So You Thought Lincoln Was A Hero
Reign of Terror
by: Lyndle J. Gharst
In 1861, the American people entered into the presidential administration of one of the most brutal, cold-blooded tyrants in history. His administration, hostile to Liberty, ended the heritage of our early American forefathers and entrenched a system of criminal politics, monopoly, and injustice in its place. When Lincoln became President morality and Bible Law were swept aside and an alien reign of terror began. The North became one vast prison camp.
English tyrant Oliver Cromwell had no regard for human life. Neither did Abraham Lincoln. Cromwell was the homicidal maniac who brought the Jews back into England and into power after they had been banished from the country centuries earlier. Lincoln brought them to power here.
What is referred to among the White-wing as our Zionist Occupational government or ZOG, was born in America under King Lincoln’s rule. Our captivity to the Edomite/Khazar Jewish Bankers began in 1860 when their abolitionist puppet and his Black Republican party rose to power.
Abraham Lincoln’s war was the second American revolution. His revolution for nigger equality and the idolatry of Union worship over threw the victorious results of our first American revolution in 1776. The American people, especially the White Christian Patriots who should know better, need to understand this.
A few years after Cromwell’s death in 1658, a British mob dug up his remains, removed the head, and hung the rest of this race-traitor by the heels. In the not too distant future, Lincoln’s remains (along with Franklin D. Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, Harry Truman, Dwight D. Eisenhower, Theodore Roosevelt; all Jews, along with many others) will no doubt get the same treatment, when an educated American people realize the extent of his crimes against this nation. But first his phony icon must be shattered. The lies of the historical myth makers must be dispelled and replaced with historical truth.
The real Abraham Lincoln story is horrible reading. It was Lincoln and his cabinet who committed treason and not the eleven Confederate states. The real rebels were the criminals from the North, the boys in blue who served the Jew. Abraham Lincoln, considered one of this country’s most patriotic examples, was in fact one of the worst traitors to his country in our history. A traitor in reality is often the least suspected individual. The International Jewish bankers of Europe, headed by the Rothschilds, sent agents in the mid 1800s to America to divide the nation by a civil war that would capture our financial institutions. By controlling our monetary system they could control our government. The Northern media, controlled by the banks, had been captured by 1830. From 1830 on, about the only topic in Northern newspapers was the evils of slavery. The Abolitionist movement was financed by the Rothschilds and their agents in the Freemasonic lodges. This evil “love the poor nigger” society was financed as lavishly as the Abolitionist movement in England in the late 1700s had been, and more recently, the Abolitionist movement in Haiti, which resulted in the massacre of virtually all the island’s White citizens. The same types of revolutionary pamphlets for insurrection and uprising began to appear all over the South that had stirred up the Black slaves in Haiti only a short time before.
Abraham Lincoln was a secret abolitionist although he publicly denied it and did all he could to distance himself from John Brown and the movement. But in 1922, Dr. W.T. Knappe of Vincennes, Indiana reveled that he and his father had seen a $100.00 contribution signed by A. Lincoln given to John Brown at an abolitionist shoe store in Ashland, Ohio.[i]
Brown was collecting cash at the time to arm the slaves of Virginia to murder their masters. Knappe said at the time that if Lincoln and every traitor who gave a dollar to Brown and his movement had been hung as Brown later was, there would have been no war between North and South. In fact, if the Christian people of this nation had done their Christian duty and executed a few thousand of these race-traitors and burned their printing presses, the staged media even known as the Civil War would have been averted and a million lives saved. We believe that the condemnation of Brown by Lincoln wasn’t sincere, and that he secretly honored and supported him. When the war began, the most popular song in the Federal Army was “John Brown’s Body.” this was not condemned by Lincoln.
Lincoln’s double-mindedness is at work here, but one of many examples of his hypocrisy or as Pastor Herrel describes in his works, a “mongrelized mentality” and as we will try to show, a man mongrelized in body as well. Lincoln is perhaps the greatest example of a mongrelized mind in American history. Worse yet, Lincoln was so confused and unstable and incomprehensible, that many have concluded that he rightfully belonged in a lunatic asylum, rather than in the White House.
Many of those in the White Christian Patriot movement are still repeating the Lincoln myths and are still heaping praise on this bastard’s memory. This is usually done in ignorance. But for those who read this ignorance can no longer be used as an excuse. Before the rise of the modern tyrants of this century, Americans lived under a tyrant Joseph Stalin and Mao-Tse-Tung admired.
Lincoln was the first of a long line of American Presidential tyrants, like Woodrow Wilson, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and the current Bolshevik mongrelizer, Bill Clinton. But for Lincoln’s treacherous reign of Martial Law none of these other Jewish-traitors could have been elected to the Presidency. Lincoln set a precedent. He was more than the false media image of a dumb backwoodsman, born in a log cabin. The Jewish bankers owned and controlled the Republican party, along with its president Abraham Lincoln. All American presidents since Lincoln are representatives of the Rothschild/Rockefeller Banking cartels. They represent their Edomite/Khazar masters and their Anti-White, Anti-Christian usury system. This is the reason they never represent the White Aryan people, for no man can serve two masters.
The Rockefeller Family - Secret Jews!
A book overlooked by most people and published for sale mainly within the Jewish community states that the Rockefellers are Jews of Sephardic descent (meaning Spanish and Portuguese Jews). The book is entitled "The Grandees - America's Sephardic Elite." The author is Stephen Birmingham, who is recognized by the Jewish community as an expert on Jewish history.
The publisher of "The Grandees" is the Jewish owned publishing firm of "Harper and Row" of New York City. Mr. Birmingham also wrote the book "Our Crowd" about the family background of America's wealthiest and most successful Jews. Both books have been hailed by Jewish publications as first class works in the documentation of Jewish history.
In "The Grandees" Stephen Birmingham reveals the existence of a very rare book which was published only for Jews some years ago. The work was published only for Jews some years ago. The work was compiled by the Jewish historian Malcolm H. Stern and entitled "Americans of Jewish Decent." That book weighed 10 pounds and gave the history of 25,000 Jewish individuals in America. It is extremely interesting to note that only 550 copies of the book were printed and each copy was consecutively numbered. The book was delivered to the top Jewish community leaders in America for their personal reference files in dealing with and contacting Jews who are "Marranos" (those Jews who "Pretend" to be Christians in their community but secretly hold to their Jewish faith and race when among their own kind).
Mr. Birmingham in "The Grandees" reports: "Who would expect to find the Rockefellers in the book." Stern's work traces what he calls the "Nobility of Jewry - the Sephardim who lived in Spain and Portugal as princes of the land." Many centuries ago the Jews flooded into Spain in great numbers and through usury and stealth became vast land owners. The Jews controlled both Spain and Portugal through their monopoly over the finances of the country.
It was in 1492 that King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella of Spain expelled the Jews from their country and confiscated their ill-gotten wealth. It was during this period that the Rockefeller family moved to the Turkish Empire which welcomed the Jews at that time, believing them to be a "poor persecuted people."
The grandfather of our former Vice-President Nelson Rockefeller, admitted that his family once moved from Turkey to France. It was from France that they moved to America. John D. Rockefeller, Sr., was a wealthy man even before he took over Standard Oil Co., which made their family one of the richest in the world. No one has ever explained how this family came into such wealth as soon as they arrived in America from France.
There is no known information on how the Rockefellers came into huge amounts of money in France. Some thing they got their money from the Rothschilds and were originally their agents in buying up Christian businesses in America. "Marranos" are Jews who "Pretend" to convert to Christianity so as to deceive Christians in their business dealings, but secretly continued to practice Judaism in private rituals. For this reason, a Marrano family like the Rockefellers would make the perfect tool for the Rothschilds of France who have for centuries used secret agents to carry on their work.
"The Thunderbolt" was the first publication to bring Vice-President Nelson Rockefeller's Jewish ancestry to public attention. This information finally explains why he has always been able to work so closely with Jewish interests and why his administration as governor of New York was loaded down with Jews from top to bottom. His political campaigns of the past were always directed by Jews and he was always the support of the Jewish community in all of his political races.
Normally the Jews would not support a Christian multi-millionaire for political office because they would be afraid they could not control him after the election. The fact that Jewish community leaders have long known that the Rockefellers were fellow Jews goes a long way in explaining why the organized Jewish community has always supported the Rockefeller's political ambitions. Now we can see why Nelson and David Rockefeller boosted his fellow Jew Henry Kissinger into the Nixon administration and Kissinger in turn has used his position to bring his fellow Jew Rockefeller into power.
History is again repeating itself. The Kings of ancient Israel waxed worse and worse, with one tyrant replacing another, each one leading Israel into more mongrelization and paganism until finally, God had their enemies carry them off into captivity into foreign lands. Our captivity began in 1861. Not a physical conquest by foreign armies, but a legal captivity of stealthy encroachments against our liberties with a constant barrage of new laws and amendments. The civil was was the beginning of the legal control and captivity the Plutocratic Jews installed over our government and legal system. The Reconstruction Acts, the Civil Rights acts, the 14th and 15th Amendments were all revolutionary in nature bing based on Jewish communistic principles.[ii]
THE RECONSTRUCTION OF THE SOUTH
I. Political Aspects
Reconstruction, the period that followed the Civil War, is perhaps the most controversial era in American history. Traditionally portrayed as a sordid time when vindictive Radical Republicans fastened black supremacy upon the defeated Confederacy, Reconstruction has come to be viewed more sympathetically, as a laudable if unsuccessful experiment in interracial democracy.
Reconstruction witnessed far-reaching changes in America's political life. At the national level, new laws and constitutional amendments permanently altered the federal system and the nature of American citizenship. In the South, a politically mobilized black community joined with white allies to bring the Republican party to power, and with it a redefinition of the purposes and responsibilities of government.
The national debate over Reconstruction began during the Civil War. On what terms should the defeated Confederacy be reunited with the Union? Who should establish these terms, Congress or the president? What should be the place of blacks in the political and social life of the South? These were the questions on which Reconstruction persistently turned, and they acquired increasing urgency as emancipation became a Union war aim in 1863.
In December of that year, President Abraham Lincoln announced the first comprehensive program for Reconstruction, the Ten Percent Plan. This offered a pardon to all southerners, except Confederate leaders, who took an oath affirming loyalty to the Union and support for emancipation. When 10 percent of a state's voters had taken such an oath, they could establish a new state government. To Lincoln, the plan was more an attempt to weaken the Confederacy than a blueprint for the postwar South. Although it was put into operation in Union-occupied Arkansas, Louisiana, Tennessee, and Virginia, none of the new governments achieved broad local support or was recognized by Congress.
Many Republicans deemed Lincoln's plan too lenient. In 1864, Congress enacted (and Lincoln pocket vetoed) the Wade-Davis bill, which proposed to delay the formation of new southern governments until a majority of voters had taken a loyalty oath. Some Republicans, moreover, were already convinced that equal rights for the former slaves must accompany the South's readmission to the Union.
In his last speech, in April 1865, Lincoln himself expressed the view that some southern blacks ought to enjoy the right to vote. Thus, Gen. Robert E. Lee's surrender in April 1865 found the Union without a settled Reconstruction policy. With Congress out of session, it fell to Lincoln's successor, Andrew Johnson, to outline plans for the South's readmission.
In May, he issued a series of proclamations that inaugurated the period of Presidential Reconstruction (1865–1867). Johnson offered a pardon to all southern whites except Confederate leaders and wealthy planters (although most of these subsequently received individual pardons), appointed provisional governors, and outlined steps whereby new state governments would be created. Apart from the requirements that they abolish slavery, repudiate secession, and abrogate the Confederate debt; all inescapable corollaries of southern defeat, these governments were granted a free hand in managing their affairs. Johnson offered blacks no role whatever in the politics of Reconstruction.
Having long identified himself as a tribune of the South's (white) common people, Johnson assumed that ordinary yeomen would replace in office the planters who had led the South into secession. But when southern elections restored members of the old elite to power, he did not modify his Reconstruction program. The course adopted by the new southern governments turned much of the North against Presidential Reconstruction.
Alarmed by the apparent ascendancy of “rebels,” northern Republicans were further outraged by the Black Codes enacted by southern legislatures. These laws required blacks to sign yearly labor contracts, declared unemployed blacks vagrants who could be hired out to white landowners, provided for the apprenticing of black children to white employers without the consent of their former owners, and in other ways sought to limit the freedmen's economic options and reestablish plantation discipline. Blacks strongly resisted the implementation of these measures, and the evident inability of the white South's leaders to accept emancipation fatally undermined northern support for Johnson's policies.
When Congress assembled in December 1865, Radical Republicans like Thaddeus Stevens and Charles Sumner called for the abrogation of the Johnson governments and the establishment of new ones based on equality before the law and manhood suffrage. But the more numerous moderate Republicans hoped to work with Johnson while modifying his program. Congress refused to seat the congressmen and senators elected from the southern states and in early 1866 passed and sent to Johnson the Freedmen's Bureau and civil rights bills.
The first extended the life of an agency Congress had created in 1865 to oversee the transition from slavery to freedom. The second defined all persons born in the United States as national citizens and spelled out rights they were to enjoy equally without regard to race — making contracts, bringing lawsuits, and enjoying “full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of person and property.”
As the first statutory definition of the rights of American citizenship, the civil rights bill embodied a profound change in federal-state relations. Traditionally, citizens' rights had been delineated and protected by the states. Less than a decade earlier, Chief Justice Roger A. Taney, in the Dred Scott decision, had announced that a black person could not be a citizen of the United States.
Now Congress proposed that the federal government guarantee the principle of equality before the law, regardless of race, against state violation. A combination of personal stubbornness, fervent belief in states' rights, and deeply held racist convictions led Johnson to reject the bills.
His vetoes caused a permanent rupture between the president and Congress. The Civil Rights Act was the first major piece of legislation in American history to become law over a president's veto. Shortly thereafter, Congress approved the Fourteenth Amendment, which forbade states from depriving any citizen of the “equal protection of the laws,” barred many Confederates from holding state or national office, and threatened to reduce the South's representation in Congress if black men continued to be kept from voting.
Not until 1867, however, was Congress prepared to endorse black suffrage directly. This happened after two developments further strengthened the Radical Republicans. First, northern voters overwhelmingly repudiated Johnson's policies in the fall 1866 congressional elections.
Then, the southern states, with the exception of Tennessee, rejected the Fourteenth Amendment. Congress now decided to begin Reconstruction anew. The Reconstruction Acts of 1867 divided the South into five military districts and outlined how new governments, based on manhood suffrage, were to be established. Thus began the period of Radical or Congressional Reconstruction, which lasted until the fall of the last southern Republican governments in 1877. By 1870, all the former Confederate states had been readmitted to the Union, and nearly all were controlled by the Republican party. These groups made up southern Republicanism.
Carpetbaggers, or recent arrivals from the North, were former Union soldiers, teachers, Freedmen's Bureau agents, and businessmen, most of whom had come south before 1867 (and most were Jewish), when the possibility of obtaining office was remote. But they leapt at the opportunity to help mold the “backward” South in the image of the North.
The second large group of Republicans — scalawags, or native-born white Republicans — included some Old Whig planters who hoped to lead a “harnessed revolution” in which whites would recognize blacks' civil and political rights but retain control of state government. Most, however, were nonslaveholding small farmers from the southern up-country. Loyal to the Union during the Civil War, they saw the Republican party as a means of keeping “rebels” from regaining power in the South.
In every state, blacks formed the overwhelming majority of southern Republican voters. Composed mainly of those who had been free before the Civil War and slave ministers, artisans, and Civil War veterans, an articulate black political leadership emerged during Reconstruction to press for the elimination of the nation's racial caste system and the economic uplifting of the former slaves.
Although blacks did not obtain office in proportion to their numbers in the party, and “black supremacy” never existed, some sixteen served in Congress during Reconstruction, over six hundred in state legislatures, and hundreds more in local offices, from sheriff to justice of the peace, scattered across the South. The presence of sympathetic local officials, black or white, made a real difference in southern life, ensuring that those accused of crimes would be tried before juries of their peers and enforcing fairness in such prosaic aspects of local government as road repair, tax assessment, and poor relief.
In many ways, Reconstruction at the state level profoundly altered traditions of southern government. Serving an expanded citizenry and embracing a new definition of public responsibility, Reconstruction governments established the South's first state-funded public school systems, adopted measures designed to strengthen the bargaining power of plantation laborers, made taxation more equitable, and outlawed racial discrimination in public transportation and accommodations.
They also embarked on ambitious programs of economic development, offering lavish aid to railroads and other enterprises in the hope of creating a New South whose economic expansion would benefit black and white alike. But the program of railroad aid did much to undermine support for Reconstruction. Spawning corruption and rising taxes, it alienated increasing numbers of white voters.
The essential reason for the growing opposition to Reconstruction, however, was the fact that southern whites could not accept the idea of former slaves voting and holding office or the egalitarian policies adopted by the new governments. Increasingly, Reconstruction's opponents turned to violence. The Ku Klux Klan launched a campaign of terror that targeted for beatings or assassination local Republican leaders as well as blacks who asserted their rights in dealings with white employers.
The Klan decimated the Republican organization in many localities. Increasingly, the new southern governments looked to Washington for survival. By 1869, the Republican party was firmly in control of all three branches of the federal government. After attempting to remove Secretary of War Edwin M. Stanton, in apparent violation of the new Tenure of Office Act, Johnson had been impeached by the House of Representatives in 1868. Although the Senate, by a single vote, failed to convict him, his power to obstruct the course of Reconstruction was gone.
Republican Ulysses S. Grant was elected president that fall. Soon afterward, Congress approved the Fifteenth Amendment, prohibiting states from restricting the franchise because of race. Then it enacted a series of Enforcement Acts authorizing national action to suppress political violence.
In 1871, the administration launched a legal and military offensive that destroyed the Klan. Grant was reelected in 1872 in the most peaceful election of the period. Nonetheless, Reconstruction soon began to wane. Democrats had never accepted its legitimacy, and during the 1870s, many Republicans retreated from both the racial egalitarianism and the broad definition of federal power spawned by the Civil War. Southern corruption and instability, Reconstruction's critics argued, stemmed from the exclusion of the region's “best men”— the old planters — from power. As the northern Republican party became more conservative, Reconstruction came to symbolize both misgovernment and a misguided attempt to use state power to uplift the lower classes of society.
The depression that began in 1873 pushed economic questions to the forefront of politics, eclipsing Reconstruction. And when Democrats, for the first time since the Civil War, won control of the House of Representatives in 1874, it was clear that southern Republicans could expect little further help from Washington.
When violence again erupted in the South in the mid-1870s, Grant failed to intervene. By 1876, only South Carolina, Florida, and Louisiana remained under Republican control — the remaining southern states had been “redeemed” by white Democrats. The outcome of the presidential election of 1876 between Republican Rutherford B. Hayes and Democrat Samuel J. Tilden hinged on the disputed returns from these states. After negotiations between southern political leaders and representatives of Hayes, a compromise was reached: Hayes would recognize Democratic control of the remaining southern states, and Democrats would not block the certification of his election by Congress.
Hayes was inaugurated, federal troops returned to their barracks, and Reconstruction came to an irrevocable end. The collapse of Reconstruction deeply affected the future course of American development. Except in a few areas, the southern Republican party all but disappeared, and the South long remained a one-party region under the control of a reactionary ruling elite who used the same violence and fraud that had helped defeat Reconstruction to stifle internal dissent. Despite its expanded authority over citizens' rights, the federal government stood by indifferently as the South effectively nullified the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and stripped blacks of the right to vote. Not until the 1960s would the nation again attempt to come to terms with the political agenda of Reconstruction.
II. Economic and Social Aspects
For all Americans, the Civil War and the postwar era of Reconstruction brought far-reaching economic and social changes. As Allan Nevins observed over fifty years ago, the period witnessed the “emergence of modern America.” In the victorious North and West, these years saw the completion of the national railroad network, the creation of the modern steel industry, the settlement of the trans-Mississippi West and final subduing of the Plains Indians, and the expansion of the mining frontier.
The world of small farms and artisans' shops inexorably gave way to a rapidly industrializing economy, as the wage earner replaced the independent small producer as the typical member of the laboring class. Even though the depression of the 1870s brought an abrupt halt to the heady economic expansion of the immediate postwar years, by the end of Reconstruction in 1877 the nation's industrial production stood 75 percent above its 1865 level.
Many issues that galvanized postwar northern politics — from the fate of the greenback currency to labor's demand for the eight-hour day and farmers' calls for railroad regulation — arose from the economic changes unleashed during the war and Reconstruction. Because of the destruction of slavery, the South's social and economic transformation proved even more far-reaching than the North's.
The central institution of antebellum southern life, slavery was simultaneously a system of labor, a form of race relations, and the foundation of a distinctive regional ruling class. Its demise led inevitably to conflict between blacks seeking to breathe substantive meaning into their freedom and planters seeking to retain as much as possible of the old order. Out of this conflict arose new systems of labor and new kinds of relations between black and white southerners.
But these developments took place in a context that severely limited the region's prospects for economic growth. A war-torn, capital-scarce region, whose level of per capita income continued to lag far behind the rest of the nation, the South lacked the institutional base for sustained economic development. To blacks, freedom meant independence from white control, autonomy both as individuals and as members of a community itself being transformed as a result of emancipation.
This aspiration was reflected in the consolidation and expansion of the institutions of black life. Under slavery, most blacks had lived in nuclear family units, although they faced the constant threat of separation from loved ones by sale. Reconstruction provided the opportunity for blacks to solidify their family ties. Freedpeople made remarkable efforts to locate loved ones from whom they had been separated under slavery, and many black women, preferring to devote more time to their families, refused to work any longer in the cotton fields.
Continuing resistance to planters' efforts to bind black children for involuntary labor through court-ordered apprenticeship revealed that control over their family life was a major preoccupation of the former slaves. At the same time, blacks withdrew almost entirely from white-controlled religious institutions. On the eve of the war, forty-two thousand black Methodists worshiped in biracial South Carolina churches (where they were excluded from a role in church governance); by the end of Reconstruction only six hundred remained.
At the same time, blacks established a network of independent fraternal, benevolent, and mutual aid societies. And although aided by northern reform societies and the federal government, the freedmen often took the initiative in establishing schools, pooling their meager resources to construct buildings and hire teachers. Thus, race relations during Reconstruction had a contradictory quality. In social life, there was separation, as both races retreated into their own institutions.
Despite Reconstruction civil rights laws, segregation was also the rule in many public facilities and private businesses. Almost all the new public school systems educated black and white children in separate schools, and many railroads, hotels, and theaters either excluded blacks altogether or relegated them to inferior accommodations.
But the polity was color-blind. Blacks and whites sat together on juries, school boards, and city councils, and the Republican party provided a meeting ground for like-minded men of both races. Politics and government were the most integrated institutions in southern life during Reconstruction. The appalling loss of life in the Civil War, and the widespread destruction of work animals, farm buildings, and machinery, ensured that the South's economic revival would be slow and painful.
Between 1860 and 1870, while farm output expanded in the rest of the nation, the South experienced precipitous declines in the value of farm land, the number of farm animals, and the amount of acreage under cultivation. But economic reconstruction required more than rebuilding shattered farms and repairing broken bridges. An entire social order had been swept away, and on its ruins a new one had to be constructed.
In the postwar South, as in every nineteenth-century society that abolished slavery, emancipation was followed by a comprehensive struggle over access to the land and the forging of a new labor system. The conflict between former masters aiming to re-create a disciplined labor force and blacks seeking to carve out the greatest degree of economic autonomy helped shape the transition from slave to free labor. Planters were convinced that their own survival and the region's prosperity depended on their ability to resume production using disciplined gang labor, as under slavery.
It was an article of faith that the freedmen, naturally indolent, would work only under compulsion. When they found that their personal authority over black laborers had vanished, planters turned to the new state governments of Presidential Reconstruction, which enacted the Black Codes in an unsuccessful attempt to stabilize the plantation labor force.
To blacks, economic autonomy rested on ownership of land. Many freedmen in 1865 and 1866 refused to sign labor contracts, expecting the federal government to provide them with farms of their own, to which their past labor, they believed, entitled them.
In some localities, as an Alabama overseer reported, they “set up claims to the plantation and all on it.” But President Andrew Johnson in the summer of 1865 ordered land in federal hands to be returned to its former owners. Most rural blacks remained propertyless and poor, as did those who flocked to southern towns and cities after the Civil War in an unsuccessful search for better employment opportunities.
Most blacks were thus compelled to go to work as laborers on white-owned farms and plantations, although they continued to resist white supervision of their work routines and daily lives. Nearly all former slaves refused to work in gangs under an overseer's direction, and most preferred to rent land for a fixed payment rather than work for wages.
Out of the conflict on the plantations, new systems of labor emerged in the different regions of the South. Sharecropping came to dominate the cotton South. A compromise between blacks' desire for land and planters' for labor discipline, sharecropping allowed each black family to work its own plot, with the crop divided with the landowner at year's end. In the rice kingdom of coastal South Carolina and Georgia, planters were unable to acquire the large amounts of capital necessary to repair irrigation systems and threshing machinery destroyed by the war, and blacks clung tenaciously to land they had occupied in 1865.
In the end, the great plantations fell to pieces, and blacks were able to acquire small parcels of land and take up self-sufficient farming. In the Louisiana sugar region, gang labor survived the end of slavery, with blacks paid wages and allowed access to garden plots to grow their own food. In all these cases, blacks' economic opportunities were limited by whites' control of credit and by the vagaries of a world market in which the price of agricultural goods suffered a prolonged decline. In the late 1860s, some blacks managed to accumulate enough money to move from sharecropper to renter, and a few purchased land of their own.
But many farmers who obtained supplies on credit from merchants found themselves still mired in debt after their portion of the crop was marketed at year's end. The South's postwar economic transformation also affected the position of the white yeomanry. Wartime devastation set in motion a train of events that permanently altered their previous self-sufficient way of life. Plunged into poverty by the war, many yeomen in up-country areas saw their plight exacerbated by successive crop failures in early Reconstruction.
In the face of this economic disaster, yeomen clung tenaciously to their farms. But needing to borrow money for the seed, implements, and livestock required to resume farming, many fell into debt and were forced to take up the growing of cotton, a process accelerated as new railroads linked yeomen areas to the national market.
By the mid-1870s, white farmers, who cultivated only one-tenth of the South's cotton crop in 1860, were growing 40 percent of the crop, and a region in which a majority of small farmers had once owned their land was increasingly trapped in a cycle of tenancy and cotton overproduction, and unable to feed itself.
The rise of up-country cotton farming was only one part of a wholesale reorientation of southern trading patterns and a shift in regional economic power. As railroads penetrated the interior, they enabled merchants in rapidly developing market towns like Atlanta to trade directly with the North, bypassing the coastal cities that had traditionally monopolized southern commerce.
In the up-country emerged a new bourgeoisie composed of merchants, railroad promoters, and bankers. Nationally, this class wielded little economic power, for it depended for credit and supplies on northern financiers and merchants. But within the South, it reaped the benefit of the spread of cotton agriculture. In the plantation belt, the planter still stood atop the social pyramid. In a few areas, such as the sugar region, large numbers of planters saw their lands pass into the hands of northern investors.
Generally, however, the majority of planter families managed to retain control of their land. Yet Reconstruction altered their world. Stripped of political influence at Washington and often at the state level, and lacking the ability to control their volatile labor force, many planters found themselves reduced to poverty.
The South's economic problems were exacerbated by the depression that began in 1873. Within four years, the price of cotton fell by nearly 50 percent, plunging farmers into poverty and drying up the region's already inadequate sources of credit. The depression shattered what hopes remained for the early emergence of a modernizing New South, and forced long-established businesses into bankruptcy.
It facilitated the penetration of northern capital, as outside corporations bought up bankrupt southern railroads and other enterprises. Hard times accelerated the spread of tenancy among white farmers, ruined many planters, and reversed much of the modest economic progress blacks had made in the postemancipation years.
By 1877, the contours of the South's new social order were apparent. A new class structure was well on its way to being consolidated, with a rural proletariat composed of the descendants of the former slaves and white yeomen and a new owning class of planters and merchants, itself subordinate to northern financiers and industrialists. And the end of Reconstruction sharply reduced blacks' bargaining power and opportunities for organization.
Laws limiting the options of plantation laborers, impossible to enact while blacks retained a significant role in politics, now appeared on southern statute books. Planters succeeded in stabilizing the plantation system, but only by blocking the growth of alternative enterprises, like factories, that might draw off black laborers, thus locking the region further into a pattern of economic underdevelopment. Long into the twentieth century, the South would remain the nation's foremost economic problem — a legacy not only of slavery but of the social and economic changes that began during Reconstruction, and of Reconstruction's political failure. Eric Foner, Reconstruction: America's Unfinished Revolution (1988; abridged edition, A Short History of Reconstruction, 1990); Gerald D. Jaynes, Branches without Roots: Genesis of the Black Working Class in the American South, 1862–1882 (1986); Leon F. Litwack, Been in the Storm So Long: The Aftermath of Slavery (1979). ERIC FONER See also Black Codes; Bruce, Blanche K.; Carpetbaggers; Civil War; Cotton; Douglass, Frederick; Emancipation Proclamation and Thirteenth Amendment; Freedmen's Bureau; Grant, Ulysses S.; Johnson, Andrew; Ku Klux Klan; Lynching; Plantation System; Redeemers; Republican Party; Scalawags; Slavery; Stevens, Thaddeus; Suffrage; Sumner, Charles; Truth, Sojourner; Wade-Davis Bill; Washington, Booker T. The Reader's Companion to American History Eric Foner and John A. Garraty, Editors. © 1991 Houghton Mifflin Co. Electronic version lic'd from and portions © 1994 InfoSoft Int'l, Inc. All rts rsvd.
Northerners who moved south after the Civil War were called “carpetbaggers” by critics who claimed they carried all of their possessions in one bag (luggage made of carpeting). Actually, most were educated people, ranging from business and political leaders to former soldiers. Some northern blacks, whose greater experience with freedom sometimes put them at odds with the goals of the newly freed people, also went south after the war.
Many carpetbaggers sought to invest in abandoned or repossessed lands and in partnerships with planters. Although at times they met with violence, ostracism, or derision because of their racial views, most capital-starved southerners seeking to rebuild their economy accepted them eagerly. At the height of Radical Reconstruction in 1867, some were also active in political and social reform. Because few southerners joined the Republican party, carpetbaggers won the lion's share of southern political offices. The carpetbaggers sought to modernize the southern economy through railroad building and other internal improvements. After the Compromise of 1877, many of them, who had relied upon federal patronage, returned to the North or moved quietly into southern society. (See also Reconstruction. The Reader's Companion to American History Eric Foner and John A. Garraty, Editors. © 1991 Houghton Mifflin Co. Electronic version lic'd from and portions © 1994 InfoSoft Int'l, Inc.)
The Redeemers, a loose political coalition in the post–Civil War South, consisted of prewar Democrats, Union Whigs, Confederate army veterans, and individuals interested in industrial development. They sought to “redeem” the South by undoing the changes brought about by the Civil War. Although the various groups had widely different visions of the South, they shared a commitment to reduce the scope of state government and institute stricter economic and political control of blacks.
In the late 1870s Redeemers won many state and local offices by vowing to dismantle the “corrupt” Reconstruction system. In power they cut government spending, shortened legislative sessions, lowered politicians' salaries, scaled back public aid to railroads and corporations, and reduced support for public education. They also passed laws requiring blacks to sign labor contracts and imposing poll taxes and taxes on tools and farm animals — measures that placed an added burden on tenant farmers and sharecroppers, black and white alike. The Redeemers' policies inhibited regional economic development and exacerbated the class strife and racial violence that followed the war. (See also Reconstruction. The Reader's Companion to American History Eric Foner and John A. Garraty, Editors. © 1991 Houghton Mifflin Co. Electronic version lic'd from and portions © 1994 InfoSoft Int'l, Inc.)
This Civil War measure, introduced by two Radical Republicans, Ohio senator Benjamin F. Wade and Maryland representative Henry Winter Davis, asserted congressional power over Reconstruction. It required that a majority of a seceded state's white men take an oath of loyalty to the Constitution and guarantee black equality. Then the state could hold elections for a constitutional convention, starting the readmission process.
The Radicals were seeking an alternative to Abraham Lincoln's Proclamation of Amnesty and Reconstruction. Lincoln's plan called for creating new southern state governments when 10 percent of voters in the 1860 election pledged loyalty to the Union and agreed to abolish slavery but without enfranchising blacks. Congress passed the Wade-Davis bill in 1864, but Lincoln pocket-vetoed it. He then invited southerners to rejoin the Union under either plan, knowing they would prefer his easier terms. Wade and Davis replied with a blistering manifesto, charging Lincoln with defying Congress and acting like a dictator.
The widespread support for the Wade-Davis bill by congressional Republicans reflected their desire for a larger role in shaping Reconstruction. (See also Reconstruction. The Reader's Companion to American History Eric Foner and John A. Garraty, Editors. © 1991 Houghton Mifflin Co. Electronic version lic'd from and portions © 1994 InfoSoft Int'l, Inc. All rights reserved.) (Taken from: http://lostsheep.homepage.com/)
The destruction of true Christianity had been, for the most part, already a fact of life in the Northern states before the war. They had another gospel and another Jesus. True Christianity had been replaced in the North by the worship of the nigger and his emancipation, by Spiritualism, and by worship of the Union. They were ripe for the rise of political hucksters and dictators. Because they rejected the real Christ and the truth of His Word, they were sent a strong delusion. They were sent Abraham Lincoln, and hundreds of thousands of them he would send to their deaths. Their Christian liberties would be replaced with a monstrous Jewish/Masonic form of democracy, a gradual form of Bolshevism.
Such was not the case in the South. The Southern media had not yet been captured by the Jews because the South was largely agricultural and its mostly rural population was served by local weeklies, not large conglomerates and monopolies like those that controlled the Northern press. Half of all the nations wealth in 1860 was in the Southern states, with 57% of the country’s total exports and only 8 million White Aryans to protect it.[iii] This was the bankers’ prize, to bind the south and take her wealth exactly as had been done in the North. This could not be done stealthily, because of the lack of media control in the 11 Southern states. It could only be accomplished by war and bloodshed on a monumental scale. A false pretext or excuse had to be found for an invasion. A leader of low morals, cunning cleverness, and diabolical methods had to be found to lead this gigantic looting expedition. He was found, and was elected as President in 1860.
Was Lincoln A Christian?
Many books and articles have been written in the last 130 years by people who sincerely believed Lincoln was a Christian or at least a believer in God. They did not know the following about Lincoln because; little has been published about the early life of Abraham Lincoln. However, during a search of some old property records and will in a small courthouse in central North Carolina, Alex Christopher the author of "Pandora's Box,"; in one of the old will books dated around 1840, he found the will of one A.A. Springs. Upon reading the will he was shocked and amazed at the secret that it disclosed, but one must remember that it is a known fact that wills, even though they are classified public records the same as property and corporation records, they are rarely combed through as he was doing at the time, and these records hold many dark secrets that can be hidden in public view, but are never uncovered because there are very few who research these old records.
This practice of hiding secrets in public view and the conspirators can say, when faced with the facts and accused of concealing the records; they can reply "Well it was there in the public record in plan view for any and all to find." In the will of A.A. Springs was the list of his property. it went into detail to whom the property was to be dispersed and it included his children. Mr. Christopher and others were looking to find what railroads and banks this man might have owned and had left to his son Leroy Springs. He didn't find anything like that, but he did find the prize of the century. On the bottom of page three of four pages was a paragraph where the father, A.A. Springs, left to his son an enormous amount of land in the state of Alabama which amounted to the land that is today known as Huntsville, Alabama and then he went into detail to name the son and at first Mr. Christopher and the others with him couldn't believe what they were seeing, but there it was the name of the son and it was "Abraham Lincoln!"
This new information that they had about the Springs (real name Springstein) family, this was just another twist to add to the already manipulative family. This new information about Lincoln built a fire under them to see where this new lead would take them, because everything they had found in the railroad and banking saga had been areal mind-bender. They figured this one would be the same; so they inquired at the local archives and historical records on families and found a reference to one Abraham Lincoln in the family genealogy of the family of the Carolina by the name of McAdden, in a published genealogy on the family. The family members in the Carolinas were in a limited edition that at one time could be found in the public libraries. The section on Lincoln and the story went something like the following: "In the late spring of the year of 1808 Nancy Hanks, who was of the family lineage of the McAdden family was visiting some of her family in the community of Lincolnton, North Carolina. While on her stay with family in the Carolina', she vistaed with many of the neighboring families that she had known for many years; one such visit was the Springs family. The sordid details had been omitted but obviously the young Nancy Hanks had found herself in a compromised position and was forced to succumb to the lust of A.A. Springs. She became pregnant as a result. There were no details of a love affair or an act of violence on a helpless female. Abraham Lincoln was the result of that act, which leads one to wonder if the name Lincoln was real or a fabricated name for the are of conception was Lincolnton. Was there really a Thomas Lincoln? Since the Spring were of the race that called themselves Jewish, that made Lincoln part Jewish and as part of the Springs family, he also became a relative of the Rothschild family by blood."
The following information was derived from information that exists in the Smithsonian, National Archives, the Congressional Library, Courtroom Police files, public and private libraries and storage vaults across the United States and Europe: “Abraham Lincoln was slapped three times with a white glove by a member of the Hapsburg royal family of Germany (Payseur family relatives) during a White House reception in 1862. The German royal family member demanded a pistol duel with the, then, President of the United States, Abraham Lincoln. The blows to the face stunned Lincoln but he non-verbally refused to participate in the duel by bowing his head before walking out of the reception room. What had ol' honest Abe done to so enrage and up-set the royal European personage?
It seems that the practice of promiscuity was running rampant in many families in those days and the German King Leopold had, had an illegitimate daughter named Elizabeth who was sent to America, where she lived in a very comfortable manner. Although Leopold could not recognize her position, he was very interested in her life.
In the early or mid 1850s, Abraham Lincoln and Elizabeth began having sexual liaisons that produced twin daughters named Ella and Emily in 1856. The regal German father who was so royally up-set with ol' honest Abe probably had full knowledge of what the true blood line of Lincoln really was. Abraham's wife, Mary Todd Lincoln, did not find out about Elizabeth, Ella and Emily until 1865. Previous to being informed about Elizabeth and the twins, Mrs. Lincoln had developed a ravaging dependency on opium. Her main supplier of the drug was a former member of the Confederate Intelligence community, he was a former member because the Southern gentlemen did not approve of his drug pushing and unreliable behavior. It was because of his involvement with the Souther Intelligence Community, Mary's supplier; a Jew by the name of John Wilks Booth, knew about the lover and the illegal twins.
After being spurned by the Confederate intelligence community, Mary's 'candy man' approached and became involved with the Rothschild Empire of Europe, for he realized the European banking moguls would be very interested in his pipeline to the White House.(At this time) Abraham was searching for an issue that would unite the North and South After the Civil War ended.
The issue needed to be popular to all levels of American citizenry so they could 'rally around the Stars and Stripes' thus rapidly healing the wounds of the bloodiest war in history. Lincoln was seriously considering one major movement or event that would galvanize his fellow Northern and Southern patriot countrymen into cutting loose the United States of America from the dictatorial grip of the Hapsbergs bloodline of banking control in Europe. All the time, the Rothschilds were trying to take control of the entire world monetary system, and at that time the Rothschilds were trying to get a foot-hold in America and find a way around the British, Virginia Company, and French Bourbon family that were gaining control in this country through government help...
Lincoln found himself in real hot water, because under the Virginia Company covenant the 48 families that formed it were all of the Holy Grail Bloodline. This country was to be an extension of what all the royal families of Europe controlled. The royalty of Europe is Hapsburg, no matter what their name is. The royal family of England is one such example. Now what Lincoln did is he wanted to become independent of the cogenant (in favor of his family) on the Rothschild side...the Rothschilds and their family bloodline have always been undermining the affairs of the Hapsbergs and stealing the monetary control away from them. No matter what the history books say, the Rothschilds didn't get (total) real control on things in America and the Federal Reserve until the Springs usurped the Payseur family companies in the early 1920s...
(But Lincoln had fallen from Rothschild grace also and so, due, in part to his Executive Order to print United States Greenbacks, thus interfering with the Jewish International Banks profits) It appears that the Rothschild family wanted Lincoln embarrassed to the maximum degree. (So) Mary Todd's drug dealer (John Wilks Booth) was hired to kidnap the President of the United States. Abraham would be put on a boat for a two month cruise of the Atlantic where he would be injected with and addicted to opium and then dumped on the streets of Washington. While the forcefully addicted President was stumbling around our nation's capital, the press would be informed of Elizabeth, Ella and Emily.
The drug pusher (Booth) and collaborator (agent) of the Rothschilds had his perfect accomplice in the plot to kidnap and discredit the leader of the North American continent in the First Lady Mary Todd Lincoln. After being informed of Abe's lover and the twins and the kidnap plot by her drug supplier, Mary was promised that after her husband resigned or was impeached, she and Abe would be moved to Europe to live happily ever after with plenty of opium. Superficially Mary expressed a desire to live in Europe with plenty of opium and no Civil War or politics to distract her husband or family. But her drug suppler had totally underestimated the confusion, desperation and anger of Mary Todd Lincoln.
The plotters decided the Presidential snatch needed to take place in a public, yet discreet location where minimum witnesses would be present. There were too many potential witnesses at the White House. Two hours before the capture was to take place, Mary Todd had on the floor, a tantrum, because Abe had decided not to go out of the White House that night. Mary's outrageous outburst caused Abe to change his mind and the First family departed. Several minutes after arriving at the kidnap location, Mary instructed the family bodyguard to take a position that placed the First Family out of his visual sight. The position also required the bodyguard to traverse several flights of stairs to reach Abe and Mary should he be needed for any reason...A wagon with a wooden cover arrived at the back entrance of the kidnap location with several men including Mary's opium supplier. The plan was for the drug pusher to traverse the backstairs entrance, silently move down a hallway, and open an unlocked door to a darkened room where Mary and Abe were sitting.
After entering the room, Mary's drug man (Booth) would tell the President an urgent message was waiting for him at the War Department. Before descending down the backstairs, Abe would be knocked out with a chloroform loth. The kidnappers would load the limp body into the covered wagon and swiftly stow Lincoln on an opium boat for a novel 'cruise' of the Atlantic Ocean. When Booth actually opened the door to the darkened room where Abe and Mary were sitting, he went into a panic and shock. Abe was asleep with his head on Mary's left shoulder and the First Lady had her head turned toward the left looking at the door...When she was sure the man who opened the door was Booth, she turned and looked at the President to be sure the pistol she was pointing would explode beneath the lower left earlobe of her husband.
Before Mary pulled the trigger, John Wilkes Booth, drug supplier to the First Lady, realized he was the patsy in all this mess. But he did not know if he was only Mary's patsy or also a chump for the Rothschild family. Were the men hiding around the back door of Ford's Theater there to help Booth with the kidnaping or there to point the false finger at the 'innocent' Booth? Booth was not about to run into the hallway or down the backstairs to find out the answer to that question. The only escape route was to jump the balcony and crash onto the stage during the performance. That night, Booth gave a literal interpretation of the theatrical phrase 'brake a leg' as he fractured one of his during his leaping act from 'lethally looney Mary' and the men lurking around the back entrance of Ford's Theater.
In a novelty case on a wall in Ford's Theater is 'The Gun That Shot Abraham Lincoln.' If anyone (assassin) were to kill a head of state, they would use a revolver, because several bullets might be needed to accomplish the murder and stop any guards during the escape. One would only use a one-shot pistol if they were absolutely sure they had intimate access to the victim. The gun on the wall of Ford's Theater is a derringer-the perfect weapon for the left handed female assassin who did not attend her husbands funeral. Mary Todd was not hiding in her room due to overwhelming grief and sorrow; she was imprisoned in her room with two armed guards for two weeks after killing her husband.
In the 1860s, an act of Congress mandated the compensation of widows of former and active Congressmen, Senators, Vice Presidents and Presidents. The mouth and duration was ratified by both Houses of Congress for each widow. Mary Todd Lincoln applied for her widowers compensation three times and was denied the mandated compensation three times by both Houses of Congress. An unknown benefactor paid for Mary's passage to Europe where she died in small cottage in Germany.
In 1867, the Secret Service was founded so that drunken municipal law enforcement could not unwittingly participate with drug-addicted First Ladies or Gentlemen in vengeful high-brow killings of philandering Presidents of the United States. (To cover up the murders committed which would reflect a bad light for the presiding Administration, such as the Foster murder is doing at the present time).
Before Booth jumped out of the balcony of the Presidential Box of the Ford Theater, he shouted at General Riley and his wife who were sitting to the right-front of the Lincolns. Booth's words expressed his innocence but also sealed the fate of the Rileys. Within a week of the shooting, General Riley and his wife were packed off to an insane asylum where they both died of 'unknown causes' within 30 days of being committed." [iv]
Therefore, it is obvious that Lincoln a Jewish humanist, had a god, that god was not Jesus the Christ. While he was a young man living in New Salem, Illinois, he wrote an article claiming the Holy Bible was fiction, and strove to prove Christ was not the Son of God. In other words, Lincoln was an antichrist.
John T. Stuart, Lincoln’s first law partner called him an avowed atheist and said Lincoln always denied the divinity of Christ. After Lincoln’s death, his former law partner W.H. Herndon published a 3 volume biography entitled “The Life of Abraham Lincoln,” in which he claimed Lincoln died an unbeliever, and that he despised Christianity. Lincoln never belonged to a church, and when he did attend, he always came away mocking the clergy. After his death, his widow, Mary Todd, said he was never a Christian.
In 1891, a book was published by Mrs. Nettie Colburn Maynard entitled “Was Abraham Lincoln a Spiritualist?” Mrs. Maynard was a spiritual trance-medium. She was a frequent visitor to the White House during the war at Mrs. Lincoln’s invitation. Mrs. Lincoln was deeply involved in spiritual seances, and at seeing and hearing the things said and done by young Miss Nettie while in a trance, convinced Mr. Lincoln to attend these spiritual meetings as well.
As Lincoln was deeply superstitious and believed in omens, he readily agreed to attend. Col. Simon P. Kase of Philadelphia, stated that he was present at a seance with the Lincolns and that he and several others, including the President, sat upon a piano while it was lifted bodily from the floor by spirit power. He claims Lincoln was not only impressed by the physical phenomenon, but also in the statements the medium made to him while in a trance. Lincoln said he was perfectly satisfied that the motion was caused by some invisible power.
Many prominent Washington citizens and Union officers were present with the Lincoln at these seances during the war, and years later vouched for their authenticity, some even filing affidavits with their local county clerks swearing these meetings took place. According to Mrs. Maynard, the work and mission of spiritualism in the first 25 years of its American history was to conduct unyielding warfare against the world, to uproot and change ancient ideas and do battle with school-craft, ignorance, and bigotry.[v]
In other words, the spiritualists’ mission was to destroy the ancient ways of our Hebrew forefathers, change the curriculum of the schools by eradicating the Christian ethic and destroying racism and the Christian teachings on racial separation. Their diabolical beliefs, through their agent Abraham Lincoln, were successful beyond their wildest dreams. The spiritualist cult began in 1848 when two sisters Margaret and Kane Fox from New York began hearing strange rappings in their bedroom by some alien or spiritual force. They began to communicate with this “force” by a code of rappings. Interest spread quickly across the country with all sorts of psychics, mediums, healers, and other wacko crackpots involved in the supernatural spirit world coming out of the closet.
The cult, worldwide would boast tens of thousands of followers. During and after every war, the cult enjoyed a rise in popularity, in spite of the extremely high percentage of exposed fraudulent mediums that preyed upon the people for profit. In fact, the cult’s founders, the Fox sisters themselves years later admitted the strange rappings were noises they made with their throats and were not supernatural at all! This and the later rapture vision by a woman in Scotland have deluded millions and brought massive harm and destruction upon our people.
President Lincoln once expressed to Mrs. Maynard that great pressure was being brought to bear upon him not to enforce the Emancipation Proclamation on the American people. The Emancipation Proclamation had nearly caused a mutiny in the Union Army. Thousands deserted and went home after it was declared, claiming they would not fight for the freedom of the niggers. Lincoln was depressed and on the verge of reversing it, until after an hour long seance in the White House with Miss Nettie who filled him with renewed hope. During this seance the spirit proclaimed to him not to abate or delay its enforcement, and Lincoln was assured that it was to be the crowning event of his administration and life. He was told to stand firm and fulfill the mission for which he had been raised up by providence.
Unfortunately for our race and nation, Lincoln followed her advice. During yet another wartime seance, a spirit told Lincoln to create the infamous Freedman’s Bureau, because of the supposed harsh condition of Washington D.C.’s black population. The Freedman’s Bureau would, after the war, cause the robbery and death of many a White Southerner during the post-war hell known in the South as reconstruction.
In 1865, John B. Helm wrote an account of an 1806 Christian camp meeting in Elizabethton, Kentucky, in which he observed Nancy Hanks, Lincoln’s Mother, and a man believed to be Thomas Lincoln in a wold Pentecostal type religious orgy. Thousands of Kentucky people attended these backwoods camp meetings in the early 1800s and were afflicted by what was called the “Kentucky Jerks.”[vi] These meetings lasted for days, even weeks, the sermons always on Hellfire and damnation. The sermon was always followed by many of the people being seized by uncontrollable spasms, screaming, and barking fits. Visions and hallucinations were always present as well. This was the weird, Holy roller type of religion of Lincoln’s parents and probably his childhood. It is no wonder he rejected organized Christianity. Unfortunately, Spiritualism and Abolitionism filled the void.
Lincoln, in listening to Mrs. Maynard, violated God’s law[vii] in regarding them that have a familiar spirit. He listened to an enchanter[viii] or one who claimed to know secrets of the other world. This is Moloch worship.
Throughout history a serious flaw or sin among our people has been the worship of Moloch. Moloch worship was a political religion. It was the worship of the king as god and the adoration of the state and strong central government. It is the worship of governmental power or state worship. The Lincoln government claimed total jurisdiction over man, and believed it was entitled to total sacrifice. For a state or government to claim total jurisdiction, is to claim to be as God. The modern federal Moloch state claims the right to force our youth into warfare and death at its pleasure. The state is apostasy.
When our people reject Christ as their King, the tyrannical results are foretold in 1 Samuel 8:11-18: “And he said, This will be the manner of the king that shall reign over you: He will take your sons, and appoint them for himself, for his chariots, and to be his horsemen; and some shall run before his chariots. And he will appoint him captains over thousands, and captains over fifties; and will set them to ear his ground, and to reap his harvest, and to make his instruments of war, and instruments of his chariots. And he will take your daughters to be confectionaries, and to be cooks, and to be bakers. And he will take your fields, and your vineyards, and your oliveyards, even the best of them, and give them to his servants. And he will take the tenth of your seed, and of your vineyards, and give to his officers, and to his servants. And he will take your menservants, and your maidservants, and your goodliest young men, and your asses, and put them to his work. He will take the tenth of your sheep: and ye shall be his servants. And ye shall cry out in that day because of your king which ye shall have chosen you; and the LORD will not hear you in that day. Nevertheless the people refused to obey the voice of Samuel; and they said, Nay; but we will have a king over us”
First, an anti-Biblical military draft will be instituted and enforced. The Lincoln administration was the first to send American boys by the millions as an invading army to subjugate and loot and enforce the worship of the union. Hundreds of thousands of American citizens were forced to lay down their lives to keep a tyrant in power and to preserve a union of states, even though this union had become detrimental to the liberties of the people of all the states, both North and South. Second, there will be compulsory labor battalions conscripted for state service. Third, conscription of young men and women and animals. Fourth, the federal government will expropriate property and livestock. Fifth, the government will demand as god its own tithe in the form of taxes. Sixth, God will not hear our people who are unrepentant, yet complaining at paying the price for their sins.[ix]
Thus the people’s adoration of the Red, White, and Blue became a stumbling block. The Unionists in the North developed tunnel vision and lost their reasoning. They became too stupid to understand the real reasons for the war. They then lost their liberty to aliens, and they saw it not. The new worship of Lincoln, the Union and the Federal government was here to stay. The limitless sacrifices in blood went far beyond the war between the states. Today Americans die daily in Korea, Somalia, Haiti, and a score of other places on Moloch’s altars. Today an ever larger Moloch is in place in the form of the United Nations.
The American Personality Cult
Heathen and mongrel peoples have always had their own personality cults. Ancient Babylon was the epitome of personality worship, which is the worship of man, or in modern terminology, Humanism. Humanism is man’s natural slide into idolatry. We often have a tendency to elevate our leaders above the status of mere mortals and make gods of them, worshiping them and the worldly system of government that is built around them.
In the Soviet Union, Lenin, and later Stalin, tow mongrel Jews, were the greatest examples of worship and idolatry. In China it was Mao-Tse-Tung. These three men were the greatest mass-murderers and tyrants in history, yet were worshiped and adored as gods by millions. The same situation is present in America and England. Our two greatest mass murderers and war mongers, both mongrels, are worshiped as gods by the very people they victimized. They are Abraham Lincoln and Franklin D. Roosevelt, the god of my father and his generation. In England, their two greatest tyrants, Cromwell and Churchill, are objects for worship. And so it goes, in all the White Aryan countries, the people’s gods are those who murdered and enslaved them and put them into the hands of the Edomite/Khazar Jews. Moloch worship reigns supreme in every land.
America’s decline and captivity began when our Northern states, starting with the churches, rejected Jesus Christ and chased after other gods. This started with the elevation of the Negro beasts of the field, thanks largely to the Masonic Abolitionist movement, to a position of equality in the minds of White Christians in the North. Our churches became temples of humanistic ignorance, rebellion, and superstition, setting the stage for the national idolatry that followed. To this day, our churches are at the root of all our national problems. Jesus and His apostles never instituted churches. They instituted communities of free, self-governing Christians that were in opposition to centralized government and religious organizations. The religious community of its day were the murderers of Christ and the apostles. The English word “Church” is a bad translation in the King (Queen) James Bible and should have been translated “community” or “body politic” from the Greek word “ecclesia.”
The churches of America in the 1830s and 40s with their Spiritualist, Abolitionist, and Unitarian clergy captured the minds of Northern church goers and paved the way for the armies of con-artists that followed. First was the worship of the Masonic madman, John Brown. Next came the great apostasy of 1860 when an admirer and supporter of Brown became King. Though Lincoln was hated by millions, both North and South, all of this gradually changed, especially after his assassination. This hatred and opposition to him changed after the war, even in the South. Lincoln’s malice towards them was forgotten, and he began to be well spoken of even by the survivors of his holocaust. Another nigger loving tyrant, Kennedy, who was assassinated in 1963 by the Israeli Mossad and its henchmen in the CIA and Meyer Lansky’s Jewish Mafia, would receive the same martyrdom and deification after his assassination, as would his brother, and later the communist nigger agitator Dr. Marchin’ Lootin’ Coon.
Because of the idolatry of the churches, American became a haven for con-men. We beg to be conned, and reward the con-artists for their services. We created the market, and political and religious wolves exploited it. We became idolaters and they the idols, with Lincoln becoming one of the greatest examples. We begged for a dictator, and God gave us one in 1860, just as the Children of Israel begged God for a King and He gave them Saul and the long string of tyrants that followed.
Lincoln’s Origins And Early Life
It is believed by many that Lincoln was born the son of Thomas Lincoln and Nancy (Hanks) Lincoln on the 12th of February 12th, 1809 in Hodgenville, Kentucky, His Grandfather, also named Abraham had been a captain in the Virginia Militia during the Revolutionary war, but for some reason, good or bad, had deserted his country’s cause. Whatever the reason, he didn’t profit from it, as he was killed by the Indians while laboring in the forest in May 1782, barely a year after the war. Mr. Lincoln’s Father, Thomas was a crude man. Abraham didn’t get along with him very well, as the old man usually knocked him down every time he opened his mouth. Thomas considered him a slow thinker and a dullard.
Little is known about his mother, Nancy Hanks. She died in 1818 when Lincoln was 9 years old. When Lincoln was nominated for the presidency, J.L. Scripps, a Chicago newspaper correspondent interviewed him. According to Scripps, Lincoln told him some of the facts concerning his ancestry. His mother Nancy, was an illegitimate child. He did not know who his mothers’s father was. Nancy Hanks, becoming homeless, was kindly taken in by the Abraham Enloe family. She was later thrown out by Mrs. Enloe after she became pregnant, allegedly by Abe Enloe.
Ward H. Lame, one of Lincoln’s law partners, wrote in his biography of Lincoln that he was of illegal parentage, and referred to his real father as Abraham Enloe. The Yorkville Enquirer, of April 8, 1863, noted that Lincoln’s mother, Nancy Hanks was a single woman of low degree, generally reputed to have from one-eighth to one-sixteenth Negro blood in her veins, and who had always associated with Negroes on terms of equality.[x] One of the reasons, perhaps, that Lincoln didn’t get along with his father Thomas was that maybe Thomas Lincoln knew that Abraham was not his real son. When in 1850 Thomas Lincoln’s health failed and he lay dying, Lincoln was notified but refused to visit him. He did not attend the funeral, nor ever erect a gravestone over his father or his mother’s grave. Later, as a war President, Lincoln had the valley where Thomas Lincoln was born and raised burned and devastated.[xi]
Lincoln’s appearance was as monstrous as his nature. He had arms that extended down to below his knees, ape-like, and his hair often appeared fuzzy, seldom combed. His skin was dark and dirty, unwholesome looking, his hands and feet were enormous. He was pigeon toed, and when he walked, he appeared to be going sideways in order to go forward. His head was too small for his body; his ears and mouth were huge. His oversize, awkwardly shaped body was controlled by a nervous system so sluggish, he was not capable of quick response. He stood 6'4" tall and weighed only 180 lbs., but had immense physical strength, the strength of a gorilla. His face had melancholia stamped all over it, his eyes were dull and lifeless. The span of his arms exceeded his height, another characteristic of a criminal and an ape. He dressed sloppy, his pants always well above the ankles and ridiculously short and held up by only one suspender. He was called by thousands across the country who knew or saw him as the Illinois ape, Ape Lincoln, or Abraham Africanus, the original gorilla. All of his life he was described as rude, vulgar, cruel, uncouth, extremely stupid, cunning, and deceptive. It was only after his death that the historical myth-makers gave him his false image of “honest Abe.”
His contemporaries knew he could not respond to the unexpected. He thought slowly, and acted slowly. He suffered extreme anxiety under stress; his neurotic, hysterical temperament prevented his giving cool, level-headed judgments. He could not concentrate on his work for more than short periods of time, his nature just wasn’t suited for regular or prolonged work. These are marks of savages and criminals. Lincoln had an extremely low opinion of mankind and the Christian Faith. He had no sense of guilt or honor; he had no remorse or pity for his victims, which all savage primitives lack; he was impulsive and lacked self-control.[xii] He had all the traits and characteristics of a Negroid mongrel. It is the belief of many that Negro blood was in his veins from his mother’s line is the real reason for his slow thinking, impulsiveness, and grotesque appearance.
Lincoln was a very cold man, he had no family life as his family rarely ever saw him. He was not capable of a loving relationship, and it is doubtful if he ever loved a single human being in his life. He was never loyal to anyone (a defiant Jewish trait), he lacked restraint, and was not aware of the effect of his atrocious conduct on his adversaries or neutral observers. These are marks of imbecility. He was emotionally unstable, and never trusted anyone in his life. These are character flaws of psychopaths, and lack of trust is a sign of mental disorder. Lincoln had a psychopathic nature which he tried to shield by his mastery of words.[xiii] This is extremely common among Negroes and mongrels, who often have “the gift of gab” and the gift of “rap,” which they use to hide their savage nature in appealing to unsuspecting White people, which usually leads to their destruction. Lincoln held most people in contempt, typical of a political and especially a lawyer.
The key to Lincoln’s mental and physical deformities may lie in a recent newspaper article on a hereditary disease rooted in the Lincoln family tree. It seems that scores of his descendants from a branch of Abraham Lincoln’s family, have suffered from a genetic disorder known as Hereditary Ataxia, also known as Lincoln’s disease. Those who have this disorder have slurred speech and lack of coordination, and often appear to be drunk, their reactions are slow. Ataxia, a genetic disorder and neurological defect is listed in Dr. Richard Goodman’s medical book “Genetic disorders among the Jewish People.” This book explains that illustrates scores of genetic and nervous defects common among the Jewish people. Dr. Goodman lists the reasons for these disorders among Jews in the last chapter of his book, as chiefly because of the gene flow from one type of people to another, or in other words, mongrelization.
So the evidence is all there for those with eyes to see, that the mental and physical defects suffered from was due to mongrelization in his lineage. Researchers believe the Ataxia disorder, common among mongrels, stems from Lincoln’s grandfather Abraham, but they aren’t sure. We believe it came from his Jewish/Negroidal mother, Nancy Hanks, and whoever her father was. The evidence is there that our 16th President was not a White Aryan, but a mongrel devil, which explains his actions and appearance.
Lincoln’s choice of Vice-President, another Negro mongrel should come as no surprise. Vice-President Hannibal Hamblin was known by Senator John Burham of Hancock County, Maine, who lived in an area of Hamblin, and knew of Hamblin’s ancestry. Burham reported that Hamblin’s Great-Grandfather was a mulatto who married a Canadian woman. Hamblin’s father had a brother named Africa, and when Hamblin was born, one of his uncles peered into his cradle and exclaimed, “For God’s sake, how long will this damned black blood remain in our family?” [xiv] It seems Lincoln and Hamblin were the first mongrel President and Vice-President to usurp and contaminate these positions of High office.
Some seventy years later, another war-mongering mongrel devil, in the form of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, with his Edomite/Khazar lineage and diabolical mentality, would launch an even bloodier war involving the entire White Aryan world, killing scores of millions of them.
An Associated Press headline: “Hereditary ill rooted in Lincoln family tree.”“Indirect descendants show signs of muscle control disorder. Scores of descendants from a branch of Abraham Lincoln’s family are helping researchers identify the cause of a disease that robs its victims of muscle control and can make them appear drunk. Nearly 60 indirect descendants of the president gathered recently in Corydon, Indiana to give blood samples and take coordination and dexterity tests to help scientists isolate the gene responsible for hereditary ataxia, also known as Lincoln’s disease.
Researchers have traced hereditary ataxia to the president’s grand father, who also was named Abraham Lincoln, and his wife Bathsheba. The president has no direct descendants. An estimated 150,000 people in the United States are afflicted with the disorder, which has no cure or treatment.
Lincoln’s descendants are ideal for the research because they make up a relatively large family with a known lineage, said Laura Ranum, a researcher with the University of Minnesota Institute of Human Genetics. Ranum said scientists know which chromosome is involved. ‘Once we have that clue, scientists can begin to logically design therapy,’ Ranum said.
Mary Taylor, 48, of Corydon first began experiencing symptoms when she was in her early 30s. Now she has difficulty even walking. People who don’t know she is ill often assume she is inebriated. ‘People laugh at you and make fun of you,’ she said. ‘It’s embarrassing. It really is.’
Terry Smith of San Lorenzo, California can trace his roots back to Lincoln’s uncle Josiah, from whose lineage can be found at least 50 cases of the disease. Smith didn’t learn that he had ataxia until his slurred speech and lack of coordination got him arrested in 1981. He was jailed until a breath test confirmed his innocence. Now he carries a doctor’s letter explaining his disease. Smith’s hands shake, his legs are weak and his reactions are slow. ‘Your brain is telling you what to do, but your hands don’t react,’ he said. ‘It’s no fun.’”
Lincoln met his future wife, Mary Todd, from Kentucky, in 1839 at Springfield, Illinois. After a stormy tow year courtship, the wedding was to take place on January 1, 1841 at the Edwards Mansion in Springfield. Great preparations were made, with cakes and decorations. Mary Todd arrived in her bridal gown and veil. The hours slipped by and still Lincoln hadn’t appeared. Guests searched the town but he couldn’t be found. The guests finally departed, and Mary Todd went weeping to her room.
Lincoln, always the coward, had chickened out. He had gone mad under the strain. His friend Ninian W. Edwards, owner of the mansion, said in 1866 that at the time “Lincoln went as crazy as a loon” from the shame he had caused Mary Todd. Though he later would marry her, wounds were inflicted that never healed. The 1841 wedding fiasco no doubt contributed to her being confined to an insane asylum after his demise (but this is not what happened, review the above article from “Pandora’s Box. This was what the public was told, while she was secretly spirited away).
Lincoln nearly fought a duel in 1842 with the Illinois state auditor, James Shields over a slanderous series of articles he and Mary Todd had written to the Sangamon Journal anonymously, where he attacked Shield’s competence as auditor. Shields went to the paper’s editor and learned that Lincoln was the author of the attacks, and he promptly challenged Lincoln to a duel. Lincoln agreed, but on the condition that the duel be fought with a line drawn across the ground and broadswords used instead of pistols. His idea was to use his great strength and longer arms against Shields, the smaller of the two, as they hacked away at each other with the line between them as a boundary. They both appeared, but no duel took place, as Lincoln backed down at the last minute and apologized. His cowardly nature had shown itself again. The man had no honor.[xv]
Although his personal courage was always proclaimed by the Lincoln cult, this claim is hard to believe, when one reads of his midnight ride into Washington the day before his inauguration, disguised in a clown’s costume. Alarmed by friends and by one of his spies of a possible assassination attempt by Copperheads waiting for him in Baltimore, he avoided the city and skulked into Washington late at night in a motley disguise. The representatives of his own party received him with signs of disgust at the cowardice he had displayed upon his arrival. His friends reproached him, and his enemies taunted him by his actions in response to a purely imaginary danger. The next morning he was greeted by an unkind gaze from the House of Representatives after what they considered a disgraceful creep into Washington. Lincoln would later tell his friend, Ward Lamon “the way we skulked into this city has been a source of shame and regret to me, for it did look so cowardly.” [xvi] Lincoln had a fear of assassination that bordered on hysteria. In 1864 after Confederate General Jubal Early’s raid, which came close to the Capitol, Lincoln out of fear of another raid, would order Sheridan to devastate Virginia’s Shenendoah Valley.
An expert researcher and author of many books on Lincoln on the shortwave radio, give an interesting talk on Lincoln’s younger years in Springfield, Illinois. The speaker was Webb Garrison, author of “The Lincoln No One Knows.” Mr. Garrison believes, from reading some of Lincoln’s letters from the 1840s, that Lincoln was probably a homosexual, or at least a bisexual, in that he admitted in a letter that for four solid years he slept in the same bed with his good friend, Joshua Speed, in Speed’s store in Springfield. Lincoln was upset when Speed sold the store in January, 1841, and the relationship ended. In later letters to Speed, particularly the letter written on February 14th, 1842, Lincoln signed it “yours forever,” as if there had been a lover’s relationship between the two men. The letters are a matter of public record and cannot be disputed, only ignored, as the Lincoln cult obviously does. Public awareness of a probable homosexual relationship of saint Lincoln would certainly tarnish his image, even today.
As a backwoods country lawyer, Lincoln would lose more cases than he won. He took virtually any case offered to him, and once he even tried to help a slave owner recover some runaway slaves, but lost the case. Six years earlier he’d won the freedom of a slave girl sold to a man in Illinois, on the grounds that slavery was illegal in the state. Lincoln often straddled the fence throughout his career as an attorney. He once even successfully defended a man who shot some young boys he had caught raiding his water melon patch. Lincoln held most people in contempt, something most lawyers and politicians are known for.
He was always referred to as “that jury lawyer,” a degrading term in his day. The other two members of America’s unholy trinity of Lincoln, Wilson and F.D. Roosevelt were also attorneys. Three lawyers would plunge this country into it three bloodies wars (to date), and a careful study of their political careers would show all three to be warmongers, liars, and mass murderers. All three would trick the American people into wars not in the national interest. All three would become dictators whose hands became drenched in their own people’s blood. All three lawyers would falsely blame their enemies for the outbreak of war, wars which in fact, they themselves would be responsible for. The diabolical mentality of lawyers and professional politicians works well together in hoodwinking the people into accepting ungodly laws, amendments and wars. Lincoln would carry his diabolical lawyer mentality with him throughout his political career, even to the grave, at tremendous cost to the people he professed to serve.
The freshman Illinois congressman, Abraham Lincoln, opposed President James K. Polk’s war with Mexico in the 1840s, even though it was a war Mexico started, and was the last war our country fought in its own interest. Lincoln hated Polk and called the war immoral, even though the outcome of the war nearly doubled American territory from which many of our states would be formed. Lincoln claimed that President Polk had unnecessarily and unconstitutionally commenced the war with Mexico, sending American troops into battle without congressional authority. On January 12, 1848 when he spoke before the House of Representatives, his opposition to the war and national expansion at the expense of Mexican mongrels would later lead to his defeat for congressional re-election. In his hypocritical speech against President Polk he stated: “Any people, anywhere, being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the existing government, and form a new one that suits them better. This is a most valuable, a most sacred right, a right which we hope and believe is to liberate the world.”
Thirteen years later, President Lincoln would forget what Congressman Lincoln had said, and his “any people, anywhere” speech can be cited against him in his own instigation and conduct of the war he commenced, when he took far more drastic action against the seceding southern states by launching his war by executive fiat without prior congressional approval. This approval is required by the Constitution, but on Lincoln’s example, one president after another has by passed Congress and entangled America in war after war on the orders of the Edomite/Khazar bankers always in the interests of Jewry and International Communism.
Lincoln was nominated for the Illinois senatorship by the Republican state convention in June 1858. Stephen A. Douglas had just been nominated by the Illinois democrats for his third term as Senator. Douglas, by far the wiser of the two, was famous as more than a politician, but as a statesman of world renown. Lincoln, from his association with him in the state legislature of 1837, hated Douglas intensely. In the summer of 1858, Lincoln challenged Douglas to a debate, which was held from one end of the state to the other. Douglas knew Lincoln to be a dangerous demagogue, as Lincoln had verbally attacked him before, when Douglas backed the supreme Court’s decision in the Dread Scott case in which this Negro was declared property and returned to his master. Douglas had then declared that the authors of the declaration of independence were themselves slave owners and that it would impugn their integrity and their intelligence to insist that they meant to include Negroes when they declared that all men were created equal. Lincoln at that time agreed with Douglas on this and said “There is a natural disgust in the minds of nearly all white people at the idea of indiscriminate amalgamation of the white and black races.” [xvii] Lincoln attacked the Court’s Dred Scott decision anyway.
In the Lincoln-Douglas debates of 1858, Lincoln was his usual divided self. When debating Douglas in Northern Illinois, with its large German population, Lincoln sided with the abolitionists and declared emotionally he was for Negro equality, raising his hands to heaven and declaring “he is my equal and the equal of Judge Douglas and the equal of every living man.” [xviii] However, when in Southern Illinois with its pro-Southern, pro-slavery atmosphere, Lincoln proclaimed his opposition to granting civil rights to blacks, and declared in Charleston on September 18, 1858 they were in fact an inferior race.
Before the Galesburg audience Douglas ridiculed Lincoln’s mongrelized mentality on the issue and declared: “When in one part of the state he (Lincoln) stood up for Negro equality; and in another part, for political effect, discarded the doctrine, and declared that there always must be a superior and inferior race. This Chicago doctrine of Lincoln’s declaring that the Negro and the White man are made equal by the Declaration of Independence, is a monstrous heresy...”
Stephen A. Douglas was by far the more honorable of the two. He was a statesman in favor of his race at all times, no matter what part of the state he was in. Lincoln, on the other hand, and in order to gain votes, tried to be all things to all men, depending on where he was at the time. The foolish idea that Lincoln was a racist, a separatist, or a white nationalist, falls flat on its face on this point. The man was a hypocritical political and demagogue. Lincoln had begun, in the Lincoln-Douglas debates, an American parasitism in attacking Douglas’ character, and by dodging, evading or answering hypocritically the real issues. Lincoln bated a politicians’ hook and a banker’s scheme with mud slinging and character assassination, and the grinning idiots form the Illinois prairie applauded him.
Lincoln was in favor of a strong central government, opposed to state’s rights and limited government. He was for a central banking system and would no doubt be in favor of today’s Federal Reserve System. He was in favor of expansion of the railroads at the people’s expense, and a significant amount of his income came from serving as a lawyer for the Illinois central railroad. Douglas understood what type of impostor and political huckster he was up against. He did not understand that the Jewish and abolitionist owned northern owned press, the Judeo-puritan clergy, the great monopolists, and military-industrial complex and all who make lying and swindling their profession, would exalt his opponent over him in the debates. Douglas couldn’t calculate to what lengths the establishment and forces of hell would go to elevate a false icon of Lincoln into the minds of the American people. This false image is forced upon us to this day, 130 years after the man’s death.
Though Lincoln beat Douglas by winning the popular vote, the Illinois state legislature elected Stephen A. Douglas on February 5, 1859 by a vote of 54-46 to the Senate. Douglas would face Lincoln again the following year in the race for the presidency. It was during this race that the establishment’s prostitute press would pull out all stops in pushing the “honest Abe, born in a log cabin, railsplitter” image of Lincoln on the American people, while at the same time attack Douglas as a servant of the South’s slavoracy.
In April, 1860, Abraham Lincoln was chosen by the Republican party to be their candidate for president of the United States. He would be facing three Democratic opponents, John Bell of Tennessee, John C. Breckinridge of Kentucky, and his hated rival from Illinois, Stephen A. Douglas. The Democratic party, unfortunately at this critical point in our history, could not agree on a final candidate, therefore splitting the Democratic ticket three ways. Douglas, a northerner, could not win the South, and Bell and Breckinridge, both southerners could not win in the North. The result was but a foregone conclusion. In the country at large Lincoln received 1,866,452 votes, to Douglas’ 1,375,000. Breckinridge had 847,000 votes and Bell just under 600,000. If Douglas had received the whole Democratic vote he would have been elected president. Had Stephen A. Douglas been president, it is a fact that war would have been averted.
The radicals of the Republican party, the abolitionist movement, the ever-growing Northern industrial complex, and the hidden hand of Jewry had triumphed. Forty-one days after his inauguration, Lincoln would give his Jewish and Masonic masters the war they so eagerly sought. One wonders about Masonic intrigue behind the mysterious 3-way split in the pro-Southern democratic party’s presidential race. Accidents, as F.D.R. would later state, do not happen in politics.
In the South, Lincoln’s inauguration was taken generally as a premonition of war. There were signs of the spirit of abolitionism in the new administration. Violent abolitionists and men whose hatred of the South was notorious were placed by Lincoln in every department of public service, Salmon P. Chase became Secretary of Treasury, the infamous Charles Sumner became Chairman of Foreign Relations. The list of other abolitionist appointees is long. Lincoln’s abolitionist government quickly began the subversion of American stability and prosperity. The Constitution was virtually suspended and thrown in the basement from that time on.
Lincoln, in his senatorial debates with Douglas, constantly and emotionally harped on the evils of slavery. For the Northern press, the evils of slavery was the only issue of importance to be presented to the people. Besides inflammatory revolutionary tracts, books, and plays, all manner of deceitful abolitionist tactics were stirring up the people in the North. The odious little novel “Uncle Tom’s Cabin” was produced, falsely depicting inhumane and harsh Southern treatment of the slaves.
Northern pulpits condemned the institution of slavery as unscriptural, and unchristian, despite the fact Jesus did not forbid slavery and found no faith in Israel equal to that of a slave-owning centurion. The Apostle Paul was a slave catcher when he returned the slave Onesimus back to his master Philemon. The Law of Moses did not condemn slavery, even white Israelites could be kept as slaves for up to 7 years. Criminals who could not repay what they had stolen were to be sold as slaves to work off their debts in restitution to their victims. Clearly the vile Yankee preachers didn’t know or care what the Word of God said on the subject.
Though Lincoln’s “house divided against itself” speech had tingled the spines of millions in the North, and his lies that slavery was coming to the Northern States had done likewise, slavery was dead as an institution, Eli Whitney’s cotton gin, and Cyrus McCormick’s “Virginia reaper” would have ended slavery peacefully within a few years, rendering the institution obsolete and unprofitable. But the abolitionist radicals had more than ending slavery on their minds and would not wait. They demanded war. And one of the major reasons for it, as Lincoln would later revel in his second inaugural address, was that God willed the war to continue until the South had paid in blood for the treatment given the slaves for the last 250 years. Many wonder when God told Lincoln this, considering he was an atheist. Possibly it was relayed to him from his female medium in his spiritualist seances. But such was the diabolical mentality of Lincoln and his abolitionist henchman and the deluded morons who listened to deranged women of the spiritualist circles. Men who listen to and follow the advice of women deserve to be deceived, as the first Aryan, Adam was when he listened to his wife, instead of God.
In more recent times, it has been revealed that Nancy Reagan and her astrologer controlled Ronald Reagan’s presidential policies. And there is not much doubt that Hillary Clinton calls most of the shots in Bill Clinton’s criminal reign of Federal misrule.
The election of Abraham Lincoln to the presidency on a Republican platform committed to the Abolitionist cause prompted South Carolina to secede from the Union on December 20, 1860. One by one, ten other states followed, until by June 8, 1861, the last state, Tennessee withdrew. The position taken by Lincoln to secession was unconstitutional and dishonest, and secession would be the position that furnished the abolitionist federal government an excuse for sending a massive army into the South for subjugation needed in order to plunder its wealth, destroy its culture, and enforce the new forth coming amendments, designed to strip the white man of all human rights.
The legalism Lincoln dreamed up was that the Union existed before the states and was indestructible, a state couldn’t secede and that the Union was therefore unbroken. This deranged type of thinking is the same as saying the child exists before its parents. Ignored by Lincoln was the fact that Virginia and other states had ratified the Constitution and joined the Union with the expressed provision that they could repeal ratification and secede if things worked out to their states’ disadvantage. Also ignored was the fact that secession had been voted for by the vast majority of the Southern people and their elected representatives. But Lincoln convicted them of treason and he indicted the entire White Aryan population of eleven states of this fictitious charge. He had conveniently forgotten his “any people, anywhere” speech of 1847.
Our American Declaration of Independence clearly justifies secession: “when a long rain of abuses and usurpations designed to reduce us under absolute despotism...It is their duty to throw off such government.” In 1803, 1814, and 1845, Puritan, abolitionist New England plainly considered and tried to carry out secession from the Union. The South, in 1860-61 only followed their example. But the Lincoln administration refused to acknowledge the South’s right to secede.
They were in favor of using armed force into forcing the South into staying in the Union and remaining subject to the North’s high anti-Southern tariffs. This unfair practice of economic exploitation would continue up until World War Two, nearly 80 years later. The manufacturing Northern States wanted a captive Southern market, protected from European competition, where only Yankee goods at higher prices could be bought. The slavery issue was but a mere smoke screen to disguise this vital economic issue: whether or not the south should be allowed to trade in European markets, by passing the North’s high tariff laws.[xix]
After Lincoln’s inauguration, a new reason had to be created to justify a planned invasion of the South. The slavery excuse was no longer useful as the prize of oval office had been attained. Lincoln knew that most white northerners would not fight for nigger equality and emancipation. The new excuse for war was to preserve the Union. But a Union maintained by federal bayonets ceases to be a true Union. A Union of states, no longer wanted by several states carries no real meaning. Other than abolitionist New England and Kansas, few people in either section shared Lincoln’s view on secession. Lincoln, after his explosive election, which shocked the South, offered them no signs of peace, no reassurance. He remained silent, and gave no statement that his administration would not act aggressively towards them.
Radical Republican leaders encouraged Lincoln to pursue an aggressive and provocative policy toward the South. The two main leaders in this were Thaddeus Stevens, a Pennsylvanian living with a mongrel mulatto mistress, and Charles Sumner from Massachusetts. These two despicable race traitors, along with the six Masonic agitators from Massachusetts, known as the secret six, and of course, Lincoln himself were the principle warmongers.
Lincoln had stated to William Seward in a letter in February 1861, that he was inflexible on slavery and would not compromise with the South. To state inflexibility on vital issues to avert a bloody civil war, is a mark of the criminally insane.[xx] Lincoln was expected to go to Washington to work out a peaceful solution to the secession crises, by his constituents. He did the exact opposite. The abolitionists and a creature form the spirit world had given him a mandate to destroy the Union and the South by any means necessary.
Lincoln had promised the South that he would not reinforce the Federal Forts in Southern territory. But it was necessary to provoke the South into firing the first shot in order to rally Northern opinion behind an armed invasion. The aggressor in a war, however, is not the first who uses force, but the first who renders force necessary. Virginia had sent three commissioners to meet with Lincoln about his plans. Lincoln told them he was as yet undecided as to whether he would resort to war to force the seceded states back into the Union. As of yet Virginia had not seceded, and the Virginian commissioners told him that if he used armed force against the South, Virginia would also secede and use armed force to stop them.
On April 1st, these commissioners left Washington in disgust upon learning that Lincoln was preparing a reinforced expedition to sail to Fort Sumter in Charleston, South Carolina’s harbor, and that he had deceived them in assuring them he would evacuate the Fort. Lincoln’s Secretary Gideon Welles said Lincoln’s plan for Fort Sumter displayed a weakness in his head. When the news of Lincoln’s resupply ships reached the South, the fort was bombarded and reduced to rubble. Lincoln used the South’s firing on the fort and the flag to rally the Northerners to his cause.
In a letter to G.V. Fox dated May 1, 1861, Lincoln wrote that he expected to draw Confederate fire upon the relief squadron sent to Fort Sumter. He wrote, “Our anticipation is justified by the result.” Lincoln, who was not too careful about what he put down in writing, was obviously joyfully anticipating war, although his admirers till contend that he was a peace lover.
After the fort’s surrender, Lincoln issued an executive order calling for 75,000 volunteers to form a federal army for an invasion of the South. By then the mob spirit, both North and South had the country in its grip. The abolitionist radicals in Lincoln’s cabinet, Chase and Seward, Stevens and Sumner were filling the minds of the people with fear. The press’ Horace Greely, formerly in favor of letting the South go in peace was now using his paper to call for hanging Jefferson Davis for treason.[xxi]
At no time did the south consider herself in rebellion. At no time did the south call for an armed invasion of the North, or call for an attempt to overthrow the American government. They only wanted to be left alone to pursue their own manifest destiny. But the mob spirit had seized control of the people and most rational thinking became clouded with slogans of “Save the Union” and “On to Richmond!” The American people had no consulted the Almighty in what to do. They were carried away by their emotions and in the North’s case, followed a multitude to do evil.[xxii] Though the South’s position was far more honorable and righteous than the North’s, the entire country was abandoned by God to tyrants, for not consulting Him and in prayer, asking for His advice in their decisions. This was how a bloody civil war was averted in Ancient Israel’s history, under King Rehoboam, when Judah was told by God to not go up and make war against their Israel kinsmen.
Lincoln’s call for volunteers was in violation of the Constitution which gives only congress, not the President, the right to raise an army. Lincoln had attacked President Polk on the House floor in 1848 for this very thing. His own act of raising an army by an executive order was a far greater violation of the Constitution than anything President Polk had done in the war with Mexico. Lincoln’s unconstitutional Federal Army was illegal from the beginning. It was a de facto military.[xxiii]
On April 19th Lincoln ordered a Federal blockade of the ports of the secessionist states, and even extended his blockade to the ports of Virginia and North Carolina, when North Carolina hadn’t even seceded yet and was still in the Union! Lincoln, with this act shocked Europe. According to international law no nation can blockade its own ports; only against an enemy’s ports. This was but one of Lincoln’s many insane martial law measures. Three vacancies in the Supreme Court gave Lincoln the chance to pack the court with three of his own traitors. His blockade was then upheld by a narrow 5-4 court decision.
In order to force Maryland into staying in the Union, as the state was considering joining the Confederacy, Lincoln had the state occupied by Federal troops, suspended the state’s writ of habeas corpus, and began massive arrests of the state’s citizens and state legislators. They were jailed in various federal gulags without charges on suspected disloyalty. Lincoln’s acts of usurpation persuaded Virginia, Arkansas, North Carolina, and Tennessee into secession and joining the Confederacy as well. If the border slave states of Kentucky, Delaware, and Missouri had seceded as well, that would have been the end of Lincoln’s imaginary indissolvable union. Had Kentucky left, Southern Illinois, Southern Indiana, and Southern Ohio would have followed.
Supreme Court Justice Taney had informed Lincoln that the Constitution gave Congress alone the legal right to suspend the writ of habeas corpus. Taney was ignored. Martial Law was extended to all the other border states as well, and the reign of terror began. The people’s rights vanished. Their rights now consisted of what local military authorities allowed them, which wasn’t much. Lincoln became an American dictator, and the law became what he said it was. Martial law was soon extended to the Northern states as well as Lincoln suspended the writ throughout all areas under Federal Control on September 15, 1863. Lincoln had put the American people under the control of military courts of admiralty law. After the war, when Lincoln’s damage to the nation was done, the Supreme Court would rule that Martial law cannot arise from a threatened invasion. The necessity must be actual and present; and the invasion real.[xxiv]
To get around Lincoln’s illegal blockade, the Southern States would employ many daring blockade runners, known as privateers. Privateering was recognized by England and Europe as legitimate. Lincoln declared them to be pirates and announced they would all hang upon capture. Jefferson Davis replied he would hang high ranking Yankee officers in retaliation, and Lincoln backed down.
On November 8, 1861 the British mail ship Trent was stopped by the Union navy in the Bahamas and 4 Confederate commissioners, bound for Britain and France, were forcibly removed and taken back to Federal prison at Fort Warren. England was outraged and considered the act a violation of international law. England prepared for war and the British fleet sailed for American waters, and only then did Lincoln order the four’s release and offer an apology. He had again disgraced himself and his administration and came very close to another war with England. He blamed the English for the entire affair, just as he had blamed the South for the war. Accepting the blame for any of his stupid acts was not one of his strong points.
The South’s resistance to the North’s war of aggression went far beyond Lincoln’s expectations. Many Northerners were not anxious to go south to face the fierce soldiers under Jackson, Lee and Johnston. Large cash bounties were offered to encourage enlistment, but even this failed to produce enough men for the armies. In March of 1863 Congress passed the conscription act drafting all men from 20 to 45. Great resistance was met and this law was opposed all though the North, even in New England. The law allowed for substitutes, and for $300.00 a man could buy his release from the draft. The working class declared that his made the war a rich man’s war and a poor man’s fight.
Confederate soldiers, on the other hand, under Stonewall Jackson, and Robert E. Lee enlisted and fought with the desperation of men whose land is invaded. They fought as their ancestors had fought at Bunker Hill and Yorktown. With shouts against Lincoln as a “tyrant” and “usurper,” during the war’s first major battle at Bull Run, they beat Union General McDowell’s army badly, and chased them from the field. In Virginia’s Shenendoah valley, General Jackson, always vastly out numbered, beat one Union army after another in his brilliant valley campaign, which is still studied in awe by the world’s military academies. Crushing defeats were suffered by the Federal armies at Fredericksburg, and Chancellorsville. Had Jackson not been killed accidentally at Chancellorsville, the decisive battle at Gettysburg would have had a different ending. Each new Confederate victory would send Lincoln into a state of panic and depression, which would last for days, even weeks. One Union commander after another he would cashier. At the federal prison camp at Point Lookout, Maryland the guards would open fire among the rebel prisoners during roll call upon hearing the news of any new Confederate victory. Scores of them were shot down and murdered by the camp’s vicious nigger guards.[xxv]
Lincoln’s Criminal Conduct of The War
Lincoln and his henchmen’s conduct of the war, when it finally erupted with all its fury, quickly became the most terrible war in modern history, and the most monstrous of Christian times. The worst crimes committed by the Federal army were in Missouri and the border states, at least up until 1864. On May 10th, 1861, 100 Missouri state militia, captured in a surprise attack by pro-Union Home Guards, were paraded through the streets of St. Louis, causing a riot by the pro-Southern citizens. In the riots stirred up by the German soldiers of Captain (afterwards-General) Lyon’s Federal command, 28 of the city’s citizens, including several women, were shot down and murdered to establish a federal reign of terror over the city. These were but the first of many of the thousands of non-combatants of Missouri that would be murdered on Lincoln’s orders during the war years.
The South would learn, early in the war, just what kind of barbarism it could expect from the criminals and foreign mercenaries in Mr. Lincoln’s armies. At Manasses and Pensacola, the Federals had repeatedly and deliberately fired upon hospitals. In the naval battle at Hampton Roads, the Federal had hung out a white flag of surrender, and then opened fire on the Confederate sailors as they drew near. In April of 1862 the city of New Orleans surrendered to the Federal fleet, effectively cutting the Confederacy in half. A tyrant by the name of General Benjamin Butler, or Massachusetts took possession of the city on May 1st, and the Yankee reign of terror began for the white citizens of the city. Butler, after sexual advances of his soldiers by the women of the city was resisted, would issue an order inviting his troops to treat, as prostitutes, every lady in the streets that dared to show displeasure at their presence, and a fiendish rule of vengeance was then wreaked upon the city’s conquered people.
Butler excited the horror and disgust of the civilized world by his war crimes. Europe, and especially France, were shocked, and Butler would be from then on known as “Beast Butler.” His acts had up until then surpassed all former atrocities and outrages of the war. Many of the city’s citizens, accused of petty acts of disloyalty, were confined at hard labor with balls and chains attached to their ankles, many of them whose only offense was that of selling medicine to sick confederate soldiers. After all, Lincoln had declared medicine to be contraband, off limits to the South, an act that appalled England and Europe.
Helpless women were torn from their homes and confined in prisons. In Missouri, several of these prisons had their foundations shaken loose by Yankee guards, causing the buildings to collapse, horribly crushing to death the women inside. The possessions of the city’s people were plundered. So much silverware was stolen that Butler was called “spoons Butler.” Men were forced to choose between starvation and the confiscation of all property, or taking an oath of allegiance to Lincoln, the Union, and the invaders of their country. Butler also had William B. Mumford publicly hanged on a charge that he insulted the flag of the United States, when he had taken it down from the city mint on the day of New Orleans surrender. The homes of private citizens were seized and turned into bordellos for Union troops. Wardrobes, pianos, libraries, hardware, anything that the troops fancied, was seized and sent North as presents to friends and families, even children’s toys. The Louisiana Tigers division, that fought with Lee in Virginia would storm into battle, sweeping everything in blue aside before them, shouting “Remember Butler” as their battle cry. Lincoln and the people of the North admired and cheered bully Butler, as they had earlier the abolitionist madman John Brown.
History has many instances where people joyfully surrendered their liberties to tyrants, but no instance was made more clear than when the people of the North removed the Christian Israelite crowns from their heads and threw them at Lincoln’s feet for the privilege of joining his orgy of pillage and destruction. The moral nature of the Yankee was unmasked in 1861 as the product of materialism in politics and materialism in religion-the spawn of the worship of power and the lust of gain. The Northerners gloated over the misfortune of starving southern women and children, they appealed to the animalistic passions of the niggers to take revenge upon them. They actually debated in their state legislatures the policy of paying Negroes premiums for the murder of white families of the South.
Abolitionist pamphlets were found in 1863 in the South, advocating seizing all Rebel property and giving to every slave 160 acres who brought forth their former master and his family’s scalps.[xxvi] This was race treason and race hatred at it vilest. This forthcoming servile insurrection was averted, only because the decent treatment southern slaves had received, which caused most of them to stay loyal to their masters and their families all through the war, even when the men went away to war, leaving their families at the mercy of the slaves. The exceptions to this were the tens of thousands of slaves who enlisted or were forced into Lincoln’s armies.
The inflammatory pamphlets had succeeded in stirring up some of the slaves, however. The swamp areas of northeastern North Carolina became havens for Negro bandits, that burned, robbed, raped and murdered many white citizens from this area. The federal government justified the fiendish warfare of the inhuman nigger bandits by designating them as “partisans,” thereby inviting them to prey upon the white population. In December 1863 a force of Negroes under General Wild invaded this part of the state, looting and stripping the farmers of the area of all personal property and leaving hundreds of people to starve without a morsel of food. When 2 of his niggers were captured, he kidnaped the wives of Confederate soldiers from the area and placed them under the none too gentle guard of his black soldiers. They were carried off to Norfolk, some distance away, wrists bleeding, bound by cords and led by jeering and triumphant black beasts.
In Palmyra, Missouri, Union General McNeil murdered in cold blood in the village square publicly, ten Confederate soldiers. The Missouri guerrilla chief, William Quantrill, would later avenge them, as only he could, when some of McNeil’s men would later be found dead with their faces cut up by boot-heels, after having been held down and stomped to death by Quantrill’s men.
After the famous Kentucky raider, General Morgan was captured, he and many of his men were incarcerated in the infamous penitentiary of Ohio. Stripped naked and scrubbed by Negro convicts, every lock of hair shorn from their heads and faces, they were confined in cells 38 inches wide, six and a half feet in length, and the same in height, and fed bread and water. Confinement in solitary confinement in the prison’s dungeons was common for trivial offenses, like whistling. General Morgan’s brother, a Captain, was confined in one for 16 days and nights. No blanket or coat was allowed. The thermometer was below zero. There was no room to pace. Each prisoner had to struggle night and day to stay alive. The treatment of confederate P.O.W.’s was barbarous in all of the prison camps.
In the St. Louis prison, prisoners were taken to the open air of the prison yard in winter, and hand-cuffed to a post all night long in the sleet, snow and cold. Their hands and faces by morning oozed blood and they were badly frost bitten. Many of the soldiers of General Hood’s army were horribly frostbitten by being exposed day and night in the open before being put into camp Douglas. At Alton and Camp Morton, Rebel prisoners were deliberately put into camps infected with smallpox. Insufficient rations, by design and Union policy forced these men to live on rats, dogs and slop found in the hospital slop tubs. Thousands of them starved or froze to death from this neglect. One of the punishments inflicted on the P.O.W.’s at Camp Morton, was to have them stripped naked and forced to kneel in the snow while they were beaten for 15 minutes by the belts of the guards.
According to U.S. Government statistics there were 26,436 Confederate P.O.W. deaths, to 22,576 Union P.O.W. deaths. Thus, nearly 18% more Southerners perished in the prison camps than did Northerners. Most of the suffering in the Yankee prisons was due to deliberate deprivation on the part of the Federal Government and its brutal guards which reduced prisoner rations until the P.O.W.s actually starved. Althbough in possession of abundant supplies of food, clothing, blankets and medicine, Lincoln’s Federal Government failed to supply the thousands of its Confederate captives with these indispensable items. Such was not the case in Southern prison camps. Though thousands did die in them, over 14,000 in Andersonville alone, they were fed the same rations as the prison guards and Rebel armies, as meager as that was. Starvation was rampant in the South, especially in the last two years of the war.
Although Lincoln had medicine declared a contraband of war, blockaded from the South by his navy, and all Southern drug stores destroyed, even the supplies of private physicians, by his army, Confederate authorities never refused to let Andersonville’s sick Union prisoners have food, clothes, or medicine brought or sent by their loved ones. Northern wives and mothers, trying to smuggle hidden medicine under their skirts for their sons, were searched by Federal authorities, their medicine confiscated, and were usually imprisoned in Washington’s old Capitol Prison.
The situation among the over crowded prison at Andersonville became so desperate, that in August 1864, the Lincoln administration was contacted by the Southern Commissioner of Exchange to exchange prisoners, man for man, in order to halt the starvation of Union prisoners in the camp. Lincoln’s secretary Stanton, after a short time halted the exchange policy. When the Southern exchange commission later again contacted Stanton, this time offering to give the Lincoln administration all of the thousands of Andersonville’s prisoners without an equal exchange, Lincoln and Stanton refused!
Thus the deaths and sufferings of their own men in captivity, as well as the deaths of Confederate prisoners in their hands was Lincoln’s fault and he alone must bear responsibility before God Almighty on judgement day. After the capture of Andersonville by Union troops, the starved, emaciated skeletons that survived the ordeal would be photographed and they were widely circulated throughout the North as proof of Southern war crimes. This dirty little trick would be repeated after World War II, when pictures of Buchenwald’s and Dachau’s starved inmates were circulated across the globe to falsely accuse the Third Reich of war crimes that the allies were ultimately responsible for. Here Lincoln would set a precedent in media false witness. Truly Lincoln’s war was against all white Americans, both North and South.
The Yankee’s Bastille
Abraham Lincoln hated and feared the American people. He was especially fearful of the bad press and vocal opposition he was receiving throughout the North, as he attempted to install a de facto government through Martial Law over the lawful de Jure government. Though he fooled most of the people, most of the time, tens of thousands, nevertheless, resisted his tyrannical rule throughout the North. He suspended the Writ of Habeas Corpus, canceling the right of free speech for the people, and with his Secretary of State, William H. Seward, implemented a diabolical plan to arrest without charges or a trial between 20 to 50,000 Americans citizens and incarcerate them in military prisons throughout the North. All of these people were Northerners, and would be jailed in these “Bastilles” not for anything they did but for, as Lincoln said later, for what they might do. In other words, expressing thought crimes. The experience of over 600 years of free speech and personal liberty, secured by the Magna Charta, proclaimed by the Declaration of Independence, and guaranteed by the Constitution was hereby rendered null and void by the stroke of a pen, by an American Caligula.
Mr. Seward would later boast to England’s Lord Lyons that with the ring of a bell he could arrest and imprison any Northern citizen and no power on earth, save Lincoln’s signature, could release him. He then ased “Can the Queen of England do as much?” Hordes of spies, informers, and eavesdroppers descended down upon the people. The sound of Seward’s little bell became their signal and the word of the Federal informer became law. They were arrested by the thousands and imprisoned without warrants. Judges were torn from the bench, bruised and bleeding. Anti-war preachers were beaten down, dragged through the streets, and imprisoned. Women were subjected to insult and outrage and incarcerated. Doctors, dying patients, democrats, anti-war newspaper editors, they were all brutally beaten and driven at bayonet point to the Bastilles. They were nearly all arrested at 3 o’clock in the morning by Lincoln’s secret police, at a time when groggy with sleep, they were more likely to make incriminating statements.
The conditions in the prisons were terrible; bad food, bad treatment and freezing conditions and dampness was the norm. Many of them died from neglect and mistreatment. Forced to endure months, even years of solitary confinement, their families knowing nothing of their fate, transported to other states, maimed, beaten, health ruined, they would later be released hundreds of miles from home with no transportation or compensation, forced to walk home.
Colonel Million of Ohio was strung up by the wrists for an entire night, he would lose the use of both hands, and for lack of food was reduced to a mere skeleton. He later became deaf and lost his sense of smell. Rev. K.J. Stewart was arrested by Bluecoat thugs for refusing to pray for the President during a service, his Bible torn from his hands and dashed on the floor by a Yankee officer. “Damn you priests,” he shouted. “I’ll make you preach my way. We’ll see who has the longest sword, your master (Christ) or ours (Lincoln)!” It was federal policy to harass, loot and close churches in the North and in the border states that wouldn’t bless the North’s war of aggression. Mrs. Mary B. Morris, of Illinois was arrested, her home ransacked, and sent to prison in Cincinnati, Ohio because she tried to feed, clothe and comfort destitute Confederate prisoners confined at Camp Douglas near her home. Forced to sleep on the cold floor in her cell, in the middle of winter, cursed, abused, sick and covered with lice, she nearly died from the brutal treatment that was intended to cause her death.
D.C. Wattles of Michigan was arrested and sent over 1000 miles away to Fort LaFayette and imprisoned for 5 months. He had been straining blackberries with his children, who in playing had raised upon a pole the rag stained by the berries. One of the horde of infamous informers infesting the land then contracted the war department, falsely accusing Wattles of raising a rebel flag. He was never charged, or given the informers name before being drug off to prison. The stories of these countless tales of injustice could fill many volumes. We suggest John A. Marshall’s 1877 “American Bastille” for those with a strong stomach.
Lincoln’s anti-Constitutional draft sparked a bloody riot in New York City in July of 1863. An anti-conscription brigade of volunteer Irish firemen chased the city police from the Irish slums and seized some 11,000 rifles from a city armory, shouting “do draft!” and “hand all the niggers!” This was right after Lincoln declared his warped Emancipation Proclamation, in which he declared all the slaves of the 11 secessionist states free, but declared all the slaves in Union control still under slavery. Over a hundred buildings were burned, including 3 police stations, 3 provost marshal offices, an armory, several factories and a Negro orphanage. In a fierce street battle with the police and state militia, some 2,000 rioters were killed and 8,000 wounded, being shot down in mass by the soldiers, even using cannons. Compare this treatment of White Irish rioters, butchered like dogs, with the pampered treatment shown to nigger mobs in their murderous riots of today. 50 soldiers and 3 policemen were killed by the Irish with over a thousand policemen injured. 75 blacks were hunted down and lynched or drowned by the rioters, enraged by the federal bloodbath. It seems most of them knew one of the major reasons for the war and the draft, was to free the nigger, and they violently opposed it to the death. Other bloody riots, like the one in Baltimore, took place when anti-war protesters attempted to block and prevent federal troops form passing through the city on their way South. The infamous “Beast Butler” ordered his men to open fire on the protesters, with heavy loss of life, again with Lincoln’s approval.
As bad as things were in the North, the conditions in the South were much worse. Losses in the Federal armies were massive. In order to fill their depleted ranks, foreigners, mainly German and Irish immigrants were drafted into the Union Army almost as soon as they came off the boats. Many of the Germans were taken into the Army before they could even speak English. Over 500,000 of these foreigners would be inducted by the federal draft board and sent South as cannon-fodder for a cause few of them knew anything about. For the rest of their lives, many plundered Southern civilians would remember the coarse German accents of Lincoln’s federal mercenaries as their homes were burned down and all of their belongings stolen. Never to be forgotten were the rings pulled from women’s fingers, the toys snatched from the arms of children, the graves of deceased loved-ones dug up, with the remains scattered upon the ground, gold teeth were broken from the mouths of skulls and burial vaults looted as family members watched on in horror.
Churches were ransacked, sometimes they were turned into pool halls, sometimes bordellos. Earrings were painfully jerked from the ears of women. Families were stripped of all clothing, even the infants, all bedding removed. Worst of all was the confiscation of all food, all crops. What couldn’t be taken was soiled and destroyed.
The Federal Government and its mercenaries had condemned the Southern people to death by starvation. Those condemned to this fate were the women and children, the elderly, the sick and wounded war veterans.[xxvii] The worst atrocity of the war in American history was the infamous order #11 that Union Generals Schofield and Ewing carried out in Missouri in 1863. Five counties in Southwest Missouri were thoroughly looted, ransacked and burned by Union soldiers and bands of criminal brigands from Kansas, known as Redlegs and Jayhawkers. This terrible order was issued and carried out in retaliation for Quantrill’s audacious raid on Lawrence, Kansas in August, 1863 in which his guerrillas repaid the Kansans eye for eye, life for life, for the 200 or so Missouri farmers robbed and murdered by the Redlegs, in months prior to the raid. Hundreds of soldiers and Abolitionists were killed in Lawrence and on their retreat back into Missouri. The federal response was order #11 which devastated these five Missouri counties, causing the deaths of hundreds of Missouri non-combatants in no way connected with Quantrill. It would be decades before this part of the state would even partially recover. It would be called “the burnt district.” After the war, General Schofield would claim that the order came form Lincoln’s desk with his signature on it demanding it.
It is obvious, to most students of the campaigns of our Civil war, that President Lincoln preferred Union generals that used the utmost vigor and force in their conduct of the war, over the Union generals, like George McClellan, who admired Lee and Jackson, and fought a reasonably humane war based on Christian principals. Lincoln had McClellan replaced, in spite of the fact that McClellan remained largely undefeated. General McClellan refused to endorse brutality towards the Southern civilian population. Lincoln replaced him with men who would.
Lincoln’ admirers to this day have implied that he was ignorant of the crimes that Generals Butler, Ewing, Pope, Grant and Sherman were committing in the South and the border states. However, widespread publicity in Northern newspapers gave much coverage, jubilantly reporting the crimes of Lincoln’s armies against the Southern people. Lincoln could not claim ignorance. Collin Ballard’s book “The Military Genius of Abraham Lincoln” establishes the fact that Northern military strategy was determined and laid down by the President. Lincoln’s generals only efficiently applied Lincoln’s military policy in their campaigns. They did what they were ordered by Lincoln to do.
Union general John Pope, in July 1863, would issue four general orders instructing his army in Virginia to subsist upon the country, living on the stolen food of the Virginian population to sustain his army’s needs. Pope had Virginian Farmers shot because their farms were in his troops field of fire. All Virginian towns and villages in his army’s line of march were placed under contribution and were heavily fined and punished whenever any acts of sabotage were committed by unknown guerrillas. General Adolf von Steinwehr seized many civilian hostages, to be executed if any of his men were killed by guerrillas. Pope’s conduct was so bad, General McClellen denounced him as a brute.[xxviii]
General William T. Sherman never won a battle against an enemy of equal strength. His foe’s strategy and abilities were always better than his. At the battle of Kennasw Mt. in Georgia, his army was shot to pieces in a suicidal mass charge against a strong, fortified Confederate position. Sherman would avoid battle with the Confederate army from that point on. Sherman would use, on Lincoln’s orders, the locust strategy, a scorched earth policy, always used by those who are unsuccessful in battle. It was not until Sherman employed his locust strategy that the North won the victory. Sherman declared “We are not fighting against enemy armies, but against an enemy people, both young and old, rich and poor, and they must feel the iron hand of war in the same way as organized armies.”
In 1864, the city of Atlanta, Georgia Sherman had burned to the ground after its surrender. Over 90% of the city was destroyed, and while the fires were blazing, Sherman’s Massachusetts post band played “John Brown’s body” and opera selections in rejoicing. Sherman’s army called themselves bummers. In name they were soldiers, but actually they were 60,000 bandits who marched through Georgia and Carolina stealing all they could carry and destroying what they could not. His army confiscated 100 million dollar’s worth of grain and cattle, destroyed all the farming equipment, railroads, roads, seized all provisions and in his infamous march to the sea from Atlanta to Savannah created a charred, plundered path over 40 miles wide. The state never recovered until just before the outbreak of World War I some 50 years later. Sherman’s “wonderful success” stimulated other union generals to do the same. Sheridan, one of Grant’s calvary generals would do the same to Virginia’s Shenendoah Valley. Sheridan tried to outdo Sherman from whom his favorite quotation was “even the crows will have to bring their own food with them.”
These criminals openly, with President Lincoln’s approval waged war on a whole people and betrayed their honor as soldiers, in the pursuit of victory at all costs. Sherman, with no concern for families, would have over 2,000 Georgian women and children dragged away from their homes and families and shipped North. They arrived in destitute condition, and were then hired out as no more than White slaves for Yankee merchants, at a price low enough to barely keep them alive. Nearly all of them would never be heard from again. In the Georgian town of Roswell some 400 women and children were kept in the town’s open square for nearly a week in the heat and dust, tormented by drunken guards. All of the factory workers of New Manchester were arrested and sent North, none of them ever to return. The town ceased to exist.[xxix] Death, destruction, rape, and starvation was Mr. Lincoln’s legacy to the South. There is no way of knowing the actual death count among southern non-combatants, but it was high particularly from starvation and disease. Sherman declared he would make Georgia howl, and he succeeded. South Carolina’s fate would be no different. Sherman could have made all the plunderers in history blush with shame, at least until the Red Army’s rape and plunder of Eastern Germany in 1945.
In 1864 Lincoln chose Ulysses (Useless) S. Grant to be the general in command of all the Union armies. One of the reasons for this choice was because Grant was also in favor of total war and unconditional surrender, regardless of the cost in human lives. He would become known as “unlimited slaughter” Grant by even his own men. In the spring and summer of 1864, Grant would order one mass assault after anther against Robert E. Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia. Grant’s losses of over 55,000 men, from the wilderness, Spotsylvania, and Cold Harbor, were equal in number to the number of men Lee had in his army at the beginning of the campaign. His assault on Cold Harbor, on June 3rd, sickened the North. Some 7,000 men would be killed from his army within 30 minutes, on an assault against General Lees’ perfectly constructed killing ground.
Many of Grant’s soldiers pinned addresses of their next of kin, as most of them knew they were about to be slaughtered. In less than 10 minutes one federal brigade after another had been destroyed, their men falling in heaps, the ground covered black with the dead. The thousands of Union wounded, lying between the lines were left unattended. General Lee contacted Grant in an attempt to rescue the Union wounded, but Grant refused. The survivors of the charge watched for days as the wounded moaned and expired, some of them cutting their own throats to end their suffering.[xxx] On the battlefield most of their bodies remained, as Grant had no time for burials, even of his own men. Pictures exist of their skeletons on the battle fields even years after the war.
Grant, like Sherman and other federal commanders with no regard for human life, would never lead in person any of the suicidal charges they would order. Grant always remained in the rear with the beer, or in his case whiskey, on which he was usually intoxicated. Southern generals, by comparison, usually led their men forward into battle, which resulted in their high casualty rate. Generals like Sherman and Grant were the type of field commanders Lincoln preferred. They were forgiven for their defeats, as long as they continued to order costly frontal assaults on their foes in order to gradually wear them down, or continued to wage a scorched earth policy against Southern civilians.
Lincoln and his generals implemented an inhumane, anti-Christian policy of total warfare and unconditional surrender that western armies have used to this day. The brutal treatment of P.O.W.’s and non-combatants has become standard operating procedure for federal mercenaries in the service of the anti-Christ Jew. Had the Southerners invaded, looted and burned the cities of the North, especially abolitionist New England and Washington, D.C., the federal armies would have acted differently in their treatment of the Southern people. Tyrants and war criminals respect only one thing: brute force and massive retaliation. We are commanded to reward them double for their evil deeds by the Word of God.[xxxi]
A good example of how retaliation can end atrocities is how the rape of South Carolina women in 1864 by Sherman and Kilpatrick’s bummers was stopped by the Confederate army. Some of the Confederate General Wheeler’s men had come upon a mother, out of her mind with grief, beside the dead body of her daughter, who had been bound and gang raped to death by a group of Yankee foragers. Other rapes and murders in the area by federal troops had also been discovered. Wheeler’s men took immediate action and quickly tracked and overtook the raiders, killed them, cut their throats and left their bodies along the road with the sign; these are the seven. Almost daily other union soldiers’ bodies, with slashed throats and signs would be left in plain sight for their comrades to find. General Slocum found the bodies of 21 of his men in a ravine. Eighteen of General Kilpatrick’s men were found dead with the sign; death to all foragers, draped around their necks.
After exchanging threats of executing prisoners back and forth between each other, the federal command began to discipline their men better. The rapes stopped, as did the execution of Sherman’s men.[xxxii] By showing common courtesy and respect for the lives and property of Southern non-combatants, federal policy might have succeeded in swaying the people’s sympathies to the Union’s cause. Instead, Southerners were regarded as having no rights at all, and federal troops acted as if they were in a foreign land for the sole purpose of pillage and destruction. In the last year of the war, such total destruction became the Federal Government’s sanctioned official policy, agreed upon by Lincoln, Stanton, Seward, and Grant. They gloated with macabre satisfaction as one-quarter of their own country was devastated and destroyed by Grant, Sherman, Sheridan, and the Kansas Jayhawker’s psychopath Charles Jennison.
1864 was a re-election year; and Lincoln desired to continue as the President, though all his friends warned him he couldn’t be re-elected. By 1864, the people in the North were tired of the war. They were tired of the relentless slaughter in Lincoln’s never ending war. Lincoln was hated by nearly everyone, North and South. His many blunders and moronic moves the people could not forget. His fellow Republicans told him he couldn’t win. The Democrats had nominated General George B. McClellan as their presidential candidate, and their platform called for peace and an end to Lincoln’s tyranny. They promised an end to martial law and the restoration of the people’s liberties. Believe it or not, there was a time in this country when the Democratic party stood for liberty, decency, and for rights for the White man, unlike the party today. Today the Democratic party is a party of war and treason, and rights only for minorities. They, like the Republicans, couldn’t care less about the welfare and preservation of the White Race in this country.
Had the election been held before Atlanta’s fall to Sherman in September, Lincoln would not have won re-election. But hysteria over Sherman’s triumph in Georgia swept the North. Lincoln began to look good to the Northerners’ once again. It was the votes of his soldiers in the field, intoxicated with victory for the first time in the war that won Lincoln his re-election. That, and the fact that the democratic voters in the field in the Union army from some states weren’t allowed to vote. In the border states, Lincoln had the army drive democrats away from the voting booths at bayonet point, and many were jailed. His black republican party had stolen the 1864 election, thanks to the union army. The soldiers of Lincoln’s army, after years of being slaughtered, should have hated him the most. Their opportunity to remove this war monger was missed and as a reward, Lincoln would continue to send them to their deaths by the thousands.
Mrs. Lydia P. Bixby, who had lost five sons, all killed while serving in the Union Army, received a letter from President Lincoln in 1864, expressing his condolences. Much publicity was given this letter in the North by his admirers. The hypocrisy of Lincoln’s letter to Mrs. Bixby is this. At the same time Lincoln was sending thousands of Mother’s sons to their deaths in the South, his own son Robert, 22, was kept from combat and far from harm throughout most of the war at college in Massachusetts.
In January 1865, the boy finally did go into the army. Lincoln had sent a telegram to General Grant telling him to keep his son out of the soldiers ranks and to give him a job on his staff. The boy would serve four months and would leave the army as a captain. Lincoln would receive many letters during the war from mothers begging him to exempt their only or youngest sons from service, letters he ignored.[xxxiii] But when it came to his own son risking his life to fight the abolitionist cause, well, that was another matter. Franklin D. Roosevelt would later protect his son from the horrors of combat in the Pacific during World War II. Such was not the case in the Confederacy; Robert E. Lee’s three sons all served in the army, with two of them being captured. Nathan Bedford Forrest had one of his younger brothers, whom he’d raised as a son, killed inaction, dying in his arms. Abraham Lincoln’s hypocrisy knew no bounds.
When General Grant had Jewish speculators and carpet-baggers coat-tailing his army and looting in the wake of his army’s passage through Tennessee expelled from the state, Lincoln went ballistic. Grant received a strong rebuke and the deportations were halted. In Mr. Lincoln’s way of thinking, only White Aryans could be uprooted and deported. Mr. Lincoln had many Jewish friends and advisors, and his presidential clout constantly came to the rescue of many Jews caught in hot spots during the war.[xxxiv]
Finally, Mr. Lincoln’s war came to an end with Lee’s surrender in April 1865. The cost of the war to the American people was enormous, with over 600,000 dead and some 400,000 wounded, for the military alone. Many thousands of civilians in the South had been killed as well. Tens of thousands in Missouri alone. Lincoln, by this time was the most hated man in the nation, in spite of victory. People would cross the street to avoid him wherever he walked in Washington. Of the twelve couples invited to the theater by the Lincoln on the last day of his life, only one couple accepted. Lincoln was possibly the most hated president to ever live in the White House. Several attempts on his life were made during the war. He was shot at near his home from the woods in August 1862. A bomb left in his room came close to getting him. The rails were sabotaged on another occasion to wreck the train he was on and kill him. He had received over 10,000 death threats by mail.[xxxv]
When John Wilkes Booth finally succeeded in killing Lincoln at the theater in April 1865 for what Booth considered justifiable homicide for treason and war crimes, the evil spirit that controlled Lincoln was finally laid to rest. However, as you have read from the previous pages, the truth about John Wilks Booth and Lincoln’s assassination is very different. Within 12 hours, the most hated man in America would become, in the North, a saint and a martyr. His crimes, his tyranny, and his Presidential record of mistakes and blunders would be forgotten (which is exactly what the Jewish Sanhedrin - The Learned Elders of Zion wanted). Rising to the surface would come what we have with us today. The Lincoln cult, a politically correct, historically incorrect, cult of personality. For the people of the South, Lincoln’ reign of terror would continue. Some twelve long years of reconstruction hell was in store for them, twelve years many Southerners would remember as worse than the war itself. It would be a time of high taxes, confiscation of land, nigger lawlessness and starvation.
Lincoln’s Legacy: Mongrel Worship
Abraham Lincoln would be but the first of many mongrel icons the American people would come to worship as a god. Another war mongering mongrel tyrant, re-elected three times by his victims, would get 350,000 Americans and millions of Europeans killed in another of Jewry’s eternal Christian blood baths. America today, in 1997, has no end to mongrel worship, as the land is filled with them.
Since the end of World War II the adoration of mongrels has become the national pastime. The millions of black slaves Lincoln freed produced tens of millions of worthless mongrel offspring. These depraved half-human, half-beast creatures can do nothing good. They can only do evil. From the adoration of the mongrel General Colin Powell, whom the conservatives want to run for President, to the adoration of the mongrel child molester Michael Jackson, our youth have been programmed to adore them, and accept them as our authorities on everything. Mongrel talk show hosts, like the half-Jew Geraldo, Oprah (Ape-rah - also a Jew), Montel Williams and Larry King (Jew) hold millions of White Americans spellbound with a constant barrage of racially mixed couples, queers and noisy niggers babbling and arguing back and forth. Enough has been said about the mongrel killer O.J. Chimpson to make one puke.
It would appear that everyone idolizes the mongrel nigger sports heroes they see on T.V. They all adore mongrels like Keanu Reevs, Paula Abdul, Whitney Houston and Mariah Carey. They can’t even tell by appearance that they are mongrels and not pure White. White married couples are adopting mongrel children by the millions, as Isaiah 2:6 prophesies that they would, kindling God’s wrath against them.
The prophet Ezra in 2 Esdras 6:55-58 declares the earth’s mongrel peoples to be no better than spit in God’s sight, nations which count for nothing. This should be the sentiments of all White Aryans as well, as Pastor Herrell points out in numerous, accurately translated scriptures in his “Hidden and Forbidden Truth.” Pastor Herrell can demonstrate from the Greek, that there is nothing more abominable or worthless in God’s eyes than that which he did not create: they hybrid mongrels of the earth, and his White Aryan people’s worship of them and adopting their ways and customs. The mongrelized minds of Elvis Presley and the Beatles (all Jews), who taught our children to love nigger jungle music, have answered the Pythagorean musical call that has led to mass mongrelization among three generations of White, Aryan children. This is the result of their adopting the ways of the mongrel heathen in our midst.
It all began nationally with the worship of the mongrel tyrant, Abraham Lincoln, and the acceptance in the North of the delusion and treason of his abolitionist Republican party, called by many of his day the mongrel party. God created White men superior and Negroes inferior, and therefore all the efforts of the past century and a half to abolish His work and enforce racial equality with Negroes-every law violated, very state constitution overthrown, every White life sacrificed, every dollar wasted, are but so many steps towards national suicide. Our march towards mongrelism, if not reversed by national repentance, will result in a bloodier war than ever Lincoln’s war. We face a terrible race war that will dwarf the horrors of Haiti’s race war into but a street brawl.
Before the outbreak of Lincoln’s war, it was the Virginian slave owners, not the abolitionists, who knew the Negro to be a beast with an animal’s nature, from centuries of first hand experience. The abolitionists knew only Jewish and Masonic propaganda.
And so, as the scriptures and the Southern slave owners had predicted, a race of wild beasts were let loose among us. Since the end of World War II, and the establishment of the civil rights movement, many tens of thousands of White Aryans have been savagely murdered by the mongrel beasts loose among us. Millions of our women have been raped, our children murdered and terrorized, raped and robbed in the niggerized public schools. Our cities have become war zones and shooting galleries. Drive by shootings by numerous mongrel gangs have made even a walk to the grocery store by elderly Whites a life-threatening experience.
Mongrelization among young White girls in integrated schools is at an all time high. Our books, T.V., shows, movies all present a false image of black mongrel beasts as smarter and superior to Whites in every way. The joys of race-mixing is presented to our youth as the right thing to do, rather than the living death it is in reality. A while generation of unborn White children, some 25 million, have been murdered in their mother’s wombs in abortion death clinics. Many elderly Whites in integrated neighborhoods, seeing nothing but young mongrels, sincerely miss these aborted word-be White children today. This is the legacy to America, left by Abraham Lincoln and the Abolitionist Republican party.
In Illinois, one cannot go very far without seeing Mr. Lincoln’s ugly image on road signs, monuments, motels, or banks. Everything here is called Lincoln this, or Lincoln that, even the state itself is referred to as “Lincoln land.” Mr. Lincoln has become the god of Illinois. To try and tell others there of the real Lincoln and his murderous record, is to find yourself in a fist fight quick. The state may as well call itself Satan land. For that is what Abe Lincoln truly was: a living, breathing, two-legged flesh and blood devil, hell-bent on destroying White civilization and White rights on this continent.
Adolf Hitler once said “the stupidest people in the world live in America.” He was absolutely correct in this. We would like to bring Hitler’s statement on Americans one step further in saying that the “stupidest people in America live in Illinois,” in their worship of mongrel tyrant Lincoln. The people of this state, as well as the rest of the country, have an acute lack of historical sense in the face of abundant evidence to the contrary on Mr. Lincoln’s real record. All White Americans know of Sherman’s infamous march to the sea, and many know of Ewing’s order #11 in Missouri. These atrocities are blood smears and war crimes time can never erase. America has no excuse for our Lincoln worship.
Lincoln’s Rightful Place
In American History
Lincoln’s rightful place in American history should be as the first of a long line of liberal presidential race traitors who put special interest groups (mongrels) and their interests above the welfare of the White Christian people this country was built by and for. He advanced the country towards big government and the monstrous federal bureaucracy we now have, which is a thousand times worse than the tyranny of King George III’s day.
Lincoln advanced the country towards the radical left and towards the mongrelized Talmudic ideas of Karl Marx and Jewish bolshevism. He advanced the rise of the railroads, the corporations, monopolies and the usury banks and their love of money above any concern for exploited White Aryans. Mr. Lincoln advanced the country towards international war mongering and meddling in the affairs of other nations. One foreign war after another has been the result, with mountains of White corpses and rivers of White blood shed for the most ridiculous reasons, not in the national interest.
Lincoln’s destruction of the South and the hundreds of thousands slaughtered by his orders cannot ever be excused or forgiven. His was a war of robbery, murder and incarceration on such a scale as to boggle the mind. His war was the first of the series of American wars waged without pity or mercy on helpless non-combatants and prisoners of war, the total warfare Franklin Roosevelt would perfect in his air blitz of German cities, and Eisenhower would wage after a war to murder a million helpless German P.O.W.’s.
Since Lincoln’s presidential election, three nations; the American South, South Africa, and Germany, have been treated by the Jewish-Masonic establishment as rebel nations to be despised and black-listed as evil threats to the International Usury cartel. Every effort, every lie imaginable, has been made to denigrate their institutions, their heroes, and their accomplishments. The Lincoln administration started this trend with its pro-federal government media, hostile to the truth.
Lincoln’s war emptied the country of White Aryan men. The void was filled after the war by Jews, Orientals, Sicilians and all the mongrel dregs of Southern Europe, Asia and Mexico, not to mention the population explosion of our savage congoid people. We Aryans are now at a point in time where we are fast becoming a minority in our own land. Life in America has become a gradual hell on earth for White people. The niggers and other 3rd world mongrels have destroyed their countries, and are now in the process of destroying ours. Their goal is nothing less than the conquest and final destruction of the entire White race. Our children’s future will be the living hell of any 3rd world hell hole: the living death of mongrelization.
Mr. Lincoln and his abolitionist administrators are the authors of all this. They do not deserve the praise and adoration White America currently gives them. They deserve our everlasting hatred and contempt for their evil deeds. The Bible tells us to judge a man by his fruits[xxxvi] and that good fruit cannot come from a corrupt tree.[xxxvii] Abraham Lincoln’s fruits were evil because his family tree, being mongrelized, was evil.
It should come as no surprise that Mr. Lincoln is the darling of the American left. Communist American mercenaries serving in the murderous international brigades in Spain in the late 1930s were appropriately called the “Abraham Lincoln Brigade.” What is surprising is that the Lincoln myth was bought hook, line and sinker by conservative Americans, and even those who profess to be of the American far right. They of all people should know better. Our goal in writing this study is to topple the false image of Lincoln from the minds of the elect, and to expose him as the anti-Christ Jewish mongrel dictator he really was. His ugly image will eventually be removed form our monuments, our money and Mt. Rushmore, and eventually be assigned to its rightful place; at the bottom of urinals and bedpans, and on spittoons and dartboards. The majority of Americans will always be a part of the Lincoln cult. They are the dead living on borrowed time. For them there is no hope for the future. Death in a bloody race war, like the foolish White mongrelizers in Haiti had experienced, will be their reward. The elect of God in the White wing movement must know the truth, for it is only the truth that will set them free.
Our repulsive idols of ignorance and superstitions must come down. Our Caesar worship of anti-Christ tyrants must cease before God will answer our prayers and heal this land. A long journey towards national rejuvenation begins with the first step. Let acceptance of the truth about the mass-murdering war criminal Abraham Lincoln be this first step in cleansing the national temple of the idolatry of mongrel worship. Once Lincoln’s mongrel image is shattered, the others will soon follow.
Taylorville, Illinois Breeze-Courier
The following article is from the Taylorville, Illinois Breeze-Courier, February 13, 1994:
Abraham Lincoln Just fell out into our laps; yet, while sorting through things of importance to us, came across an item from the editorial page of the Wall Street Journal from February 11, 1988 in which was a contribution from Thomas Keiser, who then at least, was a professor and Lincoln Scholar at Lincoln Memorial University at Harrogate, Tennessee. He quoted a number of Lincoln scholars like J.F. Randall, David Donald, Thomas A. Bailey, Michael Davis and a couple of unnamed foreign journalists. But we have perhaps referred to this item once, in brief perhaps, but let’s recite all of the bad things that were said of Lincoln that come out of this treatment by Keiser. This is the 185th anniversary of Abe’s birth: and he has been called the following:
“Baboon” - “Gorilla” - “Illinois beast” - “Original gorilla” - “Imbecility” - “You cannot fill his empty skull with brains”
“Political coward” - “timid and ignorant” - “Pitiable” - “Too slow” - “No education” - “Shattered, dazed, utterly foolish”
“An awful ass” - “Blackguard” - “Craftiest and most dishonest politician that ever disgraced an office in America”“filthy story-teller” - “Half-witted usurper” - “Head ghoul at Washington” - “Mole-eyed monster with a soul of leather” - “Abraham Africanus I” - Obscene clown” - “orangutan” - “Present turtle at the head of government” - “slang-wanging stump speaker” - “unmentionable diseased” - “Wooden-head at Washington” - “He was a drunk” - “It is rumored that Lincoln has been drunk for three days” - “Cross between a Sandhill crane and an Andalusian jackass” - “Lincolnpops” were Union soldiers - “Frankenstein’s-thirst for war- not yet been quenched by the blood of a few thousand of his countrymen”
“Degenerate” - “Lincoln’s tyranny” - “The North; a huge prison from Iowa to New York” - “American Bastille” created by Lincoln - “A secret police, nightly arrests, without cause assigned” - Incarnation of ferocity” - “Presidential adder”“As arbitrary, as despotic, and as unscrupulous as the most absolute despot” - “He was as bad as the pope” and in Protestant England that was meant to be a real blasting.
And finally to add the finishing touch, “Just before the 1864 election, a patriotic LaCrosse, Wisconsin journalist said that if Lincoln were re-elected; we hope that a bold hand will be found to plunge the dagger into the Tyrant’s heart for the public’s welfare.” That speaks so well for some of the most totally deprived minds in all of our national history of course, excepting present day competition many of whom had public office, high office, the highest of office.
Bibliography And Suggested Reading
War for What?, by Francis W. Springer, Nashville: Bill Coats, Ltd., 1990; The De Facto Government of The United States, by Charles Weisman, Burnsville, MN; Weisman Publications, 1991; Abraham Lincoln, The Man, The Myth, by Rev. Jerry L. West, South Carolina: Oil of Gladness Ministries. Other suggested reading: Point Lookout Prison Camp for Confederates, by Edwin W. Point, Leonard, Maryland: St. Mary’s County Historical Society, 1983; Sherman’s March, by Burke Davis, New York: Vintage Books, 1980; Shattering the Icon of Abraham Lincoln, by Sam Dickson, The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. V, No. 3, Fall 1986, Institute for Historical Review, P.O. Box 1306, Torrance, CA 90505; Lincoln the Illuminate, On Being The Insanity of the Man, by Faustus, Smithtown, NY; Exposition Press, Inc., 1984; Genetic Disorders Among The Jewish People, by Richard Goodman, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1979; American Bastille: A history of illegal arrests and imprisonments of American citizens during the late Civil War, by Thomas Hartley, Philadelphia, 1877; Vigilantes of Christendom, by Richard Kelly Hoskins, Lynchburg, VA: The Virginia Publishing Co., 1990; The South Was Right, by James R. Kennedy, and Walter D. Kennedy, Baton Rouge: Land and Laznd Publications Division, 1991; Lincoln the Man, by Edgar Lee Masters, Dodd, Mead and Co., 1931; The Real Lincoln, by Charles L.C. Miknor, Everett Waddely Co., 1904; The Curse of Canaan, by Eustace Mullins, Staunton, VA: Revelation Books, 1987; Southern History of the War, by Edward A. Pollard, New York: C.B. Richardson, 1866; The Lost Cause, by Edward A. Pollard, New York: Treat and Co., Publishers, 1867; The Institutes of Biblical Law, by Rousas J. Rushdoony, The Craig Press, 1973.
Lyndle J. Gharst is regarded by many as the quintessential American patriot, an ex-Marine with no illusions about the Jewish socialization of America. There are few who are informed that would challenge the meticulous research of Mr. Gharst. His writings are informative, hard-hitting, and straight to the point. Mr. Gharst is no newcomer to the White Wing movement across America. His activities span more than twenty years at the present. He is an astute Christian thinker and self-taught historian.
If you have found “King Lincoln’s Reign of Terror” an informative and learning experience. You will not want to miss adding to your reading pleasure Mr. Gharst’s other booklet entitled “Quantrill’s Black Flag Brigade: The True Killer Angels. It is perhaps an understatement to say that no American patriot’s library is complete without the historical writings of Mr. Lyndle J. Gharst. You may order additional copies of Mr. Gharst’s work directly from the publisher at:
Lincoln's Spectacular Lie
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 07:38:06 ‑0800
"hengist" <[email protected]>
Lincoln’s Spectacular Lie
by Thomas J. DiLorenzo
The cornerstone of the Lincoln Legend is a spectacular lie. As eloquently stated by
former syndicated columnist James J. Kilpatrick in his 1957 book, The Sovereign
States: "The delusion that sovereignty is vested in the whole people of the United States
is one of the strangest misconceptions of our public life" (p. 15). Lincoln espoused this
fable in order to make the preposterous argument that no such thing as state sovereignty
ever existed; the states were never at any time free and independent of the federal
government; they did not in fact create the federal government by ratifying the
Constitution; and that, therefore, no group of citizens could ever secede from the federal
As Emory University philosopher Donald Livingston has said, this is not only a lie, but a
spectacular lie. It is still widely believed, however, thanks in part to the efforts of such
propagandists as Harry Jaffa and his fellow Lincoln cultists at the Claremont Institute, the
Declaration Foundation, and other state‑worshipping propaganda mills.
Lincoln claimed that the federal government was really created by the Declaration of
Independence, not the Constitution, despite the fact that the former document does not
have the legal authority that the Constitution has. But the Declaration itself is an
expression of state sovereignty, a fact which contradicts Lincoln’s whole thesis. The
concluding paragraph declares to the world that the colonists were seceding from the
British Empire as citizens of the free and independent American states, not as the
people as a whole. "These colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent
States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown . . . and that as
Free and Independent States, they have full power to levy War, conclude Peace,
contract Alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which
Independent States may of right do."
When the Revolution ended the King of England entered into a peace treaty not with
"the United States" or "the people as a whole" but with the individual states. (In my May
2002 Independent Institute debate with Harry Jaffa he made quite the buffoon of himself
by angrily denying this plain historical fact). Article 1 of the Treaty with Great Britain
His Britannic Majesty acknowledges the said United States, vis, New
Hampshire, Massachusetts Bay, Rhode Island, and Providence
Plantations, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania,
Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and
Georgia to be free, sovereign and independent States; that he treats with
them as such, and for himself, his heirs and successors, Relinquishes all
claims to the Government, proprietary and territorial rights of The same,
and every part thereof.
When the sovereign states created a federal government as their agent with the Articles
of Confederation they made a point of maintaining their independent status. As defined in
Article 1, Section II: "Each State retains its sovereignty, freedom and independence, and
every power, jurisdiction and right, which is not by this confederation expressly
delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled."
It is important to note that certain powers were delegated to the federal government but
not abandoned. Sovereignty always rested in the citizens of the free and independent
Although the state delegations that adopted the Articles hoped that the Union created by
them would be perpetual, they seceded from the Articles after just six years and
dropped the phrase "perpetual Union" from the new Constitution.
Apologists for centralized governmental power dishonestly dwell on the preamble of the
Constitution which reads, "We the People of the United States, in order to form a more
perfect Union . . ." They do this in order to argue that the government formed by the
Constitution was created by "the whole people" and not the sovereign states. But the
reason why the states were not listed individually in the Preamble is that when it was
written it was not known which states would ratify the Constitution. Thus, it was left as a
generalized "We the People . . ." It is nothing more than a semantic artifact.
No less a figure than James Madison, the Father of the Constitution, explained in
Federalist 39 that the Constitution was to be ratified by the people "not as individuals
composing one entire nation, but as composing the distinct and independent States
to which they respectively belong" (emphasis added). He also stated that the federal
government gets all of its authority from the sovereign states and not the "whole people."
The "whole people" who resided in the states stretching from Maine to Georgia at the
time had nothing at all to do with the ratification of the Constitution. It was ratified by
state political conventions (not state legislatures). Madison continued on to say that each
state ratifying the Constitution "is considered as a sovereign body, independent of all
others, and only to be bound by its own voluntary act."
Virginia, New York and Rhode Island specifically reserved the right to withdraw from
the Union if it ever became "destructive of our liberties." (This is another plain historical
fact that the delusional Jaffa angrily denied during my debate with him). Here’s what the
Virginia delegation to the Constitutional Convention put in writing:
We the delegates of the people of Virginia . . . Do, in the name and behalf
of the people of Virginia, declare and make known that the powers granted
under the Constitution being derived from the people of the United States
may be resumed by them whensoever the same shall be perverted to their
injury or oppression, and that every power not granted thereby remains
with them at their will . . .
New York and Rhode Island made almost identical statements as conditions of ratifying
The phrase "united States" is always in the plural in the Constitution, signifying not one
consolidated government but that the independent and sovereign states were united in
forming the federal government as their agent with only narrowly defined, delegated
The president is not elected by "the whole people" according to the Constitution but by
an electoral college that consists of appointees from each state, chosen by the state
Nor may any new state be formed "within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any
State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, without the
Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as Congress." (Lincoln
clearly ignored this when he orchestrated the secession of Western Virginia from
Virginia). Amending the Constitution still requires ratification by three‑fourths of the
states, not the "whole people."
Thus, all three of these founding documents – the Declaration of Independence, Articles
of Confederation, and the Constitution – declare the states to be free and independent.
Sovereignty lies in the citizens of the free and independent states, not the people as a
whole. The founders feared mass democracy and sought to strictly limit its domain. It is
patently absurd to argue that the government they created was meant to be a mass
democracy of "the whole people."
Lincoln’s theory of the non‑existence of state sovereignty never came to be accepted by
the strength of the argument, for the argument has no strength and no factual basis.
Instead, he waged the bloodiest war in world history up to that point to "prove" himself
The myth serves the purpose of making sure that the American
people can never regain true sovereignty over their government. It
should not be surprising to anyone that the modern‑day
neoconservative propagandists who perpetuate this myth are all
advocates of an even more activist, centralized state (in pursuit of
"national greatness," they say). Their latest crusade involves
invoking the sainted Lincoln, time and again, to urge President
Bush to invade and occupy much of the Middle East. They are
advocates of national power, an imperial worldwide empire, and
unlimited democracy. They are the enemies of limited, constitutional government
although they cynically invoke the founding fathers in much of their propaganda. These
are people whose entire careers are based on the perpetuation of a spectacular lie,
which is why they become so apoplectic whenever anyone threatens to expose the real
Lincoln to the American public.
February 25, 2003
Thomas J. DiLorenzo [send him mail] is the author of the
LRC #1 bestseller, The Real Lincoln: A New Look at
Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War
(Forum/Random House, 2002) and professor of economics
at Loyola College in Maryland.
Copyright © 2003 LewRockwell.com
Thomas DiLorenzo Archives
Really Learn About the Real Lincoln
Now there is a study guide and video to accompany Professor
DiLorenzo's great work, for homeschoolers and indeed anyone
interested in real American history.
Herrell Brothers Publishing House
P.O. Box 130
Kodak, Tennessee 37764-0130
If you happen to be in Australia, Mr. Gharst’s works are carried by:
Australian Separatist Evangelical Committee
P.O. Box 385
Gymea 2227, NSW Australia
[i]. The Real Lincoln.
[ii]. De Facto Government of the United States, by Charles A. Weisman.
[iii]. Vigilantes of Christendom, by Richard Kelly Hoskins.
[iv]. Pandora's Box, by Alex Christopher, pp. 282-286.
[v]. Was Abraham Lincoln a Spiritualist? By N.C. Maynard.
[vi]. Lincoln the Illuminate, by Faustus.
[vii]. Leviticus 19:31.
[viii]. Deuteronomy 18:2.
[ix]. The Institutes of Biblical Law, by Rousas J. Rushdoony.
[x]. The Curse of Canaan, by Eustice Mullins.
[xi]. Lincoln the Illuminate: on being the insanity of the man, by Faustus.
[xii]. Lincoln the Illuminate: on being the insanity of the man, by Faustus.
[xiii]. Lincoln the Illuminate: on being the Insanity of the man, by Faustus.
[xiv]. Curse of Canaan, by Eustice Mullins.
[xv]. Lincoln the Man, by Edgar Lee Master, 1931.
[xvi]. Reflections of Abraham Lincoln, by Ward H. Lamon.
[xvii]. Lincoln’s Works I, p. 228.
[xviii]. Lincoln-The Prairie Years, Vol. 2, Carl Sandburg.
[xix]. Shattering the Icon of Abraham Lincoln, IHR Journal, 1986.
[xx]. Lincoln the Illuminate, by Faustus.
[xxi]. Lincoln The Man, by Edgar Lee Masters.
[xxii]. Exodus 23:2.
[xxiii]. The De Facto Government of the United States, by Charles Weisman.
[xxiv].Ex porte Millian, 4 Wallace (71 U.S.) 2, 124-126 (1866); The De Facto Government of the United States, by Charles Weisman.
[xxv]. Point Lookout Prison Camp for Confederates, by Edwin W. Beitzell.
[xxvi]. Southern History of the War, by E. Pollard.
[xxvii]. The Lost Cause, 1867 and Southern History of the War, both by E. Pollard, 1866.
[xxviii]. Shattering the Icon of Abraham Lincoln, IHR Journal, 1986.
[xxix]. The South Was Right, by James R. Kennedy.
[xxx]. Bloody Roads South, by N.A. Trudeau, 1989, Ballantine Books, NY.
[xxxi]. Revelation 18:6-7; Jeremiah 50:5.
[xxxii]. Sherman’s March, by Burke Davis. Vantage Books, NY 1980.
[xxxiii]. Shattering the Icon of Abraham Lincoln, IHR Journal, 1986.
[xxxiv]. Abraham Lincoln: The Man, The Myth, by Rev. Jerry L. West.
[xxxv]. Vigilantes of Christendom, by Richard K. Hoskins.
[xxxvi]. Matthew 7:16-20.
[xxxvii]. Luke 6:43.