Watchman Willie Martin Archive

The NEA's Anti-Christian and

Anti-American Agenda Threatens

Our Nation!

    Have you wondered what is happening to our children? Have you wondered what has gone wrong with our educational system, because the young cannot read or comprehend what they are reading any more. Have you wondered why they cannot make change at the stores you shop at, but must rely on the cash registers, or on adding machines?

Well read on and you will find out what has happened, and it should make you mad; it should make you so disgusted you can hardly sleep at night.

    Do you know who said: "Allegiance to a nation is the biggest stumbling block to the creation of International Government. National boundaries and the concept of sovereignty must be abolished. The quickest way to do this is to condition the young to another and broader alliance. Opinion favorable to International Government will be developed in the social studies in the public schools."

    Were those the words of an Alger Hiss, or some other well-known traitor to America? No, they were from a handbook for teachers published by the National Education Association, also known as the NEA for short.

    Who said: "Conditioning is a process which may be employed by the teacher to build up attitudes in the child and predispose him to the action by which those attitudes are expressed."

    Were those words taken from a Communist course book on brainwashing? No, that sage advice is from the Yearbook of the National Educational Association.

    Who said: "Education should and can be made a force to equalize the conditions of men."

    Could it have been those well-known equalitiarian ideals Marx or Lenin? No, that was from the Secretary's Report of the National Education Association right here in the United States.

     You may be starting to get the point, but here's one more quote for you: Where do these words of wisdom come from? "What if teachers don't want power? Organize the ones who do. The building of a power base needs a leader, who is initially more important than the number of people you have behind him. Among others, Martin Luther King, Ho Chi Minh, and Fidel Castro suggest the wisdom of this advice. (Train your) people by making the other side insult or assault your people so that they can learn what the other side is really like...getting the (school) superintendent to insult or to assault your people is regarded as of higher value than ten weeks of formal training. It is hard to deal with an enemy with whom you have a personal relationship. You should not let your people fraternize with the enemy."

    Sounds like it comes from a revolutionary Marxist training manual, doesn't it? It's actually from an official report to the NEA by one Saul Alinsky.

    Most Americans do not know what is going on in the public school classrooms of this country. They complain that property taxes are too high, yet, they are perplexed when a massive bureaucracy and billions upon billions in public school funding produce not young scholars but illiterate drug-abusing criminals and delinquents.

    But sadly, most of us irresponsibly throw up our hands and hope that "someone else" will solve these problems for us, that "someone else" usually meaning teachers, politicians, educational bureaucrats, "whoever is in charge." We hope for the best and trust the politicians' promises because we feel intimidated by the size of the problems and by our own lack of expertise and knowledge in the field of education. Due to this irresponsibility on our part almost an entire generation has been denied a proper education. The situation is getting so bad in many major cities that to send your child to a public school is tantamount to child abuse. Is it surprising that even such an eager booster of the education establishment as Bill Clinton (who made a promise to send his daughter, Chelsea, to a public school) when confronted with the grim realities of the hellhole that the DC (District of Corruption) public schools have become, quietly enrolled her in an exclusive private school?

    Little John or Little Jane are, in some jurisdic-tions, more likely to be hooked on dope than on the classics of English literature, more likely to learn the brutal reality of rape than the subtleties of the calculus, more likely to be assaulted than instructed, and when they are instructed, it will more than likely be in how to use a condom, how to fight for "gay rights," and how to be a good citizen of the New World Order.

    Americans desperately need to become informed and involved in their children's education. A beginning of a hopeful trend is the "home schooling" movement. A small but growing group of American parents are abandoning the public schools as hopelessly incapable of providing their children with a decent education.

    On 16th Street in Washington, DC stand the offices of an organization called the National Education Association, or NEA for short. The NEA was founded in 1857 by a group of 43 teachers. For many years it was merely a professional association of teachers, acting in many ways like a labor union and fighting for the economic interests of its members, though often clothing its agenda with high-sounding rhetoric about "fighting for an equal opportunity for all children," etc. For approximately the first fifty years of its existence, the NEA had a reputation as a relatively decent and benign institution.

    The NEA represents itself today as a professional association and much more, as an "education lobby." Now that all sounds very fine, doesn't it? After all, who could be against education?

    The NEA is a massively funded and powerful organization with effective control over teachers and public education in this country, with its tentacles reaching deeply into the education bureaucracy in Washington and into your wallet and ours; and it is an organization that is firmly dedicated to the conversion of this country into a province in a one-world government. A New World Order in which the independence of the United States would cease to exist and in which the American people would become an insignificant and powerless minority.

    How did the radical transformation of this organization take place? Let us quote form the Siecus Circle, published in 1977, by Claire Chambers: "Recognizing the organization's potential for exerting tremendous pressure and influence on American education, the...socialist complex wasted no time in seizing control of the NEA; this is accomplished as far back as the early 1900's. Early NEA leaders who strove for a one-world...order included such...Communist frontiers as John Dewey and William Heard Kilpatrick, Harold Rugg and Marxist professor George S. Counts...were among the NEA teacher-leaders whose writings helped steer the leftward course of this organization in the early 1930's."

    By maneuvering converts into top administrative positions, [these] master planner gained control of the NEA. At roughly the same time, the then National Chairman of the Communist Party, USA, William Z. Foster, in his book, "Toward A Soviet America," wrote that education could advance the revolution best if centrally controlled and organized under a federal Department of Education. Foster said that the Department of Education, "should be revolutionized, cleansed of religious, patriotic and other features of the bourgeois ideology. The students will be taught on the basis of Marxian dialectical materialism, internation-alism, and the general ethics of the new Socialist society."

    Is it merely a coincidence that the NEA fought for decades to establish just such a federal Department of Education, as envisaged by Communist William Z. Foster? Their efforts paid off in 1977 when Jimmy Carter, in return for NEA support in the 1976 election, created the DOE. The DOE bureaucracy has been since its inception heavily interlocked with that of the NEA.

    But surely, you may say, our Department of Education and the NEA are not promoting the internationalism and anti-Christianism, anti-Americanism proposed by William Z. Foster! Judge for yourself the motives of the NEA, as we read to you from the NEA publication, "Today's Education," the March/April 1976 issue, part of an article entitled "A Declaration of Interdependence" by long-time world government proponent Henry Steele Commager: "Now we must join with others to bring forth a New World Order. It is essential that mankind free itself from the limitations of national prejudice. All people are part of one global community. We call upon all nations to strengthen and sustain the United Nations and its specialized agencies, and other institutions of world order..."

    The fact that the NEA published this treasonous trash in the Bicentennial year of American Independence is an insult to every patriot. We say that the NEA's "Declaration of Interdependence" is in complete opposition to our Declaration of Independence. The one-world agenda of this organization is a direct threat to our national and individual freedom.

    Columnist Russel Evans wrote in 1983: "A big wheel in the machinery of the proposed New World Order is the National Education Association, now enjoying its crowning achievement: the Cabinet-level Department of Education. In the master plan for this New World Order, a scheme that is frightening more and more Americans, it appears that the NEA wants to control education...this is [part of] an insidious global machine designed to crush our national sovereignty."

    In 1937, in its 15th Yearbook, the NEA itself declared that: "The present capitalistic and nationalistic school system has been supplanted in but one place - Russia - and that change was effected by revolution. Hence the verdict of history would seem to indicate that we are likely to have to depend upon revolution for social change of an important and far-reaching character."

    How was it possible for such and anti-Christian, anti-American and frankly Marxist agenda to be espoused by America's largest professional association of teachers, for decades, without sparking outrage and resistance on a massive scale from parents and the many good and decent teachers?

    For one thing, part of the responsibility must lie at our feet; for it is our money-consciousness, and our materialism, our essential conservatism and our desire to "get along" and "not rock the boat" that all too often paralyzes Americans when faced with a revolutionary enemy.

    We must lay a great portion of the fault at the feet of the Judeo-Christian preachers in the pulpits of America; for they have taught far too long that Christians should not get involved in the political process. And if Christians do not get involved then all we are left with are the degenerates, perverts, deviates, Queers, Jews, Baby Killers and other undesirables.

    Then all too many Americans try to sense which way the wind is blowing and are always careful not to say or do anything that might get them branded as politically incorrect. Unfortunately, the media arbiters of what is and what is not politically correct are the allies of the NEA and the other enemies of Almighty God and the people of the United States. Additionally, we Americans don't like to believe that we have any domestic enemies. We like to believe that all our institutions and leaders are just fine and dandy, in need of a little fine-tuning perhaps. but essentially sound.

    We find it almost impossible to accept the fact that powerful alien forces have literally taken over large parts of both the public and private sectors in this country. We have an obsessive need to believe that "everything's all right." To believe otherwise would mean that we had a responsibility to face up to this extremely frightening and dangerous situation and do something about it.

    Another element in the amazing phenomenon of American non-resistance to the theft of our children's minds is the fact that the schemers who plan to turn our country into a Third World province of their world government were rising to power all over American society in the 1930's, not just in the educational establishment. With the accession to power of Franklin Roosevelt [1], the federal government threw out the welcome mat to secret and even open Communists at every level and department. These same alien forces were also at that time consolidating their power in the news and entertainment media, and all of these parts of the alien anti-Christian, anti-American coalition cooperated closely in covering each other's tracks and in diverting the attention of Americans to trivialities or imagined overseas threats, just as they do today.

    What do the NEA and their allies want? They want power - absolute power as their number one goal. This is the real motivation behind their push for the "consolidation" of local school districts, which minimizes the influence of parents and local school boards on educational decision-making. Their desire for total power is also what sends them into a state of near-frenzy on those rare occasions when parents have demanded the removal of obscene or subver-sive textbooks. You see, parents not wanting their children to read anti-Christian, and anti-American propaganda or homosexual smut is "censorship," whereas the NEA's rewriting of American history and editing of Western literature to fit in with the "multicultural" agenda is "academic freedom." They will talk a nice line to an audience of parents, and a very different one in their own conclaves and publications, a few of which we have quoted today. They care little for reading, writing, or mathematics; and they see traditional civics, English literature, Western Art, and American History as "racist" and "Eurocentric."

    The NEA's agenda for our children is this: Our children must be prepared for a world government by the year 2000. All pride of race or nationality must be destroyed, as counter to this goal. Unrestricted immigration and integration into the classroom of millions from the ghetto and the Third World must be encouraged, not out of any pretended concern for poor or oppressed peoples, but to dilute and eventually to erase our national identity as a people. Our children must be taught that traditional American moral standards and values, the heritage of our founding fathers, are outdated and repressive. Students must learn that homosexuality is normal and even desirable. Students are to learn that the traditional family is a holdover from an earlier, oppressive age, and that today they are "free to choose" "alternative lifestyles" like sodomy, lesbianism, or worse. The value system of the self-styled leftist "experts" are fast replacing that of caring parents and families.

    If you are skeptical about what we are saying, we urge you to carefully read the textbooks, all the textbooks that are now being used in your local public schools. You will find that the NEA has kept the promise of its slogan of several years ago: That slogan was "All Books Over 5 Years Old Must Go!" Attend school board meetings and hearings, become an activist for our children. You will find that these change agents in our public schools hate and abhor traditional education, moral decency, and American patriotism. You will find that you are put on their enemies list if you try to restor those values and standards.

    Do you want your precious son or daughter to be taught that homosexual perversion is acceptable behavior? Do you want your little girl or little boy to be taught that the end of American indepen-dence and our submersion into a "New World Order" is desirable and good? Do you want your children to be told that the Founding Fathers of this country were wicked bigots and criminals? Do you want your children to be taught to kill a little unborn baby, just for convenience sake? If you do want these things, then you need do nothing. The bureaucrats in the NEA are taking care of business just fine. If, however, you don't want to see America's children indoctrinated to accept a future as serfs in a multicultural, Third World America and if you'd like to see the traditional patriotic nature and academic standards of American education restored, then you need to join together with your fellow patriots and work for a brighter future for our nation and people.

The 'Judeo-Christian Heritage' Hoax!

    "Christianity would be much stronger if its Jewish heritage had not been neglected," a New York theologian said today. This quote is the first paragraph of a news story wired from Chicago, March 25, 1965, by the UPI, in reporting the remarks of Rev. William D. Davies of Union Theological Seminary who discussed, "Christianity's dependence and growth from Judaism" at an inter-faith conference of theologians and teachers of religion, "sponsored by the Jewish Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith; the Roman Catholic Bellarmine School of Theology at Loyola University; and the Divinity School of the University of Chicago."

    The dispatch also quoted Rev. Davies as saying: "Jesus was, in a sense, a rabbi no less than a prophet. Both the method and very largely the substance and form of his ethical teaching were rabbinical. Nourished in the synagogue, Jesus gave his followers much of the ethics of the synagogue."

    The Rev. Davies is a liar, for Jesus did no such thing, and The Rabbis of Judaism understand this just as do the leaders in the Christian movement.

    Rabbi Moshe Maggal of the National Jewish Information Service said in 1961 when the term Judeo‑Christian was relatively new, "There is no such thing as a Judeo-Christian Religion. We consider the two religions so different that one excludes the other!" [2]

    This is the Result of Confused Thinking: This kind of confused thinking results from the propaganda promoted by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the American Jewish Committee to convince Christians that their religion is just another Jewish sect, the implication being that Christianity has gone astray from "the true religion," Judaism. For the time being, however, the emphasis is placed on "our Judeo-Christian Heritage."      "The current expression 'Judeo-Christian' is an error which has altered the course of universal history by the confusion it has sown in men's mind, if by it one is meant to understand the Jewish origin of Christianity; for by abolishing the fundamental distinctions between Jewish and Christian messianism, it seeks to bring together two ideas that are radically in opposition. By laying the accent exclusively on the 'Christian' idea to the detriment of the 'Judean' it conjures away monotheistic messianism - a valuable discipline at all levels of thought, and reduces it to a purely confessional messianism, preoccupied like Christian messianism with the salvation of the individual soul. If the term 'Judeo-Christian' does point to a common origin, there is no doubt that it is a most dangerous idea.

    It is based on a 'contrdictio in adjecto' which has set the path of history on the wrong track. It links in one breath Two Ideas which are Completely Irreconcilable, it seeks to demonstrate that there is no difference between day and night or hot and cold or black and white, and thus introduces a fatal element of confusion to a basis on which some, nevertheless, are endeavoring to construct a civilization. Christianity offers to the world a limited messianism which it wishes to impose as the only valid one...Even Spinoza, who was further than any other thinker from the historic messianism of Israel, wrote: 'As for what certain churches say, that God assumed human nature, I must confess that this seems to me as absurd as saying that a circle assumed the shape of a square...'

    The dogmatic exclusiveness professed by Christianity must finally end...It is the obstinate Christian claim to be the sole heir to Israel which propagates anti-Semitism. This scandal must terminate sooner or later; the sooner it goes, the sooner the world will be rid of the issue of lies in which anti-Semitism shrouds itself." [3]

    To give the idea wide currency the Jewish propagandists are getting plenty of cooperation from within the Christian community. In the November 1963 issue of the ADL Bulletin there is a feature story with the headline and subhead reading: "To Know Their Jewish Heritage...A Catholic teaches Catholics that their faith rests on a solid foundation of ancient Judaism."

    The article is about "Leon Paul, a Catholic writer, lecturer, and teachers," who is conducting adult education classes on "The Church and Judaism" under the auspices of the Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, N.Y. The article quotes Paul as saying: "Catholics are very interested in what I call 'their Jewish heritage.' What is more, they are interested in Jews themselves - their customs, their beliefs, even their houses of worship."

    That Mr. Paul did not say "our Jewish heritage" was Not a subconscious slip of the tongue, for what the ADL did not tell its readers was that Leon Paul is a Jewish convert to Catholicism. The article then tells how Paul takes his students on field trips to a synagogue, about which he says: "If a Catholic doesn't feel at home in a synagogue, he doesn't understand the origin of his own beliefs."

    "A Jew remains a Jew even though he changes his religion; a Christian which would adopt the Jewish religion would not become a Jew, because the quality of a Jew is not in the religion but in the race. A Free thinker and Atheist always remains a Jew." [4]

    It is also disclosed in this ADL feature that Paul writes a column to "introduce Catholics to their roots in Jewish tradition" which is syndicated to diocesan newspapers from coast to coast, and that: "For his information on Jews, Jewish life, and Judaism, Paul consults with Jewish authorities and organizations - the Anti-Defamation League is often used in his 'Mosaic' column as a reference source, and for stories on specific activities."

    "The not content merely to destroy Christianity, but he preaches the gospel of Judaism; he not only assails the Catholic or the Protestant faith, but he incites to the unbelief, and then imposes on those whose faith he has undermined his own conception of the world, of morality and of life. He is engaged in his historic mission, the annihilation of the religion of Christ." [5]

    The ADL also supplies propaganda materials for use in Christian Churches and schools. In another ADL Bulletin, Rabbi Arthur Gilbert boasts: "...about 40,000 Catholic and Protestant churches have borrowed kits from regional offices and more than a million pamphlets have been bought by church schools...The Vacation Bible School course for juniors, to be conducted in some 100,000 Protestant churches this summer, is based on an ADL booklet."

    "The guidance and control of America has gravitated into the hands of those least worthy of trusteeship. One of their most notable achievements, has been the making of 'male prostitutes' who do the dirty work for them [Jews]. A 'male prostitute' is a male who offers the facilities of his anatomy from the neck up, to anyone who is willing to pay the price, exactly as a female prostitute of the same species offers her body from the waist down. Thousands of these 'pseudo‑Christian 'male prostitutes ‑‑ male prostitutes are circulating in all walks of life, pandering to evil propaganda for monetary profit and political power." [6]

    Hypocrisy of Textbooks: Also in line with this "Judeo-Christian heritage" fiction is the Life and Worship series of Catholic [7] textbooks for grade-school children, first announced at a national convention of Jewish Rabbis in April, 1965, and given full page coverage in the New York Times and New York Journal-American which said: "The texts strive to point up the common religious ties which have bound those of the Catholic faith to those of the Jewish faith through the centuries."

    Judeo-Christian Heritage A Hoax: It appears there is no need to belabor the absurdity and fallacy of the "Judeo-Christian heritage" fiction, which certainly is clear to all honest theologians. That "Judeo-Christian dialogue" in this context is also absurd was well stated in the author-initiative religious journal, Judaism, Winter 1966, by Rabbi Eliezar Berkowitz, chairman of the department of Jewish philosophy, at the Hebrew Theological College when he wrote: "As to dialogue in the purely theological sense, nothing could be more fruitless or pointless. Judaism is Judaism because it Rejects Christianity; and Christianity is Christianity because it Rejects Judaism. What is usually referred to as the Jewish-Christian Traditions Exists Only in Christian or Secularist Fantasy."

    There is no doubt this is true! And the fantasy exists in Christian and Secularist minds only because it was implanted there by the persistent propaganda of the masters of intrigue of the ADL-AJC Network. Nevertheless, there can be no doubt that knowledgeable theologians, Jewish and Christians who constantly allude to "our Judeo-Christian heritage" are for their own specious purposes perpetuate a grotesque and fantastic hoax.

    This hypocrisy about "our Judeo-Christian heritage" has become such a fad, and has made such a powerful impression, that on May 10, 1969, the New York Times was able to report from Hillsdale, N.J., that: "A $1 million Roman Catholic Church designed to reflect the Judaic heritage of Christianity was blessed and dedicated here today by Arch-bishop Thomas A. Boland of the Newark Archdiocese...An Old Testament wing representing Judaism and a New Testament wing representing Christianity flank two sides of the sanctuary."

    "Heritage" is a New Invention: One can search Christian literature through the centuries and nowhere has the phrase "Judeo-Christian heritage" ever been used until just a few years ago, when the ADL and the AJC and their associated groups, stooges and sycophants began popularizing this malicious myth. The result has been that today this unholy refrain is being repeated parrot-like by Catholic priests and prelates and by Protestant bishops and clergymen of every denomination, who have been encouraged to regard the expression as a mark of sophisticated liberalism, and as evidence that they are completely free of the so-called sin of "Christian anti-Semitism."

    "Given by Senator Joseph McCarthy, six months before his mouth was closed forever: George Washington's surrender: 'And many of the people of the land became Jews.' [8]. The confession of General Cornwallis to General Washington at Yorktown has been well hidden by historians. History books and text books have taught for years that when Cornwallis surrendered his army to General Washington that American independence came, and we lived happily ever after until the tribulations of the twentieth century.

    Jonathan Williams recorded in his Legions of Satan, 1781, that Cornwallis revealed to Washington that 'a holy war will now being in America, and when it is ended America will be supposedly the citadel of freedom, but her millions will unknowingly be loyal subjects to the Crown.' Cornwallis went on to explain what would seem to be a self contradiction: 'Your churches will be used to teach the Jew's religion and in less than two hundred years the whole nation will be working for divine world government. That government they believe to be divine will be the British Empire [under the control of the Jews]. All religions will be permeated with Judaism without even being noticed by the masses, and they will all be under the invisible all-seeing eye of the Grand Architect of Freemasonry [Lucifer - as Albert Pike disclosed in Morals and Dogma].' And indeed George Washington was a Mason, and he gave back through a false religion what he had won with his army."

    Cornwallis well knew that his military defeat was only the beginning of World Catastrophe that would be universal and that unrest would continue until mind control could be accomplished through a false religion. What he predicted has come to pass!!! Of that, there is no longer any doubt. A brief study of American religious history will show that Masonry and Judaism has infused into every church in America their veiled Phallic Religion.

    Darby and the Plymouth Brethren brought a Jewish Christianity to America. Masons Rutherford and Russell [both Jews] started Jehovah Witnesses' in order to spread Judaism throughout the world under the guise of Christianity.

    Needless to say, most Christian leaders, both lay and clerical, who are injecting this noxious notion into their writings, discussions and sermons, are largely unaware of its true meaning; they misunderstand its importance, they are completely unconscious of the subversive purpose they are serving. They are using the phrase mechanically, thoughtlessly, simply because it has become a popular catch-phrase. "I am devoting my lecture in this seminar to a discussion of the possibility that we are now entering a Jewish century, a time when the spirit of the community, the non‑ideological blend of the emotional and rational and the resistance to categories and forms will emerge through the forces of anti‑nationalism to provide us with a new kind of society. I call this process the Judaization of Christianity because Christianity will be the vehicle through which this society becomes Jewish." [9]

    This brainwashing scheme has been so successful that the devilish distortion was even fasted on the Vatican Council and put into the mouths of 2,400 bishops, archbishops and cardinals, who know better; but who should have read the Declaration on the Jews with more critical scrutiny, before adopting it.

    The Declaration that the Vatican Council Fathers approved embodies a glaring misconception of this popular fallacy when it says that there is a "great spiritual heritage common to Christians and Jews"  referring to the Jews of today. In its reference to the Jews of today the Declaration says in the very same sentence that "it is the wish of this sacred Council to foster and recommend a mutual knowledge and esteem..."

    The reason for the inclusion of the word "mutual" is explained in a footnote in the official American publication of "The Documents of Vatican II." It declares that this word "tactfully expresses the request of Cardinal Ruffini, Archbishop of Palermo, that Christians should love Jews, and Jews should declare that they will not hate Christians (and he asked that certain passages in the Talmud be corrected)."

     Anti-Christian Passages in Talmud: Of course, there has been no declaration by any Jewish authority that Jews should stop hating Christians, nor have any anti-Christian passages in the Talmud been corrected. And it can be said with certainty that the Jewish religious community, unlike the Christian community, will never permit the teachings of the Talmud to be corrected.

     It is because of such misconceptions as promulgated by the Vatical Council that the Judeo-Christian heritage myth persists.

     In the ADL's monthly magazine, "Christian Friends," which is sent free to Christian clergymen across the country, Dr. Joseph L. Lichten, the ADL agent who attended Vatican Council sessions disguised as a correspondent for two leading Catholic magazines, "Ave Maria" and "Jubilee," falsely writes that the above Council statement "affirms the Judeo-Christian heritage."

     The phrase "Judeo-Christian heritage" implies that present-day Judaism and Christianity emanated form the same spiritual source and share similar characteristics and traditions. This suggestion is unfortunately misleading - it is fatuous nonsense. More important, it is a brazen sacrilegious affront to Jesus Christ, the founder of Christianity.

     Christianity has its roots in God - a God which the Jews of today deny and hate, when they deny His Son. Christianity is based upon the teachings of Jesus Christ.

     It has no kinship with the religion practiced by the Jews of Jesus' time, the religion of the Pharisees that Christ denounced and condemned, time and time again, the religion that the Jews of our time claim as their heritage. Judaism is based on lies, deception, murder and intrigue.

     There is no truth in the presumption that Jews and Christians can be hyphenated, that Christianity and Judaism share common foundations in a common culture, that they are two forms of the same belief.

     The "Judeo-Christian heritage" slogan suggests that there is some connection, a close religious bond, between true Christians and a collection of modern Jews of various beliefs, unbelief and non-belief, who call their religion Judaism. There is no such connection; there can be no such bond. But this is not to say that there can be so friendship between Christians, Jews and mutual respect for each others beliefs.

     The ADL's Rabbi Arthur Gilbert, in his book, "A Jew in Christian America," writes: "Paul was convinced that the disbelief of the Jews in Jesus was a sign that God intended to provide an occasion for the conversion of the Gentiles. Paul did not seek converts, however, for a sect within Judaism; instead he offered a new religion based on belief in the crucified and resurrected Christ."

     If Christianity was "a new religion" how could there be a Jewish heritage? That Christians have a spiritual relationship to the Hebrews of the Old Testament is a reality, in the sense that the heritage of the ancient Hebrews and Christians stems from the same God - the God of Abraham. But the Jews of today, who believe in Judaism, do not believe in the religion of Moses, as ordained by the God of Abraham - they believe in the perverted beliefs of the Pharisees.

     Judaism is not mentioned in the Bible; neither in the New Testament, nor in the Old Testament; it has evolved since Christ's time. Judaism is a spiritual outlook and practice which arose among the Jews after the Babylonian exile, from which it retains many pagan influences, such as "Sex initiation, Mooncult, Tatooning, Mutilation, and other Primitive Rituals." The quoted phrase is from the sub-title of the book, "Pagan Rites in Judaism," by Dr. Theodor Reik, the noted Jewish author and president of the "National Association of Psychoanalytic Psychology." "Judaism: Judaism denotes the Jewish faith in its extravagant form of blind attachment to rites and traditions, and national exclusiveness. This must have been prevalent in the time of Christ, because of His constant exposure of their formalism and self-assumption, and because in John's Gospel 'the Jews' is used as synonymous with opposers of Christ and His teachings." [10]

     While Judaism retains some vestiges of Old Testament piety and belief, it has in the course of time, gone through constant change. Most of which has come about since the Khazars of Russia and Eastern Europe adopted Judaism as their state religion. Today, Judaism lives in three branches, Orthodox, Conservative and Reform, each of which has several sub-divisions and many facets. All beliefs in Judaism are not only completely different from Christianity; they encourage opposition to, and inspire hate of Christianity.

     Because of this hatred toward Christ and the Christian way of life, we would ask: Is the Christian more dangerous to Judaism and the other religions of the world, because God forbids them to injure his brother, is the same God before whom we are both one day to appear in judgment; is that God less tremendous to the wicked, or less favorable to the just, because on His word we believe him to be one in essence, though three in persons?

     This hatred of the Jews which is becoming more and more frenzied, which even the pagans and infidels themselves could not justify on such pretexts as they present for public consumption. What fanatic rage must it be that blinds the Jews, when in contradiction with themselves, they applaud the toleration of the ancient Philosophers, who, though disbelieving the mysteries of Paganism, never attempted to rob the people of their religion; while on the other hand they incessantly conspire against Christians and Christianity under pretence that it contains some sort of mysteries.

     Another objection not less extravagant, is that against Revelation itself. It is God, they say, whom the Christians declare to have spoken; hence there can be no further liberty of opinion in man on matters of faith. The so-called defenders of liberty and equality is then authorized to rise in arms against Christ and Christianity and its way of life which, they say, denies people of their liberty. Such is their arguments.

     But to what length does their frenzy carry them? Rabbis for hundreds of years have conspired to overthrow every altar, Catholic, Protestant, Lutheran, or any of the other Christian sects. What stupid idea is this? Can reason be traced through plots and conspiracies, of which the sole tendency is the overthrow of the religion of the White Race, under the pretence of liberty of worship; we have heard all sorts of false ideas to crush the God of the Christians

     For 2000 years we have seen them conspire and use every artifice of cunning intrigue to rob the world of the religion of God, of Christianity. And because they utter the empty sounds of Liberty, Equality and Toleration, people mistake their utterings as that of profound men, when they are nothing but empty shells, trying to escape the judgment they know is coming. Perhaps most telling of all is that "it was American Roman Catholic bishops in the middle and late 19th Century who demanded the removal of Bible reading from public schools..."

     Why? The full weight of history confirms that the Bible has been and continues to be opposed by those seeking to destroy freedom, but those seeking to bring mankind into bondage. This speaks volumes about the worth and the truth of the Bible.     The West's tyrants of tomorrow are even now painting heavily against it, and in particular, the 17th-century King James Version is based on the Textus Receptus (also banned by Rome) with Hebrew and Greek texts differing from all other modern verses, which come from the Judaized Alexandrian texts, and contains many errors.

     From the "Encyclopedia of Jewish Knowledge" we learn that, "There is a peculiar contradiction in Judaism" in that the Jewish people "contributed little to the development of theology, the science of religion. What theology did grow up among Jews came chiefly by contact with Christian and Moslem theologians." it might be concluded form this that Judaism has a Christian heritage, in part, but Christianity certainly has adopted nothing from what today is called Judaism. "Their kingdom is at hand, their perfect kingdom. The triumph of those ideas is approaching in the presence of which the sentiments of humanity are mute, the thirst for truth, the Christian and national feelings and even the common pride of the peoples of Europe. That which is coming, on the contrary, is materialism, the blind and grasping appetite for personal material well‑being, the thirst for the accumulation of money by any means; that is all which is regarded as a higher aim, such as reason, such as liberty, instead of the Christian ideal of salvation by the sole means of the close moral and brotherly union between men. People will laugh at this, and say that it does not in the least proceed from the Jews...Was the late James de Rothschild of Paris a bad man? We are speaking about Judaism and the Jewish idea which has monopolized the whole world, instead of defective Christianity. A thing will come about which nobody can yet even imagine. All this parliamentarism, these theories regarding the community which are believed today, these accumulations of wealth, the banks, science, all that will collapse in the winking of an eye and without leaving a trace behind, except the Jews however, who will know then what they have to do, so that even this will be for their gain. All this is near, close by...Yes, Europe is on the eve of collapse, a universal, terrible and general collapse...To me Bismarck, Beaconsfield the French Republic, Gambetta and others, are all only appearances. Their master, who is the same for every one else and for the whole of Europe, is the Jew and his bank. We shall still see the day when he shall pronounce his veto and Bismarck will be unexpectedly swept away like a piece of straw. Judaism and the banks now reign over all, as much over Europe as over education, the whole of civilization and socialism, especially over socialism, for with its help Judaism will root out Christianity and Destroy Christian Culture. And if nothing but anarchy results the Jew will be found directing all; for although preaching socialism he will remain nevertheless in his capacity of Jew along with the brothers of his race, outside socialism, and when all the substance of Europe has been pillaged only the Jewish bank will subsist." [11]

     "The Jewish Encyclopedia" says that, "a clear and concise definition of Judaism is difficult to give, for the reason that it is not a religion pure and simple based upon accepted creeds, like Christianity or Buddhism...Judaism is a theocracy, a religious legislation for the people, but not a religion."

     If Judaism is not a religion, how can it have a religious heritage, along with Christianity, or otherwise.

     "The Encyclopedia of the Jewish Religion," tells us that "the character of later-day Judaism was determined by...the emergence of a strong mystic trend (Kabbalah, Zohar)."

     This same encyclopedia describes Zohar "as a mixture of theosophic theology, mystical psychology, anthropology, myth and poetry." Mystic pertains to the occult, which Webster's Dictionary says is "designating alchemy, magic, astrology and other arts and practices involving use of divination, incantation, magical formulae, etc."

     How could any conscientious Christian even suggest that Christianity has anything of this nature in its heritage? Christians, including the Vatican Council Fathers, could better understand the preposterous nature of the phrase "our Judeo-Christian heritage" if it were given its true meaning by being stated as "our Pharisee-Christian heritage." Of course, many brainwashed Christian leaders would quickly respond that such a statement is incongruous; it would be denied as a falsehood, and denounced as mendacious.

     Yet, this is exactly what the phrase "our Judeo-Christian heritage" proclaims. For all leading Jewish authorities agree that modern-day Judaism is undiluted Phariseeism. This is clearly set forth in the most authorative writings on the subject, "The Pharisees: The Sociological Background of Their Faith."

     The author is the distinguished Jewish scholar and religious leader Rabbi Louis Finkelstein, once Chancellor and Professor of Theology at the "Jewish Theological Seminary of America," and former president of the "American Academy for Jewish Research." In his "Foreword," in tracing the background of "the unchanged faith in Rabbinic Judaism," Dr. Finkelstein writes: "Pharisaism became Talmudism; Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism; and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism, but throughout these changes of name, inevitable adaptation of custom, and adjustment of Law, the spirit of the Ancient Pharisee survives unaltered."

     Today's Judaism: The modern Judaism of the Talmud is very different from the religion described in the Old Testament. An outstanding Jewish scholar, the late Rabbi Steven S. Wise, made this abundantly clear when he said: "The return from Babylon, and the adoption of the Babylonian Talmud, marks the end of Hebraism, and the beginning of Judaism."

     Every thoughtful Christian theologian and sincere student of the Holy Bible knows that Jesus Christ spent the years of His ministry on earth replacing the hateful religion of the Pharisees with a new religion of God's love and mercy. They, also, are well aware that no one knew better "the spirit of the Ancient Pharisees" than did Jesus Christ. In the Holy Bible we read: "Then came to Jesus scribes and Pharisees (who became know, over time, as Jews), which were of Jerusalem, saying, Why do thy disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? for they wash not their hands when they eat bread. But he answered and said unto them, Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition (now known as the Talmud, Cabala and etc.)? For God commanded, saying, Honour thy father and mother: and, He that curseth father or mother, let him die the death. But ye say, Whosoever shall say to his father or his mother, It is a gift, by whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me; And honour not his father or his mother, he shall be free. Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition. Ye hypocrites, well did Esaias prophesy of you, saying, This people (the Jews - not Israelites) draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoureth me with their lips; but their heart is far from me. But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men." [12]

     In the 23rd chapter of Matthew, seven different times, Christ begins His denunciation of the scribes and Pharisees (the Jews) with the words, "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites!" And then He concludes with a thunderous climax, which puts the lie, once again out of Christ's own mouth to Davies when he said, "Jesus was, in a sense, a rabbi... his ethical teaching were rabbinical...Jesus gave his followers much of the ethics of the synagogue." This proves, conclusively, that William D. Davies was a liar, a deceiver, a false teacher, and etc. For Christ said: "Ye serpents (descendants of Satan), ye generation (race-people) of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?"

     Jesus also said: "I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews (Judeans - of the tribe of Judah) and are not but do lie and are of the synagogue of Satan." [13]

     When the Pharisees branded Jesus an idolater ("we be not born of fornication") He declared that they were worshippers of the devil, and were the devil's children in John 8:44: "Ye (Jews) are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it."

     "As long as there remains among the Gentiles (Christians) any moral conception of the social order, and until all faith, patriotism, and dignity are uprooted, our reign over the world shall not come... And the Gentiles (Christians), in their stupidity, Have Proved Easier Dupes than we expected them to be. One would expect more intelligence and more practical common sense, but they are no better than a herd of sheep. Let them graze in our fields till they become fat enough to be worthy of being immolated to our future King of the World...

     We have founded many Secret Associations, which all work for our purpose, under our orders and our direction. We have made it an honor, a great honor, for the Gentiles to join us in our organizations, which are, thanks to our gold, flourishing now more than ever. Yet it remains our secret that those Gentiles who betray their own and most precious interests, by joining us in our plot, should never know that those associations are of our creation, and that they serve our purpose.

     One of the many triumphs of our Freemasonry is that those Gentiles (Christians) who become members of our lodges, should never suspect that we are using them to build their own jails, upon whose terraces we shall erect the throne of our universal King of the Jews; and should never know that we (Jews) are commanding them to forge the Chains of their own Servility to our Future King of the World...

     We have induced some of our children to join the Christian body, with the explicit intimation that they should work in a still more efficient way for the Disintegration of the Christian Church, by creating scandals within her. We have thus followed the advice of our Prince of the Jews, who so wisely said: 'Let some of your children become cannons, so that they may destroy the Church.' Unfortunately, not all among the 'convert' Jews have proved faithful to their mission. Many of them have even betrayed us! But, on the other hand, others have kept their promise and honored their word. Thus the counsel of our Elders has proved successful.

     We (Jews) are the fathers of all Revolutions, even of those which sometimes happen to turn against us. We are the supreme Masters of Peace and War. We can boast of being the Creators of the Reformation! Calvin (Phillip II, by William Thomas Walsh) was one of our Children; he was of Jewish descent, and was entrusted by Jewish authority and encouraged with Jewish finance to draft his scheme in the Reformation. Martin Luther yielded to the influence of his Jewish friends unknowingly, and again, by Jewish authority, and with Jewish finance, his plot against the Catholic Church met with success. But unfortunately he discovered the deception, and became a threat to us, so we disposed of him as we have so many others who dare to oppose us...

     Many countries, including the United States have already fallen for our scheming. But the Christian Church is still alive...We must destroy it without the least delay and without the slightest mercy.

     Most of the Press in the world is under our Control; let us therefore encourage in a still more violent way the hatred of the world against the Christian Church. Let us intensify our activities in poisoning the morality of the Gentiles. Let us spread the spirit of revolution in the minds of the people. They must be made to despise Patriotism and the love of their family, to consider their faith as a humbug, their obedience to their Christ as a degrading servility, so that they become deaf to the appeal of the Church and blind to her warnings against us. Let us, above all, make it impossible for Christians to be reunited, or for non-Christians to join the Church; otherwise the greatest obstruction to our domination will be strengthened and all our work undone. Our plot will be unveiled, the Gentiles will turn against us, in the spirit of revenge, and our domination over them will never be realized.

     Let us remember that as long as there still remain active enemies of the Christian Church, we may hope to become Master of the World...And let us remember always that the future Jewish King will never reign in the world before Christianity is overthrown..." [14]

     The above shows what Jews really think of Christians and their desire for their ultimate destruction and annilation. The lies of the Pharisees, of the Scriptures are not forgotten; they live in the "holy" literature of Judaism. "The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia" says under "Pharisees:" "The Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees...The Talmud is the largest and most important single piece of (their) literature... and the study of it is essential for any real understanding of Pharisaism." To this very day the Talmud teaches that Mary, the Mother of Jesus Christ, was a whore and an adulteress who spawned Jesus by a Roman soldier, Pandera. This is "our Judeo-Christian heritage?" While many Christian leaders disagree with the Judeo-Christian concept, not a single voice of consequence has been heard in open disagree-ment or criticism. This is largely because Christians are well aware of, and are intimidated by the smear terror; they would rather not be branded as bigots or anti-Semites by the ADL and the AJC and their ilk. Many are traitors to Almighty God and the Lord Jesus Christ and adhere to "The Ten Points of Seelisberg," a document summarizing an "International Conference of Christians and Jews" which met in 1947 at Seelisberg, Switzerland.

     Those ten points in effect prevent Christians who abide by them from telling the truth about the Jews and Judaism. They are as follows:

   1). Remember that One God speaks to us all through the Old and New Testament. [15]

   2). Remember that Jesus was born of a Jewish mother of the seed of David and the people of Israel, and that his everlasting love and forgiveness embrace his own people and the whole world. [16]

   3). Remember that the first disciples, the apostles, and the first martyrs were Jews. [17]

   4). Remember that the fundamental commandment of Christianity, to love God and one's neighbor, proclaimed already in the Old Testament and confirmed by Jesus, is binding upon both Christians and Jews in all human relationships without any exception. [18]

   5). Avoid disparaging biblical or post-biblical Judaism with the object of extolling Christianity. [19]

   6). Avoid using the word Jews in the exclusive sense of the enemies of Jesus, and the words the enemies of Jesus to designate the whole Jewish people. [20]

   7). Avoid presenting the Passion in such a way as to bring the odium of the killing of Jesus upon Jews alone. In fact, it was not all the Jews who demanded the death of Jesus. It is not the Jews alone who are responsible, for the Cross which saves us all reveals that it is for the sins of all that Christ died. [21] Remind all Christian parents and teachers of the grave responsibility which they assume, particularly when they present the Passion story in a crude manner. By so doing they run the risk of implanting (the truth) an aversion in the conscience or subconscience of their children or hearers, intentionally or unintentionally. Psychologically speaking, in the case of simple minds, moved by a passionate love and compassion for the crucified Savior, the horror which they feel quite naturally towards the persecutors of Jesus will easily be turned into an undiscriminating hatred of the Jews of all times, including those of our own day. [22]

   8). Avoid referring to the scriptural curses or the cry of a raging mob. His blood be upon us and upon our children, without remembering that this cry should not count against the infinitely more weighty words of our Lord; Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do. [23]

   9). Avoid promoting the superstitious notion that the Jewish people is reprobate, accursed, reserved for a destiny of suffering. [24]

   10). Avoid speaking of the Jews as if the first members of the Church had not been Jews. [25] [26]

     After contrasting critically almost nine pages of glaring differences between Judaism and Christianity to the disadvantage of the latter, and after reviewing the back-grounds of both religions, he concludes that, "A Judeo-Christian heritage or tradition in the proper sense of that hyphenated word does not exist; it has no foundation in historical fact."

     "It is the Jew who lies when he swears allegiance to another faith; who becomes a danger to the world." [27]

     "The Jew is the instrument of Christian destruction. Look at them carefully in all their glory, playing God with other peoples money. The robber barons of old, at least, left something in their wake; a coal mine; a railroad; a bank. But the Jew leaves nothing. The Jew creates nothing, he builds nothing, he runs nothing. In their wake lies nothing but a blizzard of paper, to cover the pain. If he said, 'I know how to run your business better than you.' That would be something worth talking about. But he's not saying that. He's saying 'I'm going to kill you (your business) because at this moment in time, you are worth more dead than alive!'" [28]

     Absurdity of Heritage: There is no need to belabor the absurdity and fallacy of the "Judeo-Christian heritage" fiction, which certainly is clear to all honest theologians. That "Jewish-Christian dialogue" in this context is also absurd was well stated in the authoritative religious journal, "Judaism," Winter 1966, by Rabbi Eliezar Berkovitz, chairman of the department of Jewish Philosophy, Hebrew Theological College, who wrote: "As to a dialogue in the purely theological sense, nothing could be more fruitless or pointless. Judaism is Judaism because it rejects Christianity, and Christianity is Christianity because it rejects Judaism. What is usually referred to as the Jewish-Christian tradition exists only in Christian or secularist fantasy."

     This is true! And the fantasy exists in Christian and secularist minds only because it is implanted there by the persistent propaganda of the masters of intrigue of the ADL/AJC network. Nevertheless, there can be no doubt that knowledgeable theologians, Jewish and Christian, who constantly allude to "our Judeo-Christian heritage" are, for their own specious purposes, perpetrating a grotesque and fantastic hoax. For guidance, honest Christian religious leaders, lay and clerical, should turn to their Holy Bible, the Word of God and read 2 Corinthians 6:15, which says: "And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel?"

     And without casting aspersions, they should contemplate another passage in Deuteronomy 22:10: "Thou shalt not plow with an ox and an ass together."

     The next time you hear someone praise Winston Churchill for his so-called bravery in World War II, and how much he did for England and America, remember the following.

     This will be difficult for many to believe, one can hear them say, what:, England do that to this country? Why they are our greatest ally, we could not do without them. Let us look at the record and see just how much love there is for us in this pretended friendship. To begin with, when we were at war with Spain, this great Churchill, "Churchill entered British Army 1895, serving with the Spanish forces and fired on the American forces. It was a little embarrassing when the Honorable William Langer of North Dadota made this announcement on the floor of the United States Senate. Mr. Churchill was in this country, because you know, we never hit a man behind his back, he was going to speak in Boston, a little more of the Churchillian propaganda. Learning that this statement had been made by the patriotic Senator Langer, Mr. Churchill was a little upset, he sent a telegram to the Honorable Tom Connally denying the fact. Good Friend, as he was, Senator Connally rose to his feet and read the telegram to the Senate. "

     Little did they realize that the records were available, that already these facts had been read to the Senate and were in the Congressional Record. Once again Senator Langer read the record to the Senate. Mr. Churchill is a brilliant man, but how stupid to try to deny what he has sanctioned in his biography, for you will find the record in World's Who's Who and a very good account in International Who's Who. The preface to these books states: "This volume contains an authentic record of notable men and women throughout the world, page 114, 1940 edition: 'Winston Churchill...He entered the British Army 1895, serving with the Spanish forces against the American forces in Cuba."

     International Who's Who, page 158, published by Europe Publications Ltd. London, 39 Belford Square, W.C. 1 the 13th edition, states: "Churchill entered the army in 1895, served in Cuba with Spanish forces against the Americans. The preface in this book states, 'We wish to express our thanks to all those who, by completing questionnaires or by correcting proofs sent to them have enabled us to bring information up to date and to remind others that unless proofs are returned, no responsibility can be accepted for the accuracy of their biographical records."

     In 1946, the Biographical Encyclopedia of the World repeats: "Churchill entered the British Army 1895, serving with the Spanish forces in Cuba."

     Webster's Biographical Dictionary, 1st edition by G. & C Merriam, publishers, Springfield, Mass., also states that "Churchill served in Cuba with the Spanish forces."

     Current Biography, 1940 edition, published by H.W. Wilson Co., 950 University Avenue, New York City also states: "Churchill: He was with the Spanish forces in Cuba." It was repeated in 1942. It is here that we find Churchill quoted: "He had always thought it a pity that it all had to be so make believe, and that the age of wars between civilized nations had come to an end forever, now he, at least had an opportunity to join civilized Spain in a war against uncivilized Cuba."

     Robert's account of Winston Churchill, 1928, Robert H. McBride, publishers, page 32, through Sir Henry Drummond, ambassador at Madrid, (Spain) Churchill: "He joined the Spanish forces in Cuba in 1895. Spain conferred the 'Order of Military Merit, 1st class.'"

     While the New York Times, which prints "all the news that is fit to print," in their issue of September 19, 1945 states: "Churchill fought with Spain in Cuba." [29]

     The war time Premier (Winston Churchill) said he "thought the problem of a National Jewish Home in Palestine was too big to be handled by one single nation alone. Favors joint inquiry. I am strongly in favor of a joint inquiry by the United States and Great Britain." adding "As you probably know I am a Zionist from the beginning." [30]

     "Propaganda mostly in hands of Jews, who control almost 100 percent radio, film, daily and periodical press. Although this propaganda extremely coarse and presenting Germany as black as possible, nevertheless extremely effective since public here completely ignorant and knows nothing of situation in Europe... Situation here excellent platform for public speakers of all kinds, for emigrants from Germany and Czechoslovakia, who with great many words inciting public, with most various calumnies. They are praising American liberty which contrasts with totalitarian states. it is interesting to note that in this extremely well-planned campaign which conducted above all against National Socialism. Soviet Russia almost completely eliminated.

     Soviet Russia if mentioned at all is mentioned in friendly manner and things presented in such way as if Soviet Union co-operating with block democratic states. Thanks to clever propaganda sympathies of American public completely on side of Red Spain. This propaganda war psychosis being artificially created. American people are told that peace in Europe only hanging on thread...that in case of world War America must take active part in order defend slogans of liberty and democracy in World.

     President Roosevelt was first one to express hatred against Fascism. In doing so he was serving double purpose; first, he wanted to divert attention of American people from difficult and intricate domestic problems, especially from...struggle between capital and labor. Second, by creating war psychosis...he wanted induce American people to accept enormous armament program...Unemployed today already number twelve million...Only huge sums running into billion which treasury expends for emergency labor projects are keeping certain amount of peace in country...As to point two I can only say that... Roosevelt, as clever player of politics...speedily deviated public attention form domestic situation in order to fasten it on foreign policy...Munich Pact came to...Roosevelt as God-sent...Reigning hatred against everything which in any way connected with German National Socialism is further kindled by brutal attitude against Jews in Germany and by emigree problem. In this action participated Jewish intellectuals, for instance Bernard Baruch, Governor of New York, Lehman...judge of Supreme Court Felix Frankfurter, Secretary of Treasury Morgenthau and others who are close personal friends of President Roosevelt. They want President to become champion of human rights, freedom of religion and speech, who in future shall punish trouble mongers. This group, people who want to pose as representatives of 'Americanism' and 'defenders of democracy' in last analysis are connected by unbreakable ties with international Jewry.

     For this Jewish international, which above all is concerned with interest in its race, was putting of President of United States at this 'ideal' post of champion of human rights was clever move. In this manner they created dangerous hotbed for hatred and hostility in this hemisphere and divided world into two hostile camps. Entire issue is worked out in mysterious manner. Roosevelt has been forcing fountain for vitalizing American foreign policy and simultaneously procure enormous stocks for coming war for which Jews are striving fully consciously..." [31]

     "Another World War, plotted by Roosevelt and World Jewry, the Jewish controlled American press and radio, the British-Jewish Empire and the French Empire with a large proportion of their press and banks owned by the Jews, is being fought as these words are put down...

     This is a war to renew Jewish domination of Germany and Central Europe and for the maintenance of the power and glory of the British-Jewish Empire. The conspirators in America, England and France are responsible for the greatest tragedy the world has ever known and their names will be dishonored and execrated in history, It never would have started had not Roosevelt and the half Jew Bullitt guaranteed to Britain and France all of America's resources, which meant, first, repeal of our neutrality act and supplying them with munitions and bombers without stint; second, in time the extension of unlimited credit; third, the use of our fleet in the Pacific to protect British, French and Dutch interests; if these did not suffice for victory, then our young men as air pilots and our fleet to be sent to Europe; and, lastly, if World Jewry and the British-Jewish Empire could not win with them, millions of our lads to die in Europe's battles.

     The premeditated killing of a human being by another, save in self defense, is murder, a crime against Christianity, morality, humanity, and civilization, and this applies with greatest guilt to the wholesale slaughter by one nation of the people of another who have not attacked or harmed them.

     After this illegal, secret plot was negotiated, Roosevelt, the Jews and the war-mongers of this Country, of England and France sought to overthrow the Chamberlain government and to replace it with the half Jew Churchill, part Jew Eden, Jew Hore-Belisha and Duff Cooper. They plotted to get Bonnet out of the French Cabinet and to substitute Reynaud, Jew Blum and Jew Mandel. The ardent but unsuccessful courtship of bloody Stalin and Soviet Russia was insisted upon by Roosevelt, World Jewry and war-mongers of America, England and France.

     One of the reasons for the Roosevelt-Eden plot to overthrow the Chamberlain government and remove Bonnet from the French Cabinet was because they would not agree to pay the price Stalin demanded to encircle and defeat Germany. At Roosevelt's and the Jews' insistence, England and France guaranteed the boundaries of Poland in order to encircle Germany and renew Jewish control. This guarantee of the boundaries of Poland was the direct and proximate cause of the World's War; in face, it knowingly necessitated it." [32]

     Little has been published about the early life of Abraham Lincoln. However, during a search of some old property records and will in a small courthouse in central North Carolina, Alex Christopher the author of "Pandora's Box,"; in one of the old will books dated around 1840, he found the will of one A.A. Springs. Upon reading the will he was shocked and amazed at the secret that it disclosed, but one must remember that it is a known fact that wills, even though they are classified public records the same as property and corporation records, they are rarely combed through as he was doing at the time, and these records hold many dark secrets that can be hidden in public view, but are never uncovered because there are very few who research these old records.

      This practice of hiding secrets in public view and the conspirators can say, when faced with the facts and accused of concealing the records; they can reply "Well it was there in the public record in plan view for any and all to find." In the will of A.A. Springs was the list of his property. it went into detail to whom the property was to be dispersed and it included his children. Mr. Christopher and others were looking to find what railroads and banks this man might have owned and had left to his son Leroy Springs. He didn't find anything like that, but he did find the prize of the century. On the bottom of page three of four pages was a paragraph where the father, A.A. Springs, left to his son an enormous amount of land in the state of Alabama which amounted to the land that is today known as Huntsville, Alabama and then he went into detail to name the son and at first Mr. Christopher and the others with him couldn't believe what they were seeing, but there it was the name of the son and it was "ABRAHAM LINCOLN!"

      This new information that they had about the Springs (real name Springstein) family, this was just another twist to add to the already manipulative family. This new information about Lincoln built a fire under them to see where this new lead would take them, because everything they had found in the railroad and banking saga had been areal mind-bender. They figured this one would be the same; so they inquired at the local archives and historical records on families and found a reference to one Abraham Lincoln in the family genealogy of the family of the Carolina by the name of McAdden, in a published genealogy on the family. The family members in the Carolinas were in a limited edition that at one time could be found in the public libraries. The section on Lincoln and the story went something like the following: "In the late spring of the year of 1808 Nancy Hanks, who was of the family lineage of the McAdden family was visiting some of her family in the community of Lincolnton, North Carolina. While on her stay with family in the Carolina', she vistaed with many of the neighboring families that she had known for many years; one such visit was the Springs family. The sordid details had been omitted but obviously the young Nancy Hanks had found herself in a compromised position and was forced to succumb to the lust of A.A. Springs. She became pregnant as a result. There were no details of a love affair or an act of violence on a helpless female. Abraham Lincoln was the result of that act, which leads one to wonder if the name Lincoln was real or a fabricated name for the are of conception was Lincolnton. Was there really a Thomas Lincoln? Since the Spring were of the race that called themselves Jewish, that made Lincoln part Jewish and as part of the Springs family, he also became a relative of the Rothschild family by blood."

      The following information was derived from information that exists in the Smithsonian, National Archives, the Congressional Library, Courtroom Police files, public and private libraries and storage vaults across the United States and Europe: "Abraham Lincoln was slapped three times with a white glove by a member of the Hapsburg royal family of Germany (Payseur family relatives) during a White House reception in 1862. The German royal family member demanded a pistol duel with the, then, President of the United States, Abraham Lincoln. The blows to the face stunned Lincoln but he non-verbally refused to participate in the duel by bowing his head before walking out of the reception room. What had ol' honest Abe done to so enrage and up-set the royal European personage?

     It seems that the practice of promiscuity was running rampant in many families in those days and the German King Leopold had, had an illegitimate daughter named Elizabeth who was sent to America, where she lived in a very comfortable manner. Although Leopold could not recognize her position, he was very interested in her life.

     In the early or mid 1850s, Abraham Lincoln and Elizabeth began having sexual liaisons that produced twin daughters named Ella and Emily in 1856. The regal German father who was so royally up-set with ol' honest Abe probably had full knowledge of what the true blood line of Lincoln really was. Abraham's wife, Mary Todd Lincoln, did not find out about Elizabeth, Ella and Emily until 1865. Previous to being informed about Elizabeth and the twins, Mrs. Lincoln had developed a ravaging dependency on opium. Her main supplier of the drug was a former member of the Confederate Intelligence community, he was a former member because the Southern gentlemen did not approve of his drug pushing and unreliable behavior. It was because of his involvement with the Souther Intelligence Community, Mary's supplier - John Wilks Booth - knew about the lover and the illegal twins.

     After being spurned by the Confederate intelligence community, Mary's 'candy man' approached and became involved with the Rothschild Empire of Europe, for he realized the European banking moguls would be very interested in his pipeline to the White House.

     (At this time) Abraham was searching for an issue that would unite the North and South AFTER the Civil War ended. The issue needed to be popular to all levels of American citizenry so they could 'rally around the Stars and Stripes' thus rapidly healing the wounds of the bloodiest war in history. Lincoln was seriously considering one major movement or event that would galvanize his fellow Northern and Southern patriot countrymen into cutting loose the United States of America from the dictatorial grip of the Hapsbergs bloodline of banking control in Europe. All the time, the Rothschilds were trying to take control of the entire world monetary system, and at that time the Rothschilds were trying to get a foot-hold in America and find a way around the British, Virginia Company, and French Bourbon family that were gaining control in this country through government help...

     Lincoln found himself in real hot water, because under the Virginia Company covenant the 48 families that formed it were all of the Holy Grail Bloodline. This country was to be an extension of what all the royal families of Europe controlled. The royalty of Europe is Hapsburg, no matter what their name is. The royal family of England is one such example. Now what Lincoln did is he wanted to become independent of the cogenant (in favor of his family) on the Rothschild side...the Rothschilds and their family bloodline have always been undermining the affairs of the Hapsbergs and stealing the monetary control away from them. No matter what the history books say, the Rothschilds didn't get (total) real control on things in America and the Federal Reserve until the Springs usurped the Payseur family companies in the early 1920s...

     (But Lincoln had fallen from Rothschild grace also and so, due, in part to his Executive Order to print United States Greenbacks, thus interfering with the Jewish International Banks profits) It appears that the Rothschild family wanted Lincoln embarrassed to the maximum degree. (So) Mary Todd's drug dealer (John Wilks Booth) was hired to kidnap the President of the United States. Abraham would be put on a boat for a two month cruise of the Atlantic where he would be injected with and addicted to opium and then dumped on the streets of Washington. While the forcefully addicted President was stumbling around our nation's capital, the press would be informed of Elizabeth, Ella and Emily.

    The drug pusher (Booth) and collaborator (agent) of the Rothschilds had his perfect accomplice in the plot to kidnap and discredit the leader of the North American continent in the First Lady Mary Todd Lincoln. After being informed of Abe's lover and the twins and the kidnap plot by her drug supplier, Mary was promised that after her husband resigned or was impeached, she and Abe would be moved to Europe to live happily ever after with plenty of opium.

     Superficially Mary expressed a desire to live in Europe with plenty of opium and no Civil War or politics to distract her husband or family. But her drug suppler had totally underestimated the confusion, desperation and anger of Mary Todd Lincoln.

     The plotters decided the Presidential snatch needed to take place in a public, yet discreet location where minimum witnesses would be present. There were too many potential witnesses at the White House. Two hours before the capture was to take place, Mary Todd had on the floor, a tantrum, because Abe had decided not to go out of the White House that night. Mary's outrageous outburst caused Abe to change his mind and the First family departed.

     Several minutes after arriving at the kidnap location, Mary instructed the family bodyguard to take a position that placed the First Family out of his visual sight. The position also required the bodyguard to traverse several flights of stairs to reach Abe and Mary should he be needed for any reason...

     A wagon with a wooden cover arrived at the back entrance of the kidnap location with several men including Mary's opium supplier. The plan was for the drug pusher to traverse the backstairs entrance, silently move down a hallway, and open an unlocked door to a darkened room where Mary and Abe were sitting.

     After entering the room, Mary's drug man (Booth) would tell the President an urgent message was waiting for him at the War Department. Before descending down the backstairs, Abe would be knocked out with a chloroform loth. The kidnappers would load the limp body into the covered wagon and swiftly stow Lincoln on an opium boat for a novel 'cruise' of the Atlantic Ocean.

     When Booth actually opened the door to the darkened room where Abe and Mary were sitting, he went into a panic and shock. Abe was asleep with his head on Mary's left shoulder and the First Lady had her head turned toward the left looking at the door... When she was sure the man who opened the door was Booth, she turned and looked at the President to be sure the pistol she was pointing would explode beneath the lower left earlobe of her husband.

     Before Mary pulled the trigger, John Wilkes Booth, drug supplier to the First Lady, realized he was the patsy in all this mess. But he did not know if he was only Mary's patsy or also a chump for the Rothschild family. Were the men hiding around the back door of Ford's Theater there to help Booth with the kidnapping or there to point the false finger at the 'innocent' Booth? Booth was not about to run into the hallway or down the backstairs to find out the answer to that question.

     The only escape route was to jump the balcony and crash onto the stage during the performance. That night, Booth gave a literal interpretation of the theatrical phrase 'brake a leg' as he fractured one of his during his leaping act from 'lethally looney Mary' and the men lurking around the back entrance of Ford's Theater.

     In a novelty case on a wall in Ford's Theater is 'The Gun That Shot Abraham Lincoln.' If anyone (assassin) were to kill a head of state, they would use a revolver, because several bullets might be needed to accomplish the murder and stop any guards during the escape. One would only use a one-shot pistol if they were absolutely sure they had intimate access to the victim.

     The gun on the wall of Ford's Theater is a derringer-the perfect weapon for the left handed female assassin who did not attend her husbands funeral. Mary Todd was not hiding in her room due to overwhelming grief and sorrow; she was imprisoned in her room with two armed guards for two weeks after killing her husband.

     In the 1860s, an act of Congress mandated the compensation of widows of former and active Congressmen, Senators, Vice Presidents and Presidents. The mouth and duration was ratified by both Houses of Congress for each widow. Mary Todd Lincoln applied for her widowers compensation three times and was denied the mandated compensation three times by both Houses of Congress. An unknown benefactor paid for Mary's passage to Europe where she died in small cottage in Germany.

     In 1867, the Secret Service was founded so that drunken municipal law enforcement could not unwittingly participate with drug-addicted First Ladies or Gentlemen in vengeful high-brow killings of philandering Presidents of the United States. (To cover up the murders committed which would reflect a bad light for the presiding Administration, such as the Foster murder is doing at the present time).

     Before Booth jumped out of the balcony of the Presidential Box of the Ford Theater, he shouted at General Riley and his wife who were sitting to the right-front of the Lincolns. Booth's words expressed his innocence but also sealed the fate of the Rileys. Within a week of the shooting, General Riley and his wife were packed off to an insane asylum where they both died of 'unknown causes' within 30 days of being committed." (Pandora's Box, by Alex Christopher, pp. 282-286).

     In 1861, the American people entered into the presidential administration of one of the most brutal, cold-blooded tyrants in history. His administration, hostile to Liberty, ended the heritage of our early American forefathers and entrenched a system of criminal politics, monopoly, and injustice in its place. When Lincoln became President, morality and Bible Law were swept aside and an alien reign of terror began. The North became one vast prison camp.

     English tyrant Oliver Cromwell had no regard for human life. Neither did Abraham Lincoln. Cromwell was the homicidal maniac who brought the Jews back into England and into power after they had been banished from the country centuries earlier. Lincoln brought them to power here. What is referred to among the White-wing as our Zionist Occupational Government or ZOG, was born in America under Lincoln's rule. Our captivity to the Edomite Jewish Bankers began in 1860 when their abolitionist puppet and his Black Republican party rose to power.

     Abraham Lincoln's war was the second American revolution. His revolution for nigger equality and the idolatry of Union worship over threw the victorious results of our first American revolution in 1776. The American people, especially the White Christian patriots who should have known better, need to understand this. A few years after Cromwell's death in 1658, a British mob dug up his remains, removed the head and hung the rest of this race-traitor by the heels. In the not too distant future, Lincoln's and Roosevelt's remains will no doubt get the same treatment, when an educated American people realize the extent of his crimes against this nation.

[1] Roosevelt's Jewish Ancestry. Even a hasty perusal of the genealogy chart as produced by the Carnegie Institution of Washington, D.C., under direction of Dr. H.H. Laughlin, per asso. press Dispatch March 7, 1934, in the Daily Citizen of Tucson, Arizona, a similar chart was published by the Washington, D.C., Star, of February 29, 1936. Even a hasty perusal of the document convinces one as to President Roosevelt's Jewish ancestry. From the viewpoint of eugenics, it explains his natural bent toward radicalism. It shows why he has given hundreds of so-called Liberals, Socialists and Communists powerful positions in the national government. It reveals the origin of the sinister spirit which today animates the White House. It proves unmistakably, that the Roosevelt Administration offers a biological, as well as a political problem.

     The New York Times of March 14, 1935, quotes the President as saying: "In the distant past my ancestors may have been Jews. All I know about the origin of the Roosevelt family is that they are apparently descended from Claes Martenszen van Roosevelt, who came from Holland." Additional information regarding the nationality of the Roosevelt family, was given by Chase S. Osborn, early in 1934, at St. Petersburg, Florida. Mr. Osborn was formerly Governor of Michigan. The leading newspaper of the city (The Times) carried the following report after the interview: "Although a Republican, the former Governor has a sincere regard for President Roosevelt and his policies. He referred to the 'Jewish ancestry' of the President, explaining how he is a descendant of the Rossocampo family expelled from Spain in 1620. Seeking safety in Germany, Holland and other countries, members of the family, he said, changed their name to Rosenberg, Rosenbaum, Rosenblum, Rosenvelt and Rosenthal. The Roosenvelts in North Holland finally became Roosevelt, soon becoming apostates with the first generation and others following suit until, in the fourth generation, a little storekeeper by the name of Jacobus Roosevelt was the only one who remained true to His Jewish Faith. It is because of this Jewish ancestry, former Governor Osborn said, that President Roosevelt has the trend of economic safety (?) in his veins."

     In the 1938 "World Almanac" under the heading "Biographies of U.S. Presidents and Their Wives," page 237, appears: "Franklin Delano Roosevelt was the son of James Roosevelt, a direct descendant of Claes Martenzen van Rosenvelt, who arrived in New Amsterdam in 1649 and married Jannetje Samuels."

     The following is from "The House of Roosevelt" by Paul Haber, 1936 edition "Claes Rosenvelt entered the cloth business in New York, and was married in 1682. He accumulated a fortune. He then changed his name to Nicholas Rosenvelt. Of his four sons, Isaac died young, Nicholas married Sarah Solomons. Jacobus married Catherina Hardenburg. The Roosevelts were not a fighting but a peace-loving people, devoted to trade. Isaac became a capitalist. He founded the Bank of New York in 1790."

     The American Freedom Magazine of Los Angeles, California, April, 1938, issue, stated: "In an address to the National Convention of the D.A.R., President F.D. Roosevelt said that he too was of revolutionary ancestry. But not a Roosevelt was in the American Army. They were Tories, busy entertaining British Officers. The first Roosevelt came to America in 1649. His name was Claes Rosenfelt. He was Jew. Nicholas the son of Claes, was the ancestor of both Franklin and Theodore. He married A Jewish Girl named Kunst in 1682. Nicholas had a son named Jacobus Rosenfelt. In the family tree there are 351 persons bearing biblical names of the Tribe of Israel. From the Corvallis Gazette-Times, of Corvallis, Oregon."

     New York Jews having designed and struck and struck off a medal with the head of Roosevelt on one side and the six-point Solomon Star, synagogue symbol of possession and world power, on the other, with a mystical so-called "Good Luck" idiom in the center of the star, the undersigned and his associates investigated to ascertain the significance, if any, and report these implications: "Good Luck and Wisdom to Franklin D. Roosevelt, our Modern Moses, Leading Jewry in 'The Promised Land' (America) under the 'Seal of Solomon.'"

     The following New York item was published from Coast to Coast under an Associated Press date line of May 8, 1937: "President Roosevelt will receive the tenth award of the Gottheil Medal for 'Distinguished Services to Jewry.'" Another such Jewish medal was given him December 22, 1938, according to the N.Y. Herald-Tribune of December 23, 1938. What "distinguished services" did Roosevelt render to Jewry???

     Professor H.J. Laski, Jewish Socialist of England, was quoted in the London "Fascist" of January, 1935, thus: "If the experiment for which Roosevelt is responsible, should in any serious degree break down, as a result of the association with it of a number of eminent Jews, there would be an out-break of Anti-Semitism in the U.S. more profound than anything Anglo-Saxon Civilization has so far known."

     The Delanos Jewish Also?: Writing in the "Hakenkreuzbanner" of May 14, 1939, Professor Dr. Johann von Leers of Berlin-Dahlem, Germany, publishes an exhaustive analysis of Roosevelt's ancestry. While it is apparent that the authorities quoted are not convinced regarding the authenticity of the Holland Rossocampo-Rosenvelt Jewish genealogy, a new discovery is quoted to show that President Delano Roosevelt's mother, Sarah Delano, is from a Jewish-blood family. "At once the veil fails" comments Dr. von Leers. "The President's father married Sarah Delano; and it becomes clear. Schmalix (genealogist) writes: 'In the seventh generation we see the mother of Franklin Delano Roosevelt as being of Jewish descent. The Delanos are descendants of an Italian or Spanish Jewish family; Dilano, Dilan, Dillano. The Jew Delano drafted an agreement with the West Indian Co., in 1657 regarding the colonization of the island of Curacao. About this the directors of the West Indies Co, had correspondence with the Governor of New Holland. In 1624 numerous Jews had settled in North Brazil, which was under Dutch Dominion. The old German traveler Uienhoff, who was in Brazil between 1640 and 1649, reports: 'Among the Jew settlers the greatest number had emigrated from Holland.' The reputation of the Jews was so bad that the Dutch Governor Stuyvesant (1655) demanded that their immigration be prohibited in the newly founded colony of New Amsterdam (the New York of today). It would be interesting to investigate whether the Family Delano belonged to these Jews whom the Dutch Governor did not want. It is known that the Sephardic Jewish families which came from Spain and Portugal always inter-married; and the assumption exists that the Family Delano, despite Christian-confession, remained purely Jewish."

     "What results? The mother of President Roosevelt was a Delano. According to Jewish Law (Schulchan Aruk, Ebenaezer IV) the woman is the bearer of the heredity. That means; children of a full-blooded Jewess and a Christian are, according to Jewish Law, Jews. It is probable that the Family Delano kept the Jewish blood clean, and that President Roosevelt, according to Jewish Law, is a blooded-Jew even if one assumes that the father of the President was Aryan. "We can understand why Jewish associations call him the 'New Moses;' why he gets Jewish medals - highest orders of the Jewish people. For every Jew who is acquainted with the law, he is evidently one of them. The secret surrounding President Roosevelt solves itself through the assiduous investigations of Schmalix."

     In this connection it is noteworthy that Who's Who in American Jewry lists the New York Brentanos as Jewish - Sephardics from Italy or Spain. Delano and Brentano end with "o". Jews expelled from Brazil settled in the U.S. Genealogist Schmalix is quoted in the article mentioned as saying: "When the Delanos changed to the Christian religion can only be ascertained by further investigations in America."

     With this alleged Jewish Delano descent added to the other records herein the fact that New York Jews on the East Side constantly refer to the President proudly as "Rosenvelt," it would seem that Dr. von Leers, in his letter of May 14, 1939, to the undersigned, transmitting his latest discoveries, is justified in exclaiming: "It being true that the Delanos are well-known Jews from the Netherlands, President Roosevelt is, from the standpoint of Jewish Heredity Law, As Good A Jew As Bernard M. Baruch." Baruch is a Sephardic Jew, whose family is reported to have come from Europe via Brazil to North America.

     Roosevelt Expected & Wanted the Japanese Attack on Pearl Harbor: The Pearl Harbor attack was instigated by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Winston Churchill. The attack was forced into existence by the United States, Great Britain and the Dutch. This was accomplished by an embargo, which cut off all shipping into and out of Japan, thus threatening Japan with starvation.

     Nine months before the Pearl Harbor Attack, one Clifford M. Andrew was sent to Pearl Harbor and put in charge of a critical portion of both Army and Navy Intelligence Communications, so that when the time of the attack came, Andrew would be in a position to run interference by preventing the commanding officers at Hawaii, Admiral Kimmel and General Short, from receiving any warning of an impending attack.

     Approximately one week prior to the Pearl Harbor attack, General George C. Marshall and Admiral Stark discontinued informing President Roosevelt of incoming Japanese intelligence information. Also one week before the attack, Rear Admiral Paulus Prince Powell (Roosevelt's Senior White House Naval Aide prior to 1934) was ordered to the Naval Intelligence Department, Washington, D.C., to be briefed as first naval attache' to Portugal (which was neutral).

     On Thursday, December 4th, 1941, at 2:00 o'clock in the afternoon (Hawaiian time), a message was received in the Hawaiian Army Intelligence Department from Melbourne, Australia that the United States agreement with Great Britain and the Dutch (the ABCD agreement) had been activated; that we were automatically at war with Japan. Furthermore, the Hawaiian military intelligence department had received messages from U.S. picket ships and submarines to the effect that a Japanese fleet with aircraft carriers fully loaded was approaching Hawaii and would be within striking distance by Sunday morning, December 7th.

     Gerald Mason Van Dyke, was an Army Intelligence Officer in Hawaii at the time of the attack. He knew of the coming attack. His first report on the subject was made November 29th, 1941. He sent his warning message to Washington, D.C., Thursday afternoon, December 4th, 1941, at 2:00 p.m. His message was received and intercepted by Rear Admiral Paulus Prince Powell in Washington, D.C., at about 7:00 p.m. (due to Global Time Difference), Powell notified Secretary of the Navy Frank Knox who in turn immediately contacted Secretary of War Henry Stimson. Stimson called Roosevelt, and Roosevelt came to the Naval Intelligence Department. Secretary of Navy Knox said that they should get the Navy out and set up a defense perimeter for the Islands. Under-secretary of Navy James Vincent Forestall became very concerned too. Roosevelt blocked their attempt to warn Pearl Harbor by putting Powell, Knox and Forestall under armed guard until after the Pearl Harbor Attack. Roosevelt sent the following message to Clifford M. Andrew: "The Japanese will attack, do not prepare defenses, we need the full support of the American Nation in a war-time effort by an unprovoked attack upon the Nation." The message sent to Admiral Kimmel and General Short by Roosevelt read "Expect Japanese Sabotage." Preparation for Sabotage is exactly the opposite of the preparation for an aerial attack.

     On Friday evening at about 5:00 p.m., December 5th, 1941, Mason warned Lyle Hartford Van Dyke, Sr., of Portland, Oregon, that the Japanese would attack soon, most probably Sunday. He was told that the intelligence department in Washington, D.C., had been warned. So he put up a stock of canned goods on Saturday, December 6, 1941, in preparation for the attack.

     The attack occurred Sunday morning, December 7th, with a death toll of 4,000 men. The Arizona went down in ninety feet of water with its hold only thirty feet below the surface. Roosevelt forbade any rescues from being made, and men buried alive in the Arizona banged on the bulkheads, screaming for help and kept diaries in the dark for two weeks after the attack until they finally died.

     The Supreme Court and the Legislature covered Roosevelt's Treasonous Mass Murder by scapegoating Admiral Kimmel and General Short. Had Roosevelt lived past the end of the Second World War, the investigation of his actions would have resulted in a complete exposure of the One World Government - New World Order - Conspiracy now coming down upon us.

     Roosevelt was killed when his face was blown off by a Soviet portrait artist. When James Vincent Forestall's knowledge became a threat to those in power in 1949, he was pitched out of about the seventh floor of the hospital in Bethesda, Maryland. On May 15, 1966, Clifford M. Andrew was murdered in his home in Tigard, Oregon by a bullet in the back of his head. The FBI took charge of the matter.

     On Thursday, May 10, 1973, an attempt was made by twenty police officers, Federal, State (Oregon) and County (Clackamas) to steal the manuscript of Hartford Van Dyke, then about two months into the writing. However, he was tipped off four hours before the  raid and was able to secure the work. Three weeks later a second attempt was made to get his manuscript, and so he went into hiding until his book, "The Skeleton In Uncle Sam's Closet," was completed and published.

[2] National Jewish Information Service, 6412 W. Olympic Blvd. L.A. CA.

[3] Joshua Jehouda, l'Antisemitisme Miroir du Monde, pp. 135-136; Judaism and the Vatican, Vicomte Leon de Poncins, pp. 30-31.

[4] Jewish World, London December 14, 1922.

[5] Benard Lazare, Antisemitism: It's History and Causes, Translated by Britons Publishing Co., London (1967), p. 158.

[6] Facts Are Facts, by Benjamin Freedman.

[7] "Much of the old love for Isis, and especially for Cybele, the Great Mother of the Gods, was taken over into the church and translated into the worship of Mary, the Mother of Christ...Similarly the worship of the old deities was made a part of Christianity. The pagan gods and goddesses were discreetly made over into Christian saints, as is instanced by the case of St. Bridget. Their 'relics' were sold far and wide in Christendom as fetishes guaranteed to ward off evil; and their ancient festive days were made part of the Christian calendar. The Roman Parilia in April became the Festival of St. George, and the pagan midsummer orgy in June was converted into the Festival of St. John; the holy day of Diana in August became the Festival of the Assumption of the Virgin; and the Celtic feast of the dead in November was changed into the Festival of All Souls (Halloween). The twenty-fifth day of December, the winter solstice according to ancient reckoning, celebrated the birthday of the sun-god of Mithraism, was accepted as the birthday of Christ, and the spring rites in connection with the death and re-birth of the mystery gods were converted into the Easter rites of the Crucifixion and Resurrection>' (This Believing World, Rabbi Lewis Browne, pp. 294-295).

[8] Esther 9:17.

[9] Rabbi Martin Siegel, New York Magazine, p. 32, January 18, 1972.

[10] The Popular and Critical Bible Encyclopedia, Vol. II, (1901), p. 999.

[11] Fedor Dostoievsky, an 18th century, citizen who invented the theorist of a purely economic conception of the world which rules nearly everywhere today. The contemporary political commercialism, business above everything, business considered as the supreme aim of human effort, comes directly from Ricardo. G. Batault, Le problem juif, p. 40; Journal d'un ecrivain, 1873‑1876, 1877 editions Bossard; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, pp. 165‑166.

[12] Matthew 15:1-9.

[13] Revelation 2:9; 3:9.

[14] From a series of speeches at the B'nai B'rith Convention in Paris, published shortly afterwards in the London Catholic Gazette, February, 1936; Paris Le Reveil du Peuple published similar account a little later.

[15] One Triune God has communicated to mankind through the Bible. However, the God of the Christians is NOT THE GOD OF THE JEWS!

[16] Jesus was not born of a Jewish mother. Mary was an Israelite but NOT A JEW!, for Jewishness is a religion-culture that was not embraced by Jesus and most Galileans. His love is for the potential of each soul for regeneration, not for its beliefs and practices.

[17] The first disciples, the apostles, and the first martyrs were not all Jews, they were Israelites. Except for Judas the traitor, who WAS a Jew.

[18] Loving God and one's neighbor is binding upon all people, not just Christians and Jews. But loving one's neighbor must not preclude faithfulness to the entire New Testament and its precepts.


[20] While it is true that not all Jews are the enemies of Christ, all of their leaders are quite forthright in condemning Jesus and His followers. And would destroy them in a minute if they only could.

[21] This is not true, for Christ said:"But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel." (Matthew 10:6; See also - Matthew 15:24; 18:11; Luke 15:6, 9, 24, 32; 19:10). Also the Jews WERE responsible, and WERE THE ONES WHO DID THE ACTUAL CRUCIFIXION OF THE LORD JESUS CHRIST! See Luke 24:20; 23:23-33; John 19:6; 14-18; Acts 2:36; 3:14-15; 4:8-10; 4:11-12; 5:30; 10:39; 13:27-29 and 1 Thessalonians 2:14-15. There are more but they are hard to understand without much study; usually much more than most Christians are willing to do.

[22] "Rule" number seven is very important to Jewish leaders seeking historical absolution for the crucifixion of Christ. However, it is true, and we have stated it before, not all Jews were guilty of condemning Jesus, but the primary blame accrues to those Jewish leaders who tried Him and found Him guilty of blasphemy, which was worthy of death. The important thing about Jewish teachers today is their continued assertion that Caiaphas and company did the right thing. "ONE OF THE FINEST THINGS EVER DONE BY THE MOB WAS THE CRUCIFIXION OF CHRIST. Intellectually it was a splendid gesture. But trust the mob to bungle the job. If I'd had charge of executing Christ, I'd have handled it differently. You see, what I'd have done WAS HAD HIM SHIPPED TO ROME AND FED HIM TO THE LIONS. THEY COULD NEVER HAVE MADE A SAVIOR OUT OF MINCEMEAT!" (Rabbi Ben Hecht) As for everyone's guilt being he cause of His death, this is true in a very general sense, but to follow this reasoning too closely lads to the hypothesis of Decide (God killed His own Son), which is a theological absurdity.

[23] This so-called "rule" obviously comes from the Jews and "bleeding heart" liberals. If we avoided all the admonitions in Scripture about the wrath of God and the final destination of those who disobey, no one would ever be saved. Jesus' compassionate words, "Father, forgive them for they know not what they do" must be understood by exegeting and expositing the Greek language and with an overall comprehension of the Scriptures. His compassion for His enemies is genuine, of course, but if His enemies persist in rejecting His love, their sins remain unforgiven. And Christ was not speaking of the Jews at all when He uttered these words: He was speaking of the Roman soldiers who were merely standing around watching His crucifixion. He was asking for their forgiveness for not doing anything to prevent it.

[24] Individual Jews have exactly the same opportunity as non-Jews to repent and trust Christ as Savior. But like all other "nations" or "religions" or "cultural provincialism," they as a group find no favor with God. God under the New Covenant, saves individuals, not groups. Yet the Old Testament in many places relates that the Jews will be utterly destroyed. There is Edom [Esau is called Edom in Genesis 36:8. And Edom is in 'Modern Jewry' (Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925 edition, Vol. 5, p. 41). This makes the Scriptures very clear: "The vision of Obadiah. Thus saith the Lord God concerning Edom...Behold I have made thee small among the heathen: thou (you Jews) are greatly despised...Shall I not in that day, saith the Lord, even destroy the wise men out of Edom, and understanding out of the mount of Esau?...And the house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame, and THE HOUSE OF ESAU FOR STUBBLE, AND THEY SHALL KINDLE IN THEM AND DEVOUR THEM; AND THERE SHALL NOT BE ANY REMAINING OF THE HOUSE OF ESAU (there will be no Jews left, all will be destroyed)." (Obadiah 1:1-2, 8, 18).

[25] The first members of the Church WERE NOT JEWS!

[26] These Ten Points of Seelisberg, was published in the October 1971 issue of The Chosen People, p. 2; and Smyrna, newsletter for August 1995, pp. 2-3.

[27] Rabbi Stephen Wise, New York Tribune, March 2, 1920.

[28] Quotations from the Movie, The Liquidator.

[29] And Men Wept, by Catherine Palfrey Baldwin.

[30] Philadelphia Record, January 11, 1946; And Men Wept, by Catherine Palfrey Baldwin, p. 83.

[31] Document dated January 12, 1939, from Polish Ambassador in Washington, War! War! War!, Cincinnatus, pp. 173-174.

[32] War! War! War!, Cincinnatus, pp. 188-189.

Reference Materials