Search_Willie_Martin_Studies

                                                                                 Chapter Five

                                                                     Is It Time For Judgment

Judgment has already begun at the house of God.

"For the time is come that judgment must begin at the house of God: and if it first begin at us, what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of God?"

The day of judgment is upon every Israelite Nation of the Western World, all of which now are suffering tremendous political, economic, moral, social, and religious problems. The clouds are gathering over the Western World, and America, in particular, is coming under increasing judgment as the hand of a righteous and sovereign God reaches to shake the Covenant Israelites. This judgment is intended to bring correction and repentance, not destruction. The promise of the Holy Scriptures [1] is that our own wickedness will correct Israel. The promise of Isaiah 26:9 is that when the judgments of God are in the earth, His people will learn righteousness.

We are now in the time of Jacob's trouble and this Divine chastisement will grow increasingly more intense as we move deeper into this period of national judgment a period which in the Divine master plan of God will bring all these nations to their Prophetic Fullness . Jeremiah 30:11 and 46:28 confirm that all of the nations of Israel will come to their full end during the time of Jacob's trouble. Jeremiah 30:11 assures us that the people will survive and endure, but the nations will not.

The Israelite nations are now in another captivity which will exceed both the Assyrian and Babylonian captivity. Future writers will describe Israel in America as the American captivity. We are in the day of judgment; the time of Jacob's Trouble is upon us, and the Israelite remnant with contrite hearts must seek the face of God and turn in obedience to His Covenant.

                                      God Is Speaking To America, But America Is Not Listening

God is speaking to America, the great nation of the Birthright promised to Joseph. But our nation is not listening. In January of 1986, the American spaceship Challenger exploded seconds after takeoff, and several subsequent space shots have failed. The multi‑racial crew aboard the Challenger was an attempt to glorify America as a fully integrated society, and God, who controls events in heaven and earth, recorded His displeasure by allowing the spaceship to be blown to pieces and sending all the crew members to a fiery death. The heavens still rule!

The West Coast area of America has been baking, quaking, and burning since the summer and fall of 1987. Earthquakes, floods, droughts, and violent weather patterns have increased in both frequency and intensity in America in recent years. But still America does not listen.

Leading candidates for the American Presidency have been brought to ruin by immoral acts which they personally committed and sanctioned. Giant television ministries have been brought to ruin as a righteous God is exposing the immorality and corruption of their leaders.

In September, the religious leader of the Roman Catholic Church incurred the wrath of God when he visited the United States. A bolt of lightning brought an end to the spectacular million dollar mass being celebrated by almost a million people in Miami, Florida.

The mass was placed in darkness and the voice of the Pope was silenced by this bolt of lighting and the subsequent storm. The preparations underway in San Antonio, Texas for celebration of the Roman Catholic Mass were struck a devastating blow when a fierce thunder storm toppled the altar and other preparations for an outdoor mass. Both the Protestant and Catholic factions of the church world have received warnings from the God of Heaven. God is speaking to America, but America is not listening.

The United States of America was birthed in a Covenant relationship with Jesus Christ. The birth of America in 1776 marked the beginning of the separate destiny of Israel in the birthright promise made to Jacob [2] ; as the singularly great nation, Manasseh would become a great people [3] . America represents the greatest nation making up the great land assigned to Joseph in Deuteronomy 33:13.

The American land of Manasseh represents the fulfillment, together with the nations of the British Empire in the role of Ephraim, of the promises made to Joseph. America is a covenant land, the land of Regathered Israel! When the Israelite people known as the Pilgrims and Puritans came to America along with other Israel settlers, they were planting the Birthright promise made to Joseph in the soil of this land. Most of the early colonial populations came from the birthright population of Joseph/Israel, then located in the British Isles.

From the beginning America was a nation under covenant status. Our political, economic, social, and religious institutions were stablished upon the foundations of the Bible. The character of the people was absolutely Christian, and Christian morality was the standard for this nation. The people of this land were in covenant relationship with Jesus Christ, and the trade, commerce, productivity and growth of this land prospered under the blessings of Almighty God.

From 1607 through the early years of the 19th century America was in right covenant relationship with Jesus Christ. Beginning at a point around 1850, this nation gradually turned from the Covenant Law of Jesus Christ and the Bible. Christian morality began to suffer and decline.

With the advent of the 20th century in 1900, both the character of the people and the institutions of this land became more and more secular and humanistic. America's entry into the first world war in 1917 marked the beginning of our present seventy year captivity and subsequent plunge into political, economic, moral, social, and religious darkness. The political, economic, industrial, and military apex of America was reached at the end of the Second World War in 1945. At that point, American political and military power dominated the world and dictated the geographical perimeters of the earth.

American industrial output exceeded that of the rest of the world. American agriculture out‑produced the rest of the world. American agriculture outproduced the rest of the nations on earth. The economic fortunes of America were the most coveted on earth, and the standard of living exceeded by far the best of all other nations on this planet.

Beginning at a time in 1914 with the advent of the First World War in Europe, followed by the Bolshevik Revolution in Christian Russia in 1917, a series of events brought about the political, military, social, economic, industrial, and religious transformation of this nation: American recognition of the Soviet Union in 1933, our entry into World War II in 1941 and the subsequent sellout of American politicians to the Soviet Union at the close of the Second World War, the loss of Eastern Europe to the Soviets, the fall of China in 1949, the Korean Police Action, 1950‑1953, the American military and industrial buildup of the Soviet Union from 1933 through to 1960, followed by the Vietnam War, 1961‑1973. The birthright nation of America in 1987 is an empty shell of its former glory and grandeur.

America is now into the seventieth year of captivity, beginning at the point of our entry into World War I in 1917. From that date forward America has been on steady and gradual political, economic, industrial, military, social, and spiritual decline. The glory cloud has lifted from this land. The Covenant blessings of Jesus Christ no longer shine upon us. The bountiful outpourings of Divine favor no longer bless this country. The sterling character and Bible‑centered mindset are not longer a part of the American vision. The American dreams of righteousness, peace, and prosperity have turned into a long nightmare of political instability, economic downturns, industrial collapse, military retreat, social chaos, and spiritual decline and death. The glory cloud has lifted from our land, and the clouds of Divine Judgment gather over our national heads, and has increased dramatically since our recognition of the Easu‑Canaanite‑Khazar Jew in Palestine with ever increasing fury and intensity.

The punishment of a righteous and jealous God is now upon America. The curses are upon our land and the judgment causeless has not come. We have become a proud, stiffnecked, and disobedient people and have turned from God and the righteous Laws of His Divine Covenant. We have worshipped other gods, we have discarded His Law, and we have followed vain idols, sought for vain riches, and polluted His Holy Word. We have broken Covenant with the God of our fathers, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob/Israel. We live in sin, and every imagination of man's heart is bent upon a betrayal of the Covenant which God established with our Christian fathers in the early history of America.

The curses now poured upon our land are only the preliminary round of Divine Judgment as the promises of Leviticus 26 and Deuteronomy 28 visit our people. These curses are intended to turn us in repentance to God, who commands obedience to His Law. The judgments upon us are legion, and no pen can describe them all. We are presently under an alien invasion, and the millions of non‑white, non‑Israelite people pouring into this country from Asia, Africa, India, Mexico, and the far corners of the non‑white third world stagger the mind.

In fulfillment of Leviticus 26 and Deuteronomy 28, our White Native Birthright population of Israelite people is being swallowed up in a sea of third world aliens. Soon, we native Americans will be living in our enemies land as foreign, alien swarms buy up our country.

The curse of heathen gods, heathen temples, and alien religions are rampant in America. Witchcraft, the occult, and the religions of demons and darkness are captivating the minds of our people. The curses of diseases and plagues cover our land. Millions are dying from the degenerative diseases promised in Leviticus 26 and Deuteronomy 28. One out of four Americans will contract cancer of some kind. The plague of Aids [Acquired Immoral Deadly Sin] threatens the very existence of the American people. Up to two million people may already be infected, and millions may die within five years.

Economically, our fortunes are tumbling into oblivion. America is the largest debtor nation in the world. We have lost our economic footing and are plunging into the depths of debt, recession, depression, inflation, and ultimately, total economic collapse! The standard of living in America is plunging, and millions face poverty.

The rust belt from the great lakes all the way through the industrial north‑Eastern United States bears testimony to the closed factories, the empty shipping yards, and the millions of unemployed people now dependent upon welfare doles. Timber, mining, and ranching in the Pacific Northwest are in decline, as is the textile industry of the Southeast.

The Agricultural farm belt in the Midwest is now in its seventh year of economic stagnation. The homeless, helpless, unemployed, and mistrained people are growing by the millions in mainstream America. We are under the curses of Leviticus and Deuteronomy. And yet our elected leaders tell us it is good when not everyone is working! And America believes this abominable lie.

The morality of the American people is sinking into the spiritual abyss. Sodomites [Queers] stalk our land by the millions, seeking the prey of our children. Sexual promiscuity is a way of life for the unmarried, and adultery is the standard for the married of our land. Miscegenation is a growing fad as tens of thousands of white girls become the proud wives of non‑white males and millions of mongrel children are born across the hinterland of America. We openly sanction the murder of the unborn in infanticide murder mills throughout our nation: murder is now legalized in America as abortion clinics put innocent unborn babies to death every hour. Crimes of violence, rape, murder, kidnapping, and sodomy are skyrocketing in our land. We have become an immoral people, and our thirst for sin is taking us to the bottomless pit of every vile perversion known to mankind.

Our civil servants [politicians] are scrambling night and day to destroy our country, while all the while pretending to be trying to hold it together. Our political future is so unsettled that no one seems to know what to do. In a nation of 240 million people, we cannot find any men of character and moral strength to run for public office.

We seek more and more to increase taxation to the working population to fund the ever increasing needs of the millions who are now dependent upon public welfare doles, and to support the anti‑Christ countries such as Russia and Israel. The red tape of government grows ever more as small business is strangled and chocked by regulations, paperwork, and higher and higher taxes. People are lined up for minimum wage jobs, and tens of thousands of college graduates are begging for jobs in this land.

Those people who are numbered in the remnant must enter into a time of repentance and remember rebellion is not the answer. The judgments upon our land have come because of our national disobedience to the Covenant Law of God. No amount of rebellion and resistance to civil authority is going to remove this "Yoke of Bondage" from our necks. We are under the punishment inflicted by a just and Holy God. We can resist this judgment in whatever form it may be coming upon us, but God will not bless our efforts, unless and until we turn completely to Him and the Lord Jesus Christ. We will continue to meet with increased suffering.

The time has come for the remnant to lead the way to national repentance in this land. God wants repentance, from His people. Because we have not repented, twenty years of tax rebellion in America produced the most sweeping income tax reform law in the history of this nation. Only Repentance will bring favor from God and reprieve from our bondage.

Like the Prodigal Son in Luke 15:18‑19, we must be willing to acknowledge our national sin and declare it to God. National repentance is the message for our Covenant People, and no other message will bring our people deliverance. Repentance will return us to God and bring about the restitution of His Law.

Christians are called to war against Satan, and the evil in this world. We are not to roll over and play dead with sin. We are to protest and fight sin at every opportunity. We are to Hate Evil and Love the Good. We are to expose sin and lift up our voice on high against it with all our might and strength. We need to put the protest back into the word Protestant and stand up for the truth and cause of Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ Himself told us in no uncertain terms, When we see the Enemy Coming to :

"He that hath no Sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one." [4]

Christians have a duty to not only witness against sin and to witness for Jesus Christ, but to Fight when necessary with all the strength and courage that God's People have always had, when God was on their side. The Holy Bible becomes the standard by which we are to war against Satan, sin and the world. We are not to love the world, but we are to wage warfare against evil. True Christian America is at war with Satan, with all that is anti‑Christian in this world, and with sin; wherever and whenever it appears.

     Pacifism Is A Religion of Cowards ! The Church must defend the faith, and uphold the Lord Jesus Christ, and that which belongs to God. When Caesar [government] invades God's jurisdiction, The People Who Are Called by His Name Must Draw Lines and Take up The Sword and Take a Stand: Even to the Giving up of one's Life!

Jesus said:

"...he that loseth his life for my sake shall find it." [5]

                                    There Can and Must be no Compromises and No Pacifism In

                              The Defense of The Faith and The Lord Jesus Christ, And His Laws

The Israelite remnant must stand in defense of the faith of Jesus Christ. Heresies blow in with every wind that stirs across our land. Thousands of people live by a mail box theology. Multitudes of Christians forge their doctrines from the latest delivery of mail.

Christians must remember that the faith and doctrines of True Christianity was forged on the anvil of intense faith, study, persecution, and tribulation by the first Apostles, the Apostolic Fathers, and the students of the Word in the first dawning of the Christian era. Beware of the multitude of doctrinal heresies which have invaded the churches of organized religion. As Israelites called to be Christians, we must walk in the faith of our Christian fathers; that faith is articulated in the early creeds of the Christian faith. Do not allow your children to be raised in doctrinal error, or they will not remain in the faith.

The single greatest priority of our lives should be to witness to the truth of the Lord Jesus Christ and the Gospel of His Kingdom to come here on Earth not in some far away heaven. As the Exodus from the Organized Church world continues and even well‑known television ministries fold, vast numbers of Israelites in America will be seeking the truth. [The failing of the TV ministries will be used by the anti‑Christs in Government to destroy the faithful and true churches of the Lord Jesus Christ if at all possible]. Jesus said of the days to come in the very near future:

"For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places...Then shall they deliver You [Christians] up to be afflicted [placed in jail, beaten and etc.], and Shall Kill You [Christians]: and ye [Christians] shall be hated of all nations [due to the propaganda of the anti‑Christs who own all the news media sources ‑ The Jews] for My [the Lord Jesus Christ] Name's [CHRISTian] Sake . And then shall many be Offended [the most outspoken enemies other than the anti‑Christs of today are the so‑called Christians who rail against those who would teach the Truth to our Israel people and are the ones who deny that truth the most], and shall Betray one another, and shall Hate one another. And many False Prophets shall Rise , and Shall Deceive Many . And Because Iniquity shall abound, the Love of many shall Wax Cold [these days are here now and things will get much worse because of our national unbelief and sins]." [6]

The political social and economic storm clouds now gathering over our national heads will bring us to a time of increasing trouble and tribulation. There will be a persecution against the True Christians . The Anti‑Christ forces are even now marshalling their tremendous power against all who stand for Christ in these, the last days. We live in the very close of the Western Christian Culture Cycle, and we dare not forget that the precarious times in which we live demand that we go forth with a vision and with the Banner of the Lord Jesus Christ held high.

With a national population of some 240 million people, and with more than one half of this number non‑white and another high percentage of mixed mongrel blood, the pure White Stock of America is a decided minority. The presence of such a large non‑White population, together with a national policy of forced integration of the races, leaves the Israelite [and We Do Not Mean The Jews: We Mean The True Israelites The White Anglo-Saxons ] remnant in America with limited options.

Our best hope is to quietly: Arm ourselves with all types of weapons for defense, learn to become self‑sufficient, grow our own food, educate our own children, and live in obedience to Gods Commandments under the protection of Almighty God and under the Shed Blood of the Lord Jesus Christ.

Wake up, Preachers! Wake up, Christians! Wake up America! For while you sleep the enemy is destroying you and your posterity! Turn back to Almighty God and the Lord Jesus Christ and Repent for there is No Salvation Outside of Them, There are no other Saviours, and We cannot save ourselves without Them!

General Douglas MacArthur stated:

"I am concerned for the security of our great nation, not so much because of a potential threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within which, opposed to all of our great traditions, have gravely weakened the structure and tone of our American way of life." [7]

And again before the Massachusetts Legislature, on July 25, 1951, he enlarged on the same warning with even more emphasis.

"This evil force, with neither spiritual base nor moral standard, rallies the abnormal and subnormal elements [Queers and misfits of society] Among Our Citizenry and Applies Internal Pressure Against All Things We Hold Decent and All Things That We Hold Right : the type of Pressure Which Has Caused Many Christian Nations Abroad to Fall and their own cherished freedoms to languish in the shackles of complete suppression."

As it has happened there, It Can Happen Here . Our need for patriotic fervor and religious devotion has never been more impelling. There can be no compromise with Atheistic Zionist Communist Judaism: No half way in the preservation of freedom and the worship of Almighty God and our Saviour the Lord Jesus Christ. It must be all or nothing.

We must unite in the high purpose that the liberties etched upon the design of our life by our forefathers, and upon our heart by Almighty God, that be unimpaired and that we maintain the moral courage and spiritual leadership to preserve inviolate that bulwark of all freedom, Our Christian Faith .

The prevailing trend today is marked by a disposition to be all things to all men. It is popular to exhibit a magnanimous spirit of compromise where most of the pertinent issues of the day are concerned. What is overlooked, however, is the fact that the word "compromise," as defined in the dictionary, means "to give up" "to surrender."

To surrender one's convictions in order to appease those who would otherwise be offended is sinful, for in so doing the truth is forsaken. It is interesting to note that the words, "compromise" and "surrender" are not found in the Bible, For there is to be no quarter given in the unending war between the forces of good and evil until the victory is won. Thus there must be no letup in the struggle to resist the inroads of wickedness, until the reign of righteousness is ushered in at the end of the age.

When the Christian forgets these fundamental facts, and accepts concessions which discredit Scriptural pronouncements for the sake of a false sense of accord, he is treading on forbidden ground. As long as evangelists Hew to the line in their presentation of the Gospel of Salvation by Grace, there is no basis for criticism. In fact, to their endeavors to convince the unregenerated of the necessity to Pray to Jesus Christ that God will call you to be His; Then Repent; Then God Says He will Forgive our Sins and Restore our Land and People! To That We Say A fervent "God-Speed."

However, when the vital realities of prophecy fulfilled are mishandled, and the doctrines of the Gospel are twisted, As is being done in almost every pulpit in America today by Prophets and Priests of Baal , it become our duty to take issue and to fight against those false statements and expose the unwarranted assumption of Scriptural support for spurious claims being made from pulpits, on radio and on television.

It is ever more imperative to attack the false lying doctrine that the Jews are "The Chosen People" and to just as strongly oppose the negation of the Christians as constituting the true Israel in the world today. The Lord Jesus Christ said the Jews were His enemies and to bring them forth and slay them before Him:

"But those mine enemies [the Jews], which would not that I should reign over them [the Jews said: '...We have no king but Caesar.' [8] thus rejecting the Lord Jesus Christ as their king], bring hither, And Slay Them Before Me. " [9]

Therefore, if the Jews are the enemies of the Lord Jesus Christ: Then they are my enemies and I will, with the help of Almighty God, for without His help I am nothing and would not be able to keep my word; Never Never, be a "Compromise" or "Surrender" Even if I should live a thousand years, or if I should be murdered by the Jews Tomorrow, They will never be other than my enemies: For the Lord Jesus Christ is My Saviour and King!!

There are many facts in this presentation which you, the reader, will not wish to accept. I ask you to accept nothing, make your own investigations. For in doing so you may find even more astonishing true facts than I have managed to glean in years of intensive and in‑depth research and study.

"Agree with me if I seem to you to speak the truth; or, if not, withstand me might and main that I may not deceive you as well as myself in my desire, and like the bee leave my sting in you before I die. And now let us proceed." [10]

It is a fact, proven from both the Scriptures and History, that the race, religion, nationality and culture of Jesus, was not the race, nationality and culture of the "Jews" of the 20th Century. There are very few of the so‑called "Jews," who can trace their bloodlines back to Abraham. And those who can Must trace their ancestry through the mixed blood of the children of Judah, Esau and the Canaanites. The Jewish writer, Alfred Lilienthal, in his book, The Controversy of Zion states:

"I have no doubt some of my Christian readers have as much right to the land of Palestine as Menachem Begin."

                                               Begin's Ancestors Never Lived in The Holy Land

Begin and all other Russian Jews originated from South Russia in the Khazar area. These Khazars converted to Judaism in about the year 800 A.D. and their ancestors never lived in Palestine and are in no way related to the ancient Hebrews of the Holy Bible. The Russian Jews rule over a captured state which rightfully belongs to the Palestinian people. Please bear in mind the fact that the Palestinians are half Christian and half Moslem and the Holy Land holds the most sacred shrines of both these religions. Therefore, if anyone has a Biblical right to Palestine, it is the native Palestinian Arab population which has resided there almost since the beginning of time itself. Many of these people are descended from the original Christian Crusaders and that is why so many of them are blonde, red‑headed and blue‑eyed. Most are Christians! The Jews would have us believe that Palestinians are desert nomads without any civilized roots. The opposite is the truth. The Palestinians built a beautiful agricultural country with an advanced society which has now been seized from them by alien Jew usurpers from Russia and Poland.

Americans are not told that at the time of World War I, 93% of the population of Palestine was Arab and that 98% of the land was owned by Arabs. Nor are they told that just before the Jews created the State known to the world as Israel more than 93% of the land was still owned by Arabs. How then, you should ask, did the Jews obtain Palestine? It was by a military conquest as ruthless as any of Hitler's conquests and the soldier behind it was trained at West Point! Where did the Jews get this army? The British, who ruled Palestine in violation of the treaty of independence which they had made earlier with the Arabs, trained in Palestine an army of Jews for use in World War II. In contrast the British denied the Arabs any military training.

At the close of World War I, America was the only major western nation that the Arab world trusted. Today the Arabs hate the American Government even more than they hate Great Britain under whose politics the state of Israel was created. The Arabs do not like atheistic Russia; but when America collaborates with the godless government of Israel they feel compelled to turn to Russia for the very existence of their governments.

The 1916 agreement between the World Zionist Organization and the British War Cabinet explained to Germans the reason for sudden and unexpected 1916 Zionist stab in German's back. The Germans learned the Zionists did not care who won the war as long as Zionists acquired sovereignty over Palestine. The Germans learned the reason Zionists suddenly deserted Germany and rushed in time of war to ally themselves with Germany's enemy to work for their defeat.

The Germans learned also the reason for Great Britain's post‑war obligation to the Zionists. The Germans learned why after the war ended in 1920, Great Britain stationed 200,000 British troops in Palestine as a shield behind which Great Britain in the next twenty‑eight years illegally transplanted 600,000 Jewish/Zionist paupers into Palestine from Eastern European countries. The Jews justified their usurpation of Palestine by describing that invasion as "the repatriation of God's Chosen People to their ancient homeland, their Promised Land."

Great Britain's post‑war obligation to the Jews under the 1916 agreement required Great Britain to create a Jewish majority in Palestine before holding an election to create the Government of Palestine. Great Britain was appointed temporary administrator of Palestine by the League of Nations in 1920 for the express purpose of holding that election as soon as possible. The Palestine population in 1920 would not have become a Jewish/Zionist Government. In 1920 there were 700,000 Christians and Moslems in Palestine and 50,000 so‑called Jews of whom about one‑half were genuine resident Jewish‑Zionists in Palestine.

Great Britain remained in Palestine for twenty‑eight years as "temporary administrator" without holding that election. In those twenty‑eight years the Christian and Moslem population increased to 1,350,000 and the so‑called Jews increased to 650,000 including the 600,000 transplanted into Palestine by Great Britain. Great Britain had failed to create a Jewish‑Zionist majority. So they withdrew from Palestine in 1948 after turning over her responsibilities to the United Nation.

On the day the last British soldiers left Palestine, May 14, 1948, the 600,000 transplanted Jews armed with $300‑million in the world's most modern weapons drove the 1,350,000 unarmed and defenseless indigenous population into exile. These facts disprove the Jewish‑Zionist lie that usurpation of Palestine can historically be "the repatriation of God's Chosen People to their ancient homeland, their Promised Land."

In 1915 Great Britain pledged Arabs liberation after the war from Turkish sovereignty if Arabs assisted Great Britain in the defense of the Suez Canal against advancing enemy forces. Great Britain gave the Arabs that pledge in writing in advance to show Great Britain's good faith. The loss of the Suez Canal by Great Britain in 1915 meant the loss of the war to Germany. The Arabs revolted against the Turkish Empire and fought with Great Britain's Middle East armed forces. The Arabs thus saved the Suez Canal in 1915.

The Jews knew about Great Britain's 1915 pledge to the Arabs when the Zionists made their 1916 proposal to the British War Cabinet. England knew before concluding the 1916 agreement with the Zionists they could not fulfill both the 1915 Arab pledge and the 1916 Zionist pledge. England was not troubled about double‑crossing the Arabs to win their war against Germany. England was at the mercy of Zionists who dictated their own terms as the price they must pay the Jews for dragging the United States into World War I to prevent Great Britain's defeat.

Among all 600,000 Zionists transplanted into Palestine between 1920 and 1948 by England from Eastern Europe there was not one who had an ancestor who ever set a foot in Palestine in Bible History. These Jewish‑Zionists were descendants of the Asian Mongoloid tribal nation of Turco‑Finn ethnic origin known in Asia as Khazars.

American Christians at the grass‑roots level were told another lie to justify Zionist usurpation of Palestine. They were told the Jews acquired Palestine by virtue of the so‑called Balfour Declaration. They were told the Balfour Declaration "gave" Palestine to the Jews.

They were told Palestine was England's gift to the Jews in gratitude for Chaim Weismann's "discovery" which enable England to win the war against Germany. Chaim Weizmann was a chemist born in Russia who emigrated to England in 1908. He was a Zionist "pioneer" who became the first "president" of the Jewish‑Zionist, so‑called "State of Israel."

The Jews concocted the lie that Chaim Weizmann "discovered" a "miracle" for the manufacture of Acetone. Acetone is an ingredient in the manufacture of high‑explosives. The manufacture of acetone in England had been discontinued long before the outbreak of World War I. Acetone was imported from Germany for a fraction of what it cost to manufacture it in England. German acetone for a great many years enjoyed a monopoly of the existing acetone market in Great Britain.

The outbreak of World War I suddenly created a demand for enormous quantities of acetone. German acetone was no longer imported. And a crash program for it's manufacture was organized. Discontinued facilities were put back into operation again. Chaim Weizmann was employed in that crash program. Acetone for the manufacture of high‑explosives was no longer a problem. Chaim Weizmann performed no "miracle" for which England awarded Palestine to the Jews as compensation for Chaim Weizmann's "miracle."

Neither did Chaim Weizmann nor did acetone have anything to do with the Balfour Declaration. The Balfour Declaration was the meaningless misleading letter of a few sentences jointly prepared by the Jews in Washington with Jews in London. American Christians at the grass‑roots level were never told the purpose of the double‑talk in that cryptic letter. The sixth draft of the letter was rushed to Prime Minister Lloyd George in London with instructions to copy that draft on the official stationery of England's Foreign Office to which their Foreign Minister Arthur Balfour should affix his signature. The draft was addressed by the Jewish‑Zionists to Lord Rothschild, one of its authors and the architect of all Zionist long‑range plans.

Unless England complied with the Zionists demand for that letter the Jews threatened to tell the world the whole story of the 1916 agreement. England submitted to that threat rather than have the world told the facts about the 1916 agreement. England feared world reaction if the Jews told the world how Great Britain was pressured into promising Palestine to the Zionists as compensation for railroading the United States into World War I as England's ally. The 1916 agreement was still a well‑kept secret from the world at large.

Zionists required something justifying England's opening the doors of Palestine wide after the war to unlimited Zionist illegal immigration. Without that letter the Jews would have had no alternative except to expose the 1916 agreement as justification for Zionist usurpation of Palestine. To avoid that possibility England gave the Zionists the Balfour Declaration. The Jewish‑ Zionists were then able to tell the world the Balfour Declaration justified Zionist usurpation of Palestine. Their 1916 agreement could thus remain their secret.

In the text of the Balfour Declaration the Zionists made a reference to an alleged "historic" connection of Zionist Jews with Palestine. The Zionists and England knew the Jews had no "historic" connection with Palestine. The Jews inserted that alleged "historic" connection with Palestine to create the belief that Palestine was the "homeland" of the Jews once upon a time. The Balfour Declaration was intended to draw a "red herring" across the trail of the criminal conspiracy to rob Christians and Moslems of their homeland.

As to the Balfour Declaration, "The Anglo‑Saxon World," in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, said in February 1966: Quote: On Nov. 2, 1917, Arthur James Balfour, then British Foreign Secretary, conveyed the following statement in a letter to Lord Rothschild:

"His Majesty's Government views with favor the establishment in Palestine of a natural home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non‑Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country."

The British Government issued "the White Paper" in May of 1939, in which they said,

"The Framers of the Mandate in which the Balfour Declaration was embodied could not have intended that Palestine be converted into a Jewish State against the will of the Arab population of the country."

A joint Anglo‑American committee was set up {Great Britain and the United States} and this committee issued the following statement in 1945:

"We regard it as essential...that Jew shall not dominate Arab and Arab shall not dominate Jew in Palestine; that Palestine shall be neither a Jewish state nor an Arab state...Palestine must ultimately become a state which guards the rights and interests of Moslem, Jew and Christians alike...We therefore, emphatically declare that Palestine is a Holy Land, sacred to Christians, to Jew and to Moslem alike; and because it is a Holy Land, Palestine is not, and never can become, a land which any race or religion can justly claim as its own...the fact that it is the Holy Land, sets Palestine completely apart from other lands, and dedicates it to the precepts and practices of the brotherhood of man, not those of narrow nationalism."

So what happened? The Zionist state was illegally set up in 1948, the Arabs persecuted and "Brotherhood" preached far and wide by the same nationalistic Zionists.

                                                                           The Rothschild's

The Baron Rothschild banking system of Europe previous to World War I, had negotiated a loan of one‑billion dollars to the Turkish Nation and had taken a mortgage on Palestine to assure its payment. Hence when the Armies of General Allenby, fighting with the Allied Nations, captured the city of Jerusalem and the entire Holy Land, they found it to be mortgaged property. The Jewish banking firm of Europe demanded a settlement of their billion dollar loan to Turkey. In order to bring about the settlement of this enormous debt, together with a large amount of accumulated interest, certain liberal deductions were made on the part of the Rothschild Bankers, with the understanding that Palestine was to be given to the Jews for their national homeland. This was the reason for the famous Balfour Declaration, and the action of the 53 nations in the year of 1922, giving the land officially to the Jews.

                                                                  A Further Historical Look

Palestine, which has been an Arab country since the True Israelies were taken away captive by the Assyrains, has been the target of invasion and attempts aiming at de‑Arabising it. The idea of creating a Jewish homeland in Palestine was first advanced in the first Zionist Congress chaired by Theodore Herzel in Basle, Switzerland in August 1897. The most significant step on the road to achieving it was the "Balfour Declaration."

On November 2, 1917, Arthur James Balfour, British Foreign Minister, addressed the following written communication to Lord Rothschild:

"I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty's Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to and approved by the Cabinet. His Majesty's Government views with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this objective, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non‑Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country. I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation."

This communication, Saeed Hammami, remarked: "one people solemnly promised to a second the country of a third," has created one of the most explosive problems of our times; a problem which has convulsed the Middle East for more than 70 years, and which even today has not ceased to shake the region to its very foundations. This Declaration is at the root of the Palestine tragedy and of the Arab‑Israeli conflict.

Rev. Denis Fahey, in his The Mystical Body of Christ in the Modern World, p. 292, in reference to a British White Paper and the Balfour Declaration relates:

     "In the April issue of the Loyalty League I dealt with the attempt made, in the course of a series of lectures by a Mr. M. Farbman, at the London School of Economics, to transfer the responsibility for the hideous Russian revolution of 1917 from the real perpetrators, the Jews, and to ascribe it to a purely agrarian movement among the peasants. I undertook in that article to marshal the voluminous and conclusive evidence that this revolution was entirely Jewish in organization and operation, to show that it had nothing to do with an agrarian movement, or indeed with any cause that had Russian interests in view.

     Perhaps one of the most damning pieces of evidence, not only that this revolution, but also the world‑revolution which is planned, is Jewish, lies in the strenuous and partially successful efforts which organized Jewry has made to suppress the truth about it. Not only has Jewry succeeded in large measure in suppressing the truth, but it has seemingly been able to intimidate or cajole the British Foreign Office to suppress a very vital part of one of its own official publications.

     In April, 1919, there was published by the command of His Majesty, and by His Majesty's Stationery Office, a White Paper entitled, Russia, No. 1 (1919). A Collection of Reports on Bolshevism in Russia. The Foreword, on p. 6, is as follows: 'The following collection of Reports from His Majesty's official representatives in Russia, from other British subjects who have recently returned from that country, and from independent witnesses of various nationalities, covers the period of the Bolshevik regime from the Summer of 1918 to the present date. They are issued in accordance with a decision of the War Cabinet in January last. They are unaccompanied by anything in the nature either of comment or introduction, since they speak for themselves in the picture which they present of the principles and methods of Bolshevik rule, the appalling incidents by which it has been accompanied, the economic consequences which have flowed from it, and the almost incalculable misery which it has produced.'

     The position, then, is this: This document as it then stood was published by the specific decision of the British War Cabinet. It was such an appalling document, that it needed neither comment, explanation nor extension. The information in it came from His Majesty's official representatives in Russia and from independent persons who had returned from that country with first‑hand knowledge of conditions. The testimony from all these sources of information is the same. Apart from the appalling and fiendish cruelties, the one vital fact which this White Paper reveals is given on page 6, in a report issued by the Netherlands Minister at Petrograd, September 6th, 1918. The Minister was then acting officially for the protection of British subjects and interests, our own official representative, Captain Cromie, having been murdered by the Bolsheviks. The part of the report, in which the one vital and central fact is found, reads as follows:

     'The foregoing report will indicate the extremely critical nature of the present situation. The danger is now so great that I feel it my duty to call the attention of the British and all other Governments to the fact that, if an end is not put to Bolshevism in Russia at once, the civilization of the whole world will be threatened. This is not an exaggeration, but a sober matter of fact; and the most unusual action of German and Austrian consuls‑general, before referred to, in joining in protest of neutral legations, appears to indicate that the danger is also being realized in German and Austrian quarters. I consider that the immediate suppression of Bolshevism is the greatest issue now before the world, not even excluding the war which is still raging, and unless, as above stated, Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole world, As it is Organized and Worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the Existing Order of Things ...I would beg that this report may be telegraphed as soon as possible in cipher in full to the British Office in view of its importance.'

     This very vital and significant report was sent by the Netherlands Minister in Russia, to Sir M. Finlay, British representative at Christiania, and by him telegraphed to Mr. Balfour at the British Foreign Office. There are many questions that could very pertinently be asked concerning this report. But there are two at the moment that press for an answer beyond all others: (1) Why was this very alarming and crucial information not published in the Press? Why the almost universal silence concerning it? Whose influence suppressed it? (2) Why did this official White Paper, published by His Majesty's command at the express decision of the War Cabinet in April, 1919, disappear from circulation and become unobtainable? And why was there published in its place an abridged edition, in which this particular passage and very little else of equal importance from the Netherlands Minister's report was eliminated? So that when innocent and unsuspecting Englishmen applied to His Majesty's Stationery Office (never suspecting guile or deception in their own Foreign Office) for this particular White Paper, they were given the abridged edition, without specific attention being called to the fact.

     A large proportion of those who applied in the ordinary course doubtless accepted what was given them, and little realized the important nature of the truth which had been expunged in the abridged edition. Some, however, wishing for the fullest information, returned the abridged edition and asked for the original. They were told it was out of print...

     Now we come to the crucial question: Why was this abridged edition substituted for the original? Why did the abridgement take the form it did, i.e., eliminate the damning and sinister fact that: 'Bolshevik is organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things.'

     Why is the original edition unobtainable? It is an official document and therefore public property. Under what constitutional right does the British Foreign Office refuse to supply it?

     It is obviously and logically clear that there is only one race on earth that has any interest in the suppression of this official document, and that race is the Jewish race. No other race nor any civilized Government can be benefited by its suppression, for the report within it says quite specifically: 'The danger is now so great that I feel it my duty to call the attention of the British and all other Governments to the fact that, if an end is not put to Bolshevism in Russia at once, the civilization of the whole world will be threatened.'

     Mr. Norman Bentwich, O.B.E., M.C., was legal secretary, then Attorney‑General, of the Government of Palestine, and had been in the Ministry of Justice, Cairo. He had served as co‑editor of the Jewish Review, is a lecturer on Jewish subjects, and author of historical and legal books. In an American paper, B'nai B'rith Magazine, for March, he had an article, 'Is Judaism Doomed in Soviet Russia?' to which he says 'No'; and from that article the quotations given below are of interest. The 'B'nai B'rith' [Children of the Covenant] is a Jewish secret society, not affiliated to Freemasonry, but having much the same ritual and operative methods:

     'The teaching of the Hebrew Prophets,' to set the oppressed and to break every yoke,' was the underlying motive [a false presentation] of the Bolshevik revolution. It is certain that the principal prophet of the proletarian movement was the German Jew, Karl Marx, whose picture hangs in every public institution and whose book, Kapital, is the gospel of the Communist creed; that another German Jew, Ferdinand Lassalle, whose heroic statue adorns the Nevski Prospect of Leningrad, was one of the inspirers of the early revolutionary parties; that Jews have, from the beginning to the present day, played a part in the creation and the maintenance of the revolution; and that for no community has the revolution brought about a greater change of status than for the Jews. Under the Czars their life was outwardly a long humiliation; but it had its compensations in the inner strength of the community and in the national ideal of which the flame burnt eternally. Today, they have been given complete civic and social equality with the rest of the population; and, indeed, Lenin's saying is constantly quoted, that those peoples which were previously oppressed should be specially favored. On the other hand, their inner strength and cohesion are broken, and the hold of the traditional religion is weakened by every possible pressure and persuasion: while the fostering of the Zionist ideal is punished ruthlessly by the State as a counter‑revolutionary movement.

     'The essential feature about their community which strikes the visitor is that the Jews, and particularly the younger generation, feel at home, and part and parcel of the new order. They are proud of their share in the councils of the revolution: of Trotsky, who organized the Red Army (though among non‑Jews he is in disgrace and his name is not mentioned), and of the Jews who hold high positions in the Foreign Office and other Ministries, in the Army and the Navy, in the economic councils and academies.

      When we landed in Leningrad, our interpreters and guides from the State Tourist Organization were usually Jews and Jewesses. It is the function of the Jew to be the interpreter of Soviet Russia to the world and of the world in Soviet Russia; for he forms the principal element in the proletarian society which has close touch with the Western European culture and languages...The suppression of the Ghetto and of the Orthodox Church has brought this outward freedom; and the Government punishes severely any outward manifestation of anti‑Semitism.

     The industrial enthusiasm of the Soviet State, which finds its expression in the Five Years' Plan, has been an advantage for the Jews, who can acquire a technical capacity quicker than the rest of the people. The policy of collective farming with mechanical machinery and the industrialization of agriculture, which is being carried out with breathless and ruthless vigor, accords also with the Jewish intelligence. For the Jew is often by nature a collectivist.

     The achievement in the way of fostering industrial skill, in the heavy as well as in the lighter industries, among the Jews, has been equally remarkable. Hundreds of thousands are working in the textile factories, the metal works, the electric power stations, the tailor shops, and the manifold industries of the State. Their numbers were reckoned in 1932, at over 1,300,000.

     In the towns such as Kiev, Odessa, Berdichev, where the Jews are a quarter or more of the whole population, there are Yiddish law courts and Yiddish codes of law, and Yiddish is an official language. But the Rabbinical law which used to regulate Jewish family affairs may not be applied, and the Beth‑Din may not function. The academy of higher learning in such centers, which has taken the place of the former university, includes a section for Jewish learning and research...

     The Communist Party, which controls the Soviet Government, is opposed to Judaism as to any other established religion; for its dominant creed is a militant atheism. Yet it has to be recognized that the attack on the old Jewish worship and learning, the demand for the closing of synagogues and schools and yeshivas comes principally from the younger generation of Jews. The Jewish Communist youth in large part have revolted against the older order...The question arises whether Judaism will survive in this hostile atmosphere, without the religious hold and without the national atmosphere, without the religious hold and without the national ideal, reduced to a matter of national or racial pride and feeling...The revulsion of this generation against the old creed and its devotion to a materialistic theory of the work will not be a permanent belief. It is contrary alike to the Russian and the Jewish nature and to the outlook of science in our day.' [11]

     In connection with this extract, it is well to note that Jews who are members of the B'nai B'rith may be Freemasons, but that non‑Jews are not allowed to enter the B'nai B'rith.

     'Using the term Anglo‑Saxons in its broad modern sense of meaning the English‑speaking peoples, it will be generally considered an impossible proposition that those peoples, reputed pre‑eminent in their love of freedom, are subject to a very real censorship over what they are permitted to read. At a time when the utmost license is exercised daily in printed and spoken word against God, King, morals, and country, it will seem to most Anglo‑Saxons an absurd story that they are not permitted to read, or to publish, a certain class of subjects of world‑wide bearing, which are freely published and discussed by non‑English speaking peoples. The seeming absurdity of the statement is due to the fact that the censorship is invisible in application, is never mentioned publicly, and its decrees are discreetly enforced, usually without any specific judgment having to be pronounced. For simplicity in explanation of the broad facts, this article will be confined to the censorship under which publishers of books and newspapers must conduct their part of the education of Anglo‑Saxons on current events and past history. The recognition of the authority of the censorship is based, in most part, on a great commercial power at the disposal of the censors; and in part on the indirect effects of a vast propaganda in the shaping of popular opinion in a sense favorable to the aims of the censors. It is obvious that a deliberate limitation, in any country, of what can be profitably published is a restriction of the freedom in reading for the great mass of people in that country.

     The censorship in force is Jewish in character, in backing, and in its operative machinery. But it is not confined in its supervision and operation to a definitely organized body of men, even if there be such an organization unknown to us. The Jewish race is absolutely apart from all others in its solidarity, which is maintained in spite of complete dispersion over the globe, and in spite of fundamental differences in religion, in politics, and in material and spiritual attachments within many different nations. The dispersion of the individuals, accompanied as it is by close inter‑communications, through business relations in all countries, and by literature on racial interests, permits of the exercise of an over‑growing world power. The guiding of that power cannot be traced to any one central control: but there are many organizations which co‑operate in all matters affecting racial interest. In England there is a very influential 'Board of Deputies of the British Jews'; in America there are the 'New York Kehillah,' and the 'American Jewish Committee,' as powerful directors of Jewish thought and actions; whilst the equivalent of a great Masonic lodge of the Jewish people is found in the 'Independent Order of B'nai B'rith,' which has a very large (America) membership, as well as lodges in many countries. In France there is the nucleus of the building of a single directing center in the 'Alliance Israelite Universelle,' with the ambition of domination over the earth, and working thereto hand in hand with subversive anti‑Christian Grand Orient Freemasonry.

     Other countries have also organizations aiding Jewish solidarity; and that this solidarity does exist can be shown by two illustrations: First, the amazing way in which the whole world was shaken up on several occasions during the long period of the trials for treason of a single French Army officer, Dreyfus; and second, by the persistent policy of concealment, from all peoples, of the leading part played by a section of revolutionary Jews in all the bloodshed and commercial destruction of the Russian people. That concealment is enforced so successfully that neither writers of books nor editors of newspapers can safely forget the interdict. Even a Government White Book issued in April, 1919, and making clear the world‑danger of the Jewish‑Bolshevik conspiracy against civilization was, by some unknown influence, suppressed, and a bowdlerized abridgement was substituted.

     The over‑riding power in literature and publicity of a small Jewish minority in most countries is made up of a variety of elements. There is vast wealth to be drawn on for racial objects; there is ownership or control of large numbers of newspapers; and that control is not merely over the complexion given to some news, but over those reviews of new publications which affect largely their sales. The news agencies feeding the newspapers are mostly under Jewish control. The power exercised in film and theatrical productions is pretty generally known. The enormous potential force of a combination of the wealthy Jewish advertisers in all important papers is fully recognized by journalists, for whom advertisements are the life blood of commercial publication. [The comments of two former editors should suffice to prove the point: 'A considerable portion of the Press is now an ominous danger to public morals, since it has shown itself to be both vile and venal, and willing to deceive and brutalize mankind. The depths to which its employees are frequently reduced is seen in the judgment passed upon the calling of the American journalist, by a New York editor, John Swinton, during an annual dinner of the New York Press Association. It certainly is a frank confession: 'There is no such thing as an independent Press in America, if we except that of little country towns. You know this and I know it. Not a man among you dares to utter his honest opinion. Were you to utter it, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid 150 dollars a weak so that I may keep my honest opinion out of the paper for which I write. You, too, are paid similar salaries for similar services. Were I to permit that a single edition of my newspaper contained an honest opinion, my occupation, like Othello's, would be gone in less than twenty‑four hours. The man who would be so foolish as to write his honest opinion would soon be on the streets in search for another job. It is the duty of a New York journalists To Lie, To Distort, To Revile, To Toady at the feet of Mammon, and to Sell His Country and His Race for his daily bread, or what amounts to the same thing, his salary. We are marionettes. These men pull the strings, and we dance. Our time, our talents, our lives, our capacities are all the property of these men; WE [journalists] Are Intellectual Prostitutes. '

     Philip Francis, for years an editorial writer of great influence in America, and who had had for forty years an intimate connection with journalism, writes: 'With a few honorable exceptions, the big papers and magazines of the United States are the most ignorant and gullible, as well as the most cowardly and controlled Press, printed in any country in the world. The majority of the owners are mere financiers, who look upon their magazines and newspapers simply as money‑making mills, who, whenever it is a question between more coin and good, honest, patriotic, public service, will take the coin every time.' [12]

     What adds to the peril of this capitalized Press, which is, of course, not confined to any country, is the deplorable fact that millions of the people of all lands find in their newspapers their only mental food, and form their opinions on practically all subjects by reading insincerely written editorials. Some even have time only for the headlines!]

     While the political power of Jews might appear negligible because they are equally active in all three Parties here, it is a fact that the division works to great advantage; for, not only is the power exercised out of proportion to numbers in each Party, but it is multiplied by three in matters of racial interest. This is clearly expressed in the words of Emanuel Shinwell, M.P. (Financial Secretary to the War Office), in a speech at the annual dinner of 'B'nai B'rith,' on 23rd June: The Jews in the House of Commons, whatever their political opinions may be, will always stand in that assembly for the rights of the Jewish community. It has been said that they must emphasize the fact of their Judaism before the fact of citizenship. He held that they must regard themselves as Jews and citizens equally.

     In England there is general ignorance of the existence of any important Jewish question. The old idea still prevails that Jews are merely a religious sect; and, in Britain, are mostly rich, and consequently unsympathetic to revolutionary movements. It is a ridiculous misconception of the facts, and it makes the British people particularly easy to guide in matters affecting the Jewish race. There is an important section of Jews who join, and lead, every revolution, as Disraeli made clear in his books; and their predominance in the Bolshevik seizure of power and regime of atrocities should have long ago dissipated the old British illusion. So much sympathy with Bolshevism was shown even in English Jewish papers that ten of the best known British Jews felt forced to write a letter to the Press in April, 1919, repudiating all such sympathy. Large numbers of Jews who first went to Palestine were so little religious, and so much Bolshevik, that orthodox Jews, long settled in the country, objected; and a universally esteemed Rabbi, who was about to visit London to protest, was assassinated. Zionism is an accurate subject of differences between the Jews.

     Some want a national standing of their own centered in Palestine, and also to enjoy full national rights in any country they choose for residence. Others have no desire to weaken their present position of full citizenship in their adopted countries.

     Mr. Ford owned a weekly paper called the Dearborn Independent, and in this a series of articles appeared on the international Jews, and on the Jewish power in America. Those articles were reproduced in four volumes, beginning in November, 1920, and were largely based on Jewish authorities. Three or four lawsuits for large sums were brought against Mr. Ford, and later he received serious injuries in a motor‑car accident, and shortly after that he made a public recantation of all that had appeared in his paper about Jews. Since that date the Jewish power and censorship have found no chronicler in America. When Ambassador Page was editor of the Atlantic Monthly he gave the following advice to a young journalist: 'The most interesting fellow in America is the Jew: but don't write about Jews: without intending it, you may precipitate the calamity America should be most anxious to avoid, I mean Jew‑baiting.' Incidentally we may mention that an English book which happened to contain that quotation was suppressed, soon after birth, by a very obvious withdrawal of the usual advertising nourishment.

     Anglo‑Saxon historians, with the exception of Mrs. Nesta H. Webster, have, to an extraordinary degree, kept off the vital subject of revolutions, on which many learned French writers have produced so much; and, in consequence, English readers are still spoonfed on the picturesque fables of Carlyle and others about the French Revolution, which was typical of all later revolutions in its creation and guidance. In October there will be issued an English translation of the Vicomte de Poncins' book Les Forces Secretes de la Revolution: a compilation from the French school of writers just mentioned, selling well in France, and now appearing in Germany. The 'reaction' of our accepted censorship to the book may give occasion for a supplement to this present article.' [13]

      'In the Patriot of 18th July, 1929, an article under the heading 'Censorship of the Anglo‑Saxons' pointed out how the English‑speaking peoples are today subject to a very real censorship over what they can read, and over what they may publicly state, on a certain range of subjects. That censorship has no legal authority, nor is it a visible organization; but its indisputable power depends on control over the Press and book publishers, exercised either through direct financial interests in the business of newspaper and book‑production, or through indirect influence over producers by the enormous power of bestowal of advertisements and of effectual boycotting. As regards the influence over public speaking, the exercise of power is more subtle and diffused, and is maintained partly by strength in all three of our political parties, partly by varied means of propaganda, including the Press, the films, and broadcasting, which contribute to public ignorance or misdirection on some subjects. In the article it was explained how and why the censorship was in Jewish hands, although large number of Jews are in no way conscious parties to its operation.

     The preponderating part played by Red Jews in the Bolshevik revolution, which dispossessed the Menshevik Government, established on the abdication of the Czar, is beyond doubt, if the facts in the case are put squarely before anyone capable of impartial reasoning. Nevertheless, the censorship, in force for the last twelve years, has been so effective that most British and American people have been kept in ignorance of the essential facts of the past and present situation in Russia, and of the threat involved to civilization and Christianity in most parts of the world. That this Anglo‑Saxon ignorance is due to continuous suppression of the publicity of all undesired views is evident from the fate which has befallen the occasion attempts in newspapers, books, and lectures, to show that the preparation, the execution, and the administration of the Soviet dictatorship were all the products of Jewish brains, aided by a few Russian leaders, prominent as figure‑heads...

     As bearing on the part taken by Red Jews in the Bolshevik triumph over Russia, we quote Dr. Angelo S. Rappaport, a Jewish writer, who published a book in 1918 called Pioneers of the Russian Revolution: 'To a greater degree than the Poles, the Letts, or Fins, or, indeed, any other ethnic group in the vast Empire of the Romanovs, the Jews have been the artisans of the revolution of 1917...It is no exaggeration to say that the small, even insignificant, amount of freedom obtained by the Russian Liberals in 1905 and 1906 was largely due to the effort of the Jews...There was no political organization in the vast Empire that was not influenced by Jews or directed by them...Throughout history the spirit of the Jew has always been revolutionary and subversive...Long before they had been formulated in French, the principles of the 'Rights of Man' had been announced in Hebrew...The Russian Jews, the pioneers of the revolution, are not continuing to fight for the cause of Justice, for the principles of Democracy against German Militarism.'

     When the Jewish and Russian Bolsheviks seized power, Red Jews flocked to the scene from all countries, and reinforced the brains and hands of the murderous tyranny. Mr. Robert Wilton, for seventeen years correspondent of The Times in Russia, and who was decorated for his work on the Russian front in the earlier part of the later war, wrote a book, The Last Days of the Romanoffs. This book showed that the murder of the Czar and is family was the work of Red Jews, and that they prepared the whole revolution, and became masters of Russia from their domination of all the important offices under the Soviet. He wrote in 1920: 'The Jewish domination in Russia is supported by certain Russians...they are all mere screens or dummies behind which the Sverdlovs and the thousand and one Jews of Sovdepia continue their work of destruction.'

     After this Mr. Wilton's chances in English journalism were gone. He was a true British patriot; and he died in very straitened circumstances in France in January, 1925, No one who has paid the slightest attention to the course of Russian events since the Bolshevik accession to power in November, 1917, can have failed to know that, when all the important members of the Russian aristocracy, the learned profession, the Army and Navy, had been executed, or imprisoned, or driven abroad, Red Jews were in possession of the great majority of responsible positions in and under the Soviet. So clear was this that, in the past, Jewish apologists, here and in America, have explained the fact by the true statement that only among the Jews could be found any longer the brains and business experience for filling important posts. Yet in the face of this situation there have been dozens of books published in English, and innumerable articles throughout the Press, and any number of lectures delivered, all with the astounding omission of any mention of Jewish handiwork in Russian Bolshevism. There have been public references to the sufferings of some orthodox non‑Communist Jews at the hand of the Soviet.

     Newspapers bear witness to a censorship over them by what they omit to publish, and by their sketchy apologetic mention of incidents tending to produce undesired conclusions about the march of events. Authors can safely reckon on the freufal of book publishers to produce any book unorthodox to current propaganda which supports the censorship. Mr. Ford ran a newspaper of his own, in which for several years the world‑wide question of growing Jewish predominance was treated; but so much pressure was brought to bear on him that he had to drop the subject and recant all he had published thereon, although he had not himself written the articles.

     Censorship over the enormous propaganda of 'Labor,' in the formation of public opinion, is rendered easy by the almost unanimous sympathy of the Socialist and Communist elements, constituting the party, with everything originating in Russia: a senseless sympathy based on the belief that Sovetism is a demonstration, if 'a crude one, of the practicability of Socialism.

     A very recent illustration can be cited here in support of some of the above statements. The Patriot has been the vehicle of advertising a new book, The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by the Vicomte L. de Poncins. It is an English translation from the second edition of a French book, and treats of the influence of Grand Orient Freemasonry and of the Red Jews, in all revolutionary and subversive movements since the French Revolution. The publishers, on issue of the book here, sent review copies as usual to important daily and weekly papers to the number of eighty. Out of the eighty, one provincial newspaper gave a notice which was confined to less than one half the book, that portion relating to French Masonry; the larger portion, relating to Jewish activities, was not mentioned. It is obvious that such a book might provoke violent differences of opinion among reviewers; but, considering that it is a compilation from well‑known French, German and English writers, and that it treats of the vital question of the world revolution, of which the first step is the destruction of our Empire; considering these things, a universal silence cannot be accepted as natural.'

     Thanks to their dual citizenship in modern times, the Jews, while retaining their primary allegiance to their own nation and their devotion to the ideal of the domination of the natural messiahs, have been able to use their positions of power for the furtherance of their natural program which, as I have so often insisted is necessarily and inevitably opposed to the rule of Christ our King. And now unfortunately, the Balfour Declaration of November 2nd, 1917, would seem to have for effect the perpetuation of this anti‑Christ, anti‑Christian anomaly. For citizens of other states, citizenship is restricted to one State. Why should Jews be permitted to be citizens of two States? The anomaly is already glaring when they form a State within a State: it is doubly so when they have a Jewish State in Palestine. And it must always be remembered that it means keeping the enemies of Christ in a specially favored position.

     In Der Tag (Yiddish Daily), New York, 10th July, 1937: 'Hail the Jewish State in Palestine! For close on two thousand years it has lived only in the memory of an uprooted, wandering people. Conquered and leveled to the earth by the Roman hosts of Titus, aided by the hordes swarming across Europe from the primeval forests of old Germania, it is now about to rear its head once more, looking with new hope across the Mediterranean. It is our historic privilege, denied our forefathers for twenty centuries, to see the Jewish State revived again in the old historic site. The landless people, so long deprived of Nationhood, is landless and stateless no longer. Once more we are a member of the family of nations, recognized and welcomed as such. Our Ambassadors and Ministers will be found in every capital, and a seat will be reserved for us at the council table of the League of Nations [this has been fulfilled in the United Nations]. Even in Germany, whence two thousand years ago came those who destroyed us, just as today they plot our ruin, we shall have our envoy speaking for us proudly, courageously, as one Government representative to another. Washington the center of Jewish hope in the Western World, will count the Jewish Ambassador among the youngest members of its diplomatic family ...Hail the new Jewish State!' [14]

     An Ambassador represents a foreign nation in the capital of the country to which he is accredited. The Jews are, therefore, on their own admission members of a foreign nation in the various countries in which they for the time being dwell. The members of a nation which is represented by a foreign ambassador to the Government of a country, cannot logically at the same time occupy posts in the Government and seats in the Parliament of the country in question. That would be an intolerable anomaly, for example in the case of Frenchmen in Germany and Italians in England. The same must hold good for the Jews, in fact, it must hold a fortiori in their case because of their naturalistic messianic aims. The setting up of the Jewish State must logically lead to the elimination of Jews from the public life of England, Ireland and other countries.

     By the fact of the Jews becoming citizens of a Jewish State and ceasing to be citizens of other States another evil can be remedied. The small minority of sincere Jewish converts to Catholicism have up to the present always for all practical purposes been excluded from their own nation. The Jews insisted upon the 'rights of minorities,' that is, their 'rights,' being safeguarded in the treaties at the end of the Great War. We must insist upon the rights of the minority of Catholic Jews and see that those who accept the false messiahs must have special guarantees against ostracism and social injustice on the part of their own people. the Jewish State cannot treat its minority differently from the way the Jews claimed that they should be treated in the States of Western Europe. They surely cannot always expect to have it both ways.

     It is not easy to combat Jewish Naturalism in public life and at the same time keep oneself free from racial hatred, which is itself but a form of naturalism. Yet is must be done. On March 25th, 1928, the Congregation of the Holy Office abolished the association called The Friends of Israel, which in action and language had departed from the mind of the Church and of the Fathers and had adopted a mode of procedure abhorrent to the liturgy, thus falling into naturalism. Nevertheless in that same decree the Church insists upon the fact that she 'habitually prays for the Jewish people who crucified our Lord and Savior; on account of their blindness. Actuated by this spirit of charity Christians have protected this people against unjust treatment.

     After all that has already been said, it will be easy to deal with the question of anti‑Semitism. What is meant by the term? Anti‑Semitism is the word used by the Jews to designate any form of opposition to themselves , and they strive persistently to associate irrationality and want of balance with the term. They evidently want the world to believe that anyone who opposes Jewish pretensions is more or less mentally deranged. In that sense, as there is only one Divine Plan for order in the world, every sane thinker must be an anti‑Semite. The Jewish World, February 9, 1883, contained the following program: 'The great ideal of Judaism is...that the whole world should be imbued with Jewish teachings, and that in a universal Brotherhood of nations, a greater Judaism in fact, All the Separate Races and Religions Shall Disappear. '" [15]

In review, we note that the world war had entered its fourth year in the latter part of 1917, with no indication of a rapid settlement in sight. The complexity and variety of events, increasing with the years, had emphasized its universal character. Every country engaged, whether America, Germany, Russia, Greece, France, Italy, or England, found its entire interests, political, economic, and ethnic, involved in the issue. All these nations seemed gripped in a deadlock, and at the same time felt the pressing need of deliverance.

Before 1917, it had been thought that if the allies continued to hold the western front, the Russian "steam roller" would crush the central powers by sheer force of numbers. But the "steam roller" had itself exploded: there had been a revolution, and, by the end of July, Russian troops had withdrawn from Bessarabia and Moldavia, and between the Dniester and the Pruth, leaving the eastern front undefended. If this loss was somewhat offset by the fact that America, in spite of the President's make believe reluctance, had finally joined the allies, it was still doubtful whether her forces would arrive in time and in sufficient numbers to be of real military value.

The scale on which the war was waged made all usual methods of reaching a settlement out of the question: no outside Power could be invoked as mediator; the Pope had issued a peace proposal on August 1, but the allies regarded it as inspired by Germany and turned a deaf ear.

Allied statesmen had cast about for some principle on which an honorable peace could be proposed, if a crushing defeat could not be inflicted on the enemy. The principle of nationalities, viz., the right of small nations to form their own government, had been advanced, and had met with general acceptance.

Thus America's object in entering the war, according to President Wilson, was "to deliver the peoples of the world from autocracy, to make the world safe for democracy," and the like. But the application of this principle presented difficulties. That Germany and Austria should be broken up into Poland, Czecho‑Slovakia, Hungary, Jugo‑Slavia, etc., in the way that afterward occurred, was one matter; but the example of Russia, and the possibility of the principle being applied to England, then troubled by Irish agitators, and the other allies, led many to dread a completely dismembered Europe.

Forgotten and totally ignored by most historians was the real reason behind World War I. That being: When, in 1896, Germany obtained from the Sultan the concession for the Baghdad Railway and reached out over Palestine towards India, some leading Western Jews were alarmed and felt the need of uniting Jewry. The only basis of union was the Eastern program, for the Eastern group, being fanatics, would accept no other.

To win over the western group to the new aim, an assimilated Jewish writer, Theodore Herzl, was called on to paraphrase Leo Pinsker's Auto‑emancipation (Whose direct orders Herzl was obeying is not clear: probably those of David Wolfsohn, acknowledged leader of western Jewry at the time]. This paraphrase, published in 1896, bore the title, The Jewish State. There was little that was original about the book, but the character and influence of the author carried much weight.

Theodore Herzl was a typical assimilated Jew [His enemies in the Zionist camp later hurled the epithet "assimilated" at him to express their scorn for his moderation]. Born in Hungary in 1860, after finishing school in Budapest and studying law at the university of Vienna, he devoted himself to journalism and literature. As a reporter for the Viennese paper, Die neue freie Presse, he worked in Spain and later in France. While in Paris, he reported on the Dreyfus case, under the influence of another Jew, the famous Dr. Blowitz, correspondent of the London Times.

It is said that the Dreyfus case "made a Jew of Herzl." He did not know Hebrew, and had never been taught the fanatical books of the Talmud, such as the Shulchan Aruk and the Abodah Zarah. He was opposed to violent methods, and in one of his novels, Altneuland, has left a picture of a civilized Jewish state, patterned on those of Western Europe. But it was a false hope, for The Jews, like the Blacks, have never been able to build a Civilization from within their own ranks, they cannot build anything good; They can only build Evil: They can only Destroy!

In any case after the publication of The Jewish State, the Friends of Zion in Odessa, and the body of students (Kadimah) under Nathan Birnbaum, adopted Herzl. The first Zionist congress was called at Basle the following year (1897). Herzl was elected president, a position which he held until he was assassinated in 1904.

At the congress, as the eastern group was the more numerous, the name "Zionism," coined by Nathan Birnbaum in 1886, was adopted, and its aim declared essentially democratic. But the western group was not wholly won. Some of them, mostly from England and France, responded coldly to Herzl's appeal, fearing to compromise the rights and positions already acquired in those countries. The desired union could not yet be effected, and the two groups rallied around their respective leaders, Herzl and Ginzberg.

Herzl nevertheless remained faithful to the task he had undertaken [Osiah Tonn mentions several letters of Herzl, expressing the wish to retire form the Zionist movement as soon as possible]. He entered into negotiations with the rulers of several nations to obtain some suitable home for the Jews. He failed to get Palestine from the Sultan, and later the El Arish peninsula from Khedive of Egypt; but he received, and virtually accepted, the offer of Uganda from Great Britain. In 1903, he laid his proposal before the sixth Zionist congress: it was thrown out by the Zionists who would have no land but Palestine. Because they realized they could not continue the deception as the "Chosen People" if they were to accept any other place. Herzl died the following year, and with him the leadership of the moderate party was soon to pass into the hands of the violent nationalists [David Wolfsohn succeeded Herzl as president for a short time].

An article in The Judisk Tidskrift, written by Dr. Ehrenpreis, Chief Rabbi of Sweden, contained, according to the Swedish paper Nationen, the following passage:

"I participated with Herzl in the first Zionist Congress which was held in Basle in 1897. Herzl was the most prominent figure at that first Jewish World Congress. He worked to achieve an object which had been fixed beforehand. Just as Isaiah foresaw, decades before the event occurred, the victorious power of Cyrus before anyone else, so did Herzl foresee twenty years, before we experienced them, the revolutions brought about by the Great War, and he prepared us for that which was going to happen. He foresaw the splitting up of Turkey, and he foresaw that England would obtain control over Palestine. 'We may expect important developments in the world.' These were the words spoken by Herzl twenty years before the Great War. He added that the events would offer the Jewish people fresh opportunities." [16]

It is very clear that Herzl was under the instruction of the Jewish Cahalla and had been told their long range plans. And rabbi Ehrenpreis, thought that Herzl had foreseen all that was to happen. Never knowing himself that those events were cleverly laid out years before.

This we know by the Jews own admission. In his novel Coningsby (London, 1844), Disraeli drew a picture form the life of the Jews ruling the world from behind the thrones as graphic as anything in the Protocols of Nilus. Many believe, and it has been proved to most, Coningsby was a plagiarism of a Byzantine novel of the XVIIth century. The passage in which Rothschild (Sidonia) describes this is as follows:

     "If I followed my own impulse, I would remain here," said Sidonia. "Can anything be more absurd than that a nation should apply to an individual to maintain its credit, and with its credit, its existence as an empire and its comfort as a people; and that individual one to whom its laws deny the proudest rights of citizenship, the privilege of sitting in its senate and of holding land; for though I have been rash enough to buy several estates, my own opinion is that by the existing law of England, an Englishman of Jewish faith cannot possess the soil.'

     'But surely it would be easy to repeal a law so illiberal.'

     'Oh! as for illiberality, I have no objection to it if it be an element of power. Eschew political sentimentality. What I contend is that If you permit men to accumulate property, and they use that permission to a great extent, power is inseparable from that property , and it is in the last degree impolitic to make it in the interest of any powerful class to oppose the institutions under which they live. The Jews, for example, independent of the capital qualities for citizenship which they possess in their industry, temperance, and energy and vivacity of mind, are a race essentially monarchical, deeply religious and shrinking themselves from converts as from a calamity, are ever anxious to see the religious systems of the countries in which they live, flourish; yet since your society has become agitated in England and powerful combinations menace your institutions, you find the once loyal Jew invariably arrayed in the same ranks as the leveller and the latitudinarian, and prepared to support rather than tamely continue under a system which seeks to degrade him. The Tories lose an important election at a critical moment; 'Its the Jews who come forward to vote against them. The Church is alarmed at the scheme of a latitudinarian university, and learns with relief that funds are not forthcoming for its establishment; a Jew immediately advances and endows it. Yet the Jews, Coningsby, are essentially Tories. Toryism indeed is but copied from the mighty prototype which has fashioned Europe. And every generation they must become more powerful and more dangerous to the society which is hostile to them. Do you think that the quiet humdrum persecution of a decorous representative of an English university can crush those who have successively baffled the Pharaos, Nebuchadnezzar, Rome, and the feudal ages? The fact is You Cannot Destroy A Pure Race of White Organization [Here is the secret, and a Rothschild is telling us why the Jews are trying to destroy the White Race. It is because the Jews know, if the race is kept pure, it cannot be destroyed; because it will be protected by Almighty God and the Lord Jesus Christ!]. It is a physiological fact; a simple law of nature, which has baffled Egyptian and Assyrian kings, Roman emperors, and Christian inquisitors. No penal laws, no physical tortures, can effect that a superior race should be absorbed in an inferior, or be destroyed by it. The mixed persecuting races disappear, the pure persecuted race remains. And at this moment in spite of centuries, or tens of centuries, of degradation, the Jewish mind exercises a vast influence on the affairs of Europe. I speak of their laws, which you still obey; of their literature, with which your minds are saturated; but of the living Jewish intellect.

     You never observe a great intellectual movement in Europe in which the Jews do not greatly participate. The first Jesuits were Jews; that mysterious Russian diplomacy which so alarms Western Europe is organized and principally carried on by Jews; that mighty revolution (of 1848) which will be in fact [followed] by a second an greater Reformation, and of which so little is as yet known in England, is entirely developing under the auspices of Jews, who almost monopolize the professorial chairs of Germany. Neander the founder of Spiritual Christianity, and who is Regius Professor of Divinity in the University of Berlin, is a Jew. Benary, equally famous and in the same university, is a Jew. Wehl, the Arabic Professor of Heidelberg, is a Jew. Years ago, when I was in Palestine, I met a German student who was accumulating materials for the history of Christianity and studying the genius of the place; a modest and learned man. It was Wehl; then unknown, since become the first Arabic scholar of the day, and the author of the life of Mohamet. But for the German professors of this race, their name is legion. I think there are more than ten at Berlin alone.

     I told you just now that I was going up to town tomorrow, because I always made it a rule to interpose when affairs of state were on the carpet. Otherwise, I never interfere. I hear of peace and war in the newspapers, but I am never alarmed, except when I am informed that the sovereigns want treasure; then I know that monarchs are serious.

     A few years back we were applied to by Russia. Now there has been no friendship between the Court of St. Petersburg and my family. It has Dutch connections which have generally supplied it; and our representations in favor of the Polish Jews, a numerous race, but the most suffering and degraded of all the tribes, have not been very agreeable to the Czar. However circumstances drew to an approximation between the Romanoffs and the Sidonias. I resolved to go myself to St. Petersburg. I had on my arrival an interview with the Russian Minister of Finance, Count Cancrin; I beheld the son of a Lithuanian Jew. The loan was connected with the affairs of Spain; I resolved on repairing to Spain from Russia. I travelled without intermission. I had an audience immediately on my arrival with the Spanish minister Senior Mendizabel; I behold one like myself, the some of Nuevo Christiano, a Jew of Aragon. In consequence of what transpired at Madrid, I went straight to Paris to consult the President of the French Council; I beheld the son of a French Jew, a hero, an imperial marshal and very properly so, for who should be military heroes if not those of the Jewish faith.'

     'And is Soult a Jew?'

     'Yes, and others of the French marshals, and the most famous Massna, for example; his real name was Mannasheh: but to my anecdote. The consequence of our consultations was that some northern power should be applied to in a friendly and mediative capacity. We fixed on Prussia, and the President of the Council made an application to the Prussian minister, who attended a few days after our conference. Count Arnim entered the cabinet, and I beheld a Prussian Jew. So you see, my dear Coningsby, that The World is Governed by Very Different Personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes. " [17]

Rollin, Pierred Leroux, and a group of socialists, among whom was Maurice Joly [His father was Philippe Lambert Joly, born at Dieppe, Attorney‑General of the Jura under Louis‑Philippe for ten years. His mother Florentine Corbara Courtois, was the daughter of Laurent Courtois, paymaster‑general of Corsica, who had an inveterate hatred of Napoleon I. Maurice Joly was born in 1831 at Lons‑le‑Saulnier and educated at Dijon: there he had begun his law studies, but left for Paris in 1849 to secure a post in the Ministry of the Interior under M. Chevreau and just before the coup d'etat. He did not finish his law studies till 1860. Committed suicide in 1878].

Joly, some thirty years younger than Cremieux, with an inherited hatred of the Bonapartes, seems to have fallen very largely under his influence. Through Cremieux, Joly became acquainted with communists and their writings. Though, until 1871 when his ambition for a government post turned him into a violent communist, he had not in 1864 gone beyond socialism, he was so impressed with the way they presented their arguments that he could not, if the chance were offered, refrain from imitating it. And this chance came in 1864‑1865, when his hatred of Napoleon, whetted by Cremieux, led him to publish anonymously in Brussels the Dialogues aux Enfers entre Machiavelli et Montesquieu. In this work he tells us,

"Machiavelli represents the policy of Might, while Montesquieu stands for that of Right: Machiavelli will be Napoleon, who will himself describe his abominable policy.' It was natural that he should choose the Italian Machiavelli to stand for Bonaparte, and the Frenchman Montesquieu, for the ideal statesman: it was equally natural that he should put in the mouth of Machiavelli some of the same expressions which Venedey had put in it, and which Joly had admired. His own view was: 'Socialism seems to me one of the forms of a new life for the people emancipated from the traditions of the old world. I accept a great many of the solutions offered by socialism; but I reject communism, either as a social factor, or as a political institution. Communism is but a school of socialism. In politics, I understand extreme means to gain one's ends, in that at least, I am a Jacobin."

The French authorities, however, penetrated the thinly‑disguised satire: Joly was arrested and sentenced to two years imprisonment (April, 1865). But the Dialogues had pleased Cremieux as much as they had displeased the emperor, and, when his term expired, his Jewish patron rallied to his support: Joly was able to found a legal review, Le Palais, with Jules Favre, Desmaret, Leblond, Arago, Berryer, and Adolphe Cremieux as its principal stockholders.

With the fall of Napoleon III, Adolphe Cremieux once more took an open part in politics. Pushing to the front his former secretary, Gambetta, he directed through him the negotiations with Bismarck. Bismarck himself was guided by the Jew Bamberger (1832‑1899), a former revolutionary of '48, but who had for years managed the Paris branch of the Jewish bank Bischofsheim & Goldschmidt; he was also a friend of Cremieux. A third Jew in the negotiations was the son of James Rothschild [Bismarck, who had met the latter's grandfather, knew that Rothschild's real name was Meyer, and regarded him as an "Jewish citizen of Frankfurt," hence a German subject. To make matters worse, the victor was obliged to discuss the terms of peace with this renegade subject in French, the language of the vanquished, because Rothschild professed not to understand German. Corti, House of Rothschild Vol. II]. In this way, care was taken that the treaty should be satisfactory, if not entirely to the signatories, yet at least so to the Alliance Israelite Universelle.

From then (1871) until his death in 1880, as President of the Alliance Israelite Universelle and Supreme Master of the Scottish Rite, Cremieux was one of the promoters of the anti‑clerical movement following the Franco‑Prussian war. His favorite theme was that there should be one cult: speaking at a general assembly of the Alliance he said:

"The Alliance is not limited to our cult; it voices its appeal to all cults and wants to penetrate in all religions, as it has penetrated into all countries. Let us endeavor boldly to bring about the union of all cults under one flag of 'Union and Progress': such is the motto of humanity." [18]

One cult, one flag. Are the Protocols of Nilus, or the words of Machiavelli in Joly's book or in Venedey's book, anything but an elaborate exposition of the ideas thus briefly expressed by Cremieux? His activities are one of the best examples of Jewish internationalism. Thus the principal attempt to discredit the Protocols leads directly into historical studies which substantiate and illustrate their doctrine in a remarkable and unexpected manner.

The fact, that the "existing non‑Jewish communities in Palestine" represented at the time 92 percent of the total population did not discourage the British Government from giving its support to Zionist aspirations. Nor was the British Government deterred by the fact that it had given earlier assurances and pledges to the Arabs regarding their independence after the war.

These pledges were contained in the McMahon‑Hussain correspondence of 1915‑1918, the Anglo‑French Declaration of Nov. 1918, the Hogarth Message of Jan. 1918, the Declaration to the "seven" of June 1916, and in General Allenby's assurances to the inhabitants of Palestine, Syria and Lebanon. At a meeting of the Supreme Council of the Allied Powers at Paris on March 20, 1919, General Allenby, Commander‑in‑chief of the Expeditionary force which wrested Palestine, Syria and Lebanon from Ottoman control declared that "the Allies were honor bound to endeavor to reach a settlement in accordance with the wishes of the peoples concerned."

In the McMahon‑Hussain Correspondence, Britain promised Sherif Hussain of Mecca to create an independent state of the Arabs as a reward for the alliance with it against Turkey in the First World War. At the same time Britain was negotiating secretly with France; the second major imperialist power of the time, on the division of Arab land into spheres of influence between them.

In the Sykes‑Picot agreement of 1916, Sir Mark Sykes (1873‑1919) a distinguished British orientalist, and Charles Georges Picot, formerly French Consul in Beirut, prepared a draft agreement about the post‑war division of the Middle East, which was approved, in principle by Russia. Thus the Jews, after centuries of dispersion, were to be established in a homeland. Here was poetic justice; it seems as though nineteen centuries of alleged wrongs were to be righted.

Having obtained the British Government's declaration of sympathy with Zionist aims, the next objective of the Zionists was to secure its implementation by Great Britain. This they succeeded in doing. The mandate which the League of Nations entrusted to Great Britain in 1922 to administer Palestine provided that the Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the Declaration made on Nov. 2, 1917 in favor of the establishment on Palestine of a national home for the "Jewish People."

The League of Nations, by admitting the Balfour Declaration into the terms of the British Mandate, violated its own Covenant, by lending support to the Zionist cause, and by helping a process of dispossession and displacement of the native Arab population, instead of preparing it for independence as it was supposed to do.

During the 30 years of British rule the Jewish emigrants converged to Palestine from all over the world, taking advantage of the legislative measures and assistance of the mandatory power whose policies were intended to realize the Balfour Declaration.

The first Governor of Palestine was a British Zionist (Herbert Samuel). He was dubbed then the King of Israel because he was the initiator of the state of Israel by allowing a flood of Jewish emigrants disguised as pilgrims to the Holy Land to settle in Palestine, permitting them to train and arm themselves and facilitating land transfer from Arabs to Jews under the guise of British grants to Zionist institutions.

Thus the Balfour Declaration was not just a document to secure the entrance of the United States into World War I on the side of England, or to secure a temporary national homeland for the Jews in the diaspora as was claimed by British Premier David Lloyd George, but a declaration to create a Zionist entity as an alien ethnic wedge in the heart of the Arab land, to separate the Arab people of Asia from the Arabs of North Africa, i.e., a spearhead to shatter any attempts to unify the Arab nation to develop and advance the unified Arab community.

From the beginning of the mandate, British policy toward the indigenous Arab community in Palestine was marked by a refusal to recognize its national existence. The Arabs invariably were described as the non‑Jewish communities (the Balfour Declaration) or simply as "the other sections of the population," where it was necessary to distinguish between them and the immigrants, the use of the terms "Muslim," "Christian" or "Jews" was adopted.

The fiction that Palestine was inhabited only by a small number of people, or by desperate religious sects, was encouraged. In this context it was easier to add another, the Jewish community, without such action being seen internationally as a denial of the right of those already present. What was especially provocative as far as the Arabs were concerned was the decision to give the Jewish Agency a special role in formulating mandatory policy while the Arabs, who still constituted the overwhelming majority of the population, were denied any representation at all. As a result of this policy major rioting broke out in 1921 and 1929 between Palestinian Arabs and the ever increasing number of Jewish immigrants.

Jewish immigration into Palestine declined from 1929 until 1933, but when the Nazis came to power in Germany, the rate of immigration increased to more then 30,000 a year as compared to 9,500 in 1932. By 1935 the number of Jewish immigrants had risen to 61,800. A genuine and unbridgeable conflict of interest grew between the Zionists and the native Palestinians. The Jewish underground army, the Haganah, was created during this period.

The ensuing frictions led to serious disturbances between the Arab and Jewish communities in 1936. "The Peel Commission" was set up in the same year and in July 1937 it recommended the creation of a Jewish and an Arab state in Palestine with Jerusalem remaining under British control. The recommendations were opposed by both communities.

                                                                         The Zionists' Claim

The Zionists have advanced different arguments in support of the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine. These arguments are:

   1). The religious argument, which is, in effect, that God promised to give Palestine to the Jews; this promise was made to their ancestors, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob; pointing to the Old Testament of the Christians' Bible. [This has already been proven false, as the Jews are not Semites; They are not Descendents of Abraham, Isaac or Jacob! They are the descendents of Japheth, not Shem.

   2). The "statelessness" of the Jews, a people without a country, and that they should have one in which to live, practice their religion, and develop their own culture; and that since they once lived in Palestine, they should be allowed to return to it;

    3). That the Balfour Declaration of 1917 granted them Palestine, and this grant was confirmed by the League of Nations;

   4). That the United Nations grated them the right in 1947 to establish a Jewish state in Palestine.

As we have already stated all the Zionist claims are false, but in fairness, lets look at these arguments in the order listed above.

                                                              The "Promised Land" Argument

We could go into a discussion that would take a thousand pages, and prove that the Jews have no claim to Palestine from the Scriptures, but we believe that Frank C. Sakran, in his Palestine Still A Dilemma, provides what would probably be the easiest to understand for those who are not intensive Bible students. Therefore we will present his writings on the subject for your review, study and thoughts:

     "In this age of space flights, moon exploration, and nuclear power, it seems ridiculous to discuss the merits of a claim by a group of foreign persons to a country on the grounds that some four thousand years ago God promised it to them. But the claim is based on passages in the Bible, which are read and believed not only by Zionists and other Jews but also by Christians and which are quoted in Sunday morning sermons by thousands of Christian ministers and read to children in Sunday schools and to adult Bible classes in thousands of parishes every week. This has caused some people to believe and assert that the establishment of the state of Israel in 1948 is a fulfillment of God's four thousand‑year‑old promise.

     Besides, in his book The Birth and Destiny of Israel, David Ben‑Gurion, Israel's first prime minister, said that the Bible gives the Jews a 'sacrosanct title‑deed to Palestine.'

     For these reasons it is deemed necessary to discuss this claim fully, and in doing so we shall restrict ourselves to the words of the Bible. Because it is the most widely read, we shall use the King James edition unless otherwise indicated.

     The book of Genesis, which contains the material in question, says that the promise was originally made to Abraham in Haran, Syria, after his father, Terah, brought the family from Ur of the Chaldees to go to the land of Canaan, but Terah decided to stay in Haran, where he died [19] . Shortly after Terah's death, the Lord appeared to Abram and said, 'Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father's house, unto a land that I will shew thee.' [20]

     Abram, in obedience to this command, folded up his tent, took his wife Sarai, his nephew Lot, and their flocks and shepherds and proceeded by stages to Palestine, finally pitching tents in the plain of Moreh near Sichem. Her God appeared to him again and said, 'Unto thy seed will I give this land.' [21]

     Abram did not remain in this area very long. He moved southward and, because of a drought that caused famine in Palestine, went down to Egypt. He was expelled from that country when it was discovered that he had falsely told the Egyptians that Sarai was his sister. It seems that Sarai was so beautiful that the Pharaoh decided to marry her. As was the custom, he bestowed lavish gifts upon Abram. Pharaoh, discovering the truth, returned Sarai to Abram and ordered him out of the country but let him keep the gifts he had given him. So Abram returned to Palestine richer than when he had left it.

     Abraham (his name had been changed from Abram to Abraham) repeated this unmanly performance at Gerar and led Abimelech, king of Gerar, to take Sarah (Sarai) for a wife. Before touching her, however, the Lord appeared to Abimelech in a dream and told him that the woman had a husband. Abimelech pleaded his innocence, and early the next morning summoned Abraham and demanded, 'What possessed you to do this?' Abraham replied, 'I thought there would be no fear of God here and that the people would kill me because of my wife.' So Abimelech took sheep, cattle, men and women slaves, and presented them to Abraham, and gave him back his wife, plus a thousand pieces of silver.

     Abimalech, who was a Philistine king, gave Abraham permission to graze within his domain but made him swear that he would never again trick him or his descendants.

     Isaac, too, represented his wife, Rebekah, as his sister in Gerar. But Abimalech discovered the truth and told his people, 'whoever touches this man or his wife shall be put to death.' [Or was this a mistake made by the author of Genesis, attributing to Isaac what Abraham had done?]

     Shortly after returning from Egypt, Abram's (Abraham's) and Lot's shepherds began to quarrel over pasture and water. To put an end to this quarrel, Abraham suggested to his nephew that they part and told him to choose the area in which he preferred to live. 'And Lot lifted up his eyes and behold all the plain of Jordan, that it was well watered every where, before the Lord destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah, even as the garden of the Lord, like the land of Egypt.' [22]

     So Lot decided to move there. Abram (Abraham) remained in the land of Canaan. 'Abram dwelled in the land of Canaan, and Lot dwelled in the cities of the plain, and pitched his tent toward Sodom.' [23]

     'And the Lord said unto Abram, after that Lot was separated form him, Life up now thine eyes, and look from the place where thou art northward, and southward, and eastward, and westward: For all the land which thou seest, to thee will I give it, and to thy seed forever. And I will make thy seed as the dust of the earth: so that if a man can number the dust of the earth, then shall thy seed also be numbered. Arise, walk through the land in the length of it and in the breadth of it; for I will give it unto thee.' [24]

     Despite God's assurance that his seed would be as numerous 'as the dust of the earth,' Abram complains in Genesis 15 that he has no heir to inherit his estate, mostly domestic animals. So the Lord again assured him that he will have children. 'And he brought him forth abroad, and said, Look now toward heaven, and tell the stars, if thou be able to number them: and he said unto him, So shall thy seed be. And he believed in the Lord; and he counted it to him for righteousness. And he said unto him, I am the Lord that brought thee out of Ur of the Chaldees, to give thee this land to inherit it.' [25]

     A few verses later on, we read, 'In the same day the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river the river Euphrates.' [26] [This is quite an expansion of the territory promised early that day].

     But Abram still had no children, and his wife Sarai who was getting along in years and knew it, feared that the wealth they had amassed would be inherited by their steward, a man from Damascus named Eliezer. So Sarai decided that Abram should marry another woman. She chose her maid, an Egyptian named Hagar, perhaps given to her by Pharaoh, to be his second wife. 'And Sarai Abram's wife took Hagar her maid the Egyptian, after Abram had dwelt ten years in the land of Canaan, and gave her to her husband Abram to be his wife. And he went in unto Hagar, and she conceived: and when she saw that she had conceived, her mistress was despised in her eyes.' [27]

     Naturally enough, Sarai did not like that. And, after obtaining Abram's grudging consent, she retaliated vigorously with the result that Hagar ran away into the wilderness where an 'angel of the Lord found her by a fountain of water' and said to her, 'I will multiply thy seed exceedingly, that it shall not be numbered for multitude.' The angel also told her that she will give birth to a son who shall be named Ishmael, who 'shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.' [28] As ordered by the angel, Hagar returned home. In due time, she gave birth to a son, Ishmael. Abram was comforted.

     Not long after Israel's birth, when Abram was ninety‑nine years old, the Lord again appeared to him and said, 'And I will give unto thee, and to thy seed after thee, the land wherein thou art a stranger, all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession; and I will be their God.' [29]

     It was at this time that God made a covenant with Abram and his 'seed' and ordained the rite of circumcision as 'a token of the covenant betwixt me and you.' Abram promptly obeyed and had himself and 'every man child' in his household, including Ishmael, circumcised, for he was told that any man 'not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people.' [30] During this conversation, the Lord also told Abram that his wife Sarai will have a son, and that hence forth his name should not be Abram but Abraham, 'for a father of many nations have I made thee.' Sarai's name also was ordered changed to Sarah.

     The Lord also assured Abraham regarding Ishmael, saying: 'And as for Ishmael, I have heard thee: Behold, I have blessed him, and will make him fruitful, and will multiply him exceedingly; twelve princes shall he beget, and I will make him a great nation. But my covenant will I establish with Isaac, which Sarah shall bear unto thee at this set time in the next year.' [31] Both Abraham and Sarah were now advanced in years, and it was hard for them to believe that Sarah would have a son. But she did, and he was named Isaac.

     The birth of Isaac caused trouble in Abraham's household. Sarah, who herself had suggested his second marriage and had chosen his second wife, now did not want to see Hagar or her son around the camp. 'Wherefore she said unto Abraham, Cast out this bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with my son, even with Isaac. And the thing was very grievous in Abraham's sight because of his son. And God said unto Abraham, Let it not be grievous in thy sight because of the lad, and because of thy bondwoman; in all that Sarah hath said unto thee, hearken unto her voice; for in Issac shall thy seed be called. And also of the son of the bondwoman will I made a nation, because he is thy seed.' [32] Hagar's son married an Egyptian girl. But Isaac, in accordance with his father's wishes, married Rebekah, daughter of Bethuel, son of Nahor, Abraham's brother.

     Sarah died at the age of one hundred and twenty‑seven. She was buried in the cave of Macphelah, located in a field at Hebron which Abraham purchased from one Ephron, the son of Zohar, for four hundred shekels of silver. This Field is the only plot of Land which he ever Owned ! Abraham was a nomad and, like all nomads, roamed over the countryside in search of greener pastures. He had no need to own land. He needed only permission to set up camp temporarily and to graze his flocks.

     Although Abraham was very old when Sarah died, he married again. 'Then again Abraham took a wife, and her name was Keturah. And she bare him Zimran, and Jokshan, and Medan, and Midian, and Ishbak, and Shuah. And Jokshan begat Sheba, and Dedan. And the sons of Dedan were Asshurim, and Letushim, and Leummim. And the sons of Midian; Ephah, and Epher, and Hanoch, and Abidah, and Eladah. All these were the children of Keturah. And Abraham gave all that he had unto Isaac. But unto the sons of the concubines, which Abraham had, Abraham gave gifts, and sent them away from Isaac his son, while he yet lived, eastward, unto the east country. And these are the days of the years of Abraham's life which he lived, a hundred three‑score and fifteen years. Then Abraham gave up the ghost, and died in a good old age, an old man, full of years; and was gathered to his people. And his sons Isaac and Ishmael buried him in the cave of Macphelah, in the field of Ephron the son of Zohar the Hittite, which is before Mamre.' [33]

     Today there is a great Islamic mosque over the graves which is called 'Al Khalili Mosque' in reference to Abraham, who is called Abraham Al Khalil, which means the fried (of God).

     Ishmael, Abraham's oldest son, had twelve sons. 'And these are the names of the sons of Ishmael, by their names, according to their generations: the firstborn of Ishmael, Nebajoth; and Kedar, and Adbeel, and Mibsam, And Mishma, and Dumah, and Massa, Hadar, and Tema, Jetur, Naphish, and Kedemah: These are the sons of Ishamel, and these are their names, by their towns, and by their castles; twelve princes according to their nations.'" [34]

                                                                           The Fulfillment

     It will be observed from the foregoing that Abraham was assured by God that he personally would be given the 'land of Canaan,' yet he lived and died a nomad, neither ruling over nor owning any part of the country except the burial plot at Hebron. Likewise, the promises made to his son Isaac, and to his grandson Jacob, or Israel, were never fulfilled. Both lived in the country as nomads at the sufferance of the Canaanite or Philistine people and their rulers. Both were buried in the same plot that Abraham had purchased for the purpose of burying his wife Sarah.

     The only other land owned by any of them was the small plot that Jacob purchased for the purpose of erecting an altar and which was abandoned when he and is sons moved to Egypt.

     It will be recalled that while Jacob was in Syria where he went to escape his brother Esau's wrath, the lord said to him, 'Return unto the land of thy fathers.' Yet his 'fathers' Isaac and Abraham owned no land whatsoever, other than the grave site at Hebron. Of course the Lord knew that. Why then did he tell Jacob to go to the land of his fathers?

     Abraham had obtained permission from the Canaanites to live and graze his flocks in their country. Isaac exercised that privilege after his father's death. Could the Lord have meant to tell Jacob to leave Syria and take the flocks he had acquired there to Canaan where he, too, would enjoy the privilege of camping and grazing his flocks as his father and his grandfather had done? Could this have been what God meant when he told the patriarchs that he would give them the land inhabited by the Canaanites?

     If this is what God meant, then his promises were fulfilled. But if He meant to give them exclusive possession and control, the obviously He did not fulfill His promises either to the three patriarchs themselves or to their immediate descendants, for Jacob and his sons moved to Egypt, and their descendants remained there four hundred years until Moses led them out.

     The reader is familiar with the beautiful story of Joseph, who was sold by his brothers to the Ishmaelite merchants, who took him to Egypt where he became an adviser to the pharaoh, or prime minister, after interpreting a dream for the pharaoh. The Bible says that Joseph later brought his brothers and his father to Egypt and settled them in 'the land of Goshen,' a lush area in the Nile delta. Jacob soon died and his sons took him to Palestine and buried him in the cave of Macphelah with his father and grandfather.

     It may be relevant to repeat here that before Jacob returned from Syria, his brother Esau had become a powerful chief and Jacob did not dare cross the border without his permission. Esau settled in Seir, the southeastern part or Palestine (the Negeb), permanently and eventually became master of that region. When the children of Israel came out of Egypt under Moses, the children of Esau, or Edom as he was also known, denied them permission to pass through their territory. During the Roman period, Edomite kings ruled in Judea.

     These facts indicate that the Lord granted possession of this land or a part of it to Esau, in fulfillment of his promises to Abraham and Isaac. It should be recalled that Esau was the elder son of Isaac, and under the traditional rules of that era, he was supposed to take his father's place upon the latter's death, but hunger caused him to sell that right to Jacob for 'a mess of pottage.'

     This is the interpretation made by Moses, for when he brought the Hebrews out of Egypt, he ordered them not to trespass upon the land of Edom. And Moses' successor, Joshua, did not try to occupy Edom. The Edomites were never evicted from the land occupied by them. May of them are still there...

     The children of Ishmael, Abraham's firstborn, multiplied rapidly in Palestine, with the result that a large number of them, perhaps a majority, emigrated eastward and established themselves in Arabia. Ishmael and his mother, Hagar, are buried in the Sacred Mosque at Mecca alongside the Ka'bah wall. The Ishmaelites, too, were never evicted from this territory. Many of them joined the army of Islam, which conquered and for centuries ruled an empire stretching from Spain to India.

     Some Ishmaelite families came with the victorious armies of Islam and settled in Palestine when the country was taken from its Byzantine rulers.

     The Bible says that Ishmael, who had twelve sons, 'twelve chiefs of as many tribes,' settled first in 'the wilderness of Paran' but that his descendants moved further east to Arabia. Genesis 25:18 of the Jerusalem Bibles says, 'He lived in the territory stretching from Havila to Shur, which is to the east of Egypt, on the way to Assyria. He set himself to defy his brothers.'

     Lot's descendents, the Ammonites and the Moabites, also had permanently settled in the region east of the Jordan River and became the rulers of the territories they occupied long before the sons of Jacob came out of Egypt. Indeed, the Hebrews had to fight Moab to pass through to the Jordan River.

     The descendants of Jacob multiplied in Goshen. As time passed, they ceased to think about the land of Canaan. They occupied a rich territory and lived a tranquil life in it. They even forgot the Lord, the God of their forefathers, and learned to worship the local gods. But history does not stand still. A nationalist revolution drove out the so‑called shepherd kings, which ruled the country, and xenophobia raised its head throughout the land. The Bible says that the new rulers of Egypt drafted the Hebrews (as the Israelites were known) into labor battalions organized to make bricks for Pharaoh's new cities. Evidently some of the Egyptian foreman treated the Hebrew laborers harshly.

     The reader will recall the romantic story of Moses, who was rescued from the Nile River by Pharaoh's daughter and was reared to manhood in the royal palace. One day, while visiting one of the brickworks, Moses saw an Egyptian taskmaster strike a Hebrew laborer. Incensed at the abuse of one of his people, and thinking that no one was looking, he killed the Egyptian. The next day, however, he learned that there was at least one witness to the crime, a Hebrew with whom he had had an argument. Fearing punishment, he at once left Egypt and crossed into 'the land of Midian.' (Midian was one of Abraham's sons by his third wife Keturah).

     In Midian, Moses became a shepherd for Jethro, the local priest, and married his master's daughter, Zipporah. One day, while tending Jethro's sheep out in the hills, Moses saw a bush burning but not being consumed by the fire. As he approached to investigate, God spoke to him and told him that He was the God of his fathers and that He wanted him to go back to Egypt and bring the children of Israel out and settle them in 'a land flowing with milk and honey,' the land He had promised to their ancestors...

     Just before his death, Moses had Joshua, the son of Nun, proclaimed commander of the Israelites, and to him was entrusted the task of leading them across the Jordan River to capture Canaan. Joshua eventually led a new generation of Israelites across Jordan, and after numerous battles with the Canaanites, they conquered the eastern or hilly part of Palestine from the border of Edom in the south to the Lebanese or Phoenician border in the north. This conquered territory comprise the areas later known as Judea and Samaria, and was described as extending 'from Dan to Beersheba.'

     Like Moses before him, Joshua avoided confrontation with the Philistines who dwelt along the Mediterranean coast south of Mount Carmel. He did not consider this area as part of the Promised Land. For in enumerating the tribes or clans that the Hebrews were to dispossess, God never included the Philistines, whose name the country was later to bear. (The Arabs call it Philistine ‑‑ not Palestine). Indeed, after Joshua had subjugated Canaan, the Philistines, who had 'chariots of iron,' a weapon that the Hebrews did not posses then, came up, defeated them, and levied tribute upon them. While the books of Genesis and Exodus did not include the Philistines in the list of nations or tribes to be dispossessed, Genesis 15 says that God promised Abraham's descendants all the land between the Nile and the Euphrates rivers, and Joshua 1:4 says the Promised Land extended from Lebanon and the Euphrates river to the great sea in the west.

     These passages raise a serious question concerning the size or extent of the territory promised the patriarchs and contradict the specific orders given by God when the Hebrews under Moses and later under Joshua marched out of Egypt to claim the 'Promised Land.' It will be recalled that God told Moses not to try to go through the land of the Philistines because that could mean war in which he would lose. And God specifically forbade Israel to try to take any part of Edom's territory or that of Moab and Ammon. Indeed, if God did really intend to give the Hebrews any part of Egypt, why did he take them out of that country?

     The Hebrews were in Egypt when Moses came to lead them into the Promised Land. Had God meant to give them the Egyptian territory east of the Nile River, it would have been much easier to claim it and defended it right then and there while they were in it. Surely the Lord, who inflicted ten plagues on Egypt, parted the waters of the Red Sea to allow the Hebrews to escape, and then drowned the Egyptian army, could have helped the Hebrews to take and to defend the Egyptian territory that he meant them to have. Since the country had been weakened by the plagues inflicted upon it, and its army had been destroyed in the Red Sea, holding a part of it then would have been a cinch.

     Likewise, if the Israelites were destined to occupy or colonize any part of Syria, why did not Moses or Joshua try to occupy that territory when they were on its fringes and before crossing the Jordan River? Both leaders, it will be recalled, told the Israelites that their Promised Land was 'across Jordan' or west of it, but not east of it. Reuben and Gad had to ask for special dispensation to stay east of the Jordan. They renounced or gave up their share in Canaan, preferring to stay on the east side of the river.

     Be that as it may, suffice it to say that the Israelites did not attempt to go back to Egypt after Moses took them out of it, except as individual immigrants. On the contrary, Egypt, which ruled Jerusalem before the time of Moses, returned again after Solomon's death to exact tribute from its Jewish kings.

     Two and a half of the Israelite tribes did settle in Trans‑Jordan, but Syria proper and Iraq were never settled by the sons of Jacob. True, David defeated the king of Damascus and exacted tribute from him. But the Hebrews did not annex or colonize his territory. Nor did their armies ever reach the Euphrates.

     However, the Assyrians, whose capital, Nineveh, was on the banks of the Euphrates, removed the people of 'Israel,' the northern kingdom of the Hebrews, to their country, and these ten tribes became assimilated there and were lost as Israelites [Here we can see that the author has not studied the history of the travels of Israel, across Europe to the British Isles and westward]. Their blood mingled with that of the Arameans of the country, and they ceased to be a separate people. They are part of the country's 'Arab' population of today.

     Apparently, no one during the long history of the Hebrews, or the Jews, took these expansionist statements seriously. (There is a political party in Israel today, the Likud, which dreams of the conquest of the entire area between the Nile and the Euphrates). And when Joshua had completed the conquest of Canaan, 'from Dan to Beersheba,' God told him to go ahead and divide this territory among the nine and a half tribes, thus indicating that the job of conquering the Promised Land had been completed. Joshua accepted this conclusion and divided the territory as directed.

     The tribe of Judah, of which the 'Jews' of today claim to be descended, (the Jews of today are not racially pure. There are too many converts among them) and Benjamin, the small tribe that eventually merged with Judah, were allotted the area from Jerusalem southward to the border of Edom. The city of Jerusalem itself was not given to them because Joshua was not able to take it. However, it was later taken by David and made part of Judah's territory.

     When the division of the conquered territory was completed Joshua said, 'And the Lord gave unto Israel all the land which he sware to give unto their fathers; and they possessed it, and dwelt therein.' [35]

     In his farewell address to the people, Joshua recited the many favors bestowed on them and quoted God as saying, 'And I have given you a land for which ye did not labour, and cities which ye built not, and ye dwell in them; of the vineyards and oliveyards which ye planted not do ye eat.' [36]

    This settles the argument concerning the extent or boundaries of the territory promised to Abraham and his descendants. It was the area that Joshua conquered and that comprised only the eastern part of Palestine, from Dan, on the Lebanese border in the north, to Beersheba on the border of Edom in the south. It included neither the land of the Philistines on the coast of the Mediterranean Sea nor the land of Edom. This is what God said, and Joshua and all the Israelites agreed...

     1). The 'promise' was originally made to Abraham and his 'seed' before any children were born to him. God specifically assured Abraham that He would make a nation of Ishmael 'because he is thy seed.' [37]

History records that when the Muslim Arab army took Damascus from the Romans and prepared to move on to Palestine, its commander, Khalid ibn‑al‑Walid, sent a message to the Roman commander in Palestine saying: 'God promised to give the country of Abraham and his descendants. We are the children of Abraham and have come to take possession of our sacred heritage. So please take your troops and go in peace.'...Likewise, the descendants of Esau must be included among Abraham's heirs. They were allotted the southeastern part of Palestine, the Negeb.

   2). The Bible contains conflicting statements concerning the size of the 'promised' land. At one time Abraham was told by God that he would get 'all the land which thou seest,' which would be a very small part of the country. At another time the future gift was enlarged to include the entire region between 'the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates.' In an even more generous moment God is reported to have said, 'Everywhere thy feet trod that shall be yours.' (This would include Russia, Europe, and the United States). This conflict, however, was settled when Joshua finished his conquests, which included only the eastern part of Palestine, extending 'from Dan to Beersheba,' and then wrote, 'And unto their fathers.' The Israelites accepted this and settled down to enjoy the fruits of their conquests.

   3). When Joshua, in obedience to God's orders, partitioned the promised and now conquered land, he gave the tribe of Judah the area west of the Dead Sea extending from Jerusalem to Hebron. But Jerusalem itself was not included in Judah's territory then because it had not been conquered.

   4). The Israelite tribes split into two often warring kingdoms. Judah and Benjamin formed one kingdom and Jerusalem as its capital. Their territory became known as 'Judea'...

   5). Although the 'land of Canaan' was occupied and colonized by the Hebrews, they never were the sole occupants of it. Many Canaanite pockets remained in it, including the entire population of some cities. The Edomites and the Philistines who inhabited the southern part of Palestine were not dispossessed by the Hebrews...

   6). In 722 B.C. the northern kingdom, Israel, was completely wiped out, and most of its people were carried to Assyria, where they became totally assimilated with the Assyrians. Their former land in Palestine was repopulated by people from Syria, who mingled with the remnant of the Israelites and Canaanites and became known as 'Samaritans.'...The majority, however, like the Canaanites, the Edomites, and the Philistines, as well as thousands of Jews...So no one today can make a claim to Samaria in the name of the lost ten tribes of Israel...[Therefore we can clearly see] 1). God's promise was made to Abraham and his 'seed,' meaning his physical, biological descendants. No other persons were included. Although Abraham had many sons, the heirs were somehow narrowed down to Isaac's son Jacob and through him to his twelve sons. When the promised land was conquered five centuries later, it was divided among the descendants of these sons, and Judah (with Benjamin) was allotted the eastern part of Palestine between Jerusalem and Beer Sheba. So those who claim any part of Palestine as 'Jews' must show descent from Judah and their claim must be restricted to Judea. Converts to Judaism like the Khazars in Russia or the Chicago black people who emigrated to Israel and were accepted as 'Jews,' not being Abraham's 'seed,' have no valid claim. If we admit the claims of these converts to the religion of Judah and Abraham we would open the door to the Whole Christian and Islamic worlds because both assert that they are following the faith of Abraham. Indeed the Christian church calls itself the 'New Israel,' and the Arabs refer to the ancient patriarch as 'Abouna Ibrahim' Father Abraham, and remember that the Jews themselves have not agreed on who is a Jew. 2). Those who qualify as the descendants of Judah may not claim the lands in which their enemy, the ten tribes of Israel, lived. The Hebrew tribes were expressly forbidden to transfer land from one tribe to another. [38]

     This and the history of the wars between the kingdoms of Judah and Israel make it clear that the Jews of today Have no Rights under God's Promise to Palestine! 'Judea' covered only the area between Ramallah in the north and Beersheba in the south, the Dead Sea in the east and the land of the ancient Philistines in the west. Moreover, there is a question whether those Jews now in Israel numbering three million out of fourteen million in the world today may expropriate the rights of the Jewish majority, which has no plans to immigrate to Palestine. 3). The Jewish state, established in 1948 and cleverly named 'Israel' for propaganda purposes, was established neither in Judea nor even in the area of the northern kingdom, Israel, but mostly on land that had been Expressly Denied by God to the Tribes of Israel. Only a tiny part of Judea, a corridor to the western suburb of Jerusalem, was included in it. The occupation of this corridor, as well as the occupation of the new Jerusalem, was in violation of the U.N. partition resolution." [39]

"Zionism is a convenient peg on which to hang a powerful weapon," wrote Louis Marshall, meaning that the project of a national home in Palestine would serve as an organization to supplant eventually the present national governments.

From whatever angle one considers it, the project is an experiment on a vast scale. Decades have passed since the experiment was begun, and it is time to ask:

a). Is the experiment a success or a failure?

b). Have the promoters of the experiment proved that they have throughout always acted in good faith, or not?

To answer these questions properly would require a careful study of conditions, not only in Palestine, but in the world  at large: such a study is beyond the present scope. It is, however, possible to examine certain points which bear directly on the above, namely:

   1). Did the promoters of the national home for the Jews use undue political influence on the European powers, England in particular, in obtaining control of Palestine?

   2). Did the promoters (the Zionist organization) benefit by the realization of the project?

   3). Was their administration of funds scrupulous and competent?

   4). Have the inhabitants of Palestine benefited by the mandate; has Great Britain benefited by it; and have the Jews as a whole benefited by it?

In connection with the first point, the origin of the Sykes‑Picot agreement and of the Balfour declaration has already been traced. Both of these were in direct violation of the agreement made by the British government in 1915 through Sir Henry MacMahon with the Sherif of Mecca, Hussein. Then the Sherif had agreed to aid the British cause against the Turks, in return for a promise that Great Britain would recognize and support the independence of the Arabs, south of the prospective Turkish boundary.

The British government withheld from publication part of the official correspondence containing this agreement, in spite of requests made in the House of Lords and the House of Commons. It is affirmed by a writer to whom Hussein showed Sir Henry's letters that, when the Arab leader flatly refused to accept territorial reservations proposed by the British authorities, the latter finally conceded the point and in January 1917 definitely undertook to support Arab claims in the whole territory south of the Turkish boundary, except in the protectorate of Aden and in the region of Basra in Southern Iraq. In March 1916, Sir Henry wrote again in the Sherif confirming the agreement.

But, as Chaim Weizmann once said, in this connection:

"Negotiating with a government is easy: one must demand things from a government; a government does not do things by itself; you must know what to demand, how to demand, and when to demand. If you know that, you know all the secret: that is essential for Zionists to understand." [40]

The Balfour declaration was endorsed in February, 1918, by the French government; in May, by the Italian government through its ambassador in London; in August, 1918, by a published letter from President Wilson; and, later by a joint resolution of the United States Congress in its 1922 session. The Balfour declaration was never submitted to either the French or British Parliament. On June 21, 1922, the House of Lords passed a resolution expressing its dissatisfaction with the terms of the mandate [41] .

There remains to consider whether the native population of Palestine has benefited by the mandate. It is recalled that 79 percent of the population at the time of the St. Remo award was Moslem and it is therefore fitting to weigh the complaints of the Palestine Arabs. These may be grouped as follows:

   1). Prior to the British occupation, Jews and Arabs lived together in tranquillity; since, there have been four serious breaks, of which three occurred in 1920 and 1921 and totalled 104 killed and 400 wounded; the last was still more serious. In view of the fact that each break has inspired a fruitful campaign of Zionist appeals, there would seem to be a deeper connection between the former and the latter.

   2). The purpose of article 22 of the League covenant was to promote "the well‑being and development of the people" of the mandated territories. Allien Jews, living outside Palestine, did not come within the scope of this aim. The Balfour declaration prevented Palestine from creating those self‑governing institutions described in article 2 of the mandate. Article 20 of the League covenant provided that all states members of the League must take immediate steps to procure their release from any undertakings inconsistent with the terms of the covenant: the Balfour declaration feel under this category.

   3). Because of the Balfour declaration, the British authorities set up in Palestine a Jewish agency whose function was to advance Jewish interests above all others; Jews should be represented in a Palestinian legislature only in proportion to their numbers.

   4). The Jewish national home policy cannot be accepted by the Arabs. If it constituted a reason for letting the Jews outside Palestine enter the country "as of right and not on sufferance," it was the more reason that the Arabs themselves should be confirmed in their national home as against all intruders, and immigration placed in their control. The Jews already in Palestine were there by right and should enjoy the same status as the Arabs. But to argue (as the British did) that the right of the Jewish community in Palestine should be extended to all the Jews of the world, was to adopt a line of reasoning "which no people, let alone the Arabs, would accept if applied to itself.

   5). The Arab‑speaking inhabitants, to whom Palestine is Falastin (Philistia) resent its being referred to in all official documents as Eretz‑Israel (land of Israel). They do not see why a country which they are accustomed to think of as their own should suddenly become Eretza‑Israel without their consent, simply because it has pleased other nations to set up a Jewish national home. They point out, and rightly so, that their own possession of the country since the seventh century gives them rights which the Jews scattered abroad do not possess.

The next question is, have the Jews as a whole benefited by the national home policy? The native Jewish population of Palestine is in much the same position as the Arab population: it has suffered from a large influx of immigrants causing acute unemployment. Nor have the immigrants benefited greatly.

It is clearly seen that the Zionists, through undue political influence, engaged England in carrying out a Jewish national home policy. This policy, contrary to England's prior engagements and against her own best interests, has resulted in a costly and futile experiment.

It has created a politico‑racial problem in the near east, which has been disastrous to the native population of Palestine, and even to Jewry taken as a whole. But to its Zionist promoters, it has brought vast influence through the expansion of their own powerful, international organization, and billions in revenue. World Zionist organizations, or Jewish agencies, or Alliance Israelite Universelle, whatever name it takes, it is at bottom always the Khal with its eighteen centuries of accumulated experience. Its aims and principles, whether shrouded in the mysticism of the Talmud or bluntly stated in the Protocols, are the same today as under the Roman empire.

But in recent years the technical improvements in its methods of operating and the debility of national governments, partly due to the increased facility of communication and consequent breakdown of national feeling, partly to the spread of demagogic ideas, sentimentalism, etc., have advanced its cause with singular rapidity. Just fifty years ago, a German wrote:    "Russia is the last defense against the Jews, and its surrender is only a matter of time. The elastic spirit of Jewish intrigue will crush Russia in a revolution, such as the world has never seen the like. When it has overthrown Russia, it will have nothing to fear from any quarter; when it has seized in Russia all the offices of state as it has done with us, then the Jews will openly undertake the destruction of western civilization, and this 'last hour' of condemned Europe will strike within a hundred or a hundred and fifty years at the latest, since the march of events moves more rapidly in our era than in preceding centuries." [42]

                                                                The Kellogg Palestine Pact

Extract from League of Nations, Treaty Series, Vol. XLIII‑1926, No. 1046, pages 41‑59. Convention respecting the Rights of the Governments of the two Countries and their respective Nationals in Palestine, signed at London, December 3, 1924. English official text communicated by His Britannic Majesty's Foreign Office. The registration of this Convention took place January 6, 1926. This Convention was also transmitted to the Secretariat by the Department of State of the Government of the United States of America, February 17, 1926. Preamble followed by the text of the mandates as it was approved by the Council of the League of Nations, 28 articles signed at London, July 3, 1922. Whereas the mandate in the above terms came into force on September 29, 1923:

Whereas the United States of America, by participating in the war against Germany, contributed to her defeat and the defeat of her Allies; and to the renunciation of the rights and titles of her Allies in the territory transferred by them, but has not ratified the Convenient of the League of Nations embodied in the Treaty of Versailles; and

     Whereas the Government of the United States and the Government of His Britannic Majesty desire to reach a definite agreement independently with respect to the rights of the two Governments and their respective Nationals in Palestine;

His Britannic Majesty and the President of the United States of America have decided to conclude a convention to this effect, and have named as plenipotentiaries:

His Majesty (titles):

The Right Honourable Joseph Austen Chamberlain (titles):

The President of the United States of America:

His Excellency the Honourable Frank B. Kellogg (titles):

Who...........have agreed as follows:

                                                                                  Article 1

Subject to the provisions of the present Convention the United States consents to the dominion of Palestine by His Britannic Majesty, pursuant to the mandate recited above.

                                                                                  Article 2

The United States and its nationals shall have and enjoy all the rights and benefits secured under the terms of the mandate to Members of the League of Nations and their nationals, notwithstanding the fact that the United States is not a Member of the League of Nations.

                                                                                  Article 3

Vested American property rights in the mandated territory shall be respected and in no way impaired.

                                                                                  Article 4

A duplicate of the annual report to be made by the Mandatory under Art. 24 of the mandate shall be furnished to the United States.

                                                                                  Article 5

Subject to the provisions of any local laws for the maintenance of public order and public morals, the nationals of the United States will be permitted freely to establish and maintain educational, philanthropic, and religious institutions in the mandated territory, and to receive voluntary applicants and to teach in the English language.

                                                                                  Article 6

The extradition treaties and conventions which are or may be in force between the United States and Great Britain, and the provisions of any treaties which are or may be in force between the two countries which relate to extradition or consular rights shall apply to the mandated territory.

                                                                                  Article 7

Nothing contained in the present Convention shall be affected by any modification which may be made in the terms of the mandate, as recited above, unless such modification shall have been assented to by the United States.

                                                                                  Article 8

The present Convention shall be ratified in accordance with etc. Done in duplicate at London this 3rd day of December, 1924.

The Kellogg‑Briand Pact was not written by Secretary of State Frank B. Kellogg, but was entirely the work of a Jewish Chicago lawyer, Solomon O. Levinsohn. He first presented it to the late M. Briand and later to Mr. Kellogg, who sponsored it. It became known as the Kellogg‑Briand Pact and was signed in Paris on August 27, 1928. [43]

The Arab revolt that began in 1936 lasted three years, starting with a six months general strike, guerrilla activities and effective liberation of large areas of Palestine. This Arab resistance was effectively broken by the British, using tanks and airplanes.

Members of leading Palestinian families acted as spokesmen before the British administration through the Arab Higher Committee, which was formed during the strike. The British banned the committee in 1937, arrested its members and exiled its leaders.

In a White Paper of 1939 Britain backed away from the idea of a Jewish states as proposed by the "Peel Commission," and sought to limit further Jewish immigration to 75,000 Jews over a five year period. The fall of the Neville Chamberlain government the next year saw the departure of Malcolm McDonald, Chamberlain's Colonial Secretary, and a firm supporter of the White Paper. Winston Churchill, who became Prime Minister in May 1940, had been an ardent friend of Zionism from the 1920s when he was Colonial Secretary and was clearly anti‑White Paper.

With the outbreak of the war Britain played for time and sought Arab neutrality in the war 1939‑1945. During this period two Jewish terrorist organizations, the Stern Gang and the Irgun Zvei Leumi, made a number of attacks on British security forces in Palestine and on officials abroad. Particularly noteworthy was the assassination in Cairo in November 1944 of Lord Moyne, the British Resident Minister in the Middle East.

Hart quotes a senior former British officer as telling him the following:

"You will never know how angry we were at not being allowed to fight the Jewish terrorist. We were close to mutiny. It is a part of the story of Palestine that will be censored for ever and a day. But I will tell you this much. When my boys were murdered by the Irgun whose commander was Begin and the Stern, one of whose leaders was Shamir, we used to go hunting for their killers in our civilian clothes. We usually knew who the bastards were, and when we found them we knocked them off."

Throughout World War II the Jewish Agency undertook extreme measures to secure military recruits in Palestine, ostensibly to serve with the British forces. However, such measures should be seen in the context of the longer term logic, of Zionist Colonization in Palestine and the attempt to create a Jewish military force.

In 1947 the British government relinquished its mandate, and the Palestinian problem, as a result, was transferred to the U.N. for settlement. On October 22nd of the same year an Adhoc committee of the U.N. General Assembly recommended the partition of Palestine allotting about 60% of the land area to the Jews and 40% to the Arabs. Despite protests from the Afro‑Asian states (India, Pakistan, and the few Arab states then members of the U.N.) the plan was gerrymandered through the General Assembly by American pressure.

By adopting the partition plan, the U.N., like its predecessor the League of Nations, violated its own charter: instead of preparing the native population for independence, it fragmented Palestine and helped a process of displacing its people. From the legal point of view, the U.N. could not give away what it did not possess. The partition plan would not have been adopted if a number of the smaller nations who were members of the U.N. had been allowed to vote freely. It was approved only because of the U.S. under the influence of the Jewish lobby; intimidated smaller countries whose votes were needed for the necessary majority. By this time, the Zionist had accelerated mobilization of their forces in preparation for seizing Arab towns and cities. Despite its illegal status, the Haganah militia, for example, expanded to number ten thousand trained and mobilized men, and forty thousand reservists. Zionist leader David Ben‑Gurion stepped up the process, as well as bought arms from the United States and Europe.

Comparatively, the Arabs of Palestine; who had been systematically disarmed by the British army were impoverished and ill prepared to resist the increasing Jewish attacks. City after city, village after village were overrun and occupied by the Jewish forces during the six months preceding the end of the mandate: Tiberias was occupied on April 19, 1948, Haifa on April 22, Jaffa on April 28, the Arab quarter in the new city of Jerusalem on April 30, Beisan on May 8 and Acre on May 14, 1948. The chronology of events in Palestine during this period shows that the British helped the Zionist forces and facilitated their drive to take over Arab cities and villages. For example, when the British began to move out of Haifa on April 21, 1948, they informed the Jews of their intention to withdraw, but not the Arabs. This enabled the Jewish troops and the Haganah men to occupy the city and the surrounding villages in upper Galilee, populated almost exclusively by Arabs. By now several hundred thousand Palestinians were on the move, criss‑crossing Palestine or fleeing towards neighboring countries, dodging the Zionist army, sleeping in olive groves and in mountain huts or swamping villages not yet under attack. In the flight crops were abandoned and families were scattered, never to be united again.

On May 14, 1948, the British washed their hands of the problem of Palestine when the chief secretary of the British administration formally announced that the Mandate was at an end. He was asked by a journalist:

"And to whom do you intend to give the keys of your office?" he replied: "I shall put them under the mat."

There was, by now, no doubt as to who would pick them up. The next day Zionist leader Ben‑Gurion declared at the Jewish national Council; the Knesset, the establishment of the state of Israel: a proclamation which was recognized within an hour by the United States.

Fighting broke out immediately between the Arabs and Jewish forces. The better armed and organized Jewish forces, with help from International Zionism, occupied not only the territory allotted to the Jewish state as envisaged by the U.N. but also more than half of that earmarked for the proposed Arab state. The Zionist success was mainly due to the biased policy of the mandatory authorities. Britain not only caused serious prejudice to the "rights and position" of the Palestinians, which was its duty, under the terms of the mandate, to safe‑guard, but used its mighty power to wreak massive defeats upon successive Palestinian revolts and facilitated the transfer of Arab land, cities and villages to the Jewish community.

In his book The Strange Eventual History, Edward Henderson, who served in the Arab Legion and Haifa during the last nine months of the British Mandate, recalls his memories and describes this period as "miserable...we are clearly handing the city over to the Jews, and almost all the Arab citizens were driven out by the Jewish irregular armies under our noses." Newly declassified British documents show that British government officials frequently expressed alarm at their security forces' behavior which they described as very lenient towards the Jews but very strict and brutal with the Arabs. They complained that the mandates higher authorities were taking no action to curb the excesses.

The Independent newspapers in London, which shifted the government files carefully, reported that one tactic, called "revolting" by officials, was to force Arab cab drivers to ride at the head of British convoys in case the road was mined. Some of the laws Israel has invoked to combat the present Palestinian uprising, including blowing up homes and administrative detention, were inherited from the British Mandate. As late as 1953 the Jews conducted a massacre at Quibya.

                                Massacres Committed by The Jews in Palestine - A Partial List

Following are just a few of the many massacres committed by the Jewish/Zionists; specifically the Hagana, Irgun and Stern Gangs of Israel: The Massacre of,

1. King David Hotel, July 22, 1946.                      10. Sharafat, Feb. 7, 1951.

2. Deir Yassin, April 10, 1948.                             11. Falameh, April 2, 1951.

3. Naseruddine, April 14, 1948.                           12. Quibya, Oct. 14, 1953.

4. Carmel, April 20, 1948.                                   13. Nahalin, March, 28, 1954.

5. Al‑Qabu, May 1, 1948.                                    14. Gaza, Feb. 28, 1955.

6. Beit Kiras, May 3, 1948.                                 15. Khan Yunis, May 31, 1955.

7. Beitkhoury, May 5, 1948.                                16. Khan Yunis Again, Aug. 31, 1955.

8. Az‑Zaytoun, May 6, 1948.                               17. Tiberia, Dec. 11, 1955.

9. Wadi Araba, May 13, 1950.                             18. As‑Sabha, Nov. 2, 1955.

19. Gaza Again, April 5, 1956.                            23. Houssan, Sept. 25, 1956.

20. Rafa, Aug. 16, 1956.                                     24. Qalqilyah, Oct. 10, 1956.

21. Ar‑Rahwa, Sept. 12, 1956.                            25. Kahr Kassem, Oct. 29, 1956.

22.  Gharandal, Sept. 13, 1956.                           26. Gaza Strip, Nov. 1956.

     July 2, 1946: The King David Hotel in Jerusalem was bombed. Killing 91 people.

Menachem Begin, who was recently given the so‑called Nobel Peace Prize {It seems this prize is given to the people who can kill the most Christians and get away with it! (April, 1996}, and is the same Begin who planned the destruction of the King David Hotel and the massacre of Deir Yassin. Ex prime minister, Shamir, was originallya member of the Jewish terrorist gang called Irgun, which was headed by none other than Menachem Begin. Shamir later moved over to the even more radical "Stern Gang," which committed many vicious atrocities.

Shamir himself has defended the various assassinations committed by the Irgun and Stern gangs on the grounds that "it was the only way we could operate, because we were so small. So it was more efficient and more moral to go for selected targets." The selected moral targets in those early days of the founding of the state of Israel included bombing of the King David Hotel and the massacre of Deir Yassin.

     April 9, 1948: A combined force of Irgun and Stern Gangs committed a brutal massacre of 260 Arab residents of the village of Deir Yassin. Most of whom were women and children.

Accounts by Red Cross and United Nations observers who visited the scene, said that the houses were first

set on fire and the occupants were shot down as they came out to escape the flames. One pregnant woman had her

baby cut out of her stomach with a knife. Reminiscent of the acts committed by their brother Jews in Russia

during and after the Bolshevik {Jewish} take over. The head of the International Red Cross delegation in

Palestine, Jacques de Reynier, drove into the village and was met by a detachment of Irgun terrorists. In his

report of the massacre the previous night, he wrote: "All of them were young, some even adolescents, men and

women armed to the teeth: revolvers, machine‑guns, hand‑grenades, and knives, most of them still blood‑stained.

A beautiful young girl with criminal eyes showed me hers {knife} still dripping with blood, she displayed it like

a trophy."

     May 1948: The U.S. appointed Count Folke Bernadotte of Sweden to mediate between the Arabs and the Israelis. In his first progress report (of Sept. 16, 1948) he recommended that the U.N. should affirm "the right of the Arab refugees to return to their homes in Jewish controlled territory at the earliest possible date." The Israelis responded in their own quiet way. The following day Bernadotte was murdered in Jerusalem.

The spectacular assassination which caused an International outcry was claimed, the, by an unknown "Fatherland Front," but that was a cover for Shamir's Stern Gang. Yoshua Zeitler and Meshlam Markover of Stern told Israeli Television earlier this year {1989} that, they respectively directed and led the operation that killed the Swedish diplomat and his French aid‑de‑camp. Zeitler, 71, said he decided to speak now because of fear that the U.N. and the "goyim" {non‑Jews} are again trying to force Israel into concessions.

     February 1949: Israel launched an offensive across the Armistice lines with Egypt which brought its forces to the Gulf of Aqaba, occupying the Palestinian police post of Umm Rashrash which they afterwards named Eilat.

     1950: Israelis seized the Al‑Uja de‑militarized zone on the Egyptian side and Baqqara on the Syrian side, expelling their Arab inhabitants and razed their homes to the ground by bulldozers.

     1950‑1955: Israeli forces unleashed more than 40 acts of armed aggressions against Arab states, almost all causing a heavy loss of life. This included attacks and massacres in Qibya, Huleh 1953, Nahalin, Kfar Qassem in 1954, Gaza and a Syrian outpost on Lake Tiberias in 1955.

     October 14‑15, 1953: Under the command of Ariel Sharon, Israeli squads attacked the unarmed Arab village of Qibya in the demilitarized one. Where they blew up 42 houses and killed more than sixty residents who were trapped inside. The details were so gruesome that the U.S. joined in a U.N. condemnation of the Israeli action, and for the first and only time, suspended aid to Israel in reprisal.

     July 1954: Israeli intelligence planted "a ring of spies (Moles)" in Cairo, its task was to begin sabotage operations against selected Egyptian, British and American targets...On July 14, the Alexandria post office was fire‑bombed and the U.S. Information Agency offices in Cairo and Alexandria were damaged by fire started by phosphorous incendiary devices, as was a British‑owned theater. Members of the spy ring were caught, and they confessed. They had been planted by Modin, the Israeli military intelligence organization. The purpose, presumably, was to sabotage Egyptian relations with the U.S. and Britain. Various commissions of inquiry into the affair conducted in Israel were never able to decide whether or not Israeli Defence Minister Pinchon Lavon authorized the operation.

     1956: Squads of Israeli soldiers committed a hideous atrocity in the Palestinian village of Kafr Qasim, forty‑seven innocent people were shot down in cold blood. The careful and premeditated mass murders, never received great attention in the West. Although the Israeli courts convicted eight soldiers of murder, they were all released within two years of their trial, and within three years one of them who had been convicted of killing forty‑three Arabs in an hour, was engaged by the municipality of Ramleh as the "officer responsible for Arab affairs in the city." Taking advantage of the situation created by Egypt's decision of nationalization of the Suez Canal, Israel joined forces with Britain and France to invade Egypt. As a result, it occupied the Sinai Peninsula, seized the Gaza Strip, and Sharm Al sheikh which guarded the Strait of Tiran and the entrance to the Gulf of Aqaba. a year letter it withdrew reluctantly under the combined pressure of the U.N., U.S.A. and the Soviet Union.

     In October 1956: Israel, backed by England and France, attacked Egypt to gain control of the Suez Canal. President Eisenhower {For reasons known only to the Jews, because he was himself Jewish}, however, defended the Arab cause, rallied world wide support for it and compelled Israel to abandon this military conquest. This is the only United States action which has not backed up Israel's crimes against the Arabs.

     1960‑1962: Israeli forces attacked Syrian villages on Lade Tiberias and brought death to hundreds of Arab civilians.

     1966: Squads of Israeli soldiers raided the Jordanian village of Sammu, they killed 18 civilians, wounded 100 others and demolished 130 houses including a school, a clinic and a mosque.

     June 5, 1967: Israeli committed its biggest, most treacherous and premeditated aggression against Egypt, Syria and Jordan. After destroying Arab aircraft on the ground in a lightening attack, Israeli forces invaded and occupied the rest of Palestine i.e., the West Bank, Gaza Strip, East Jerusalem, the Syrian Golan Heights and the Egyptian Sinai Peninsula. In the first days of its aggression and in plain disregard of the truth, Israel fabricated a charge of aggression against its victims and presented it in a dramatic manner to the U.N. Security Council. Western media spread this fabricated story and the whole world sympathized with the supposed victim.

The great deception practiced by Israel on the U.N. and the whole world is now completely discredited, the Israelis, therefore, changed their tactics and rely nowadays on the argument that, they were Not attacked by Egypt, they were in danger of Being attacked, and hence they resorted to a so‑called pre‑emptive strike. Alan Hart quotes a former Israeli Director of military intelligence as telling him "if Nasser had not given Israel the excuse to attack the Arabs, Israel would have invented a pretext for war within six or ten months" because its military planners had decided that the time had come to knock out vast amounts of mainly Soviet‑supplied Arab armour. Yitzhak Rabin, who as chief of staff planned this attack told Le Monde in February 1968, quite simply: "We knew that Nasser did not intend to attack."

     In 1967: The Israeli's made a third ruthless blitzkrieg attack upon the Arabs. This time they deliberately destroyed three quarters of a million dollar's worth of church property. There was no military necessity for this destruction; it was sheer vengeance against Arab Christians. This action created another 300,000 Arab refugees, thus making a total refugee population of Christian and Muslin Arabs, which is larger than the combined populations of Montana, Nevada and Wyoming. It was during this campaign that the Israeli's attacked the U.S.S. Liberty with the death of 34 of its number. If this had been an Egyptian or a Russian attack, American would have been at war, but the Jewish vote of America silenced any American criticisms of this action. Americans are also not told that Israel has always refused to obey any mandate of the United Nations. Resolutions affirmed by vote every year since 1948 recognize the right of the return of Palestinian refugees, but Israel always refuses to obey. Israel has been condemned over and over again for breaking the charter and now fulfilling the conditions upon which she was allowed to become a member!

     1967: The U.S.S. Liberty was deliberately attacked in International Waters as it monitored communications during the Six‑Day War. Israel used U.S.‑donated equipment to jam the ship's S.O.S., hoping to sink it and murder all aboard before word could get out. 34 sailors were butchered and 170 wounded in this blatant Act of War. The Liberty was part of the Sixth Fleet, a powerful group of men and ships paid for by U.S. Taxpayers to protect the Israeli's. What do the Jews think of our American Service Men, the descendants of the men who pulled their chestnuts out of the fire in World War II? Read the following for Just a sample of the many murders of American military, the Jews have committed.

Even though the United States, beguiled by Zionist propaganda and fearful of domestic political pressures by the Israeli lobby in the United States, has been the major supporter of Israel and has become an accessory to Israeli crimes by providing the financial backing and sinews of war used by the Israelis, Americans, and even American servicemen, are not exemtp from Israeli-perpetrated massacres if the highest Israeli authorities consider them to be in the way of their objectives.

During the June 1967 war of aggression unleashed by Israel against Egypt, Jordan and Syria, it was vitally important to the Israeli leaders tha eir plan for aggression against the Arab countries should not be monitored. They were exceedingly upset at the presence of an American intelligence ship, the USS Liberty, int he Eastern Mediterranean monitoring communications traffic in the area.

According to CIA Intelligence Reports, General Moshe Dayan ordered the June 8, 1967, strafing by Israeli aircraft of the USS Liberty and the resultant massacre of her defenseless crew of American sailors. In the words of Admiral Thomas H. Moorer, United States Navy,

"During this unprovoked attack, 34 U.S. Navy men were killed and 171 wounded."

     The U.S.S. Liberty was deliberately attacked in International Waters as it monitored communications during the Six‑Day War. Israel used U.S.‑donated equipment to jam the ship's S.O.S., hoping to sink it and murder all aboard before word could get out. 34 sailors were butchered and 170 wounded in this blatant Act of War. The Liberty was part of the Sixth Fleet, a powerful group of men and ships paid for by U.S. Taxpayers to protect the Israeli's. What do the Jews think of our American Service Men, the descendants of the men who pulled their chestnuts out of the fire in World War II? Read the following for Just a sample of the many murders of American military, the Jews have committed.

                                                   Israeli's Attempt To Sink The U.S.S. Liberty

An eyewitness report from the U.S.S. Liberty, by John Hrankowski:

     "June 8, 1967, was a bright, sunny day in international waters off Egypt. A breeze tracked our electronic‑laden vessel, the U.S.S. Liberty, cruising under orders of the U.S. Navy. As an engineer I was not on deck, but when several jets began buzzing us I bounded to the main deck. My shipmates waved, laughed, and joked. Among the planes was a Piper Cub, clearly marked with the Star of David. The plane flew so low and so slowly that we could see its camera turret as it snapped our picture. Over our communications equipment we could hear the aircraft identify our ship as the U.S.S. Liberty. These were our allies, our friends, the Israeli's. Several hours later, about 2 P.M., the jets returned and made five to seven passes over us, machine‑gunning and rocketing our lightly‑armed ship. More planes arrived, this time Mirage Jets, and loosed bursts of bullets and cannon fire as well as napalm into the ship.

     In the initial attack, nine of my surprised comrades died, scores more were lying everywhere, wounded, horribly burned, moaning, dead or dying. I was seriously wounded by rocket shrapnel. This, however, was not the end of the two‑and‑one‑half hour ordeal. Israeli torpedo boats streaked toward our stricken ship and fired five torpedoes. One hit home, bringing violent death to 25 more American crew members.

     Preparing to abandon ship, some of my shipmates dropped rubber rafts into the sea. It seemed like a horrible, slow motion movie as we watched the (Israeli) Torpedo Boats Circle Back and Fire Machine Guns at the Helpless Survivors on Deck and in the Rubber Rafts Already in the Sea . One curious torpedo boat skipper even picked up an empty raft ‑‑ perhaps to keep as a souvenir.

     To prevent the Liberty from communicating with other vessels and navy communication centers, our radio was jammed. This, we later learned, could only have been accomplished by a 'Friendly ' nation who knew our radio frequencies...For 19 (This report was published in The Washington Report on Middle East Affairs ‑‑ December, 1986) my shipmates and I have been trying to get out the truth about the attack that killed 34 Americans and wounded 171 others. All of us agree that The Attack Could Not Possibly Have Been A Mistake. The Israeli aircraft that came within 200 feet, the messages giving the ship's name, the two large U.S. Navy Flags billowing in the breeze, the big GTR‑5 stenciled on the bow ‑‑ characters well ‑‑ known to friend and foe as a U.S. Navy designation ‑‑ all clearly identified us.

     For years our crew was puzzled, and incredulous, when Israeli authorities claimed our ship had been mistaken for an Egyptian freighter. Of it all I Believe it was no Coincidence that the Israeli Attack Took Place on June 8, and that the next day Israel invaded Syrian territory, capturing the Golan Heights, an area it still holds years later and which it now says it has annexed for permanent retention.

     The Liberty was a navy electronic 'ferret' research vessel, listening to communications from both sides in the Six Day War...Very little of this information has ever reached the American public. Even Congress, importuned for decades by survivors to at least investigate the reasons behind the attack on a U.S. Military Vessel, up to now has refused to do so. After the attack, when the surviving crew members were still together aboard the ship, we were Officially Warned not to talk to Reporters . The Navy has Never been willing to release, even to us, a list of crew members so that we can mobilize them to tell our story...

     I speak frequently in the upstate New York area, and I find people invariably shocked that they have been kept ignorant of this incident. The fact that the American public remains largely unaware of what happened at the hands of a so‑called ally proves that the press has failed to exercise its mandate to keep the American People informed. The American public will believe and support us, when they learn Americans like themselves who joined the Navy to serve their country, when we produce irrefutable evidence that the attack on June 8, 1967, could not have been an error. It was, in fact, an Attempt to Sink an American Ship that might have Alerted the World to an (Senseless and Murderous) Israeli Act of Aggression.

     Americans should know the facts so they can judge the readability and reliability of a nation that wants us to believe it is 'our closest ally.' The American tax payers should know because they bought the planes, the boats, the bombs, rockets, torpedoes, and napalm that struck us. At one time we surviving crew members hoped official naval inquiries would elicit all the facts. But we have given up on that. Those inquires, we're convinced, were part and parcel of the American Government Coverup: Evidence was concealed, key crew witnesses were never interviewed; The Israeli Government's conclusions were never really queried or published ...' I just cannot accept the explanation that the attack was a case of mistaken identity,' Admiral Thomas H. Moorer, said. 'I think, Without a Doubt, that those 34 men who were killed in the Sneak Attack on the Liberty were Killed (Murdered) Deliberately. '..."

Is it not strange that on June 8, 1967, Israeli Jews viciously attacked the American Ship U.S.S. Liberty, leaving 34 American Sailors dead and 171 injured, yet to this day the Jewish media has ignored it and the American Congressmen have wittingly forgotten about it. The attack was deliberate, lasting almost 2 hours, and due to political orders the U.S. Military would not come to the aid of the U.S.S. Liberty.

General Dayan was a hero to the media in the United States. They never mentioned his complicity in such massacres as Kibya [44] . They swept under the rug his direct responsibility for the USS Liberty massacre. Even worse, the United States Government, for domestic political reasons, conducted a massive cover-up of the crime, making it an accessory after the fact to this slaughter of American servicemen.

 

If the same criteria were used to investigate and try those responsible for the USS Liberty massacre as has been used on German and Japanese war criminals, the entire Israeli War Cabinet and General Staff would have been convicted for the crime.

For his direct order of the massacre of defenseless sailors on an unarmed communications vessel sailing in neutral waters, General Dayan would have been hung, and then President of the United States Lyndon Johnson would have been sentenced to many years of incarceration in prison for obstructing justice in a criminal cover-up of the USS Liberty massacre.

                                             President Johnson and The U.S.S. Liberty Incident

The weekly newspaper "Christian News" is published by the Lutheran Church movement. In their issue of June 15, 1987, a very interesting article regarding the U.S.S. Liberty incident was published. The title of the article was

"LBJ gave the order to let the USS Liberty sink and let all hands on board drown. "

Some very important information was revealed in that article that is very relative to our survival today as a Christian Nation. The article revealed:

     "In a private interview of U.S.S. Liberty survivor Commander (Ret.) David Lewis, who was in command of the scientific mission of the ship which was the gathering and dissemination of intelligence data. He told me that the order to Abandon The USS Liberty and her crew to the attacking Israeli planes and Torpedo Boats came from President Lyndon B. Johnson. Two days after the rescue of the survivors, and after Commander Lewis had regained his eyesight, he was hit by an exploding torpedo ‑‑ Admiral and Commanding Officer of the Mediterranean Fleet Larry Geis called him into his quarters and said to him, 'Commander, we received your calls for help, and we attempted to send our planes to the rescue. But in the event that something happens to me, or if I am blamed for not answering your call for help, I want you to know exactly what happened. As soon as we received your radio call for help I deployed our fighter‑bomber planes and radioed the Pentagon of our action. A few minutes later I received a call from Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara ordering me to recall the planes because they were carrying nuclear arms. So I called them back. I immediately rearmed another squadron with conventional weapons, deployed it, and reported to the pentagon. A few minutes later I got another call from McNamara ordering me to recall these planes too. I was angry and mystified, and exercised my prerogative to go to the next highest level of authority so as to have McNamara's order reversed.

     Seconds later President Lyndon Johnson was on the radiophone, and I made my case to him. I told him that the USS Liberty had been under attack for an hour, and had radioed for help, and that I had sent out a squadron of fighter‑bombers armed with conventional weapons to the rescue. Then the President said to me, 'I Don't Care If The Ship Sinks and Every Man On Board Drowns , we are not going to fight against our allies (Israel)'."

The article then discusses the holding of the 20th Anniversary reunion of the members of the USS Liberty Veterans Association in a Washington, D.C. hotel on 5, 6 and 7 June, 1987. The article then continues:

"Besides us ordinary citizens and many other sympathizers and supporters at the banquet there were many retired naval officers, including three admirals, and a retired United States Ambassador. Admiral Thomas Moorer, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and former United States Ambassador to Egypt, Lucius Battle were the main speakers. Both told of their absolute belief that the one and one‑half hour air and sea attack by Israel was deliberate , that the official refusal to disclose all that is known about the attack is shameful, and that if the United States does not soon recognize that its interests are for the most part different from Israel's interests in the Middle East and in the world, there will be dire consequences. In our USS Liberty petition signing booth near the Vietnam Memori­al...twenty‑five hundred signatures have been collected. On Saturday, June 6, six of the USS Liberty survivors dropped by to add their signatures to the petition. While we were reminiscing another citizen identified himself as a member of AIPAC (American‑Israel Political Affairs Committee), and reminded us that AIPAC ‑‑ Controls the election or defeat of every member of Congress! "

As far as I know the "Only " so‑called national publication which is patriotic enough to print it was the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, in their September issue. Isn't that something, our enemies so the Jews say, or would have to believe so, is the only ones who respect our American Service Men enough to publicize, what should have been a National Event; but it was not because of the almost absolute control over our government that ZOG has at the present time. It is an article by Paul Findley who served in Congress from 1961 to 1982.     

                                                            The USS Liberty Heroes Honored

     "Thirty surviving crewmen of the USS Liberty, a US Navy reconnaissance ship nearly destroyed by Israeli forces 22 years ago (1967), gathered in Milwaukee the weekend of June 9‑11 for a reunion to recall that dreadful day and pay tribute to the 34 sailors Killed (Murdered) In the Assault . They have a lot to remember: The Liberty, an intelligence‑gathering ship, had only a pair of 50‑caliber machine guns for defense. But on the bright, clear afternoon of June 8, 1967, with its American Flag fluttering in a strong breeze, the ship came under a thundering, pitiless 75‑minute assault by air and sea forces. Israel, already victorious over Egypt and Jordan in the first three days of the Six‑Day War of June 1967, was planning a surprise ground offensive the next day against Syria (which for its part was calling a cease‑fire). The best explanation for what followed is that the Israelis feared the Liberty 'MIGHT' intercept messages revealing Israeli intentions, pass reports to Washington, and frustrate Israel's plans to scale and hold Syria's Golan Heights.

     Whatever the motivation, the Liberty endured an assault so fierce and sustained that crew members were convinced that Israel wanted the ship and its entire crew destroyed. Who but the survivors can relive those awful moments, the cries of the wounded as lethal bursts of cannon fire swept the ship; the stench of burning flesh as napalm created instant infernos on the deck; the earsplitting thunder as a torpedo tore an immense hole in the ship's sides; decks made slippery with blood; the feeling of outrage as circling torpedo boats deliberately shot to pieces rubber life rafts launched in case the ship had to be abandoned.

     Israel claimed the attack was a case of mistaken identity, apologized, and eventually paid reparations. President Lyndon Johnson, facing a crisis in Vietnam, accepted the apology warmly and did his best to keep from public knowledge the overwhelming conviction of crew members and their commanders, both the Navy and the National Security Agency, that the attack was deliberate. Why the cover‑up? For one thing, President Johnson feared publicity about the Liberty might alienate Jewish citizens he wanted to support the Vietnam war. Whatever the motivations, his cover‑up succeeded. Few Americans, even to this day, are aware of this tragedy, one of the worst in the Navy's peacetime history. As a consequence, the bravery of the Liberty crewmen has been little noted, and no Congressional investigation into the attack has occurred."

Although Minister of Defense General Moshe Dayan was principally responsible for the USS Liberty massacre, then Israeli Prime Minister Levi Eshkol also shared responsibility. Because the USS Liberty was an intelligence monitoring vessel, it is also certain that Meier Amit, head of Mossad (Israeli Intelligence) in 1967, and General Aharon Yariv, then head of Military Intelligence, had to give clearance for the attack. Amit had previously been a participant in the Kibya massacre. Further, the Chief of Staff of the Israeli Armed Forces in 1967, General Yitzhak Rabin, had legal responsibility to ensure that Israeli aircraft did not fire upon neutral vessels in neutral waters.

General Mordekhai Hod, then Commander of the Israeli Air Force, and later president of Israeli Aircraft Industries, Ltd., also was legally responsible for the crime committed by his pilots, as were the pilots themselves for carrying out obviously unlawful orders to strafe an unarmed neutral vessel in international waters. The same criteria of judgment rendered on the German and Japanese war criminals of World War II would have held these as well as other Israeli political and military leaders individually responsible and accountable for their acts of omission and commission regarding the USS Liberty massacre. Following are details on the massacre recounted by the distinguished former U.S. Congressman from Illinois, Paul Findley:

     "The day of the attack began in routine fashion, with the ship first proceeding slowly in an easterly direction in the eastern Mediterranean, later following the contour of the coastline westerly about fifteen miles off the Sinai Peninsula. On the mainland, Israeli forces were winning smashing victories in the third Arab-Israeli war in nineteen years. Israeli Chief of Staff Yitzhak Rabin, announcing that the Israelis had taken the entire Sinai and broken the blockade on the Strait of Tiran, declared: 'The Egyptians are defeated.' On the eastern front the Israelis had overcome Jordanian forces and captured most of the West Bank.

     At 6 a.m. an airplane, identified by the Liberty crew as an Israeli Noratlas, circled the ship slowly and departed. This procedure was repeated periodically over an eight-hour period. At 9 a.m. a Jew appeared at a distance, then left. At 10 a.m. two rocket-armed jets circled the ship three times. They were close enough for their pilots to be observed through binoculars. The planes were unmarked. An hour later the Israeli Noratlas returned, flying not more than 200 feet directly above the Liberty and clearly marked with the Star of David. The ship's crew members and the pilot waved at each other. This plane returned every few minutes until 1 p.m. By then, the ship had changed course and was proceeding almost due west. At 2:00 p.m. all hell broke loose. Three Mirage fighter planes headed straight for the Liberty, their rockets taking out the forward machine guns and wrecking the ship's antennae. The Mirages were joined by Mystere fighters, which dropped napalm on the bridge and deck and repeatedly strafed the ship. The attack continued for over 20 minutes. In all, the ship sustained 821 holes in her sides and decks. Of these, more than 100 were rocket size. As the aircraft departed, three torpedo boats took over the attack, firing five torpedoes, one of which tore a 40-foot hole in the hull, killing 25 sailors. The ship was in flames, dead in the water, listing precariously, and taking water. The crew was ordered to prepare to abandon ship. As life-rafts were lowered into the water, the torpedo boats moved closer and shot them to pieces. One plane concentrated machine-gun fire on rafts still on deck as crew members there tried to extinguish the napalm fire. Petty Officer Charles Rowley declares, 'They didn't want anyone to live.'" [45]

Paul Findley continues:

     "At 3:15 p.m. the last shot was fired, leaving the vessel a combination morgue and hospital. The ship had no engines, no power, no rudder. Fearing further attack, Captain McGonagle, despite severe leg injuries, stayed at the bridge. An Israeli helicopter, its open bay door showing troops in battle gear and a machine gun mounted in an open doorway, passed close to the deck and then left. Other aircraft came and went during the next hour. Although U.S. air support never arrived, within fifteen minutes of the first attack and more than an hour before the first assault ended, fighter planes from the USS Saratoga were in the air ready for a rescue mission under orders 'to destroy or drive off any attackers.' The carrier was only 30 minutes away, and, with a squadron of fighter planes on deck ready for a routine operation, it was prepared to respond almost instantly.

     But the rescue never occurred. Without approval by Washington, the planes could not take aggressive action, even to rescue a U.S. ship confirmed to be under attack. Admiral Donald Engen, then captain of the America, the second U.S. carrier in the vicinity, later explained: 'President Johnson had very strict control. Even though we knew the Liberty was under attack, I couldn't just go and order a rescue.' The planes were hardly in the air when the voice of Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara was heard over Sixth Fleet radios: 'Tell the Sixth Fleet to get those aircraft back immediately.' They were to have no part in destroying or driving off the attackers.

     Shortly after 3 p.m., nearly an hour after the Liberty's plea was first heard, The White House momentary approval to a rescue mission and planes from both carriers were launched. At almost precisely the same instant, the Israeli Government informed the U.S. naval attach é in Tel Aviv that its forces had 'erroneously attacked a U.S. ship' after mistaking it for an Egyptian vessel, and offered 'abject apologies.' With apology in hand, Johnson once again ordered U.S. aircraft back to their carriers." [46]

The cowardly and callous attempt by the Israeli airforce to ensure that there would be no survivors to their crime constituted an offense in its own right. Lord Russell of Liverpool, who was legal adviser to the Commander-in-Chief in respect of all trials of German war criminals in the British Zone of Occupied Germany, reports a similar crime committed by German submarine U-i52's commander Kapitanleutnant Heinz Eck, who had ordered his crew to open fire on the rafts of the Greek vessel SS Peleus in 1943.

"The commander and four members of his crew were tried by a British Military Court in Hamburg in October 1945 for being concerned in the killing of members of the crew of the Peleus by firing and throwing grenades at them. All were found guilty of the charge and the commander and three others sentenced to suffer death by shooting." [47]

Details on CIA documents indicting the Israeli leadership for murder of the defenseless crew of the USS Liberty were uncovered through the painstaking research of James M. Ennes, Jr., an officer of the USS Liberty and an eyewitness to the massacre:

     "The CIA reported a conversation with a confidential Israeli source who strongly implied that the attack was no error. The message read in part: 'He said that 'you've got to remember that in this campaign there is neither time nor room for mistakes,' which was intended as an obtuse reference to the fact that Israel's forces knew what flag the Liberty was flying and exactly what the vessel was doing off the cost. (The source) implied that the ship's identity was known at least six hours before the attack but that Israeli headquarters was not sure as to how many people might have access to the information the Liberty was intercepting. He also implied that there was no certainty or control as to where the information was going and again reiterated that Israeli forces did not make mistakes in their campaign. He was emphatic in stating to me that they knew what kind of ship the USS Liberty was and what it was doing offshore. This report gains credibility when we recall that Israel did identify the ship six hours before the attack. Hence, the informant does indeed have access to inside information.

     On November 9, 1967, a confidential source reported clearly and unequivocally that General Moshe Dayan ordered the attack. The message read: ' (The source) commented on the sinking (sic) of the US Communications ship Liberty. They said that Dayan personally ordered the attack on the ship and that one of his generals adamantly opposed the action and said, 'This is pure murder.' One of the admirals who was present also disapproved the action, and it was he who ordered it stopped and not Dayan." [48]

The United Nations has time and again rebuked Israel for the violations of the laws of war and conquered territory. Time and again the U.N. commission on human rights has declared the actions of Israel in the occupied territories violate human rights and "constitute war crimes." They specify Israel's acts in the deportation. The decisive motivation for the settlement policy, given to the world, is based upon the so‑called "historic‑right" of the Jewish nation.

The basis for this belief, is in the permanent Jewish ties to "Eretz Israel" (the land of Israel), is the divine promise of God. No wonder that Menachem Begin called the territories "liberated" not "occupied." Addressing a crowd at Kadoum Settlement, manned by Ghoush Emunim, Begin said: "Judea and Samaria are Israeli land, belonging to the Jewish people, settlement is right and we have a duty to continue to fulfill that right and duty."

In addition to this supposed "historical right" the security argument forms the second important pillar of legitimacy for the Jewish settlements. According to the conception of Israeli politicians, the state still has no final "secure" border capable of defence. The new defence village settlements should help secure existing and possible future borders, in that they serve as the first military bulwark against possible Arab attacks.

     February 15, 1968: Israel invaded PLO bases in Karamah, on the eastern bank of the River Jordan with helicopter‑ borne troops and tanks. Three hundred commandos fought off 1,500 Israeli soldiers and force them to retreat. The battle lasted all day and into the evening. Although the village was totally destroyed, the Palestinian defenders repelled the Israelis and inflicted heavy casualties among the invaders. By the Israeli account, they lost 28 soldiers and 90 were wounded.

     1969: The Israelis distinguished themselves by committing a horrible crime, in retaliation of attrition war across the Suez Canal, Israeli war planes raided an Egyptian school "Bahr al Baker" in southern Egypt killing 75 children and wounding over 100.

     August 1969: An Israeli set fire to one of the most sacred Islamic shrines. Al Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem, causing extensive damage to it. This crime plunged over one billion Muslims throughout the world into the deepest anguish.

     March 12, 1970: Israeli forces invaded part of South Lebanon known as "Fatah‑Land" killing a number of Palestinian and Lebanese civilians.

     September 8, 1972: Without any apparent cause or reason, Israeli Phantoms bombed Palestinian targets in Lebanon and Syria in a series of raids killing hundreds of civilians. This action was explained by the Israeli prime minister the next day, who in the Knesset, that "Israel had now adopted a new policy to strike at the terrorist organizations where ever we can reach them."

     February 21, 1973 ‑‑ Israel landed commando units on the coasts of the northern Lebanese city of Tripoli. They attacked two Palestinian refugees camps, dynamited several houses and buildings, some over the heads of their occupants, killing 35 refugees and wounding a similar number. On the same day, Israeli War Planes shot down a Libyan Civilian Aircraft over the Sinai Desert Killing over 100 Passengers!

     April 10, 1973: Israeli commando units with the help of some Lebanese collaborators stormed into a residential quarter in East Beirut and killed three PLO leaders: Yusef Al Najjar, Kamal Adwan and Kamal Nasser.

     1974: Israeli air‑borne commando units attacked Beirut airport and destroyed 13 Lebanese civilian aircraft on the ground. In the same year, Israeli planes intercepted a civilian Syrian aircraft and forced it to land at Lydda (Lod) airport on suspicion that it was carrying a Palestinian commando leader. Christian shrines in Jerusalem were subjected to several acts of aggression and robbery. This included damaging the church of the Holy Sepulchre, burying 4 other Christian centers, and stealing the diamond Crown of the Virgin Mary {An not a peep from so‑called American Ministers!}.

     1975‑1980: Israeli's intelligence service, the Mossad, distinguished itself by feats of terrorist actions that killed a number of Arab and Palestinian diplomats, scientists and journalists such as the PLO representatives in London, Rome, Paris and Brussels, prominent Palestinian journalist and writer Ghassan Kanafani and the Egyptian nuclear scientist Dr. Al Mashad.

     1981: Putting their so‑called pre‑emptive policy in action, Israeli warplanes raided and destroyed a peaceful Iraqui nuclear reactor near Baghdad.

     June 6, 1982: The Israeli armed forces invaded Lebanon. Less than two weeks after its election, the New Menachem Begin government unleashed the first blow in its war to liquidate the PLO in Lebanon.

     June 1982: Israeli forced launched their savage invasion of Lebanon. As a result of this invasion a great number of refugee camps, Lebanese towns and villages were destroyed. Israeli warplanes launched eight raids on Palestinian targets in South Lebanon and Beirut, killing nearly one thousand people and wounding many others. The fantasy of the "pre‑emptive strike policy" was dropped and even the Jerusalem Post correspondent was at pains to explain the purpose of the bombing raids. "The past few days of activities on the northern border followed five weeks of quiet. It is not know what triggered Israeli's Friday afternoon raid." Outraged by Israel's onslaught and the cruel destruction of Beirut, Jewish journalist Jacobo Timmerman called Begin "unbalanced" ...a "terrorist" and "a disgrace to the people." He accused Sharon of helping to make Israel "the Prussia of the Middle East."

     July 17, 1982: U.S. supplied F‑4 and F‑5 jets swooped low over Beirut in 4 passes, bombing the densely‑populated Fakahani district. Five tall apartment buildings were destroyed, 200 people were killed and 800 wounded. Forty percent of the victims were small children, and one of the survivors was an unborn baby pulled by doctors from the dead mother's womb. Israel's then Chief‑of‑staff Rafael Eitan announced on Israeli Radio that civilian causalities were unimportant and that the Arab causalities suffered as of the July 17 attack did not yet constitute the Israeli "final solution."

     September 1982: Israeli raids and bombardments continued during the weeks following the raid on Beirut in July. It was the beginning of the invasion of Beirut; after which an 80 days war led by Ariel Sharon, (then War Minister of Israel) resulted in the destruction of much of Beirut, killing and wounding thousands of Palestinians and Lebanese civilians. It was during this invasion that the massacre of the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps was committed. Where over 2,500 Palestinian women, children and elderly people were slaughtered in cold blood. Even the Israeli high court held a number of the Israeli military officers, including Sharon, responsible.

      October 1982: Israeli terrorists bombed the houses, cars and offices of three elected Palestinian mayors on the West Bank, Nablus, Ramallah and Al Beireh.

     1984: Israeli warships and gunboats intercepted merchant ships on the high seas off the coast of Lebanon and kidnapped a number of Palestinians.

     1985: Israeli planes raided and destroyed the PLO headquarters in Tunis.

     1986: Israeli secret agents assassinated a noted Palestinian cartoonist Naji Al Ali, in London.

     April 1988: Israeli commando units stormed into the house of Khalil Al Wazir, in Tunis. Al Wazir who was the most senior PLO military commander and believed to be in charge of the Intifada, was murdered while sleeping.

     February and March 1989: Israeli F‑16 planes pounded Palestinian targets in Lebanon's Shouf Mountains, Damour and the Beka's valley with a series of raids killing a numbers of civilians, including 15 school children in Damour.

     April 14, 1989: Israeli border guards and settlers attacked the peaceful and unarmed village of Nahalin near Bethlehem. Eight Palestinians were massacred for no reason and over 50 were injured. The killings took place late in the night and at the beginning of the Holy month of Ramadan.

The Israeli hordes even attacked the dead to satisfy their bestial tendencies. In April, 1954, during Holy Week, and on the eve of Easter, The Christian cemeteries in Haifa were invaded, crosses broken down and trampled under the feet of these miscreants, and the tombs desecrated. The Israeli military conquest, therefore was made against a defenseless people, who had been softened up by such earlier massacres as Deir Yasin {250 Arabs; men, women and children were massacred there}.

The Jew, Weizman, referred to the massacre as this "miraculous simplification of our task" and Ben Gurion said "without Deir Yasin there would be no Israel." Americans are not told that 10% of the Arabs killed by the Israeli's in 1948 were Christian and that 10% of the Arab property confiscated belonged to Christians. Nor are they told the fact that Israel's massacres and military actions forced 100,000 Christians to become refugees.

Equally significant (to the settlements which have established an irrevocable condition) have been intimations from official quarters that Israel is planning to retain at least most, if not all, of the territories seized in 1967. This intention was clearly illustrated in a speech made by Mordechai Zippori, Israeli minister of energy, on October 10, 1982. The occasion was the opening ceremony of Inav, a new settlement, established on land seized from the villagers of Anabta, near Tulkarem.

The continuation of settlements is the backbone of the Zionist movement in the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip. It is the only means to defeat any peace initiative which is intended to bring foreign rule to Judea and Samaria. The presence of an Arab majority in the West Bank should not prevent Israel from accelerating the settlement process in the occupied territories. He was born in Petah Tikve (one of the earliest Jewish colonies established in Palestine) which was surrounded by many Arab villages. No trace has been left of those villages today, but Petah Tikve remained. Those closing words have clear and chilling implications for Palestinians in the occupied territories.

The ruling Likud‑led coalition, represents an extreme Zionist philosophy, as it has opposed any compromise and called for retention of the occupied territories. The Labour Alignment although appearing to the less intransigent on the question of territorial revision, has indicated that at the very least East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights are irrevocably a part of Israel.

The Zionist leaders, have left no one in doubt that their policies will continue with an even greater relentlessness. Israel's response to the eight‑point Arab peace initiative of Sept. 1982 ("Fahd Plan") and to the Reagan Plan of February 1983 (which called among other things for an immediate halt to building a new settlements in the occupied territories) was eight more settlements!

                                                                  Night of The Broken Clubs

                                                                   By Yossi Sarid [Member of the Israeli Parliament ‑‑ YA]

     "The events described below are grim ones, which will always follow us, and which we can in no way escape. From the story that follows it is clear that what Israel was, it can never again be. It is now another country, just as the IDF is today another army, and in the new Israel any act of horror is possible.

     For my own reasons I prefer to withhold the names of the people involved and certain other identifying details. However, the rest is a full and accurate account. What do the names matter anyway? This could have happened to every one of us, almost every one.

      The events took place during the second month of the Intifada, at the end of January 1988, and they have never before been made public: Captain A., commander of the support company of one of the more famous regiments, was summoned to his commanding officer, the Area Commander, a lieutenant colonel. The colonel gave the captain explicit orders concerning arrests to be performed in the village of Khawara, near Nablus. Captain A. listened to the instructions and contested them: he told his commander that the orders contradicted, in his opinion, IDF morality, and that they would not bring about calm in the area either. The colonel responded that this was a new policy dictated from higher up, and that it had to be followed.

     When the colonel gave the orders there were several other officers, of various ranks, present in the room. Not one of them commented or got involved. Captain A. who became very agitated, asked if he was being 'compelled' to carry out the mission, saying that if so, he would perform it despite his conscientious objections.

     That was in the morning. In the afternoon, Brigadier General Z. summoned Captain A. to discuss with him, 'How all this will affect the morale of the company.' Captain A. believed that a face‑to‑face discussion between the company and General Z. would definitely be helpful, and such a discussion was indeed scheduled for the next day, following the night action in Khawara.

     When evening came, the company, forty soldiers and four officers, arrived at the departure point. They boarded a civilian bus and joined with three additional officers who were traveling in two jeeps. One of the officers, Major G. complained to Captain A. that he needed the whole operation like a hole in the head, and that it might ruin his relationship with the Mukhtar [head ‑‑ YA] of the village.

     At approximately 11 p.m. the bus and the two jeeps arrived at Khawara. Major G. proposed that instead of the soldiers going house‑to‑house, he would instruct the Mukhtar to gather the people in one place. Major G. went to the Mukhtar, handed him a list of 12 names, and a short while later they were all brought over without any problem. As they were being collected, they sat on the sidewalk, near the stores at the village center, without showing any resistance.

     The soldiers bound the villagers' hands behind their backs and led them to the bus. Major G. left the area and was not seen again. The bus took off and stopped some 200 to 300 meters down the road, near an orange grove. The 'locals' [as Israelis refer to Palestinian residents of the occupied territories ‑‑ YA] were taken off the buss and led into the grove in groups of three, one group after the other, each accompanied by an officer. Altogether there were four such rounds made. Captain A. could not stomach actually taking part in the operation, but he ascertained from afar that it was being carried out according to orders. Later he testified that the separation into groups of three was necessary in order 'to keep things under control.'

      In the dark, in the grove, the soldiers bound the legs of the residents of Khawara too, and laid them down on the ground. The officers urged the soldiers 'to finish things quickly, so that they could all leave and forget.' They then stuck cloths into the Arabs mouths, so that they would not be able to shout, and the bus driver revived the engine [the same way the Jews did, while executing White Christian Russians during and after the Bolshevik revolution], so that the noise would mask the screams.

     And then the soldiers faithfully executed the orders they had been given:

   1). To break both arms and both legs of the Arabs with blows of their clubs;

   2). Not to hit the people's heads;

   3). After breaking the arms and legs, to untie the wounded men and to leave them in the field;

   4). To leave one 'local' with broken arms, but not broken legs, so that he would be able to return to the village on his own and summon help.

     The mission was executed in its entirety. In the course of the action most of the wooden clubs carried by the beating soldiers broke. Those soldiers who absolutely refused to take part in the beating were permitted to remain in the bus, guarding the prisoners.

     Four and a half months later, in the beginning of May, the Red Cross filed a complaint with the police against the IDF for its brutality towards residents of the village of Khawara. An investigation was begun, and a portion of its findings are reported here. If the Red Cross had not complained, the whole affair would have remained buried in the orange grove to this day.

     One cannot even console oneself with the thought that this was an isolated event, what is usually referred to as 'an exception.' Two days earlier the exact same action, following precisely the same orders, with the same soldiers and some additional officers, took place in the neighboring village of Beita [Where the Jewish settler girl was killed later! ‑‑ YA].

     The investigative Military Police gathered testimony from 29 soldiers and all the officers involved:

   1). The Commanding General of the Region: Didn't hear, didn't see, didn't know a thing;

   2). The commander, Brigadier General Z. Didn't hear, didn't see, didn't know a thing [despite meeting, according to other testimony, with the soldiers of the support company both before the Khawara action and after it];

   3). The Area Commander, Lieutenant Colonel Y. Refused to present his version, either verbally or in writing;

   4). Major G. admitted that there was no need for force to be used during the arrests;

   5). Captain A. said that immediately following the action he gathered the perturbed soldiers and promised them that he would to General Z. and ask that he 'Not give us any more such tasks.' At the end of his testimony he asked that it be emphatically noted that 'The above case was among the reasons for my leaving the IDF.'

     The Military Police investigation determined that in accordance with the material gathered, and based on the testimony of Captain A. 'Lieutenant Colonel Y. exceeded his authority by ordering the beating of locals.' Since the events in Khawara, it should be noted, several of the officers involved have been Promoted in Rank or Assignment. Not A Single Person Has Been Brought To Trial! "

                                                                         The Landau Report

For those who claim the Israeli government is the "only democracy in the Mideast," the following is proof that the form of government is far less important than the actions of government. In late 1987, the Landau Commission was established to investigate the practices of the Israeli Shin Bet (security police) after a detainee died in Jenin Prison. The commission was headed by former Israeli Supreme Court Justice, Moshe Landau.

The published report not only acknowledged the routine use of torture, but condoned its use for "security reasons." The Commission concluded that "moderate force" could be used to extract confessions from Palestinians in detention.

                                                                Racism In The Promised Land

60,000 Jewish settlers in the West Bank use more water than the one million native Palestinians. The Israeli International Terrorists would have us believe this is because Arabs are filthy and don't like to bathe. But the truth is the racist policies of the military government allow unlimited water use by Jews but severely limit what can be used by Palestinians. Only Palestinians have water meters and (the NRA would love this) Palestinians are required to register water pumps and obtain permits for spare parts.

                                                                  Turning The Desert Green

There was a tear jerk story on National Public Radio, recently, about a fire started by Arab protesters that destroyed many acres of trees which are "particularly cherished by Jews because of their sense of pride in turning the desert Green."

It certainly is sad to see anyone's labor of love destroyed by fellow humans but the claim that Jews cherish a particular concern for trees needs to be put into proper perspective. To quote a paragraph from a report by the Palestinian Human Rights Information Center. "TREES: It is estimated that well over 100,000 fruit and olive trees, in addition to hundreds of thousands of seedlings and small plants have been destroyed by the Israeli Army." The uprooting of trees is only one indicator of the widespread punitive destruction of trees and crops, mostly by the army but also by settlers. Bulldozers clearing streets of stones, have uprooted hundreds of trees and whole orchards have been uprooted as punitive measures for alleged stone and Molotov throwing in the area.

In many instances of prolonged curfew or military siege, the army has carried out bulldozing and uprooting operations on trees and other crops, in addition to preventing regular harvest and maintenance of crops. Crops have been bulldozed or burned by both settlers and the army in several locations of the West Bank and Gaza, often without official pretext. Jiftlik farmers whose homes were demolished in November (1991) have been prohibited from harvesting their crops.

                                                                      Judaism Is Pharisaism

There are also many people living throughout the world who practice a religion called Judaism; they are people from various races and call themselves Jews because of their religious beliefs. This problem is further compounded because there are some Scots, Irish, Germans, Swedes, etc., who also practice Judaism and call themselves Jews. Even Sammy Davis Jr. [a Negro] claimed to be a Jew.

These people are not Khazarian‑Jews nor are they necessarily political Zionists. They simply practice a religion called Pharisaism [Judaism] which, except for the name, has not changed in 2,000 years. The eminent Jewish Rabbi, Louis Finkelstein, head of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America, in the Foreword of his first edition, The Pharisees, The Sociological Background of Their Faith, stated on page 21:

"Judaism...Pharisaism...Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became modern Rabbinism. But throughout these changes in name...the spirit of the ancient Pharisee survives, unaltered...From Palestine to Babylonia; from Babylonia to North Africa, Italy, Spain, France and Germany; from these to Poland, Russia, and Eastern Europe generally, ancient Pharisaism [Judaism] has wandered...demonstrates the enduring importance which attaches to Pharisaism [Judaism] as a religious movement..."

The celebrated Rabbi Louis Finkelstein in his great classic quoted from above traces the origin of the form of religious worship practiced today under the present name of "Judaism," to its origin as "Pharisaism" [Tradition of the Elders] in Judea in the time of Jesus. Rabbi Louis Finkelstein confirms what the eminent Rabbi Adolph Moses states in his classic Yahvism, and Other Discourses, in collaboration with the celebrated Rabbi H.G. Enlow, published in 1903 by the Louisville Section of the Council of Jewish Women, in which Rabbi Adolph Moses, on page 1, states:

"Among the inumerable misfortunes which have befallen...the most fatal in its consequences is the name Judaism...Worse still, the Jews themselves, who have gradually come to call their religion Judaism...Yet, neither in biblical nor post‑biblical, neither in Talmudic, nor in much later times is the term Judaism ever heard...the Bible speaks of the religion...as 'Torath Yahve' the instruction or the moral law revealed by Yahve...in other places...as 'Yirath Yahve,' the fear and reverence of Yahve. These and other appellations Continued for many ages to stand for the Religion ...To distinguish it from Christianity and Islam, the Jewish philosophers sometimes designate it as the faith or belief of the Jews...

     It was Flavius Josephus, writing for the instruction of Greeks and Romans, who coined the Term Judaism , in order to pit it against Hellenism...by Hellenism was understood the civilization, comprising language, poetry, religion, art, science, manners, customs, institutions, which...had spread from Greece, its original home, over vast regions of Europe, Asia and Africa...The Christians eagerly seized upon the name...The Jews themselves who intensely detested the traitor Josephus, refrained from reading his works...Hence the term Judaism coined by Josephus Remained absolutely unknown to them...It was only in comparatively recent times, after the Jews became familiar with modern Christian Literature, that they began to name their Religion Judaism. "

This statement by the world's two leading authorities on this subject clearly establishes beyond any question of any doubt that so‑called "Judaism" was not the name of any form of religious worship practiced in Judea in the time of Jesus.

We cannot be expected to agree with the religious beliefs of the Jews any more than we do with the Hindus, Buddhists, Mormons or Catholics. Why is it so terribly wrong to be anti‑Jew and not terribly wrong to be anti‑Buddhist, anti‑Hindu, anti‑ Catholic and anti‑Mormon? Since we also disagree with these other religions shouldn't we also be branded as anti‑Hindu, anti‑Buddhist, anti‑Catholic and anti‑Mormon?  It should be obvious to anyone that these religions are anti‑us [Christians].

Why isn't someone crying out about The Jews' bias against Christians? Why is it we can speak out against the pope, Joseph Smith, and Buddha and no one really gets upset, but speak out against a Jew or Judaism and you are immediately denounced?

                                                                        Christ Was Anti-Jew

While the Scripture does not state, by name, what political, economic, and religious organizations are righteous, we should have enough sense to follow the guidance and example of our Lord and Saviour.

A reading of John 8 and Matthew 23 should be enough to convince anyone that Christ was anti‑Jew:

"Ye [Jews] are of your father the devil [In other words Jesus is telling us The Jews are Satan's Children! ], and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it...He that is of God heareth God's words: ye [Jews] therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God." [49]

Again:

"Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites!...Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?" [50]

Why isn't the news media screaming at Christ for vilifying the Jews? Christ and the apostles continuously warned us about the false prophets of Judaism. Paul was a Pharisee and proclaimed Judaism until called by God. Paul then spoke out against Judaism and even went so far in the Epistle to Titus to call their religion "Jewish fables." He said the Jews were "rebellious men" whose "mouths must be stopped" because they were "teaching things they ought not" and that we were to "reprove them sharply" as they were "giving heed to Jewish fables and commandments of men." Paul continued by calling them "defiled and unbelieving" and those; "...who profess they know God: but by their works they deny him being abominable and disobedient..." [51]

If we look to the deeds and history of the Khazarian Zionist Jews and of Judaism for the last 2,000 years, we see that they have done nothing to advance the Gospel of the Kingdom of God or the good news of salvation. The Jews of yesterday so hated Christ they planned his death. Today's Jews vehemently denounce and deny Christ Jesus as Saviour and, according to a letter from a Jew, would again plot His death as did the Pharisees. To this day the Jews look to the Talmud for their guidance and reject the living Word of the Holy Bible. We need look no further for their good deeds and works for Christ in the world today: There Are None!

Christ was and is our role model and He knew the Pharisaical Jews by their Deeds and Works and we also know them by their Deeds and Works . Since Christ was anti‑Jew and spoke out against them, should we not also stand and as Paul said "reprove them sharply" to expose their corrupting works.

                                       The Jews and Marxism - Socialism - Communism - Zionism

Marxism, Socialism, or Communism in practice are nothing but state‑capitalism and rule by a privileged minority, exercising despotic and total control over a majority having virtually no property or legal rights. Talmudic Judaism is the progenitor of modern Communism and Marxist collectivism as it is now applied to a billion or more of the world's population. Only through thorough understanding of the ideology from which this collectivism originates, and those who dominate and propagate it, can the rest of the world hope to escape the same fate. Communism/Socialism was originated by Jews and has been dominated by them from the beginning.

There is no moral, philosophical or ethical conflict whatsoever between Judaism and Marxist collectivism as they exist in actual practice. Marxism, to which all branches of Socialism necessarily adhere, was originated by a Jew, Karl Marx, himself of Rabbinical descent. Every Jewish source today boasts of his rabbinical ancestry, and his "keen dialectical ability" (as presumably manifested by his abstruse hairsplitting, Das Kapital) being due to his Talmudic inheritance.

Marx did not actually originate anything, but merely "streamlined" Talmudism for Gentile consumption. The "Socialist" system he conceived merely brings about a practical means for a state dominated and controlled through a Jewish minority to rule by absolute dictatorship over everything and everyone, a concept which has been carried out very successfully in those countries of the World brought thus far under Marxist dictatorship. Socialism is indeed merely the cover held in front of the cow's nose to get her into the barn under the milking machine. It is a mechanism whereby a "human" can lead a whole non‑human herd into the Jewish controlled barn.

The next time when some Christian dupe tells you: "Socialism is not Jewish!," for one thing, pull out the pamphlet "Jew and Non‑Jew," put out by the Reform Jewish "Union of American Hebrew Congregations" and their "Central Conference of American Rabbis" and read: Communism/Socialism was originated by Jews; and today Jews play leading in its spread and interpretation." [52]

In a publication of the Jewish Publication Society of America, Jewish Contributions to Civilization, it is stated that,

"We find a strong Jewish participation throughout the socialistic movement which, from its inception up to the present day, has been largely dominated by Jewish influence. Jews have been prominently identified with the Socialist movement from its very inception." [53]

Again:

     "Socialism [Communism] was originated by Jews ; and today Jews play a leading roll in its spread and interpretation. And under the leadership of a Jew trades unionism has been brought to its highest point of efficiency and has been brought to its highest point of efficiency and been given an increasing ethical bearing. Certainly we find a Strong Jewish Participation throughout the Socialistic movement which, from its inception up to the Present Day, has been Largely Dominated by Jewish Influence. Socialism: Theory of civil policy which advocates public collective ownership, production, and distribution. Jews have been prominently identified with the modern Socialist Movement from its very inception. The small circle of the first disciples of Saint Simon in the third decade of the nineteenth century numbered among its members two Jewish young men of Portuguese origin, the brothers Isaac and Emile Pereire. A generation later when the apostles of Saint‑Simonism had distinguished themselves in various fields of science and industry, the Pereire brothers won fame and fortune as the builders of the first French railway, and became the leading bankers and financiers of the second empire. Paris in the thirties and forties was the intellectual capital of Europe. 'Young Germany' was after the Napoleonic wars, under the sway of French democratic ideas. The Socialist theory was regarded as an application of the principles of democracy to the industrial organization of society: and it was but natural that it should soon enlist the sympathies of the numerous German refugees who in those days made Paris their headquarters. Karl Ludwig Borne notes in his 'Briefe aus Paris,' though in a somewhat light vein, the appearance of the Saint‑Simonists in the advanced intellectual circles of Paris.

     The educated German Jews, who were still suffering under legal disabilities and social discrimination, were active in the Democratic movement of their day. The spread of the socialistic faith among the German colony at Paris was therefore bound to convert Jew and Gentile alike. Two of those early Jewish converts, Karl Marx and Ferdinand Lasalle, were to become commanding figures in the history of socialism: one as the father of scientific socialism, the other as the founder of the German, Socialist party. Marx, the son of a Jewish lawyer of Treves, numbered among his ancestors many famous rabbis. The chapters on the theory of value in his principal work, 'Das Kapital,' suggest by their subtle analysis an inherited Talmudical bent.

     He was then a young man of twenty‑five, with a mind trained in Hegelian philosophy and deeply absorbed in political problems: The outcome of these studies was his 'Manifest der Kommunistischen Partei' (Manifesto of the Communist Party), written on the eve of the Paris revolution of 1848 in collaboration with Friedrich Engels; in it Marx laid down the foundation of his theory. He was one of the charter members and leaders of the International Working Men's Association, which was organized in London in 1864, and he framed its declaration of principles. In 1867 he published the first volume of his life‑work, 'Das Kapital,' which has been aptly called 'the Bible of modern Socialism.' This was to be followed by three other volumes: but his work was cut short by his death (March 14, 1883). Two posthumous volumes were published by Engels, Marx's lifelong friend and literary executor...

     While in Germany Socialism has attracted individual Jews, in Russia it has become a movement of the Jewish masses. During the reign of Alexander II, the high schools and universities were thrown open to Jews. All classes, rich and poor alike, eagerly embraced the educational opportunities thus offered: and in the eighth decade of the nineteenth century Jews contributed a large contingent of the students. As in Germany, education quickened their resentment of legal discrimination against their race. This was the time when the universities became the hotbeds of socialistic agitation: the Socialists preached and practised the doctrine of equal rights, without distinction of race or creed; and the Jewish student, welcomed as a social equal, began to feel like one of the Russian people. As a began to feel like one of the Russian people. As a natural consequently, numbers of Jewish students threw themselves into the Russian socialistic and revolutionary movement. The anti‑Jewish riots of the next decade produced a strong reaction against this socialistic sentiment; furthermore the wave of emigration to the United States carried away many Jewish Socialists, while others joined the ranks of the Palestinians (the forerunners of the Zionists). Anti‑Semitism made rapid progress among university students; and even the populist faction of the Socialists (Narodniki) fell under its influence.

     The revival of socialistic agitation in the nineties found a fruitful field among the Jewish working men and women in the Pale of Settlement. In 1897 was organized the Judischer Arbeiter‑bund von Littauen and Polen (Jewish Labor Federation of Lithuania and Poland), which grew rapidly...

     The advocacy of this principle by the Bund has brought it into conflict with the cosmopolitan tendency of the Socialist movement. It is contended by the opponents of the Bund that its policy creates division within the Socialist ranks. It must be noted, however, that the Bund addresses itself to those classes of the Jewish people which under the existing social conditions rarely, if ever, come into contact with other races. At the same time All other Russian and Polish Socialist Organizations still contain a Large and Influential Jewish Membership.

     The Jewish Exodus from Russia Drafted to the United States Large Numbers of Socialists , mostly college and university students, who must be reckoned among The Pioneers of the Socialist Parties in America. Their main field of activity was the ghetto. But the masses of Jewish Workmen and Tradesmen who were Educated by this Propaganda scattered throughout the country in pursuit of employment or business opportunities and became 'The Peddlers of Socialism' among their shopmates and neighbors. The City of Haverhill, Mass., Which Elected the First Socialist Mayor in the United States, is a notable example of the Proselytizing work of Russo-Jewish Socialsits. The Russian Jews themselves have contributed their quota to the rank and file, as well as to the leaders, of the American Socialist Parties. One of the prominent national leaders is Morris Hillquit, A Young Russo-Jewish Attorney in New York, Author of 'The History of Socialism in The United States. '" [54]

Individual revolutionary leaders of Jewish origin; such as Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev and Sverdlov, played a conspicuous part in the revolution of November, 1917, which enabled the Bolsheviks to take possession of the state apparatus. Yet the majority of Jewish radicals adhered to democratic Socialism, and among the Jewish working class the Leninist faction had a limited following. From the first, the so‑called United Jewish Socialist Labor Party fought the Bolsheviks, and the more influential Bund, Too , after some hesitation ranged itself with the Menshevik opposition, though many of its members joined the Bolsheviks. In July, 1918, there was established A Jewish Section (along with other national divisions) of the Central Committee of The Communist Party (CPSU).

     2). The Revolution and Civil War (1917 to 1921).

The political revolution of March, 1917, brought about the complete emancipation of the Russian Jews. All the disabilities under which they had labored, including the Pale of Settlement which had already been breached, were abolished by a general decree of the Provisional Government dated March 20 and April 2, 1917. Jews were placed on an equal footing with the rest of the citizenry.

No official measures were taken, however, to implement their right to live as a national minority having an identity of its own, all parties, Zionist and Socialist, demanded for the group some sort of cultural autonomy to be realized through self‑governing communal agencies recognized and supported by the state. In many localities the old Kehillahs were reorganized on a democratic basis and assumed a new importance.

On November 2/15, 1917 (eight days after the overthrow of the Provisional‑Government), the Bolsheviks [Jews] promulgated their Declaration of the Rights of the Peoples of Russia (signed by Lenin and Stalin).

     On July 17, 1918, the Council of People's Commissars outlawed all those who either perpetrated or incited to progroms.

                                                                                 Socialism

                                                          The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia

     Second Period (1893 to 1907) : The actual Jewish Socialist movement began in Russia at the beginning of the 1890's. It grew out of the so‑called Socialist circles that were founded by Russian Jewish students for the Jewish working class in order to win it over to Socialism. After 1893 the movement took on a mass character and led to the founding (1897) of the Bund, the first Jewish Socialist party, which developed intensive activity in industrial as well as in political fields. The program of the party was generally Socialistic, that is, equal civil rights were to be won for the Jews. Only after the turn of the 20th century was interest in national questions aroused and, finally, the party formulated (in 1901, and again in 1905) a platform for the national‑cultural autonomy of the Jewish people. This became an essential feature of its program after that time.

In contrast to the Bund, another part of the Jewish working class began from a national standpoint and also arrived at Socialism. It was the portion of the Jewish working class that came under the influence of Zionist ideology and was brought into the Zionist Movement.

The segregation of the Labor Zionists within the general Zionist Movement began early in the 20th century and, in the course of time, led to the founding of three so‑called proletarian Zionist parties: the Sejmists, the S.S. (Zionist socialists) and the Poale Zion.

The Poale Zion held that the Jewish masses should be concentrated in Palestine. The other two parties were also territorialy minded, but the Sejmists emphasized in their program (contrary to the S.S.) the necessity for struggling for the improvement of the position of the Jewish people in whatever country they may live, especially by achieving a national‑political autonomy which they saw as a prerequisite for successful territorial concentration.

In contrast to the Bund, which was essentially a Russian party (similar movements developed under other names also in England, America and Galicia), the S.S. movement especially, and the Poale Zion as well, spread also to other lands, namely, America, Austria, Palestine and England. In 1907 the Poale Zion succeeded in unifying the various national parties into a world union.

     Third Period (1907 to 1914) : All Jewish Socialist parties came into public life out of a struggle among themselves and with the civil parties existing within Judaism.  In the early years of the 20th century, the Bund achieved great influence in the political life of Russia, and played a significant role during the revolutionary years (1905‑6). The Jewish Socialist parties in Russia and Austria participated actively in general political life; for example, in Russia, in the Duma elections, and in Austria, in the struggle for the right to be elected to the Reichsrat or the Galician Landtag. In Austria there was a struggle for the recognition of Jewish nationality and of the Yiddish language.

In internal Jewish life, an attempt was made to win the working class by means of direct agitation as well as by founding unions, always under the leadership of the parties, of which there were as many in each land as there were Jewish Socialist parties. Only in the United States was it possible to create large politically unaffiliated Jewish unions. In addition, there was a struggle for the democratization and secularization of the Jewish communities. In the field of cultural work the attempt was made especially to foster Yiddish language and culture. There was a demand also for the founding of public schools with Yiddish as the language of instruction, and in the United States the first of these schools, the so‑called national radical schools, were set up. Between 1908 and 1912 the Jewish Socialist parties in Russia were hard‑hit by the pressure of political and economic reaction, but by the end of the period the movement began to revive.

     Fourth Period (1914 to 1919) : In the first years of the first World War, the Jewish socialist movement, to all intents and purposes, came to a standstill. Only the movement in the United States remained active, where the interest of the parties revolved about charitable work, on the one hand, and the thought of a Jewish congress in America, on the other.

Moreover, the world union of Poale Zion did much for the clarification of the international Socialist movement in relation to the Jewish question and it was able to secure from the Second International a statement of precise Jewish peace demands. The outbreak of the revolution in Russia, where Jewish Socialist parties played a significant role generally as well as in internal Jewish life, greatly stimulated the Jewish Socialist movement.

The Zeire Zion movement began in this period. It was different from the other Jewish Socialist parties mainly in the fact that it had a broader socialist parties mainly in the fact that it had a broader conception of the proletariat and it emphasized the significance of Hebrew cultural work. The end of the War brought disruption to the Jewish socialist movement in Russia which until that time had been unified. It became divided into a series of national movements (Greater Russia, Poland, Ukraine, White Russia, Lithuania and Latvia). The center of the movement shifted to Poland where the strongest parties were located and where union and cultural work developed intensively.

     Fifth Period (from 1919 on) : The most important phenomenon of this period is the splitting and liquidating process which occurred within the Jewish Socialist parties under the influence of the Communist movement. This movement, which promised to bring with it a quick and direct solution of the question of the Jewish worker, attracted large numbers of members of the Jewish Socialist Parties. In Russia and the Ukraine the Bund and the United, a party which was created in 1917, when the S.S. and the Sejmists merged, were absorbed by the Russian Communist Party. Although it remained independent, the Poale Zion accepted the Communist program. In 1920 the world movement of the Poale Zion, within which many parties took on the Communistic program, split into a Right and Left (Communist) world union. The Communist wing broke away from all other Jewish Socialist parties, with the exception of the Zeire Zion.

          2). Modern Times.

After their entrance into general political life in the 19th century. Jews participated significantly and creatively in all political tendencies and parties. They were to be found in considerable numbers in the conservative parties (Stahl, Disraeli, Neander) and in the national liberal and free‑thinking parties of all shadings. The same is true of the Socialist movement. They spread over all the various tendencies, from the right wing, which has hardly any relationship with International Socialism and is politically conservative (Samuel Gompers), over right revisionism (Euard Bernstein) to right center (Leon Blum), to left center (Oscar Cohn) and, from there, over left Marxism (Rosa Luxemburg) to Bolshevism (Leon Trotsky) and anarchism (Gustav Landauer, Bernard Lazare).

In continental Socialist parties the Jews always played a determining and, at times, leading role. In Italy, Austria (Victor Adler), Germany (Paul Singer), Bohemis (Alfred Meissner and Leo Winter), France, Poland and Russia they were to be found in all parties, from the Right Social Revolutionary and Menshevik to the Bolshevik. Some of the founders of European Socialism were Jews. They played an especially helpful role as disciples of Saint Simon (Emile Pereire).

Scientific Socialism originated in the combination of Jewish Messianic feeling with German philosophy in Marx and Lassale (whose thinking is founded upon Ricardo's theory of values, Moses Hess, and their contemporaries, including, to a degree, Heine and Borne.

Knowing all of this, the leaders of the great, nationwide Christian Movements, such as the Moral Majority, who will stand behind their pulpits and appear on national television, to thunder against the evils of corruption in government, the liquor industry, the murder of unborn babies by abortion, pornographic literature on our news stands, sex education in the school, and other assorted ills; these men are afraid, or refuse to mention publicly, that it is Jewish promoters who are behind most of these ills they are fighting.

There have been Fundamentalist leaders who have admitted in private, they know Jews control the media; they put out the anti‑Christian filth of Hollywood; they operate the dope and prostitution rackets; Jewish doctors man the abortion centers of America.

They will admit this in private, but I have yet to see one with "guts" enough to admit this publicly from their pulpits and to tell their parishioners that Jews are behind these troubles. For you see, once again the bugaboo arises: "I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee." [55]

We have often wondered why our modern day clergy has propounded the idea that Christians must bless those who curse the very name of our Lord, and who, by their own confession, are the bitterest enemies of Christianity. This seems to me to be treason in the best Constitutional definition of this crime: "Giving them aid and comfort; adhering to their enemy." We have often wondered why Christians must bless those who seek to take Bibles and prayer out of our schools and stop the singing of Christmas carols. It doesn't make very much sense!

Is it "Common Sense" to believe that God will place a blessing upon those who organized to Destroy His Blessed Son and His Teachings? Does it make sense to believe that God will bless those who are dedicated to the Destruction of the Church for which He Died? Does it make sense to believe God would bless a people who have murdered millions of His Son's Followers?

Yet this grave misconception is taught to millions of unsuspecting, gullible Christians and is flung in the face of those of us who have been honest enough to study the subject and know whereof we speak. When we come to understand this vital subject, it becomes necessary for many to leave their church, for their pastor will accuse them of being an apostate. Their ideas about the fundamentals of the faith have not changed; their sin was that they have had their eyes and ears opened so that they could see and understand the Satanic doctrine that the Jews are His Chosen People, therefore anything they do is all right and must be accepted.

Our so‑called "Ministers" tell us that only those nations which bless the Jews will prosper. But you don't have to be much of an historian, or look very deeply into modern history to put the lie to this myth. The nations of both ancient and modern times, which have been destroyed, have been destroyed because they turned their backs on God and His Laws. They have rotted out from within, by moral and spiritual subversion, often aided and abetted by the Jews, and have been destroyed, long before the barbarians swarmed over their walls, or battered down their gates.

In Psalms 33:12 we find:

"Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord; and the people whom He hath chosen for His own inheritance."

Who is this God referred to as "the Lord?" It is none other than Jesus Christ, the King of Kings, and Lord of Lords, who is spoken of in John 14:6:

"...I am the way, the truth and the life: No Man Cometh Unto The Father, But By Me. "

How can it be any plainer? No Man, be he Jew, Gentile [non‑Jew], Mohammedan, Hindu; no one, can reach God, unless they first come to Him through Jesus Christ.

Many nations in the history of the world have prospered, but every one, without fail, that has allowed the Jews to enter with their Talmudic teachings, have been demoralized and destroyed. Once the evil of Talmudic teachings begins to rot the morality of a country; once the "money changers" get in control of a nation's finances, then that country is on the "downhill slide" to oblivion. Don't argue with us about this, Look At History! If you dare?

England has declined as an Empire, ever since they allowed the influx of Jewish immigrants and allowed them to seek places of importance in finance and government. They tell us that America has been blessed by God, because we were kind to the Jews, yet our moments of greatest decline have come since we recognized the Israeli State as a nation and allowed Jewish control in our finances and government. This has Always been the constant lesson of history.

If this blessing should have been upon any nation or ruler, it should have fallen on Napoleon, France and the United States. Napoleon forced his people in many communities to participate in Jewish holidays and caused the erection of synagogues, at taxpayer expense in many cities which his armies captured. Yet he and his army were destroyed; he was betrayed As Always, by the very people he had tried to befriend.

America has not faired any better. For since 1948, our people have apparently changed from worshipping Almighty God and the Lord Jesus Christ to the worship of the Jews. As a result America is being smitten with the judgment of the Living God.

Aliens are pouring across our borders. Temples and Synagogues, and the worship of Heathen gods is rampant in our land. Heathen powers are threatening our hemisphere. Tyrants from enemy nations are focusing covetous eyes upon our country. Public and private debt is suffocating our economic life. Our moral fabric has come apart and unraveled.

The Christian family is in dissolution. Pestilence, disease, and plague stalk our land. Uncontrolled diseases, plagues, and sexually transmitted diseases are now pandemic among our population. The spectre of drought and national famine hang over our land. God's locust and caterpillar, the IRS, ravage our crops and the wages of the workers of our country. Our air, water, and land are under the curse! We are a people in a clear and present danger! The curses as related in the Book of Deuteronomy are clearly being brought upon America and it's people.

Millions of our Israelite [Not Jewish] children are murdered shortly after conception when ungodly birth control methods are used to destroy the "fertilized egg." And if they survive conception, they are often murdered in the abortion murder mills of America. We as a people, are murdering some 4,500 babies per day in those murder mills.

If our children survive birth control and abortion, they must then survive the savage mind destroying powers of television. Our children than must face the brainwashing of the public schools. Where they are subjected to the pressures of their peer group where drugs, sex and alcohol abound. In the public schools they are introduced to the Talmudic filth of promiscuity, sodomy, miscegenation, and devil worship.

As they make their way through the public schools, they become addicted to mind destroying rock music, profanity, and every form of perversion known to Satan and his Children. The curse upon our land is focused upon or children. Satan's primary agenda is to destroy our children's faith in God and the Lord Jesus Christ. Which is the same goal the Jews are seeking.

                                                                           The Enemy Within

Aristotle once said:

"The success of a nation is the homogeneity of its people and political institution."

Ask yourself this simple, honest question:

"Should approximately 3% of any one segment of the population of the United States hold 90% of the key and controlling influential positions in our government?"

Since the Jews are constantly telling us that we should support "quotas" of one type or another why shouldn't they be cut back to 3% of those influential government positions, so that Christians would have a chance to govern America? Especially since America was founded as a Christian Nation.

If you are like the average, passive, American you may live to witness the takeover of the United States from within and without a shot being fired. For it is practically taken over at this very moment. Make no mistake about it, the Jews are the disrupters, deceivers, destroyers and intimidators of the world. They are rude, murderous, fomenters of discord and disharmony, and are full of greed and avarice. They are boastful braggarts, and brag about their exploits and destruction of Millions of Christians in hundreds of book on the shelves of the libraries scattered across the country. [56]

But they are cleverly written and most gullable Christians do not comprehend the truthfulness of their subversion as the few who actually read them; plus the fact that they have been able to limit the exposure of such information to the masses because of their almost total control over the media. Which they use continually to discredit all who would expose them for who and what they are and what they are doing to our country and our religion.

They have developed the attributes of the camel who first sticks his head in the tent and then his whole body. Thus with their natural brashness they have taken advantage of our Israel people, the Anglo‑Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, Celtic and kindred people's passivity and tendency toward trust [earned or unearned] since they have the Laws of God in their heart and minds. As a result, they have wormed their way into positions of leadership within our local, state and federal governments: Which plan was revealed in the Protocols of The Learned Elders of Zion.

Therefore, they are "in place" to act as the "termites of civilization," eating away the foundation where they hope to continue unseen and undetected until the "house" comes down upon our heads. Exactly as it happened in virtually every country in Europe in succeeding centuries and here in chronological order is a list of their evictions over the years.

     1215: The Fourth Lateran Council of the Catholic Church curbed the Jewish monopoly of commerce by:

   1). The restriction of Jews to their own community.

   2). Prohibiting the Jews from hiring Christian workers and from engaging in many trading activities.

     1221: Pope Honorius III passed an edict forbidding Jews from holding public office and also required them to wear badges which identified them as Jews.

     1290: The Jews were expelled from England in 1290 A.D. by Edward I, and were not permitted to re‑enter until 1655.

     1306: They were expelled from France in 1306 A.D. by Philip the Fair. A few returned but were again evicted in 1394.

     1349: They were expelled from Saxony in 1349 A.D.

     1360: By 1092 they had gained control of Hungary's tax collections and were finally expelled in 1360 A.D. They returned later but were once again expelled in 1582 from the Christian parts of Hungary.

     1360: They were expelled from Belgium in 1370 A.D. But a few settled there again by 1450, but not in large numbers until after 1700.

     1365: Pope Urban V [a Jew himself] forbid the molestation of the Jews.

     1380: They were expelled from Prague in 1380 A.D. But many had settled there again after 1562, and in 1744 Marie Theresa expelled them once again.

     1415: Pope Benedict XIII forbid the Talmud and all other anti‑Christ books of the Jews.

                                                      Over The Years Numerous Other Popes

                                                  Took More Drastic Action Against The Jews

     1420: They were expelled from Austria in 1420 A.D. by Albrecht V.

     1444: Expelled from Utrecht in the Netherlands in 1444 A.D.

     1492: They were expelled from Spain in 1492 A.D.

     1495: They were expelled from Lithuania in 1495 A.D. by Grand Duke Alexander. But, of course, they later returned.

     1498: They were expelled from Portugal in 1498 A.D.

     1510: Expelled from Prussia in 1510 A.D.

     1540: They were expelled from Italy, the Kingdom of Naples and Sardinia in 1540.

     1551: Bavaria permanently banned them in 1551 A.D.

     1593: Pope Clement VIII deported the Jews from ALL the Papal States, except Rome and Ancona.

     1782: The Jews were not permitted to enter Sweden until 1782 A. D.

     1800: No Jews were permitted to enter Denmark before the 17th century.

     1814: They were not allowed to settle in Norway until after 1814 A.D. With the result that only a few thousand reside today in all Scandinavia.

                                                                           The Renaissance

The period marked by the evictions, 1300 to 1650, also marks the period of the Renaissance which broke over Europe as the Jews and their evil influences departed. About 1300 A.D. there began a rebirth of culture and learning that was a wonder to behold, and very quickly this increase in culture and honesty spread over all of Europe. But it did not happen, however, until the nations of Europe had wrested the commercial control from the Jews did this rebirth of Western Civilization occur. It is an historical fact that ALL of Europe prospered while the Jews remained expelled.

It is plain to see, the Jews have been expelled from almost every country in Europe, at one time or another, but do you dare ask yourself WHY? Many of the various rulers of the countries were tolerant and compassionate as they indulged in the rising Jewish problem, and many used them to collect revenue to further their own personal desires and aspirations, against the advice of trusted advisors, only to regret it deeply later.

In Martin Luther's home town a sign prominently displayed the following, until it was later destroyed by the Jews:

"Only ignorance of the true facts can induce Christians to tolerate Jews. Only absolute misapprehension as to Luther's aims and ideas can permit Christians to take the part of and intercede for Jews. This pamphlet has been issued in Luther's town Eisenach, at the foot of the Wartburg, and has been disseminated in all countries to prevent that the lack of knowledge in regard to the situation as it really presents itself shall develop into the instrument by the means of which Christ may be disavowed and the honor of the Church blemished. As Protestant Christians we fully recognize the great debt of gratitude we owe to Luther and we feel it our duty to warn all Protestant Christians in the whole world against the Jews and their protectors with Luther's very own words. Signed ‑‑ Martin Sasse, Bishop."

                                                    The Jews And Their Lies By Martin Luther

In the following, short, presentation by Martin Luther, the pioneer of Protestantism, is to give you an accurate translation of Luther's treatment of one of the most delicate and dangerous subjects for a public man to discuss; that being a discussion of The Jews!

Luther's experience with the Jews was very disappointing. He spent many years trying to convert them. Like St. Paul, he gave the Jews the first chance at the gospel, but concluded in later years, as you will soon see, that his efforts in this direction were futile.

Some of Luther's language will shock you, but it is our business to give to you the words of the Reformer just as he wrote them. You will also see, this generation is not the first generation which has faced a Jewish problem. Yes, it will serve a second purpose; namely, an alertness to the Jewish problem does not necessarily indicate that the individuals who are alerted are depraved or un‑Christian.

One other thing you should keep in mind is that Luther's viewpoint concerning the Jews is necessarily Protestant. Numerous Popes used language as strong, if not stronger, than the language used by Luther. In fact, the ghettos were established by Papal edict, with the consent of Jewish Rabbis, as they could control their fellow religionaries much easier.

Some individuals will doubt that these writings originated with Martin Luther, as the Lutheran Church has banned them from their Seminaries. However, the information original language and contents may be found in Martin Luther's works in the Congressional Library, Washington, D.C., and in very few Lutheran seminaries. Numerous clergymen of all denominations are aware of the existence of this work. They are also aware of the fact that this is a partial copy of the first English translation published in the United States; so far as we are able to ascertain. This work by Luther was among the last of his writings. Luther, it will be recalled, died in the prime of life, having lived only to the age of 63.

"I had decided not to write anymore, neither of the Jews, nor against the Jews. Because I have learned, however that those miserable, wicked people do not cease trying to win over to themselves us, that is, the Christians also, I have permitted this booklet to go forth that I might be found among those who have resisted such poisonous undertaking of the Jews, and have warned the Christians to be on their guard against them. I would not have thought that a Christian would permit himself to be fooled by the Jews to share their exile and misery. But the Devil is the god of the world, and where God's Word is not, he has easy sailing, not only among the weak, but also among the strong. God help us. Amen. Signed: Martin Luther."

Grace and Peace in the Lord! Dear Sir and Good Friend: I have received a treatise of a Jew carrying on a conversation with a Christian in which the Jew has the audacity to pervert and misconstrue the passages of Scripture [which we use for our faith, of our Lord Christ, and of Mary, His mother] whereby he means to overthrow the foundation of our faith. To this I give to you and to him this answer.

It is not my intention to quarrel with the Jews or to learn from them how they interpret and understand the Scriptures. I have known all that before. Much less do I intend to convert the Jews. For That Is Impossible . Nor does it do any good among the Jews everywhere, and they have generally become worse. Also, because they became so hardened to visitations that they do not want to become conscious of the terrible dilemma, that they have now been in exile for over fourteen hundred years, and cannot yet see an end or a definite time [of relief] through fervent, eternal crying and screaming to God [as they suppose]. [I say] If visitations do not help, we might as well figure that our talking and interpreting will help much less.

                                                                         No Use To Quarrel

Therefore, a Christian should be satisfied and not quarrel with the Jews. But if you think you must or desire to talk with them, do not say more than this: 'Do you hear, Jew, do you know that your principality together with the temple and priesthood are destroyed now for 1460 years? For this year, as we Christians write after the birth of Christ 1543, it is exactly 1469 years, and is thus going on 1500 years since Vespasianus and Titus destroyed Jerusalem and expelled the Jews from it.' On this little nut let the Jews bite and dispute among themselves as long as they want to.

For such terrible wrath of God is sufficient proof that they certainly must be in error and doing wrong; even a child can grasp that. For no one should think of God so terrible that He would punish His own nation so unmercifully and keep silent by neither comforting words or indicating the duration or end of such misery! Who would want to believe in such a God, hope in Him, or trust in Him! Therefore, this wrath leads to the conclusion that The Jews Are Certainly Rejected by God and Are Not His People, and He also is not Their god ; according to the passage, Hosea 1:9, 'Lo, Ammi; You are not my people, so also am I not your God.' Yes, they are in a terrible dilemma. Whatever interpretation they may place on it, we see the thing before our eyes, it does not deceive us.

                                                                Victims of The Wrath of God

And wherever there should be a spark of sense and reason in them, they would certainly think to themselves thus: 'O Lord God, things are not right with us, our misery is too great, our exile too long and too hard, God has forgotten us,' etc. I, of course, am not a Jew, but I seriously do not like to think about such terrible wrath of God over this nation. I shudder so much that it penetrates my body and life. What will be the eternal wrath of God in hell over all false Christians and unbelievers!

Here we would like to pause and interject what will be the final end of the Jews. Which is, in essence, what Luther is looking for, but overlooked or did not understand for it was not time for it to be revealed to the world:

"The vision of Obadiah. Thus saith the Lord God concerning Edom [The Jews]...Behold I have made thee small among the heathen: Thou [Jews] Art Greatly Despised . The pride of thine heart hath deceived thee, thou that dwellest in the clefts of the rock, whose habitation is high; that saith in his heart, Who shall bring me down to the ground? Though, thou [Jews] exalth thyself as the eagle, and though thou set thy nest among the stars [nations of Israel], Thence Will I Bring Thee Down , saith the Lord...For as ye have drunk upon my holy mountain [Christian Nation], so shall all the heathen drink continually, yea, they shall drink, and they shall swallow down, and they shall be as though they had not been...the house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame, and the house of Esau [The Jews] for stubble, and they shall kindle in them, and devour them; and There Shall Not Be Any Remaining Of The House Of Esau ..." [57]

Continuing on with Luther's work. Well, the Jews may regard our Lord Jesus Christ as whatever they desire; we see the fulfillment of Luke 21:2‑22:

"And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh...For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled."

In short, as was said: Do not dispute much with the Jews about the articles of our faith. From childhood they have been brought up with poison and hatred against our Lord, that there is no hope until they arrive at the point where through their misery they become soft and compelled to confess that the Messiah has come and is our Lord Jesus Christ. Otherwise it is altogether too soon, yea, altogether in vain to dispute with them...In order to strengthen our faith, we shall consider a few instances of foolishness in their faith and interpretation of the Scriptures, because they slander our faith in such a mean way. Should it bring about the improvement of a Jew, that he become ashamed, so much the better! We are not talking with the Jews, but of the Jews and their deeds, which our German people well know.

They hold one principle on which they depend and in which they trust so much. That is, they are born of the highest people on earth, of Abraham, Sarah, Isaac [which they were but the Jews father was Esau who sold his birthright: for the Scriptures say he despised it; but the Jews have been trying to steal it back since that time], Rebecca, Jacob, etc. [While] We [Goyim are] heathen [and] are not human beings in their sight, but hardly worthy to be regarded as worms. For we are not of that high, noble blood, birth and descent [Which is false because we the White Anglo‑Saxon, Germanic and kindred peoples Are The Tribes of Israel ; Not the Jews].

This is their argument, and in my opinion the foremost and strongest. Therefore, God must suffer them in their schools, prayers, songs, doctrine and entire life; there they stand before Him and pester Him [that I may speak of God in such human manner]. He must hear how they exalt themselves and praise God for separating them from the heathen, and permitting them to be born of the holy fathers and chosen them for His own, holy nation, etc. And there is no end of boasting about blood and bodily birth of the fathers.

                                                              Their Self-Righteous Boasting

In order that their raving, frantic and foolish nonsense might be perfect, they praise and thank God, first, that they are human beings and not animals; secondly, that they are Israelites and not Goyim [heathen]; thirdly, that they were created as Men and not as Women. Such foolishness they do not have from Israel, but from the Goyim.

     "You {non-Jews} resent us {Jews}, but you cannot clearly say why...Not so many years ago I used to hear that we were money-grubbers and commercial materialists; now the complaint is being whispered around that no art and no profession is safe from Jewish invasion...

     We shirk our patriotic duty in war time because we are pacifists by nature and tradition, and we are the Arch-Plotters of Universal Wars and the Chief Beneficiaries of those wars. We are at once the founders and leading adherents of capitalism and the chief perpetrators of the rebellion against capitalism. Surely, history has nothing like us for versatility!...

     You accuse us of stirring up revolution in Moscow. Suppose we admit the charge. What of it?...You make much noise and fury about undue Jewish influence in your theaters and movie palaces. Very good; granted your complaint is well founded. But what is that compared to our staggering influence in your churches, schools, your laws and your government, and the very thoughts you think every day? ...'The Protocols of the Elders of Zion' which shows that we plotted to bring on the late World War. You believe that book. All right...we will underwrite every word of it. It is genuine and authentic. But what is that besides the unquestionable historical conspiracy which we have carried out, which we never have denied because you never had the courage to charge us with it, and of which the full record is extant for anybody to read?

     If you really are serious when you talk of Jewish plots, may I not direct your attention to one worth talking about? What use is it wasting words on the alleged control of your public opinion by Jewish financiers, newspaper owners, and movie magnates, when you might as well also justly accuse us of the proved control of your whole civilization...

     You have not begun to appreciate the real depth of our guilt. We are intruders. We are subverters. We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and have played havoc with them. We {Jews} have been at the bottom of not merely of the latest war {WWI} but of nearly all your wars, not only of the Russian but of every other major revolution in your history. We have brought discord and confusion and frustration into your personal and public life. We Are Still Doing It. No one can tell how long we shall go on doing it...Who knows what great and glorious destiny might have been yours if we had left you alone.

     But we did not leave you alone. We took you in hand and pulled down the beautiful and generous structure you had reared, and changed the whole course of your history. We Conquered You as no empire of yours ever subjugated Africa or Asia. And we did it solely by the irresistible might of our spirit, with ideas, with propaganda...

     Take the three principal revolutions in modern times, the French, the American and Russian. What are they but the triumph of the Jewish idea of social, political and economic justice? And the end is still a long way off. We Still Dominate You ...

     Is it any wonder you resent us? We have put a clog upon your progress. We have imposed upon you an alien book {Scofield Bible} and alien faith {Judeo-Christianity, a false Christianity} which is at cross-purposes with your native spirit, which keeps you everlastingly ill-at-ease, and which you lack the spirit either to reject or to accept in full...We have merely divided your soul, confused your impulses, paralyzed your desires...

     So why should you not resent us? If we were in your place we should probably dislike you more cordially than you do us. But we should make no bones about telling you why...You Christians worry and complain about the Jew's influence in your civilization. We are, you say, an international people, a compact minority in your midst, with traditions, interests, aspirations and objectives distinct from your own. And you declare that this state of affairs is a measure of your orderly development; it muddles your destiny. I do not altogether see the danger. Your world has always been ruled by minorities; and it seems to me a matter of indifference what remote origin and professed creed of the governing clique is. The influence , on the other hand, is certainly there, and it is vastly greater and more insidious than you appear to realize ...

     That is what puzzles and amuses and sometimes exasperates us about your game of Jew-baiting. It sounds so portentous. You go about whispering terrifyingly of the hand of the Jew in this and that and the other thing. It makes us quake. We are conscious of the injury we did when we imposed upon you our alien faith and traditions. And then you specify and talk vaguely of Jewish financiers and Jewish motion picture promoters, and our terror dissolves in laughter. The Gentiles, we see with relief, will never know the real blackness of our crimes ...

     You call us subversive, agitators, revolution mongers. It is the truth , and I cower at your discovery...We undoubtedly had a sizable finger in the Lutheran Rebellion, and it is simply a fact that we were the prime movers in the Bourgeois Democratic Revolutions of the century before last, both in France and America. If we were not, we did not know our own interests. The Republican revolutions of the 18th Century freed us of our age-long political and social disabilities. They benefited us...You go on rattling of Jewish conspiracies and cite as instances the Great War and the Russian Revolution! Can you wonder that we Jews have always taken your anti-Semites rather lightly, as long as they did not resort to violence?" [58]

For thus the historians write that the Greek Plato daily gave such praise and thanks to God, if such blasphemy and haughtiness could be called the praise of God. For that man also praised his gods for these three things, that he was man and not animal, a man and not a woman, a Greek and not a non‑Greek of barbarus. Such is the praying of a fool and the praise of a blasphemous barbarus; just as the Mals imagine that they alone are human beings and all the rest of the world nothing but inhuman beings, ducks, or mice. Well, no one can deprive them of their boasting about blood and the tribe of Israel. In the Old Testament they lost many a battle on that account. [No Jew understands this]. All prophets have chided them because of it, for it is a proud, carnal assumption without spirit and faith; but they have also been murdered and persecuted because of it.

                                                                      Children Of The Devil

Our Lord also calls them "Vipers." In John 8:39: "Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham." Verse 44: "Ye are of your father, the Devil."

This was unbearable for them, that they should be the children of the Devil, as they cannot bear it yet. For if they would have to give us this foundation [Abraham's children], everything they have built upon it would have to fall and be different. [In the following this self‑praise is refuted from Scripture as unfounded assumptions. These dissertations then close with these words]. But this will I say for the strengthening of our faith. For the Jews will not let this pride and this glory of their nobility and blood be taken away from them, as said above. They are hardened.

Our people, however, should be on their guard against these hardened, condemned people [who accuse God of lying and proudly despise the whole world], that they be not misled. For the Jews would gladly entice us to accept their faith and do so wherever they can.

For if God should be gracious toward the Jews, they first would have to do away out of their schools, out of their hearts, and out of their mouths, all such blasphemous prayers and songs, and the boasting and pride about their blood. For such prayer constantly increases God's wrath upon them. But they will not do this, nor humble themselves, except a few individuals whom God draws especially and redeems them from their terrible destruction.

                                                                          Exalt Themselves

The other boast and superiority, on account of which they exalt themselves above all other people and despise them, is this: that from Abraham on down they have circumcision. God help, how we heathen here must suffer in their schools, prayers, songs and teaching! How ugly we despised people stink before their noses because we are not circumcised, etc.

Once again we must pause to show that God actually wanted us, the White Anglo‑Saxon, Germanic and kindred people, the True Tribes of Israel to be circumcised in the heart:

"Circumcise therefore the foreskin of your heart, and be no more stiffnecked." [59] ; "And the Lord thy God will circumcise thine heart, and the heart of thy seed, to love the Lord thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, that thou mayest live." [60] ; "Circumcise yourselves to the Lord, and take away the foreskins of your heart, ye men of Judah and inhabitants of Jerusalem: lest my fury come forth like fire, and burn that none can quench it, because of the evil of your doings." [61] ; "But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God." [62]

Continuing on. [Here follow lengthy theological treatises based on numerous passages from Scripture]. They are pictured in it in a masterful manner before all heathen; for they are the very people who always practiced such ungodly manner of idolatry, and false doctrine, and have had uncircumcised hearts as Moses himself, and all prophets lament over them; but at the same time have endeavored to please God and for that reason [the Jews] killed the prophets.

They are the wicked and hardened people who did not suffer themselves to be converted from their evil to good deeds through preaching, teaching, chiding of the prophets, as Scripture testifies everywhere. Yet they want to be God's servants and stand before Him! They are boastful, proud fools who to this day can not do more than to praise themselves because of their nobility and blood; praise themselves alone and despise and condemn the while world in their schools, prayers, and teachings; yet they imagine themselves to be standing before God as His dearest children!

                                                                    Liars And Bloodhounds

They are the real liars and bloodhounds, who have not only perverted and falsified the entire Scriptures from beginning to end and without ceasing with their interpretations. And all of the anxious sighing, longing and hope of their hearts is directed to the time when some day they would like to deal with us heathen as they dealt with the heathen in Persia at the time of Esther...O how they love that book Esther, which so nicely agrees with their bloodthirsty, revengeful and murderous desire and hope! The sun never did shine on a more bloodthirsty and revengeful people as they who imagine to be the people of God who desire to and think they must murder and crush the heathen. And the foremost undertaking which they expect of their Messiah is that He should slay and murder the whole world with their sword. As they at first demonstrated against us Christians and would like to do so now, if they only could; have also tried it often and have been repeatedly struck on their snouts. But of this perhaps later. [Here Luther uncovers the deepest cause of the ever‑recurring persecution of the Jews: their own fault and overbearing pride. Luther now enumerates more references of which the Jews boast, in addition to circumcision, the Mosaic Law and the Jewish self‑righteousness based on it, cites the multitude of Bible passages which lament over the falling away, unbelief and unrighteousness of the Jewish nation and speaks of the Devils with whom he compares the Jews].

                                                                    Worse Than The Heathen

How much better it would be for them if they did not have God's Commandment or did not know it. For if they did not have it, they would be uncondemned. They are condemned because they have [know] God's Commandment and do not keep it, but act against it without ceasing.

In like manner murderers and whores, thieves and scoundrels and all evil men could boast they are God's holy and chosen people, because they have His Word and know that they should fear and obey Him, love Him and serve Him, honor His Name, do not commit murder, do not commit adultery, etc...Since, however, they are sinning and are condemned, it is certain that they have the most holy and correct Word of God against which they are sinning. Let them boast, like the Jews, that God has sanctified them through His Law, and chosen them before all people as His peculiar nation.

Such is also the glory of the Jews when they boast in their schools, praise and thank God that He has sanctified them through His Law and made them His chosen nation, while they are well aware that they are keeping none of those things, are filled with pride, envy, usury, avarice and all meanness, and most of all those among them who act very pious and holy in their prayers.

For they are so blinded that they do not only practice usury [that I should be silent about their other vices], but teach it as a right which God had commanded them through Moses, in which as in other ways also, they lie about God in a miserable manner, about which there is no time to speak now.

Again we must pause to show that The Jews did not have the Commandments or the Laws of God. For Jesus said:

"If I had not come and spoken unto them, they had not had sin [Because: "...for by the law is the knowledge of sin." [63] ; "(For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law." [64] ]: but now they have no cloak for their sin." [65]

Now we know why Jesus said this. It is because The Jews did not have the Laws because they are Not The Children of God! This is verified by Caiaphas, who was the Jews high priest at the time of Christ, when he said:

"And one of them, named Caiaphas, being the high priest that same year, said unto them...but that also he [Christ] should gather together in one The Children Of God That Were Scattered Abroad. " [66]

                                          They Mock The Ten Commandments ‑ Make God A Fool   

If the Ten Commandments are not kept, what is the keeping of other commandments otherwise than jugglery and trickery, yea, a real mockery in which God is treated like a fool! Just as if a mean Devils head among us would march along in robes of bishop or preacher, and keep all the laws and ways of such persons outwardly, but under that spiritual decoration were a real Devil, wolf, an enemy of the Church and a blasphemer who would tread under foot, curse and condemn both the Gospel and the Ten Commandments: O what a wonderful saint that would be before God.

Or if in this world a beautiful woman were to parade in a wreath [token of virginity] and follow all manners, rights and behavior of maidenly modesty and virginity, but underneath were nothing but a nasty, shameful whore transgressing the Ten Commandments, what would her fine obedience help her if outwardly she observed the rights and ways of virginity? This it would do to her, that people would despise her seven times more than a free, public whore! Thus God always chided Israel a mean whore through His prophets, because they practiced all manner of idolatry and wickedness under the show of outward commandments and sanctity. As Hosea especially laments in Chapter 2:4‑5:

"And I will not have mercy upon her children; for they be the children of whoredoms. For their mother hath played the harlot: she that conceived them hath done shamefully: for she said, I will go after my lovers, that give me my bread and my water, my wool and my flax, mine oil and my drink."

It is nice indeed to find a maiden or woman who is pious, cleanly and decently dressed and outwardly behaving in a modest manner. But when she is a whore; the dress, decorations, wreath and trinkets would appear more honest on a sow in the mire. Therefore, they might as well keep from boasting about outward obedience to the Laws of Moses without true obedience to God's Ten Commandments. Yea, it makes them sevenfold more unworthy to be the people of God than the heathen. Let them alone! And let us remain with those who pray the miserere, the 51st Psalm, that is, who know and understand what the Law is and what is keeping or not keeping the Law.

From this, dear Christian, note what you are doing when you permit these blinded Jews to mislead you. In such an instance the proverb certainly is fulfilled:

"Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch." [67]

More you cannot learn from them. To lack understanding of God's commandments and yet be proud and overbearing towards the heathen who are much better than they are before God, because they do not have such pride of holiness, and yet do much more of the Law than proud saints and condemned blasphemers and liars.

                                                                Their Schools A Devil's Nest

Therefore be on your guard against the Jews and know that where they have their schools there is nothing but the Devil's nest in which self‑praise, vanity, lies, blasphemy, disgracing God and man, are practiced in the bitterest and most poisonous way as the Devils do themselves. Wherever you see or hear a Jew teaching, do not think otherwise than that you are hearing a poisonous Basiliskus [Medieval legend] who with his face poisons and kills people.

Through God's wrath they have been delivered to believe that all of their boasting, vanity, lying to God, cursing all men, are right and a great service to God, something well becoming to such noble blood of the fathers and circumcised saints [no matter how mean they otherwise might know themselves to be in gross vices] which service they think they have rendered hereby. Look out for them! They brag and boast that they have had the land of Canaan, the city of Jerusalem and the temple from God. Although God has overthrown such boasting and vanity many times, especially through the king of Babylon who led them away and destroyed everything, like the King of Assyria had before led away and destroyed the entire Israel.

Finally they were rooted up and devastated by the Romans, now almost 1400 years ago, that they might comprehend how God did not consider, nor will He regard country, city, temple, priesthood and principality, that He should consider them His own chosen people on that account; yet their iron neck [as Isaiah calls it] is not bowed, nor has their iron forehead become red with shame. They constantly remain stiff‑necked, blinded, hardened, and immovable. Still hope that God will bring them home again and give everything back to them.

                                                                           Devil Possessed

They do not see and hear that God had given everything for the purpose that they should keep His Commandments; therefore they should be His people and Church. Just as they boast of their blood and nobility, but that they should keep His Commandments, on account of which and for which purpose he had chosen them, that they do not see and regard.

They boast about their circumcision, but the purpose for which they were circumcised; to keep God's Commandment, does not mean anything to them. They know how to boast of their Law, Temple, Divine Services, city, country and principality; but disregard the purpose for which they had it. The Devil has possessed these people with all his angels; that they always boast of outward things, their gifts, their accomplishments and deeds, which is to offer up the empty shells without the kernels. Those He is to look upon and on their account take them [the people who offer them] for His nation, exalt and bless them above all heathen. But that they should keep His Commandments and keep Him as their God, that they will not accept.

The saying of Moses [paraphrased] applies to them: "They do not regard Me as God, therefore I do not regard them as my people," as also says Hosea 1:9, "Then said God...for ye are not my people, and I will not be your God."

If God had not permitted the people of Jerusalem to be torn asunder and driven them from the land, but had let them keep it after as before, no one could convince them that they are not God's chosen nation. Because they would still have the temple, city and country, regardless of their wickedness, disobedience and stiff‑neckedness. Although many prophets would daily cry out and a thousand Moses' be standing here and exclaiming: "You are not the people of God, because you are disobedient and rebellious."

Even now they cannot give up their insane raving boast that they are the chosen people of God, after they have been dispersed and rejected for 1500 years! Still they hope to get back there because of their own merits. There is no promise for that on which the could lean for comfort, except what they smear into the Scriptures according to their own imagination. Thus the Jews at last continue in their wilfulness, and knowingly want to err and not leave their Rabbis, and therefore we also must leave them to their poisonous blasphemies and lies, and disregard them.

                                                                  Dishonest With Scripture

I have also had this experience...Three learned Jews came to me in the hope of finding a new Jew in me, because here in Wittenberg we began to read Hebrew. They also pretended that things would soon improve because we Christians were reading their books. When I disputed with them, they acted according to their kind; gave me their interpretations. When I compelled them to remain with the text, they fell from the text and said they had to believe their Rabbis, as we had to believe the Bishops and Doctors, etc...Then I had mercy on them, gave them a recommendation for safe‑conduct to the guides, that they should permit them to pass for the sake of Christ. Later I was informed that they called Christ a "Tola," i.e., a hanged malefactor.  Therefore, I do not care to have anything to do with any Jew. Paul says they are given over to wrath.

The more you try to help them the harder and more wicked they become. Let them alone! [Here follow many proofs from the Bible which are accompanied by detailed theological, scientific, and therefore in general not understood, citations, which cannot be restated here because of their volume, although they are powerful and correspond with Luther's German essence and often strike the nail on the head in a precariously forward manner.

From the wealth of striking Scripture passages, only the following are here cited: Haggai 2:6‑7:

"For thus saith the Lord of hosts; Yet once, it is a little while, and I will shake the heavens, and the earth, and the sea, and the dry land; And I will shake all nations, and the desire of all nations shall come..."

"All nations" is equal to "heathen". Under the "Desire of Nations" the ancient people designated the "Messiah."] The Jews deny that he came when the temple was still standing and claim that He shall still come, as they now have been waiting 1568 years after the destruction of that same temple; and cannot be called a "little while," because they do not yet know the end of such a "long while."

                                                              Gold And Silver Their Messiah

He will never come, for He has missed the "little while" and has gotten into the great, long while, which will never come to anything. For the prophet speaks of a "little while," not of a great, long while! But here they squirm out of it in this way: Since they cannot deny the "little while," they take the expression: "Desire of Nations," in Hebrew "Hemdath," by itself, and crucify it. Say it should not designate "Messiah," but should denote all gold and silver of the heathen. Because the word "Hemdath," according to the grammar, really means "Desire and love for," as that which the heathen desire and love. And now the text shall read thus: "After a little while the desire of all heathen shall come."

What is that? What do the heathen desire? Gold, silver, and jewels. You may be inclined to ask why the Jews insert such interpretations here. I will say: Their breath stinks for the gold and silver of the heathen, since no people under the sun always have been, still are, and always will remain more avaricious than they [the Jews] as can be noticed in their cursed usury.

They also find comfort with this: "When Messiah comes, He shall take all the gold and silver in the world and distribute it among them [the Jews]." Thus wherever they can direct Scripture to their insatiable avarice [desire for money] they wickedly do so. You would think that God and His prophets did not know of anything else to prophecy than how the fathomless avarice of the Jews could be satisfied with the silver and gold of the heathen.

God told us through Ezekiel that He would give the gold and silver of the world to the wicked:

"And I will give it [gold and silver] into the hands of the strangers [aliens] for a prey, and to the wicked of the earth [Jews] for a spoil; and they shall pollute it. My face will I turn also from them, and they shall pollute my secret place [America]: for the robbers shall enter into it, and defile it." [68]

Since childhood they have devoured such poisonous hatred against the Goyim from their parents and Rabbis, and still devour such without ceasing, that according to Psalm 109 it has gone over into their flesh and blood, bone and marrow, and has become their life and being. And as little as they can alter flesh and blood, bone and marrow, so little can they change such pride and envy. They just have to stay that way and be ruined, if God does not perform a special miracle.

                                                                  A Bitter, Poisonous Enemy

Therefore know, my dear Christian, that next to the Devil you have no more bitter, more poisonous, more vehement an enemy than a real Jew who earnestly desires to be a Jew. There may be some among them who believe what the cow or the goose believes. But all of them are surrounded with their blood and circumcision. In history, therefore, they are often accused of poisoning wells, stealing children and mutilating them; as in Trent, Weiszensee, etc. Of course, they deny this. Be it so or not, however, I know full well that the full, ready will is not lacking with them if they could only transform it into deeds, in secret or openly. Know this for a certainty and act accordingly!

Should they at times do something good, however, know full well that it is not done out of love for you, nor for you good. In order to have space to live among us they must of necessity do something [good]. But their heart is and remains as I have said. Do you not want to believe me? Then ready Lyra, Burgen and others, honorable and truthful men. If they had not written it, Scripture reveals that the two seeds of the serpent and of the woman are at enmity, and there is no concord between God and the Devil. This is also found in gross form in their writings and prayer books.

A person who does not know the Devil, might wonder why they are so at enmity with the Christians above all others; for which they have no reason, since we only do good to them. They live among us in our homes, under our protection, use land and highways, market and streets. Princes and government sit by, snore and have their mugs [mouth] open, let the Jews take from their purse and chest, steal and rob whatever they will. That is, they permit themselves and their subjects to be abused and sucked dry and reduced to beggers with their own money, through the usury of the Jews. For the Jews, as foreigners, certainly should have nothing; and what they have certainly must be ours. They do not work, do not earn anything from us. Neither do we donate or give it to them. Yet they have our money and goods and are lords in our land where they are in exile. If a thief steals ten gulden he must hang; if he robs people on the highway, his head is gone. But a Jew, when he steals ten tons of Gold through his Usury, is dearer than God Himself!

                                                                    In Secret They Curse Us

And as a distinguishing mark, they strengthen their faith and bitter hatred against us by saying Among Themselves :

"Keep on, see how God is with us and does not forsake His people in exile. We do not work, we enjoy good, lazy days; the cursed Goyim must work for us, we get their money; thereby we are their masters, they, however, our servants. Keep on, dear Children of Israel, it will be better still! Our Messiah will come if we thus continue and appropriate to ourselves, by usury, the 'Hemdath' [Hebrew: desire, possessions] of the heathen!"

All this we accept from them while we are protecting them: yet they curse us, as said before. But of this later. [After lengthy exegetical, historical dissertations there follows a highly interesting paragraph from which it may be seen that Luther was acquainted with the Talmud and Schulchan‑Aruch already at this time, which explains his changed attitude over the Jew question].

Does not their Talmud and Rabbis write that it is no sin to kill if a Jew kills a Christian, but it is sin if he kills a brother in Israel! It is no sin if he does not keep his oath to a Christian. Therefore, to steal and rob [as they do with their usury] from a Christian, is a divine serve. For they hold that they cannot be too hard on us nor sin against us, because they are the noble blood and circumcised saints; we however, cursed Goyim. And they are the masters of the world and we are their servants, yea, their cattle! In short, as the Rabbis have taught them, so also their Evangelists tell us in Matthew 15:6, "And honour not his father or his mother, he shall be free. Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition."

That they have abolished the Fifth Commandment about honoring father and mother; and in Matthew 23:13,

"But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in."

Practiced more shameful doctrines, not to mention what Christ says in Matthew 5:28,

"But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart."

How they cunningly preached and expounded the Ten Commandments! And into the temple they had placed money changers, merchants and all manner of avaricious trade, that our Lord Christ said they had made of God's house a den of thieves. Now figure it out for yourself what a fine honor that was, how the house was full of glory that God had to call his own house a den of thieves! Because so many souls were murdered through avaricious, false doctrine; that is, through two‑fold idolatry. To this day the Jews cling to such doctrines and do as their fathers did; pervert the Word of God, are avaricious, practice usury, steal, commit murder [wherever they can do so], and on and on and teach their children to do such.

                                                     Talmud Worse Than Heathen Philosophy

The heathen philosophers and poets write much more honorably; not only about God's government and future life, but also about temporal virtues. They write that man is by nature obligated to serve others, also to keep his word to enemies, and be true and helpful to them especially in need, as taught by Cicerto and his like.  Yea, I maintain that in three fables of Aesop there is more wisdom to be found than in all the books of the Talmudists and Rabbis and more than ever could come into the hearts of the Jews.

Should someone think I am saying too much; I am not saying too much, but much too little! For I see in writings how they curse us Goyim and wish us all evil in their schools and prayers. They rob us of our money through usury, and wherever they are able, they play us all manner of mean tricks; [what is worst of all] they mean to have right and well in this, that is, they think they have rendered God a service in this and teach that such should be done. No heathen has done such things and none would do so except the Devil himself and those whom he possesses, like he possesses the Jews.

Burgensis, who was a very learned Rabbi among them and by the grace of God became a Christian [which seldom occurs], is much moved that in their schools they so horribly curse us Christians [as Lyra also writes] and from that draws the conclusion that They [Jews] Must not be the People of God . For if they were the people of God, they would act like the captive Jews did in Babylon, to whom Jeremiah writes thus: pray for the king of the city where you are captive; for their peace is also your peace. But our bastards and false Jews think they must curse us, hate and do us all manner of harm wherever they can do so; for which they have no reason whatsoever. Therefore they certainly are not God's People. More about this later.

                                                  The Jews Profane The Name of Jesus Christ

[Very interesting are the dissertations about the sophisticated manner of the Jews in hiding their hatred against Jesus under sham names. Here it says:] Accordingly they treat His [Jesus'] Name. For Jhesus in Hebrew means "Healer" or "Helper." The ancient Saxons used a name: "Helprich" or "Hilprich," which sounds like the name Jhesus which we now would call "Helprich," that is, who may or should be able to help. Distortingly, however, the Jews call Him "Jesu," which in Hebrew is neither name nor word, but simply three letters or ciphers, or cipher letters, as if I were to take the letters CLU as ciphers and make the word CLU out of them, that is 155 [CLU, Roman ciphers: C ‑‑ 100, L ‑‑ 50, ‑‑ V ‑‑ 5 ‑‑ 155. V and U originally are the same]. Thus they call Jesu, that is 316. Such a figure is said to bring about another word which means Nebel Borik. About this you may read more in Anton, Margaritham. What Devil's work they practice with such numbers and words. They treat us Christians in like manner.

When we come to them and they receive us they pervert the word: God welcome you [German ‑‑ said Gott Wilkommen] and say: "Shed will kom," that is: "Devil come!" or: "There comes a Devil." Since we do not understand the Hebrew, they secretly practice their hatred against us, that we think they are friendly to us while they curse us with the fire of hell and all misfortune.

                                                          They Call The Virgin Mary A Whore

They call Him [Jesus] the child of a whore and His mother, Mary, a whore, whom she had in adultery with a smith. Reluctantly I must speak so coarse in opposing the Devil. Now they well know that they speak such lies in plain hatred and wilfulness, solely to poison their poor youth and simple Jews against the Person of our Lord, to prevent them from accepting His doctrine [which they cannot deny]. Sabastianus Muenster also points out in his Biblia, that there is said to be a poisonous Rabbi who does not call the dear mother "Maria," but "Haria," a heap of mud.

And who knows what more they have among themselves of which we know nothing! [Luther now shows in elaborate, scientific discussions about the Messiah and Bar‑Kochab, his thorough knowledge of the Jewish character, the writings and hopes of Juda and finally arrives at the so‑called "captivity" among the Christians].

  Now behold what a nice, thick, fat lie it is when they complain about being captives among us. Jerusalem was destroyed more than 1400 years ago and during that time we Christians have been tortured and persecuted by the Jews in all the world. For nearly 300 years [as stated above] we might well complain that during that time they captured and killed the Christians, which is the clear truth. On top of that, we do not know to this day which Devil brought them into our country. We did not fetch them from Jerusalem!

On top of all that, no one is holding them now. Land and highways are open to them; they may move to their country whenever they care to do so! We would like to add a present in order to get rid of them. They are a heavy burden to us in our country, like a plague, pestilence, and nothing but misfortune.

Do you call that being held captive when a person cannot stand one in his own house? Why, they hold us Christians in captivity in our own country; they let us work in the sweat of our noses, while they appropriate money and goods, sitting behind the stove, are lazy, gluttlers and guzzlers, live well and easy on goods for which we have worked, keep us and our goods in captivity through their cursed usury, mock us and spit on us, because we must labor and permit them to be noblemen at our expense; thus they are our lords and masters, we their servants with our own property, sweat and labor! And to thank us and reward us, they curse our Lord!

                                                           Enslave Us With Our Own Wealth

Should the Devil not laugh and dance, when in this manner he can have his paradise among us Christians, that through the Jews, his saints, he devours what is ours and to thank us fills our mugs [mouths] and noses, blasphemes and curses God and man! They could not have enjoyed such good days in Jerusalem under David and Solomon in their own possessions as they now have in our property, which they daily steal and rob. Still they complain that we are holding them captive! Yes, we have and hold them captive, as I would like to keep my rheumatism, furnacles and all other diseases and misfortune, who must wait as a poor servant, with money and property and everything I have! I wish they were in Jerusalem with the Jews and whomsoever they would like to have with them!

Since it is certain that we do not hold them captive, how do we deserve that such great and noble saints are so angry with us? We do not call our wives whores as they call Maria, the Mother of Jesus; we do not call them bastards, as they call our Lord Christ. We do not curse them, but wish them all manner of bodily and spiritual good, permit them to lodge with us. We don't steal and mutilate their children; do not poison their water; do not thirst after their blood. With what do we deserve such terrible wrath and envy and hatred of such holy children of God?

It is not otherwise than we have quoted from Mises, that God has struck them with insane blindness and a raving heart, thus it is our fault that we do not avenge the innocent blood which they shed on our Lord, and the Christians, for three hundred years after the destruction of Jerusalem, and from that time on children [which still shines from their eyes and skin]. That we  do not slay them, but for all their murder, cursing, blaspheming, and disgracing, permit them to dwell among us without charge, protect their schools, houses, body and goods, by which we make them lazy and secure and help them confidently to squeeze from us our money and goods, and in addition to mock us and spit on us, hoping finally to overcome us and slay all of us for such great sin and take away all of our goods, as they daily pray for.

Now tell me, do they not have great cause to hate us cursed Goyim, to curse us and seek our final, thorough and eternal ruin? Now what are we going to do with these rejected, condemned, Jewish people?

We should not suffer it after they are among us and we know about such lying, blaspheming and cursing among them, lest we become partakers of their lies, cursing, and blaspheming. We cannot extinguish the unquenchable fire of God's wrath [as the prophets say], nor convert the Jews. We must practice great mercy with prayer and godliness that we might rescue a few from the flame and violent heat.

We are not permitted to take revenge. Revenge is around their neck a thousand times greater than we could wish them. I will give you my true counsel:

     First: That we avoid their synagogues and schools and warn people against them. And such should be done to the glory of God and Christendom, that God may see that we are Christians and have not knowingly tolerated such lying, cursing and blaspheming of His Son and His Christians. For what we so far have tolerated in ignorance [I myself did not know it], God will forgive us. Now that we know it, however, and in spite should before our very noses tolerate such a building for the Jew in which they blaspheme, curse, spit upon and disgrace Christ and us, that would be simply too much, as if we did it ourselves and much worse, as you well know. Moses writes in Deuteronomy that where a city practiced idolatry, it should be entirely destroyed with fire and leave nothing. If he were living today he would be the first to put fire to the Jew schools and houses. [Followed by proofs from Scripture].

     Second: That you also refuse to let them own houses among us. For they practice the same thing in their houses as they do in their schools. Instead, you might place them under a roof, or stable, like the Gypsies, to let them know that they are not lords in our country as they boast, but in exile as captives; like without ceasing they howl bloody murder and complain about us before God.

     Third: That you take away from them all of their prayer books and Talmuds wherein such lying, cursing, and blaspheming is taught.

     Fourth: That you prohibit their Rabbis to teach. For they have forfeited the right to such an office, because they keep the poor Jews captive with the passage of Moses 7:11‑12, who there commands them to obey their teachers under threat of losing body and soul. Moses clearly adds: What they teach you according to the law of the Lord. This the profligates pass over, and use the obedience of the poor people for their own wilfulness against the law of the Lord, and pour out for them such poison and blasphemy.

     Fifth: That protection for Jews on highways be revoked. For they have no right to be in the land, because they are not lords, nor officials. They should stay at home. I am told that at this time a wealthy Jew is riding with twelve horses in our country. He wants to become a Kochab [Star Bar‑Kochba, "Star Son," false Messiah, was leader of the last rebellion of the Jews against the Romans 132-135 after Christ]. He practices his usury on princes and lords, land and people. High officials close an eye to it. If you princes and masters do not forbid land and highways to such usurers, I would like to assemble a cavalry against you, because you will learn from this book what the Jews are and how they are to be treated and their activities not to be protected. For you should not and cannot protect them unless you want to be partners of their abominations. What good would be the result, you may well consider and perish.

   Sixth: That their usury be prohibited, which was prohibited by Moses, where they are not lords in their own country over strange lands, and take away all the currency and silver and gold and put it away for safe‑keeping. For this reason, everything they have they have stolen from us [as said above] and robbed through their usury, since they have no other income. Such money should be used as follows: whenever a Jew is truly converted, he be given one, two, or three hundred flo [measure of money] according to his person, that he may begin to support his poor wife and child and/or support the aged and infirm. For such property which was obtained dishonestly is cursed where it is not turned to good use with God's blessing.

                                                                  They Even Betrayed Moses

Whenever they boast that Moses had permitted them to practice usury against strangers, [69] "Unto a stranger thou mayest lend upon usury; but unto thy brother thou shalt not lend upon usury: that the Lord thy God may bless thee in all 'that' thou settest thine hand to in the land whither thou goest to possess it.") Otherwise they have not one letter in their favor ‑‑ they are to be given the following answer: There are two kinds of Jews or Israel. The first are those whom Moses led out of Egypt into the land of Canaan, as God had commanded him; to them He gave His Law, which they were to keep in that land, not beyond; and that only until Messiah should come...The other are the Kaiser's [Caesar's] Jews, not Moses' Jews.  They had their origin at the time of the governor Pilate in the land of Juda. For when he asked them before his tribunal: "What shall I do with Jesus who is called the Christ?"

They cried: "Crucify Him, crucify Him!"

He said: "Shall I crucify your king?"

They cried out: "We have no king but Caesar [Kaiser]."

Such obedience to Caesar, God had not commanded them, they did this on their own accord. Thereupon when Caesar demanded obedience, they resisted and rebelled against him, did not want to be Caesar's now. Then he came and visited his subjects, took them away from Jerusalem and dispersed them throughout his entire domain where they had to be obedient.

Of such are the present remaining dregs of the Jews, of whom Moses knew nothing; they also know nothing of him, for they do not keep one passage in Moses. They must first come back into the land of Canaan and become Moses' Jews, keep his commandment, subdue heathen and strangers under themselves. There they may practice usury as much as the strangers will stand for.

Since, however, they are disobedient to Moses in a strange land under the Kaiser, they should keep the Kaiser's law and not practice usury against their superiors until they become obedient to Moses. For the land which they should possess on the other side of Canaan or the nation of Israel. For he was not sent to the Egyptians, Babylonians, or any other nation, with his law, but solely and alone to that nation which he brought out of the land of Egypt into the land of Canaan, as he himself often states in Deuteronomy: They should keep such commandments in the land which they should possess on the other side of the river Jordan.

Inasfar as priesthood, ceremonies, principality, which were mostly built by Moses, have fallen, now almost 1400 years ago, it is certain that his law, which was in existence before that time, also has fallen and come to an end, Therefore the Kaiser's Jews should be treated according to the Kaiser's law and not be treated like Moses' Jews of whom for 1400 years none have existed. For they have no land of their own, much less strange land, where they might practice usury according to Moses.

     Finally: That young, strong Jews be given flail, ax, spade, spindle, and let them earn their bread in the sweat of their noses as imposed upon Adam's children, in Genesis 3:19: "In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return." For it will not do that they should let us cursed Goyim work in the sweat of our brow, while they, the holy people devour our bread in laziness behind the stove and then boast that they are masters over the Christians; but their laziness should be driven from their back.

Should we be concerned, however, that they might do bodily harm to us, to wife and children, servants, cattle, etc., when they serve us or should be compelled to work, because it is to be surmised that such noble lords of the world and poisonous, bitter worms, who are not accustomed to work, would be very remiss to humble themselves under the cursed Goyim; let us apply the ordinary wisdom of other nations like France, Spain, Bohemia, et al., who made them give an account of what they had taken from them by usury and divided it evenly; but expelled them from their country. For, as heard before, God's wrath is so great over them that through soft mercy they only become more wicked, through hard treatment, however, only a little better.  Therefore, away with them!

                                                                Charitable With Our Wealth

I hear it said that the Jews give large sums of money and thereby are helpful to the government. Yes, from what do they give it? Not of their own, but from the property of the rulers and subjects, whom they deprive of their possessions through usury! And thus the rulers take from the subjects what the Jews have taken, that is: subjects must give money and suffer themselves to be fleeced for the Jews so they can remain in the land freely to lie, slander, curse and steal. Should not the despairing Jews have a good laugh over the way we suffer ourselves to be fooled and be led around by the nose to give our money in order that they may stay in the land to practice all manner of wickedness?

On top of all that they even become rich on our sweat and blood, but we become poor and are sucked dry by them? If that is right, that a servant, yea, a guest, or a captive may annually give to his host ten flo, and in return steal a thousand, the servant and guest will soon be rich, and the master and host in a short time a beggar. Even if the Jews could give the government such sums from their own, which is not possible, and thereby purchase from us protection openly to lie about, slander, spit upon, and curse our Lord Christ in their schools; and wish on us all manner of misfortune, that all of us be stabbed and perish with our Haman, Kaiser, Princes, Lords, wife and children, that certainly would mean for Christ our Lord, the entire Christendom together with our principality, our wives, and children, to be sold miserably cheap.

The traitor Judas would be valued a much greater saint than we. Yea, if every Jew could annually give 100,000 flo; yet we should not permit them to have power to blaspheme, curse, spit upon one single Christian and practice their usury on him. That would be selling ourselves much too cheap.

How much more unbearable is it that we should permit the entire Christendom and all of us to be bought with our own money, be slandered and cursed by the Jews who on top of all that be made rich, and our lords, who would laugh us to scorn and be tickled by their audacity! What a joyful affair that would be for the Devil and his angels and cause them to laugh through their noses like a sow grinning at her little pigs, but deserving real wrath before God.

                                                                          Advice To Rulers

To sum up, dear princes and lords who have Jews under themselves: if my advice is not acceptable, you may find a better one, that all of us be relieved of the unbearable, devilish burden of the Jews and not become partakers before God of all the lies, slander, spitting, cursing of the raving Jews against the person of our Lord Jesus Christ, His mother, all Christians, all rulers and ourselves, as they freely and deliberately practice it. That you do not let them have protection or safe‑conduct, nor fellowship. Neither permit your money and goods, and the money and goods of your subjects, to serve the Jews through their usury. We still have plenty of our own sins and daily add much to them through our ingratitude and despising God's grace and work; that it is not necessary to add to them these mean foreign vices of the Jews and also give them our money and goods. Let us remember that we are daily fighting against the Turk and therefore are much in need of getting rid of our own sins and of spiritual growth and improvement. With this I want to have my conscience cleared and excused as one who has truly exposed the danger and warned against it.

And you, my dear sirs and friends, who are pastors and preachers: I hereby wish to have dutifully reminded of your office, that you also warn your parishioners against their eternal ruin, as you well know how to do; namely, that they be on their guard against the Jews and avoid them. Not that they should curse them and inflict personal harm! For they have cursed and insulted themselves too much by cursing the Man Jesus of Nazareth, Mary's son, as unfortunately they have been doing for 1400 years. In this respect you may let the government deal with them as I have said. Whether or not the government does any thing about it, every individual should take care of himself and his conscience, by keeping before himself such a definition or picture of a Jew!

                                                              Desire The Death Of Christians

Whenever you see or think about a Jew, say to yourself as follows: Behold, the mouth which I see there has every Saturday cursed, execrated, and spit upon my dear Lord, Jesus Christ who has redeemed me with His precious blood; and also prayed and cursed before God that I, my wife and children, and all Christians should be stabbed and perish in the most miserable manner ‑‑ would like to do so himself if he could that he might come into possession of our goods. Perhaps he has this very day often spit on the ground over the Name of Jhesu [according to their custom] and that the spittle is still clinging to his mouth and beard where there is still room for it. Should I eat, drink with, or speak to such a Devilish mug [mouth]? I might devour many Devils, as for a certainty I would become partaker of all the Devils who live in that Jew, and would spit upon the precious blood of Christ, God keep me from doing that!

If they do not believe as we do, we cannot help it and cannot compel anyone to accept the faith. We, however, should avoid strengthening them in their deliberate lying, blaspheming, cursing and disgracing, also do not become partakers of their devilish raving and ranting by according them protection, meat and drink, lodging and other neighborly kindness. Especially because they proudly and haughtily boast, wherever we are friendly to them or serve them, that God has made them to be lords and us to be servants. As when a Christian on the Sabbath lights their fire and cooks for them whatever they desire, for which they curse, despite and slander us as if they were doing something good, and yet eat up our goods which they have stolen from us.  Such a despairing, evil, poisonous thing it is with these Jews who these 1400 years have been and still are our plague, pestilence and all misfortune.

                                                                       Advice To Preachers

Especially you who are preachers: where there are Jews, diligently insist that your masters and regents remember the duties of their office as they owe it to God, and compel the Jews to work, forbid them to practice usury and stay their blaspheming and cursing. For if they punish thieves, robbers, murderers, slanderers and other vices among us Christians, why should the Devil's children among the Jew be free to do such things against us? do we not suffer more from them than the Wals from the Spaniards? They take from their host; kitchen, cellar, chest, money bag, and in addition curse them and threaten them with death. In like manner we are treated by the Jews, our guests; we are the hosts.

Thus they rob and deprive us, recline on our neck, the lazy and idle bellies, are gluttons in eating and drinking, have easy days in our homes and as a reward curse our Lord Christ, Church, princes and all of us without ceasing to threaten us and to wish us death and all misfortune. Just think, how do we poor Christians get that way that we enrich such idle people, such blaspheming enemies of god and receive nothing in return but their cursing, slandering and all misfortune that they can do and wish against us? In this respect we are blind dogs, such as the Jews are in their unbelief; that we suffer such tyranny from such merciless knaves, do not see and feel such, to let them be our lords, yea, or raving tyrants. We are, however, their captives and subjects; and still they lament that we are holding them as captives, mock us on top of all that as if we had to accept it from them! If the rulers, however, refuse to compel them nor restrain their devilish wantonness, that they be driven from the country, as said, and be told that they move to their own land and possessions in Jerusalem and there lie, curse, blaspheme, spit, murder, steal, rob, practice usury, mock, and engage in all such slanderous abominations as they do among us; and leave us our land, principality, body, goods, much more, our Lord Jesus, faith and church undisturbed and unbesmirched with such devilish tyrannies and wickedness. Of course, they could pretend that this would not help them. For no one has the right to grant liberty to practice such abominations, and all liberties are thereby lost.

After you pastors and preachers have diligently and dutifully issued such warning, and neither master nor subjects will do anything about it, then let us [as Christ says] shake the dust from our shoes and say: we are innocent of your blood. For I can see and have often had the experience how lenient and merciful the reversed world is; where it should be stern, and again is stern where it should be lenient and merciful. The Prince of this world rules like King Ahab, 2 Kings, 20. In like manner they may now want to be lenient with the Jews, these blood‑thirsty enemies of our Christian and human name, to earn heaven therewith. But for the Jews to hold in captivity, plague, torture and inflict all misery on us poor Christians with all such devilish cruelties as described above, that we should suffer and is considered a good, Christian indeed, especially where there is money which they have stolen from us.

What are we poor preachers to do meanwhile? First, we want to believe that our Lord Jesus is truthful when He says of such Jews who do not accept Him, but crucified Him: "You are vipers and children of the Devil." As His forerunner, John the Baptist also says. Now such rulers and such merciful saints who wish the Jews well, will be the last to let us alone to believe in our Lord Jesus Christ, who, of course, knows all hearts better than such merciful saints; that these Jews must be a generation of vipers and children of the Devil; that is, who grant us just as much good as their father, the Devil. What good that fellow has done to us, we Christians should have understood long and well from experience besides the statements of Scripture.

Whoever has a desire to lodge, nurse, and honor such poisonous serpents and young Devils; that is, the worst enemies of Christ our Lord and of us all; and permit himself to be abused, plundered, robbed, spit upon, cursed and suffer all evil, let the Jews be commended to him. If this be not sufficient, let him also be put into his mug or crawl and worship such a sanctuary, and afterward boast that he had been merciful, had strengthened the Devil and his young Devils to blaspheme our dear Lord and the precious blood with which He has bought us. In that way he will be a perfect Christian, filled with deeds of mercy, for which Christ will reward him on Judgment Day with the Jews and eternal hell fire! If that be rudely spoken it is said to the rude cursing of the Jews! Of which others write much, which also the Jews well understand that it is called cursing, as they who thereby knowingly want to curse and blaspheme.

Let us also speak of this in a subtle, and as Christians, in a spiritual way. Thus says our Lord Jesus Christ:

"Whosoever receiveth Me, receiveth Him that sent Me." [70] ; "He that despiseth you, despiseth Me; and he that despiseth Me, despiseth Him that sent Me." [71] ; "He that hateth Me, hateth also my Father." [72] ; "That all men should honor the Son as they honor the Father. He that honoreth not the Son, honoreth not the Father who hath sent Him." [73]

                                                     The Jews Blaspheme The New Testament

Will you say: Yes, the Jews do not believe and do not know this, because they do not accept the New Testament? I answer: May the Jews know or believe this or that; we Christians know that they openly blaspheme God the Father when they blaspheme and curse Jesus.

If God would say to us now or on the Day of Judgment: Do you hear, you are a Christian and know that the Jews openly blasphemed and cursed Me and My Son, and you gave them a place to do so, also protected and guarded them so they could do so unhindered and unpunished in your country, city or house! Tell me: What shall we answer? [Now follow long dissertations, supported by passages from Scripture about the Messianic office of Jesus, which are not given here because of their scientific, theological nature. Finally Luther sums up his presentations as follows:].

Accordingly, we should not joke about this matter, but very sincerely find counsel against it and save our souls from the Jews; that is, from eternal death. As stated before, this counsel is in the first place: that we refuse them the right to have synagogues, so the world may know that we do not permit a house to remain in which the Jews have for so long a time blasphemed our dear Creator and Father, together with His Son, which so far we had tolerated in ignorance.

     Second: That all of their books be taken away; prayer books, Talmuds, and not one page of it be left; and keep them for those who will become converted. For they use all of that only to blaspheme the Son of God; that is, God Himself, the Father, Creator of heaven and earth, and will never use it any other way.

     THIRD: That among us and in our possessions they be forbidden openly to praise and thank God, to pray and to teach. Let them do that in their own country or wherever we Christians do not hear or know about it. The reason for this: their praise, thanks, prayers, and teachings are nothing but blasphemy, cursing, idolatry; since their heart and mouth call God Father Nebel Borik, the same as they call His Son, our Lord Jesus Christ. For as they call and honor the Son, so the Father is likewise called and honored. It will not help them to employ many beautiful words and gloriously use the Name of God. For it is written: "Thou shalt not take the Name of the Lord, thy God, in vain." Just as it did not help their forefathers to use the Name of God and still call Him Baal in the time of the kings of Israel.

     FORTH: That they be forbidden to mention the Name of God before our ears, for we cannot suffer that with a clear conscience. When their blasphemous mouth and heart call the Son of God Nebel Borik, they are also calling the Father by the same name; as we Christians cannot understand it otherwise. We must believe that as the Son is named or believed to be, even so the Father is named and believed to be. Therefore the mouth of the Jews should not be considered worthy to mention the Name of God before our ears; but whosoever hear it mentioned by the Jews should report it to the rulers, etc. And let no one be merciful and kind in this respect; for it concerns the honor of God and the salvation of us all [also of the Jews].

And should they or anyone else propose that they did not mean it so wickedly, neither knew that with such blasphemy and cursing, they were blaspheming and cursing God the Father; for they most highly and beautifully praise and honor God, although they slander Jesus and us Christians. That has been answered above as you heard. If the Jews do not want to know it or consider it good, we Christians must know it. So the Jews are not excused because of their ignorance, since God has caused this to be preached for almost 1500 years so that they are obligated to know this and God also requires it of them. For whosoever hears God's Word for 1500 years and always says: I do not want to know it! The ignorance of such a one will earn him a mean excuse, that is, a sevenfold debt.

                                                                  The Jews' Messiah Is False

Lastly will I say this for myself: If God would not want to give me a Messiah who is different from the one the Jews desire and hope for, I would much rather be a sow than a human being! And I will give you some good reasons for this: The Jews desire no more from their Messiah than that He should be a Kochab and a worldly king, who would slay the Christians, divide the world among the Jews and make them rich lords, and finally die like other kings and his children after him likewise.

Of what good would the Jewish Messiah be to me, if he could not help me, poor human being, against my spiritual loss, and could not make my life one tenth part as good as that of a sow? I would say: Dear Lord God, keep your Messiah or give Him to anyone who will have Him. Me, however, change to a sow, for it is better to be a living sow than an eternally dying human being. Yea, as Christ says: "It were better for that man if he had never been born!"

If, however, I had a Messiah who could help me in spiritual need; that I would not have to fear death, would always and eternally be certain of life, could mock at the Devil and hell and would not have to shiver before the wrath of God, then my heart would skip for joy and be drunken with happiness. Then I would light a fire of love for God and never cease to thank and praise Him. If then He would not give me silver and gold and other riches, still the whole world would be a paradise to me eve if I should have to live in a prison.

Such A Messiah We Christians Have, and for it we thank God the Father with full, overwhelming joy of our hearts! Such a Messiah the Jews do not desire, and of what good would He be to them? They must have one from an earthly Utopia who would satisfy their stinking belly and die with them like a cow or a dog.

                                                   Beware Of The Jews' Blasphemy And Usury

In my opinion it will have to come to this: if we are to stay clean of the Jew's blaspheming and not become partakers of it, we must separate, and they must leave our country. Thus they could no more cry and lie to God that we are holding them captive; and we could no more complain that they plague us with their blaspheming and usury. This is the nearest and best advice that makes it safe for both parties. [Here follow longer proofs from Scripture against the accusation of the Jews against the Christian doctrine].

So much writing, good Sir and dear Friend, you have compelled me to do about your booklet in which a Jew exhibits his cunning arguments against an absent Christian. Thank God, he would not do so to me at the present time. I hope that in this a Christian who does not desire to become Jewish will find sufficient arguments to guard against the blind, poisonous Jews, and will also become an enemy of the wickedness, lies, and cursing of the Jews, and come to the knowledge that their belief is not only false, but that they are also possessed of all the Devils.

Following are paragraphs taken from various sermons and writings of Luther. After each paragraph the original source of the quotation is indicated. Note: Quotations from Luther's works marked "W" originate from the Weimar Edition, those marked "E" from the Erlangen Edition.

                                                                   An Appraisal Of Mankind

Jews are young devils condemned to Hell. [74] Maybe mild‑hearted and gentle Christians will believe I am too rigorous and drastic against the poor, afflicted Jews, believing that I ridicule them and treat them with much sarcasm. By my word, I am far too weak to be able to ridicule such a satanic breed. I would fain do so, but they are far greater adepts at mockery than I and possess a god who is master in this art; it is the Evil One himself. [75]

Even with no further evidence than the Old Testament, I would maintain, and no person on earth could alter my opinion, that the Jews, as they are today, are veritably a mixture of all the depraved and malevolent knaves of the whole world over, who have then been dispersed in all countries, similarly to the Tartars, Gypsies and such folk, to afflict the different nations with their usury, to spy upon others and to betray, to poison wells, to deceive and to kidnap children, in short, to practice all kinds of dishonesty and injury. [76]

                                                                         The Jewish Danger

Those Jews professing to be surgeons or doctors deprive the Christians who make use of their medicaments, of health and prosperity, for such Jewish doctors believe they find especial favor with their god if they torment and furtively kill Christians. And we, fools that we are, even turn for succor to our enemies and their evil ways in the times when our lives are in danger, which is indeed sorely trying God's patience. [77]

                                                                           Luther's Legacy

As soon as my principal business, Warning Against the Jews, has been accomplished, I shall have to devote myself to the expulsion of the Jews. Count Albrecht is hostile towards them and he has already abandoned them, but as yet they are being molested by none. With the help of God I shall, in the sermons I hold from the pulpit, assist Count Albrecht and shall also abandon them. [78]

                                                                      Luther's Last Sermon

Besides, you also have many Jews living in the country, who do much harm...You should know that the Jews blaspheme and violate the name of our Savior day for day...for that reason you, Milords and men of authority, should not tolerate but expel them. They are our public enemies and incessantly blaspheme our Lord Jesus Christ, they call our Blessed Virgin Mary a harlot and her Holy Son a bastard and to us they give the epithet of changelings and abortions. If they could kill us all, they would gladly do so; in fact, many of them murder Christians, especially those professing to be surgeons and doctors. They know how to deal with medicaments in the manner of the Italians, the Borgias and Medicis, who gave people poison which brought about their death in one hour or in a month. Therefore deal with them harshly as they do nothing but excruciatiningly blaspheme our Lord Jesus Christ, trying to rob us of our lives, our health, our honor and belongings...For that reason I cannot have patience nor carry on an intercourse with these deliberate blasphemers and violators of our Beloved Savior. As a good patriot I wanted to give you this warning for the very last time to deter you from participating in alien sins. You must know I only desire the best for you all, rulers and subjects. [79]

The divergencies between the Counts of Manfeld which were the cause of his journey. Held at Eisleben, a few days before his death, on February 1546. According to the teachings of our so‑called "Ministers," the Soviet Union should have been blessed above any nation on the earth, for they are the only known nation which has forbidden "anti‑Semitism," by law. A quotation from The Daily Worker in 1939 related:

"In the USSR, anti‑Semitism is strictly prosecuted as a phenomenon profoundly hostile to the Soviet system. According to the laws of the USSR, Active Anti-Semites are punished with Death ."

Is this law so strange, when you consider that more than 90% of the top Communist leaders have been and still are Jews? Yet Russia has not been blessed. Oh, they have a tough military machine, built up with the blood of the Russian people. They scare the daylights out of the "milquetoasts" in our churches and government, but they are beset by constant internal troubles, which could destroy them overnight. They can control their vast, imperial empire, only through fear and terror.

The second lie, which throws fear into the hearts of anyone who seeks to become enlightened concerning the position of the Jews in the world, is the bugaboo of "anti‑Semitism." Have you stopped to ask yourself, "Who is a Semite?" History proves that the Semites descended from Noah's son Shem. This takes in the White, Anglo‑Saxon, Celtic, Germanic, Scandinavian and related people. However, it does not include the people who call themselves Jews.

They are the greatest "anti‑Semites" of all time, since they constantly harass descendants of Abraham, the Arabs, Whose Land they have Stolen. Yet no one would think of calling a Jew "anti‑Semitic" because he harasses an Arab.

The third lie, which has been sold to American Christians by the Jewish propagandists, is that our heritage is "Judeo‑Christian"; in other words, that Christianity is a direct derivative of Judaism. The New Testament is Not Now, Nor Ever Has Been a Product of Judaism. Judaism is built on the Talmud, which is the antithesis of the Bible.

The Rabbis of Judaism understand this just as do the leaders in the Christian movement. Rabbi Moshe Maggal of the National Jewish Information Service said in 1961 when the term Judeo‑Christian was relatively new,

"There is no such thing as a Judeo‑Christian religion. We consider the two religions so different that one excludes the other." [80]

Most of our so‑called "Judeo-Christian Ministers" know this, but they will not teach it for fear of the Jews. Biblical Christianity is built on the teachings of the Lord Jesus Christ and Divine revelation as it was given to His Apostles. It has absolutely nothing in common with Judaism as anyone can see, who has taken the time and effort to read any of the Talmud.

     "The current expression 'Judeo-Christian' is an error which has altered the course of universal history by the confusion it has sown in men's mind, if by it one is meant to understand the Jewish origin of Christianity; for by abolishing the fundamental distinctions between Jewish and Christian messianism, it seeks to bring together two ideas that are radically in opposition. By laying the accent exclusively on the 'Christian' idea to the detriment of the 'Judean' it conjures away monotheistic messianism - a valuable discipline at all levels of thought, and reduces it to a purely confessional messianism, preoccupied like Christian messianism with the salvation of the individual soul. If the term 'Judeo-Christian' does point to a common origin, there is no doubt that it is a most dangerous idea.

     It is based on a 'contrdictio in adjecto' which has set the path of history on the wrong track. It links in one breath two ideas which are completely irreconcilable, it seeks to demonstrate that there is no difference between day and night or hot and cold or Black and White, and thus introduces a fatal element of confusion to a basis on which some, nevertheless, are endeavoring to construct a civilization. Christianity offers to the world a limited messianism which it wishes to impose as the only valid one...Even Spinoza, who was further than any other thinker from the historic messianism of Israel, wrote: 'As for what certain churches say, that God assumed human nature, I must confess that this seems to me as absurd as saying that a circle assumed the shape of a square...'

     The dogmatic exclusiveness professed by Christianity must finally end...It is the obstinate Christian claim to be the sole heir to Israel which propagates-anti-Semitism. This scandal must terminate sooner or later; the sooner it goes, the sooner the world will be rid of the issue of lies in which anti-Semitism shrouds itself." [81]

Jesus Christ, speaking to the Judaic religious leaders of His day in Matthew 15:9, and quoting from the Prophet Isaiah said:

"In vain they do worship me [God], teaching for doctrines the commandments of men."

In Mark 7:13 Christ again harshly criticizes the Pharisees, accusing them of,

"Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition..."

This same general idea is carried over in the teachings of the Apostle Paul when he warned the church at Colossae:

"Which all are to perish with the using; after the commandments and doctrines of men."

In 1 Timothy 4:1 Paul warned of a time which will come on this earth, when men will depart from sound doctrine to;

"...giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils."

Oh how the fundamental Judeo-Christian preachers love this text, but none of them will tell their parishioners that this is what we find in the Jewish Talmudic teachings; they are heavily laced with the occult, in direct disobedience to the instructions of God, as given to Moses.

In Titus 1:14, Paul gives us a final warning about Jewish doctrine, when he said:

"Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth."

So you see, if Christians listen to the lies of the Jews they will turn the Chriatian from the truth; if a Christian is honest there is no way you can truthfully use the term "Judeo‑Christian." They are at opposite ends of the pole. The Old Testament was compiled by Holy men of God who were Israelites. They believed in the one God, as shown in Isaiah 45:5; "I am the Lord, and there is none...beside me!"

They looked forward to the coming Redeemer of Israel, the Savior of the Christians. The Holy men of God wrote the sacred Book we call the Bible, as they were moved by the Spirit of God. The Old Testament is therefore the product of God, Working through His servants, the prophets. Christianity predates the Jewish religion, for this came into being during the Babylonian captivity, when Israelites turned away from God and brought back to Jerusalem the heathen commandments of men, which later became known as the Talmud.

The Judaism of today is not the Law and the Prophets of the Old Testament, but the heathen occult religion of ancient Babylon. The Talmud, therefore, contradicts the teachings of Moses in almost every aspect. Moses was a Christian [He looked forward to Christ: Just as we look backward to Christ]. This can be seen in a careful reading of Hebrews 11:24‑26:

"By faith [The same faith which saves men and women in the present time known as the Twentieth Century] Moses, when he was come to years, refused to be called the son of Pharaoh's daughter; Choosing rather to suffer affliction with the people of God, than to enjoy the pleasures of sin for a season; Esteeming the reproach of Christ [Notice this part very carefully; Esteeming the Reproach of Christ ] greater riches than the treasures in Egypt: for he had respect unto the recompense of the reward."

But you say: "Abraham and Moses were Jews; our 'Judeo-Christian Minister' teaches this all the time." I beg to differ with

you. THEY WERE NOT JEWS! This term was not used until 2 Kings 16:6 more than 1100 years after the death of Abraham and 700 years after the death of Moses. To call these men Jews is to engage in intellectual dishonesty. The Jewish writer, Benjamin Freedman writing in 1954 to Dr. David Goldstein, a Jew who had been converted to Catholicism and who had become outstanding in his defense of the Catholic faith, said:

"It is a well‑known fact that Many of The Recent Conversions are Counterfeit [that is, of Jews to Christianity] and have often proved But Infiltrations of Latent Traitors With Treasonable Intentions. "

In one place in the Talmud, Jews are advised to "become Christians for the sake of infiltrating their ranks." Mr. Freedman goes on to say:

"The Divine and sacred mission of the Christian faith is in jeopardy today to a degree never witnessed before in its long history of almost 2000 years...When the day arrives that Christians can no longer profess their Christian faith as they profess it today in a free world, the Christian faith will have seen the beginning of the end."

Freedman goes on to show how the Christian faith has been put on the defensive throughout the world and mentions that a conspiracy is underway to destroy this faith.  He goes on to prove to any honest mind that This Is A Jewish Conspiracy!

                                                                       What Is The Talmud?

The religion practiced by the Pharisees in Jesus' time was based exclusively on the Babylonian Talmud. This, according to Rabbi Morris Kertzer,

"The Talmud consists of 63 books of legal, ethical and historical writings of the ancient rabbis. It was edited five centuries after the birth of Jesus. It is a compendium of law and lore. It is the Legal Code which forms the Basis of Jewish Religious Law and it is the textbook used in the Training of Rabbis. "

In his lifetime Michael Rodkinson, the assumed name of a "Jew" who was one of the world's great authorities on the Talmud, wrote History of the Talmud. This classic on the subject was written by Michael Rodkinson in collaboration with the celebrated Rabbi Isaac M. Wise. In his History of the Talmud Michael Rodkinson, on page 70, states:

"Is the literature that Jesus was familiar with in his early years yet in existence in the world? Is it possible for us to get at it? Can we ourselves review the ideas, the statements, the modes of reasoning and thinking, on moral and Religious Subjects , which were current in his time, and must have been evaluated by Him during those thirty silent years when He was pondering His Future Mission? To such inquiries the learned class of Jewish rabbis answer by holding up the Talmud ...and the question becomes, therefore, an interesting one to every Christian. What is the Talmud? The Talmud, then, is the Written Form of that which, in the Time of Jesus Was called the Traditions of the Elders and to which He makes frequent allusions. "

Arsene Darmester in the book The Talmud states:

"Judaism finds its expression in the Talmud, it is not a remote suggestion and a faint echo thereof, but it...has become incarnate, in which it has taken form, passing from a state of abstraction into the domain of real things. The study of Judaism is that of the Talmud, as the study of the Talmud is that of Judaism...they are two inseparable things...they are one and the same...the Talmud, is a complete expression of religious movement, and this code of endless presumptions and minute ceremonials represents in its perfection the total work of the religious idea...The miracle was accomplished by a book, The Talmud...The Talmud is composed of two distinct parts the Mishna and the Gemara; the former the text, the latter a commentary upon the text...term Mishna we designate a collection of decisions and traditional laws embracing all departments of legislation, civil and religious...This code, the work of several generations of rabbis...nothing can equal the importance of the Talmud unless it be the ignorance that prevails concerning it...This explains how it happens that a single page of the Talmud contains three or four different languages, or rather specimens of one language at three or four stages of degeneracy...many a Mishna of five or six lines is accompanied by fifty or sixty pages of explanation...is law in all its authority; it constitutes dogma and cult; it is the fundamental element of the Talmud...The daily study of the Talmud which among Jews begins with the age of ten to end with life itself necessarily was a severe gymnastic for the mind, thinks to which it acquired incomparable subtlety and acumen ...since it aspires to one thing: To establish for Judaism a 'Corpus Juris Eccleiastict!'"

Now, let's turn to Facts are Facts, by Benjamin H. Freeman, who was a Jew, for a summary of references to Jesus in the Talmud:

   Sanhedrin 67a: Jesus referred to as the son of Pandira, a soldier. Mother a prostitute.

   Kallah 1b. (18b): Illegitimate and conceived during menstruation. Mother a Prostitute.

   Sanhedrin 67a: Jesus was hanged on the eve of Passover.

   Toldath Jeschu: The Birth of Christ related in most shameful expressions.

   Abhodah Zarah II: Referred to as the son of Pandira, a Roman soldier, a Prostitute Mother.

   Schabbath XIV: Again referred to as the son of Padira the Roman soldier.

   Sanhedrin 43a: On the eve of Passover they hanged Jesus.

   Schabbath 104b: Called a fool and no one pays attention to fools.

   Toldoth Jeschu: Says Judas and Jesus engaged in a quarrel with human excrement.

   Sanhedrin 103a: Suggested corrupts his morals and dishonors self.

   Sanhedrin 107b: Seduced, corrupted and destroyed Israel.

   Zohar III (282): Died like a beast and buried in animal's dung heap.

   Hilkoth Melakhim: Attempt to prove Christians err in worship of Jesus.

   Abhodah Zarah 21a: Reference to worship of Jesus in homes unwanted.

   Orach Chaiim 113: Avoid appearance of paying respect to Jesus.

   Iore Dea 150, 2: Do not appear to pay respect to Jesus by accident.

   Abhodah Zarah (6a): False teaching to worship on the first day of Sabbath.

Following are a few references to Christians:

   Kerithuth (6b p. 78): Jews called men, Christians are not called men.

   Makkoth (7b): Innocent of murder if intent was to kill Christian.

   Sohar (II 64b): Christian birth rate must be diminished materially.

   Schabbath (116a) Tos: Gospels called volumes of iniquity, heretical books.

   Schabbath (116a): Talmudists agree that the books of Christians are to be burned.

   Chullin (91b): Jews possess dignity even an angel cannot share.

   Hilkoth Akum (V. 12): Quote Scriptures forbid mentioning The Christian God.

   Choschen Ham (226 1): Jew may keep lost property of Christian found by Jew.

   Babha Kama (113b): It is permitted to deceive Christians; Jew may lie and perjure to condemn a Christian.

   Babha Kama (113b): Name of God not profaned when lying to Christians.

   Kallah (1b p. 18): Jew may perjure himself with a clear conscience.

   Schabbouth Hag. (d): Jews may swear falsely with subterfuge wording.

   Zohar (1 160a): Jews must always try to deceive Christians.

   Choschen Ham (425 5): Jews are not to prevent the death of a Christian.

   Hilkkoth Akum (x,1): Do not save Christians in danger of death ‑‑ instructed to let die.

   Abhodah Zarah (25b)T: Even the best of the Goim [Christians] should be killed.

   Sepher Or Israel 177b: If Jew kills a Christian he commits no sin.

   Zohar (11 43a): Extermination of Christians necessary.

   Hilkhoth Akum (x,1): Make no agreements and show no mercy to Christians.

   Hilkhoth Maakhaloth: Christians are idolators.

   Abhodah Zarah (22a): Do not associate with gentiles, they shed blood.

   Abhodah Zarah (22a): Christians have intercourse with animals.

   Iore Dea (198, 48): Female Jews contaminated when meeting Christians.

   Makkoth (7b): Innocent of murder if intent was to kill a Christian.

   Orach Chaiim (225, 10): Christians and animals grouped for comparisons.

   Zohar II (64b): Christian likened to cows and asses.

   Kethuboth (110b): Psalmist compares Christians to beasts.

   Sanhedrin (74b) Tos: Sexual intercourse with Christian same as intercourse with beast.

   Kethuboth (3b): The seed [children] of Christians valued same as the seed of a beast.

   Iore Dea (337, 1): Replace dead Christians like you would a lost cow or ass.

   Schabbath (116a) Tos: Gospels called the volumes of iniquity, and heretical books.

   Schabbath (116a): Talmudists agree the books of Christians are to be burned.

   Chullin (91b): Jews possess dignity even an angel cannot share.

   Sanhedrin (58b): To strike a Jew is the same as slapping the face of God.

   Zohar (1, 25b): Those Jews who do good to Christians never rise when dead.

   Iore Dea (148, 12H): Jews are to hide their hatred for Christians.

   Babha Bathra (54b): Christian property belongs to the first Jew claiming it.

   Choschen Ham (193, 7): Keep any overpayment Christians make in error.

   Babha Kama (113b): It is permitted for a Jew to deceive Christians.

   Iore Dea (157, 2) H: Jew may deceive Christians.

   Babha Kama (113a): Jew may lie and perjur himself to condemn a Christian.

   Babha Kama (113b): The name of God is not profaned when Jew lies to Christians.

   Kallah (1b, p. 18): Jew may perjure himself when lying about Christians.

   Schabbouth Hag (6d): Jews may swear falsely by the use of subterfuge wording.

   Zohar (1, 160a): Jews must always try to deceive Christians.

   Choschen Ham (425, 5): Do not prevent a Christians death.

   Iore Dea (158, 1): Christians who are not Jews' enemies must also die.

   Hilkkoth Akum (X,1): Jews are not to save Christians in danger of death.

   Choschen Ham (388, 15): Kill any Jew who gives Jews' money to a Christian.

   Sanhedrin (59a): Christians who study the Jews' "Laws" to be put to death.

   Hilkhoth Akum (X,2): Baptized Jews are to be put to death.

   Zohar (1, 25a): Christians are to be destroyed when no danger of discovery.

   Abhodah Zarah (26b)T: Even the best of the Goim [non‑Jews] should be killed.

   Sepher Or Israel (177b): If a Jew kills a Christian he commits no sin. He has done god a service.

   Ialkut Simoni (245c): A Jew shedding the Blood of a Christian is offering a Sacrifice to god.

   Zohar (II, 43a): Extermination of Christians is a necessary Sacrifice to god.

   Zohar (L, 38b, 39a): A Jew to receive a high place in heaven if he kills a Christian.

   Hilkhoth Akum (X,1): Jews are to show no mercy to a Christian.

These are just a few selected from a very complicated arrangement in which many references are obscured by intricate reasonings. Speaking of the "Tradition of the Elders," Jesus said:

"Why do thy disciples transgress the tradition of the elders?...But he [Jesus] answered and said unto them, Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition?...ye have made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition." [82]

Jesus said a second time:

"Then the Pharisees and scribes [The Jews] asked him [Jesus], Why walk not thy disciples according to the tradition of the elders...He [Jesus] answered and said unto them...Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition." [83]

Paul said of the "Tradition of the Elders."

"Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and Not After Christ ." [84]

Peter also spoke of them.

"Forasmuch as ye know that ye [Jews] were not redeemed...from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers." [85]

So Jesus' teaching could not have possibly come from this blasphemous book. The Babylonian Talmud is the Jewish holy book, used in the training of rabbis, taught in the synagogues by the rabbis and studied by the Jews from an early age until death.

Without any question, the Talmud stands as the Supreme Authority of Jewish Law [Their lies to the contrary notwith-standing], philosophy and ethics; it contains the unchanging moral code by which the religious and social life of the Jews has been regulated to this day. The Jews believe in the teachings of the Talmud and act in accordance with its commands. Whereas the teachings of the Christian Bible are available to all, for it is to be found everywhere.

On the other hand, only a very few non‑Jews have even so much as heard of the Talmud, and still fewer know of its teachings, for it is scores of volumes in length and shrouded in secrecy by the Jews.

Are you naive enough to believe that a religious book which encourages incest, such as the Sanhedrin volume of the Talmud does, or unnatural intercourse, or rape of non‑Jews; or bestiality, as found in this filthy book; do you believe this could be the basis of Jesus' teaching? If you do, then you are guilty of the vilest form of blasphemy. Are you willing to believe that statements found in the Talmud, such as those which follow, are those of Christianity? Listen closely, while we give you a few more by chapter and verse:

   Kallah, 1b, (18b): "Jesus was illegitimate and conceived during menstruation."

   Scabbath XIV: "Jesus is referred to as the son of a Roman soldier and a Jewish Prostitute."

   Sanhedrin, 103a: "This passage suggests that Christ corrupted His morals and dishonored Himself."

   Sanhedrin, 107b: "This passage states that Christ seduced and destroyed Israel."

   Hilkoth Melakhim: Suggests that Christians sin by worshipping Jesus Christ.

   Hilkoth Maakhaloth: "Christians are idolaters."

   Orach Chaiim (20, 2): "Christians disguise themselves as Jews in order to kill them."

   Abhodah Zorah (15b): Suggests that Christians have sexual relations with animals.

   Chaggigah, (15b): "A Jew is considered to be good in the eyes of God, in spite of any sins he may commit."

   Babha Kama (113b): "The name of God not profaned, if a Jew lies to a Christian."

   Kelhubath (11a‑11b): "When a grown‑up man has had intercourse with a little girl...It means this: When a Grown up Man Has Intercourse with a Little Girl it is nothing , for when the girl is less than this [See Footnote] Three Years Old it is as if one puts the finger into the eye [Again See Footnote] tears come to the eye again and again, So Does Virginity Come Back to the Little Girl Three Years Old. " Why are you surprised the Jews are Satan's Children ‑‑ could you expect less?

   Tract Mechilla: "Almighty God Studies The Talmud Standing , because He has such respect for that book. "

   Sanhedrin (59a) & Abohodah Zarah 8‑6: "Every goy [non‑Jew] who studies the Talmud and every Jew who helps him in it, ought to die.

   Szaaloth-Utszabot The Book of Jore Dia 17: "A Jew should and must make a false oath when the goyim [non‑Jew] asks if our books contain anything against them."

   Simeon Haddarsen fol. 56‑D: "When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves."

   Midrasch Talpioth 225‑L: "Jehovah created the non‑Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non‑Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night."

   Nadarine, 20, B; Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348: "A Jew may do to a non‑Jewess what he can do. He may treat her as he treats a piece of meat."

   Josiah 60, 6, Rabbi Abarbanel to Daniel 7, 13: "As soon as the King Messiah will declare himself, and He will destroy Rome and make a wilderness of it. Thorns and weeds will grow in the Pope's palace. The He will start a merciless war on non‑Jews and will overpower them. He will slay them in masses, kill their kings and lay waste the whole Roman land. He will say to the Jews: 'I am the King Messiah for whom you have been waiting. Take the silver and gold from the goyim."

   Schulchan Aruch Choszen Hamiszpat 348: "A Jew may rob a goy [non‑Jew] ‑‑ that is, he may cheat him in a bill, if unlikely to be perceived by him."

   Tosefta, Erubin VIII, 1: "On the house of the goy [non‑Jew] one looks as on the fold of cattle."

   Schulchan Aruch Choszen Hamiszpat 348: "All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish na‑tion, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples [This is what the Jews use for justification to steal the land of the Palestianians]. An orthodox Jew is not bound to observe principles of morality towards people of other tribes. He may act contrary to mortality, if profitable to himself or to Jews in general."

   Tosefta, Abhodah Zarah VIII, 5: "How to interpret the word 'robbery.' A goy [non‑Jew] is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a goy or from a Jew. But a Jew is NOT forbidden to do all this to a goy."

   Schulchan Aruch Edit, I, 136: "All vows, oaths, promises, engagements, and swearing, which, beginning this very day of reconciliation till the next day of reconciliation, we intend to vow, promise, swear, and bind ourselves to fulfill, we repent of beforehand; let them be illegalized, acquitted, annihilated, abolished, valueless, unimportant. Our vows shall be no vows, and our oaths no oaths at all."

   Schulchan Aruch Orach Chaim 539: "At the time of the Cholhamoed the transaction of any kind of business is forbidden. But it is permitted to cheat a goy [non‑Jew], because cheating of goyi at any time pleases the Lord."

   Schulchan Aruch Choszen Hamiszpat 388: "It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces."

   Livore David 37: "If a Jew be called upon to explain any part of the rabbinic books, he ought to give only a false explanation. Who ever will violate this order shall be put to death."

   Abhodah Zarah 26b Tosephoth: "A Jew who kills a Christian commits no sin, but offers an acceptable sacrifice to god. "

And on and on, and on it goes, for 63 volumes of filth and blasphemy. This is what the Jews are taught in their synagogues. Do any of you Christians reading these words, believe the Christian religion got its start from this kind of blasphemy and filth? This is what your  [Judeo-Christian Minister] teaches, when he tells you that we have a Judeo‑Christian culture.

                                                      The History of Jewish Human Sacrifice

At the dawn of civilization, the blood rite, in which human blood is drunk from the body of a still-living victim, was known to many tribes. However, only one people, that has never progressed beyond the Stone Age, has continued to practice the blood rite and ritual murder. This people are know to the world as Jews. Arnold Toynbee, a noted scholar, has called the Jews "a fossil people."

In so doing, he must have been aware of the fact that they still practice ritual murder and the drinking of human blood (especially Christian blood). As a scholar, he could not have failed to note the many attested incidents of this practice of the Jews, for hundreds of example of ritual murder by the Jews are cited in official Catholic books, in every European literature, and in the court records of all the European nations.

It is the official historian of the Jews, (Josef Kastein, in his History of the Jews, who gives the underlying reason for this barbaric custom. On page 173, he says,

"According to the primeval Jewish view, the blood was the seat of the soul."

Thus it was not the heart which was the seat of the soul, according to the stone-age Jews, but the blood itself. They believed that by drinking the blood of a Christian victim who was perfect in every way, they could overcome their physical short comings and become as powerful as the intelligent civilized beings among whom they had formed their parasitic communities. Because of this belief, the Jews are known to have practiced drinking blood since they made their first appearance in history.

Civilized people find this practice so abhorrent that they cannot believe it, despite the hundreds of pages of evidence against the Jews which are found in court records. Historical records for five thousand years have provided irrefutable proof of the blood guilt of the Jews.

As other people became more civilized, the blood rite became a symbolic one, and a symbolic form of blood, usually wine, was drunk during the ritual, while the barbaric practice of killing a victim was given up altogether. Only one group, the Jewish cult, has continued to practice the blood rite in modern times. Authorities on the blood rite, such as the noted Catholic scholar, James e. Bulger, state that the Jews practice the blood drinking rite because they are a parasitic people who must partake of the blood of the gentile host if they are to continue to survive. Bulger also states that the drinking of blood is a rite of black magic which enables the Jewish rabbis to predict the future as the blood of their non-Jewish victim courses through their veins.

Therefore, Jewish leaders from time to time entice a non-Jewish child, preferably male, and from six to eight years old. According to Jewish ritual, the non-Jewish (preferably a Christian child) child must be perfectly formed, intelligent, and without blemish. He also must be younger than the age of puberty, because the Jews believe that the blood becomes impure after the beginning of puberty. When the (Christian) child is enticed into the synagogue, or, if the Jews are under observation, into some more secret gathering place, the kidnapped child is tied down onto a table, stripped, and its body pierced with sharp ritual knives in the identical places where the nails entered the body of Christ on the stake.

As the blood is drained into cups, the Jewish leaders raise the cups and drink from them, while the child slowly expires in an atmosphere of unrelieved horror. The Jews call down curses upon Christ and on all the non-Jewish people, and celebrate their symbolic victory over them as they continue to drink the blood of the dying child. Only by performing this rite, so the Jews believe, can they continue to survive and prosper among their non-Jewish host.

The ancient Khazar Jews along with others of that Near East era followed a common custom of human sacrifice. The practice was to burn a young person upon an altar called a Tophet. The Old Testament of the Bible mentions this practice and condemns it. Around the Tophet altar, drums would be beaten loudly to drown out the cries of the children being burned alive.

In the days of Ancient Israel the Priests of Baal would blow trumpets to drown out their screams. The Carthaginians also were worshippers of Baal and sacrificed children on a massive scale. When faced with defeat in Syracuse in 310 B.C., they cast the sons of 500 nobles into a fiery pit, or Tophet, from a scaffold shaped in the likeness of the god Baal.

In other words, the Jews have a god which finds blood pleasing. In the words of Mr. Leese,

"What sort of a people is this whose god finds the blood obtained from mutilation of human genital organs as 'pleasing?'"

Even though God commanded circumcision, there is no way a reading of Scripture shows that God intended that the procedure turn into a bloody ritual. Besides that, it seems apparent that when Christ nailed the blood ordinances to the cross, he also nailed the circumcision to the cross.

"Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing." [86]

Make no mistake about it, The God of the Jews is not the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel . And if it were the same God ‑‑ the manner in which the Jews worship is administered is an abomination in the eyes of the Lord our God. Many people think this sort of thing may have happened in the past but did not exist after the Babylonian captivity. However, from the account of Dio Cassius in the 78th Book of his history, Chapter 32, written in 117 A.D. comes the following:

"Then the Jews in Cyrene [on the modern Tripoli coast of North Africa] choosing as their leader one Andreas, slew the Romans and Greeks, and Devoured [ate] their bodies, drank the blood, clothed themselves in the flayed skins, and sawed many in half from the head downwards; some they threw to wild beasts and others were compelled to fight in single combat, so that in all 220,000 were killed. In Egypt they did many similar things, also in Cyprus, led by one of them named Artemion; and there another 240,000 were slain."

Following is an expose on Jewish Ritual Murder which is currently being conducted just as it has for centuries.

Jewish Ritual Murder

On May 1, 1989, the Oprah Winfrey show had as its guest a person who, as a young girl, was forced to participate in a ritual in which a Christian infant was sacrificed. The amazing thing about this guest is that she was not affiliated with some unknown radical blood letting cult, but that She Was A Jew.

According to an article on the show in the "Chicago Tribune," the woman was "undergoing long‑term psychiatric treatment," apparently because of her horrible experience. The news paper article is quoted below in its entirety.

Jews Protest Sacrifice Tale on Oprah Show

                                                                              Chicago Tribune, 5/7/89

                                                                                                  New York Times News Service

     "Hundreds of television viewers and the leaders of several Jewish and civil liberties organizations have protested allegations on a popular talk show last week that some Jews practice ritual killing of children. The allegations were made by a guest using the pseudonym Rachel on 'The Oprah Winfrey Show,' a widely viewed syndicated talk show. During the program, broadcast Monday, Winfrey introduced the guest as someone who was undergoing long‑ term psychiatric [87] treatment for a multiple personality disorder. The woman told Winfrey that she had witnessed the ritual sacrifice of children and had been a victim of ritualistic abuse.

     The guest also said of such practices: 'there's other Jewish families across the country. It's not just my family.' The assertions were made during a program that focused on the cult murders of at least 13 people whose bodies were found last month near Matamoros, Mexico. The woman's comments provoked hundreds of angry phone calls and letters to Jewish and civil liberties groups, spokesmen for the groups said in interviews late last week. Jeffrey Jacobs, the chief operating officer of Winfrey's production company, Harpo Productions Inc., denied Winfrey had acted irresponsibly in broadcasting the interview since she had emphasized on the show that the guest spoke only for herself. He added that Winfrey and her producers would meet with representatives of the Jewish and civil liberties groups next week in Chicago, where the show is taped. Winfrey was traveling Friday, Jacobs said, and was unavailable for comment. Early in the interview Winfrey said, 'This is the first time I have heard of any Jewish people sacrificing babies, but anyway ‑‑ so you witnessed the sacrifice?'

     The woman responded: 'Right. When I was very young, I was forced to participate in that , and which I had to sacrifice an infant .' The guest was repeatedly identified by Winfrey as being Jewish. At one point, the woman asserted that {Jewish} ritual sacrifices occurred in other Jewish families around the country and that they were known to the Police ."

Although all Jews are aware of the blood rite and its importance to the Jewish cult, only the most important Jewish leaders, the rabbis and the wealthiest members of the Jewish community, are allowed to participate in the blood-drinking rite.

Kastein states, on page 173, that the ordinary Jews are forbidden to participate in the rite. One reason for this is the fact that the practice of ritual murder is fraught with danger for the entire Jewish Community. Most uprisings against the Jews during the past two thousand years have stemmed from the discovery of this practice, and the resulting attempts of the non-Jews to punish the Jews for murdering non-Jewish children.

The principal reason that this crime is so often discovered, is that the naked, pierced body of the child, once it has been drained of blood, must be thrown on a trash heap. The Jewish rite forbids burial of the body, even though this would conceal all evidence of their crime. The Talmud, the Holy Book of the Jews, defines all non-Jews as beasts, and by Jewish law, the burial of beasts is forbidden. Therefore, the Jews try to conceal their crime by throwing the corpse of the murdered child down an abandoned well, where it may not be discovered, or by hiding it in some manner which will not constitute burial.

In many cases, the body is discovered, and then the Jews either are attacked by the non-Jews, or they spend thousands of dollars bribing witnesses and officials, and attempting to frame some gentile as a "sex murderer." Bribery and intimidation of public officials and newspapermen is always the first step in this campaign.

In the United States, since many of these are Jews, no bribery is necessary, as every Jew knows that it is his first duty to conceal the evidence of ritual murder. It is also customary for the Jews to pay off the murdered child's parents with a large sum of money, which in many cases means that they will not prosecute.

Could Jewish Ritual Murder

Still Exist?

At one time or another the Jews have been expelled from every country in Europe. And in almost every case it was over the charge of Ritual Murder. The most objective book on this subject available is "Jewish Ritual Murder" by Arnold Leese is available from The Truth At Last, P.O. Box 1211, Marietta, Georgia 30061, for $3.50 per copy.

The accusation was that during the Jewish feasts of Purim and/or Passover extremist Hassidic Orthodox Jewish sects would sacrifice a Christian youth for his blood. It was then dried and the powder mixed into triangular cakes or bread for eating in order for the Jews to gain atonement in the eyes of God. It is possible that Purim blood might sometimes have been held over for the Passover.

The ancient Khazar Jews along with other of that Near East era followed a common custom of human sacrifice. The practice was to burn a young person upon an altar called a Tophet.

The Old Testament of the Bible mentions this practice and condemns it. Around the Tophet altar, drums would be beaten loudly to drown out the cries of the children being burned alive. In the days of Ancient Israel the Priests of Baal would blow trumpets to drown out their screams.

The Carthaginians also were worshippers of Baal and sacrificed children on a massive scale. When faced with defeat in Syracuse in 310 B.C., they cast the sons of 500 nobles into a fiery pit, or Tophet, from a scaffold shaped in the likeness of the god Baal.

In Excavations at Gezer, the archeologist R.A.S. Macalister notes that the bodies of sacrificed young children are found in every strata of Jewish remains from the earliest times. Photographs of the children's bodies are published in Macalister's book, although the book itself, like most works which attest to the criminal nature of the Jews, is now almost unobtainable. It is classified as a rare book, and most rare book dealers are Jews.

In the Bible, Isaiah 57:3-5 the prophet, talking of the Jews of his day says:

"But draw near hither, ye sons of the sorceress, the seed of the adulterer and the whore. Against whom do ye sport yourselves? against whom make ye a wide mouth, and draw out the tongue? are ye not children of transgression, a seed of falsehood, Enflaming yourselves with idols under every green tree, slaying the children in the valleys under the clefts of the rocks?"

By the phrase, "ye sons of the sorceress," Isaiah calls attention to the fact that Jewish ritual murder is a black magic rite. It is customary for the rabbi, as he drinks blood, to invoke the presence of Satan, who will then presumably carry out the wishes of the Jews. The drinkers of blood also swear eternal obedience to Satan during the blood rite.

Isaiah also calls attention to the fact that here the children are slain "under the cleft of the rocks." This refers to the Jewish ban against burying the slain gentile child, and to hiding the body in the rocks in the hopes that the gentiles will not discover their crime.

The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. VIII, page 653, published in 1904, says,

"The fact, therefore, now generally accepted by critical scholars, is that in the last days of the kingdom, human sacrifices were offered to Yhwh (Yahu, or Jehovah), as King of Counsellor of the Nation, and that the Prophets disapproved of it."

Yahu also is interchangeable with Baal, the Golden Idol, and Satan, who is thought to have been a minor god of the Jews, and an instrument of Baal. The two themes of Jewish history are blood and gold, and every practice of the Jews is inextricably bound up with these two factors.

One expose of the subject of Ritual Murder was written in great detail by Arnold S. Leese, entitled My Irrelevant Defense on Jewish Ritual Murder, London, 1938. Addressing the issue of sacrifices, Mr. Leese states:

"Let a Jew speak for us here: 'Bernard Lazare, a Jew who was stated [88] to be 'without any religious convictions.' wrote what he himself described as 'an impartial study of the history and sociology of the Jews.' calling his book L'Antisemitisme; in the 1904 edition of this, Vol. II, p. 215, he writes, after mentioning the accusations against the Jews of Ritual Murder: 'To this general belief are added the suspicions, often justified, against the Jews addicted to magical practices. Actually, in the Middle Ages, the Jew  was considered by the people as the magician par excellence; one finds many formulae of exorcism in the Talmud, and the Talmudic and Cabalistic demonology is very complicated. Now one knows the position that blood always occupies in the operations of sorcery. In Chaldean magic it had a very great importance...Now, it is very probable, even certain that Jewish magicians sacrificed children ; hence the origin of the legend of ritual sacrifice.'"

Thus Lazare tries to absolve the Jews of the ritual murder charge by saying that they were guilty, but that it was done from motives of sorcery, rather than as a key element in the practice of the Jewish religion.

He apparently has not read the Bible, or noted Isaiah's denunciations of the Jews as sorcerers and murderers of children. Of course the Jews killed children during their rites of sorcery, as Lazare admits, but these horrors were committed as essential rites of the Jewish religion.

Dr. Eric Bischoff, a famous German Jewish scholar, has found the explicit authorization of the practice of Jewish ritual murder in the Thikunne Zohar, Edition Berdiwetsch, 88b, a book of cabalistic ritual, as follows:

"Furthermore, there is a commandment pertaining to the killing of strangers, who are like beasts. This killing has to be done in the lawful (Jewish) method. Those who do not ascribe themselves to the Jewish religious law must be offered up as sacrifices to the (Jews) High God (Satan)."

Murders of Christian children by the Jews usually occur during the important feast-days, Purim, one month before Easter, and Passover, at Easter. Jewish law prescribes that the gentile victim at Purim, a Jewish holiday as the Jewish victory over the gentiles, may be an adult.

Also if no gentile victim can be obtained, dried blood from a previous victim may be used. However, a Jewish law is quite specific that the victim at Passover must be a White Child (as the Whites are the True Israelites, and the Jews know it) under seven years of age, who must be bled white, frowned with thorns, tortured, beaten, stabbed, and finally given the last blow by being wounded in the side, the dagger prescribed to be in the hands of a rabbi, in a complete re-enactment of the crucifixion of Christ.

This vindicative ceremony reassures the Jews that even if a few of the gentiles are alerted to the nature of this people, as Christ talked against them, the Jews will always win out by murdering the critic. Consequently, many critics of the Jews are slain in these terrible ceremonies. In the United States, perhaps the most famous victim of Jewish ritual murder was the son of Charles Lindbergh, on March 1, 1932, during the time of the annual Jewish celebration.

Lindbergh's son was chosen because Lindbergh himself was the most logical person to lead the gentiles against the Jews. His son was slain as a warning to him to decline this service. Lindberg's father, a Congressman, had led the fight against Paul Warburg of Kuhn, Loeb Co., when Warburg succeeded in getting a subservient Congress to pass the Federal Reserve Act. The elder Lindbergh had published a book which was burned by Federal agents during World War I, even though he was a Congressman at the time. He was well aware of the nature of the Jewish problem. Now that his son was a world-famous man, after his feat of flying alone across the Atlantic, the Jews feared that he might be persuaded to lead a gentile revolt against their power.

They had already planned World War II, in which Germany was to be the sacrificial victim, and now they brought in an almost illiterate German, Gerhart Hauptmann, and convicted him of the killing. Symbolically, Hauptmann, like Christ, was also a carpenter, a profession which made him a logical victim for the Jews.

Hauptmann's defense was that a Jew named Isidor Fisch had hired him to do some carpenter work, and had paid him with the bills which proved to be from the Lindbergh ransom money. Although the existence of Fisch was proven, he could not be located during the trial. The court was like the one which had convicted Jesus, for it only accepted evidence which the Jews allowed to be presented. In reality, of course, one cannot believe anything which is accepted as evidence in an American court, due to the facility of the Jews for manufacturing evidence and due to the prevalence of Jewish lawyers and judges in all American court rooms.

This was also the first of many efforts of the Jews to vilify the Germans so that America would be more easily deceived into fighting a Jew's war.

A book entitled The Jew, the Gypsy, and El Islam, indicates that the Talmudic god of the Jews [Not the God of Christians] is a blood loving god:

"The Talmud declares that there are two kinds of blood pleasing to the lord, viz: (1) that of Paschal holocaust [Easter sacrifice & the Feast of Purim]; (2) that of circumcision."

According to The Jewish Encyclopedia, 1903, Vol. IV., p. 90, when performing the operation of circumcision on children, the mohel (Jewish Rabbi who does the circumcision):

"takes some wine in his mouth and applies his lips to the part involved in the operation, and exerts suction, after which he expels the mixture of wine and blood into a receptacle provided."

Among the Jews themselves, the blood rite is an integral part of the ceremony of circumcising Jewish males. According to The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. VI, page 99, when performing the circumcision, the mohel, or circumciser,

"takes some wine in his mouth and applies his lips to the part involved in the operation and exerts suction, after which he expels the mixture of wine and blood into a receptacle provided."

What the Jewish Encyclopedia does not tell us is that this mixture of wine and blood is then drunk by the rabbi, as a great delicacy. No other people in the world today enacts such a weird blood rite, save, perhaps, some Stone-Age natives in the deepest jungles of the Congo or New Guinea.

Hatred of Christianity is a tradition among the Jews. One of the principle feast-days is that of Purim. This feast is an orgy of hate against Haman, the story of whom is found in the Book of Esther of the Old Testament, the only Jewish book in the entire Bible.

The story, is that Xeroxes, King of Persia, became enamored with a Jewess, Esther a prostitute, and made her Queen in place of his rightful wife. Haman, the King's minister, complained to him of the conduct of the Jews who, he said, did not keep the laws of the land, and obtained from the King an order to slay them.

Esther pleaded with the King and prevailed upon him to summon Haman to a banquet. There, Queen Esther further prevailed upon the King to spare the Jews and hang Haman on a gallows prepared for the execution of her guardian. Instead of the Jews being destroyed, their enemies were slaughtered, including Haman's ten sons, who were hanged.

This feast is often celebrated by an exhibition of gluttony, intoxication, and curses on the memory of Haman; and even to this day the Jewish bakers make cakes, laced with dried Christian blood, in the shape of human ears which are eaten by the Jews on this day, and are called "Haman's Ears," revealing once again the inherent hate and barbarism of the Jews in our midst.

When a Ritual Sacrifice occurs at Purim, it is usually that of an adult Christian who was murdered for his blood; the blood is then dried and the powder mixed into triangular cakes for eating; it is possible that the dried blood of a Purim Sacrifice might sometimes be used for the following Passover.

When a Ritual Sacrifice is done at Passover, it is usually that of a Christian child under seven years old, as perfect a specimen as possible, who is not only bled white, but crucified, sometimes circumcised and crowned with thorns, tortured, beaten, stabbed, and sometimes finished off by wounding in the side in imitation of the murder of Christ. The blood taken from the child is then mixed either in the powdered state or otherwise into the Passover bread.

Another festival at which Ritual Sacrifice has sometimes been indulged in is Chanucah (Which is called Hanukkah today) which occurs in December, commemorating the recovery of Jerusalem under the Maccabees in B.C. 165.

Although hate is the principal motive, superstitious traditions are also involved, one being the association of blood-sacrifices with the idea of atonement; some Jews have confessed that Jewry cannot be saved unless every year the blood of a Christian is obtained for the purpose of ritual consumption.

The Jewish Encyclopedia, 1903, Vol. III, pp. 266-267, gives a list of Accusations of Ritual Murder (Sacrifices) made against the Jews through the centuries; 122 cases are listed in chronological order, and no less than 39 of them were made in the 19th century! There were far more than double the number of Blood Accusations made in the 19th century than in any previous century, according to this authoritative Jewish list.

The list of Ritual Murder Accusations made by a converted Jew, Cesare Algranati, in 1913, and published in Cahiers Romains; there are listed 101 accusations, or which 28 were made in the 19th century and only 73 for all the eight preceding centuries! Even the Jew Roth gives the argument away, for he says:

"The nineteenth century proved little less credulous than those which proceeded it." [89]

The fact that the charges increase in number as the age becomes more and more enlightened is particularly significant, because the Jewish Money Power and its silencing activities are more developed than ever before and has been instrumental in reducing the number of charges by covering them up.

It is absolutely amazing that there are always influential Judeo-Christian men/women who can be induced, when Jewish interests are at stake, will declare to all the world that there is nothing improper in not attempting to examine these charges of Ritual Sacrifice by the Jews; and to declare them as lies by "Anti-Semitic" authors.

Yet the record is clear if one is inclined to study and learn. Following are few such examples:

"Then the Jews in Cyrene (on the modern Tripoli coast of North Africa) choosing as their leader one Andreas, slew the Romans and Greeks, and devoured their bodies, drank the blood, clothed themselves in the flayed skins, and sawed many in half from the head downwards; some they threw to wild beasts and others were compelled to fight in single combat, so that in all 220,000 were killed. In Egypt they did many similar things, also in Cyprus, led by one of them named Artemion; and there another 240,000 were slain." [90]

The second:

     "Baena (Cordoba Province): Ninety-one assassinations, mostly by shooting, hatchet blows, or strangling. Others were burned alive. Two nuns who had been dragged from the convent of the Mother of God, had their religious medals, with the figure of the Virgin, nailed into the sockets of their eyes.

     La Campana (Seville): Reds, led by a woman, Concepcion Velarde Caraballo, who either killed or was responsible for killing 11 persons in prison. The prisoners were fired on until they fell, covered with petrol, and set on fire. Some were still writhing in the flames when the city was entered.

     Lore del Rio (Seville): 138 assassinated. They were dragged to the cemetery, lined up, and shot in the legs, being burned alive as they fell in a trench. When the town was entered hands could still be seen writhing above the ground." [91]

From The Magick, in Paris, France:

"...it was the theory of the ancient (Jewish) magicians that any living being is a storehouse of energy varying in quantity according to the size and health of the animal (non-Jews), and in quality according to its mental and moral character. At the death of the animal this energy is liberated suddenly. The animal should therefore be killed within the Circle, or Triangle, as the case may be, so that its energy cannot escape...For the highest spiritual working one must accordingly choose that victim which contains the greatest and purest force. A (Christian) male child of perfect innocence and high intelligence is the most satisfactory and suitable victim." [92]

A footnote on p. 95 says:

" (4) It appears from the Magical Records of (the Jew) Frater Perdurabo that he made this particular sacrifice on an average about 150 times every year between 1912 and 1928."

Even today the Jewish sects who keep the Passover by solar computation, indulge in these bloody sacrifices of Christians on that feast-day; an account is given of a visit to the scene of sacrifice on Mount Gerizim in this century, and these words were used:

"I have heard the wild, primitive scream of triumph as the knife is withdrawn from the neck of the (Christian) lamb of sacrifice."

A paragraph from The B'nai B'rith Messenger, 1936:

"The sophisticated Pharisee (Jew) of the 20th century unceasingly gives thanks that he has outgrown the fables and rituals of the Ancients. The worldly-wise man loves the evident and is exasperated by that which is not evident. Plutocrat and proletarian alike regard themselves a victimized by that person whose words or actions they do not understand. We love the obvious because it flatters us, and hate the mysterious because it damns our intelligence with faint praise. Riddles are irksome [93] . The modern cry is for facts. Yet, with facts for his fetish, the modernist is more foolish than his forebears. Decrying superstition, he is most superstitious; rejecting fancies, he is the fanciful product of a fictitious age. The modern world is bored with its own importance; life itself has become a botheration. Suffering from chronic ennui, how can a world ever become interested in anything but itself? Smothered in their self-complacency, these all-sufficient ones ask for facts. But what facts are there that fools can understand? How can the helpless superficial grasp the hopelessly profound, for are not realities reserved for the wise (Jews)?"

Although this paragraph is clothed in nonsense it is a picture of a Ritual Sacrifice, with the victim crucified. And is merely showing the contempt the Jew has for Christians because they cannot understand this type of wording.

Following in chronological order, where the death of the victim is perpetrated by the Jews; and in light of the show by Ophra Winfry in 1989 we can clearly see that there many cases of Ritual Sacrifice by Jews have been unsuspected and undiscovered up to today, 1995, and will continue for years to come.

   1144 A.D. Norwich: A twelve-year-old Christian boy was crucified and his side pierced at the Jewish Passover. His body was found in a sack hidden in a tree. A converted Jew, called Theobald of Cambridge, confessed that the Jews took blood every year from a Christian child because they thought that only by so doing could they ever obtain their freedom and return to Palestine; and that it was their custom to draw lots to decide whence the blood was to be supplied; Theobald said that last year the lot fell to Narbonne, but in this year to Norwich. The boy was locally beatified and has ever since been known as St. William. The Sheriff, probably bribed, refused to bring the Jews to trial. [94] There is an illustration of an old painted rood-screen depicting the Ritual Murder and Sacrifice of St. William; the screen itself is in Loddon Church, Norfolk, unless the Power of the Jewish Money has had it removed. No one denies this case as a historical event, but the Jews of course say it was not a Ritual Sacrifice. [95]

The Jew, C. Roth stated, in reference to this case:

"Modern enquirers, after careful examination of the facts, have concluded that the child probably lost consciousness in consequence of a cataleptic fit, and was buried prematurely by his relatives." [96]

How these so-called enquirers arrived at a conclusion like that after all those years, Mr. Roth does not say; nor is it a compliment to the Church to suggest that its ministers would allow the boy's death to be celebrated as a martyrdom of a saint without having satisfied themselves that the wounds on the body confirmed the crucifixion and the piercing of the side.

John Foxe's Acts and Monuments of the Church records this Ritual Sacrifice, as did the Bollandists and other historians. The Prior, William Turbe, who afterwards became Bishop of Norwich, was the leading light in insisting that the crime was one of Jewish Ritual Sacrifice; in the Dictionary of National Biography (edited by a Jew) it is made clear that his career, apart from this Ritual Sacrifice, is that of a man of great strength of character and moral courage.

   1160. Gloucester: The body of a Christian child named Harold was found in the river with the usual wounds of crucifixion. Sometimes wrongly dated 1168. [97]

   1171. Blois, France: At Passover, a Christian child was crucified, his body drained of blood and thrown into the river. [98]

   1179. Pontoise: A Christian boy named Richard was tortured, crucified and bled white. Philip Augustus's chaplains and historians, Rigord and Guillaume l'Armorician, attested this case. The body of the boy was taken to the Church of the Holy Innocents in Paris and he was canonized as St. Richard. [99]

   1180. Paris. (UJE - Universal Jewish Encyclopedia) [100]

   1181. Bury St. Edmunds: A Christian child called Robert was sacrificed at Passover. The child was buried in the church and its presence there was supposed to cause 'miracles.' [101] ; E. Bristol. (UJE)

   1192. Winchester: A Christian boy crucified. [102]

   1192. Braisne: Philip Augustus attended to this case personally, and had the criminals burnt. It was a case of the crucifixion of a Christian sold to the Jews by Agnes, Countess of Dreux, who considered him guilty of homicide and theft. [103]

   1199. G. Erfurt. (UJE)

   1232. Winchester: Christian boy crucified. Details lacking. [104]

   1232. E. Gloucester. (UJE)

   1235. Norwich: In this case, the Jews stole a Christian child and hid him with a view to crucifying him. Haydn's Dictionary of Dates (1847), says:

"They (the Jews) circumcise and attempt to crucify a child at Norwich; the offenders are condemned in a fine of 20,000 marks." [105]

   1235. G. Wolfsheim and G. Fulda. (UJE)

   1238. Fulda, Hesse-Nassan: Five children murdered; Jews confessed under torture, but said the blood was wanted for healing purposes. Frederick II exonerated the Jews from suspicion, but the Crusaders had already dealt with a number by putting them to death. Frederick II called together a number of converted Jews, who denied the existence of Jewish Ritual Sacrifice. But Frederick's bias is evident in his own words when, in publishing his decision, he gives his objects in calling these people together,

"although our conscience regarded the innocence of the aforesaid Jews adequately proved on the ground of several writings."

Had Frederick II lived today, he would have relied little upon religious literature in deciding whether Jewish Ritual Sacrifice exists or not. [106]

   1244. London: A Christian child's body found unburied in the cemetery of St. Benedict, with ritual cuts. Buried in St. Paul's. [107]

   1247. Valreas, France: Just before Easter, a two-year-old Christian girl's body was found in the town moat with wounds on forehead, hands and feet. Jews confessed that they wanted the blood of the child, but did not say that it was for ceremonial purposes. Pope Innocent IV said that three of the Jews were executed without confessing, but the Jewish Encyclopedia, 1903, Vol. III, p. 261, says they confessed.

   1250. Saragossa: A Christian boy crucified, afterwards canonized as St. Dominiculus. Pius VII, 24th November 1805, confirmed a decree of the Congregation of Rites of 31st August, according this canonization.

   1255. Lincoln: A Christian boy called Hugh was kidnapped by the Jews and crucified and tortured in hatred of Jesus Christ. The boy's mother found the body in a well on the premises of a Jew called Joppin or Copinus. This Jew, promised by the judge his life if he confessed, did so, and 91 Jews were arrested; eventually 18 were hanged for the crime. King Henry III himself personally ordered the juridical investigation of the case five weeks after the discovery of the body, and refused to allow mercy to be shown to the Jew Copinus, who was executed. [108]

   1257. London: A Christian child sacrificed. [109]

   1261. Pforzheim, Baden: An old woman sold a seven-year-old Christian girl to the Jews, who bled her, strangled her and threw the body into the river. The old woman was convicted on the evidence of her own daughter. A number of Jews were condemned to death, two committing suicide. [110]

   1270. A.L. Weissenburg, a Christian child crucified. (UJE)

   1276. London: Christian boy crucified. [111]

   1279. Northampton: A Christian child crucified.

"They (the Jews) crucify a child at Northampton for which 50 are drawn at horses' tails and hanged." [112]

   1281-83. G. Mayence. A Christian child sacrificed. (UJE)

   1285. Munich. A Christian child crucified.   (UJE)

   1286. Oberwesel, on the Rhine: A Christian boy named Werner was tortured for three days at Passover, hanged by the legs and bled white. The body was found in the river. A sculptured representation of this Ritual Sacrifice is still in the Oberwesel Church. [113]

   1286. G. Friesland. A Christian child murdered for his blood. (UJE)

   1287. Berne: Rudolf, a Christian boy, was murdered at Passover in the house of a rich Jew called Matler. Jews confessed that he had been crucified; many were put to death. [114] A stone monument still exists in Berne commemorating the crime. It is called The Fountain of the Child-Devourer, and is now on the Kornhausplatz. It represents a monster, with a Jewish countenance, eating a child. The figure wears the Judenbut, the hat prescribed for the Jews to wear by decree of the Fourth Lateran Council in

   1215. This monument was first placed in a street of the Jews' quarter as a reminder of the monstrous crime and as a punishment for the whole of Berne Jewry. Later, it was removed to its present location.

   1287. A. Salzburg, a Christian child crucified. (UJE)

   1288. Troyes, France: some Jews were tried for a Ritual Sacrifice and 13 were executed by burning. [115]

   1290. Oxford: The Patent Roll 18 Edward I, m. 21, 21st June, 1920, contains an order for the gaol delivery of a Jew, Isaac de Pulet, detained for the murder of a Christian boy at Oxford. Only one month after this, King Edward issued his decree expelling the Jews from the Kingdom. There is, every reason to believe that it was the Oxford murder which proved the last straw in toleration for the English.

Hugh was locally beatified, and his tomb may still be seen in Lincoln Cathedral, but the Jewish Money Power has evidently been at work, for between 1910 and 1930, a notice was fixed above the shrine which reads as follows:

"The body of Hugh was given burial in the Cathedral and treated as that of a martyr. When the Minster was repaved, the skeleton of a small child was found beneath the present tombstone. There are many incidents in the story which tend to throw doubt upon it, and the existence of similar stores in England and elsewhere points to their origin in the fanatical hatred of the Jews of the Middle Ages and in the common superstition, now wholly discredited, and that ritual murder was a factor of Jewish Paschal Rites. Attempts were made as early as the 13th century by the Church to protect the Jews against the hatred of the populace and against this particular accusation."

No one who studies the case history questions the historical facts in this case; but the Jews and their Judaised Christians unite in denying the fact of this Ritual Sacrifice.

   1288. F. Troyes, a Christian child murdered. (UJE)

   1290. A. Laibach, a Christian child sacrificed. (UJE)

   1292. A. Krems. (UJE)

   1294. Sw. Bern. (UJE)

   1302. G. Remken. (UJE)

   1303. G. Weissensee. (UJE)

   1305. Vienna and Prague. (UJE)

   1308. G. Thuringia. (UJE)

   1317. F. Chinon. (UJE)

   1331. G. Oberlingen. (UJE)

   1345. Munich. (UJE)

   1387. A.L. Strasbourg. (UJE)

   1401. G. Diessenhofen. (UJE)

   1407. P. Cracow. (UJE)

   1420. Vienna. (UJE)

   1428. G. Regensburg. (UJE)

   1430. Ravensburg, Oberlingen, and G. Lindau. (UJE)

   1435. Majorca, Sp. Palma. (UJE)

   1442. A. Lienz. (UJE)

   1453. F. Arles. (UJE)

   1462. Rinn, Innsbruck: A Christian boy called Andreas Oxner was bought by the Jews and sacrificed for his blood on a stone in the forest. The body was found by his mother in a birch-tree. No Jew was apprehended because, the border being near, they had fled when the crime was made known. The Abbe Vacandard, defender of the Jews, says there was no trial. Well, of course there wasn't. Even in 1995 there is no trial for a crime where the criminals have escaped! The boy was sanctified by Pope Benedict XIV, in his Bull Beatus Andreas, Venice, 1778, which says he was "cruelly assassinated by the Jews in hatred of the faith of Jesus Christ." This last is admitted by Pope Clemet XIV, who wrote his report on the investigation he made into the matter of Jewish Ritual Sacrifices when, as Cardinal Ganganelli, he had been commissioned by Pope Benedict XIV to go into the matter; and in this report, he said:

"I admit the truth of another fact, which happened in the year 1462 in the village of Rinn, in the Diocese of Brixen, in the person of the Blessed Andreas, a boy barbarously murdered by the Jews in hatred of the faith of Jesus Christ."

No one questions the historical occurrence of this case. An engraving on wood representing the Ritual Sacrifice still exists in the church.

   1468. Sepulveda, Segovia, Spain: The Jews sacrificed a Christian child on a cross. The Bishop of Segovia investigated the crime, and ordered the culprits to Segovia, where they were executed. It is important to know that this Bishop was himself a son of a converted Jew; Jean d'Avila was his name. Colmenares's History of Segovia records the facts of the case, which was juridically decided by a man of Jewish blood. That may be the reason that one finds no mention of it in Strack's book in defense of the Jews, The Jew and Human Sacrifice.

   1470. G. Endingen. (UJE)

   1475. Simon of Trent:

     "In the year 1475, when the Jews of Trent met in their synagogue on Tuesday in Holy Week, to deliberate preparations for the approaching festival of the Passover, which fell that year on Thursday following, they came to a resolution of sacrificing to their inveterate hatred of the Christian name, some Christian infant on the Friday following, or Good Friday. A Jewish physician undertook to procure such an infant for the horrid purpose. And while the Christians were at the office of Tenebrae on Wednesday evening, he found a child called Simon, about two years old, whom by caresses and by showing him a piece of money, he decoyed fromt he door of a house, the master and mistress whereof had gone off to Church, and carried him off.

      On Thursday evening the principal Jews shut themselves up in a chamber adjoining to their synagogue, and at midnight began their cruel butchery of this innocent victim. (Ed. Note, Did not Christ say to the Jews, 'This is your hour, and the power of darkness'). having stopped his mouth with an apron to prevent his crying out, they made several incisions in his body, gathering his blood in a basin. Some, all this while, held his arms stretched out in the form of a cross; others held his legs. The child being half dead, they raised him to his feet, and while two of them held him by the arms, the rest pierced his body on all sides with their awls and bodkins. When they saw the child had expired, they sung round it: 'In the same manner did we treat Jesus the God of the Christians; thus may our enemies be confounded forever.'

     The magistrates and parents making strict search after the lost child, the Jews hid it first in a barn of hay, then in a cellar, and at last threw it into a river. But God countered all their endeavors to prevent the discovery of the fact, which being proved upon them, with its several circumstances, they were put to death, the principal actors in the tragedy being broken upon the wheel and burned. The synagogue was destroyed, and a chapel was erected upon the spot where the child was martyred. God honored this innocent victim with many miracles. The relics lie in a stately tomb in St. Peter's Church at Trent; and the name occurs in the Martyrology."

During this ceremony, the Jews identify Christ as the God of the Christians; they do not claim Him as a Jew, as do so many of our so-called Christian religious leaders. Also, they could not conceal the body and hide their crime, for the Talmud forbids the burial of a gentile "beast." As in many such cases of ritual murder, a Jewish physician obtained the gentile victim, because Jewish doctors have many opportunities to steal away gentile children.

There are now many Jewish hospitals in the United States, which are owned and operated by Jewish doctors and nurses. Parents who place their children in these institutions for minor ailments are stunned to be told, a day or two later, that the child has suddenly passed away. In many such cases, the child has been removed to a synagogue and murdered by the prescribed ritual. The bloodless body of the victim is then turned over to the parents. This procedure also obeys the Jewish prohibition against the burial of a gentile, for the Jews simply allow the parents to take care of the burial.

It, therefore, behooves American parents to avoid leaving their children unguarded in the presence of a Jewish physician or placing the child in a hospital run by Jews. Any parent should think twice about abandoning a helpless child to a people which has a history of five thousand years of murdering children under such horrible circumstances. And any parent should be able to visualize the horror of the handsome, perfectly formed body of the child on which they have lavished such loving care, being stripped and laid down on a table while Jews, their eyes filled with blood lust and hatred of the Christians, gather round the child and pierce its flesh, and drink its blood, and call down curses upon the name of Jesus Christ. Can any parent really wish to place its child in such danger and to have it die in such terrible circumstances?

   1480. Venice. (UJE)

   1490. Sp. Sa Guardia. (UJE)

   1494. Tyrnau, Hungary: A Christian boy was bled white and killed. The Jews culprits were betrayed by the confessions of women, who were persuaded to do so by the sight of some instruments of torture, which however were not applied to them. The Jews, arrested after this confession, themselves confessed that this was the fourth child they had killed for the blood, but they said they wanted this for medical purposes. [116]

   1494. H. Trnava (Tyrnau). (UJE)

   1504. G. Frankfort. (UJE)

   1505. B. Budweis. (UJE)

   1510. Brandenburg: Several Jews were accused in Berlin of buying a small Christian boy, bleeding him and killing him. They confessed, and 41 were executed. [117]

   1518. G. Geisingen. (UJE)

   1529. H. Bazin. (UJE)

   1536. H. Nagyszombat. (UJE)

   1540. G. Neuburg. (UJE)

   1545. Asia Minor, Amasia. (UJE)

   1553. It. Asti. (UJE)

   1554. Rome. (UJE)

   1564. P. Bielsk. (UJE)

   1570. G. Brandenburg. (UJE)

   1571. G. Hellerspring. (UJE)

   1593. G. Frankfort. (UJE)

   1598. P. Luck. (UJE)

   1623. Dalmatia Ragusa. (UJE)

   1636. P. Lublin. (UJE)

   1637. P. Cracow. (UJE)

   1639. P. Leezyea. (UJE)

   1650. A. Razinai. (UJE)

   1668. Vienna. (UJE)

   1670. Metz: As this was a very strongly established case, one does not find any mention of it in Strack's book in defense of the Jews. A three-year-old Christian boy was lost by his mother on the way to a well. The boy was wearing a red cap, and witnesses had seen him carried away by a Jew mounted on a horse. This Jew was Raphael Levi. At first, the boy's body could not be traced. The Jews, becoming frightened, spread the report that wolves must have killed him in the forest. The forest was searched and eventually the head, neck and ribs of a boy were found, together with clothes which were identified as the missing boy's, red cap and all, by the boy's father. But as these clothes were neither torn nor bloody, it was concluded that the wolf story was a "blind," and then witnesses came forward who had seen Raphael Levi with the boy in such places and at such times as to remove all doubt of his guilt. Levi was sentenced to death by the order of the parliament of Metz, and was burned alive. [118]

   1691. Vilna. (UJE)

   1696. Posen. (UJE)

   1698. Sandomir, Poland: The highest tribunal in the land, that of Lublin, condemned a Jew for Ritual Sacrifice, the local court having exculpated him. [119] ; P. Zausmer and Kaidan. (UJE)

   1705. Italy, Viterbo. (UJE)

   1710. Rm. Neamtz. (UJE)

   1712. G. Frankfort. (UJE)

   1714. Rm. Roman. (UJE)

   1721. Danzig. (UJE)

   1736-40. Posen. (UJE)

   1743. P. Jaslau. (UJE)

   1745. G. Furth. (UJE)

   1748. Duniagrod, Poland: Jews condemned for Ritual Murder by Episcopal Court. [120]

   1753. Pavalochi, Poland: Jews condemned for Ritual Murder by Episcopal Court. [121]

   1753. Zhytomir, Poland: In this case, a three-year-old Christian boy was murdered; Jews were tried by the Episcopal Court of Kiev and condemned to death. [122]

   1756. R. Jampol. (UJE)

   1764. H. Orcutta. (UJE)

   1783. Rm. Botoshani. (UJE)

   1791. H. Tasnad. (UJE)

   1797. Rm. Galatz. (UJE)

   1799. White Russia. (UJE)

   1801. Bucharest. (UJE)

   1803. Rm. Neamtz. (UJE)

   1811. Rm. Talowitza. (UJE)

   1816. Rm. Piatra and P. Grodno. (UJE)

   1823. Velisch, Russia: On Easter Sunday, a 2 ½ -year-old Christian boy disappeared. His body was found in a marsh one week later; there were puncture wounds all over the body and the skin was scarified. There were wounds of circumcision; the feet were bloody and a bandage had been tied around the legs. The body had been undressed, washed, and again dressed. No blood was found near the body, which was drained of blood. Doctors gave evidence on oath that the child had been tortured to death. Some years later, five Jews were arrested together with three Russian women who had become Jewesses; these three women confessed that they had, one week before Passover in 1823, been made drunk by a Jewess who kept an inn and that the latter had bribed one of them to procure a boy. One of these converted Jewesses described how the boy had been forcibly circumcised by the Jews and rolled about in a barrel until his skin was scraped all over. The boy had been taken to the school where a number of Jews were assembled, laid in a trough, and all present had made stabs with a nail in his side and temples. When the boy died under this torture, his body was taken to a wood by two of the converted Jewesses; and the third woman took a bottle of the blood of the boy to the Jewess innkeeper aforesaid. Next day, the Rabbi's wife took the three women again to the school where the Jews were gathered; bottles were filled from the trough by means of a funnel, and the Rabbi dipped a nail into the blood and dropped a little on a number of pieces of cloth, one piece of which was given to everyone present. The case went to the Imperial Council at St. Petersburg, all the lower courts which dealt with the case having found the Jews guilty. The Imperial Council reversed the verdict and, on 18th January, 1835, the three Russian Jewish convert women were sent to Siberia whilst all the Jews were acquitted of the crime. [123]

   1824. Rm. Bakau. (UJE)

   1829. P. Boleslaw. (UJE)

   1831. St. Petersburg: The Christian daughter of non-commissioned officer was the victim in this case. There were five judges, of whom four recognized the ritual character of the murder. The Jewish murderers were transported to Siberia. Monniot says the facts of this case were not contested.

   1834. C. Neuenhoven. (UJE)

   1837-47. Buffeto, Fiorenzola, Monticelli, and Cortemaggiore, Italy. (UJE)

   1840. Rhodes: On the eve of Purim a small Christian Greek boy was missed; he had been seen entering a house in the Jewish quarter; after that he was never seen again. It is interesting to note that the time of this event was the same as in the famous Damascus case. Yusuf Pasha, Governor of the island, took depositions of witness and sent to Constantinople for instructions as to what to do next. Meanwhile "at the instigation of the Greek clergy and the European consuls" (admits the Jewish Encyclopedia, 1905, Vol. X, p. 401) the Jewish quarter was blockaded and the leading Jews arrested. The Austrian Consul, however, supported the Jews, Austria being in need of loans from the Rothschilds.

But

"owing to the efforts of Count Camondo, Cremieux and Montefiore" (to quote from the Jewish Encyclopedia) "a firman was obtained from the Sultan which declared all accusations of ritual murder null and void."

The Jews were released. Now Camondo, Cremieux and Montefiore were all rich Jews. Cremieux and Montefiore also figured in the Damascus case. Count Camondo

"exercised so great an influence over the sultans Abd-al-Majid and Abd-al-Aziz and over the Ottoman Grand Viziers and ministers that his name became proverbial. He was banker to the Ottoman Government..." [124]

There cannot be a shadow of doubt that the proceedings in this case were stopped by the force of the Jewish Money Power, in spite of the efforts of

"the Greek clergy and the European consuls." [125]

   1840. The Damascus Case: This case, now almost completely forgotten by Christianity, convulsed Europe for a considerable time owing to the agitation induced by the Jewish Money Power which left no stone unturned to misrepresent and vilify the individuals responsible for bringing the Jews to justice. Achille Laurent, a Member of the Societe Orientale, brought together the full details of the trial of the culprits as reported in Arab newspapers at the time, and he published the hole facts of the case [126] , which was produced in France as a Yellow book in two volummes, in 1846.

The Jewish Festival of Purim fell on 15th February, 1840. Father Thomas, a Catholic monk, disappeared in Damascus on 5th February. His servant went to look for him and disappeared also. The French Consul, Comte Ratti-Menton, began to make enquiries, and got the Sherif Pasha to investigate. After a while seven Jews were arrested.

They confessed, some after receiving chastisement with the bastinado, to having murdered Father Thomas for the sake of his blood. Four of them were promised pardon if they would speak the truth; thee were Mousa Abou-el-Afieh, who became a Mahomedan, explaining that that was necessary before he could confess about the crimes of other Jews; Aslan Farkhi; Suliman, a barber; and Mourad el Fathal. They confessed fully. Sixteen Jews were found to have been involved and all were arrested.

Several of the Jews, including Mourad el Fathal, Mousa Abou-el-Afieh, Isaac Arari and Aaron Arari, described how the blood was required and collected from the cut throat of the victim to send to a Rabbi for use in preparing ceremonial bread (pains azymes).

   1840. G. Julich. (UJE)

   1843. T. Marmora. (UJE)

   1844. P. Tarnow and Stobikowaka. (UJE)

   1852-53. R. Saratov. (UJE)

   1859. Rm. Galatz. (UJE)

   1861. Rm. Chavlian. (UJE)

   1863. t. Smyrna. (UJE)

   1867. Rm. Galatz and Rm. Calrash. (UJE)

   1875. P. Ostrovo. (UJE)

   1879. R. Kutais. (UJE)

   1882. H. Tisza-eszlin. (UJE)

   1891. Xanten, Prussia: A five-year-old Christian boy called Hegmann was murdered, his throat cut and the body bloodless. "The Government did all in its power to suppress the rumour" of Ritual Sacrifice [127] The doctor who examined the boy said on June 29th that: "The trace of blood appears as an after-bleeding." And H. Nagyszokol.

   1892. F. Ingrandes, Rm. Bakau, Rm. Bakau and G. Eisleben. (UJE)

   1893. Prague. B. Kolin. (UJE)

   1894. Bulgaria. Tatar Pazardzhik. (UJE)

   1898. G. Skaisgirren. (UJE)

   1899. The Polna Case (Bohemia): Agnes Hruza, 19 years of age, was murdered March 29th, 1899. On April 1st, her body was found in a wood with the head nearly severed from the body. In spite this frightful wound, there was no blood about, although the body itself, of course, was almost bloodless.

A man called Peschak had seen a Jew Hilsner with two other Jews on the day of the murder on the spot where the body was found. Hilsner was arrested and tried; another witness testified that he had seen the prisoner very agitated on March 29th, coming from the spot where the body was found. The court recognizing that Hilsner must have had accomplices, found him guilty and condemned him to death. He then confessed, and implicated two other Jews.

   1900. Konitz, West Prussia: A 19-year-old Christian youth, Ernst Witnter, was murdered in March. His body had been dismembered and parts of it were found in different localities. The culprits were never discovered, but two Jewish agents were sentenced to imprisonment for false witness and for the subornation of witnesses during the enquiry. [128] ; and B. Nachod. (UJE)

   1903. R. Kishinev. (UJE)

   1911-13. Kiev, Russia: In 1911 a 13-year-old Christian boy's body was found at Kiev with curious wounds and drained of blood. A Jew named Beiliss was arrested on suspicion. It was proved that the murder took place inside the premises of a Jewish brick factor to which only Jews had access. This factory contained a Jewish hospice with a secret synagogue attached. After long-drawn-out preliminaries, Beiliss, who was proprietor of the factory, was tried; the jury found that there was no proof that he himself was the culprit, although half of them considered he was; the verdict therefore having to be unanimous, he was declared Not Guilty. But the jury agreed as to the cause of the boy's death; their verdict about this was as follows:

"The boy after being gaged, was wounded with a perforating instrument in the nape of the neck, temples and neck, which wounds severed the cerebral vein, the left temporal and jugular arteries, producing thus profuse hemorrhage; and afterwards, when Joutchinski (the boy's name) had lost about five glasses of blood, his body was pierced with the same instrument, lacerating thus the lungs, the liver, the right kidney and the heart, where the last wounds were inflicted, in all 47 wounds, causing acute suffering to the victim and the loss of practically all the blood of the body, and finally death."

   1924. Syria. Aleppo. (UJE)

   1926. P. Dobrzyn and R. Kanieff. (UJE)

   1928. Gladbeck, Germany: This occurred at the time of Purim; a twenty-year-old Christian lad called Helmuth Daube was found dead in front of his home, with his throat cut, his genital organs missing, whilst there were wounds on the hands and stabs in the abdomen. There was no blood about where the body was found and it was bloodless. Experts said in Court that the throat showed the Jewish ritual cut. The Jews set to work and eventually a young Gentile called Huszmann was accused of the murder, unnatural lust being alleged as a feature in the crime. The case was conducted against Huszmann by a Jew called Rosenbaum, and special police had been sent from Berlin to enquire about the circumstances; the President of the Police at Berlin was the Jew Bernhard Weiss. These special police did what they could to convince the Court that it was a "lust-murder," but Huszmann was acquitted. The Bochumer Abendhlatt and Der Sturmer both gave their opinion that it was a Ritual Murder by Jews, and the latter paper was suppressed for a time, and its editor imprisoned. Y. Petrovo Selo and N.Y. Massena. (UJE)

   1929. G. Manau, Bamberg, Memel, Vilna and Greece. Salonika, Kovno. Lithuania. and others. (UJE)

   1930. R. Novosimera. (UJE)

   1936. Memel. (UJE)

   1937. G. Bamberg. (UJE)

   1940. B. Welhartitz. (UJE) [129]         

We could go on and on with case after case for hundreds of pages, but we believe this should suffice to show that the Jews did and still do sacrifice Christian children for their ceremonies. In other words, the Jews have a god which finds blood pleasing. In the words of Mr. Leese,

"What sort of a people is this whose god finds the blood obtained from  mutilation of human genital organs as 'pleasing?'"

Quoting from the Jewish writer Charles A. Weisman's Book Who is Esau-Edom?:

"During the Middle Ages Jews were found guilty of ritual murder of Christians in England; at Norwich in 1146, and Lincoln in 1225; in France at Blois in 1171; and in northern Italy at Trent in 1475. The Jewish Encyclopedia lists 121 Ritual Murder cases from 1146 to 1900, which were tried in courts. Many of the listings show convictions and the mode in which guilty Jews were executed." [130]

Continuing from Who is Esau-Edom?:

"From 1900 to 1939's there have been about another twenty cases of ritual murder by Jews. Even to this day there are reports of ritual murder of {Christian} children by certain extremist Hasidic Orthodox Jewish  sects." [131]

Continuing from "Who is Esau-Edom?":

"Abortion has become an overt means of child sacrifice which Jews have instituted under their de facto law. A more covert means of {Christian} child sacrifice has been by their infamous 'ritual murders, which Jews have been accused through the ages.' In this practice 'the blood of the sacrificed gentile {Christian Child} is mixed with flour to make the unleavened bread eaten at Passover.'" [132]

Even though God commanded circumcision, there is no way a reading of Scripture shows that God intended that the procedure turn into a bloody ritual. Besides that, it seems apparent that when Christ nailed the blood ordinances to the cross, he also nailed the circumcision to the cross.

"Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing." [133]

Make no mistake about it, as we have already stated The god of the Jews is not the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel !!! And if it were the same God ‑‑ the manner in which the Jews worship is administered is an abomination in the eyes of the Lord our God. According to Leese there are two specific periods of time for Ritual Murders by the Jews.    

     "The two principal feast days associated with Ritual Murder have been (1) Purim, and (2) Passover, the latter at Easter and the former about one month before it. When a Ritual Murder occurred at Purim, it was usually that of an adult Christian who was murdered for his blood...the blood was dried and the powder mixed into triangular cakes for eating; it is possible that the dried blood of a Purim murder might sometimes be used for the following Passover. When a Ritual Murder was done at Passover, it was usually that of a [Christian] child under seven years old, as perfect a specimen as possible, who was not only bled white, but crucified, sometimes circumcised and crowned with thorns, tortured, beaten, stabbed, and sometimes finished off by wounding the side in imitation of the murder of Christ.

     The blood taken from the child was mixed either in the powdered state or otherwise into the passover bread [Then eaten - A type of Jewish Blood ritual was apparently still common even in 1903, as the Jewish Encyclopedia for that year, in discussing the method of performing a circumcision, states that the person performing the ritual: "...takes some wine in his mouth and applies his lips to the part involved in the operation, and exerts suction, after which he expels the mixture of wine and blood into a receptacle provided." [134]

The Jewish circumcision rite requires that this mixture of the mohel's sputum, wine and blood from his mouth be mixed into a larger batch of wine. From this, all the Jewish guests drink and celebrate by singing and dancing] [135]

There is little doubt that the Jews and other historians who are possessed by the spirits of the Jews claim that the "Dark Ages" were from 493 A.D. to 711 A.D. What they mean by the "Dark Ages" is that the Christian Church kept the Jews under control and countered their every move to put their Satanic battle plan into motion.

During the "Dark Ages" (the dark ages got its name from the Jews; because they were driven out of almost every country in Europe at the time, for their wickedness and ritual murders) they were countered by brave Christian souls like St. Bernard and others who led forces which confined them to their own ghettoes where they could not mix their blood with those of our Adamic people or killed them outright.

Following is quoted from Mullins' New History of the Jews.

In the United States, Jews have been able to practice ritual murder of gentile children with impunity, because they control the press, and because they hold so many high public offices. It has been estimated by a leading police official that four thousand children disappear in the United States each year. There is no question that the majority of them are victims of Jewish ritual murder. So prevalent has the custom become in this country that Jews are able to ship large quantities of the children's blood to Israel for use in their ceremonies there. One of the problems of the Jewish homeland in Israel has been a shortage of Christian children who could be used in the ritual ceremony, and the Unite States, which has also furnished most of the money to Israel, has also provided much of the required children's blood.

Because most of these children are taken from poor families, no mention is ever made of their disappearance in the press. Only in rare instances do the Jews dare to take the child of a well-known public figure, as they did in the Lindbergh case, and then it is done for a specific political purpose, and as part of a larger policy.

Because of the terror that strikes the Jewish community when the body of a Christian child is found murdered in the ritual manner, and the public outcry from the Christians, many have found fame and sudden fortune by siding with the Jews in these instances. Typical was the case of Jan Masaryk, the President of Czechoslovakia. Masaryk was an obscure lawyer when the body of Agnez Hruza was found in Bohemia in 1899. A Jew named Hilsner confessed to the murder and implicated two other Jews. Nevertheless, a new trial was ordered. Dr. Baxa, attorney for the murdered girl's mother, who was seeking justice in this case, made a speech in the Bohemian Diet, or Parliament, December 28, 1899, accusing the Government of having shown extreme partiality to the Jews in this case. A second body was found, that of Maria Klima, who had also been murdered with a ritual knife which was found in Hilsner's possession.

Hilsner's defending counsel at this trial was Jan Masaryk. At the Versailles Peace Conference, twenty years later, the Jews showed their gratitude by making a new nation, Czechoslovakia, and appointing Masaryk President, with the title, founder of Czechoslovakia. Throughout his life, Masaryk was an eager and willing tool of Jewish leaders.

In the United States, many gentiles have found large sums of money suddenly available to them for campaign purposes, after they have aided in hushing up some new scandal of Jewish ritual murder. The path to the Governor's mansion, the Senate, and the White House has been magically eased when the candidate proves that he is willing to cover up for the Jews in their murders of gentile children.

The director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, J. Edgar Hoover, annually conducts a scare campaign warning children in the United States never to talk to strangers, or to get into a strange car. It is not generally known that Hoover has to do this because of the prevalence of Jewish ritual murder. Hoover's campaign is ostensibly directed at molesters of children, although only a dozen such cases are reported annually in the entire country.

The real reason behind Hoover's campaign is that Jewish leaders fear the recklessness of some of the lesser Jews, who try to seize Christian children for ritual purposes without covering their tracks. Therefore, J. Edgar Hoover spends hundreds of thousands of dollars annually of taxpayers' money to warn children against all strangers, although he should only be warning them against Jews. He does not dare reveal the true purpose of this campaign, which is intended solely to prevent children from falling into the hands of unauthorized Jewish murderers. Not only does this cause the American child to be brought up in an atmosphere of fear and horror, so that it is taught to mistrust all adults, and causes much neurosis in later life, but it also refuses to face the real issue, the taste of the Jews for Christian blood.

Some journalists suppose that J. Edgar Hoover performs this annual task, and many other favors, for the Jews because he is grateful to the Anti-Defamation League for having ghostwritten a book for him called "Masters of Deceit," and for having peddled hundreds of thousands of copies for him. The book was written by a Jewish communist name Jay Liebstein, who claims to have shocking personal information about the Great Deceiver himself. The real reason why Hoover uses the FBI to harass all non-Jews who know the truth about Jews may lie in Liebstein's hold over him.

Because the city of Chicago is a center of Jewish financial power, and is completely controlled by the Jews, some of the most flagrant cases of ritual murder of Christian children have occurred there in recent years. Chicago is said to have become one of the world centers of the supply of children's blood used in Jewish rites. The Chief of Police admitted that three hundred children disappear each month in Chicago, but he claims that they are all "runaways." it is odd that these runaways never turn up, either in Chicago or anywhere else. In October, 1955, the rash of ritual murder cases was at a height when the bodies of two Schuessler boys, a Peterson boy, and the two Grimes girls were discovered.

Police officials immediately labeled these killings "sex crimes," as the Jews had taught them to do. Frantic efforts were made to railroad several poverty-stricken and ill-educated gentiles to the electric chair, but no evidence could be manufactured against them which would hold up in court, and they were released. As in the trial of Christ, the lies of the Jews conflicted with each other.

Although these murders occurred in the heart of a great city, Not One Clue Has Ever Been Discovered In These Cases! Or rather, we should say that no clue was ever announced to the public. Although hundreds of police and detectives worked day and night, due to the public horror over these crimes, nothing was ever admitted to have been found. There were many charges that there had been a coverup, and that Chicago officials had destroyed or concealed all the evidence that was uncovered.

Due to this public interest, the Chicago press published many stories about the killings, which were seen at once to be typical Jewish ritual murders. In these cases, the bodies had been stripped and thrown onto garbage heaps. Pathologists agreed that not one of them had been sexually molested. However, there were many strange punctures on the bodies, which could not be explained. The Daily News published an early afternoon edition in which a diagram of the Peterson boy's body showed puncture marks in each of the places where the body of Christ had been wounded on the Stake. Within ten minutes, the edition had been taken off the newsstands and rushed back to the News building, where it was burned. However, eight copies of this issue were obtained by Mrs. Lyrl Clark Van Hyning, the courageous publisher of a patriotic journal called "Women's Voice." When she called the News office to ask why the edition had been taken off the stands, she was told that there had been complaints about it, and that it was likely to cause "racial unrest." During this entire episode, Mrs. Van Hyning printed the truth about the murders.

Police reports showed that the bodies of the Grimes girls bore puzzling wounds on their chests, which were to shallow to cause death. Also, no cause of death could be agreed upon. It was even claimed that they had died of fright! Actually, as Mrs. Van Hyning pointed out in her paper, they died from a very simple cause, loss of blood, for the News had already published the strange fact that there was no blood in their bodies, when they were found.

A copy of Arnold Leese's definitive work, Jewish Ritual Murder, was sent to Arnold Schuessler, father of the murdered boys. He read it, and began to ask questions of the police. The Jewish Sheriff of Chicago, Lohman, had assigned a Jewish deputy, Horwitz, to stay with the Schuesslers night and day in case they raised the question of ritual murder. When Mr. Schuessler asked Horwitz if his boys had been killed for their blood, in a Jewish religious ceremony, the Jew immediately accused him of murdering his own sons! He was taken to police headquarters and given a lie detector case, which completely cleared him. Instead of releasing him, the Police turned him over to a Jew named Dr. Steinfeld. He was spirited away to a "sanitarium" operated by Steinfeld in the nearby town of Des Plaines, Ill. Mr. Schuessler was given electric shock treatments and died that same afternoon.

An inquest was held, and Dr. Steinfeld was forced to testify. He claimed that Mr. Schuessler had been suffering from "hallucinations," but he refused to describe these visions. He also refused to give any further information, and it was obvious to Dr. Thomas McCarron, the City Coroner of Chicago, that Steinfeld was concealing the truth. McCarron denounced Steinfeld, and told the newspapers that the case was very strange. Patients were never given shock treatments immediately upon being admitted to a sanitarium. McCarron knew that Schuessler had been murdered, but he could do nothing about it, and city officials ordered him to say nothing further about the case. For a few days, there was a very real danger that he too would be murdered. He has since refused to discuss the case with anyone.

Dr. McCarron knew Steinfeld's sinister history. During World War II, Dr. Steinfeld had been convicted of giving special drugs to Jewish boys in the Chicago area which caused their hearts to flutter. They were exempted from military service as 4-F. Steinfeld received $2000 fee for each of these cases. After the war, Steinfeld opened his sanitorium in Des Plaines, which became the production center for Jewish ritual murder in the Midwest. it was ironic that Mr. Schuessler, supposedly being protected by the police, was murdered in the same place his boys were killed, and his murder, like that of his sons, went unavenged, except for one later development.

Several patriots went to Des Plaines the next afternoon and distributed five hundred copies of a pamphlet charging Dr. Steinfeld with the murder of Mr. Schuessler, and accusing him of operating a Jewish ritual murder center. One of the pamphlets was handed to the chief of police, yet nothing was done. The distributors of these pamphlets could have been arrested and charged with criminal libel, with a possible ten-year sentence, yet Steinfeld refused to make any charge against them. A few days later, he flew to Switzerland, and it was announced that he was taking a "rest cure." The next day, his body was found hanging in a closet in his hotel room. The verdict was "suicide," although he may have been a reluctant one. Strangely enough, no Chicago newspaper carried the notice of this well known local figure's death.

A few weeks later, Arnold Leese, who had been preparing a book about the Schuessler case as a classic example of Jewish ritual murder, died suddenly. He had been airmailed copies of all newspaper accounts of the case during the long investigation, some one hundred pages of newspaper clippings, but these were not found in his effects after his death. Meanwhile, a Jewish columnist for the Sun-Times, Irv Kupcinet, whose daughter died a drug addict in a Hollywood pad, raised $100,000 among the Jewish community and presented it to Mrs. Schuessler.

The Jewish deputy had continued to stay with her, and a few days later Mrs. Schuessler revealed to a reporter that he had taken all the money and gone to Las Vegas. Sheriff Lohman also left Chicago, being given a $20,000 sinecure as consulting criminologist at the University of California. [136]

It is the duty of every American parent whose child disappears to make every effort to find it. However, many poor families with too many children to feed take it for granted that a child has gone out into the world to make his own way, and they are unaware of the probability that the child has been murdered by the Jews for his blood.

Consequently, no effort is made to investigate these Jewish crimes, despite the fact that they have been going on for many centuries. It is necessary for us to use every weapon to arm ourselves against the Jews, and to observe the divinity of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, in Whose Name Salvation awaits us.

Another horrible involvement of an official American agency in the wide-spread practice of Jewish ritual murder was hushed up recently. A deputy chief of the Central Intelligence Agency committed suicide in Washington. The verdict was "over-work," thereby concealing a terrible tragedy. This official had been off from work for three months, following a nervous breakdown. He had suffered a fit of remorse over discovering that he had inadvertently been responsible for the murder of many Christian children in the Jewish religious ceremonies. This man, a gentile had become known for a special talent in an agency that was sixty percent Jewish. Most of the Jewish agents travelled around the world with unlimited expense accounts, staying at the best hotels, a la James Bond, while they carried out spy missions for Israel, with the American taxpayer footing the bill.

The Christian's special talent was a gift for picking up boys who could be used as homosexuals for the pleasure of foreign officials. At least, that was what he had been told, and he saw no reason to suspect otherwise, for the use of boys in international espionage was an old story, and most governments employed them at one time or another in order to blackmail high-ranking officials of other governments. In the early evening hours, this CIA official would stroll about downtown until he saw a handsome lad. He would strike up a conversation, and if the boy was not otherwise engaged, he would take him to a hotel room, where he would turn him over to another agent. This CIA official would then leave, after promising the boy a sum of money, usually about twenty dollars.

During the period from 1947 to 1952, this CIA official picked up eighty-six boys on the streets of Paris and Vienna in this manner. He heard nothing further from any of them although it must have seemed odd that he never saw any of them again after leaving them in the hotel room. In 1963, a Jewish agent in CIA headquarters in Washington, who had learned of this official's former specialty, asked him if he would pick up a boy for him. By this time, the gentile had risen much higher in the hierarchy of the CIA, and he refused, saying that he did not have to engage in such activities any longer.

The Jew then astounded him by saying that since he already had eighty-six murders on his conscience, one more wouldn't hurt him. He could not believe that the gentile did not know that every one of the boys had been used as a victim of a Jewish ritual murder, and he described for him the entire ceremony. The Jew ended up by threatening him, saying that if the gentle did not get him a boy for a ceremony planned for the approaching Passover holiday, he would be exposed. The gentile went home that evening, and collapsed with a complete nervous breakdown, from which he never recovered. Some months later, he committed suicide.

However, most gentiles who aid the Jews in committing ritual murders, covering up for them in police departments, on newspapers and in government offices, are not so squeamish. It has been estimated that at least one-third of all officeholders in the United States are well aware of the prevalence of Jewish ritual murder of children, and that their continuing to hold office depends on aiding and abetting the Jews in the practice of these crimes.

During a conversation with Father Bulger in 1956, he related that he had been working all his life on a book which was to be the definitive work on Jewish ritual murder. Father Bulger furnished much of the information contained herein. However his superiors had forbidden him to have his own book published. In former years, most of the information about this type of crime had been published in Catholic encyclopedias and official parochial works, but further writings on the subject of Jewish ritual murder had been banned because of Jewish pressure on the Vatican.

Father Bulger said that according to his estimates, six million gentile children had been done to death in the ritual manner by Jews since the crucifixion of Christ. These six million victims have not only gone unavenged, but each one of them, deserving to be elevated to sainthood for their sufferings at the hands of the Jews, has died without gentile society making the slightest effort to protect other children from becoming victims in the same manner. Father James E. Bulger said, "The blood lust of the Jews and their hatred of Jesus Christ are combined in this horrible ceremony." Not only have six million innocent souls been done to death in ritual murder by the Jews, but each of us must ask himself, What kind of Christian, what kind of human being, am I, if I do nothing to protect children from such horrible sacrifice in a supposedly Christian and modern society? [137]

Many people think this sort of thing may have happened in the past but did not exist after the Babylonian captivity. However, from the account of Dio Cassius in the 78th Book of his history, Chapter 32, written in 117 A.D. comes the following:

"Then the Jews in Cyrene [on the modern Tripoli coast of North Africa] choosing as their leader one Andreas, slew the Romans and Greeks, and Devoured [ate] their bodies, drank the blood, clothed themselves in the flayed skins, and sawed many in half from the head downwards; some they threw to wild beasts and others were compelled to fight in single combat, so that in all 220,000 were killed. In Egypt they did many similar things, also in Cyprus, led by one of them named Artemion; and there another 240,000 were slain."

And so goes the history of the Jews and little has changed up until the present time. These stories are not isolated and have been documented extremely well from 1144 A.D. until 1913 in Lesse's book. Another example from an entry for the year 1803 is as follows:

"A converted ex‑Rabbi wrote a book in the Moldavian language in 1803 which was published again in Greek in 1834 by Giovanni de Georgio under the title 'Ruin of the Hebraic Religion.' this converted Rabbi called himself by the name Neophyte. Also two leading Jewish journalists by the name of Ehrenburg and Siminov; whose pictures showing them to be two ugly, swarthy looking, curly‑haired individuals appeared in the New York Times Book Review of May 19, 1946. The Press reported they were sent here by David Zaslavsky, the Jewish dictator of the entire news media in Soviet Russia. The New York Sun for May 23, 1946, reported that Browder's trip to Russia was 'to arrange the details for a U.S. Agency for Soviet Publishers.'"

The following telegram, from President Wilson, was read at the same mass meeting in Carnegie Hall of the night before:

"...This government formally recognizes the New Government of Russia. By this act the United States has expressed its confidence in the success of and its natural sympathy with the popular government."

Of Woodrow Wilson the famous Dr. H.J. Boldt wrote as follows:

"Woodrow Wilson was a Sephardic Jew...The name of his parents was Wohlson; a German‑Jewish name; they came from Germany, and went to England where they were known as Mr. and Mrs. Wolfson and when they landed here in America they called themselves Wilson."

His second wife, the former Mrs. Galt is also Jewish. On the death of Dr. Boldt The Herald Tribune, on January 14, 1943,

said:

"...an internationally known gynecologist and professor emeritus of gynecology at the Post‑Graduate Medical School of Columbia University."

He may be found in Who is Who in America, in Who's Who Among Physicians and Surgeons; in Who is Who in the Western Hemisphere; in the Blue Book of England. Thus it is clear that the Jews were responsible for what happened in Russia where the gentiles are in serfdom under Jewish control. It is interesting to note that the Jews of today are shown mourning the supposed death of six million Jews.

Knowledgeable Christians, however, are not impressed by this "SIX‑MILLION MYTH" because they know that the Jewish leaders in Russia and around the world are responsible for the death of 20‑million innocent Christians during and after the Russian Revolution. Russia is dominated by Jews and it is common knowledge that Stalin and Molotov married Jewesses and thus merely represent the gentile front for the exclusive leadership of the Jewish Kaganowitch brothers who keep in the background.

Simon Liberman, a former leader of the Russian Social Democratic Party, remained to serve as the business adviser to the Soviet Government until 1926, was actually the Jewish leader behind the scene in the revolution from 1917‑1926, reported to his Jewish co‑religionists that the Russian workers were coming to realize that they are the slaves of the Jews and he predicted the coming of violent anti‑Jewish outbreaks in that country, just as soon as the people dare to chance a counter revolution against the Jewish dictatorship. And that only the death penalty, for anti‑Semitism in any form has been able thus far to frighten or discourage such action.

That is why there is 4‑million Jews desperately trying to leave Russia today, they know they are fast losing their grip of that country and know what is in store for them when the Russian people throw off the control of the Jews. The Jews hope to come to America, where their control is still strong, but it now appears that the Jewish leadership has plans for them going to the country known today as Israel, instead. So they will be transported there first, in order to obtain large grants from America to resettle them there. Then after they have received payment the Russian Jews will then come to America, where they will no doubt receive resettlement money a second time.

However, unknown to them; America is the New Jerusalem as spoken of in the Holy Scriptures, and they are coming here in response to the commandment of the Lord Jesus Christ when he said:

"But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me." [138]

And who were Christ's enemies that would not have Him to rule over them? The answer is given in:

"When Pilate therefore heard that saying, he brought Jesus forth, and sat down in the judgment seat in a place that is called the Pavement, but in the Hebrew, Gabbatha...and he saith unto the Jews, Behold your King! But they [The Jews] cried out, Away with him, away with him, crucify him. Pilate saith unto them, Shall I crucify your King? The chief priests answered, We Have No King But Caesar. " [139]

In France, anti‑Semitism is daily growing and were it not for the contiguous trials of so‑called Nazi War Criminals it would grow even faster. It was the French people who objected to the selection of the Greenwich section for the United Nations Building because of the proximity of Jewish controlled New York City. The French hate Jews more than they hate Germans, and is common knowledge in Europe. But that knowledge is kept carefully concealed from the American people.

France does not pretend to have a Christian or gentile government. It is commonly admitted who is conducting that program. And De Gaulle, a few short years ago, did not confer with Stalin for nothing, for bear in mind it was only a few days after his conference with Stalin when French funds here in the United States, to the sum of four billions of dollars, frozen since the start of the Second World War, were released to De Gaulle's credit.

In France German prisoners of war were allowed only 650 calories of food per day after the end of the Second World War. The great "Humanitarian" agency, the UNRRA, which was under the direction of the Jew Lehman, did not even operate in France. It was reported that the French Government is completely dominated by Jews and Grand Orient Masons and it is common knowledge the latter were acting as the errand boys of the Jews. Thus one could see the accomplishment of what was prophesied by an awakened Christian by the name of Francis Coty, in his Paris paper, L'AMI DU PEUPLE, February 29, 1932:

"...All of these facts united, of which the reality cannot be denied seem to have the same significance; that the heads of Kuhn, Loeb & Co., are engaged in an international enterprise of the same importance as that undertaken by Jacob Schiff against Russia. only today it is France which they plan to destroy, to erase from the map of Europe all independent nations , and to deliver the people over to a revolution on the Russian model which would allow them to reimburse themselves for the expense of triumphing over us."

                                                                              Father Fahey

On page 186 of Rev. Fahey's book The Mystical Body of Christ is given an account of the secret origin of Bolshevism and described the conversion of Heinrich Marx [The father of Karl Marx] and his family.

"Marx's father became extraordinarily a convert to Protestantism, while continuing to practice the Jewish religion at home. Young Marx's infancy was thus steeped in the tradition of his race: God has given the world to the Jews. They will reign over it forever when the Messiah shall come. Jews alone have the right to own. When the Messiah shall have come, 200 mules will be required to carry the keys of the trunks or boxes in which the riches taken from the Christians will be heaped up, etc...Of this doctrine this young Jew was to retain above all the idea of an expropriation on a fast scale, coinciding with the triumph of his race."

Thus Communism can properly be defined as a Jewish scheme to expropriate the Christians and make them the slaves of the Jews. Such anti‑Christianism is still being taught to the young Jews of the world today.

Maurice Gomberg's Post War New World Map for the establishment of a "New World Moral Order" in the Library of Congress and copyrighted March 31, 1942, shows with what accuracy Coty made his prophecy. There is also something uncanny about Gomberg's advance information in that he shows Madagascar in the color of Great Britain although she did not take that Island until six weeks later, and the Russian‑German line is precisely shown, in March, 1942, while the island of Sakhalin and the Kurile Islands are shown to be the property of Russia.

Coty, worth twenty million dollars when he had the courage to write his exposures, died a pauper three years later and his widow married a Jew. That is what it cost him when he tried to save his beloved France. By constantly growing revelations, disclosed since World War II, many more people, than the Jews think, are awakening to the fact that it is the aim of Jewish Freemasonry to change the essentially Christian civilization and the replacing of it by a Masonic world ruled by Jews.

                               Race Awakening of Christians Means The Downfall of The Jews

Hence, the beginning of Jewish world domination is the race consciousness of the Jews; its downfall will be the race awakening of all gentile people. That is why the initiated Jew Disraeli stated: "The race question is the secret of the history of the world."

From the above it is evident that only Jews gain from the aims of freemasonry, which is the realization of the triumph of Judaic ideas or the domination of Judaism. It is certainly never a question of a struggle for the interest of humanity. "We intend to remake the Christian...What the Communists are doing to Russia," Wrote the Jewish author Lewis Brown in his book, How Odd of God.

Proof of this is the great freedom provided for America, when those who were at the helm would, without any equivocation, be loyal in their defense of the Constitution of the United States, the Bill of Rights, and that form of Government which for more than 160 years, by the right of individual initiative, made this the greatest country in the history of the world. Today, in 1989, the United States is no longer a Republic, but a Jewish State ruled by International Jew Bankers and Zionists from behind the scenes.

The proof is as follows: I submit that it is time for the American People to awake‑to realize that we are a conquered people; that we are no longer free, we are being held captive; we are enslaved. You don't believe it! History reveals nations and people can be conquered by the use of one or more of three methods.

The most common is conquest by war. In time, though, this method usually fails, because the captives hate the captors and rise up and drive them out if they can. Much force is needed to maintain control, making it expensive for the conquering nation.

A second method is by religion, where men are convinced they must give their captors part of their earnings as "obedience to a god." Such a captivity is vulnerable to philosophical exposure or by overthrow by armed force, since most religions by their nature lacks military force to regain control, once its captives become "disillusioned."

The third method can be called economic conquest. It takes place when nations are placed under "tribute" without the use of visible force or coercion, so that the victims do not realize they have been conquered. "Tribute" is collected from them in the form of "legal" debts and taxes, and they believe they are paying it for their own good; for the good of others or to protect all from some enemy. Their captors become their "benefactors" and "protectors;" instead of the enemy they actually are.

Although this is the slowest to impose, it is often the most long‑lasting, as the captives do not see any military force arrayed against them; their religion is left more or less intact; they have, for the most part, freedom to speak and to travel; and they are allowed to participate in so‑called "elections" for their rulers. Thus, without realizing it, they are conquered, and the instruments of their own society are used to transfer their wealth to their captors and make the conquest complete.

In 1900, the average American worker paid few taxes and had little debt. Last year payments on debts and taxes took more than half of what the American worker earned. Why can our people not see, it is just that form of conquest which has been imposed upon our people?

Just recently the Supreme Court decided that a person could burn our National Banner the Flag of the United States of America. Well there is only one way that anyone has ever been able to burn the flag of a country and that was after they had been conquered!

                                        This Is The Home Of The Brave And The Land Of The Free

A few months ago a little perverted communist creep, who called himself an artist, put on a display in a museum in Chicago, Illinois. Placed under that display was an American Flag the Stars and Stripes, in a position that everyone who looked at or even walked near that perverted display had to walk on the Flag. And not a single so‑called brave American whipped the S.O.B. Where are the brave?

Where were you so-called Judeo-Christian Ministers: Hiding Behind your mask of False Christianity While They Spreak their Sickening Baal Doctrines and Jewish Fables! You say it is the Land of the Free.

Consider a law that which went into effect in the State of Oklahoma in 1991. Citizens of Oklahoma in 1991, will be required, by statutory law to make a list of all their possession and submit it to the State Government. Everything from watches and kitchenware to livestock, automobiles and farm equipment. Oklahoma house bill 1750 was signed into law by Governor Bellom in 1987. And reads on or about January 1st of each year the Oklahoma Tax Commission shall prescribe for use by all county assessors suitable blank forms for the listing and assessments of all property both real and personal.

These forms will then be furnished to every taxpayer for the listing of all personal property. From January 1 to the end of February the county assessor must set up a temporary office in each town located in the county for a minimum of one day, to allow the taxpayer to submit the list. The assessor must then be present at the county seat from March 1st through March 15 to receive lists not turned into the temporary offices. The list will include personal property such as livestock, furniture, gold, silverware, musical instruments, watches, jewelry, wagons, vehicles, machinery, and all other property having actual, constructive or taxable status.

Taxpayers failing to provide such a list will be visited by the assessor for a detailed inspection of the premises. And if you deny him access, he or his deputy will be required to obtain a search warrant. Obtained upon the probable cause that personal property is located on the premises is subject to advaluorium taxation. According to the bill property not previously listed or undervalued will result in a penalty of up to 20 percent of the value of the property. The assessor must physically inspect all real property in the county every four years. I ask you: Are the people in Oklahoma living in a free state?  If this bill is allowed to go into effect in 1991 then the only possible answer is: Of Course Not!

For if you are an average American you still live under the supposition that the United States is under the control and ownership of the American people: But I submit to you "If"

   A). If Americans were in control of our nation: Would we be forced to bus our children to integrated ghetto schools, to be intimidated, assaulted, robbed, raped and murdered?

   B). If Americans were in control of our nation: Would our children be taught, through methodical government programming and Brain Raping techniques; To be ashamed of being white; To be ashamed of and to ridicule their ancestors?

   C). If Americans were in control of our nation: Would the White Anglo‑Saxon American be discriminated against when he or she applies for a job? Or a college education?  Would the reverse discrimination be as rampant as it is?

   D). If Americans were in control of our nation: Would our government force integration of our schools and neighborhoods against the resident opposition?

   E). If Americans were in control of our nation: Would our children be attacked by homosexuals [Queers: who try and convince people that they are not the subhuman creeps they are; and who should be driven from our country] and pornographic propaganda [if the feminists were truly for women they would be fighting this with every weapon at their disposal for it degrades women more than any single event known to man, the leaders of the feminists are anarchists and anti‑Christ and are not for women but are agents of those who are working toward a one‑world government controlled by the enemies of Christ; they are deceiving the women of our country just as Satan deceived Eve in the Garden of Eden!!!], and brow beaten with anti‑White bias, as it is in the newspapers, magazines, news media, radio, television ‑‑with government backing control and protection?

   F). If Americans were in control of our nation: Would it be overrun by millions of unwanted illegal aliens? Would these enemies of our nation be given jobs ahead of our natural citizens and sometimes even in preference to them, unemployment compensation, welfare and social security payments, which is desperately needed right now by millions of our own White Americans?

   G). If Americans were in control of our nation: Would our White Anglo‑Saxon People allow an organized criminal minority of political anti‑Christ Jewish Zionist Gangsters to wrangle billions of American Taxpayer dollars in U.S. foreign aid for the Bastard Bandit State of Israel so they will be free to murder women and children?

   H). If Americans were in control of our nation: Would we allow our foreign policy makers to antagonize our traditional friends and our government to work for their overthrow?

   I). If Americans were in control of our nation: Would we allow the Communist to subvert or nation and to conquer the world piece by piece while we sit idly by and do nothing?

   J). If Americans were in control of our nation: Would we allow the government to finance the farming operations of foreigners to compete with our native farmers while they are being driven from their farms by the same government in droves?

In 1917, America went to war, "...to make the world safe for Democracy." The result was Lenin, Soviet Russia and Partial Chaos. Twenty‑five years later America was again brought into a foreign war, this time for "four freedom." The net result Soviet Russia covering all of Europe, with Chaos over all the world. Out of all this the Cabalist Jews and Freemasons, ruled by the program brought forth by the United nations, the Jewish World State.

This is the "Ordo ab Chao" [Jewish Order out of Chaos], a new order, the incarnation of the basic principle of Universality, i.e., "World Republic by World Revolution," with the deceiving pronouncement of "human rights;" with the slogan "Liberty, Equality and Fraternity," and with the fate of unfortunate France, which suffered in 1789, in store for all countries that succumb to the voice of this siren, i.e., total destruction of all native Countries, States, Races and Nations.

Going back to the Illuminati, from whence all these movements stem, we find it was the plan which the admitted leaders of the French Revolution established; It is the exact plan of the Soviets : an obligarchy and its Dictator.

It is the plan set forth in Colonel House's Philip Dru: Administrator, in Clinton Roosevelt's New Dynasty, and it is the Plan forced upon the United States by those directing the New Deal with a global Dictatorship operating under the United Nations. Thus we note that identically as during the first World War the Jew Barney Baruch was directing Woodrow Wilson, while George Mandell [Rotschild] was guiding General Clemenceau, and Philip Sasson directing Lloyd George, so in this present hour we have Boris Stein "advising" Adrei Gromyko, and Ben Cohen in our State Department, "advising" Mr. Stettinius and Mr. Byrnes, and another Jew Laski commanding Foreign Secretary Bevin in England.

It was because of their actions that Hilaire Belloc, in his book The Jews (1922) wrote:

"The Great War brought thousands upon thousands of educated men up against the staggering secret they had never suspected; the complete control exercised over things absolutely necessary to the nation's survival by half a dozen Jews who were completely indifferent as to whether we or the enemy should emerge alive from the struggle."

After this Global War, plotted by the Jewish race, no man, and certainly no American who is not of Jewish blood, would be so cruel as to mass starve a whole disarmed German people which our Director Lehman, of the UNRRA, was actually in the process of doing. Before the Appropriation Committee he testified that it would be against the UNRRA'S Constitution and contrary to law" to give so much as a crumb to German Nationals." Even personal letters and parcels are forbidden Germans from any outside country not even from gentile Americans of German birth although Jews were able to send anything they wished to Europe. Under the UNRRA and other organizations, Jews are receiving 2300 calories of food per day. The Christian Germans are getting less than 1200 and German prisoners 650 calories in France.

A refugee paper in New York City, predicted that the Germans would be compelled through expropriation and proletarianization, to accept communism in order to bring them definitely under Jewish rule. He said the same paper prophesied with uncanny accuracy Morgenthau's Potsdam Declaration, which operated in Germany. All of the editors of the German papers were Jewish, while the Hungarian Jew Habe completely directed the policy of the entire news media which were operating in that section of Europe at the time. What would the Jews do if all the editors of Jewish papers were suddenly replaced by Christians by government decree?

It should be evident to every thinking citizen of the United States that the FEPC, was the first plotted step in America which will eventually end in the death penalty for "anti‑Semitism," just as it operates today in the Soviet Union. The Jewish press had admitted to Christianity that Communism and Freemasonry were Jewish inventions. Rabbi Lee J. Levinger goes so far in his book, Fold and Faith, the Confirmants Guide Book, as to claim that Jesus was a Jewish Rabbi whose sole aim was to lead the Christians through tolerance into the Jewish fold.

This is reflected in the writings of the Jew Lazare, who wrote:

"The Jew is not satisfied with de‑Christianising, he Judaises; he destroys Catholic or Protestant faith, he provokes indifference but he imposes his idea of the world, of morals, and life upon those whose faith he ruins."

The stupidity of the gentiles in fighting each other for the sole benefit of our race which "knows no nationality" except our own and who for two thousand years have never fought a battle for themselves. Do Jews think they can bamboozle the stupid Christians forever? It is certain that Christians are beginning to realize that the Jews intend to make them their slaves.

The Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve Banking System with its decisive influence upon the Tax System is in our hands; it exercises its colossal power at its own discretion in conformity with the famous statement at its own discretion in conformity with the famous statement of Mayer Amschel Rothschild, whose house is dominating the financial policy of practically every country in the world: "Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws."

So:

"When former Secretary of the Treasury, the Jew, Henry Morgenthau's plan for dealing with Germany was made public, it was received with wide‑spread condemnation by the press and by Congress. It has never received Congressional approval. Nevertheless, the State Department issued a directive to General Eisenhower on October 17, 1945, incorporating the main features of Mr. Morgenthau's plan. This plan had the hearty approval of the American communists and the Soviet Union. It may in fact, have been originally drawn up by, the Jew, Harry Dexter White and the Jew Gregory N. Silvermaster of the Treasury Department, both of whom have Communist records." [140]

But you may be certain that the Christians will not be intimidated forever as evidenced by the efforts the Jews have failed in their efforts made in the fiasco of the so‑called "sedition trial" in Washington where it was shown that the Treasury Department ably supported by members of our race and with few exceptions, by the press which the Jews control, sought through that action to intimidate and frighten every opponent to them and to Communism.

The defendants did not realize the enormous odds against which they were pitted. This was the second time the Jews have attempted to send patriotic Americans to jail for their efforts to prevent the complete takeover of the United States by an alien nation which hates Almighty God, the Lord Jesus Christ, Christians and the United States with a passion not understood or realized by those who have not studied the situation as it has developed over the past three thousand years.

This pattern of sedition was really shown up in a masterly way by Representative Dondero in a speech to be found in the Congressional Record of January 23, 1946, where he proved that the Communists are trying to break the morale of the Army and aid Communistic activities; that all of the files of the Intelligence Branches on subversive activities were called back to Washington to be destroyed and that the order for this was issued by Lt. Gen. Joseph T. McNarney, Eisenhower's successor in Europe; that over two hundred Communists were commissioned with none rejected in the Army from October 30, 1944 to December 30, 1944, when instructions were sent to all commanding officers at home, behind the lines and at battle fronts stating that there should no discharges for Communist activities.

Anyone who would honor the Jews after learning what has been presented in this presentation is a Traitor to Almighty God The Lord Jesus Christ; The Holy Spirit and The United States of America: The New Jerusalem and New Zion!

In spite of such sound warnings James Waterman Wise, the son of Rabbi S.S. Wise, born in Hungary, wrote in The New Masses on October 29, 1935:

"Jews who deny that many Jews are Communists are jockeying themselves into the position of citizens on tolerance...The Jews of America write themselves down as Communists; so be it."

And this same Wise was reported in The New York City Press on October 29, 1934, as telling a Jewish congregation assembled the day before in Carnegie Hall, that the,

"United States Needed a Dose of the Reds, that the direction, plan and purposefulness of Russia, had enabled that nation to achieve something no other nation has."

In view of all these facts, which could be multiplied, it is obvious that the Jews have lost their most effective weapon; the Conspiracy of Silence. Too much material is now commonly known which proves to the Christians who will listen and learn their heretofore hidden plans for world domination as well as their innate hatred of Christians and Christianity.

Jewish papers contemptuously speak of American gentiles as morons, mongrels or hodgepodge, phrases we have noted many times. Christians, however, are beginning to see that the Jews do not wish to join the American melting pot which is the first prerequisite for participating in true Americanism. These same papers state with pride that in the last one hundred and sixty years less than one percent of our race intermarried with Christians. Some married a Christian girl and their families ostracized them for this mortal sin.

What do we not observe? Hordes of Asiatics; Jews, impelled by what the Jewish Russian‑born Judge Simon Rifkind [Who was General McNary's "good right arm"] talked of the "bugaboo" of a Jewish world conspiracy, are finding their way into Western Europe: From there, unknown thousands of them are making their way into America where they are to find, according to the late President Truman's announcement: "...a haven of refuge."

The term "Melting Pot," correctly used for more than a century, is now replaced by other terms such as "Acculturation," or "Philharmony of Nations." This growth of Jewish immigration constitutes a swarm of human locusts just as foretold in the prophecy of the Old Testament in the Second Book of Joel. They destroy as they come and that is the purpose of having them come here.

These countless Jews, unwilling to be assimilated, are impelled, not by any "bugaboo," but by a diabolical plot directed by very clever men; such men as expressed their plot in The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. This "bugaboo," Judge Rifkind to the contrary, is real and man‑made. these hordes come as anti‑Christian, and are fostering an intense hatred which the Jews have nurtured for centuries. They come to what for them is no longer a "Melting Pot" but for the purpose of "Acculturation" which their high command expects to make their own: to promote the mongrelizing and the enslavement of the Christian peoples of the world.

If this is not true why are they not directed to that paradise which was created for them in Palestine, by their own Jewish leaders of Soviet Russia? Why, no, you ask? Because they must; as outlined in the Protocols of theirs, be provided with victims from races other than our own; because we cannot practice anti‑Christianism

in a solely Jewish State.

But God is working, and Christian Americans are slowly becoming aroused and are beginning to realize that only such persons as are wholly absorbed in their "Melting Pot" can become true Americans, there is an ever growing danger facing the Jews as they contend for land in Palestine now owned by the Arabs, and that Christian Americans are also beginning to look upon the Jews as the only group refusing to put America first, they are beginning to realize that the Jews and everything they do is un‑American and may some day drive them out of our country altogether.

It is today a well recognized fact of life in the political circles in the United States that the censorship exercised today by the Zionists over the media for mass information, constitutes a virtual monopoly. It is likewise today, a well recognized fact of life in the political circles in the United States since President Wilson won his first election in 1912, as president of the United States, that elections in America are seldom won or lost today based upon the candidates' qualification for office. Elections in the United States since 1912, are won or lost on the battlefields of the media for mass information by character assassination.

Zionist ownership of the news media, or by Zionist control exercised by some devious corporate device in effect and in fact, censors the publishers, publishing houses, news and editorial policies of all the leading daily and Sunday newspapers, all the weekly and monthly news magazines, all the leading Radio and Television stations and networks, the entire Motion Picture Industry, the Entire Entertainment World and the Entire Book Publishing Industry , in effect and in fact The Entire Complex of Media for Mass Information in the United States, and is without doubt a brainwashing monopoly.

                           Zionist Jews Control News and Editorial Policies of the Mass Media

As a result of that condition which has existed in the United States, for approximately the last fifty years the grass roots population of the United States has only read, heard and seen what has passed the Zionist censorship and best served Jewish objectives, instead of reading, hearing and seeing what best served the interests of the grass roots population of the United States.

The Jewish‑Zionist‑ruled media for mass information in America has never informed the grass roots population of the United States how and why President Woodrow Wilson lied the United States into the desperate predicament in which America finds itself in the Middle East.

In their consideration recently of the alleged theft of the so‑called Pentagon Papers, the United States Supreme Court declared "the public has a right to know the truth." However, the Supreme Court should have said "the public has a right to know the Whole truth." As half‑truths are often more harmful than outright lies.

On April 2, 1917, President Wilson addressed both houses of Congress and pleaded with them to declare war against Germany. His appeal to Congress to declare war against Germany in was primarily President Wilson's liquidation of an obligation to his brother Jewish blackmailers. As a result of his plea the United States declared war against Germany on April 6, 1917. The following incontestable facts confirm that conclusion beyond all question of any doubt.

When President Wilson asked Congress to declare war against Germany, he was in effect and in fact conspiring to pay the debt he obligated himself to pay to his fellow Jewish Zionists. Congress only declared war against Germany because he informed them that a German submarine had sunk the S.S. Sussex in the English Channel in violation of international law and that United States citizens aboard the S.S. Sussex had perished along with the ship.

However, after General Pershing's troops had been fighting in Europe for some time, the hoax was exposed. The alleged sinking of The S.S. Sussex was used as the "pretext" to justify a declaration of war against Germany by the United States. The S.S Sussex had Not Been Sunk and no American citizens had lost their lives. But the United States was now at war in Europe as Great Britain's ally. That is what Great Britain and the Jews of the world had conspired to achieve in their crooked diplomatic underworld.

The discovery of the hoax by the British Navy shocked many honorable Englishmen. A large segment of the British public were shocked to learn the S.S. Sussex had not been sunk. That in fact the S.S. Sussex was available for anyone to visit who might care to do so to see for themselves, with their own eyes what an outlandish lie that had been perpetrated upon the citizens of the United States.

Because of that Jewish lie the United States mobilized 4,734,991 men to serve in the armed forces, of whom 115,516 were killed and 202,002 were either injured or maimed for life.

The Right Honorable Francis Neilson, a member of Parliament, wrote a book in England called Makers of War pages 149‑150. Mr Neilson's book created such a sensation that he was compelled to resign his seat in Parliament. Things became so intolerable for him in Great Britain, because of Jewish pressure, as a result of the exposures in his book, that he was compelled for his personal safety to flee from his home in Great Britain and to make his home in the United States.

In Mr. Neilson's book Makers of War on pages 149‑150, he discloses many unsuspected and undisclosed reasons for the outbreak of World War I in Europe in August 1914. With reference to the alleged sinking of the S.S. Sussex in the English Channel, he emphasizes:

"In American, Woodrow Wilson, desperate to find a pretext to enter the war, found it at last in the 'sinking' of the Sussex in mid‑channel. Someone invented a yarn that American lives had been lost. With this excuse he went to Congress for a declaration of war. Afterwards, the navy found that the Sussex had not been sunk, and that no lives had been lost."

There is no doubt whatever, The alleged sinking of the S.S. Sussex was conceived in the imagination of the Jews to facilitate the purpose planned, to get America into the war, and was successfully executed.

                                                               Justice Brandeis ‑ The Pay Off

The day soon arrived when President Wilson was presented with the necessity of appointing a new member of the United States Supreme Court. A dream close to the heart's of the Zionists of the world; the placement of a Zionist Jew on the United States Supreme Court. None had ever served upon it. At which time Wilson recommended Louis Dembitz Brandeis for the vacancy, who was immediately confirmed by Congress. President Wilson and Justice Brandeis became unusually close intimate friends. But the American people never knew that both were Zionist Jews.

In 1914, Justice Brandeis was the most prominent and most politically influential of all the Zionists in the United States. As a justice Brandeis was in a better position than ever before to be of service to his fellow Zionist Jews, both at home and abroad. It was justice Brandeis who gave the opinion to President Wilson that the sinking of the S.S. Sussex by a German submarine in the English Channel with the loss of lives of United States citizens would justify the declaration of war against Germany the United States. Relying upon this legal opinion of Justice Brandeis, President Wilson addressed both house of Congress on April 2, 1917. So he appealed to Congress to declare war against Germany and they did on April 7, 1917.

After the October 1916, The Balfour Declaration was concluded between the British War Cabinet and the World Zionist Organization, the Jews throughout the world were hopeful that an international incident would soon occur to justify a declaration of war against Germany by the United States.

The declaration of war against Germany by the United States guaranteed the Zionist Jews throughout the world that Palestine was to be turned over to them upon the defeat of Germany. The defeat of Germany was certain if the United States could be railroaded into the war in Europe as Great Britain's ally.

Guided by the recommendation of Justice Brandeis that the sinking of the S.S. Sussex justified a declaration of war under international law against Germany by the United States. President then addressed a joint session of both houses of Congress on April 2, 1917, and in that address he pleaded with Congress to declare war against Germany. As a result Congress met on April 6, 1917, and declared war against Germany Without justification.

President Wilson and Justice Brandeis knew something the grass roots population of the United States did not know; they knew the full particulars about the October 1916 London Agreement which is known today as the Balfour Declaration.

They also knew the declaration of war against Germany by the United States activated this agreement and believed the Jews of the world would not have long to wait for the land of Palestine, which was to become their sovereign Jewish Zionist State, if their plan worked. There has seldom ben an address made to Congress that stirred the people of the United States, and to the world, as did President Wilson's in his April 2, 1917, plea to Congress to declare war against Germany. Wilson was also aware when he addressed Congress, that Germany had not committed any act against the United States which justified a Declaration of War by the United States Against Germany Under International Law.

                                  England's Prime Minister Lloyd George: A Jewish Zionist Tool

There were a great number of Jews in the United States who questioned the reality of the October 1916, London Agreement. They found it extremely difficult to believe that Great Britain would promise to turn over Palestine to them as compensation for railroading the United States into the war in Europe as Great Britain's ally. These Jews could not believe that Great Britain would promise anything to anyone that they did not own as compensation. It appeared inconceivable to the Jews familiar with Great Britain's reputation for respect of property rights under their laws.

To overcome the doubts that existed in the minds of the Jews in the United States, Prime Minister Lloyd George immediately sent Mr. Josiah Wedgewood to the United States. Mr. Wedgewood was one of the most respected and dedicated members of Parliament.

Prime Minister Lloyd George, a rabid well‑known Zionist Jew, was unexpectedly appointed Prime Minister on December 4, 1916. He rushed Mr. Wedgewood to the United States on December 5, 1916. It is well known that the prime minister whom Lloyd George succeeded was unsympathetic towards Zionist objectives. Therefore, he was replaced at that time because the Zionists could not control him.

Great Britain was helpless in October 1916; it was seriously considering surrender to Germany, who had made several peace offers to them earlier to discontinue the war. Mr. Lloyd George considered Mr. Wedgewood's hasty trip to the United States as vital to Great Britain's survival. So Mr. Wedgewood came to the United States with documented evidence proving the reality of the October 1916, London Agreement; The Balfour Declaration, thus proving its reality to the Jews of America.

                                                         Colonel House A Conspiring Enigma

Mr. Wedgewood arrived in the United States on December 23, 1916. Upon his arrival he was met at the pier by Colonel Edward Mandel House, President Wilson's closest personal friend and most trusted adviser. Col. House in his early life negotiated cotton purchases in America for Rothschild interests in Great Britain, and arranged for Mr. Wedgewood to live in his apartment on 54th Street during his stay in the United States.

Col. House quickly made arrangements for the meeting at which Wedgewood was to prove the reality of the Balfour Declaration. The meeting was to be held on Sunday afternoon, December 25, 1916, at the old Hotel Savoy at 59th Street and Fifth Avenue in New York City. There were fifty‑one influential Jews invited to attend. Col House introduced Wedgewood to the audience, after which he then presided over the meeting.

Wedgewood presented evidence there that left no doubt in the minds of the fifty‑one Jews present about the reality of the Balfour Declaration. On behalf of Lloyd George, Wedgewood further vouched for the reality of Great Britain's pledge that Palestine would be turned over to the Jews of the world by Great Britain upon the defeat of Germany as compensation for railroading the United States into the war in Europe as Great Britain's ally.

After concluding the Balfour Declaration the Jews in England were invited by Great Britain to take an increasingly active participation in Great Britain's Department of Defense for the duration of the war. The Jews who accepted the invitation were trained as experts in the use of England's codes and their worldwide diplomatic cable facilities.

The available data in the English archives for World War I will dispel any and all existing doubt as to whether the information cabled to Washington from London on the alleged sinking of the S.S. Sussex was cabled by the Jews in the Department of Defense in London to their counterparts in Washington. The available data on this matter leaves nothing to conjecture.

The hoax alleging the sinking of the Sussex and the loss of American lives was the invention of the Jews in London to facilitate and expedite the railroading of the United States into the war in Europe. The hoax was discovered by the British Navy. It was also confirmed by other equally reliable sources for the information on the subject by qualified experts in the United States.

The Balfour Declaration was known to the Germans shortly after it was concluded, in fact, on the same day. Germany thereafter exercised great care both on land and on the sea, so as not to commit any act which, under international law, could possibly provide the United States with the justification to declare war against Germany. The German military and naval commanders leaned over backwards in their efforts not to provide the United States with a reason for war and for a long time were successful.

The Germans had reason to feel if the war in Europe continued for just a few more months without the entrance of the United States into the war, that Britain would be compelled to surrender to Germany by circumstances beyond England's power to control.  Germany made another peace offer to England in October 1916. England this time welcomed the offer but it was declined because they knew the power the Jews were able to exercise over the thinking of the people of the United States, through their ownership of most of the newspapers and magazines.

In referring to the declaration of war against Germany by America, Sir Winston Churchill said in an interview with a prominent editor, and published in Scribner's Commentator in 1936, that he "could never understand why he put us in 1917," referring to President Wilson.

In that Sir Winston Churchill stated further:

"America should have minded her own business and stayed out of the World War. If you hadn't entered the war the Allies would have made peace with Germany in the spring of 1917. Had we made peace there would have been no collapse of Russia followed by Communism, no breakdown in Italy followed by Fascism, and Germany would not have signed the Versailles Treaty, which has enthroned Nazism in Germany. If America had stayed out of the war, all of these 'isms' wouldn't be sweeping the continent of Europe and breaking down parliamentary government, and if England made peace early in 1917, it would have saved over one million British, French, American and other lives."

Germany's peace offer to England asked for neither indemnities nor reparations. Germany offered to restore the territorial status and the political independence of every country with whom Great Britain was at war, as they existed in August 1914, when the war in Europe started. Germany demanded no benefits.

                                     The Jews Select America's Ally For The First World War

Germany's October 1916, peace offer was on the table before the British War Cabinet; it needed only one signature to end the war. England would have quickly accepted their peace offer if the World Jewish Zionist Organization had not interfered.

The British War Cabinet was then taking their instructions from the Jews in London. When the British War Cabinet decided to accept Germany's peace offer, the World Jewish Zionist Organization offered to trick the United States into the war in Europe as Britain's ally if they would promise the Jews of the world Palestine as compensation after Germany's defeat at the hand of the Americans.

Jewish pressure in London and New York prevailed. President Wilson, himself Jewish, made his address and Congress, without hesitation or investigation, declared war against Germany at his request. The Germans attributed, and rightly so, their crushing defeat in World War I to the entry of the United States into that war. Germany also considered the Balfour Declaration as a stab in the back by the Jews of the world. And they were correct in this also:

The Jews have always been the most traitious people that have ever existed in the history of the world. They have never been faithful to any country they have resided in. They are truly an evil people. And well does the Scriptures declare that they cannot be saved, and are the Devil's Children!

With a view towards the Emancipation Edict issued in Germany in 1822, the Germans regarded the Balfour Declaration as a doublecross by the Jews who lived in Germany. Quota systems then existed in all the countries in Europe, but there was no quota system in Germany after the Emancipation Edict of 1822. Talmudist Jews Promise Germans Victory, then stab them in the Back.

 

The Kaiser provided the World Zionist Organization with the offices for their world headquarters in Berlin. He, his family and government officials were constantly extending assistance to Theodore Herzl. Germany had extended opportunities to the Jews not available to them in any other European country. The Kaiser himself personally arranged the meeting between the Sultan of the Ottoman Empire and The leading Zionist Jew Theodore Herzl.

Bleichroeder & Company in Berlin were the private bakers of the Kaiser's family for generations. They were Jews. Warburg & Company of Hamburg were the world's largest Merchant Bankers. They were Jews. The head of the German General Electric Company, then the world's largest industrial enterprise, was a Jew. The head of the Hamburn‑American and North German Lloyd Steamship Companies, the two largest steamship companies in the world, second only to the Cunard Line, was a Jew. Countless prominent German industrialists, bankers and merchants were Jews.

So the attitude of the Germans towards the Jews in Germany and throughout the world worsened much after the October 1916 stab in the back by the Jews. Mr. Samuel Landman, the secretary of the World Jewish Zionist Organization in London from 1917 to 1922, wrote in his book, Great Britain, the Jews and Palestine, published in London in 1936, on page six:

"The fact that it was Jewish help that brought the U.S.A. into the war on the side of the allies has rankled ever since in German; especially Nazi, minds and has contributed in no small measure to the prominence which anti‑Semitism occupied in the Nazi programme."

The sentiments of prominent German leaders were expressed in the Jewish Daily Bulletin of New York City on October 30, 1934, in an article reprinted on page three from the Jewish Telegraphic Agency dispatched from Berlin which stated:

"The New Germany persists toward the complete extermination of the Jew because it was Jews who instigated the United States to enter the World War, accomplishing the defeat of Germany, and who later caused the inflation in Germany, Herr Richard Kunze, a leading Nazi Parliament figure, declared at a mass meeting in Magdeburg yesterday."

The Jews throughout the world made matters worse on August 7, 1933, when they declared their "Holy War" to Destroy The German NAtion "by destroying their export trade upon which their very existence depends." Under the leadership of Mr. Samuel Untermeyer, the Jews of the world declared a world boycott on all German goods and services. They asked their "Christian friends" to join their worldwide boycott of German goods and services.

It was Mr. Samuel Untermeyer, who arranged for the "International Boycott Conference" in Amsterdam in July of 1933. There he was elected the president of the "World Jewish Economic Federation." The Jews throughout the world had tried in vain since 1919 to destroy German resentment against them for tricking the United States into the war in Europe without justification or provocation. The Jews were held, and rightly so, responsible for Germany's defeat and for every disadvantage that resulted from that defeat.

The New York Times on August 7, 1933, published the Jews declaration of their "holy war" against Germany in a three‑column report of Mr. Untermeyer's address to the nation from the Columbia Broadcasting Company's studio on the night of his arrival home from Europe.

He stated, among other things:

"...holy war...in which we are embarked...it is a war which must be waged unremittingly...the Jews are the aristocrats of the world...the economic boycott against all German goods, shipping and services...boycott is our only really effective weapon...bring the German people to their senses by destroying their export trade on which their very existence depends...we shall force them to learn...it is not sufficient that you buy no goods in Germany...you must refuse to deal with any merchant or shopkeeper who sells any German‑made goods...we will drive the last nail in the coffin..."

That statement was made on August 7, 1933, when not a hair on the head of a Jew in all of Germany had been touched. Germany was emershed in a depression difficult to describe in a few words, their export business suddenly ended as if by magic. The Jews hoped in that way to stop the Germans from continuing to talk about why they lost the war. The Jews in Germany were finding it difficult to live that down. Because the Germans at that time felt the way Winston Churchill in 1936 expressed himself about the entry of the United States into World War I in 1917.

                                   Jewish International Banks Financed Bolshevik Revolution

The Jewish Chronicle , London, April 4, 1919 stated:

"There is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself, that so many Jews are Bolsheviks. The ideals of Bolshevism are consonant with many of the highest ideals of Judaism."

While the Bolshevik Revolution overthrew Czar Nicholas II of Russia in 1917, its beginnings occurred many decades earlier. It is no accident that Karl Marx [A Jew descended from a long line of Talmudic Rabbis], wanted to overthrow the "free enterprise" system and install communism throughout the world.

One of his chief assistants credited with developing Marxism was Rabbi Moses Hess.  A.S. Rappoport, a Jew, writing in Fortnightly Review in April of 1911, pages 654‑55, said the International Jewish banker, James Rothschild, financed the first communist publication advocating the overthrow of the Czars. It was entitled The Bell and was published by the Jew Alexander Hertz in the mid‑1900s.

The famous White Russian philosopher and anarchist, Mikhyl Bakunyin [Who opposed the Czars; but was also against Jewish Communism], charged in the 1870's that the Jews had seized control of the newspapers and banks in Russia. He added:

"This Jewish world of today is largely at the disposal of Marx or Rothschild. I am sure that, on the one hand, the Rothschilds appreciate the merits of Marx, and on the other hand, Marx feels an instinctive inclination and a great respect for the Rothschilds."

                                           Jewish Terrorists Assassinated Russian Patriots

Around the turn of the century radical Jews organized a terrorist society called, "The Jewish Socialist Bund" later shortened to "Jewish Bund." After several attempts to assassinate the Czar, Alexander II, they finally succeeded in 1881. The killers were two Jewesses, Hesia Helfman and Vera Figner. They operated under the Jew Grigory Gershuni who ran a nationwide terrorist underground.

A Democratic reformist member of Parliament, Peter Stolypin, was moving Russia toward free elections and land reform. This would have undermined the plans of the Jewish Bund for a future Communist State. Therefore, Stolypin was assassinated by the Jew Mordecai Bogrov in September of 1911, while attending a gala court in Kiev. The terrorist acts carried out by young Jew revolutionaries was admitted by the well known Jew Simon Dubnow, the author of, The History of The Jews.

He wrote:

"In Russia itself the Jewish revolutionaries were heart and soul devoted to the cause [of Socialism]. The children of the ghetto displayed considerable heroism and self‑sacrifice in the revolutionary upheaval of the seventies. Jews figured in all important political trails and public manifestations."

During the 100 year period before the Soviet Revolution, over 7 million Jews lived in Russia. They seethed with discontent and rebellion against the Christian Czars for imagined "discrimination and anti‑Semitism." The Jews sought to monopolize trade through usury and buying out successful Christian businesses [I ask you have they changed at all over the years to this very day?].

The well‑known Jewish historian Abraham Sachar wrote in History of the Jews,

"All through the twelfth century Jews in Poland prospered as merchants, traders and tax farmers. Many of them were in charge of the mints, and the Polish coins sometimes bore the names of the princes in Hebrew characters!  After the middle of the thirteenth century the Jews became the only commercial class in a country of landlords and peasants. The peasants who were being exploited by the nobles, hated the tools of tyranny more than tyranny itself."

There were many localized peasant uprisings and "pograms" against the Jews. The Czars sought to quiet the exploited Christians by requiring the Jews to live in certain Western areas of Russia. The Czars sought to keep the Jews out of certain lines of work so they couldn't swindle Christians out of their money or property. This did not work because through financial loans to the nobles and out right bribery of local officials Jews seized control of the professions, medicine, law and teaching. The Russian census of 1897, shows that seven out of every eight professionals were Jews. Organized Jewry did not show any change of heart toward the Czar for their good fortune under his rule and continued to plot his downfall.

Prior to 1900, practically all of the Bolshevik revolutionaries were Jews. Their violent Russian language newspaper The Spark was for years published in Munich by revolutionary Jews, smuggled into Russia by the Jews and distributed by radical Jews.

About the middle of the last century, Jacob Brafmann, a Jewish rabbi in Russia, became a convert to Christianity and spent the rest of his life endeavoring to throw light on the Jewish questions in general, and on the situation in Russia in particular, both in the interest of gentiles and of the Jews themselves. His two works, The Book of the Kahal, and The Jewish Brotherhoods, were first published at government expense some sixty years ago and are still the best source of information on many points. Brafmann's story, given in his own words in the preface to the Book of the Kahal, is as follows:

     "During his majesty's (Alexander II) stay at Minsk in 1858, I submitted to him a report on the social status and organization of the Jews in Russia. Some time after, by order of the holy synod (April 29, 1859), I was called to St. Petersburg in connection with the report, and was subsequently (may 13, 1860) appointed professor of Hebrew at the Minsk seminary. I was also charged with finding a means for overcoming the obstacles to conversion to Christianity set up by the Jews...Thoroughly familiar with the Jewish question (as I had professed Judaism till the age of thirty‑four), I knew where to draw the materials necessary for the work, and the archbishop of Minsk furnished me with the means.

     My task was facilitated by the co‑operation of several enlightened Jews. I thus obtained valuable material which served not only for the work at hand, but also to throw light on the Jewish question in general, as well as their social and religious organization in Russia.

     This material included over a thousand acts of the Jewish Kahal (civil administration), and of the beth‑dins (Talmudic law courts), showing the power and extent of their secret government. The Kahal goes so far as to decree what individuals may be invited to, and what dishes served at, a Jewish family feast.

     On the important question, whether the law of the land is binding on the Jews, the comments in the Talmud are evasive, but the documents...show that the Jews must abide by the instructions of the Kahal and the beth‑din, in contradistinction to the law of the land and their own conscience.

     Similarly, on the question of the real estate and appurtenances belonging to non‑Jews, the Talmud is obscure; but the thirty‑seven acts cited in our fifth article prove conclusively that the Kahal may sell to Jews the right (Hasaka and Meropie) to the real estate and appurtenances of any gentile. The documents also prove that the Kahal and the beth‑din are not bound to judge according to Jewish law, but may hand down personal decisions as they please...

     Thus, by secret acts, the Jews circumvent their Christian competitors and acquire a controlling share of the capital and real estate of the country. I submitted these documents together with my recommendations to Gov. Gen. von Kaufmann, who appointed a commission to examine them, with the result that the official Jewish Kahal was suppressed by the circular of August 34, 1867.

     The authenticity of all the documents is thoroughly established; the 290 documents published herewith cover the period from 1794 to 1803. To facilitate their study, they have been arranged in seventeen categories, each preceded by a short explanation on the laws and customs referred to, and indicating their real aim and influence on the Jews and on the gentiles."

                                                                    The Writing On The Wall

The Cabbalistic signifance of the mysterious inscription found on the wall of the room in which the Imperial Russian Family was murdered. The three letters of the inscription are the letter "L" repeated three times in three different languages. In pictures reproduced in several books, the characters appear as though reversed, and written from right to left. But this is not the case, and is explained by the position assumed by the writer, who stood with his back to the wall, with his right arm stretched down, and formed the letters from right to left, in the Hebrew manner. The first letter on the right is an L (lamed) in the cursive handwriting of the ancient Hebrew alphabet. It is the twelfth letter of that alphabet with the numerical value of 30 (cabbalistically reduced to the fundamental number: ‑ 3 + 0 = 3, which explains why the letter "L" is thrice repeated in the inscription). These cabalistic interpretation of letters and words can be found in the following books: Kircher, Oedipus Aegyptiacus; Lenain, La Science Cabbalistique; Dee, Monas Hieroglyphica; H. Krumrath, Amphitheatre de l'eternel sapience; Franck, La Cabbale. The second letter is also the letter lamed but in the Samaritan script.

The third letter is the Greek letter lambda, corresponding to the same letter lamed. In ancient Hebrew, based on the ancient sacred language of the Egyptian temples, each letter, apart from its vernacular value as sound and number, has, moreover, secret meanings known only to adepts. Fabre d'Olivet thus characterizes the accumulation of the different meanings contained in the ancient Hebrew alphabet [141] :

"Moses, in his teaching, followed the method of the Egyptian priests who made use of three methods to express their thoughts: the first was the common use; the second was symbolical or figurative; the third was sacred or hieroglyphic. Such was the character of that language. According to their will, the same word had the ordinary, figurative or the allegorical meaning. Heraclitus has expressed this difference in three terms: namely, the spoken word, the symbol, and the hidden meaning."

Moreover, each letter stood for one of the names of God, and for one of the mysterious keys of the Tarot, the sacred book wherein, under different images, is concentrated all the ancient practice of magical science. The name of God, corresponding to the letter lamed, is Shadai, composed of three letters, represented by the Greek capital letter D and it governs the sphere of Saturn. The number of Saturn is also 3. This explains once again why the letter lamed is thrice repeated.

On the other hand, following cabalistic teaching, the letter lamed stands for the heart, the king of the body, wherein dwells the soul, Ruach. Cabbalists affirm that man is formed of three main invisible parts: namely, Nesham, the mind, Ruach, the soul, and Nefesh, the lower soul or subconscience which governs directly the material body. Nesham has its seat in the brain; Nefesh, in the liver, and Ruach, in the center, between liver and brain, namely, in the heart. According to the ancients, the heart is king of the body (Melek = king), and, we repeat again, was situated in the body between brain and liver, that is, in the center [The report made by Leinigen to the Munich Psychological Society, March 3, 1887]. This is clearly shown by the cabalistic analysis of the word Melek ‑ king.

Three words are fused in one: "brain," represented by the first letter of the word mem; "heart" by the first letter of the word lamed; and "liver," by the first letter of the word kaph, which is the same letter as "J", but in the form used at the end of a word. It is clear, therefore, that the letter L (lamed), symbolizing the "heart," which is found in the center between "liver" and "brain," is placed in the word Melek between letters representing these two organs. To cipher the real meaning, cabbalists frequently resort to a special kind of hieroglyphics, one form of which is synthetic, whereby a word is concealed by several others. For instance, the first letters of several words are taken and assembled in one word, as in the present case in the word Melek.

The inscriptions found on the wall of the room in Ekaterinburg where the Tsar Nicholas II and his Family were murdered, in 1918, by order of the Bolsheviks, is reproduced in several books such as Waters Flowing Eastward, by L. Fry. The town was retaken from the Bolsheviks, a few weeks after the murder, by the forces of General Denikin, at whose command an official inquest was instituted: the bodies of the Imperial Family were exhumed, etc., and a careful record of the proceedings was kept. The name of the town has since been changed by the Bolsheviks to Sverdlovsk, after the Jewish President, Sverdlov, of the Court which ordered the murder.

Therefore, according to the ancients, the heart (lamed) is the king (Melek) of the organism and the seat of life. The destruction of the heart causes the death of the organism and, in symbolical language, it also means that the destruction of the king brings about the downfall of the kingdom. Furthermore, in studying the hidden meaning of the roots, one discovers that the root LL (double lamed), still found in Arabic, means the agony of a man being torn to pieces. The addition of a third only strengthens this meaning and indicates the agony of a desperate situation.

Interpreting the inscription on the wall with the help of the Tarot, one finds that the letter L corresponds to the twelfth card of the Great Arcana [The Arcana (arcana = mysterious) are the cards of the Tarot: the Great Arcana, of which there are twenty‑two, correspond to the letters of the sacred alphabet which was first of all Egyptian and afterwards became Jewish. Their invention is attributed to the founder of the Egyptian secret science, Hermes Tot or Trismegistos. Our playing cards today originally came from the Lesser Arcana], and also the letter Luzain, of the sacred language of the Egyptian Magi.

This arcanum represents a man hanging by one foot from a pole whose two ends rest on two trees from each of which six branches have been cut. The man's arms are tied behind his back and folded so as to form the base of a triangle pointing downwards; the apex is formed by the head of the man. It is the sign of violent death, but it can also mean sacrifice (p. Christian, Historie de la Magie).

Therefore, reading the cabalistic meaning of the three letters, one gets: Here the King was struck to the heart in punishment of his crimes, or, here the King was sacrificed to bring about the destruction of his kingdom. Finally, the line drawn beneath these three letters (in magical Science the horizontal line is the symbol of the passive principle) indicates that those who killed the king did not do so of their own will, but in obedience to superior command.

Whoever wrote this inscription was a man well versed in the secrets of the ancient Jewish cabalism, as contained in the Cabala and the Talmud. In accomplishing the deed in obedience to superior order, this man performed a rite of Black Magic. It is for this reason that he commemorated his act by a cabalistic inscription in cipher, which belonged to the rite.

The inscription therefore proves:

   1). That the Tsar was killed;

   2). That the murder of the Tsar was committed by men under the command of occult forces; and by an organization which, in its struggle against existing power resorted to the ancient cabalism in which it was well versed.

                                                 U.S. State Department Document Suppressed

Probably the most superficially damning collection of documents on the Jewish conspiracy is in the State Department Decimal File (861.00/5339). The central document is one entitled "Bolshevism and Judaism," dated November 13, 1918.

The text is in the form of a report, which states that the revolution in Russia was engineered "in February 1916" and "it was found that the following persons and firms were engaged in this destructive work":

(1) Jacob Schiff..................................................Jew

(2) Kuhn, Loeb & Co.......................................Jewish Firm

Management: Jacob Schiff......................................Jew

Felix Warburg.....................................Jew

Otto H. Kahn......................................Jew

Mortimer L. Schiff................................Jew

Jerome J. Hanauer.................................Jew

(3) Guggenheim....................................................Jew

(4) Max Breitung..................................................Jew

(5) Isaac Seligman................................................Jew

The report goes on to assert that there can be no doubt that the Russian Revolution was started and engineered by this group and that in April of 1917:

"Jacob Schiff in fact made a public announcement and it was due to his financial influence that the Russian revolution was successfully accomplished and in the Spring of 1917, Jacob Schiff started to finance Trotsky, a Jew, for the purpose of accomplishing a social revolution in Russia. The report contains other miscellaneous information about Max Warburg's financing of Trotsky, the role of the Rheinish‑Westphalian syndicate and Olof Aschberg of the Nya Banken (Stockholm) together with Jivotovsky. The anonymous author (actually employed by the U.S. War Trade Board) states that the links between these organizations and their financing of the Bolshevik Revolution show how 'the link between Jewish multi‑millionaires and Jewish proletarians was forged.'"

The report goes on to list a large number of Bolsheviks who were also Jews and then describes the actions of Paul Warburg, Judus Magnes, Kuhn, Loeb & Company, and Speyer & Company.

                                                    The Jews Financed Japan's War On Russia

The Japanese attack upon Russia in the 1904‑05, war was financed by the super‑rich New York Jew, Jacob Schiff, the head of Kuhn, Loeb & Co. Schiff, the richest Jewish, so‑called capitalist bankrolled the Japanese with a $25‑million loan which today would be worth hundreds of millions.

The following was reported in The Jewish Communal Register of New York City for 1917‑1918; it was edited and published by the Kehillah (Jewish Community) of New York City at 356 Second Ave. New York City, New York:

     "Schiff, Jacob Henry, was born in 1847, at Frankfort‑on‑the‑Maine, Germany. He received his education in the schools of Frankfort. In 1865 he came to America, where he settled in New York City. Here, he joined the staff of a banking house. In 1873, he returned to Europe where he made connections with some of the chief German banking houses. Upon returning to the United States, he entered the banking firm of Kuhn, Loeb and Company, New York, of which he later became the head. His firm became the financial reconstructors of the Union Pacific Railroad, and since then is strongly interested in American railroads.

     Mr. Schiff's principle of 'community of interests' among the chief railway combinations led to the formation of the Northern Securities Company, thus suppressing ruinous competition. The Firm of Kuhn, Loeb & Co., Floated the Large Japanese War Loans of 1904-5, Thus Making Possible The Japanese Victory over Russia. Mr. Schiff is director of numerous financial companies, among them the Central Trust Company, Western Union Telegraph Co...Mr. Schiff has always used his wealth and his influence in the best interests of his people. He Financed the Enemies of Autocratic Russia and used his Financial Influence to keep Russia from the money market of the United States. When last year, Mr. Schiff celebrated his seventieth birthday, All the Factions of Jewry in the United States and elsewhere united in paying tribute to him. "

As you can plainly see, Jacob Schiff was described here on pages 1018‑1019 of New York's Jewish Communal Register for 1917‑1918, was one of the wealthiest Jews in America. He headed the powerful Wall Street banking firm of Kuhn, Loeb. Yet Schiff, after first bankrolling the Japanese against the Russians in 1904, gave Trotsky and other Jewish communists $25‑million to launch the Bolshevik revolution of 1917. And some Americans still believe that there is a fundamental antithesis between Jewish capitalism and Jewish communism!

Also please note this article states: "...all the factions of Jewry in the United States and elsewhere united in paying tribute to him." [For trying to defeat and destroy the Christian Czarist Leadership of Russia]. The nearly all‑Jewish Bolshevik Party tried a short lived revolution in 1905. Hoping that by quickly following the defeat by Japan a weakened Czarist government would fall. But the revolt was crushed at that time. Even today, most of the Jews are pleased with their life in the Soviet Union. However, to day the Zionist leaders in the state known to the world as Israel say there are over 4 million Jews in Russia and that all of them are trying to leave Russia. This, we believe, is because the Jews know they have but a short time left before the truth about them will come out and they will be destroyed, by God, from off the face of the earth.

The last paragraph boasts:

"Mr. Schiff has always used his wealth and his influence in the best interests of his people. He financed the enemies of the autocratic Russia. [This was written in 1918, after the Bolshevik revolution had been made secure]...and used his financial influence to keep Russia from the money market of the United States."

It is stated that "all factions of Jewry" hailed him for this. "Today it is estimated by Jacob's grandson, John Schiff, a prominent member of New York society, that the old man sank about $20‑million for the final triumph of Bolshevism in Russia." [142]

                                                                      More On Jacob Schiff

The New York Times on March 24, 1917, reported a speech made by George Kennan. Who was the head of a group

called, "Friends of Russian Freedom" which just happened to be financed by Jacob Schiff. It quotes him as saying

in part:

     "Mr. Kennan told of the work of the Friends of Russian Freedom in the revolution. He said that during the Japanese‑Russian War he was in Tokyo, and that he was permitted to make visits among the 12,000 Russian prisoners in Japanese hands at the end of the first year of the war.

     He had conceived the idea of putting revolutionary propaganda into the Russian Army. The Japanese authorities favored it and gave him permission. After which he sent to America for all the Russian revolutionary literature to be had. He said that one day Dr. Nicolas Russell came to him in Tokyo, unannounced and said that he had been sent to help the work.

     The movement was financed by a New York banker you all know and love,' he said, referring to Mr. Schiff. '...and so soon we received a ton and a half of Russian revolutionary propaganda. At the end of the war 50,000 Russian officers and men went back to their country ardent revolutionists. The Friends of Russian Freedom had sowed 50,000 seeds of liberty in 100 Russian regiments. I do not know how many of these officers and men were in the Petrograd fortress last week, but we do know what part the army took in the revolution.

     Then we read a telegram from Jacob H. Schiff, part of which is as follows: Will you say for me to those present at tonight's meeting how deeply I regret my inability to celebrate with the Friends of Russian Freedom the actual reward of what we had hoped and striven for these long years."

Further documentation on the extent of Jacob Schiff's secret role behind the Bolshevik revolution appeared in the New York Journal‑America of February 3, 1949. Society columnist Cholly Knickerbocker wrote:

"Today it is estimated even by Jacob's grandson, John Schiff, a prominent member of New York Society, that the old man sank about $20,000,000 for the final triumph of [Jewish] Bolshevism in Russia."

This certainly traces Jacob Schiff's communist activities from 1904 to 1918 in financing the Jewish‑Bolshevik overthrow of the Christian Czars of Russia.

                                                    Representative McFadden Warns America

Following is part of a speech [Which cost him his life] given by United States Representative McFadden, before Congress in 1934, and is recorded in the Congressional Record ‑‑ House pages 11841‑11844, in which he said:

     "Mr. Speaker, the recognition of Russia by the United States was consumated by President Roosevelt and M. Litvinoff, alias Finkelstein, representing Russia...one specific proof of the activities of the Russian Government I now desire to call your attention to a booklet entitled 'Why Communism?' by M.J. Olgin, published by Workers Library...which is Russian Communist Propaganda, a Russian born Jew, has a long history of revolutionary activities in the U.S. since 1915, took a Ph. D. degree at Columbia University. He has been editor of many racial publications in Soviet Russia before coming here, and in 1924, was a candidate for the New York State Assembly on the Communist party ticket.

     Students of radicalism know the present Soviet Government in Russia was organized by aliens and not representative of the thoughts and ideas of the 150 million citizens of Russia, and that the controlling body in 1930, was as follows:

Stalin                (Georgian Jew)   Soviet Political Bureau.

Micazan            (Georgian Jew)   Agriculture.

Monjinsky         (Polish Jew)       Head of the OGPU (KGB).

Ricoff                (Russian Jew)    Head of Committees.

Litvinoff  (Russian Jew)    Foreign Affairs.

Tomsky (Polish Jew)       Trade Union Control.

Kamener           (Russian Jew)    Concessions Department.

Russians           32         Armenions         10

Poles                2         Georgians           3

Checks             1         Hungarians          1

Letts                 34         Germans           10

Finns                3         Jews                 469

NOTE: The preponderance of Jews.

     It is significant to note that the recent overthrow of the German Government by The Hitler movement was caused by the preponderance of Jews in the German Government, in the Universities as Lawyers, as Physicians, as Bankers, The Complete Domination of All Exchanges, in Commerce, in The Theater, Moving Picture Industry and in Politics. And now in the present United States Government it is noticed that an increasing humber of Jews occupy high key positions in all departments. In this connection I quote from an article appearing in the Washington Herold under date of June 2, 1934: 'New York, June 2 ‑‑ Ten thousand persons in Madison Square Garden heard Earl Brodder, General Secretary of the Communist Party, declare tonight that The forces that created the Soviet Union are going to create a Soviet Power in Germany and the United States. '

     Brodder spoke at a meeting under the auspices of 100 Jewish organizations to celebrate the conferring of autonomy upon Biro‑Bidjon, in Eastern Siberia I want to remind loyal Americans that it is well to remember the boring‑from‑within tactics pursued by these aliens and usurpers who pursued these tactics in Soviet Russia which caused the downfall of their government and set up the present Communist‑Jewish controlled government which is now in operation in Russia, and to point out that the same kind of aliens and usurpers [Study has shown these aliens and usurpers are none other than our age old enemy, the Jews, the Children of Satan! ] are now at work in the United States to establish a form of government other than Constitutional Government, and in order to do this they are seeking to paralyze industry, to destroy patriotism, and finally, to secure the overthrow of the government itself in the United States..."

                                                                 Trotsky Arrives In America

Leon Trotsky was born Lev Davidovich Bronstein. His wealthy Jewish parents sent him to Odessa University. There at age 20 he was arrested for anti‑government activity. He escaped abroad. Later he secretly returned and became a leader in the Bolshevik uprising in St. Petersburg in 1905. That was quickly put down and again he escaped abroad. In Paris Trotsky wrote inflammatory articles for the communist paper, "Nashe Slovo." For this he was exiled to Spain and with a sudden influx of money he sailed for New York on January 13, 1917. Here in America, he immediately went to work for the Marxist paper, "Novy Mir." This Russian Language publication was owned by the Jews Brailowsky and Weinstein and advocated overthrowing the Czar.

Trotsky arrived with his new bride; the Jewess Natalya Sedova. Some historians have maintained that she was the daughter of banker Ivan Jivotovsky who was a director of the Rhine‑Westphalian financial syndicate in Germany. Soon Jivotosky would be sending huge sums of money to help finance the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia.

At that time "Hollywood" was actually located in Brooklyn. There the old Jewish owned Vitagraph Movie Studios hired Trotsky to play bit roles in three films. One was "My Official Wife" starring Clara Kimball Young. Interesting enough is the fact that Trotsky played a Russian revolutionary in the film!

Trotsky was no "poor Jewish refuge." He lived in an expensive apartment with "luxuries" which were not common in that era. He had a telephone, electric refrigerator and a chauffeured limousine. So the question presents itself: Where did all this money come from? It was during this period of "exile" in New York City when Trotsky met the most powerful banker in the world, The Jew Jacob Schiff, the head of Kuhn Loeb & Co. It is well known that Schiff had been working for years to bring down the Czars. He found in Trotsky the most effective Jewish revolutionary ever. Trotsky was totally self‑confident that he could bring down the Russian Government.

Therefore, Schiff promised Trotsky unlimited funds to buy arms, propaganda and for money to be used as bribes inside Russia to help in overthrowing the Czar. The Jew who would be in charge of transferring huge sums of money to the Bolsheviks was Israel Helphand. Helphand's life work in helping finance communism was documented in the book, "The Merchant of Revolution."

In the meantime a deal had been cut between the Kaiser of Germany and Communist Jews for the overthrow of the Czar of Russia. Germany was at war on two fronts, against Russia in the East and France and England in the West. By helping the Jewish Bolsheviks rise up in arms out of the ghettos the Czar would be so weakened that his armies just might collapse. The Jews promised they would withdraw Russia from the war if they were able to seize control. And this is exactly what happened!

                            President Woodrow Wilson Allowed Trotsky To Leave For Russia

It was the Jew, Jennings C. Wise, who wrote: Woodrow Wilson: Disciple of Revolution, stated:

"Historians must never forget that Woodrow Wilson, despite efforts of the British police, made it possible for Leon Trotsky to enter Russia with an American passport."

Like all politicians, the Jews support, he was touted as being a representative of the people against the great financial interests, when in fact he was just the opposite, he was their hireling; they owned him like you own your dog, and he came to heel just as obediently; just like every other American President since that time. It was this Marrano Jew, who helped the International Jewish bankers to get the Federal Reserve Bank Act through the Congress of the United States. Wilson agreed to the Jewish bankers request that he order the U.S. Immigration Service to issue Trotsky and American Passport, even though He was not a citizen . In fact, Trotsky was the single most deadly enemy; To our ally at the time , Russia had in the entire world! It was Trotsky who organized the revolution, wrote the propaganda, made the fiery speeches, founded and built the Red Army. He was called "The Father of the Red Army," and was supposed to take Lenin's place as the head of Russia but was out‑maneuvered by Stalin. At one time he was the most powerful man in the Soviet Union and one of the most important figures in the world!

On March 13, 1917, Jacob Schiff [Jew] sent Miloukoff, the New Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Bolshevik Revolutionary Government, and a personal friend of Schiff, a telegram reproduced in The New York Times on April 10, 1917:

"Allow me, as the irreconcilable enemy of the tyrannical autocratic government which pitilessly persecuted co‑religionaries, to congratulate through the Russian people for what they have so brilliantly accomplished, and to wish success to your comrades in government and to yourself."

Do you see how he cleverly directs the world's attention, making them believe that it was the Russian people who instigated and carried out the Revolution; Shifting it away from the Real Culprits; The Jews! Now you know why the Jews are always shoving the nose of our American People into the great Holocaust Lie! So that they will not look at their past [The Jews past] and see the murders of millions of Christians: The Jews have committed!

This same issue of The New York Times also reproduced Miloukoff's enthusiastic reply:

"We are one with you in our hatred and antipathy for the old regime which is overthrown."

The key word here is "Hatred." The following was described by the American Rohrbach Commission and published in the Defender Magazine, in 1933:

     "The Jews, were now free to indulge in their most fervent fantasies of the mass murder of helpless victims. Christians were dragged from their beds, tortured and killed. Some were actually sliced to pieces, bit by bit, while others were branded with hot irons, their eyes poked out to induce unbearable pain.

     Others were placed in boxes with only their heads, hands and legs sticking out; then hungry rats were placed in the boxes to gnaw upon their bodies. Some were nailed to the ceiling by their fingers or by their feet, and left hanging until they died of exhaustion. Others were chained to the floor and hot lead was poured into their mouth. Many were tied to horses and dragged through the streets of the city, while Jewish mobs attacked them with rocks and kicked them to death. Christian mothers were taken to the public square and their babies snatched from their arms. A [Jewish] Red Terrorist would take the baby, hold it by the feet, head downward and demand that the Christian mother deny Christ. If she would not, he would toss the baby into the air, where another member of the mob would rush forward and catch it on the tip of his bayonet. Pregnant Christian women were chained to trees and their babies cut out of their bodies. There were many places of public execution in Russia during the days of the Revolution.

     The whole cement floor of the execution hall of the Jewish Cheka of Kiev, to name just one, was flooded with blood; it formed a level of several inches. It was a horrible mixture of blood, brains and pieces of skull. All the walls were bespattered with blood. Pieces of brains and of scalps were sticking to them. A gutter of 25 Centimeters wide by 25 Centimeters deep, and about 10 meters long was along its length full to the top with blood. Some bodies were disemboweled, others had limbs chopped off, some were literally hacked to pieces. Some had their eyes put out, the head, face and neck and trunk were covered with deep wounds.

     Further on, we found a corpse with a wedge driven into its chest. Some had no tongues. In a corner we discovered a quantity of dismembered arms and legs belonging to no bodies that we could locate."

We are further told what will happen in America if the Jews ever gain total control:

     "The Red Terror became so wide‑spread that it is impossible to give here all the details of the principal means employed by the [Jewish] Cheka(s) to master resistance; one of the most important is that of hostages, taken among all social classes. These are held responsible for any anti‑Bolshevist movements (revolts, the White Army, strikes, refusal of a village to give its harvest etc.) and are immediately executed. Thus, for the assassination of the Jew Ouritzky, member of the Extraordinary Commission of Petrograd, several thousands of them were put to death, and many of these unfortunate men and women suffered before death various tortures inflicted by cold‑blooded cruelty in the prisons of the Cheka.

      This I have in front of me photographs taken at Kharkoff, in the presence of the Allied Missions, immediately after the Reds had abandoned the town; they consist of a series of ghastly reproductions such as: Bodies of three workmen taken as hostages from a factory which went on strike. One had his eyes burnt, his lips and nose cut off; the other two had their hands cut off.

     The bodies of hostages, S. Afaniasouk and P. Prokpovitch, small landed proprietors, who were scalped by their executioners; S. Afaniasouk shows numerous burns caused by a white hot sword blade. The body of M. Bobroff, a former officer, who had his tongue and one hand cut off and the skin torn off from his left leg.

     Human skin torn from the hands of several victims by means of a metallic comb. This sinister find was the result of a careful inspection of the cellar of the Extraordinary Commission of Kharkoff. The retired general Pontiafa, a hostage who had the skin of his right hand torn off and the genital parts mutilated.

     Mutilated bodies of women hostages: S. Ivanovna, owner of a drapery business, Mme. A.L. Carolshaja, wife of a colonel, Mmo. Khlopova, a property owner. They had their breasts slit and emptied and the genital parts burnt and having trace of coal.

     Bodies of four peasant hostages, Bondarenko, Pookhikle, Sevenetry, and Sidorfehouk, with atrociously mutilated faces, the genital parts having been operated upon by Chinese torturers in a manner unknown to European doctors in whose opinion the agony caused to the victims must have been dreadful.

     It is impossible to enumerate all the forms of savagery which the Red Terror took. A volume would not contain them. The Cheka of Kharkoff, for example, in which Saenko operated, had the specialty of scalping victims and taking off the skin of their hands as one takes off a glove...At Voronege the victims were shut up naked in a barrel studded with nails which was then rolled about. Their foreheads were branded with a red hot iron FIVE POINTED STAR. At Tsaritsin and at Kamishin their bones were sawed...At Keif the victim was shut up in a chest containing decomposing corpses; after firing shots above his head his torturers told him that he would be buried alive. The chest was buried and opened again half an hour later when the interrogation of the victim was proceeded with. The scene was repeated several times over. It is not surprising that many victims went mad." [143]

                                                        The Slaughter Of Christians In Spain

In 1936: Jewish Communists lead antichristian riots in Spain, 4,000 churches were wrecked and over 75,000 Christians were Murdered by Them. The Spanish Civil War by Hugh Thomas is a 720 page book and is considered the "Definitive Study" of that tragic war. This book can be found in many libraries. "The Churches Are Burning" is the title of Chapter 20. Mr. Thomas writes:

"At no time in the history of Europe or even perhaps the world, has so passionate a hatred of religion and all its works been shown. About 75,000 persons may be supposed to have been executed or murdered between July 18 and Sept. 1, 1936, for nearly all the illegal killings in the Republic occurred at the start of the war. Of those killed, 7,937 were religious persons: 12 were bishops, 283 nuns, 5,255 priests, 2,492 monks and 249 novices."

Over 4,000 churches were burned, sacked or severely damaged including every single church in Catalonia province where Ernest Gero [Jew] was in command of the Communists.

                                                             Who Were The Killers In Spain?

Hugh Thomas says that the Communist Party established {Jewish} "Chekas" or terror squads patterned after what Lenin set up in Russia for the murder of Christians. Gero gave them violent names such as "The Red Lions," "Spartacus" or "Fighters For Liberty."

                                                        Tortue Was Used Against Christians

Hugh Thomas describes such grisly tortures as: In Cernera, rosary beads were forced into a monk's ears until his eardrum burst leaving him deaf. Fr. Dias del Moral was placed in a bull ring and gored to death. At the Alcazar a group of young Christian youths were forced to dig their own graves and then burned alive. In Ciudad the Reds forced a crucifix down the mouth of a woman just because she had two sons who went off to become priests. In another city all the members of the middleclass, some 800 people, were thrown down deep wells to their deaths.

Some people went mad before they died of tortue. Earnest Gero told the Reds they were doing all this to preserve Liberty, then he would shout, Long Live Liberty!

Do you need more? Can you see what depravity that the wicked will do when given the chance? This is what they have in mind for American Christians if they can bring us under their total control: And make no mistake about it!

Listen to the words of the Jewish Chairman of the American Communist Party, Gus Hall:

"The Christians are always singing about the blood. Let us [Jews] give them enough of it! Let us cut their throats and drag them over the altar! And let them drown in their own blood! I dream of the day when the last priest is strangled on the guts of the last preacher! "

                                                        Trotsky Leaves New York For Russia

On March 26, 1917, Trotsky left New York City on a ship bound for Russia, along with 267 Yiddish speaking Jewish radicals who had previously been expelled from Russia for their revolutionary activity. This time their mission was being financed with a $20,000,000 gift from President Woodrow Wilson, out of his personal expense account and was forwarded to them by Jacob Schiff.

                                                       Jewish Bankers Move To Free Trotsky

On March 29, 1917, the British Admiralty in London sent a telegram to Canadian officials ordering that Trotsky be arrested and not allowed to proceed to Russia. The telegram explained:

"...these are Russian Socialist leaving for purposes of starting revolution against present Russian government for which Trotsky is reported to have $10,000 dollars subscribed by Socialists and Germans."

They were taken off the ship and placed under arrest.

April 3, 1917, Trotsky's ship, was ordered into port at Amherst, Nova Scotia by the British Admiralty. There Trotsky was ordered removed from the ship for internment until the end of World War One. Also, arrested with Trotsky where his wife, their two sons and five other Jewish revolutionaries who were Trotsky aids. Trotsky was finger printed and given the number 1098. His description read:

"37 years old, a political exile, occupation journalist born in Gromskty, Russia, a Russian citizen."

Trotsky signed the document. "Leon Bromstein Trotsky," deliberately misspelling his first and middle name. During this period a Postmaster General was a very powerful political leader and not the figurehead position it is today. Thus Dr. R.M. Coulter held this post in Canada. The New York Jewish lawyer Nicholas Aleinikoff wired Coulter demanding that he investigate why Trotsky and his friends were being held adding:

"Trust as champion of freedom you will intercede on their behalf."

The Records show another Jew from New York City also sought to free Trotsky. On April 11, Arthur Wolf sent Coulter a telegram urging that Trotsky be released. Wolf had escaped from Siberia where the Czar expelled him for his Bolshevik activity. Trotsky was a brilliant speaker, writer and organizer who would turn out to be the real revolutionary who would bring the Bolsheviks into power.

Postmaster Coulter then wrote Maj. Gen. Willoughby Gwatkin the head of the Canadian Department of Defense. He asked about Trotsky and attached copies of the telegrams from Aleinikoff and Wolf. Coulter's letter read, in part:

"These men have been hostile to Russia because of the way the Jews have been treated, and are now strongly in favor of the present Administration, so far as I know. Both are responsible men. Both are reputable men, and I am sending their telegrams to you for what they may be worth."

Aleinikoff then sent a letter to Coulter thanking him, which read, in part:

"...most heartily for the interest you have taken in the fate of the Russian Political Exiles...You know me, esteemed Dr. Coulter, and you also know my devotion to the cause of Russian freedom...Happily, I know Mr. Trotsky, Mr. Melnichahnsky and Mr. Chudnowsky...intimately."

April 21, Maj. Gen. Gwatkin wrote Coulter that Trotsky and his party were being released and allowed to proceed on their journey to Russia. He said this had been approved by the Admiralty in London. Gwatkin added, these words:

"...this will please your New York correspondents immensely."

It is important to note that on April 6, 1917, America entered World War One. So, to allow Trotsky and his Jewish Bolsheviks to bring down the Russian Government would be tantamount to treason! Their subversion of Russia would obviously prolong the war by providing Germany with a one front war in France. There can be no doubt that Trotsky alone was responsible for prolonging the war which cost hundreds‑of‑thousands of additional lives lost on both sides during that fratricidal fighting.

Canada's MacLean's Magazine of June 1919, carried the following:

"Some Canadian politicians or officials were chiefly responsible for the prolongation of the war, for the great loss of life, the wounds and sufferings of the winter of 1917, and the great [war] drives of 1918. During which hundreds of thousands of young men perished in brutal trench fighting."

MacLeans stated that "these persons" were doing everything possible to prevent the public from leaning the facts about the collapse of the Russian Government in 1917. MacLean's reported that had Russia remained in the war it would have ended one year earlier.

Remember, The United States was only in the war for 1 year and 7 months and we lost over 300,000 men! Thanks to the Jews!

                                                   The Jews and The Communization of Russia

Very few people are aware of the extent to which Jews were responsible for the Communization of Russia, first through organizing of the unsuccessful revolution of 1905, and then the later and successful Bolshevik Revolution of 1917. Both were heavily financed by outside Jewish financial and banking houses, and ultimately resulted in Jews assuming control of what had become the Russian Soviet Government. Concurrently, Jewish machinations in the United States, Germany and elsewhere helped set the stage for the takeover. This Jewish control still exists, despite the propaganda to the contrary, designed to delude and deceive non‑Jews.

Long prior to the Revolution of 1905, the Jews had conceived a hatred of Christian and Czarist Russia, because of opposition of the Russian people and Government to Jewish Talmudism. In his introduction to the 1903 translation of the Talmud, for example, Rodkinson details the repeated denunciations of the Talmud over many centuries by nearly every country, the Popes, and others, and states:

     "The Rabbis next encountered the Popes. From the time of Pope Innocent III, the Talmud was burned at the stake in nearly every century from the 11th to the 18th, in Italy, France, Germany, Spain and many other countries, and in the 18th, also in Poland by the Frankists, by Bishop Dembovski, where copies were dragged through the streets of the city, tied to horses' tails and then delivered to the executioner to be burned at the stake in Kamenetz, Lemberg, Brody and elsewhere.

     In most places, before it was resolved what was to be done with Talmud, the Jews were forced to dispute with its enemies and had to pay heavy fines for arriving late to the dispute, as well as for being vanquished in argument, the judges being their enemies. Still what has been the result? The Talmud exists today, and not one letter in it is missing.

     It is true, the persecutions against it are not yet at an end; accusations and calumnies by its enemies, under the new name of anti‑Semites are still directed against it, while the government of Russia legislates against and restricts the rights of the nation [Jewish Nation] which adheres to the Talmud. No modern persecutions, however, can seriously endanger its existence, and it would appear that the Talmud will also survive them and continue as long as the sky spans the earth."

One of the prime Jewish conspirators plotting to Communize Russia was Jacob Schiff, who became head of the enormously powerful New York Jewish banking house of Kuhn, Loeb and Co. One should research the laudatory sketch of Jacob Schiff, in the Jewish Communal (Kehillah) Register of New York City, 1917‑18, of which Kehillah he was an Executive Committeeman. It is stated there how German‑born Schiff came to America and made connections with a banking house.

"In 1873, he returned to Europe where he made connections with some of the chief German banking houses" and "The firm of Kuhn‑Loeb & Co. floated the large Japanese war loans of 1904‑5, thus making possible the Japanese victory over Russia..."

 


[1] Jeremiah 2:19.

[2] Genesis 35:11.

[3] Genesis 48:19.

[4] Luke 22:36.

[5] Matthew 10:39.

[6] Matthew 24:7‑12.

[7] General Douglas MacArthur, before the Texas Legislature in Austin, Texas June, 1951.

[8] John 19:15.

[9] Luke 19:27.

[10] Edith Hamilton's rendering Of Socrates' most notable admonition.

[11] The Patriot, April 6, 1933.

[12] The Poison in America's Cup, p. 31.

[13] The Patriot, July 18, 1929.

[14] The Patriot, August 12th, 1937.

[15] The Mystical Body of Christ in the Modern World, p. 292.

[16] The Judisk Tidskrift, No. 6, Aug.‑Sept., 1929, written by Dr. Ehrenpreis, Chief Rabbi of

Sweden.

[17] Coningsby, pp. 249‑252.

[18] Speech made on May 31, 1864; Union and Progress was the name given to several revolutionary associations and Masonic lodges. "One cult" is strongly reminiscent of Protocol XVI.

[19] Genesis 11:31‑32.

[20] Genesis 12:1.

[21] Genesis 12:7.

[22] Genesis 13:10.

[23] Genesis 13:12.

[24] Genesis 13:14‑17.

[25] Genesis 15:5‑7.

[26] Genesis 15:18.

[27] Genesis 16:3‑4.

[28] Genesis 16;10‑13.

[29] Genesis 17:8.

[30] Genesis 17:14.

[31] Genesis 17:20‑21.

[32] Genesis 21:10‑13.

[33] Genesis 25:1‑9.

[34] Genesis 25:13‑16.

[35] Joshua 21:43.

[36] Joshua 24:13.

[37] Genesis 21:13.

[38] See Numbers 36:8‑9.

[39] Frank C. Sakran, in his Palestine Still A Dilemma, pp. 109‑145.

[40] Jewish Chronicle, May 25, 1928, p. 18.

[41] Current History, Sept. 1922, p. 1008.

[42] Wilhelm Marr, who took an active part in the revolution of 1848, in Der Sieg des Judentums uber das Christentum (1879).

[43] The entire story of this Pact can be found in the Revue Internationale des Societies Secretes, Paris, 1930.

[44] The Massacre of Kibya : The Massacre of Kibya on October 14, 1953, was a continuation of such brutal, inhuman massacres as the King David Hotel, Semiramis Hotel and Deir Yassin. But it was also a watershed in one of the most sinister grand designs in military history, a deliberate turning of an entire officer corps into a cabal with shared personal guilt for vicious war crimes.

     The Nazis organized a separate all-volunteer army under Heinrich Himmler, the Waffen SS. The SS was responsible for the majority of the German war atrocities comparable to those committed by the Zionists. In 1953, Ben-Gurion established an SS equivalent in the Zahal, designated as Commando Unit 101. This all-volunteer unit was responsible for the Kibya massacre and was given exemption from the rules of war as if the Geneva Convention never existed. The first, and only, commander of Commando Unit 101 was Ariel Sharon, the single person most responsible years later for the notorious Sabra and Shatila massacre in Beirut, Lebanon.

     The guilt of Commando Unit 101 was in the most sinister fashion extended first to the Israeli Airborne forces, and subsequently to the entire career officer corps of the Israeli Army. Sharon maneuvered the resignation of the professional commander of the Israeli paratroops, Yehuda Harari, and amalgamated the paratroops along with Commando Unit 101 into Unit 202 of the Israeli Army.

     The professionalism of the Israeli Airborne troops was thus destroyed, turning all Israeli paratroopers, not just the participants in the Kabya Massacre, into common criminals and murderers of innocent men, women and children. The Zionists, having destroyed the professionalism of their own Airborne Force, proceeded to destroy the professionalism of the entire Officer Crops of the Israeli Defense Forces. No senior officer of the IDF could gain promotion without prior service in the paratroops, and all paratroopers shared in war crimes guilt through assignments given them to murder civilians and to commit other acts illegal under the Geneva Convention.

     According to an authoritative survey of the Israeli Army; "The silver parachute 'jump-wings' are worn by almost all Zahal officers, as it is normally a required qualification." (The Israeli Army in the Middle East Wars 1948-1973 (London: Osprey Publishing). p. 31).

     The Government of Israel at the time claimed that the Kibya Massacre was performed by "civilian Jewish settlers." But the historical record shows that it was sanctioned by acting Prime Minister Moshe Sharrett, and was planned by Defense Minister Pinhas Lavon, the Chief of the General Staff Mordecai Maklef, and the Chief of Operations, General Moshe Dayan, in concert with vacationing Israeli Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion.

     Despite the Israeli Government's attempt at cover-up, word spread of their responsibility for the Kibya Massacre and Ariel Sharon's role ultimately came out in connection with this crime. No less a Zionist figure than I.L. Kenen, the founding father of AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee), the official Israeli lobby in the United States, revealed in his Memoirs: "I was on my way home on the subway, headed for Riverdale, when I heard a brief news flash in the World Telegram disclosing that 66 Arabs had been killed at Kibya as Israelis sought to avenge the slaughter of an Israeli family. I did not know until years later that the raid was ordered by Ariel Sharon, the Israeli commander who led the invasion of Lebanon in 1982." (I.L. Kenen, All My Causes, p. 60).

     At 9:30 p.m., on Wednesday, October 14, 1953, Israeli troops attacked the border Jordanian village of Kibya, Northwest of Jerusalem. Seven hundred regular Israeli troops participated in the attack in which mortars, machine guns, rifles and explosives were used. Forty-two houses as well as the school and the mosque of the village were dynamited. Every man, woman and child found by the criminal attackers was killed; all in all, seventy-five innocent villagers were murdered in cold blood that night. Later, the attackers turned their fire on the cattle, killing 22 cows. The attack was the bloodiest and most brutal Zionist crimes since the infamous Deir Yassin massacre of 1948. (Encyclopedia of the Palestine Problem, pp. 272-273).

[45] Paul Findley, They Dare to Speak Out (Westport: Lawrence Hill, 1985), pp. 166-168.

[46] Paul Findley, They Dare to Speak Out, pp. 166-168.

[47] Lord Russell of Liverpool, The Scourge of the Swastika (New York: Philosophical Library, 1954), p. 76.

[48] Mames M. Ennes, Assault on the Liberty (New York: Random House, 1979), pp. 214-216.

[49] John 8:44‑47.

[50] Matthew 23:29‑33.

[51] Titus 1:10‑16.

[52] The Commission on Information about Judaism, Merchants Bldg., Cincinnati, Ohio., page 30.

[53] Jewish Encyclopedia, 1905, p. 72.

[54] New York, Jewish Encyclopedia, 1905 Edition.

[55] Genesis 12:3.

[56] "As long as there remains among the Gentiles any moral conception of the social order, and until all faith, patriotism, and dignity are uprooted, our reign over the world shall not come...And the Gentiles, in their stupidity, have proved easier dupes than we expected them to be. One would expect more intelligence and more practical common sense, but they are no better than a herd of sheep. Let them graze in our fields till they become fat enough to be worthy of being immolated to our future King of the World...

     We have founded many secret associations, which all work for our purpose, under our orders and our direction. We have made it an honor, a great honor, for the Gentiles to join us in our organizations, which are, thanks to our gold, flourishing now more than ever. Yet it remains our secret that those Gentiles who betray their own and most precious interests, by joining us in our plot, should never know that those associations are of our creation, and that they serve our purpose.

     One of the many triumphs of our Freemasonry is that those Gentiles who become members of our Lodges, should never suspect that we are using them to build their own jails, upon whose terraces we shall erect the throne of our Universal King of the Jews; and should never know that we are commanding them to forge the chains of their own servility to our future King of the World...

     We have induced some of our children to join the Christian Body, with the explicit intimation that they should work in a still more efficient way for the disintegration of the Christian Church, by creating scandals within her. We have thus followed the advice of our Prince of the Jews, who so wisely said: 'Let some of your children become cannons, so that they may destroy the Church.' Unfortunately, not all among the 'convert' Jews have proved faithful to their mission. Many of them have even betrayed us! But, on the other hand, others have kept their promise and honored their word. Thus the counsel of our Elders has proved successful.

     We are the Fathers of all Revolutions, even of those which sometimes happen to turn against us. We are the supreme Masters of Peace and War. We can boast of being the Creators of the Reformation! Calvin (Phillip II, by William Thomas Walsh, p. 248: 'The origin of Calvin (whose real name was Chauvin) See also: Lucin Wolf, in Transactions, Jewish Historical Society of England, Vol. XI, p. 8; Goris, Les Colonies Marchandes Meridionales à Anvers; Lea, History of the Inquisition of Spain, III, 413)) was one of our Children; he was of Jewish descent, and was entrusted by Jewish authority and encouraged with Jewish finance to draft his scheme in the Reformation.

     Martin Luther yielded to the influence of his Jewish friends unknowingly, and again, by Jewish authority, and with Jewish finance, his plot against the Catholic Church met with success. But unfortunately he discovered the deception, and became a threat to us, so we disposed of him as we have so many others who dare to oppose us...

     Many countries, including the United States have already fallen for our scheming. But the Christian Church is still alive...We must destroy it without the least delay and without the slightest mercy. Most of the Press in the world is under our Control; let us therefore encourage in a still more violent way the hatred of the world against the Christian Church. Let us intensify our activities in poisoning the morality of the Gentiles. Let us spread the spirit of revolution in the minds of the people. They must be made to despise Patriotism and the love of their family, to consider their faith as a humbug, their obedience to their Christ as a degrading servility, so that they become deaf to the appeal of the Church and blind to her warnings against us. Let us, above all, make it impossible for Christians to be reunited, or for non-Christians to join the Church; otherwise the greatest obstruction to our domination will be strengthened and all our work undone. Our plot will be unveiled, the Gentiles will turn against us, in the spirit of revenge, and our domination over them will never be realized.

     Let us remember that as long as there still remain active enemies of the Christian Church, we may hope to become Master of the World...And let us remember always that the future Jewish King will never reign in the world before Christianity is overthrown..." (From a series of speeches at the B'nai B'rith Convention in Paris, published shortly afterwards in the London Catholic Gazette, February, 1936; Paris Le Reveil du Peuple published similar account a little later).

[57] Obadiah 1‑18.

[58] Marcus Eli Ravage (Big Destruction Hammer of God), member of the staff of the New York Tribune, "A Real Case Against the Jews," in Century Magazine, January-February, 1928.

[59] Deuteronomy 10:16.

[60] Deuteronomy 30:6.

[61] Jeremiah 4:4.

[62] Romans 2:29.

[63] Romans 3:20.

[64] Romans 5:13.

[65] John 15:22.

[66] John 11:49‑52.

[67] Matthew 15:14.

[68] Ezekiel 7:21‑22.

[69] Deuteronomy 23:20.

[70] Matthew 10:40.

[71] Luke 10:16.

[72] John 15:23.

[73] John 5:23.

[74] E. 32, p. 276.

[75] E. 32, p. 286.

[76] Extract from the Pamphlet "Von Schem Hamphoras und vom Geschlecht Christi." 1543.

[77] E. 62, p. 367.

[78] Extract from one of Luther's letters to his wife, shortly before his death.

[79] E. 62, p. 189.

[80] National Jewish Information Service.

[81] Joshua Jehouda, l'Antisemitisme Miroir du Monde, pp. 135-136; Judaism and the Vatican, Vicomte Leon de Poncins, pp. 30-31.

[82] Matthew 15:3‑6.

[83] Mark 7:5‑9.

[84] Colosians 2:8.

[85] 1 Peter 1:18.

[86] Galatians 5:2.

[87] "The Jews are more subject to diseases of the nervous system than the other races and peoples among which they dwell. Hysteria and neurasthenia appear to be most frequent. Some physicians of large experience among the Jews have even gone so far as to state that most of them are neurasthenic and hysterical." (The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. IX, (1905), p. 225); "Idiocy and imbecility are found comparatively more often among Jews than among non-Jews...The Mongolian type of idiocy is also very frequently observed among Jews...Among the Jews the proportion of insane has been observed to be very large...Jews are more liable to acute psychoses of early age than are non-Jews." (The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. VI, (1904), p. 556, 603-04).

[88] Jewish Encyclopedia, 1904, Vol. VII, p. 650.

[89] Ritual Murder Libel and The Jew, 1935.

[90] From the account of Dio Cassius in the 78th Book of his history, dated A.D. 117, Chapter 32.

[91] From the Daily Mail, 17th September (describing the horrors of the Red Revolution in Spain, A.D. 1936.

[92] Magick, by Master Therion, published in 1929 by the Lecram Press, Paris, France.

[93] Which is why Christ always spoke in parables when speaking before the Jewish Pharisees. They did not like it, did not understand the parables and He knew it.

[94] Close and Patent Rolls of the Realm, London, Winchester and Oxford.

[95] J.C. Cox's Norfolk Churches, Vol. II, p. 47; Victoria County History of Norfolk, 1906, Vol. II.

[96] The Ritual Murder Libel and the Jew (1935), C. Roth.

[97] Recorded in Monumentsa Germania Historia, Vol. VI (Erfurt Annals); Polychronican, R. Higdon; Chronicles, R. Grafton, p. 46.

[98] Monumenta Germania Historica, VI, 520; Magd. Cent. 12, c. 14 and 13, c. 14.

[99] Acta, Vol. III, March, 591; Magd. Cent., 23, c. 14; Spec. Vinc., 129, c. 25; and Cosm. Munst., 23, c. 14.

[100] UJE - Listed in the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia.

[101] Rohrbacher, from the Chronicle of Gervase of Canterbury.

[102] The Jewish Encyclopedia says this was a false charge.

[103] Histoire des Ducs et Comtes de Champagne, IV, 1 st part, p. 72, Paris, 1865, by A. de Jubainville; Spec. Vinc., 129, c. 25; Gauin, L. 6, De Francis; Magd. Cent., 12, c. 14, col. 1670.

[104] Hayamon's History of the Jews in England; also in Annals of Winchester; and conclusively in the Close Roll 16, Henry III, membrane 8, 26.6. 1232.

[105] Huillard Breolles, Grande Chronique, III, 86. Close Roll, 19 Henry III, m 23.

[106] Chron. Hirsaug., and Magd. Cent., 13, c. 24.

[107] Social England, Vol. I, p. 407, edited by H.D. Traill.

[108] Henry III, 39, m. 2, 7.10 1255; 39, m. 2, 14.10.1255; 40, m. 20, 24.II, 1255; 40, m. 13, 13.3.1256; 42, m. 6, 19.6.1258. Patent Rolls, Henry III, 40, m. 20, 26.II.1255; 40, m. 19, 9.12.1255; 40, 27.3.1256; and 40, m. 5, 20.8.1256.

[109] Cluverius, Epitome Historia, p. 541.

[110] Bollandists, Acta, Vol. II, p. 838; Rohrbacher, L'Histoire Universelle de l'Englise Catblique, Vol. XVIII, pp. 697-700; Thos. Cantipranus, De ratione vita, Vol. II, xxix.

[111] Close Roll of the Realm, 4, Edward I, membrane 14, 3.3.1276.

[112] Haydn's Dictionary of Dates, 1847, Reiley, Memorials of London, p. 15; H. Desportes, Le Mystere du Sang.

[113] Aventinus, Annals of Bavaria, 1521, 17, p. 576; Chron. Hirsaug., Magd. Cent., 13, c. 14.

[114] Bollandists, Acta, Vol. II, April; Helvetia sancta (H. Murer); Karl Howard, Die Brunnen zu Bern, 1848, p. 250; Cosm. Munst., 13, p. 482.

[115] Jewish Encyclopedia, 1906, Vol. XII, p. 267.

[116] Bollandists, Acta, April, Vol. II, 838.

[117] Richard Mun, Die Juden in Berlin; Sir Richard Burton, The Jew, the Gypsy and El Islam, 1898, p. 126.

[118] La France Juive, by Drumont.

[119] Ritual Murder Libel and the Jew, p. 24, Cecil Roth.

[120] Cecil Roth, Ritual Murder Libel and the Jew.

[121] Ritual Murder Libel and the Jew, Cecil Roth.

[122] Ritual Murder Libel and the Jew, p. 25, Cecil Roth.

[123] Jewish Encyclopedia, 1903, Vol. II, p. 267; also described in Der Sturmer, May, 1934.

[124] Jewish Encyclopedia, 1903, Vol. III, p. 521.

[125] M. P.-N. Hamont in Egypt under Mehemet Ali, and the Jewish Encyclopedia.

[126] Relation historique des Affaires de Syrie, 1840-1842.

[127] Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. I, p. 645.

[128] Jewish Encyclopedia.

[129] Lit.: Strack, Hermann L., The Jew and Human Sacrifice (1909); Leroy-Beaulieu, Israel Among the Nations (1904) 36-142; Bloch, Joseph Samuel, Israel and the Nations (1927); idem. Akten and Gutachten im Prozesie Rohling-Block (1892), Solomons, D., An Account of the Recent P{ersecutions of the Jews in Damascus (1840); Jacobs, Joseph, The Jews of Angevin England (1893); Stern, M., edit. Die plipstirchen Brillen uber die Blutbeschuldigung (1893); Roth, Cecil, edit., The Ritual Murder Libel and the Jews (report of Cardinal Lorenzo Ganganelli, trans. 1935).

[130] This is referenced to The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. III, (1903) pp. 266-67.

[131] The Pharisees were originally identical with the Hasidim or Hasidic sect of Judaism. The Jewish Encyclopedia Vol. IX (1905) p. 661.

[132] The Illustrated Atlas of Jewish Civilization, Ed. Martin Gilbert, MacMillan Pub. Co., 1990, p. 125.

[133] Galatians 5:2.

[134] Jewish Encyclopedia, 1903, Vol. IV, p. 99.

[135] Ritual Murder, p. 7.

[136] A few weeks after an earlier edition of this book had been circulated in California, which recounted the story of the Schuessler murders in full, another name was added to the list of those who had died. Joseph Lohman died suddenly in Los Angeles of unknown causes. The obituary notice, strangely enough, did not mention Lohman's term as Cook County Sheriff, but identified him incorrectly as "a former State Treasurer of Illinois!"

[137] Eustace Mullins, Mullins' New History of the Jews, Chapter 6, pp. 49-66. Other books by Eustace Mullins, "The Federal Reserve Conspiracy," "My Life in Christ," "The Biological Jew." Eustace Mullins books can be ordered from him at: The International Institute of Jewish Studies, 126 Madison Place, Staunton, VA 24401.

[138] Luke 19:27.

[139] John 19:13‑15.

[140] Congressional Record November 6th, pages A‑5091‑3.

[141] This is a perfect example of Jewish lies and fables, the Scriptures warn about.

[142] Cholly Knickerbocker in his society news column in the Hearst Press, February 3, 1949, appearing in the N.Y. Journal‑American and other papers.

[143] S.P. Melgounov, p. 164‑166; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 151‑153.