but she is exempt.(7) Now, any of the forbidden degrees' implies even a beast: in this case. there is degradation but no stumblingblock, yet it is taught that they [including a beast] are slain on her [end of excerpt]


[>three year old girl menstruating and likened to gonorrhoea<]

(1) According to the latter explanation of the Mishnah, this problem is solved, whilst the first remains unanswered; but according to the first explanation, the first problem is solved, but not the second. As we cannot be certain which is correct, both so far are unsolved. (2) A man who had sexual connection with a niddah, defiles that upon which he lies, even if he does not actually touch it. But the degree of uncleanliness it thereby acquires is not the same as that of bedding upon which a niddah herself, or a person afflicted with gonorrhoea, lies. For in the latter case, the defilement is so great that the bedding in turn renders any person or utensil with which it comes into contact unclean; whilst in the former, it can only defile foodstuffs and liquids. This is the same degree of uncleanliness possessed by a garment which has lain upon, or been borne by a zib (i.e., one afflicted with issue). (3) As the law of an Israelite's (adult) daughter who married a priest. But if she was less than three year's old, although the Kiddushin accepted on her behalf by her father is valid, yet since she is sexually immature, the marriage cannot be consummated, and hence she is not thereby enabled to eat of terumah. >On terumah, the priest's portion of an Israelite's produce v. Glos. >(4) E.g.,

a heathen, hallal, nathin or bastard (5) I.e., if a priest's daughter, or if the daughter of a Levite or Israelite married to a priest, she may not eat of terumah. (6) If they are of those forbidden on pain of death,' v. supra. 53a. (7) As she is a minor. Exh. 81



An idea of the asinine language found in the Yebamoth volume can be seen by the following. A little girl is determined to be an adolescent (one who has not borne a child) if she has only two pubic hairs on her private parts. This is too stupid to credit to anything but a sewer mentality. Yet dealing in unnatural filth is at the core of Talmudic teaching. No wonder the Apostle Paul said that they changed the truth of God into a lie. (Romans 1:25‑28)

When Jesus called the Pharisees "blind and fools," He knew whereof He spoke since in The Talmud they argue over whether "dipping one or two fingers in salt makes one wise; whether passing under the bit of a camel, or the camel itself, interferes with one's mentality; and how many rows of students must stand up when the head of the Talmudic school, called the "nasi" enters the room." (See following exhibit.)



[>Heavy "wisdom"<]

>Ten things adversely affect one's study<:Passing (3) under the bit of a bit of a camel and much more so under the camel itself, passing(3) between two camels, passing between two women, the passing of a woman(4) between two men, passing under the offensive odour of a carcass, passing under a bridge under which water has not flowed for forty days, eating bread that was insufficiently baked, eating meat out of a soup‑ladle, drinking from a streamlet that runs through a graveyard, and looking into the face of a dead body. Others say: He who reads an inscription upon a grave is also [subject to the same disability). [<Pharisee pomp, smut<]

Our Rabbis taught: When the Nasi(5) enters, all the people rise and do not resume their seats until he requests them to sit. When the Ab‑beth‑din>(6)< enters, >one row rises on one side(7) and another row and another row on the other [and they remain standing] until he has sat down in his place. When the Hakam>(8)< enters, every one [whom he passes] rises and sits down [as soon as he passed] >until the Sage has sat down in his place. Sons of sages, and scholars may<, if the public is in need of their services, tread upon the heads of the people.(9) If one [of them] >went out in his need to ease himself< he may re‑enter >and sit down in his place.<(10)  Sons of a scholar  (11) whose father holds [end of excerpt]

(1) An aid for remembering the numbers given by the two Tannaim. (2) Which, the thumb, not being counted, has one finger on its right and two on its left (3) Lit., 'he who passes.  (4) Lit., 'and a woman who passes,' >(5) The Prince, the President of the Sanhedrin<. (6)[Father of the Beth din, generally taken to denote as here the Vice President, Buchler, Synedrion, pp. 172ff., however, shows that the title 'Ab‑beth‑din,' was also of a more general character, designating the >head of any important school<.] (7) Lit., 'they make for him one row from here.' >(8)<[Lit., 'the Sage' There is no certainty either in regard to the original function or rank of the 'Hakam.  He here appears as third in rank to the Nasi; v. Buchler, op. cit. pp.155, 161ff.] (9) [I.e., >they, may enter the house of study though the rest are already seated< (cf. n.10); V. Sanh. (Sonc. ed.) p30 n. 8] (10)Though he thereby disturbs the people whom he has to pass.  (11) Lit., scholars.'


12b‑13a                               YEBAMOTH

more conclusive proof than the marks of puberty. What practical difference is there between the two statements?‑[It is this: That] even he who follows >R.Judah who stated,  a girl may exercise the right of refusal] until the black >(1)<predominates(2)admits in the case of children.(3) [1 3a] R.Zebid, however, stated: No children are possible prior to the appearance of the marks of puberty.(4) >Then let an examination be held.(5) There is the possibility that they might have fallen off<(6). This reply is perfectly satisfactory according to him who holds that such a possibility is taken into consideration;(7) what, however, can be said according to him who holds that no such contingency need he considered? ‑Even according to him

who holds that no such contingency need be considered. the >possibility must be taken into consideration in this case on account of the pains of birth(8)<

HOW IS THE EXEMPTION OP THEIR RIVALS [BY THE WOMEN MENTIONED] TO BE UNDERSTOOD? Etc. Whence is this law(9) deduced?‑Rab Judah replied: [From] Scripture which stated, li‑zeror,(10) [implying that] the Torah included many rivals.(11) R.Ashi replied, 'It(12) is arrived at by reasoning: Why is a rival forbidden? Surely because she takes the place of the forbidden relative; the rival's rival also takes the place of the forbidden relative'.

HOW [IS ONE TO UNDERSTAND THE STATEMENT THAT] IF THEY HAD DIED etc. Even if he married(14) first and then divorced?(15)

[>"Two hairs" and puberty<]

>(1) the pubic hair,<  (2) >The growth of two hairs which the Rabbis regard as a definite mark of puberty not being considered by R.Judah as conclusive proof.< .Keth. 36a. B.B. 156a, Nid. 52a  (3) That they provide definite proof of puberty irrespective of the state of the hair. (4) Should an apparent minor, whatever her age, ever give birth to a child it must be taken for granted that the marks of puberty had already appeared, and the age of minority had passed. (5)>Why should the existence of the marks be left to conjecture when an examination would definitely determine the facts?< (6) And the examination would prove nothing.  (7) This is a question in dispute in Nid.46a (8)>Which may have caused the falling off of the hair<.  (9) Lit., 'these words'. That a rival's rival is also exempt.  (10) Lev. XVIII, 18, to be a rival. V.supra 3b.  (11) For explanation, V. p 12, n. 8.  (12) The exemption of a rival's rival.   (11) The brother now deceased.  (14) The rival.  (15) His first wife, the forbidden relative. In such a case, is the rival, though the two were rivals prior to the divorce,[end of excerpt]


12b                                     YEBAMOTH

defect,(2) and even the rival of one's own daughter who was incapable of procreation [is permitted].(2) But what about the expression WERE FOUND(3) in our Mishnah?‑Read, 'were'

When Rabin came(4)  he stated in the name of R. Johanan: The rival of a mema'eneth,(5) the rival of a woman incapable of procreation, as well as the rival of a divorced woman who had been remarried to her former husband,(6) are all permitted.

R.Bebai recited before R. Nahman: >Three [categories of] women may(7) use an absorbent in their marital intercourse(9) A minor, a pregnant woman and a nursing woman. The minor,(8) because [otherwise] she might become pregnant<, and as a result(11) might die. A pregnant woman,(10)  because [otherwise]. she might(11) cause her foetus to degenerate into a sandal.(12) A nursing woman,(10) because [otherwise] she might(11)  have to wean her child prematurely (13) and this would result in his death. >And what is the age of such a minor? (14)  From the age of eleven years and one day until the age of twelve years and one day. One who is under,(15)  or over this age(16)  must carry on her marital intercourse in the usual manner.< This is the opinion of R Meir. The Sages, however, say:>The one as well as the other carries on her marital intercourse in the usual manner,< and mercy will be vouchsafed from [end of excerpt].

[>"Sages" on birth control<]

(1) And nevertheless consented to the marriage, which is consequently valid, and the woman is his lawful wife.  (2) The rival of a forbidden relative is forbidden only where the latter would have been subject to the precept of the levirate marriage if she had been no relative. In the case of a wife incapable of procreation, however, since she is not subject to the levirate marriage even where she is no relative at all, her rival even where she (the wife) is a forbidden relative, is regarded as the rival of one in relation to whom the precept of levirate marriage is not applicable at all. Cf.[Heb. text]  quoted by Rashi. (3) V. p. 61, n. 14. (4) From Palestine to Babylon. (5) V. Glos. s.v. mi'un. In this case it refers to one who refused the levir (V. Rashi a.l.).  (6) After she had been married by a second husband who divorced her or died. (7) (So Rashi. R. Tam: Should use, v. Tosaf s.v.[Heb. Text]] (8) [Heb. text] hackled wool or flax. >(9) To prevent conception< (10) May use the absorbent. (11) Lit., 'perhaps'. (12) [Heb. text] lit, 'a flat fish'. i.e,. a flat, fish shaped abortion due to superfetation. (13) Owing to her second conception. (14) Who is capable of conception but exposed thereby to the danger of death. (15) When no conception is possible. 16)When pregnancy involves no fatal consequences.



There are some very amusing things found in the stupidity of Talmudic remedies, such as found in the Gittin volume with its mixtures of dung, blood and filth. It is not so much the stupidity of the remedies themselves, but the commentary by a goy English doctor (which appears in the Soncino English translation) as he attempts to justify and praise the medical wisdom of the Pharisees.

Following are some interesting exhibits devoted to remedies made from "tearing a black hen lengthwise and crosswise; shaving the middle of the head, and putting the bird on it until it sticks fast. Then go to the river and stand in the water until becoming faint; then swim out and sit down." This is the cure for sunstroke.

Notice also the cures prescribed for swollen glands and catarrh. The one I like is where you take the excrement from a white dog and knead it in with balsam. Sounds like pure medical science, doesn't it? (Exhibits follow.) ************************************************************************************************


GITTIN                                       69a‑69b

put it on his thumb nail on the side where the tooth aches and put a rim of dough round it, taking care that it does not touch his flesh, as it may cause leprosy. For swollen glands,(1) R.Johanan said that pellitory leaves are as good as mamru (2) and the root of pellitory better than mamru, and he should put them in his mouth. This is to prevent it from spreading. To soften it he should take bran that came to the top of the sieve and lentils with the earth still on them and dover and hemlock flower and the bud of cuscuta, and he should put about the size of a nut in his mouth. To make it burst, someone should blow into his throat seeds of unripe dates, through a wheat straw. >To make the flesh close he should bring dust from the shadow of a privy and knead it with honey and eat< This is effective. For catarrh(3) he should take about the size of a pistachio of gum‑ammoniac and about the size of a nut of sweet galbanum and a spoonful of white honey and a Mahuzan natla(4) of clear(5) wine and boil them up

together; when the gum‑ammoniac boils, it is all boiled enough. If he cannot manage this, let him. take a revi'ith of milk of a white goat [69b] and let it drip on three stalks of carob and stir it with a piece of stem of marjoram; when the stem of marjoram is boiled it is all boiled enough. >He can also take the excrement of a white dog and knead it with balsam<. but if he can possibly avoid it he should not eat the dog's excrement as it >loosens the limbs<. For gira(6) he should take an arrow of Lilith(7) and place it point upwards and pour water on it and drink it. Alternatively he can take water of which a dog has drunk at night, but he must take care that it has not been exposed.(8) For [drinking] water which has been exposed let him take an anpak(4)' of undiluted wine. For an abscess, an anpak of wine with purple‑coloured aloes. For palpitations of the heart he should take three barley‑cakes and streak them with hamak(9)  which has been made less than forty days before, and eat it and wash it down with wine well diluted. Said R.Aha from Difti to Rabina: This will make his

heart palpitate [end of excerpt]

(1) So Rashi. jast.: 'jaws'. (2) A kind of herb. (3) [So Rashi. Preuss (op. cit. p.198) Pleurisy.) (4) About a revi'ith (1/4 log). (5) I.e. not dark (6) Perhaps a kind of fever.

(7)Probably a kind of meteoric stone. (8)For fear a snake may have injected venom into it. (9)A Persian sauce of milk.


GITTIN                                        96b‑70a

should say is that] he should take regularly a bite early in the morning, as this is good for the whole body. >For anal worms he< should take acacia and aloe juice and white‑lead and silver dross(1) and an amulet full of phyllon(2)   > the excrement of doves and tie it all up in linen rags in the summer or in cotton rags in the winter.(3)< Alternatively, let him drink strong wine well diluted. For hip disease(4) let him take a pot of fish brine and rub it sixty times(5) round one hip and sixty times round the other. >For stone in the bladder< let him take three drops of tar and three drops of leek juice and three drops of clear wine and >pour it on the membrum of a man or on the corresponding place in a woman<. Alternatively he can >take the ear of a bottle and hang it on the membrum of a man or on the breasts of a woman. Or again he can take a purple thread which has been spun by a woman of ill repute or the daughter of a woman of ill repute and hang it on the membrum of a man or the breasts of a woman.

Or again he can take a louse from a man and a woman and hang it on the membrum of a man and the corresponding place in a woman; and when he makes water he should do so on dry thorns near the socket of the door, and he should preserve the stone that issues, as it is good for all fevers<. For external fever(6)  he should take three sacks of date stones and three sacks of adra(7) leaves and boil each separately while sitting between them and put them in two basins and bring a table and set them on it and bend first over one and then over the other until he becomes thoroughly warmed, and then he should bathe himself in them, and in drinking thereof(9)  afterwards he should drink only of the water of the adra leaves but not of the >date stones<, as they cause barrenness<. For internal fever he should take seven handfuls of beet from seven beds and boil them with their earth and eat them and drink adra leaves in beer [70a] or grapes from a vine trailed on a palm [end of excerpt]

(1) used for cooling the metal. (2) A kind of scent often carried by women in a little case attached to their necklaces. (3) Applying it to the affected part. (4)[Apparently lumbago, V. Preuss, op. cit. p. 355.]  (5) [A round number, i.e., many times, V. Preuss, loc. cit,. n. 5.] (6) I.e., eruptions. (7) [A species' of cedar, probably Spanish juniper.] (8) [As is usual after a hot bath. v. Shab. 41a.]



                                      CHAPTER VII




[>Remedies of the "Sages."<]

GEMARA. What is kordiakos?‑Samuel said: Being overcome(3) by new wine from the vat. Then why does it not say if one is overcome by new wine?‑The mode of expression teaches US that >this spirit [which causes dizziness is called kordiakos<.Of what use is this [knowledge]?‑>For a charm<. What is the remedy for it? Red(4) meat broiled on the coals, and wine highly diluted.

Abaye said: My mother(5) told me that >for a sun‑stroke [fever] the remedy is on the first day to take a jug of water, [if it lasts] two days to >let blood<, [if] three days to take red meat broiled on the coals and highly diluted wine. >For a chronic heat stroke, he should bring a black hen and tear it lengthwise and crosswise and shave the middle of his head and put the bird on it and leave it there till it sticks fast, and then he should go down [to the river] and stand in water up to his neck till he is quite faint, and then he should swim out and sit down. If he cannot do this, he should eat leeks [end of excerpt].

(1) A kind of delirium in which he does not know exactly what he is saying. V. infra. Apparently [Greek text] which, however, is not found in this sense. Goldschmidt derives  it from [Greek text]  (2) Lit., 'three time', to see if he is still compes mentis  (3) Lit., 'bitten'.  (4) I.e., without much fat. (5) V, Kid. 32b.



The supreme hatred of Talmudic Judaism is reserved for, and directed against, the believers of the Christian Bible. Yes, you brainwashed Judeo‑Christians who want to elevate these worst enemies of Jesus Christ and His church to the position of God's Chosen People, you need to know what they think and teach about your religion and your Savior.

You who believe the Christian Bible is the Word of God are classified as the primary enemies of Judaism. You are called "heathen," "Idolators," and "goy‑animals" by your Jewish friends. You rank lower than the ordinary goy non‑Jew: in fact, in the Jewish mind, you are the lowest and most despised of all forms of life.

As a Christian, you receive the Jewish curses of the 7th and 12th of the Eighteen Benedictions called the SHEMONEH ESREH. The orthodox Jew recites this three times daily and four times on the Sabbath, or Jewish holidays. This means that Christians are cursed six times on ordinary days and eight times on special Jewish days. This is Talmudic brotherhood. Remember this, the next time your pastor arranges for a inter‑faith meeting with the Jews.

According to volume Gittin 56b‑57a, "All who mock the sages (this means all Christians who believe Bible) will be punished for eternity in boiling hot  excrement."(See exhibit on following page.)


GITTEN                                                      56b‑57a

[>Punishment of Christ in Hell<]

about joining them? He said: Their observances are burdensome and you will not be able to carry them out. Go and attack them in that world and you will be at the top, as it is written, her adversaries have become the head(1) etc.; whoever harasses Israel becomes head. He asked him: [57a] What is your Punishment [in the other world]? He replied: What I decreed for myself. Every day my ashes are collected and sentence is passed on me and I am burnt and my ashes are scattered over the seven seas. >He then went and raised Balaam by incantations<. He asked him: Who is in repute in the other world? He replied: Israel. What then, he said, about joining them? He replied: Thou shalt  not seek their peace nor their prosperity all thy days for ever.(2) >He then asked: What is your punishment?< He replied: >With boiling hot semen(3)< He then went and raised by incantations the >sinners of Israel<(4)He asked them: Who is in repute in the other world? They replied: Israel. What about joining them? They replied: Seek

their welfare, seek not their harm. Whoever touches them touches the apple of his eye He said: >What is your punishment?< They replied: >With boiling hot excrement<. Master has said: >Whoever mocks at the words of the [>Talmud<] Sages is punished with boiling excrement<. Observe the difference between the sinner's of Israel and the prophets of the other nations who worship idols. It has been taught: Note from this incident how serious a thing it is to put a man to shame, for God espoused the cause of Bar Kamza, and destroyed His House and burned His Temple.[>Christians in hell‑excrement)


As one studies The Talmud in detail, apart from the whitewash done by men such as Dr. Neusner, you will begin to understand that the bloody, the sadistic and the obscene are the darlings of the "synagogue of Satan mentality."

If you have ever wondered why Jewish comics the world over are noted for their obscenity, you need wonder no longer. It is as fundamental to them as the knowledge of God is to the average Caucasian. If you want to know why the movies and television are degenerating into a hog wallow of sexual filth, the advice of Talmudic Jews is the answer. This filthiness is literally bred into the Jewish mind, no matter how much they attempt to deny it. According to the book, "Jews Must Live". authored by the Jewish businessman Samuel Roth, one of the first things he was taught as an European Jew was to spit when he passed a Christian church, or when the name of Jesus Christ was even mentioned. The second lesson was that it was accepted for a Jew to cheat the detested goyim as long as you weren't caught at it because that would bring shame upon Judaism.

The 1905 Jewish Encyclopedia clearly notes that it was the Pharisees who took over the pure Hebrew religion in Babylon and turned it into the monstrosity of Judaism. The rabbis removed obnoxious references to God, just as many of the modern Jewish influenced translators have gone about removing anti‑Jewish passages from the Bible. This trend has now reached the point where there is a move underway to remove the Gospel of John and his Epistles because they tell the truth about the anti‑Christs.

The sacrificing of white babies on the altars of abortion is supported by the Talmudists. Most of the large abortion clinics in America which regularly murder over two million unborn babies every year are Jewish owned and staffed by Jewish abortionists. It is also interesting to note that Jews head most of the sob‑sister organizations that want to protect baby seals and whales. In their twisted thinking, it is better to protect other living creatures than it is to protect human life. This is a Talmudic monstrosity!

The ultimate target for infamy in The Talmud is our precious Lord, Savior and King, Jesus Christ. The Talmud targets Him as the object of its special, vitriolic hatred which is difficult for the average Christian to understand. Yet the Jewish masters look on Christians as "docile asses, bearers of burdens for the Jews" and hate you if you believe in Christ and follow Him as Savior and King. According to The Talmud, you are vermin to be eradicated like rats.

Jesus appears in The Talmud under the name of Balaam. Proof that this word refers to Christ can be found in the Jewish Encyclopedia, which states: Hence... the Pseudonym 'Balaam' given to Jesus in SANHEDRIN 106b and GITTIN 51a. (See following exhibit.)

‑In Rabbinical Literature: Balaam is represented as one of seven heathen prophets; the other six being Balaam's father, Job and his four friends(B.B.15b). He gradually acquired a Position among the heathen as exalted as that of Moses among the chosen people (Num. R. xx 1). At first a mere interpreter of dreams, Balaam later became a magician, until finally the spirit of prophecy descended upon him (ib. 7). He possessed the special gift of being able to ascertain the exact moment during which God is wroth ‑ a gift bestowed upon no other creature. Balaam's intention was to curse the Israelites at this moment of wrath; but God purposely restrained His anger in order to baffle the wicked prophet and to save the nation from extermination (Ber. 7a). When the law was given to Israel a mighty voice shook the foundations of the earth; so that all kings trembled, and in their consternation gathered about Balaam, inquiring whether this upheaval of nature portended a second deluge; but the prophet assured them that what they heard was the voice of the Almighty giving the sacred Law to His children of

Israel (Zeb. 116a).

Nevertheless, it is significant that in rabbinical literature the epithet "rasha" (the wicked

one) is often attached to the name of Balaam (Ber. I.c.; Ta anit 20a; Num. R. xx. 14). He is pictured as blind of one eye and lame in one foot (San. 105a); and his disciples (followers) are distinguished by three morally corrupt qualities, viz., and evil eye, a haughty bearing, and a varicious spirit ‑ qualities the very opposite of those characterizing the disciples of Abraham (Ab. v.19; compare Tan., Balak, 6). Balaam received the divine communication at night only ‑ a limitation that applies also to the other heathen prophets (Num. H. xx. 12). The Rabbis hold Balaam responsible for the unchastity which led to the apostasy in Shittim, and in chastisement of which 24,000 persons fell victims to a pestilence (Num. xxv. 1‑9). When Balaam, "the wicked," saw that he could not curse the children of Israel, he advised Balak (intimated in Num. xxiv. 14) as a last resort to tempt the Hebrew nation to immoral acts and, through these, to the worship of Baal‑peor "The God of the Hebrews, " adds Balaam, "hates

lewdness; and severe chastisement must follow" (San. 106a; Yer. ib x. 28; Num. R. I. c.).

The Rabbis, playing on the name Balaam, call him "Belo' Am" (without people; that is, without a share with the people in the world to come), or "Billa'Am" (one that ruined a people); and this hostility against his memory finds its climax in the dictum that whenever one discovers a feature of wickedness or disgrace in his life, one should preach about it (Sanh. 1 06b). In the process of killing Balaam (Num. xxxi. 8), all four legal methods of execution ‑ stoning, burning, decapitating, and strangling ‑ were employed (Sanh. I. c.). He met his death at the age of thirty‑three (1b.); and it is stated that he had no portion in the world to come (Sanh. x. 2; 90a). The bible devotes a special section to the remarkable history of the prophet, in order to answer the question, why God has taken away the power or prophecy from the Gentiles (Tan., Balak, 1). Moses is expressly mentioned as the author of this episode in the Pentateuch

(B. B. 14b).

Henceforth he became the type of false prophets seducing men to lewdness and obscene idolatrous practises (Rev. ii. 14; II Peter ii. 15; Jude 11; Abot v. 19). The name "Nicolaitanes," given to the Christian heretics "holding the doctrine of Balaam" (Rev. ii. 6, 15), is probably derived from the Grecized form of Balaam, and hence also the pseudonym, "Balaam" given to Jesus in Sanh 106b) and Git. 57a).

The life of this sorcerer was further detailed in the "Sefer Ha‑Yashar" legends and by the later cabalists (Yalk., Reubeni to Balak). Balaam's ass formed an especial object of haggadic interpretation and embellishment. "The speaking mouth of the ass" was declared to be one of the ten miraculous things that God had created in the twilight of the sixth day (Abot v.6). Targ. Yer. to Num. xxii. 30 gives a long monition which the ass offers to her foolish master.

See also the following exhibit from the SANHEDRIN volume of The Talmud:


                                                                                                                                            SANHEDRIN                                              106a‑106b

[>Mary a harlot<]

>his reward for the twenty‑four thousand Israelites whose destruction he had encompassed.(1)<  Mar Zutra b. Tobiah remarked in Rab's name: This is what men say. 'When the camel went to demand horns, they cut off the ears he had.' (2) Balaam also the son of Beor, the soothsayer [did the children of Israel slay with the sword](3). A soothsayer? But he was a prophet! ‑ R.Johanan said: At first he was a prophet, but subsequently a soothsayer.(4)  R. Papa observed: This is what men say 'She was the descendant of princes and governors >played the harlot with carpenters.'(5)< [106b] Did the children of Israel slay with the sword among them that were slain by them.(6) Rab said: They subjected him to four deaths, stoning, burning,

decapitation and strangulation.(7) [>4 Deaths for Jesus<] A certain min(8)  said to R. Hanina: Hast thou heard how old Balaam was?‑He replied: It is not actually stated, but since it is written, Bloody and deceitful men shall not live Out half their days (9) [it follows that] he was thirty‑three or thirty‑four years old. (10) He rejoined: Thou hast said correctly; I personally have seen >Balaam's Chronicle< in which it is stated, '>Balaam< the lame was thirty years old [>Referring to Jesus<] when Phinehas the Robber killed him.'

(1) V. ibid, XXV, 1‑9: since Israel was thus seduced and punished through his advice, as stated above, he demanded payment. (2) So Balaam, demanding a reward lost his life. (3) Joshua XIII, 12. (4) >As a punishment for wishing to curse Israel he was degraded from a prophet to a soothsayer<.(5) Shipdraggers, (v.Rashi). Herford, Christianity in the Talmud, p.48, suggests that >Balaam is frequently used in the Talmud as a type for Jesus (also pp. 64‑70)< Though no name is mentioned to shew which woman is meant, >the mother of Jesus may be alluded to<, which theory is strengthened by the statement that >she mated with a carpenter. (The Munich MS. has [Heb. Text] in the margin instead of [Heb. Text] i.e., singular instead of plural.) (6) Ibid. (7)This is suggested by the use of the plural 'among them that were slain by them,  intimating that >the various deaths inflicted upon others were all suffered by Balaam.

Thus he was hung (strangulation), a fire was lit under him (burning), his head was struck off (decapitation), and then  he was allowed to fall to earth(stoning);v.Supra 45d. 8) Heretic. v.Glos. (9)Ps. LV, 24. (10)cf. p.471. N. 1. (11)[According to the view that >all the Balaam passages are anti‑Christian in tendency, Balaam being used as an alias for Jesus. Phinehas the Robber is thus taken to represent Pontius Pilate and the Chronicle of Balaam probably to denote a Gospel< (v.Herford op. Cit. 72ff). This view is however disputed by Bacher and others. (cf. Ginsburg. Journal of Biblical Literature, XLI, 121]


Jesus, according to The Talmud, deserved all four "legal methods of death; stoning, being hanged, burned and crucified."

In SANHEDRIN (52a) the manner of burning as an execution is explained and it is also found in YEBAMOTH (6b); this is verified in the Jewish Encyclopedia under the title of "Balaam."

The victim is lowered into a pit filled with dung up to his armpits. Then a hard cloth was placed within a soft one and wound around his neck, and the two loose ends were pulled in opposite directions forcing him to open his mouth. A wick was then lit and thrown into his mouth so that it descended into his body and burnt his bowels. Admitting the possibility that the victim might not be burned to death before he died of strangulation, they prescribed that his mouth was forced open with pincers against his wish, and then the wick was lit and thrown into his mouth.


[>Jesus Burned<]




(6)The soft one alone could not exert sufficient pressure to open his mouth: whilst a hard one alone would bruise the skin and unnecessarily disfigure him (Rashi). ************************************************************************************************

[>Jesus "Strangled"<]


GEMARA. Our Rabbis taught: [And the man that committeth adultery with another man's wife. even he that committeth adultery with his neighbour's wife, the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death].(4) 'The man' excludes a minor; 'that committeth adultery with an‑other man's wife' excludes the wife of a minor; 'even he that committeth adultery with his neighbour's wife' excludes the wife of a heathen; 'shall surely be put to death', by strangulation. You say, by strangulation; but perhaps one of the other deaths decreed by the Torah is meant here?‑I will answer you: Whenever the Torah decrees an unspecified death penalty, you may not interpret it stringently but leniently:(5) this is R. Josiah's view. R. Jonathan said: Not because strangulation is the most lenient death, but because by >every unspecified death in the Torah strangulation is meant<. Rabbi {proceeding to demonstrate this] said: Death by God is mentioned in Scripture;(6) and death by man is also [end of excerpt]

(1) Deut. XXI, 9.  (2) Lit., 'the heifer, the neck of which is broken.' (3) Lev. XIX.18. (4) Ibid. XX, 10.  (5) Lit., 'attract it to stringency etc'. Hence strangulation, the easiest of death, must be meant.  (6) E.g., God's slaying of Onan, Gen. XXXVIII, 10.



That Jesus knew of the Talmudic translations is proven by the fact that the Jew Rodkinson, who made the first English translation of The Talmud, in the section on "History of The Talmud," asks, "Is the literature that Jesus was familiar with in His early years yet in existence in the world? Is it possible for us to get at it?"

The answer to this question is given by the Jewish rabbis who point to the "traditions of the elders" which The Talmud was known by at the time of Jesus. This was the set of Jewish (not Hebrew) beliefs that Jesus often condemned. (See Matthew 15:3 and 6; Mark 7:3, 5, 8,9,13. The Apostle Paul referred to them in Colossians 2:8 and the Apostle Peter in I Peter 1:18.)

We could go on and on, covering many more pages with proof of the blasphemy and pornography of this Jewish religious work. Far from being a compendium of religious laws and wise sayings, the "music of a choir of voices, the give and take of intelligent arguments," as Dr. Neusner states in his book, we find it replete with filth, asininity, and a viral hatred of Christ and Christians which can be found in no other religious writing known to man. Dr Neusner's Invitation to The Talmud, which we looked into at the beginning of this book, is based on the overall trickiness and subtlety of Talmudic teaching which can never be trusted to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

Neusner's book is a means of laundering the filth and hatred to The Talmud knowing full well that very few Christians, including the majority of their pastors, will ever make the effort to see what The Talmud really says.

Like Karl Mordecai Marx, the father of modern socialism, the Jew Moses Hess (1812‑1875) was  born in Germany of Talmudic, rabbinic ancestry and was steeped in the traditions of orthodox Judaism by his grandfather who raised him. He worked actively with both Karl Marx and Frederich Engels (Marx's promoter) in bringing communism to birth. Hess believed that communism was the best way to achieve the Zionist dream of a One World State, governed by Jews. (This is the New World Order which is being promoted by our President, George Bush, and many other prominent men.)

Hess is still considered to be the pillar of modern‑day Zionism. In actuality, he was a pagan philosopher who believed that the prayer and ritualism of Judaism was for the "little Jew, and for women and children." In the higher echelons of Judaism, the atheist Einsteins and the Jewish seminary Finklesteins see eye to eye as can be seen from numerous articles in the Jewish Encyclopedia. All personality, intelligence, planning and supreme power were taken from Almighty God by the pagan Pharisees. They called this "ridding the Bible of anthropomorphisms."

Sneering at Christianity, which believes in a Jewish race, Hess advocated instead a breed of all races and nations, dedicated to the synagogue of Satan, which would extoll The Talmud and delegate Moses to an inferior role while elevating the Jewish rabbi to the point where they were taught that when God had a problem in heaven, He called on earthly rabbis for advice. Hess looked to the black magic and occultism of CHASIDISM, (a sect of Jewish mystics) which, along with Zionism, would achieve a one‑world, communist dictatorship under Jewish control.

The idea that Jews are citizens of the country in which they reside, or were born into, is a delusion. The structure of the inner world government, within which each Jew is a citizen, places their loyalties first to world Judaism, then to the country in which they reside. The United States of America is the only country I know of that recognizes this dual citizenship, and it has been an albatross around our necks since the formation of the Jewish State of Israel in 1948.

The American Jewish Committee is the most single powerful body in world Jewry. Its membership embraces world capitalists and many of the members of powertul semi‑secret organizations such as the Bilderbergers, the Tri‑Lateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations (which is part of a larger, much more powerful One World Government organization) and, of course, the Masonic order of B'nai B'rith. The American Jewish Committee is the world organizer for Jewry and operates in more than 65 different countries.

Jewish immigration to the United States has come mainly from Eastern Europe, Russia and Poland and has been made up almost totally of Ashkenazi Jews of Turko‑Mongolian background. Their ancestors never set foot in ancient Palestine. Every national leader in the State of Israel has come from this non‑Semitic background.

Volumes could be written about the international leaders of the Jewish Kehillas who make the American Jewish Committee one of the most powerful political forces in the world today. There have been men such as Louis Marshall who brought the Christian industrialist Henry Ford, Sr. to his knees after Ford had written his masterpiece The International Jew which exposed Judaism for what it really was.

There was Bernard Baruch, who once publicly boasted that he was the "unelected President of the United States" because of the power he wielded over the American government.

There was Eugene Meyer, Jr. of the Federal Reserve and owner of the Washington Post; Herbert Lehman, Governor of New York State and a U.S. Senator; Felix Warburg, President of Kuhn, Loeb and Company; the international banker Jacob Schiff, who supplied the money which made the Bolshevist Revolution of 1917 in Russia a success. He had been the American agent of the Rothschild interests, working for over fifty years to set up the Federal Reserve System which has systematically stolen billions of dollars from the American taxpayer and which now controls the economics of America. (See my book, The Great Conspiracy, $3.00 ppd.)

Today, there are men such as Howard Metzenbaum, U.S. Senator from Ohio, who is one of the most dangerous men in modern America. He works consistently and incessantly to destroy the Second Amendment rights of Americans to keep and bear arms. Of course we can't forget the German Jewish enigma Henry Kissinger, the power behind the throne of numerous Republican and Democratic administrations, who, according to Army Intelligence sources, was an agent of the Soviet KGB during World War II.

A good example of how Jewish power works can be seen in the case of Max Warburg from the German branch of the Rothschild (powerful Jewish) banking firm. Warburg was a member of the American Jewish Committee prior to World War II. Felix (brother of Max), a  member of the 1917‑1918 Kehillah, married Freda Schiff, daughter of Jacob Schiff, head of the powerful Kuhn, Loeb and Company Bank of New York. Frederich Warburg, the son of Felix, was listed in the Who's Who of Jewry(1938‑39) as a member of the American Jewish Committee. These men, along with other Jews such as Sidney Warburg, were the power which ran the administration

of the Swedish Jew, Dwight David Eisenhower.

Many innocents in the Christian world have been taken in by the Jewish fairy tale that Judaism is a religion opposed to Zionism. The truth is that Judaism is the religion of Jewish Nationalism, which all intents and purposes is Internationalism directed and managed by Jewish leaders who delegate the rest of mankind to human asses under Jewish control. This, my Christian friend, is the Judaism that you and your pastor support when he declares the Jews to be the Chosen People of God, the "apple of His eye." What fools men can become when they refuse to listen to the truth or insist on proof.

If we look back to 1917‑18, we can see Jews such as Rabbi Judah Magnes, a protege of banker Jacob Schiff, who was the maneuvering power behind the American Civil Liberties Union. This staunchly pro‑Zionist, pro‑Communist body has been a thorn in the sides of Christians with its effort to abolish prayer and Bible reading in public schools, its efforts to do away with Christian symbols during the Christian holidays and its defense of most anti‑Christian drives in America. Periodically, they will defend what could be called a Christian patriotic cause in order to keep up appearances, and keep the Christians asleep. Magnes served in communist‑front organizations such as the Garland Fund and alongside anti‑American, anti‑Christians such as Earl Browder and William Z. Foster, both of whom were Talmudic stooges of Judaism and


Socialism has always been the carrot held under the noses of the goyim to get them into the Jewish‑communist barn. It is a mechanism whereby the "human" Jew can lead a whole herd of goyim "cattle" into the milking barn, first to be milked and then to be slaughtered for their beef.

As the Russian Jews began to arrive in this land, they immediately established socialist organizations similar to those of which they had been members in Russia. Take a close look at the socialist organizations headed by such renegades as Norman Thomas and Gus Hall (Hallberg), perennial President of the American Communist Party. The Jew Samuel Gompers was a product of the socialist, Jewish/English ghetto and worked to turn the American Federation of Labor into the socialist ranks under Jewish control.

During the Jewish Congress Movement in the late 1910's, the red Rabbi Stephen S. Wise was instrumental in uniting all national radical elements in America into the National Social Workmen's Committee. Rabbi Wise is the one who boasted that the Russian Revolution was the "crowning feat of the sons and daughters of Zion" (New York Times, 3/24/17), and who, when asked to define communism, said: Some call it communism; I call it Judaism.

A chain of communist‑socialist schools has been set up in America by world Jewry. In 1937, the Russian Textbook on Psychopolitics/Brainwashing (the communist blueprint for the takeover of America, available for $2.50 ppd.) was brought to America. It had been introduced at the Lenin School of Psychopolitical Warfare at the University of Moscow in 1936, where it was used as a textbook in a class of 47 American college students (45 of whom were Jews) who had been sent to Moscow by the American Jewish Committee for the express purpose of learning how to infiltrate

American education. In 1937 it was the primary textbook at the communist Eugene Debs Labor School in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The welcoming speech to these American students was made by Lavrenti Beria who was at that time head of the Russian KGB. Among other things he is quoted as having said:

You must work until every teacher of psychology unknowingly or knowingly teaches only communist doctrine under the guise of "psychology". You must labor until every doctor and psychiatrist is either a psycho‑politician or an unwitting assistant to our aims.

You must labor until we have dominion over the minds and bodies of every important person in your nation....

You must dominate as respected men in the fields of psychiatry and psychology. You must dominate the hospitals and universities....

Psychopolitics is a solemn charge, for with it you can erase our enemies as insects. You can cripple the efficiency of their leaders... You can change their loyalties. Given a short time with a psycho politician, you can alter forever the loyalty of a soldier, or a statesman, or you can destroy his mind.

Use the courts, use the judges, use the Constitution of the country.. and when you have succeeded you will discover that you can now effect your own legislation at will, and you can make the capitalist (Christian) himself finance, by his own appropriations, a large portion of the communist conquest of the nation.

This, my Christian friend, is Talmudic Judaism at its most effective and dangerous stage.

The purpose of these Jewish‑run schools, such as the Highlander Folk School in Tennessee, was to build a firm foundation for the more than 40,000 Marxist professors who have infiltrated our educational system and who daily poison the minds of young Americans. If they can be successful in taking over America, they will be well on their way towards world control.

It is interesting to note that most of the political parties in the State of Israel are either

controlled by socialists or communists. The MAPAI, a Zionist‑Socialist party; the HEROT, formed by former Jewish terrorists; the MAPAM; the AHDUT or ACDUTH which is a Socialist Party dedicated to the subjugation of all "sub‑humans" to Jewish control.

I have already mentioned the red Rabbi Stephen S. Wise who was probably one of the most influential Jewish leaders in the twentieth century. He was one of the original founders of the American Jewish Committee and served as its president in 1924. He was also a committeeman on the American Civil Liberties Union and the American League Against War and Fascism before it changed its name to the American League for Peace and Democracy. He worked hand‑in‑glove with such known communists as Earl Browder, the communist dynamiter Tom Mooney and, of course, the communist William Z. Foster. Wise was an ardent backer of those who burned churches and

massacred priests and nuns during the Spanish Revolution. To his dying day Rabbi Wise never stopped his enthusiastic and often maniacal support of the Soviet Slave State and waxed enthusiastically about the murder of countless thousands of Christians in Russia by his Jewish brethren. When the big shots of World Jewry decided to create a new bogeyman (new enemy of America), they selected Russia as this enemy, and Wise was instrumental in backing every effort to incite mutiny and sabotage within the Armed Forces of America. Congressional Investigating Committees of the time, such as the Un‑American Activities Committee, recognized Wise as being behind these efforts.

Wise bragged that the Bolshevik Revolution established the Talmudic‑Zionist base in Russia and was financed by the large Jewish banks headed by Jacob Schiff who personally donated $20‑million to the Bolshevik cause.

It was well known. throughout the administration of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt that Schiff had financed this revolution and openly bragged about it. (See New York Times report, 3/24/17, subtitled: "Rabbi Wise Ready for War!") This article relates how Jacob Schiff financed the propaganda campaign within the Czarist Army which led to the Bolshevik success in Russia. They haven't changed their course in 3,000 years.

At a Carnegie Hall celebration in March, 1917, it was said:

...then the rabbi (Wise) praised the Russian Revolution....... "I, cannot forget, "he said, "that I am a member and a teacher of the race of which half has lived under the domination of the Czar, and as a Jew, I believe that of all our achievements none has been nobler than the part the sons and daughters of Zion have taken in the great movement which culminated in a free Russia."

(Interpreted correctly, that means "free to kill and enslave Christians.")

In 1950, Wise was praised by the American Jewish Congress who said ot him:

... more than any other American he was an outstanding symbol and advocate of Zionism, not only in the eyes of American Jews, but also the entire American people and to its leaders, including President Wilson and F. D. R.

It was Wise who funded the first English translation of The Talmud which was accomplished by Rabbi Rodkinson.

Elizabeth Dilling sued Wise for defamation of character and received an out‑of‑court settlement. He had made the following statement at a mass meeting:

This meeting is to fight the "mamser" (Yiddish for 'bastard') Dilling whose lies about The Talmud have set Judaism back a decade. She dragged our sacred Talmud in the sewer.

Dilling replied:

If I had done so, it might have helped clean it up; for a sewer is a helpful and normal channel for cleaning; The Talmud is an abnormal, diabolical channel for funnelling sub‑sewage into the minds of those who follow it.

The whole Talmudic religion would have to be revamped to bring it up to the level of a sewer... Its doctrines are illegal in all civilized countries. It stands for mass‑murder of non‑Jews, mass‑enslavement of mankind and the reversal of all laws based on Old and New Testament morality.

What a fighter that little woman was and, oh, how we need thousands more like her! I would like to have known her!

The Jews have always used threats to gain their will. In 1917‑18, Louis Marshall, then President of the American Jewish Committee, served notice on Henry Ford, Sr., to cease telling the truth about the Talmudists. When Ford refused, Jewish threats were followed by Jewish actions. Several attempts were made against the great Christian industrialist and his family. His car was forced off the highway on several occasions, and these incidents became so frequent that Mrs. Ford pleaded with Henry to come to terms with the Zionists. Henry did make an apology of sorts, and all the scraping and bowing of the Ford family to Jewish interests from that time on can be traced to the fear which was engendered by Jewish threats.

It would take many pages to tell about the Jewish efforts to control America's economy. It began shortly after our nation became free and resulted in the assassination of President Lincoln. (For further details on this, see my book, The Great Conspiracy. $3.00 ppd.)


Running true to form, The Talmud uses the most foul language when speaking about the Virgin Mary, mother of our king. In one place she is called "Miriam, the dresser of women's hair who committed adultery." In the SANHEDRIN (106a‑106b) it says; She who was the descendant of princes and governors played the harlot with carpenters.See the following exhibit;


                                          SANHEDRIN                                         106a‑106b

[>Mary a harlot<]

>his reward for the twenty‑four thousand Israelites whose destruction he had encompassed.(1)<  Mar Zutra b. Tobiah remarked in Rab's name: This is what men say. 'When the camel went to demand horns, they cut off the ears he had.' (2) Balaam also the son of Beor, the soothsayer [did the children of Israel slay with the sword](3). A soothsayer? But he was a prophet! ‑ R.Johanan said: At first he was a prophet, but subsequently a soothsayer.(4)  R. Papa observed: This is what men say 'She was the descendant of princes and governors >played the harlot with carpenters.'(5)< [106b] Did the children of Israel slay with the sword among them that were slain by them.(6) Rab said: They subjected him to four deaths, stoning, burning,

decapition and strangulation.(7) [>4 Deaths for Jesus<]

A certain min(8) said to R. Hanina: Hast thou heard how old Balaam was?‑He replied: It is not actually stated, but since it is written, Bloody and deceitful men shall not live Out half their days (9) [it follows that] he was thirty‑three or thirty‑four years old. (10) He rejoined: Thou hast said correctly; I personally have seen >Balaam's Chronicle< in which it is stated, '>Balaam< the lame was thirty years old [>Refers to Jesus<] when Phinehas the Robber killed him.'

(1) V. ibid, XXV, 1‑9: since Israel was thus seduced and punished through his advice, as stated above, he demanded payment. (2) So Balaam, demanding a reward lost his life. (3) Joshua XIII, 12. (4) >As a punishment for wishing to curse Israel he was degraded from a prophet to a soothsayer<.(5) Shipdraggers, (v.Rashi). Herford, Christianity in the Talmud, p.48, suggests that >Balaam is frequently used in the Talmud as a type for Jesus (also pp. 64‑70)< Though no name is mentioned to shew which woman is meant, >the mother of Jesus may be alluded to<, which theory is strengthened by the statement that >she mated with a carpenter. (The Munich MS. has [Heb. Text] in the margin instead of [Heb. Text] i.e., singular instead of plural.) (6) Ibid. (7)This is suggested by the use of the plural 'among them that were slain by them,  intimating that >the various deaths inflicted upon others were all suffered by Balaam.

Thus he was hung (strangulation), a fire was lit under him (burning), his head was struck off (decapitation), and then  he was allowed to fall to earth(stoning);v.Supra 45d. 8) Heretic. v.Glos. (9)Ps. LV, 24. (10)cf. p.471. N. 1. (11)[According to the view that >all the Balaam passagesi are anti‑Christian in tendency, Balaam being used as an alias for Jesus. Phineahas the Robber is thus taken to represent Pontius Pilate and the Chronicle of Ballam probably to denote a Gospel< (v.Herford op. Cit. 72ff). This view is however disputed by Bacher and others. (cf. Ginsburg. Journal of Biblical Literature,

XLI, 121]


All Jewish rabbinical sources state that Jesus was of "illegitimate birth." The seducer of the Virgin Mary was said to have been a Roman soldier. Two accounts are recorded in the following exhibit. One indicates that He was "the son of Pandera," and another indicates that He is called "Ben Stada." (son of Stada, Ed.)

The TOLEDOT JESU edition contains a story about a dispute carried on by Jesus with the scribes. Based on that dispute, they declared Him to be a bastard. (See following exhibit from the Jewish Encyclopedia under the title, "Jesus.")

‑ In Jewish Legend: The Jewish legends in regard to Jesus are found in three sources, each independent of the others ‑ (1) in New Testament apocrypha and Christian polemical works, (2) in the Talmud and the Midrash, and (3) in the life of Jesus ("Toledot Yeshu') that originated in the Middle Ages. It is the tendency of all these sources to bellttle the person of Jesus by ascribing to him illegitimate birth, magic and a shameful death. In view of their general character they are called indiscriminately legends. Some of the statements, as that referring to magic, are found among pagan writers and Christian heretics; and as the Ebionites, or Judeo‑Christians, who for a long time lived together with the Jews, are also classed as heretics, conclusions may be drawn from this as to the origin of these legends.

It ought also to be added that many of the legends have a theological background. For polemical purposes, it was necessary for the Jews to insist on the illegitimacy of Jesus as against the Davidic descent claimed by the Christian Church. Magic may have been ascribed him over against the miracles recorded in the Gospels; and the degrading fate both on earth and hereafter of which the legends speak may be simply directed against the ideas of the assumption and resurrection of Jesus. The Jewish legends relating to Jesus appear less inimical in character when compared with the parallel passages which are found in pagan authors and Christian sources, more especially as such legends are fixed and frequently occurring themes of folk‑lore; and imaginations must have been especially excited by the historical importance which the figure of Jesus came to have for the Jews.

The earliest authenticated passage ascribing illegitimate birth to Jesus is that in Yeb. iv. 8.  The mysterious phrase ("that man") cited in this passage as occurring in a family register which R. Simeon ben Azza is said to have found seems to indicate that it refers to Jesus (see Derenbourgh in "R. E. J "i. 298), and here occur also the two expressions so often applied to Jesus in later literature (= "that anonymous one; the name of Jesus being avoided) and ("bastard": for which in later time... was used). Such a family register may have been preserved at Jerusalem in the Judeo‑Christian community.

The Jews, who are represented as inimical to Jesus in the canonical Gospels also, took him to be legitimate and born in an entirely natural manner. A contrary statement as to their attitude is expressed for the first time in the "Acts of Pilate" ("Gospel of Nicodemus" ed. Thilo, in "Codex Apoc. Novi Testamenti," i. 526 Leipaic, 1832; comp. Origem, "Contra Celsum," i. 38). Celsus makes the same statement in another passage where he refers even to a written source: adding that the seducer was a soldier by the name of Panthera.  The name "Panthera" occurs here for the first time; two centuries later it occurs in Epiphanius ("Haeres."Ixxvii. 7), who ascribes the surname "Panther" to Jacob, and ancestor of Jesus;andJohn of Damascus (Do Orthod. Fide." iv. ss 15) includes the names "Panther" and "Barpanther" in the genealogy of Mary. It is certain, in any case, that the rabbinical sources also regard Jesus as the "son of Pandera, afthough it is noteworthy that he is called also "Ben Stada" (Shab. 104b; Sanh .67a).

It appears from this passage that, aside from Pandera and Stada, the couple Pappus b. Judah and Miriam the hairdresser were taken to the parents of Jesus. Pappus has nothing to do with the story of Jesus, and was only connected with it because his wife happened to be called "Miriam" (= "Mary'), and was known to be an adulteress.

The one statement in which all these confused legends agree is that relating to the birth of Jesus. Although this is ascribed only to the Jews, even in Celsus, the Jews need not necessarily be regarded as its authors, for it is possible that is originated among heretics inimical to Jesus, as the Ophites and Cainites, of whom Origen says "they uttered such hateful accusations against Jesus, as Celsus himself did" ("Contra Celsum," iii. 13). It is probable, furthermore, that the accusation of illegitimacy was not originally considered so serious; it was ascribed to the most prominent personages, and is a standing motive in fork‑lore (Krauss, "Leben Jesu,"p. 214).

The incident of Jesus concerning the dispute with the Scribes was copied by the rabbinical sources (Kallah 18b [ed. Venice, 1528, fol 41c]: comp. N. Coronel, "Comment. Quinque, "p. 8b, Vienna, 1864, and "Batte Midrashot, "ed. Wertheimer, iii. 23, Jerusalem, 1895). All the "Toledot" editions contain a similar story of a dispute which Jesus carried on with the Scribes who, on the ground of that dispute, declared him to be a bastard. Analogous to this story are numerous tales of predictions by precocious boys.

The sojourn of Jesus in Egypt is an essential part of the story of his youth. According to the Gospels he was in that country in his early infancy, but Celsus says that he was in service there and learned magic; hence he was there in early manhood. This assumption may serve to throw more llght on the obscure history of Jesus that the account found in the Gospels. The Talmud also says that Jesus was in Egypt in early manhood. H. Joshua b. Perahyah is said to have fled with his pupil Jesus to Alexandria in order to escape the persecutions of the Jewish king Yannai (103‑76 B.C.); on their return Jesus made a remark on the not faultless beauty of their hostess, whereupon H. Joshua excommunicated him; and when Jesus approached him again and was not received he set up a brick for his god, and led all Israel into apostasy (Sanh. 107b; Sotah 47a; Yer. Hag. 77d). This account is supplemented by the statement, made on the assumption

that Ben Stada is identical with Ben Pandera, that Ben Stada brought magic from Egypt.(3)

This conforms to the Scripture found in John 8:41 when Jesus told them that they did the deeds of their father (ref. vs 44). They replied with: " We be not born of fornication; we have one father, even God." Compare this with I John 2:23 which clearly teaches that one cannot have the Father without first accepting the Son. This makes these Jewish leaders out to be liars.


3. The Jewish Encyclopedia, Funk and Wagnalls Co., N.Y. and London, 1905. p.170



It is interesting to note that The Talmud (see Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, under "Nero") states that Nero, the hater and persecutor of the early Christian church, was a convert of Judaism. Matthew 23:15 tells us quite plainly that those who convert from Christianity to Judaism become "two‑fold more a child of hell" than those who have led them to this conversion. It is also interesting to note that the famous Jewish Rabbi Meir was a descendant of Nero.

The infamous butchery of Christians by Nero has been acknowledged for centuries, but this butchery was but a kindergarten measure of what has been carried out by modern Judaism in the slaughter of Christians in countries under Zionist‑Communist‑Talmudic control. The Babylonian whore of Judaism has become "drunk with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus." (Revelation 17:6)

According to The Talmud, SHABBATH (104b), Jesus was a magician who worked His miracles through magic. Remember where the Talmudist Pharisees accused Him of casting out devils through Beelzebub, the chief of devils? (Luke 11:15)

Notice in the following exhibit, the weird teaching of The Talmud concerning Christ's miracles as described in the Jewish Encyclopedia:

According to Celsus (in Origen, "Contra Celsum," i. 28) and to the Talmud (Shab. 104b), Jesus learned magic in Egypt and performed his miracles by means of it; the latter work, in  addition, states that he cut the magic formulas into his skin. It does not mention, however; the nature of his magic performances (Tosef., Shab, xi. 4,. Yer. Shab. 13d); but as it states that the disciples of Jesus healed the sick "in the name of Jesus Pandera" (Yer. Shab. 14d; Ab. Zarah 27b; EccI. R. i. 8) it may be assumed that its author held the miracles of Jesus also to have been miraculous cures.  Different in nature is the witchcraft attributed to Jesus in the "Toledot." When Jesus was expelled from the circle of scholars, he is said to have returned secretly from Gaillee to Jerusalem, where he inserted a parchment containing the "declared name of God" ("Shem ha‑Meforash"), which was guarded in the Temple, into his skin, carried it away, and then, taking it out of his skin, he performed his miracles by its means. This magic formula then had to be recovered from him, and Judah the Gardener (a personage of the "Toledot" corresponding to Judas Iscariot) offered to do it; he and Jesus then engaged in an aerial battle (borrowed from the legend of Simon Magus), in which Judah remained victor and Jesus fled.

The accusation of magic is frequently brought against Jesus. Jerome mentions it, quoting the Jews: "Magum vocant et Judaei Dominum meum" ("Ep. lv., ad Ascellam, "i. 196, ed. Vallarsi); Marcus, of the sect of the Valentinians, was, according to Jerome, a native of Egypt, and was accused of being, like Jesus, a magician (Hilgenfeld, Ketzergesch. "p.370, Leipsic, 1884). There were even Christian heretics who looked upon the founder of their religion as a magician (Fabricius, in "Codex Apocr. Novi Testamenti." iii 396), and public opinion at Rome accused all Christians of magic. M. Ramsay, "The Church in the Roman Empire Before A.D. 170, "pp.236,

392, London, 1897). The Apostles were regarded in the same light('Acta Petri et Andraes," ed. Bonnet, ss.8). Neither this accusation nor that concerning the birth of Jesus is found in the canonical Gospels, but it occurs in the apocryphal accounts,... Somewhat different is the accusation that Jesus imposed upon the people and led them astray.... As Balaam the magician and, according to the derivation of his name, "destroyer of the people," was from both of these points of view a good prototype of Jesus, the latter was also called "Balaam." (4)

According to the TOLEDOT, Jesus was executed on the eve of the Passover feast, which was also the eve of the Sabbath. His executioners were unable to hang Him on a tree, as prophesied, because they said:

He conjured up all trees by the name of God not to receive Him. Therefore they all broke. He was finally received by a large cabbage stalk. He was buried that same day in conformity with the law.

Again, according to the TOLEDOT, when His disciples came looking for His body, it had been taken from the grave by a man named Judas the Gardener who had taken it and used it as a dam to keep the water out of his garden which had flooded the tomb. When Christ's body was finally displayed before the Queen of Jerusalem, the Christians were ashamed.

It might be of interest here to look at the Scriptural account in Matthew 27:62‑66 which says that the chief priests and Pharisees went to Pilate asking for a guard on the tomb so that the disciples could not steal His body and claim that He had risen. The Roman Governor granted permission to them to post a guard of their own at the tomb, and they helped seal the tomb's entrance with the Roman seal. This meant that anyone who broke it would be liable to the death penalty. Interestingly enough, the story spread by the Phari sees, when they discovered He had indeed risen from the dead,


4.The Jewish Encyclopedia, Funk and Wagnalls co., N.Y. and London, 1905. p.171


was that His disciples had come while the guard was asleep and stolen the body. (See Matthew 28:12‑15) It was apparent that they bribed Pilate not to prosecute the guard who normally would have been executed for sleeping while on duty.

Jewish legends all deny the resurrection of Jesus and state that Christ now sojourns in hell. Matthew 28:15 states that this false report is still believed by the Jews. It is authenticated in a newspaper report which appeared in the Canadian Toronto Telegram News a few years ago which stated:

Jesus of Nazareth arranged His own crucifixion and planned His resurrection. He played on the weakness of Judas Iscariot to betray Him.

He induced the Jewish establishment (Talmudic Pharisees, Ed.) to deliver Him into the hands of Pontius Pilate where they accused Him of sedition against Rome.

It was all a carefully engineered plot, executed at the crucial season of the Passover, in which the plotter was also the victim.

Its purpose was to bring to pass the events forecast in the Old Testament texts, in order to make the plotter‑victim acceptable as the Messiah who would lead His people, and through them, humanity, into an era of peace and good will.

"This is the real historic Jesus," says Dr. Hugh Schonfeld in his book, The Passover Plot. which has sold over 800,000 copies in Britain alone. When promoting his book and his thesis in Toronto, Schonfeld spoke fervently about the need to strip the theological encrustations from the character of the Nazarene and make Him acceptable to both Christians and Jews." Schonfeld went on to say:

Many thousands are leaving the Christian church because they have outgrown so much that traditional Christianity has taught about the New Testament figure as God Incarnate. Jews have ignored Jesus because they have been alienated by Christian theologians who have clothed Him with pagan ideas of Godhood.

Only if we concentrate on working through historical channels will emerge a different image of Jesus, acceptable to Jews and non‑Jews.

This is typical of Jewish religious thinking. Everything the Christian does must conform to their ideas in order to be acceptable. My answer is: Why do we need to make the Son of God acceptable to anyone, no matter who they are, especially if we MUST falsify the facts in order to do so?

All through Dr. Schonfeld's book we find Talmudic assumptions that Jesus was not the Messiah, He was not the Son of God, He was an imposter who had delusions of grandeur and wanted to become a "big shot," so to speak. This is a typical Jewish attitude towards our Lord and King. The Jews cannot logically, or historically, refute the evidence of hundreds of eyewitnesses who saw Him repeatedly in the 40 days following His Resurrection and before His Ascension, so they hate Him all the more, and with Him, His followers. The dirty work of Talmudic‑Judaism is done under the Talmudic sign of the "Magen David," sometimes erroneously called the Shield of

David. It is the six pointed star seen on the flag of the State of Israel. It becomes even more amusing when one realizes that there were no people in existence anywhere in the world who were known as Jews until almost 300 years after the death of King David when we find them in II Kings 16:6 fighting against Israel.

Since the so‑called "Shield of David" is not mentioned in rabbinical literature, it probably did not originate until much later. We know it dates back at least to the third century A. D. It was commonly used by European Jews and was prominent in Spain which was then the hotbed of Cabalistic superstition during the Middle Ages. (For a study of how Talmudic Cabalism is connected with the Masonic Lodge, I suggest you obtain my book, The Hidden Power Behind Freemasonry $7.00 ppd.)

The information we have covered so far is nothing but a rudimentary introduction to Talmudism and its effect on the Christian church. It has become so effective that Christianity in 1992 has, indeed, become Judeo‑Christianity.



NOTE: On the final page of this chapter Col. Mohr included a age from the Talmud displaying

 an amulet, below the amulet is the text from the Talmud explaining it's meaning.  In this archive are two graphic files of the amulet nad it's caption.  For the sake of compression they have been UUencoded. The amulet is in two parts (amulet.001, amulet.002), the caption to the amulet is in three parts (amluttxt.001, amluttxt.002, amluttxt.003).

                                          What is The Answer?

                                                Chapter Eight

In answering this question, we need to remember the admonition given in Hosea 4:6: My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge....

Notice it does not say, "lack of education," but "lack of knowledge." There is a great deal of difference between the two. Men and women can have strings of degrees behind their names, and in the words of the Apostle Paul (Romans 1 :22) "professing themselves to be wise, they became fools." He elaborated on this in II Timothy 3:7, when he spoke of those who were "ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth." In other words, they are educated idiots.

We must reach our Christian brethren and the relatively uneducated majority of Christians (those who depend on their pastor for Scriptural information rather than seeking it out for themselves) with sound evidence that proves that our media in America, both secular and religious, has played a tremendous role in delivering Christian America into the hands of the Talmudic One Worlders. The religious press, for the most part, plays the role of keeping Christians calm and anesthetized. They shape the news and answer complaints with the doctrine of their denominational cause, rather than what The Word says.

As for the regular news media, they have become, with the exception of a very few independently owned newspapers, "intellectual prostitutes of Zionism," who have sold themselves from the shoulders up as a whore sells herself from the waist down. This was clearly seen in a statement made by John Swinton, editor of a well‑known daily newspaper, in 1914 at the Annual Dinner of the American Press Association. Swinton was giving his retirement speech to them and said: There is no such thing as an independent press in America if we except those of little country towns. You know this, I know it! Not a man among you dares to utter his honest opinion. Were you to utter it, you know that it would never appear in print....... I am paid to keep my honest opinion out of the newspaper for which I write. You, too, are paid for similar services. Were I to permit an honest opinion, my occupation ... would be gone in less than twenty‑four hours. The man who is foolish enough to write an honest opinion would soon be walking the streets in search of another job. It is the duty of the New York journalist to lie, distort, to destroy, to revile, to toady at the feet of Mammon, and to sell his country, and his race, for his daily bread, or what amounts to the same, for his salary. We are tools and vessels of the rich (International Bankers) behind the scenes. We are marionettes. These men pull the strings and we dance. Our time, our talents, our lives, our capacities, are all property of these men ‑ we are intellectual prostitutes.

Day by day these intellectual prostitutes mold public opinion according to establishment policy which, in this case, is overwhelmingly pro‑Zionist. They are subservient to the Council on Foreign Relations, and the Tri‑Lateralist cabal and answer to them for their daily bread. They are the highest paid prostitutes in the world's history and should be beneath our contempt.

As an example, a few years ago Bill Moyers of CBS, who is supposed to be a Southern Baptist Christian layman, spoke sarcastically on the CBS Monday Morning show, calling the Moral Majority "a religious group of some kind, trying to influence abortion, equal rights, military spending and other establishment programs." Of course Mr. Moyers was careful not to criticize the National Council of Churches which has taken a decidedly liberal, anti‑Christian attitude towards political and secular issues in America.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation has known for many years that the Soviet KGB Department of Disinformation has been spending hundreds of millions of dollars annually on propaganda which is dispersed daily in all the large, Jewish owned and operated news outlets. (This comprises more than 90% of the media.) Men such as ABC reporter Geraldo Rivera boast publicly about their influence in slanting the news, and this attitude is reflected in men such as Eric Severeid, Sam Donaldson, the entire crew of Sixty Minutes, Peter Jennings and a host of others who daily show their smugness and pseudo‑intellectual superiority. They should be beneath the contempt of decent people, just as decent people in a decent community shun a whore. These

men, for the most part, look on the average citizens as being mentally deficient fools who must be led by the intellectual superiority of the media.

History has proven, over and over again, that when decent Americans know the truth, they will act upon it. Several arrogant Congressmen have learned this to their sorrow. This is one of the major reasons the truth is being kept from the American people, both in secular life and in the church. For if our people knew the truth, there would be the biggest explosion in the history of the world. Today, America in particular is likened to a man smoking a cigar as he sits on an open keg of gunpowder, knocking the ashes into the keg. It will only take one tiny spark, at the right time, to reach the powder, and the explosion will come which will blow those who seek world power out of the driver's seat. This is the major reason they hide the truth.

When will Christians ever learned the truth regarding Jewry, of whom our risen Lord said in Revelation 2:9 and 3:9: "...1 know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are of the synagogue of Satan."

If they learned that Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and the prophets were not Jews and that God's promise in Genesis 12:3 was never made to a Jew; if they learned that the Israeli Talmudists who annually soak up billions of their tax dollars are not the Covenant People of the Bible; if they learned that the imposters in Palestine are Edomite‑Turko‑ Mongolians, the Christian world would rise in righteous indignation to throw the Talmudic money changers out of the national temple and return this nation to its Christian heritage and to its risen Christ. This is why the truth MUST be suppressed.

If the members of our churches knew that doctrines being taught in their church, such as the "rapture" and "the Jews are God's chosen people," were doctrines designed by Talmudic propagandists to lure Christians away from reality, and that these doctrines are not according to Scripture but are false, then millions of Christian who are now sitting in their comfortable religious foxholes waiting for Jesus to rapture them out of this mess, would rise up and become the "salt of the earth" as their Master intended them to be.

Oh, how sick I have become of those Christians who shrug their shoulders when they are warned of danger ahead, and say smugly: "Well, I don't have to worry, you know. I'm saved, and Jesus will come back and take me out of this mess before it gets that bad."

What a shock they are going to have when they learn the truth, and it doesn't happen the way their pastors have been telling them. Millions of Christians have become infected with this "holier‑than‑thou" attitude because of the Judaizing of the church seminaries that have produced shepherds who have neutralized Christians from being "soldiers of the cross," to becoming "prostitutes for those who hate their Lord." This sort of religious attitude is what the enemy wants.

A threatened and compromised America today stands at the point of no return because of her religious and political leaders. In Jeremiah 23:22, we read these words which were written to the pastors and political leaders of America:

But if they (the pastors) had stood in my (God's) counsel, and had caused my people to hear my words, then they should have turned them from their evil way, and from the evil of their doings.

In plain words, folks, the pastors of America have been traitors to their calling. Instead of preaching the whole truth, in the words of II Timothy 4:3‑4, they have brought about the time when the average Christian no longer wants to hear the truth, but would rather have their ears tickled by the pastors of their choosing who will talk of the rapture, immortality of the soul, brotherly love and how the Jews are blessed and protected by God. No wonder this country is headed for hell at a breakneck speed.

We need to get across to the controlled media of America, and to our religious leaders, that freedom of the press is not some immutable decree handed down by God on Mt. Sinai which allows them to slant the news as they will for their purposes. Freedom of the press is political license granted to the media by the American people, and what we have given to the media and their religious pundits, we can also take away.

The time has come when concerned Americans can no longer afford to take the path of least resistance. For Christians to remain in their spiritual foxholes while the battle for the survival of Christianity and Christian values rages outside, is cowardice. It is impossible to look at the debacle of America since the beginning of the New Deal in the 1930's, without realizing the responsibility of our leaders, both political and religious, and how they have fallen down in this responsibility. It is time that decent Americans called them to account for their poor stewardship. Our country and our American way of life have been placed in jeopardy by their irresponsibility.

Public opinion polls and common sense tell us that military superiority is the only thing which the internationalist enemy understands. But we MUST not be led into believing that we can cooperate with our enemy and come out in the driver's seat. The "Glasnost" of the 1980's and 1990's is not the first time the International Zionist‑Communists have tried to trick us. They have pulled this same stunt many times since the Russian Revolution began in 1917. We should be ashamed of ourselves as Christian citizens for allowing ourselves to be fooled so many times. There is an old Indian saying which I believe is appropriate here and which goes: White man fool Indian once, shame on white man; white man fool Indian twice, shame on Indian.

The same is true in our dealing with the Talmudic conspiracy.

We cannot afford to remain in this self‑imposed ignorance, for our very existence as a free, Christian people is at stake. Abraham Lincoln recognized this when he stated: "If disaster come upon us, it will come from within. We will either live forever as free men, or we will die by suicide."

Today, as our nation rushes on a collision course with national suicide, any intelligent, honest and observing person should be able to see that drastic action is necessary to preserve the Republic. The danger signs are clearly visible on every side. America's retreats in Korea and Vietnam have been observed worldwide as has our recent smashing victory in Iraq. This all points to the fact that our government policies in Washington, D.C. are not for the betterment of America, but for the well‑being of the Internationalists who control us. We did not lose in Korea and Vietnam because our fighting men were less willing to fight than they were in the Middle East. We did not lose because we had inferior military equipment. We had the best equipment, and in both wars we had overwhelming air superiority. We lost in Korea and Vietnambecause it was expedient for our international masters, just as we won in the Middle East for the same reason. The program of the New World Order was always uppermost in the minds and designs of those men who (think they) control American destiny.

Remember the rallying cry of the American Revolution? "Put only Americans on guard tonight!" That must be our cry in the 1990's. We have had enough of foreign control from the Kissingers and the Brezinskis. Now is the time when only dedicated Americans should be allowed in office. To compromise with the enemy, regardless of magnitude, should be grounds for TREASON in accordance with Article III, Section 3, of the Constitution of the United States.

The following are a few actions which I believe are necessary to save the America we once loved: First and foremost we must get our white majority, especially those who call themselves Christians, into a right relationship with God so that He will hear their prayers. Isaiah 59:2 clearly indicates that God will not even listen to our prayers until we get into a proper relationship with Him. And, yes, I am speaking about church members!

We MUST return to obeying His Law. Christians MUST be re‑educated to know that being "born‑again" is only the first step to becoming a Christian, and that they have no option whatsoever to "do their own thing."

We MUST teach our brainwashed Christian people that Christ did not abolish The Law when He died for our sins. He "established" it. These are His words from Matthew 5:17: "Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets; I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil."

Here the Greek word "fulfil" is "plerosai," which carries the meaning (among others): "to make replete; execute; verify; accomplish; complete; perfect." As you can see, there is not even a suggestion that this word meant to "do away with" God's Law as so many ministers teach. From this verse alone you should realize that your pastor is lying to you when he teaches that Christ did away with The Law.

We must educate our Christian people to the truth of what is taking place on the national as well as the international scene today. They must be taught to read between the lines of the controlled news. This means that our church leaders must tell their people the truth and declare the whole counsel of the Lord, not just those things which follow denominational lines or which the people want to hear in order to feel good. Jeremiah 23:22 indicates that if our spiritual leaders will do this, the people will "turn from their wicked ways, and from the evil of their doings."

When we accept this truth, we MUST re‑educate the nominal Christian masses into accepting the consequences found in Deuteronomy 28. In this passage, God is specific with His blessings which accrue for obedience to His Law and just as specific with His curses which abound for disobedience to His Law. By reading this chapter in Deuteronomy and applying it to America's woes today, we can see God's hand in applying the curses He promised when we turn from Him and His Law. To read this chapter and not see the reason America is being destroyed is beyond my comprehension.

In verse two we are told: And all these blessings shall come on thee, and overtake thee IF THOU SHALT HEARKEN UNTO THE VOICE OF THE LORD THY GOD...(emp. added)

And in Deuteronomy 28; 6‑1 1: Blessed shalt thou be when thou comest in, and blessed shalt thou be when thou goest out The Lord shall cause thine enemies that rise up against thee to be smitten before thy face: they shall come out against thee one way, and flee before thee seven ways. The Lord shall command the blessing upon thee in thy storehouses, and in ALL (Emphasis added) that thou settest thy hand unto; and He shall bless thee in the land which the Lord giveth to thee. The Lord shall establish thee as a holy people unto himself, as he hath sworn unto thee, if thou shall keep the commandments of the Lord thy God, and walk in his ways. And all the people of the earth shall see that thou art called by the name of the Lord: and they shall be afraid of thee. (This was true of America up through World War II, but now, following the Iraq war, the people are afraid of the New World Order, which controls our military.) And the Lord shall make

thee plenteous in goods, in the fruit of thy body, and in the fruit of thy cattle, in the fruit of thy ground, in the land which the Lord sware unto thy fathers to give thee. Notice that this promise hinges on obedience to His Law, and that this promise was made to Jacob‑Israel, not to a people called Jews.

See II Samuel 7:10. He was most certainly not referring to Old Palestine in this passage.

Now notice what will happen if we refuse to obey God. Much of this has already come to pass, and we can see these curses in operation all about us in the Israel nations of Christendom. Notice particularly the calamities which will befall us if we refuse to obey our God and "do our own thing." Much of this has already happened, or is in the process of happening.

In Deuteronomy 28:15‑24 we find a variety of afflictions and disasters which will come upon Israel for disobedience, and it takes no stretch of the imagination to recognize that this is taking place in Israel‑America today. If we refuse to accept the truth that we are Israel, then we will be deceived into believing that this Scripture was not for us. Notice verse 25, which speaks about what happened to us in Korea and Vietnam where we were defeated by nations smaller than many of our states. Our military did not lose these wars; they were lost by the traitors in our government. The Lord shall cause thee to be smitten before thine enemies:... (Deuteronomy 28:25) Verse 27 addresses the spread of diseases such as cancer, VD and AIDS which are decimating our people. Now, with unlimited immigration, strange and terrifying diseases which we have never heard of before, are destroying us. Verse 27: The Lord will smite thee with the botch of Egypt, and with the emerods, and with the scab, and with the itch, whereof thou canst not be healed. (Emphasis added) The New American Standard version translates that verse as: The Lord will smite you with the boils of Egypt and with hemorrhoids, and with the scab and with the itch, from which you cannot be healed.

Verse 28, speaks about mental diseases which lead many of our people into the hopelessness that ends in suicide. The Lord shall smite thee with madness, and blindness, and astonishment of heart:... Today, suicide is the third largest killer in America and number one among high school and college students.

Verse 33 tells how aliens will consume our food supply. The fruit of thy land, and all thy labours, shall a nation which thou knowest not eat up; and thou shaft be only oppressed and crushed alway:...

According to reports from the Department of Agriculture, America's "emergency food supply," dropped from 158 days in 1987, to 56 days in 1988, to 32 days in 1989, and yet we "sell" (do they ever repay us?) corn and wheat to communist and Third World nations faster now than ever before. While our traitorous president arranges for the Soviet Union to receive $1‑billion in emergency food supplies, hundreds of thousands of Americans are going to bed hungry every night. While we give the Israelis extra billions to house their immigrants from Russia, thousands of Americans and American families are homeless. These are the curses for disobedience to His Law and from turning our faces to other gods.

It will take only one season of crop failures to place America on an emergency food basis and leave us ripe for a declared National Emergency which could very well usher in the control needed for Mr. Bush's New World Order.

Verse 43 prophesies of this very occurrence: The stranger that is within thee shall get up above thee very high; and thou shalt come down very low.

We see the aliens ruling over us in America today. They eat our food which we give them through welfare, they take our jobs and leave us homeless, they set up their own communities where no English is spoken, they have gotten up high above the Israelite people while the white majority, who made this America great, have become the "tail." In our military, we have a Jew, "Stormin' Norman" Schwartzkopf (An article in an August 1954 issue of The New York Times, indicated that Norman's grandfather was a German Jew from Austria, who had been a metallurgist. His father was head of the New Jersey State Police at the time of the Lindberg kidnaping, and it has been established that he withheld vital information, which would have proven that Bruno Hauptman did not kill the Lindberg Child.) at the head of our military forces, and a black as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, while the overall policy of America may very well be controlled by a German Jew named Henry Kissinger.

When you have thought about these things, go back and read Deuteronomy 28, in its entirety, and weep for Christian America.

We must bring our economic system under the control of Congress which was envisioned by our forefathers when they wrote the Constitution, and remove it completely from the international control of the Federal Reserve Board.

It should be pointed out here that when the Talmudists control our foreign policy and we seek detente with the enemy, we break a Biblical Law which will bring disaster to our country. The Bible clearly teaches in Proverbs 4:14: Enter not into the path of the wicked, and go not in the way of evil men. Proverbs 25:5 says: Take away the wicked from before the king (president), and the throne (government) shall be established in righteousness.

Nowhere, at any time nor for any purpose, are Christians given the option to compromise with evil, or evil men, in any manner. It has never worked out to the advantage of individuals or nations in over 6,000 years of recorded history.

Probably one of the most debilitating diseases in America today is the manner in which professing Christians compromise with evil, and evil men, for a little temporary safety or comfort. Most Christians prefer to be "middle‑of‑the‑roaders," without realizing that this is the most dangerous place on the road for they will be hit from both directions. Also, this is where you will find a yellow streak" and where you can locate all the dead skunks in the morning.

In recent years, most Americans have lost the virtue of righteous indignation which is the ability to recognize right from wrong, and then do something to correct the wrong when recognized. Instead, the average Christian wants to be like everyone else, good and bad alike, and completely reject the words of James 4:4.. know ye not that the friendship of the world (order) is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world (order) is the enemy of God. That's pretty plain and uncompromising, isn't it? That's why very few Christians want to accept it! It's too narrow minded for them.

There are many church groups in America who have injected their Talmudic Judeo‑Christian  theology of "compromise with God's enemy" into our national life. This is why, over the last fifty years or so, we have aided our enemies, and stabbed our friends in the back. The U.S. Catholic Bishops have injected leftist ideology into the debate on national defense since 1983, although the majority of Catholic laymen reject it, I believe. Actually, 13 major religious groups in the United States have pressured Congress to seek detente with the communist world at any cost even though they know this enemy has promised to "bury us" and destroy Christianity.

These 13 religious groups are:

The American Baptist Church

Church of the Brethren

Episcopal Church

Jesuit Social Ministries

Mennonite Central Committee

The National Council of Churches

The National Council of Religious Women

Network (a Catholic Social Justice Lobby)

Unitarian Universalist Association of Churches in North America

United Church of Christ

United Methodist Church (Board of Church and Society ‑ Women's Division)

United Methodist Church

Council of Religious Women

This is but the tip of the iceberg. Multiply those by millions of evangelical and fundamentalist Christians who have been brainwashed into supporting the anti‑christ, Zionist Jews at any cost, and you can understand why we see the huge peace rallies in Washington, D.C. These rallies are not spontaneous at all, but are prompted by our enemies and their religious friends in the so‑called Christian world.

Even many conservative Christians who believe in the principles of Constitutional Government and one government, under God, have been led astray by their religious leaders who are determined to stand behind international Judaism regardless of Judaism's terrorist, manipulatory and heinous acts.

Have you ever wondered what the Good Samaritan of Luke 10:33 would have done if he had come by when the victim was being beaten and robbed? I sincerely doubt that he would have stood by as a spectator as many of our Christians do today. "Oh, brother Mohr, Christ wouldn't want us to be violent."

Yet it seems to me He was rather violent when He made a whip of ropes and drove the unscrupulous money changers out of His Father's Temple. (John 2:15‑16)

Jesus was discussing common sense theology when He stated in Luke 11:21‑22: When a strong man armed keepeth his palace (home), his goods are in peace (safe): But when a stronger than he (a criminal, whether of the regular stripe or a government criminal) shall come upon him, and overcome him, he taketh from him all his armour (gun control)... and divideth his spoils.

In other words, if you are not armed, you can be overtaken and robbed. There is little doubt in my mind that many sincere supporters of peace at any price are well‑intentioned, no matter how naive or misinformed they may be. But the sad thing is that most of them are afraid of learning the truth and they become like the Christians at Galatia to whom the Apostle Paul once said in Galatians 4:16: Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?

Unfortunately, many of our political and religious leaders know exactly what they are doing, and these are the subversive traitors who are willing to sell America down the river for a little temporary safety, public recognition and money. They are more interested in what they can get for the moment, than in fulfilling the oath they have taken to support our Constitution and our people from ALL enemies, both from within and from without. They want to feather their own nest even if it means abandoning you and I to a heartless enemy. If you look closely at every major foreign policy President Bush has been engaged in, you will find behind them the financial interests of his family. In Panama, in Bahrain, in the Golden Triangle of Southeast Asia, (Which has been proven thorough sworn testimony by Lt. Col. James "Bo" Gritz, who has been in contact with top dope producers in the Golden Triangle.) and now in Red China. In all of these areas the Bush family holds billions of dollars in business deals.

These men want to align themselves with the world Talmudists whom they believe have the money and the power to handle any problem that comes along.

About now, some fundamentalist may come along and say: "Slow down a bit, Colonel, our church teaches that Jesus is the answer!" I'll not argue with you about that, for He MUST be first. But the message of salvation goes much deeper than "ye MUST be born again." That is just the first step to becoming a Christian and walking the Christian experience. What good is your faith if it is not backed by your actions? The Apostle James realized this when he wrote in James 2:14‑18: What doth it profit, my brethren, though a man (or woman) say he hath faith, and have not works? can faith save him? If a brother or sister be naked, and destitute of daily food, and one of you say unto them, Depart in peace, be ye warmed and filled; notwithstanding ye give them not those things which are needful to the body; what doth it profit? Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone. Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: show me thy faith without thy works, and I will show thee my faith by my works. (emph. added) This is a lesson a lot of Christians need to learn.

The enemy within who has become contaminated by the Talmudic poison is a thousand times more dangerous to the cause of Christ than the Talmudic enemies themselves. Jesus said in Matthew 23:15: "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves." Don't become angry with me, it was King Jesus who said that.

The great Roman Senator and statesman Marcus Tullius Cicero (106‑43 B.C.) put it this way: A nation can survive its fools, and even its ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banners openly. But a traitor moves among those within the gates freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears no traitor! He wears their face and garments and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of the nation; he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city; he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist; a murderer is less to be feared.

Following the definition of "treason," we find in the U.S. Constitution, Article III, section 3, the following: Treason shall consist only in levying war against them (the U.S.), adhering to their enemies, giving them AID AND COMFORT.

Any fifth grader can understand those words. If the actions of our President and Congress are not treason, then I fail to understand the meaning of the English language.

There are a multitude of men in Washington, D.C., in our State Houses, and in the pulpits of our churches who are guilty of this heinous crime against our people. A hundred years ago, a justifiably angry population would have accused them openly, and they would have been tried in a court of law and executed as the traitors they are. But today, they are the big names in government and church.

The defense of Christianity and Christian freedom, my friend, will require sacrifice and the continuing actions of those Christians who love God and care for the future of America. Christians must be in the forefront of this movement to bring America back to God, for they have the most to lose if the Talmudic enemy is successful.

Here are some suggestions I prayerfully and humbly make, by which you, as a Christian individual, can help save America. They are quoted from The Church and the Sword. by G. Russell Evans, and G. Greg Singer, 1983, page 126:

1. Refuse to accept the bias and misinformation of the controlled news, the analysis given by the Talk Show hosts and TV preachers. Get the truth from the Word of God, and from history as it actually is and deliver it courteously in a Christian manner to all who will listen. Never attempt to cram truth down the throats of a reluctant public. Remember that your task is not to persuade anyone of the truth, that is the task of the Holy Spirit, Who is the Convincer. Your job is to take the unbiased truth to men and women everywhere, do it to the best of your ability, and once they have heard it, it becomes a matter between them and God. (See Ezekiel 3:17‑21: 33:7‑9)

2.  Find out if the church you attend belongs to the National Council of Churches, and if it does, GET OUT! You have no business in a contaminated atmosphere like that, no matter how long your family may have been members. If your pastor insists that you MUST support the anti‑christ Jews, do the same thing. (Read and ponder II Chronicles 19:2)

3.  Find out how your members in Congress vote and let them know in no uncertain manner how you stand on issues. Be courteous, but firm, and don't let them try to "pull the wool over your eyes.",'Congratulate them when they take a stand for that which is right and good for the country, and get on their backs when they serve the enemy.

4.  Join a church which teaches the truth regarding the Talmudist enemy. If you can't find one in your neighborhood, that is no excuse to attend a compromising church. Start a study group in your own home, and if you would like to start a church, write: America's Destiny, 1501 W. Peoria, Phoenix, AZ 85012, telephone 602/944‑3297 and ask how to start a church in your area. Learn for yourself what the Bible teaches, not the ideas of some Judaized seminary graduate.

5.  Don't stop here. Write letters to church leaders and editors of both secular and religious publications and let them know that you know what is going on and how you feel about compromise with the enemy. This, of course, should be done in a Christian manner; abusive letters will gain nothing for either you or the Kingdom cause. It will do much damage!

6.  Monitor radio and TV programs and request "fairness doctrine" time to answer the propagandists and promote Kingdom Movement truths.

7.  If you see church bulletins which present an antichrist attitude in any way, and there are many of these today; or if your pastor preaches so as to glorify the anti‑Christs, go to him in the spirit of Christian love and talk to him about it. While in most cases you will be rebuffed, it is possible that a few open minded men may be reached with the truth.

It never ceases to amaze me how denominational pastors are becoming increasingly disturbed over what is happening in their denominations, yet few seem to want to know the answer. Still, a month scarcely passes that I do not receive a letter, usually from a young pastor, which says: "What is happening in my denomination that I can no longer preach the whole counsel of God's Word?" There is hope for a man such as this. Cultivate him.

8. If your local school or service organization has a speaker who advocates an anti‑Christian, anti‑American attitude, politely ask for your side to be heard. You may be surprised at how many people will want to hear both sides of a controversy.

9.  Be active in promoting pro‑Christian, pro‑American candidates for public office; the two should go hand‑in‑hand. While I personally do not believe the problems of America are going to be solved through the political process, proper candidates can go a long way to alleviate some of the ills which are afflicting the country.

10. In all your dealings with the enemy, keep cool. Remember, "He that is slow to anger is better than the mighty; and he that ruleth his spirit than he that taketh a city." (Proverbs 16:32) Also, 'A soft answer turneth away wrath; but grievous words stir up anger. "(Proverbs 15:1) This is one of the sad mistakes made by many of our people. I have seen this happen, time and time again. There is nothing that will get a Talmudist more upset on a TV Talk Show, than to have you remain cool when he has attacked you unmercifully.

In April, 1972, while speaking for the American Opinion Speaker's Bureau of the John Birch Society, I addressed a large student group at the University of Kansas, in Lawrence, Kansas. I was opposed by a group of about ten radicals (most of whom I learned later were not even students) who harassed and actually physically assaulted me. They were led by a young Jew whose father was a well‑known criminal lawyer. They pelted me with marshmallows which had been made sticky by being held in the mouth until soft, and when they hit, they stuck like glue to my dark suit. With the help of God, I managed to remain cool, even though I was struck in the face with some hard object that caused lacerations.

Later, I received 72 letters from students who had attended the lecture. Some rejected my message which was against Sex Education in the schools, but all said they were impressed by the manner in which I remained "cool underfire," and all apologized for the "unbelievable rudeness" of a few of their classmates. Some of them asked for further information. So remember, it pays to keep cool under fire!

Many American Christians are coming under severe attack today because of pressure to destroy the Second Amendment. Under no circumstance must we allow this to happen. They are being led for the most part by Talmudists, (such as Senator Howard Metzenbaum of Ohio who is trying desperately to paint all gun owners as bad while they express sympathy for the criminal). A good deal of this pressure is coming from church groups who should know better.

A few years ago when I was lecturing in San Francisco, a full page ad which had been sponsored by 14 prominent Protestant churches, appeared in the very liberal San Francisco Examiner. It asked that church members turn in their firearms at a church service, on a certain day, where they were to be melted down to make a statue of a famous American compromiser. (It may have been Saint Martin Luther King, Jr., I don't remember.) It went into some detail regarding how decent Christians would certainly turn in their "death‑dealing weapons" at the church service.

The Monday issue of The Examiner rather ruefully stated that only eight guns had been turned in at 14 services the day before, which means that some of the Christians in that wicked city had at least some perspective of what was happening. Personally, I sort of like this idea for I believe that anyone who would be stupid enough to turn in their guns at the request of some pacifist Pastor is too dangerous to be allowed to own one.

There is nothing inherently bad about a sword. The quality of sharpened steel may depend on whether it is in the hands of a surgeon or a bandit. The same goes for a firearm. There is nothing inherently evil in a firearm, and I am convinced that you cannot trust a government who will not trust its citizens with a means of self‑defense.

If guns are only in the hands of evil men, then the only peace the lamb will have with the lion is when it ends up in the lion's belly. There are evil men who label disarmament as peace, but it is the peace of slavery and death. I Thessalonians 5:3 warns us about those who: ... when they say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them.. and they shall not escape. This is the peace of International Talmudism.

If Israel America does not remain free, there will be no one to carry out the "mission of the King," for one of the avowed aims of the Talmudists is to eliminate Christian civilization from the face of the earth.

In the controversial Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, we read: The goyim are a flock of sheep, and we are their wolves. And you know what happens when wolves get hold of the flock?...

There is another reason why they close their eyes: for we shall keep promising them back all their liberties we have taken away as soon as we have quelled the enemies of peace...

God has granted to us, His Chosen People, the gift of dispersion, and in this which appears in all eyes to be our weakness, has come forth all our strength, which has now brought us to the threshold of sovereignty overall the world. (Protocol Number 11)

The outstanding characteristic of Talmudic Judaism is an active, increasing, powerful and virulent attack upon all forms of Christianity. Occasionally we hear of outbreaks of sectarian bigotry between Catholics and Protestants which is given heavy coverage in the press. Nine times out of ten this is brought about by Talmudic pressure, but at no time does it reach the virulence of the steady and relentless Jewish attacks against Christianity. Organized Judaism is not content with doctrinal disputation, but enlists its vast commercial and political power against everything it regards as "Christialogical manifestations" (in their own words).

It has reached the place in America where no President of the United States dares to take his inaugural oath on the open pages of the New Testament. If he did, the Jews would denounce him as a religious bigot. No public official in America can give public evidence of his Christian faith without rebuke from the Jews, with the exception of those "pseudo‑Christian" Zionist traitors who support them.

Not only does the Talmudist disagree with Christian teachings, but everything that would remind a child in our government school system that he/she is living under a Christian system, in the midst of a once‑Christian civilization, must be expunged. Year after year, the Talmudists extort apologies from Christian leaders because these leaders have inadvertently used the term "Christian" in their official language. The Talmudist glories in religious persecution as the true American does in patriotism. This, of course, is part of the Talmudic plan. It is time that our Christian people begin to realize that most of the cries of "bigot" are coming from the bigots themselves.

Yet strangely, in spite of all this obvious ill will towards Christians everywhere, there has been a concerted drive in the Christian world to exonerate the Jewish people from the responsibility of Christ's death and place it solely upon the shoulders of the Roman government. This, of course, is a complete refutation of both Scriptural and Roman records. I can understand, as I read the Gospel of John, why the Talmudists want it removed. It is the most devastating attack against this evil form of religion that has ever taken place in the history of the world and it was conducted by the Lord, Himself.

As one Rabbi Stephen Wise, known as the "Red Rabbi" was quoted as saying; As long as the (true) records of the Gospels remain the New Testament, so long will there be anti‑semitism (anti‑Talmudism).

It has been proven over and over again during the past 2,000 years, that the Talmudists cannot stand up under the blazing illumination of truth as found in the New Testament. The true feelings of the Talmudists can be seen in the statement made by the Jew, Ben Hecht, a well‑known Hollywood writer, when he said: One of the finest things ever done by the mob was the crucifixion of Christ. Intellectually it was a splendid gesture... But if I had been in charge, I'd have handled it differently You see, I would have shipped Him off to Rome and fed Him to the lions. They (Christians) could never make a Savior out of mince meat" This from a man whom many pastors say comes from the Chosen Race.

If we allow the Talmudists to remain in control of our government, and we are not wrong in calling it a ZOG (Zionist Occupation Government) today, the first Christians who will be executed when the Talmudists have complete world control will be the milquetoast Christians such as the Falwells, Swaggerts, the Robertsons and the Van Impes who have helped them come to power. Haven't we watched as Pat Robertson was ridiculed and maligned when he ran for President? Haven't we watched as the tabloids and TV brazenly publicized the sexual escapades of Swaggart? Haven't we witnessed the destruction of PTL empire's leaders, Tammy Faye and Jimmy Bakker? These people were made glamorous and powerful by the media. The media has removed their power, just as it gave them their power.

Do these "leaders" know about this peril? If not, why not? The evidence is all around them, and the Talmudic leaders of International Communism have been warning us of their plans for over 70 years. The Talmud says: Even the best of the goyim should be destroyed.

There is little doubt in my mind that many so‑called Christians will become irritated, disturbed and angry when they read the truth of which I have written. But I like what Solzenitsyn tells his audiences: My friends, I have not come to tell you comfortable things, but to tell you the truth.

In Jeremiah 22:21, we read of Israel (true Israel): I spake unto thee in thy prosperity; but thou saidst, I will not hear... This has been our overwhelming problem in dealing with American Christians. They don't want to know the truth, but would rather listen to the soothsayers, spoken of by the Apostle Paul in II Timothy 4:3‑4: For the time will (has) come when they (white Christian Israel) will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts (longing for material things) shall they heap (gather) to themselves teachers (pastors), having itching ears; And they (the pastors) shall turn away their (Israel's) ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables (Talmudic teachings).



Col. Mohr refers to several of his books throughout this piece.  However, since its writing Col. Mohr has retired, and these books are no longer available through him.  They may be available through patriotic booksellers, or certain Christian ministries. Col. Mohr may be contacted at:

Crusade for Christ

Lt. Col. Gordon "Jack" Mohr

800 Napa Valley Road, #197

Little Rock, Arkansas 72211


Many other files are available by Anonymous FTP from:


Reference Materials