Watchman Willie Martin Archive

Israel and Judah

It is absolutely amazing that our people are so easily deceived by the Jews and their proselytes in the pulpits of America; the Judeo-Christian clergy. They teach our people falsely about God’s Laws, Statutes, and Judgments being done away with and that Judah comprises the jews. When the truth is available to be studied and understood.

Many who will read this on the news groups will read it and go away and never let the thought come to them again; they are simply brain dead when it comes to the ungodly, antichrist, children of the devil: The Jews.

According to the Standard Jewish Encyclopedias 96% of all the Jews known to the world today are the descendants of the Khazar tribes of Russia, Eastern Europe and Western Mongolia. These are the Asknazi Jews.

The other major sect of the Jews are the Sephardic Jews, and they are a bastard people from the mixing of the Canaanites, Hitites, Amorites, Perizzites, Hivites, Jebusites, Girgashites, Kenites, Edomites and some True Israelites. The JEWS HAVE NEVER BEEN ISRAELITES; THEY ARE NOT ISRAELITES NOW; AND THEY WILL NEVER BE ISRAELITES.

Why they will not study to make themselves approved as the scriptures tell them to do:

“STUDY TO SHEW THYSELF APPROVED UNTO GOD, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, RIGHTLY DIVIDING THE WORD OF TRUTH.” (2 Timothy 2:15)

There can be only one reason for it; they are not worthy of attaining the Kingdom of God and so He has sent them:

“Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshiped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God. Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things? And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time. FOR THE MYSTERY OF INIQUITY DOTH ALREADY WORK: ONLY HE WHO NOW LETTETH WILL LET, UNTIL HE BE TAKEN OUT OF THE WAY. AND THEN SHALL THAT WICKED BE REVEALED, WHOM THE LORD SHALL CONSUME WITH THE SPIRIT OF HIS MOUTH, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming: Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, And WITH ALL DECEIVABLENESS OF UNRIGHTEOUSNESS IN THEM THAT PERISH; BECAUSE THEY RECEIVED NOT THE LOVE OF THE TRUTH, THAT THEY MIGHT BE SAVED. AND FOR THIS CAUSE GOD SHALL SEND THEM STRONG DELUSION, THAT THEY SHOULD BELIEVE A LIE: THAT THEY ALL MIGHT BE DAMNED WHO BELIEVED NOT THE TRUTH, BUT HAD PLEASURE IN UNRIGHTEOUSNESS.” (2 Thessalonians 2:3‑12)

There can be no doubt to any thinking person who is searching for the truth that this is speaking of the devil and his children the Jews and their proselytes.

Until the distinction between Israel and Judah, as taught in the Scripture, is clearly understood, a great portion of the Bible will remain a closed book.

In order that we may deal with Scripture evidence systematically we will treat the subject as it affects the history of God’s Israel people:

FIRST: From Adam to Abraham.

SECOND: From the close of the Babylonian captivity to the coming of Christ.

THIRD: From Abraham to the captivities.

FOURTH: As the prophets foretell the activity of Israel and Judah, which predictions have been historically fulfilled.

FIFTH: The future glorious state of both Israel and Judah.

Let us review the facts in the history of the White Race from Adam to Abraham; Eve has sex with the serpent (the devil, who can change into whatever form he wishes), which produces Cain and Abel; Cain the child of the devil slays his brother Abel (whom the Bible says was righteous); he leaves the Garden of God and travels to another land and takes a wife and builds cities; Noah’s flood; then Abram is born and his name changed to Abraham.

Then let us examine the facts of history of the White Race from Abraham to the captivity of Israel and Judah.

One would think that after 10, 20, and more years in church that folks would understand that the failure to recognize that Scripture distinguishes from Israel and from Judah sets all the prophetic books at variance one with the other.

One prophet then declares another prophet is wrong. For instance, Isaiah, Hosea and Christ say that Israel is to be lost, while Jeremiah and Ezekiel declare that Judah to be known. Hosea tell us Israel would be as the sands of the sea for multitude, Jeremiah declares Judah to be few in number. Obadiah and Isaiah refer to Israel as an Island Nation with large colonies. Jeremiah and Ezekiel state Judah to be strangers in all countries, without geographical inheritance. Isaiah, Hosea, Micah, Habakkuk and Paul declare Israel to be a Christian people but Ezekiel, Nahum, Zechariah, Christ and Peter tell us Judah is under the Mosaic Law.

We could continue to give other instances of such contradictions, IF ISRAEL AND JUDAH were one and the same people. To teach they are identical makes the Bible a mass of confusion. TO UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ISRAEL AND JUDAH GIVES A KEY THAT UNLOCKS THE TRUTH OF GOD’S DEALINGS WITH HIS PEOPLE, clarifying the Bible facts and statements, and enabling one to understand prophecy and current events.

Take a red, blue and a yellow marks-a-lot pencil and mark your Bible as follows: 1). Underline in red all parts of Scripture referring to Israel; 2). Then with the blue, all passages which refer to Judah; 3). Then with the yellow all that refer to the Gentile world apart from Judah and Israel. Do this and you will be well repaid in the results that follow.

You will be astounded by previous failure to recognize the distinction God so clearly makes between these different groups. The red will predominate, the blue will follow, while only about one-eighth of the whole bible will have any bearing upon the Gentiles, or non-Israelites.

Beginning with Adam, we have the start of Biblical chronology and of the genealogical tables of the Bible. There are ten generations from Shem (Noah’s son) to Abraham. Eber or Heber was the fourth in generation from Shem. All of the descendants of Heber were Hebrews. Adam was six generation later. He therefore was a Hebrew. The Hebrews were NOT Jews, although the Jews can claim to be the seed of Abraham therefore are Hebrew in part. This is one of the reasons so much confusion occurs in the minds of our people.

The Jews are the seed of Abraham through Esau, the cursed one, that God Hated:

“I HAVE LOVED YOU, saith the LORD. Yet ye say, Wherein hast thou loved us? Was not Esau Jacob's brother? saith the LORD: yet I loved Jacob, And I HATED ESAU, and laid his mountains and his heritage waste for the dragons of the wilderness.” (Malachi 1:2-3)

“(For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth;) It was said unto her, The elder shall serve the younger. AS IT IS WRITTEN, JACOB HAVE I LOVED, BUT ESAU HAVE I HATED.” (Romans 9:11-13)

Edom [Esau is called Edom in Genesis 36:8]. And Edom is in 'Modern Jewry' Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925 edition, Vol. 5, p. 41.

THUS WE CAN SEE CLEARLY THAT NEITHER ESAU NOR ANY OF HIS DESCENDANTS WERE ISRAELITES. But all of his children from that time on could be classified as Jews. Also, his descendants could be called brothers to the Arabs, because he married one of Ishmael’s daughters.

The Encyclopedia Americana calls Hyrcanus a Jewish high priest [135‑105 B.C.] who forced the Idumeans to become "Jews." Idumea is the Greek for Edomites. The works of Josephes relates how the Idumeans were forced to accept Judaism. In the Bible Esau, Edo, Mt. Seir and Idumea are interchangeable for the offspring of ESAU, Jacob's twin brother.

Now let us closely follow the facts; Abraham had eight sons. One son was Ishmael whose mother was Hagar. One was Isaac whose mother was Sarah. After Sarah’s death, Abraham married Keturah and she bore him six sons.

Abraham, being a Hebrew, or descendant of Heber, “his descendants” would therefore be Hebrews, BUT THEIR DESCENDANTS ARE NOT JEWS! If they are, then Ishmael was a Jew and, as the Arabs are the descendants of Ishmael, that would make the Arabs Jews.

The descendants of Keturah’s six sons became the Brahmans of India. It would be foolish to declare they are Jews, although as the descendants of Abraham, they are the stock of Heber; therefore, Hebrews. The same reasoning applies to Isaac. Isaac was a Hebrew, the son of Abraham. Now Isaac had two sons, Esau and Jacob. If Abraham was a Jew, then both Esau and Jacob would be Jews. This would make the descendants of Esau also Jews, but the descendants of Esau became the Edomites, later the Turks; also the Pharaohs of the Oppression were of the Esau line, BUT NONE OF THESE PEOPLE ARE JEWS!

Jacob had twelve sons of four different mothers. NONE WERE JEW! One of his sons was Judah, but in the sense in which we use the word Jew today, the term cannot be applied to Judah, for HE WAS NOT A JEW. Remember, please, they whom we call Jews today have certain characteristics and racially are a type that came into existence hundreds of years after Israel left Egypt.

This racial type or remnant we know as the Jew is only a small portion of the descendants of Judah, and also according to the Book of Jasher so were at least a portion of Reuben. There are no Jews in any of the descendants of Jacob’s other 10 sons. Now Judah had three sons and Reuben had 4 sons.

Of Judah’s firs three sons; the descendants of one son, Zarah, peopled the shores of the Mediterranean, leaving Egypt many years before the Exodus. They formed the ancient civilization that founded the City of Troy, as well as other cities around the Mediterranean shores. They also moved as far North and West as the British Isles.

No student of history should be so foolish as to declare the Trojans were Jews. Pharez, the twin brother of Zarah, became the progenitor of the tribe of Judah. But the tribe of Judah WERE NOT JEWS IN THE SENSE IN WHICH WE EMPLOY THE WORD TODAY, TO DESIGNATE A PARTICULAR TYPE AND RACIAL STOCK.

The tribe of Judah was divided “by Yahweh” into two Houses, the House of David and the House of Judah. THERE ARE NO JEWS IN THE HOUSE OF DAVID. The House of Judah was further divided, but for our present purposes we need but follow the history of the branch that returned from the Babylonian captivity.

It was a small number, which returned; a part of the group that was organized into the so-called nation of the Jews. This group, or the nation of the Jews, was composed of a remnant from the House of Judah, a remnant from the Tribe of Benjamin, a remnant from the Tribe of Levi and a remnant form the House of David.

The remnant of the House of Judah, with some of the Levites, intermarried with the people of the land; the Hittites, etc. The result of those forbidden marriages has given us the racial type, which we designate as the Jew. The study of the genealogical tables, with the tribal distinction of God’s people and the different houses into which they were divided, following the history of the posterity of these people, would eliminate most of the erroneous teaching now prevalent regarding Israel and Judah.

Let us now briefly follow the history of the Children of Israel whom God organized into His Kingdom at Mount Sinai. There they received His commandments, statutes and judgments as their constitution. Although they were organized into a kingdom, we recognize that the tribal distinction was kept during the time of the Judges and up to the time of the coming of the Kings. That distinction is also shown during the reign of Saul.

The time came for David to take the throne. He reigned first over Judah only:

“And the men of Judah came, and there they anointed David king over the house of Judah.” (2 Samuel 2:4)

Read carefully the history of God’s Israel people and you will find the Bible very clear on these matters:

“David was king in Hebron over the house of Judah for seven years and six months.” (2 Samuel 2:11)

Later he reigned over all Israel for thirty-three years. This made a reign of forty years over both Israel and Judah. Read the rest of the second chapter of 2 Samuel, and the distinction between Israel and Judah will be so clearly set forth that only one who has made up his mind “not to see,” after attention has been called to these facts, will fail to understand.

Later in David’s reign he caused Israel and Judah to be numbered; therefore if Judah and Israel are “one,” why do we continually find the expression Israel and Judah, or Judah only and Israel only? To one who reads the Bible and permits the Book to speak for itself, it is a continuous source of astonishment to find men and women calling themselves Bible students, teachers and also Judeo-Christian preachers who say there is no difference between Israel and Judah. They are doing nothing but lying or they are exercising intellectual dishonesty; they deceive themselves and try to deceive others.


One thing is certain, in such a statement they are declaring that they do not know the history of the Bible or what it teaches, and anything they say will be lies as Jeremiah said. Until they know the Bible, they are not qualified to instruct others in its message. It is a dangerous thing to tach that which is not true in the handling of God’s Word.

The history of Israel and of Judah and the facts as recorded in the Old Testament are the very foundation on which rests the whole story of the Bible. The New Testament itself depends for authenticity upon the record as set forth in the Old. It would be impossible to know that Yahshua was the Messiah, were it not for the information given us in the prophecies of the Old Testament.

When Solomon died, the ten-tribed House of Israel revolted from the rule of the House of David. The House of Judah, however, remained loyal to the House of David. With Samaria as its capital, Israel set up a line of kings of its own. Judah, with Jerusalem as its capital, was a separate kingdom from Israel.

Sometimes the two; Israel and Judah, were joined against a common foe, but more often they were fighting against each other and supporting the enemies of the other. There were families in Israel that remained loyal to the rule of the House of David, but no tribe as such ever returned to that rule. There is not one single passage in Scripture that states otherwise.

Strong's Concordance more or less defines the words "Jew" and "Jews" as: "in the sense of a country, i.e., a Judean." The word "Jew" is used 22 times in the King James Version of the Bible in the New Testament, and the word "Jews" is used 172 times and 170 times of those are from the same #2453 as the above "Jew" definition. There are another 6 times the plural word "Jews'" is used and all but one of these is this #2454. So for the 200 times, the words: "Jew, Jews, and Jews'" are used in the New Testament, at least 197 occasions are referring to a Judean in the sense of from a place, i.e., as from a country.

The question still haunts many and they have often asked just who are these people the Bible calls "Jew, Jews, and Jews'"? Why were these people not just simply called "Judeans," "Israelites," or "Judeans whose religion was Judaism?" This is the age old word problem of society problem that is surrounded with so many, many, lies and deceptions. "THE FEAR OF THE JEWS" syndrome that plagues society today.

Much of it as a result of the so-called holocaust which we have been told 10,000 times 10,000 that the Germans cremated 6-million Jews during WWII. This story has installed a guilt complex in the American people, until the word Jew has become a non speakable word, and if one dares to utter the word except in reverence and humility they will be attacked by both Jews and Christians.

Therefore, we have prepared this study to prove to you and any other thinking American that the bulk of these people called "Jew" or "Jews" in the Bible, were not and are not of the House of Israel or of the House of Judah.

Then who are these people who have plagued the pages of history for so, so very long? The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia defines "Jew" as the same word of Strong's #2453 in the following words: "'Jew' denotes originally an inhabitant of Judah, (2 Kings 16:6 applies to the two tribes of the Southern Kingdom) but later the meaning was extended to embrace all descendants of Abraham." (James Orr, Volume III, page 1675)

It is an incontestible fact that the word "Jew" did not come into existence until the year 1775. Prior to 1775 the word "Jew" did not exist in any language on earth. The word "Jew" was introduced into the English language for the first time in the 18th century when Sheridan used it in his play "The Rivals," Chapter 2, p. 1, "She shall have a skin like a mummy, and the beard of a Jew." Prior to this use of the word "Jew" the word "Jew" had not become a word.

Contrary to what most people believe Shakespeare never saw the word "Jew" nor did he ever use the word "Jew" in any of his works, the common general belief to the contrary notwithstanding. In his "Merchant of Venice," V, III, I, 61, Shakespeare wrote as follows "what is the reason? I am a Iewe; hath not a Iewe eyes?" You see there was not even a letter "j" or "J" until the middle of the 18th century. Check any encyclopedia you wish for proof of this.

In the Latin Jerome 4th century Vulgate Edition of the New Testament Jesus is referred to by the Genitive Plural of "Iudaeus" in the Gospel by John reference to the inscription on the Cross, "Iudaeorum." It was in the 4th century that Jerome translated into Latin the manuscripts of the New Testament from the original languages in which they were written.

This translation by Jerome is referred to still today, as the Vulgate Edition by the Roman Catholic Church authorities, who use it today. Jesus is referred to as a so-called "Jew" for the first time in the New Testament in the 18th century editions in the English language of the 14th century first translations of the New Testament into English.

The history of the origin of the word "Jew" in the English language leaves no doubt that the 18th century "Jew" is the 18th century contracted and corrupted English word for the 4th century Latin "Iudaeus" found in Jerome's Vulgate Edition. Of that there is no longer any doubt.

The available original manuscripts from the 4th century to the 18th century accurately trace the origin and give the complete history of the word "Jew" in the English language. In these manuscripts are to be found all the many earlier English equivalents extending through the 14 centuries from the 4th to the 18th century.

From the Latin "Iudaeus" to the English "Jew" these English forms included successively: "Gyu," "Giu," "Iu," "Iuu," "Iuw," "Ieuu," "Ieuy," "Iwe," "Iow," "Iewe," "Ieue," "Iue," "I’ve," "Iew," and then finally the 18th century, "Jew." The many earlier English equivalents for "Jews" through the 14 centuries are "Giwis," "Giws," "Gyues," "Gywes," "Giwes," "Geus," "Iuys," "Iows," "Iouis," "Iews," and then also finally in the 18th century, "Jews."

The Compton’s Interactive Encyclopedia relates the following in reference to the letter “J”: THE LETTER J. The history of the letter J is linked with the history of l. The Romans and their European successors used l both for the vocalic "i" and for the consonantal "y" (as in the English word "yet"). The English letter J did not come into existence until the end of medieval times, when scribes began to use a tailed form of "i," with or without the dot, next to the short form of "i" (1). When printing was invented, the tailed form of "i" (2) was often used for an initial "i," which is usually consonantal. Not until the 17th century, however, was the distinction between J or j as a consonant and l or i as a vowel fully established. (Compton’s Interactive Encyclopedia)

Apparently when the Jews first inserted the word “Jew” into the scriptures to deceive Christians was during the time that 2 Kings was being transcribed. Because the first mention in the Bible of the Jews is in 2 Kings 16:6. (The book of Ester was written latter than 2 Kings according to those who have made a study of the times the various books were written) Here we are told of the Jews being driven out of a certain city. As Jew is here used it is but a shortening of the word Judahite. Not even yet had that type of bastard (mixed breed) racial stock come into being whom we today recognize as Sephardic Jews. This did not occur until after the intermarriages with the Hittites, which produced the racial characteristics with the “show of countenance.”

“The shew of their countenance doth witness against them; and they declare their sin as Sodom, they hide it not. Woe unto their soul! for they have rewarded evil unto themselves.” (Isaiah 3:9)

Ezra and Nehemiah both emphatically condemned the intermarriages, which were taking place after the return from the Babylonian captivity. It seems that our men cannot keep it in their pants no matter the race of the other party; and clearly violate the commandment of God to not mix with the other races.

Through Jeremiah, the Lord makes this interesting statement:

“And I saw, when for all the causes whereby backsliding Israel committed adultery (race mixing) I had put her away, and given her a bill of divorce; yet her TREACHEROUS SISTER JUDAH FEARED NOT, BUT WENT AND PLAYED THE HARLOT ALSO.” (Jeremiah 3:8)

Ask those who declare that Israel and Judah are the same people, to read that passage analyzing it in the light of their belief. Their contention is not only illogical but utter nonsense. Yet it is a fact that in the face of such strong Biblical evidence; and there are many such passages showing the clear distinction between Israel and Judah, the theological leaders, seminaries and Bible schools are continually trying to tell us there is no distinction between Israel and Judah. (This is because they have foolishly allowed the Jews to infiltrate and teach lies and falsehoods in those schools of learning)

Continually they refer to Israel as Jews, and even change the name Judah to Israel. Here is another quotation for them to explain:

“Backsliding Israel hath justified herself more than treacherous Judah.” (Jeremiah 3:11)

Make Israel and Judah one and the same people referred to, and the statement becomes ridiculous. The whole trouble with religious teaching in our Bible schools and seminaries is that, instead of reading the “Bible” and studying it to find the truth, they read the statements of MEN (Mostly Jews) regarding the Book.

In doing this they have accepted as truth the traditions or teachings of men instead of the revealed facts of the Word. (The traditions of men was the teaching of the scribes and Pharisees, which Yahshua so bitterly denounced)

How often we hear such statements as this: Dr. Blank has said, so and so, with the declaration that because this Doctor is a scholar he must be right. Or, professor Blank of such and such a school has published a book and he is an authority; he says Israel and Judah are one. In this process of accepting man’s word and quoting from men’s words, they have built up a case, but have no evidence of Scripture to substantiate their findings.

Remembered, please, there is no authority (regardless of the scholastic Degree or the standing of the scholar of school) aside from the authority of the Word of God. How clearly Yahweh as condemned false teaching. He said:

“The prophet (that is, the preacher or teacher) that hath a dream, let him tell a dream; and he that hath my word, let him speak my word faithfully. What is the chaff to the wheat? Said the Lord.” (Jeremiah 23:28)

How concisely Yahweh has here defined as a dream that method of spiritualizing the truth; mental dreams. Let us speak the Word faithfully. For Yahweh says what He means and means what He says. The Bible is not ambiguous; neither does it require a theological training in spiritualization to understand its plain statements.

Reference Materials