Mixing, Mixing, by Reed Benson: There exists in our time unbelievable social pressure to legitimize the mixture of the races. In an attempt to “Manufacture” a Bible basis for such activity, many strategies are employed. One such tactic has been to redefine Biblical terminology in such a way as to make racial admixture acceptable. The word “kind” is being disconnected from its proper historic and Biblical context to achieve the goal of racial amalgamation.
“We will..Forbid the Whites to mate with Whites. The White Women must cohabit with members of the dark races, the White Men with black women. Thus the White Race will disappear, for the mixing of the dark with the White means the end of the White Man, and our most dangerous enemy will become only a memory. (From Rabbi Rabinovich’s speech of January 12th, 1952 - added by WM)
It is becoming a commonly held opinion that it is impossible for two different “kinds” to produce an offspring. Therefore, it is suggested that if offspring can be begotten from two living organisms, the parent creatures mus be of the same kine. This view would suggest that “kind after kind” (Genesis 1:11-25) is a law that is impossible to break. It is an interesting theory, but a wrong one, for Biblical evidence places the parameters of “kind” as something narrower.
In the natural world, it is plain that lions and tigers virtually never mate, and the same can be said of cattle with buffalo and many other examples. However, craven man (especially those how hate being white, and thus hate all white men - WM) cleverly seeks to become god and force “new kinds” to appear.
Scripture indicates that two different “kinds” can indeed be forced tp produce offspring. Note Leviticus 19:19: “ye shall keep my statutes. Thou shalt not let thy cattle gender with a diverse kind...” Obviously, if God gave a statute forbidding such activity, then it must be possible. In fact, it is a safe assumption that if God bothered to promulgate such a statute, it had already occurred in the past or was likely to in the future. The crossing of cattle with buffalo would be a well-known example. Less common, yet in existence is the liger, a cross of lion and tiger. These are clear violations of “kind after kind,” yet it is plainly possible from a physiological point of view that offspring can be produced. Note also, that unlike mules, sterility is not always a consequence. Thus, sterile offspring are not the earmark that can be used as a crutch to define ‘kind.”
Genesis 6:1-4 should be considered in this light as an example of angel-kind mixing with mankind to produce a spurious “kind.” Observing verse 4, we read: “There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of god came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.” Here is the mixing of two different “kinds” that did not result in sterility; rather, a new race of “mixed-kind” creatures was brought forth. Jude 6-7 proves that Sodom and Gomorrah practiced the same sin as these fallen angels, going after strange flesh: “And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day. Even as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.”
Is it any coincidence that we see the sin of sodomy rising dramatically in our time simultaneous to race-mixing? Furthermore, consider the judgment that God declares He will bring upon Israel in Jeremiah 31:27: “Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, that I will sow the house of Israel and the house of Judah with the seed of man, and with the seed of beast.” Whatever one believes about “beasts,” this “beast” is certainly another “kind” than Israelites. The only reasonable way to interpret this passage and maintain context is if the seed of man are descendants of Adam other than Israelites, and the seed of “beast” is another race.
Traditional barriers of what is proper and possible concerning the mixing of different “kinds” will continue to fall. Now that gene splicing and cloning are no longer confined to the realm of science fiction, we can expect to see within a matter of years new and monstrous creatures come forth from our laboratories. Headless mice are already being produced (they cannot live beyond birth, but that problem is being worked on). Scientists find the gene that tells the embryo to produce a head and then simply delete it. A few researchers are arguing that this technology could be applied to humans, with the aim of harvesting their organs. Transplanting animal organs into humans has already been attempted, and within a short time will likely become a successful and morally accepted procedure. Although there may be some good that has potentially been reaped in agriculture in the area of genetic research, we are generally embarking into an era that would make Doctor Frankenstein green with envy. While most people are comfortable with beefalo and ligers, creatures such as centaurs and satyrs may not always be confined to legend and lore.
As the moral and ethical principles of our society continue to be assaulted, let us not fool ourselves into thinking that everything that is biologically possible is necessarily acceptable in the eyes of god. The mixing of the races is as surely a violation of “kind after kind” as the mixing of biped and quadruped.