Watchman Willie Martin Archive

                                                                  The Deception of Edom

                                                                        The False Jews

The Messianic Syndrome: Throughout the United States and Canada on October 2, 1984, World Zionism’s continuing propaganda blitz took on a new dimension. That evening, for two hours on prime time, a TV public broadcasting network began a weekly nine-episode showing on “Jewish Civilization.” This may well be the most extravagant pseudo-documentary of “the Jew’s role in Bible and secular history” ever contrived.

Not content to target the general public, the production is specifically aimed at the school-age children of North America. Here the series producers have achieved a virtual monopoly of classroom attention by students and teachers in the public schools. This announcement appeared in the “Public Schools Staff Bulletin,” October 5, 1984: “Nine-week public TV series on Jewish civilization begins. Heritage: Civilization of the Jews begins its weekly nine-episode showing Tuesday, October 2, at 9:30 P.M. on (local station) KTPS (KCKA) Tv.

Heritage is also being supported by the most ambitious educational program in the history of public broadcasting, designed to reach every secondary school and college in the U.S. and Canada. It was more than five years in production and is narrated by Abba Eban, former Israeli ambassador to the United Nations and the United States.”

It can be safely assumed that the private Judeo-Christian church schools of the evangelical fundamentalists, which aid and abet the Zionist Jews’ spurious claims to the heritage and land of Israel, will not fail to add this bonanza to their curriculum.

The enormity of the deception of the Zionist Jews’ false claim to the name and land of Israel, which continues to be so widely acclaimed by many Judeo-Christian theologians, is beyond calculation. This spurious doctrine, that the Jews fulfill the prophetic role of Israel’s return to the Promised Land, is being given renewed impetus by this TV docu-drama, “Heritage: Civilization of the Jews.” (This is actually a lie, for the Jews have never developed a civilization of any kind, they have only destroyed those the White Race has developed).

Concurrently; whether by coincidence or design, a book, “Jerry Falwell and the Jews,” written by Merrill Simon, who is himself a Jew, authoritatively presents the well-nigh universal position of the fundamentalist Judeo-Christian churches which support this delusive doctrine.

The false premise held by (sic) Rev. Jerry Falwell and other so-called “(Judeo) Christian Fundamentalists” that the Jews are God’s Chosen People, is not simply the result of their blindness to the true identity of the House of Israel. Much of their confusion on this whole matter arises from their failure to investigate the historical background of World Jewry.

This raises the obvious question: Why this unaccountable vacuum of understanding when abundant informed from Biblical and secular historians, including Jewish authoritative sources, is available?

A partial answer may be found in Benjamin H. Freedman’s book, “Facts Are Facts.” Concerning the major part of World Jewry, he wrote: “What secret mysterious power has been able for countless generations to keep the origin and history of the Khazars and the Khazar Kingdom out of our history textbooks and out of the classroom courses of history throughout the world? The origin and history of the Khazars and the Khazar Kingdom are incontestable facts...(which) establish beyond any question of doubt the origin and history of the self-styled ‘Jews’ in Eastern of history’s best kept secrets until wide publicity was given in recent years.”

Freedman, who was himself a Jew, explains further: “Popular ignorance of the real basis of political Zionism is beyond calculation. Vaguely most Christian Americans have the idea that the Jews claim Palestine because it was the ‘Promised Land’ in which they lived for a period of a few centuries that ended 2,000 years ago. And the thought of a people returning to its ‘homeland’ seems emotionally satisfying and good.

But here are the facts most Americans do not know: Political Zionism is almost exclusively a movement by the Jews of Europe: But these Eastern European Jews have neither a racial nor an historic connection with Palestine. Their ancestors were not inhabitants of the ‘Promised Land.’ They are the direct descendants of the people of the Khazar Kingdom, which existed until the 12th century.

The Khazars were a non-Semitic, Turko-Finn, Mongolian tribal people who, about the 1st century A.D., the King of the Khazars adopted Judaism as the state religion, and the majority of the inhabitants joined him in the new allegiance. Before that date there was no such thing as a Khazar whose ancestors had come from the Holy Land.

In view of this fact, what becomes of the cry for ‘repatriation’ to the ‘homeland?’ These Eastern European, Yiddish-speaking Jews have no historic or racial connection with Palestine, or, for that matter, with the other Jews who existed in other countries for thousands of years prior to the Khazar conversion.”

                                            Judaism, Born in Babylon, Not Jerusalem

In his “Outline of History,” H.G. Wells wrote that out of the Babylonian Captivity there arose “consequences of primary importance to all mankind.” Wells wrote: “The Jews who returned, after and interval of more than two generations, to Jerusalem from Babylonia in the time of Cyrus were a very different people from the warring Baal worshipers and Jehovah worshipers...of the kingdoms of Israel and Judah...It is manifest that, relieved of their bickering and murderous kings...and in the intellectually stimulating atmosphere of that Babylonian world, the Jewish mind made a great step forward during the Captivity.

Everything, therefore, contributed to set the exiled Jews inquiring into their own history, and they found an inspiring leader in the Prophet Ezekiel. From such hidden records and forgotten records as they had with them, genealogies, contemporary histories of David, Solomon, and their other kings, legends and traditions, they made out and amplified their own story, and told it to Babylon and themselves.”

H.G. Wells could hardly be accused of anti-Jewish bias (But neither did he know the Israel Truth); rather he seemed to admire the aggressive nationalism of the Jews. In his statement that the Jews found an inspiring leader in the Prophet Ezekiel; which is certainly not born out by Ezekiel’s writings, Wells inadvertently revealed the innate deception in the Jews’ usurpation of Israel’s inheritance and identity.

Evan a cursory reading of the Book of Ezekiel should make it plain that the Lord’s promises of national blessings and restoration are addressed to Ezekiel’s brethren, “the men of thy kindred,” and to “the House of Israel wholly.” No such blessings or promises were ever made to the “evil fig” elements of the southern Kingdom of Judah who were called “the inhabitants of Jerusalem” by the Lord. It was these “evil fig” elements, during the Captivity, which searched the ancient records and “made out and amplified their own story, and then told it to Babylon and themselves.”

Wells reveals that their numbers were swelled in Babylon by proselytes form many non-Judahite races who became zealous participants in their national aspirations. “This welding together into one tradition-cemented people in the course of the ‘seventy years’ is the first instance in history of the new power of the written word in human affairs.

This idea of belonging to a chosen race predestined to preeminence was a very attractive one. It possessed all those Jews who remained in Babylonia. Its literature reached the Jews now established in Egypt. It affected the mixed peoples who had been placed in Samaria, the old capital of the Kings of Israel when the ten tribes were deported to Media (and later most of Judah and Benjamin and Levi). It inspired a great number of Babylonians and the like to claim Abraham as their father, and thrust their company upon the returning Jews (to Jerusalem). Ammonites and Moabites became adherents. To proselytes of whatever race, Judaism long held out welcoming arms.”

Well’s history further reveals the main facts about the Diaspora...and the gradual development of one just God ruling the earth and bound by a special purpose to honor the Jewish people: “The Jewish idea was, and is, a curious combination of theological breadth and intense racial patriotism. The Jews looked for a special savior, a Messiah who was to redeem mankind by the agreeable process of restoring the fabulous glories of David and Solomon, and bringing the whole world at last under the benevolent but firm Jewish heel.”

Gradually, the incredible concept that the Jews, collectively, represent a corporate fulfillment of the Messiah who would come to redeem His people has evolved out of their dilemma brought about they their rejection of the True Messiah.

Today, the most serious aspect of this monstrous aberration is the belief on the part of many Jews that they are about to enter the age in which the Messianic promises of world rule will be fulfilled through them as a race. The following report is from “Intelligence Digest - A Review of World Affairs” by Kenneth de Courcy, cabled from London and published in Destiny Magazine for April 1949: “We are told on very high Jewish authority that nearly all the Jewish theologians are convinced that the Messianic age is about to begin, and this conviction is going to spread and create a force, the power of which may prove immense.

Still stranger is the tendency of leading Jews to speak of the prophecies. All that has happened, they say, was foretold and the actual occurrence of these events now must therefore (they claim) give entirely fresh authority to their old prophets.”

From one of Judaism’s own prolific propaganda sources we find corroboration of the Jewish Messianic syndrome, “What Do Jews Believe?” by rabbi H.G. Enelow was the first in a series of thirty four studies published in separate booklets, “Popular Studies in Judaism,” cleverly written for Christian readers by the Commission on Information About Judaism. These are mailed gratis to Protestant ministers and to others who request them.

To the question in rabbi Enelow’s pamphlet, “but what do we believe about the Messiah?,” he answers in part as follows: “Doubtless some Jews still entertain the hope of a personal Messiah. Reform Jews, however, do not. They do not believe in the miraculous Messiah. All Jews, however, agree in the hope for the advent of a Messianic age.

Moreover, we believe in the Election of Israel (meaning Jews; not Biblical Israel) as a means to an end, the end being the diffusion of those ideas (held by Judaists) among all men and the ultimate reform of human life in accord with them. Whenever this has come true, ti shall mean the Kingdom of god on earth, the Messianic age, the fulfillment of Israel’s (i.e., Jewry’s) highest ideal.”

This then, in essence, is Judaism’s Messianic concept, “bringing the whole world at last under the benevolent but firm Jewish heel,” as wells wrote in his “Outline of History.” The spread of this bizarre belief is engendering a fanatical zeal among Zionist Jews that bars any hope of peace in Palestine. Rev. Jerry Falwell and all Judeo-Christian church leaders who falsely identify the Jews as God’s Chosen People unwittingly (I believe the author is in error her, because I believe that Jerry Falwell full well knows what he is doing) lend credence to this colossal hoax. Moreover, as blind shepherds, they keep their own Christian congregations in darkness regarding their national inheritance and responsibility as the true Hose of Israel.

                                                               A False Identification

Judaism’s masquerade as Biblical Judah and, moreover, as all Israel; which is the basis of Jewish Nationalism, becomes parentally counterfeit when placed in juxtaposition with the historical record of the true House of Israel and Judah. Even a brief summary will show the contrast between the descendants of Biblical Jacob/Israel as opposed to the alien posterity of the cabal which claims for itself not only the Promised Land but the very name and inheritance of Israel.

While the ultimate concern of the Creator encompasses the well-being of all His creation, God chose a special race; the seed of Abraham, from whom the Israel people later came, to become the nucleus of the Kingdom of God on earth: “The Lord thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth.” (Deuteronomy 7:6)

In order to implement His Divine Plan, God addressed this one people variously called “the seed of Abraham, the seed of Isaac, the children of Jacob, the children of Israel,” etc. The Lord God promised vast territorial expansion to Abraham’s posterity, far beyond the “Promised Land” of Canaan (Palestine): “And thou shalt spread abroad to the west, and to the east, and to the north, and to the south: and in thee and in thy seed shall all the families of the earth be blessed.” (Genesis 28:14)

A nation and a company of nations would come from Abraham’s seed. (Genesis 35:11) In fact, he would be the “father of many nations.” (Genesis 17:4-5) And the promise of a royal seed was given: “I will make thee exceeding fruitful, and I will make nations of thee, and kings shall come out of thee. And I will establish my covenant between me and thee and thy seed after thee in their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be a God unto thee, and to thy seed after thee.” (Genesis 17:6-7)

Consider the words of Moses, leader, lawgiver and prophet: “When the most High divided to the nations their inheritance, when he separated the sons of Adam, he set the bounds of the people according to the number of the children of Israel. For the Lord’s portion is his people; Jacob is the lot of his inheritance.” (Deuteronomy 32:8-9)

Today, the historical, lineal descendants of Abraham through Isaac; The Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, Celtic, Nordic, Slavic and kindred peoples, in habit the very lands allotted to Jacob/Israel. To equate the great historical expansion God promised to the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel with the 15 million heterogenous peoples called Jews dwelling in various nations not their own, much less the 3.77 million “Israelis” who presently occupy Palestine, is patently absurd. Yet, strangely enough, this myopic view is held by the vast majority of the Judeo-Christian clergy and laity throughout Christendom.

How could the miscellany of racial types called “Jews” possibly fulfill the tremendous heritage of a race destined to spread abroad over the whole earth “as the dust of the earth and the stars of heaven for multitude” (Genesis 13:16) and Deuteronomy 1:10) “seeing that Abraham shall surely become a great and mighty nation” (Genesis 18:18) “and a multitude of nations?” (Genesis 48:19)

                                                              The Appointed People

The Book of Genesis carefully records the genealogy of Adam to Noah “who was perfect in his generations” (racial descent) and continues a selective line of descent through Shem, one of Noah’s sons, to Abraham.

Abraham was not a Jew, but he was an Hebrew through his descent from Eber, or Heber, the first Hebrew whose forefather was Shem. The select line of descent continued when God told Abraham: “Sarah thy wife shall bear thee a son indeed; and thou shalt call his name Isaac; and I will establish my covenant with him for an everlasting covenant, and with his seed after him.” (Genesis 17:19)

The children of Abraham were many, but only those who were descended from Isaac were the children of promise. The first reference to this separate selection was recorded in Genesis 21:12: “In Isaac shall thy seed be called.” A more correct translation from the Hebrew, according to Professor Edward Odlum, would be: “In Isaac shall thy seed be named.”“This covenant promise,” he said, “has been made good. The seed of Isaac today are called Sacksons (Saxons) in and after Isaac.”

The Children of Israel were first called as a family, then formed into a nation. The importance of this call is given by David: “O ye seed of Abraham his servant, ye children of Jacob his chosen. He is the Lord our God: his judgments are in all the earth. He hath remembered his covenant for ever, the word which he commanded to a thousand generations. Which covenant he made with Abraham, and his oath unto Isaac; And confirmed the same unto Jacob for a law, and to Israel for an everlasting covenant.” (Psalm 105:6-10)

Led by Moses, the Children of Israel came out of Egypt, and they entered the Promised Land under Joshua as a nation under Divine law and administration. As God’s Kingdom people, Israel was furred under judges and then under kings. The royal line of the House of David was established to perpetuate the throne in Israel forever. (2 Samuel 7:12-16; Psalm 89:35-37)

Parallel with Israel’s Bible history from Egypt to Canaan (Palestine), the line of Zarah, a son of Judah whose descendants were separated form the main body of Israel before the Exodus, established settlements along the Mediterranean. Secular history records that colonies of this early Milesian civilization extended to the British Isles. These Children of Israel were no less under the Abrahamic Covenant than their kinsmen in Palestine. Moreover, the British Isles became the appointed place where the Prophet Nathan said the Throne of David and the people of Israel would be at rest: “Moreover I will appoint a place for my people Israel, and will plant them, that they may dwell in a place of their own, and move no more; neither shall the children of wickedness (the Jews) afflict them any more, as before time.” (2 Samuel 7:10)

This could not refer to Palestine for, when the Prophet spoke, Israel was already dwelling there! In fact, advance outposts were already in the Isles to which, later, the tribes of Israel migrated. It was there where the Lord addressed them, “Listen, O Isles, unto me; and hearken, ye people, from far.” (Isaiah 49:1)

It is not within the scope of this study to recount how the Kingdom of Israel rose to preeminence among the nations under David and Solomon, then was divided, ultimately dismantled and the people taken to Assyria and Babylon.

Of paramount concern to us is the fact that a major division occurred in the kingdom which has led to wide-spread misconceptions regarding a great people; lost for a time from the world and from “the rock from whence they were hewn.” (Isaiah 51:1-2)

It was King Solomon’s affinity for foreign women which caused a major breach in the Kingdom’s cotenant relationship with the Lord. Solomon led the nation into idolatry after the gods of the daughter of Pharaoh, and the women of the Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Zidonians and Hittites of the nations which the Lord said to the children of Israel, “ye shall not go in to them..for surely they will turn away your heart after their gods.” (1 Kings 11:1-11)

So the Lord said to Solomon: “Because you have done this, and you have not kept my covenant and my statutes, which I commanded you. I will surely tear the Kingdom from you...not in your days for the sake of your father David, but I will tear it out of the hand of your son. However, I will not tear away all the Kingdom but I will give one tribe (Benjamin) to your son that my servant David may have a lamp always before me in Jerusalem.” (1 Kings 11:1-11; 34-36)

The tremendous significance of this provision; that the tribe of Benjamin should remain with Judah to provide “a lamp always before me in Jerusalem” was a long-range preparation for the day when the Son of God could safely pursue His ministry.

Among the Benjamites and “the gleaning grapes...of the outmost fruitful branches,” (Isaiah 17:6) a representative number of all the tribes, he would find a responsive remnant of Israel, apart from an overwhelming hostile and alien populace.

The division came at the very zenith of the Kingdom’s power and affluence when Solomon’s son Rehoboam came to the throne. Against the advice of his elder counselors, he imposed the most burdensome taxes and his tyranny caused the northern ten tribes, led by Jeroboam, to rebel under his command, “To your tents, O Israel!” (1 Kings 12:16; 2 Chronicles 10:16)

In rebelling against the Throne of David, ten-tribed Israel had, in fact, rejected the Lord’s throne, reserved in perpetuity “until Shiloh came.” (Genesis 49:10) they further departed from the Lord when Jeroboam set up two golden calves as their national gods. Later, during the reign of King Omri, “the statutes of Omri” (Micah 6::16) were substituted for the commandments of the Lord.

Following the division in the Kingdom, Israel had repudiated the Law of God and lapsed into idolatry. Later, Judah followed the same course. From a modern English language version, The New American Standard Bible, we quote the Prophet Jeremiah: “Then the Lord said to me in the days of Josiah the King, Have you seen what faithless Israel did?...For all the adulteries of faithless Israel, I have sent her away and given a writ of divorce, yet her treacherous sister Judah did not fear; but went and was a harlot also...and did not return to me with all her heart, but rather in deception, declares the Lord...Faithless Israel has proved herself more righteous than treacherous Judah.” (Jeremiah 3:6-11)

“Hear the word of the Lord, O kings of Judah and inhabitants of Jerusalem (now if the inhabitants of Jerusalem were Israelites, would God have made this statement and made reference to the “inhabitants of Jerusalem?” I think not, I think that God said this because the inhabitants of Jerusalem were the Jews, the mixed breeds from marriages or unions between True Israelites and the other races indigenous to the area): behold I am about to bring a calamity upon this place...because they have forsaken me and have made this an alien place and have filled this place with the blood of the innocent and built high places to Baal...This place shall be called the valley of slaughter. And I shall make void the counsel of Judah and Jerusalem...I shall cause them to fall by the sword of their enemies...I shall make this city a desolation.” (Jeremiah 19:3-8)

Now, consider the long-range historical consequences of the Lord’s intentions regarding the future restoration of the House of Israel in stark contrast to the terminal fate of Judah: “The word which came to Jeremiah from the Lord saying: Arise and go down to the Potter’s house, and there I shall announce my words to you. Then I went down to the Potter’s house, and there he was, making something on the wheel. But the vessel that he was making of clay was spoiled in the hand of the Potter; so he remade it into another vessel, as it pleased the Potter to make. Then the word of the Lord came to me saying: Can I not, O house of Israel, deal with you as this Potter does? Declared the Lord. Behold like clay in the potter’s hand so are you in my hand, O house of Israel.” (Jeremiah 18:1-6, New American Standard Bible)

But unlike the clay which can be remolded into another vessel, Judah is likened to an earthenware jar which, when broken, cannot be made whole again: “Then you are to break the jar in the sight of the men... and shalt say unto them. Thus said the Lord of hosts; Even so will I break the people and this city, as one breaketh a potter’s vessel, that cannot be made whole again.” (Jeremiah 19:1-11)

The finality of this judgment was later confirmed by Christ speaking of Jerusalem and its inhabitants: “For the days shall come...They shall not leave in thee one stone upon another.” (Luke 19:43-44)

The sentence was carried out in 70 A.D., when the Roman armies under Titus destroyed the city amid scenes of unparalled horror.

In his book Nicholas II et les Juifs, Netchvolodow explains that, "the Chaldean science acquired by many of the Jewish priests, during the captivity of Babylon, gave birth to the sect of the Pharisees whose name only appears in the Holy Scriptures and in the writings of the Jewish historians after the captivity (about 606 B.C.). The works of the celebrated scientist Munk leave no doubt on the point that the sect appeared during the period of the captivity. From the dates the Cabal or Tradition of the Pharisees. For a long time their precepts were only transmitted orally but later they formed the Talmud and received their final form in the book called the Sepher ha Zohar." [1]

The Pharisees were, as it were, a class whose tendency was to form a kind of intellectual aristocracy among the Jews. At first, they formed a sort of brotherhood, a haburah, the members being called haburim or brothers. They were a subversive element aiming at the overthrow of the Sadducean High‑priesthood, whose members prided themselves on their aristocracy of blood and birth, to which the Pharisees opposed an aristocracy of learning. The war waged by the latter extended over a long period of time, and the rivalry was bitter.

The Pharisees, who, although they professed, as one of their chief tenets, the utmost contempt of the am‑haretz or simple people, did not overlook the fact that they needed their mass support for the attainment of their own aim, and they enlisted it by opposing the Sadducean strictness of the Law in many instances, namely, in the observance of the Sabbath. The power of the Sadducees fell with the destruction of the Temple by Titus and thenceforth the Pharisaic element held supremacy among the Jews.

Quoting an acknowledged authority on Judaism, Mr. Flavien Brenier, Lt. Gen. Netchvolodow further describes the policy of the sect as follows [2]: "Before appearing proudly as the expression of Jewish aspirations, The Tradition of the Pharisees had serious difficulties to surmount, the chief of which was the revival of the orthodox faith stimulated in the Jewish people. To the exiles, bemoaning the fall of the Temple of Jerusalem and begging their god to end the misfortunes of their homeland, the revelation that their god was only a phantom, entailed not only certain defeat, but also their own exposure to perils the least of which would have been the loss of all authority over the Jews.

The Pharisees then, judging it wiser to capture the confidence of their compatriots by taking the lead of the religious movement, affected a scrupulous observance of the slightest prescriptions of the law and instituted the practice of complicated rituals, simultaneously however cultivating the new doctrine in their secret sanctuaries. These were regular secret societies, composed during the captivity of a few hundred adepts. At the time of Flavius Josephus which was that of their greatest prosperity they numbered only some thousands of members.

    This group of intellectual pantheists was soon to acquire a directing influence over the Jewish nation. Nothing, moreover, likely to offend national sentiment ever appeared in their doctrines. However saturated with pantheistic Chaldeism they might have been, the Pharisees preserved their ethnic pride intact. This religion of man diminished, which they had absorbed at Babylon, they conceived solely as applying to the profit of the Jew, the superior and predestined being.

    The promises of universal dominion which the orthodox Jew found in the Law, the Pharisees did not interpret in the sense of the reign of the God of Moses over the nations, but in that of a material domination to be imposed on the universe by the Jews. The awaited Messiah was no longer the Redeemer of original Sin, a spiritual victor who would lead the world, it was a temporal king, bloody with battle, who would make the Jews master of the world and 'drag all peoples under the wheels of his chariot.' The Pharisees (Jews) continue to pretend to worship in public, only as a concession to popular opinion, for they expected its eventual consummation to be achieved by the secular patience the use of human means.

    Monstrously different from the ancient Laws of God were such principles as these, but they had nothing one could see, which might have rendered unpopular those who let them filter, drop by drop, among the Jews. One cannot better define its action in the midst of Jewish society before Jesus Christ,' said Mr. Flavien Brenier, 'than in comparing it with that of the Freemasons in modern society. A carefully restricted membership tightly bound, imposing on their members the religion of 'the secret,' the Pharisees pursued relentlessly their double aim which was:

1). The seizure of political power, by the possession of the great political offices (the influence of which was tremendous in the reconstituted Jewish nation) and the conquest of the Sanhedrin (Jewish parliament).

2). To modify gradually the conceptions of the people in the direction of their secret doctrine."

The first of these aims was achieved when Hillel, a Pharisee of Babylon was elected president of the Sanhedrin. Thus ended the bitter fight between the Pharisees and the Sadducees. Opposed to Hillel was Shammai, a Sadducee, supporter of the Sadducean High Priest who was made Chief Judge of the assembly. The attitude of the two men towards each other is a matter of long record in the Talmud.

Among the most noted Pharisees, after Hillel, are: Yochanan ben Zakkai, founder of the school of Yamnai, Akibah who, with Bar Cochba, fomented the revolt against the Romans under Hadrian, rebellion ending with the order for the dispersion of Jews (132 A.D.). Also Simon ben Yohai, who might be termed the great Magician and Father of the Cabala, lastly Judah the Prince who compiled the Babylonian Talmud. Under these chiefs, the Pharisaic power was definitely established in the Sanhedrin. Those among the Jews who clung to the Sadducean tradition and refused to acknowledge the dominion of the Pharisees, remained as dissidents. Such were the Samaritans and the Karaites who rejected the Talmud.

Addressing the Prophet Jeremiah, the Lord drew yet another drastic distinction, this time within Judah between “the good figs” who were carried away captive whom the Lord acknowledge; “I sent out of this place into the land of the Chaldeans for their own good,” and “the bad figs,” whom He called “the residue of Jerusalem” along with Zedkiah King of Judah and his princes that remain in this land and them that dwell in the land of Egypt: “And I will deliver them to be removed into all the kingdoms of the earth for their hurt, to be a reproach and a proverb, a taunt and a curse, in all places whither AI shall drive them.” (Jeremiah 29:9)

Jesus was fully aware of the prophecies regarding those in Jerusalem who would reject Him. He used a barren fig tree to symbolize Jewry and pronounced the judgment: “Let no fruit grow on thee henceforward for ever. And presently the fig tree withered away.” (Matthew 21:19)

Christ leveled His most devastating judgment against them in the Kingdom parable of the wicked husbandmen: “There was a certain householder, which planted a vineyard...and let it out to husbandmen (caretakers), and went into a far country; And when the time of the fruit drew near, he sent his servants to the husbandmen, that they might receive the fruits of it. And the husbandmen, took his servants, and beat one, and killed another, and stoned another. Again, he sent other servants more than the first: and they did unto them likewise. But last of all he sent unto them his son, saying, They will reverence my son. But when the husbandmen saw the son, they said among themselves, this is the heir; come, let us kill him, and let us seize on his inheritance. And they caught him, and cast him out of the vineyard, and slew him. When the Lord therefore of the vineyard cometh, what will he do unto those husbandmen? They say unto him, He will miserably destroy those wicked men, and will let out his vineyard unto other husbandmen, which shall render him the fruits of their season. Jesus saith unto them, did ye never read in the scriptures, the stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: This is the Lord’s doing, and it is marvelous in our eyes? Therefore say I unto you, the Kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.” (Matthew 21:33-43)

In the following verses His indictment continues: “And whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder” a direct reference to Isaiah’s prophecy: “And he shall be for a sanctuary; but for a stone of stumbling and for a rock of offence to both the houses of Israel, for a gin (trip) and for a snare to the inhabitants of Jerusalem.” (Isaiah 8:14)

The Children of Israel forfeited God’s blessings when they failed to keep the terms of the Law Covenant made at Sinai. However, this did not abrogate nor nullify the Lord’s everlasting, unconditional Covenant of Promise made with them through the fathers. All the prophets agree that, when the times of exile expired, they would be regathered as the Kingdom over which the Lord Himself shall reign.

All such promises of national restoration are addressed only to the House of Israel which includes individuals of all the tribes of Israel (including the true posterity of Judah) who are the family of Jacob/Israel. But no promise of national restoration is ever made to Judah. And no promise of restoration is ever made to the Jews.

In fact: The Jews Cannot Be Saved

The Judeo‑Christian clergy is always, falsely, telling their people that all can come to the Lord and be Saved. Well this is demonstratably wrong. The following verses prove that all cannot be saved and that there are a certain amount of people in the world today which cannot be saved no matter what.

Whenever the Scriptures says that one cannot enter into the congregation of the Lord, it means that person cannot be saved, and they will never be allowed by Almighty God to enter into the congregation (of Israelites, the saved, Redeemed of Christ) of the Lord.

Deuteronomy 23:1: "He that is wounded in the stones, or hath his privy member cut off, shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD." This is in reference to those who follow after other religions, some of which, requires the male members to either be castrated or to cut their privy member off and throw it into the fire for a  sacrifice.

Deuteronomy 23:2: "A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the LORD."

Here we learn that all of the mixed breed children that our Israel men and women produce by marrying other races cannot be saved; and can never enter into the congregation of the Lord. They are not to be among our people; they are to be divided and separated and sent on the way.

Deuteronomy 23:3: "An Ammonite or Moabite shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to their tenth generation shall they not enter into the congregation of the LORD for ever." Here we are told that the Ammonite or Moabite (which have been absorbed into the Jewish religion) cannot be saved.

Deuteronomy 23:7‑8: "Thou shalt not abhor an Edomite; for he is thy brother: thou shalt not abhor an Egyptian; because thou wast a stranger in his land. The children that are begotten of them shall enter into the congregation of the LORD in their third generation."

Abhor: Brown‑Driver‑Briggs Definition: #8581  ta` ab‑to abhor, to be abominable, to do abominably

a) (Niphal) to be abhorred, to be detested

1) in the ritual sense

2) in the ethical sense

b) (Piel)

1) to loathe, to abhor, to regard as an abomination

a) in the ritual sense

b) in the ethical sense

2) to cause to be an abomination

c) (Hiphil) to make abominable, to do abominably

1) in the ritual sense

2) in the ethical sense

Now I have not done a complete study on this, but these few verses show that there are some people in the world that cannot be saved; and cannot ever enter into the Congregation of the Lord.

The Kingdom of Judah was permanently broken. Judah was, for a time, “the Lord’s Sanctuary,” but Israel was His Dominion (Psalm 114:2)

Moses told the Children of Israel: “For thou art an holy (set apart) people unto the Lord thy God: the Lord thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all the people that are upon the face of the earth.” (Deuteronomy 7:6)

Israel’s unique relationship with the Almighty and the great commission as His servant people, to be a light to the Gentiles, is the underlying theme of the Bible Message. Why, then, is so-called “Christian Orthodoxy” so unprepared to accept the true Scriptural identification of these chosen people, even when the evidence proves them to be other than the Jews?

The ultimate irony of the Jewish masquerade as the Lord’s chosen people lies hidden in the little-known fact that today, as in centuries past, many who claim the appellation “Israel” are, in truth, the descendants of Esau, Israel’s archenemies throughout history. There is Edom [Esau is called Edom in Genesis 36:8]. And Edom is in 'Modern Jewry' Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925 edition, Vol. 5, p. 41.

“Jewish Nationalism, Part II: the Esau-Edom-Idumean Connection” will shed more light on the background of the murkey genesis of World Jewry.

Judaism does have prophetic role to play, but not as Israel returning to the Promised Land, nor in fulfillment of the Zionist delusions of a Messianic Overlordship.

The Esau - Edom - Idumean Connection: No more subtle deception was ever perpetrated by “the father of lies” than Christendom’s acceptance of the counterfeit “Israeli” state in Palestine. Christian theologians and evangelists have given credibility to the specious claim that the enemies of our Lord and His Kingdom are the chosen people rather than the Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, Celtic, Nordic, Slavic and kindred people who are the true House of Israel in the world today! The ultimate irony inherent in the Jews’ spurious claim to be the descendants of Jacob/Israel is the act that a mainstream of World Jewry is actually the progeny of Esau.

The posterity of Esau is very much in the world today and now, as in the beginning (Genesis 27:41), his descendants hate the true inheritors of the Covenant Promises. (Verified by the story of the husbandmen in Matthew 21:34; Mark 12:6).

The conflict, being summarized here, between two antagonistic people is a very ancient one. Its genesis was in the Garden when the Lord God said to the serpent, “I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your posterity and hers.” (Genesis 3:16, The Bible an American Translation)

The Lord God provided the witness of the sun, moon and stars as His pledge that the seed of Israel would remain a nation before Him forever. (Jeremiah 31:35) But an Adversary has sought to destroy the nation from its very inception.

The enmity of the “seed of the serpent” toward the “seed of the woman” has been manifest in a satanic conspiracy against her descendants.

As has been summarized previously, the continuity of the seed of the woman has been preserve in the children of Abraham through Isaac and his son, Jacob, whose name was changed to Israel. From the beginning, the descendants of Jacob/Israel have been, and still are, the target of a satanic conspiracy to invalidate the Lord god’s purpose in them.

With the birth of Esau and Jacob (Genesis 25:22-23), hated his brother Jacob (Genesis 27:41), despised his birthright (Genesis 25:34) and took foreign wives in violation of God’s command, “thou shalt not take a wife...of the daughters of the Canaanites.” (Genesis 24:37) The hybrid offspring of these unions provided an historical continuity for the alien, subversive seed in which was at enmity with the seed of the woman.

The magnitude of this enmity is indicated by the Prophet Malachi’s report of the word of the Lord to Israel: “I have loved you, saith the Lord. Yet ye say, Wherein hast thou loved us? Was not Esau Jacob’s brother? Saith the Lord: Yet I loved Jacob, And I hated Esau, and laid his mountains and his heritage waste...Whereas Edom saith, We are impoverished, but we will return and build the desolate places; thus saith the Lord of hosts. They shall build, but I will throw down; and they shall call them, the border (territory) of wickedness, and, The people against whom the Lord hath indignation for ever.” (Malachi 1:2-4)

                                                                  The Great Conspiracy

The agelong sanguinary struggle between these “two nations,” these “two manner of people,” is a recurrent theme of the Bible history. Asaph, a prominent poet and musician who was appointed by David to preside over the sacred choral services in Israel, petitioned the Lord to cause His enemies who conspired against his people to be put to shame and death: “Keep not thou silence, O God, hold not thy peace, and be not still, O God. For, lo, thine enemies make a tumult: and they that hate thee have lifted up the head. They have taken crafty counsel against thy people (The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion), and consulted against thy hidden ones. They have said, Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation; that the name of Israel may be no more in remembrance.” (Psalm 83:14)

The nature of this conspiracy is somewhat obscured by the English translation: “Come and let us cut them off from being a nation.” Consider the phrase “cut them off.” The word “cut” is from the Hebrew KAW KHAD; KACHAD, which means “to secrete by word or act; to conceal, to hide or make desolate.”

The conspiracy’s first objective then was to conceal or hide the nation, not only from the eyes of the world but from the nation itself, “that the name of Israel may be no more in remembrance.” The first reference to the identity of the serpent seed line is given in Genesis 4:16: “And Cain went out from the presence of the Lord, and dwelt in the land of Nod, on the east of Eden.” Here, among a non-Adamic, pre-Adamic people, Cain became the progenitor of a hybrid posterity who became the enemies of the Lord’s Kingdom people.

“Sargon the Magnificent” (Sargon the Magnificent, Mrs. Sydney Bristowe, The Covenant Publishing Co., Ltd., London, England) gives secular evidence that Cain founded a prehistoric city or civilization. In the 23rd chapter of Matthew, Jesus identifies His enemies as being of this serpent seed line which He traces back to Cain.

These alien interlopers were a subversive influence within the Lord’s Kingdom from its inception. When the northern ten tribes of Israel asked Rehoboam to ease the tax burden which his father, Solomon, had imposed on them, he rejected the counsel of “the old men,” i.e., the elder statesmen, and sought instead the advice of the young men that were brought up with him.

Most students interpret this passage to mean simply that Rehoboam turned to the men of his own age. But the Hebrew term translated “brought up” is gadal which Mr. Strong defines: “In a causative sense, to make large (in various senses, as to body, mind, estate or honor, also in pride).” It can be concluded that King Rehoboam sought the advice of the Shelanite-Jebusite faction which had been made large in the King’s service.

These Shelanite-Jebusite advisers persuaded King Rehoboam to ignore the pleas of the people and urged him to tax and spend to promote the glory of the Kingdom and enhance his own prestige and power, were upon the House of Israel rebelled against the Throne of David and established the Kingdom of Israel as an independent nation.

Thus, the interlopers or the “houses of Achzib” (Shelah) succeeded in dividing the Lord’s Kingdom people and weakened the Royal House which they envied and hated. Corrupted from within by the Shelanite subverters who had become “pricks in their eyes, and thorns in their sides,” neither the northern Kingdom of Israel nor the southern Kingdom of Judah could withstand the assaults of the Assyrians. In the 8th century B.C., the Assyrians conquered the northern Kingdom of Israel and, in a series of raids, they carried the people into captivity in the land of the Medes.

King Sennacherib captured the 46 strongholds (fenced cities) of Judah about the same time (721 B.C.) He took part of the Kingdom of Israel into Assyria. These captives of Judah were taken in the same northerly direction where Tiglath-ileser had taken their kinsmen-the tribes of Manasseh, Reuben, and Gad in 745 B.C. These all became part of the great migration to the appointed place, north and west of Palestine.

Only “the inhabitants of Jerusalem,” a minor fraction of the Kingdom of Judah, escaped the Assyrian conquests. About 130 years later, Jerusalem fell to the Babylonians under Nebuchadnezzar and the inhabitants were taken to Babylon. “The name of Israel may be no longer in remembrance” had become an historical reality.

On a six-sided baked clay prism, now in the British Museum, is the Assyrian King Sennacherib’s record of the eight campaigns against Israel which began in 703 B.C., and ended in 689 B.C. The inscription refers to the captured peoples, not by their name “Israel,” but Beth Omri or “House of Omri.”

That the children of Israel would no longer be known as “Israel,” but be called Beth Omri after the name of their King, was a stroke of Divine judgment. Deuteronomy 18:38 cites national blindness would inexorably follow their repudiation of the Law of the Lord when they substituted the statutes of Omri.

The national amnesia that blinded Israel to here own identity could at no time apply to the Jews. They have never ceased to identify themselves as Jews, nor has the world ever been allowed to lose sight of them. Moreover, the Jews have not only convinced the world that they are “of Judah,” they have largely succeeded in expanding their claim to represent all of Israel.

Careless over-simplification by many theologians and laymen has contributed to the grossly mistaken assumption that the whole House of Judah was taken to Babylon, and, after 70 years in captivity, returned, intact, to Jerusalem. They allow that the northern Kingdom of Israel was taken captive to the north by the Assyrians where the ten tribes are conveniently “lost” somewhere in the steppes of southeastern Europe. But facts are stubborn things. Histories, both biblical and secular, record what actually happened.

The main body of the southern Kingdom of Judah, as well as the northern Kingdom of Israel, was taken by the Assyrians into the land of the Medes by the Caspian Sea. These Judaites were taken by the Assyrian King Sennacherib in the same northerly direction where Tiglath-pilaster had taken their kinsmen; the tribes of Manasseh, Reuben and Gad in 745 B.C. These all became part of the great migration to “the appointed place” north and west of Palestine.

Only the inhabitants of Jerusalem, a very small minority of the southern Kingdom of Judah, escaped the Assyrian conquests.

About 130 years later, Jerusalem was captured by the Babylonians under Nebuchadnezzar. After 70 years in Babylon, a small remnant, together with some of the tribe of Benjamin and the royal descendants of David, as well as a few of the tribe of Levi, returned to Jerusalem.

After their return from Babylon, certain ones of the House of Judah and some of the priests intermarried with the inhabitants of the land and these intermarriages were severely condemned by Ezra and Nehemiah. (Ezra 9 and 10; Nehemiah 13:23-29)

While there were other race admixtures, these forbidden marriages were mainly with Hittites of the former Canaanite Empire. In time, this merging of Judaites with Hittites became one of the racial types called “Jews.” To begin to grasp the complex heterogeneity of World Jewry, it is essential to keep in mind that the inhabitants of Jerusalem were a composite of antagonistic groups, “the good figs” of Judah and “the evil fig” Shelanite-Canaanite pseudo-Judaites. When Nebuchadnezzar carried “the good fig” Judaites with Jeconiah and the princes of Judah to Babylon (Jeremiah 24:1), “the evil fig” residue of Jerusalem was left under Zedekiah who reigned in Jerusalem for eleven years as Nebuchadnezzar’s puppet king.

The Jews’ masquerade as the Lord’s chosen people is undoubtedly the greatest hoax in history; only the so-called HoloHoax of World War II is even close to it. This is the basis of the anti-God conspiracy of which Asaph spoke. The plan began to evolve among the Jews in Babylon who, as the historian H.G. Wells wrote, found “the idea of belonging to a chosen race predestined to preeminence was a very attractive one.” If they could foist themselves off on the world as Israel, their grandiose ambitions for world dominion would be greatly enhanced. They began to claim Abraham for their father, and thrust their company upon the remnant of the true Judaites in Babylon.

When the remnant of the Kingdom of Judah was taken to Babylon, many of the Edomite, Amalekite, Canaanite peoples who were already in Babylon became proselytes to Judaism. These proselytes adopted the name of the Diaspora or “Dispersion of the Jews” but they were neither of Judaite nor Israelite ancestry.

The true Judaites, like their Israelite kinsmen, who were taken northward in the Assyrian captivities were never known as “Jews,” nor had they been called “Jews” while in Palestine. Most certainly their captors never took them south to Babylon, nor did they ever migrate to Babylon to join the jews, nor ever became any part of the Jewish Diaspora. As Wells wrote, “The main part of Jewry was never in Judea (Palestine).”

In his “Study of Esau-Edom in Jewry,” C.F. Parker of London explained how the pseudo-Judaites brought in addition al Esau-Edomites and Ishmaelites to help them gain control. So great was the number and influence of these interlopers that, during our Lord’s ministry, He found them “sitting in Moses’ seat,” i.e., in complete control of the Jewish Nanton, albeit it was subject to Rome.

However, these Shelanite-Jebusite Canaanites who returned to Jerusalem with the remnant of real Judaites from Babylon, and who took over and corrupted the nation of the Jews, were but a small part of the Babylonian conspirators who had palmed themselves off as the Diaspora or “Dispersion of the Jews.”

Sir Leon Levinson in his book, “The Jews of History,” wrote: “Many of them found life in Babylon, upon the whole, congenial. They intermarried with foreigners, had built up good businesses, and had no liking for the hardships of a return journey on the score of mere sentiment. They were at ease in Babylon.”

Babylon became the real headquarters of Judaism. “So mild, especially during the later years, was the treatment which they received in the Babylonian Empire, that when liberty was announced to the whole body of captives, only the lowest of the low returned together with the Levites and the Priests.” (Talmud, Kidd. IV. I)

It was the “evil fig” Shelanite-Canaanite “residue of Jerusalem” (Jeremiah 24:8) which has contrived to usurp Israel’s inheritance to the Promised Land. The Prophet Ezekiel records the conspiracy: “Again the word of the Lord came unto me, saying, Son of man, thy brethren...the men of thy kindred, and all the house of Israel wholly, are they unto whom the inhabitants of Jerusalem, have said, Get you far from the Lord: unto us is this land given in Possession.” (Ezekiel 11:14-15)

This spurious claim by the Shelanite-Jebusites of Ezekiel’s day has far-reaching implications for the present in the Israelis’ militant aggression against the Palestinians. The Zionist/Jews can never fulfill the role of the children of Israel returning to the land of their inheritance but they do have prophetic role to play in “the day of the Lord’s vengeance...the controversy of Zion.” (Isaiah 34:1-8)

Attention has already been drawn to Asaph’s petition to the Lord concerning those who said: “Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation; that the name of Israel may be no more in remembrance. For they have consulted together with one consent: they are confederate against thee.” (Psalm 83:4-5)

First to be named by the Psalmist in his indictment of God’s enemies were The Tabernacles of Edom who said “Let us take to ourselves the houses of God in possession.” (Psalm 83:6, 12)

Also named among the anti-God conspirators was Amalek the grandson of Esau. In the Book of Numbers 24:20, the marginal rendition reads: “Amalek was the first of the nations to war against Israel. And it is recorded in the 17th chapter of Exodus: shortly after the children of Israel left Egypt, the Amalekites attacked them at Rephidim. When Joshua led the Israelites to victory, the Lord said unto Moses, ‘Write this for a memorial in a book, and rehearse it in the ears of Joshua; for I will utterly put out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven.’”

The sons of Amalek, it should be kept in mind, were the leaders of the Edomites who dwelt in Seir.(Genesis 36:1-9) Another significant link in the conspiracy, the Edomite-Idumean connection, becomes readily, apparent in the Lord’s instructions to the Prophet Ezekiel: “Set thy face against mount Seir (Edom), and prophesy against it...Thus saith the Lord God; I am against thee...and I will lay thy cities waste, and thou shalt be desolate...Because thou hast had a perpetual hatred, and hast shed the blood of the children of Israel... I have heard all thy blasphemies which thou hast spoken against the mountains of Israel...thou shalt be desolate, O mount Seir, and all Idumea.” (Ezekiel 35)

“Thus saith the Lord God; Because the enemy hath said against you, Aha, even the ancient high places are ours in possession...Therefore thus saith the Lord God; surely in the fire of my jealousy have I spoken against the residue of the heathen, and against all Idumea, which have appointed my land into their possession.” (Ezekiel 36:2, 5)

In the agelong Esau-Idumean conspiracy to displace the seed of Jacob in order to seize Israel’s inheritance, the most heinous act was the Idumean Herod’s plot to murder the Christ-child. His motive was to make certain that no legitimate seed of Israel should arise to claim the Kingship from him. (Matthew 2:16)

When Christs’ ministry was about to end, He left the safe environs of Galilee to confront the Jews in Jerusalem. He knew the identity of those who still sought to kill Him and usurp His Kingship as the Son of David. To those who believed on Him, He said: “If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed; And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” Here His enemies raised the issue: “We be Abraham’s seed, and were never in bondage to any man: how sayest thou, Ye shall be made free?” (John 8:31-33) but this was a tact admission that, although they co9uld claim descent from Abraham, they were not of the seed of Promise through Isaac and Jacob/Israel who had been in bondage in Egypt. Jesus knew they were the descendants of Esau.

When Jesus said, “the scribes and Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat,” He meant they had taken control of the government. He characterized them as hypocrites: “Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.” (Matthew 23:15)

Jesus identified them by their own admission: “If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets. Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves...Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. Ye serpents, ye generation (offspring) of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell? Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes: and some of them ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute them from city to city: That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.” (Matthew 23:30-35)

In His parable of the Nobleman Jesus indicated those who would deny Him the Kingdom: “His citizens hated him, and sent a message after him, saying We will not have this man to reign over us.”

To them, He rendered a final verdict: “But those mine enemies, which should not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.” (Luke 19:11-27)

The finality of the Lord’s judgment upon the Esau-Edom-Idumean confederacy was seen in the vision of the Prophet Obadiah: “Thus saith the Lord God concerning Edom...Behold, I have made thee small among the heathen: thou art greatly despised. The pride of thine heart hath deceived thee...that saith in his heart, Who shall bring me down to the ground? Though thou exalt thyself as the eagle, and though thou set thy nest among the stars, thence will I bring thee down, saith the Lord...How are the things of Esau searched out! How are his hidden things sought up! All the men of thy confederacy...that were at peace with thee have deceived thee, and prevailed against thee...Shall I not in that day, saith the Lord, even destroy the wise men out of Edom, and understanding out of the mount of Esau? And thy mighty men, O teman, shall be dismayed to the end that every one of the mount of Esau may be cut off by slaughter. For thy violence against thy brother Jacob shame shall cover thee, and thou shalt be cut off for ever.” (Obadiah 1:1-10)

The key to the timing of this judgment is given in the prophet’s next words: “For the day of the Lord is near upon all the heathen (nations): as thou hast done, it shall be done unto thee: thy reward shall return upon thine own head...But upon mount Zion shall be deliverance, and there shall be holiness; and the house of Jacob shall possess their possessions. And the house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame, and the house of Esau for stubble...and there shall not be any remaining of the house of Esau; for the Lord hath spoken it...And saviours shall come up on mount Zion to judge the mount of Esau; and the kingdom shall be the Lord’s.” (Obadiah 1:15-21)

The extent of the enmity of the posterity of Esau toward the House of Jacob is almost beyond comprehension. A measure of its historic consequences is given in the Lord’s answer to the Prophet Esdras’ question: “What shall be the parting asunder of the times? Or when shall be the end of the first, and the beginning of it that followeth? And he said unto me, From Abraham unto Isaac, when Jacob and Esau were born of him, Jacob’s hand held first the heel of Esau. For Esau is the end of the world, and Jacob is the beginning of it that followeth.” (2 Esdras 6:7-9)

The judgment attendant to the end of this world (order, system or cosmos) is epitomized by the word of the Lord to Isaiah: “For my sword...shall come down upon Idumea, and upon the people of my curse, to judgment.” (Isaiah 34:5) And he speaks of a great slaughter in the land of Idumea: “For it is the day of the Lord’s vengeance, and the year of recompenses for the controversy of Zion.” (Isaiah 34: 6-8)

The Prophet Ezekiel points to the day beginning what follows; when all nations will know that the Lord God is the Holy One in Israel (Ezekiel 39:7): “And I will set my glory among the heathen, and all the heathen shall see my judgment that I have executed, and my hand that I have laid upon them. So the house of Israel shall know that I am the Lord their God from that day and forward.” (Ezekiel 39:21-22)

The many diverse peoples who call themselves Jews lay claim to all the Covenant Promises God made with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel, albeit the writings of well-known Jewish scholars [3] reveal that they are not descended from Judah, much less the whole House of Israel. In fact, evidence from historical sources is overwhelming that the Jews are not a distinct racial group.

Professor Lathrop Stoddard wrote in “The Pedigree of Judah,” Forum, March 1926, a concise summary of the ethnic background of the Jews in the world today. “Investigations of contemporary Jewry have brought out one striking fact,” he wrote, “the presence of two sharply contrasted types within the Jewish fold.” The physiognomy of the Jews of Eastern Europe and the Jews of the Mediterranean basin and adjacent Afro-Asiatic areas differ markedly from one another.

These analyses confirm a division which the Jews themselves have long made” Prof. Stoddard emphasized. “For more than a thousand years, Jews have clearly recognized two distinct physical types, called by them, the Ashkenazim or Jews of Eastern Europe, and the Sephardim or Jews of the Mediterranean and adjacent regions.

In the eighth century A.D., Mesopotamia, Persia, and the Armenian-Caucasian area still contained the bulk of the world’s Jewish population. By the end of the tenth century, these lands were almost emptied of Jews. Lured to the Khazaria as to the Promised Land, Jewry pushed northward from Asia into southeastern Europe-swarming in by the hundred thousand, by sea, by river, and by mountain trail. And during those two centuries was forged the Ashkenazic stock of today. This migration involved sweeping racial changes. In the first place, Jewry’s slow progress through the Arminian and Caucasian highland implied a further admixture and strengthening of the Armenoid at the expense of the Semitic element. Then, once in Khazaria, the extensive inter-marriage with the converted Khazars resulted in a further influx of Turkish and Mongoloid blood. The result was a population prevailingly Armenoid and Mongoloid. The Semitic type must have entirely disappeared,” Prof. Stoddard concludes. “Such, in brief, is the complex pedigree of Judah. It effectively disposes of the fiction that the modern Jew is the true scion of the ancient Hebrew.”

Today, there are many non-Israelite, non-Judaite infiltrations in World Jewry other than Ashkenazim (Khazars) of Eastern Europe and the Sephardim of the Mediterranean basin. Among them are black Jews of Malabar and Ethiopia and the Mongoloid Jews of China. But most important of these infiltrations must be the intrusion of the Esau-Idumean line which survives and persists, absorbed in that “remnant of Judah” known as Jews. This latter fact is disclosed by the Encyclopedia Biblica, and is acknowledged by the Jewish Encyclopedia.

As David Davidson says in “Palestine: Esau Claims Possession” [4]: “The race of Esau were the Edomites, of Old Testament history, and included the marauding Sinaitic tribe of Amalek. The dominant physiognomy and aggressively intrusive characteristics of the race were derived from the native stock of North Syria through the ‘Hittite’ wives of Esau, and by subsequent intermarriage between the Edomites and ‘Hittites.’ After the Edomites (or Idumeans) were absorbed into the remnant of Judah, after 130 B.C., but mainly in the dispersion following the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 A.D., the Edomite-Hittite physiognomy eventually emerged as the European Jewish type; falsely called ‘Semitic’...Herod the Great was an Edomite and became the first ‘King of the Jess.’ As such he sought to destroy our Lord at birth. At that time the Idumeans had been comprised in the Jewish state and had been Jews in religion for over a century. They dominated the whole of Jewish life and our Lord, in revealing the nature of the Herodian or Idumean domination, refers to ‘the leaven of Herod’ as the antithesis of the leaven of the Kingdom of God’...In the Revelation of Jesus Christ (Revelation 1:1) the effect of the intrusion is referred to as ‘the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.’ (Revelation 2:9; 3:9)

Behind the mask of Idumean physiognomy, neither Jew nor Christian can discern what is true and what is false in Jewry, except by their works...Josephus, in describing the conditions internal to the Roman siege of Jerusalem, reveals how the race of Esau (as the Idumeans) were mainly instrumental in inflaming the hatreds of the three internal factions of disintegration.”

C.R. Dickey in “A Backward Look” comments on “this contradictory element in Jewish history which is so confusing to Christians.” The author quotes from an article by C.F. Parker who refers to modern Idumean Hittites who claim to be the seed of Israel: “It is remarkable that pogroms against the Jews have constituted seeming contradictions. If the first Jesuits were Jews, as indicated, why should they persecute their own people? If, however, they were Edomites, masquerading as Jews, their desire to eliminate Judah is easily understood.

Central Europe has long been a source of contradictory elements in Jewry and this can only be explained through a duality within that people: the false seeking to destroy that cherished by the other. Communism, the product of Marx and allied teachings promulgated and supported by numbers of Jews, are odious to the orthodox, pious religious element of Jewry...The two elements are quite incompatible.”

While this was a fair assessment of the disparity within Jewry then (in 1948), today an accommodation of sorts has come about. Now, even the most arrogant atheists among the Zionists who presently dominate Judaism use the pious pretension that the Jews are God’s chosen people as the main thrust of their militant aggression in Palestine. On this wholly false propaganda level, all the diverse factions in World Jewry; under Zionist pressure, share a broad unanimity of purpose.


                                           The Khazar and Edomite Jews Claim it In Possession

“And God appeared unto Jacob again, when he came out of Padan‑aram, and blessed him. And God said unto him, Thy name is Jacob: thy name shall not be called any more Jacob, but Israel shall be thy name: and he called his name Israel. And God said unto him, I am God Almighty: be fruitful and multiply; a nation and a company of nations shall be of thee, and kings shall come out of thy loins; And the land which I gave Abraham and Isaac, to thee I will give it, and to thy seed after thee will I give the land.” [5]

“The Archbishop of New (Dr. C.F. Garbett), who visited Palestine in 1946, comments on the situation there, and on the report of the Anglo-American Committee of Enquiry, in the June issue of the York Diocesan Leaflet.

‘I am sure,’ he says, ‘that the Committee is right in rejecting the exclusive claims of the Jews and Arabs to Palestine, and in looking forward to the time when it shall become a State which guards the rights and interests of Moslems, Jews and Christians alike. Fir it must never be forgotten that Palestine is the Holy Land of the Christian as well as of the Jew and Moslem. Christendom would be deeply stirred if its sacred places were transferred to either.

No pledge was ever given by the British Government that Palestine should be handed over to the Jews. The pledge of the Balfour Declaration was that within it there should be established a National Home for the Jewish people without prejudice to the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities. This promise has been faithfully observed.

Palestine today is the home of over 600,000 Jews...Without the good will and the active protection of the British Government, it would have been impossible for the Jews to have made this home...When I visited our Forces in Palestine last March, the country was like an armed camp in which everyone was incessantly on the alert. By unscrupulous and violent propaganda many of the Jews, especially the younger men and women, have been worked up to such a condition of hysterical fanaticism that they have been brought to believe that Great Britain was responsible for the awful sufferings of their people in Europe.

                                                                 Alienating Sympathy

The Stern gang, with a membership of three to four hundred, is committed to murder and terrorism. The Jewish Agency, the recognized organization of the Jews, has an army of 60,000, and while formally dissociating itself from acts of violence, refuses to cooperate in preventing them or bringing their perpetrators to justice.

Our soldiers are thus living under conditions of great tension. They frequently hear of their comrades attacked or murdered by Jews disguised in British uniforms and armed with British weapons, and the sympathy which they first feel towards the Jews is changing into hostility, which in time will communicate itself to their friends at home.

There is a serious danger that the violence of Jewish propaganda, combined with the murder of our soldiers, will encourage a deplorable growth of anti-Semitism in our midst. We must make it plain to those who are representing us in Palestine, and who are acting with complete fairness and impartiality, that they have behind them the support of his government and the people of this land in suppressing violence from whatever source it may come, and in restoring peace and order to a land sacred to three great religions.’”

“And from the days of John the Baptist until now the kingdom of heaven suffereth violence, and the violent take it by force.” [6]

                                                 The Cosmic Drama of Jacob and Esau

In the world-travail of history were born, fighting in the womb, the twin brethren of destiny, Jacob and Esau. In “the womb of the second birth,” again they fought during the life of our Lord and through the birth-pangs of Christendom. The end of the age of the travail of mundane creation finds them fighting still, their origin forgotten; racially unknown one to the other. Fiercely clinging to Jacob, for financial security, Esau is being dragged through chaos to deliverance, known, partly, as the Jews - the others are Khazars, unto Palestine for their total destruction. “But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.” [7] “For,” as it is written in 2 Esdras 6:9, “Esau is the end of the world, and Jacob is the beginning of it that followeth;” when Jacob, the Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, Celtic, and kindred people become known as Israel (ruling with God). It is strangely persistent and an obviously “Cosmic” allegory which has thus been lived in history and which is now being brought to a climatic conclusion. For the destiny of Jacob to be fulfilled in the world of materialism, the destiny of Esau had, perforce, to be. Once this fact of history’s purpose is understood the bases of ignorant hatred and strife are uprooted.

Esau, having sold his birthright to meet a temporal, material need, the people of Esau (they cannot be called a race because Esau married in the Canaanite people) has spent all history in striving to acquire the material gifts of the lost inheritance. Jacob, having had in mind the gifts that were promised him by God, seized the material gifts by stealth, acquired them by subtlety, and retained them by adopting a policy of compromise to every threatening circumstance. The race of Jacob  (The Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, Celtic and kindred people, The White Race) in following the methods of the father of the race, is now, near the end of the age, losing all that has been thus vainly won, in order that the race may gain all by the way of God’s promise: “Seek ye first the Kingdom of God, and His righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.” [8] The last act of this age-long drama is to witness Esau (and Khazars) standing by, as the self-appointed official receiver to the bankrupt race of Jacob, receiving all of old-worldly value to find it of no account in the new world then about to begin. “And they shall go into the holes of the rocks, and into the caves of the earth, for fear of the LORD, and for the glory of his majesty, when he ariseth to shake terribly the earth. In that day a man shall cast his idols of silver, and his idols of gold, which they made each one for himself to worship, to the moles and to the bats.” [9]

The people of Jacob exists today in the English-speaking peoples. Today, the people of Esau have mixed with the Khazars of Russia and survives and persists, absorbed in that remnant of the Israelitish tribe of Judah known which are falsely called; The Jews.  The latter fact of history is disclosed by the “Encyclopedia Biblica, and is acknowledged by the Jewish Encyclopedia [10] the essential facts of the history are given in chaos to Cosmic Christ.”

The people of Esau were the Edomites of Old Testament history and the Idumeans of the New Testament times, and included the marauding Sinaitic tribe of Amalek. The dominant physiognomy and aggressively intrusive characteristics of the people were derived from the native stock of North Syria through this “Hittite” wives of Esau, and by subsequent intermarriage between the Edomites and “Hittites.” After the Edomites (or Idumeans) were absorbed into the remnant of Judah, after 130 B.C., but mainly in the dispersion following the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70 and later in A.D. 135,  the Edom-“Hittite” physiognomy eventually emerged as the European Jewish type of physiognomy; falsely called “Semitic.” this fact is recognized by Winston Churchill, in his essay on Moses, wherein he refers to the “strong Hittite Infusions” of the later times as having been instrumental in altering the true Jewish type. Herod the Great was an Edomite and became the first Idumean “King of the Jews.” As such he sought to destroy our Lord at birth. At that time the Idumeans had been compromised in the Jewish state and had been Jews in religion for over a century. They dominated the whole of Jewish life and our Lord, in revealing the nature of the Herodian or Idumean Domination, refers to the “leaven of Herod” as the antithesis of the “leaven of the Kingdom of God. [11] In the “Revelation of Jesus Christ” [12] the effect of the intrusion is referred to as “the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews (meaning Judeans), but are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.” [13]

The Idumean intrusion has brought a blight upon true Israel and has placed an undeserved stigma upon the name of Israel. Behind the mask of Idumean physiognomy neither Jew nor Christian can discern what is true and what is false in Jewry, except by their respective works. By their works the Idumean influence is disclosed and their works are revealing everywhere. The true Israelite is a lovable personality and endearing to all who can truly contact him. The Jew is abhorred by True Israel and by Christian alike as having brought discredit upon the people whom God has chosen to be His servants in the service of humanity.

                                                                         In Conclusion

                                                          Who Really Are The Modern Jews?

The following is taken in part from “The Exodus to Come” by Scott Stinson, Appx. 112-117, which can be obtained from The Church of Israel, P.O. Box 218E, Schell City, Missouri 64783. Although I don’t agree with his premise it is a very interesting little book and everyone who calls themselves an Israelite should obtain a copy for review.

“It is ironic that the people the world calls the Jews today have admitted in their own writings that they are not in fact Israelites at all. This truth is revealed in scientific terms in their own Jewish Encyclopedia. Many of the anthropologic studies done on the modern Jews at the turn of the century are contained in the Jewish Encyclopedia published from 1901 to 1905, and clearly show that there is almost no genetic connection between the modern Jews of our time and the Israelites of the Bible.

“The implications of this fact are far reaching and should not be quickly dismissed by the serious Bible student. It does not take a degree in anthropology to understand the startling conclusions of the Jewish scholars who analyzed the scientific data collected on the Jews at the turn of the century. What the Jews say about themselves is perhaps the most incriminating evidence ever collected to challenge their infamous claims to be God’s chosen people. Their own scientists reveal a great deal of evidence that presents quite a different picture about their racial origins. We will present to you those facts that have not yet been censored or suppressed by the historical revisionists of our day.

An article entitled, Purity of Race, in which Jewish scholar Joseph Jacobs makes this statement:

“The question whether the Jews of today are in the main descended from the Jews (Israelites - WM) of Bible times, and from them alone, is still undecided.” (Jewish Encyclopedia Vol. X (1905), 283).

The implications of this statement should not be quickly overlooked by the reader, especially in light of the scientific evidence that Jacobs presents from the studies done in his day. He writes:

“Some anthropologists are inclined to associate the racial origins of the Jews, not with the Semites, whose language they adopted, but with the Armenians and Hittites of Mesopotamia, whose broad-skulls and curved-noses they appear to have inherited.” (Jewish Encyclopedia Vol. X (1905), p. 284)

Many people in our time are surprised to learn that the famous “round-heads” and “curved-noses” seen on many modern Jews are not the racial characteristics of the ancient Hebrews, but rather the ancient Hittites who were the sworn enemies of ancient Israel. Another reputable encyclopedia from this same period confirms this important truth about the ancient Hittites from archeological evidence. In the article on the “Hittites” found in the Encyclopedia Britannica, we find this statement:

“The human type is always brachycephalic (round-headed), with the brow receding sharply, and a long nose making almost one line with the sloping forehead. In the sculptures of the Commagene and Tyana districts, the nose has a long curving tip, of very Jewish appearance.” (Encyclopedia Britannica, <III (1910), p. 537)

Such clear archeological evidence confirms without any doubt that the so called “Jewish nose” seen on many modern Jews today is not Jewish at all and has no affinity with the ancient Hebrews. Rather, it clearly shows that the modern Jews are the actual descendants of the ancient Hittites, and not the Israelites.

The study of anthropology has always determined racial origins from the shape of the skull, as well as the shape of the nose, and both of these factors prove beyond any doubt that the modern Jews are not who they say they are. Our study continues by looking first at the skull measurements of these people. This area of anthropology is commonly known as Cranimetry and is highly touted for its ability to determine racial origins. Dr. Maurice Fishberg, a former Medical examiner from New York City, writes the article on this particular topic. He states forthwith:

“As is at present accepted by nearly all anthropologists, the shape of the head is the most stable characteristic of a given race.” (Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. IV (1902), p. 335)

The shape of the head is primarily determined by the cranial measurement which is commonly known as the cephalic index. The method of calculating the cephalic index and the three distinct categories recognized by anthropologists are explained by Fishberg. He writes:

“The cephalic index is expressed by multiplying the width of the head by 100 and dividing the product by the length...The broader or rounder a head is, the higher its cephalic index, and vice versa. When the cephalic index is above 80 anthropologists term it ‘brachycephalic;’ between 75 and 80, ‘mesocephalic;’ and less than 75, ‘dolichocephalic.’” ( Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. IV (1902), p. 333).

After gathering extensive cranial measurements on the modern Jews taken from samples around the world, Doctor Fishberg assembled a table of evidence and evaluated the results of his study with these comments:

“On an examination of the figures in this table a remarkable uniformity of the cephalic index of the modern Jews will be noticed...nearly 90 percent are between 81.5 and 83...Another remarkable fact is the striking absence of the dolichocephalic type, which is characteristic of all other modern Semitic races.” (Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. IV (1902), p. 334)

Fishberg further remarks on the revealing results of his study:

“What is worthy of notice is the small percentage of dolichocephaly; only 1.58 percent, and the large preponderance of brachycephaly, 76.48 percent.” ( Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. IV (1902(, p. 334)

Fishberg concludes his report by addressing the most confronting problem presented by his study, namely how these cranial measurements challenge the racial claims of the modern Jews, whose heads are different from that of all other Semitic races. He writes:

“The most important problem suggested by a study of the craniometrical results concerning Jews is the relation of the type of head of the modern Jews to that of the ancient Hebrews and to the modern Semitic skulls. The pure Semitic skull is dolichocephalic, as may be seen from a study of the heads of modern Arabs, Abyssinians, and Syrians. The catholic index of these races is from 73 to 77. As is at present accepted by nearly all anthropologists, the shape of the head is the most stable characteristic of a given race. It is little if at all influenced by climate, environment, nutrition, or sexual and social selection. The only way the type of the head may change is by intermixture with other races. If the ancient Hebrews were of the same stock as the modern non-Jewish Semites, and if the modern Jews are their descendants, then a pure dolichocephalic type of head would be expected among the Jews. As has been seen, all results of Cranimetry prove that the Jews are brachycephalic, and that the dolichocephalic form is only found among them in less than two percent of the cases.” (Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. IX (1902), p. 335)

These scientific facts speak for themselves and should not be ignored by anyone in our time of history who seeks the truth, as they clearly prove beyond any doubt that the modern Jews are not who they say they are.

The findings of Doctor Fishberg are also corroborated by other Jewish scholars from this same period. Joseph Jacobs, who wrote the article on Anthropology, reckons with this same problem. He also has seen the great body of evidence collected on the cranial measurements of the modern Jews and knows the implications it presents. He states forthwith:

“Much turns upon the preliminary question whether contemporary Jews are of the same race as those mentioned in the Bible.” (Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. I (1901), p. 619)

Jacobs comments on the astonishing results of the Jewish cranial measurements and the response of his day. He writes:

“Their skulls are mainly brachycephalic; that is, the breadth is generally over 80 percent of the length. This has been used as an argument against the purity of race, as most Semites; like the Arabs and Syrians, are dolichocephalic, or long-headed.” (Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. I (1901), p 619)

In his article on Purity of Race Jacobs also addressed the cranial measurements of the modern Jews. Again, he states:

“They are predominantly brachycephalic, or broad-headed, while the Semites of Arabic origin are invariably dolichocephalic, or long-headed.” (Vol. X (1905), p. 284)

The Jewish cranial measurements that were collected at the turn of the century provide undeniable scientific proof that the modern Jews are simply not who they say they are.

In addition to the shape of the skull the shape of the nose has also provided an important facial index for anthropologists to determine racial origins. The former Jewish Medical examiner, Maurice Fishberg, also writes the article on the Nose in the Jewish Encyclopedia and states the following about this particular racial indicator:

“The relation of the breadth of the nose to its length, known as the ‘nasal index,’ has been considered one  of the best means of distinguishing the various races of mankind.” (Vol. IX (1905), p. 339)

Joseph Jacobs also addressed this particular area in his article on Anthropology and stated the following about the Jews:

“The nose is generally the characteristic feature of the Jews, who have on the average the longest (77mm) and narrowest (34mm).” (Vol. I (1901)

It is ironic that the peculiar shape of the so-called “Jewish nose” was recognized by many anthropologists at the turn of the century as another confirming sign of their true racial origins. Fishberg again writes:

“Some show that this form of nose is not characteristically Semitic, because the modern non-Jewish Semites, particularly such as are supposed to have maintained themselves in a pure state, as the Bedouin Arabs, do not possess this characteristic nose at all. Their noses are as a rule short, straight, and often snub or concave. Luschan holds that the hood-nose is by no means characteristic of the Semites, and contends that the number of arched noses that are found among the Jews is due to intermixture with the Hittites in Asia Minor. He shows that other races also, as the Armenian, for instance, who have a good portion of Hittite blood in their veins, have hooked-noses.” (Vol. IX (1905), p. 338)

This same opinion was shared earlier by Joseph Jacobs who again states:

“Some anthropologists are inclined to associate the racial origins of the Jews, not with the Semites, whose language they adopted, but with the Armenians and Hittites of Mesopotamia, whose broad-skulls and curved-noses they appear to have inherited.” (Vol. X (1905), p. 284)

The racial characteristics of the ancient Hittites are also revealed in the Encyclopedia Britannica which clearly shows the true racial origins of the modern Jews. Once again we read:

“The human type is always brachycephalic (round-headed), with the brow receding sharply and a long nose making almost one line with the sloping forehead. In the sculptures of the Commagene and Tyana districts, the nose has a long curving tip, of very Jewish appearance.” (Encyclopedia Brittica, XIII (1910), p. 537)

The reason the ancient Hittite nose has a “very Jewish” appearance is because the modern Jews are the actual descendants of the Hittites, and the archeological evidence clearly bears witness to this fact.

The anthropologic and scientific evidence collected on the modern Jews at the turn of the century clearly proves their true racial origins and refutes their contemporary claims to be God’s chosen people and the Israelites of the Bible. The scientific facts contained in the Jewish Encyclopedia speak for themselves and should not be ignored by anyone who is willing to follow the truth and turn from the great deception of the last days and the great impostors of all time. In the old yellowed pages of the Jewish Encyclopedia there lies recorded for anyone to read the undeniable scientific proof that the modern Jews of our time are simply not who they say they are.

[1] Nicholas II et les Juifs, Lt. Gen. A. Netchvolodow, p. 139.

[2] Nicholas II et les Juifs, Lt. Gen. A. Netchvolodow, p. 139.

[3] Arthur Koestler, The Thirteenth Tribe, Random House, New York, N.Y.; Alfred M. Linenthal, What Price Israel, Henry Ragnery Company, Chicago, Ill; Dr. I.M. Rabinowich and Benjamin Freedman, Palestine: Center of World Intrigue,, pp. 12-13, Destiny Publishers, Merrimac, Mass. 01860

[4] Destiny Magazine for May 1948, p. 155. Destiny Publishers, Merrimac, Mass., 01860

[5]Genesis 35:9-12

[6] Matthew 11:12

[7] Luke 19:27

[8] Matthew 6:33

[9] Isaiah 2:19‑20

[10] Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925 Edition, Article Edom, Vol. V. p. 41

[11] Chaos to Cosmic Christ, D. Davidson

[12] Revelation 1:1

[13] Revelation 2:9; 3:9

Reference Materials