Watchman Willie Martin Archive

                                                         Willie Martin

                                                    22752 Arapaho Rd.

                                                    Justin, Texas 76247

                                                       (940) 648-8030

                                                  [email protected]

Mr. Hank Handegraaff

Christian Research Institute

P.O. Box 7000

Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688-7000

Dear Mr. Handegraaf:

I wish to express my most profound thanks for the research on John 3:16, and the material that your organization sent me. And I agree with you assessment, or the assessment of William Hendriksen, in his “New Testament Commentary,” published by Baker Book House, Grand Rapids, Michigan. I have been doing some research for myself and have come to the same conclusion that John 3:16 does belong in the Scriptures and was not placed there by someone to deceive people.

However, if you will permit me, I will show that I do disagree with Mr. Hendricksen on several points. For one thing I don’t believe that he really understood what John 3:16 was telling people. For instance the word “world” does not, in this instance, mean the entire planet earth. Which is clearly shown by using the story of Noah’s Flood to see what the word “world” actually means when stated in the Scriptures.

                                                                             Was Noah’s Flood Universal?

For years the controversy has raged about whether Noah's flood was universal, or was it confined to a certain geographical location. This is a study to present our view about the flood as related in the Scriptures. We will use the Bible, and see if it has anything to say about it's scope.

The common claim, among most denominations, who still preach the Bible; and who more or less try to stay with the Scriptures as they read it and study it. Is that there was a world wide drowning of men, about 4300 to 4500 years ago. That there was a flood called Noah's flood that drowned all the men upon the earth at that time in the world's history, except for his wife, his sons and their families. This is the common teaching among most Protestant Denominations, the Catholic Church. Some Fundamentalists groups and some Pentecostal groups do not teach this. Then there are many people outside of the church who don't know one way or the other, and could really care less.

Some of them think this is nonsense, they think the Bible story is a myth. Some say that is not important anyway. Then there is the great, vast bulk of the population, know so little about the Bible, they don't know if there might have been a flood or not. Those who do study the Bible, and are willing to go through the Scriptures and see what the Bible actually teaches about where was the flood in Noah's time. First of all let us look at the Book of Genesis.

It is amazing how people can read a verse of scripture, and think to themselves: Yes that's right. Then they put their brain in neutral and simply become brain dead. They will study no further; they have found the truth; and God help the person who disagrees with them.

Such is the case when a discussion comes up concerning Noah's flood. Many read Genesis 6:13-17:

"And God said unto Noah, The end of all flesh is come before me; for the earth is filled with violence through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth...And, behold, I, even I, do bring a flood of waters upon the earth, to destroy all flesh, wherein is the breath of life, from under heaven; and every thing that is in the earth shall die."

These are the verses most generally used when defending the destruction of the entire earth by Noah's flood. Now first off we know that the earth was not destroyed. Yet, if one is to believe that the flood was universal, they must also believe that the entire world was destroyed at that time. Because that is what is says "I will destroy them with the earth."

By this one verse we know that the flood was not universal. But let's go on because those who believe in the entire world being flooded will not be content with this verse. But one can just see them beginning to foam at the mouth, and wish to destroy me, and accuse me of trying to destroy God's Word. And nothing could be further from the truth. I simply believe in reading and "understanding" all of God's Word and not present some stupid argument that the atheists and other non-believers can latch upon like a dog on a bone.

First. Let's look at what Strong's Concordance has to say about the word earth. I suppose you all will accept that Strong's is an authority. If you do not, then there is nothing which can be used as an authority for anything. Strong's relates:

In the Old Testament the following is used almost every time. #127: soil; country, earth, ground, husband, land. #776: a land; common, country, earth, field, ground, land, nations, way, wilderness, world. In the following one is used only once and the other only a few times. #2789: a piece of pottery; earth; sherd, stone. #6083: dust; clay, earth, mud: ashes; dust; earth; ground, mortar; powder; rubbish.

In the New Testament the following is used almost every time: #1093: soil; region; country; earth; ground; land; world. Once as #3625: Part of the globe; the Roman Empire; Once as #1919: worldly; in earth; terrestri­al. Once as #2709: The ground; subterranean, under the earth. Once as #3749: eartern-ware; of earth; earthen.

"And the flood was forty days upon the earth; and the waters increased, and bare up the ark, and it was lift up above the earth. And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth: and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered. {Well so far so good. Everything is going to die and everything is covered, but in the next verse it says} Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered." (Genesis 7:17-20)

There are two possibilities of this specific verse. First of all 15 cubits is believed by most Bible scholars to equal approx. 22 1/2 feet. In other words a foot and a half for each cubit. Now, if this means 22 1/2 feet above the highest hill then the earth was covered. If it means 22 1/2 feet above the location of the Ark or where the Ark was built. Then you are in trouble, the water would not have been deep enough to cover the entire planet. But let's go on and read some other verses:

"And all flesh died that moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beast, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man: All in whose nostrils was the breath of life, of all that was in the dry land, died." (Genesis 7:21-22)

So far everything that we have read, is quite familiar to those who teach about the flood. And it does sound pretty complete. It sounds pretty complete as far as the destruction of everything outside of the Ark. And of course, we know, from the contents of the scriptures that all of the animals and people inside the Ark did not die. The real question is, after reading and studying God's Word and trying to find out about the flood. Which must be understood in order to understand history a little better. When God said in His Word - The Earth - did He mean the planet earth? Or did He mean the Land? Did He mean the planet earth, which would mean the entire earth? Or did He actually mean the land which was being spoken about?

Turn to Genesis 4:11-14 where in speaking about Cain we read:

"And now art thou cursed from the earth...And Cain said unto the Lord, My punishment is greater than I can bear. Behold, thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth..."

It is clear that Cain was only being driven out from the place where he was, to another place. But Cain said to the Lord "thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth." If we used just that phrase one could easily say that Cain was removed off of the earth entirely.

Because it says from the face of the earth. But then the scriptures show that Cain clearly understood what had happened. "And from thy face shall I be hid; and I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond in the earth." Here we have two things pointed out to us.

One: That the scriptures are only concerned with a certain geographical area of the world. Cain knew this, otherwise he would not have made the proviso statement: "from thy face shall I be hid." This clearly shows that when Cain moved out of that specific geographical area, that God was no longer concerned with him, and he would be, in effect, hidden from God's eyes.

Second: That Cain clearly knew that he was being driven from one area of the earth to another. And not literally from off the earth entirely, the planet earth, but from the land wherein he had dwelt. And that he would sill be on the planet earth.

After The Flood: Genesis 11:1:

"And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech."

Now that's what it says. It says that "the whole earth was of one language and one speech." Trying to interpret this in the same manner as the previous verses to mean a world wide flood. We would have to assume that it meant that every person on the earth spoke one language. Because that is what it says.

"And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar; and they dwelt there."

Now they must be the people of all the earth. So if we follow the same line of interpretation we would have to assume all of the living people on the face of the earth spoke one language and they all came and dwelt in the land of Shinar. Yet Archaeologists and sciences can provide no record of all the people of the earth living in the land of Shinar, about 2400 years before the birth of Christ. But let's go on and read some more.

This is the story of the angel bringing Lot out before the destruction of the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah:

"The sun was risen upon the earth when Lot entered into Zoar. Then the Lord rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the Lord out of heaven; And he overthrew those cities, and all the plain, and all the inhabitants of the cities, and that which grew upon the ground. But his wife looked back from behind him, and she became a pillar of salt." (Genesis 19:23)

We know from the story that those who were inside these cities on the plain were wicked. When God destroyed those two cities, Lot and his two daughters and his wife went out and his wife died and was turned into a pillar of salt. And as some translations say, turned into a pillar of ashes. Leaving Lot and his two daughters alive.

When we read verses 30 and 31 listen to what is said:

"And Lot went up out of Zoar, and dwelt in the mountain, and his two daughters with him...And the firstborn said unto the younger, Our father is old, and there is not a man in the earth to come in unto us after the manner of all the earth."

There is not a man in the earth. When one interprets this in the same manor as he might interpret the others. You would have to assume, with the limited knowledge that we have hear, that what she means is that all the rest of humanity has died. That there are no other men alive.

Because she said "there is not a man in the earth" to come into us in like manner. And of course you know the rest of the story. That the girls went ahead and got pregnant by their father, because they "thought" all the rest of the men on earth had died. Yet in verse 30 we know there "were" others alive because Lot "feared to dwell in Zoar."

Understand this one thing. As we go through these verses of Scripture. I am not poking fun or trying in anyway to discredit the Scriptures. I am simply trying to get you to think, use your head. Turn away from the Jewish Fables and false teachings and listen to what God says for a change!

If there were no others alive but him and his two daughters what did he have to fear. Of course those who don't want to accept what is being presented will cry out: "He was afraid of the animals."

But the scriptures don't say that. And if one believes in a universal flood, then they have to believe that if there were animals that frightened Lot, the scriptures would say so. At any rate, here, the universal flood advocates will be forced to admit, all mankind was once again destroyed except Lot and his two daughters.

As we continue on to Genesis 41 we find that Joseph is in Egypt, and we are coming up to the time of the famine. "And the seven years of plenteous-ness, that was in the land of Egypt, were ended. And the seven years of dearth began to come, according as Joseph had said: and the dearth was in all lands; but in all the land of Egypt there was bread."

Following the same line of reasoning that has been followed before. That would mean that all the rest of the world was suffering from a famine or a dearth or drought, whatever turns you on; except for the land of Egypt. Verses 55-57:

"And when all the land of Egypt was famished, the people cried to Pharaoh for bread: and Pharaoh said unto all the Egyptians, God unto Joseph; what he saith to you, do. And the famine was over all the face of the earth: And Joseph opened all the storehouses, and sold unto the Egyptians; and the famine waxes sore in the land of Egypt. And all countries came into Egypt to Joseph for to buy corn; because that the famine was so sore in all lands."

We are arriving at a time when secular history is very specific, and we can study the ancient writings and get a pretty good idea of what was happening in those days. Of course, prior to the flood, we recognize that there are few actual written records available and thus are limited in our knowledge of that time in history.

But, if we follow the same reasoning as on the previous verses, the plain teaching of these scriptures, and if we interpret them in the same manner as the advocates of a universal flood do, this very definitely means that all of the rest of the world was having a famine. Right?

This would mean that the Americas, England, Australia, China, New Zealand and etc., were suffering from a famine or dearth. And that they all came to Egypt to purchase food. Which would have been impossible because the Scriptures does not even recognize China or the rest of the world at this point in time.

From the knowledge that we have gained from history and archeology in the last thousand years of this time, after the flood, does not indicate that we have any knowledge of people from Asia, the Americas, the Eskimos, or anybody else from the opposite side of the earth going to Egypt to buy food. In fact, if one will study closely they will see that the only people involved in this famine was Egypt and the lands immediately surrounding Egypt.

If you will obtain a map of that portion of the earth, you will clearly see, that everything we have talked about so far, has been a relatively small geographic area in the Middle East.

But, yet many still teach that the flood was over all the earth. Now we have read that the famine at the time of Joseph was over all of the earth. Yet there is no record of it in our secular history, of people coming into Egypt from the other parts of the earth to buy food.

So far, to briefly relate what has transpired:

1). We have a flood which has covered all the earth;

2). We have had a fire which the survivors have stated specifically, that there were no other men left on the earth;

3). We also have a famine which was, a famine over all the face of the earth.

Do we, have, in truth, three things which has either destroyed all of the populations of the earth or most of them. In fact, the last one leaves us to believe that all of the people on earth, who did not go to Egypt died.

Therefore, everyone on earth died of the famine except for those in Egypt and the few fortunate enough to be able to get to Egypt to get food.

Now turn to the Tenth Chapter of Exodus where we will look at the plagues of Egypt, a story most know quite well. Exodus 10:14-15: "And the locusts went up over all the land of Egypt, and rested in all the coasts of Egypt: very grievous were they; before them there were no such locusts as they, neither after them shall be such. For they covered the face of the whole earth..."

Here, we have yet another plague which covered the face of the whole earth.

" that the land was darkened; and they did eat every herb of the land, and all the fruit of the trees which the hail had left: and there remained not any green thing in the trees, or in the herbs of the field, {where?} through all the land of Egypt."

Yet the phraseology or terminolo­gy is identical to what we have read before. They covered all the face of the whole earth. In Ezekiel 39 all of the Israelites were killed. Did you know that all of the Israelites were dead in Ezekiel's day? Well Ezekiel the prophet said so. Talking about this end of the age battle, he said:

"And the heathen shall know that the house of Israel went into captivity for their iniquity: because they trespassed against me, therefore hid I my face from them, and gave them into the hand of their enemies: so fell they all by the sword."

Thus Ezekiel is telling us that all of the Israelites had fallen by the sword.

As we said earlier, we am not trying to be frivolous about this thing. I am simply trying to show you that when the Bible talks about something happening over all of an area or all of something or over all of the earth; that it does not necessarily mean that every single solitary person on every inch of the entire planet was involved. Because if it did we have already had more than four total destructions or almost total destructions.

Turn to Ezra we will show you, after we state the point, we will show you the location of the flood according to the Bible! "Now in the first year of Cyrus king of Persia, that the word of the Lord by the mouth of Jeremiah might be fulfilled, the Lord stirred up the spirit of Cyrus king of Persia, that he made a proclamation throughout all his kingdom, and put it also in writing, saying, Thus saith Cyrus king of Persia, The Lord God of heaven hath given me all the kingdoms of the earth..."

Now we are arriving down to a point in history where we can easily verify the things that have happened in the scriptures according to secular written history. There is no way for us to know what Cyrus was thinking or what God Almighty was thinking when He put it in His Word. But we know from secular history that Cyrus's kingdom never extended more than a thousand miles from his capital city. He had a tremendous kingdom; But the Bible says that God had given him "all the kingdoms of the earth." Yet we know, and no minister tries to prove to us, that Cyrus ruled over China or North America or South America, or even over Africa. They know better. They know just how foolish such teaching would be. Because it would not take long for their flock to realize that he was teaching a falsehood.

Turn to Daniel. You know that Daniel was a high official in the Babylonian Kingdom, and after he and the others has shown their protection and favor of God. Daniel 6:24:

"And the king commanded, and they brought those men which had accused Daniel, and they cast them into the den of lions, them, their children, and their wives; and the lions had the mastery of them, and brake all their bones in pieces or ever they came at the bottom of the den."

Darius was so pleased with the actions of God and His apparent protection of Daniel that this was what he did. Then, in verse 25:

"Then king Darius wrote unto all people, nations, and languages, that dwell in all the earth..."

That is what is says. God's Word says; "Darius wrote unto all people, nations, and languages, that dwell in all the earth; Peace be multiplied unto you. I make a decree, That in every dominion of my kingdom men tremble and fear before the God of Daniel."

What was he talking about? Of course, when Darius wrote to all the people on the earth, he was writing to all the people in his kingdom! And his kingdom, we know from secular history and from God's Word was rather limited compared to the entire planet.

It covered an area contained in that small geographical area, where all of the Bible talks about. It did not exceed beyond it. Not a single bit of the previous history has gone outside that small geographical area of the Middle East.

Now turn to the New Testament to the book of Luke, where we read the reason that Joseph and Mary came to Bethlehem. Luke 2:1-3:

"And it came to pass in those days, that there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus, that all the world should be taxed. (And this taxing was first made when Cyrenius was governor of Syria.) And all went to be taxed, every one into his own city."

You see what happens if one interprets the scriptures the same way all the way through the Bible. Now we have Caesar Augustus ruling over all of the world. Which is absolutely not true. He never ruled over Germany. He never ruled over all of the British Isles. He never ruled over the Americas. He never ruled over Japan. He never ruled over Asia, nor any of the other countries of the world. Do you not see how silly those who would have us believe that the flood was universal?

Because according to the way they interpret the scriptures they would have all the indians in North and South America going into their cities to be taxed. They would have all the Chinese going into their cities to be taxed. They would have all the Japanese going into their cities.

Countries that never knew Rome existed for hundreds or thousands of years later. They would have you believe that. Because right here in the scriptures it says "All went to be taxed, every one to his own city." It is clear that this scripture is not talking about the entire planet earth, it is talking, once again, about a certain geographical location in the Middle East.

For another point turn to the book of Acts. Did you know that if all of the people did not die in the famine in Egypt, that they are going to die in another famine, which is related in Acts.

"And in these days came prophets from Jerusalem unto Antioch. And there stood up one of them named Agabus, and signified by the spirit that there should be great dearth throughout all the world: which came to pass in the days of Claudius Caesar." (Acts 11:27-28)

Now we are down to about 1900 years ago, where we have excellent written secular history, and no one; not even the most ardent universal flood advocates would dare to declare that all the world had a great dearth or famine. Yet if one interprets these scriptures in the same way, then there must have been a famine over all the world, the entire planet 1900 years ago. And secular history failed to mention such a catastrophe.

We are laying a foundation, so that you will fully understand what we are presenting, that it the interpretation is not true, that when the Bible says all the earth, it is talking about the entire planet.

The entire Bible only encompasses one small Geographical area of the Scriptures when it is speaking historically. It is only when it is speaking prophetically that it is speaking about other parts of the world, and then it is only concerned with the Children of Israel. And we don't mean the Jews when we say that for they are no part of Israel. They are mostly of Japheth, Esau, and Khazars.

Turn to the Second Book of Peter. For we will now look at verses which are quite often referred to when the universal flood advocates talk of the flood again. And remember as we read these verses also, that so far, that the history written down in the Word of God still has not moved outside of the area of one small geographical portion of the Middle East.

All the way from the Book of Genesis to 2 Peter we have been talking about one geographical location. Peter is referring to the flood:

"For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment; And spared not the old world, but saved Noah the eighth person, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood upon the world of the ungodly; And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah into ashes condemned them with an overthrow, making them an ensample unto those that after should live ungodly." (2 Peter 2:4-6)

God brought in the flood upon the world of the ungodly. And we would state that this doesn't necessarily mean all the world, the entire planet. First of all you must remember and understand the principle that God operates upon. Which is, that sin is the transgression of the Law. And where there is no Law there is no transgression.

God does not destroy even peoples unless they have the Law and violate it. And you can read this far in the Holy Scriptures and you will not find definite and conclusive evidence that God's Law was ever preached beyond the confines of that small geographical area of the world.

God's Law, as far as the scriptures relates had not gone out to the other parts of the planet. So the flood was brought in upon the ungodly.

Again this does not necessarily mean all the world - the entire planet. As we have already shown quite clearly, we believe. Of course there will be skeptics, such as one of the thieves which was crucified next to Christ. Who railed and mocked Him as they died.

"For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old {notice he was talking about people being destroyed who were 'willingly' ignorant, and definitely disobeying the Word of the Lord}, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished." (2 Peter 3:5-6)

But this does not necessarily prove a world or planet wide flood. Now make no misunderstanding, we know these can not be used to preach or teach a limited flood, but the universal flood advocates almost always use them and so we must recognize they are there.

Turn to Joshua, who we believe will show you the bounds of Noah's flood. You must understand that this was happening to Joshua approx. 500 years after Shem.

So we are talking about a period of time which was 500 years after one of Noah's sons who was actually in the Ark during the flood. We are not talking about Joshua doing something a 1000 or 2000 years after the flood. But only about 500 years after it. He has called all the people of Israel together. He's old and knows he is going to die. "Joshua gathered all the tribes of Israel to Shechem {a city between the Mediterranean and the Jordan River - this is where this event took place}, and called for the elders of Israel, and for their heads, and for their judges, and for their officers; and they presented themselves before God. And Joshua said unto all the people, Thus saith the Lord God of Israel, your fathers dwelt on the other side of the flood in old time, even Terah the father of Abraham, and the father of Nachor: and they served other gods." (Joshua 24:1-2)

Now we have read, in part, the Bible through several times and never realized what is being presented here. Every time I read it I always thought in terms of time. Your fathers dwelt before the flood. But that is not what it is saying, is it? It says "Your fathers dwelt on the other side of the flood." And then it gives the names of their fathers. "Terah, the father of Abraham." If you think about it for a minute it will dawn upon you that Terah didn't live before the flood. Terah lived just before Abraham, long after the flood.

Yet the scriptures says that Terah lived "on the other side of the flood." Now if you will read this several times and "think" use your heads you will realize that Joshua is not talking about "time." He is talking about Geography!

He is telling them "WHERE THEY LIVED," not when they lived! Now listen carefully to what he says: "...and I took your father Abraham from the other side of the flood, and led him throughout all the land of Canaan, and multiplied his seed, and gave him Isaac."

Turn to Genesis 11 and we will show you where Terah, Nachor and Abraham lived. Genesis 11:10: "These are the generations of Shem: Shem was an hundred years old, and begat Arphaxad two years after the flood."

Then it goes down and gives all of the descendants of Shem. And two hundred and twelve years after the flood we read in verse 24: "And Nahor lived nine and twenty years, and begat Terah."

Yet in Joshua 24, Joshua says, "your fathers even Terah," which Genesis 11 said was born two hundred and twelve years after the flood, "lived on the other side of the flood." And then it talks about bringing Abraham. "And Terah took Abram {Abraham} his son, and Lot the son of Haran his son's son, and Sarai his daughter in law, his son Abram's wife; and they went forth with them from Ur of the Chaldees, to go into the land of Canaan; and they came unto Haran, and dwelt there. And the days of Terah were two hundred and five years: and Terah died in Haran." (Genesis 11:31-32)

Joshua said in Joshua 24:3:

"And I {Almighty God} took your father Abraham from the other side of the flood..."

Now it is very apparent that Abraham did not live before the flood. So if God brought Abraham from the other side of the flood, what is He talking about.

Well he is telling us that he, Joshua, standing at Shechem is on one side of where the flood was; and Abraham living in Ur of the Chaldees was living on the other side of the flood. And there is no doubt that he is talking about the flood of Noah.

So if you wish to know where the Flood of Noah was, then get you a good map of that part of the world in old times and look between Ur of Chaldees and Shechem and you will see the geographical area of the flood.

Now the scriptures tell us to have a second witness. So we will turn to a well known verse for this second witness. I believe that God has laughed at those who espouse a universal flood, and has revealed its location in one of the best known verses in the Bible, as a jest. To see if we would search out the truth for ourselves. Or would we grope in blindness. "And if it seem evil unto you to serve the Lord,choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood {Not 'before' the flood, but 'on the other side of the flood'}, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord." (Joshua 24:15)

Most ministers will read this and say "Well I don't know what you people are going to do, but I am going to serve the Lord."

Yet right here in that very commonly used verse is the double or second witness that Joshua knew he stood on one side of the flood, and that Abraham was born and raised on the other side of the flood. We realize this is a futile effort for most Christians because they do not want to know the truth. Because they would rather believe a lie than the truth. God said this was so:

"A wonderful and horrible thing is committed in the land; The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests bear rule by their means; and my people love to have it so..." (Jeremiah 5:31-32)

This is one of the reasons that Hosea declared:

"My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: {why?}: Because thou Hast rejected knowledge..." (Hosea 6:4)

And if you will read the scriptures carefully and honestly you will see God destroyed the old world because the people were mixing with other races.

Therefore, we must research the word "world" and see what it actually means.

World: Strong's Concordance: #2889  kosmos (kos'‑ mos); probably from the base of 2865; orderly arrangement, i.e. decoration; by implication, the world (in a wide or narrow sense, including its inhabitants, literally or figuratively [morally]):  KJV‑adorning, world.

World: Strong's Concordance: #2865 komizo (kom‑ id'‑zo); from a primary komeo (to tend, i.e. take care of); properly, to provide for, i.e. (by implication) to carry off (as if from harm; genitive case obtain): KJV‑‑ bring, receive.

World: Thayer's Definition: #2889  kosmos‑

1) an apt and harmonious arrangement or constitution, order, government

2) ornament, decoration, adornment, that is, the arrangement of the stars, ‘the heavenly hosts,’ as the ornament of the heavens. 1 Pet. 3:3

3) the world, the universe

4) the circle of the earth, the earth

5) the inhabitants of the earth, men, the human race

6) the ungodly multitude; the whole mass of men alienated from God, and therefore hostile to the cause of Christ

7) world affairs, the aggregate of things earthly  the whole circle of earthly goods, endowments riches, advantages, pleasures, etc., which although hollow and frail and fleeting, stir desire, seduce from God and are obstacles to the cause of Christ

8) any aggregate or general collection of particulars of any sort

a) the Gentiles as contrasted to the Jews (Rom. 11:12 etc)

a) used of believers only, John 1:29; 3:16; 3:17; 6:33; 12:47 1 Cor. 4:9; 2 Cor. 5:19

World: Thayer's Definition: #2865  komizo‑

1) to care for, to take care of, to provide for

2) to take up or carry away in order to care for and preserve

3) to carry away, to bear off

4) to carry, to bear, to bring to, to carry away for oneself, to carry off what is one's own, to bring back

a) to receive, to obtain: the promised blessing

b) to receive what was previously one's own, to get back, to receive back, to recover

Now does it make sense that Yahweh would tell us that He loved world affairs, the aggregate of things earthly  the whole circle of earthly goods, endowments riches, advantages, pleasures, etc., which although hollow and frail and fleeting, stir desire, SEDUCE FROM GOD AND ARE OBSTACLES TO THE CAUSE OF CHRIST.

WORLD: "World is also associated with mankind. Christ said of His disciples, 'Ye are the light of the world' (Matthew 5:14). OFTEN WORLD IS USED TO INDICATE 'THE MEN OF THIS WORLD' WHO ARE SAID TO LIE IN WICKEDNESS (Ephesians 2:2; 1 John 5:19). THE MEN ARE CALLED 'THE WORLD,' not only because they compose the greater part of the world's population, but mainly because they pursue and cherish the things of this world. The Psalmist describes these men 'as having their portion in this life.' (Psalm 17:14)

"World may also denote the fleeting character of life's riches and pleasures and the folly of making them of central importance in life. "Will a person gain anything if he wins the whole world, but loses his life?" (Matthew 16:26) (from Nelson's Illustrated Bible Dictionary, Copyright (C) 1986, Thomas Nelson Publishers)

Next I disagree with the word “cross” to describe what Christ was crucified upon. For according to the Companion Bible

                                                                                      The Cross and Crucifixion

In the Greek New Testament two words are used for “the cross,” on which the Lord was put to death.

1). The word “stauros”; which denotes an upright pale or stake, to which the criminals were mailed for execution.

2). The word “xulon,” which generally denotes a piece of a dead log of wood, or timber, for fuel or for any other purpose. It is not like “dendron,” which is used of a living, or green tree, as in Matthew 21:8; Revelation 7:1, 3; 8:7; 9:4.

As this latter word “xulon” is used for the former “stauros,” it shows us that the meaning of each is exactly the same.

The verb “stauroö” means to drive stakes. (There are two compounds of it used: sustauroö═to put any one thus to death with another (Matthew 27:44; Mark 15:32; John 19:32; Romans 6:6; Galatians 2:20); and anastauroö=to raise up and fix upon the stake again (Hebrews 6:6). Another word used is equally significant; prosp_gnumi=to fix or fasten anything (Acts 2:23)

Our English word “cross” is the translation of the Latin crux; but the Greek stauros no more means a crux than the word “stick” means a “crutch.”

Homer uses the word stauros of an ordinary pole or state, or a single piece of timber. (Iliad xxiv.453, Odyssey, xiv.11) And this is the meaning and usage of the word throughout the Greek classics. (e.g. Thucydides iv.90. Xenophon, Anabasis v.2.21)

It never means two pieces of timber placed across one another at any angle, but always of one piece alone. Hence the use of the word “xulon” (No. 2, above) in connection with the manner of our Lord’s death, and rendered “tree” in Acts 5:30; 10:39; 18:22; Galatians 3:13; 1 Peter 2:24. This is preserved in our old English name “rood,” or “rod.” See the Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th (Camb.) Ed., vol. 7, p. 505d.

There is nothing in the Greek of the New Testament even to imply two pieces of timber.

The latter “chi,” X, the initial of the word Christ (Xρτ_oς), was originally used for His Name; or xρ. This was superseded by the symbols (as multipointed star with a P inscribed over it) and (a tall cross with a P on top of it) and even the first of these had four “equal” arms.

These crosses were used as symbols of the Babylonian sun-god (a circle with a cross in it), and are first seen on a coin of Julius Caesar, 100-44 B.C., and then on a coin struck by Caesar’s heir (Augustus) 20 B.C. (Other coins with this symbols were struck by Augustus, also by Hadrain and other Roman emperors. See Early Christian Numismatics, by C.W. King, M.A.)

On the coins of Constantine the most frequent symbol is (the multipointed star with the P inserted in the center of it); but the same symbol is used without the surrounding circle, and with the four equal arms vertical and horizontal; and this was the symbol specially venerated as the “Solar Wheel.”

It shoud be stated that Constantine was a sun-god worshiper, and would not enter the “church” till some quarter of a century after the legend of his having seen such a cross in the heavens. (Eusebus, Vil. Const. I.37) The evidence is the same as to the pre-Christian (phallic) symbol in Asia, Africa, and Eghypt, whether we consult Nineveh by Sir A.H. Layard (ii.213), or Manners and Customs of the Ancient Eghyptisans, by Sir J. Gardner Wilkinson, iii. pp. 24, 26, 43, 44, 46, 52, 82, 136.

Dr. Schliemann gives the same eividence in his Llois (1880), recording his discoveries on the site of prehistoric Troy. See pp. 337, 350, 353, 521, 523.

Dr. Max Ohneflasch Bichter gives th4e same evidence from Cyprus; and these are “the oldest extant Phoenician inscriptions;” see his Kypros, the Bible and Homer: Oriental Civilization, Art., and Religion in Acient Times. Plates xix, xxv, xxvi, xxx, xxxi, xxxii, xi, lvii, lxix.

The Catacombs in Rome bear the same testimony “Christ” is never represented there as “hanging on a corss,” and the cross itself is only pourtrayed in a vieled and hesitating manner. N the Egyptian churches the cross was a pagan symbol of life, borrowed by the Christians, and interpreted in the pagan manner. See the Encyclopedia Britinica, 11th (Camb) ed., vol. 14, p. 273.

In his Letters from Rome Dean Burgon sayd: “I question whether a cross occurs on any Christian monument of the first four centuries.”

In Mrs. Jameson’s famous History of our Lord as Exemplified in Works of Art, she says (vol. Ii, p. 315): “It must be owned that ancient objects of art, as far as hitherto known, afford no corroborations of the use of the cross in the simple transverse form familiar to us, at any period preceding, or even closely ancceeding, the time of Chrystom”; and Chrysostom wrote half a century after Constantine!

“The invention of the Cross” by Helena the mother of Constantine in 326), through it means the finding of the cross, may or may not be true; but the ‘invention’ of its use in later times, are truths of which we need to be reminded in the present day. The evidence is thus complete, that the Lord was put to death upon an upright stake, and not on two pieces of timber placed at any angle. (The Companion Bible, Appendix 162, page 186)

A little more on the Cross:

                                                                               Is The Cross A Christian Symbol?

This study would not be complete without a close look at what has been presented as the instrument upon which the Lord Jesus Christ was placed. The instrument upon which He died. So we present the following for your study and consideration. It is taken in part, from a book called "Babylon Mystery Religion ‑ Ancient and Modern" by Ralph Woodrow.

The Cross is recognized as one of the most important symbols of the Roman Catholic church. It is displayed on the top of the roofs and towers of their churches. It is seen on their altars, furnishings, and ecclesiastical garments. The floor plan of the majority of Catholic churches is laid out in the shape of the cross. All Catholic homes, hospitals, and schools have the cross adorning the walls. Everywhere the cross is outwardly honored and adored ‑ in hundreds of ways.

In like manner, the sign of the cross is often used in the Catholic rites. When an infant is sprinkled the priest makes the sign of the cross upon the infants forehead saying: "Receive the sign of the cross upon thy forehead."

During confirmation, the candidate is signed with the cross. On Ash Wednesday, ashes are used to make a cross on the foreheads of Catholic members. When they enter the church building, they dip the forefinger of the right hand in "holy water," touch the forehead, the chest, the left and the right shoulder ‑ thus tracing the figure of the cross. The same sign is made before eating meals. During Mass, the priest makes the sign of the cross 16 times and blesses the altar with the cross sign 30 times.

Most Christians will never study enough to come to realize that THE MARK OF THE BEAST IS THE CROSS! See #5516: chi xi stigma, khee xee stig'-ma; the 22d, 14h and an obsol. letter (4742 as A CROSS) of the Greek alphabet (intermediate between the 5th and 6th), used as numbers; denoting respectively 600, 60, and 6; 666 as a numeral:-six hundred threescore and six..

Protestant churches, for the most part, do not believe in making the sign of the cross with their fingers. Neither do they bow down to it or use it as an object of worship as does the Catholic church and many of its affiliates. They have recognized that these things are unscriptural and superstitious. But they have made use of the cross on their steeples, on their church roofs, on pulpits, and in various other ways.

And so, to one degree or another, Christendom ‑ both Papal and Protestant ‑ has assumed that there is virtue in the cross image; that our church buildings should be decorated with it; that it is a Christian symbol. But we ask: Is the cross which took our Savior's life a thing to be adored?

Should we parade the instrument of death before the world and be proud of it? Do the scriptures anywhere teach that we are to take the cross and place it upon our buildings or wear it around our necks? Many have never questioned the use of the cross on churches and their furnishings. They have assumed that the cross was a Christian symbol. But a study of historical evidence plainly reveals that the cross symbol is of pagan origin! The early Christians did not consider the cross a virtuous symbol, but rather as "the accursed tree," a device of “death” and "shame." (Hebrews 12:2) They did not trust in an old rugged cross. Instead, their faith was in what was accomplished on the cross; and through this faith, they knew the full and complete forgiveness of sin!

It was in this sense that the apostles preached about the cross and gloried in it. (1 Corinthians 1:17‑18) Such references to the cross in the epistles never refer to A PIECE OF WOOD one might wear around his/her neck or carry in his/her hand. The message of the apostles was concerning the ONE that hung and died on the cross. When they spoke of the cross, they were speaking of the suffering of Calvary, the supreme sacrifice that was made there, and the eternal purpose of God that was accomplished. But never did those of the early church consider a piece of wood as a protector, a good luck charm, or as an object of worship. No, such use of the cross came much later.

IT WAS NOT UNTIL CHRISTIANITY BEGAN TO BE PAGANIZED THAT THE CROSS CAME TO BE THOUGHT OF AS A CHRISTIAN SYMBOL! It was in 431 A.D. that crosses in churches and chambers were introduced, while the use of the crosses on steeples did not come until about 586 A.D. (Harper's Book of Facts)

In the 6th Century, the crucifix image was introduced and its worship sanctioned by the church of Rome. (Fausett, p. 145) It was not until the second council at Ephesus that private homes were required to possess a cross. (The Cross in Tradition, History, and Art, p. 157)  Such use of the cross then was obviously not a doctrine of the early true church. It was not a part of "the faith that was once delivered to the saints." From where then did it come?

In the following, we will give historical proof that the cross was an object of worship centuries before the Christian Era. We will see that the cross sign is Babylonish and that its entrance into the professing church was but a further attempt to mix paganism with Christianity. Centuries before the Christian era, the cross was honored as a religious symbol by the people of Babylon. It is seen on their oldest monuments. (Doane, p. 342) Historians say that it was a symbol associated with Tammuz ‑ a Jewish god. (The Greatness that was Babylon, p. 496‑498)

The Cross Symbol

THE CROSS SYMBOL: In its original form ‑ came from the first letter of the name Tammuz, the "T". The same sign of the cross that Rome now worships was used in the "Babylonian Mysteries," says Hislop, "...that which is now called the Christian cross was originally no Christian emblem at all, but was the mystic Tau of Chaldeans and Egyptians ‑ the true original form of the letter T ‑ the initial of the name of Tammuz...and was used in every variety of way as the most sacred was used as an amulet over the heart; it was marked on the official garments of the priests, as on the official garments of Rome today." (Two Babylons, p. 197) From Babylon, this cross symbol spread to Egypt, where monuments preserved to this day give abundant evidence of its use there.

In ANY book on Egypt that shows the old monuments and walls of their ancient temples, one can see the kings and gods of antiquity holding crosses in their hands. The inscription shows some of the gods of Egypt in mystery form ‑ part human and part animal ‑ each holding a cross! A building of Amenophis IV at Thebes, Egypt, has inscriptions of the king praying, with a picture of a round sun circle with a mystery form of the sun‑god beneath it. A noted historian in reference to Egypt: "Here unchanged for thousands of years, we find among her most sacred hieroglyph­ics the cross in various forms...but the one known specially as the 'cross of Egypt,' or the Tau cross, is shaped like the letter T, often with a circle or ovoid above it, yet this mystical symbol was not peculiar to this country, but was reverenced...­among the Chaldeans, Phoenicians, Mexicans, and EVERY ancient people in both hemispheres." (The Cross in Tradition, History, and Art, p. 2‑3)

As the cross worship spread to various nations, it took on varied forms and was used in varied ways: Among the Chinese, "the cross is...acknowledged to be one of the most ancient is portrayed upon the walls of their pagodas, it is painted upon the lanterns used to illuminate the most sacred recesses of their temples." (The Cross in Tradition, History, and Art, p. 13)

The cross has been a sacred symbol in India for centuries among non‑Christian people. "In Northern India, the cross is used to mark the jars of sacred water taken from the Indus and Ganges...In Southern India the cross is used as an emblem of disembodied Jaina saints...The east Indians (revered the cross sym­bol)...centur­ies before our Lord appeared upon earth." (The Cross in Tradition, History, and Art, p. 10)

In the central part of India, two rude crosses of stone have been discovered which date back to a time centuries before the Christian era. One of these crosses is over 10 feet high; the other over eight feet. (The Cross in Tradition, History, and Art, p. 12) Among the Hindoos of India, the cross was regarded as sacred to their god Agni. (Monumental Christianity, p. 14) The Buddhists, and numerous other sects of India, marked their followers on the head with the sign of the cross.

On the continent of Africa, "at Susa, the Abyssinia...the natives plunge a cross in the River Gitche...­the Kabyle women although Mohammedans, tattoo a cross between their eyes...In Wanyamwizi, or the land of the moon, the inhabitants decorate their walls with crosses...the Yaricks established a line of kingdoms from the Niger to the Nile...on their shields (was) painted the image of a cross." (The Cross in Tradition, History p. 9) Here then is mention of the use of the cross by numerous heathen tribes in Africa who knew nothing of Christ!

When the Spaniards first landed in Mexico, "they could not suppress their wonder," says Prescott, "as they beheld the cross, the sacred emblem of their own (Catholic) faith, raised as an object of worship in the temples of Anahuac. The Spaniards were not aware that the cross was the symbol of worship of the highest antiquity...(and was used by many) pagan nations on whom the light of Christianity had never shone."

In Palenque, Mexico, founded by Votan in the 9th century before the Christian era, is a heathen temple known as "the temple of the cross." There inscribed on an altar slab is a central cross six and a half by eleven feet in size! (Encyclopedia or Religions, Vol. 3, p. 70) In olden times, the Indians of Mexico worshiped the cross as TOTA (Our Father).

This practice of addressing a piece of wood with the title "father" is also mentioned in the Bible. When God's people of the Old Testament mixed idolatry with their religion, they worshiped pagan gods and said to a stock, "Thou art my father!" (Jeremiah 2:27) But it is contrary to the Word of God to call a piece of wood (or a priest!) by the title "father." " no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." (Matthew 23:9)

Ages ago in Italy, before the people knew anything of the arts of civilization, they believed in the cross as a religious symbol. Even at this early period, they believed it was a protector and it was placed upon tombs. (The Cross in Tradition, History and Art, p. 99) Through the centuries, it was used as a religious symbol right on up to the days of the pagan Roman empire.

In 46 B.C. Roman coins show Jupiter holding a long scepter terminating in a cross. (The Cross in Tradition, History and Art, p. 26) This was his symbol. (Encyclopedia of Religions, Vol. 1, p. 495) The vestal Virgins of pagan Rome wore the cross suspended from their necklaces, as the nuns of the Roman Catholic church do now. (Two Babylons, p. 198)

The Greeks depicted crosses on the head band of their god corresponding to Tammuz of the Babylonians. In the Eleusinian Mysteries, a cross was placed on the breast of each initiate. (Bible Myths, p. 343) Porcelli mentions how that Isis was shown with a cross on her forehead. Her priests carried processional crosses in their worship of her. The temple of Serapis in Alexandria was surmounted by a cross. The temple of the Sphinx when it was unearthed was found to be cruciform in shape. Ensigns in the form of a cross were carried by the Persians during their battles with Alexander the Great (B.C. 335). ibid, p. 346. The cross was used as a religious symbol by the Aborigines of South America in ancient times. (Curiosities of Popular Customs, p. 297)

New born children were placed under its protection against evil spirits. The Patagonians tattooed their foreheads with crosses. (Encyclopedia of Religions, Vol. 1, p. 495) Ancient pottery in Peru has been found that is marked with the cross as a religious symbol. (Encyclopedia of Religions, Vol. 1, p. 386)

Monuments show that Assyrian kings wore a cross suspended on their necklaces, (Encyclopedia of Religions, Vol. 1, p. 494) as did some of the foreigners that battled against the Egyptians. These warriors wore a small cross suspended to a necklace or to their collar. The cross was also figured upon the robes of the Rot‑n‑no as early as the 15th century before the Christian era. (Wilkinson, Vol. 1, p. 376)

Much more could be said about the many uses of the cross as a religious symbol and object of worship among those who lived in olden times. But enough has been said to well establish the fact that the cross was in use long before the Christian era. To sum it up, there is hardly a pagan tribe where the cross has not been found. (Two Babylons, p. 199) "In some form, all through the ages, the cross has existed and has had a vital significance and influence." (The Cross ‑ Its History and Symbolism, p. 16)

As an instrument of death, of crucifixion, the cross is also very ancient and pagan. "The cross was used in ancient times as a punishment for flagrant crimes in Egypt, Assyria, Persia, Palestine, Carthage, Greece, and Rome...Tradition ascribes the invention of the punishment of the cross to a woman, the queen SEMIRAMIS!" (The Cross in Tradition, History, and Art, p. 64)

"But since Jesus died on a cross," some ask, "does this not make it a Christian symbol?" NO! The fact that Jesus was killed on a cross shows that it was already an established form of punishment and death ‑ among pagans. However, Christ was not killed on a cross, He was crucified on a "Stake."

It was not a Christian symbol when Jesus hung on it, and nothing has ever changed to make it a Christian symbol now! As one has asked: Suppose Jesus had been killed with a shot‑gun; would this be any reason to have a shot‑gun hanging from our necks or on top of the church roof? Would this make a shot‑gun a Christian symbol of virtue? No!

It is not what killed our Lord, but what his death accomplished that is important! As the cross symbol spread to the ancient nations (as we have seen it did), it took on different forms in different countries until there were many forms of the pagan cross. Catholicism, adopting the pagan idea of cross worship, also adopted these various forms of the cross. Thus, to this day, the Catholic church does not adore just ONE type of cross, but numerous types. Now we ask: If the Catholic use of the cross originated with the cross of Christ, then WHY are so many different forms of the cross used? It is evident that Christ only hung on one cross.

If cross worship originated with the cross of Christ, would it not seem that only one type would be used? The fact is that cross worship did not originate with Christ and all of these various forms of the cross were pagan symbols before the Christian era. A noted writer said: “Of the several varieties of the cross still in vogue, as national and ecclesias­tical emblems, distinguished by the familiar appellations of St. George, St. Andrew, the Maltese, the Greek, the Latin, etc., there is not one amongst them the existence of which may not be traced to the remotest antiquity!" (The Pentateuch Examined, Vol. 6, p. 113)

Now let's notice a few examples of how these different crosses were actually sacred symbols long before the Christian era: That form of the cross which is known as the Tau cross was widely used in Egypt. What is known as the Greek cross may also be found on Egyptian monuments. This form of the cross was used in Phrygia where it adorned the tomb of Midas (B.C. 718). (Doane, p. 344; The Cross in Tradition, p. 21) In the ruins of Nineveh, a king is shown wearing a MALTESE cross on his bosom. The form of the cross that is today known as the LATIN cross was used by the Etruscans. Its use on an ancient pagan tomb with winged angels to each side of it.

What has been called the St. Andrew's cross was highly venerated among the Cumas in South America. It was regarded as a protector against evil spirits. (Encyclopedia of Religions, Vol. 1, p. 494) It appeared on the coins of Alexander Bala in Syria in 146 B.C. and on those of Baktrain kings about 140 to 120 B.C. (Needless to say, this was long before "St. Andrew" was ever born!)

Most of the crosses on the Protestant Churches is called the Calvary cross, yet this cross is taken from an ancient inscription in Thessaly which dates from a period prior to the Christian era! Now the fact that these various forms of the cross have all been adopted by the Romish Church, makes it obvious that such cross‑ sacredness did not originate with the cross of Christ, for he died on only one cross!

What type of cross was it upon which Jesus died? The word "cross" in the Bible is translated from "stauros" which comes from the root "sta," that is, "to stand." As far as the Word itself is concerned, there is no indication of any cross piece whatsoever. In his scholarly "expository Dictionary of New Testament Words," W.E. Vine states that the Greek word "stauros" means simply an upright stake and is, "to be distinguished from the ecclesiastical form of a two beamed cross...(which) had its origin in ancient Chaldea, and was used as the symbol of the god Tammuz (being in the shape of the Mystic Tau, the initial of his name) in that country and in adjacent lands, including Egypt...

“In order to increase the prestige of the apostate ecclesiasti­cal system, pagans were received into the churches apart from regeneration by faith, and were permitted largely to retain their pagan signs and symbols. Hence the Tau or T, in its most frequent form, with the cross‑piece lowered, was adopted to stand for the cross of Christ." (Encyclopedia of Religions, Vol. 1, p. 256)

As to the exact shape of the cross upon which Christ hung, we need not be too concerned, for it is not the shape of the cross that is the important thing. It is the ONE ‑ The Lord Jesus Christ ‑ that hung there and what He accomplished that is ALL important.

Constantine and The Cross

When considering the above information concerning the cross, someone will, almost always bring up the so‑called vision of Constantine. So we include the following with that in mind. A factor that caused the adoration of the cross image to become firmly established in the church of the falling away was the famous "vision of the cross" and the so‑called "conversion" of the Roman Emperor Constantine.

On the day before the Battle of Milvian Bridge, Constantine prayed to his sun‑god and there appeared a cross ‑ we are told ‑ over the setting sun with the inscription: "In hoc signo Vinces;" that is, "In this sign conquer." The next day, Constantine advanced the battle behind a standard portraying a Cross. He was victorious in this battle and professed conversion. Of course such a seeming victory for Christianity, the conversion of the emperor ‑ as the result of the cross vision did much to further the use of the cross in the Roman Church.

But are we to suppose that the Lord Jesus gave such a vision to the Emperor Constantine? Actually there is little reason to consider this vision as authentic, especially since it has no real historical basis, and due to the fact that Constantine's vision was supposedly in answer to him. The only authority from whom the story has been gathered by historians is Eusebius, who confessedly was prone to edification and was accused as a "falsifier of history."

If Constantine ever did, in reality, have such a vision, we can be sure its author was not Almighty God or the Lord Jesus Christ. The very idea that our Lord would command a pagan emperor to make a military banner embodying the cross and to go forth conquering and killing in that sign, is altogether inconsistent with the general teachings of the Bible and with the Spirit of true Christianity. This Roman empire (of which Constantine was the head), had been described in the scriptures as a "Beast."

Daniel saw four great beasts which represented four world empires. These were Babylon (lion), Medio‑Persia (bear), Greece (leopard), and Rome. This fourth beast, the Roman Empire, was so horrible in the eyes of God that it could not be compared to any earthly beast. (Daniel 7:1‑8) Considering then how wicked this beastly Roman Empire was in the eyes of God, are we to suppose that the Lord Jesus Christ became the leader of this beast system? Or would Jesus give a wicked emperor a vision and tell him to kill and fight as his representative?

Did Jesus ever tell his people to go forth to kill others under a cross‑banner supposedly representing him? Of course not! The very basis of Christianity is opposed to the unfairness of war, hate, and murder. Why then should we suppose that Christ would tell Constantine to conquer in His name and sign to further the Beast system of Rome?

Obviously, such a vision came not from our Lord Jesus Christ! But if the vision was not of God, how was it that Constantine was converted as a result? The fact is that the "conversion" of Constantine WAS A HOAX! Even though this man had much to do with the establishment of certain doctrines and customs within the fallen church, the facts plainly show that he was not truly converted, not in the Bible sense of the word. Historians admit that the conversion of Constantine was "nominal, even by contemporary standards." (Man and His Gods, p. 220)

Probably the most obvious indication that he was not truly converted may be seen from the fact that AFTER his supposed conversion, he committed several murders ‑ including the murder of his own wife and son! According to the Scriptures, no murderer hath eternal life abiding in him. (1 John 3:15)

Constantine's first marriage was to Minervina, by whom he had a son named Crispus. His second wife was named Fausta who bore him three daughters and three sons. Now Crispus, his first born son, became a great soldier and a help to his father in the battles. Yet, in 326, very shortly after the directing the Nicaen Council! Constantine had this son put to death. The story is that Crispus had made love to Fausta, Constantine's wife. At least he was so accused by Fausta. But this may have been her way of getting Crispus out of the way, so that her sons would have claim to the throne!

However, Helena, Constantine's mother, persuaded him that his wife "had yielded to his son." And so, Constantine had Fausta murdered also. (The Story of Civilization ‑ Caesar and Christ, p. 663) But these were not the only murders he committed. About the same time that Constantine had his son murdered, he decreed the execution of Licinianus, his sister's son. Constantine also put Licinus, his sister's husband, to death ‑ even though he had promised her that he would spare his life! (The Story of Civilization ‑ Caesar and Christ, p. 663; Medieval Italy, p. 4)

After Constantine's supposed conversion, he still remained the Pontifix Maximus or High Priest of the pagan state religion. (The Growth of the Christian Church). As Pontiff, he was required to carry out the ceremonial of the traditional cult.

Likewise, when he dedicated Constantinople, he used both pagan and Christian rites in the dedication. Further evidence of how Constantine attempted to unite and mix together both paganism and Christianity, is seen on coins of the period which he had made. On these coins he put a cross (to please the professing Christians) while on the same coins were representations of Mars or Apollo. While professing on one hand to be a Christian, yet on the other hand, he continued to believe in pagan magic formulas for the protection of crops and the healing of disease. (The Story of Civilization, p. 656) Constantine did show numerous favors toward the Christian faith however.

He abolished death by crucifixion. He stopped the persecutions of the Christians which had become so cruel at Rome. Why them, if he was not truly a Christian, did he do these things? The answer to this is also clearly written in history. Persecutions had not destroyed the Christian faith. Constantine knew this. And since his position was being challenged by a rival emperor and because of his dire need for support from every quarter, he turned to the Christians.

Instead of the empire constantly being divided ‑ the pagans opposing the Christians ‑ why not take such steps as might be necessary to MIX both paganism and Christianity together, and thus bring a UNITED force to the empire? This was clearly the reasoning of Constantine. By this time, most of the church leaders were thinking in terms of numbers and popularity, rather than in terms of spirituality and truth anyway, and thus were ready to make compromises with paganism.

This was especially the case at Rome. Soby adopting the cross as a symbol on the banners of his army, Constantine figured he could establish a UNITY among his troops. The apostate Christians would think they were fighting for the cross of Christ; the pagans could not object because the cross was also one of their sacred emblems. Says the noted historian Durant: "To the worshiper of Mita (the pagans) in Constantine's forces, the cross could give no offense, for they had long fought under a standard bearing a Mithraic cross of light." (The Story of Civilization, p. 655) And thus the so‑called Christians and pagan Mithraists in the army of Constantine were united and successfully fought the battle.

Another factor that contributed to cross‑worship in the church of Rome centered around Helena, Constantine's mother. In 326, when she was almost eighty ‑ according to the legend ‑ she made a pilgrimage to Jerusalem and there by the help of a Jew who understood her superstitious tastes, found three crosses.

The original cross was identified, we are asked to believe, because it is said to have worked miracles at the suggestion of Macarius, bishop of Jerusalem. The other two crosses produced no miracles. And so Helena ‑ according to the story ‑ had found the original, the true cross! But that the true cross was found is no doubt false, for laws among the Jews required crosses to be burned after being used for crucifixion. (Fausett, p. 145) That Helena did visit Jerusalem seems to be historically correct. But the story of her discovery of the original cross was evidently a later addition, for it did not appear until 440 A.D. ‑ 114 years later! (Encyclopedia of Religions, Vol. 1, p. 494)

Let us just suppose that someone did find the actual cross upon which Jesus died. Would there be any virtue in that piece of wood? No, absolutely none. The Calvary cross served its purpose even as the brazen serpent had served its purpose when the children of Israel were bitten by snakes. We will remember that Moses had made a brazen serpent and raised it up on a pole. This was a type of the way that Christ was to be lifted up. (John 3:15)

Nevertheless, after the brazen serpent had served its purpose, the Israelites kept it around and finally began to worship it. (2 Kings 18:4) They made it a relic and attempted to copy the heathenistic use of relics and mix it into their religion! And so Hezekiah "did that which was right in the sight of the Lord" by breaking the brazen serpent to pieces. In like manner, if we actually had the original cross ‑ if it were still in existence ‑ there would be no reason to set it up as an object of worship. Why? Because its purpose has been fulfilled. If then there would be no power in the ORIGINAL cross, how much less is there in a mere piece of wood in its shape?

In view of these things, it becomes obvious that the use of the cross ‑ in sign or symbol, in any shape or form ‑ as an object of worship, is a mockery to true worship, which is the worship of Christ himself! But each century brought more superstition into the Romish church in connection with the cross image. It came to be recognized as a protector. Had it not helped Constantine win the battle of Milvian Bridge? Had not the cross worked miracles for Helena? And so it came to be regarded as an image that could scare away evil spirits. It was worn as a charm. It was placed high up on church steeples to frighten away lightning. But because of the high position of the cross upon the steeple, it was often the very thing that caused lightning to strike the building! The use of the cross in private homes was supposed to ward off trouble and disease. And so even as the pagan Egyptians had set up obelisks, image was believed to possess supernatural powers, even so did people come to worship the cross. Thousands of pieces of wood ‑ supposedly pieces of the "original cross" were sold as protectors and charms.   

Christianity is NOT a universal religion. For Christ came only to the House of Israel, He did not come to all the various races and peoples on earth; He came to His Israel people, and them only. The other races are to receive their blessings and benefits from His Israel people and this they have done in abundance.

For the other races and people on the earth, the planet, the entire globe cannot sin, because they don’t have God’s Laws and have never had them, the futile efforts of the misguided missionaries, to make God’s word of none effect and untrue.

                                                                                    The Other Races Cannot Sin

Constantly we hear from the Judeo‑Christian clergy and evangelists, and even too many so‑called layman Judeo‑Christians that the Bible and the Gospel is for all the various races on earth. That all the races must be saved.

But that is an error, the Bible was not written to all the different races on earth, and it certainly was not written to the Jews, for they hate Christ and Christian (His followers) with a passion, and at every chance they get, they murder as many as they can get away with. Look at Russia, they murdered over 50 million Christians after they took over in 1917 until the present time and they are not through yet.

"Thanks to the terrible power of our International Banks, we have forced the Christians into wars without number. Wars have a special value for Jews, since Christians massacre each other and make more room for us Jews. Wars are the Jews' Harvest: The Jew banks grow fat on Christian wars. Over 100‑million Christians have been swept off the face of the earth by wars, and the end is not yet." (Rabbi Reichorn, speaking at the funeral of Grand Rabbi Simeon Ben‑Iudah, 1869, Henry Ford also noted that: 'It was a Jew who said, 'Wars are the Jews' harvest'; but no harvest is so rich as civil wars.' The International Jew: The World's Foremost Problem, Vol. III, p. 180).

"Wars are the Jews harvest, for with them we wipe out the Christians and get control of their gold. We have already killed 100‑million of them, and the end is not yet." (Chief Rabbi in France, in 1859, Rabbi Reichorn).

The Laws, Statutes, and Judgments of Almighty God was given ONLY to Israel and not to any other people on the face of the earth.

"Only be thou strong and very courageous, that thou mayest observe to do according to all the law, which Moses my servant commanded thee: turn not from it to the right hand or to the left, that thou mayest prosper whithersoever thou goest." (Joshua 1:7)

God has not delt with any nation or people on earth as He has with Israel; nor will He ever do so, for He has chosen Israel to be His own and not the other races.

I have heard some sermons by some Judeo‑Christian preachers, one in particular, which would have you believe that the Blacks, Jews, Mexicans and all the other races are God's Chosen people;  who were crying out that there is no Chosen Race, or People. This is a damnable, and provable lie. There is a Chosen Race and People in the Scriptures. The following very clearly shows this, and there are many more that I could have listed, but these should suffice.

Chosen People:

"For thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God: THE LORD THY GOD HATH CHOSEN THEE TO BE A SPECIAL PEOPLE UNTO HIMSELF, ABOVE ALL PEOPLE THAT ARE UPON THE FACE OF THE EARTH. The LORD DID NOT SET HIS LOVE UPON YOU, NOR CHOOSE YOU, because ye were more in number than any people; for ye were the fewest of all people: BUT BECAUSE THE LORD LOVED YOU, and BECAUSE HE WOULD KEEP THE OATH WHICH HE HAD SWORN UNTO YOUR FATHERS..." (Deuteronomy 7:6‑8; 14:2; Isaiah 41:9; 43:1, 10‑20; 44:23; 48:10; 49:3; Haggai 2:23)

My People Israel:

"Now the Lord had told Samuel in his ear a day before Saul came, saying, To morrow about this time I will send thee a man out of the land of Benjamin, and thou shalt anoint him to be captain OVER MY PEOPLE ISRAEL, THAT HE MAY SAVE MY PEOPLE out of the hand of the Philistines: for I HAVE LOOKED UPON MY PEOPLE, because their cry is come unto me. And when Samuel saw Saul, the LORD said unto him, BEHOLD THE MAN WHOM I SPAKE TO THEE OF THIS SAME SHALL REIGN OVER MY PEOPLE." (Exodus 7:4; 1 Samuel 9:15‑17; 2 Samuel 3:18; 5:2; 7:7; 7:10‑11; 1 Kings 6:13; 8:16; 14:7; 16:2; 1 Chronicles 11:2; 17:7; 17:9‑10; 2 Chronicles 6:5‑6; Jeremiah 7:12; 12:14; 23:13; 30:3; Ezekiel 14:9; 25:14; 36:12; 9:7; Daniel 9:20; Amos 7:8; 7:15; Matthew 2:6)

My Chosen:

"I HAVE MADE A COVENANT WITH MY CHOSEN, I have sworn unto David my servant." (Psalm 89:3; Isaiah 43:20; 65:15)

I Have Chosen:

"BUT THOU, ISRAEL, ART MY SERVANT, JACOB WHOM I HAVE CHOSEN, THE SEED OF ABRAHAM MY FRIEND. Thou whom I have taken from the ends of the earth, and called thee from the chief men thereof, and said unto thee, THOU ART MY SERVANT I HAVE CHOSEN THEE, and not cast thee away. Fear thou not; for I am with thee: be not dismayed; for I am thy God: I will strengthen thee; yea, I will help thee; yea, I will uphold thee with the right hand of my righteousness. Behold, all they that were incensed against thee shall be ashamed and confounded: they shall be as nothing; and they that strive with thee shall perish. Thou shalt seek them, and shalt not find them, even them that contended with thee: they that war against thee shall be as nothing, and as a thing of nought. For I the LORD thy God will hold thy right hand, saying unto thee, Fear not; I will help thee. FEAR NOT, THOU WORM JACOB, AND YE MEN OF ISRAEL; I WILL HELP THEE, SAITH THE LORD, AND THY REDEEMER, THE HOLY ONE OF ISRAEL." (Isaiah 41:8‑14; 43:10; 44:1‑2; John 13:18)

Thou Art My Servant:

"Thou whom I have taken from the ends of the earth, and called thee from the chief men thereof, and said unto thee, THOU ART MY SERVANT I HAVE CHOSEN THEE, and not cast thee away." (Isaiah 41:9; 44:21; 49:3)

His Chosen Ones:

"O YE SEED OF ISRAEL HIS SERVANT, YE CHILDREN OF JACOB, HIS CHOSEN ONES.". (1 Chronicles 16:13; Psalms 105:6; 135:4; Isaiah 41:8; 44:1; Acts 9:15)

The People whom God has Chosen for His Inheritance:

"Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord; and THE PEOPLE WHOM HE HATH CHOSEN FOR HIS OWN INHERITANCE." (Psalm 33:12)

I have called thee by thy name; thou art mine.

"But now thus saith the Lord that created thee, O Jacob, and he that formed thee, O Israel, Fear not: for I have redeemed thee, I have called thee by thy name; thou art mine...For I am the LORD thy God, the Holy One of Israel, thy Saviour: I gave Egypt for thy ransom, Ethiopia and Seba for thee. Since thou wast precious in my sight, thou hast been honourable, and I have loved thee: therefore will I give men for thee, and people for thy life." (Isaiah 43:1, 34)

God chose Abraham alone.

"Hearken to me, ye that follow after righteousness, ye that seek the Lord: look unto the rock whence ye are hewn, and to the hole of the pit whence ye are digged. Look unto Abraham your father, and unto Sarah that bare you: FOR I CALLED HIM (Abraham) ALONE, and blessed him, and increased him." (Isaiah 51:1‑2)

They also say that Christ died to save all the races from their sins. Well the other races and peoples of the earth did not need Christ to save them from their sins, because they had no sins to begin with.

"Because the law worketh wrath: for where no law is, there is no transgression." (Romans 4:15)

"(For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law." (Romans 5:13)

"And hath confirmed the same to Jacob for a law, and to Israel for an everlasting covenant," (1 Chronicles 16:17)

"For he established a testimony in Jacob, and appointed a law in Israel, which he commanded our fathers, that they should make them known to their children." (Psalm 78:5)

Therefore, if the other races and peoples did not have the law, then they could not have any sin. That is why there will be people who have never had a belief in Christ, will be outside the walls of the city as spoken of in the Book of Revelation.

"Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city. For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie." (Revelation 22:14‑15)

Therefore, the other races and people have not sinned because they never had God's Law, Statutes, and Judgments. But they are alive and outside the holy city.

So when you hear the Judeo‑Christian preachers, evangelists and etc., tell you that we are to be a multi cultural people, and that there is no difference in the races is a damnable liar, for God created all the various races with to serve a specific service in His plan, and He formed Adam the father of Abraham, and therefore our father also; and only Adams descendants, the Israelites were given the Law, Statutes and Judgments of Almighty God. And God said that the different races were Good, but He will not acknowledge mixed breeds.

It is only our White Israelite people who can commit sin, because they are the only ones who were given the Law.

"Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law." (1 John 3:4)

We are not to be a multi cultural people, we are not to mix with the other races because that is an Abomination to God Almighty.

One other aspect that I would like to cover and that is the Bible and what it actually is:

                                                                                  The Bible is Not A Jewish Book

There is a growing, proliferating need, for our people to know their racial and spiritual identity in the Plan of God! Millions of our White Christian Caucasian people are yearning and searching, thirsting and fainting for a deeper meaning for their life! They are searching to find the meaning behind their existence and being as the Children of Light upon this earth. Why was I born? Where did I come from? Why am I here? Where am I going? What is my ultimate end? Who were my ancestors? What is God's will for my life?

These and many other questions are gripping the hearts of many of our young people! Behind all of this unrest, uncertainty, confusion, frustration and bewilderment, lies the unmistakable truth that our people are searching for their Ancestral Roots, they are searching for their Identity.


America has al­most lost two gener­ations! The present living Christian White people are a people who have been separated and estranged from their history, their culture, and their heri­tage in Jesus Christ. We will never be able to understand how those who teach in Organized Reli­gion, can know so many Scriptures, by heart, but never come to a realization or understanding of just what the Bible truly is.

Then when the Truth is presented to them they will simply close their eyes and stop their ears so that they cannot see or hear that Truth! And begin to cry out to high heaven; I do not wish to clutter my mind with such Racist Trash, thus denying Almighty God, His Word, the Lord Jesus Christ and the History of their people Israel.

"For the Lord hath poured out upon you the spirit of deep sleep, and hath closed your eyes: the prophets [Clergy] and your rulers [Gov­ernment and Church Leaders], the seers [Pastors, Ministers etc.] hath he cov­ered. And the vision of all is become unto you as the words of a book that is sealed, which men deliver to one that is learned [Clergy, Pastors, Ministers, Teachers etc.], saying, read this, I pray thee: and he saith, I cannot; for it is sealed...Whe­refore the Lord said, For as much as this people draw near me with their mouth, and with their lips do honour me, but have removed their heart far from me...therefore...their wise men shall perish, and the understanding of their prudent [cautious] men shall be hid." (Isaiah 29:10‑14)

Zechariah told us:

"But they refused to hearken...and stopped their ears, that they should not hear. Yea, they made their hearts as an adamant stone, lest they should hear the law, and the words which the Lord of hosts hath sent in his spirit by the former prophets..." (Zechariah 7:11‑12)


"This is the book of the generations of Adam [his race]. In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him; Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called Their name Adam, in the day when they were created." (Genesis 5:1‑2)

   Thus it is very clear, the Holy Bible, is the Book of Adam's Race. This is the declaration made in Genesis 5:1. The Bible is the family of one race, the race of Adam. This is what the Bible states about itself! So we must come to the realization that this fact becomes one of the most important of all our Christian pre-suppositions.

They have been robbed, and stripped of their racial, and spiritual inheritance by the culture distorting enemies of Christianity. Our people are lost, they have been blinded from recognizing the truth, their minds have been negated, and they have lost the ability to think conceptually, the news media, public schools, denominational pulpits, the university and college classrooms, have cut off, and blacked out of the minds, of our people, all truth and knowledge about their past heritage, duty and purpose in the plan of God. Our Christian Caucasian people, have been robbed and fleeced out of their racial and spiritual heritage, they have become challel slaves to the elite money masters of this nation, and the world. The time has come for the Anglo-Saxon, Celtic, Germanic, Scandinavian, Nordic, Slavic and kindred people  to rise up and claim their birthright under Jesus Christ!

It becomes a foundation of truth upon which we build our faith! The implications of this Biblical Presup­position, this beginning point in our Chris­tian thinking and understanding of the Holy Bible, is crucial to the preservation of our Christian faith and of the race of Adam: the White Race!

When we understand what this Divine Truth means: "This is the book of the generations of Adam [his race]," we will see a rebirth of our Christian Faith take place in a world which denies both Jesus Christ our savior and the Bible!

Since the declaration of the Scripture is that the Bible is "...THE BOOK...OF...ADAM..." it becomes imperative that we explore, ponder and investigate all we can about the man Adam. Our first great clue to understanding the man Adam is to know the meaning of his name.

The Word Adam is translated from a Hebrew word "aw‑damn" or "aw‑dam." (#119 and #120 in Strong's Concordance) The word "Adam" means "RUDDY" (#120), "TO SHOW BLOOD (in the face), FLUSH OR TURN ROSY, BE (made) RED (ruddy)." This clearly shows, the Hebrew meaning of the word "ADAM" identifies him as a WHITE MAN. Adam was ruddy...he could blush...he could show blood in the face. Adam was the beginning of the White Race upon this earth.

Therefore, the Holy Bible is the History of the White Race; Later to become known as "ANGLO‑ SAXONS" after Isaac as the Scriptures relate. For God said:


"And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying...AND THEY [children of Israel and others] SHALL PUT MY NAME [CHRIST ‑ ian] UPON THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL; and I will bless them." (Numbers 6:22, 27)


Now that we have identified the Bible to be the Book of Adam's Race and have documented that Adam was Ruddy, could blush or show blood in the face, and was a WHITE MAN, we must continue on and examine the implications of this.  But first let us look and see further, that we are speaking of the WHITE RACE and see how God describes King David and the Lord Jesus Christ. David is described as:

"And Samuel said unto Jesse, Are here all thy children? And he said, There remaineth yet the youngest, and, behold, he keepeth the sheep. And Samuel said unto Jesse, Send and fetch him: for we will not sit down till he come hither. And he sent, and brought him in. Now he [David] WAS RUDDY, and withal of a beautiful countenance, and goodly to look to..." (1 Samuel 16:11‑12)


"And when the Philistine looked about, and saw David, he disdained him: for he was but a youth, and RUDDY, and of A FAIR COUNTENANCE." (1 Samuel 17:42)

   The Lord Jesus Christ is described as:

MY BELOVED IS WHITE AND RUD­DY..." (Solomon's Song 5:10)

"Nazarites (See Matthew 2:23) WERE PURER THAN SNOW, THEY WERE MORE RUDDY IN BODY THAN RUBIES..." (Lamentations 4:7)

Now back to the Presupposition of our Faith for it is related: THE HOLY BIBLE IS THE BOOK OF ADAM'S RACE AND ADAM WAS A WHITE MAN. The implications of this presupposition are as follows:

FIRST: Since the Holy Bible is the Book of Adam's Race, it means that the White Race of Adam was made the custodians of the Sacred Scriptures [not the Jews]! The White Race was given the stewardship of Divine Truth [though many will deny it and cry out, THAT IS RACIST, I don't want to hear it. Thus fulfilling Isaiah 29:10‑14 and Zechariah 7:11‑12].

THE BIBLE IS NOT THE HISTORY OF THE OTHER RACES! Moreover, we must not cause the Scriptures to be violated or broken by involving other races as principals of the Holy Bible. For we have no authority from the Words of the Lord Jesus Christ or Almighty God to make the Bible anything more than what God's Word declares it to be!

IT IS THE BOOK OF THE RACE OF ADAM, NOTHING MORE, NOTHING LESS! It does not belong to the other races, for they have and will receive their blessings through the Race of Adam!

"And in thy [Abraham's] seed shall ALL THE NATIONS OF THE EARTH [other races] BE BLESSED..." (Genesis 22:18)

It is nothing less than blasphemy for one to seek to make God's Word more or less than it declares itself to be. For Christ declared:

"Give not that which is holy unto the dogs [Jesus said the Canaanites were dogs (Matthew 15:22, 26), Esau Married Canaanite women (Genesis 36:2) Esau is Edom (Genesis 36:8) Edom is in modern Jewry (Jewish Encyclopedia) ‑ thus Jesus made it very clear and commanded us not to give that which is Holy unto the Jews!!!], neither cast ye your pearls before swine [the heathen races], lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you [as the black is always doing when they kill Missionaries in the most revolting and sickening ways possible, as reported in the news recently of a family in Africa]." (Matthew 7:6)

Can you not see; open your eyes, so that you might see; open your ears, so that you might understand: All Missionary programs designed to take the White Man's Religion and his book; The Holy Bible, and his relationship with the Lord Jesus Christ to the non‑white races is pure blasphemy before Almighty God!

Moreover, this is proven by the record of history which shows that (Genesis 5:1‑2) it has been tested and proven by centuries of historical development [the slaughter of the Missionaries recently by the blacks in Africa is what happens all too many times when White Men mistakenly take Christianity to them].

Christianity has been carried in the genes of the White Anglo‑Saxons since his creation, almost six thousand years ago. Wherever the White Man has wondered over the earth, he has taken his book [his family history] the Holy Bible [the foundation of his faith] with him! With a study of history it will be found: CHRISTIANITY THRIVES ONLY IN THOSE AREAS OF THE WORLD WHERE THE WHITE MAN LIVES. AND TO BRAND THIS PRESENTATION AS RACIST, AS MANY WILL DO, IS ONLY TO DENY THE TRUTH BEING PRESENTED.

There is a movement that is catching the attention and awakening an increasing number of people across America commonly known as “Christian‑Israel Identity,” “Christian Identity,” “Israel Truth,” or simply as “Identity.”

It is cutting across denominational lines, touching the corners of the so‑called “extreme” (That’s the liberals and Jews name for someone that is honest, patriotic, believes in God and in a future resurrection) fringe groups, drawing elements of the disenchanted unchurched and many church people who are truly searching for the truth, and offering hope, purpose and spiritual encouragement to the many American patriot Christians who have suffered from the lawless power of the present Jewish controlled government.

The Christian‑Israel Identity movement is steadily being received by an increasing number of Anglo‑ Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, Celtic, Nordic, Slavic and kindred people in America with great joy and encouragement.

Christian‑Israel Identity, and the basic theology that it represents, offers a resurrected look at the interpretation of the Bible based on the contemporary Identity of Israel, the physical descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel.

Challenging the widely accepted false teaching of the Judeo‑Christian churches that those who call themselves Jews today are Israel, Christian‑Israel Identity demonstrates it is the Anglo‑Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, Celtic, Nordic, Slavic and kindred peoples that are the True genetic descendants of the Biblical patriarchs.

This movement draws from the evidence of the heraldry of Europe and the Untied States of America: the post‑captivity migrations of the house of Israel; the numerous comparisons of language, law and culture between Biblical Israel and Europe and America that defy the law of coincidence; and, of course, an overwhelming preponderance of Biblical evidence supporting the claim that the white Race of European stock, and not the Jews, are God’s “peculiar treasure.” (Exodus 19:5) His chosen people to rule with Him (for “Israel” means “he will rule with God”), and the subjects of the New Covenant in Jesus, the Messiah (Jeremiah 31:31‑34 and Hebrews 8:7‑12)

It is inevitable, of course, that once a movement like Christian‑Identity Israel begins to grow and gain in popularity, that the de facto government the Judeo‑Christian (This particular type of Christianity maintains that the foundation of Christianity is based on the Jewish religion called Judaism.

Judaism is based upon the Talmud which came out of Babylon and at the time of Christ was known as the Tradition of the Elders. Both church and media establishment will attempt to probe, ridicule and denounce it.

Indeed, it has already come to pass that those in Christian‑Israel Identity have been called a “cult,” a bunch of “racists,” “bigots,” “White Supremacists,” “anti‑Semites,” and progenitors of the “gospel of hate,” among many others. Unfortunately, the intention of many is simply to smear Identity with the standard buzzwords used to create fear, animosity and misunderstanding in people’s minds, (so they will not look closely at it and see the truth in what it teaches)

Some critics of Identity are simply uninformed regarding the basic belief system due to tan inadequate foundation of evidence and education. Others are so brainwashed by the Judeo‑Christian false shepherds, writers, radio and TV personalities, that their premise that the Jews are God’s Chosen People becomes an almost insurmountable barrier to open, honest and rational examination of the evidence to the contrary. Yes, Identity has become the new target of the cult watchers, the politically and religiously correct, and the simple‑minded.

                                                                                        The Jews Are Not Israel

        They Are The Descendants of The Khazars of Russia

Encyclopedia Americana (1985): "Khazar, an ancient Turkic‑speaking people who ruled a large and powerful state in the steppes North of the Caucasus Mountains from the 7th century to their demise in the mid‑11th  century A.D...In the 8th Century it's political and religious well as the greater part of the Khazar nobility, abandoned paganism and converted to Judaism...(The Khazars are the ancestors of most Russian and Eastern European Jews)."

Encyclopedia Britannica  (15th edition):

"Khazars, confederation of Turkic and Iranian tribes that established a major commercial empire in the second half of the 6th century, covering the southeastern section of modern European Russia...In the middle of the 8th century the ruling classes adopted Judaism as their religion."

Academic American Encyclopedia (1985):

"Ashkenazim, the Ashkenazim are one of the two major divisions of the Jews, the other being the Shephardim."

Encyclopedia Americana (1985):

"Ashkenazim, the Ashkenazim are the Jews whose ancestors lived in German was among Ashkenazi Jews that the idea of political Zionism emerged, leading ultimately to the establishment of the state of Israel...In the late 1960s, Ashkenazi Jews numbered some 11 million, about 84 percent of the world Jewish population."

The Jewish Encyclopedia:

"Khazars, a non‑Semitic, Asiatic, Mongolian tribal nation who emigrated into Eastern Europe about the first century, who were converted as an entire nation to Judaism in the seventh century by the expanding Russian nation which absorbed the entire Khazar population, and who account for the presence in Eastern Europe of the great numbers of Yiddish‑ speaking Jews in Russia, Poland, Lithuania, Galatia, Besserabia and Rumania."

The Encyclopedia Judaica (1972):

"Khazars, a national group of general Turkic type, independent and sovereign in Eastern Europe between the seventh and tenth centuries C.E. During part of this time the leading Khazars professed Judaism...In spite of the negligible information of an archaeological nature, the presence of Jewish groups and the impact of Jewish ideas in Eastern Europe are considerable during the Middle Ages. Groups have been mentioned as migrating to Central Europe from the East often have been referred to as Khazars, thus making it impossible to overlook the possibility that they originated from within the former Khazar Empire."

The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia:

"The primary meaning of Ashkenaz and Ashkenazim in Hebrew is Germany and Germans. This may be due to the fact that the home of the ancient ancestors of the Germans is Media, which is the Biblical Ashkenaz...Krauss is of the opinion that in the early medieval ages the Khazars were sometimes referred to as Ashkenazim...About 92 percent of all Jews or approximately 14,500,000 are Ashkenazim."

The Bible: Relates that the Khazar (Ashkenaz) Jews were/are the sons of Japheth not Shem:

"Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth: and unto them were sons born after the flood. The sons of Japheth;...the sons of Gomer; Ashkenaz..." (Genesis 10:1‑3)

Therefore, the Bible proves that the Ashkenaz Jews [Khazars] are not the descendants of Shem and cannot be Semite.

Kimyarite King Adopts Judaism and Converts His Army and People:

"Kimyarite (Himyarite) see Sabeans (Jewish Encyclopedia, p. 403) Sabeans: The inhabitants of the ancient kingdom of Sheba in southeastern Arabia, known from the Bible, classical writers, and native inscriptions.

The genealogies of Genesis give three pedigrees for Sheba, the eponymous ancestor of the Sabeans, who is variously termed (1) the son of Raamah and the grandson of Cush, (Genesis 10:7; 1 Chronicles 1:9; comp. Ezekiel 27:22; 38:13) (2) the son of Joktan and a great‑great‑grandson of Shem, (Genesis 10:28; 1 Chronicles 1:22) and (3) the son of Jokshan and a grandson of Abraham by Keturah. (Genesis 25:3; 1 Chronicles 1:32) There seem, therefore, to have been three stocks of Sabeans: one in Africa, (comp. the Ethiopian city of Saga mentioned by Strabo, 'Geography,' p. 77) and the other two in Arabia.

The Outline of History: H. G. Wells,

"It is highly probable that the bulk of the Jew's ancestors 'never' lived in Palestine 'at all,' which witnesses the power of historical assertion over fact."

Following is the story of the conversion of a tribe of people in Russia to Judaism and is the origin of more than 95% of the Jews of Eastern Europe. Facts Are Facts, By Benjamin Freedman.

"Without a complete and accurate knowledge of the origin and history of the 'Jews' in Eastern is quite impossible for [Christians] to intelligently understand the harmful influence the Jews have exerted for ten centuries...You will probably be astonished as many Christians were years ago when I electrified the nation with the first publication by me of the facts disclosed by my many years of research into the origin and the history of the 'Jews' in Eastern Europe. My many years of intensive research established beyond the question of any doubt, contrary to the generally accepted belief held by Christians, that the 'Jews' in Eastern Europe at any time in their history in Eastern Europe were never the legendary 'lost ten tribes' of Bible lore. That historic fact is incontrovertible.

“Relentless research established as equally true that the 'Jews' in Eastern Europe at no time in their history could be correctly regarded as the direct lineal descendants of the legendary ‘Lost Ten Tribes’ of Bible lore. The ‘Jews' in Eastern Europe in modern history cannot legitimately point to a single ancient ancestor who ever set even a foot on the  soil of Palestine in the era of Bible History.

“Research also revealed that the 'Jews' in Eastern Europe were never ‘Semites,’ are not ‘Semites’ now, nor can they ever be regarded as ‘Semites’ at any future time by any stretch of the imagination. Exhaustive research also irrevocably rejects as a fantastic fabrication the generally accepted belief by Christians that the 'Jews' in Eastern Europe are the legendary 'Chosen People' so very vocally publicized by the Christian clergy from their pulpits..."

The American People’s Encyclopedia for 1954 at 15‑292 records the following in reference to the Khazars:

"In the year 740 A.D. the Khazars were officially converted to Judaism. A century later they were crushed by the incoming Slavic‑speaking people and were scattered over central Europe where they were known as Jews.

It is from this grouping that most German, Polish and Hungarian Jews are descended, and they likewise make up a considerable part of that population now found in America. The term Ashkenazim is applied to this round‑headed, dark‑complexioned division."

Nathan M. Pollock has a beef with the Israeli government. His elaborate plans to celebrate this September the 1000th anniversary of the Jewish ‑ Khazar alliance were summarily rejected. An elderly, meek‑looking man who migrated to Israel from Russia 43 years ago.

He has devoted 40 of his 64 years trying to prove that six out of ten Israelis and none out of ten Jews in the Western Hemisphere are real Jews' Jews, but descendants of fierce Khazar tribes which roamed the steppes of Southern Russia many centuries ago.

For obvious reasons the Israeli authorities are not at all eager to give the official stamp of approval to Pollock's theories.

"For all we know, he may be 100 percent right,' said a senior government official. 'In fact, he is not the first one to discover the connection between Jews and Khazars. Many famous scholars Jews and non‑Jews, stressed these links in their historical research works. But who can tell today what percentage of Khazar blood flows in our veins..." (San Diego Union, August 28, 1966, Leo Heiman: Copley News Service)

From the above, we can clearly see that the Jews fully understand their Khazarian heritage as the third edition of the Jewish Encyclopedia for 1925 records:

"CHAZARS [Khazars]: A people of Turkish origin whose life and history are interwoven with the very beginnings of the history of the Jews of Russia. The kingdom of the Chazars was firmly established in most of South Russia long before the foundation of the Russian monarchy by the Varangians (855). Jews have lived on the shores of the Black and Caspian seas since the first centuries of the common era [after the death of Christ]. Historical evidence points to the region of the Ural as the home of the Chazars.

“Among the classical writers of the Middle Ages they were known as the 'Chozars,' 'Khazirs,' 'Akatzirs,' and 'Akatirs,' and in the Russian chronicles as 'Khwalisses' and 'Ugry Byelyye.'..."

The Encyclopedia Judaica: Vol. 10, (1971) relates the following about the Khazars (Chazars):

"Khazars, a national group of general Turkic type, independent and sovereign in Eastern Europe between the seventh and tenth centuries A.D. During part of this time the leading Khazars professed Judaism." (Encyclopedia Judicia, Vol. 10, (1971))

The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia:

"Khazars, a medieval people, probably related to the Volga Bulgars, whose ruling class adopted Judaism during the 8th cent. The Khazars seem to have emerged during the 6th cent., from the vast nomadic Hun (Turki) empire which stretched from the steppes of Eastern Europe and the Volga basin to the Chinese frontier. Although it is often claimed that allusions to the Khazars are found as early as 200 C.E., actually they are not mentioned until 627...Most Jewish Historians date the conversion of the Khazar King to Judaism during the first half of this century {A.D.}..."

The primary meaning of Ashkenaz and Ashkenazim in Hebrew is Germany and Germans. This may be due to the fact that the home of the ancient ancestors of the Germans is Media, which is the Biblical Ashkenaz.. Krauss is of the opinion that in the early medieval ages the Khazars were sometimes referred to as Ashkenazim ...About 92 percent of all Jews or approximately 14,500,000 are Ashkenazim.

New Standard Jewish Encyclopedia, page 179,[GCP pg 68]

"ASHKENAZI, ASHKENAZIM...constituted before 1963 some nine‑tenths of the Jewsish people (about 15,000,000 out of 16,5000,000)[ As of 1968 it is believed by some Jewish authorites to be closer to 100%]"

Academic American Encyclopedia:, Deluxe Library Edition, Volume 12, page 66 states:

"The Khazars, a turkic people, created a commercial and political empire that dominated substantial parts of South Russia during much of the 7th through 10th centuries. During the 8th century the Khazar aristocracy and the Kagan (King) were converted to Judaism."

The New Encyclopedia Britannica, Volume 6, page 836 relates:

"Khazar, member of a confederation of Turkic‑ speaking tribes that in the late 6th century A.D. established a major commercial empire covering the southeastern section of modern European Russia...But the most striking characteristic of the Khazars was the apparent adoption of Judaism by the Khagan and the greater part of the ruling class in about 740...The fact itself, however, is undisputed and unparalleled in the history of central Eurasia. A few scholars have asserted that the Judaized Khazars were the remote ancestors of many of the Jews of Eastern Europe and Russia."

Collier’s Encyclopedia: Volume 14, page 65 states:

"Khazars [kaza'rz], a semi-nomadic tribe of Turkish or Tatar origin who first appeared north of the Caucasus in the early part of the third century...In the eighth century Khaghan Bulan decided in favor of the Jews and accepted Judaism for himself and for his people..."

New Catholic Encyclopedia, Volume VIII, page 173 relates:

"The Khazars were an ethnic group, belonging to the Turkish peoples, who, toward the end of the 2d century of the Christian Era, had settled in the region between the Caucasus and the lower Volga and Don Rivers...At the beginning of the 8th century, dynastic ties bound the Khazars more closely to Constantinople, which led to a limited spread of Christianity among them. They also became acquainted with Judaism from the numerous Jews who lived in the Crimea and along the Bosphorus. When the Byzantine Emperor, Leo the Isaurian, persecuted the Jews in A.D. 723, many Jews found refuge in the Khazar kingdom, and their influence was so great that, around the middle of the 8th century, the King of the Khazars and many of the Khazar nobility accepted the Jewish faith.

The Cadillac Modern Encyclopedia, page 822, states:

"Khazars (khah'-zahrz), a S Russian people of Turkic origin, who at the height of their power (during the 8th-10th cent., A.D.) controlled an empire which included Crimea, and extended along the lower Volga, as far E as the Caspian Sea. The Khazar royal family and aristocracy converted to Judaism during the reign of King Bulan (768-809 A.D.) And Judaism was thereafter regarded as the state religion..."

The Jewish author, Arthur Koestler, relates the following concerning Jewish history: In his 1976 best seller The Thirteenth Tribe, the Author of Darkness at Noon, Promise and Fulfillment, and The Roots of Coincidence dropped another bombshell by proving that today’s Jews were, for the most part, descendants of Khazars, who converted to Judaism seven centuries after the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 A.D.

"This, of course, is inspired by the story of the Covenant in Genesis; and it implies that the Khazars too claimed the status of a Chosen Race, who made their own Covenant with the Lord, even though they [Khazars] were not descended from Abraham’s seed...He cannot, and does not, claim for them [the Khazars] Semitic descent, he traces their [Khazars] ancestry not to Shem, but to Noah’s third son, Japheth, or more precisely to Japheth’s grandson, Togarma, the ancestor of all Turkish tribes. 'We have found in the family registers of our fathers,' Joseph asserts boldly, 'that Togarma had ten sons, and the names of their off-spring are as follows: Uigur, Dursu, Avars, Huns, Basilii, Tarniakh, Khazars, Zagora, Bulgars, Sabir. We [Khazars] are the sons of Khazar, the seventh...'" (The Thirteenth Tribe, Arthur Koestler, pages 58‑82))

The Jewish author Alfred M. Lilienthal relates the following concerning Jewish history:

"...The existence of [The State of] Israel is not founded on logic. It has no ordinary legitimacy. There is neither in its establishment nor present scope any evident justice ‑ though there may be an utter need and wondrous fulfillment.'...

“Arthur Koestler answers this question with an emphatic 'NO!' In his 1976 best seller The Thirteenth Tribe, the Author of Darkness at Noon, Promise and Fulfillment, and The Roots of Coincidence dropped another bombshell by proving that today’s Jews were, for the most part, descendants of Khazars, who converted to Judaism seven centuries after the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 A.D... Therefore, the great majority of Eastern European Jews are not Semitic Jews at all, and as most Western European Jews came from East Europe, most of them also are not Semitic Jews.

“Thus, maintains Koestler, the veins of 45 percent of Israelis (save only the Arab and the Sephardic Jews), plus a big majority of Jews around the world, are utterly vacant of corpuscular links to the tribe of Moses and Solomon...The Koestler thesis, however startling, is in no wise a new one. The genetic Khazar derivation of most Jews, only the Sephardic may be accounted Hebrews by blood, has been long if not widely known...The home to which Weismann, Silver, Ben‑Gurion and so many other Ashkenazim Zionists have long yearned to return has most likely never been theirs...[it is an] anthropological fact, many Christians may have much more Hebrew- Israelite blood in their veins than most of their Jewish neighbors!

“Ironically enough, too, Volume IV of the Jewish Encyclopedia (as of the time of research, 1952), because this publication spelled Khazars with a 'C' instead of a 'K,' is titled 'Chazars to Dreyfus.'.

“And it was the famed trial of Captain Alfred Dreyfus, as interpreted by Theodore Herzl, that made the modern Jewish Khazars of Russia...forget their descent from converts to establish the State of Israel...

“And with out the hue and cry, ‘Anti-Semitism,’ pray what happens to the Zionist movement? Khazar conversion was not unique...Who can say for sure that many Christian readers of this book might not in fact have a better claim, which they do not choose to exercise, to go back ‘Home’ to Palestine than Hannah Semer, Menachem Begin, or Golda Meir? Queen Victoria herself belonged to an Israelite society that traced the ancestry of its membership back to the Lost Tribes of Israel. When the word 'Judaism' was born, there was no longer a Hebrew-Israelite state. The people who embraced the creed of Judaism were already a mixture of many nations, races, and strains, and this diversification was rapidly growing..." (The Zionist Connection II, Alfred M. Lilienthal, pp. 759‑768)

There are hundreds of other books one could make reference to that tell exactly the same story, but these should suffice. But if it is not sufficient for you then go to any large city or university library and look up the books listed here and look up the word “Khazar” or “Chazar.”

An accurate understanding of the beginning of the Bible and its premises is critical to a proper interpretation of the rest of the unfolding story as the Scripture presents it. Adam is the focal point in the Account of God’s creation in Genesis chapter 1-5, since he alone is formed in the “image” and “likeness” of God. (Genesis 2:7-8)

Therefore, the study of Adam will be the starting place for this study. It is one that we must repeat and repeat until people understand the message.

Adam, the first White man, was Formed in God’s “image and likeness.”

“And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. And the LORD God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed.”

The Hebrew rod translated “man” or otherwise translated “Adam (Genesis 2:19-21) is Adam (pronounced aw-dawm.’ Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance #12)) This word is derived from Adam (pronounced aw-dam,’ Strong’s #119) which, according to Strong’s means “to show blood (in the face) i.e., flush or turn rosy.” The name “Adam” is descriptive of the appearance of Adam. He is one that “blushes” or turns “flush” or “rosy.”

This fact is further supported by other scholarly theological works. The New Brown-Driver-Brigs’ Gesenius Hebrew-English Lexicon renders Adam (Strong’s #119) “be red...ruddy...redden, grow or look red...emit redness.”  The Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament also refers to the use of #119 in Lamentations 4:7 as describing “the color of skin:” “Her (referring in the context to the ‘daughter of Zion’ who were Israelites) Nazarites were purer than snow, they were whiter than milk they were more ruddy (#119) in body than rubies...” (R. Laird Harris, Gleason I. Archer, Jr., Bruce K. Waltke. The Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament, (Chicago, Ill Moody Press, 1980), p. 11)

Notice that the same “Nazarites” were “whiter than milk” and also “ruddy in body” in their appearance. This same volume adds the following about Adam (#120): “Although the etymology of (Adam) cannot be explained with certainty...the word probably relates to the original ruddiness of man’s complexion...” (R. Laird Harris, Gleason I. Archer, Jr., Bruce K. Waltke. The Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament, (Chicago, Ill Moody Press, 1980), p. 10)

So, it seems quite clear that the name “man” or “Adam” refers to the color of his complexion. He maintains a red, ruddy appearance or, as Strong’s explains, he is able to blush red in the race. What race of people is able to blush red in the face? Is it not the White Race? Can a Black of the African race blush? Can an Asian blush red? Can an Indian turn flush in the face? Simple observation answers, “No!”

Charles Weisman, in his book, “The Origin of Race and Civilization,” quotes author William C. Boyd, Ph.D., “Races of People” (1955), pp. 43-45 as to the scientific explanation for this phenomena of the differences in racial cast:

“The color of normal human skin is due to the presence of three kinds of colored chemicals, or pigments. The most important of these pigments is melanin, a dark-brown substance...The second of the three pigments is carotene. This is a yellow substance which is present in carrots (from which it gets its name) and egg yokes as well as human skin. The third pigment is hemoglobin, which is the red, coloring matter of blood...the hemoglobin occurs in the blood vessels beneath the skin, so that very little can show through. The presence of fair amounts of either melanin or carotene in the skin covers it up completely. Hemoglobin does show up however in the skin of white men, particularly in those of light complexion. It is the hemoglobin that accounts for pink cheeks and the ability to blush. On the bases of these differences in coloring, mankind is sometimes divided into (1) a ‘Black Race,’ high in melanin, (2) A ‘Yellow Race,’ low in melanin but high in carotene; and (3) a ‘White Race,’ low in both melanin and carotene.”

Adam was A White man low in the melanin and carotene pigmentations in order to render him able to blush red in the face. This was his distinguishing feature in appearance, thus differentiating Adam from other races which God had created.

There are at least two issues that should be addressed at this point. First is a rather reactionary but subconscious guilt issue created by the well-coordinated, monopolistic public information “system.”

The issue arises when confronted with the fact that Adam was a White Man. It is an extremely difficult concept to accept in today’s modern society, especially among White people they have been made to feel guilty for being White because the government/media propaganda machines (now also passively supported by most Judeo-Christian churches) have constantly told them that they have no business thinking they should be different from other races.

They have been told that they, especially White Christians, are the real cause of the ills of society (never realizing that the Jews have caused most of the problems, and most people mistakenly think they are white, but they are not; they are a mixed breed of people from all the races); from the injustice of “prejudice’ and “bigotry” to the “environment.”

They have been told that unless they conform to the New World Order ideas of “equality for all” and “tolerance” of all others, as well as promote “diversity” in “multi-cultralism” and all forms of integration and miscegenation, the white people are nothing more than “White Supremacists” and people of “hate.” (Why is the White man the only focus of the so-called “hate crimes?” Could it be that those who really want to control the world understand that the White man must be subjugated in order for them to succeed?)

Who would want to be tagged with such politically and religiously incorrect images? So today, any perception of Adam as being exclusively a White man is considered an anathema. Because of the brainwashing the Jews have done with their ownership of the media; radio, television, movies, stage plays, and the newspapers, magazines and periodicals.

The second issue arises from an objective and honest question, “If Adam was a White Man, then where did all the other races come from?” the Judeo-Christian assumption has been that all races came form Adam. There have been many theories purported as to how this came about. Most, however, require interjections forcing an interpretation of Scripture. For example, it has been believed that, after the flood (Genesis 7and 8), god miraculously changed the skin color and features of the Adamites at the time when He confused the languages at the tower of babel. (Genesis 11)

The problem is that the bible does not say that He did this! Of course, if the Bible does not reveal this, then some contend, the skin color and features changed from that time in an evolutionary manner.

However, this conjecture is not provable and is really beyond any scientific reason. How could Adamites change in skin colo0r and physical features so radically into Blacks and Asians within a matter of even a couple thousand years, much less a couple hundred years.

Nevertheless, the unfounded theory that God did such things or that evolution has taken place seems to placate the majority of people interested in answering the question of the origin of the races.

The secular world does not have a very good answer either as to the origin of the races. Like some creationists, they too attempt to advance the evolutionary theory.

Though evolution is unfounded by scientific examination, scientists do have a good deal of archeological substantiation for the belief that there were other races before Adam. There were humans that existed thousands of years before Adam was formed. It is not surprising that secular scientist are quite mystified and shake their heads at the Christian creationists who insist that Adam was the first “human being.” (The author uses the phrase “human being” here as most people would use it, i.e., in a very generic sense applying to the entire “human race.” However, the author distinguishes between the phrase “human being” and “man” or “man-kind.” The phrase “human being” literally means “colored” (hue) “man.” “Man” or “mankind’ refers to Adam or Adam kind)

The evidence proves otherwise. Except for the interposition of evolution, the secular scientists are quite right in asserting that there were other “human beings” in existence before Adam. (See Pre-Adamites; A book entitled, "Preadmites," or a demonstration of the Existence of Men Before Adam; together with a study of their condition antiquity, and Racial Affinities, and Progressive Dispersion Over the Earth, by Alexander Winchell, LL. D., and published by S.C. Griggs and Company, London: 1880, which contains 500 pages. Another book entitled, "Adam and The Adamite" or, The Harmony of Scripture and Ethnology by Dominick Meausland, Q.C. LL. D., London: Richard Bentley, New Burlington St. England 1864)

If God did create other races of human beings before Adam, it is not clear in the Genesis creation account, although some contend that they are mentioned as a part of God’s creation (for example in Genesis 1:25). However, is it possible that God, through His Word, simply did not reveal it? Recall that Adam as the crowning creation of God and, as will be shown, the Bible is the book about Adam and his generations. Perhaps other races of humankind were not the subject matter of the Genesis account at all.

It is possible, and even probably that, even though there is an absence of Biblical evidence in light of the scientific documentation, the other races were CREATED before Adam. (The author again cites Charles Weisman’s book, “The Origin of Race and Civilization,” see footnote 5 for an excellent and documented compendium of facts that there were races of humans before Adam) This can also be seen with a reading of the following books: Pre-Adamites; A book entitled, "Preadmites," or a demonstration of the Existence of Men Before Adam; together with a study of their condition antiquity, and Racial Affinities, and Progressive Dispersion Over the Earth, by Alexander Winchell, LL. D., and published by S.C. Griggs and Company, London: 1880, which contains 500 pages. Another book entitled, "Adam and The Adamite" or, The Harmony of Scripture and Ethnology by Dominick Meausland, Q.C. LL. D., London: Richard Bentley, New Burlington St. England 1864

Returning to the point of this section, the first premise that Adam was a White Man Formed in God’s image is founded on biblical evidence and authority. It may not be correct by “private interpretation,” according to man’s own reason and society’s rationale based on universality, but it is Scripturally accurate.

Adam, a white man, was formed to have “dominion” over all the earth. It was apparently the purpose of God to give Adam the charge and responsibility to take “dominion over...the earth.” The earth as obviously a part of God’s creation and His Kingdom. He is the Sovereign Owner and ruler of it.

“The earth is the Lord’s, and the fullness thereof, the world, and they that dwell therein.” (Psalm 24:1)

Though God could have ruled over the earth personally without any help, He, in His providence appointed Adam and his descendants to rule over it as His stewards.

The Hebrew word translated “dominion” is radah (Strong’s #7287) which means “to tread down, i.e., subjugate...prevail against, reign...rule.”

In other words, Adam was to rule and reign over god’s Kingdom on earth. This was the job God appointed Adam to do as Psalm 8:3-6 confirms:

“When I consider the heavens, the work of thy fingers, the moon and the stars, which thou hast ordained; What is man, that thou art mindful of him? And the son of man, that thou visitest him? For thou hast made him a little lower than the angels, and hast crowned him with glory and honor. Thou madest him to have dominion over the works of thy hands; thou hast put all things under his feet.”

In verse 4, “the son of man” is the “son of Adam” (Strong’s #120) It is the “son of Adam” that god “madest him to have dominion over the works of thy hands’ and “hast put all things under his feet.” The word translated “dominion” in Psalm 8 is mashal in Hebrew (Strong’s #4910) which, although different from #7287, is substantially rendered the same meaning. Adam, a White man, was commissioned to rule in God’s Kingdom on the earth.

The Kingdom of God, that is, God’s rule and reign, is the major theme of the Bible. This is uncontested by the majority of Biblical scholars even though there might be different views on it. From Genesis to Revelation, the Bible is the story of God’s unfolding plan to establish His Kingdom in righteousness and justice and this plan clearly and directly involves Adam and his generations as Psalm 145:11-13 points out:

“They shall speak of the glory of thy kingdom, and talk of thy power. To make known to the sons of men (Adam - Strong’s #120) his mighty acts, and the glorious majesty of his kingdom. Thy kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and thy dominion endureth throughout all generations. (The word “generation” is the Aramaic term dhar (Strong’s #1859) that corresponds to #1755 (dhor) which means ‘ revolution of time, i.e., an age of generation..posterity.”

This has to do with a race or class of men as it relates to a period or cycle. In this context, god’s Kingdom was present within and during the generations of the race of Adam)

The Biblical premise of Adam’s appointment to dominate the earth is not a very popular idea either. Since the Civil War era, the White man in this country has been subdued into submission tot he equalitarian doctrine of communism. He must not even consider a thought that would make him think he is somehow different than other races. Although it is difficult to suppress the mass of history and daily evidence that the white Race is responsible for the advancement in every area of civilization this fact is frequently overlooked or ignored in the present politically and religiously correct world of thinking.

Consider the following testimonies of the observations of history:

“The moral and intellectual character we find to be in unison with his (the Caucasian form of man’s) structure; the reasoning powers outstripping the mere process of comparing sensations, and showing, in volition, more elevated thought, more reasoning, justice, and humanity; he alone of the races of mankind (“mankind” used generically) has produced examples of free and popular institutions, and his physical characteristics have maintained them in social life.

“By means of his logical intellect, he has arrived at ideas requisite for the acquisition of abstract truths, resorting to actual experiment, he fixed bases whereon to build demonstrable inferences, when the positive facts are not otherwise shown; he invented simple arbitrary characters to represent words and musical sounds, and a few signs which, nevertheless, denote, in their relative positions, all possible combinations of numbers and quantity; he has measured time and distance, making the sidereal bodies unerring guides to make locally and give nautical direction; he has ascended to the skies, descended into the deep, and mastered the powers of lightning.

“By mechanical researches (he) has assuaged human toil, multiplied the results of industry, and created a velocity of locomotion superior to the flight of birds. By his chemical discoveries he has modified bodily pain, and produced numberless discoveries useful in medicine, in arts and manufactures.

“He has found a sound and connected system of the sciences in general, and acquired a critical literature, while, for more than three thousand years, he has been the principal possessor of all human knowledge and the assetor of fixed laws.” (Lt. Col. Hamilton Smith, “The Natural History of the Human Species,” (Boston Gould & Lincoln, 1851), p. 361)

“The physical differences among men are as great as usually form specific differences in animals. In the Caucasian nations, generally, we see the rights of woman acknowledged and established; enlightened governments, just laws, a rational system of religion, commerce, agriculture, art and science in the highest known perfection.

“In the Mongolian races, woman is a slave, an article of merchandise, government despotic, religion idolatrous, laws unjust and bloody, commerce, agriculture, in a low state; all the arts of life little advanced, and stationary for ages. In the American races (American Indians), the state of things is worse still; and in the African, at the lowest point. (S. Kneeland, Jr., Introduction, “The Natural History of the Human Species,” Lt. Col. Hamilton Smith, p. 7)

“The Caucasian so named, from Mt. Caucasus... those races in which intellect, both native and cultivated, has produced the mightiest results; those races, whose history would be the history of civilization and of Christianity...” (S. Kneeland, Jr., Introduction, “The Natural History of the Human Species,” Lt. Col. Hamilton Smith, pp 15-16)

“The leading part in the history of the world has been, and is still, played by the Aryan nations. The Caucasian presents us with the highest type among the five families of man; the Aryan branch of the Caucasian family present us with the noblest pattern of that highest is the Aryans...that have reached the highest point of intellectual development, as shown in their political freedom, and in their science, literature, and art.” (Henry W. Ruoff, “Book of Races and Peoples,” The Circle of Knowledge, (Boston: The Standard Publication Company, 1916), p. 277)

“The testimony of history, and the results of philanthropic experiment, are the data upon which the ethnologist must institute his inquiries, if he would arrive at conclusions instructive to humanity...Let us take for illustration the white and the black races, supposed by many to represent the two extremes of the scale of gradation. The whole history of the former shows an uninterrupted progress; that of the latter, monotonous stagnation. To the one, mankind owes the most valuable discoveries in the domain of thought, and their practical application; to the other, it owes nothing...” (H. Hotz, Analytical Introduction, Arthur de Gobineau, “The Moral & Intellectual Diversity of Races,” Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott & Co., 1856, pp. 32-33)

Time after time scientific and historical study after study, from past centuries to the present, reveal the same conclusion that the White Race is different from the others. Again, the modern sensibilities will most likely be offended and recoil that such commentary is nothing more than sowing the seeds of “racism.”

Nevertheless, the facts of history and experience make it undeniable that the white Race on the whole possess special inherent qualities. Could this be commensurate with the account that Adam, a White man, was formed in the “image” of God so that he could have the capability and capacity to rule over His Kingdom on earth?

The statement is commonly made, even by those who should know better, that we Christians owe a debt to the Jews, for we got our Bible and our religion from them. While many people have been deceived into believing this, it is completely false. Part of the mistake comes from the complete confusion in the minds of nearly all people as to just what they mean by Jew.

Are  they referring to people of a certain race, or referring to a people of a certain religion, for the two are not the same. There are in Africa today, some pure blooded Negroes who are Jews by religion and there are in China today, some pure blooded Mongolians who are Jews by religion. Likewise, there are some people today who are racially of the stock we know as Jews, but who have been converted to other religions.

First let's consider the claim we got our Bible and our religion from the Jews, as meaning Jews by religion. It is certain we didn't get the New Testament from them, for it condemns the Jewish religion throughout all the New Testament. But did we get the Old Testament from them? No, for several reasons in the first place, no Jew by religion existed before the return from the Babylonian captivity, shortly after 536 B.C.

Their great historian Josephus writes,

"So the Jews prepared the work. Jew is the name they are called by from the day that they came up from Babylon."

The only books of the Old Testament that were written after the return from Babylon are, Kings, Chronicles, Ezra and Nehemiah (all of them historical, rather than doctrinal) Haggai, Zechariah and Malachi.

In none of these do the Jews receive anything but rebuke for their wickedness, for their apostasy from the religion of the Old Testament. The late Rabbi Stephen F. Wise, formerly the Chief Rabbi of the United States said,

"The return from Babylon and the introduction of the Babylonian Talmud mark the end of Hebrewism and the beginning of Judaism."

The learned Rabbi was correct in distinguishing the true religion of the Old Testament as Hebrewism for it was the religion of the real Hebrews, who were not Jews at all. Judaism, the religion of the Jews, is as the learned Rabbi says, based upon the Babylonian Talmud, which contains the supposed oral law. It was never reduced to writing as part of the Bible.

This oral law gradually gained greater force among the Jews than the written law in the Bible, with which it often conflicted in Yahshua's day, the Babylonian Talmud was known as the Tradition of the Elders.

This is why Yahshua told the Jews:

"Well hath Esaias prophesied of you hypocrites, as it is written, This people honoreth Me with their lips, but their heart is far from Me. Howbeit, in vain do they worship Me, teaching for doctrines the Commandments of men. For laying aside the commandments of Yahweh that ye may keep your own tradition...making the word of God of none effect through your tradition which ye have delivered." (Mark 7:6‑13)

"Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of Yahweh." (Matthew 22:29)

"Woe unto you, Scribes and Pharisees, Hypocrites! for ye pay tithes of mint, anise and cumin and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy and faith" (Matthew 23:23)

This was the religion of the Jews. As the learned Rabbi Stephen F Wise said, Judaism as distinguished from Hebrewism, the real religion of the Old Testament. Certainly Christianity took nothing from any Jewish religion for we have never taken any part of Christianity from the Talmud.

Well then, can it be said we got our Bible or our religion of Christianity from men of the Jewish race? No, it cannot. I haven't the time in the remainder of this lesson to give the Bible evidence in detail. We will have to reserve that for a later lesson. It can be clearly proven, both out of the historical books of the Bible and out of the only thorough history of the times written by one living when the facts were still well known.

Josephus' "Antiquities of the Jews," tells that the Jews were a people distinct and separate from Yahweh's people Israel, although living among them. The Jew were the Canaanite people who lived in Palestine, before Israel entered the promised land and who were not driven out. These Canaanite people, and the mixed offspring from intermarriage with the Israelites, were allowed to remain in the land while paying heavy tribute taxes.

The prophets who wrote the books of the Old Testament, were all of pure Israelite stock, from one or another of the 12 tribes of Israel. Moses, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Habakkuk, Haggai anti Zechariah were of the tribe of Levi. Joshua and Samuel were of the tribe of Ephraim. Isaiah, Daniel and Zephaniah were of the house of David, Jonah was of the tribe of Zebulun. Hosea was of the tribe of Issachar.

When the Assyrians conquered and deported the people of the ten northern tribes, the Bible records that the Assyrians brought other people in from the Assyrian empire and settled them in Samaria, in place of the Israelites they had deported. Samaria is only the southern half of the territory occupied by these ten northern tribes.

The northern half was Galilee and this was left vacant. When the kingdom of Judah was later deported to Babylon, for their seventy years captivity, their land was left with very little population. While they were gone, the Edomites who were descendants of Esau, mixed with Canaanite people, were forced out of their own land by pressure of invading Arab tribes, and moved westward into the vacant lands of Judah, occupying the southern half of the former kingdom of Judah.

Therefore, when a portion of the two tribes of Judah and Benjamin returned from the Babylonian captivity, they were too few in numbers to drive out the warlike Edomites and had to try to squeeze into the very little territory they had left. It was too small for them, so what was left of the tribe of Judah took the little territory remaining around Jerusalem and Benjamin was pushed to the north. They could not move next door into Samaria, as this area was occupied by the people the Assyrians had settled there. Benjamin had to leapfrog over them into the vacant territory of Galilee.

That the apostles and the majority of Christian converts came from the Benjaminites should not surprise us. When the kingdom was split in two upon the death of Solomon, Yahweh said He would leave Benjamin with Judah so that the house of David should have a light before them.

In Yahshua's time the people of Benjamin were still the light bearers. In the New Testament all of the apostles were of the tribe of Benjamin except Judas Escariot, the only Jew among them.

Judas came from the village of Kerioth in southern Judea. Iscariot is a corruption of Ish Kerioth, man of Kerioth. Paul tells us that he (Paul) was of the tribe of Benjamin and at the other apostles except Judas Escargot were from Galilee where the tribe of Benjamin settled after the return from Babylon.

This is confirmed by Yahshua. In Matthew 15:24 He said,


In John chapter 10 Yahshua tells the Jews,

"I am the good Shepherd and know My sheep and am known of Mine. But ye believe not because ye are not of My sheep, as I said unto you. My sheep hear my voice and I know them and they follow me"

This proves that the Jews are not the sheep, for they do not follow Yahshua, they follow their father the devil.

From the Savior's own tips we have the proof that the Jews are not of the tribes of Israel. Note carefully that He does not say that their unbelief keeps them from being of His sheep. He says the exact opposite, that the reason why they do not believe is that they are not of His sheep, the house of Israel.

Christianity and Judaism are completely and irreconcilably inconsistent. Whichever one is right, the other must be wrong for they mutually repudiate each other. A great part of Yahshua's reported words are His denunciation of the Jews for their religion, which He tells them is not that of the Old Testament.

Judeo-Christian Heritage a Hoax: It appears there is no need to belabor the absurdity and fallacy of the "Judeo-Christian heritage" fiction, which certainly is clear to all honest theologians. That "Judeo-Christian dialogue" in this context is also absurd was well stated in the author-initiative religious journal, Judaism, Winter 1966, by Rabbi Eliezar Berkowitz, chairman of the department of Jewish philosophy, at the Hebrew Theological College when he wrote:

"As to dialogue in the purely theological sense, nothing could be more fruitless or pointless. Judaism is Judaism because it rejects Christianity; and Christianity is Christianity because it rejects Judaism. What is usually referred to as the Jewish- Christian traditions exists only in Christian or Secularist Fantasy."

There is no doubt this is true! And the fantasy exists in Christian and Secularist minds only because it was implanted there by the persistent propaganda of the masters of intrigue of the ADL-AJC Network. Nevertheless, there can be no doubt that knowledgeable theologians, Jewish and Christians who constantly allude to "our Judeo-Christian heritage" are for their own specious purposes perpetuate a grotesque and fantastic hoax.

In John 5:46 Yahshua told them,

"Had ye believed in Moses, ye would have believed Me: for he wrote of Me."

In Luke 16:31 Yahshua said,

"If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded through one rose from the dead."

He was right, He did rise from the dead, but to this day they are not persuaded.

It is therefore clear, we did not get either our Bible or our Christian religion, either in whole or in part from those who were Jews, either by religion or by race. We owe them no debt, for they gave us nothing.

Therefore it is amazing how many millions of Christians over the centuries have poured over the pages of the Holy Bible without taking note of a fundamental truth: The Bible is a book written by, for, and about Israelites. And by this we do not mean the Jews for they are no part of Israel. While it is possible that this truth may not send spiritual shock waves through any given congregation, or even any individual, but it should.

How people could read the best selling book of all history and not be more concerned about the subjects of that book remain a mystery. Seldom does one hear any adverse comment when it is made known that the Koran was written by and for Arabians. It is common knowledge that the Vedas contain the sacred scripture for the Hindu people; yet that book proceeded from their kind and hand is not disputed. People seem to have no trouble relating the Talmud exclusively to the Jewish synagogue and those who profess Judaism, and as such are called Jews.

We have yet to meet a Christian who wanted to claim the Talmud. The historical archives confirm that almost all people have strong links to a particular religious creed. It should not come as a surprise, then, for the Christian to find that his ties and Biblical roots go back to a people called Israel. This study is with the purpose that our Christian community learn and absorb this truth.

The Bible is inseparably linked to the people who comprise the Anglo‑Saxon, Celtic, Germanic, Scandinavian and kindred family in the earth. The spiritual eyes of millions of Christians need to be opened wide to the racial origins of the Bible.

The Bible shares a genetic continuity in history from Genesis to the Revelation Letter. "And he had in his hand a little book opened" was the statement of John, who in a vision saw the people of the Book preparing to take its message overseas.

History has since demonstrated the willingness of the White Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, Celtic and kindred people to endure the hardships of the journeys in order to bring others the blessings of the open Book.

So long as that Book continues to remain open in the hands of Almighty God's people, they are in possession of the perfect guide and chart which will enable them to follow the course of their God-given heritage to a glorious destiny. Westward, ever westward, has been the course of Empire as the ships of the People of the Book plowed the seas, bringing our forefathers to the Isles from whence they set sail to the uttermost parts of the earth. In obedience to the prophecy of the Scriptures:

"Ephraim (Israel) feedeth on wind, and FOLLOWETH AFTER THE EAST WIND (Always going Westward - ever Westward to the ends of the earth - the West Coast of the United States of America): he daily increaseth lies and desolation; and they do make a covenant with the Assyrians, and oil is carried into Egypt." (Hosea 12:1)

And wherever they went, the open Book accompanied them on their journeys. As they colonized, they evangelized: proclaiming the truth out of the Book in their hand! In establishing governments, building cities, organizing communities and administering law, the guiding hand of Almighty God, whose purposes were revealed to them through the open Book, enabled His people to build (Far better than they knew) a type of civilization whose foundation was to rest upon the administration of righteousness.

Familiarity with the open Book and the reason for sailing westward is well illustrated in a statement from the Mayflower Compact of 1620, which began "In the name of God."

It proceeded:

"Having undertaken for the glory of God, and advancement of the Christian faith, and honor of our King and country, a Voyage to plant the first Colony in the Northern part of Virginia, do by these presents solemnly and mutually in the presence of God and one of another, covenant and combine our selves together into a civil body politic."

It was the knowledge of the teachings of the open Book and the desire to follow these teachings which brought the Pilgrim fathers to our shores to build anew a civilization in conformity with the requirements of the law as set forth in this national document.

Let us turn back to the time before ever the Bible, as we know it, was written. In so doing we will discover that the outstanding men of our Race were pressing forward to a God-given destiny and as they lived, and worked, and labored, they wrote into the record of the Book their faith, while in each succeeding generation men of renown carried on the work of faith as the race continued on towards its destiny.

Thus, in an ever-increasing crescendo the Race of the Book moved forward with the open Book of the Race which, when finally completed was taken by this Race to the less fortunate, that they might also freely read and partake of its blessings.

Amounting almost to a paradox is the fact that the open Book from which we are now to receive counsel, instruction, advice and guidance today is largely the history of our race and an account of God's dealing with our forefathers. But along with the recording of that history the future of the Race was also pre-written and we will do well to follow the Divine instruction!

That Christianity has been the basic historic religion of the Nordic branch of the Caucasian Race for the past two thousand years is something worthy of consideration. Moreover, it should occasion no great surprise to find that the Anglo‑Saxon, Celtic Germanic, Scandinavian, and kindred people of the earth are more closely linked to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob/Israel of Bible fame than any other people in history Research confirms that the Israelites of the Old Testament are directly linked to the Israelites of the New Testament.  


Moreover, the same blood that links Abraham, Isaac and Jacob to the twelve Apostles and early Christians also flows in the blood of the modern day Anglo‑Saxon, Germanic and kindred people of the earth. There is a racial connection between the subjects of the Bible and the main followers of Christianity. There is a racial significance to the major religions of the world, and no amount of historical revision will alter this. The religions of Buddhism, Shintoism, Taoism, and all forms of the transcendental worship are linked to the Far East. Certainly none of these religions rose out of the Caucasian world! The Moslem faith arose out of the Arabic world.

Judaism arose out of the Jewish mind.

"It is highly probable that the bulk of the Jew's ancestors 'never' lived in Palestine 'at all,' WHICH WITNESSES THE POWER OF HISTORICAL ASSERTION OVER FACT." (H. G. Wells, The Outline of History)

Hinduism was not born in the Occidental western Caucasian world. Historically, one major religion has been associated with the Western Caucasian world; Christianity. Just as the Moslem faith has followed the Arabs in their migrations over the earth, Christianity has followed the Caucasians in their wanderings.

Voodooism has always found a home in the hearts of the black race, but never within the Western Christian world. There is a positive chemistry between Christianity and the blood of the Caucasian race. That there might be a link between genetics and faith in Jesus Christ is something that has yet to be fully explored by those who major in religious issues.

The Bible has ALWAYS found a home in the heart of the Caucasian race. Its influence upon the other races has been sparse, sporadic, transient, and meager at best, the claims of the Judeo‑Christian evangelists on television and radio notwithstanding.

The moral values of the Bible appear to take root ONLY within the minds and hearts of the Caucasian Race. The fact that the Anglo‑Saxons have always been the custodians of the Bible links them inseparably to the people of God and of Scripture.

LOST ISRAEL HAS BEEN FOUND: WE ARE THEY! The Bible is an Israelitish book written for and about the same people who have always found a place for it within their homes, churches and public life.

It is impossible to give a true record of Anglo-Saxon activities without always taking into consideration the Book (Regardless of what the anti-Christs, humanists, communists and etc., wish you to believe). Wherever this Race has gone, whether the fact of the presence of the Book is mentioned or not, the writings of this Book and the spirit of its message have always played a most prominent part in all our undertakings.

The importance of the open Book in the hand of the pioneers of our Race is clearly and appropriately depicted in the figurehead of the man on the prow of the sailing ship in whose hand is held the open Book, and who, yet reading, is moving forward as the vessel sails the sea. This figurehead of the early Americans sailing to our shores should be a continuous reminder to our generation that this nation was founded upon the Book and God's Laws.

But the Book has not always been opened. Evil forces have sought again and again to close it; knowing that, so long as it remains open, the irresistible forward march of a Race destined to conquer evil and establish righteousness and peace cannot be stayed!

In the early Christian century the disciples of our Lord brought the open Book to the Isles and to a people residing in those isles whose forefathers, because of their refusal to keep His laws, had been led captive into Assyria. From the land of the Assyrians this Race had moved north and west: migrated through southern and central Europe and, after centuries, finally reached the isles north and west of Palestine.

It was to them who Jesus sent His disciples to when He told them to go "to the lost sheep of the house of Israel." To Israel in the Isles they went, and to them they brought the open Book. Thus, after centuries, the open Book was placed at the disposal of His people.

As a result Christianity took root downward and grew upward in the isles of the sea. A few centuries passed during which Christianity flourished in the Isles, then the Book was again closed.

During the period known as the Dark Ages the light of spirituality was all but extinguished, for there was no open Book to which the people might have access. The Bible had been written in a language which the common people did not understand and chained to the altar of the Church. This period of darkness ended in a spiritual revolution.

Society of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries was agitated to its profoundest depths as the Reformation began. The invention of the printing press had reduced the Bible from the bulky hand-written Book to a little Book and translated into the common language of the masses: placing it in the hands of the people, opened, that all might read its contents. John saw a Mighty One holding that Book open.

Men now had access to the Bible and the result, insofar as evil forces were concerned, was to arouse them to frenzy, for they knew that the open Book spelled disaster to all their plans. The Spanish Armada was equipped and launched with the avowed purpose of forever closing that Book. But it was to remain open and no physical power on earth could stop the Reformation.

With the opening of the Book there began a period of activity for the Anglo-Saxon-Israel people, first to acquire a knowledge of what was written therein and afterwards to spread that knowledge throughout the world. Such was the task assigned to this people of whom the Lord said through Isaiah the Prophet:

"And he said, It is a light thing that thou shouldest be my servant to raise up the tribes of Jacob, and to restore the preserved of Israel: I will also give thee for a light to the Gentiles, that thou mayest be my salvation unto the end of the earth." (Isaiah 49:6)

In fulfillment of that mission the Anglo-Saxon peoples have taken the Bible and translated it into over a thousand different languages and in their missionary activities given it to the nations. Missionary Societies in Great Britain and in the United States of America have, for over a century, been actively carrying out the mission laid upon His Israel people.

Upon careful examination, the Bible proves to be the family history of one people; the Israel people of God. And touches the other races only when they come into contact with the people of the book, the Israelites. The Bible refers to many people and nations, but its primary focus is always Israel.

The Bible is the manufacturer's handbook for His people in time and creation. Everything that Israel needs to know for this life is contained within the canon of the Bible, a book that has been Divinely inspired and preserved throughout time.

The Holy Bible is intended to enable the Israelite people to be theocrats (ruled by God) in this earth. Its principles, laws, and precepts govern every area of life. All of man's is couched by God's Word. There is no escape from the Holy Scriptures, for they follow man and govern him in every possible area. Scripture is both infallible and unchangeable because it issues from a sovereign God. The key to a successful and prosperous life is to read meditate, memorize, and apply Scripture to every area of one's life.

The early chapters of Genesis cover the creation of the universe, the vegetable and animal kingdom, and the final work of God's hand in the creation of man.

The fall of Adam and the Genesis Flood are all a major focus of the early portion of Genesis. The post flood history of nations, the building of the Tower of Babel, and the multiplication of nations and people are covered in these early chapters. Beginning with Genesis 12, the remainder of the Bible IS FOCUSED ON ABRAHAM AND HIS OFFSPRING AND NONE OTHERS.

Abraham became the father of eight sons born to three different women: Sarah, Hagar, and Keturah. Only one of these sons become the focus of the Bible. The birth of Isaac, the seed of promise which God made with Abraham and Sarah, becomes the object of the Bible.

Like a giant laser beam, the Holy Scriptures zero in on the PROMISE SEED OF ABRAHAM. Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob/Israel become the central focus of the bible from Genesis 12 to the remainder of the Bible. Every mention of other people and nations is always in relationship to Israel, and their interaction with the primary focus of the Bible.

Jacob, son of Isaac and grandson of Abraham, became the father of twelve sons. They are, beginning with the eldest: Reuben, Simeon, Levi, Judah, Issachar, Zebulun, Joseph, Benjamin, Dan, Naphtali, Gad, and Asher. These twelve men became heads of twelve tribes that multiplied into a mighty nation numbering just short of three million people at the time of the exodus from Egypt. In subsequent history, millions of these Israelites populated the earth.

In Genesis 13:16 Abraham is promised that his seed will number as the dust of the earth. Genesis 15:5 records the promise that Abraham's seed would become as populace as the stars of the sky. Genesis 22:17 confirms that the seed of Abraham would become numbered like the sands of the sea shore. Rebekah was prophesied to be the mother of thousands of millions in Genesis 24:60. God promised Jacob that he would become a nation and A COMPANY OF NATIONS in Genesis 35:11. From Joseph's sons Ephraim and Manasseh would come A MULTITUDE OF NATIONS. (Genesis 48:16, 19)

A number of questions flow out of these Biblical promises made to Abraham and his seed. Where are the thousands of millions who were to spring from Isaac and Rebekah?

What people make up the COMPANY OF NATIONS promised Jacob/Israel? Where is the MULTITUDE OF NATIONS that were to spring from Ephraim and Manasseh? We need to account for HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF PEOPLE to fulfill all of the promises and covenants of the Bible!

The people known in modern history as "Jews" have NEVER at any time fulfilled the promises made to Abraham.

However, they have been found among the multiplied missions that constitute the Anglo‑Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, and kindred people of the earth. Lost Israel has been found, and the Bible is the record of these people It is time that their discovery as the subjects of the Bible be known to all who have spiritual eyes to see and ears to hear.

The Bible is indeed an Israelitish book. Every author of Scripture descended from Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob/Israel. The family history of the Israelite Race of people is contained within the pages of the Holy Bible. The Bible is the composite history and genealogical record of Israel. The genealogical records of Egypt, Babylon, China, Japan, and the other nations is missing from the Bible BECAUSE THE BIBLE IS NOT THEIR RECORD!

The first five books of the Bible or Law, is said to have been written by Moses, an Israelite. The historical records of Joshua, Judges, Ruth, I and II Samuel, I and Ii Kings, I and II Chronicles, Ezra, and Nehemiah focus on the Israelites descended from Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob/Israel.

All of the books of Job, Psalms, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, and the Song of Solomon flow from the pen of inspired Israelite writers. Every prophet of Scripture was an Israelite raised up to prophesy to either or both Judah and Israel, the two primary families within Israel.

The New Testament is no exception to all that has previously been confirmed about the Bible. Every writer of the New Testament was an Israelite. All of the Gospels, the Epistles, and the Revelation Letter are inspired and preserved records of the Israelite people.

There is no book and no writer of the New Testament who does not have racial roots into the stock of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob/Israel From the first chapter in Matthew's Gospel to the final restoration of the twelve tribes in a new heaven and new earth in Revelation 21, the New Testament is an Israelitish book.

To make the family history of the Bible include the entire world is to wreck and ruin the entire plan of a supernatural and provident God. Failure to correctly identify Biblical Israel and understand the Bible message has resulted in the Church world seeking to build a program of world evangelism.

The attempt of modern Christianity to evangelize the world has erased the color line in the Church, greatly accelerated interracial marriage, and brought the Church of Jesus Christ to a day of real peril.

UNIVERSALISM IN SALVATION HISTORY IS NOT FOUND IN THE BIBLE. It is the vain imagination of man running wild before God and in disobedience to His Word.

Is it not about time that we were content to leave the non‑Israelites of the world to follow their gods and their religions and rest content in the knowledge that God has ordained the Bible and the salvation history contained therein for His people Israel?

Why do we want to rewrite the Bible in the image of fallen man? Why do we seek to make the Bible something that God did not intend? Let the non‑Israelites of the world follow their gods, build their temples, and read their religious books. Bring back the Israelite missionaries that are running to the far corners of the earth with a program God did not ordain. is it not about time that we believed God and Scripture and be content to hear the words of Jesus Christ in Matthew 15:14:


As for Israel, let them follow Jesus Christ, be faithful to His Commandments, and evangelize their own kind. What God hath ordained let no man seek to change.

Whenever the Anglo-Saxon people allow the Book to be closed, through neglect or a refusal to heed its warnings or listen to its message, the ensuing spiritual decadence brings retribution in sorrow, trouble and national calamities.

The forces of evil were unable to close the open Book at the time of the Spanish Armada, but now they have succeeded in bringing about the closing of the Book in the evil doctrine of modernism. The teachings of this sugarcoated Judeo-Christian atheism have literally closed the Book to the understanding of multitudes of our people.


With the advent of this Judeo-Christian modernism the Book began to close and people turned away from its truths until today millions never look into its pages nor read its message. A state of spiritual decadence is afflicting our land with unbelief, from the men who stand in our pulpits to those who sit in the pews and the multitudes that crowd the streets of our cities.

Let us once again open the Book before it is too late, that there may be a revival of interest, bringing such a spiritual awakening that it will enable God to save us. Let those who are in authority seek for Divine guidance as they pilot the Ship of State through troubled waters.

They must yet open the Book and follow the instructions of God contained in this Book of books; there is no other solution for the crisis ahead, nor can we expect victory over our enemies until there is compliance with these requirements. Of Israel the Lord said:

"Behold, I send an Angel before thee, to keep thee in the way, and to bring thee into the place which I have prepared. Beware of him, and obey his voice, provoke him not; for he will not pardon your transgressions: for my name is in him. But if thou shalt indeed obey his voice, and do all that I speak; then I will be an enemy unto thine enemies, and an adversary unto thine adversaries. For mine Angel shall go before thee, and bring thee in unto the Amorites, and the Hittites, and the Perizzites, and the Canaanites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites: and I will cut them off." (Exodus 23:20-23)

Today that Mighty Angel has "in his hand a little book opened." Let us obey His voice and follow the instruction of the opened Book that our enemies may become God's enemies and our adversaries His adversaries.

If we continue to provoke Him by refusing to believe, to read, to study and to be guided by the instruction of the open Book, there will be no one but ourselves to blame for the troubles and national calamities that will come upon us. May the figurehead, the man with the open Book, so markedly portraying the reason for America's greatness, be a symbol of a soon awakening throughout our land to the need of opening our Bibles that God's Will may be done and our country and people saved from all their enemies.

Now that we have identified the Bible to be the Book of Adam's Race and have documented that Adam was Ruddy, could blush or show blood in the face, and was a WHITE MAN, we must continue on and examine the implications of this. But first let us look and see further, that we are speaking of the WHITE RACE and see how God describes King David and the Lord Jesus Christ.

David is described as:

"And Samuel said unto Jesse, Are here all thy children? And he said, There remaineth yet the youngest, and, behold, he keepeth the sheep. And Samuel said unto Jesse, Send and fetch him: for we will not sit down till he come hither. And he sent, and brought him in. Now he [David] WAS RUDDY, and withal of a beautiful countenance, and goodly to look to..." (1 Samuel 16:11‑12)


"And when the Philistine looked about, and saw David, he disdained him: for he was but a youth, and RUDDY, and of A FAIR COUNTENANCE." (1 Samuel 17:42)

The Lord Jesus Christ is described as:

"MY BELOVED IS WHITE AND RUDDY..." (Solomon's Song 5:10)

"Nazarites (See Matthew 2:23) WERE PURER THAN SNOW, THEY WERE MORE RUDDY IN BODY THAN RUBIES..." (Lamentations 4:7)

Now back to the Presupposition of our Faith for it is related: THE HOLY BIBLE IS THE BOOK OF ADAM’S RACE AND ADAM WAS A WHITE MAN. The implications of this presupposition are as follows:

First: Since the Holy Bible is the Book of Adam's Race, it means that the White Race of Adam was made the custodians of the Sacred Scriptures [not the Jews]! The White Race was given the stewardship of Divine Truth [though many will deny it and cry out ‑ THAT IS RACIST, I don't want to hear it. Thus fulfilling Isaiah 29:10‑14 and Zechariah 7:11‑12)].

THE BIBLE IS NOT THE HISTORY OF THE OTHER RACES! Moreover, we must not cause the Scriptures to be violated or broken by involving other races as principals of the Holy Bible.

We have no authority from the Words of the Lord Jesus Christ or Almighty God to make the Bible anything more than what God's Word declares it to be! IT IS THE BOOK OF THE RACE OF ADAM, NOTHING MORE, NOTHING LESS! It does not belong to the other races, for they have and will receive their blessings through the Race of Adam!

"And in thy [Abraham's] seed shall ALL THE NATIONS OF THE EARTH [other races] BE BLESSED..." (Genesis 22:18)

It is nothing less than blasphemy for one to seek to make God's Word more or less than it declares itself to be. For Christ declared:

"Give not that which is holy unto the dogs [Jesus said the Canaanites were dogs, (Matthew 15:22, 26) Esau Married Canaanite women. (Genesis 36:2) Esau is Edom. (Genesis 36:8) Edom is in modern Jewry (Jewish Encyclopedia); thus Jesus made it very clear and commanded us not to give that which is Holy unto the Jews!!!], neither cast ye your pearls before swine [the heathen races], lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you [as the black is always doing when they kill Missionaries in the most revolting and sickening ways possible, as reported in the news recently of a family in Africa]." (Matthew 7:6)

Can you not see ‑ open your eyes, so that you might see ‑ open your ears, so that you might understand: All Missionary programs designed to take the White Man's Religion and his book, The Holy Bible, and his relationship with the Lord Jesus Christ to the non‑white races is pure blasphemy before Almighty God!

Moreover, this is proven by the record of history which shows that (Genesis 5:1‑2) it has been tested and proven by centuries of historical development [the slaughter of the Missionaries recently by the blacks in Africa is what happens all too many times when White Men mistakenly take Christianity to them].

Christianity has been carried in the genes of the White Anglo‑Saxons since his creation, almost six thousand years ago. Wherever the White Man has wondered over the earth, he has taken his book [his family history] the Holy Bible [the foundation of his faith] with him! With a study of history it will be found: CHRISTIANITY THRIVES ONLY IN THOSE AREAS OF THE WORLD WHERE THE WHITE MAN LIVES. AND TO BRAND THIS PRESENTATION AS RACIST, AS MANY WILL DO, IS ONLY TO DENY THE TRUTH BEING PRESENTED.

Christianity - Religion of the West

The observed and verifiable facts of the world about us are not affected by religious faith or the lack of faith. Christians must find themselves in perfect agreement when they affirm that lead is more malleable than steel, that the earth is an oblate spheroid rotating on its axis, that whales are mammals, that Germany was defeated and devastated by the many nations allied against her in 1945, and that the Chinese are Mongolians.

About such matters there can be no dispute among Christian men, who instinctively accept the reality of the world about us and cannot believe, as do many Orientals, that it is merely an illusion in the mind of a dreamer.

If we are to salvage and restore our civilization; the Occidental culture that is peculiarly our own and that now seems to be disintegrating and rotting before our very eyes ‑ we must do so as White Christian men, by observing reality objectively and by reasoning from it dispassionately. And when we try to compute what resources remain to us, we need first of all to determine the actual strength of the Christian Traditions at the present time.

West and Christianity Synonymous

It is a fact, which Christians will regard with satisfaction and some atheists may deplore, that Western Civilization in the sense that the great majority of the people belonging to it [Although never, at any time, all of them] believed implicitly in the truth of the Christian Religion. That religious unanimity was for a long time so nearly complete that, after the fall of the Roman Empire and the evanescence of hopes for its restoration, we White Christians of the West regarded our religion as the bond that united us and distinguished us from the rest of the human species. During the Middle Ages, our Anglo‑Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian and Celtic ancestors occupied the greater part of Europe, and, until they discovered the American Continents, they lived only in Europe, but despite that geographical unity, they did not generally refer to themselves as Europeans.

For all practical purposes, furthermore, our ancestors belonged to the same division of the White Race: they, like the True Greeks and the True Romans before them, were all members of the great race that we now call Indo‑European or Aryan, but they have in their languages no word to designate their blood relationship and biological unity.

"...and thou [Israel ‑ the White Race] SHALT BE CALLED BY A NEW NAME, which the mouth of the Lord shall name." (Isaiah 62:2)

Isaiah again related:

"...and call his servants [Israel ‑ the White Race] BY ANOTHER NAME." (Isaiah 65:15)

Hosea also relates:

"...and they [Israel ‑ White Race] SHALL NO MORE BE REMEMBERED BY THEIR NAME." (Hosea 2:17)

Thus, when they referred to the unity of which they were always conscious as something transcending the constantly shifting territorial and political divisions of Europe, they called themselves Christendom.

"For, lo, I will command, and I will sift the house of Israel among all nations, like as corn is sifted in a sieve, yet shall not the least grain fall upon the earth." (Amos 9:9)

And for many centuries that word was adequate and misled no one. For many centuries the West was Christendom and its White Civilization was indubitably Christian: that, whether you like it or not, is an historical fact.

There is a complementary historical fact that was less obvious at the time and that even thoughtful men overlooked or tried to ignore until the events of the past few decades have made it indubitable: Christianity is a Religion of the West, and, for all practical purposes, only of the West.

It is not, as its polemical adversaries so often charge, a Semitic cult, for it is an adhesion of a considerable number of Semites, and it is not, as Christians once generally believed, a universal religion, for experience has now proven; CHRISTIANITY CANNOT BE SUCCESSFULLY EXPORTED TO POPULATIONS THAT ARE NOT INDO-EUROPEAN!

Established Facts are Undeniable

Experience has also proven that it does not do the slightest good to deny ascertained facts. The men of Classical antiquity knew, of course, that the earth was spherical, and Eratosthenes in the third century B.C. calculated its circumference as 24,663 miles.

But the early Fathers of the Church, living in the age of growing ignorance that shrouded the last century of the Roman Empire, decided, on the basis of some statements in the Old Testament that the earth ought to be flat, or, at least, no more curved than a shield.

Lactantius was the most eloquent and probably, therefore, the most influential of many who assiduously demanded that the earth be flat and so imposed on their contemporaries the conviction that it was.

In the Middle Ages, to be sure, there were some learned men, such as Buridan, who knew that the globe is a globe, but they, like LEARNED MEN TODAY, KNOW VERY WELL THAT TALK ABOUT THE EQUALITY OF THE RACES IS UTTER NONSENSE, usually refrained from publicly denouncing fashionable delusions.

It was not until the Fifteenth Century that the truth became again inescapable, but when it did, the White Christians, being men of the West, who do not deny the lessons of experience, surrendered the comfortable error in which they had once generally believed; and since that time, no rational White Christian has doubted that the earth is spherical.

Western Civilization Unexportable

Today, as in the Fifteenth Century, Western men have had to discard a congenial assumption to bring their conception of the world into conformity with observed reality. So long as we of the West held unquestioned dominion over the whole earth, we permitted ourselves to assume that our civilization is general, and our religion in particular, could be exported and made universal. We did not sufficiently observe that talent for mimicry is common to all human beings and indeed to all anthropoids; that all human beings stand in awe of those who have power over them; and that a genius for dissimulation and hypocrisy is hereditary in the most intelligent of men.

Even with these oversights, the evidence against our assumption was fairly clear, but in the pride of our power we felt that we could indulge an assumption that was so congenial to the romantic generosity that is a peculiarity of our White Race.

The events of the past have shown us, beyond peradventure of doubt, the shape of the world in which we live. We now know what our prolonged missionary effort, cultural as well as religious, accomplished ‑ and how its visible effects were produced.

Transformation By Cannon

When Cortez (When Cortez landed on the Eastern shore of Mexico with his armed Conquistadors, he unfurled the banners of the Spanish king and planted the Cross on the beach. As he stood there and claimed Mexico for Spain, at his side was his close friend, Hernando Alonso, a Marrano Jew! In that small band of Conquistadors, there were six known Jews and it is estimated that there were many more than that.

The hierarchy of the Catholic Church had finally realized their mistake in forcing the Jews to convert to Christianity, and discovered that the Marrano Jews were escaping the Inquisition in Spain by moving to the new world. So, they followed them to the new world and renewed the Inquisition!

This same Hernando Alonso was the first of them to be discovered. He was burned at the stake in 1528. The story of Hernando Alonso tells of just how powerful and rich were the converso [Jews forced to convert to Christianity under the threat of death] Marranos within the Spanish government.

His brother-in-law, Eiego de Ordaz, and undoubtedly another Marrano, was the representative of the governor of Cuba. Hernando Alonso himself had the second largest ranch in Mexico, second only to the one owned by Cortez himself. Yet, his money and his connections were of no value in the Inquisition. Many of the Spanish Jews who came to Mexico became ranchers. It was here [in Mexico] that they found their refuge. They had no intention of ever returning to Spain. Their families grew and they became the landed gentry. Many of the great haciendas were owned by these people.

Many of the great Spanish land grants were given to them. Of these grants, one of the largest in Mexico, named Nuevo Leon, was established by Jewish Conquistadors. It ran from a place near Mexico City, north along the eastern coast of Mexico, and across the Rio Grande into what is now Texas far as the present city of San Antonio!

The part of modern Mexico is now a whole state! More than one hundred Jewish families joined together and operated this huge ranch. Their labor was cheap, if not free. They interbred with the natives and a new class of people was created called the mestizos.

The grant was given to a Jew named Don Luis de Carvajal, who was to be its Governor General. The Carvajal family was an old and influential and very rich family. One was the Postmaster General of the Indies. One was the director of the House of Trade in Seville that regulated all of the trade to and from the American. Also, it was Fernandez Carvajal who was the great military contractor for Oliver Cromwell in England in the 1600's.

In 1545, ONE HALF OF ALL RESIDENTS LIVING IN MEXICO CITY WERE ADMITTED JEWS AND THAT DID NOT INCLUDE THE CONVERSOS AND MARRANOS! The number was so great that the Catholic Church stated that there were more Jews in Mexico City than there were Catholics!

The Bishop of Puerto Rico complained that the Spanish ships were bringing mostly Jews. The Bishop of Cuba complained that every boat from Spain was full of Jews and Marranos.

However, among the church leaders many were Jews, also. The Franciscan monk Bernardino de Sahagun was born of Jewish parents. The Archbishop of Mexico, Francisco de Vitoria, was a Jew. The church historian, Father Diego de Duran was also a Jew.

The Catholic Church, the nations of Spain and Portugal, and the people of the Spanish Americas, both native and European alike, were to suffer tremendous hardships. All of this was because the government of Spain and the Catholic Church failed the Laws of God. Once the mistake is made it is too late to prevent suffering and we here in the New Jerusalem, the United States have gone down the same path. Of course, the Catholic Church made matters worse by continuing the Inquisition here in the Americas. They were bound to correct their original mistake for allowing the Jews to convert. But they didn't really learn anything. All the while the Church was hunting down the Marranos among the conversos, they ordered those conversos whom they thought to be good Catholics to convert the Indians! That was like assigning the fox to guard the hen house!

The secret Jews were very flexible and resilient. As the church got closer and closer to uncovering the names of the Marranos, the secret Jews simply changed their names and went into hiding for a while. Very often, they changed their name to a new word that was the name of a flower. This was a code they used so that all of the secret Jews would know each other. Names such as de La Rosa (rose) became common. Rose was the name of the Jewish coward who left the Alamo!

Another method they used to escape the Inquisition was to move North into what is now the Southwestern United States. When the Onate expedition moved North into Nueva Espana, now known as New Mexico, secret Jews were with the expedition. They settled in the Santa Fe area of New Mexico and the Carbajal family again became numerous.

But with the Inquisition moving behind them, right on their heels, they changed their names. New Mexico is covered with  numerous Spanish land grants. Many of them belonged to the families of Marranos. When the United States took over from Mexico the Southwestern part of this country, those secret Jews were out of reach of the Mexican Catholic Church because the United States was not a predominantly Catholic country. However, they still kept their secret to themselves, that is until very recently.

When the modern progeny of these Hispanics in New Mexico and Arizona recognized that the Jews had become entrenched in the high levels of our government and in business, just like they once were in Spain, they began to feel more secure, so they began to speak out and declare their Jewish ancestry.

That is what is happening right now in the Southwestern part of the country. The Universities in Arizona and New Mexico are beginning studies of this heritage. The larger newspapers are running lengthy article, with photographs and all, of supposedly Catholic families who have maintained their secret Jewish roots. The purpose of the newspaper articles and university study groups is to encourage them and let all of them know that they have nothing to fear. Many, but not all of them, are responding. Many are still furtive and keep their secret to themselves.

For all of these years, the Hispanics who were secret Jews would go to their Mass in the Catholic Church and then go home and enter into their little prayer room, or little building in the back yard, and recited their Jewish rituals. This is still happening to this very day! and his small but valiant band of iron men conquered the teeming empire of the Aztecs, he was immediately followed by a train of earnest missionaries, chiefly Franciscans, who began to preach the Gospel to the natives and soon sent home, with naive enthusiasm, glowing accounts of the conversions they had effected.

Their pious sincerity and innocent joy still lives in the pages of Father Shagun, Father Torquemada, and many others. For their sake I am glad that the poor Franciscans never suspected how small a part they actually played in the religious conversions that gave them such happiness.

Far, far more persuasive than their sermons and their book had been the Spanish cannon that breached and shattered the Aztec defenses, and the ruthless Spanish soldiers who slew the Aztec priests at their altars and toppled the Aztec idols from the sacrificial pyramids. The Aztecs, Tepanecs, and other natives accepted Christianity, not because their hearts were touched by alien and incomprehensible doctrines of love and mercy, but because it was the religion of the White Men whose bronze cannon and mail-clad warriors were invincible.

Military Force - Not Love

That was early in the Sixteenth Century and even then there were not wanting indications that should have given pause to a critical mind, but we of the West went on repeating that fond mistake for four centuries, as the missionaries whom we sent to all parts of the world wrote home glowing reports of the number of "hearts" they had "won for Christ."

It was only after our enemies' campaign of "anti‑ colonialism" really got under way that most of us realized that what had won all those hearts was primarily the discipline of British regiments and the manifest power of the White Man.

We now know what happened. On many a shore of Africa, for example, missionaries eager to "win souls for Christ" ventured to land alone, and the aborigines, after mutilating and torturing them for a good communal laugh, ate them, cooked or raw according to the custom of the local cuisine.

Usually, a few weeks or a few months later, a British cruiser hove to off shore and lobbed half a dozen 4.5 shells into the native village, and, if not pressed for time, landed half a company of marines to beat the bushes and drag out a dozen or so savages to hang on convenient trees. Consequently the tribe, if not very obtuse, took the hint and respected the next bevy of missionaries as some how representing the god of thunder and lightning.

And if the men of God distributed enough free rice and medical care with their sermons, they were able to make "converts," as the natives learned to utter the words that Christian Missionaries like to hear. (Just as they do today).

White Missionaries Murdered

That is, in essence, the whole history of "winning souls" among the heathens ‑ the non‑white races of the world. There were, of course, many local variations. If the first missionaries were preceded by troops or White Settlers, the Blacks had already been convinced of the virtues of Christian rifles and had learned White Men should not be regarded as esculent comestibles. It often happened, however, that the natives, even after many years of preaching and conversion, rejected the White Man's odd rites very emphatically, and a fresh supply of missionaries were needed.

In 1905, for example, the Maji‑Maji conspiracy in Tangnyika murdered all the missionaries and almost all the White Men and White Women in the entire territory, and it required a German regiment and several companies of marines to restore the teaching of the Gospel. That was done by giving some forty or fifty thousand demonstrations that a Mauser bullet could penetrate even a Black hide that had been carefully anointed with the grease of a boiled baby.

This same scenario still happens today in Africa. As can be seen by carefully watching the newspaper stories. However, the Christian Missionaries did teach a ritual and often inculcated a superstition that had some superficial substance of Christianity, but they might as well have followed the example of St. Francis and preached sermons to the birds. That is why the many, many thousands of devoted Christians who expended their whole lives to "save souls" built only an edifice of cardboard and tinsel that is now gone in the wind.

Christianity Is Bewildering

To Primitive Natives

What the vanishing of that flimsy facade has made obvious was predictable from the first. The religion of the West has never been comprehensible to the rudimentary minds of the Congoids, Capoids, and Australoids: races so primitive that they were incapable of inventing a wheel and even of using one without supervision races that could not develop for themselves even the first and simplest preliminaries of a civilization. Even though they pre‑dated the Adamic White Man by thousands of years.

When the missionaries invented systems of writing the crude languages of the primitives, they had also to invent words to express such concepts as "God," "soul," "justice," "morality," and "religion" invent them by either creating new words or by perverting to such meanings sounds in the native jargons conveyed impressions that were faintly and remotely analogous.

That fact alone should have made us think. It was clear, furthermore, that the so‑called "converts" even those who had been most thoroughly imbued with an awe of the god of repeating rifles and locomotives, would conform to the White Man's morality only under coercion, and that WHENEVER THEY ESCAPED FROM THE WHITE MAN’S SUPERVISION THEY “ALWAYS” SPONTANEOUSLY REVERTED, NOT ONLY TO THEIR OWN MORES, BUT ALSO TO WHATEVER FORM OF VOODOO THEY HAD PRACTICED BEFORE THE WHITE MAN CAME.

Even if earlier experience had not been conclusive, what happened in Haiti at the very beginning of the Nineteenth Century should have removed the last lingering doubt. But the missionaries did not learn, and the "Ladies' Missionary Society" went on contributing their mites, plying their needles, and glowing with tender emotion for the sweet little savages depicted by their romantic imaginations.

Although it is true that in some places in the former colonial possessions missionaries are still tolerated, if they are obsequious to the natives and pay very well, we have at last learned that the Gospel follows the British regiments IN THE WHITE MAN’S IGNOMINIOUS AND INSANE RETREAT FROM THE WORLD THAT WAS HIS. (Taken in part from a pamphlet by Revelo Oliver)

Second: While the Holy Bible is, generally speaking, as we have said, the Book of the Race of Adam; It is more particularly the family history of one man within the White Adamic Race. This particular man is Abraham. Beginning in Genesis Twelve through the remainder of the Bible the narrative of the Holy Scripture deals with Abraham, Isaac, Jacob/Israel, Joseph and his two sons, in other words about the thirteen tribes of Israel. Abraham was a direct descendant of Adam. (Genesis 5:1‑32; Genesis 11:10‑26)

Abraham was a descendant of Shem [the father of all Semitic peoples], and he was also a Hebrew, being descended from Heber. (Genesis 11:14) THE HEBREWS WERE WHITE, THEY WERE SEMITIC and are racially classified as Nordic. The Bible, beginning in Genesis Twelve, becomes the Story of Adam, his family and how God purposed to bless all the other families of nations (Genesis 12:3) descended from White Adamic Man and ultimately all creation [including other races]. (Romans 8:19‑22)

The principal subject of the Bible is Abraham and his family of White Nations, all now identified on the world stage as America, Canada, England, Scotland, Ireland, Wales, Scandinavia, Greenland, Western Europe, South Africa, Australia, New Zealand, Rhodesia and a few other places scattered over the earth. Not only is the Bible the Book of the Race of the White Man, but more particularly, it is the family record of the Anglo‑Saxon Race as descended through Isaac. Other Adamic Peoples and Nations are discussed and included in the Bible Narrative.

Reference Materials