"Lindbergh on the eve of World War II"

Lots of dramatic developments in connection to the incident at the Orient

House in Jerusalem, where about 35 demonstrators from many parts of the

world as part of the International Solidarity Movement were peacefully

demonstrating against Israeli brutality ‑ and got a first taste of that

brutality when Israeli police charged them and started brutalizing them.�

I have at least 20 reports, which need to be sifted and prioritized, which

will take some time.� I hope to start doing an Orient House series tomorrow.

Meanwhile, here is an interesting and very revealing speech by Charles

Lindbergh at the eve of World War II.� You can see that the lies and

deceptions we are experiencing today are nothing new ‑ and that the

spiritual war Americans are fighting today was already in full swing in 1941.

Worldwide truth‑education continues:

[START]

Lindbergh's Des Moines Speech

� It is now two years since this latest European war began. From that day

in September, 1939, until the present moment, there has been an

over‑increasing effort to force the United States into the conflict.

�That effort has been carried on by foreign interests, and by a small

minority of our own people; but it has been so successful that, today, our

country stands on the verge of war.

�At this time, as the war is about to enter its third winter, it seems

appropriate to review the circumstances that have led us to our present

position. Why are we on the verge of war? Was it necessary for us to become

so deeply involved? Who is responsible for changing our national policy

from one of neutrality and independence to one of entanglement in European

affairs?

�Personally, I believe there is no better argument against our intervention

than a study of the causes and developments of the present war. I have

often said that if the true facts and issues were placed before the

American people, there would be no danger of our involvement.

�Here, I would like to point out to you a fundamental difference between

the groups who advocate foreign war, and those who believe in an

independent destiny for America.

�If you will look back over the record, you will find that those of us who

oppose intervention have constantly tried to clarify facts and issues;

while the interventionists have tried to hide facts and confuse issues.

�We ask you to read what we said last month, last year, and even before the

war began. Our record is open and clear, and we are proud of it.

�We have not led you on by subterfuge and propaganda. We have not resorted

to steps short of anything, in order to take the American people where they

did not want to go.� What we said before the elections, we say [illegible]

and again, and again today. And we will not tell you tomorrow that it was

just campaign oratory. Have you ever heard an interventionist, or a British

agent, or a member of the administration in Washington ask you to go back

and study a record of what they have said since the war started? Are their

self‑styled defenders of democracy willing to put the issue of war to a

vote of our people? Do you find these crusaders for foreign freedom of

speech, or the removal of censorship here in our own country?

�The subterfuge and propaganda that exists in our country is obvious on

every side. Tonight, I shall try to pierce through a portion of it, to the

naked facts which lie beneath.

�When this war started in Europe, it was clear that the American people

were solidly opposed to entering it. Why shouldn't we be? We had the best

defensive position in the world; we had a tradition of independence from

Europe; and the one time we did take part in a European war left European

problems unsolved, and debts to America unpaid.

�National polls showed that when England and France declared war on

Germany, in 1939, less than 10 percent of our population favored a similar

course for America. But there were various groups of people, here and

abroad, whose interests and beliefs necessitated the involvement of the

United States in the war. I shall point out some of these groups tonight,

and outline their methods of procedure. In doing this, I must speak with

the utmost frankness, for in order to counteract their efforts, we must

know exactly who they are.

�The three most important groups who have been pressing this country toward

war are the British, the Jewish and the Roosevelt administration.

�Behind these groups, but of lesser importance, are a number of

capitalists, Anglophiles, and intellectuals who believe that the future of

mankind depends upon the domination of the British empire. Add to these the

Communistic groups who were opposed to intervention until a few weeks ago,

and I believe I have named the major war agitators in this country.

�I am speaking here only of war agitators, not of those sincere but

misguided men and women who, confused by misinformation and frightened by

propaganda, follow the lead of the war agitators.

�As I have said, these war agitators comprise only a small minority of our

people; but they control a tremendous influence. Against the determination

of the American people to stay out of war, they have marshaled the power of

their propaganda, their money, their patronage.

�Let us consider these groups, one at a time.�

�First, the British: It is obvious and perfectly understandable that Great

Britain wants the United States in the war on her side. England is now in a

desperate position. Her population is not large enough and her armies are

not strong enough to invade the continent of Europe and win the war she

declared against Germany.

�Her geographical position is such that she cannot win the war by the use

of aviation alone, regardless of how many planes we send her. Even if

America entered the war, it is improbable that the Allied armies could

invade Europe and overwhelm the Axis powers. But one thing is certain. If

England can draw this country into the war, she can shift to our shoulders

a large portion of the responsibility for waging it and for paying its cost.

�As you all know, we were left with the debts of the last European war; and

unless we are more cautious in the future than we have been in the past, we

will be left with the debts of the present case. If it were not for her

hope that she can make us responsible for the war financially, as well as

militarily, I believe England would have negotiated a peace in Europe many

months ago, and be better off for doing so.

�England has devoted, and will continue to devote every effort to get us

into the war. We know that she spent huge sums of money in this country

during the last war in order to involve us. Englishmen have written books

about the cleverness of its use.

�We know that England is spending great sums of money for propaganda in

America during the present war. If we were Englishmen, we would do the

same. But our interest is first in America; and as Americans, it is

essential for us to realize the effort that British interests are making to

draw us into their war.�

�The second major group I mentioned is the Jewish.�� It is not difficult to

understand why Jewish people desire the overthrow of Nazi Germany. The

persecution they suffered in Germany would be sufficient to make bitter

enemies of any race.

�No person with a sense of the dignity of mankind can condone the

persecution of the Jewish race in Germany. But no person of honesty and

vision can look on their pro‑war policy here today without seeing the

dangers involved in such a policy both for us and for them. Instead of

agitating for war, the Jewish groups in this country should be opposing it

in every possible way for they will be among the first to feel its

consequences.

�Tolerance is a virtue that depends upon peace and strength. History shows

that it cannot survive war and devastations. A few far‑sighted Jewish

people realize this and stand opposed to intervention. But the majority

still do not.

�Their greatest danger to this country lies in their large ownership and

influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio and our government.�

�I am not attacking either the Jewish or the British people. Both races, I

admire. But I am saying that the leaders of both the British and the Jewish

races, for reasons which are as understandable from their viewpoint as they

are inadvisable from ours, for reasons which are not American, wish to

involve us in the war.

�We cannot blame them for looking out for what they believe to be their own

interests, but we also must look out for ours. We cannot allow the natural

passions and prejudices of other peoples to lead our country to destruction.

�The Roosevelt administration is the third powerful group which has been

carrying this country toward war. Its members have used the war emergency

to obtain a third presidential term for the first time in American history.

They have used the war to add unlimited billions to a debt which was

already the highest we have ever known. And they have just used the war to

justify the restriction of congressional power, and the assumption of

dictatorial procedures on the part of the president and his appointees.

�The power of the Roosevelt administration depends upon the maintenance of

a wartime emergency. The prestige of the Roosevelt administration depends

upon the success of Great Britain to whom the president attached his

political future at a time when most people thought that England and France

would easily win the war. The danger of the Roosevelt administration lies

in its subterfuge. While its members have promised us peace, they have led

us to war heedless of the platform upon which they were elected.

�In selecting these three groups as the major agitators for war, I have

included only those whose support is essential to the war party. If any one

of these groups‑‑the British, the Jewish, or the administration‑‑stops

agitating for war, I believe there will be little danger of our involvement.�

�I do not believe that any two of them are powerful enough to carry this

country to war without the support of the third. And to these three, as I

have said, all other war groups are of secondary importance.

�When hostilities commenced in Europe, in 1939, it was realized by these

groups that the American people had no intention of entering the war. They

knew it would be worse than useless to ask us for a declaration of war at

that time. But they believed that this country could be entered into the

war in very much the same way we were entered into the last one.

�They planned: first, to prepare the United States for foreign war under

the guise of American defense; second, to involve us in the war, step by

step, without our realization; third, to create a series of incidents which

would force us into the actual conflict. These plans were of course, to be

covered and assisted by the full power of their propaganda.

�Our theaters soon became filled with plays portraying the glory of war.

Newsreels lost all semblance of objectivity. Newspapers and magazines began

to lose advertising if they carried anti‑war articles. A smear campaign was

instituted against individuals who opposed intervention. The terms "fifth

columnist," "traitor," "Nazi," "anti‑Semitic" were thrown ceaselessly at

any one who dared to suggest that it was not to the best interests of the

United States to enter the war. Men lost their jobs if they were frankly

anti‑war. Many others dared no longer speak.

�Before long, lecture halls that were open to the advocates of war were

closed to speakers who opposed it. A fear campaign was inaugurated. We were

told that aviation, which has held the British fleet off the continent of

Europe, made America more vulnerable than ever before to invasion.

Propaganda was in full swing.

�There was no difficulty in obtaining billions of dollars for arms under

the guise of defending America. Our people stood united on a program of

defense. Congress passed appropriation after appropriation for guns and

planes and battleships, with the approval of the overwhelming majority of

our citizens. That a large portion of these appropriations was to be used

to build arms for Europe, we did not learn until later. That was another

step.

�To use a specific example; in 1939, we were told that we should increase

our air corps to a total of 5,000 planes. Congress passed the necessary

legislation. A few months later, the administration told us that the United

States should have at least 50,000 planes for our national safety. But

almost as fast as fighting planes were turned out from our factories, they

were sent abroad, although our own air corps was in the utmost need of new

equipment; so that today, two years after the start of war, the American

army has a few hundred thoroughly modern bombers and fighters‑‑less in

fact, than Germany is able to produce in a single month.

�Ever since its inception, our arms program has been laid out for the

purpose of carrying on the war in Europe, far more than for the purpose of

building an adequate defense for America.� Now at the same time we were

being prepared for a foreign war, it was necessary, as I have said, to

involve us in the war. This was accomplished under that now famous phrase

"steps short of war."

�England and France would win if the United States would only repeal its

arms embargo and sell munitions for cash, we were told. And then

[illegible] began, a refrain that marked every step we took toward war for

many months‑‑"the best way to defend America and keep out of war." we were

told, was "by aiding the Allies."

�First, we agreed to sell arms to Europe; next, we agreed to loan arms to

Europe; then we agreed to patrol the ocean for Europe; then we occupied a

European island in the war zone. Now, we have reached the verge of war.

�The war groups have succeeded in the first two of their three major steps

into war. The greatest armament program in our history is under way.

�We have become involved in the war from practically every standpoint

except actual shooting. Only the creation of sufficient "incidents" yet

remains; and you see the first of these already taking place, according to

plan [ill.]‑‑ a plan that was never laid before the American people for

their approval.�

�Men and women of Iowa; only one thing holds this country from war today.

That is the rising opposition of the American people. Our system of

democracy and representative government is on test today as it has never

been before. We are on the verge of a war in which the only victor would be

chaos and prostration.

�We are on the verge of a war for which we are still unprepared, and for

which no one has offered a feasible plan for victory‑‑a war which cannot be

won without sending our soldiers across the ocean to force a landing on a

hostile coast against armies stronger than our own.

�We are on the verge of war, but it is not yet too late to stay out. It is

not too late to show that no amount of money, or propaganda, or patronage

can force a free and independent people into war against its will. It is

not yet too late to retrieve and to maintain the independent American

destiny that our forefathers established in this new world.

�The entire future rests upon our shoulders. It depends upon our action,

our courage, and our intelligence. If you oppose our intervention in the

war, now is the time to make your voice heard.

�Help us to organize these meetings; and write to your representatives in

Washington. I tell you that the last stronghold of democracy and

representative government in this country is in our house of

representatives and our senate.

�There, we can still make our will known. And if we, the American people,

do that, independence and freedom will continue to live among us, and there

will be no foreign war.�