Watchman Willie Martin Archive

This study will show you that the Blacks are not on an equal footing with White people, the lies of the Jews, liberals and race mixers notwithstanding.

Immigration of Blacks and other races and people have always been the major contributiion factor to the destruction of the civilizations of the world; all through history and will lead to the destruction of the United States, if it is not stopped. There are many who lie and say that diversity is our strength. It is not a strength, it is the road to destruction of our country and our civilization.

The Mexicans are not much better than the Blacks because they are a mixed race of people. They used to be White Spaniards, but they cared so little for their race that they mixed with the Indians, blacks and etc., until they have lost almost all of the attributes that they had when they were White. So as far as they are concerned they are little advanced from Blacks.

Also they have had such an influx of Jews into their midst that they have never been able to construct a civilization, even if they were capable of doing so. FOR THE JEWS ARE TAKERS, DESTROYERS, NOT BUILDERS. THERE HAS NEVER BEEN ANYTHING TO COME FROM THEM THAT WAS WORTHWHILE FOR THEY ARE NOT CAPABLE OF RATIONAL AND DEVELOPMENT THOUGHTS. Because of their father the devil they can only think of stealing, murdering, destroying and causing grief and mysery to all of mankind.

The Chinese have NEVER progressed except as they come into contact with the White Race. It matters not what people want to believe that is a fact. Only recently has the news been widely known (it has been privately known for many years to researchers and scholars) that there was a great influx of The White Race into China several thousand years ago. And that their descendants were the ones who invented gun powder and the other scientific advances made in China. Therefore, the Chinese only progress when they come into contact with the White Race.

The Japanese are a little above the Chinese because they are the descendants of those of the White Race that invaded Asia many thousand years ago, and mixed with the Chinese, but since they were isolated for thousands of years on the little island they retained some of their White genes and so their progress was a little more than the Chinese. But they didn’t make any great strides in progress until the White Race began to go to Japan in great numbers.

S0 as you go through this study, keep in mind that all of the races on earth, other than the White Race have about the same attributes, and such.

It is the White Race, ALONE, that has created each and every single civilization that has ever existed on earth since Almighty God created everything.

Now I full well realize that many will not wish to accept this as the truth. Well let me assure you that I don’t really give a damn what you accept or reject. I am presenting you with facts and you can do with them what you will.

     Whites & Blacks: Senator Bilbo's Warning;

"If our buildings, our highways, and our railroads should be wrecked, we could rebuild them. If our cities should be destroyed, out of the very ruins we could erect newer and greater ones. Even if our armed might should be crushed, we could rear sons who would redeem our power.

“But if the blood of our White race should become corrupted and mingled with the blood of Africa, then the present greatness of the United States of America would be destroyed and all hope for civilization would be as impossible for a Negroid America as would be redemption and restoration of the Whiteman's blood which had been mixed with that of the Negro." (Senator Theodore G. Bilbo, of Mississippi in 1947)

In the pages of this study are found 100 facts, the vast majority of which can be easily verified in any set of encyclopedias, almanacs, psychology text, and other reference materials commonly found in any public library.

THE LIES: Cleverly hidden within these hundred facts, for added incentive to read onward, is one lie. not a lie of statistical or grammatical error, but a ludicrous falsehood at once so absurd as to strike the reader as an insult to human intelligence, and yet so deadly evil that if allowed to go unanswered its final cost would be incalculable.

FACT 1: The White race has crossed seas, harnessed rivers, carved mountains, tamed deserts, and colonized the most barren icefields. It has been responsible for the invention of the printing press, cement, the harnessing of electricity, flight, rocketry, astronomy, the telescope, space travel, firearms, the transistor, radio, television, the telephone, the lightbulb, photography, motion pictures, the phonograph, the electric battery, the automobile, the steam engine, railroad transportation, the microscope, computers, and millions of other technological miracles.

It has discovered countless medical advances, incredible applications, scientific progress, etc. Its members have included such greats as Socrates, Aristotle, Plato, Homer, Tacitus, Julius Ceaser, Napoleon, William the Conqueror, Marco Polo, Washington, Jefferson, Hitler, Bach, Beethoven, Mozart, Magellan, Columbus, Cabot, Edison, Graham Bell, Pasteur, Leeuwenhoek, Mendel, Darwin, Newton, Galileo, Watt, Ford, Luther, Devinci, Poe, Tennyson, and thousands upon thousands of other notable achievers. (Waddell, L. A. The Makers of Civilization, 1929, Angriff Press, Hollywood, CA; Weisman, Charles A. The Origins of Race and Civilization, 1990, SFA)

FACT 2: Throughout 6,000 years of recorded history, the Black African Negro has invented nothing. Not a written language, weaved cloth, a calendar, a plow, a road, a bridge, a railway, a ship, a system of measurement, or even the wheel. (Note:

This is in reference to the pure‑blooded Negro.) He is not known to have ever cultivated a single crop or domesticated a single animal for his own use (although many powerful and docile beasts abounded around him.)

His only known means of transporting goods was on the top of his hard burry head. For shelter he never progressed beyond the common mud hut, the construction of which a beaver or muskrat is capable. (Pendell, Elmer, Sex Versus Civilization, Noontide Press; Weisman, Charles A. The Origins of Race and Civilization, 1990, SFA)


FACT 3: The I.Q.'s of American Negroes are from 15 to 20 points, on average, below those of American Whites. (Audrey H. Shuey, The Testing of Negro Intelligence, Social Science Press, New York, 1966; Arthur R. Jensen, Straight Talk About Mental Tests, the Free Press (Macmillan) New York, 1981; Frank McGurk, A Scientist’s Report on Race Differences; U.S. News and World Report, September 21, 1956, Washington, D.C.; Carleton Putnam, Race and Reason, 1961, Howard Allen Press, Cape Canaveral, FL)

FACT 4: These Black\White differences have been demonstrated repeatedly by every test ever conducted by every branch of the U.S. Military, every state, county, and local school board, the U.S. Dept. of Education, etc.

The same ratio of difference has held true over a 40 year period. (Frank McGurk, A Scientist’s Report on Race Differences; U.S. News and World Report, September 21, 1956, Washington, D.C.; Carleton Putnam, A study in Racial Realities, an address at the University of California at Davis, December 17, 1964; Audrey H. Shuey, The Testing of Negro Intelligence, Social Science Press, New York, 1966)

FACT 5: With an average I.Q. of 85, only 16% of Blacks score over 100, while half the White population does. The Negro overlap of White median I.Q.'s ranges from 10 to 25 percent; equality would require 50 percent. (Arthur R. Jensen, Straight Talk About Mental Tests, the Free Press (Macmillan) New York, 1981; William Gayley Simpson, Which Way Western Man? 1978, National Alliance Press, Box 3535, Washington, D.C. 2007; Stell v. Savannah-Chattham County Board of Education, U.S. District Court, Southern Georgia, May 13, 1963)

FACT 6: Blacks are 6 times as likely to have I.Q.'s of 50 to 70 which put them in the slow learner (retarded) category, while Whites are ten times more likely to score 130 or over. (Arthur R. Jensen, Bias in Mental Testing, The Free Press, New York, 1980; Arthur R. Jensen, Straight Talk About Mental Tests, the Free Press (Macmillan) New York, 1981; Frank McGurk, A scientist’s Report on Race Differences, U.S. News and World Report, September 21, 1956, Washington, C.C.; Carleton Putnam, Race and Reality, a Search for Solutions, 1967, Howard Allen, Box 76, Cape Canaveral, FL 32920)

FACT  7: The U.S. government's PACE examination, given to 100,000 university graduates who are prospective professional or administrative civil‑service employees each year, is passed with a score of 70 or above by 58% of the whites who take it but by only 12% of the Negroes.

Among top scorers the difference between Negro and White performance is even more striking: 16% of the white applicants make scores of 90 or above, while only one‑fifth of one percent of a Negro applicants score as high as 90‑‑a White/Black success ration of 80/1. (William Gayley Simpson, Which Way Western Man? 1978, National Alliance Press, Box 3535, Washington, D.C. 20007)

FACT 8: Differences between Negro and White children increase with chronological age, the gap in performance being largest at the high school and college levels. (Audrey H. Shuey, The Testing of Negro Intelligence, Social Science Press, New York, 1966; Stell v. Savannah-Chattham County Board of Education, U.S. District Court, Southern Georgia, May 13, 1963)

FACT 9: White/Negro I.Q. differences are constantly excused as results of environmental variations. but at least five studies that have attempted to equate socio‑economic backgrounds of the two races indicate no significant change in relative results.

As environment improves, the Negro does better but so does the White. The gap is not decreased. (26) In fact, extensive research by DR. G.J. McGurk, associate Professor of Psychology at Villanove University, reveals that the gap in intelligence between Blacks and Whites INCREASES where socio‑economic levels of both races are raised to the middle classes. (Frank McGurk, A Scientist’s Report on Race Differences; U.S. News and World Report, September 21, 1956, Washington, D.C.)

FACT 10: In 1915, Dr. G.W. Ferfuson took 1000 school children in Virginia, divided them into 5 racial categories, and tested them for mental aptitude. On average. full‑blooded Negroes scored 69.2% as high as Whites. Three‑quarter Negroes scored 73.0% as high as Whites. One‑half Negroes scored 81.2% as high as Whites. One‑quarter Negroes scored 91.8% as high as Whites.

All of these Blacks lived as and considered themselves "Negroes." Their environments and "advantages" or disadvantages were exactly the same. (A. Jacob, White Man, Think Again! 1965, publ. By author; Audrey H. Shuey, The Testing of Negro Intelligence, p. 452, Social Science Press, New York 1966)

FACT 11: Results of the Army Beta test given by the U.S. Army to over 386,000 illiterate soldiers in WWI showed Negro draftees to be "inferior to the Whites on all types of tests used in the Army." Additionally, tests were conducted upon pure Negroes, Mulattoes, and Quadroons. It was found that "the lighter groups made better scores." (A. Jacob, White Man, Think Again! 1965 , published by the author)

FACT 12: Studies conducted with identical twins raised apart in radically different environments provide conclusive evidence that over‑all influence of heredity exceeds that of environment in a ratio of about 3 to 1. (Des Griffin, Martin Luther King (Man Behind the Myth))

FACT 13: Even when Blacks and Whites have the same backgrounds, in terms of family income and childhood advantages, Blacks still have average I.Q. scores 12 to 15 points lower than comparable Whites.

This includes cases where Black children have been adopted by White parents. Their I.Q.s may be improved by environment, but they are still closer to their biological parents than their adoptive parents. (American Renaissance, December ‘90, Box 2504, Menlo Park, CA 94026; Arthur R. Jensen, Bias in Mental Testing, The Free Press, New York 1980; Audrey H. Shuey, The Testing of Negro Intelligence, Social Science Press, New York, 1966)

FACT 14: Equalitarian ideologists often discount I.Q. test results with the excuse that they are culturally biased. Nonetheless, NO ONE, not the NAACP nor the United Negro College Fund, nor NEA had been able to develop an intelligence test which shows Blacks and Whites scoring equally. (American Renaissance, December ‘90, Box 2504, Menlo Park, CA 94026; Arthur R. Jensen, Bias in Mental Testing, The Free Press, New York 1980)

FACT  15: American Indians, who often live in conditions far worse than American Blacks during their entire lives, still consistently outscore them on I.Q. tests. (American Renaissance, December ‘90, Box 2504, Menlo Park, CA 9426; William Gayley Simpson, Which Way Western Man? 1978, National Alliance Press, Box 3535, Washington, D.C. 20007)

FACT 16: The offspring of interracial marriages tend to have lower I.Q.s than the white parent. (Dr. Ed Fields, How the Greatest White Nations Were Mongrelized - Then Negroized, Sons of Liberty Books; Audry H. Shuey, The Testing of Negro Intelligence, Social Science Press, New York, 1966)

The Negro Brain:

FACT 17: Among human races numerous studies have been made of the comparative weight of White and Negro brains with results that fell within the range of about an 8‑12 percent lower weight for the Negro brain. Such studies have been conducted by Bean, Pearl, Vint, Tilney, Gordon, Todd, and others. (Carleton Putnam, A Study in Racial Realities, and address at the University of California at Davis, December 17, 1964; William Gayley Simpson, Which Way Western Man? 1978, National Alliance Press, Box 3535, Washington, D.C. 20007)

FACT 18: In addition to the difference in brain weight, the Negro brain grows less after puberty than the white. Though the Negro brain and nervous system mature faster than the white brain, its development is arrested at an earlier age which limits further intellectual advancement. (Carleton Putnam, Race and Reason, 1961, Howard Allen Press, Cape Canaveral, FL; William Gayley Simpson, Which Way Western Man? 1978, National Alliance Press, Box 3535, Washington, D.C.20007)

FACT 19: The thickness of the supragranular layer (the outside layer) of the Negro brain is about 15 percent thinner, and its convolutions are fewer and more simple, on average, than that of the White brain. (Carleton S. Coon, The Origin of Races, 1962, Alfred A. Knopf)

FACT 20: The frontal lobes of the Negro brain, responsible for abstract conceptional reasoning, are smaller relative to body weight, less fissured, and less complex than those of the White brain. (Carleton S. Coon, The Origin of Races, 1962, Alfred A. Knopf; Carleton Putnam, Race and Reality, a Search for Solutions, 1967, Howard Allen, Box 76, Cape Canaveral, FL 32920; Carleton Putnam, Race and Reality, a Search for Solutions, 1967, Howard Allen, Box 76, Cape Canaveral, FL 32920; William Gayley Simpson, Which Way Western Man? 1978, National Alliance Press, Box 3535, Washington, D.C. 20007)


FACT 21: The name Homo sapiens was first used by the 18th Century Swedish botanist Carolus Linnaeus. The word "sapiens" means "wise." The name was originally used to speak of the White man and synonymous with "europaeus." As a result, many later taxonomists and geneticists believed that Negroes and other races should be classified as different species.

In fact, Darwin declared in The Descent of Man that the varieties of mankind are so distinct that similar differences found in any other animal would warrant their classification in different species, if not different genera. (Charles A. Weisman, The Origins of Race and Civilization, 1990, SFA)

FACT 22: For his mammoth work, The Origin of Races, Professor Carleton Coon, President of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists and the premier geneticist of the world, assembled massive evidence from geography, anatomy, genetics, physiology, comparative detrition, linguistics, archeology, and fossil records from 300 bone‑bearing sites to verify his theory of pre‑sapiens racianation.

In other words, Homo erectus was divided by race even before evolution into Homo sapiens stage. (William Howells, Mankind So Far, Doubleday, Garden City, NY 1945)

FACT 23: According to Dr. Coon, while the Caucasoid subspecies (the White race) was evolving in Europe, the Negro race was standing still on the evolutionary plane and is today no less than 200,000 years behind the European in skull and brain development. (Carleton S. Coon, The Origin of Races, 1962, Alfred A. Knopf)

FACT 24: The Negro skull, in addition to having a smaller brain volume and thicker cranial bones than that of the White, is prognathous; i.e., the lower face projects forward, rather in the manner of an animal's muzzle. In consequence, the Negro jaw is substantially longer, relative to its width, than the White jaw.

A feature of the Negro lower jaw is its retention of a vestige of the "simian shelf," a bony region immediately behind the incisors. The simian shelf is a distinguishing characteristic of apes, and it is absent in Whites. (Carleton S. Coon, The Origin of Races, 1962, Alfred A. Knopf; William Howells, Mankind So Far, Doubleday, Garden City, NY 1945; Charles A. Weisman, The Origins of Race and Civilization, 1990, SFA)

FACT 25: The skin of the Negro is thicker and possibly superior to the White's in the way it impedes the penetration of germs and in its protection from the ultraviolet rays of the sun. (A. Jacob, white Man, Think Again! 1965, published by author; Charles A. Weisman, The Origins of Race and Civilization, 1990, SFA)

FACT 26: The dark color of the Negro is due to melanin pigment which is spread through every layer of the skin and is found even in the muscles and brain. (Carleton S. Coon, The Origin of Races, 1962, Alfred A. Knopf; William Gayley Simpson, Which Way Western Man? 1978, National Alliance Press, Box 3535, Washington, D.C. 20007)

FACT 27: An African dentist can tell a Negro's tooth from a white man's at a glance. (A. Jacob, White Man, Think Again! 1965, published by author)

FACT 28: Negroes have arms which are longer, relative to body height, than those of Whites. This feature, together with their much thicker cranial bones, gives Black athletes an advantage over Whites in boxing.

The skeletal and muscular peculiarities of Negroes' lower limbs have given them considerable success as sprinters, but have left them relative undistinguished as distance runners. (William Gayley Simpson, Which Way Western Man? 1978, National Alliance Press, Box 3535, Washington, D.C. 20007; Charles A. Weisman, The Origins of Race and Civilization, 1990, SFA)

FACT 29: Additional Differences:

·The hair is black, crispy, and "woolly" in texture, it is flat and elliptical with no central canal or duct like the hair of Europeans.

·The nose is thick, broad and flat, often turned up nostrils exposing the red inner lining of the mucous membrane similar to an ape.

·The arms and legs of the Negro are relatively longer than the European. The humerus is a trifle shorter and the forearm longer thereby approximating the simian form.

·The eyes are prominent, iris black and the orbits large. The eye often has a yellowish sclerotic coat over it like that of a gorilla.

·The Negro has a shorter trunk the cross‑section of the chest is more circular than whites. The pelvis is narrower and longer as it is in an ape.

·The mouth is wide with very thick, large and protruding lips.

·Negro skin has a thick superficial horny layer which resists scratching and impedes the penetration of germs.

·The Negro has a larger and shorter neck akin to that of anthropoids.

·The cranial sutures are more simple than in the white type and close together earlier.

·The ears are roundish, rather small, standing somewhat high and detached thus approaching the simian form.

·The Negro is more powerfully developed from the pelvis down and the white more powerfully developed in the chest.

·The jaw is larger and stronger and protrudes outward which, along with lower retreating forehead, gives a facial angle of 68 to 70 degrees as opposed to a facial angle of 80 to 82 degrees for Europeans.

·The hands and fingers are proportionally narrower and longer. The wrist and ankles are shorter and more robust.

·The frontal and paricial bones of the cranium are less excavated and less capacious. The skull is thicker especially on the sides.

·The brain of the Negro on the average is 9 to 20% smaller than whites.

·The teeth are larger and are wider apart than in the white race.

·The three curvatures of the spine are less pronounced in the Negro than in the white and thus more characteristic of an ape.

·The femur of the Negro is less oblique, the tibia (shin bone) more curved and bent forward, the calf of the leg high and but little developed. ·The heel is broad and projecting, the foot long and broad but slightly arched causing flat soles, the great toe is shorter than in the white.

·The two bones proper of the nose are occasionally united, as in apes.

FACT 30: Blood group studies made during WWII suggest the American Negro gene pool is about 28% white. ‑‑This despite all manner of institutional discrimination, social segregation, etc. Keep in mind that the results of test from true Black Africans would show even bigger differences from Whites. (A. Jacob, White Man, Think Again! 1965, published by author; Jared Taylor, Paved With Good Inteions: The Failure of Race Relations in Contemporary America, 1992, Carrol & Graf. New York, NY)


FACT 31: The rate at which Blacks commit murder is thirteen times that of Whites; Rape and assault, ten times. These figures, as given by the F.B.I. reports, vary somewhat from year to year but fairly represent the trend for the past decade. (William F. Buckley, syndicated column, January 5, 1993; Marvin Harris, 1981. Why Nothing Works, Simon & Schuster, New York, NY; William Gayley Simpson, Which Way Western Man? 1978, National Alliance Press, Box 3535, Washington, D.C. 20007)

FACT 32: According to the justice Dept, 1 in every 4 Black males between the ages of 20 and 29 is currently in prison or on probation or parole. (American Renaissance, December ‘90, Box 2504, Menlo Park, CA 94026; William F. Buckley, syndicated column, January 5, 1993; Jared Taylor, Paved With Good Intentions: The Failure of Race Relations in Contemporary America. 1992, Carrol & Graf. New York, NY)

FACT 33: Though only 12% of the U.S. population, Blacks commit more than half of all rapes and robberies and 60% of all murders in the U.S. (William F. Buckley, syndicated column, January 5, 1993; William Gayley Simpson, Which Way Western Man? 1978, National Alliance Press, Box 3535, Washington, D.C. 20007; Jared Taylor, Paved With Good Intentions: The Failure of Race Relations in Contemporary America. 1992, Carrol & Graf. New York, NY)

FACT 34: Approximately 50% of all Black males will be arrested and charged with a serious felony during their lifetime. (William Gayley Simpson, Which Way Western Man? 1978, National Alliance Press, Box 3535, Washington, D.C. 20007)

FACT 35: A Black person is 56 TIMES more likely to attack a White person than Vice Versa. (American Renaissance, December -90, Box 2504, Menlo Park, CA 94026; Jared Taylor, Paved With Good Intentions: The Failure of Race Relations in Contemporary America. 1992, Carrol & Graf. New York, NY)

FACT 36: Black rapists choose White victims over half (54.9%) of the time, 30X as often as Whites choose Blacks. (American Journal of Sociology, Vol 92, p. 822; Social Forces, Vol. 69, p. 1, September ‘90; Jared Taylor, Paved With Good Intentions: The Failure of Race Relations in Contemporary America. 1992, Carrol & Graf. New York, NY)

FACT 37: The annual report from the Department of justice shows that when Whites commit violence they do it to Blacks 2.4% of the time. Blacks, on the other hand, choose White victims MORE THAN HALF the time. (American Renaissance, December ‘90, Box 2504, Menlo Park, CA 94026)

FACT 38: In New York City, any White is over 300 TIMES MORE LIKELY to be assaulted by a gang of Blacks than is a Black by a gang of Whites. (Jared Taylor, Paved With Good Intentions: The Failure of Race Relations in Contemporary America. 1992, Carrol & Graf, New York, NY)

FACT 39: Many people argue that high Black incarceration rates show that police center enforcement at Black crimes and ignore white‑collar crimes. However, Blacks commit a disproportionate number of white‑collar offenses as well. In 1990, Blacks were nearly 3 times as likely to be arrested for forgery, counterfeiting, and embezzlement as Whites. (William F. Buckley, syndicated column, January 5, 1993; Jared Taylor, Paved With Good Intentions: The Failure of Race Relations in Contemporary America. 1992, Carrol & Graf. New York, NY)

FACT 40: Many people believe that crime is a product of poverty and lack of "advantages." However, the District of Columbia, which enjoys the highest average annual salaries and is second only to Alaska in personal income per capita, leads the nation in just about every category of crime including murder, robbery, aggravated assault, and vehicle theft. D.C. also has the country's strictest gun control, highest police costs per capita, highest ration of police and correctional officers per citizen, and highest rate of incarceration.

Its permanent population is over 80% Black. West Virginia, which has the nation's lowest crime rate, suffers from chronic poverty and has the highest unemployment in the U.S. It also has the fewest police per capita. West Virginia is over 96% White. (World Almanacs, ‘88, ‘89, ‘90, ‘91, ‘92)

The Black Family:

FACT 41: 46% of inner city Black men between the ages of 16 and 62 are unemployed. (William Gayley Simpson, Which Way Western Man? 1978, National Alliance Press, Box 3535, Washington, D.C. 20007)

FACT 42: More than 66% of the children of Negroes are born out of wedlock. Per capita, their illegitimacy rate is ten times that of Whites. (William Gayley Simpson, Which Way Western Man? 1978, National Alliance Press, Box 3535, Washington, D.C. 20007; Jared Taylor, Paved With Good Intentions: The Failure of Race Relations in Contemporary America. 1992, Carrol & Graf. New York, NY)

FACT 43: Blacks are four and a half times more likely than Whites to be on welfare. (Jared Taylor, Paved With Good Intentions: The Failure of Race Relations in Contemporary America. 1992, Carrol & Graf. New York, NY)

FACT 44: More than 35% of all Black men in U.S. Cities are drug or alcohol abusers. (William Gayley Simpson, Which Way Western Man? 1978, National Alliance Press, Box 3535, Washington, D.C. 20007)


FACT 45: The January l986 issue of the journal of Ethnic and Racial Studies, "Skin Color Preference, Sexual Dimorphism and Sexual Selection: a case of Gene‑Culture Co‑evolution?" by Peter Frost and Pierre Van der Herghe, stated that in any given race, the women tend to have lighter complexions than the men.

Using standard ethnographic files from 51 societies on five continents which have recorded their preference for human skin color, the study found that 30 preferred lighter women and 14 preferred lighter women and lighter men. The cultures of India, China, Brazil and Bali, as well as the Arabs and Negroes regard the lightest women as the most beautiful; perpetuating the aesthetic appeal of the ivory‑skinned, rosy‑cheeked, blue‑eyed, blond "nordic ideal" of feminine beauty, even though they themselves do not possess the genetic capacity to reproduce such an organism.

Over time, the study said, the upper classes of all races have become lighter‑skinned than their fellow countrymen because they have repeatedly skimmed off fairer women from the lower classes. (Dr. Ed Fields, The Dangers of Interracial Marriage, P.O. Box 1211, Marietta, GA 30061)

FACT 46: Scientific research on what constitutes human beauty, in which 300 judges of various backgrounds were shown portrait photographs and asked to rate the beauty of the individual's face, has revealed that nordic Whites are universally recognized as the most attractive humans, even by Blacks. The judges were instructed to evaluate the faces solely on his or her "personal standards of beauty and not to consider popular norms.”

FACT 47: In experiments in which Black children have been left to themselves with White and Black dolls, it has been found that most of the them would rather play with White dolls. This is true all over the world. Even in such places as Tobago. (Carleton Putnam, Race and Reason, 1961, Howard Allen Press, Cape Canaveral, FL; Carleton Putnam, Race and Reality, a Search for Solutions, 1967, Howard Allen, Box 76, Cape Canaveral, FL 32920; Jared Taylor, Paved With Good Intentions: The Failure of Race Relations in Contemporary America. 1992, Carrol & Graf. New York, NY)

American History:

FACT 48: The Declaration of Independence, which contains the oft‑repeated phrase "...all men are created equal..." was written by Thomas Jefferson, who owned about 200 slaves at the time and never set any of them free, including the mulattoes and quadroons.

Jefferson's words certainly had no reference to Negroes, who at that time had no place in American society except as property. (William Gayley Simpson, Which Way Western Man? 1978, National Alliance Press, Box 3535, Washington, D.C. 20007; Stell v. Savannah-Chattham County Board of Education, U.S. District Court, Southern Georgia, May 13, 1963; Charles A. Weisman, Free, White and Christian, 1989, SFA, Box 766-C, LaPorte, CO 80535)

FACT 49: The Constitution was written by and for ”We the people" and dedicated to "ourselves and our posterity," All of the 55 delegates that met in Philadelphia to draft the Constitution and all of the members of the 13 state conventions that ratified it were of the White race. (Charles A. Weisman, America: Free, White and Christian, 1989, SFA, Box 766-C, LaPorte, CO 80535)

Webster’s Dictionary of 1828: defines Posterity as: POSTERITY. 1. Descendants; children, children's children, etc. indefinitely; the race that proceeds from a progenitor. 2. In a general sense, succeeding generations; opposed to ancestors...

`     FACT 50: The 14th Amendment is invalid for the following reasons:

· It was never ratified by three‑fourth of all the States in the Union according to Article 5 of the U.S. Constitution. Out of 37 States, 16 had rejected it.

· Many of the States who were counted as ratifying it, were compelled to do so under duress of military occupation. Any legal act entered into under force duress, and coercion is automatically null and void.

· The FACT that 23 Senators had been unlawfully excluded from the U.S. Senate, shows that the Joint Resolution proposing the Amendment was not submitted to or adopted by a constitutional Congress.

· The intent of the 14th Amendment is repugnant to the original U.S. Constitution and the Organic Law of the land. It did not, and could not, repeal anything that was part of the Organic Law. Therefore the principles of precedent and stare decisis render it void. (Carleton Putnam, Race and Reality, a Search for Solutions, 1967, Howard Allen, Box 76, Cape Canaveral, FL 32920)

FACT 51: In Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation of Sept. 1862 he said: "I have urged the colonization of the Negroes, (back to Africa), and I shall continue. My Emancipation Proclamation was linked with this plan (of colonization).

There is no room for two distinct races of White men in America, much less for two distinct races of Whites and Blacks...I can think of no greater calamity than the assimilation of the negro into our social and political life as our equal...Within twenty years we can peacefully colonize the Negro. ..under conditions in which he can rise to the full measure of manhood.

This he can never do here. We can never attain the ideal union our fathers dreamed, with millions of an alien, inferior race among us, whose assimilation is neither possible nor desirable." (William Gayley Simpson, Which Way Western Man? 1978, National Alliance Press, Box 3535, Washington, D.C. 20007)

FACT 52: Lincoln actually proposed an amendment to the constitution that would've authorized congress to recolonize all freed Blacks back to Africa. On Aug. 15, l962, Congress did appropriate over half a million dollars for that purpose. Thousands of Negroes had been shipped back when Lincoln was shot. (William Gayley Simpson, Which Way Western Man? 1978, national Alliance Press, Box 3535, Washington, D.C. 2007)

Washington D.C.:

FACT 53: The District of Columbia, which is approximately 70% Black, leads the U.S. in many areas:

1). The nations highest crime rates;

2). Strictest gun control;

3). Highest incarceration rates;

4). Highest birthrate;

5). Highest death rate;

6). Highest rate of federal assistance per capita;

7). Highest number of welfare recipients per capita;

8). Highest rate of illegitimacy ;

9). Highest high school dropout rate even though its teachers are the highest paid in the U.S.;

10). Highest rate of gonorrhea and syphilis;

11). Highest incidence of AIDS. (Jared Taylor, Paved With Good Intentions: The Failure of Race Relations in Contemporary America. 1992, Carrol & Graf. New York, NY; World Almanacs, ‘88, ‘89, ‘90, ‘91, ‘92)


FACT 54: Populated by White stock, the nation of Portugal rose in four centuries to be the wealthiest most powerful country in the world. A great commercial and maritime power, it had large colonies in Asia, Africa, and America. Its seamen were the first to explore western Africa and they brought back hundreds of Negro slaves.

By 1550, at the height of Portugal's power, one‑ tenth of its population were Blacks. Today, Portugal's population is described as one of the most homogeneous in Europe, having slowly absorbed the Negro gene pool. As of l975 it had lost all of its outside territories.

Its workers are the lowest paid in Europe and they have the highest rate of illiteracy and a high infant mortality rate. In terms of art, literature, music, science and philosophy the "new" Portugal has produced virtually nothing in 100 years and by most standards is the most backward nation in Europe. *Keep in mind that the Black population of the U.S. is approximately 13%.  (William Gayley Simpson, Which Way Western Man? 1978, National Alliance Press, Box 3535, Washington, D.C. 20007)


FACT 55: The Republic of Haiti, the only completely Black republic in the Western Hemisphere also happens to be the poorest country in the Western Hemisphere. It also has the lowest life expectancy, highest illiteracy, lowest per capita consumption of newsprint, lowest per capita GNP, and the lowest level of political stability. (William Gayley Simpson, Which Way Western Man? 1978, National Alliance Press, Box 3535, Washington, D.C. 2007)

FACT 56: Haiti once had a promising future. Before 1789 as a French colony under White rule, San Domingo (Haiti) was as rich or richer in productivity as all the 13 American Colonies combined.

It was considered the "crown jewel" of the French colonial system, and was in fact the most prosperous colony anywhere in the world. Populated by 40,000 Whites, 27,000 freed Mulattoes, and 450,000 Black slaves and with a bountiful climate and productive soil, it supplied all of France and half of Europe with sugar, coffee, and cotton.

But in 1791, the French government issued a decree ordering Haiti to give the vote to the Mulattoes, and soon after another ordering freedom for all the slaves. This resulted in a bloody civil war in which the entire White population (about 40,000 Frenchmen) was murdered, down to the last man, woman, and child.

Rape, decapitation, and mutilation were committed almost universally upon their bodies. (Carleton Putnam, Race and Reason, 1961, Howard Allen Press, Cape Canaveral, FL; Carleton Putnam, Race and Reality, a Search for Solutions, 1967, Howard Allen, Box 76, Cape Canaveral, FL 32920)

FACT 57: After the Blacks massacred the last of the White population in 1804, Haiti remained a part of Santa Domingo, until 1844 when it became a separate "republic."

Between 1844 and 1915 only one Haitian president completed his term in office. Fourteen were ousted by armed uprisings, one was blown up, one was poisoned and another was hacked to pieces by a mob. Between 1908 and 1915 the revolutions and assassinations increased so rapidly that a United States military occupation was needed to restore order.

This lasted from 1915 to 1934. Thereafter followed twelve years of rule by a Mulatto elite which ended in the resumption of control by the Black military in 1946. Since then wholesale corruption and political murder have been the rule. (Carleton Putnam, Race and Reality, A Search for Solutions, 1967, Howard Allen, Box 76, Cape Canaveral, FL 32920)


FACT 58: India's Negroid peoples have been subjected to numerous White invasions for over 5000 years, prompting the rise and fall of one civilization after another as the White invaders became absorbed into the non‑White masses.

Then, about 1800 B.C. Aryans again invaded from the northwest, this time establishing a rigid caste ("varna." meaning color) system of White supremacy which eventually evolved into an integral part of the Hindu religion. Interracial mixing was banned and punishable by death. (A.L. Basham, The Wonder That Was India, Grove Press, New York, NY 1954; L.A. Waddell, The Makers of Civilization, 1929, Angriff Press, Hollywood, CA)

FACT 59: Led by an Aryan ruling class, Classical India blossomed into a great culture, giving expression to philosophy, poetry, science, mathematics, and literature. The land prospered as never before ‑‑or after.

FACT 60: The caste system lasted about 2,000 years (probably longer than any civilization under similar racial circumstances.) However, eventually the castes broke down due to miscegenation and by modern times virtually no pure Whites were remaining. (Myron C. Fagan, How The Greatest White Nations Were Mongrelized - Then Negroized, Sons of Liberty Books; L.A. Waddell, The Makers of Civilization, 1929, Angriff Press, Hollywood, CA; Charles A. Weisman, The Origins of Race and Civilization, 1990, SFA)

FACT 61: Today, India has 834 million people who speak 150 different languages and dialects. When the annual rainfall is insufficient, they die of starvation at a rate of 2,000,000 to 6,000,000 per year. India has the highest birthrate in Asia, one of the lowest per capita incomes in the world, and an illiteracy rate close to 70%. (World Almanacs, ‘88 thru ‘92.; Henrick Van Loon, 1940, Van Loon’s Geography, Garden City Publication)


FACT 62: Ancient Egypt was founded and built by Mediterranean Caucasians as far back as 4500 B.C. Egypt's period of greatness was from 3400 B.C. to 1800 B.C. and was characterized by its amazing architecture, pyramids, temples, and mastery of mathematics and engineering, the remnants of which are still evident today. The White Egyptians pioneered medicine, chemistry, astronomy, and law; In many cases, their achievements remain unequaled. (37) (39) (21)

FACT 63: But, about 3400 B.C. Egypt civilization began to spread up the Nile River, bringing it in close contact with the black Nubians to the south. Soon they were using Blacks for slave labor and Egypt became history's first melting pot. (39) (10) (14)

FACT  64: In time the infusion of Negro blood worked itself up from the bottom of Egyptian society. The slaves were eventually freed, received political equality, and took posts of authority in government. (10) (37)

FACT 65: By the time of King Tut (1370‑1352 B.C.) even the ruling classes had been Mongrelized and Egypt began a tailspin downward. Today, the once‑mighty Egypt is very much a Third World country, having lost its art, its medicine, its architectural ability, and its position in world affairs. (10) (37)

The absurd notion that Ancient Egypt was a product of Negro ingenuity is now being widely disseminated in the schools. Though scholars know this is a blatant lie, they justify the deception by assuming it will boost the "self‑esteem" of Black children.

South Africa: (Note: These facts will most likely change drastically now that South Africa has fallen under black rule.)

FACT 66: White people have lived in South Africa much longer than Negroes. There have been White settlements in South Africa for over 300 years, about the same length of time Europeans have lived in North America. Even 150 years after the first colonies around Capetown, at the beginning of the 19th Century, there still were no Blacks within 500 miles. The Blacks wandered in from central Africa later on, possibly fleeing the slave trade or due to famine. In fact, most of South Africa's Blacks were born in other countries. (29) (8) (14)

FACT 67: South Africa is by far the wealthiest and most advanced country in Africa, producing nearly 75% of the continent's Gross National Product.

It is almost completely self‑sufficient so boycotts have little affect upon its economy. In fact most of Africa is dependent upon South Africa. South Africa is governed by a Western parliamentary republic and strictly segregated racially. South Africa grants complete self‑government to the Blacks in their own areas of the country. (29) (8) (14)

FACT 68: Though South Africa is perpetually criticized by the world press for its racial separatism, its Blacks live better than the Blacks of any other African country and are multiplying rapidly and healthily. 87% of Black welfare costs are being paid by the White man. This includes food, clothing, training, housing, education an health care. ‑‑even old age pensions. (14)

FACT 69: Thousands of South African Blacks graduate from college every year, more than three times as many as in the rest of Africa combined. Every Black child is within walking distance of a primary school. Africa's largest hospital, which serves Blacks almost exclusively and performs over 1800 operations per month, is in South Africa. (14)

FACT 70: The Blacks of South Africa own more cars than do all the citizens of the Soviet Union. (29)

FACT 71: South Africa has more Black doctors, lawyers, professional people, and millionaires than all of the rest of the world combined. (8)

FACT 72: In fact, conditions are "so bad" for Blacks in South Africa that the country has a tremendous problem with illegal Black immigration, having over one million illegal foreign workers. (14) (29)


FACT 73‑75: Iceland, the only all‑White nation in the world, has the world's highest literacy rate. 100%. It is an island of cooled volcanic magma, located Just south of the Arctic Circle. It has no coal, no fuel, no timber, no mineral wealth or natural resources, and no navigable rivers. 75% of the interior is uninhabitable and only about 1% of the land is arable.

It is the youngest nation in Europe and one of the most isolated countries in the world. Nonetheless, Iceland is #2 in the world in life expectancy and has one of the world's highest standards of living, in terms of per capita income. It has tremendous medical facilities and a thriving publishing business. Virtually every family has a telephone. Upon graduation from high school, each Icelandic student has learned five languages. (33)

Martin Luther King

FACT 75‑77: On Jan. 31, 1977, Martin Luther King's FBI records were sealed by court order until the year 2027 because, as his wife said, "its release would destroy his reputation" These records are rumored to contain instances of bizarre sexual perversion and homosexuality, and proof that King was under the direct orders of Soviet spies and financed by the Communist Party.

FACT 78: The Wall Street Journal (Nov.9, 1990) disclosed that Stanford University editors of The Papers of Martin Luther King Jr. have long known that King was guilty of plagiarism in his l955 Boston University doctoral thesis, having lifted significant portions from the works of other writers and graduate students.

FACT 79: Martin Luther King frequently enjoyed prostitutes and paid for them with his church's money. Still, congress has voted to make King's birthday a national holiday, in most places replacing Columbus Day or Washington's Birthday as an official observance.

FACT 80: Almost every state in the union has a King holiday, and almost every city has a King Boulevard or King Civic Center. Yet the electoral evidence suggests that Americans will almost always vote down honors for King when given a chance. (41)


FACT 81: The entire continent of Africa, perhaps Earth's richest land, accounts for only 3% of world trade. (27)

FACT 82‑84: Almost all Blacks who have been leaders in fields other than athletics or music have had some White ancestry: Fredick Douglas, W.E.B. Dubois, Booker T. Washington, George Washington Carver, Alex Hailey, Thurgood Marshall, Bryant Gumbell, Colin Powell, Carl Rowan, Ed Bradley, Doug Wilder, etc. According to Dr. E.B. Reuter, "...Of successful and best known men that the Negro race has produced, at least thirteen‑ fourteenths are men of mixed blood.” (27) (21)

FACT 85: Blacks are 50 times more likely to have syphilis than Whites. (32)

FACT 86: Twice as many Blacks as Whites receive dishonorable discharge from the U.S. military. (32)

FACT 87: A White woman is 15 times more likely to contract AIDS by engaging in sex with a Negro than with a White heterosexual. (U.S. Centers for Disease Control)

FACT 88: 90% of U.S. children with AIDS are Black or Hispanic. (36)

FACT 89‑92: In l950, American schools were among the best in the world. However, vocal elements within our society demanded that the public schools take on a social engineering role as well as an educational one. Violent disruptions of American education were ordered by the Supreme Court for the purpose of breaking down racial barriers.

For 30 years, American schools have diverted enormous resources into forced integration, quotas, and bussing operations. (Few people realize how expensive bussing is. Annual cost may run into tens of billions of dollars. In l990 California alone was spending $500 million per year on integration. Many school districts spend a quarter or more of their budgets on transportation. In Milwaukee alone and in a single school year, 30,000 staff hours were diverted into calculating the race of students to attend the various schools.)

The results? Today's students rank at the very bottom worldwide in science and math, some 40% of American adults are functionally illiterate, and standardized test scores have declined steadily for both Whites and Blacks. Today the average White still scores 200 points higher on the combined SAT than the average Black. Americans spend more on education than any other country in the world and have the worst results.

Massive White flight to escape racial zoning has reduced the tax base of every major American city. In l983, after nearly two generations of racial experimentation to promote equality, the research arm of the Dept. of Education could not produce a single study that showed Black children were learning appreciably better after desegregation. (25) (20) (32)

FACT 93: In Black Africa the average ruler lasts 7 months. (22) (27) (7)

FACT 94: By 1995, a third of U.S. students will be non‑Whites and Whites will be a minority in the school districts of 5 states. (32)

FACT 95: Dr. William Shockley, Nobel prize winner for his work in the invention of the transistor and renowned geneticist as Stanford University, said, "The major cause for American Negroes' hereditary is origin and thus not remedial to a major degree by improvement in environment."

FACT 96: In 1930, about 33% of the world was White. Today, the U.N. estimates that only about 9.5% of the world's population is Caucasian. This percentage is falling rapidly. (34) (27)

FACT 97: Every race has an equal capacity to learn and contribute to civilization and any differences are caused by prejudice and racism. The fact that white skins are associated with civilization is merely a quirk of fortune and coincidence. Any attempt to distinguish the races is motivated by paranoia and hatred. We must prevent any investigation into the subject and work to melt society together into a reckless, nationless, harmonious utopia. (?)

FACT 98: In 1988 there were 9,406 cases of Black‑on‑White rape and fewer than 10 cases of White on Black rape in the U.S. (32)

FACT 99: For the book Intelligence and National Achievement, by Raymond Cattell, three distinguished American scholars compare massive evidence of national I.Q. score averages worldwide and warn against the decline of any nation whose population reflects declining intelligence. Taking into consideration the differential birthrates of American ethnic stocks, they concluded that American ability is declining rapidly. (21)

FACT 100: The American taxpayers have spent over $2.5 TRILLION trying to upgrade Blacks since the l960's. (6)

FACT 101: Quotes "The Negroes' rude ignorance has never invented any effectual weapons of defense or destruction: they appear incapable of forming any extensive plans of government or conquest: and the obvious inferiority of their mental faculties has been discovered and abused by the nations of the temperate zone." Edward Gibbon, the great historian and author of The Decline And Fall of The Roman Empire, (Vol. III, pg. 277)

"Wherever you find the Negro everything is going down around him, and wherever you find the White man you see everything around him improving." (Robert E. Lee, to Col. Thomas H. Carter, May, l965)

The Black Man's Gift to Portugal

Ray Smith

[Taken from the Stormfront website]

We have all heard racial integration defended and advocated on the grounds that we have deprived our country of the benefit of the talents and abilities of the Negroes ‑ that the Negroes have a positive contribution to make and we have failed to take advantage of it. Because of our irrational prejudice against the Negroes, we have excluded them from full participation in American society and, we are told, this is America's loss.

The Lesson of History

In view of the fact that we are now being forced to integrate with the Negroes and grant them equal participation, it might be instructive to look at other countries which have integrated with Negroes in the past to see what the Negroes gave them. What is the historical evidence?

here is a wealth of material here for study in such places as Haiti, Cuba, Puerto Rico, Brazil, etc., but the nearest parallel to the United States today is Portugal in the 16th century.

It may come as a surprise to hear of the Negroes' role in the history of Portugal, for in spite of all the emphasis on "Black studies" in our schools, no one seems to talk about the Blacks' contribution to Portugal; neither the Portuguese, the Blacks, nor our modern historians who are rewriting our history books to make the Negroes look good. It takes considerable digging in books written before our modern era of forced integration to uncover the story of Portugal.  Poets and Explorers

        Portugal began the Negro slave trade after encountering Negroes in its explorations and forays into Africa. Portugal brought the first Black slaves to Lisbon in 1441, and they continued to be imported in such numbers that by 1550, the population of Portugal was 10 percent Negro (the U.S. is 13‑14 percent Negro today).

Defilement of the Blood

There was no taboo or injunction against sexual relations with the Negroes, and the Negroes blood soon became assimilated into the general population through miscegenation, so that today there are no Negroes, as such, in Portugal. The present‑day population of Portugal is described by the New York Times Encyclopedic Almanac, 1971, as follows: "Ethnic Composition: The people are a mixture of various ethnic strains, including Celtic, Arab, Berber, Phoenician, Carthaginian, Lusitanian, and other racial influences. The present population is one of the most homogeneous in Europe, with no national minorities." (Note that the Negro strain is

not listed by the New York Times).

What you can see in Portugal today is the product of uniform, non‑selective mixing of the 10 percent Negroes and 90 percent Whites into one homogeneous whole. In effect, it is a new race ‑ a race that has stagnated in apathy and produced virtually nothing in the last 400 years.

The Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th ed., 1911, in its article on Portugal states,

"The Portuguese intermarried freely with their slaves, and this infusion of alien blood profoundly modified the character and physique of the nation. It may be said without exaggeration that the Portuguese of the 'age of discoveries' and the Portuguese of the 17th and later centuries were two different races."

People Without a Future

The contribution of this new race to civilization in terms of literature, art, music, philosophy, science, etc. has been practically nothing. Portugal today is the most backwards country in Europe. The illiteracy rate is 38 percent (in the U.S., 2.2 percent, Japan, 1.0 percent). The infant mortality rate in Portugal is 59.2 per 1000 births (in Sweden, 12.9 percent, U.S., 20.7 percent, France, 20.4 percent). The workers wages are the lowest in Western Europe, the equivalent of a little more than $2.00 a day.

Portugal is a forgotten land ‑ bypassed by the tourists and shunned by the scholars. It is a sad country, known mainly for its plaintive, mournful fado music ‑ nostalgic music that looks to the past and sees no future.

Portugal and America

In spite of the close similarity between the situation of Portugal in the 1550's and the United States today, we cannot predict that the outcome of our racial integration with Negroes will be exactly the same.

The historical significance, however, is that any country, society, or group which has integrated to any appreciable extent with the Negroes has suffered drastically in its ability to maintain a civilized standard of living and its ability to compete with others. There is no evidence that any other country ever gained anything from integration with Negroes.

It should be pointed out that the Negro‑White ratio, 1:9, in Portugal in the 1550's does not represent the final percentage of Negro genes, for the Negro element was rapidly increasing while the White element was declining. The male Whites were leaving Portugal in large numbers ‑ sailing, settling in the colonies, and marrying native women (the government encouraged this). Most of the Negro slaves brought to Portugal were adult males.

The population was thus unbalanced ‑ an excess of White women and Negro males, and a shortage of White men. Chronicles of the era  relate that Portuguese women kept Negro slaves as "pets." They also married them. The situation in the U.S. today is not too different. The radical‑chic Whites have their Black pets.

Our percentage of the Negro element today does not represent the final amalgam. The Negro birth rate is almost twice as high as that of the Whites. There is no White population explosion in America, or anywhere in the world. It is all colored. The colored woman has the children; the White women are on the pill or have abortions.

What the final amalgam in America will be we can not say, but if the present trends continue, the Negro element will be much more than 14 percent.

Why Did Portugal Integrate?

The British, French, Dutch, Spanish, and Portuguese all engaged in the Negro slave trade, but only Portugal brought them to their own country. The question arises ‑ why did Portugal so willingly accept racial integration with Negroes while other European countries kept the Negroes out and maintained their racial integrity? What was the climate of opinion, the current ideology, teaching, or propaganda that led the Portuguese to depart from the behavior of the other countries? What was the difference about Portugal?

        You will not find the answer to these questions in our modern


books and recently published encyclopedias, for the whole subject of the

decline has become taboo. You will have to dig into older sources and

discover your own answers.

        You might also ask yourself why America is accepting racial


while most of the rest of the world is "racist." Why are we different?

The Role of the Jew

        One significant difference in Portugal before its fall in the


century was that it had become a haven for Jews. For several centuries,

the Jews had more wealth, influence, and more power in Portugal than in

any other European country. In 1497, at Spain's request, the Jews were

asked to leave Portugal or be converted. Most of them became normal

Christians and remained.

        However, by 1550 many of the Jews were voluntarily leaving. They

saw the

writing on the wall. The Encyclopedia Britannica (edition of 1885) notes

that "even observers like the Dutchman Cleynarts saw that, in spite of


its wealth and seeming prosperity, the kingdom of Portugal was rotten at

the core and could not last."

        America has also served as a haven for the Jews. The Jews in


today have risen to a greater position of power, wealth, and influence

than they have ever had in any other country. They dominate the

newspapers, book publishing, television and radio, movies, universities ‑

all of the educational media, as well as the commercial life of the


        The Jews have always proselytized for racial integration ‑ in


America, or in whatever country they have been, for without such a


of tolerance of alien races, they themselves, would not be accepted. It

has, therefore, been in the Jews' interest to suppress evidence which

would lead people to reject alien races.

History Rewritten

        Our encyclopedias and history books have been purged and

rewritten. If

you look up Portugal in the 1970 edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica,

you will not find anything about the role of the Negroes and Jews in the

history of Portugal, or anything about the decline and fall of Portugal.

        The Jews are briefly mentioned among others who "exerted various

influences over the territory which in the 13th century acquired the

frontiers of modern Portugal." There is no elaboration of what this

influence was.

        The Negroes have been eliminated entirely. They are not listed

with the

other ethnic groups in the ancestry of the Portuguese people. In the

entire 15‑page article, there is no clue that Negroes were ever present


Portugal or that they had any role or influence in Portuguese history.

        The 1970 edition of the Encyclopedia Americana also makes no

mention of

the presence of Negroes in Portugal.

        In all these sources you find "facts," i.e., names and dates, but

with no

meaning and no indication of what actually happened or why. However, if

you can manage to find some older sources, you can learn a great deal

about the history of Portugal.

        The article on Portugal in the 1911 edition of the Encyclopedia

Britannica contains more real information than you can get in reading a

hundred history books of more recent vintage. From our modern point of

view, this article would probably be called "racist," but the point is

that the presence and activities of the Negroes and Jews are recorded.


information is there, and you can draw your own conclusions. The article

is actually pro‑Jewish. There is also a scholarly analysis of the factors

in the decline and fall of Portugal, with the author tending to blame the

Inquisition, the Jesuits, and anti‑Semitism. However, neither his

conclusions nor his bias prevents him from including factors or

information which might lead the reader to a different conclusion.

        Our modern scholars and authorities eliminate information which


lead the reader to the "wrong" conclusion.

Suppressing the Evidence

        The 1964 edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica still briefly

lists the

Negroes and Jews, along with others, as Portuguese racial elements, but

with no details or elaborations. By 1966, the Negroes have vanished


        Now, what has happened between 1911 and 1966 that makes us purge


rewrite history in such a way? Have we decided that race no longer is, or

ever was, a factor in history? This cannot be, since "Black Studies" are

flourishing at our universities. Historians are supposedly trying hard to

discover all they can about the role of the Negroes in history.

        In a trial, a lawyer tries to suppress evidence that would be

damaging to

his client. He tries to prevent this evidence from reaching the jury. Our

modern historians and scholars are trying to suppress evidence. The Negro

is their client. We are the jury ‑ and we must not reach the "wrong"


        This, of course, reveals what the liberal establishment really

thinks of

Negroes ‑ that they are inferior and must be protected. The evidence must

be suppressed. The New York Times, et al., is a lawyer, well paid, who

knows his client "did it," but tried to get him off.

        Liberals in the United States often became very self‑righteous


superior when the former Soviet Union purged and rewrote its

encyclopedias, eliminating from its history current undesirables and

making them "unpersons." We ridicule their lack of objectivity and

irrational scholarship.

        But we do exactly the same thing when we rewrite history of

Portugal and

make "unpersons" of the Negroes (and Jews). In terms of rewriting and

deliberately falsifying history, we are much closer to Orwell's 1984 than

the Soviet Union ever was. Big Brother protects us from dangerous


Quo Vadis, Aryan Man

        There is a great need for the American people to know what

happened in

Portugal in the 16th century, for we are repeating their experience. We

are in the same predicament, at the same juncture, at the same crossroads

in history. There is an amazing similarity between our situation today


Portugal's in the 1500's. Shall we take the same road?

        Travelers from other European countries were amazed to see so


Negroes in 16th‑century Lisbon, as are travelers today in Washington,


Our own capital is a large percentage Black, and, as was the case in

Lisbon, the Negroes do all the manual labor and service jobs. The 1911

Encyclopedia Britannica comments, "While the country was being drained of

its best citizens, hordes of slaves were imported to fill the vacancies,

especially into the southern provinces. Manual labor was thus


the peasants sold their farms and emigrated or flocked to the towns; and

small holdings were merged into vast estates."

        Manual labor has been "discredited" for many White people these

days, and

Negroes fill these jobs. We are "too good" for it.

Americans Alienated

        The American people are also leaving the land and flocking to the


or metropolitan areas, and our small farms have been replaced by huge,

mechanized farms.

        If we had any colonies, many American men would gladly emigrate

to them.

Many are leaving anyway for Canada, Australia, and Europe. Those who

remain feel rootless and displaced ‑ from their jobs, their country, and

even their families. It is difficult to feel any sense of belonging to

what America has become today.

Stout Hearts ‑ and Pure Blood

        In analyzing the catastrophe which befell Portugal, the historian


Morse Stephens (in his book, Portugal, written in 1891) concludes:

        "They [the Portuguese] were to produce great captains and

writers, and

were able to become the wealthiest nation in Europe. But that same

sixteenth century was to see the Portuguese power sink, and the

independence, won by Alfonso Henriques and maintained by John the Great,

vanish away; it was to see Portugal, which had been one of the greatest

nations of its time, decline in fame, and become a mere province of


Hand in hand with increased wealth came corruption and depopulation, and

within a single century after the epoch‑making voyage of Vasco da Gama,

the Portuguese people, tamed by the Inquisition, were to show no sign of

their former hardihood. This is the lesson that the story of Portugal in

the sixteenth century teaches, that the greatness of a nation depends not

upon its wealth and commercial prosperity, but upon the thews and sinews

and the stout hearts of its people."

        This is rather old‑fashioned language, but what Stephens is

saying is

that, by the end of the 16th century, the quality of the people was

lacking. Other European nations suffered military defeat, but continued


grow and develop. Portugal stopped dead in its tracks. It had nothing to

build on. Portugal can now only look nostalgically to the past. We

Americans must use this information as insight into our future. It is too

late to save the White Aryan people of Portugal, but we must save



The Best of Attack and National Vanguard Tabloid

Ref: Issue No. 6, 1971

Greetings kinsmen;

        Last week, we reviewed the basic,one man equipment load ‑ the


essentials, if you will ‑ for an individual freedom fighter in the field.

The list allowed for the budget of a blue collar worker, and was by

necessity limited not only by cost, but by weight and ease of transport.

We assumed the fighter would be self sufficient in food gathering and

shelter construction, so only rudimentary materiel was listed for these

needs. This week, let's review a more comprehensive list of gear for

multiple troops under extended field conditions.

        Let's use as an example five fighters, each equipped with the

basic load

listed last week. The costs of the following is assumed to be split

between the five evenly.

(I cannot recall the NSN #'s on these items; sorry)


1. Pay no heed to the fancy lightweight modern tents and bivvies from the

stores and catalogs unless you like to get wet. They are fine for a

civilian camping or hunting trip, but cannot take extended punishment.


durability, the old US Army 8 man Cold Weather/Arctic Tent is advised.

Heavy, but multi‑environment capable. These tents are designed to last.


has a liner, a chimney port, and plenty of room. No tent is comfy in

extreme heat, especially this one, but when the lakes freeze, this tent


the one you want to lug your tired ass to after a day's work. Weighs


80 lbs. with stakes and poles. Excellent wind resistance. OD heavy


2. The Yukon Stove (1951) is a handy little furnace that fits the tent

perfectly. Ugly, bulky, but functional. Uses diesel fuel from a drip


or can burn solids. Stove generally comes with the drip line kit (fits


mouth of a five gallon jerry can), stove pipe sections, collapsible legs,

and a cleaning brush (It gets very sooty). If you can find the tent,

you'll probably find the stove. Weighs about 30 lbs. Black.

        3. Sleeping Gear. Strongly recommend an Army issue arctic mummy

bag, for

durability and comfort. Try to get the old style one, pre‑1985, because a

new ECWSS bag can run you over $250. A foam pad over a bed of leaves or

needles is fine, but to avoid drafts in extreme cold, I advise the Army

cot, the aluminum‑legged one, not the wooden legged one. These puppies


rugged, and you can stow your gear underneath to save tent space. Bag

weight 12lbs. Cot weight 18lbs.

        4. Fire Starters. Lifeboat matches and magnesium shaving blocks


advised. Helpful in damp conditions.

        Can you tell that I am a fan of Mil Spec gear yet??


        1. If you are planning long term, get the biggest First Aid kit

you can

afford, and a field surgery kit as well. Medical handbooks, including the

NATO Emergency War Surgery book, are necessities. You can always build

your own kit from scratch, as some of the big kits cost big $. Use common

sense and consider all expected hazards when selecting supplies. Some

useful items include:

                a. Tea bags. For colon and duodenum spasms. Tannic acid

does the trick.

                b. Instant ice packs

                c. Plenty of alcohol...invest in grain alcohol

(Everclear, Clear

Spring)and put in plastic containers. Use to sterilize and as emergency

calorie source (courage, too!!)

                d. Instant heat packs

                e. High Capacity Water Purifier...augment your personal


                f. Iodine Tabs...for water purification

                g. Vitamin Tabs...(suggest Purity's Perfect Multi

Vitamins..1‑800‑281‑7781). Your diet will undergo radical changes,

depending on your foraging skills, so keep a supply handy.

                h. Do some research on herbs...many are health beneficial

and are

packaged conveniently for space savings. Stock up.

                i. Make a point to get some EMT training...definitely not

a waste of


        2. Fire starters.

        I list these here because you may need to boil water for safety


sterilize first aid gear. Stock up on Trioxane, Mil spec Tri‑Fuel, or

Sterno. They give you a cleaner, hotter flame than leaves and twigs, plus

a lot less smoke to avoid detection.

Miscellaneous Gear:

        Toilet paper. Night Vision Goggles. Assorted knives, machetes,


snares, axes. Binoculars. Mess gear and cleaning agent for it.

        Wood saw. Preserved food, for emergency use. Extra boots/clothes.


weather clothes. Jerry Cans for water (plastic) and diesel (metal).

        All of the above is assuming that no home base is available and

pillaging/commandeering is unlikely. If you are in the middle of nowhere,

you will at least be reasonably well prepared. Obviously, a home base can

be stockpiled with 100 times more gear, or an urban area would be a

cornucopia of easy pickings in the event of a war. But it's safe to


plan for the worst.

        Now that you have all this gear, you don't want to have to hump

it on



        A 4X4 truck would be enough for the 5 men and all their gear,

either a

tonneau covered pick up, or a Blazer/Bronco type arrangement. (A half

track or armored car would be great,if you have the cash)

But the details are important:

        Manual locks/windows

        Big block V8 for power /runs cooler

        Carburated EFI

        No computer/unnecessary electronics....remember the possibility


nuclear detonation...

        Flat or matte paint scheme

        No chrome

        AM radio minimum

        Undercarriage protection like scrape plates, etc.

        Quality tires

        Don't forget the gear for your steed:

        Jack, tool kit, spare battery, spare tires, water/coolant jugs,


wrench, assorted fuses, jumper cables, spare alternator and solenoid in

event of EMP, extra belts.

        Laugh all you want, but the "rednecks" in the '72 F‑150 will


EMP,pausing only to replace an alternator and battery, while Mr. Liberal

will suffocate, trapped in his '99 BMW when his power

locks/windows/computer gets fried.

Dealing with the Media.

By Rexist

        One of the most dangerous forces we face today is the

'mass‑media'. They

have successfully been able to  influence and change public opinion

through the use of print, radio, film and worst of all, television.

        When dealing with the media under no circumstances are they to be

considered 'friendly'. They have become very productive in twisting and

exploiting our ideals over the years. They have infiltrated our

organizations, ambushed us in interviews, spread lies and slander; they

have twisted the truth to suit their own views and they have tricked us

with their under‑handed and dishonest tactics.

        They will dress up as the wolf in sheep's clothing; they will


sympathy for our cause, they will offer money or media attention, but


ever they offer they are not to be trusted. They are our enemies and they

should be treated as such. Never forget that they are our enemies ‑ they

are not 'fence‑sitting' ‑ they are actively taking part in the war


our Race.

        In any war, you will have the opportunity to face your enemies on


different levels and occasions, and when dealing with the media, we must

treat them as an enemy and nothing less. We will be hostile towards them;

we must also be intelligent and prepared to out‑think them and outfox


at their own game. When dealing with them, we must do the most to use


as they would use us. We should at all times attempt to remain in control

when dealing with them; answer questions with questions, turn the tables

around and make them face an inquisition. We do not need to play by their

rules we will play by our rules or not play at all.

        Do not be too eager to involve the media in your activities. A


mystery will feed and increase their anxiety and nervousness about


with us. When dealing with the media we must make sure we are prepared


make the proper statements and assertions. For too long we have provided

them with the ammunition to shoot us with; don't be afraid the defy them.

They have no honour ‑ when you are in an interview situation, don't feel

you have a responsibility to answer their questions.

        ATTACK, ATTACK, ATTACK! Place the burden back upon them! Attack


attack the system, attack our enemies, shout out aloud our slogans, our

phone numbers and addresses; let them know we're taking charge. Let them

know we will play our way not their's. Let them know that they are our

enemy and they will treated as such.

        We must beat them at their own game and this will not be a easy

task as

they have a impressive wealth of experience behind them. We must create a

feeling of tension everytime they deal with us, and we must make them


apprehensive whenever they deal with us. We must show an organized,

professional and dedicated face when dealing with them. At every

opportunity we must increase this uneasiness to make them increasingly

nervous and place the pressure upon and force them into making errors


would normally not make.

        Let them know we are watching them. When you are interviewed,

record the

interview yourself with a tape recorder or a video camera, take pictures

of them, their car's (focusing on their number plates), don't be afraid


say, "NO, I won't take anymore of your lies and slander!"and rip off the

microphone, push the camera man and storm out.

        The time has come for us to take charge and show the media we


business and that we are not to be taken lightly. For if they do, they do

it at their own risk.

Black Youth Culture Blamed As Pupils Fail

Special report: race issues in the UK

Gaby Hinsliff and Martin Bright Sunday August 20, 2000

[Taken from the Euronat mailing list]

        A respected black academic last night sparked a furious debate

after he

claimed his community was 'not interested' in intellectual activity and

blamed black youth culture for the poor school record of Afro‑Caribbean

boys and girls.

        In an exclusive interview with The Observer, Tony Sewell, a


lecturer who has just finished an inquiry into soaring levels of

exclusions among black pupils from a London school, claimed that too much

concern with money and consumer goods was almost as damaging to black

pupils' chances as racism.

        He warned that fashionable black youth culture inevitably crossed

over to

white teenagers, and said tackling it would benefit all pupils. 'What we

have now is... not only the pressure of racism, but black peer grouping

[which] has become another pressure almost as big as institutional racism


        Black children had gained much‑needed self‑esteem from their


culture becoming part of the mainstream, he conceded. 'But that culture


not one that, for example, is interested in being a great chess player,


intellectual activity.

        'It is actually to do with propping up a big commercial culture

to do

with selling trainers, selling magazines, rap music and so on.'

        Sewell's comments provoked an angry response from others in the


community and ignited an acrimonious debate about the real causes of

under‑achievment in British schools. Black community leaders accused him

of encouraging a 'blame the victim' culture.

        The Commission for Racial Equality (CRE) is already investigating


string of allegations that head teachers unfairly excluded black


Official figures show that this is four times as likely to happen to

Afro‑Caribbean children as to whites. A report to be published tomorrow


the United Nations Committee for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination

is expected to criticise the UK.

        Lee Jasper, who advises London Mayor Ken Livingstone on race


said: 'Tony Sewell... is somebody who gets attention for saying the


that well‑meaning white liberals would naturally agree with.

        'I don't believe that any community can suffer the levels of


and missed education that we have had without suffering from the kind of

problems that are now apparent.

        'It is a "blame the victim" culture yet again ‑ if it's not the

Government saying it's lone mothers that are the problem, it's the

aggressive nature of black kids.'

        British schools were suffering a 'race crisis', particularly over

exclusions, said Jasper. 'There is a raft of evidence that white female

teachers find black boys intimidating, difficult to deal with. They have

an expectation about their behaviour which tends to dictate the quality


teaching,' he said.

        An Ofsted survey last year found that Afro‑Caribbean boys were

often the

lowest‑ performing group in GCSE exams. It asked schools urgently to

establish 'what is happening to Afro‑Caribbean boys to cause a good start

in primary schools to turn into such a marked decline, and take action to

reverse it'.

        Maxie Hayles, chair of the Birmingham Racial Attacks Monitoring


said in his submission to the UN that black children 'are often labelled

by teachers as disruptive and less intelligent than white pupils',

creating a self‑fulfilling prophecy.

        'It would be daft to think that all social exclusions are based


institutional racism,' he said.

        'But I would never attack black culture... Black youths need


they feel debased, they need something to idenitify with.'

        Sewell, a lecturer at the University of Leeds who investigated


parents' allegations of unfair exclusions from Malory comprehensive


in Lewisham, south‑east London, said he was telling a truth that liberal

white researchers dare not.

        He admits he was one of the lucky few blacks to succeed

academically: 'I

teach 400 trainee teachers and there is not one black face.'


1. African Business Magazine, Dec. '91

2. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 92, pg 822+

3. American Renaissance, Dec. '90, Box 2504, Menlo Park, CA 94026

4. American Sociological Review, Vol 45, pg. 859

5. Basham, A.L., The Wonder That Was India, Grove Press, New York, NY 1954

6. Buckley, William F. syndicated column, Jan. 5. 1993

7. "But What about Africa?" Harper's, May '90

8. "The Christian Heritage of South Africa Under Attack!", Peter Hammond, Herald the Coming, Dec. '92.

9. Coon, Carleton S. The Origin of Races, 1962, Alfred A. Knopf

10. Fagan, Myron C. How the Greatest White Nations Were Mongrelized ‑ Then Negroized, Sons of Liberty Books.

11. Fields, Dr. Ed, The Dangers of Interracial Marriage, PO Box 1211, Marietta, GA 30061

12. Howells, William. Mankind So Far, Doubleday, Garden City, NY 1945.

13. Harris, Marvin, 1981. Why Nothing Works. Simon & Schuster, New York, NY

14. Jacob, A. White Man, Think Again! 1965, publ. by author.

15. Jensen, Arthur R. Bias in Mental Testing, The Free Press, New York 1980

16. Jensen, Arthur R. Straight Talk About Mental Tests, the Free Press. (Macmillan) New York, 1981

17. McCall's, May '92, pg 76

18. McGurk, Frank, "A Scientist's Report on Race Differences." U.S. News and World Report, Sept. 21, 1956. Washington, D.C.

19. Pearson, Roger, Eugenics and Race, 1966, Noontide Press

20. Pearson, Roger. Race, Intelligence, and Bias in Academe, Scott‑Townsend Publishers, N.W. Washington, D.C.

21. Pendell, Elmer, Sex Versus Civilization, Noontide Press.

22 .Putnam, Carleton. Race and Reason, 1961, Howard Allen Press, Cape Canaveral, FL

23. Putnam, Carleton. Race and Reality, a Search for Solutions, 1967, Howard Allen, Box 76, Cape Canaveral, FL 32920

24. Putnam, Carleton. A Study in Racial Realities, an address at the University of California at Davis, Dec. 17, 1964

25. Scott, Ralph. Education and Ethnicity: The U.S. Experiment in School Integration, Scott‑Townsend. Washington, D.C. 1989

26. Shuey, Audrey H., The Testing of Negro Intelligence, Social Science Press, New York, 1966

27. Simpson, William Gayley. Which Way Western Man? 1978, National Alliance Press, Box 3535, Washington, D. C. 20007

28. Social Forces, Vol. 69, pg.1+, Sept. '90

29. "South Africa: Time to Choose Sides" Soldier of Fortune, Dec. '89.

30. Snyderman, Mark, and Rothman, Stanely. The IQ Controversy, the Media and Public Policy. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ 1990.

31. Stell v Savannah‑Chattham County Board of Education, U.S. District Court, Southern Georgia, May 13, 1963.

32 .Taylor, Jared, Paved with Good Intentions: The Failure of Race Relations in Contemporary America. 1992, Carrol & Graf. New York, NY 33.World              Almanacs, '88, '89, '90, '91, '92

34. United Nations World Census, 1990

35. Van Loon, Henrick, 1940, Van Loon's Geography, Garden City Publ.

36. The Voice, Feb. 27, 1990.

37. Waddell, L. A. The Makers of Civilization, 1929, Angriff Press, Hollywood, CA

38. Weisman, Charles A. America: Free, White and Christian, 1989, SFA, Box 766‑c, LaPorte, CO 80535

39. Weisman, Charles A. The Origins of Race and Civilization, 1990, SFA

40. Weyl, Nathaniel. The Geography of American Achievement, Scott‑Townsend, Washington, D.C. 1989.

41. Martin Luther King (Man Behind the Myth) by Des Griffin.



Every high school student has had the story drummed into him: Dr. Charles Drew, the brilliant Negro

medical researcher who discovered how to preserve human blood plasma so that it could be used for

transfusions, is responsible for saving countless lives of wounded GIs during the Second World War. Five

years after the war, however, White racism was responsible for Drew's own death.

The poignant story was first told by William Loren Katz in his high school textbook, Eyewitness: the Negro

in American History (1967). On page 449 of the book Katz writes: "On April 1, 1950, Dr. Drew was injured

in an auto accident near Burlington, North Carolina. Al‑ though he was bleeding profusely, he was turned

away from the nearest 'white' hospital. By the time he was taken to another hospital, the scientist had bled to


Every major element in this story is untrue. First, Drew was hardly a "Negro." He was of mixed race, at least

three‑quarters White, as his photograph clearly reveals.

Second, his actual contribution to the technology of the modern blood bank was minimal. His work for the Red

Cross Blood Bank was more logistic and administrative than scientific, and it involved nothing in the way of a

scientific breakthrough or a major technical innovation.

Third, the claim that Drew bled to death after being turned away from a White hospital has been flatly

contradicted by virtually everyone, including Blacks, with firsthand knowledge of his death. When Drew fell

asleep at the wheel of his car on April 1, 1950, it ran off the road, threw him out, and rolled over him. He

suffered massive brain damage and chest injuries. One leg was nearly severed.

He was rushed to Alamance General Hospital, where three White physicians worked desperately for two

hours to, save his life. One of the witnesses to the emergency‑room drama in the hospital on that morning was

Dr. Charles Mason Quick, now a 67‑year‑old Black physician practicing in Fayetteville. In an interview in

Greensboro last month, Quick told newsmen what he had seen. He says he wants to establish a North

Carolina scholarship in memory of Drew "that would go a long way toward dispelling this terrible myth."

Another witness was Marvin Yount, the White administrator of the hospital. Yount demanded an apology from

Katz for his false version of Drew's death, and in May 1971 Katz acknowledged his "error" in a letter to

Yount. The latest edition of Katz's book has quietly dropped the story, but Katz has made no effort to undo the

mischief already caused by the earlier editions.

Indeed, Katz, a Jew, earns his living peddling stories designed to make minorities look good and Whites feel

guilty. He has been a major figure in the promotion of the "Black history" craze which has overtaken the

U.S. educational system in the last 15 years, inventing Black gunfighters who won the West, a Black

explorer who discovered the North Pole, Black military heroes responsible for America's freedom, and Black

scientists who launched the scientific revolution of the 20th century.

In addition to Eyewitness: the Negro in American History, Katz has also written Teachers' Guide to

American Negro History (1968), American Minorities and Majorities: a Syllabus of United States History

for Secondary Schools (1970), The Black West: a Documentary and Pictorial History (1971), A History of

Black Americans (1973), Minorities in American History (six volumes, 1974‑5), and four other books

dealing with the same general subject matter. He is also the editor of several series of monographs on Black

history and is a member of the editorial board of the periodical Black Studies.

DESTROYING THE PAST ‑ National Vanguard, March 1983

Last month was decreed "Black History Month," and so the February 1 issue of the Washington Post

contained a feature article titled "Ancient African Heroines." The two principal heroines treated were

Hatshepsut, an Egyptian queen of the XVIIIth Dynasty, and Cleopatra, who reigned over the same land 14

centuries later. The clear implication of the article is that the former queen was a Negress, and that the latter

may have been. Actually, both were White women, and nothing that is known about either suggests the least

Negro taint to her blood.

The Washington Post article begins with the not‑so‑subtle insinuation that the words "African" and "Negro"

are synonymous: "Women of African descent ‑ whether called Creole, Afro‑American, black or even

'colored' ‑ are typically depicted as women without a history... Unfortunately, works on the development and

influence of African civilizations usually have been overlooked and relegated to near obscurity in the stacks,

the achievements of ancient black women with them."

The article then introduces Hatshepsut, but in case any reader has so far failed to make the desired

assumption that the great queen was a "woman of color" (the term used later in the article in referring to

Cleopatra), there is a portrait. It is supposedly an artist's rendering based on a photograph taken in

Hatshepsut's tomb, but one can only suspect that the Washington Post's artist used Aunt Jemima as his

model, rather than anything photographed in an Egyptian tomb.

The lie is given to the Washington Post by Hatshepsut's life‑size portrait statue, found in her temple at Deir

el‑Bahri, near Thebes, and now residing in New York's Metropolitan Museum of Art. Numerous portrait

statues of Hatshepsut's close relatives are also extant, and they all show distinctly Europid features. Her

nephew, the renowned Pharaoh Thutmose III, regarded as ancient Egypt's greatest ruler, could pass easily as

a Swede or an Englishman.

QUEEN HATSHEPSUT, who ably ruled Egypt for 21 years during the 15th century B.C. and is the first great

woman known to history, has been dipped in the tar pot and converted into an instant Black by the

history‑destroyers of the controlled news media. Hatshepsut's portrait statue, carved during her life, is on the

right. The Washington Post artist's conception of her in a recent article is on the left.

Hatshepsut's mummy has not been identified with certainty, but the only reasonable candidate, found in the

tomb of her grandson Amenhotep II, has long, slightly wavy, brown‑blond hair. Blondness was not an

uncommon trait among the Egyptian nobility of Hatshepsut's time.

MUMMY believed to be that of Queen Hatshepsut was discovered In 1 98 in the tomb of her grandson,

Amenihotep II. The hair, remarkably well preserved, is very light brown, almost blond. The photograph is

plate XCVII from the Catalogue General des Antiquites u Egyptionnes du Muses du Cairo (Cairo, 1912).

Two other XVIIIth Dynasty mummies, both of which have been identified positively, are those of Yuya and

Thuya, the maternal grandfather and grandmother, respectively, of Amenhotep IV, the famous Akhenaton.

They are also the paternal grandparents of Akhenaton's cousin‑wife, the beautiful Nefertiti. The mummies of

both Yuya and Thuya have well‑preserved, long, reddish‑blond hair.

As for Cleopatra, though she was a queen of Egypt in the first century B.C., she was of pure Macedonian

descent, ruling one of the many lands conquered by her great countryman Alexander three centuries earlier.

On the matter of her race there is not the slightest doubt; her ancestry can be traced back to Alexander's

marshal Ptolemy.

That does not stop the Washington Post from attempting to paint Cleopatra as a mulatta, citing William

Shakespeare, of all people, as an authority, because he describes her as "tawny" in a play. (His Antony and

Cleopatra opens with one of Mark Antony's friends complaining about Antony's infatuation with Cleopatra:

"... His goodly eyes ... now turn the office and devotion of their view upon a tawny front ...") "Tawny," says the

Washington Post, " often has been used, throughout history, for mulatto or mixed blood personages ....

The Washington Post goes from Cleopatra to "black Queen Tiy of Nubia noted as the mother of King Tut."

Tiy was not Black, and she was not a Nubian; she was the daughter of Thuya and Yuya. Furthermore, she was

not King Tutankhamon's mother, although she was related to him in a roundabout way; Tiy's daughter

Nefertiti was the wife of Tutankhamon's father, Amenhotep, IV, but one of the latter's harem concubines was

almost certainly Tutankhamon's mother, since Tut himself does show strong signs of a Negroid taint. Negro

blood was introduced into more than one Egyptian royal family via harem slaves.

The article concludes with a boost for a "Great Kings of Africa" series of paintings which, among other

things, portrays Hannibal, the great Carthaginian general, as a coal‑black Negro. Reproductions of the

paintings have been distributed free ‑‑ "as a public service" ‑‑ to schools all over America to promote "Black

History Month."

HANNIBAL AS NEGRO a series of paintings of "Great Kings of Africa" being circulated in America's

public schools and promoted by the controlled media depicts the great Carthaginian general (274‑183 B.C.)

as a Negro (left). On the right is Hannibal's portrait statue, now in the Museo Archeologico Nazionale,


Why did the Washington Post do it? Ignorance is not a plausible excuse for the nation's second most

prestigious newspaper, with the enormous files of reference material at its disposal. Its editor refused even to

acknowledge a detailed letter from NATIONAL VANGUARD Editor William Pierce pointing out the errors

and mis‑representations in its article. Malice and greed, however, are plausible.

Thirty‑five years ago the English writer George Orwell noted with irony in his novel 1984 that those who

control the past also control the future. In his dark vision of our present era he saw government thought

controllers continuously rewriting history to suit the political and social needs of the moment, changing the

citizens' image of the past and, thereby, their attitudes toward the present and their expectations for the


Alas, grim reality has already outstripped Orwell's fancy. But it is not the government which has undertaken

the task of revising Americans' understanding of the past ‑‑ at least, not the elected government in

Washington, as bad as it is, but instead the self‑appointed shadow government which stands behind it: the

Sanhedrin of the masters of the controlled media. High, indeed, in the Sanhedrin sits Katherine Meyer

Graham owner of the Washington Post; and important, indeed, is the role of her newspaper in the

Sanhedrin's program of falsifying history in order to bring it into line with the needs of the moment.

One of the foremost of those needs is the undermining of the White man's racial consciousness. For those

who sit in the Sanhedrin belong to the most racially conscious of all peoples, and they realize that in their

consciousness lies their strength. Their rule can only be secure, however, so long as the majority race

among whom they live as a parasitic minority does not regain its own self‑consciousness.

Racial self‑consciousness demands a consciousness of the history of one's people; if a people can be robbed of

its history, then there will be no soil in which the roots of its racial consciousness can grow. That is the

ultimate motive behind every aspect of the Sanhedrin's history‑rewriting program.

THE FRAUD OF BLACK HISTORY ‑ National Vanguard, February 1986

February, by presidential decree, is Black History Month. That means, more than anything else, that

schoolchildren all over America are being given special materials and special lesson assignments designed

to raise their consciousness of the great artistic, political, literary, scientific, and philanthropic

contributions to human progress made by Blacks throughout recorded history ‑‑ contributions which need to

be emphasized over and above those of Whites and the members of other races, because White racism has

distorted and minimized the treatment of Black achievements in the standard history curricula heretofore

used in America's schools. That is the official rationale behind the school‑centered activities of Black

History Month, and most teachers and school administrators have accepted it without even blinking.

It is a fact, of course, that prior to the civil rights revolution two decades ago, school history texts said very

little about Blacks, outside of their role as slaves in the U.S. South prior to the Civil War. But there was a

very good reason for the omission: one can't squeeze blood from a stone or make a silk purse from a sow's

ear ‑‑ at least, not if one plays by the accepted rules ‑‑ and one can't teach schoolchildren about non‑existent

Black achievements.

Blacks left to their own devices in sub‑Saharan Africa prior to contact with Whites and other races simply

didn't do anything worth noting: they never discovered the wheel or the axle, developed writing, learned to

smelt metals, or domesticated animals for food. Introduced to the cultures of other races, they adapted some

tools and crafts to their own needs, but they showed remarkably little ability to improve them or invent new

things on their own. Enslaved, brought to America, and later freed and integrated into White society, they

have continued to show as little aptitude for invention as they did in their natural environment.

Those Whites ‑‑ and others ‑‑ with a vested interest in the cause of political, social, and economic equality

between Blacks and Whites, and those Whites with an emotional or religious need to believe in the

intellectual equality of the two races, have made up for this deficiency in recent decades by the simple

expedient of deliberately concocting a fraudulent history of Black achievement.

The counterfeiting process began in a relatively innocuous manner with a desperate search for every genuine

Black who actually had done something creative or other‑ wise noteworthy, and then magnifying his

achievements to the limit of credibility: Matthew Henson, Admiral Robert Peary's Black man‑servant and

valet who accompanied his master on the latter's Arctic expeditions, was magnified to co‑discoverer of the

North Pole; George Washington Carver, an agricultural researcher of modest talents who developed several

new uses for the peanut, was magnified to a scientific innovator of the first rank; Crispus Attucks, a mulatto

who incited a Boston mob against the local British troops in 1770 and was killed in the resulting riot, was

magnified to a leader of the American Revolution. This, at least, gave Blacks a few role models of their own

race and a source of racial pride, even though the latter was somewhat ill‑founded.

Magnification was not enough for the egalitarians, however. They began labeling as "Black" everyone whose

ancestors had ever had a passing acquaintance with the tarbrush. Charles Drew, a U.S. physician who served

with the Red Cross Blood Bank during the Second World War and is given credit for helping to develop the

technology of blood and plasma transfusion, was one of them. Drew, a man of mixed race, had so little Negro

ancestry that he was easily able to pass as White.

When Blacks themselves began getting into the counterfeiting act, the results became ludicrous. They

discovered, for example, that both Ludwig van Beethoven and Joseph Haydn were Blacks, whose true ancestry

had been concealed by White racists; why they failed to claim Mozart and Bach as well remains unknown.

One might have guessed that such excesses would embarrass the White and Jewish inventors of Black

history, but apparently they didn't; the counterfeit Black achievers continued to increase in number, but the

counterfeiters looked further back in history to find their candidates for a dip into the tar pot ‑‑ back to an era

from which portraits and other tell‑tale evidence were less likely to have survived.

And they looked to the continent of Africa, where they might more plausibly claim that various historical

personages were Black. Actually, they usually have been more indirect and devious than that: instead of

making explicit claims, they simply have implied that "African" is synonymous with "Black" ‑‑ a trick which

has not been particularly hard to pull off before America's credulous school‑children. Thus, the African

civilizations of ancient Egypt and Carthage have become the achievements of Black culture‑creators in the

lesson materials distributed in the schools during Black History Month.

The hoax reached a new level of effrontery and mendacity recently with the publication of a series of

"educational" Black history posters by Anheuser‑Busch, Inc. Titled "Great Kings of Africa," the large,

colorful posters, each featuring an African ruler of the past and a few paragraphs of biographical text, have

been distributed in thousands of schools all over America. Each ruler is portrayed as a Black, with fully

Negroid features and coloring. Among them are Hannibal, the great Carthaginian general, and Cleopatra, the

queen of Egypt who won the love of Julius Caesar and Mark Antony. The text on Cleopatra's poster informs

the reader that she is "often erroneously portrayed as Caucasian."

Yes, indeed. One such portrayal of Cleopatra (who, of course, was not Egyptian at all, but Macedonian, and a

direct descendant of Alexander the Great's general and successor, Ptolemy) is her contemporary portrait

statue, now in the British Museum.

BLACK HISTORY POSTER distributed to America's schools by Anheuser‑Busch, Inc., portrays Cleopatra

as a Negress. Text on the poster says that she is "often erroneously portrayed as Caucasian." Another poster

in the Anheuser‑Busch series shows the Carthaginian general Hannibal as a Negro. America's teachers

shrink from exposing this fraud, from fear of being labeled "racists."

The real Cleopatra had her image preserved in a portrait statue, now in the British Museum. She was

Macedonian, a descendant of one of the generals of Alexander the Great, who conquered Egypt in the fourth

century B.C. Unfortunately, America's school children aren't taught enough genuine history to know that.

Perhaps we should not be surprised that America's big businessmen ‑‑ Anheuser‑Busch is only one of many

large corporations which have sponsored Black History Month ‑‑ have become participants in the fraud. After

all, they have never been noted for a sense of social or racial responsibility. Their aim in life is to make

money and avoid trouble with the government, and they have learned that catering to minorities at least helps

with the latter.

What is deeply disturbing is the abject cowardice of the academic establishment. Every historian worth his

salt knows that neither Hannibal nor Cleopatra had the least trace of Black ancestry; and even though the

educational level of America's educators has declined sadly, there are many high school principals and high

school history teachers who also know it. Their silence is shameful.

It may seem a small thing, this caving in to the counterfeiters of history, but think what it means: all over

America, in every school district in the land, those who have been entrusted with the education of our children

have said, in effect, that they will teach lies rather than risk being labeled "racists." It is a national

phenomenon, part of a long‑term national trend, and it tells us that the nation is dying. It also tells us that,

regardless of the methods we personally may choose to use, we must be on the side of the Seattle Ten; we

must take up their fight, and, one way or another, we must destroy the evil against which they struggled.

For the King of kings!

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

Holy_War‑[email protected]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!

Terms of Service.





                     JPEG Image (image/jpeg)







                    JPEG Image (image/jpeg)







                    JPEG Image (image/jpeg)







                    JPEG Image (image/jpeg)







                    JPEG Image (image/jpeg)







                    JPEG Image (image/jpeg)




        Black Innovation?


        Mon, 24 Feb 2003 03:19:22 ‑0800


        "hengist" <[email protected]>



                                    Black Innovation?

                                           by V.S. Herrell

Recently, it has become popular to spread yet even more misinformation, this time regarding black inventions. While history has proven that

blacks have failed to contribute anything significant to the building of civilization, campaigns are spreading across America attempting to

credit black "inventors" with certain inventions. One such campaign is promoted by IBM who offers a poster of "Famous Black Inventions."

Included on this poster are pictures of blacks and their supposed inventions ‑ including the traffic light.

While the black Garrett A. Morgan did submit and receive a patent for a traffic signal in 1923, he did not invent the traffic light. The first

"traffic light" was created in London in 1868, used to control the traffic of pedestrians and buggies. It was illuminated by gas using green and

red colors, and was manually operated by policemen who turned a lever to reveal the appropriate color to the appropriate lane of traffic.

Railroads were already using a lighting system as well. It was a police officer, William Potts, who first improved on the gas‑light invention,

which required a police officer to operate. William Potts recognized the need for something better when he observed that police officers were

spending much of their time directing traffic after the invention of the automobile. He created an electric lighting system using red, amber, and

green to control automobile traffic in Detroit. It was first used in 1920 and was the herald of the modern traffic light. William Potts was not

black. Garrett A. Morgan's traffic light of 1923 did not contribute significantly to the traffic light of today, but resembled train switching lights

already in use.

When reading these lists of so‑called inventions, which are especially prevalent on the Internet, it becomes painfully obvious the lies

contained within those lists. These lists are especially popular on college campuses. Afrocentrism is the term used to describe the attempts

to cover‑up the truth of history by spreading lies which claim that the blacks of Africa actually created civilization. This ridiculous theory is

being taught in many schools and even universities. Many college graduates think they are being intelligent when they state that without H.

A. Jackson, we wouldn't have a kitchen table, which he "invented" on October 6, 1896. This is how ridiculous these lists have become. I am

sure that the kitchen table was invented centuries ago, although I don't believe the blacks in Africa were furnishing their mud huts with

kitchen tables. H.A. Jackson may have submitted an idea for a patent which was a special modification of the kitchen table, but he certainly

did not invent it, and neither did his patent have any significance on the civilization of the world. This is also true for W. R. Davis, Jr., who is

credited with inventing the library table ‑ in 1878!

What many are doing is obtaining patent lists of blacks and then attempting to pass them off as inventions. Most of what these people are

doing is taking a certain invention, modifying it in some way, and then patenting that modification. In other words, they are not patenting

original creations. Many are just outright lying. One list credits Sarah Boone, a female black, with the invention of the ironing board in 1892.

White people were ironing clothes on ironing boards long before 1892.

J. Standard, another black, is credited with inventing the refrigerator in 1891. Yet, the truth of history reveals this is another lie. William Cullen

demonstrated the first known artificial refrigeration at the University of Glasgow in 1748. In 1805, Oliver Evans, an American, designed the

first refrigeration machine, and in 1844, John Gorrie used this design to build a refrigerator which he used to cool the air for his patients

suffering from yellow fever. This all happened well before J. Standard ever submitted his patent. Furthermore, the concept of refrigeration was

known by whites long before the first artificial devices were ever created.

The lists go on and on. One credits the invention of the two‑stroke gasoline engine in 1950 and the internal combustion engine in 1958 to a

black, Frederick M. Jones. The truth is that thermal engines were created as long ago as the 1600's by whites. Almost one hundred years

before Frederick M. Jones, N. Otto developed the first successful four‑stroke spark ignition gasoline engine in the 1870's. The same year,

Dougald Clerk built the first successful two‑stroke engine, which remains in use today. The first person to actually experiment with the

internal combustion engine was a Dutchman, Christian Huygens, who did so in 1680. Most of the modern gasoline engines are descendants

of Gottlieb Daimler's creation of 1885. For those who don't know this, Daimler was a German. Frederick M. Jones is also credited with the

invention of the starter generator in 1949; however, electric ignitions had already been introduced in 1924. On the same note, another black,

Andrew J. Beard, is credited with inventing the rotary engine in 1892. This is completely unfounded. The first practical rotary engine was

created by a German, Felix Wankel, in 1927.

On a lighter note, Lydia O. Newman, a black, is credited with inventing the hairbrush in the late 1800's, despite the fact that white women have

been brushing their hair for centuries. Burridge and Marshman supposedly invented the typewriter in 1885, despite the fact that Remington

and Sons had already been selling the typewriter since 1874, and the original machine was created in 1868 by Christopher Latham Sholes. The

initial typewriter did not have lowercase letters, but the shift key of the Number 2 typewriter, manufactured by Remington in 1878, allowed for

lowercase letters. Other claims include riding saddles, which were supposedly invented by W. D. Davis in 1895. Again, this is claimed despite

the fact that riding saddles were in use long before 1895, primarily by whites.

Another famous claim is that a black, Paul Williams, invented the helicopter. Again, a little research will prove this to be false. The fact is that

no one person "invented" the helicopter. However, Leonardo da Vinci did pen down his own version of a helicopter long before Paul E.

Williams was born. Furthermore, the first successful lift‑off of a helicopter was accomplished in 1907 by a Frenchman, Paul Cornu, and

Etienne Oehmichen, another Frenchman, was able to fly a helicopter 1 kilometer in 1924. This flight lasted 7 minutes and 40 seconds. >From

that moment, white engineers advanced and perfected the helicopter, and in 1937 the first practical helicopter was introduced. Not

surprisingly, this first practical helicopter was a German creation ‑ the Focke‑Wulf Fw 61. Igor Sigorsky, a Russian, is credited with many

innovations and record setting flights after this time which greatly enhanced helicopter engineering.

Perhaps one of the most ridiculous claims is that a black, W. A. Lavallette, invented the printing press, which he had patented in America.

This was undoubtedly news to Gutenberg, who had already invented the printing press in 1445, long before America was even a country and

almost fifty years before Columbus even landed.

The list goes on and on, and each and every so‑called "invention" can be refuted in a similar manner, from the biscuit cutter (A. P.

Ashbourne, 1875) to the "portable shield for infantry" (H. Spears, 1870). Anyone familiar with history should be aware that whites have been

using devices to cut out biscuits long before A. P. Ashbourne, and I am sure that Roman soldiers from the first century never went into battle

without a "portable shield for infantry." Michael Harney, another black, is credited with inventing the lantern. Why not credit him with

inventing light or fire? Again, these claims are so ridiculous as to boggle the mind, yet many Americans blindly accept what they are being

told as truth ‑ white or black. What is worse, children are being taught these lies in schools supported by our tax money. There are also

federally funded "black history" museums throughout the country spreading such lies.

Even the claim that the mulatto George Washington Carver invented peanut butter is false. The truth is that early civilizations often crushed

peanuts into paste and Civil War soldiers ate "peanut porridge." As far as modern peanut butter is concerned, a St. Louis physician

encouraged a food company owner to produce and sell peanut butter in 1890 to individuals who had difficulty chewing food. The physician

had experimented with grinding peanuts and recognized peanut paste to be highly nutritious. Bayle, the owner of the food company, sold

peanut butter for 6 cents per pound. Additionally, the first patent for peanut butter was obtained by John Harvey Kellogg, another physician

experimenting with sources of protein for his patients. George Washington Carver didn't even begin his "peanut research" until 1903. Most

of the so‑called black inventors are mulattos like George Washington Carver, and do not deserve to be called black anyway.

Lies such as these are harmful not only to whites, but to blacks as well. Black children are armed with such flimsy lies which are easily torn

down, and white children are taught to appreciate so‑called "black culture" as being better than "white culture." White children are no longer

allowed to be proud of their heritage, which is full of white men and women who have built nations, constructed civilizations, and who have

contributed to a full history of art and science.

While many of the claims stated above are almost comedic in their absurdity, it is no laughing matter when lies such as these are spread.

Some promoters of so‑called "black inventions" go so far as to claim that blacks created, among other things, civilization, chess, medicine,

paper and the alphabet. Liars use the fact that early white civilizations created some of these things on the continent of Africa. Thus, they

state that "Africans" invented all of these. While the geological identification may be correct in some instances, the race is certainly not. It is

a well‑known fact of history that Egyptians, Romans, Greeks, and so on were white people who created their respective civilizations.

Cleopatra was not black, and neither was Marc Antony. Both were very clearly white people who bore no resemblance to the blacks or

mongrels we see in America today. Alexander the Great was a white man, though he may have visited the continent of Africa. The builders of

the pyramids were certainly not kin to the mud‑hut builders of the desert. Socrates, Hippocrates, Plato, and so on were also certainly not

blacks. Even Ethiopia was once a nation of white people, ruled by white kings and queens, until only recently when the blacks took over.

These are all facts of history and easily verifiable, especially when one has the ability to read the historians of the time, who were, once again,

also white. Unfortunately, most of these great nations toppled in the wake of the plague of mongrelization, a story which has been repeated

in every great nation founded by white men throughout history.

All of these attempts to change history and discredit white culture are merely the beginning when it comes to the deviousness of the mongrel

mind. Martin Bernal of Cornell University attempted to rewrite history over a decade ago with his books: Black Athena The Afroasiatic Roots

of Classical Civilization 1: The Fabrication of Ancient Greece 1785‑1985 (London: Free Association Books. and New Brunswick: Rutgers

University: 1987) and Black Athena 2: The Archaeological and Documentary Evidence (London, Free Association Books; New Brunswick:

Rutgers University:1991).

Bernal's works attempted to credit black Africans with the creation of the Greek Civilization and therefore western civilization in general. The

works were easily refuted by leading Classicists and experts, yet Bernal's "work" continues to garner unwarranted attention. Bernal's work

consists of trying to prove an Egyptian‑Phoenician influence on Greek Classical culture. Even if his interpretation of history were correct,

which it is not, it is certainly not correct to state that the ancient Egyptian and Phoenician civilizations were created by Negroes. Bernal's

books are simply extensions of an earlier work and an on‑gong attempt to change the truth of history. In 1954, George G.M. James published

a book entitled Stolen Legacy, which offers no proof for his claims of African influence on Greek philosophy. In one argument, he states:

"[The Greeks] did not possess the native ability essential to the development of philosophy ... the Greeks were not the authors of Greek

philosophy, but the Black people of North Africa, the Egyptians."

Again, his claims that the Hellenists stole their philosophical ideas from the Africans are unfounded. Even more unfounded, however, is that

the "Black people of North Africa" were the same creators of the Egyptian civilization. The builders of the pyramids and Egyptian rulers were

most certainly white. Even Cleopatra was a Macedonian Greek, whose family went to extreme lengths to preserve their Greek racial line, even

to the point of incest.

Two other works have been written refuting Bernal's claims. The first, Not Out of Africa by Mary R. Lefkowitz easily discredits Black Athena.

More recently, Black Athena Revisited, Edited by Mary R. Lefkowitz and Guy MacLean Rogers, offers over 500 pages of proof written by

numerous scholars against "Afrocentrist" claims of the black creation of civilization. One popular claim is that Aristotle and Alexander raided

the library at Alexandria (which is in Egypt) and that was where they stole their ideas from the Egyptian civilization and that Aristotle was

black. This, of course, is utterly ridiculous for several reasons. First of all, the library at Alexandria was not built until at least 25 years after

Aristotle's death. Secondly, this library was assembled by a Greek student of Aristotle, Demetrius, and contained books written almost

entirely in Greek. Thirdly, the city of Alexandria, though located in Egypt, was by no means an "Egyptian" city. It was the ruling center of the

Ptolemies, the Macedonian Greek family of which Cleopatra was a member. It was even designed by a Greek architect. The name of the city

was, of course, taken from the Greek ruler, Alexander the Great. Even the colony of white Judeans living in Alexandria, which numbered over

1,000,000, were a Greek‑speaking people, as recorded in Philo. The Bible says, "No lie is of the truth ... "no liar has eternal life" and "the lake

of fire was created for all liars and all who help make a lie."

Reference Materials