There is a people upon the earth who constitute the family of God, set apart from others by various characteristics, most especially by a spiritual capacity to know God. A glance at the races of the world during the last four thousand years shows that it has been one people who has had a continual, on-going relationship with Him Who created all.

These are the people Isaiah was speaking of when he said:

“Woe to the rebellious children, saith the LORD, that take counsel, but not of me; and that cover with a covering, but not of my spirit, that they may add sin to sin: That walk to go down into Egypt, and have not asked at my mouth; to strengthen themselves in the strength of Pharaoh, and to trust in the shadow of Egypt! Therefore shall the strength of Pharaoh be your shame, and the trust in the shadow of Egypt your confusion. For his princes were at Zoan, and his ambassadors came to Hanes. They were all ashamed of a people that could not profit them, nor be an help nor profit, but a shame, and also a reproach. The burden of the beasts of the south: into the land of trouble and anguish, from whence come the young and old lion, the viper and fiery flying serpent, they will carry their riches upon the shoulders of young asses, and their treasures upon the bunches of camels, to a people that shall not profit them. For the Egyptians shall help in vain, and to no purpose: therefore have I cried concerning this, Their strength is to sit still. Now go, write it before them in a table, and note it in a book, that it may be for the time to come for ever and ever: That this is a rebellious people, lying children, children that will not hear the law of the LORD: Which say to the seers, See not; and to the prophets, Prophesy not unto us right things, speak unto us smooth things, prophesy deceits: Get you out of the way, turn aside out of the path, cause the Holy One of Israel to cease from before us.” (Isaiah 30:1‑11)

It is from this people that we got the Bible which conveys the intent of God for not only His family but for all those who live upon the earth. It is this people which has demonstrated in a thousand ways that it has a relationship with God not known by others.

A reading of the Old Testament removes all doubt that of the people upon the earth, God enjoys the relationship He has in the intimacy of His own family. That He is Creator of all we must affirm. But that He is Father of a single seed line we cannot deny, because the evidence in Scripture is abundant. We shall discover this seed line and follow its course through the Old Testament.

It is not this writer’s purpose to solve all the problems in the Genesis account of Creation. These problems are difficult at best, and to claim total understanding is to enter an area of dogmatism which precludes further enlightenment. Perhaps we simply do not have enough revelation to bring total understanding. Then, perhaps we simply do not have enough understanding of what has been revealed.

There are bits of revelation throughout Scripture which, if applied correctly, help us in our understanding of the Scripture as a whole. Let us look at one example. Somewhere in the first two chapters of Genesis an important even took place which is not recorded there; the advent of Satan. That the event is not recorded in Genesis chapters one and two is no reason to deny the event because Scripture elsewhere tells of it.

Let us see, Ezekiel reads:

"Thus says the Lord GOD, ‘You had the seal of perfection, full of wisdom and perfect in beauty. ‘You were in Eden, the garden of God; every precious stone was your covering: the ruby, the topaz and the diamond; the beryl, the onyx and the jasper; the lapis lazuli, the turquoise and the emerald; and the gold, the workmanship of your settings and sockets, was in you. On the day that you were created they were prepared. ‘You were the anointed cherub who covers, and I placed you {there.} You were on the holy mountain of God; you walked in the midst of the stones of fire. ‘You were blameless in your ways from the day you were created until unrighteousness was found in you. ‘By the abundance of your trade you were internally filled with violence, and you sinned; therefore I have cast you as profane from the mountain of God. And I have destroyed you, O covering cherub, from the midst of the stones of fire. ‘Your heart was lifted up because of your beauty; you corrupted your wisdom by reason of your splendor. I cast you to the ground...’” (Ezekiel 28:12‑17)

It would appear that Satan was created perfect, blameless and placed in the Garden of god. This Garden of God was Eden. This is interesting because it is in Eden where our racial understanding has its source. We shall soon learn, the unrighteousness which caused Satan’s sin, and because of it he was cast down.

In Luke, Jesus told the 70 returning laborers:

“...I was watching Satan fall from heaven like lightning.” (Luke 10:18; John 12:31; 16:11;  Revelation 12:8-9)

Here Jesus adds his credibility to the Scripture found in Ezekiel.

The prophet Isaiah adds measurably to our understanding of this event:

“How you have fallen from heaven, O star of the morning, son of the dawn! You have been cut down to the earth, you who have weakened the nations! But you said in your heart, I will ascend to heaven; I will raise my throne above the stars of God, and I will sit on the mount of assembly in the recesses of the north. I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will make myself like the Most High. Nevertheless you will be thrust down to Sheol, to the recesses of the pit.” (Isaiah 14:12-15)

Satan’s sin becomes evident here. His splendor described in Ezekiel put him on the greatest ego trip the universe has ever known:

“I will ascend to heaven...I will raise my throne above...I will sit on the mount...I will ascend above the heights...I will make myself like the Most High.”; the downfall of Satan! God threw him out of heaven;

“And there was war in heaven, Michael and his angels waging war with the dragon. And the dragon and his angels waged war, and they were not strong enough, and there was no longer a place found for them in heaven. And the great dragon was thrown down, the serpent of old who is called the devil and Satan, who deceives the whole world; he was thrown down to the earth, and his angels were thrown down with him.” (Revelation 12:7-9)

In the oldest writing in Scripture, we learn from the book of Job,

“And the Lord said to Satan, From where do you come? Then Satan answered the Lord and said, From roaming about on the earth and walking around on it.” (Job 1:7)

Satan was forced out of heaven and henceforth lives on the earth. Peter confirms this in the New Testament:

“Your adversary, the devil, prowls about like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour.” (1 Peter 5:8)

Other Scriptures in both the Old and the New Testaments tell further of Satan’s activities, his authority and powers, and his final destruction. For our purpose, the Scriptures used here suffice to establish the advent of Satan on earth somewhere before Genesis 3:1.

Even though it was not reported here, other scripture references give ample evidence that the event most assuredly took place. This is a prime principle which we must acknowledge and accept, that the whole of Scripture testifies to all parts of Scripture. This principle is clearly evident in the case of Satan’s advent; it is evident and necessary in other cases which we shall soon see.

There is an all-out war of words being waged in the circles of the Israel Truth, otherwise known as the Israel Identity. Parties on both sides of the issue have drawn a line in the sand, and ideological clenched fists are being shaken from indignant participants. Each participant, in his own way, is trying his best (or maybe his worst), in the most brutal manner, to draw ideological blood. They are aiming their rhetorical cutting words for no less than the proverbial jugular vein of their opponents in order to kill what they believe are damming heretical influences.

Both sides go to long and contentious lengths in an attempt to prove their undying convictions on this subject. To these opposing adherents, there is no common middle ground for compromise, nor can there ever be any. This is a matter where one is either totally correct or totally wrong; no gray middle areas.

Many simply do not have a complete knowledge of this subject, but will find themselves eventually, on one side of the fence or the other. If one tries to straddle the fence on this subject, he will only find himself with his pants torn, and espoused in the most unseemly location. Like all controversies, there is usually a right and a wrong side to consider. And of course the Jews are throwing in their provocateurs to cause continued friction between the two sides, to the point that neither side will relent even a little in their core beliefs. In this study we will be considering who is wrong on this GREATEST OF ALL ISSUES, at least some believe that it is the greatest of all issues.

The First Jews:

First let us make it abundantly clear that there were no Jews prior to the 1700s, for the letter “J” had not been invented prior to that time. “J: This letter has been added to the English Alphabet in modern days; the letter I being written formerly in words where J is now used. It seems to have had the sound of y, in many words, as it still has in the German. The English sound of this letter may be expressed by dsh, or edth. A compound sound coinciding exactly with of g, in genius; the French , with the articulation d preceding it. It is the tenth letter of the English Alphabet. (Noah Webster’s First Edition of an American Dictionary of the English Language 1828 Edition)

Genesis 5:2‑3:

“Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created. And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth.”

Please note that neither Cain nor Able is mentioned in Adam’s line. Therefore, we can conclude from this that neither Cain nor Able were Adam’s children. For if they had God certainly would have instructed that they be noted as such.

False Doctrine Placed in the Scriptures

                 By Kenite Scribes

In the Books of The Chronicles we find recorded there the names and the genealogies of the Tribes of Israel and where their portions of the inheritance is listed.

“These were the sons of Caleb the son of Hur, the firstborn of Ephratah; Shobal the father of Kirjath‑jearim, Salma the father of Bethlehem, Hareph the father of Beth‑gader. And Shobal the father of Kirjath‑jearim had sons; Haroeh, and half of the Manahethites. And the families of Kirjath‑jearim; the Ithrites, and the Puhites, and the Shumathites, and the Mishraites; of them came the Zareathites, and the Eshtaulites. The sons of Salma; Bethlehem, and the Netophathites, Ataroth, the house of Joab, and half of the Manahethites, the Zorites. ‘AND’ THE FAMILIES OF THE SCRIBES which dwelt at Jabez; the Tirathites, the Shimeathites, and Suchathites. THESE ARE THE KENITES that came of Hemath, the father of the house of Rechab.” (1 Chronicles 2:50-55)

Other genealogies in the Bible go into great detail and never leaves out a son! (Especially a firstborn son) If one reads Genesis 4:1 correctly, as depicted, it is not there either. Why is Cain totally left out?? Cain's descendants are mentioned separately in Genesis 4:17‑24 and it doesn't list Adam as the father of Cain! WHY???

The next place we find Cain in the Scriptures is Genesis 15:19 and we will have to read verses 18 through 21:

"In the same day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates: The Kenites, and the Kenizzites, and the Kadmonites, And the Hittites, and the Perizzites, and the Rephaims, And the Ammonites, and the Canaanites, and the Girgashites, and the Jebusites." (Genesis 15:18‑21) (KJV)

One of these nations among the Canaanites was the KENITES (#7017 Strong's) which were DESCENDANTS OF CAIN. Being that Cain was of the SATANIC SEEDLINE, he would infect his satanic blood AMONG ALL THESE TEN NATIONS. And the "Kenizzites" were Edomites.

In the Peake's Commentary on the bible, page 116 we find this about this mixed group of nations spoken of in Genesis 15:19‑21:

"When the Israelites entered Canaan they found there a VERY MIXED population generally designated by the term Amorite or Canaanite."

The Adam Clarke's Commentary on the Bible, Abridged by Ralph Earle, page 38, says: "The Kenites. Here are ten nations mentioned, though afterwards reckoned but seven; see Deuteronomy 7:1; Acts 13:19. Probably some of them which existed in Abram's time had been BLENDED with others before the time of Moses, so that seven only out of the ten then remained."

Kenites: "[KEE nights] (metalsmiths)‑‑ the name of a wandering tribe of people who were associated with the Midianites (Judges 1:16) and, later, with the Amalekites (1 Samuel 15:6). The Kenites lived in the desert regions of Sinai, Midian, Edom, Amalek, and the Negev. The Bible first mentions the Kenites as one of the groups that lived in Canaan during the time of Abraham (Genesis 15:19); their territory was to be taken by the Israelites (Numbers 24:21‑22). The Kenites were metal craftsmen who may have traced their ancestry to TUBAL‑CAIN (a descendant of Cain) (Genesis 4:22). (from Nelson's Illustrated Bible Dictionary) (Copyright (C) 1986, Thomas Nelson Publishers)

The Wycliff Bible Commentary, editors: Charles F. Pfeiffer & Everett F. Harrison has this to say on page 8, and this quote will cover Genesis 3:14‑15: "CURSED (arûr) ART THOU. The Lord singled out the originator and instigator of the temptation for special condemnation and degradation. From that moment he must crawl in the dust and even feed on it. He would slither his way along in disgrace, and hatred would be directed against him from all directions. Man would always regard him as a symbol of the degradation of the one who slandered God (cf. Isaiah 65:25).

HE WAS TO REPRESENT NOT MERELY THE SERPENT RACE, BUT THE POWER OF THE EVIL KINGDOM. As long as life continued, men would hate him and seek to destroy him. I WILL PUT ENMITY. The word "êbâ" denotes the blood‑feud that runs deepest in the heart of man (cf. Numbers 35:19‑20; Ezekiel 25:15‑17; 35:5‑6) THOU SHALT BRUISE (shûp).

A PROPHECY OF CONTINUING STRUGGLE BETWEEN THE DESCENDANTS OF WOMAN AND OF THE SERPENT TO DESTROY EACH OTHER. The verb shûp is rare (cf. Job 9:17; Psalm 139:11). It is the same in both clauses.

“When translated ‘crush’ it seems appropriate to the reference concerning the had of the serpent, but not quite so accurate in also rendered lie in wait for, aim at or (LXX) watch for. The Vulgate renders it "conteret," "bruise" in the first instance and in this famous passage, CALLED THE PROTEVAGEFIUM, ‘FIRST GOSPEL,’ the announcement of a prolonged struggle, perpetual antagonism, wounds on both sides, and eventual victory for the seed of the woman. “God's promise that the head of the serpent was to be crushed pointed forward to the coming of Messiah and guaranteed victory. Thus assurance fell upon the ears of God's earliest creatures as a blessed hope of redemption."

The Zondervan Pictorial Encyclopedia of the Bible, Volume 3, page 782: "KENITES: Meaning (metalworkers, smiths). Clan or tribal name of semi‑nomadic peoples of South Palestine and Sinai. The Aramaic and Arabic etymologis of the root ‘gyn’ show that it has to do with metal and metal word (thus the Hebrew word from this root, ‘lance’). This probably indicates that the Kenites were metal workers, especially since Sinai and wadi ‘arabah were rich in high grade cooper ore. W.F. Albright has pointed to the Beni Hassan mural in Egypt (19th century B.C.)

“As an illustration of such a WONDERING GROUP OF SMITHS. This mural depicts thirty‑six men, women and children in characteristic Semitic dress leading along with other animals, donkeys laden with MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS, weapons and an item which Albright has identified as a BELLOWS.

He has further noted that Lemech's three children (Genesis 4:19‑22) were responsible for HEARDS (Jubal), MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS (Jubal), and METAL WORK (Tubal‑Cain, or Tubal, THE SMITH), the three occupations which seem most evident in the mural...2nd quote from the same article: THE EARLY MONARCHY. During this period a significant concentration of Kenites was located in the southern Judean territory. This is clear from 1 Samuel 15:6 cited above and also from David's relations with them.”

Postexilic references. In 1 Chronicles 2:55 the FAMILIES OF THE SCRIBES living at Jabaz are said to be Kenites. Apparently, during the kingdom and exile periods, certain Kenites had given up NOMADIC SMITHING and had taken on a more sedentary, but equally honorable PROFESSION (?) OF SCRIBE.

Peake's Commentary on the Bible, page 114: "The etymology of the name suggest THAT THEY WERE SMITHS OR ARTIFICERS, a theory which is supported by their association with the Wadi ‘Arabah, where there were copper deposits which had been worked by the Egyptians since the middle of the 3rd millennium.

The Jamieson, Fausset & Brown Commentary On The Whole bible has this to say on Kenite, page 293: "THE FAMILIES OF THE SCRIBES; either civil or ecclesiastical officers of the Kenite origin, WHO ARE HERE CLASSIFIED WITH THE TRIBE OF JUDAH, NOT AS BEING DESCENDED FROM IT, but as dwellers within its territory, and in a measure INCORPORATED with its people."

The Matthew Pool's Commentary On The Holy Bible has this to say on the Kenites, Volume 1, page 778:

"THE SCRIBES; either civil, WHO WERE PUBLIC NOTARIES, WHO WROTE AND SIGNED LEGAL INSTRUMENTS; OR ECCLESIASTICAL...and are here mentioned not as if they were of the tribe of Judah, but because thy dwelt among them, and probably were allied to them by marriages, and so in a manner incorporated with them. Which dwelt, or rather, dwelt; Hebrew, were dwellers. For the other translation, which dwelt, MAY SEEM TO INSINUATE THAT THESE WERE DESCENDANTS OF JUDAH, WHICH THEY WERE NOT; but his translation ONLY SIGNIFIES COHABITATION WITH THEM, for which cause they are here named with them.”

All these things the Jews do today, here in America. And because Christians have listened to the lying, deceiving, traitorous, Priests of Baal, the Judeo-Christian Clergy they have almost destroyed our nation and are fast destroying our people.

             Who Were/Are The Kenites?

It is obvious from all this that the scribes in the House of Israel, in the days of the Kings, were Kenites, and that the title of scribes was kept in the family so-to-speak, just as it is in some parts of the world today. So it is obvious that the Israelites allowed them to stay in the land with them because they were the Kenite Scribes that were living in Canaan when Israel first come into the land. After their 40 year trek through the wilderness in their escape from Egypt.

For it is the land of Canaan that Yahweh told Abraham: “In the same day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates: THE KENITES, and the Kenizzites, and the Kadmonites, And the Hittites, and the Perizzites, and the Rephaims, And the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Girgashites, and the Jebusites.” (Genesis 15:18-21)

These verses are witnesses that Yahweh gave the land to Abram (before He changed his name to Abraham) and some 400-500 years before the Children of Israel returned to the Promised Land under the leadership of first Moses and then Joshua.

Kenites: Strong’s Concordance #7017 Qeyniy (kay‑nee'); or Qiyniy (1 Chronicles 2:55) (kee‑nee'); patronymic from OT:7014; a Kenite or member of the tribe of Kajin: KJV ‑ Kenite.

Kenites: Strong’s Concordance #7014 Qayin (kah'‑yin); the same as OT:7013 (with a play upon the affinity to OT:7069); Kajin, the name of the first child, also of a place in Palestine, and of an Oriental tribe: KJV ‑ CAIN, Kenite (‑s). (Biblesoft's New Exhaustive Strong's Numbers and Concordance with Expanded Greek‑Hebrew Dictionary. Copyright (c) 1994, Biblesoft and International Bible Translators, Inc.)

Which shows that a Kenite are identified with the descendants of Cain or Kajin. Therefore, Kenites are the descendants of Cain. And since Cain intermarried (mixed race) with pre-Adamic peoples and thus the Kenites were only a partially of Adamic stock; THEY WERE DEFINITELY NOT FROM THE TRIBE OF SHEM, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT SEMITES.

“The Kenites were a nomadic people whose original home was in the region just south of Palestine, and they were loosely associated with the Amalekites. Balaam, in his prophecy recorded in Numbers 24:20-23, spoke of the Kenites in connection with the Amalekites. “And he took up his parable, and said, Balaam the son of Beor hath said, and the man whose eyes are open hath said: He hath said, which heard the words of God, and knew the knowledge of the most High, which saw the vision of the Almighty, falling into a trance, but having his eyes open: I shall see him, but not now: I shall behold him, but not nigh: there shall come a Star out of Jacob, and a Sceptre shall rise out of Israel, and shall smite the corners of Moab, and destroy all the children of Sheth. And Edom shall be a possession, Seir also shall be a possession for his enemies; and Israel shall do valiantly. Out of Jacob shall come he that shall have dominion, and shall destroy him that remaineth of the city. And when he looked on Amalek, he took up his parable, and said, Amalek was the first of the nations; but his latter end shall be that he perish for ever. And HE LOOKED ON THE KENITES, AND TOOK UP HIS PARABLE, AND SAID, STRONG IS THY DWELLINGPLACE, AND THOU PUTTEST THY NEST IN A ROCK. NEVERTHELESS THE KENITE SHALL BE WASTED, until Asshur shall carry thee away captive. And he took up his parable, and said, Alas, who shall live when God doeth this! And ships shall come from the coast of Chittim, and shall afflict Asshur, and shall afflict Eber, and he also shall perish for ever. And Balaam rose up, and went and returned to his place: and Balak also went his way.” (Numbers 24:15‑25)

Jeremiah the Prophet wrote that Yahweh did NOT speak to, NOR did He give any command to Israel concerning burnt-offerings or sacrifices in the day that He brought them out of Egypt. “For I SPAKE NOT UNTO YOUR FATHERS, NOR COMMANDED THEM IN THE DAY THAT I BROUGHT THEM OUT OF THE LAND OF EGYPT, CONCERNING BURNT OFFERINGS OR SACRIFICES: But this thing commanded I them, saying, Obey my voice, and I will be your God, and ye shall be my people: and walk ye in all the ways that I have commanded you, that it may be well unto you. But they hearkened not, nor inclined their ear, but walked in the counsels and in the imagination of their evil heart, and went backward, and not forward.” (Jeremiah 7:22-24)

Here we can see that Jeremiah has declared that the Kenite scribes had falsified the Law by writing lies into it. This was because the Kenites were worshipers of Baal, and the fact that animal sacrifice was a very important part of the worship of Baal, Jeremiah’s proclamation and denunciation would seem to be substantiated.

Therefore, it is clear that it was the Baal worshiping Kenite Scribes who tampered with the Word of Yahweh. For He would not have commanded His Israel People, to practice the same rites of animal sacrifice that were so important to the Canaanitish worshipers of Baal? Yahweh commanded Israel not to follow the

Neither is there any mention of Cain and Abel in the Chronology of Adam listed in 1st Chronicles: “Adam, Sheth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalaleel, Jered, Henoch, Methuselah, Lamech, Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.” (1 Chronicles 1:1‑4) By this we know that none of the offspring of Cain were the seed of Adam, and were the seed of the Devil, just as Christ told us in John 8:44. The very first people, that of the descendants of Adam, Seth, Abraham, Isaac (Whom we, the White Race is named after as instructed by Jacob/Israel in the 48th chapter of Genesis).

“The Angel which redeemed me from all evil, bless the lads; and let my name be named on them, and the name of my fathers Abraham and Isaac; and let them grow into a multitude in the midst of the earth.” (Genesis 48:16)

This has been fulfilled, in that the Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, Celtic and kindred people of the earth have been called “Anglo-Saxons” after the name of Isaac. And they have, have also, been called after Jacob/Israel because they have been called Israelites. These same people have always occupied the center of the earth, for they can be found to have created nations and civilizations just north and south of the equator.

However, we must mention here that Esau as the brother to Jacob; so he was NEVER an Israelite; but his seed would have been of mixed blood, because of his marriage to the Hittite women:

“And Esau was forty years old when he took to wife Judith the daughter of Beeri the Hittite, and Bashemath the daughter of Elon the Hittite.” (Genesis 26:34)

Then we are told in Genesis 28:8‑9:

“And Esau seeing that the daughters of Canaan pleased not Isaac his father; Then went Esau unto Ishmael, and took unto the wives which he had Mahalath the daughter of Ishmael Abraham's son, the sister of Nebajoth, to be his wife.”

Thus we can see clearly that neither Esau nor any of his descendants were Israelites. But all of his children from that time on could be classified as Jews. Also, his descendants could be called brothers to the Arabs, because he married one of Ishmael’s daughters.

The first time that a mixed multitude is mentioned in the Bible is in Exodus 12:37‑38:

“And the children of Israel journeyed from Rameses to Succoth, about six hundred thousand on foot that were men, beside children. And a mixed multitude went up also with them; and flocks, and herds, even very much cattle.”

Then the mixed multitude is mentioned again in Nehemiah:

“Now it came to pass, when they had heard the law, that they separated from Israel all the mixed multitude.” (Nehemiah 13:3)

There was another group of mixed breeds which came back from the Babylonian captivity with SOME of the True Israelites which returned to build the Temple. During this time the priests found that many of the Israelites had married into the other races, and had strange wives (meaning they were not Israelites) and were told to separate themselves from them:

“Now it came to pass, when they had heard the law, that they separated from Israel all the mixed multitude.” (Nehemiah 13:3)

PLEASE NOTE THAT NEITHER CAIN NOR ABLE IS MENTIONED IN ADAM’S LINE. Therefore, we can conclude from this that neither Cain nor Able were Adam’s children. For if they had God certainly would have instructed that they be noted as such.

Neither is there any mention of Cain and Abel in the Chronology of Adam listed in 1st Chronicles: “Adam, Sheth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalaleel, Jered, Henoch, Methuselah, Lamech, Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.” (1 Chronicles 1:1‑4) BY THIS WE KNOW THAT NONE OF THE OFFSPRING OF CAIN WERE THE SEED OF ADAM, AND WERE THE SEED OF THE DEVIL, JUST AS CHRIST TOLD US IN JOHN 8:44.

The very first people, that of the descendants of Adam, Seth, Abraham, Isaac (Whom we, the White Race is named after as instructed by Jacob/Israel in the 48th chapter of Genesis).

“The Angel which redeemed me from all evil, bless the lads; and let my name be named on them, and the name of my fathers Abraham and Isaac; and let them grow into a multitude in the midst of the earth.” (Genesis 48:16)

This has been fulfilled, in that the Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, Celtic and kindred people of the earth have been called “Anglo-Saxons” after the name of Isaac. And they have, have also, been called after Jacob/Israel because they have been called Israelites. These same people have always occupied the center of the earth, for they can be found to have created nations and civilizations just north and south of the equator.

`“And Esau was forty years old when he took to wife Judith the daughter of Beeri the Hittite, and Bashemath the daughter of Elon the Hittite.” (Genesis 26:34)

Then we are told in Genesis 28:8‑9:

“And Esau seeing that the daughters of Canaan pleased not Isaac his father; Then went Esau unto Ishmael, and took unto the wives which he had Mahalath the daughter of Ishmael Abraham's son, the sister of Nebajoth, to be his wife.”

Thus we can see clearly that neither Esau nor any of his descendants were Israelites. But all of his children from that time on could be classified as Jews. Also, his descendants could be called brothers to the Arabs, because he married one of Ishmael’s daughters. The first time that a mixed multitude is mentioned in the Bible is in Exodus 12:37‑38:

“And the children of Israel journeyed from Rameses to Succoth, about six hundred thousand on foot that were men, beside children. And a mixed multitude went up also with them; and flocks, and herds, even very much cattle.”

Then the mixed multitude is mentioned again in Nehemiah:

“Now it came to pass, when they had heard the law, that they separated from Israel all the mixed multitude.” (Nehemiah 13:3)

The Jewish Encyclopedia, states:

"EDOM IS IN MODERN JEWRY.” (Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925 edition, Vol. 5, p. 41)

Which is a true statement, based on the above information that we have seen in the Scriptures. The Jews know this and they know they are not Israelites because they have admitted it, both here and in: Under the heading of "A brief History of the Terms for Jew" in the 1980 Jewish Almanac is the following:

"Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an Ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew." (A brief History of the Terms for Jew, in the 1980 Jewish Almanac)

There was another group of mixed breeds which came back from the Babylonian captivity with SOME of the True Israelites which returned to build the Temple.

During this time the priests found that many of the Israelites had married into the other races, and had strange wives (meaning they were not Israelites) and were told to separate themselves from them:

“Now it came to pass, when they had heard the law, that they separated from Israel all the mixed multitude.” (Nehemiah 13:3)

This is a subject that has very effectively been obscured by society and churches in particular. Thank God, there is a remnant that understands the Bible truth concerning the seed of the serpent.

Some of you may be cognizant of the edifying details of this documentation, however we know that very few people have ever been exposed to the detailed information herein, which supports the literal and physical existence of the Luciferian seed of the serpent in our midst.

Unfortunately the heretic doctrine of virtually all churches today, expound the lie that the seed of the serpent, Satan the devil, is manifest in some obscure virus in the ethereal space, that may infect or contaminate man, causing man to be evil. (However, these Judeo-Christian churches claim they have the prescription to destroy this virus). Therefore, it is our endeavor to present the Biblical evidence, that we are all rubbing shoulders with the literal and physical seed of the serpent here on earth daily. We shall document the evidence in this matter from the undeniable researched Word of God, the Bible. Many relevant scriptures we will note for you to read, because we do not have space to quote all the pertinent documentation.

So if the seed of the serpent is literally and physically in our midst, then we would want to recognize them, wouldn’t you? Let us begin with Jude 11-13:

“Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Core. These are spots in your feasts of charity, when they feast with you, feeding themselves without fear: clouds they are without water, carried about of winds; trees whose fruit withereth, without fruit, twice dead, plucked up by the roots; Raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own shame; wandering stars, to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness for ever.”

Who are these “people” spoken of in these scriptures? An ilk that are spiritually and materially dead, non-productive, loud and noisy, wandering over the earth to work their diabolical deeds of rape, murder, theft and corruption, which has reserved for them the pits of hell.

We read further of these in Matthew 23:33:

“Ye serpent, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?”

Serpent: Strong’s Concordance: #3789  ophis (of'‑is); probably from 3700 (through the idea of sharpness of vision); a snake, figuratively (as a type of sly cunning) AN ARTFUL MALICIOUS PERSON, especially Satan: KJV– serpent.

Generation: Strong’s Concordance: #1081  gennema‑what has been born or begotten


b) the fruits of the earth, the produce of agriculture

These are the words of Yahshua, and it certainly behooves us to consider who He is speaking of herein. With all of the evidence in the Bible, why is the seed of the serpent in our midst a total mystery to the great majority of the people on earth? Why does Yahshua identify the seed of the serpent as Mystery Babylon in Revelation chapter 17? The answer is very simple: Because the people have rejected knowledge, and do not and have no desire to recognized the enemies of Yahshua.

“My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou has forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.”

We have the first evidence in the Bible, of the seed of the serpent in Genesis 3:15:

“And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, (Lucifer and Eve) and between thy seed and her seed; (progeny, offspring) It shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.”

Here we see that Yahweh declared war between His children (seed), and the children (seed) of the serpent Lucifer. This war has been raging in the world since Genesis 3:15, to this very moment, and will not ease until the victorious second coming of Yahshua. Certainly we have the Word of God, as evidence, that the seed of the serpent exists here on earth. Therefore it is incumbent upon all Christians, to understand the who, what and where our enemies are. How can a Christian wage the Divinely ordained war for Yahshua, if we do not recognize the enemy?

The seed of the serpent has long ago infiltrated every facet of society in order to pervert the Divine plan of God. It is the duty of all true, sincere Christians to guard the keys to the Kingdom. But the truth of the matter is; we have turned the keys to the Kingdom over to the seed of the serpent, the Jews, and that is why we today have the doctrine of Balaam in our churches.

First let us consider the words of Jude 11-13, a people that are “twice dead.” We read in Job 26:5:

“Dead things are formed from under the waters, and the inhabitants thereof.”

We see that Job speaks of the spiritually and materially dead inhabitants form under the waters. The prophet tells us in Isaiah 14:9:

“Hell from beneath is moved for thee at thy coming: it stirreth up the dead for thee, even the chief ones of the earth: it hath raised up from their thrones all the kings of the nations.”

Indeed this tells us where most of the rules of all nations are along with their proselytes, and we also know that the Jews have been in control of most governments ever since ancient Babylon. Please pay particular attention to the following scriptures, pertaining to the dead:

“Wilt thou show wonders to the dead? Shall the dead arise and praise thee? Shelah.” (Psalm 88:10); “For her house inclineth unto death, and her paths unto the dead.” (Proverbs 2:18); “But he knoweth not that the dead are there; and that her guests are in the depths of hell.” (Proverbs 9:18); “The getting of treasures by a lying tongue is a vanity tossed to and fro of them that seek death.” (Proverbs 21:6); “With my soul have I desired thee in the night; yea, with my spirit within me will I seek thee early: for when thy judgments are in the earth the inhabitants of the world will learn righteousness.” (Isaiah 26:9)

Yahshua when speaking to the Jews in John 8:47:

“He that is of God heareth God’s words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God.”

There are a multitude of scriptures that identify the Jews as being (spiritually and materially) dead from the womb, from birth.

They are not children of Yahweh, they are a cabal of Luciferian children that are literal vampires and parasites, deriving their physical existence from the blood and material assets of the children of Yahweh. All deceit, crime, corruption, perversion, and anti-Christ activity in the world, can be traced to it’s origin, the Jew and his proselytes.

     Are Today’s Jews True Israelites?

     "Things are seldom as they seem ... Skim milk masquerades as cream." (Gilbert and Sullivan, Pinafore)

These passages were not compiled to reveal Israel's identity. However, since it has been proven that God continues to have a specific purpose and plan for His people Israel, then it becomes imperative to identify who the Israelites are and who they are not. This brings us to the second of the two questions posed in chapter 1:         

          Who Are The Israelites Today?

Even asking the question presupposes that there are reservations about the identity of the modern‑day Jew and his relationship to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel. For the majority of Christians the answer is a foregone conclusion. Ask this question of the average person claiming to be a Christian, and he will quickly tell you: "The true descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob are those people today who call themselves Jews." Yet in light of that answer, we should know that the Bible makes it very clear that there are imposters masquerading as Israelites although no Israelite blood flows through their veins. The book of Revelation informs us of this deception and the identity of these blasphemers:

I [Yahshua] know your tribulation and your poverty (but you are rich) and the blasphemy by those [imposters] who say they are Jews [Judahites] and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan. (Revelation 2:9)

In other words, there are those who claim to be of the house of Judah or Judahites, and therefore Israelites, but who in reality are imposters identified by Yahshua as a synagogue of Satan. We find a double witness to this statement in Revelation 3:

“... I [Yahshua], will cause those of the synagogue of Satan, who say that they are Jews [Judahites], and are not, but lie ‑ behold, I will make them to come and bow down at your feet, and to know that I have loved you. (Revelation 3:9)

Modern‑day Jews themselves verify the truth of these passages in what they say and write, although in many cases their admissions are not meant for non‑Jewish eyes or ears.

Reprinted below is the first sentence of the first chapter of The (1980) Jewish Almanac:

                        Jewish Almanac

                           Identity Crisis

A Brief History of the Terms for “Jew”

Strictly speaking, it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a "Jew" or to call a contemporary Jew an "Israelite" or a "Hebrew."'

This is a remarkable admission. Read it again and let it really sink in! Furthermore, in the San Diego Union (August 28, 1966) Leo Heiman quoted Nathan M. Pollock, a professor of Medieval Jewish History at Tel Aviv University, who, after spending forty of his sixty‑four years in research, confirmed the preceding statement from The Jewish Almanac:

Are Today's Jews True Israelites? The Jews That Maybe Aren’t; By Leo Heiman: Coplan News Service

Nathan M. Pollock has a beef with the Israeli government.

His elaborate plans to celebrate this September the 1,000th anniversary of the Jewish Khozar (Khazar) alliance were summarily rejected.

An elderly meek‑looking man who migrated to Israel from Russia 43 years ago, Pollock ekes out a living as a translator of Scientific texts and proofreader in publishing firms. But his great passion, hobby and avocation is historic research.

He has devoted 40 of his 64 years to trying to prove that six out of 10 Israelis and nine out of 10 Jews in the Western Hemisphere ARE NOT REAL JEWS’ JEWS, BUT DESCENDANTS OF FIERCE KHOZAR (Khazar) TRIBES WHICH ROAMED THE STEPPES OF SOUTHERN RUSSIA MANY CENTURIES AGO.

For obvious reasons the Israeli authorities are not at all eager to give the official stamp of approval to Pollock's theories.

"For all we know, he may be 100 per cent right," said a senior government official. "In fact, he is not the first one to discover the connection between Jews and Khozars. Many famous scholars, Jews and non‑Jews, stressed these links in their historical research works."

In the year 965 the Khozars were defeated for the first time in 500 years by Prince Sviatoslav of Kiev. King Bulan of Khozaria concluded that Prince Sviatoslav emerged victorious from the war because his troops and mercenaries were Christians, while his nomads were pagan worshipers.

The king and his nobles embraced Judaism in 965, and in 966 a royal edict was passed enforcing Judaism as the only legal religion in the Khozar Kingdom.

Tribesmen had to undergo circumcision, learn Hebrew prayers, and recognize Jewish rabbis as their spiritual leaders; on pain of death.

This also would explain why so many European Jews are blond and blue eyed, with a slight Mongol slant to their eyes, as well as the total absence of Semitic features among many Israelis of European descent. 

The flourishing Jewish‑Khozar (Khazar) Kingdom was destroyed in 1239 by the Mongol invasion of Balu Khan.

Following the Mongol invasion and conquest, surviving members of Jewish‑Khozar tribes trekked west and settled in Poland, Hungary, Bohemia, Austria, Romania, and the Ukraine (Russia).

According to Pollack, whose parents came from Poland, if your name is Halperin, Alpert, Halpern, Galpern, etc., you are 100 per cent Khozar. "Alper" means "brave knight" in the Khozar tongue, and the name was granted by the king to the most distinguished warriors.

Names like Kaplan, Caplon, Koppel, and the like, are positive proof of Khozar descent, according to the scholar. "Kaplan" means "fierce hawk" in the Khozar language. Kogan, Kagan, Kaganovich show aristocratic descent from Kagan, Hagan, King Bulan’s chief‑minister.


Under an alternate spelling of Khazars, The Jewish Encyclopedia states the following:

“CHAZARS: A people of Turkish origin whose life and history are interwoven with the very beginnings of the history of the Jews of Russia...”

It was probably about that time that the chaghan of the Chazars and his grandees, together with a large number of his heathen people, embraced the Jewish religion [Judaism/Talmudism ‑ an adulterated religion brought back from Babylon]. According to A. [Albert] Harkavy ("Meassef Niddahim," i.), the conversion took place in 620; according to others, in 740. King Joseph, in his letter to [C]Hasdai ibn Shaprut (about 960), gives the following account of the conversion:

"Some centuries ago King Bulan reigned over the Chazars. To him God appeared in a dream and promised him might and glory. Encouraged by this dream, Bulan went by the road of Darian to the country of Ardebil, where he gained great victories (over the Arabs).

The Byzantine emperor and the caliph of the Ishmaelites sent to him envoys with presents, and sages to convert him to their respective religions. Bulan invited also wise men of Israel, and proceeded to examine them all. As each of the champions believed his religion to be the best, Bulan separately questioned the Muhammadans and the Christians as to which of the other two religions they considered the better. When both gave preference to that of the Jews, that king perceived that it must be the true religion. He therefore adopted it." (see Harkavy, "Soobshchenija o Chazarakh" in "Yevreishaya Biblioteka," vii. 153).

This account of the conversion was considered to be of a legendary nature. Harkavy, however, (in "Bilbasov" and "Yevreiskaya Bibliotek"), proved from Arabic and Slovenian sources that the religious disputation at the Chazarian court is a historical fact. Even the name of [Isaac] Sangari has been found in a liturgy of Constantine the Philosopher (Cyrill). It was one of the successors of Bulan, named [King] Obadiah, who regenerated the kingdom and strengthened the Jewish religion. He invited Jewish scholars to settle in his dominions, and founded synagogues and schools...From the work "Kitab al‑Buldan," written about the ninth century (p. 121; cited by [Daniel] Chwolson in "Izvyestiya o Chazarakh," etc., p. 57), it appears as if all the Chazars were Jews and that they had been converted to Judaism only a short time before that book was written.

The map from The Jewish Encyclopedia clearly illustrates the Jews' position regarding their ancestry. The Jews recognize that their genetic lineage is primarily from the Turkish Mongolian Khazars rather than from the lineage of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

The Khazars adopted the religion of Judaism between the seventh and ninth centuries; this conversion gave rise to their false claim of being Judahites when in fact they have no historical or racial basis for doing so. The Khazars' and their modern‑day descendants' claim to being Jews is strictly religious.

The Map is showing the Distribution of Religions in Europe in the Tenth Century, C.E., Indicating Extent of the Kingdom of the Chazars. (After Schrader, "Atlas de Géographic Historique.")

The information contained in The Jewish Encyclopedia is corroborated under the heading "KHAZARS" in The New Standard Jewish Encyclopedia:

“KHAZARS: A Turkish or Finnish tribe which settled in the lower Volga region...In the 8th cent., a powerful Judaizing movement manifested itself among the K. [Khazars]. Ultimately, about 786‑809, their king BULAN and 4,000 of his nobles accepted Judaism, the prince Obadiah being active in  securing their Judaization.

Under the heading "PROSELYTES," this same source states the following:

“PROSELYTES: the 8th ‑ 9th cents., there was a widespread conversion movement among the Khazars, led by the king and embracing other classes, and in W. Europe too, numerous persons continued to enter Judaism...”

The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, under the heading "KHAZARS," begins its very similar narrative by repeating essentially the same information:

“KHAZARS, a medieval people, probably related to the Volga Bulgars, whose ruling class adopted Judaism during the 8th cent.”

In Antisemitism: Its History And Causes, Bernard Lazare summarizes the Khazarian conversion to Judaism:

“About 620 they [the Jews] converted there a whole tribe, the Khazars, whose territory was in the neighborhood of Astrakhan. Legend seized upon this fact, which greatly stirred up the Jews of the West, but...[in spite] of this, there can be no doubt about it. Isidore Of Seville [Spain], a contemporary of the event, mentions it, and afterwards Chasdai Ibn‑Shaprut, minister of the Khalif Abd‑er‑Rahman, corresponded with Joseph, the last Khagan of the Khazars, whose kingdom was destroyed by Svyatoslav, prince of Kieff [Kiev, Russia]...The [Judaized] Khazars exercised a great influence over the neighboring Slav tribes, the Polyane, Syeveryane and Vyatichi, and made numerous proselytes among them.”

In an article "The Jewish Kings of Russia" from the Jewish magazine Shabbat Shalom, Robert C. Quillan elaborated upon the Khazar Gentile? Jews: “King Menachem? King Benjamin? King Joseph? King Obadiah? King Isaac? King Hanukkah? King Zebulun? King Moses? King Nessi?”

Bible students won't find these names in the Scriptures; instead, these [non-genetic] Jewish kings ruled what is now part of the southern Soviet Union. Long before the modern [twentieth century] State of Israel, a Jewish kingdom located between the Caspian and Black seas arose amid a world overtly hostile to the Jews. This new Israel was called Khazaria.

The King converted to Judaism. His Khazar nobles followed, as did much of the population. [King] Bulan and 4,000 Khazars were soon circumcised. Thus began a line of Gentile? Jewish [non-Israelite] kings that ruled into the tenth century.

THOUGH NOT OF SEMITIC ORIGIN, Joseph [one of the Khazar kings] regarded his people as a part of Israel, and considered himself a Jew by faith rather than by genetics. He was a spiritual son of Abraham rather than a biological one. He apparently considered Semitic and non‑Semitic be brothers in a common faith and a common Messiah.

This same article later admitted that since "...the Jews of Poland and eastern Europe are of largely Khazar? Jewish, rather than Semitic? Jewish origin," and "Because many American Jews trace their lineage to these countries," many scholars have concluded that this "disturbs the concept of a chosen people [from today's Jews] extending back to Abraham."

The following are portions of a letter written by Dr. Benjamin H. Freedman, a Jew, that was published by the National Economic Council, Inc. as "Council Letter No. 177 (October 15, 1947)." Dr. Freedman's letter exposed political Zionism for what it really is:

“Popular ignorance of the real basis of political Zionism is beyond calculation. Vaguely most Christian Americans have the idea that the Jews claim Palestine because it was the "Promised Land" in which they lived for a period of a few centuries that ended 2000 years ago. And the thought of a people returning to its "homeland" seems emotionally satisfying and good.

“But here are facts most Americans do not know:

“Political Zionism is almost exclusively a movement by the Jews of Europe. But these Eastern European Jews have neither a racial nor a historic connection with Palestine. Their [non‑Semitic] ancestors were not inhabitants of the ‘Promised Land.’ They are the direct descendants of the people of the Khazar Kingdom, which existed until the 12th century.

“The Khazars were a non‑Semitic, Turko‑Finn, Mongolian tribal people who, about the 1st century A.D., emigrated from Middle Asia to Eastern Europe...About the 7th century A.D., the King of the Khazars adopted Judaism as the state religion, and the majority of inhabitants joined him in the new allegiance. Before that date there was no such thing as a Khazar who was a Jew. Neither then nor since was there such a thing. as a Khazar whose ancestors had come from the Holy Land. The Semitic people who established Judaism in Palestine many centuries before the Khazars became converts to the Hebrew faith [Dr. Freedman errs at this point] ‑ Judaism, a corrupt and blasphemous religion brought back from Babylon to Judea, has nothing to do with the Hebrew faith of the Old Covenant, as is proven in chapter 101, did mostly emigrate from Palestine. But none of them [Semitic Judahites] emigrated to the Khazar Kingdom far to the North. 

“In view of this fact, what becomes of the cry for ‘repatriation’ to the ‘homeland?’ These Eastern European, Yiddish‑speaking Jews have no historic or racial connection with Palestine...

“If the Indians should demand America back, would we all pack up and return to the lands of our ancestral origins? Yet the Arabs have been in Palestine a thousand years longer than we have been here [in America]. And if the claim of Palestinian‑descended Jews is so dubious, what of the claim of Khazar‑descended Jews?

“Would a single Christian support their trek back to the ‘homeland’ or want to oblige them by expelling the Arabs, if it were known that these Eastern European, Yiddish‑speaking Jews who form the Zionist group practically in toto [almost entirely], have neither a geographic, historic nor ethnic connection with either the Jews [Israelite Judahites] of the Old Testament or the land known today as Palestine.”

Dr. Freedman's statements are substantiated in the book The Circle of Knowledge in a section entitled "Book Of Races And Peoples":

“The social solidarity of the Jews is chiefly a product of religion and tradition. Taking all factors into account, and especially their type of civilization, the Jews of today are more truly European than Asiatic or Semitic.”

Under the heading, "Khazar," The New Encyclopedia Britannica validates this Khazar‑Jew connection:

“Khazar, But the most striking characteristic of the Khazars was the apparent adoption of Judaism by the Khagan and the greater part of the ruling class in about 740 A.D. The circumstances of the conversion remain obscure, the depth of their adoption of Judaism difficult to assess; the fact itself, however, is undisputed and unparalleled in the history of central Eurasia. A few scholars have even asserted that the Judaized Khazars were the remote [genetic] ancestors of many of the Jews of eastern Europe and Russia.”

H.G. Wells, in his Outline of History, reached the same conclusion:

“The main part of Jewry never was in Judea and had never come out of Judea.”

On September 10, 1985 in an address to the Cornell Club of Washington, DC, Jewish author Dr. Alfred M. Lilienthal revealed that the Khazar‑Jewish connection has been verified by many prominent anthropologists:

“Many [modern‑day Jews] of whom have clamored to go back [to Palestine] never had antecedents [physical ancestors] in that part of the world....

“The overwhelming majority of Jews are descendants from the converts of Khazaria and elsewhere who adopted Judaism ... This view of the non‑ethnicity of the largest portion of Jewry is sustained by such prominent anthropologists as Ripley, Weissenberg, Hertz, Boas, Pittard, Fishberg, Mead and others.”

In his book From Pharaoh to Hitler, 'What Is A Jew?," Bernard Joseph Brown, another Jew, admitted that since the Jews of today are not Israelites, they have no claim to the land of Judea:

“Being consciously Jewish is the lowest kind of chauvinism [excessive patriotism], for it is the only chauvinism that is based on false premises.”

All of the previous quotations are documented as true and historically accurate in the remarkable book The Thirteenth Tribe by the well‑known Jewish author, Arthur Koestler, published in 1976. Following are a few of the many admissions made by Mr. Koestler about the true ancestry of today's Jewish people:

“... genetically they [today's Jews] are more closely related to the Hun, Uigur and Magyar tribes than to the seed of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Should this turn out to be the case, then the term "anti‑Semitism" would become void of meaning.

“The Khazars and their King are all Jews [not genetically, but rather by conversion to Judaism]...Some are of  the opinion that Gog and Magog are the Khazars [Ezekiel 38:1‑9].

“Joseph [one of the Khazar kings] then proceeds to provide a genealogy of his people. Though a fierce Jewish nationalist, proud of wielding the ‘Sceptre of Judah,’ he cannot, and does not, claim for them Semitic descent; he traces their ancestry not to Shem, but to Noah's third son, Japheth; or more precisely to Japheth's grandson, Togarma, the ancestor of all Turkish tribes.”

According to the article "Statistics" in The Jewish Encyclopedia, in the sixteenth century the total Jewish population of the world amounted to about one million. This seems to indicate...that during the Middle Ages the majority of those who professed the Judaic faith [Judaism/Talmudism] were [non‑Semitic] Khazars. In this study we have tried to show that the evidence from Anthropology concurs with history in refuting the popular belief in a Jewish race descended from a biblical tribe [the tribe of Judah].

“...the lingering influence of Judaism's racial and historical message [that today's Jews are descended from Israel], though based on illusion, acts as a powerful emotional break by appealing to tribal loyalty...Abraham Poliak, a professor of history at Tel Aviv University and no doubt an Israeli patriot, made a major contribution to our knowledge of Jewry's [true non‑Semitic] Khazar ancestry, undermining the legend of the Chosen Race.”

Random House advertised Mr. Koestler's book quite extensively; they began some of their ads with the headline: "WHAT IF MOST JEWS AREN'T REALLY SEMITES AT ALL?" Not only should most Jews be asking themselves this question, but so should modem‑day Christians.


Khazars are also known by the name "Ashkenazim." The following quotations are from the book The Life of an American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel by Jack Bernstein, an Ashkenazi or Khazar Jew:

“The powerful Zionist propaganda machine has led the American people to believe that a Jew is a Jew ‑ one race of people and that they are ‘God's Chosen People.’ We will deal with the ‘God's Chosen People’ lie later. First, it is important for you to understand that Jews are NOT [Mr. Bernstein's emphasis] one race of people.

“There are two distinct groups of Jews in the world and they come from two different areas of the world ‑ the Sephardic Jews from the Middle East and North Africa and the Ashkenazi Jews come from Eastern Europe.

“The Sephardic is the oldest group and it is they, if any, who are the Jews described in the bible because they lived in the area described in the bible. They are blood relatives to the Arabs ‑ the only difference between them is religion.

“The Ashkenazi Jews, who now comprise 90% of the Jews in the world, had a rather strange beginning. According to historians, many of them Jewish, the Ashkenazi Jews came into existence about 1200 years ago [approximately the 8th century A.D.”

Mr. Bernstein's evaluation is verified in The New Standard Jewish Encyclopedia. Under the heading "ASHKENAZI, ASHKENAZIM," this source provides population statistics for the Ashkenazim:

“ASHKENAZI, ASHKENAZIM: ...constituted before 1933 some nine‑tenths of the Jewish people (about 15,000,000 out of 16,500,000) [as of 1968 it is believed by some Jewish authorities to be closer to 100%].

The veracity of Jack Bernstein's remarks concerning the Ashkenazi Jews was also confirmed by Wilmot Robertson in his book The Dispossessed Majority:

“The [non‑Israelite] Jews in Slavic lands, the Ashkenazim, are to be distinguished from the Sephardim, the purer‑blooded Mediterranean Jews... 

“The Zionist pioneers of Palestine were mostly Ashkenazim...The ‘un‑Jewish’ [non‑Israelite] temperament and character of these Zionists were accented by their ‘un‑Jewish’ [non‑Israelite] appearance.”

In his book The American Jews Jewish author, James Yaffe, wrote of the Ashkenazim. in America. Note that he considers the Sephardic Jew nearly extinct:

“It has been estimated that 95 percent of the Jews in America today are descended from these East European [Khazar/Ashkenazi] immigrants. What the American Jew is now, his style of living and thinking, comes to him from the shtetl [a small town or village formerly found in Eastern Europe], tempered in the furnace of the lower East Side [of New York City].

“...the early Sephardic settlers, for example, left practically no descendants who are still Jewish...They disappeared not because they intermarried but because they refused to intermarry...without sufficient choice among their own, they remained unmarried and died out...choosing extinction rather than assimilation.”

Arriving at the obvious conclusion that the Ashkenazi Jews were not Semitic, Dr. Lilienthal wrote:

“These ‘Ashkenazim [Khazar] Jews’ (the Jews of Eastern Europe), whose numbers were swelled by Jews who fled from Germany at the time of the Crusades and during the Black Death, have little or no trace of Semitic blood.“

A very recent admission that the Jews of today are not Israelites was made by Rabbi Cyril A. Stanway in "Viewpoints," Thursday, November 8, 1990, in the Sun‑News (Las Cruces, New Mexico):

“...Though many Jews are not of Semitic origin, we are the religious, spiritual, and national [but not genetic] descendants of those who first formed the early foundations of Judaism who were Semites.”

In other words, Rabbi Stanway ADMITTED THAT MANY JEWS ARE NOT SEMITES. Since they are not Semites, then today's Jews certainly can not be of Abraham's lineage because Abraham was a Semite (or Semite) descended from Shem, the son of Noah.

Following the same line of reasoning, since today's Jews are not Semites, they can not be Israelites either because Jacob/Israel was also a Semite, a direct descendant of Shem through Abraham.”

More than once in history, genetically non‑Judahite (non‑Israelite) peoples became known as Judahites or Jews, and were, therefore, looked upon as Israelites. The Bible records that in Esther's day this very thing occurred:

“... many among the [heathen non‑Judahite] peoples of the land [of Babylon] became Jews [converts in name only] for the dread of the Jews [genetic Judahites] had fallen on them. (Esther 8:17)

Obviously those non‑Israelite peoples could not alter their genealogy, so they simply assumed the name Judahites or Jews, and then came to be regarded as such, at least by some people.

As clearly demonstrated, there is an abundance of substantial evidence proving that contemporary Jews are not descendants of the Bible patriarchs. Mr. Bernstein echoes the findings of Arthur Koestler regarding the adoption of Judaism on the part of the Ashkenazim (Khazars), and under the heading "God's Chosen People," he uncovers the chosen people myth of the Ashkenazim:

“The American people have been led to believe that Jews are ‘God's chosen people.’ This myth was started by a small group of Jews. A few Jewish leaders took excerpts from the Bible and interpreted them to mean that God designated them as "chosen people... 

“Leading the cry, ‘We are God's Chosen People,’ are the Zionist/Marxist (Ashkenazi) Jews who for political purposes chose Judaism and who don't have a drop of biblical Jewish [Judahite or Israelite] blood in them...The Judeo‑Christian ethic we hear so much about in America is a big joke ‑ the result of an intense Zionist propaganda campaign.

We'll toss in one last thought about the "God's chosen people" myth: God said, "Beware of those who call themselves Jews and are not, for they lie [Revelation 2:9; 3:9]." Could it be the Ashkenazi Jews are the people to whom God was referring?

Mr. Bernstein ends his book by challenging his Zionist‑Jewish brethren to a debate before the American people:

                                A Challenge


“I am well aware of the tactics you, my Zionist brethren, use to quiet anyone who attempts to expose any of your subversive acts.

“If the person is a Gentile [non‑Jew], you cry, ‘You're anti‑Semitic’ which is nothing more than a smoke screen to hide your actions. But, if a Jew is the person doing the exposing, you resort to other tactics: 

* First, you ignore the charges, hoping the information will not be given widespread distribution.

* If the information starts reaching too many people, you ridicule the information and the person or persons giving the information.

* If that doesn't work, your next step is character assassination. If the author or speaker hasn't been involved in sufficient scandal, you are adept at fabricating scandal against the person or persons.

* If none of these are effective, you are known to resort to physical attacks.

But, NEVER do you try to prove the information wrong.

So, before you start your efforts to quiet me, I OFFER THIS CHALLENGE:



“Let's explore the information and let the American people decide for themselves if the information is true or false.”

             Isn’t That A Fair Challenge?

“Certainly, you [my Zionist brethren] will willingly accept the challenge if what I have written is false. But, if you resort to crying, ‘Lies, all lies,’ and refuse to debate the material, you will, in effect, be telling the American people that what I have written are the true facts.”

Mr. Bernstein wrote his book in 1984, and his challenge has yet to be accepted. Obviously the Jews are using the tactic of ignoring the charges and hoping they will not be given widespread distribution. The last thing the Jews want is to have this type of information aired for the world to see, hear and evaluate. If too many people discover and try to stop this hoax, the Jews will lose their "favored" status, along with the money and political power they extort and relish. 

The Jews will never debate this issue. They think they can go undetected, and thus they even brag about their deceit. In the following quotation the Jewish writer, Paul Meyer, boldly bragged of this deception:

“Yet, I [a non‑Semitic Jew] have a clever touch, and pander [cater] to your [Christian] vices, while looking on in exultation. And so I play my game, with the exuberance of experience,  the strange and terribly subtle aims of my Asiatic [non‑Semitic] blood that remain a mystery to you [Christians].”

Certain religious groups claim that the Caucasian peoples are Israelites, descendants from the house of Israel, while maintaining that the Jews are Judahites, descendants from the house of Judah.

But by the authorities previously quoted, it is clear that most, if not all, modern‑day Jews are not ancestrally or genetically linked to the house of Judah, and, therefore, they have no right to be called Israelites in any sense of the word. Today's Jews are neither Judahites nor Israelites. They are, instead, imposters!

In the preface of the book The World Significance of the Russian Revolution, Dr. Oscar Ludwig Levy, another Jew, asked the following rhetorical question:

“...are not they [today's non‑Israelite Jews] the inventors of the Chosen People Myth?”

                   Whom Do You Believe?

“Your pastors who falsely declare that the Jews are God's Chosen People without any proof whatsoever to substantiate their claim.

* Jews who truthfully admit (to their own kind and occasionally to those outside of Jewry) what Jewish and non‑Jewish historians have verified: The Jews of today have no historical or racial connection to the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/ Israel.

* The Zionist Jews who lie for their own political gain and profit as they falsely claim to be Israelites, the Chosen People of God, but who refuse to debate the facts when challenged.

“Whom should you believe? Almighty God who warned us of ‘the blasphemy by those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.’ Not only does the Bible warn us, but the Jews themselves also confess that today's Khazar Jews are imposters. Consequently, we Christian Americans no longer have any excuse for perpetrating or financing the lie that the modem‑day Jews are either Judahites or Israelites.

                          Academia Proves

               Jews Are Not Israel

There are hundreds of books {most of which are Jewish Encyclopedias and history books} available for study, which prove that over 90% of the Jews of the world are not a Semitic people, but few people other than historians ever bother to read them. Following are just a few: "Chazars: A people of Turkish origin whose life and history are interwoven with the very beginnings of the History of The Jews of Russia...driven on by the nomadic tribes of the steppes and by their own desire for plunder and revenge...In the second half of the sixth century the Chazars moved westward...The kingdom of the Chazars was firmly established in most of south Russia long before the foundation of the Russian monarchy by the Varangians...At this time the kingdom of the Chazars stood at the height of its power and was constantly at war...At the end of the eighth century...the chagan (king) of the Chazars and his grandees, together with a large number of his heathen people, embraced the Jewish Religion." (Benjamin Freeman, Facts Are Facts)

Russia and The Khazars: Having traced the Knighthood of the Teutonic Order from its origin to its dissolution as a military-religious brotherhood, and having noted the development of successor sovereignties down to the obliteration of Prussia in 1945, we must turn back more than a thousand years, to examine another thread; a scarlet one, in the tangled skein of European history.

In the later years of the dimly recorded first millennium of the Christian era, Slavic people of several kindred tribes occupied the land which became known later as the north central portion of European Russia. South of them between the Don and Volga rivers and north of the lofty Caucasus Mountains lived a people known to history as Khazars. (Ancient Russia, by George Vernadsky, Yale University Press, 1943, p. 214)

These people had been driven westward from Central Asia and entered Europe by the corridor between the Ural Mountains and the Caspian Sea. They found a land occupied by primitive pastoral people of a score or more of tribes, a land which lay beyond the boundaries of the Roman Empire at its greatest extent under Trajan (ruled, 98-117 A.D.), and also beyond the boundaries of the Byzantine Empire (395-1453)

By slow stages the Khazars extended their territory eventually to the Sea of Azov and the adjacent littoral of the Black Sea. The Khazars were apparently a people of mixed stock with Mongol and Turkic affinities. Around the year 600, a Belligerent tribe of half-Mongolian people, similar to the modern Turks, conquered the territory of what is now Southern Russia.

Before long the kingdom (khanate) of the Khazars, as this tribe was known, stretched from the Caspian to the Black Se. Its capital, Ityl, was at the mouth of the Volga River. (A History of the Jews, by Solomon Grayzel, Philadelphia, The Jewish Publication Society of America, 1947)

In the eighth or ninth century of our era, a khakan (or chagan, roughly equivalent to tribal chief or primitive king) of the Khazars wanted a religion for his pagan people. Partly, perhaps, because of incipient tension between Christians and the adherents of the new Mohammedan faith (Mohammed died in 632), and partly because of fear of becoming subject to the power of the Byzantine Emperor or the Islamic Caliph, (Ancient Russia, by George Vernadsky, Yale University Press, 1943, p. 291) he adopted a form of the Jewish religion at a date generally placed at c. 741 A.D., but believed by Fernadsky to be as late as 865.

According to the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, (Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. VI, pp. 375-377) “This chieftain, Christianity and Mohammedanism to expound their doctrines before him. This discussion convinced him that the Jewish faith was the most preferable, and he decided to embrace it. Thereupon he and about 4,000 Khazars were circumcised; it was only by degrees that the Jewish teachings gained a foothold among the population.”

In his “History of the Jews,” (The Jewish Publication Society of America, Vol. III, 1894, pp. 140-141) Professor H. Graetz gives further details: a successor of Bulan, who bore the Hebrew name of Obadiah, was the first to make serious efforts to further the Jewish religion. He invited Jewish sages to settle in his dominions, rewarded them royally, founded synagogues and schools...caused instruction to be given to himself and his people in the Bible and the Talmud, and introduced a divine service modeled on the ancient communities.

After Obadiah came a long series of Jewish chagans, for according to a fundamental law of the state only Jewish rulers were permitted to ascend the throne. The significance of the term “ancient communities” cannot be here explained. For a suggestion of the “incorrect exposition” and the “tasteless misrepresentations” with which the Bible, i.e., the Old Testament, was presented through the Talmud, see below in this chapter, the extensive quotation from Professor Graetz.

Also in the Middle Ages, Viking warriors, according to Russian tradition by invitation, pushed from the Baltic area into the low hills west of Moscow. Archaeological discoveries show that at one time or another these Northmen penetrated almost all areas south of Lake Ladoga and West of the Kama and Lower Volga Rivers. Their earliest, and permanent, settlements were north and east of the West Dwina River, in the Vale Llmen are, and between the Upper Volga and Oka Rivers, at whose junction they soon held the famous trading post of Nizhni-Novgorod. (Ancient Russia, by George Vernadsky, Yale University Press, p. 267)

These immigrants from the North and West were principally “the ‘Russ,’ a Varangian tribe in ancient annals considered as related to the Swedes, Angles and Northmen. (Encyclopedia Britannica, Vol. XIX, pp. 375-377) From the local Slavic tribes, they organized (c. 862) a state, known subsequently from their name as Russia, which embraced the territory of the Upper Volga and Dnieper Rivers and reached down the latter river to the Black Sea, (An Introduction to Old Norse, by R.V. Gordon, Oxford University Press, 1927, map between pp. xxiv-xxv) and to the Crimea. Russ and Slav were of related stock and their languages, though quite different, had common Indo-Germanic origin. They accepted Christianity as their religion. “Greek Orthodox missionaries, sent to Russ (i.e., ‘Russia’) in the 860'z baptized so many people that shortly after this a special bishop was sent to care for their needs. (A History of the Ukraine, by Michael Hrushevsky, Yale University Press, 1941, p. 65)

The “Rus” (or “Russ”) were absorbed into the Slav population which they organized into statehood. The people of the new state devoted themselves energetically to consolidating their territory and extending its boundaries. From the Khazars, who had extended their power up the Dnieper Valley, they took Kiev, which “was an important trading center even before becoming, in the 10th century the capital of a large recently Christianized state.” (Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. VI, p. 381)

Many Varangians (Rus) had settled among the Slavs in this area (the Ukraine), and Christian Kiev became the seat of an enlightened Westward-looking Dynasty, whose members married into several European royal houses, including that of France.

The Slavs, especially those in the area now known as the Ukraine, were engaged in almost constant warfare with the Khazars and finally, by 1016 A.D., destroyed the Khazar government and took a large portion of Khazar territory. For the gradual shrinking of the Khazar territory and the development of Poland, Lithuania, the Grand Duke of Moscow, and the other Slavic states. (See the pertinent maps in the Historical Atlas, by William r. Shepherd, Henry Holt and Company, New York, 1911) Some of the subjugated Khazars remained in the slav-held lands their khakans had long ruled, and others “migrated to Kiev and other parts of Russia, (Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. VI, p. 377) probably to a considerable extent because of the dislocations wrought by the Mongols under Genghis Khan (11162-1227), who founded in and beyond the old Khazar khanate the short-lived khanate of the Golden Horde.

The Judaized Khazars underwent further dispersion both northwest into Lithuania and Polish areas and also within Russia proper and the Ukraine. In 1240 in Kiev “the Jewish community was uprooted, its surviving members finding refuge in towns further west. (Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. VI, p. 382) Along with the fleeing Russians, when the capital fell to the Mongol soldiers of Batu, the nephew of Genghis Khan.

A short time later many of these expelled Jews returned to Kiev. Migrating thus, as some local power impelled them, the Khazar Jews became widely distributed in Western Russia. Into the Khazar khanate there had been a few Jewish immigrants; rabbis, traders, refugees, but the people of the Klevan Russian state did not facilitate the entry of additional Jews into their territory. The rulers of the Grand Duchy of Moscow also sought to exclude Jews from areas under its control.

“From its earliest times the policy of the Russian Government was that of complete exclusion of the Jews from its territories. (Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. I, p. 384) For instance, “Ivan IV (reign 1533-1584) refused to allow Jewish merchants to travel in Russia.” (Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. I, p. 384)

Relations between Slavs and the Judaized Khazars in their midst were never happy. The reasons were not racial; for the Slavs had absorbed many minorities, but were ideological. The rabbis sent for by Khakan Obadiah were educated in and were zealots for the Babylonian Talmud, which after long labors by many hands had been completed on December 2, 1499.

In the thousands of synagogues which were built in the Khazar khanate, the imported rabbis and their successors were in complete control of the political, social and religious thought of their people. So significant was the Babylonian Talmud as the principal cause of Khazar resistance to Russian efforts to end their political and religious separatism, and so significant also are the modern sequels, including those in the United States, that an extensive quotation on the subject from the “History of the Jews,” by Professor H. Graetz, (History of the Jews, by Professor H. Graetz, Vol. II, 1893. Pp. 631 ff) is here presented: The Talmud must not be regarded as an ordinary work, composed of sixty three volumes; it possesses absolutely no similarity to any other literary production, but forms, without any figure of speech, a works of its own, which must be judged by its peculiar laws.

The Talmud contains much that is frivolous of which it treats with great gravity and seriousness; it further reflects the various superstitious practices and views of its Persian birthplace which presume the efficacy of demoniacal medicines, of magic, incantations, miraculous cures, and interpretations of dreams...It also contains isolated instances of uncharitable judgments and decrees against members of other nations and religions, and finally it favors an incorrect exposition of the scriptures, accepting, as it does, tasteless misrepresentations.

More than six centuries lie petrified in the Talmud...Small wonder then, that...the sublime and the common, the great and the small, the grave and the ridiculous, the altar and the ashes, the Jewish and the heathenish, be discovered side by side.

The Babylonian Talmud is especially distinguished form the Jerusalem or Palestine Talmud by the flights of thought, the penetration of mind, the flashes of genius, which rise and vanish again...It was for this reason that the Babylonian rather than the Jerusalem Talmud became the fundamental possession of the Jewish race (people, for the Jews are not a race but a people), its life breath, its very soul...nature and mankind, powers and events, were for the Jewish nation insignificant, non-essential, a mere phantom; the only true really was the Talmud.

Not merely educated by the Talmud but actually living the life of its Babylonian background, which they may have regarded with increased devotion because most of the Jews of Mesopotamia had embraced Islam, the rabbi-governed Khazars had no intention whatever of losing their identity by becoming Russianized or Christian. The intransigent attitude of the rabbis was increased by their realization that their power would be lost if their people accepted controls other than the Talmudic. These controls by rabbis were responsible not only for basic mores, but for such externals as the peculiarities of dress and hair. It has been frequently stated by writers on the subject that the “ghetto” was the work, not of Russians or other Slavs, but rabbis.

As time passed, it came about that these Khazar people of mixed non-Russian stock, who hated the Russians and lived under Babylonian Talmudic law, became known in the western world, from their place of residence and their legal-religious code, as Russian Jews.

Ain Russian lands after the fall of Kiev in 1240, there was a period of dissension and disunity. The struggle with the Mongols and other Asiatic khanates continued and from the Russians learned much about effective military organization. Also, as the Mongols had not overrun Northern and Western Russia, (Historical Atlas, by William R. Shepherd (Henry Holt and Company, New York, 1911), Map 77) there was a background for the resistance and counter-offense which gradually eliminated the invaders. The capital of reorganized Russia was no longer Kiev, but Moscow (hence the terms Moscovy and Muscovite). In 1613 the Russian nobles (boyars), desired a more stable government than they had had, and elected as their Czar a boy named Michael Romanov, whose veins carried the blood of the Grand Dukes of Kiev and the Grand Dukes of Moscow. Under the Romanovs of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, there was no change in attitude toward the Judaized Khazars, who scorned Russian civilization and stubbornly refused to enter the fold of Christianity. “Peter the Great (reign 1682-1725) spoke of the Jews as ‘rogues and cheats.’” (Popular History of the Jews, by H. Graetz, New York, The Jordan Publishing Co., 1919, 12935, Vol. VI, by Max Raisin, p. 89) “Elizabeth (reign 1741-1762) expressed her attitude in the sentence: ‘From the enemies of Christ, I desire neither gain nor profit.” (Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. I, p. 384)

Under the Romanov dynasty (1613-1917) many members of the Russian upper classes were educated in Germany, and the      Russian nobility, already partly Scandinavian by blood, frequently married Germans or other Western Europeans. Likewise many of the Romanovs, themselves; in fact all of them who ruled in the later years of dynasty, married into Western families.

Prior to the nineteenth century the two occupants of the Russian throne best known in world history were Peter I, the Great, and Catherine II, the Great. The former; who in 1703 gave Russia its “West window,” St. Petersburg, later known as Petrograd and recently as Leningrad, chose as his consort and successor on the throne as Catherine I (reign 1725-1727), a captured Marienburg (Germany) servant girl whose mother and father were respectively a Lithuanian peasant woman and a Swedish Dragoon. Catherine II, the Great, was a German princess who was proclaimed reigning Empress of Russia after her husband, the ineffective Czar Peter III, “subnormal in mind and physique,” (Encyclopedia Britannica, Vol. V, p. 37) left St. Petersburg. During her thirty-four years as Empress, Catherine, by studying such works as Blackstone’s Commentaries, and by correspondence with such illustrious persons as Voltaire, F.M. Grimm Frederick the Great, Dederot, and Maria-Theresa of Austria, kept herself in contact with the West. (Encyclopedia Britannica, Vol. XIX, p. 718 and passim) She chose for her son, weak like his father and later the “madman” Czar Paul I (reign 1796-1801), a German wife.

The nineteenth century Czars were Catherine the Great’s grandson, Alexander I (reign 1801-1825; German wife); his brother, Nicholas I (reign 1825-1855; German wife); his son, Nicholas II (reign 1894-1917; German wife) who was murdered with his family (1918) after the Jewish Communists seized power (1917) in Russia.

Thus many of the Romanovs, including Peter I and Catherine II, had far from admirable characters; a fact well advertised in American books on the subject, and though some of them including Nicholas II were not able rulers, a general purpose of the dynasty was to give their land certain of the advantages of Western Europe. In the West they characteristically sought alliances with one country or another, rather than ideological penetration.

Like, their Slavic overlords, the Judaized Khazars of Russia had various relationships with Germany. Their numbers form time to time, as during the Crusades received accretions from the Jewish communities in Germany; principally into Poland and other areas not yet Russian; many of the ancestors of these people, however, had previously entered Germany form Slavic lands.

More interesting than these migrations was the importation from Germany of an idea conceived by a prominent Jew of solving century-old tension between native majority population and the Jews in their midst. In Germany, while Catherine the Great was Empress of Russia, a Jewish scholar and philosopher named Moses Mendelssohn (1729-1786) attracted wide and favorable attention among non-Jews and a certain following among Jews.

His conception of the barrier between Jew and non-Jew, as analyzed by Grayzel, (Encyclopedia Britannica, Vol. V, p. 37) was that the “Jews had erected about themselves a mental ghetto to balance the physical ghetto around them.” Mendelssohn’s objective was to lead the Jews “out of this mental ghetto into the wide world of general culture; without, however, doing harm to their specifically Jewish culture,” The movement received the name Haskalah, which may be rendered as “enlightenment.” Among other things, Mendelssohn wished Jews in Germany to learn the German language.

The Jews of Eastern Europe had from early days used corrupted versions of local vernaculars, written in the Hebrew alphabet (A History of the Jews, by Solomon Grayzel, Philadelphia, The Jewish Publication Society of America, 1947, p. 456) just as the various vernaculars of Western Europe were written in the Latin alphabet, and to further his purpose Mendelssohn translated the Pentateuch; Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, into standard German, using however, the accepted Hebrew alphabet. (A History of the Jews, by Solomon Grayzel, Philadelphia, The Jewish Publication Society of America, 1947, p. 543) Thus in one stroke he led his readers a step toward Westernization by the use of the German Language and by offering them, instead of the Babylonian Talmud, a portion of Scripture recognized by both Jew and Christian.

The Mendelssohn views were developed in Russia in the nineteenth century, notably by Isaac Baer Levinsohn (1788-1860), the “Russian Mendelssohn.” Levinsohn was a scholar who, with Abraham Harkavy, deceived into a field of Jewish history little known in the West, namely the settlement of Jewish history little known in the West, namely the settlement of Jews in Russia and their vicissitudes furring the dark ages... Levinsohn was the first to express the opinion that the Russian Jews hailed not from Germany, as is commonly supposed, but from the banks of the Volga. This hypothesis, corroborated by tradition, Harkavy established as a fact.” (The Haskalah Movement on Russia, by Jacob S. Raisin, Philadelphia, The Jewish Publication Society of America, 1913, 1914, p. 17)

The reigns of the nineteenth century Czars showed a fluxiation of attitudes toward the Jewish “state within a state.” (The Haskalah Movement on Russia, by Jacob S Raisin, Philadelphia, The Jewish Publication Society of America, 1913, 1914, p. 43) In general, Nicholas I had been less lenient than Alexander I toward his intractable non-Christian minority, but he took an immediate interest in the movement endorsed by opportunity for possibly breaking down the separatism of the Judaized Khazars. He put in charge of the project of opening hundreds of Jewish schools a brilliant young Jew, Er. Max Lilienthal.

From its beginning however, the Haskalah movement had had bitter opposition among Jews in Germany; many of whom, including the famous Moses Hess, (Graetz-Raisin, The Haskalah Movement on Russia, by Jacob S. Raisin, Philadelphia, The Jewish Publication Society of America, 1913, 1914, Vol. VI. Pp. 371) became ardent Jewish nationalists, and in Russia the opposition was fanatical. “The great mass of Russian Jewry was devoid of all secular learning, steeped in fanaticism, and given to superstitious practices (Graetz-Raisin, The Haskalah Movement on Russia, by Jacob S. Raisin, Philadelphia, The Jewish Publication Society of America, 1913, 1914, p. 112) and their leaders, for the most part, had no opinion of tolerating a project which would lessen or destroy their control.

These leaders believed correctly that the needed education was designed to lessen the authority of the Talmud which was the cause, as the Russians saw it, “of the fanaticism and corrupt morals of the Jews.” The leaders of the Jews also saw that the new schools were a way “to bring the Jews closer to the Russian people and the Greek Church.” (Graetz-Raisin, The Haskalah Movement on Russia, by Jacob S. Raisin, Philadelphia, The Jewish Publication Society of America, 1913, 1914, p, 116)

According to Raisi, “the millions of Russian Jews were averse to having the government interfere with their inner and spiritual life” by “fosting upon them its educational measures. The soul of Russian Jewry sensed the danger lurking in the imperial scheme.” (The Haskalah Movement on Russia, Vol. VI, p. 117) Lilienthal was in their eyes “a traitor and informer,” and in 1845, to recover a modicum of prestige with his people, he “shook the dust of bloody Russia from his feet.” (Graetz-Raisim, The Haskalah Movement on Russia, by Jacob S. Raisin, Philadelphia, The Jewish Publication Society of America, 1913, 1914, Vol. V, p. 117) Thus the Haskalah movement failed in Russia to break down the separatism of the Judaized Khazars.

When Nicholas I died, his son Alexander Ii (reign 1855-1881) decided to try a new way of winning the Khazar minority to willing citizenship in Russia. He granted his people, including the Khazars, so many liberties that he was called the “Czar Liberator.”

By irony, or nemesis, his “liberal regime” contributed substantially to the downfall of Christian Russia. Despite the ill-success of his Uncle Alexander’s “measures to effect the ‘betterment’ of the ‘obnoxious’ Jewish element, (Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. I, p. 384) he ordered a wholesale relaxation of oppressive and restraining regulations (Graetz-Raisin, The Haskalah Movement on Russia, by Jacob S. Raisin, Philadelphia, The Jewish Publication Society of America, 1913, 1914, Vol. VI, p. 124) and the Jews were free to attend all schools and universities and to travel without restrictions. The new freedom led, however, to results the “Liberator” had not anticipated.

Educated, and free at last to organize nationally, the Judaized Khazars in Russia became not merely an indigestible mass in the body polite, the characteristic “state within a state,” but a formidable anti-government force. With non-Jews of nihilistic or other radical tendencies; the so-called Russian “intelligentsia” they sought in the first instance to further their aims by assassinations. (Modern Europan History, by Charles Downer Hazen, Holt, New York, p. 565)

Alexander tried to abate the hostility of the “terrorists” by granting more and more concessions, but on the day the last concessions were announced “a bomb was thrown at his carriage. The carriage was wrecked, and many of his escorts were injured. Alexander escaped as by a miracle, but a second bomb exploded near him as he was going to aid the injured. He was horribly mangled, and died within an hour. Thus perished the Czar Liberator. (Modern European History, p. 567)

Some of those involved in earlier attempts to assassinate Alexander II were of Jewish Khazar background. (See The Anarchists, by Ernest Alfred Vizetelly, John Lane, London and New York 1911, p. 66) According to the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, the “assassination of Alexander II in which a Jewess had played a part” revived a latent “anti-Semitism.” Resentful of precautions taken by the murdered Czar’s son and successor, Alexander III, and also possessing a new world plan, hordes of Jews, some of them highly educated in Russian universities, migrated to other Europan countries and to America. The emigration continued under Nicholas II. Many Jews remained in Russia, however, for “in 1913 the Jewish population of Russia amounted to 6,946,000. (Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. IX, p. 285)

Various elements of this ruthless aggressive minority nurtured the amazing quadruple aims of international Communism, the seizure of power in Russia, Zionism, and continued migration to America, with a fixed purpose to retain their nationalistic separatism. In many instances, the same individuals were participants i two or more phases of the four-fold objective.

Among the Jews who remained in Russia, which then included Lithuania, the Ukraine, (A History of the Ukraine, Michael Hrushevsky, Yale University Press, 1941) and much of Poland, were the founders of the Russian Bolshevik party.

In 1897 was founded the bond, the union of Jewish workers in Poland and Lithuania...They engaged in revolutionary activity upon a large scale, and their energy made them the spearhead of the Party. (Article on “Communism” by Harold J. Laski, Encyclopedia Britannica, Vol. III, pp. 824-827)

The name Bolsheviki means majority (from Russian Bolshe, the larger) and commemorates the fact that at the Brussels-London conference of the party in late 1902 and early 1903, the violent Marxist program of Lenin was adopted by a 25 to 23 vote, the less violent minority or “Mensheviki” Marxists fading finally from the picture after Stalin’s triumph in October, 1917. It has been also stated that the term Bolshevik refers to the “larger” or more violent program of the majority faction. After (1918) the Bolsheviki called their organization the Communist Party.

The Zionist Jews were another group that laid its plan in Russia as a part of the new re-orientation of Russian Jewry after the collapse of Haskalah and the assassination (1881) of Alexander II.

“On November 6, 1884, for the first time in history, a Jewish international assembly was held at Kattowitz, near the Russian frontier, where representatives from all classes and different countries met and decided to colonize Palestine...” (The Haskalah Movement in Russia, p. 285)

“For a suggestion of the solidarity of purpose between the Jewish Bund, which was the core of the Communist Party, and early Zionism. (Graetz-Raisin, The Haskalah Movement on Russia, by Jacob S. Raisin, p. 662) Henceforth a heightened sense of race-consciousness takes the place formerly held by religion and is soon to develop into a concrete nationalism with Zion as its goal.” (Graetz-Raisin, The Haskalah Movement on Russia, by Jacob S. Raisin, p. 168)

In Russia and abroad in the late nineteenth century, not only Bundists but other Khazar Jews had been attracted to the writings of Karl Marx (1818-1883), party, it seems, because he was Jewish in origin. “On both paternal and material sides Karl Marx was descended from rabbinical families. (Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. VII, p. 289)

The Marxian program of drastic controls, so repugnant to the free western mind, was no obstacle to the acceptance of Marxism by many Khazar Jews, for the Babylonian Talmud under which they lived had taught them to accept authoritarian dictation on everything from their immorality to their trade practices. Since the Talmud contained more than 12,000 controls, the regimentation of Marxism was acceptable; provided the Khazar population, like the Talmudic rabbi, exercised the power of the dictatorship.

Under Nicholas II, there was no abatement of the regulations designed, after the murder of Alexander II. To curb the anti-government activities of Jews; consequently, the “reaction to those excesses was Jewish support of the Bolsheviks...(Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. VII, p. 286) The way to such support was easy since the predecessor organization of Russian Communism was the Jewish “Bund.”

Thus Marxian Communism, modified for expediency, became an instrument for the violent seizure of power. The Communist Jews, together with revolutionaries of Russian stock, were sufficiently numerous to give the venture a promise of success, if attempted at the right time. After the rout of the less violent fraction in 1917, when Russia was staggering under defeat by Germany/ a year before Germany in turn staggered to defeat under the triple blows of Britain, France, and the Untied States. “The great hour of freedom struck on the 15th of March, 1917,” when ‘Czar Nicholas’s train was stopped” and he was told “that his rule was at an end...Israel, in Russia, suddenly found itself lifted out of its oppression and degradation.” (Graetz-Rasin, The Haskalah Movement on Russia, p. 209)

At this moment Lenin appeared on the scene, after an absence of nine years. (Encyclopedia Brit., Vol. XIII, p. 912)  The Germans, not realizing that he would be anything more than a trouble maker for their World War I enemy, Russia, passed him and his party (exact number disputed; about 200?)

In a sealed train from Switzerland to the Russian border. In Lenin’s sealed train, “Out of a list of 165 names published, 23 are Russian, 3 Georgian, 4 Armenian, 1 German, and 128 Jewish. (The Surrender of an Empire, Nesta H. Webster, Boswell Printing and Publishing Company, Ltd., 10 Essex St., London, W.C2, 1931, p. 77)

“At about the same time, Trotsky arrived from the United States, followed by over 300 Jews from the East End of New York and joined up with the Bolshevik Party.” (The Surrender of an Empire, p. 73)

Thus under Lenin, whose birth-range was Ulianov and whose racial antecedents are certainly Jewish, and under Leon Trotsky, a Jew, whose birth name was Bronstein, a small number of highly trained Jews from abroad, along with Russian Judaized Khazan and non-Jewish captives to the Marxian ideology, were able to make themselves masters of Russia. “Individual revolutionary leaders and Sverdlov; played a conspicuous part in the revolution of November, 1917, which enabled the Bolshevists to take possession of the state apparatus. (Universal Jewish Encyclopedia Vol. IX, p. 668)

Here and there in the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia other Jews are named as co-founders of Russian Communism, but not Lenin and Stalin. Both of these, however, are said by some writers to be half-Jewish. Whatever the racial antecedents of their top man, the first Soviet commissariats were largely staffed with Jews. The Jewish position in the Communist movement was well understood in Russia.

“The White Armies which opposed the Bolsishvik government linked Jews and Bolsheviks as common enemies.” (Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. I, p. 336)

Those interested in the ratio of Jews to others in the government in the early days of Communist rule in Russia should, if possible, see Les derniers jours des Romanof, (The Last Days of the Romanovs, by Robert Wilton) long the Russian correspondent of the London Times.

A summary of its vital passages is included in the “foreword to Third Edition” of “The Mystical Body of Christ in the Modern World, by Rev. Denis Fahey, a well-known Irish professor of philosophy and Church history. Professor Fahey gives names and nationality of the members of the Council of Peoples Commissars, the Central Executive Committee, and the Extraordinary Commission, and in summary quotes from Wilton as follows:

According to the data furnished by the Soviet Press, out of 556 important functionaries of the Bolshevik State...there were in 1918-1919, 17 Russian, 2 Ukrainians, 11 Armenians, 35 Letts, 15 Germans, 1 Hungarian, 10 Georgians, 3 Poles, 3 Finns, 1 Karaim, 457 Jews.

As the decades passed by; after the fateful year 1917, Judaized Khazars kept a firm hand on the helm of the government in the occupied land of Russia. In due time they built a bureaucracy to their hearts’ desire. The government; controlled Communist press “issued numerous and violent denunciations of anti-Semitic episodes, either violence or discriminations.

Also, “in 1935 a court ruled that anti-Semitism in Russia was a penal offense. (Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. I, p. 386) Among top-flight leaders prominent in the middle of the twentieth century. Stalin, Kaganovich, Beria, Molotov, and Litvinoff all have Jewish blood, or are married to Jewesses. The latter circumstance should not be overlooked, because from Nero’s Poppaea (Encyclopedia, Italiana, Vol. XXVII, p. 932; also, The Works of Flavius Josephus, translated by William Whiston, David McKay, Philadelphia, pp. 8, 612, 616) to the Montreal chemist’s women friend in the Canadian atomic espionage trials (Report of the Royal Commission, Government Printing Office, Ottawa, Canada, 1946) The influence of a certain type of wife; or other closely associated woman, has been of utmost significance.

Nero and Poppaea may be allowed to sleep; if their crimes permit, but Section III, 11, entitled “Raymond Boyer, Montreal,” in the Report of the Canadian Royal Commission should be read in full by all who want facts on the subject of the corruption of scientists, and others working on government projects.

In the Soviet embassy records, turned over to Canadian authorities by Ivor Gouzinko, was Col. Zabotin’s notebook which contained the following entries; (Report of the Royal Commission, Government Printing Office, Canada, 1946, pp. 375 and 397 respectively) Professor Frenchman, a noted chemist, about 40 years of age. Works in McGill University, Montreal. Was the best of the specialists on VV on the American Continent. Gives full information on explosives and chemical plants. Very rich. He is afraid to work. (Gave the formula of RDX, up to the present there was no evaluation from the boss)

Contact; I. Freda: Jewess; works as a co-worker in the International Bureau of Labor. A lady friend of the Professor. In view of the facts furnished above as to the racial composition of the early Communist bureaucracy, it is perhaps not surprising that a large proton of the important foreign efforts of the represent government of Russia are entrusted to Jews.

This is especially notable in the list of current or recent exercises of Soviet power in the satellite lands of Eastern Europe. Anna Rabinsohn Pauker, Dictator of Rumania; Matyas Rakosi, Director of Hungary; Jacob Berman, Dictator of Poland; D.M. Manuilsky, Director of the Ukraine; and many other persons highly placed in the governments of the several Eastern European countries are all said to be members of this new Royal Race of Russia.

Of Eastern European origin are the leaders of late nineteenth century and twentieth century political Zionism which flowered from the already recorded beginnings at Kattowitz in 1884. Born at Budapest, Hungary, was Theodor Herzl (1860-1904), author (1896) of Der Judenstatt (The Jews’ State), who presided over the “Zionist Congress,” which “took place at Basel, Switzerland, on August 29-31, 1897. (Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. II, p. 102)

Dr. Chaim Weizmann, the had of political Zionism at that time of its recourse to violence, was born in Plonsk, Poland. Since these top leaders are Eastern Europeans, it is not surprising that most of the recent immigrants into Palestine are of Soviet and satellite origin and that their weapons have been largely from the soviet Union and from Soviet-controlled Czechoslovakia.

As a number of writers have pointed out, political Zionism entered its violent phase after the discovery of the incredibly vast mineral wealth of Palestine. According to “Zionists Misleading World With Untruths for Palestine Conquest,” a full-page article inserted as an advertisement in the New York Herald Tribune (January 14, 1947), “an independent Jewish state in Palestine was the only certain method by which Zionists could acquire complete control and outright ownership of the proven Five Trillion Dollar ($5,ooo,ooo,ooo,ooo) chemical and mineral wealth of the Dead Sea.”

The long documented article is signed by R.M. Schoendorf, “Representative of Cooperating Americans of the Christian Faith;” by Habib I. Katibah, “Representative of Cooperating Americans of Arab Ancestry;” and by Benjamin H. Freedman, “Representative of Cooperating Americans of the Jewish Faith,” and is convincing. Irrespective, however, of the value of the Dead Sea minerals, the oil flow of the dominance of the motive of self-aggrandizement in political Zionism has been affirmed and denied; but it is difficult for an observer to see any possible objective apart from mineral wealth or long range grand strategy, including aggression, in a proposal to make a nation out of an agriculturally poor, already overpopulated territory the size of Vermont.

The intention of aggression at the expense of Moslem peoples, particularly in the direction of Iraq and Iran, is suggested also by the fact that the Eastern European Jews, adherents to the Babylonian Talmud, had long turned their thoughts to the lands where their sages lived and where most of the native-Jewish population had embraced the Moslem faith. Any possible Zionist religious motive such as the hope of heaven, which fired the zeal of the Crusaders, is apparently ruled out by the nature of Judaism, as it is generally understood.

“The Jewish religion is a way of life and has no formulated creed, or articles of faith, the acceptance of which brings redemption or salvation to the believer...” (Opening words, p. 763, of the section on “doctrines,” in Religious Bodies: 1936, Vol. II, Part I, Denominations A to J, U.S. Department of Commerce, Jesse H. Jones, Secretary, Bureau of Census, Superintendent of documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.)

The secret or underground overseas efforts of Khazar-dominated Russia apparently been intrusted principally to Jews. This is especially true of atomic espionage. The Report of the Royal Commission of Canada, already referred to, shows that Sam Carr (Cohen), organizer for all Canada; Fred Rose (Rosenberg), organizer for French Canada, and member of the Canadian Parliament from a Montreal constituency; and Germina (or Hermina) Rabinowich, in charge of liaison with U.S. Communists, were all born in Russia or satellite lands.

In this connection, it is important to stress the fact that the possession of a Western name does not necessarily imply Western European stock. In fact, the maneuver of name-changing frequently disguises an individual’s stock or origin. Thus the birth-name of John Gates; editor of the Communist Daily Worker was Israel Regenstreif. Other name changers among the eleven Communists found guilty by a New York jury in October, 1949, included Gil Green, born Greenberg; Gus Hall, born Halberg; and Carl Winter, born Weissberg. (For details on these men and the others, see the article, “The Trial of the Eleven Communists,” by Sidney Shalett, Reader’s Digest, August, 1950, pp. 59-72)

Other examples of name-changing can be cited among political writers, army officers, and prominent officials in the executive agencies and departments in Washington. Parenthetically, the maneuver of acquiring a name easily acceptable to the majority was very widely practiced by the aliens prominent in the seizure of Russia for Communism, among the name-changers being Lenin (Ulianov), Trotsky (Bronstein), and Stalin(Dzygasgvuku), the principle founders of State Communism.

The United States Government refused Canada’s invitation in 1946 to cooperate in Canada’s investigation of atomic spies, but in 1950 when (despite “red herring” talk of the Chief Executive) our atomic spy suspects began to be apprehended, the first was Harry Gold, then Abraham Brothmn, and Miriam Moskowitz.

Others were M. Sobell, David Greenglass, Julius Fosenberg, and Mr. Ethel Rosenberg (not to be confused with Mrs. Anna Rosenberg). Various sentences were given. The Rosenbergs received the death penalty. (See Atom Treason, by Frank Britton)

As of early May, 1952, however, the sentence had not been carried out and a significant portion of the Jewish press was campaigning to save the Rosenbergs. Referring to Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, Samuel B. Gach, Editor-in-Chief and Publisher of the California Jewish Voice (“Largest Jewish Circulation in the West”) wrote as follows in his issue of April 25, 1952: “We deplore the sentence against that two Jews and despise the cowardly Jewish judge who passed same...”

In March, 1951, Dr. William Perl of the Columbia University physics Department was arrested “on four counts of perjury in connection with the crumbling Soviet atomic spy ring ...Perl whose father was born in Russia...had his name changed from Utterperl (Mutterperl?) To perl” in 1945. (Washington Times-Herald, March 15, 1951)

For further details on these persons and others, see “Atomic Traitors,” by Congressmen Fred Busbey of Illinois in the June, 1951, Number of National Republic.

Finally, the true head of Communism in America was found not to be the publicly announced head, but the Jew, Gerhardt Eisler, who, upon detection “escaped” from America on the Polish S.S. “Batory,” to a high position in the Soviet Government of East Germany.  (Communist Activities Among Aliens and National Groups, part III, Government printing Office, Washington, D.C., p. 236)

Very pertinent to the subject under consideration is a statement entitled “Displaced Persons: Facts vs. Fiction,” made in the Senate of the United States on January 6, 1950, by Senator Pat McCarran, Democrat of Nevada, Chairman of the Judiciary Committee. Senator McCarran said in part: “Let it be remembered that the Attorney General of the United States recently testified that an analysis of 4,984 of the more militant members of the Communist Party in the United States showed that 91.4 percent of the total were of foreign stock or were married to persons of foreign stock.”

With more than nine-tenths of our “more militant” Communists thus recruited from or allied to “foreign stock” and with that “stoc: totaling perhaps not more than 10,000,000 or one-fifteenth of our nation’s population, a little recourse to mathematics will suggest that the employment of an Eastern European or other person of recent alien extraction or connection is one hundred and fifty times more likely to yield a traitor than is the employment of a person of native stock!”

An “authoritative” Jewish point of view toward Soviet Russia is explained in the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia in the concluding paragraphs on Karl Marx. According to this source, Jews “recognize the experience of the Soviet Union, borne of 6,000,000 Jews, as testimony of the Marxist position on the question of national and racial equality.” The Encyclopedia comments further on the “striking fact that the one country which professes official allegiance to Marxian teachings is the one where anti-Semitism has been outlawed and its resurgence rendered impossible by the removal of social and economic inequalities.” (Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. VIII, p. 390)

In “The Jewish People Face the Post-War World,” by Alexander Bittelman (Morning Freiheit Association, 1945, p. 19) the affection of a considerable body of American Jews for the Soviet Union is considerable body of American Jews for the Soviet Union is expressed dramatically: If not for the Red Army, there would be no Jews in Europe today, nor in Palestine, nor in Africa; and in the United States, the length of our existence would be counted in days...The Soviet Union Has Saved The Jewish People.

Therefore, let the American Jewish masses never forge our historic debt to the Savior of the Jewish people; the Soviet Union. Be it noted, however, that Mr. Bittelman admits indirectly that he is not speaking for all American Jews, particularly when he assails as “reactionary” the “non-democratic forced in Jewish life...such as the Sulzbergers, Rosenwalds, and Lazsrons.” (Morning Freiheit Association, p. 9)

In addition to ideology, another factor in the devotion to their old homelands of so many of the newer American Jews of Eastern European source is kinship. According to The American Zionist Handbook, 68 to 70% of United States Jews have relations in Poland and the Soviet Union.

Quite in harmony with the Bittleman attitude toward the Soviet was the finding of the Canadian Royal Commission that Soviet Russia exploits fully the predilection of Jews toward Communism:

“It is significant that a number of documents from the Russian Embassy specifically note ‘Jew’ or ‘Jewess’ in entries on their relevant Canadian agents or prospective agents, showing that the Russian Fifth Column leaders attached particular significance to this matter.” (The Report of the Royal Commission, p. 82)

In view of the above-quoted statement of a writer for the great New York publication, the Universal Jewish encyclopedia, which is described on its title page as “authorative,” and in view of the findings of the Canadian Royal Commission, not to mention other facts and testimonies, it would seem that no one should be surprised that certain United States Jews of Eastern European origin or influence have transmitted atomic or other secrets to the Soviet Union.

Those who are caught, of course, must suffer the fate of spies, as would happen to American espionage agents abroad; but, in the opinion of the author, the really guilty parties in the Untied States are those Americans of native stock who, for their own evil purposes, placed the pro-Soviet individuals in positions where thy could steal or connive at the stealing of American secrets of atomic warfare.

This guilt, which in view of the terrible likely results of atomic espionage is really blood-guilt, cannot be sidestepped and should not be overlooked by the American people.

The presence of so many high-placed spies in the United States prompts a brief reference to our national habit (a more accurate term than policy) in regard to immigration. In December, 2, 1832, President Monroe proclaimed, in the famous Doctrine which bears his name, that the American government would not allow continental European powers to “extend their system” in the Untied States.

At that time and until the last two decades of the nineteenth century, immigration brought us almost exclusively European people whose ideals were those of Western Christian civilization; these people became helpers in subduing and setting our vast frontier area; they wished to conform to rather than modify or supplant the body of traditions and ideals summed up in the word “America.”

After 1880, however, our immigration shifted sharply to include millions of persons from Southern and Eastern Europe. Almost all of these people were less sympathetic than predecessor immigrants to the government and the ideals of the Untied States and a very large portion of them were non-Christians who had no intention whatever of accepting the ideals of Western Christian civilization, but had purposes of their own. These purposes were accomplished not by direct military invasion, as President Monroe feared, but covertly by infiltration, propaganda, and electoral and financial pressure. The average American remained unaware and unperturbed.

Among those who early foresaw the problems to be created by our new immigrants was General Eisenhower’s immediate predecessor as President of Columbia University. In a small but extremely valuable book, “The American As He Is,” President Nicholas Murray Butler in 1908 called attention to “the fact that Christianity in some one of its many forms is a dominant part of the American nature.” Butler, then at the zenith of his intellectual power, expressed fear that our “capacity to subdue and assimilate the alien elements immigration may soon be exhausted.” He concluded accordingly that “The dangers which confront America will come, if at all, from within.”

Statistics afford ample reasons for President Butler’s fears. “The new immigration was comprised preponderantly of three elements: the Italians, the Slavs, and the Jews. (The Report of the Royal Commission, p. 82) The Italians and the Slavs were less assimilable than immigrants from Northern and Western Europe, and tended to congregate instead of distributing themselves over the hole country as the earlier Northern European immigrants had usually done.

The assimilation of Italians and Slavs was helped, however, by their belonging to the same parent Indo-Germanic racial stock as the English-German-Irish majority, and above all by their being Christians; mostly Roman Catholics, and therefore finding numerous co-religionists not only among fully Americanized second and third generation Irish Catholics but among old stock Anglo-American Catholics descending from Colonial days.

Quite a few persons of Italian and Slavic stock were or became Protestants, chiefly Baptist; among them being ex-Governor Charles Poletti of New York and ex-Governor Harold Stassen of Minnesota. The new Italian and Slavic immigrants and their children soon began to marry among the old stock. In a protracted reading of an Italian language American newspaper, the author noted that approximately half of all recorded marriages of Italians were to person with non-Italian names.

Thus in one way or another the new Italian and Slavic immigrants began to merge into the general American pattern. This happened to some extent everywhere and was notable in areas where the newcomers were not congregated; as in certain urban and mining areas, but were dispersed among people of native stock. With eventual complete assimilation by no means impossible, there was no need of a national conference of Americans and Italians or of Americans and Slavs to further the interests of those minorities.

With the new Jewish immigrants, however, the developments were strikingly different; and quite in line with the fears of resident Butler. The handful of Jews, mostly Sephardic (Webster’s New International Dictionary, 1934, p. 2281) and German, already in this country (about 280,000 in 1877), were not numerous enough to contribute cultural guidance to the newcomers. (See Graetz-Raisin, Vol. VI, Chapter IV, an “American Continent,” A “the Sephardic and German Periods,” “B” “The Russian Period.”)

These newcomers arrived in vast hordes; especially from territory under the sovereignty of Russia, the total number of legally recorded immigrants from that country between 1881 and 1920 being 3,237,079, (The Immigration and Naturalization Systems of the United States, p. 817) most of them Jews. Many of those Jews are now referred to as Polish Jews because they came from that portion of Russia which had been the kingdom of Poland prior to the “partitions” of 1772-1795 (Modern History, by Carl I. Becker, Silver Burdett Company, New York, p. 138) and was the Republic of Poland between World War I and World War II. Accordingly New York City’s 2,500,00 or more Jews.

Thus by sheer weight of numbers, as well as by aggressiveness the newcomer Jews from Eastern Europe pushed into the background the more or less Westernized Jews, who had migrated or whose ancestors had migrated to America prior to 1880 and had become for the most part popular and successful merchants with no inordinate interest in politics. In striking contrast, the Eastern European Jew made himself “a power to be reckoned with in the professions, the industries, and the political parties. (Graetz-Raisin, Vol. VI, p. 344)

The overwhelming of the older Americanized Jews is well portrayed in “The Jewish Dilemma,” by Elmer Berger. (The Devin Adair Company, New York, 1945) Of the early American Jews, Berger writes: “Most of thee first 200,000 came from Germany.

They integrated themselves completely. (The Devin Adair Company, New York, 1945, p. 232) This integration was not difficult; for many persons of the Jewish religion Western Europe in the nineteenth century not only had no racial or ethnic connection with the Khazars, but were not separatists or Jewish nationalists. The old contentions of their ancestors with their Christian neighbors in Western Europe had been largely overlooked on both sides by the beginning of the nineteenth century, and nothing stood in the way of their full integration into national life. The American kinsmen of these Westernized Jews were similar in outlook.

Since the predominant new Jews consider themselves a superior people, (Race and Nationality as Factors in American Life, by Henry Pratt Fairchild, The Ronald Press Company, New York, 1947, p. 140) and a separate nationality, assimilation appears now to be out of the question. America now has virtually a nation within the nation, and an aggressive culture-conscious nation at that.

The stream of Eastern Europeans was diminished in volume during World War I, but was at flood level again in 1920. (Race and Nationality as Factors in American Live, p. 140) At last the Congress became sufficiently alarmed to initiate action. The House Committee on immigration, in its report on the bill that later became the quota law of 1921, reported: There is a limit to our power of assimilation...the processes of assimilation and amalgamation are slow and difficult.

With the population of the broken parts of Europe headed this way in every-increasing numbers, why not pre-emptorily check the stream with this temporary measure, and in the meantime try the unique and novel experiment of enforcing all of the immigration laws on our statutes? Accordingly, the 67th Congress “passed the first quota law, which was approved on May 19, 1921, limiting the number of any nationality entering the United States to 3 percent of the foreign-born of that nationality who lived here in 1910. Under the law, approximately 350,000 aliens were permitted to enter each year, mostly from Northern and Western Europe. (The Immigration and Naturalization Systems of the United States, p. 56)

The worry of the Congress over unassimilated aliens continued and the House Congress over unassimilable aliens continued and the House Committee on Immigration and Naturalization of the 68th Congress reported that it was “necessary to the successful future of our nation to preserve the basic strain of our population” and continued (The Immigration and Naturalization Systems of the United States, p. 60) as follows:

Since it is the axiom of political science that a government not imposed by external force is the visible expression of the ideals, standards, and social viewpoint of the people over which it rules, it is obvious that a change in the character or composition of the population must inevitably result in the evolution of a form of government consonant with the base upon which it rests. If, therefore, the principle of individual liberty, guarded by a constitutional government created on this continent nearly a century and a half ago, is to endure, the basic strain of our population must be maintained and our economic standards preserved.

The American people do not concede the right of any foreign group in the United States, or government abroad, to demand a participation in our possessing, tangible or intangible, or to dictate the character of our legislation.

The new law “changed the quota basis form 1910 to 1890, reduced the quotas from 3 to 2 percent, provided for the establishment of permanent quotas on the basis of national origin, and placed the burden of proof on the alien with regard to his admissibility and the legality of his residence in the United States.”

It was passed by the Congress on May 15,and signed by President Calvin Coolidge on May 26, 1924. The new quota system was still more favorable relatively to the British Isles and Germany and other countries of Northern and Western Europe and excluded “persons who believe in or advocate the overthrow by force or violence of the government of the United States.” Unfortunately, within ten years, this salutary law was to be largely nullified misinterpretation of its intent and by continued scandalous maladministration, a principle worry of the Congress (as shown above) in 1921 and continuously since. (The Immigration and Naturalization Systems of the United States, p. 60)

By birth and by immigration either clandestine or in violation of the intent of the “national origins” law of 1924, the Jewish population of the U.S. increased rapidly. The following official Census Bureau statement is of interest: “In 1887 there were at least 277 congregations in the country and 230,000 Jews; in 1890, 533 congregations and probably 475,000 Jews; in 1906, 1700 congregations and about 1,775,000 Jews; in 1916, 1900 congregations and about 3,300,000 Jews; in 1936, 3,118 permanent congregations and 4,641,184 Jews residing in the cities, towns and villages in which the congregations were located.” (Religious Bodies, p. 763)

On other religions, the latest government statistics are mostly for the year 1947, but for Jews the 1936 figure remains. (The Immigration and Naturalization Systems of the United States, p. 849) As to the total number of Jews in the Untied States the government has no exact figures, any precise figures beyond a vague “over five million” being impossible because of incomplete records and illegal immigration.

The Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate, (The Immigration and Naturalization Systems of the United States, p. u8423) however, accepts the World Almanac figure of 15,713,638 Jews of religious affiliation in the world and summarizes thus: “statistics indicate that over 50 of 15,713,638 Jews of religious affiliation in the world and summarizes thus: “statistics indicate that over 50 percent of the World Jewish population is now residing in the Western Hemisphere, (The Immigration and Naturalization Systems of the United States, p. 21) i.e., at least 8,000,000.

Since some three-fourths of a million Jews live in other North and South American countries besides the United States may be placed at a minimum of about 7,250,000. Jews unaffiliated with organizations whose members are counted, illegal entrants, etc., may place the total number in the neighborhood of 10,000,000. This likely figure would justify the frequently heard statement that more than half the Jews of the world are in the United States. Percentage-wise this is the government summary (The Immigration and Naturalization Systems of the United States, p. 241) of Jewish population in the United States.

In 1937, Jews constituted less than 4 percent of the American people, but during the 7-year period following (1937-43), net Jewish immigration to the United States ranged between 25 and 77 percent of total net immigration to this country. For the 36-year period, 1908-43, net Jewish immigration constituted 14 percent of the total. The population of the Jewish population has increased twenty-one-fold during the same period.

The above government figures require elucidation. The figures include only those Jews connected with an organized Jewish congregation and, as a corollary, exclude the vast number of Jews, illegal entrants and others, who are not so connected, and hence not officially listed as Jews.

The stated increase of Jews by 2100 percent since 1877 is thus far too small because non-Congregational Jews are not counted. Moreover, since the increase of 300 percent in the total population includes known Jews, who increased at the rate of 2100 percent, the increase in population of non-Jews is far less than the 300 percent increase of the total population. This powerful and rapidly growing minority; closely knit and obsessed with its own objectives which are not those of Western Christian civilization, will be discussed along with other principal occupants of the stage of public affairs in America during the early 1950s. Details will come as a surprise to many, who are the unwitting victims of censorship. Valuable for its light on the global projects of political Zionism, with especial reference to Africa, is Douglas Reed’s “Somewhere South of Suez.” (Devin-Adair Company, New York, 1951)

After mentioning that the “secret ban” against publishing the truth on “Zionist Nationalism,” which he holds “to be allied in its roots to Soviet Communism,” has grown in his adult lifetime “from nothing into something approaching a law of lese majesty at some absolute court of the dark past,” Mr. Reed states further that “the Zionist Nationalists are powerful enough to govern governments in the great countries of the remaining West!” He concludes further that “American Presidents and British Prime Ministers, and all their colleagues,” bow to Zionism as if venerating a shrine.

The History of The Jewish Khazars: "...Our first question here is, When did the Khazars and the Khazar name appear? There has been considerable discussion as to the relation of the Khazars to the Huns on the one hand and to the West Turks on the other. The prevalent opinion has for some time been that the Khazars emerged from the West Turkish empire.

Early references to the Khazars appear about the time when the West Turks cease to be mentioned. Thus they are reported to have joined forces with the Greek Emperor Heraclius against the Persians in A.D. 627 and to have materially assisted him in the siege of Tiflis. it is a question whether the Khazars were at this time under West Turk supremacy. The chronicler Theophanes {died circa A.D. 818} who tells the story introduces them as 'the Turks from the east whom they call Khazars.'...

A similar discussion on the merits of the different races is reported from the days before Muhammad, in which the speakers are the Arab Nu'man ibn-al-Mudhir of al-Hirah and Khusraw Anushirwan. The Persian gives his opinion that the Greeks, Indians, and Chinese are superior to the Arabs and so also, in spite of their low material standards of life, the Turks and the Khazars, who at least possess an organization under their kings. Here again the Khazars are juxtaposed with the great nations of the east. It is consonant with this that tales were told of how ambassadors from the Chinese, the Turks, and the Khazars were constantly at Khusraw's gate, (Tabari, i, 899. According to ibn-Khurdadhbih, persons wishing access to the Persian court from the country of the Khazars and the Alans were detained at Bab al-Abwab (B.G.A. vi, 135)) and even that he kept three thrones of gold in his palace, which were never removed and on which none sat, reserved for the kings of Byzantium, China and the Khazars.

In general, the material in the Arabic and Persian writers with regard to the Khazars in early times falls roughly into three groups, centering respectively round the names of (a) one or other of the Hebrew patriarchs, (b) Alexander the Great, and (c) certain of the Sassanid kings, especially, Anushirwan and his immediate successors.

A typical story of the first group is given by Ya'qubi in his History. After the confusion of tongues at Babel (Genesis 10:18; 11:19); the descendants of Noah came to Peleg (Genesis 10:25; 11:16-19; 1 Chronicles 1:19; 1:25), son of Eber (Genesis 10:21; 10:24-25; 11:14-17; Numbers 24:24; 1 Chronicles 1:18-19; 1:25; 8:12; Nehemiah 12:20), and asked him to divide (Genesis 10:5; 10:25; 10:32; Exodus 14:21; Deuteronomy 4:19; 32:8; 1 Chronicles 1:19) the earth among them. He apportioned to the descendants of Japheth (Genesis 5:32; 6:10; 7:13; 9:18; 9:23; 9:27; 10:1-2; 10:21; 1 Chronicles 1:4-5) - China, Hind, Sind, the country of the Turks and that of the Khazars, as well as Tibet, the country of the (Volga) Bulgars, Daylam, and the country neighboring on Khurasan. In another passage Ya'qubi gives a kind of sequel to this. Peleg (Genesis 10:25; 11:16-19; 1 Chronicles 1:19; 1:25) having divided the earth in this fashion (Deuteronomy 32:8), the descendants of 'Amur ibn-Tubal (Genesis 10:2; 1 Chronicles 1:5; Isaiah 66:19; Ezekiel 27:13; 32:26; 38:2-3; 39:1), a son of Japheth, went out to the northeast. One group, the descendants of Togarmah Genesis 10:2; 1 Chronicles 1:5; Isaiah 66:19; Ezekiel 27:13; 32:26; 38:2-3; 39:1, proceeding farther north, were scattered in different countries and became a number of kingdoms, among them the Burjan (Bulgars), Alans, Khazars (Genesis 10:3; 1 Chronicles 1:6; Ezekiel 27:14; 38:6), and Armenians. Similarly, according to Tabari, there were born to Japheth Jim-r the Biblical Gomer (Genesis 10:2-3; 1 Chronicles 1:5-6; Ezekiel 38:6; Hosea 1:3), Maw'-' (read Mawgh-gh), Magog (Genesis 10:2; 1 Chronicles 1:5; Ezekiel 38:2; 39:6; Revelation 20:8), Mawday Madai (Genesis 10:2; 1 Chronicles 1:5), Yawan (Javan) (Genesis 10:2; 10:4; 1 Chronicles 1:5; 1:7; Isaiah 66:19; Ezekiel 27:13; 27:19), Thubal (Tubal), Mash-j (read Mash-kh), Meshech (Genesis 10:2; 1 Chronicles 1:15; 1:17; Ezekiel 27:13; 32:26; 38:2-3; 39:1) and Tir-sh (Tiras). (Genesis 10:2; 1 Chronicles 1:5) Of the descendants of the last were the Turks and the Khazars (Ashkenaz). There is possibly an association here with the Turgesh, survivors of the West Turks, who were defeated by the Arabs in 119/737, (H.A.R. Gibb, Arab Conquests in Central Asia, London 1923, 83ff. Cf. Chapter IV, n. 96) and disappeared as a ruling group in the same century. Tabari says curiously that of the descendants of Mawgh-gh (Magog) were Yajuj and Majuj, adding that these are to the east of the Turks and Khazars. This information would invalidate Zeki Validi's attempt to identify Gog and Magog in the Arabic writers with the Norwegians. The name Mash-kh (Meshech) is regarded by him as probably a singular to the classical Massagetai (Massag-et). A Bashmakov emphasizes the connection of 'Meshech' with the Khazars, to establish his theory of the Khazars, not as Turks from inner Asia, but what he calls a Jephetic or Alarodian group from south of the Caucasus.

Evidently there is no stereotyped form of this legendary relationship of the Khazars to Japheth. The Taj-al-Artis says that according to some they are the descendants of Kash-h (? Mash-h or Mash-kh, for Meshech), son of Japheth, and according to others both the Khazars and the Saqalibah are sprung from Thubal (Tubal). Further, we read of Balanjar ibn-Japheth in ibn-al-Faqih and abu-al-Fida' as the founder of the town of Balanjar. Usage leads one to suppose that this is equivalent to giving Balanjar a separate racial identity. In historical times Balanjar was a well-known Khazar center, which is even mentioned by Masudi as their capital.

It is hardly necessary to cite more of these Japheth stories. Their Jewish origin is priori obvious, and Poliak has drawn attention to one version of the division of the earth, where the Hebrew words for 'north' and 'south' actually appear in the Arabic text. The Iranian cycle of legend had a similar tradition, according to which the hero Afridun divided the earth among his sons, Tuj (sometimes Tur, the eponym of Turan), Salm, and Iraj. Here the Khazars appear with the Turks and the Chinese in the portion assigned to Tuj, the eldest son. Some of the stories connect the Khazars with Abraham. The tale of a meeting in Khurasan between the sons of Keturah (Genesis 25:1; 25:4; 1 Chronicles 1:32-33) and the Khazars (Ashkenaz) (Genesis 10:3) where the Khaqan is Khaqan is mentioned is quoted from the Sa'd and al-Tabari by Poliak. The tradition also appears in the Meshed manuscript of ibn-al-Faqih, apparently as part of the account of Tamim ibn-Babr's journey to the Uigurs, but it goes back to Hishim al-Kalbi. Zeki Validi is inclined to lay some stress on it as a real indication of the presence of the Khazars in this region at an early date. Al-Jahiz similarly refers to the legend of the sons of Abraham and Keturah settling in Khurasan but does not mention the Khazars. Al-Di-mashqi says that according to one tradition the Turks were the children of Abraham by Keturah, whose father belonged to the original Arab stock. Descendants of other sons of Abraham, namely the Soghdians and the Kirgiz, were also said to live beyond the Oxus..." (The History of The Jewish Khazars, by D.M. Dunlop, pp. 4-15. This book is especially important because the Jews make reference to it in all of their Jewish Encyclopedias, and uphold him as an authority on Jewish History)

Encyclopedia Americana (1985): "Khazar, an ancient Turkic‑speaking people who ruled a large and powerful state in the steppes North of the Caucasus Mountains from the 7th century to their demise in the mid‑11th century A.D...In the 8th Century it's political and religious well as the greater part of the Khazar nobility, abandoned paganism and converted to Judaism...(The Khazars are believed to be the ancestors of most Russian and Eastern European Jews)."

Encyclopedia Britannica  (15th edition): "Khazars, confederation of Turkic and Iranian tribes that established a major commercial empire in the second half of the 6th century, covering the southeastern section of modern European Russia...In the middle of the 8th century the ruling classes adopted Judaism as their religion."

Academic American Encyclopedia (1985): "Ashkenazim, the Ashkenazim are one of the two major divisions of the Jews, the other being the Shephardim."

Encyclopedia Americana (1985): "Ashkenazim, the Ashkenazim are the Jews whose ancestors lived in German was among Ashkenazi Jews that the idea of political Zionism emerged, leading ultimately to the establishment of the state of Israel...In the late 1960s, Ashkenazi Jews numbered some 11 million, about 84 percent of the world Jewish population."

The Jewish Encyclopedia: "Khazars, a non-Semitic, Asiatic, Mongolian tribal nation who emigrated into Eastern Europe about the first century, who were converted as an entire nation to Judaism in the seventh century by the expanding Russian nation which absorbed the entire Khazar population, and who account for the presence in Eastern Europe of the great numbers of Yiddish‑speaking Jews in Russia, Poland, Lithuania, Galatia, Besserabia and Rumania."

The Encyclopedia Judaica (1972): "Khazars, a national group of general Turkic type, independent and sovereign in Eastern Europe between the seventh and tenth centuries C.E. During part of this time the leading Khazars professed Judaism...

In spite of the negligible information of an archaeological nature, the presence of Jewish groups and the impact of Jewish ideas in Eastern Europe are considerable during the Middle Ages. Groups have been mentioned as migrating to Central Europe from the East often have been referred to as Khazars, thus making it impossible to overlook the possibility that they originated from within the former Khazar Empire."

The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia: "The primary meaning of Ashkenaz and Ashkenazim in Hebrew is Germany and Germans. This may be due to the fact that the home of the ancient ancestors of the Germans is Media, which is the Biblical Ashkenaz...Krauss is of the opinion that in the early medieval ages the Khazars were sometimes referred to as Ashkenazim...About 92 percent of all Jews or approximately 14,500,000 are Ashkenazim."

The Bible: Relates that the Khazar (Ashkenaz) Jews were/are the sons of Japheth not Shem: "Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth: and unto them were sons born after the flood. The sons of Japheth;...the sons of Gomer; Ashkenaz..." (Genesis 10:1‑3) Therefore, the Bible proves that the Ashkenaz Jews [Khazars] are not the descendants of Shem and cannot be Semite.

Kimyarite King Adopts Judaism and Converts His Army and People: "Kimyarite (Himyarite) see Sabeans (Jewish Encyclopedia, p. 403) Sabeans: The inhabitants of the ancient kingdom of Sheba in southeastern Arabia, known from the Bible, classical writers, and native inscriptions. The genealogies of Genesis give three pedigrees for Sheba, the eponymous ancestor of the Sabeans, who is variously termed (1) the son of Raamah and the grandson of Cush, (Genesis 10:7; 1 Chronicles 1:9; comp. Ezekiel 27:22; 38:13) (2) the son of Joktan and a great‑great‑grandson of Shem, (Genesis 10:28; 1 Chronicles 1:22) and (3) the son of Jokshan and a grandson of Abraham by Keturah. (Genesis 25:3; 1 Chronicles 1:32) There seem, therefore, to have been three stocks of Sabeans: one in Africa, (comp. the Ethiopian city of Saga mentioned by Strabo, 'Geography,' p. 77) and the other two in Arabia.

Of the latter one is connected with the story of Abraham, and the other with that of the kingdom localized by Genesis 10:30, including the Joktanites generally, and extending 'from Mesha, as thou goest unto Sephar, a mount of the east.'

In Job 6:19 the Sabeans are mentioned in close association with the Temeans, an Ishmaelite stock (Genesis 25:15) that dwelt in Arabia. (Isaiah 21:14, comp. Jeremiah 25:23‑24) The Psalms and the prophetical books lay special emphasis upon the wealth and commercial activity of the Sabeans. The gifts of the kings of Sheba and of Seba to Solomon are noted in Psalm 62:10, gold being especially mentioned among these presents. (Psalm, 62:15) In both these passages the Septuagint, followed by the Vulgate, identifies Sheba with Arabia Isaiah 60:6 adds incense to the gifts which these countries were to bring. (comp. Jeremiah 6:20)

'Despite the collocation with Dedan in Genesis 10:7, 1 Chronicles 1:9 and Ezekiel 38:13, the merchants of Sheba, whom Ezekiel addressed in the words 'occupied in thy fairs with chief of all spices, and with all precious stones, and gold...' (Ezekiel 27:22) were doubtless Sabeans; but the reference in the following verse to the 'merchants of Sheba,' together with Haran, Canneh, Eden Asshur, and Chilmad, who by implication would be Asiatics, is probably a mere dittography, and is rightly omitted in the Septuagint. The wealth of Sheba is indicated also by the list of the gifts brought by its queen to Solomon, and which were 'a hundred and twenty talents of gold, and of spices very great store, and precious stones: there came no more such abundance of spices as these which the Queen of Sheba gave to King Solomon.' (1 Kings 10:10; 2 Chronicles 9:1‑9); see Sheba, Queen Of).

The only mention of the Sabeans in a warlike connection is in Job 1:15, where they are described as attacking and killing the servants of Job to rob them of cattle; but according to Joel 4, (A.V. 3:8) they dealt in slaves, including Jews.

In the New Testament there is a reference to the kingdom of Sheba in the allusion to 'the queen of the south.' (Matthew 12:42; Luke 11:31) Sheba must be carefully distinguished from the Cushite or African Seba, (Genesis 10:7; 1 Chronicles 1:9) as is shown by the discrimination between the 'kings of Sheba and Seba.' in Psalm 72:10, and by the collocation of Egypt, Ethiopia, and Seba in Isaiah 43:3, 45:13.

Strabo, basing his account for the most part on Eratosthenes, an author of the third century B.C., gives considerable information of value concerning the Sabeans. (Geography, ed. MÜller, pp. 768, 778, 780) Their territory was situated between those of the Mineans and Cattabanes; and their capital, Mariaba, stood on the summit of a wooded hill.

The country, like those adjoining, was a flourishing monarchy, with beautiful temples and palaces, and with houses which resembled those of the Egyptians. The mode of succession to the throne was peculiar in that the heir apparent was not the son of the king, but the first son born to a noble after the monarch's accession. The king himself was also the judge; but he was not allowed to leave the palace under penalty of being stoned to death by the people.

Inscriptions of the Sabeans are numerous, but the information which these records furnish is comparatively meager. They cover, it is true, a period of about 1,300 years, ceasing only with the extinction of the kingdom in the sixth century C.E. (A.D.); but only of the period just before and just after the beginning of the present era are they sufficiently abundant to allow even an approximation to a coherent history. The earliest inscription known is one containing the name of Yetha‑amara, who has been identified with the 'Ithamara the Sabean' of an inscription of Sargon dated 715 B.C.

Besides the epigraphical remains, there is a large number of coins, dating chiefly from 150 B.C. to 150 C.E. These are of special value for the history of the nation, even during its period of decline, since they bear both the monograms and the names of numerous kings.

The Sabean inscriptions are dated by eponymous magistrates previous to the introduction of an era which has been identified with the Seleucidan (312 B.C.), and which has also been fixed by other scholars as beginning in 115 B.C., although there are traces of other chronological systems as well. These texts frequently allude to commerce, agriculture, and religion...

Among the Sabean gods the most important were Almakah ('the hearing god?'), Athtar (a protective deity and the male for of 'Ashtaroth,' to whom the gazel seems to have been sacred), Haubas (possibly a lunar deity), Dhu Samawi ('lord of heaven'), Hajr, Kainan, Kawim ('the sustaining'), Sin (the principal moon‑god), Shams (the chief solar deity), Yata', Ramman (the Biblical Rimmon), El ('God' in general), Sami' (the hearing'), Shem (corresponding in functions to the general Semitic Ba'al), Hobal (possibly a god of fortune), Homar (perhaps a god of wine), Bashir (bringer of good tidings), Rahman (the merciful), Ta'lab (probably a tree‑god), and Wadd (borrowed from the Mineans). A number of goddesses are mentioned, among them Dhat Hami (lady of Hami), Dhat Ba'dan (lady of Ba'dan), Dhat Gadran (lady of Gadran), and Tanuf (lofty). It becomes clear, even from this scanty information, that the religion was in the main a nature‑cult, like the other Semitic religions; and this is borne out by a statement in the Koran (sura 27:24) that the Sabeans worshiped the sun.  Few details of the cult are given, although there are frequent mentions of gifts and sacrifices, as well as of 'self‑presentation,' a rite of doubtful meaning, but one which evidently might be performed more than once.

Raciall purity and abstinence of various forms also seem to have formed part of the Sabean religion, and the name of the month Dhu Hijjat or Mahijjat, the only one retained by the Arabs (Dhu'l‑Hijja, the twelfth month), implies a custom of religious pilgrimage to some shrine or shrines. To the account of the government as described by Strabo the Sabean inscriptions add little. The word for 'nation' is 'khums' (fifth), which apparently implies an earlier division of Arabia or of a portion of it into five parts; and the people were divided into tribes (shi'b), which, in their turn, were composed of 'tenths' or 'thirds.'

The kings at first styled themselves 'malik' (king) and, possibly later, 'mukarrib,' a term of uncertain meaning, while they afterward were called 'kings of Saba and Dhu Raidan,' and finally monarchs of Hadramaut and Yamanet as well. There were likewise kings of a number of minor cities. From a late text which mentions a king of Himyar and Raidan and of Saba and Silhin, it has been inferred that the capital of Sheba was later removed to Raidan while the actual palace remained at Himyar, and that from this circumstance the dynasty and all that it ruled were formerly called Himyaritic (the 'Homeritae' of Ptolemy and of Christian ecclesiastical authors), a designation now generally discarded.

The state of society in Sheba seems to have been somewhat feudal to character. The great families, which evidently possessed large landed estates, had castles and towers that are frequently mentioned in the inscriptions; and remains of some of these buildings are still extant. The status of woman was remarkably high. The mistress of a castle is mentioned in one inscription, and the epigraphical remains represent women as enjoying practical equality with men, although a few passages imply the existence of concubi­nage.

The Sabean language belonged to the Semitic stock. While some of the inscriptions differ little from classical Arabic, most of them show a close affinity with Ethiopic. The weak letters occasionally possessed their consonant value as in Ethiopic, although they have become vowels in Arabic. On the other hand, the article is affixed as in Aramaic, instead of being prefixed as in Arabic, and certain syntactic phenomena recall Hebrew rather than the South‑Sem­itic dialects. The alphabet, which, like all the Semitic systems except Ethiopic, represents the consonants only, is plausibly regarded by man as the earliest form of Semitic script." (Jewish Encyclopedia, pp. 608‑610)

The Encyclopedia Americana calls Hyrcanus a Jewish high priest [135‑105 B.C.] who forced the Idumeans to become "Jews." Idumea is the Greek for Edomites. The works of Josephes relates how the Idumeans were forced to accept Judaism. In the Bible Esau, Edo, Mt. Seir and Idumea are interchangeable for the offspring of ESAU, Jacob's twin brother.

Between the time of Nehemiah and the birth of Christ, the problem of intermarriage increased. The climax of the problem came about a century and a half before the birth of Christ, when the Judean, John Hyrcanus, conquered the heathen cities in Palestine and forced the Canaanites to become Judeans ["Jews"].

Josephus, the Judean historian, writing in about 95 A.D. wrote of this: "Hyrcanus took also Dora and Marissa, cities of Idumea [Greek form of Edom], and subdued all the Idumaeans; and permitted them to stay in that country, if they would be circumcised, and make use of the laws of the Judeans; and they were so desirous of living in the country of their forefathers, that they submitted to the use of circumcision, and the rest of the Judean ways of living; at which time therefore this befell them, they were hereafter no other than Judeans." (Ant. Book 13, ch. 9 par. 1)

A footnote in Josephus quotes Ammonius, an ancient grammarian, who says further: "The Judeans are such by nature, and from the beginning, whilst the Idumaeans were not Judeans from the beginning, but Phoenicians and Syrians; but being afterward subdued by the Judeans and compelled to be circumcised, and to unite into one nation, and be subject to the same laws, they were called Judeans."

This same footnote also quotes Dio, the ancient historian: "That country is also called Judea, and the people Judeans; and this name is given also to as many as embrace their religion, though of other nations."

Josephus continues his history of how the Judahites incorporated the Edomites and Canaanites and a history of the son of Hyrcanus named Aristobulus: "He was called a lover of the Grecians; and had conferred many benefits on his own country, and made war against Iturea, and added a great part of it to Judea, and compelled its inhabitants if they would continue in that country, to be circumcised, and to live according to the Judean laws. (Josephus Ant. Book 13, ch. 11, par. 3) "Now at this time the Judeans were in possession of the following cities that had belonged to the Syrians, and Idumeans, and Phoenicians: [Here he lists 23 non‑ Israelite cities]; which last [city] they utterly destroyed, because its inhabitants would not bear to change their religious rites for those peculiar to the Judeans. The Judeans also possessed others of the principle cities of Syria, which had been destroyed." (Josephus Antiquities Book 13, chapter 15, paragraph 4)

This all took place at least a century before Christ. It is obvious, then, that by the time Christ was born a great host of the people living in Judea were Canaanites and Edomites by race, although they were Jews by religion and Judeans by citizenship. Even the ruling dynasty of the Herods were Edomites. Josephus speaks of: "Herod, who was no more than a private man, and an Idumean, i.e., a half‑Judean" (Josephus Ant. Book 14, ch. 15, p. 2)

A footnote here says: "Accordingly, Josephus always esteems him an Idumean, though he says his father Antipater was of the same people with the Judeans, and a Judean by birth, as indeed all such proselytes of justice as the Idumeans, were in time esteemed the very same people with the Judeans."

The Esau‑Edomite nation ["Idumea"] ceased to exist as a separate nation at this point in history. And yet the Bible is clear that Edom would be the enemy of Israel in the latter days.

How could these prophecies be fulfilled, if there are no Edomites left in the world? There is only one nation in the world that can prove ancestral ties with Edom, and the Jews themselves claim that dubious distinction. The Jews have thus adopted the materialistic and anti‑Christ attitude that characterized the father of the Edomites, Esau.

As judgment for their sins, including that of the Crucifixion of Christ, God cast them out of Palestine in 70 A.D. whereupon they fled to North Africa and Spain. We find what happened to them in The American People's Encyclopedia for 1954, page 15‑492, under "The Jews."  "Following their dispersal many spread across North Africa to Spain and during this movement converted many of the Berber tribes to Judaism. This had little effect on physical type, since most of the Berbers were likewise of that Mediterranean Race. That portion which moved into Spain and later northward achieved considerable wealth and prestige and became known as Sephardim Jews."

The Outline of History: H. G. Wells, "It is highly probable that the bulk of the Jew's ancestors 'never' lived in Palestine 'at all,' which witnesses the power of historical assertion over fact."      

Following is the story of the conversion of a tribe of people in Russia to Judaism and is the origin of more than 95% of the Jews of Eastern Europe. Facts Are Facts, By Benjamin Freedman. "Without a complete and accurate knowledge of the origin and history of the 'Jews' in Eastern is quite impossible for [Christians] to intelligently understand the harmful influence the Jews have exerted for ten centuries...“You will probably be astonished as many Christians were years ago when I electrified the nation with the first publication by me of the facts disclosed by my many years of research into the origin and the history of the 'Jews' in Eastern Europe. My many years of intensive research established beyond the question of any doubt, contrary to the generally accepted belief held by Christians, that the 'Jews' in Eastern Europe at any time in their history in Eastern Europe were never the legendary 'lost ten tribes' of Bible lore. That historic fact is incontrovertible.

Relentless research established as equally true that the 'Jews' in Eastern Europe at no time in their history could be correctly regarded as the direct lineal descendants of the legendary ‘Lost Ten Tribes’ of Bible lore. The ‘Jews' in Eastern Europe in modern history cannot legitimately point to a single ancient ancestor who ever set even a foot on the soil of Palestine in the era of Bible History.

Research also revealed that the 'Jews' in Eastern Europe were never ‘Semites,’ are not ‘Semites’ now, nor can they ever be regarded as ‘Semites’ at any future time by any stretch of the imagination. Exhaustive research also irrevocably rejects as a fantastic fabrication the generally accepted belief by Christians that the 'Jews' in Eastern Europe are the legendary 'Chosen People' so very vocally publicized by the Christian clergy from their pulpits..."

The American People’s Encyclopedia for 1954 at 15‑292 records the following in reference to the Khazars:  "In the year 740 A.D. the Khazars were officially converted to Judaism. A century later they were crushed by the incoming Slavic‑speaking people and were scattered over central Europe where they were known as Jews.

It is from this grouping that most German, Polish and Hungarian Jews are descended, and they likewise make up a considerable part of that population now found in America. The term Ashkenazim is applied to this round‑headed, dark‑complexioned division."    

Nathan M. Pollock has a beef with the Israeli government. His elaborate plans to celebrate this September the 1000th anniversary of the Jewish ‑ Khazar alliance were summarily rejected. An elderly, meek‑looking man who migrated to Israel from Russia 43 years ago.

He has devoted 40 of his 64 years trying to prove that six out of ten Israelis and none out of ten Jews in the Western Hemisphere are real Jews' Jews, but descendants of fierce Khazar tribes which roamed the steppes of Southern Russia many centuries ago.

For obvious reasons the Israeli authorities are not at all eager to give the official stamp of approval to Pollock's theories. "For all we know, he may be 100 percent right,' said a senior government official. 'In fact, he is not the first one to discover the connection between Jews and Khazars. Many famous scholars Jews and non‑Jews, stressed these links in their historical research works. But who can tell today what percentage of Khazar blood flows in our veins..." (San Diego Union, August 28, 1966, Leo Heiman: Copley News Service)

From the above, we can clearly see that the Jews fully understand their Khazarian heritage as the third edition of the Jewish Encyclopedia for 1925 records:

"CHAZARS [Khazars]: A people of Turkish origin whose life and history are interwoven with the very beginnings of the history of the Jews of Russia. The kingdom of the Chazars was firmly established in most of South Russia long before the foundation of the Russian monarchy by the Varangians (855). Jews have lived on the shores of the Black and Caspian seas since the first centuries of the common era [after the death of Christ]. Historical evidence points to the region of the Ural as the home of the Chazars. Among the classical writers of the Middle Ages they were known as the 'Chozars,' 'Khazirs,' 'Akatzirs,' and 'Akatirs,' and in the Russian chronicles as 'Khwalisses' and 'Ugry Byelyye.'..."

The Encyclopedia Judaica: Vol. 10, (1971) relates the following about the Khazars (Chazars): "Khazars, a national group of general Turkic type, independent and sovereign in Eastern Europe between the seventh and tenth centuries A.D. During part of this time the leading Khazars professed Judaism." (Encyclopedia Judicia, Vol. 10, (1971))

The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia: "Khazars, a medieval people, probably related to the Volga Bulgars, whose ruling class adopted Judaism during the 8th cent. The Khazars seem to have emerged during the 6th cent., from the vast nomadic Hun (Turki) empire which stretched from the steppes of Eastern Europe and the Volga basin to the Chinese frontier. Although it is often claimed that allusions to the Khazars are found as early as 200 C.E., actually they are not mentioned until 627...Most Jewish Historians date the conversion of the Khazar King to Judaism during the first half of this century {A.D.}..."

The primary meaning of Ashkenaz and Ashkenazim in Hebrew is Germany and Germans. This may be due to the fact that the home of the ancient ancestors of the Germans is Media, which is the Biblical Ashkenaz...Krauss is of the opinion that in the early medieval ages the Khazars were sometimes referred to as Ashkenazim...About 92 percent of all Jews or approximately 14,500,000 are Ashkenazim.

Academic American Encyclopedia: Deluxe Library Edition, Volume 12, page 66 states: "The Khazars, a Turkic people, created a commercial and political empire that dominated substantial parts of South Russia during much of the 7th through 10th centuries. During the 8th century the Khazar aristocracy and the Kagan (King) were converted to Judaism."

The New Encyclopedia Britannica, Volume 6, page 836 relates: "Khazar, member of a confederation of Turkic-speaking tribes that in the late 6th century A.D. established a major commercial empire covering the southeastern section of modern European Russia...But the most striking characteristic of the Khazars was the apparent adoption of Judaism by the Khagan and the greater part of the ruling class in about 740...The fact itself, however, is undisputed and unparalleled in the history of central Eurasia. A few scholars have asserted that the Judaized Khazars were the remote ancestors of many of the Jews of Eastern Europe and Russia."

Collier’s Encyclopedia: Volume 14, page 65 states: "Khazars [kaza'rz], a semi-nomadic tribe of Turkish or Tatar origin who first appeared north of the Caucasus in the early part of the third century...In the eighth century Khaghan Bulan decided in favor of the Jews and accepted Judaism for himself and for his people..."

New Catholic Encyclopedia, Volume VIII, page 173 relates: "The Khazars were an ethnic group, belonging to the Turkish peoples, who, toward the end of the 2d century of the Christian Era, had settled in the region between the Caucasus and the lower Volga and Don Rivers...At the beginning of the 8th century, dynastic ties bound the Khazars more closely to Constantinople, which led to a limited spread of Christianity among them. They also became acquainted with Judaism from the numerous Jews who lived in the Crimea and along the Bosphorus. When the Byzantine Emperor, Leo the Isaurian, persecuted the Jews in A.D. 723, many Jews found refuge in the Khazar kingdom, and their influence was so great that, around the middle of the 8th century, the King of the Khazars and many of the Khazar nobility accepted the Jewish faith.

The Cadillac Modern Encyclopedia, page 822, states: "Khazars (khah'-zahrz), a S Russian people of Turkic origin, who at the height of their power (during the 8th-10th cent., A.D.) controlled an empire which included Crimea, and extended along the lower Volga, as far E as the Caspian Sea. The Khazar royal family and aristocracy converted to Judaism during the reign of King Bulan (768-809 A.D.) And Judaism was thereafter regarded as the state religion..."

The Jewish author, Arthur Koestler, relates the following concerning Jewish history: In his 1976 best seller The Thirteenth Tribe, the Author of Darkness at Noon, Promise and Fulfillment, and The Roots of Coincidence dropped another bombshell by proving that today’s Jews were, for the most part, descendants of Khazars, who converted to Judaism seven centuries after the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 A.D. "This, of course, is inspired by the story of the Covenant in Genesis; and it implies that the Khazars too claimed the status of a Chosen Race, who made their own Covenant with the Lord, even though they [Khazars] were not descended from Abraham’s seed...He cannot, and does not, claim for them [the Khazars] Semitic descent, he traces their [Khazars] ancestry not to Shem, but to Noah’s third son, Japheth, or more precisely to Japheth’s grandson, Togarma, the ancestor of all Turkish tribes. 'We have found in the family registers of our fathers,' Joseph asserts boldly, 'that Togarma had ten sons, and the names of their off-spring are as follows: Uigur, Dursu, Avars, Huns, Basilii, Tarniakh, Khazars, Zagora, Bulgars, Sabir. We [Khazars] are the sons of Khazar, the seventh...'" (The Thirteenth Tribe, Arthur Koestler, pages 58‑82))

The Jewish author Alfred M. Lilienthal relates the following concerning Jewish history: "...'The existence of [The State of] Israel is not founded on logic. It has no ordinary legitimacy. There is neither in its establishment nor present scope any evident justice ‑ though there may be an utter need and wondrous fulfillment.'...

     Arthur Koestler answers this question with an emphatic 'NO!' In his 1976 best seller  The Thirteenth Tribe, the Author of Darkness at Noon, Promise and Fulfillment, and The Roots of Coincidence dropped another bombshell by proving that today’s Jews were, for the most part, descendants of Khazars, who converted to Judaism seven centuries after the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 A.D...Therefore, the great majority of Eastern European Jews are not Semitic Jews at all, and as most Western European Jews came from East Europe, most of them also are not Semitic Jews.

Thus, maintains Koestler, the veins of 45 percent of Israelis (save only the Arab and the Sephardic Jews), plus a big majority of Jews around the world, are utterly vacant of corpuscular links to the tribe of Moses and Solomon...The Koestler thesis, however startling, is in no wise a new one. The genetic Khazar derivation of most Jews, only the Sephardic may be accounted Hebrews by blood, has been long if not widely known...The home to which Weismann, Silver, Ben‑Gurion and so many other Ashkenazim Zionists have long yearned to return has most likely never been theirs...[it is an] anthropological fact, many Christians may have much more Hebrew- Israelite blood in their veins than most of their Jewish neighbors!

Ironically enough, too, Volume IV of the Jewish Encyclopedia (as of the time of research, 1952), because this publication spelled Khazars with a 'C' instead of a 'K,' is titled 'Chazars to Dreyfus.'. And it was the famed trial of Captain Alfred Dreyfus, as interpreted by Theodore Herzl, that made the modern Jewish Khazars of Russia...forget their descent from converts to establish the State of Israel...

And with out the hue and cry, ‘Anti-Semitism,’ pray what happens to the Zionist movement? Khazar conversion was not unique...Who can say for sure that many Christian readers of this book might not in fact have a better claim, which they do not choose to exercise, to go back ‘Home’ to Palestine than Hannah Semer, Menachem Begin, or Golda Meir? Queen Victoria herself belonged to an Israelite society that traced the ancestry of its membership back to the Lost Tribes of Israel. When the word 'Judaism' was born, there was no longer a Hebrew-Israelite state. The people who embraced the creed of Judaism were already a mixture of many nations, races, and strains, and this diversification was rapidly growing..." (The Zionist Connection II, Alfred M. Lilienthal, pp. 759‑768)

Consider: even as the elect True Christian overcomers are of the Body of Christ, and will rule and reign with Him, LIKEWISE, Satan has copied the Divine plan of Yahweh, and his body of Satan, manifest in his elect, the most prolific antichrist devils, whom Satan has promised, will rule and reign with him in the One World Government we see forming in the world today. This will be a Jew Zionist total dictatorship according to Jewish plans, but we know Yahshua will not allow it.

The imminent B.F. Jackson in his series of books entitled “the Mystery of the Serpent,” has indeed documented the detailed information concerning the “dead” blood of a Jew. We shall not quote, but will paraphrase some of this enlightening information.

“For the life of the flesh is in the blood.” (Leviticus 17:11)

Here Yahweh was speaking to His Israel Children, and this is in reference to spiritual and physical life, which had it’s origin in Genesis 2:7:

“And the Lord god formed (begot) man (Adam) of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life (Yahweh’s Spirit); and man became a living soul.”

This spiritual and physical faculty is not present in a Jew. Only God has the power to bestow this phenomenon upon man. The only way Lucifer could reproduce his seed, was to plant it in a host that possessed that life fore, thereby gaining physical life only. The Jew is spiritually dead from the womb, as the Bible tells us. Yahweh’s children on the other hand possess the genealogical power which causes the marrow of the bones to generate the blood of life, both spiritually and physically.

“One dieth in his full strength, (spiritual) being wholly at ease and quite. His breasts are full of mil, (choice part)  and his bones are moistened (irrigated, supplied) with marrow, and another dieth in the bitterness of his soul, and never eateth with pleasure.” (Job 21:23-25)

Here we are told of the difference of death, between a child of Yahweh and a child of Lucifer, a Jew. Please read the following scriptures pertaining to “marrow:”

“My soul shall be satisfied as with marrow and fatness; and my mouth shall praise thee with joyful lips.” (Psalm 63:5)

“It shall be health to thy navel, and marrow to thy bones.” (Proverbs 3:8)

“And this mountain shall the Lord of hosts make unto all people a feast of fat things, a feast of wines on the lees, of fat things full or marrow, of wines on the lees well refined.” (Isaiah 25:6)

“For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the hearth.”

The spiritual and physical life of Yahweh’s children is in the marrow of the bones. The revelation of this matter is, that without this faculty, no being can live, therefore the seed of the serpent must steal this faculty from the children of Yahweh, which is the process of adultery or mongrelization, and one of the reasons for their ritual murders. Therefore all Jews are mongrels or a hybrid.

Histologically, the White corpuscles of the Jew are long and stringy, as opposed to man’s corpuscles which are round. History documents that a family of Jews can not long survive without adultery, to renew their life force, from a host, as the parasite and vampire. When a Jew becomes very deficient in this life force (blood) then he develops a disease known as Ta Sachs syndrome. (We can assure you that if you try to find some documented information on this subject, that it is there, but it will be very hard to find it) this is a disease only found in the seed of the serpent, the vampire Jews. This disease will kill them, unless they can gain the blood of a child of Yahweh by transfusion. This means that in order to survive, the Jew must seek adultery ever few generations or the family dies out without periodic transfusions. (Is this what is happening to the thousands of our young children that disappear every year, never to be heard of again? Of course it is!)

HALLELUJAH! Revelation 20:1-3 tells us that Satan and his minions of Jews will be isolated from the world for a thousand years, in which time most of all of these vampires shall be consumed by Ta Sachs disease for lack of man’s blood.

“And I saw an angel come down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit and a great chain in his hand. And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years, And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season.”

However until that time we are faced with the following quote:

“Mongrelization with man is essential so Jewry can renew the depleted life force. Extensive mongrelization can change the outward appearance so much that the Jewish characteristics are difficult, if not impossible to perceive. (This is why Yahweh said to let the tares (Jews) and the wheat (Israelites) grow together, because even the angels would not be able to tell them apart until the time of the harvest, and the wheat would be full of seed, but the tares would be empty) When that occurs and Satan is about to transform himself (2 Corinthians 11:14-15) into a human automatically possessing the Life Force of Yahweh, Divine Law intervenes and the next generation reverts back with all the physical characteristics known as Jewish, and that line of Devils is entirely sterile.” (The Mystery of the Serpent, by B.C. Jackson)

Therefore, we can conclude the seed of the serpent is a “hybrid,” genealogically a mongrel. A hybrid is a mongrel produced by crossing two distinct species. This is cacogenic reproduction, which vitiates the blood, the Divine Life Force of the flesh. In the case of the seed of the serpent it enhances life, but in the case of man it depletes and deteriorates life.

The same parasitic/vampire principles for Jews to survive physically, also apply to their material existence. The Jews are a totally unproductive ilk, that steal the material assets of man by whatever means necessary, including murder. These parasites attach themselves to a system all along the line, between producer and consumer, milking off the profits that belong to man. (Understand, the Jew serpent seed on this earth is not identified as man, but as serpents, vipers, dragons, cockatrice, brute beasts, Satan, devils, Canaanites, Edomites, Babylonians and Jews according to the Bible)

Now we believe the reader should understand that the word “serpent” is used and defined in three distinct usages. We will give only the distinct definition pertaining to the serpent seed of Lucifer, manifest in world Jewry. The serpent in Genesis chapter three refers to the parasitic vampire Jew. In Strong’s Concordance this serpent is “nachash” in the original Hebraic. However, the Hebrew word nachash does not always refer to the serpent seed of Lucifer. One must know how to use the Concordance to determine when the word serpent is used otherwise. Allow us to quote B.F. Jackson on this matter:

“When the word (in the concordance) contains a dash, or a bar, under the second and third characters, it means occult science, witchcraft, black magic. When a dot is included under the bars, the word means the Serpent race fathered by the original material Devil, and the race is the racial body of the Devil in similar manner as Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, Celtic, Nordic people are the Racal body of Israel. The Serpent in Genesis 3 is written with bars and dots under the two last characters, to prove he is Satan’s cursed Serpent race of Jews; and the word ‘Jew’ is Yehudin in the Hebraic, Aramic and Greek, which mean the race cursed by God, notwithstanding the Jew lie that it means the sons of Judah.”

In light of this information, we find, according to Strong’s Concordance, the words serpent/serpents, appear (31) times in the Old Testament, referring to the serpent seed, the Jews, and we find that in the New Testament, Yahshua speaking to or of the Scribes, Pharisees, and Sadducees, who were/are Jews, He referred to them (14) times as serpents. The Word of God supplies us with the Answers to the who, what, and where concerning the parasitic vampire seed of the serpent! Much history could be documented here in support of this message, but space does not allow.

Please understand that the serpent seed of Jews in the world, usurped the identity and name of Judah, way back in the time of ancient Babylon. Today the seed of the serpent claim to be the tribe of Judah, when IN FACT, Germany represents the original tribe of Judah. In several scriptures in the Bible, Judah is identified as the Royal Tribe of the House of Israel. The Bible further documents the promise of Yahweh, that kings would come from the loins of Jacob/Israel. History documents, that all of the kings and Queens of Europe trace their genealogy to Germany, the Royal Tribe of Israel. THIS IS THE REASON WHY THE SEED OF THE SERPENT, THE JEWS HATES GERMANY AND GERMANS WITH A VENGEANCE! In order for the Jews to army on their evil charade, they must destroy Germany, and obliterate anything German on this earth. In this process, the Devilish ilk, with the aid of their proselytes, have murdered millions of White Caucasian, Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, Celtic, Nordic, and Slavic children of Yahweh.

“That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Able unto the blood of Zachariah son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.” (Matthew 23:35)

As we know, the governments of Russia, England, Israel and the United States of America are all one and the same ilk, the seed of the serpent. (Those that are not Jews, they are proselytes doing the bidding of the Jews) However, when the Jews turn Russia loose against Germany and the United States, (and they will) for it’s final destruction, they will fail.

“In that day will I make the governors of Judah like an hearth of fire among the wood, and like a torch of fire in a sheaf; and they shall devour all the people round about, on the right hand and on the left: and Jerusalem shall be inhabited again in her own place, even in Jerusalem.” (Zechariah 12:6)

The Throne of David is for everlasting, and in spite of the overwhelming control and destruction imposed by the vampire Jews, we shall prevail by and through the victorious second coming of our King of kings, Yahshua, or Redeemer and Savior.   

The Shelah Connection:

To understand that the Pharisees at the time of Christ and those of Jewry in the 20th century are at least partial descendants of the children of the flesh, we must go back and begin with Judah, Jacob's 4th son of Leah and his descendants. The story of Judah's marriage and descendants is recorded in Genesis, Chapter 38.

     Genesis, Chapter 37 ends with Joseph being sold into Egypt and the story of Joseph starts again in Chapter 39. It is both interesting and strange that Chapter 38 should be placed at this particular place in the Scriptures about a subject totally unrelated to the former and latter chapters.

     We are told in verse 1 that Judah "went down from his brethren." This appears to have been an act of poor judgement such as later Dinah exhibited and was raped due to her poor judgement. We are not told the reason for Judah's poor judgement but it begins the history of conflict between Judah and his brothers which will continue till the later separation of the nation into the House of Israel and the House of Judah.

     Judah, being separated from his family ties, could and did fall prey to the women in the land who were not his kinsmen according to the flesh. We are told that Judah:

"...saw there a daughter of a certain Canaanite, whose name was Shuah; and he took her, and went in unto her." (Genesis 38:2)

This connection was contrary to the will of God and Judah should have known better from his upbringing if not the example of his fathers. His indiscretion or poor judgement in forming an alliance with the people in the land was a crime that produced bastard children. If this bastardization of Israel was to continue the chosen people would soon be assimilated into surrounding heathenism and would no longer be God's chosen people.

Thus we see the necessity for God to separate His people from these heathen peoples. In any event Judah took a Canaanite for a wife and had three bastard sons {sons born from mixed seed}: Er, Onan, and Shelah. We say bastard sons because in the Old Testament a bastard was a child born from a mixed marriage with an Israelite and another race. (See Strong's Concordance) When the time came that Er, Judah's eldest son, was to have a wife, Judah obtained for him a woman named Tamar.

We are not told how or why, but Er was "wicked in the sight of the Lord" (Genesis 38:7) and the Lord slew him. We are not told what this wickedness was but the word used here also means evil and mischief and these definitions lead many to believe this evil had something to do with the law. Being raised by his Canaanite mother, he would have become indoctrinated in the ways of the pagan Canaanites - not the ways of the Lord.

According to the law, Onan, Er's younger brother, had to marry Tamar and raise up seed to his elder brother, Er. However, Onan was wicked also, and refused to do this, spilling his seed on the ground. (Genesis 38:9) This was probably because of the threat of losing the inheritance {that is, he would be raising up seed for his brother}, again, possibly from the training he received from his Canaanite mother. In any event, God also slew Onan. Once again, according to the law Tamar should have been given to the third son, Shelah, that he might raise up sons for his elder brother.

However, by this time Judah must have been just a little bit concerned. After all, Tamar had already been the wife of two of his sons and both had been killed by the Lord. Thus it is easy to understand his reluctance. Scripture tells us that Judah told Tamar to wait until Shelah was older; however, when he got older Judah failed or refused to give Tamar to Shelah. Tamar waited and waited but Shelah eventually took another for a wife, apparently with his father's blessing.

It is recorded in the 45th chapter of the book of Jasher that Tamar was a daughter from the genealogy of Elam, the son of Shem. That she was a daughter of Shem makes sense in view of what Judah said when he found out she was pregnant with child. Scripture records that it was reported to Judah that:

"Tamar thy daughter in law hath played the harlot; and also behold, she is with child by whoredom. And Judah said, Bring her forth, and let her be burnt."  (Genesis 38:7)

Stoning was the normal mode of capital punishment at that time in history - death by fire was not the normal procedure used to execute someone. Therefore it is significant that Judah pronounced death by burning for that was reserved for priests' daughters who brought disgrace upon the sacred office. The law states:

"And the daughter of any priest, if she profane herself by playing the whore, she profaneth her father: she shall be burnt with fire." (Leviticus 21:9)

Since Judah pronounced death by fire we are able to conclude that she must have been the daughter of a priest. However, one would think that if she was, she should be aware of the law prohibiting mixed marriages. But perhaps that was not the case.  Tamar could have been imported from another geographical area as was Rebecca for Isaac. Thus at the time of her arrival and marriage to Er and Onan she could have been unaware of the covenant God had made with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob/Israel. Not being aware of the covenant she would not know that the two men she married were half Canaanite and half Israelite and not legitimate heirs to the promise. By the time Shelah had taken another wife, Tamar was probably educated in the covenant relationship with God and realized that even if she was given to Shelah, any sons from that union would not produce a bloodline heir. This is about the only logical reason for her to play the harlot, entrapping Judah to become the father of her children (Pharez and Zerah) at the risk of being put to fiery death. It would also partially explain Judah's response when he found out that he was the father and stated:

"She is more righteous than I; forasmuch as I gave her not to Shelah my son." (Genesis 38:26)

Although Judah may not have totally understood or admitted that his marriage to a Canaanite was in violation of the law, he is, at least, acknowledging that Tamar should have been the mother of children of the birthright. He must have understood this birthright problem sooner or later, as the scepter was not passed to Shelah, Judah's third and only surviving son from Shuah, but to Judah's firstborn son from Tamar who was named Pharez. This is evidenced by the fact that Pharez's name appears in the genealogies of Christ in Matthew 1:3 and Luke 3:23.

The union of Judah with Tamar produced the twin births of Pharez and Zerah, and once again Judah had three sons: 1). Shelah, who was a bastard {½ Canaanite & ½ of Judah} by his Canaanite wife; 2). Pharez; and 3). Zerah, the latter two both from Tamar. Pharez and Zerah being the sons of Judah, the son of Jacob/Israel, and Tamar the daughter of the genealogy of Shem, were full-blooded Israelites even though they were born out of wedlock. The whole story is recorded in Genesis 38. These births produced three descendant lines from Judah which we will call Pharez-Judah, Zerah-Judah, and Shelah-Judah. The question now becomes, what happened to the three descendants of Judah: Pharez, Zerah and Shelah? It will simply be stated at this point in the study that Pharez and Zerah were children of the promise whereas Shelah was a child of the flesh and destined to become the father of the Pharisees. This study will not be concerned with Pharez and Zerah - only the family of Shelah will be addressed.


We need to keep in mind the fact that a strict genealogy was kept on each tribe. Even though Shelah was a bastard son of Judah, his genealogy is given in Scripture and his descendants can be traced to the city of Elath. In Chronicles it is recorded:

"The sons of Judah; Er, and Onan, and Shelah: which three were born unto him of the daughter of Shua the Canaanite. And Er, the firstborn of Judah, was evil in the sight of the LORD; and he slew him. And Tamar his daughter in law bare him Pharez and Zerah.

All the sons of Judah were five. The sons of Pharez; Hezron, and Hamul. And the sons of Zerah; Zimri, and Ethan, and Heman, and Calcol, and Dara: five of them in all. And the sons of Carmi; Achar, the troubler of Israel, who transgressed in the thing accursed. And the sons of Ethan; Azariah." (1 Chronicles)

Verse 3 is unusual, as once a name is dropped from the promised seed line it usually does not appear in later genealogies. For example the descendants of Cain do not appear in the genealogies of Adam in Genesis, Chapter 5, or Matthew 1 or Luke 3. It is difficult to determine exactly when the Book of Chronicles was written, however verse 1 of chapter 9 states:

"So all Israel were reckoned by genealogies; and, behold, they were written in the book of the kings of Israel and Judah, who were carried away to Babylon for their transgression." (1 Chronicles 9:1)

Since the first 8 chapters deal with the genealogies of Adam to this statement in verse 1 of chapter 9, which refers to the Babylonian captivity, it seems apparent that this portion of Chronicles was not recorded until sometime after the Babylonian captivity (600 B.C.) - perhaps by Ezra or Nehemiah.

Again, all of Judah's sons must be important or they would not be recorded in Scripture, especially since the descendants of Shelah were not children of the promise. It should be noted that verses 5 and 6 list the descendants of Pharez and Zerah, and verse 8 begins with Ethan, a son of Zerah. What is missing here are the sons of Shelah. But verse 7 seems to be completely out of place as it lists the genealogy of a person named "Carmi."

Carmi is not one of the five sons of Judah, nor is he listed in the Genealogies of Pharez or Zerah. The name also appears in 1 Chr. 4:1, but it is still unclear whose son he was. However, it is most interesting that his son "Achar" is referred to as "the troubler of Israel, who transgressed in the thing accursed." (You can read the story about the thing accursed in Joshua 6:18) While it appears impossible to prove it, it is suggested that "Carmi" and his son "Achar," the troubler of Israel, were in the genealogy of Shelah.

We mentioned that these names were also listed in Chronicles, chapter 4, as follows: "The sons of Shelah the son of Judah were, Er the father of Lecah, and Laadah the father of Maresbah, and the families of the house of them that wrought fine linen, of the house of Ashbea, And Jokim, and the men of Chozeba, and Joash, and Saraph, who had the dominion in Moab, and Jashubilehem. And these are ancient things. These were the potters, and those that dwelt among plants and hedges; thee they dwell with the king for his work." (1 Chronicles 4:21-23)

Again there is no mention of "Carmi" nor his son "Achar," but her we do have a reference to these descendants of Shelah being "men of Chozeba." Chozeba was a town in southwestern Judah and is also the town of Chezib of Genesis 38:5 and Achzib of Joshua 15:44. The words Chezib, Achzib or Chozeba mean "lying," "deceptive," "disappointing," or "failing." It is also interesting that Shelah-Judah was born in Chezib (Genesis 38:5) and it appears that his descendants centuries later inherited this same city.

In Joshua we find that:

"This then was the lot of the tribe of the children of Judah by their families; even to the border of Edom the wilderness of Zin southward was the utter most part of the south coast. And Keilab, and Achzib, and Mareshah; nine cities with their villages." (Joshua 15: 1, 44)

Thus we see that the town of "Achzib" was given to some descendants of Judah. Achzib or Chozeba was located in the valley of Elath. ELATH WAS IN OLD EDOM in the valley of Elath and north of Adullum. The word "Adullum" should ring a bell as that was the place where Judah went down from his brothers and took a Canaanite for a wife. This was on the extreme southern border of the Southern Kingdom of Judah at the northern end of the Gulf of Aquabah.

In fact most scholars seem to be in agreement that this area was actually outside the land inherited by Judah. This would make some sense as we know that a bastard could not even enter the congregation, even unto the tenth generation; (Deuteronomy 23:2) therefore it would also make sense that these Shelahites, being bastards, could not inherit land belonging to the children of the promise.

But this does not mean that they could not be given land on the southern border of Judah. The city of Elath was next to Ezion-geber, which would later become Solomon's seaport. Remember now that these Shelahites are ½ Canaanite, and the word Canaanite is defined in Strong's Concordance as merchants and traders. Doesn't it seem logical that merchants and traders would congregate in the cities, and especially in and around a busy seaport where they could engage in trade, commerce, and industry?

There is another reference to this city named "Achzib" in the Book of Micah where it states: "The house of Achzib shall be a lie to the kings of Israel." (Micah 1:14)

Is it just a coincidence that Shelah was born at "Chezib" which is basically the same word as Achzib? Is it coincidence that the word "Achzib so closely resembles and has the same meaning as "Achar," the troubler of Israel? Remember these words mean "lying," "deceptive," "disappointing," or "falling." Was it not a lie that Shelah was a true child of the promise? Would not their existence next to and/or as a part of Israel make any claim they would make as being a descendant of Abraham, (John 8) entitled to receive the promises, a lie or at the least a clever deception?

Jews From Elath:

Elath or Eloth was a part of the land of Edom belonging to the descendants of Esau who were called Edomites an later Idumeans. Apparently Elath and Ezion-geber came under the control of Israel in 1040 B.C. by David's conquest of Edom as recorded in 2 Samuel 8:13-14. This land is also mentioned as being under the rule of Solomon in approximately 1000 B.C.(1 Kings 9:26; 2 Chronicles 8:17) The land passed back into Edomite control in 890 B.C. during the days of Jehoarm, king of Judah. (2 Kings 8:20-22) 80 years later in 810 B.C., the city of Elath was rebuilt  under the kingship of Azariah or Uszziah.(2 Kings 14:21-22 and 2 Chronicles 26:1-2) This historical background brings us to the time of the "Jews from Elath" as recorded in 2 Kings, Chapter 16, which states:

"In the seventeenth year of Pekah the son of Remaliah Ahaz the son of Jotham king of Judah began to reign. Then Rezin king of Syria and Pekah son of Remaliah king of Israel came up to Jerusalem to war; and they besieged Ahaz, but could over come him. At that time Rezin king of Syria recovered Elath to Syria, and drave the Jews from Elath..." (2 Kings 16:1, 5-6)

Keep in mind that the time frame is approximately 750 B.C., which is around 200 years after the split of Israel into the Houses of Judah and Israel in 975 B.C., and just before the beginning of the Assyrian captivity in 721-745 B.C. By this time Jotham was the king of Judah {the two southern tribes of Judah and Benjamin}, and Pekah was the king of Israel {the 10 northern tribes}.It is the king of Syria, and Pekah, the king of Israel {not Judah}, who formed an alliance and went  to war against the House of Judah. During that war they were unable to take Jerusalem, but Rezin, king of Syria, was able to recover the city of Elath and "drave the Jews from Elath." (2 Kings 16:6)

As previously stated, Elath was far south of the area inherited by Judah and was given to Shelah as an inheritance. Again this was probably done because as a bastard, he could not enter the congregation of Israel nor inherit with the children of Israel. Remember, these people were part Canaanite, and in Strong's Concordance the word "Canaanite" means merchants and traders. Merchants cannot be merchants except in populated areas and therefore would have a propensity to migrate towards the cities, so it is logical to conclude that they were the ones who resided in Elath and were driven there-from.

It was from this area called Elath, and this area alone, that Rezin "drave the Jews." Ahaz, king of Judah {Southern Kingdom}, was still in Jerusalem and was never defeated nor was he driven anywhere. Pekah, king of Israel {Northern Kingdom}, apparently returned home. Therefore, whatever "Jews" were driven from Elath were only a small portion of people located South of Judah - not all of the House of Judah, and none of the House of Israel. Therefore, the word "Jews," as used in this verse does not include any people from the House of Israel and probably none from the House of Judah. This limits the use of the word "Jew" in the Old Testament to a very small group of people who resided in the town of Elath, who were most likely descendants of Shelah.

Scripture does not tell us where these so-called "Jews from Elath" went after being driven from Elath, but being traders and merchants they would be city dwellers, and it is probably safe to assume that they moved north to the walled city of Jerusalem. After Rezin "drave the Jews" from Elath the area was again populated but this time by Edomites.

The word "Jews" is used for the first time in Scripture in the King James Authorized (KJA) version in this verse. If you own a 1592 copy of the Geneva Bible, or a 1611 King James version and will open it to this verse you will not find the word "Jew."

According to the Jewish Encyclopedia:

"Up to the seventeenth century this word was spelled in the Middle English in various ways:...Ieue, Ieu, Iwe, Iewe, Iue... corresponding to the Hebrew...a gentile adjective from the proper name 'Judah' seemingly never a;;lied to member of the tribe {of Judah}, however, but to members of the nationality inhabiting the South of Palestine. It appears to have been afterward extended to apply to Israelites in the North..." (The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. VII, p. 174)

If you will once again look at 2 Kings 16:6 in an original 1611 KJA version, you will find one of these words - You will not find the word "Jews."  And probably more interesting in this quote is the fact that the word "Ieue,' etc., was never applied to the tribe of Judah but to a nationality "inhabiting the South of Palestine." The encyclopedia fails to point out who these people were but it has previously been shown that the land South of Judah was occupied by the Shelah branch of Judah - a bastard son from his Canaanite wife.

According to Biblical scholar Alexander Schiffner:

"The first reference to any Jews in Scripture is found in 2 Kings 16:6. The name was applied TO A REMNANT OF JUDAH’S DESCENDANTS OF THE SHELAH BRANCH. Shelah-Judah was born in Chezib (Genesis 38:5) and his descendants centuries later inherited his territory. (Joshua 15:1, 13, 44) REMEMBER A STRICT GENEALOGY WAS KEPT OF EACH TRIBE AND BRANCH. (2 Kings 16:5-7; 1 Chronicles 2:1-15; Ezra 2:59, 62, 64; Matthew 1:1-25; Luke 3:23-38) Chezib, (Genesis 38:5)  Achzib (Joshua 15:44) and Chozeba (1 Chronicles 4:21-22) refer to one and the same place. it was a town in the lowlands of western Judah and was given to the Shelah branch of Judah for their inheritance. (Joshua 15:1, 13, 44)

This then was the lot of the tribe of the children of Judah BY THEIR FAMILIES.  The word Chezib, Achzh or Chozeba means 'deceptive' or 'failing' and the place received its name from a winter spring or brook, which failed in the summer heat. {Symbolic of the failing of the Shelah branch of Judah under trial}. It was the place where Judah was at the time of the birth of his half-breed son, Shelah. (Genesis 38:5)

In 1 Chronicles 4:21-22 it is called 'Chozeba.' it is in the valley of Elath and north of Addulum. Note 2 Kings 16:6 - the first reference to this branch of Judah; 'the Jews of Elath.' The Jews are the remnant' of 'Yehudim' of Judah. This branch of Judah rejected Christ. They are the open witness, 'The shew of their countenance doth witness against them - their tongue and their doings are against the Lord - they declare their sin as Sodom, they hide it not.' (Isaiah 3:8-9)." (From the "Five Sons of Judah," written by Alexander Schiffner, editor, Prophetic Herald, Spokane, WA)

James Fox, the author of several books, wrote of Shelah:

"The reason for the divergence of facial appearance between the true Hebrew or Abrahamic White-Race Men, and the Jews, is that the patriarch Judah disobeyed God's will at the outset by marrying a Canaanitish woman called 'Shua' (Genesis 38:1-5), producing descendants all half-castes, later known as 'Jews.'” (The Glorious Majesty of His Kingdom, J.S. Fox, 1 st ed., 1958, p. 10)

According to these authors, the "Jews of Elath" were the 'remnant' of 'Yehudim' of Judah, and verses 5 and 6 of 2 Kings, chapter 16, are the first reference to the mongrel Canaanite branch of Judah where they are referred to as "Jews." (Actually "Ieue," etc., in the 1611 KJA Version) The use of the word "Jews" in 2 Kings 16:6 rather than "Ieues" has added to the misconception that the Jews are all of Israel, when it is obvious that in this verse only a small group of people were implied - those living in Elath - which omits the entire northern ten tribes and the majority of the House of Judah.

The major problem with the Jew in Any-town USA's conversations is that the word carries so many definitions and so few seem very want to know fully what he is really talking about or referring to when he uses the term "Jew."

Most so-called (c)hristians of today, even those who are of Israelite stock, and are not aware of it, don't want to hear the words, concepts and truth contained in this study. Those of Israelite heritage may find some fulfillment in Jeremiah's words, found in Chapter 5:30-31 which sound all too familiar: "A wonderful and horrible thing is committed in the land; The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests bear rule by their means; and my people love to have it so; and what will ye do in the end thereof?"

Some think that the King James Version is the only correct version. This version was written in 1611, but it for sure contains some errors. Look at John 4:22, where Christ tells the woman of Samari: "Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship; for salvation is of the Jews."

This is a primary script for the problem we face today, for any discerning true Christian Israelite should see this is not a true statement, but rather a false one based on its own merits.


The Ferrar Fenton version, which comes from the original Greek text, says: "the salvation comes from among the Judeans." Now which way should we Israelites come to know fully the truth of this verse? If Christ came out of the region of Judea and the Hebrew tribe of Judah, then He is the way, the truth and the life. (John 14:6) Paul planted the first Christian Church in Corinth, teaching that Christ is the Salvation for HIS people. But we hear the resounding common statement, but Pontius Pilate said that He was "King of the Jews." But did he really say that as most, deceived, Judeo-Christians believe?

There are some who say, "Thank God! My Savior Was Not A Jew!," that there is a historical record found in the Achoko Volume in the Congressional Library in Washington, D.C., containing an official record of one of Pilate's correspondences.

He states on pages 137-139:

"The Archoko record gives an eye-witness account from Pontius Pilate, who testified that Jesus did not look like, or act like a Jew. Here is the account as it appears in this official record: To Tiberius Caesar, Emperor of Rome Noble Sovereign, Greetings: '...Among various rumors that came to my ears there was one in particular that came to my attention. A young man it was said, had appeared in Galilee, preaching with noble unction a new law in the name of the God who sent him. At first I was apprehensive that his design was to stir up the people against the Romans, but my fears were soon dispelled.

Jesus of Nazareth spoke rather as a friend of the Romans than of the Jews. One day in passing by the place of Siloe, where there was a great concourse of people, I observed in the midst of the group a young man who was leaning against a tree, calmly addressing the multitude. I was told it was Jesus.

This I could easily have suspected, so great was the difference between him and those who listened to him. His golden colored hair and beard gave to his appearance an almost celestial aspect.

He appeared to be about thirty years of age. Never have I seen a sweeter or more serene countenance. What a contrast between he and his hearers with their black beards and tawny complexions!...

Never have I heard in the words of the philosopher, anything that can compare with the maxims of Jesus. One of the rebellious Jews, so numerous in Jerusalem, asked Jesus if it was lawful to give tribute to Caesar, he replied: 'Render unto Caesar the things which belong to Caesar, and unto God the things which are God's...

I wrote to Jesus requesting an interview with him at the praetorium and he came."  (Think now for a moment on your own, without having some Judeo-Christian preacher tell you that this is fantasy. What would be so strange in this? Even though this meeting is not recorded in the Gospels, we know that most of what Christ did during His three years of public ministry was never recorded.” (See John 21:25)

Pilate's report to Caesar continues:

“You know that in my veins flows the Spanish mixed with Roman blood...When the Nazarene made his appearance, I was walking in my basilic, and my feet seemed fastened with an iron hand to the marble pavement, and I trembled in every limb as does a guilty culprit, though the Nazarene was as calm as innocence itself. When he came up to me and stopped, and by a signal sign seemed to say to me, 'I am here!' though he spoke not a word. For some time I contemplated with admiration and awe, this extraordinary type of man, a type unknown to our numerous painter...There was nothing about him that was repelling in its character and I felt awed and tremulous to approach him.

Jesus, I said to him at last, 'Jesus of Nazareth, for the last three years I have granted you ample freedom of speech (It is not recorded anywhere, either in the Gospels, or Roman historical records, that the Romans ever attempted to suppress Christ's ministry) nor do I regret it. Your words are those of a sage. I know not whether you have read Socrates or Plato, but this I know, there is in your discourse a majestic simplicity that elevates you above those philosophers...'your blood shall not be spilled,' I said, with deep emotion, 'you are more precious in my estimation on account of your wisdom than all the turbulent and proud Pharisees who abuse the freedoms granted them by Rome. They conspire against Caesar, and convert his bounty into fear, impressing on the unlearned, that Caesar is a tyrant who seeks their ruin...i will protect you against them. My praetorium shall be an asylum both day and night.' I am our obedient servant, Pontius Pilate."

You can accept this letter, as we do, since it makes sense, or dismiss it as most of your Judeo-Christian preachers and church Bible scholars will do. But, think for yourself! Doesn't it make sense to you that the Jews would try and suppress this truth? There is one point in the aforementioned passage of Acts 18 that most folks seem to over look. Paul came to Corinth and planted the first Christian Church with the True Israelite inhabitants who apparently were worshiping Judaism out of ignorance. With little success at first, but a s a rational, as well as spiritual preacher, Paul reasoned with all Jews (Both non-Israel and True Israel) not with force or violence but by fair arguing he won some over to his own opinion.

In verses 9 and 10, Paul had a vision. Each of us ought to know fully this vision and effectively grasp its meaning in our lives, today, as White Israelites. We read in the King James Version:

"Then spake the Lord to Paul in the night by a vision, Be not afraid, but speak, and hold not thy peace: For I am with thee, and no man shall set on thee to hurt thee: for I have much people in this city."

We should renew our own commission "be not afraid of the Jews."  That means be not afraid of the magistrates of the city, county, state or federal for they have no power against you but what is given them from above. We are pleading, like Paul, the cause of heaven and we need to do it boldly. We should not be afraid of their words, nor dismayed at their quirky looks and fraudulent judgments. At the right times we should speak, and not hold back.

We should let no opportunity slip by without speaking in defense of Christianity and in opposition to the Jews and their hideous Judaism. We should not speak shyly or with caution, but up front, plainly and fully and with courage. We need to speak out in the liberty of the Spirit that becomes an ambassador for Christ.

Paul did speak up and the "Jews" rose up against him, but the Lord went to court with him and threw out his accusers by the hand of a person in high position.

In this city that "Jews flocked to" you must remember that Corinth was a very profane and wicked city, full of impurity of all kinds and idols of all kinds. Yet in this great evil heap, with all its contempt for White Christian Israelites, i.e., the wheat, it sure seemed to human knowledge that the chaff would over come, but in this ore that seems to be all dross, there is gold. Even in Corinth, Christ had much people.

So we need to unseat this "fear of the Jews syndrome" and expose their evil, wicked plot to destroy all Christianity. This needs to be done today, before time runs out. Have you come "to know fully" the truth about Judaism and Christianity?

In verses 12-17 of Acts, Chapter 18, we find another of Paul's many trying times with the Jews {worshipers of Judaism - Traditions of the Elders}. Paul is accused by member of this Jewish sect before the Roman Governor, Gallio. Gallio was the deputy of Achaia, that is he was the proconsul for this province of the Roman Empire. In modern words this Jewish sect filed a frivolous complaint in a Roman court against Paul and Gallio was to be the presiding judge.

Paul was rudely apprehended with violence and fury in broad day light. These Jews cared little for public peace and justice, so they made insurrection. To me this means that they used disturbance of the public peace and force, i.e., vi et armis, to apprehend Paul. They had little concern for his welfare or the safety of others. They, as they do today, already had pronounced Paul guilty in the media of their day. Just as they had at the trials of Christ. These enforcers hurried Paul off, probably in chains, to the judgment seat before Gallio. Paul was allowed no time, whatsoever, to prepare for his trial. Sounds like a familiar patriot scenario of arrest today, does it not?

Paul, much like Christ, is falsely accused before Gallio (v. 13). What was the formal charge? "This fellow persuades men to worship God contrary to the law." My what a crime! Paul must have been "anti-Semitic." These Jews could not charge him with persuading men NOT to worship God at all or to worship other Gods. (See Deuteronomy 13:2) So the only trumped up charge they could accuse him of breaking was "that he was attempting to persuade men to worship God in a way contrary to the law."

Now what in the world would you consider as being "contrary to the law." Does this sound a familiar alarm today? Sure it does! If you act "contrary" to the "law" of Title 26, your state motor vehicle "laws," or your property appraisal and collection "laws," see how fast you will be jerked up before some judgment seat and be made to pay for your "crimes."

The Romans allowed the Jews in all their provinces the observation of their own law. But, remember in verse 2, it is recorded, that Jews had been commanded to leave Rome. I wonder why? Did they have a Jewish problem in the society of that day?

But who would enforce Jewish law in such a city of idols and corruption? Should all persons therefore be prosecuted as criminals, who worship God in any other way than that prescribed by the tenets of Judaism? The big question before Gallio is, "Does Roman toleration include a power of imposition?" Could Roman law force Paul or anyone to stop practicing any activity contrary to what the "Jews" call their law?

You must remember that the Jewish religion hates Christ and all goyium, i.e., White People. This is why the Jews of Corinth were so uptight against Paul for he was preaching Salvation through the Blood of Christ. This tenet of Israelite Christianity is unacceptable then and today for the Jews of this Pharisaism, i.e., Judaism.

How the so-called (c)hristian of today can use the term Judeo-Christian is a gigantic mystery to many. When will the little "c" Christians come "to know fully" that these are two diametrically opposites. Just like black against white, not verses cold and light verses dark?

Paul was charged unjustly. Are White Israelite patriots ever charged unjustly, for violating some phantom law? Do they have ample opportunity to be tried in courts of certified common law venue where justice, fairness and real law prevails? Rarely, if ever, not since about 1861 have justice been had in such courts.

Paul had a different circumstance at this hearing than most patriots are usually afforded today. Gallio had a sweet nature and was sympathetic and apparently a stickler for the letter of the law. For Gallio reasoned that the Jews in their own law, had in it a promise of a Prophet whom God would raise up to them, and they should listen to him and/or hear him.

And Paul only persuaded people to believe in this Prophet, who was to come and to hear Him, which was all according "to the law." For this Prophet came not to destroy the law, but to fulfill it. Paul's teaching contradicted Judaism, partially the idea of Christ being the Messiah.

At the first hearing or, perhaps, a better way to put it, is no hearing at all, for Gallio dismisses the cause and states that he will not take any cognizance of the issue, at all (v. 14-15). Paul was just about to make his defense which he apparently became so eloquently accustomed to doing. (See Acts 24-26) Paul was about to present evidence that would prove that he did not teach men to worship contrary to the law, when Gallio rules that he will not be troubled with this case and will not pass sentence upon it nor even allow himself the trouble of examining it.

He, Gallio, was very capable of doing the part of a judge in any matter properly placed before him to take cognizance of. He said to the Jews, that were the prosecutors, "If it were a matter of wrong, or wicked lewdness," if you could charge the prisoner with theft or fraud, with murder or plunder or any act of immorality.

We would be bound to hear you with your complaint or accusations. Just because these Jews were loud and noisy and rude petitioners of this court, there was no valid reason to give them a hearing in any obvious unjust case. If the petitioner's cause had been just then it would have been the duty of Gallio or any magistrate to cause justice to be done. That means redress the injured party to be afforded his right(s).

Then Gallio would pass comment and give the court's sentence upon the party causing the injury. If the complaint had merits even though not made with all the decorum of a judicial case, Gallio would have felt bound to hear the petitioner, no matter how rude and noisy they were in presenting it. But Gallio will not and did not allow these Jews a chance to make a complaint to him for something not within his jurisdiction (v. 15). Oh, if we had a few judges and magistrates today of the caliber to determine rightful venue and jurisdiction. This Jude would not allow the Jews to burden his patience by hearing it nor would he burden his conscience with passing judgment upon this matter. And when the Jews hollered and screamed more and more, he found them in contempt of "his" court and drove them from the seat of judgment (v. 16). Then he called the next cause. Bravo, Bravo!!!

This passage makes one think that Gallio conducted himself in a dignified and honorable mode. If only we had judges today who possessed this character. He did not want to, nor even pretend to judge spiritual things that he did not really understand.

This judgment would be left to the Jews in matters regarding their religion of Judaism. Yet he would not allow, the Jews to make him {Gallio} their instrument or tool of malice and pretend to pass judgment against Paul {he was following the example Pilate showed when he washed his hands of the matter concerning Christ, and told the Jews to do what they would, but he would have nothing to do with killing Christ}. Gallio looked upon this matter as not within his venue and jurisdiction and he did not intend to meddle in this affair anymore than a dismissal.

Gallio seems to have understood the law better than he did religious and/or worship. Whether Christ was the Messiah and of God, was not the issue before his court and he felt no need to take "judicial notice" of the law of any God. Whether the Gospel teachings of Christ the Messiah was of divine origin or not as these were not questions of words and names (v. 15) as Gallio scornfully and profanely called them. These are valid concerns for Christianity and Judaism but not for a Roman Court, and he felt because of his ignorance of Judaism and Christianity, he did not want to inquire very far into them.

"In 1923, Trotsky, and Lunatcharsky PRESIDED OVER A MEETING IN MOSCOW ORGANIZED by the propaganda section of the Communist party TO JUDGE GOD. Five thousand men of the Red Army were present. The Accused [Almighty God] was found guilty of various ignominious acts and having had the audacity to fail to appear, He [God] was condemned in default." (Ost Express, January 30, 1923. Cf. Berliner Taegeblatt May 1, 1923. See the details of the Bolshevist struggle against religion in The Assault of Heaven by A. Valentinoff (Boswell); The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 144‑145)

Then like today, a great contempt was placed upon the court by the Jews and/or Greeks. For they took Sosthenes and beat him in open contempt of Gallio's dismissal of the case against Paul. Look what happened, recently, in California and other places. If the Jews of Judaism can't have it their way against Christians, they will take it out in some other manner. They were enraged against not only Paul, but also against Gallio and his court of justice.

They wanted to be their own prosecutors and if Gallio would not rule in their favor, they would become their own judges and executioners. Apparently the contempt showed what the Jews did, and it did not come before Gallio's court. Gallio cared for none of those things (v. 17) is a puzzling concept of a man who somehow tried to help Paul for whatever reason.

If we can presume that this means that this judge is calloused against the things that bad men do to good men, except when brought into his jurisdiction, we find a flaw in the character of this Roman judge. As a judge he should have protected Sosthenes as much as he did Paul. But the facts point out that he did not. This kind of indifference carries just-us attitudes that compliments tyranny. His do-nothing attitude is evidence of one of Isaiah's writings: "that truth is fallen in the street, and equity cannot enter, and he that departeth from evil maketh himself a prey."  (Isaiah 59:14-15) Sounds like modern day news reporting, doesn't it?

Our courts today appear to adhere to the concept that justice somehow means just-us and all outsiders (non-Jews) will fall in line under its power to be administered by our controlled and/or deceived judges. So ask yourself, is there a "Jew" word problem; or a society "Jew" problem? Can I come "to know fully" the difference between Jewish Judaism and real true Israelite Christianity:

The mixing of the two religions don't mix anymore than trying to mix oil and water. Those who are truly seeking truth have at one time or another had a man/woman sent from God to witness of the Identity Movement and usually they simply ignored it the first time. Then God in His wisdom would send another.

This time the messenger would be so convincing that the Truth Seeker would set out to prove him {or the material if it were a book or some other written information} wrong. To prove it a false concept. Then they found that the more they studied and learned they found that they have been lied to and deceived by a lot of so-called Christian folks. They came to believe that this was more out of ignorance on their part than deliberate, for they are deceived and content, most of them, to live therein.

But when the Lord reveals much more of His Word to them, they decide to re-educate themselves and find that the process is a never ending one. Because as they learn more, God will reveal more - making the Scriptures "seek and ye shall find" ever more true. They soon found that the Identity teachings were more on line than fundamental Christianity as taught in the churches, on TV and radio today.

It appears to them that the more they study, research and meditate, the more the world pulls at their time just to make ends meet. So they know how the world will pull at you as you attempt to learn the truth. The Jew today still works as they did in the hay-day of Corinth to keep True Israelite Christians so busy that they don't have time to stop and smell the roses and find real truth.

It will only be with the help of YHWH {Almighty God} that the financial prison most of us fined ourselves caged in, will open and free us, swinging open the doors of liberty. Such liberty produces the time and resources needed to wage successful campaigns against the onslaught of deceit, lies and deception in to days (c)hristian parishes or folds.

Corinthians were famous for their cleverness, inventiveness and artistic sense. They prided themselves in the embellishment of their city and in the adornment of their heathen temples. But, not a single Corinthian ever distinguished himself in literature. Sound Jewish?

The Adamic Man, White People of Israelite, i.e., Hebrew stock, are the chosen seed of Israel's race. They need to come to know fully who they are, and what they are.

Their heritage demands fulfillment here in this American land, the New Jerusalem as spoken of in the Scriptures. Jesus the Christ, the Salvation of Israel, did not come to the Jewish people. in fact He came against almost everything they stand for. He came to the White Israelites, Matthew 15:24 states:

"I am not sent, but to the lost sheep of the House of Israel." (See James 1:1; John 10:14 & 27)

The World Book omits any reference to the Jews, but under the word Semite it states:

"Semite...Semites are those who speak Semitic languages. In this sense the ancient Hebrews, Assyrians, Phoenicians, and Carthaginians were Semites. The Arabs and some Ethiopians are modern Semitic‑speaking people. Modern Jews are often called Semites, but this name properly applies only to those who use the Hebrew Language. The Jews were once a sub‑type of the Mediterranean race, but they have mixed with other peoples until the name ‘Jew’ has lost all racial meaning."

Who are the Jews and where is the proof of their existence today? The Jewish Encyclopedia, states:

"Edom is in modern Jewry." (The Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925 edition, Vol. 5, p. 41)

There is only one nation in the world that can prove ancestral ties with Edom, and the Jews themselves claim that dubious distinction. To help answer this question further, we refer you to the excellent book (which should be required reading) entitled "Who is Esau-Edom?" (By Charles A. Weisman, copyright 1991, 2nd Edition: May 1992, paperback 128 pages, approx. $8.00. Order from Weisman Publications, %11751 W. Riverhills Dr. #107D, Burnsville, MN 55337)

This little book covers the life, history, genealogy, prophecy, predestination and modern identity of Biblical Esau.

Another excellent booklet by Pastor Bob Hallstrom is entitled "Who Are the Pharisees, and the "Jew" Are they Israel?" (Order from: The Gospel of the Kingdom, % P.O. Box 9411, Boise, Idaho 83707, Phone (208) 375-3425) If you don't understand the information in these two books, you will be unable to properly understand the central focus of the Scripture. The Dake Annotated Reference Bible, while being a scholarly effort, it provides annotations and perspectives which suffer from the authors lack of an informed basis regarding the true identity of the "Jews," Pharisees, Hebrews, and Israel.

In the last century Bram Stocker wrote the book Dracula and in his book he was describing the Jews from the very beginning of their drive to "occupy" our bodies and souls from the very beginning of the Luciferian infiltration of our society.

The Division of Judah:

As we go down through the Scriptures to the point where the people of the southern Kingdom of Judah were also divided into two divisions, namely the “good” and the “evil” figs, as Jeremiah called them. In our previous studies, in this series, we have pointed out that the mogrelized Shelanite descendants of Judah became a port of the Serpent Seed Race, and that these Shelanites became a subversive “fifth column” in the Kingdom of Judah, becoming known as the “inhabitants of Jerusalem.” Furthermore we have also found that the major portion of the people of the southern Kingdom of Judah, i.e., the “men of Judah,” in the 46 fenced cities of Judah, which Sennecherib, the Assyrian, captured, were taken by the Assyrians into “the land of the Medes,” (2 Kings 2:18; Isaiah 36:1) where the people of the northen Kingdom of Israel had been taken. These Judahite exiles joined their Israelite brethren from the northern Kingdom of Israel, who had been exiled to this same land, thus becoming a part of the so-called “lost sheep of Israel,” and joining in the great trek as wanderers among the nations of the world.

After Sennecherib’s raid there remained in the Kingdom of Judah “the inhabitants of Jerusalem,” at that time made u of a remnant of real Judahites and the mogrelized Shelanite-Jebusites, who had entrenched themselves in positions of power and influence in the Kingdom of Judah. More than a hundred years later, according to the 24th of Jeremiah, Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, conquered Judah and he carried captive to Babylon “the king of Judah, and the princes of Judah, with the carpenters and smiths,” (Jeremiah 24:1; 29:2) leaving only “the residue of Jerusalem,” i.e., the Shelanite-Jebusite branch of the Serpent Seed Race in possession of the ruined Kingdom of Judah; and these Satanically inspired Conspirators then claimed for themselves “the lot of Israel’s inheritance,” the land of Canaan, by right of possession. (Ezekiel 11:15)

Ezekiel reveals this abortive Plot in the 11th chapter of his book, where he quotes the Shelanite-Jebusite inhabitants of Jerusalem as saying to the rightful heirs i.e., the men of Ezekiel’s kindred (the “good figs” of Judah), and all the house of Israel wholly:

“Son of man, thy brethren, even thy brethren, the men of thy kindred, and all the house of Israel wholly, are they unto whom the inhabitants of Jerusalem have said, Get you far from the LORD: unto us is this land given in possession.” (Ezekiel 11:15) (KJV)

Of course this Satanically inspired plot could not succeed. In fact, these Shelanite-Jebusite “evil figs” proved to be such a cantankerous and obstreperous lot that Nebuchadnezzar finally had to take them to Babylon, thus destroying the last vestige of the Kindom of Judah.

Since we have gone into this matter at length to show the fundamental difference between the real Dispersion (Captivity) of Judah, and the Captivity of the pseudo-Judahites, i.e., the Shelanite-Jebusite “evil fig inhabitants of Jerusalem,” who became known as the “dispersion of the Jews.”

So we see that there were in reality three Dispersions, namely the “Dispersions of Israel,” the “dispersions of Judah,” and the “Dispersions of the Jews.” It was around the last of the “dispersions” that Satan’s Serpent Seed Conspirators planned their Great Babylon Conspiracy, and we shall now examine the evidence, from authoritative and widely accepted secular historical sources, proving that such a Conspiracy was hatched at Babylon.

The Development of Jewish Nationalism:

Let’s look at a few passages from H.G. Wells’ “Outline of History.” Surely Wells cannot be accused of anti-Jewish bias. In fact he seems to admire the aggressive nationalism of the Jews. After outlining the History of the Israel people, Mr. Wells goes on to say, quoting from page 230:

“So the four centuries of Hebrew kingship comes to an end (with the Babylonian Captivity). From first to last it was a mere incident in the larger and greater history of Egypt, Syria, Assyria, and Phoenicia. But out of it (the Babylonian Captivity) there were now to arise moral and intellectual consequences of importance to all mankind.”

Note carefully that Mr. Wells minimizes the importance of the early history of Israel, but he says that out of the Babylonian Captivity there arose “consequences of primary importance to all mankind.” We continue quoting from the same source:

“The Jews who returned, after an interval of more than two generations, to Jerusalem form Babylonia in the time of Cyrus were a very different people from the warring Baal worshipers and Jehovah worshipers...of the kingdoms of Israel and Judah...It is manifest that relieved of their bickering and murderous kings, restrained from politics (?) And in the intellectually stimulating atmosphere of that Babylonian world, the Jewish mind made a great step forward during the Captivity...

“Everything, therefore, contributed to set the exiled Jews inquiring into their own history, and they found an inspiring leader in the prophet Ezekiel. From such hidden records and forgotten records as they had with them, genealogies, contemporary histories of David, Solomon, and their other kings, legends and traditions, they made out and amplified their own story, and told it to Babylon and them selves.

The statement by Mr. Wells that the Jews, “Found an inspiriting leader in the Prophet Ezekiel,” IS NOT BORNOUT BY EZEKIEL’S WRITINGS. Even a superficial reading of the Book of Ezekiel should make it clear to the student that all of Ezekiel’s prophecies of divine blessings and national restoration are addressed to “the children of Israel,” made up of “the house of Israel wholly” and Ezekiel’s brethren, “the good fig” elements of Judah, while he is very critical of, and even condemns, the “evil fig” Shelanite-Jebusite “inhabitants of Jerusalem.” (Ezekiel 11, 14 and 16). It was these “evil fig” elements which searched the ancient records and “made out and amplified their own story, and then told it to Babylon and themselves.”

Mr. Wells also tells that these Babylonian plotters recruited people from many non-Israelite races to join them in promoting their nationalistic aspirations. On page 231, he wrote:

“This welding together into one tradition-cemented people in the course of the ‘seventy years’ is the first instance in history of the new power of the written word in human affairs. This idea of belonging to a chosen race predestined to pre-eminence was a ve4ry attractive one. It possessed also those Jews who remained in Babylonia. Its literature reached the Jews now established in Egypt. It affected the mixed peoples who had been placed in Samaria, the old capital of the kings of Israel when the ten tribes were deported to Media. It inspired a great number of Babylonians and the like to claim Abraham as their father, and thrust their company upon the returning Jews (Judeans, Israelites). Ammonites and Moabites became genuine proselytes of whatever race, Judaism long held out welcoming arms.

Thus the Jews were in violation of yet another of God’s Commandments; proving they were not Israelites but were a mixed breed bunch of people, who were adherents to a common religion known in the time of Christ as the “Tradition of the Elder,” which Christ condemned so completely.

“And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you. ( 2 Corinthians 6:16-17)

Continuing on from Well’s History, page 493:

“...We have already told the main facts about the origin of the Jewish nation and tradition, abut the Dispora, about the fundamentally scattered nature of Jewry even from the beginning, and the gradual development of the idea of one just God ruling the earth and bound by a special promise to honor the Jewish people. The Jewish idea was and is a curious combination of theological breadth and an intense racial patriotism. The Jews looked for a special savior, a Messiah, who was to redeem mankind by the agreeable process of restoring the fabulous glories of David and Solomon, and bring the whole world at last under the benevolent but firm Jewish heel.

As the political power of the Semitic peoples declined, as Carthage followed Tyre into darkness and Spain became a Roman province, this dream grew and spread. There can be little doubt that the scattered Phoenicians in Spain and Africa and throughout the Mediterranean, speaking as they did a language closely akin to Hebrew and being deprived of their authentic political rights, became proselytes to Judaism.

For phases of vigorous proselytism alternated with phases of exclusive jealousy in Jewish history. On one occasion the Idumeans (Esauites) being conquered, were all forcibly made Jews. There were Arab (Ishamaelite) tribes who were mainly Jews in South Russia in the ninth century. Judaism is indeed the reconstructed political ideal of many shattered people; mainly Semitic ... The main part of Jewry never was in Judea, and never came out of Judea.

Racial Background of Jewry:

The evidence, from reputable historical sources, is overwhelming that the people generally called Jews are not a distinct racial group. Professor Lathrop Stodddard, in an article entitled “The Pedigree of Judah,” published the “Forum” Magazine for March 1926, has so concisely summarized the racial background of the so-called “Jews,” that we shall quote several extracts from his article:

“Scientific investigations of contemporary Jewry have brought out one striking fact, the presence of two sharply contrasted types within the Jewish fold. The Jews of Eastern Europe and the Jews of the Mediterranean basin and adjacent Afro-Asiatic districts differ markedly from one another in physical appearance...” (p. 323)

“These scientific analyses confirm, in the main, a division which the Jess themselves have long made. For more than a thousand years the Jews have clearly recognized two distinct physical types, called by them the ‘Ashkenazim’ or Jews of Eastern Europe, and the ‘Sephardim’ or Jews of the Mediterranean and adjacent regions...” (p. 324)

“Let us analyze the physical appearance of the two races. The earliest Hittite (Canaanite) sculptures show us a people strikingly like the modern Armeans and the older populations of Asia Minor and the Caucasus; that is to say, a short, thick-set folk, with extremely broad heads, rather coarse features, and big fleshy, hooked noses. On the other hand, the historical evidence shows that the ancient Semites were about like the modern Bedouin Arabs, splendidly built, with long heads and fine cut features.

“Now these two ancient races, which at that time occupied Western Asia, offer us our first clues of the Jewish family tree, because they represent types clearly present abundantly in Jewry today. Many living Mediterranean Jews are almost indistinguishable from Arabs, both being obvious Semitic types. Even more striking is the parallel between the ancient Hittites and a large proportion of the modern Ashkenazim. One cannot look at a Hittite sculpture without being struck by the ‘Jewishness’ of the faces depicted. The famous ‘Jewish nose,’ with its peculiarly hooked nostril, is found to be not exclusively Jewish, but to have been shared by the ancient Hittites, and also by modern peoples of the West Asiatic Highlands. Many Armenians, Caucasians, and Anatolians today look so much like this type of Jew that it is practically impossible to distinguish them by their physical appearance.” (p. 325)

This is why Yeashua told the apostles the parable about the tares and the wheat:

“Another parable put he forth unto them, saying, The kingdom of heaven is likened unto a man which sowed good seed in his field: But while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat, and went his way. But when the blade was sprung up, and brought forth fruit, then appeared the tares also. So the servants of the householder came and said unto him, Sir, didst not thou sow good seed in thy field? from whence then hath it tares? He said unto them, An enemy hath done this. The servants said unto him, Wilt thou then that we go and gather them up? But he said, Nay; lest while ye gather up the tares, ye root up also the wheat with them. Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn.” (Matthew 13:24-30) (KJV)

Professor Stoddard goes on to show the effect that racial blending had on the development of the Jewish types as we know them today, and particularly on the Ashkenazim Jews. Beginning on page 329, he wrote:

“...In the eighth century A.D., Mesopotamia, Persia, and the Armenian-Caucasian area still contained the bulk of the world’s Jewish population. By the end of the tenth century these lands were almost emptied of Jews. Lured to Khazaria as to the ‘Promised Land,’ Jewry pushed northward from Asia into southeastern Europe; swarming in by the hundred thousand, by sea, by river, and by mountain-trail.

“And during those two centuries was forged the Ashkenazic stock of today. This migration involved sweeping racial changes. In the first place, Jewry’s slow progress through the Armenian and Caucasian highlands implied a further admixture and strengthening of the Ammonoid at the expense of the Semitic element.

Then, once in Khazaria, extensive intermarriage with the converted Khazars resulted in a further influx of Turkish and Mongoloid blood. The result was a population prevailingly round-headed and thick-set, but with two outstanding facial types; the full-faced, hook-nosed Ammonoid; and the flat faced squat; or pug-nosed Mongoloid, respectively. The Semitic type must have almost entirely disappeared.”

On page 331 Professor Stoddard sums up the matter thus:

“...such, in brief, is the surprisingly complex pedigree of Judah. It effectively disposes of the fiction that the modern Jew is the true scion of the ancient Hebrew. The proportion of genuine Hebrew blood today should be very small even among the Sephardim, while among the Ashkenazim it must be infinitesimal.”

The above quotes from Professor Stoddard’s article are typical of scores of similar citations which could be given from the works of sincere and conscientious research students and historians, who dispassionately investigated and examined the facts and the evidence objectively, and then wrote their histories accordingly. Today, however, very few, if any, historical writers dare to present the true historical background of World Jewry; not because the facts and the evidence have been changed by later research, for exactly the opposite is the case, but because organized Jewish “censorship” is so strong that few dare to oppose it.

The effectiveness of this censorship is one of the strangest, and even frightening, phenomenon of our time. We have never seen nor heard a single instance where these Jewish “censors” have attempted to refute or disprove the facts or the evidence in the matter, but have known hundreds of cases where they have resorted to vicious campaigns of smear attacks, character assassination and vilification against those who would dare to present these facts. In fact we have been on the receiving end of many such attacks.

Because of fear of such attacks many present day historical writers, even though they know the truth, simply “gloss over” the so-called “Jewish Question;” and the general public has been so completely “brainwashed” by Zionist propaganda and ballyhoo that they accept without question, “the fiction that the modern Jew is the true son of the ancient Hebrew.”

The apparently successful scheme of the so-called Jews to palm themselves off as the Lord’s chosen people is undoubtedly the biggest hoax ever perpetrated on a gullible world (An even greater hoax than the HoloHoax if that is possible), and it was planned by the Serpent Race Conspirators in Babylon, who, as Mr. Wells put it, found that, “the idea of belonging to a chosen race predestined to preeminence was a very attractive one,” because if they could foist themselves off on the world as “the people of the Book” it would be much easier for them to put over their ambitious program for World Dominion.

Therefore they began “to claim Abraham for their father, and thrust their company” upon the remnant of real Judahites in Babylon; and so numerous and powerful were these Interlopers that, when Yeashua came, they were in complete control of the Jewish nation, sitting in Moses’ seat. They also dominated the priesthood, rejecting Yeashua because He would not join their Satanic Conspiracy, even when He was asked to become the King-Priest of Satan’s World Order, by Satan himself.

“Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them; And saith unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me.” (Matthew 4:8-9) (KJV)

“And the devil, taking him up into an high mountain, shewed unto him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time. And the devil said unto him, All this power will I give thee, and the glory of them: for that is delivered unto me; and to whomsoever I will I give it. If thou therefore wilt worship me, all shall be thine.” (Luke 4:5-7) (KJV)

"THERE IS A JEWISH CONSPIRACY AGAINST ALL NATIONS, IT OCCUPIES ALMOST EVERYWHERE THE AVENUES OF POWER; A DOUBLE ASSAULT OF JEWISH REVOLUTION AND JEWISH FINANCE, REVOLUTION AND FINANCE. If I were God, I'd clean this mess up and I would start with cleaning the Money Changers out of the Federal Reserve. He does say in His Word that the gold and silver will be thrown in the streets. Since they aren't using money in Heaven now, we won't need any when He gets here. It will be done in earth as it is in heaven. Oh, I do thank God for that! Hallelujah! I'll bet you haven't heard this much praises, ever." (La Nouveau Mercure, Paris 1917, Rene Groos)

We are faced with THE IMPOSSIBLE TASK OF MAKING THIS CLEAR TO THOSE WHO HAVE LITTLE DESIRE TO STUDY DETAILS, and THOSE WHO DEMAND A MORE SCHOLARLY EXPLANATION. We hope this presentation will meet the needs of everyone. For those who dislike details, please make an effort to "hang in there;" for we believe the results will be worth while.

First: A Synopsis of John 4:5-26:

Verses 5-6: Jesus and His disciples traveled from Judea in the south to Galilee in the north, and stopped on the way at a water well outside of Sychar, a town in Samaria.   

Verses 7-8: A Samaritan woman came to the well for water. Jesus asked for a drink.

Verse 9: The woman wondered why Jesus talked to her because she perceived He was a Jew, and Jews shunned Samaritans.

Verse 10: Jesus told her that if she knew the gift of God and Who was speaking to her, she would ask Him for living water.

Verses 11-12: The woman didn't comprehend what He meant. She noted that He had no container with which to draw water, and besides, did He think He was greater than her forefather Jacob who dug the well and drank from it?

Verses 13-14: Jesus told her that the water from the well would not satisfy thirst indefinitely, but the living water He gave would produce eternal life.

Verse 15: The woman still didn't comprehend, but was eager for such water that would prevent her having to come back to the well repeatedly. She wanted to reduce her work load.  

Verses 16-18: Jesus told her to  fetch her husband, but she confessed she had no husband, whereupon Jesus acknowledged she told the truth, for she had lived with five men and the present one was not her husband.

Verses 19-20: The woman immediately perceived that Jesus was a prophet because He knew the intimate details of her life. Defensively, she then appealed to her religion and her forefathers, contrasting her beliefs with those of the Jews who worshiped at Jerusalem, and ascribing to Jesus the religious beliefs of the Jews.

Verses 21-24: Jesus disavowed His connection with either Jewish worship at Jerusalem or Samaritan worship at Gerizim, and said the hour was near when no one would worship at either place.

He said she didn't comprehend what she worshiped, and that "we know what we worship for salvation is of the Jews." He said the hour had come when true worshipers would worship God in spirit and in truth, for such the Father seeks to worship Him. He said God is spirit, therefore whoever worships Him must worship in spirit and in truth.

Verse 25: The woman said she knew Messiah was coming and He would show them all things.

Verse 26: Jesus then told her that He was the Messiah.

Mandatory Considerations For A Correct Understanding: A superficial reading of this passage of John's Gospel will not suffice to render a correct interpretation. We must study it very carefully.

In Verse 9 the Bible doesn't state that Jesus was a Jew. The woman ASSUMED He was a Jew. We're not told why she assumed this; perhaps it was because she knew He was traveling FROM Judea to Galilee.

The Bible often records the statements and opinions of the people in it, but their statements are not necessarily true unless the text is clear that God agrees with them, or that the statement is given to them by God. An obvious example of this is when Calaphas the High Priest accused Jesus of blasphemy. (Matthew 26:65) Note also in verse 9 that the Bible doesn't say that the Samaritans hated the Jews, but that the woman said the Jews had no dealings with the Samaritans.

The Old Testament and history tell us that the Samaritans were a mixture of the tribes of Israel with outsiders and that is why the Jews shunned them. It was primarily the Jews who were the snobs, although the Samaritans were not guiltless. It is obvious that Jesus was not snobbish.

He was not only passing through their land which the Jews would not do (and He would not walk in Jewry because the Jews sought to kill Him John 7:1) - but was conversing with one of them, another act forbidden by the Jews. This tells us that JESUS DID NOT PRACTICE THE RELIGION OF THE JEWS in this matter.

Verse 10: Jesus initiated a "witnessing" situation in which He offered universal salvation to the woman. He was doing His Father's business by giving an open invitation to a non-Jew to become a child of God. He was contradicting everything the Jews believed about Messiah.

Verses 11-12: The Samaritan woman considered herself a descendant of Jacob who was the patriarch of all the 12 Tribes of Israel. She thought of Jacob as a great man. She considered herself to be as true to the laws of Moses as the Jews, maybe more so.

She was partly correct, for the Samaritans did not practice Rabbinism as the Jews did. Also the Scriptures attest that the Jews only gave lip service to the Laws of God as given to the Israelites by Almighty God: "For had ye (Jews) believed Moses..." (John 5:46) Thus we have it that the Jews did not believe Moses, nor did they teach the people to obey God’s Laws, they taught them to observe the Tradition of the Elders (which later became codified as The Talmud) which is totally opposite.

The Scriptures further attest to the fact that Jesus did not recognize the leadership of the Jews, and that they were not the legitimate rulers of Israel by:

"Therefore say I (Christ) unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you (because you do not deserve to possess it, as you have no right to it), and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof (to the rightful heirs of it)." (Matthew 21:43)

Following is how the Pharisees came to be in "Moses' Seat" when Christ was born. They had many enemies at the beginning and the Sadducees were the first of these enemies. They were the constant opponents of the Pharisees and their imported Babylonian paganism, misrepresent­ed by the Pharisees as the Tradition of the Pharisees as the Tradition of the Elders, the "Oral Law" ostensibly transmitted privately to Moses and on down, superseding anything written in the Bible.     

In the six years of civil war between the Pharisees and Alexander Jannaeus, King and High Priest of Jerusalem, 50,000 were killed on both sides before this Sadducean ruler succumbed, and his widow Salome turned affairs over to the Pharisees in 79 B.C. Her brother, Simon ben Shetah, had been waiting for such an opportunity. The continued civil war resulted in the sons of Alexander Jannaeus, Hyrcanus and Aristobulus, in 63 B.C., going hat in hand to Pompey, Caesar's Roman General in Syria, asking him to invade Palestine and slaughter their respective opponents. This is how Rome happened to be in power when Christ was born. The full story can be found in the Jewish Encyclopedia under "Pharisees."

Verses 13-14: Jesus was teaching with metaphors - figures of speech. Living water obviously meant eternal life. He was giving her the gospel of salvation message. Like the Roman Centurion whose servant needed healing (Matthew 8:5-13) and the Canaanite woman whose daughter needed healing, (Matthew 15:21-28) Jesus demonstrated throughout His ministry that salvation was available to anyone, not just to Judeans. He found great faith among some non-Jews.

Verse 15: The Samaritan woman dwelt on worldly things, not understanding that Jesus talked to her of spiritual things. God's primary concern is with our spiritual condition, but the Samaritan woman repeatedly focused on her worldly desires. You and I often do the same thing.

Verse 16-18: The woman was a sinner but Jesus did not condemn her to hell for that. He was truthful and firm, but kind. This again tells us that He was not a Jew because the Jews, according to the Bible, were exclusivists. They would not have talked to the Samaritan woman, much less have offered her kindness and salvation. Remember the account of the good Samaritan, recorded in Luke 10:30-36.

Verses 19-20: Because Jesus obviously knew the woman's sins, she at once acknowledged Him as a prophet, but human nature being what it is, she retreated defensively into her own mind-set, i.e., that her religion was just as good as the Jewish religion. She inferred that Jesus was like all other Jews, demanding that she worship at Jerusalem.

Verses 21-24: Did Jesus demand that she confirm to Judaism by worshiping at Jerusalem? No, He did not. Instead, He told her that all true worshipers of God would soon worship Him in spirit and truth and that no true believer would worship at either Jerusalem or at Gerizim (the Samaritan place of worship).

Why Did Jesus Use “We?": Why did Jesus use the plural we in v. 22? It is important that we turn to John 3:11 and 14:23 for similar situations. In John 3:11, for example, He was talking to Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews. Nicodemus had asked how he could be born again, whereupon Jesus said, "...I say unto thee, WE speak that WE do know, and testify that WE have seen; and ye receive not OUR witness."

He used the plural four times, and the situation is closely parallel to the one with the Samaritan woman. His use of We was much like our editorial We. Therefore the conclusion that He meant His Father God and Himself.

In Spirit And In Truth: What does it mean to worship God in spirit and in truth? For this answer we go to the two great commandments given by Jesus: Love God genuinely and thoroughly (and strive to bring our characters into line with His); and Love our neighbors as ourselves (Matthew 22:37-40)-treat others as we would like to be treated, commensurate with the principles of the New Testament.

This is the worship that God is seeking. Jesus gave this message to the Samaritan woman and the people of Sychar. He didn't tell her to go to Jerusalem and worship with the Jews; there is no record that He told her to seek out some synagogue or church to attend. The Jews wouldn't have received her anyway, and He knew that the temple at Jerusalem would be destroyed a few years hence. The change from old covenant to new covenant was now being implemented. The Samaritan woman and many residents of the town became Christians. Jesus stayed with them two days and taught them.

The Sons of Satan, Called The Sons of Belial:

Genesis 3:16 has many children coming from Satan, not just Cain. Which the single seedliners never mention. In fact, there are many sons and daughters of Satan, but they are not called that.

We find the first mention of them in:

“Certain men, THE CHILDREN OF BELIAL, are gone out from among you, and have withdrawn the inhabitants of their city, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which ye have not known.” (Deuteronomy 13:13)

Now who is this Belial you ask? Well lets look at a couple of Bible commentaries and see what they have to say.


[BEE lih uhl] (worthlessness); AN OLD TESTAMENT TERM DESIGNATING A PERSON AS GODLESS OR LAWLESS. The NKJV translates corrupt (1 Samuel 2:12), perverted (Judges 19:22), rebel (2 Samuel 20:1), scoundrel (1 Kings 21:10,13), worthless men (1 Samuel 30:22), and worthless rogues (2 Samuel 16:7). A "daughter of Belial" (1 Samuel 1:16), (KJV) means a wicked woman (NKJV, NIV), one who is base (RSV) and worthless (NASB).

BELIAL SOMETIMES TAKES THE FORM OF A PROPER NAME (or a personification), APPLIED TO A DEMON OR TO SATAN (Nah. 1:15). MANY SCHOLARS BELIEVE THAT BELIAL IS ANOTHER NAME FOR SATAN. (from Nelson's Illustrated Bible Dictionary) (Copyright (C) 1986, Thomas Nelson Publishers)


BE'LIAL (be'li‑al; "worthlessness, wickedness"). Belial is often used in the KJV as if it were a proper name, but beyond question it should not be regarded in the OT as such, its meaning being "worthlessness," and hence "recklessness, lawlessness." The expression "son" or "man of Belial" must be understood as meaning simply a worthless, lawless fellow (Deuteronomy 13:13; Judg. 19:22; 20:13), see marg.; etc.)

In the NT the term appears (in the best manuscripts) in the form Belias, and not Belial, as given in the KJV. THE TERM, AS USED IN (2 Corinthians 6:15), IS GENERALLY UNDERSTOOD AS APPLIED TO SATAN, AS THE PERSONIFICATION OF ALL THAT IS BAD.

Belias, or Belial: Strong’s Concordance: #955  Beliar (bel‑ee'‑ar) or Belial (bel‑ee'‑al); of Hebrew origin [1100]; worthlessness; Belial, as an epithet of Satan: KJV‑‑ Belial (Beliar).

Belial occurs only once in the NASB and NIV (2 Corinthians 6:15). Elsewhere in those translations the Hebrew terms rendered "sons [or children] of Belial" in the KJV are given as "worthless men," "worthless fellows," or "wicked men," often with a marginal reading, "lit., sons of Belial." (from New Unger's Bible Dictionary) (originally published by Moody Press of Chicago, Illinois.  Copyright (C) 1988.)


(worthlessness): recklessness, lawlessness. Not strictly a proper name, but used so by personification. [Beli] = "without" and [ya'al] "usefulness," i.e. good for nothing. "A man of Belial" is a worthless, lawless fellow (Deuteronomy 13:13; Judges 19:22; 1 Samuel 2:12). Later [Raqa'] ("vain fellows" (2 Samuel 6:20), [hareeqiym]), and "Fool" were used instead: (Matthew 5:22). [Nabal] (= fool) is called "man of Belial" (1 Samuel 25:25)

In the New Testament "Beliar" is the form in some oldest manuscripts (2 Corinthians 6:15) AS SATAN IS OPPOSED TO GOD, ANTICHRIST TO CHRIST, SO BELIAL STANDING HERE IN CONTRAST TO CHRIST MUST DENOTE ALL ANTI-CHRISTIAN POLLUTIONS PERSONIFIED. (from Fausset's Bible Dictionary)

When reading on in the scriptures after Deuteronomy 13:13, we see that Yahweh orders the children of Belial destroyed, every man, woman and child and all their goods:

“Then shalt thou inquire, and make search, and ask diligently; and, behold, if it be truth, and the thing certain, that such abomination is wrought among you; THOU SHALT SURELY SMITE THE INHABITANTS (Yahweh is saying here all of the inhabitants of the city, the men, women and children they are so evil) OF THAT CITY WITH THE EDGE OF THE SWORD, DESTROYING IT UTTERLY, AND ALL THAT IS THEREIN, AND THE CATTLE THEREOF, WITH THE EDGE OF THE SWORD. And thou shalt gather all the spoil of it into the midst of the street thereof, and shalt burn with fire the city, and all the spoil thereof every whit, for the LORD thy God: and it shall be an heap for ever; it shall not be built again. And there shall cleave nought of the cursed thing to thine hand: that the LORD may turn from the fierceness of his anger, and shew thee mercy, and have compassion upon thee, and multiply thee, as he hath sworn unto thy fathers; When thou shalt hearken to the voice of the LORD thy God, to keep all his commandments which I command thee this day, to do that which is right in the eyes of the LORD thy God.” (Deuteronomy 13:14‑18)

The men and women of Belial were and are queers as the following verse attests:

“Now as they were making their hearts merry, behold, the men of the city, certain sons of Belial, beset the house round about, and beat at the door, and spake to the master of the house, the old man, saying, BRING FORTH THE MAN THAT CAME INTO THINE HOUSE, THAT WE MAY KNOW HIM.” (Judges 19:22)

The man of the house asked the queers to go away and leave him and the man alone and that they should not do such evil.

“And the man, the master of the house, went out unto them, and said unto them, Nay, my brethren, nay, I pray you, do not so wickedly; seeing that this man is come into mine house, do not this folly. Behold, here is my daughter a maiden, and his concubine; them I will bring out now, and humble ye them, and do with them what seemeth good unto you: but unto this man do not so vile a thing. But the men would not hearken to him: so the man took his concubine, and brought her forth unto them; and they knew her, and abused her all the night until the morning: and when the day began to spring, they let her go. Then came the woman in the dawning of the day, and fell down at the door of the man's house (she died from the abuse) where her lord was, till it was light. And her lord rose up in the morning, and opened the doors of the house, and went out to go his way: and, behold, the woman his concubine was fallen down at the door of the house, and her hands were upon the threshold. And he said unto her, Up, and let us be going. But none answered. Then the man took her up upon an ass, and the man rose up, and gat him unto his place. And WHEN HE WAS COME INTO HIS HOUSE, HE TOOK A KNIFE, AND LAID HOLD ON HIS CONCUBINE, AND DIVIDED HER, TOGETHER WITH HER BONES, INTO TWELVE PIECES, AND SENT HER INTO ALL THE COASTS OF ISRAEL.” (Judges 19:23‑29) 

When he sent the pieces of the woman to the twelve tribes, one can just imagine what consternation it caused them. It caused such a furor that they had a meeting of all the tribes to see what they would do, to these evil men.

“And it was so, that all that saw it said, There was no such deed done nor seen from the day that the children of Israel came up out of the land of Egypt unto this day: consider of it, take advice, and speak your minds.” (Judges 19:30)

So the Tribes of Israel had their meeting and it was decided that they would destroy the evil men that did this awful deed. They told Benjamin in the city to:

“Now therefore deliver us the men, the children of Belial, which are in Gibeah, that we may put them to death, and put away evil from Israel. But the children of Benjamin would not hearken to the voice of their brethren the children of Israel.” (Judges 20:13)

But the Benjamites would not deliver the evil sons of Belial to the other Israelites. And because of them not giving up the evil ones, the sons of Satan, the Jews who were called “Belial” all but a few of the tribe of Benjamin were destroyed.

“Now therefore deliver us the men, the children of Belial, which are in Gibeah, that we may put them to death, and put away evil from Israel. But the children of Benjamin would not hearken to the voice of their brethren the children of Israel.” (Judges 20:13)

Then because they would not hearken unto their brothers:

“And the children of Benjamin said, They are smitten down before us, as at the first. But the children of Israel said, Let us flee, and draw them from the city unto the highways. And all the men of Israel rose up out of their place, and put themselves in array at Baaltamar: and the liers in wait of Israel came forth out of their places, even out of the meadows of Gibeah. And there came against Gibeah ten thousand chosen men out of all Israel, and the battle was sore: but they knew not that evil was near them. And the LORD smote Benjamin before Israel: and the children of Israel destroyed of the Benjamites that day twenty and five thousand and an hundred men: all these drew the sword. So the children of Benjamin saw that they were smitten: for the men of Israel gave place to the Benjamites, because they trusted unto the liers in wait which they had set beside Gibeah. And the liers in wait hasted, and rushed upon Gibeah; and the liers in wait drew themselves along, and smote all the city with the edge of the sword. Now there was an appointed sign between the men of Israel and the liers in wait, that they should make a great flame with smoke rise up out of the city. And when the men of Israel retired in the battle, Benjamin began to smite and kill of the men of Israel about thirty persons: for they said, Surely they are smitten down before us, as in the first battle. But when the flame began to arise up out of the city with a pillar of smoke, the Benjamites looked behind them, and, behold, the flame of the city ascended up to heaven. And when the men of Israel turned again, the men of Benjamin were amazed: for they saw that evil was come upon them. Therefore they turned their backs before the men of Israel unto the way of the wilderness; but the battle overtook them; and them which came out of the cities they destroyed in the midst of them. Thus they inclosed the Benjamites round about, and chased them, and trode them down with ease over against Gibeah toward the sunrising. And there fell of Benjamin eighteen thousand men; all these were men of valour. And they turned and fled toward the wilderness unto the rock of Rimmon: and they gleaned of them in the highways five thousand men; and pursued hard after them unto Gidom, and slew two thousand men of them. So that all which fell that day of Benjamin were twenty and five thousand men that drew the sword; all these were men of valour. But six hundred men turned and fled to the wilderness unto the rock Rimmon, and abode in the rock Rimmon four months. And the men of Israel turned again upon the children of Benjamin, and smote them with the edge of the sword, as well the men of every city, as the beast, and all that came to hand: also they set on fire all the cities that they came to.” (Judges 20:32‑48)

The children of Israel slew so many of the Tribe of Benjamin that they feared that Benjamin would cease to be a tribe; so they went to Yahweh and asked how they could remedy the situation as they had sworn that they would not give their daughters to Benjamin for wives. And Yahweh told them what to do and they did it, therefore Benjamin remained a tribe in Israel.

The sons or daughters are mentioned also in the following scriptures: 1 Samuel 1:16, 10:27, 25:17, 25:25, 30:22; 2 Samuel 16:7, 20:1, 23:6; 1 Kings 21:10, 21:13; 2 Chronicles 13:7; 2 Corinthians 6:15. And every time they are mentioned they are evil and are to be eventually destroyed.

There is no doubt that these are the children of Satan, just as was Cain. They were the descendants of Cain.


(be'‑li‑al), (bel'‑yal) (beliya`al; Beliar): This name, occurring very frequently in the Old Testament, has the sense of "worthlessness" (compare (2 Samuel 23:6); accordingly in such phrases as "sons of Belial" (Judges 20:13; 1 Samuel 10:27, etc.), "Men of Belial" (1 Samuel 30:22; 1 Kings 21:13, etc.), which the English Revised Version usually retains, the American Standard Revised Version more correctly renders, "base fellows" (so "daughter of Belial" (1 Samuel 1:16), "wicked woman"). There is here no suggestion a proper name. AFTERWARD, HOWEVER, “BELIAL” BECAME A PROPER NAME FOR SATAN, OR FOR ANTICHRIST (thus frequently in the Jewish (should be rendered Israelite) Apocalyptic writings, e.g. in XII P, Book Jub, Asc Isa, Sib Or). In this sense Paul used the word in 2 Corinthians 6:15, "What concord hath Christ with Belial?" (Beliar). Bousset thinks that Paul's "man of sin" in 2 Thessalonians 2:3, where some authorities read "man of lawlessness," is a translation of this term. The sense at least is similar. See ANTICHRIST; MAN OF SIN. JAMES ORR (from International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, Electronic Database Copyright (C) 1996 by Biblesoft)

We have this from another commentary on the word Belial:

David, "what a mean creature is he!" "Lord, what is man," may we say upon the reading of this story, "what a vile creature is he, when he is given up to his  own heart's lusts!" THE SINNERS ARE HERE CALLED SONS OF BELIAL, THAT IS, UNGOVERNABLE MEN, MEN THAT WOULD ENDURE NO YOKE, CHILDREN OF THE DEVIL (for he is Belial), resembling him, and joining with him in rebellion against God and his government. (from Matthew Henry's Commentary)

So we can see that the Seedliners avoid the passages they can’t explain away, and hang on to those that can be explained and shows that their beliefs are fallacious.

Is Salvation From the Jews?: Now we back up a bit and deal with that troublesome clause in verse 22: "...for salvation is of the Jews." (KJV)

Considering the whole context thus far, did Jesus promote Judaism? It is clear that He didn't. If He didn't promote Judaism, how could salvation be of the Jews? We just learned that He told the woman of Samaria that He was the Messiah, the Living Water. Wouldn't it be a contradiction for Him to tell her that in Him was salvation and then turn right around and tell her that salvation was of the Jews? We know in John 14:6, He said: "I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh to the Father, but by me."

What, then, is our answer? The answer will be found by understanding the entire New Testament, history, and the language of this passage. The preposition Of in the KJV (salvation is Of the Jews), or From in several other translations, does not accurately reflect the Greek. The Greek language was far more specific than English when using prepositions.

For example, FROM in English could mean that a person walked from the house, but we wouldn't know whether the person was in the  house and walked out of it, or standing against the outside wall and walked away from it. Not so with the Greek. We would know exactly what happened if the Greek preposition "ek" were used; the person would have been inside the house and walked out of it, for "ek" means OUT OF. And that's the preposition used by the Apostle John when he recorded Jesus' saying that salvation is OUT OF the Jews. We will return to this later.

However, knowledge about this preposition is insufficient for a complete answer to the problem. The next language barrier is the word Jews. This may come as a surprise to many, but it is impossible for Jesus to have used the word Jews, for the simple reason that the word did not exist in His time. It didn't arrive on the scene of history until the Greek or Latin Bible was translated into English hundreds of years later, and then it had to evolve into its present form. Here's how it happened.

Who Were The Judeans?: Judeans were inhabitants of southern Palestine, the area called Judea (Judaea). This was where Jerusalem and the temple were located. Judea is the same as Judah, and Judah was the tribe of Israel that was allocated that geographical area when all twelve tribes conquered the inhabitants of Palestine in about 1400 B.C.

The patriarch of the tribe was the fourth son of Jacob, who was the son of Isaac, and Isaac was the son of Abraham. Jacob, who had been renamed Israel (Genesis 32:28) by God had twelve sons, each of whom was the patriarch of a tribe of Israel, each of which received a portion of the land of Palestine. God had already planned that the "legal" lineage of Messiah would be through Judah, for in Genesis 49:10 Moses wrote:

"The scepter shall not depart from Judah, nor a law-giver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be."    

The Tribe of Judah was the most influential. It had the place of leadership. God simply said that it would continue in this position until Shiloh, Who was Messiah, came Messiah would then take the leadership and receive the allegiance of the people. We now know that Jesus Christ's legal linage was traced through Judah back to David and to Abraham, and those who believed on Him gave Him their allegiance in fulfillment of the prophecy quoted above. He took the scepter from Judah.

At the time of Christ's ministry, mixed blood existed in Judea. Not all of its inhabitants were descended from Judah. Many were Edomites, descendants of Esau. However, the Edomites had submitted to circumcision in about 130 B.C. and therefore became co-religionists with the Judahites, who by then were practicing Rabbinism which had been developed during the exile in Babylon.

*Some* Judeans (were Jews), therefore, were those who practiced the religion which Jesus clashed. Rabbinism was a conglomeration of the context of the Old Testament, Babylonian mysticism, and human rationalizations, it is referred to in the New Testament as the "Tradition of the Elders," (Matthew 15:1-3) and is known today as Talmudism, or Judaism. Its rulers were entrenched at Jerusalem at Judea.

Jesus Would Not Walk In “Jewry":We see in the King James Version that Jesus would not walk in "Jewry" (among the Jews or Pharisees) any longer because the Jews sought to kill Him. (John 7:1) The English word "Jewry" is "Ioudaias" (Judean) in Greek, but modern translations no longer use "Jewry." For example the New American Standard Bible (NASB) sates:

"And after these things Jesus was walking in Galilee; for He was unwilling to walk in Judea, because the Jews were seeking to kill Him."

It is unfortunate that we have not been taught the exact truth about these expressions. What this verse simply means is that those who practiced the religion head-quartered at Jerusalem wanted to kill Him. Actually, the King James Translators had the right idea - they recognized that "Jewry" was the religion of the Pharisees, and not that of the Israelites.

In our time most people think of the Jews as the people of Israel but that's not correct. An Israelite was one who had descended from Jacob/Israel and who practiced the moral, civil, and ritual laws given by God to Moses. In Jesus' time the Jews may or may not have descended from Jacob/Israel, but they practiced Rabbinism. Jesus fulfilled all things given by God to Moses, whereas the Jews held on to the shell only, and have been trying to take back the birthright their father Esau sold to Jacob/Israel.

Judaism of Babylonian Origin:

The “evil fig” Shelanite-Canaanite pseudo-Jews, who returned to Jerusalem with the remnant of real Judahites from Babylon and who took over, and corrupted, the Nation of the Jews, WERE BUT A SMALL PART OF THE BABYLONIAN CONSPIRATORS WHO HAVE PALMED THEMSELVES OFF AS THE “DISPERSION OF THE JEWS.” Sir Leon Levison, in his “The Jews in History,” on p. 38 wrote:

“Many of them (Jews) found life in Babylon, upon the whole, congenial. They intermarried with foreigners, had built u good businesses, and had no liking for the hardships of a return journey on the score of mere sentiment. They were at ease in Babylon.”

The fact of the matter is, as we have already noted, Babylon became the real “headquarters” for Babylonian Judaism. We quote, as follows, from Chambers Encyclopedia, Vol. 5, p. 711:

“So mild, especially during the later years, was the treatment which they received in the Babylonian Empire, that when liberty was announced to the whole body of captives, “only the lowest of the low returned,” together with the Levites and the Priests (Talmud, Kidd, iv. 1).

Note that the authority for the statement that “only the lowest of the low” returned to Jerusalem is the Jewish Talmud, which was not a part of the sacred, or the secular, records of either the Israelites of the Judahites while they were in the Holy Land, but was written by members of the so-called “Dispersion of the Jew,” after both the Israelites and the real Judahites had gone into exile. Now according to Ezra and Nehemiah, the real Judahites of the Babylonian captivity, who returned to Jerusalem were largely from the tribes of Judah and Benjamin; and the Babylonian pseudo-Jews, who were trying to usurp the place of the Lord’s People, would naturally try to down grade the real Judahites.

We continue quoting from Chambers Encyclopedia:

“The influence of this exile, however, was of a most lasting nature. Babylon henceforth became and remained, up to 1000 A.D., the ‘second land of Israel’ in may respects even more highly prized than Palestine. To this brief period of the captivity must be traced many of the most important institutions of the Synagogue in its widest sense.”

In the Encyclopedia Britannica, Vol. 15, p. 403, we read:

“The population of the southern part of Mesopotamia, the strip of land enclosed between the Tigris and the Euphrates, was, according to Graetz, mainly Jewish; while the district extending for about ten miles on the coast of Euphrates from Nehardea in the north to Sura in the south, became a new Palestine with Nehardea for its Jerusalem.

Thus we see that the Jews had become widely scattered even before the Palestinian Jews were expelled from Palestine by the Romans; and it was to these scattered pseudo-Jews that the Judean exiles returned after their expulsion from Palestine.

The little remnant of real Judahites, who had returned form Babylon ‘to receive the Messiah,’ had left Palestine before the Roman capture of Jerusalem. During the time that Jesus was on earth these real Judahites were located largely in Galilee, rather than in Judea; and in this connection it is interesting and significant that eleven of the twelve apostles of Jesus were from Galilee, only one, i.e., Judas, was a Judean.

The import of this whole matter is that Judaism, as we know it today, is not a continuance of the religion of ancient Israel, but IS A PROGRAM ORIGINATED AND DEVELOPED BY THE SO-CALLED ‘DISPORA’ OF THE JEWS. In ‘Harmsworth’s History of the World,’ in an article entitled ‘the Hebrew Peoples,’ we find on pp. 1781-82 and 1784-85, the following statements: ‘Judaism was not evolved in Judah, it was in Babylonia that Judaism became that which it was, and still is...and Judaim was developed in Babylon, a closely united religious body in the midst of a great heterogeneous, and , as they regarded it, foreign population.’ The authors of the article, from which we quoted above, conclude: ‘Israel therefore had little to do with the development of Judaism,’ and they sum up the matter by saying that the distinction between Israel and the Jews, ‘can best be expressed in the phrase, which may sound paradoxical, but yet apply characterizes the true relationship of the two peoples: THE ISRAELITES WERE NOT JEWS.’”

The Serpent Conspirators At Babylon:

The various elements of the serpent race were brought together in Babylon and were there organized in a Great Conspiracy for World Dominion. While these elements of the serpent race had been used from the beginning by Satan to help further his rebellion against the Lord, they had up to this time operated more or less independently of each other.

However, after the “Jews” had been carried captive from Jerusalem to Babylon by Nebuchadnezzar, the various Edomite-Amalekite-Shelanite-Canaanite elements of the Serpent race were all representatively present in Babylon, and under Satanic inspiration they were united in one Conspiratorial group, which became known as the “Dispora, or Dispersion, of the ‘Jews.’” the reason for usurping this title was to hoodwink the world into accepting these self-styled “Jews’ as the Lord’s Chosen People, and so successful have they been in thus palming themselves off as the “People of the Book,” that practically all of the peoples of the earth, including even most Christians, today believe that present day Zionist Jewry represents the Israel people of the Bible.

Various Usages of The Term “Jew”:

Christ indicated that there are real and pseudo “Jews,” when He spoke of, “them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan,” (Revelation 2:9; 3:9), and Jeremiah, in the 24th chapter of his book, made it very clear that there were “good figs,” and “evil figs,” in the Kingdom of Judah.

The word “Jew” is probably from the Hebrew “Jehudi,” as a diminutive of “Judah.” Therefore it could have been used to identify the members of the tribe of Judah, BUT THERE IS NOT A SINGLE INSTANCE WHERE THE WORD “JEW” IS SO USED IN THE SCRIPTURES.

However, the united Kingdom of Israel was divided into two separate kingdoms during the reign of Rehoboam, namely the Kingdom of Israel, made up of the ten northern tribes, and the Kingdom of Judah, composed of the tribes of Judah and Benjamin, together with a portion of the tribe of Levi, and a small number from at least some of the other tribes of Israel.

Josephus tells us that the name Kingdom of Judah was used for the southern Kingdom because Judah was the dominant tribe in the nation. After the division of the children of Jacob/Israel into two kingdoms, the people of the northern Kingdom of Israel were called Israelites, and the people of the southern Kingdom of Judah were known as “Judahites,” of which “Jehudi,” translated “Jews,” is a diminutive or a corruption.

In any event the word “Jews” does not appear in the Scriptures until it is used in 2 Kings 16:6, where it is used to designate a portion of the people of the Kingdom of Judah who lived at Elath. This first use of the word “Jews” was more than one hundred years after the division of the united Kingdom of Israel into two kingdoms.

In fact it seems that the term “Jews” was used first to designate a part or portion of the “Judahites” of the southern Kingdom of Judah, but after Sennecherib the Assyrian had carried the major portion of the “men of Judah” captive into the land of the Medes, the name “Jews” came into general use for the “inhabitants of Jerusalem,” who remained in the Kingdom of Judah under king Hezekiah.

Those “inhabitants of Jerusalem” consisted of two distinct divisions or groups, i.e., the “good fig” Judahites, and the “evil fig” Shelanite/Canaanite pseudo-Judahites. In the 24th chapter of Jeremiah we are told that the “good fig” Judahites were taken to Babylon, when Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, carried Jeconiah, and “the princes of Judah, with the carpenters and smiths, from Jerusalem, and brought them to Babylon.” The “evil fig residue of Jerusalem’ was left in the weakened Kingdom of Judah, under Zedekiah who reigned in Jerusalem for eleven years as Nebuchadnezzar’s puppet king.

It was this “evil fig” Shelanite-Canaanite “residue of Jerusalem” which tried to usurp Israel’s inheritance by claiming title to the Holy Land by right of “possession.” (Ezekiel 11) However, this claim was nullified when Nebuchadnezzar carried King Zedekiah, his princes and the residue of Jerusalem to Babylon.

Thus all the “Jews,” including both the “good figs” and the “evil figs,” were brought to Babylon. However, as we have previously found in these studies, many “Babylonians and the like” joined the “Jewish Dispersion” in Babylon, and as a consequence the “Dispora, or Dispersion, of the Jews,” in Babylon, was made up largely of alien, non-Judahites, and only a relatively small number of real-Judahites.

After seventy years in Babylonian captivity, the real Judahites returned to Jerusalem to fulfill the commission given to them in Daniel 9:24, but many non-Judahite proselytes to the Jewish Dispersion, and thrust their company on the returning Jews,” and returned to Jerusalem with them.

These two elements in the Holy Land had little in common, and there was continuing enmity between them. As a result the “good figs,” especially the Benjamites, settled largely in Galilee, becoming known as the “Galileans,” while the “evil fig” pseudo-Jews abode in Judea, and were called the “Jews.” Of course a considerable number of real Judahites also lived in Judea, especially those of the tribe of Judah, but the point we are making is that the pseudo-Jews lived in, and dominated Judea.

In this connection it is both interesting and significant that the word translated “Jews” in our English New Testament appears in the original texts as “Judeans,” and not “Judahites,” or “Jehudim.” Furthermore it is tremendously significant that, according to Smith’s Bible Dictionary, eleven of Jesus’ twelve apostles were “Galileans,” and only one, i.e., Judas, was a “Judean.”

It must also be remembered that only a small portion of the mixed so-called “Dispersion of the Jews” in Babylon returned to Jerusalem. The great majority of these self-styled “Jews” remained in Babylon, and the “Jewish Dispersion” was controlled and directed from Babylon, and not from Jerusalem.

So we see that after the “Jews,” including both the “good fig” and the “evil fig” elements, had been taken to Babylon, many non-Judahites became adherents to Judaism. These non-Judahite “Jews” organized the so-called Jewish Dispersion for the purpose of palming it off as the “Dispersion of Israel,” and claiming the inheritance of the whole House of Israel for themselves. When the real Judahites returned to Jerusalem, the so-called Jewish Dispersion consisted almost entirely of Edomite-Amalekite-Shelanite-Canaanite branches of the serpent race, and the members of this so-called Jewish Dispersion lived in Babylon and in the pseudo-Jewish centers that they established in various nations and countries.

After the remnant of the people of the Kingdom of Judah (The majority of Judah, Benjamin, and the Levis had been taken into the Assryan captivity with their brothers and sisters from the House of Israel) had been taken to Babylon, many of the Edomite-Amalekite-Canaanite branches of the serpent race, who were already in Babylon, became proselytes to a pseudo-Judaism, which adopted the name of “The Dispora, or Dispersion, of the Jews,” which claimed for itself the inheritance of the whole house of Israel. Most of these proselytes were not of either Israelite or Judahite ancestry, and as a consequence, as Dr. Wells wrote:

“The main part of Jewry never was in Judea, and never came out of Judea.” Yet all these mixed peoples were called ‘Jews.’”

When the real Judahites, returned to Jerusalem to, “rebuild the city and the Temple,” according to Dr. Wells, many “Babylonians and the like, who claimed Abraham for their father, thrust their company with the returning Judahites.”

The Second Attempt to “Possess” Palestine:

We have found that the Shelanite-Canaanite branch of the serpent race made an abortive attempt to claim the Holy Land for themselves by “right of possession,” during the time that Zedekiah was King of Judah. And, after the Edomite-Amalekite-Shelanite-Canaanite elements of the serpent race had been brought together in the Great Babylonian Conspiracy, these Conspirators decided to make another attempt to “possess” Palestine, and they sent a contingent of pseudo-Jews back to Jerusalem with the real Judahites, who returned to “rebuild the city and the Temple.”

“And the LORD said unto me, A conspiracy is found among the men of Judah, and among the inhabitants of Jerusalem.” (Jeremiah 11:9)

These real Judahites returned to fulfill the commission given to them in Daniel 9:24. In that verse, the angel Gabriel said to Daniel:

“Seventy weeks (490 years) are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision, and to anoint the most holy.”

All of these things, of course, could be fulfilled ONLY THROUGH THE PROMISED MESSIAH, therefore it is clear that the Judahites were to “rebuild the city and the Temple,” in preparation for the coming of Yeashua, as the Messiah, the Redeemer, and the Savior.

While the Judahites were not commissioned to restore the Kingdom of David, it was necessary that they establish a government to maintain order and peace, and hence they established the Nation once again. On the other hand, the pseudo-Jews, who returned with the real Judahites to Jerusalem, were not interested in receiving the Messiah, in fact, they did their best to thwart Him, but they were very much interested in establishing A Nation, and taking over control of that Nation, so that they could claim “possess” of the Holy Land.

In accordance with this purpose, the pseudo-Jews set about to gain control of the Nation, and they succeeded so well in this scheme that, by the time Christ came in the flesh, they sat “in Moses’ seat.” Now Moses was not a priest-Aaron and his sons were appointed to the priesthood, but Moses was the Lawgiver and the first National Administer in Israel. Furthermore the scribes and Pharisees were not priests, and consequently, when Christ said that “the scribes and Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat,” He really meant that they had taken over control of the government in Palestine; just as they have done today.

In his work, entitled “A Short Study of Esau-Edom in Jewry,” Mr. C.F. Parker of London England, has explained how the pseudo-Jews brought in additional Esau-Edomite and Ishmaelite stock of the serpent seed race to help them gain control over the nation. Beginning on page 18, he wrote:

“Following the return of the Judahite remnant to Jerusalem, to establish a nation under priestly rule, an impious element (the Babylonian pseudo-Jews) acquiesced in the abominations established by Antiochus Epiphanes, who (170 B.C.) Pillaged the Temple and slew 40,000 people (Ant. XII, v, 4), this opened a sanguinary period of struggles between rival factions of the Jews. Judas Maccabeus succeeded in restoring the Temple services and temporarily subduing many enemies of the Jews, including the Idumeans (Anto. XII, viii, I, 6)

“The time of John Hyrcanus, 125 B.C., saw the Jews again faced the hostilities of the Idumeans (Edomites); he reduce their chief cities and incorporated the seed of Esau in the Jewish state, so that from that time onward the Idumeans came to be known also as Jews...The closing years of the history of the Jewish nation are marked by three devastating blows stuck by the seed of Esau-Edom.

“The first blow demolished the priestly line of the Asmonenas, through the murderous activities of the wicked Herod, an Idumean, who thereby established himself as king of the Jews, and sought to affiliate himself with the high priesthood through marrying Marianne, the high priest’s daughter, whom he subsequently murdered. As he marched through the Holy Land in his campaign to become King of the Jews, Herod was opposed by Antigonus (Mattathias), the last of the priestly line, who taunted him with his Idumean (Edomite) origin, and asserted that the kingdom should fall only to one of the royal line: ...but Antigonus, by way of reply to what Herod had caused to be proclaimed, and this before the Romans, and before Silo also, said, that they would not do justly if they gave the kingdom to Herod, who was no more than a private man, and an Idumean, i.e., a half Jew, whereas they ought to bestow it on one of the royal family, as their custom was. (Ant. XIV, xv, 2) Having gained the kingship, Herod destroyed the priestly line of Hyrcanus, the last of whom, the sons of Babs, had been held in secret hiding. (Ant. XV, vii, 10)

“The second, and most dreadful, act accomplished by the seed of Esau was in Herod’s endeavor to make certain that no legitimate seed of Israel should arise to claim the kingship from him; having heard that a new king had been born in Israel, he ordered the slaying of all children of two years and under. (Matthew 11, 16)

“The third blow struck by the Idumeans against the seed of Israel furnishes the occasion from which Josephus dates the commencement (66 A.D.) of the fall of Jerusalem. With the approach of Roman forces, the lawless zealots (the pseudo-Jews) took it into their own hands to invite the Idumean hordes to join with them in the defense of the city. Under the leadership of John of Gischala, and unknown to the priesthood, the zealots secretly communicated with the Idumeans, soliciting their aid, and by this means bringing 20,000 of them into battle array before Jerusalem...(Wars IV, iv, 1, 2)

“Unknown to the loyal commanders of the people, the zealots secretly admitted the Idumeans through one of the city gates; a frightly carnage ensued, in which the Idumeans let loose their hatred upon the real Judahites to such a degree as to weary themselves of the slaughter. (Wars IV, v, 1-5) At this time Anaus the high priest was slain; and Josephus dates the commencement of the destruction of Jerusalem from this unhappy even at the hands of these terrible people...” (Wars IV, v, 2)

Mr. Parker then says that the pseudo-Jewish zealots admitted that they had deliberately betrayed the real Judahites into the hands of the Idumeans. We quote, form page 21:

“The whole of these terrible atrocities was made doubly shameful by the fact that in wearying of committing them the zealots confessed to the Idumeans that they had together wrought such disaster in support of false accusations against the priesthood.”

Mr. Parker, then quotes Josephus:

“...they had taken arms, as though the high priests were betraying their metropolis to the Romans, but had found no indications of any such treachery...” (Wars IV, v, 5)

Continuing quoting from Mr. Parker’s work:

“Thus in their attempts to annihilate Israel, it may be said that the seed of Esau contributed in no small measure to the destruction of the Judahites, which was completed by the Romans under Titus in 70 A.D., yet such had been the infiltration of the seed of Esau into the nation itself that the final breaking of the nation and scattering of its people were also the dispersion of the Edomites (Jews) throughout the earth...

“This brings us to a feature of remarkable significance, for the evidence indicates that Esau-Hittites (the serpent race) comprise no small proportion of modern Jewry; and that we must be prepared to look for the continuation of Esau-Edom within the Jews...

“Since the breaking of their nation, the Jews have continued to absorb proselytes from all races, until now there is no such thing as a representative Jewish type. The ancient monuments which portray Hittite profiles confirm the infusion of Esau-Hittite blood into the nation, with other additions, almost to the point of erasing the original Israelitish features.

“History indicates that neither literally nor spiritually can modern Jewry claim to be Abraham’s heirs; and their claims to Palestine, as of right are groundless.”

There is Edom [Esau is called Edom in Genesis 36:8. And Edom is in 'Modern Jewry' Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925 edition, Vol. 5, p. 41.

Mr. Parker is a research student of note, and we have quoted from his work at considerable length, because his studies clearly indicate: (1) That from the beginning there was a continuing conflict among the Babylonian returnees to Jerusalem between “an impious element” (i.e., the pseudo-Jews) and the real Judahites; (2) That the pseudo-Jewish element was strengthened by bringing in of practically all of the Edomite-Idumeans into the citizenry of the Jewish nation, as proselytes to Judaism; and (3) That the pseudo-Jews, during “a sanguinary period of struggles,” in which many, if not most, of the real Judahites were ruthlessly murdered, took over complete control over the Jewish nation.

These facts are also born out by Christ, when in Matthew 23:2, He said:

“The scribes and Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat.”

And, in verse 33 of the same chapter, He declared that these interlopers who had taken over control of the nation were “serpents, a generation (race) of vipers,” tracing their ancestry, in verse 35, right back to Cain, the progenitor of the serpent race. In short, the Jews seemingly were succeeding in their scheme to control the Nation of the Judahites, and through that nation to claim title to the Holy Land by “right of possession.”

Christ Becomes “A Gin and A Snare”:

The prophet Isaiah prophesied that the Lord would become “a gind (net) and for a snare (nose, trap) to the inhabitants of Jerusalem. And many among them shall stumble, and fall, and be broken, and be snared, and be taken.” The Jews undoubtedly were aware of this prophecy, and that very likely is the reason why they invited the Edomite-Idumeans in to help them slaughter the real Judahites, who were in the Holy Land to carry out the Lord’s commission. Furthermore the Jews knew that the Lord had promised to send “a child and a Son” as Savior and Redeemer of His people, and to restore the throne and kingdom of David. They also knew that this promise was made to the Israelites, whose inheritance they were, and still are, trying to usurp, and this accounts for their rejection and crucifixion of Yeashua.

The Bible story clearly indicates that the “Jews in Judea rejected Jesus, while the ‘Galileans’ generally accepted Him,” and the reason is clear when we remember that “the inhabitants of Jerusalem were largely Babylonian and Idumean Jews, and most of the “Galileans” were real Judahites, mainly of Benjamite stock. It is also significant that eleven of Jesus’ apostles were Galileans, and only one, namely Judas (the traitor), was a Judean. Another fact overlooked by many Christian Bible Students, is that Jesus was condemned and crucified for political, rather than religious, reasons.

It must have seemed to the Jews in Jerusalem that they had won an outstanding victory when Christ died on the cross; but that victory turned out to be a hollow one indeed when, on the third day, He rose from the tomb, in a glorified “flesh and bone” body, forever freed from persecution or death penalty by His enemies.

In the 21st chapter of Matthew, we are told that the “chief priests and elders of the people” questioned the authority of Christ and, after confounding them with his counter-questions and parables, Jesus declared:

“Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you (i.e., the Jews), and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.”

In verse 45, we read that the “chief priests and Pharisees perceived that He spake of them: “hence it is small wonder that they set out to destroy and eliminate Him. And, just as Jesus had foretold, the kingdom was taken away from the Jews, when the Romans, in 70 A.D., captured Jerusalem, and expelled the Jews from the country, thus ending the Jewish nation. However, in 133 A.D., a little remnant of the Jews, who had been left in the eland, and such as had filtered back to Palestine, made a final desperate attempt to take the Holy Land “in possession;” but the Romans quickly crushed the revolt and expelled the last remnant of the Jews.

Thus ended the second attempt by the serpent race plotters to steal Israel’s inheritance; and again the Lord was truly “for a gin and for a snare to the inhabitants of Jerusalem,” as the prophet said. (The second half of Jesus’ prophecy has been fulfilled also, for the Kingdom was given to the exiled “lost sheep of the House of Israel,” after they found the “sanctuary,” provided for them in the “isles” to the north and west of Jerusalem. Today modern National Israel, represented by “The British Commwealth of Nations,” and “The People of the United States,” is fulfilling its prophetic mission and destiny).

The Jews Establish A Great Jewish Nation:

Although the Babylonian conspirators had failed in their attempt to establish a Jewish nation in Palestine, this failure did not deter them from continuing their Great Conspiracy. It may come as a surprise to you to learn that these Babylonian Jews actually succeeded in establishing one of the largest and strongest nations in Europe during the last half of the first millennium after Christ. Mr. Benjamin H. Freedman, in his book “Facts Are Facts,” wrote on page 39:

“What secret mysterious power has been able for countless generations to keep the origin and the history of the Khazars and the Khazar Kingdom out of our history text-books and out of the lass room courses of history throughout the world? The origin and the history of the Khazars and the Khazar Kingdom are incontestable facts. These incontestable historic facts also establish beyond any question of doubt the origin and history of the so-called or self-styled ‘Jews’ in Eastern Europe. The origin and history of the Khazars and Khazar Kingdom and their relationship to the origin and early history of the so-called or self-styled ‘Jews’ in Eastern Europe was one of history’s best kept secrets until wide publicity was given in recent years to my research on the subject.”

The evidence that such a strong and wealthy “Jewish” Khazar Kingdom existed is conclusive but, because of the limitations of space, we shall cite only a few excerpts from Vol. IV, pages 1-5, of the “Jewish Encyclopedia,” as quoted by Mr. Fredman in his book “Facts Are Facts,” as follows:

“CHAZARS: A people of Turkish origin whose life and history are interwoven with the very beginnings of the Jews in Russia...In the second half of the sixth century the Chazars moved westward...The Kingdom of the Chazars was firmly established in most of South Russia long before the foundation of the Russian Monarchy by the Varangians (885)...At this time the Kingdom of the Chazars stood at the height of its power and was constantly at war...At the end of the eighth century...the chagan of the Chazars and his grandees, together with a large number of his heathen people, embraced the Jewish religion...The Jewish population in the entire domain of the Chazars, in the period between the seventh and the tenth centuries, must have been considerable...about the ninth century, it appears as if all the Chazars were Jews and that they had been converted to Judaism only a short time was one of the successors of Bulan named Obadiah, who regenerated the kingdom and strengthened the Jewish religion.. He invited Jewish scholars to settle in his dominions, and founded synagogues and schools. The people were instructed in the Bible, Mishnah, and the Talmud and in the ‘divine service of the hazzanim’...In their writings the Chazars used the Hebrew Letters...The Chazar languages predominated...Obadiah was succeeded by his son Hezekiah; the latter by his son Manasseh by Hanukkah, a brother of Obadiah; Hanukkah by his son Isaac; Isaac by his son Moses (or Manasseh II); the later by his son Nisi; and Nisi by his son Aaron II. King Joseph himself was a son of Aaron, and ascended the throne in accordance with the law of the Chazars relating to succession...The king had twenty-five wives, all of royal blood, and sixty concubines, all famous beauties...This seems to have been the beginning of the downfall of the Chazar Kingdom...The Russian Varangians established themselves at Kiev...After a hard fight the Russians conquered the Chazars...Four years later the Russians conquered all the Chazarian territory east of the Azov...Many members of the Chazarian royal family emigrated to Spain...Some went to Hungary, but the great mass of the people remained in their native country.”

We could quote scores of authorities in support of the facts as contained in the above quotation, but we have neither the time nor the space to do so. Furthermore the “Jewish Encyclopedia” cannot be accused of anti-Jewish prejudice, and we believe that the facts, as given in the above quotation, prove our basic premise that the Babylonian Jews completely took over control of the Khazar Kingdom, making it in fact a Jewish nation.

Although, for the most mysterious of reasons, even the existence of this Jewish Khazar Nation was not mentioned in class room textbooks, or by popular historians, until quite recently, yet it is now an incontestible fact that, by the end of the first millennium after Christ, the Khazar Kingdom was probably the strongest nation in Europe, ruled by Jewish kings, with Babylonian Judaism as the state religion. In short, it was a Jewish nation, taken over and controlled by Jews from Babylon. But, as had been the case in all their previous attempts to set up a “Jewish Nation,” the Jews were unable to maintain their Jewish Khazar Nation. The Russians finally conquered Khazaria and incorporated it into the Russian Empire. And so ended another attempt by the Jewish Conspirators to fulfill their Satanically-inspired aspirations for world dominion.

However, despite their repeated failures, these same Conspirators have not given up The Great Conspiracy.



Jewish Nationalistic Aspirations Continue:

After the collapse of the Khazarian nation the Jews did not give up their nationalistic aspirations. In his article: “The Pedigree of Judah,” published in The “Forum” Magazine, Professor Lathrop Stoddard sums up the status of the Jews, after the collapse of Khazaria, as follows:

“By the eleventh century, the Khazar Empire, grown rich and unwarlike, collapsed before the onslaught of its enemies, and the Jewish masses, again fallen on evil times, drifted slowly westward in search of better opportunities. Sweeping across Southern Russia, they began to appear in Poland..Immediately, Poland became what Khazaria had once been, a magnet for Jewish mass-migration. And those Jewish immigrants, though mainly from the east, came, in lesser number, from the west as well. Western Europe had by this time become the scene of bitter anti-Jewish persecutions, so that, there also, many Jews heeded the summons of the Polish Crown. Here, them, on Polish soil, long-sundered branches of Jewry met once more.”

Although the Jews had failed in all their attempts to found a so-called Jewish nation, these failures did not change their fundamental aspirations and pur5poses. At least this was true of the Conspiratorial Leaders who dominated and controlled the mixed hybrid peoples who called themselves Jews. Naturally the Jews hated the Russian who had destroyed their Khazarian nation and, when the Russians became dominant in Poland, the enmity between the Russians and the Jews was intensified. In fact, we cannot evaluate the history of Jewry during this time, without an understanding of the basic factors underlying the enmity and conflicts between the Jews and the


The Jews hated the Russians, not because they were Russians, but rather because they had thwarted the attempt to make Khazaria a great Jewish nation, and also because Russian domination of Russia and Poland, where the Jews had migrated, prevented them from carrying out their plans to realize their nationalistic aspirations. It is a well established historic fact that the revolutionary activities of the Jews in Poland and Russia were carried on primarily for this purpose.

Dr. S.M. Dubnow has written a three-volume work, entitled: “The History of the Jews in Russia and Poland,” which was published by the Jewish Publication Society in 1920. Since Dr. Dubnow’s book cannot be ruled out because of so-called Jewish prejudice, we shall quote from his writings in this article. N page 40 of Vol. III, Dr. Dubnow wrote:

“By and by, out of the chaos of these nebulous tendencies, there emerged more and more clearly the outlines of definite politico-national doctrines and organizations, and new paths were blazed which, leading in different directions, converged toward one goal; that of regeneration of the Jewish people from within, both in its national and social life.”

Dr. Dubnow also makes it clear in his work that Russian opposition to, and even persecutions of, Jewry was not due to religious or racial considerations, but rather because of the revolutionary activities carried on by the Jews to fight for the autonomous rights for the Jewish Community within the Russian nation. It is not our purpose to go into this matter at length. However, we do want to point out that there is little, if any, justification for the popular misconception that Jewry has been opposed and persecuted because of religious or racial considerations. The basic factor in such opposition has been Jewish nationalistic aspirations and activities. As we proceed with our studies this fact will be proven conclusively from the testimony of the Jewish leaders themselves.

The Revival of Jewish Nationalism:

After outlining the historic development of the revival of Jewish nationalism, Dr. Dubnow, on page 41, Vol. III, of his work, wrote:

“The turning point of this process is marked by the year 1897. That year, in which the first International Congress held its sessions, inaugurated not only the political Zionist movement, but also the development of other currents of Jewish national and political thought...The careful observer could scarcely fail to perceive that beneath the hammer of history the formless mass of Jewry was being forged into a well-shaped instrument of great power. The organization of the Jewish people had made its beginning.”

Then on page 41, Dr. Dubnow continued:

“Among the movements which arose at the end of the nineteenth century there were some which came to the surface of Jewish life rather noisily, attracting the attention of the Jewish masses as well as the outside world. Others, however, were imbedded more deeply in the consciousness of the educated classes and were productive of a new outlook upon the national Jewish problem. The former were an answer to the question of the ‘Jewish misery,’ of the Judenot, in its practical aspect. The latter offered a solution to the National-Cultural Autonomism.”

The various movements, mentioned by Dr. Dubnow, give the clue to understanding the objectives and purpose of World Jewry. In so far as our present study is concerned the National-Cultural Autonomistic aspirations of Jewry are most significant. On page 44, Dubnow wrote:

“The first Basle Congress held in August 1897, was an impressive demonstration of the national awakening of the Jewish people. For the first time the united representatives of Eastern and Western Jewry proclaimed before the world that the scattered sections of Jewry looked upon themselves as one national organism striving for nationalistic regeneration.”

Contrary to popular misconception, the Jewish National and Cultural aspirations are not limited to the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine. On page 53, Vol. III, of his work, Dubnow said:

“The theory of Autonomism takes as its point of departure the historic fact that at all times, with the exception of a few brief and partial deflections, the Jewish Dispora, taken as a whole, represented a national organism, in which the absence of political or territorial unity was made u by the stronger cohesion of its spiritual and cultural ties and the greater intensity of its social and autonomous life. For centuries the entire culture of Judaism (?) Assumed a religious coloring and its communal autonomy was centered in the synagogue; which circumstance gave the modern champions of assimilation reason for thinking that the Jews were only a religious group scattered among the various nations...the latest development has shown that Jewry, though scattered among various political states, is a nation full of vitality, and the Jewish religion is only one of its functions. The Jewish national idea, secularized to a certain degree, is based on the assumption that all sections of the Jewish people, though divided in their political allegiance, form one spiritual or historic, Cultural nation, which, like all national minority groups in countries with mixed populations, are duty bound to fight in their several lands at one and the same time not only for their civil equality, but also for their national rights, the autonomy of the Jewish community, school and language. What Jewish orthodoxy has for centuries stood for and still stands for, under the guise of religious Judaism, progressive Jews should fight for under the banner of Jewish culture...In those lands in which civil emancipation has been achieved the fight must go on for national emancipation, the recognition of the Jews as a nation which is entitled to a comprehensive communal and cultural autonomy.”

This quote is so clear as to the real objectives of the jews that no comment is necessary. However, we ask the reader to note that Dr. Dubnow says that the Jewish religion is merely a guise for the nationalistic aspirations of the Jews and also that the Jews will never be satisfied with the civil rights enjoyed by other citizens in the nations to which they migrate, but they also demand “recognition of the Jews as a nation which is entitled to a comprehensive (special) communal and cultural autonomy.”

The Jews use such "religious" sounding words as "the Jewish faith," "the Jewish religion," "Jewish spiritual values," "Jewish religious doctrines," and like phrases which deceive and lead the unlearned into total equanimity.

Behind this mask of religiosity stands a complete plan for world government, world power, world conquest, a Jewish kingdom of this world, and the destruction of Christianity. Dr. Dubnow is not the only one who makes such claims for the Jews. Dr. Herzl, who has been called the father of modern Zionism, in a statement before the British Royal Commission on Alien Immigration in August 1920, said:

“I will give you my definition of a nation, and you can add the adjective ‘Jewish.’ A nation is in my mind, an historical group of men of a recognizable cohesion held together by a common enemy. That is my view of a nation. Then if you add the word ‘Jewish’ you have what I understand to be the Jewish nation.”

Dr. Herzl’s definition sounds strange indeed to freedom-loving people and especially the Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, Celtic, Nordic, and Slavic peoples, whose ideal of a free nation is one in which free people are bound together by a common love of freedom with justice, rather than fear of a common enemy.

The late Louis D. Brandeis (another Jewish traitor), long a Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, in his book, “The Jewish Problem-How To Solve It.” wrote:

“Let us recognize that we Jews are a distinct nationality of which every Jew, whatever his country, his nation or shade of belief, is necessarily a member...Organize, Organize, Organize, until every Jew in America must stand up and be counted, or prove himself wittingly or unwittingly of the few who are against their own people.”

By this statement Justice Brandeis really claimed dual citizenship for all Jews, and certainly degenerated to appeals to Jewish exclusiveness and nationalistic pride and loyalty. Later, in these studies, we shall see that Justice Brandeis, in one instance at least, according to the testimony of Jews themselves, placed the interests of his Jewish nationalism above the interests of the United States.

The late Rabbi Stephen Wise, also hailed by the One Worlders as a great Leader, was quoted in the New York Herald Tribune for June 15, 1938, as saying:

“I am not an American of Jewish faith, I am a Jew.”

And the following statement appeared in “the Jewish World,” for January 15, 1919, p. 6:

“Jewish Nationalism is a Jewish question which must be governed by Jewish principles and not be subservient to the convenience or exigencies for the time being of any government, however important.”

We could cite scores of similar statements from both the Jews and others, but we believe that those that we have quoted are enough such statements to prove that modern so-called Zionist Judaism is indeed a national program which is often mistakenly identified as a religious movement. However, Dr. Dubnow now says that religious Judaism is merely a guise for the National Autonomistic aspirations of the Jews.

If this study will not show the nay sayers the truth then I suspect that because of their unbelief they will never see the truth. Pray for them that their eyes will be opened so they can see, and that their ears will be opened and they can hear and understand.