America The Empire
In previous posts we have discussed briefly that the United States has become an empire. We are no longer citizens of a nation-state but rather subjects within an empire, and that is why the Constitution no longer followed. An attorney once said that ownership of anything is not the important thing. The most important concept is control and not ownership.
Luke 11:45‑52: “ Then answered one of the lawyers, and said unto him, Master, thus saying thou reproachest us also. And he said, Woe unto you also, ye lawyers! for ye lade men with burdens grievous to be borne, and ye yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers. Woe unto you! for ye build the sepulchres of the prophets, and your fathers killed them. Truly ye bear witness that ye allow the deeds of your fathers: for they indeed killed them, and ye build their sepulchres. Therefore also said the wisdom of God, I will send them prophets and apostles, and some of them they shall slay and persecute: That the blood of all the prophets, which was shed from the foundation of the world, may be required of this generation; From the blood of Abel unto the blood of Zacharias, which perished between the altar and the temple: verily I say unto you, It shall be required of this generation. WOE UNTO YOU, LAWYERS! FOR YE HAVE TAKEN AWAY THE KEY OF KNOWLEDGE: YE ENTERED NOT IN YOURSELVES, AND THEM THAT WERE ENTERING IN YE HINDERED. ”
Thayer ’ s Definitions; #1074 genea‑
1) fathered, birth, nativity
2) what has been begotten, men of the same stock, a family
a) the several ranks of natural descent, the successive members of a genealogy
b) metaphorically, a race of men very like each other in endowments, pursuits, character; especially, in a bad sense, a perverse race
3) the whole multitude of men living at the same time
4) an age (that is, the time ordinarily occupied be each successive generation), a space of 30 to 33 years
In this part of the study we will show why our nation has become of empire status, the history of the transformation, and the individuals by name who played the key roles.
Why do we spend so much time and effort to explain the decadence of government? It is simply because we are in the Kingdom that Christ gave us. He spent so much time explaining the Kingdom of Heaven and yet most people refuse to believe it. Matthew 13 is the kingdom parable chapter; read it throughly and carefully. Nearly each parable starts with the phrase “ The kingdom of heaven is like unto. ” (The kingdom of heaven us used 34 times in Matthew alone) We must note that He is obviously not describing a perfect paradise but rather problems that need to be overcome and how to perfect properly that kingdom.
Our forefathers gave us what could be classified as the unperfected kingdom. The key overriding principle was this: Government derives its power from the consent of the governed. That is Biblical; it is paramount in Biblical kingdom living. Our founders knew the weakness of man; they knew the thought processes of lawyers. Therefore, they provide the Separation of Powers concept. Thus we have the Legislative, Judicial and Executive Branches. It was mandatory in the minds of the founders that they remain absolutely separate.
Yet, today, they have become one and the same with the thought processes of a lawyer. Most of Congress, plus the Judicial, as well as the Executive Branch are lawyers. Thus, they are of a single mind with a single purpose. “ Woe be unto you lawyers. ”
The very informative Essay titled Social Democracy, written by Henry Lamb, writes thus: “ Social democracies, such as Germany, and most of the Scandinavian states, are a sophisticated version of Communism in which the people are allowed to play a greater role in the development of public policy, but where government is still sovereign.
Social democracies retain the idea that the government is responsible for the welfare of its citizens. In a government that derives its power from the consent of the governed, the people are responsible for their own welfare. Herein lies the dilemma facing the current generation in America: shall we pass to future generations the value of self governance derived from the principle that government derives its power from the consent of the governed; or shall we accept the principle that government is responsible for the welfare of its citizens and deny future generations the freedoms that allowed America to prosper?
It is a legitimate debate. Throughout most of the 20th century, America has been moving ever closer to the concept of social democracy, and away from the founding principle of government power limited by the consent of the people. The two concepts of self governance are mutually exclusive. Every step toward social democracy is an erosion of individual freedom that is maximized by limited government.
Many Americans want a social democracy. It is certainly easier to let the government be responsible for health care than to be personally responsible for paying doctor bills. It is easier to let government be responsible for providing security for old age than to be personally responsible. It is easier to let government be responsible for the homeless, for those who cannot produce an adequate income, for educating our children, for guaranteeing a minimum wage; than to be personally responsible. Most of the world lives under some form of social democracy. Increasingly, so does America.
Every time personal responsibility is transferred to the government, a measure of individual freedom is sacrificed. When government provides health care, it is the government, not the patient, who chooses the quality of the care and provider. Where the individual is responsible, the patient, not the government, chooses both. Many people gladly relinquish their freedom to choose in exchange for not having to pay the cost. Many people gladly relinquish their freedom to choose where to live in exchange for the government providing any place to live. Many people gladly relinquish their freedom to choose what their children will learn in school in exchange for the government providing an education to their children.
All of the steps America has taken toward social democracy; and away from limited government, have come as the result of choices made through “ Elected Officials. ” ( “ Woe be unto you lawyers! ” ) Many, perhaps now a majority of Americans hail those choices as ‘ progressive, ’ and call for more government-provided security for individuals. But each step toward social democracy that we, as a nation, take erodes that founding principle of government power limited by the consent of the people. The benefits of socialization are often immediate and relatively short-term, the costs, however, are obscured and have profound implications for future generations. ” (End of the extractions from the Essay by Henry Lamb (Ecologic, January-February, 1998, P.O. Box 191, Hollow Rock, Tennessee 38342))
Mr. Lamb articulately points out that the nations of the world are moving toward the governmental system called social democracies. As he pointed out, a social democracy is a sophisticated version of a communist state. He points out that the United States is rapidly becoming a social democracy with no regard to the Constitution. Considering the fact that our Congress has become excess baggage within our present scheme of government, our nation has already become a genuine social democracy. But there is one great difference with respect to the United States as compared to all of the other “ social-democracies. ”
History has clearly shown us that, with respect to governments, there can never be a vacuum among nations. There has always been one nation which considers itself strong enough to be “ king of the hill. ” There has always been one nation which wants to be the ruler of the world. The phrase “ ruler of the world ” simply means empire.
Remember the term “ Rule Britannia, Rule? ” That was empire and the phrase, “ The sun never sets on the British Empire ” was known throughout the world. The idea of Empire has been tried many times throughout history. Ghengis Khan tired it. The Moslems tried it. Alexander the Great tried it. The world-renown Roman Empire tried it. There are many others, too numerous to mention. They have all failed. Why? Because none of them understood the demands of God.
There are two ways to be the leading nation of the world. One is by example and the other is by force. In the book of Isaiah we find how God wants us to be the leading nation: “ And it shall come to pass in the last days, that the mountain of the Lord ’ s house shall be established in the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow unto it.
And many people shall go and say, Come ye, and let us go up to the mountain of the Lord, to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths: for out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem.
And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more. O house of Jacob, come ye, and let us walk in the light of the Lord. ” (Isaiah 2:2-5) The word “ mountain ” in that passage refers to governments.
It is written by historians that the “ Golden Years ” of the United States was the period between 1800 and 830, a mere 30 years. It was during that time that we earned the honor of being the leading nation of the world, not because of raw power, but because of concept.
We wrestled with the concepts of a righteous government, a government which followed Biblical principles. The historian George Bancroft, in an address before the New York Historical Society said, “ the exact measure of the progress of civilization is the degree in which the intelligence of the common mind has prevailed over wealth and brute fore; in other words, the measure of the progress of civilization is the progress of the people. ”
Note that he said, “ the intelligence of the common mind has prevailed over wealth and brute force. ” He was talking about leading by example and not brute force or money. The “ intelligence of the common man, ” meaning the ordinary citizen, wrestled with these questions during that period of the “ Golden Years. ”
What is the social mission of this nation in its continental home? What duties and virtues are necessary to the fulfilment of its historic mission? What opportunities for action lie open to the people? What knowledge is necessary for the accomplishment of their highest purposes? What principles, inherited or newly devised, should be applied for progress toward the goal called America?
The Bible clearly shows God ’ s way to find the answers to these questions. The America people understood the Biblical principles and they acted upon them. The French historian Comte de Alexis Tocqueville came to the United States to study our progress in answering those questions. He returned home and wrote his book “ De la Democratie en Amerique. ” (The American Democracy) in which he observed that it wasn ’ t the factories, nor the farms, nor the cities which made America great. It was in the churches of America where he found our greatness. “ America was great because she was good and when she ceases to be good she will cease to be great. ” This was the fulfillment of Isaiah 2:2-5 and consequently people from all over the world came to these shores to learn of our ways.
For the world to come to our shores to learn of our ways could have been a blessing to the world or it could have been a curse. It would have been a blessing if the world had come to learn of our ways and then to go home and teach the biblical principles to their own people. But it turned out to be a curse because we opened our shores to the world of diverse cultures, principles, and morals, allowing them to stay, which resulted in their teaching Americans of “ their ” ways. History proves that in every case of developing empires, they would start with the right concepts and end with the same problems.
In our country, it took one hundred years for the process to tear down the concept which was engendered during those “ Golden Years. ”
Those of us who are old enough to have lived during those glorious years just before World War II, will remember the end of the nation state concept and the start of the empire concept. We realize that those included the years of the great depression, and that was traumatic, but we lived in a nation which for the most part lived with the concept that “ government derives its power from the consent of the governed. ” Contrary to modern thought, it is far better to live in a depression and be free than to live under a system where the government does all of your thinking for you.
It is fully recognized that the controlling powers even then created that depression, just as they did in creating World War I, the Versailles Treaty, Communist Russia, Nazi Germany, and World War II. But America was not yet infected with government interfering in our private lives as it now is throughout the Western civilizations. We were free; churches were free; private organizations were allowed to organize without permits, etc. Even driver ’ s licenses were not required in most states. We could go on and on but the point is made; We Were Free.
The question is asked “ Who was at fault? ” It was us! As Pogo said, “ We has met the enemy and he is us! ” Why do we have a Congress which does absolutely nothing about the Executive Branch traveling all over the world, making end-runs around the Constitution by creating some sort of “ contractual ” agreements that don ’ t need Congressional approval? They respond by claiming that nothing can be done. How about cutting off the money flow!?
But alas, as Henry Lamb clearly showed in his essay, many Americans want a social democracy, or so the so-called polls released by the news media indicate. All of Congress pledged allegiance to the Constitution, and that includes the responsibility of making all laws and for the entire funding of the total operations of the government. They are totally misreading the will of the people and they are entirely too occupied with outperforming the opposing Party. Anything for the growth of their Party. The nation comes second and the people last. WHERE ARE THE CHURCHES?
Once upon a time the Christian Churches were at the forefront showing not only he average citizen, but the church-going congressmen ands senators the proper role of government in a Christian society. But now, those who do go to church, in both the private sector as well as our leaders in government receive at best “ canned sermons ” prepared by Bible publishing houses (mostly owned by non-Christians). Much of the time they receive sermons by trained socialists or Marxists in liberation theology, situation ethics, humanism and now, the “ new kid on the block, ” environmentalism which believes in the mother god Gaia concept.
Paul told us in 1 Timothy 5:8, “ But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel. ” The word “ house ” in that passage is oy-ki ’ -os in the Greek and it means family and kindred. Those instructions are equally applicable for our Congress. As a nation, we should be taking care of our own first.
But no, we have become an empire, just like the Roman Empire, wherein we are supposedly “ responsible ” for the entire world. Our government has a supposed duty to police all of the other nations. We send our men to all corners of the world to die for our “ empire ” just like the British Empire did. It was so proudly said, “ The sun never sets on the British Empire. ” It would have been more appropriate if the ditty had said, “ The sun never sets on the graves of English men who secured and protected the British Empire. ” So it is with us.
Up through World War II, the United States still had some resemblance of a nation-state. That is said even though we recognize that World War II was conducted to “ Make the world safe Democracy. ” (Read that Communism!)
The well known historian and writer Gore Vidal explained the mechanism that was used to transform us from a nation-state to that of an Empire. The following main points he made are extracted from his article as found in the magazine “ Vanity Fair ” for November, 1997: “ The trouble appeared to be over Germany, which, on February 11, 1945, had been split at the Yalta summit meeting into four ones: American, Soviet, British, and French. As the Russians had done the most fighting and suffered the greatest losses, it was agreed that they should have an early crack at the reparations from Germany to the extent of $20 billion. At a later meeting at Potsdam the new president Truman (Roosevelt had been assassinated),m with Stalin and Churchill, reconfirmed Yalta and opted of the unification of Germany under the four victorious powers. But something had happened between the euphoria of Yalta and the edginess of Potsdam. As the meeting progressed, the atom bomb was tried out successfully in a New Mexico desert. We were now able to incinerate Japan-or the Soviet, for that matter, and so we no longer needed Russian help to defeat Japan. We started to renege on our agreements with Stalin, particularly reparations from Germany. We also quietly shelved the notion, agreed upon at Yalta, of a united Germany under four-power control. Our aim now was to unite the three Western zones of Germany and integrate them into our Western Europe, restoring, in the process, the German economy-hence, few reparations. Then, as of May 1946, we began to re-arm Germany. Stalin went ape at this betrayal. The Cold War was on. ”
Gore Vidal clearly shows that it was the nuclear bomb which gave Truman the impetus to renege on the Yalta Agreements and try for “ The King of the Hill! ” But really was it the haberdasher Truman who figured this all out by himself? Hardly.
With respect tot he destruction of the economy of Germany, it was Morgenthau who developed the so-called “ Morgenthau Plan ” which was planned to systematically reduce Germany to nearly an agrarian society. But Truman brought the German experts in missile science to the United States to create phase two of the plan for the American Empire. Phase two was the development of the missiles to deliver, with great accuracy, the then recently demonstrated nuclear bomb.
History also shows that it takes something unusual, something extraordinary, in the military power structure to create and Empire. Those whom you want to conquer must be so awe-struck with your military prowess that they will readily submit. The Romans developed the siege engines, the attack ships loaded with Marines equipped with boarding rope ladders, the multiple shield system used by the infantry which allowed an entire squad to advance well protected. Atilla had the lightening fast horse cavalry, etc. The United States decided to use “ high-tech ” with the A-bomb, missiles, superb aircraft, etc., and, of course, money.
Continuing with Gore Vidal: “ At home the media was beginning to prepare the attentive few for disappointment. Suddenly, we were faced with the highest personal income taxes in American history to pay for more and more weapons, among them the world-killer hydrogen bomb; all because ‘ the Russians were coming. ’ No one knew quite why they were coming or with what. Weren ’ t they still burying 20 million dead? Official explanations for all this made little sense, but then, as Truman ’ s secretary of state, Dean Acheson, merrily observed, ‘ In the State Department we used to discuss how much time that mythical average American citizen put in each day listening, reading, and arguing about the world outside his own country...It seemed to us that ten minutes a day would be a high average. ’ So why bore the people?
Secret ‘ bipartizan ’ is best for what, after all, is-or should be-a society of docile workers, enthusiastic consumers, obedient soldiers who will believe just about anything for at least 10 minutes. The National Security State, the NATO alliance, the 40-years Cold War were all CREATED without the consent, much less advice, of the American people. Of course, there were elections during this crucial time, but Truman-Dewey, Eisenhower-Stevenson, Kennedy-Nixon were of a single mind as to the desirability of inventing, first, a many-tenacled enemy, Communism, the star of the Chamber of Horrors; then, to combat so much evil, install a permanent wartime state at home with loyalty oaths, a national ‘ peacetime ’ draft, and secret police to keep watch over homegrown ‘ traitors, ’ as the few enemies of the National Security State were known. Then followed 40 years of mindless wars which created a debt of $5 trillion that hugely benefitted aerospace and firms like General Electric, whose longtime TV pitchman was Ronald Reagan, eventually retired to the White House. ”
What is Gore Vidal alluding to but not quite saying? Who was it that created Communism? Where did the money come from? Where did the money come from? Who was it that funded Germany? Where did that money come from? Who were the “ traitors? ” Wasn ’ t it at first coming from the Communist left and now from the Christian right? This was to be what Mr. Vidal called “ The Last Empire. ” Perhaps so but that ’ s up to God, not man.
Isn ’ t it strange that the British Empire folded following World War II so easily and so smoothly? It was the “ marriage ” at the time of Oliver Cromwell between money which Manneseh ben Israel secured and the British nobility that created that Empire. The promise was “ Between us we will rule the world ” and that they did. To give that up so easily had to mean that another empire was taking its place, this one to be the final “ Utopia ” which the professor Michael Higger describes in his book, “ The Jewish Utopia. ” (The Lord Baltimore Press, Baltimore, MD)
Then Gore Vidal continues: “ Why go into all this now? Have we not done marvelously well as the United States of Amnesia? Our economy is the envy of the earth, the president proclaimed at Denver. (President Clinton at the Denver summit) No Inflation. Jobs for all except the 2 percent of the population in prison and the 5 percent who no longer look for work and so are not counted, bringing our actual unemployment close to the glum European average of 11 percent. And all of this accomplished without ever once succumbing to the sick socialism of Europe (Social Democracy). We have no health service or proper public education or, indeed, much of anything for the residents of the fun house. But there are lots of ill-paid work-hours for husband and wife with no care for the children while parents are away from home. Fortunately, Congress is now preparing legislation so that adult prisons can take in delinquent 14-year-olds. They, at least, will be taken care of, while, economically, it is only a matter or time before the great globe itself is green-spanned...
Today we give orders to other countries. We tell them with whom to trade and to which of our courts they must show up for indictment should they disobey us. Meanwhile, FBI agents range the world looking for drug fiends and peddlers while the unconstitutional CIA (they don ’ t submit their accounts to Congress as the Constitution requires) chases ‘ terrorists ’ so that their onetime colleagues and sometime paymaster in the Russian KGB have gone out of business.
While we were at our busiest in the fun house, no one ever told us what the North America Treaty Alliance was really all about. March 17, 1948, the Treaty of brussels called for a military alliance of Britain, France, Benelux to be joined by the U.S. and Canada on March 23. The impetus behind NATO was the United States, whose principal foreign policy, since the administration of George Washington, was to avoid what Alexander Hamilton called ‘ entangling alliances. ’ ...We were now hell-bent on the permanent division of Germany between our western zone and the Soviet zone to the east. Serenely, we broke every agreement that we had made with our former ally, no horrendous. Communist enemy. ”
He then goes on to mention the contents of the book “ Drawing the Line ” (The American Decision to Divide Germany 1944-49, publisher unknown) in which the author Carolyn Eisenberg, describes the efforts of the United States in building this empire by converting its allies, and then the former enemies like Germany, Italy, Japan into client states which made them subject to our military and our economic power.
There were those who vehemently opposed this deception of creating an empire by allowing communism to remain intact to be used as a tool. General George Patton, for example, wanted to totally destroy communism by taking down the Soviet Empire so we could return to a nation-state status But he met his demise in a truck “ accident ” and several books have been written on the subject. General Walter Bedell Smith, in a letter to General Eisenhower, wrote regarding those concept to regularize (regulate) European matters. He said, “ The difficulty under which we labor is that in spite of our announced position we really do not want nor intend to accept German unification in any terms the Russians might agree to, even though they seemed to meet most of our requirements. ” General Smith simply said that we didn ’ t really want the unification of Germany, all we wanted was to create a “ Cold War ” with which to bring in our empire status. Stalin countered with the famous Berlin Corridor Blockade. We in turn responded with the renown Berlin Airlift. That was in true keeping with the showing of spectacular force as have all nations dreaming of an empire of their own.
Mr. Vidal shows that the idea of an American Empire was never allowed to be debated in Congress. What little debate there was centered on what the CIA reported was the Soviet Union ’ s desire to conquer the whole world.
Truman released what has become known as the “ Truman Doctrine ” in which he stated, “ The policy of the United States is to support free peoples who are resisting attempted subjugation by armed minorities or by outside pressure. ” With that official policy never debated by Congress; we became the policeman of the world.
Dean Acheson tried to stir up Congress by telling them of the Soviet ’ s attempts by stating, “ They had brought the Balkans to the point where a highly possible Soviet breakthrough might open three continents to Soviet penetration. ” As Gore Vidal stated, “ Senators gasped grew pale; wondered how to get more ‘ defense ’ contracts into their states. Of the major politicians, only former vice president Henry Wallace dared answer Truman ’ s ‘ clearer than truth ’ version of history: “ Yesterday March 12, 1947, marked a turning point in American history, it is not a Greek crisis that we face, it is an America crisis. Yesterday, President Truman...proposed, in effect, that America police Russia ’ s every border. There is no regime too reactionary for us provided it stands in Russia ’ s expansionist path. There is no country too remote to serve as the scene of a contest which may widen until it becomes a world war. ”
Wallace was considered a communist for such statements. Whatever is the truth, one thing become clear. The Soviet ’ s were very probably trying for an even larger empire. They already had one but that apparently wasn ’ t big enough. The United States perhaps (let ’ s be kind!) Was trying to stop that effort but in the process was building an empire all of our own. It was the East versus the West, so to speak. But in doing all that, we have just about expended ourselves as a nation.
Now, there are two more kids on the block, wanting to be “ King of the Hill. ” They, of course, are China and the Moslems. Now, what if Russia, China and the Moslems (of which many are in Russia) come together and the three of them take on the American Empire? It appears that this could be possible in our incessant drive for an even larger empire we keep troops all over the world. The numbers are staggering, considering we are not in a “ war ” scenario.
Continuing with Gore Vidal ’ s humorous, but serious, article: “ So, after about five years in the fun house, we partially emerged in January 1950, to find ourselves in a new sort of country. We were also, astonishingly, again at war, this time in Korea. But as Truman-Acheson were nervous about asking Congress for a declaration, the war was called a United Nations police action; and messily lost. Acheson did prepare a memo assuring Truman that hitherto, 87 presidential military adventures had been undertaken without a congressional declaration of war as required by the old Constitution.
There is no escaping the fact that Communism is a Jewish World plot to enslave the True Israelites and to rule over them as kings over slaves! They consider the United States as their land and have thus turned America into an Empire to gain their ultimate plans. Following is the history of the 87 presidential military adventures which have been undertake without a congressional declaration of war.
1912: American troops were sent into China. The disorders which began with the Komintang Rebellion in 1912, was redirected by the invasion of China by Japan and finally ended with the war between Japan and the United States in 1941; and resulted to demonstrations and landing parties for the protection of U.S., interests in China, continuously and at many points from 1912 to 1941. The guard at Peking and along the route to the sea was maintained until 1941. 1927, the United States had 5670 troops in China and 44 Naval Vessels in its waters. In 1933, the U.S., had 3027 armed men ashore. All those protective action was in general terms based on treaties with China dating from 1858 to 1901.
1913: The Sixteenth Amendment was declared to be a part of the Constitution. Then, the stage was set for the financing that would be needed later, by the International Jews, and that financing arrangement was the Income Tax. It was their belief that those who were to be enslaved should themselves pay for their own enslavement.
1913: The Jews were given absolute control of the finances of the United States Government when the Federal Reserve Act, and with it the Federal Reserve System, was set in action. Which guarantees that the United States and its citizens would forever be in debt to the International Jewish bankers, and would guarantee them absolute control over the finances of the United States.
1913: Mexico. A few marines landed at Claria Estero to aid in the evacuation of American citizens and others from the Yaqui Valley, made dangerous for Americans by civil strife.
1914: Haiti: Troops were landed to protect American nations in a time of dangerous civil unrest.
1914: Mexico. The undeclared Mexican/American hostilities following the Dolphin affair and Villa ’ s raids included capture of Vera Cruz and later Perishing ’ s Expedition into Northern Mexico.
1915: Haiti. To maintain order during a period of chronic and threatened insurrection.
1916: China. American forces landed to quell a riot taking place on American property in Nanking.
1916: Dominican Republic. To maintain order during a period of chronic and threatened insurrection.
1917: Two hundred seventy-six trained Jewish revolutionaries; financed by Jacob Scoff, Otto Kahn and Paul Warburg, of Kuhn, Loeb and Co. New York Bankers with Forty-eight million dollars were shipped from New York to Russia to direct and control the overthrow of the Russian Government and establish the first Jewish/Communist State. And to who their power to the world in a quiet way, they passed through Germany, IN A SEALED CAR, with whom we were at war, by the permission of Paul Warburg ’ s brother, who was the Kaiser ’ s Chief of Espionage, and permission of the German Chancellor, Von Bethman-Hollweg (a Jew). Trotsky and Lenin (both Jews) were the leaders. All attempted assassinations and actual assassinations of the Czar and their families were carried out by Jews.
1917: First United States troops in France as America (Because of Jewish deception and propaganda), declared war on Germany on April 6, which was a result of England ’ s promise to the Jews, as stated in the Balfour Declaration. FOR THEIR ASSISTANCE IN ENTICING THE U.S. INTO ENTERING THE WAR ON THE SIDE OF ENGLAND.
1917: China. American troops were landed at Chungking to protect American lives during a political crisis.
1917: Cuba. Troops were landed to protect American interests during an insurrection and subsequent unsettled conditions. After withdrawal of the Perishing expedition, our troops entered Mexico in pursuit of bandits at least three times in 1918 and six in 1919. In August 1918 American and Mexican troops fought at Nogales.
1919: Panama. Supposedly for police duty according to treaty stipulations, at Chiriqual during election disturbances and subsequent unrest.
1918: Soviet Russia. Marines were landed at and near Vladivostok in June and July to protect the American consulate and other points in the fighting between the Bolshevik troops and the Czech Army which had traversed Siberia from the Western Front. A joint proclamation of emergency government and neutrality was issued by the American, Japanese, British, French and Czech Commanders in July and our part remained until late August. In August the project expanded, when 7,000 men were landed in Vladivostok and remained until January 1920, as part of an allied occupation force. In September 1918, 5,000 American troops joined the allied intervention force at Archangel, in support of the Bolshevik Forces, suffered 500 casualties and remained until June 1919. A handful of marines took part earlier in a British landing on the Murman Coast (near Norway) but only incidentally. All these operations were in support of the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia and were partly supported by Bolshevik elements who participated at times with us, but no war was declared, and all operations were under the personal direction of the (Jewish) President Woodrow Wilson and the (Jewish) Bernard Baruch, who had contributed $50,000 to Wilson ’ s election campaign, and was subsequently appointed Head of the War Industrial Board. Baruch spent 10 billion of American money, giving his own companies the choicest contracts on which he also could fix prices, and made himself a multi-millionaire by fleecing the People of the United States (like all Jews when they get the chance). He pretended to be a patriot, while he spent thousands to bring the Communist Church burners back from Spain WHERE THEY BURNED CHRISTIAN RELIGIOUS LEADERS ALIVE AFTER COVERING THEM WITH KEROSENE. (Time Magazine, January 2, 1939)
1918: Dalmatia. U.S. forces were landed at Trav at the request of Italian authorities to police order between the Italians and Serbs.
1918: Honduras. A landing force was sent ashore to maintain order in a natural zone during an attempted revolution.
1920: Armenia, Azerbaidzhan, Byelorussia, Georgia, Kazakh, Kirghy and the Ukraine were brought under Communist Enslavement.
1920: China. A landing force was sent ashore for a few hours to protect lives during a disturbance at Klukiang.
1920: Guatemala. To protect the American Legation and other American interests, such as the cable station, during a period of fighting between Unionists and the Government of Guatemala.
1920: Russia (Siberia). An American Marine guard to protect the United States radio-station and property on Russian Island, Bay of Vladivostok. This avoiding the use of the Radio Station from being used by anti-Bolshevik elements.
1921: Panama/Costa Rica. American naval squadrons demonstrated in April on both sides of the Isthmus to prevent war between the two countries over a boundary dispute.
1922: Turkey. A landing force was sent ashore with the consent of both Greek and Turkish authorities, to protect American lives and property when the Turkish nationalists entered Smyrna.
DO YOU SEE THE PATTERN YET? EVERY TIME, SINCE 1913, SOMEONE THREATENED THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY OR THE INTERNATIONAL BANKING INTERESTS, AMERICAN TROOPS WERE SENT IN NO MATTER WHAT THE CONSEQUENCES IN LOST RESPECT OR AMERICAN LIVES AND WITHOUT CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL.
1922: China. Between April 1922 and November 1923, marines were landed five times to protect Americans during periods of unrest.
1924: Uzbe, Turksen and Outer Mongolia were added to the Communist Block.
1924: Honduras. To protect American lives and interests during election hostilities.
1924: China. Marines were landed to protect Americans and other foreigners in Shanghai during Chinese factional hostilities.
DO NOT BE MISLED! EVERY TIME I MENTION AMERICANS OR OTHER FOREIGN INTERESTS IT IS JEWISH BANKING INTERESTS OR JEWS WE ARE TALKING ABOUT. WE MERELY WISH TO KEEP FROM REPEATING OVER AND OVER AGAIN THE WORDS JEWISH BANKING INTERESTS OR JEWISH INTERESTS. BECAUSE THE ENEMY WILL ONLY USE THE CONTINUED USE OF THESE WORDS TO SCREAM ANTI-SEMITISM!!!
1925: China. Fighting of Chinese factions accompanied by riots and demonstrations in Shanghai necessitated landing American forces to protect lives and property in the International Settlement.
1925: Honduras. To protect foreigners at La Celba during a political upheaval.
1925: Panama. Strikes and rent riots led to the landing of about 500 American troops to keep order and protect American interests.
1926: China. The nationalist attack on Hankow necessitated the landing of American naval forces to protect American Citizens. A small guard was maintained at the disposal of the consulate general even after September 16, when the rest of the forces were withdrawn. Likewise, when Nationalist (anti-Communist) forces captured Klukiang, naval forces were landed ro the protection of foreigners.
1926: Nicaragua. The coup d ’ etat of General Chamorro aroused revolutionary activities landing to the landing of American Marines to protect the interests of the U.S. United States forces came and went, but seem not to have left the country entirely until January 1933. Their work included activity against the outlaw leader Sandino in 1928.
1927: China. Fighting at Shanghai caused American naval forces and marines to be increased there. In March a naval guard was stationed at the American Consulate at Nanking after Nationalist (anti-Communist) forces captured the city. American and British destroyers later used shell fire to protect Americans and other foreigners. Following this incident additional forces of marines and naval vessels were ordered to china and stationed in the vicinity of Shanghai and Tientain.
1932: China. American forces were landed to protect American interests during the Japanese occupation of Shanghai.
1933: Cuba. During a revolution against President Genardo Machado naval forces demonstrated but no landing was made.
1933: Russia. On the verge of economic collapse, was officially recognized by then (Jewish) President Franklin D. Roosevelt, averting the failure of World Communism and PRONOUNCED A DEATH SENTENCE UPON MILLIONS OF EAST EUROPEANS, CHINESE AND OTHER PEOPLE AROUND THE WORLD!
1934: China. Marines landed at Foochow to protect the American Consulate.
1939: The Communist Government under Stalin ’ s rule, was so shaky that the Russian Army was on the verge of being defeated by tiny Finland, at the time one of America ’ s most staunch friends. And with the diversion of just a tiny fraction of the millions of tons of war equipment being shipped to Europe daily, could have saved Finland and dealt a severe blow to Stalin and a death blow to Communism. Then just two years later, when Hitler and the German Army had cleared Eastern Europe of the Bolshevik plague; accepted the eager surrender of millions of Russian solders; was knocking at the door of Moscow Russia ’ s Communist rule was once again on the verge of collapse. America, at the cost of thousands of dead and wounded American Troops, through orders of then President Roosevelt, in an unheard of frenzy, rushed billions in military aid to Russia; Saved Stalin and with one monstrous Satanic Act, saved the entre Communist World offensive from extinction.
1940: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Moldovia were brought under Communist control. Here again with the aid of the United States and under cover of a war the Communists were enabled to spread their enslavement of four more countries.
1940: Newfoundland, Bermuda, St. Lucia, Bahamas, Jamaica, Antigua, Trinidad and British Guiana. Troops were sent to guard air and naval bases obtained by negotiation with Great Britain. These were sometimes called lend-lease bases.
1941: President Roosevelt, re-elected on the promises of keeping America out of the European war, tried repeatedly to entice German submarine commanders into sinking our unarmed merchant ships which were hauling millions of tons of war supplies to German ’ s enemies. ALTHOUGH IT IS STILL A CLOSELY GUARDED SECRET, A BRITISH SUBMARINE, DISGUISED AS A GERMAN U-2 BOAT, WAS CAPTURED FIRING UPON AN AMERICAN SHIP AND WAS TAKEN TO NORFOLK AND THEN QUIETLY RELEASED! Not only that, but, it is a well know fat, Germany did not attack a single American ship, until after the United States entered the war. Unsuccessful in those attempts to entice Germany into attacking America shipping, the Great Traitor Roosevelt (just like most of his religious kindred) turned his attention to Japan where he met with a complete success by setting up our entire Pacific Fleet, he lured the Japanese into attacking Pearl Harbor where more than THREE THOUSAND AMERICAN SERVICE MEN DID; BECAUSE THE JEWISH PRESIDENT ROOSEVELT AND THE INTERNATIONAL JEWISH BANKERS WANTED THE UNITED STATES IN THE WAR!!!
1941: Netherlands (Dutch Guiana). In November the President ordered American troops to occupy Dutch Guiana, by agreement with the Netherlands Government in exile, while Brazil co-operated to protect aluminum ore supplies from the bauxite mines in Surinam.
1941: Iceland. Taken under the protection of the United States, with the consent of its government, for strategic reasons.
1941: Germany. Sometime in early spring of 1941, the President ordered the Navy to patrol ship lanes to Europe. By July U.S. Warships were convoying and by September were attacking German submarines. THIS WAS DONE WITH NO AUTHORIZATION OF CONGRESS OR A DECLARATION OF WAR. In November, the Neutrality Act was partly repealed to protect and allow military aid to Russia and Britain.
1944: This blood bath is not the subject of war crimes investigation. We are reminded at this juncture of Dr. Robert Faurisson ’ s remark that “ war itself is a crime, ” implying the prosecution of individual acts is an exercise in futility. Granted, BUT IF WE ARE TO BE FOREVER THE VICTIMS AND TO BE SUBJECTED TO TRIALS BECAUSE WE ARE RIGHTIST, ANTI-COMMUNIST AND CHRISTIANS, PERHAPS AS A FORM OF SELF DEFENSE WE MAY BE FORGIVEN FOR DESIRING THE TRIALS OF COMMUNIST AND ZIONIST KILLERS.
1945: With the signing of the Yalta Agreement, President Roosevelt, with the blessings of the United States Congress, nine more Eastern European countries were surrendered to Communist enslavement. Those countries were Albania, Bulgaria, Yugoslavia, Poland, Romania, Czechoslovakia, North Korea (The surrender of Japan was deliberately delayed until Russia could secure it), Hungary and East Germany.
1946: Treaty. President Truman ordered augmentation of U.S. Troops along the zonal occupation line and the reinforcement of air forces in northern Italy after Yugoslav forces shot down an unarmed U.S. Army transport plane flying over Venezia Giulia. Earlier U.S. Naval units had been dispatched to the scene.
1948: Palestine. A marine consular guard was sent to Jerusalem to protect the U.S. Consular General.
1948: China. Marines were dispatched to Nanking to protect the American Embassy when the city fell to Communist troops, and to Shanghai to aid in the protection and evacuation of Americans.
1949: President Truman and his administration cut off all supplies to Chiang Kai-Sheik, enabling Mao Tse Tung to slaughter resistance and insure a Communist China.
1949: President Harry Solomon Shiff Truman, who stated that he ” kinda like old Joe (Stalin) ” (and why wouldn ’ t he they were both Jews after the same objective) continued Roosevelt ’ s collaboration with the depraved murderer and refused to accept Japan ’ s pleas for surrender; until Stalin ’ s forces were in a position to claim their booty in the Pacific. Thus setting the stage for the first no win war in American history.
1950: Korea. America responded to North Korean invasion of South Korea by going to its assistance. CONGRESSIONAL AUTHORIZATION WAS NOT SOUGHT. The Korean fiasco aroused American voters who were offered another Jew Dwight D. Eisenhower for President, a soldier whom they believed would surely win that ridiculous war; not understanding that Eisenhower was a Jew and after the same objective as Truman, Stalin and all other Communist leaders. Eisenhower did end the war, but not by wining which could easily have been done, but by yielding to Communist terms and insults he provided the festering sore of a divided Korea (Which will be used at some point in the future to start another no win war); The beginning of “ no win ” engagements all over the world, which demonstrates to those who will stop and look, that THOSE PEOPLE WHO DEPEND UPON THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT IN AN ALLIANCE IS A KISS OF DEATH FOR THEIR FREEDOMS, FOR OUR GOVERNMENT IS UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE ANTI-CHRIST JEWS THE CHILDREN OF SATAN!!! This was also the first time in the history of the world, of any nation, when its military command was forbidden to defeat the enemy.
1951: Tibet was enslaved by Communist China.
1951: China. Naval units evacuated U.S. Civilians and military personnel from the Tschen Islands.
1953: East Berliners rise against Communist rule; is subsequently quelled by Russian tanks, thanks to our American leaders inaction, compliancy and co-operation.
1956: Encouraged and promised support by the United States Government, Heroic Hungarians and Poles struck for freedom from their Communist rulers; then with U.S. State Department assurance that America would not intercede, Russian tanks were dispatched to crush the rebellion. (Then later on in 1978, the United States Government, under the orders of then President Jimmy Carter, added insult to injury, and returned the Crown of St. Stephen, given to the American Government for safe keeping when the Communist came to power in Hungary; The Crown was and is Hungary ’ s symbol of sovereignty, to that hated Communist Government. This was directly against the wishes of the Hungarian People).
1956: Egypt. A marine battalion evacuated U.S. nationals and other persons from Alexandria during the Suez crisis.
1958: Lebanon. Marines were landed in Lebanon at the invitation of its government to help protect against threatened insurrection supported form the outside.
1959: Cuba. Withe the connivance of the U.S. State Department and the American News Media; Fidel Castro overthrew the government of Cuba and installed a Communist dictatorship ninety miles form our Southern Coast.
1959: The Caribbean. The 2nd Marine ground task force was deployed to protect U.S. nationals during the Cuban crisis.
1961: The United States Government trained and transported Cuban exiles for the recapture of their homeland. Then were deliberately abandoned to Castro at the Bay of Pigs. This was just another of the psychological acts performed by our Jewish owned traitorous leaders to install, in the American ’ s mind a feeling of helplessness against Communism.
1962: Cuba. President Kennedy instituted a so-called “ quarantine ” on the shipment of offensive missiles to Cuba from the Soviet Union. He also warned the Soviet Union that the launching of any missile form Cuba against any nation in the Western hemisphere would bring about U.S. nuclear retaliation on the Soviet Union. Thus, a negotiated settlement was achieved a few days later. Knowledge of the Russian missiles in Cuba, against pro-Communist Congressional and Governmental desires, became public knowledge, so President Kennedy was ordered to make a show of military force against Russia. Then reassure the American public with photo displays of objects represented as missile crates allegedly being shipped back to Russia. And only recently have we learned the truth, “ NOT ONLY WERE THE MISSILES LEFT IN CUBA, BUT SO WERE RUSSIAN TROOPS, AND THAT CUBA WAS BUILDING SUBMARINES FOR THE RUSSIANS. ”
1962: Thailand. The 3rd marine expeditionary unit landed in May 17, to support that country during the threat of Communist pressure from outside.
1962: Laos. After years of subsidizing an anti-Communist Laos, Kennedy abruptly ceased all aid. Landed troops which supposedly were to support the government, but were removed and aid restored “ only after ” the Troika Government was installed including one “ Communist ” and one so-called “ neutral ” who was favorable to the Communist.
1962: The Communist Bosch, with U.S. support, was elected president of the Dominican Republic.
1962: Algeria. Turned to the Communists.
1963: Dominican Republic. The military seized power from Juan Bosch, the United States immediately severed diplomatic relations.
1964: Congo. The U.S. sent four transport planes to prove an airlift for Congolese troops during a rebellion and to transport Belgian paratroopers to rescue foreigners.
1964: War in Vietnam: U.S. military advisers had been in South Vietnam for a decade (10 years); they were first sent to Vietnam by then President Eisenhower, and their numbers were increased as military positions of the Saigon Government became weaker. After the attacks on U.S. destroyers in the Tonkin Gulf (which later turned out to be a lie) then President Johnson asked for a resolution expressing U.S. determination to support Freedom and protect peace in Southeast Asia. Congress responded with the Tonkin Gulf Resolution, expressing support of “ all necessary measures ” the President might take to repeal armed attack against U.S. forces and prevent further aggression. Following this resolution and following a Communist attack on a U.S. installation in Central Vietnam, the U.S. escalated its participation in the war.
1965: From his sanctuary in the United States, Juan Bosch directed a Communist rebellion. Then when it was clear that the rebellion would fail President Johnson dispatched American Marines (This was done, almost unknown to the people of America, because of the Vietnam War). After a transparent show of fighting the Communists, Johnson threatened to use those same marines against the ruling anti-Communist Junta, unless it would negotiate with the Communists. Finally the Junta, unable to resist the power of the Zionist Controlled American Government, surrendered power to a coalition government, WHICH, of course, INCLUDED COMMUNIST REPRESENTATION, then and only then did Johnson restore diplomatic relations.
1967: Tanzania. Enslaved by the Communists.
1967: Congo. The U.S. sent three military transport aircraft with crews to provide the Congo Central Government (Which was proven over the years to be Communistic) with logistical support during a revolt.
1967: Israeli aircraft and patrol boats strafed and torpedoed the U.S.S. Liberty in International Waters. It was obvious that it was a deliberate attempt to destroy and sink the Liberty, and if they had been successful, they would no doubt have blamed the Syrians or some other Arab Nation. Thirty-four Americans died, seventy-five wounded and the United States Government did nothing.
1968: North Korea seized the U.S.S. Pueblo, because Washington ordered our fleet commander not to interfere (After all the Jewish master in America had to see to it that their brother Jews in Russia had access to the latest in electronic communication equipment - they don ’ t have to do that now they simply ship them to Russia or China, like the traitors they are). Which resulted in the capture of one of our most advanced technology and classified ships equipment. Simply another slap in the face of America that its Jewish masters.
1968: The Congo Republic and Syria turned to Communist Russia and away from the United States.
1969: South Yemen and Libya fell under Communist influence.
1970: Somalia brought under Communist control.
1971: Guinea brought under Communist control.
1971: Through the support of the United States, the President, with the complacency of Congress; Communist China was admitted to the United Nations and Free China, one of our most stanch allies, was expelled.
1972: Iraq came under Communist influence.
1972: WHILE AMERICANS WERE DYING IN VIETNAM, PRESIDENT NIXON PAID A “ FRIENDLY ” VISIT TO COMMUNIST CHINA. Which constitutes “ Treason ” as defined in the U.S. Constitution. TREASON: “ Shall consist...in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. ” (U.S. Constitution, Section 3) Thus it is clear for ALL to see that President Richard Nixon, COMMITTED TREASON AS DEFINED BY THE CONSTITUTION, and should have been executed for it. As the penalty for TREASON is and should be death!!
Elected in 1968, Richard Nixon continued the Johnson strategy of restrictions and frustrations to our military (IT ’ S ALRIGHT TO KILL A COMMUNIST ONLY AFTER HE HAS KILLED SOME AMERICAN SOLDIERS, IN SOME OTHER PART OF THE WORLD; BUT HERE INSIDE THE UNITED STATES, DUE TO RULINGS FROM ANTI-CHRISTIAN, ANTI-CHRIST, ANTI-AMERICAN FEDERAL JUDGES, WE MUST NOT ONLY CODDLE THESE TRAITORS BUT WE MUST HIRE THEM IN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, AND IN OUR SCHOOLS, THANKS TO THE COMMUNIST PROSTITUTES IN OUR FEDERAL COURTS!!!), and by confining the bulk of the fighting to South Vietnam, this insured that maximum damage would be inflicted on our ally; while at the same time our military leaders were restricted form attacking certain strategic targets in North Vietnam which would have forced the enemy to surrender. Further our soldiers were not allowed to fire upon the enemy, unless first being fired upon, THUS INSURING THE MAXIMUM IN CASUALTIES ON OUR AMERICAN MILITARY MEN.
Then the Jew Henry Kissinger started the long “ negotiating ” process with North Vietnam and Red China, while our sons, brothers and dads died in the Vietnam jungles (KILLED BY WEAPONS BOUGHT AND PAID FOR BY OUR INCOME TAX MONEY!) Kissinger leisurely wined and dined with his Communist friends, while President Nixon “ wound down ” the war by surrendering billions in our most sophisticated war equipment to the enemy; must as the Traitor Truman did at the end of World War II, when he had shipped billions in weapons and military equipment to North Vietnam giving them the means to start and wage a war against the United States.
1973: Afghanistan, Zambia and Equatorial Guinea were brought under virtual communist control.
1973: The United States abandoned Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos to the Communist for slaughter. Millions were massacred, with not one single peep from those responsible for this, the Jane Fondas ’ , Tom Haydens and other TRAITORS who were/are directly responsible for this mass murder of millions, by the Communists after they took control.
1974: Evacuation from Cyprus. United States Naval forces evacuated U.S. civilians during hostilities between Turkish and Greek Cypriot forces.
1975: While Guinea-Bissau, Cambodia, Laos and South Vietnam were being enslaved; President Ford, flanked by Henry Kissinger, signed the Helsinki Accord agreeing to permanent Communist enslavement of all Eastern Europe.
1977: President Carter signed the Panama Canal give-away treaty.
1978: Nicaragua. With the help of the U.S. State Department fell to the Communist.
1978: In total disregard of the overwhelming objections, more than two-thirds of our Senators, whose oaths of office promise loyalty to the United States of America and obedience to the provision of our Constitution, sanctioned the unconstitutional disposition of sovereign American Territory - The Panama Canal, well knowing that their deed provided a tremendous boast to the Communist aim of encircling and isolating our nation, setting the stage for the conquest of our Latin Neighbors.
1978: The House of Represented bowed of the dictates of the Consortium of World Jewish Bankers and Communists by approving the funding of the Panama Canal give-away, actually agreeing to pay Panama ’ s Marxist rulers to accept our gift. That gift, by the way, was used to pay off the International Jewish Bankers whose loans to panama financed the installation and maintenance of their Communist Regime.
THINK ABOUT IT, WHAT DOES IT TAKE TO CONVINCE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, AS IS CLEARLY SHOWN BY THE FOREGOING, ALMOST EVERYTHING OUR LEADERS HAVE DONE SINCE PRESIDENT TAFT, HAS PROMOTED COMMUNISM. LOOK AT A CONSOLIDATION OF THE FACTS. WASHINGTON:
1). Through Lend Lease saved Russia during World War II at the expense of thousands of American service men ’ s lives.
2). Deserted and disarmed Chian Kai-Sheik, thus enabling Communist forces to take over China.
3). Prevented General Douglas MacArthur from winning the war against a Communist enemy in Korea.
4). Denied United States forces a victory against a Communist enemy in Vietnam.
5). Broke its word to the Taiwanese and has virtually deserted over 17 million anti-Communist Chinese to the Communist gangsters on the mainland of China.
6). Ignoring the Monroe Doctrine, surrendered Cuba to the Communist and under the control of a foreign government; Russia.
7). Gave up the Panama Canal to the Communist terrorists and paid a Marxist (Jewish) Dictator to take it; and have in recent years allowed the Communist Chinese to take control of American naval bases on each end of the Canal.
8). Boycotted Rhodesia and would settle for nothing less than to have a known Communist as the President.
9). Boycotted South Africa and would settle for nothing less than the surrender to Jewish controlled Communist Blacks. Which permitted the Communists to gain control of the Horn of Africa and other strategic places that control the shipping lanes, from the Mideast oil fields, to Europe, Japan and the United States.
10). Aided and abetted the fall of the Sha of Iran, which has placed major oil supplies in danger of a Soviet takeover, and raised the threat of another “ no win war ” in the Middle-East.
11). Aided and abetted the fall of Nicaragua to Communist terrorists.
12). Through the Central Intelligence Agency have all but given El Salvador to the Communists.
13). Attacked Lybia under the excuse of stopping terrorism around the world. But in reality is just another scheme dreamed up by the Jewish Zionists to get America into the Middle-East conflict militarily.
14). Attacked Guani under the pretext of saving American college students.
15). Attacked Panama under the pretext of capturing Noriega.
16). Attacked Iraq under the pretense of liberating Kawait.
Since 1950 the United States has fought perhaps a hundred overt and covert wars. None was declared by the nominal representative of the American People in Congress Assembled, they had meekly turned over to the executive their principal great power, to wage war. That was the end of that Constitution.
As it will take at least a decade for us to reinvent China as a new evil empire, the moon is in a state of pause over the old fairground. We are entering a phase undreamed of by those ‘ present at the creation ’ of the empire. Although many still reflexively object to the world ‘ empire, ’ we have military bases in every continent, as well as 10 abroad the aircraft carrier called the United Kingdom. For 50 years we have supported too many tyrants, overthrown too many democratic governments, wasted too much of our own money in other people ’ s civil wars to pretend that we ’ re just helping out all those poor little folks all round the world who love freedom and democracy just as we do. (Can you name just one country which gained its freedom from either communism or tyranny whenever the US intervened? No because there are none, in fact just the opposite has occurred-WM) When the Russians stabbed us in the back by folding their empire in 1991, we were left with many misconceptions about ourselves and, rather worse, about the rest of the world. ”
Mr. Vidal then goes on to show that there have been several books written on this subject of The American Empire which was created starting at the end of World War II. Some of these books were critical of such an effort but they were ignored because after all “ Truman was a staunch anti-communist!! ” (What a damnable lie!) Or was he really? If we take into account the excellent article by Henry Lamb on Social Democracies which we reported at the beginning of this issue, maybe we can evaluate this a little differently. Mr. Lamb shows that a social democracy is close to communism. The whole world is rapidly moving toward social democracies. The United States is the official policeman of the world insisting on social democracy. It sounds like an empire consisting of social democracies. Isn ’ t that what both Greece and Rome were, even though Rome called itself a Republic.
One such book which is critical of Truman ’ s concept is “ NATO and the Korean War: A Context ” by Walter LaFeber. As Mr. Vidal describes the contents of LaFeber ’ s book, “ ..But the link between universities and imperial Washington has always been a strong one as Kissingers dart back and forth between classroom to high office to even higher, lucrative eminence, as lobbyists for foreign powers, often hostile to our interests. ” He then shows that the book “ Drawing the Line ” by Carolyn Eisenbert, is a step-by-step description of the years 1944-1949, when we restored, re-armed, and reintegrated our German province into our Western Europe. ”
In building the American Empire in accordance with the intent in Michael Higger ’ s book “ The Jewish Utopia, ” we reneged with nearly everybody. In our blind effort to make use of Germany, that nation is in a very strange state of limbo among the other Western nations. Walter LaFeber ’ s “ NATO and the Korean War: A Context ” as well as the book “ Drawing the Line ” by Caroline Eisenberg are not considered the politically correct reading for our public.
Gore Vidal writes, “ For those who feel that Eisenberg dwells to much on American confusions and mendacities (a lie, a falsehood-ed), there is always the elegant Robert H. Ferrel on “ The Formation of the Alliance, ” 1948-1949. A court historian, as apologists for empire are known, Ferrell does his best with Harry Truman, reminding us of all the maniacs around him who wanted atomic war at the time of Korea...At one point, Ferrell notes that Truman actually gave thought to the sufferings of women and children should we go nuclear in Korea. As for Truman ’ s original decision to sue two atomic bombs on Japan, most now agree that a single demonstration would have been quite enough to cause a Japanese surrender... ” Returning to our statement earlier, “ History also shows that it takes something unusual, something extraordinary, in the military power structure to create an empire. Those whom you want to conquer must be so awe-struck with your military prowess that they will readily submit... ”
Then a very powerful statement was made by Mr. Vidal: “ The climate of intimidation that began with the loyalty oath of 1947 remains with us even though two American generations have been born h no particular knowledge of what the weather was like before the great freeze and the dramatic change in our form of government. No thorough history of what actually happened to us and to the world 1945-1997 has yet appeared. There are interesting glances at this or that detail. There are also for too many silly hagiographies (a writing or study of the lives of the saints - ed) of gallant little guy Truman and super statesman George Marshall, who did admit to Acheson that he had no idea what on earth the plan in his name was really about. But aside from all the American and foreign dead from Korea to Vietnam, from Guatemala to the Persian Gulf, the destruction of our old republic ’ s institutions has been the great hurt. Congress has surrendered to the executive not only the first of its great powers, but the second, the power of the purse, looks to be up for grabs as Congress is forcing more money on the Pentagon than even that black hole has asked for, obliging the executive to spend many hot hours in the vast kitchen where the books are forever cooking in bright-red ink. As for our Ouija-board Supreme Court, it would be nice if they would take time off from holding seances with the long-dead founders, whose original intent so puzzles them, and actually examine what the founders wrought, the Constitution itself and the Bill of Rights. ”
We have become “ The Great Satan ” to the greater portion of the world, because of our support for the anti-Christ, anti-Christian and anti-American Jews. Those whom we classify as “ enemies ” want us destroyed. Why? The biggest single reason is our incessant pursuit of empire along the lines of Michael Higger ’ s book.
Those whom we classify as our friends also want us to disband the idea of empire. Gore Vidal discusses that too. He writes, “ In the wake of the Madrid NATO summit, it is time for the United States to step away from Europe; gracefully. Certainly the Europeans think it is time for us to go, as their disdainful remarks at Denver betrayed, particularly when they were warned not to walk more than a block or two from their hotels for fear of being robbed, maimed, murdered. Yet why do we persist in holding on to empire?
“ Cherchez la monnaie (looking for money -ed), as the clever French say. Ever since 1941, when Roosevelt got us out of the Depression by pumping federal money int re-arming for war or the threat of war has been the principal engine to our society. Now the war is over. Or is it? Can we afford to give up our-well, cozy unremitting war? Why not-ah, the brilliance, the simplicity; instead of shrinking, expand our phantom empire in Europe by popping everyone into NATO?...With an expanded NATO, or arms, makers; if not workers, are in for a bonanza...Upon joining NATO, the lucky new club member is obliged to buy expensive weapons from the likes of Lockheed Martin, recently merged with Northrop Gumman. Since the new members have precarious economies, the American taxpayer, will have to borrow ever more money to foot the bill, which the Congressional Budget Office says should come to $125 billion over 15 years with the U.S. paying $19 billion. Yeltsin correctly sees this as a hostile move against Russia.
There comes a moment when empires cease to exert energy and become symbolic. The current wrangling over NATO demonstrates what a quandary a symbolic empire is in when it lacks the mind, much less the resources, to impose its hegemony upon former client states. At the end, entropy gets us all. ”
Then, Mr. Vidal closes with this thought which is one of the important features of a falling empire. “ The optimum economic unit in the world is not the city-state. Thanks to technology, everyone knows or can know something about everyone else on the planet...In the next century, barring accident, the common market in Europe will evolve not so much into a union of ancient bloodstained states as a mosaic of homogenous regions and city-states like Milan, say, each loosely linked in trade with a clearinghouse information center at Brussels to orchestrate finance and trade and the policing of cartels, Basques, Britons, Walloons, Scots who want to be rid of onerous nation-states should be let go in order to pursue and even-why not?-overtake happiness, the goal, or so we Americans have always pretended to believe, of the human enterprise. ” That is the end of Gore Vidal ’ s very interesting and revealing article.
The signs of a falling empire have always been the same. The Roman Empire has always been considered the classic example but all of them exhibited the same signs. The multitude of people from all of the colonies of the empire flood into the controlling state. The incessant cry then is for “ bread and circuses ” with the ensuing welfare state. Which is the inevitable end of all empires and the proof that multi-cultural nations are a complete failure; for many of the foreigners like the black, Mexicans, and others cannot hold onto a civilization once they get it because they don ’ t have the ability to do so. Once the White Man is gone, so the civilization disappears and the people revert back to paganism.
The money system is then debased and the taxes become astronomical which in turn causes the producers (The farms, ranches, factories) to quit and go into the cities for the bread and circuses.
The positions of government are purchased using the wealth of the monied class. The “ elected ” members of government are then indebted to the monied class which, in turn, further reduces the living standards of the average citizen. The rich get richer and the poor get poorer.
Finally, the morals of the once powerful empire are reduced to that of the lowest standards of the many classes of immigrants living in the country. Morals, like anything else, seek the lowest common denominator.
Pompeii, for example, was once a classic Roman city. It was the home of well-to-d0 Roman citizens and was a model for the world. Mount Vesuvius erupted in 79 A.D., and destroyed the city with a deep blanket of ash. It has been recently excavated and the signs of immorality were everywhere. Human bodies were excavated in amazingly good condition with the immorality being obvious. Sings and artifacts also depicted the moral standards of this once “ show place ” of the roman Empire. The fall of the Grecian Empire was similar. Homosexuality was rampant and it is taught that even the Olympiads were affected by that immorality.
Then finally, with a total lack of good government, the empires fall into a city-state arrangement such as Mr. Vidal depicts as the current “ optimum economic state. ” Anyone with an ordinary deductive sense will realize that “ civilization ” under such an arrangement is simply starting all over again. The city-state arrangement lasts just about long enough for another “ big, bully, kid on the block ” to conquer these city-states and make them into a “ nation-state ” and then into an empire.
What is wrong with all of this? Everyone in power wants to exclude God ’ s Rules. Each wanna-be conqueror intends to be god and make the laws and totally ignore the one and only Rule Book, the Bible.
Our understanding of God ’ s system is the nation-state with the system of law clearly delineated in the Book of Deuteronomy. God ’ s definition of “ nation ” refers to ethnic nationality. The word “ nation ” means nationality and it is ethnic based. You can have a “ nation of law ” ONLY if it is based on ethnicity and God ’ s Laws, Statutes and Judgments. Congress, if it works properly, does not make law. Congress can only convert God ’ s Laws into meaningful modern language.
Our once great Christian Republic has now turned into a Social Democracy and with the tumidity of wanting an empire all of its own. The outcome was predictable many years ago.
Chapter 28 of the Book of Deuteronomy tells it exactly as it is. We are now living the proof of God ’ s Words found in that chapter. But so many churches will tell us, “ But according to Paul, the Laws, Statutes and Judgments are done away with. ” Well, then, why is everything as found in that chapter coming to pass and for the very reasons that god said they would? It ’ s like the debate over “ The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. ” If those protocols were declared a forgery, why have all of the things depicted in them come to pass?
Finally, God told us in Deuteronomy 28:63: “ And it shall come to pass, that as the LORD rejoiced over you to do you good, and to multiply you; so the LORD will rejoice over you to destroy you, and to bring you to nought; and ye shall be plucked from off the land whither thou goest to possess it. ”
In case anyone wants to excuse the word “ rejoice ” in that passage, it is the word soos, or sece in the Hebrew and it means to be glad, joy, mirth. Would God do that? In Isaiah 45:5-7 we read: “ I am the LORD, and there is none else, there is no God beside me: I girded thee, though thou hast not known me: That they may know from the rising of the sun, and from the west, that there is none beside me. I am the LORD, and there is none else. I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things. ” We are to keep God ’ s Laws in our government. He will not tolerate anything less. Jesus said, “ If you love me, keep my commandments. ” (John 14:15) Those are the same Laws no matter how much society wants to renege on them just so we can do it our way instead of God ’ s.
These are words of wisdom, if you are a Christian, then do what Christ said: “ If you live me, keep my commandments. ” For if you do not then you are no Christian no matter what you or others say. We leave you with this prayer, and we don ’ t care one bit what those who are not followers of Christ say about prayers against our enemies: “ May Almighty God remove our enemies as for as the East is from the West, and let their names be blotted out of the Book of the Living. In Christ ’ s name. Amen. (Taken in part from Christian Crusade For Truth, by Pastor Earl F. Jones, HC 66 Box 39, Deming, NM 88030, (505) 895-5365; and from Military Actions over the years from Army Historical Records; Review of the News and American Opinion, by the John Birch Society)