Watchman Willie Martin Archive

                                             Dogs - Fowls - Beasts - Idol - Idols

It staggers the mind at how many of our brothers and sisters, who call themselves “Christian” and know absolutely nothing about the Bible or who it is about and who it is to.

They will read a verse and think in their minds, yes that is what it means; when the verse or verses may mean in reality something else entirely. This is the way it is with the words “Dog,” “Dogs,” “Fowl,” “Fowls,” “Idol,” and “Idols.” For many times these words are speaking of “People” and not an animal, a bird, a dog (four legged kind), Idol or Idols made out of stone or wood or something like that.

Many will simply delete this message when they get it in their email, after reading the first one or two paragraphs, and say that is not possible; I know what the scriptures say. Well my brothers and sister Israelites, if you think that way and you don’t understand that things are not always what they seem in the Scriptures then you have not studied to make yourself approved; you have deceived yourself.

When confronted with some scripture they always, ALWAYS attack the one who has tried to give them some knowledge. But you will see they never, one time, state what they believe to be the truth. Only that the writer is in error and is all sorts of an evil person. Which only shows their ignorance.

Oh they say they will pray for that evil person, so that their god will lead them in the path to go, but they do not pray to Yahweh they pray to a false god; one who has already led them astray. For they have been led by and listen to Jewish fables which the Scriptures tell us that will turn a man/woman away from the truth.

“I charge thee therefore before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom; Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine. FOR THE TIME WILL COME (And now is) WHEN THEY WILL NOT ENDURE SOUND DOCTRINE; BUT AFTER THEIR OWN LUSTS SHALL THEY HEAP TO THEMSELVES TEACHERS, HAVING ITCHING EARS; AND THEY SHALL TURN AWAY THEIR EARS FROM THE TRUTH, AND SHALL BE TURNED UNTO FABLES. (2 Timothy 4:1-4)

If I am to be a good steward to Yahweh then what am I supposed to do if I believe that the people err from the Word of Yahweh? “This witness is true. Wherefore REBUKE THEM SHARPLY, THAT THEY MAY BE SOUND IN THE FAITH; NOT GIVING HEED TO JEWISH FABLES, AND COMMANDMENTS OF MEN, THAT TURN FROM THE TRUTH. (Titus 1:13-14)

Here we are told not to listen to the Jews for they will lead one astray and away from the truth.

What reward will I get for showing them the truth and convincing them to study to make themselves approved?

“Brethren, if any of you do err from the truth, and one convert him; Let him know, that he which converteth the sinner from the error of his way shall save a soul from death, and shall hide a multitude of sins.” (James 5:19-20)

They are like the Pharisees, scribes and Sadducees in the time of Christ, “For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of me.” (John 5:46)

Those who try to teach the truth to the lawless and deceived, those who are still in the world hate them with an undying passion, because that one points out their own failures, and for that, because of their own pride which will not allow them to see the truth, will hate him just as the world hates Christ.

“For this is the message that ye heard from the beginning, that we should love one another. NOT AS CAIN, WHO WAS OF THAT WICKED ONE (Satan, the Jews father), and slew his brother. And wherefore slew he him? Because his own works were evil, and his brother's righteous. MARVEL NOT, MY BRETHREN, IF THE WORLD HATE YOU. We know that we have passed from death unto life, BECAUSE WE LOVE THE BRETHREN (The White Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, Celtic and kindred people). HE THAT LOVETH NOT HIS BROTHER ABIDETH IN DEATH.” (1 John 3:11-14)

Which goes to show exactly what Yahweh was talking about when He was speaking these words: MY PEOPLE ARE DESTROYED FOR LACK OF KNOWLEDGE:


This is in reference to what Yahweh said in Exodus 19:5-6: “Now therefore, if ye will obey my voice indeed, and keep my covenant, then ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto me above all people: for all the earth is mine: And YE SHALL BE UNTO ME A KINGDOM OF PRIESTS, AND AN HOLY NATION. These are the words which thou shalt speak unto the children of Israel.”

“seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children. As they were increased, so they sinned against me: therefore will I change their glory into shame. They eat up the sin of my people, and they set their heart on their iniquity. And there shall be, like people, like priest: and I will punish them for their ways, and reward them their doings. For they shall eat, and not have enough: they shall commit whoredom, and shall not increase: because they have left off to take heed to the LORD. Whoredom and wine and new wine take away the heart. My people ask counsel at their stocks, and their staff declareth unto them: for the spirit of whoredoms hath caused them to err, and they have gone a whoring from under their God.” (Hosea 4:6-12)

When told that, they grow even more belligerent and say I read everything; and that is the problem they read it, and do not understand a thing about what is written. It is beyond them, and slips by in the night so-to-speak.

There is a growing, proliferating need, for our people to know their racial and spiritual identity in the Plan of God! Millions of our White Christian Caucasian people are yearning and searching, thirsting and fainting for a deeper meaning for their life!

They are searching to find the meaning behind their existence and being as the Children of Light upon this earth. Why was I born? Where did I come from? Why am I here? Where am I going? What is my ultimate end? Who were my ancestors? What is God's will for my life?

These and many other questions are gripping the hearts of many of our young people! Behind all of this unrest, uncertainty, confusion, frustration and bewilderment, lies the unmistakable truth that our people are searching for their Ancestral Roots, they are searching for their Identity.

All too many are being led to false gods, because the clergy of organized religion, priests of Baal; Evangelists, and teachers are teaching the people lies in the whore houses called churches, have failed the commission, they claim, was given to them by Almighty God and the Lord Jesus Christ; but their works prove, that is a lie, their works prove they are really working for Satan!

This is a study to show just One of the Things that the Judeo-Christians have not been taught by their leaders.

                                                             Four-Footed Animals

God, the Creator, treats the land animals, with which man was to be closely associated in his efforts to "subdue" the earth, very differently from the manner in which He treats the "FOWL of the air" and the "fish of the sea." He divided them into four classes: "cattle," "creeping things," "beasts" and dogs a division that is maintained throughout the Scriptures:

Genesis 1:24-25: “And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so. And God made The Beast of the Earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good."

In the Biblical classifications of quadrupeds, the word "cattle" is not necessarily confined to domestic animals. In its most general Scriptural definition, it refers to any four-footed animal, domestic or wild. However, it does more often refer to "herds" and "flocks."

It has already been pointed out that the "creeping things" include a far greater variety of creatures than usually supposed. Since the word "creep" means "to move along with the body prone," i.e., slinking forward close to the ground, the category includes four-footed animals that can crouch. We repeat what Webster's synonyms point out; that "creep" is used more often of quadrupeds.

The section of the animal creation under the descriptive phrase "beast of the earth" would not have presented a complex problem defying easy solution if the primary creative action, as Scripturally stated, had not been ignored. Among cattle, creeping things and beast, the Lord decreed that each should propagate "after his kind."

The development of the atheistical theory of evolution (which state, broadly, that various types of animals, etc., have their origin in other pre-existing types) was spearheaded by Charles Darwin's book, Origin of Species, published in 1859. This spurious doctrine aligned itself with the growing apostasy which was to engulf all Christendom and before long produced disbelief in the scientifically accurate but simply-worded statements of the Bible.

In spite of the fact that the theory of evolution is based on the idea of "natural development" without the miraculous intervention of any Divine Being, it found a ready and widespread acceptance even among so-called Christian believers.

The evil of this anti-Biblical error spread quickly into schools, colleges, universities and seminaries until the time came when no one could read with understanding the elementary phrase, repeated many times in Genesis 1:24-25 "after his kind!"

The word "kind," as translated from the original Hebrew, means "species" and we should understand from this that each species of animal was created, in its order, according to the Divine design.

While there is great diversity in the sorts of families within a species (for instance, the many varieties of dogs), nevertheless, each species remains separate in nature from all others.

In fact, the Creator's laws governing procreation do not permit one to cross over into another; most certainly one does not "evolve" into another. There is order in the Divine creation; this is why God saw that it was good. He makes it very plain that mixtures are abhorrent to Him -- they are confusion!

Kinds of Flesh

As a matter of fact, the Apostle Paul mentions how vital it is that, "all things be done decently and in order." (1 Corinthians 14:40) Then, as a part of his great discourse on the resurrection, he made this trenchant observation:

“All flesh is not the same flesh: but there is one kind of flesh of men, another flesh of beasts, another of fishes, and another of birds.” (1 Corinthians 15:39)

Contrast this Divinely-inspired, unequivocal statement of fact with the mouthings of evolutionists: "'Evolution' means a process by which man must trace his ancestry back to some ape form, then to some quadruped, thence to some reptile, thence to some amphibian, thence to some fish, thence to an invertebrate, thence to some single-celled creature that lived in the slime of the sea." (After Its Kind, by Byron C. Nelson, p. 2)

In Great Pyramid Proof of God, George R. Riffert writes under the heading, An Overworked Word: "The popularity of evolution as an anti- Christian explanation for the universe is not due to anything science has yet discovered in its favor, but rather to the decline of Christianity in the life of the people, the weakening of confidence in the Bible as God's Book of Truth and the widespread indiscriminate use of the word 'evolution' in connection with matters to which it bears no logical relation.

“'Evolution' is the most overworked, misapplied and misunderstood word in the English language. Growth, development and improvement are erroneously accepted as its equivalent meanings. So farfetched and ridiculous has been the use of this word that 'evolution' is now applied to anything from the undertaker's business to the making of a universe.

“When you say that a substance evolves odors or gasses and a mind evolves ideas, you have said about all that you can say and still be within the bounds of fact and truth concerning evolution.

“To say that a worm evolved a fish and that apes or lizards evolved men whose descendants produced a Lincoln or a Gladstone, a Handel or a Michelangelo, to say nothing of the Christ of God, is yielding to a speculative wildness of brain activity that is little better than philosophical imbecility." (Great Pyramid Proof of God, pp. 154-155)

                                                             Not The Same Blood

We are led to next consider another related scientific and Scriptural fact. In The Bible and Segregation, by C.R. Dickey, it is stated: "Paul's statement in Acts 17:26 is now so interpreted as to make it mean the exact opposite to what Paul intended. It reads: 'And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habita­tion...'

“Without quoting the latter part of this verse, some people make much ado over the first clause, and use it glibly to overthrow all previous Biblical teaching concerning racial separation.

“The key word used to prove the oneness of all mankind is 'blood;' yet, actually, it proves nothing because the word 'blood' does not appear in ancient manuscripts. It was added by translators. Ferrar Fenton gives this most logical reading of the passage: 'Himself giving to every one life and breath and all things; because He made by One (i.e. Christ). Every race of men to dwell upon the whole face of the earth...'" (The Bible and Segregation, pp. 16-17)

Furthermore, we are quoting in part from an article that appeared in The Putnam Sun of Palatka, Florida, on April 20, 1961, pointing out the fatal consequences of mixed blood transfusions: "Unheralded by the kept press of the day, but certainly to have more far-reaching effects than he discovery of the atomic bomb, is the news of recent advances in the biological sciences. These are of such a nature that we are today on the threshold of understanding how living things are created and live.

“No person capable of reading the printed word should miss, in the April 15th issue of The Saturday Evening Post, an article entitled 'The Messages of Life,' by James Bonner, professor of biology at California Institute of Technology.

“According to Prof. Bonner 'This almost successful search for the principle, the logic, of life may someday enable us to control the step-by-step development of the human organism to cultivate replacement organs and perhaps even to initiate life in isolated cells. This new largely concerned with the molecular facts of life...“Every day now brings new excitement as research biologists draw close to a final solution. For they have discovered that each cell of each individual contains a blueprint, an instruction manual, which gives the cell detailed instructions on what kind of chemicals to make from the available food, on how the cell shall divide or duplicate itself, on the size and shape of the systems it shall form (that is, elephant or mouse) in short, how the cell should become a part of a particular kind of living thing.'

“A tremendous fact developed is that the human races are not the same; but particular kinds of living things.”


“The blood of the White Man differs in Molecular construction and hereditary factors from that of the Negro. The physical evidence of this difference has been commonly known as sickle cell anemia, a child killer and causing invalidism in adults.

“This anemia is not a disease. It occurs in the blood of the Negro as a mutation from the normal and is an inherited characteristic. It can be and is transmitted to the White Race by means of transfusion of Negro blood. Prof. Bonner remarks that 'a striking example of an enzyme found in victims of the hereditary disease called sickle cell anemia, characterized by abnormal hemoglobin of red blood cells.'

“Developments are gradually leaking out that the epidemics of hepatitis occurring in hospitals the last few years are closely related to blood transfusions from different races and peoples. This is now being recognized by the American Association of Blood Banks. The 'social engineers' and misguided 'do-gooders' devoting their energies to race mixing as a basis for social adjustment now are proven wrong from every scientific point of view.

“Race mixing is bound to result in racial suicide. The Red Cross and other blood banks who have mixed blood of the races for transfusions under pressure from minority groups, are guilty of a crime against humanity.

“The crime is not directed to the White Race alone; but there is much evidence that White Blood given to a Negro has, in many cases, a much more serious result.

“According to the official information received from the Red Cross,' the race of the donor (of blood) has not been shown on any Red Cross records or on labels applied to the bottles since 1951.' This must not be continued in the face of the scientific evidence that mixed blood transfusions may have fatal consequences."

                                                  Anthropology Confirms The Bible

Our agreement is with the Science of Anthropology when its members classify all of mankind into three basic groups, viz., anthropologist Dr. Henry Field and his staff of the Chicago natural History Museum who trace the races of mankind from the three primary sources:

1). Mongoloid;

2). Negroid, and

3). White. (Hammond's Library World Atlas 1955)

The three great divisions confirm and amplify those three races as set forth in Gen., Chapters 1 and 2, as the "Aw-dawm" (White or Aryan), "Enosh" (Mongoloid) and "Chayee" or "Beast of the Field." (Negroid)

Anthropology distinguishes these groups as Caucasoid, Mongoloid and Negroid by their contrasting physical characteristics. As you will continue to discover, there is much more involved in separating each race from the other characteristically, than most MODERN scientists in fields affecting racial and social studies, will admit. Through grants and funding by large tax-free foundations, many members of the profession of Anthropology have sold their integrity for the price of a ride on the highly profitable "liberal band-wagon."

In his novel Coningsby (London, 1844), Disraeli drew a picture form the life of the Jews ruling the world from behind the thrones as graphic as anything in the Protocols of Nilus. Many believe, and it has been proved to most, Coningsby was a plagiarism of a Byzantine novel of the XVIIth century. The passage in which Rothschild (Sidonia) describes this is as follows: "If I followed my own impulse, I would remain here," said Sidonia. "Can anything be more absurd than that a nation should apply to an individual to maintain its credit, and with its credit, its existence as an empire and its comfort as a people; and that individual one to whom its laws deny the proudest rights of citizenship, the privilege of sitting in its senate and of holding land; for though I have been rash enough to buy several estates, my own opinion is that by the existing law of England, an Englishman of Jewish faith cannot possess the soil.' 'But surely it would be easy to repeal a law so illiberal.'

     'Oh! as for illiberality, I have no objection to it if it be an element of power. Eschew political sentimentality. What I contend is that if you permit men to accumulate property, and they use that permission to a great extent, power is inseparable from that property, and it is in the last degree impolitic to make it in the interest of any powerful class to oppose the institutions under which they live. The Jews, for example, independent of the capital qualities for citizenship which they possess in their industry, temperance, and energy and vivacity of mind, are a race essentially monarchical, deeply religious and shrinking themselves from converts as from a calamity, are ever anxious to see the religious systems of the countries in which they live, flourish; yet since your society has become agitated in England and powerful combinations menace your institutions, you find the once loyal Jew invariably arrayed in the same ranks as the leveller and the latitudinarian, and prepared to support rather than tamely continue under a system which seeks to degrade him. The Tories lose an important election at a critical moment; 'Its the Jews who come forward to vote against them. The Church is alarmed at the scheme of a latitudinarian university, and learns with relief that funds are not forthcoming for its establishment; a Jew immediately advances and endows it. Yet the Jews, Coningsby, are essentially Tories. Toryism indeed is but copied from the mighty prototype which has fashioned Europe. And every generation they must become more powerful and more dangerous to the society which is hostile to them. Do you think that the quiet humdrum persecution of a decorous representative of an English university can crush those who have successively baffled the Pharaos, Nebuchadnezzar, Rome, and the feudal ages?

     The fact is you cannot destroy a Pure Race of White Organization (Here is the secret, and a Rothschild is telling us why the Jews are trying to destroy the White Race. It is because the Jews know, if the race is kept pure, it cannot be destroyed; because it will be protected by Almighty God and the Lord Jesus Christ!) It is a physiological fact; a simple law of nature, which has baffled Egyptian and Assyrian kings, Roman emperors, and Christian inquisitors. No penal laws, no physical tortures, can effect that a superior race should be absorbed in an inferior, or be destroyed by it. The mixed persecuting races disappear, the pure persecuted race remains. And at this moment in spite of centuries, or tens of centuries, of degradation, the Jewish mind exercises a vast influence on the affairs of Europe. I speak of their laws, which you still obey; of their literature, with which your minds are saturated; but of the living Jewish intellect.

     You never observe a great intellectual movement in Europe in which the Jews do not greatly participate. The first Jesuits were Jews; that mysterious Russian diplomacy which so alarms Western Europe is organized and principally carried on by Jews; that mighty revolution (of 1848) which will be in fact [followed] by a second an greater Reformation, and of which so little is as yet known in England, is entirely developing under the auspices of Jews, who almost monopolize the professorial chairs of Germany.

     Neander the founder of Spiritual Christianity, and who is Regius Professor of Divinity in the University of Berlin, is a Jew. Benary, equally famous and in the same university, is a Jew. Wehl, the Arabic Professor of Heidelberg, is a Jew. Years ago, when I was in Palestine, I met a German student who was accumulating materials for the history of Christianity and studying the genius of the place; a modest and learned man. It was Wehl; then unknown, since become the first Arabic scholar of the day, and the author of the life of Mahomet.

     But for the German professors of this race, their name is legion. I think there are more than ten at Berlin alone. I told you just now that I was going up to town tomorrow, because I always made it a rule to interpose when affairs of state were on the carpet. Otherwise, I never interfere. I hear of peace and war in the newspapers, but I am never alarmed, except when I am informed that the sovereigns want treasure; then I know that monarchs are serious.

     A few years back we were applied to by Russia. Now there has been no friendship between the Court of St. Petersburg and my family. It has Dutch connections which have generally supplied it; and our representations in favor of the Polish Jews, a numerous race, but the most suffering and degraded of all the tribes, have not been very agreeable to the Czar. However circumstances drew to an approximation between the Romanoffs and the Sidonias. I resolved to go myself to St. Petersburg. I had on my arrival an interview with the Russian Minister of Finance, Count Cancrin; I beheld the son of a Lithuanian Jew.

The loan was connected with the affairs of Spain; I resolved on repairing to Spain from Russia. I travelled without intermission. I had an audience immediately on my arrival with the Spanish minister Senior Mendizabel; I behold one like myself, the some of Nuevo Christiano, a Jew of Aragon. In consequence of what transpired at Madrid, I went straight to Paris to consult the President of the French Council; I beheld the son of a French Jew, a hero, an imperial marshal and very properly so, for who should be military heroes if not those of the Jewish faith.'  'And is Soult a Jew?' 'Yes, and others of the French marshals, and the most famous Massna, for example; his real name was Mannasheh: but to my anecdote.

The consequence of our consultations was that some northern power should be applied to in a friendly and mediative capacity. We fixed on Prussia, and the President of the Council made an application to the Prussian minister, who attended a few days after our conference. Count Arnim entered the cabinet, and I beheld a Prussian Jew. So you see, my dear Coningsby, that The World is Governed by Very Different Personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.' (pp. 249‑252)

Rollin, Pierred Leroux, and a group of socialists, among whom was Maurice Joly. His father was Philippe Lambert Joly, born at Dieppe, Attorney‑General of the Jura under Louis‑Philippe for ten years. His mother Florentine Corbara Courtois, was the daughter of Laurent Courtois, paymaster‑ general of Corsica, who had an inveterate hatred of Napoleon I. Maurice Joly was born in 1831 at Lons‑le‑Saulnier and educated at Dijon: there he had begun his law studies, but left for Paris in 1849 to secure a post in the Ministry of the Interior under M. Chevreau and just before the coup d'etat. He did not finish his law studies till 1860. [Committed suicide in 1878]. Joly, some thirty years younger than Cremieux, with an inherited hatred of the Bonapartes, seemed to have fallen very largely under his influence.

Through Cremieux, Joly became acquainted with communists and their writings. Though, until 1871 when his ambition for a government post turned him into a violent communist, he had not in 1864 gone beyond socialism, he was so impressed with the way they presented their arguments that he could not, if the chance were offered, refrain from imitating it. And this chance came in 1864‑1865, when his hatred of Napoleon, whetted by Cremieux, led him to publish anonymously in Brussels the Dialogues aux Enfers entre Machiavelli et Montesquieu. In this work he tells us, 'Machiavelli represents the policy of Might, while Montesquieu stands for that of Right: Machiavelli will be Napoleon, who will himself describe his abominable policy.'

It was natural that he should choose the Italian Machiavelli to stand for Bonaparte, and the Frenchman Montesquieu, for the ideal statesman: it was equally natural that he should put in the mouth of Machiavelli some of the same expressions which Venedey had put in it, and which Joly had admired. His own view was: 'Socialism seems to me one of the forms of a new life for the people emancipated from the traditions of the old world. I accept a great many of the solutions offered by socialism; but I reject communism, either as a social factor, or as a political institution. Communism is but a school of socialism. In politics, I understand extreme means to gain one's ends, in that at least, I am a Jacobin."

All of this has worked well, on the unsuspecting public, to help evolve the "one-race" or "Brotherhood of Man" idea the enemies of Christ and His Israel people advocate.

However, occasionally a few do speak out on what they find to be true regarding separatist factors among the three racial divisions as pertains to abilities and qualities reflecting upon our Western standards.

Their independent findings have withstood persecution in place of rebuttal. Dubbing a scientist a "racist" is a cowards way of avoiding the responsibility of an intelligent refutation, which seems impossible considering the evidence to be surmounted.

That evidence points to, "...the overwhelming balance of probability that racial differences exist in the morphology of the human brain which in turn account for differences in the capacity to adapt to Western Civilization."

There is no dispute about the fact that, other things being equal (such as sex, body size, proportion of parts and stultification) the weight of the brain correlates with intelligence. This has been found to be true throughout the series of vertebrate animals. It is only denied in humans because that truth will not fit in with those who would destroy our Israel people thus destroying Christ's witnesses on earth.

Various studies have been made of the comparative average weights of white and Negro brains with results that all fall within the range of about 8 to 12% lower weight for the Negro brain. Such studies have been published by Drs. Bean, Pearl, Vint, Tilney, Gordon, Todd and others.

As a racial average, the Negro brain is lighter than the white and this in turn indicates a lower average level of intelligence. In the words of Dr. Carleton Coon, past president of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists: "Among living populations, absolute brain size is generally, although not necessarily individually, related to achievement."

Naturally achievement can be attributed to both mental ability (brain size) and will power. This latter attribute is a major contributory factor which must necessarily be evaluated on an individual basis.

Dr. Clyde Kluckhohn, Professor of Anthropology at Harvard wrote, "On the premise that specific capacities are influenced by the properties of each gene pool, it seems very likely indeed that populations differ quantitatively in their potentialities for particular kinds of achievement."

                                                   Differences In Races Are Innate

Dr. Henry Garrett, for 15 years head of the Dept., of Psychology at Columbia, tested six cases where Negroes and Whites had the same exact environment. The tests corroborate the direct evidence from other sciences, namely that the Negroes' limitations are chiefly innate!

Other tests show that environment contributes about 25% and inheritance 75%, to human capacity; the ratio varying somewhat with different characteristics.

Obviously a man's or a race's genetic limitations eventually influence their environment so that the one compounds the other. It will never be possible completely to equate White and Negro "environment"  without making the Negro into a White Man.

This the "Race Mixers" know! To equate the Negro with the White they must be blended into a composite which can equalize only by diminishing the higher talents of the White Race and raising those of the Negro.

Our God expressly forbids this in his 7th Commandment against adultery in Exodus 20:14. Funk & Wagnalls New College Standard Dictionary defines Adulterate: "To make impure by admixture of other or baser ingredients; corrupt. Adulterated: corrupted, debased; spurious, Adulterous: from the Latin meaning, to add to, to alter."

The Latin from which our English originated was preceded by the Greek which followed the Hebrew of our Holy Scriptures. The entirety of those Scriptures are very definite regarding Adultery as the mixing of God's people, Israel, in pro-creation, with any of the other races or mixtures of races!

To ignore this Biblical fact in preference for the modern, liberalized translation; "marital unfaithfulness" amounts to a confession of having missed what can easily be considered one of the most vital acknowledgments to be derived from the Holy Scripture. It is a case of Intellectual Dishonesty, make no mistake about it! However, the point we wish to make is that the Bible and Science do agree! Sir Julin Huxley's finding that a difference of one and one-half percent in average I.Q. makes a difference of fifty percent in the number of those having an I.Q. of 160 or higher.

Since the Negro I.Q. ranges from fifteen to twenty percent below that of the White, it is easy to understand the relative dearth of Negro intellects throughout human history.

And since a civilization is totally dependent for leadership upon a thin top layer of it's population, it is equally obvious that any amalgamation of the races would be disastrous for our culture. Such then, is the cumulative and converging testimony from anatomy, histology, physical anthropology, genetics and psychology.

While no single item may constitute proof, each item constitutes evidence, and we feel justified in saying that the total of the evidence must amount to proof to any unbiased mind. When the sum is added to the testimony from history (Here we would remind you once again: The English historian, Arnold Toynbee, has stated: 'The White Race has created some 13 civilizations, the Oriental race, some 3 civilizations.

(But) as of this date the Black Race has not, contributed to the development of one single civilization; but has, in fact, destroyed every civilization he has come into contact with through the mixing of the races - Egypt, Assyria, Babylonia, Greece, and Rome were, at one time White, but due to the mixing of the races, were eventually destroyed, because the children of mixed races are too stupid to retain a civilization, anywhere in the world.'), the result is beyond reasonable doubt. Nothing in the self-conflicting and undocumented edicts of various scientific cliques offers anything factual in contradiction.

Now many people will deny that Egypt was once populated by white people; but those folks don’t know the scriptures and what it says. Now we know that Adam was a White man, able to show blood in the face, and therefore Noah and his children would also be white people. So the Scriptures tell us that the Land of Egypt was the land of Ham.

ISRAEL ALSO CAME INTO EGYPT; AND JACOB SOJOURNED IN THE LAND OF HAM. And he increased his people greatly; and made them stronger than their enemies. He turned their heart to hate his people, to deal subtilly with his servants. He sent Moses his servant; and Aaron whom he had chosen. They shewed his signs among them, AND WONDERS IN THE LAND OF HAM. (Psalm 105:23‑27)


Our American (Israel) people have been misled long enough by equalitarian propaganda claiming support in scientific circles. It is time all of us realized that the constant parroting of denials of the existence of well established evidence does not effect an adequate refutation.

We should become aware that undocumented resolutions by scientific societies have no probative value, and that the perversion of truth in the interest of race amalgamation must be stopped. Honest, conscientious Christians must adhere to God's Word on this subject.

                                                            Confirmed By Science

A convincing array of scientific evidence is now adduced in support of the Biblical premise upon which the fact is established that THE OTHER RACES ARE not of Adamic origin.

                                                             The Family Simiidae

When scientists discovered striking similarities between "prehistoric" inhabitants of the earth and Negroes, they approached more nearly the truth than they realized.

Their findings that the characteristics of the so-called "Neanderthal man" and the Negro are very similar are valid because they were not describing the characteristics of a man but of the "beast of the earth." One scientific statement is significant in this context because it states:

"In anthropology, the term 'Grimaldi Man' is applied to a Negroid type of prehistoric man found in the caves of Grimaldi, near Mentone, Italy."

The pure Negro, who was created before the white man (Genesis 1:27), is of the family Simiidae, for while he did not "evolve" from apes, he stands, nevertheless, at the head of that family, as the lion stands at the head of the cat family. The Negro is of the Anthropoidea because, while he is not man, he resembles man in many of his characteristics.

It was man who was to have dominion over the earth and "subdue" it. (Genesis 1:28-30) The "Beast of the earth" is mentioned separately and the conclusion may be logically drawn that a being was created by God in the animal order as nearly as possible like man to take from Adam's shoulders many of the tasks of subduing the earth, maintaining the Garden of Eden and other duties of the earth and the field.

                                                                 Scientists Agree

Many scientists who, while they are not familiar with the order of creation in which the Negro is categorized, do confirm what the Scriptures maintain. It must be said that this was not always their intention, since some were exponents of the theory of evolution.

This very fact, however, enhances the value of their objective testimony and Dr. Alexander Winchell, an American geologist and professor of geology and paleontology in the University of Michigan from 1879 to 1891, made these statements: "The inferiority of the Negro is fundamentally structural. I have enumerated the points in his anatomy in which he diverges from the White Race and have indicated that, in all these particulars, he approximates the organisms below. It follows that what the Negro is structurally at the present time is the best he has ever been. It follows that HE HAS NOT DESCENDED FROM ADAM."

When we turn upon the conclusions of this scientist the light of the Apostle Paul's declaration that "there is one kind of flesh of men, another flesh of beasts, another of fishes, and another of birds," (1 Corinthians 15:39) we find that the Negro who "has not descended from Adam." and is consequently not of the "flesh of men," belongs to one of the other three "kinds of flesh." Being a land animal, he belongs to the "flesh of beasts" - that is, he is of the Anthropoidea.

                                                              Man Not A Species

Let it be stated here with emphasis that the term "species" correctly applies only to plants and animals; it does not apply to mankind. The theory of evolution attempts to say that man is of the "genus of mammals usually considered as belonging to the order (Primates) which contains also the monkeys, apes and lemurs."

The dictionary definition of man takes its cue from this and designates man as the highest type of animal; that he is the human "species." this is entirely erroneous, refuting, as it does, the inspired statements of the Bible.

But, then, this was the atheistic intention, supported by such evolutionists as Julian Huxley who did not propose to allow God to be anywhere in the evolutionary picture. Certainly He was not in the caricatures they drew of "early man!" Huxley is quoted to have asserted: "If you let God in one place, you may as well let Him in all along the line."

The whole theory of evolution -- postulating, as it puts it, man's descent from the ape -- is not only irrational and unscientific; it is completely unscriptural. One tragic result is that the Negro has obtained his present unjustifiable, unnatural position "in the family of man" as the result of the acceptance of the notion that man is merely a highly develop species of ape -- the "human species" -- of which the Negro is the lowest race.

Hence, our social, political and religious relationships with the Negroes are not based upon the Scriptures, but upon the teachings of atheism. This position repudiates the declaration the White Man is a distinct creation in the image of God, for our yielding to the degrading influence of the atheistic theory of evolution; to renounce kinship with God by claiming to be kin to the ape.

First Contrast:

Contrasting Black and White - Advancing his arguments that man - and man alone - was created in the image of God, Professor Charles Carroll took strong exception to the evolutionist position (the theory of natural development (selection)) that the White Race is a "human species," one of "five races of men."

As the Professor maintained, the number of races may be more or less, "dependent upon the whim of the naturalist who makes the classification."

Nevertheless, borrowing the very phrase he detested, Professor Carroll went on to assert: "The White, the highest, and the Negro, the lowest of the so-called (five races of men), present the strongest contrast to each other in their physical and mental characteristics... White is not a color; neither is Black a color; yet the White, colorless complexion of the White finds its strongest contrast in the Black, colorless complexion of the Negro."

The following facts are relevant here as put on record by Professor Carroll. He quotes first from a discussion by anthropologist Quatrefages in The Human Species:

"With all anthropologists, I recognize the high value of the color of the skin as a character...We know that it does not result from the existence or disappearance of special layers.

“Black or White, the skin always comprises a White dermis, penetrated by many capillaries, and epidermis, more or less transparent and colorless. Between the two is placed the mucous layer, of which the pigment alone in reality varies in quantity and color according to the race. All the colors present in the human skin have two common elements: the White of the dermis and the red of the blood.

“Moreover, each has its own proper element, resulting from the colorings of the pigment. The rays reflected from these different tissues combine into a resultant which produces the different tints and traverses the epidermis. The latter plays the part of roughened glass. The more delicate and the finer it is, the more perceptible is the color of the subjacent parts...

“From the preceding we can also understand why the White alone can be said to turn pale or to blush. The reason is that in him the pigment allows the slightest difference in the efflux of the blood to the dermis to be perceived. With the Negro, as with us, the blood has its share in the coloring, the tint of which it deepens or modifies. When the blood is wanting, the Negro turns grey from the blending of the White of the dermis with the Black of the pigment."

Professor Carroll concluded from his extensive examination of this subject: “Thus, it is shown by the highest scientific authorities that the Black, colorless complexion of the Negro IS NOT THE RESULT OF CLIMATIC INFLUENCE; it is due solely to the Black pigment which intervenes between the dermis and the epidermis."

Second Contrast:

Dr. Ernst Heindrich Haeckel wrote in "History of Creation," Volume II (pp. 414-415; 1868): "The long, fine, silken hair of the White finds its strongest contrast in the short, coarse, woolly hair of the Negro. Each individual hair of the White is cylindrical. Hence, 'its section is circular.' In striking contrast to that of the White, each individual hair of the Negro 'is flattened like a tape.' Hence, 'its section is oval.'" 

The Negro's hair is inserted in the vertical in his scalp, while in the White Man's scalp, the insertion is oblique.

Third Contrast:

The long, narrow skull of the White finds its strongest contrast in the short, broad skull of the Negro. The shortness and broadness of the Negro skull displays its similarity to the bodily construction of the anthropoid ape.

A certain relative length of skull (i.e., high forehead) appears to be associated with energy, force and executive ability. Hence the shortness of the Negro's skull denotes his lack of these attributes. The Negro skull is very thick and solid; it is flattened on the top and well suited to carrying burdens.

Fourth Contrast:

The relatively short, narrow jaw of the White finds its strongest contrast in the long, broad jaw of the Negro. The jaw of the Negro extends forward at the expense of the symmetry of the face, and backward at the expense of the brain cavity.

It is well known that in the Negro, the entire face, and especially the lower portion, projects forward. In the living subject, it is exaggerated by the thickness of the lips. The prominent chin of the White finds its strongest contrast in the retreating chin of the Negro. This is also a simian characteristic.

Dr. Winchell says: "The retreating contour of the chin, as compared with the European, approximates the Negro to the chimpanzee and lower mammals."

The front teeth of the White, set perpendicularly in the jaw, find their strongest contrast in the front teeth of the Negro, which set slanting in the jaw, still another simian characteristic.

Dr. Haechel describes as Prognathi those "whose jaws, like those of the animal's snout, strongly project, and whose front teeth, therefore slope in front;" and men with straight teeth Orthognathi, "whose jaws project but little and whose front teeth stand perpendicularly."

The relatively thin lips of the White find their strongest Contrast in the thick, puffed lips of the Negro. The prominent nose of the White is in strong contrast to the flat nose of the Negro, which has the appearance of having been crushed in. In the Negro these are both simian characteristics.

Fifth Contrast:

The color of the Negro brain is darker than that of the White, and its density and texture inferior. Dr. Winchell states: "The average weight of the European brain, males and females, is 1,340 grammes; that of the Negro is 1,178 grammes."

On a related subject, Dr. J. Hendree of Aniston, Alabama, in writing to Dr. Winchell, made this comment: "Let me mention one fact especially, drawn from my own experience of forty years. The coarseness of their (the Negro') organization makes them require about double the dose of ordinary medicine used for the Whites."

Dr. M.L. Barrow, of Drayton, Georgia, in writing to Dr. Winchell, reported: "I have practiced among the Negroes over forty years...Your information in respect to the dosage of medicine for the colored people corresponds with my experience - except as regards opiates, and perhaps they will bear large quantities of these as I have known some to take very large doses with impunity."

Sixth Contrast:

The highly developed calves, in the bodily structure of the White, find their strongest contrast in the think calves of the Negro. The calves of the White, situated low on the leg, find their strongest contrast in the calves of the Negro, set relatively high on the leg. The short, narrow heel of the White, finds its strongest contrast in the long, broad heel of the Negro. Again, all of these Negro characteristics are related to their background as of the family Simiidae.


In many places in the scriptures men are described as trees. One of the clearest is chapter 31 of the Book of Ezekiel where one can clearly see that there were other people in the Garden of Eden or the Garden of God besides Adam and Eve.

Please turn with us to the book of Ezekiel; to chapter 31 where we read:

1). "And it came to pass...that the word of the Lord came unto me, saying,

2). Son of man, speak unto Pharaoh king of Egypt, and to his multitude; Whom art thou like in thy greatness?

3). Behold, the Assyrian was a cedar (A TREE) in Lebanon with fair branches, and with a shadowing shroud, and of an high stature; and his top was among the thick boughs.

4). The waters made him great, the deep set him up on high with her rivers running round about his plants, and sent out her little rivers unto all the trees (PEOPLE) of the field.

5). Therefore his (THE ASSYRIAN) height was exalted above all the trees (TALLER THAN THE OTHER PEOPLE) of the field, and his boughs were multiplied (HAD MANY CHILDREN), and his branches became long because of the multitude of waters, when he shot forth.

6). All the fowls of heaven made their nests in his boughs, and under his branches did all the beasts of the field bring forth their young, and under his shadow dwelt all great nations (countries).

7), Thus was he fair in his greatness, in the length of his branches; for his foot was by great waters. (NOW WE CHANGE AND GO TO THE GARDEN OF EDEN)



10). Therefore thus saith the Lord God; Because thou hast lifted up thyself in height, and he hath shot up his top among the thick boughs, and his heart (TREES DO NOT HAVE HEARTS) lifted up in his height;

11), I have therefore delivered him (NOW GOD IS SPEAKING OF ADAM) into the hand of the mighty one of the heathen: he shall surely deal with him: I have driven him out (DRIVEN ADAM OUT OF THE GARDEN OF EDEN, BECAUSE OF HIS DISOBEDIENCE TO ALMIGHTY GOD) for his wickedness.

12). And strangers (PEOPLE OF OTHER RACES), the terrible of the nations, have cut him off and have left him: upon the mountains and in all the valleys his branches (SEE HE IS AGAIN COMPARING HIM WITH A TREE) are fallen by all the rivers of the land; and all the people of the earth are gone down from his shadow, and have left him (HERE IS WERE THE DEPARTING OF THE VARIOUS RACES LEFT THE GARDEN OF GOD ‑ THE GARDEN OF EDEN AND WERE SCATTERED ALL ACROSS THE EARTH, AWAY FROM ADAM AND HIS PEOPLE. THUS GOD SEGREGATED THE RACES FROM EACH OTHER, SO THEY COULD NOT MIX; WHICH IS AGAINST GOD’S LAW OF KIND AFTER KIND).

13). Upon his ruin shall all the fowls of the heaven remain, and all the beasts of the field shall be upon his branches (HERE GOD IS SAYING THAT ADAM’S CHILDREN WOULD ALWAYS BE ATTRACTED TO THE BLACK RACE ‑ THE BEAST OF THE EARTH);

14). To the end that none of all the trees by the waters exalt themselves for their height, neither shoot up their top among the thick boughs, neither their trees stand up in their height, all that drink water: for they are all delivered unto death (ALL MANKIND WILL DIE BECAUSE OF ADAM’S SIN), to the nether parts of the earth (IN OTHER WORDS ALL PEOPLE EVERYWHERE, NO MATTER WHAT RACE WOULD DIE IN THEIR TIME), in the midst of the children of men, with them that go down to the pit (grave).

15). Thus saith the Lord God; In the day when he (ADAM) went down to the grave (PIT) I caused a mourning: I covered the deep for him, and I restrained the floods thereof, and the great waters were stayed: and I caused Lebanon to mourn for him, and all the trees (PEOPLE) of the field fainted (HERE AGAIN TREES DO NOT FAINT, ONLY PEOPLE DO THAT) for him.

16). I made the nations to shake at the sound of his fall (WHEN ADAM FELL ALL THE VARIOUS RACES AND NATIONS ON EARTH KNEW OF HIS FALL AND SHOOK WITH FEAR AND SADNESS), when I cast him down to hell (THE GRAVE) with them that descend into the pit; and all the trees of Eden (PEOPLE), the choice and best of Lebanon, all that drink water, shall be comforted (HERE AGAIN TREES CANNOT BE COMFORTED) in the neither parts of the earth.

17). They also went down into hell (THE GRAVE) with him unto them that be slain with the sword (IN OTHER WORDS EVERYONE WILL DIE AND GO TO THE GRAVE); and they that were his arm, that dwelt under his shadow in the midst of the heathen (Here we are told that the trees of the Garden were people of other races, other than Adam who was a White Man, like it or not, love it or not).

18). To whom art thou thus like in glory and in greatness among the trees (PEOPLE) of Eden? yet shalt thou be brought down with the trees (PEOPLE) of Eden unto the nether parts of the earth; thou shalt lie in the midst of the uncircumcised with them that be slain by the sword. (NOW GOD GOES BACK TO PHARAOH WHOM HE IS COMPARING ADAM AND THE ASSYRIANS WITH) This is Pharaoh and all his multitude, saith the Lord God." (Ezekiel 31)

Following we have trees clapping their hands:

“ For ye shall go out with joy, and be led forth with peace: the mountains and the hills shall break forth before you into singing, and ALL THE TREES OF THE FIELD SHALL CLAP THEIR HANDS.” (Isaiah 55:12)

Therefore, as one studies the scriptures they must keep in mind that everything is not as it appears for there are many allegories given where an animal, bird, tree, vine and etc., are used to describe people.

Other places in Scriptures where men are described as trees are as follows: Leviticus 26:4, 20; Deuteronomy 28:40, 42; Judges 9:8-15; 1 Kings 4:33; 2 King 3:25; 1 Chronicles 16:33; Psalm 96:2; Isaiah 7:2; 10:18; 14:8; 55:12; 61:3; Ezekiel 17:24; 31; Hosea 2:12; Joel 1:12; Zechariah 1:8; 4:4-12; Matthew 3:10; 8:24; Luke 3:9; 21:29; Jude 11:12; Revelation 7:3; 11:4. There are others but they are hard to dig out and takes much study to see that the trees, vines and etc., are indeed people.

Now we will show you that men are described as a dog or dogs in many places in the scriptures.


“But against any of the children of Israel SHALL NOT A DOG MOVE HIS TONGUE, AGAINST MAN OR BEAST: that ye may know how that the LORD doth put a difference between the Egyptians and Israel.” (Exodus 11:7)

Now we must face the fact that a human cannot stop a dog from barking without some sort of violence toward the animal making it afraid to make a noise. Otherwise it will bark no matter what if something happens that it is not used to what is going on around it.

1 Samuel 17:43: “And the Philistine said unto David, AM I A DOG, that thou comest to me with staves? And the Philistine cursed David by his gods.”

Here the Philistine asked the question of David if he thought he was a dog, thereby describing a dog as a person.

2 Samuel 9:8: “And he bowed himself, and said, WHAT IS THY SERVANT, THAT THOU SHOULDEST LOOK UPON SUCH A DEAD DOG AS I AM?

Here we have another witness saying that he was a dog.

2 Samuel 16:9: “Then said Abishai the son of Zeruiah unto the king, WHY SHOULD THIS DEAD DOG CURSE MY LORD THE KING? let me go over, I pray thee, and take off his head.”

Since dogs have no vocal cords to be able to speak as a man, we know that this is the description of a person who is able to speak and curse the king. Not some four footed animal called a dog.

2 Kings 8:13: “And Hazael said, But what, IS THY SERVANT A DOG, THAT HE SHOULD DO THIS GREAT THING? And Elisha answered, The LORD hath shewed me THAT THOU SHALT BE KING OVER SYRIA.

There is no dog that can do great things, nor sit as king over Syria. Oh yes there will be people who say that a dog saved their life or their babies life or some such. But in actuallity that is great only to the person involved.

Psalm 22:16: FOR DOGS HAVE COMPASSED ME; the assembly of the wicked have inclosed me: THEY PIERCED MY HANDS AND MY FEET.

This is clearly speaking of Christ and the dogs, the jews, who pierced His hands and feet while they were crucifying Him.

Psalm 22:20: “Deliver my soul from the sword; MY DARLING FROM THE POWER OF THE DOG.”

How can a dog have power over a man, when with one swipe of a sword the dog is no more. No this dog is a person.

Isaiah 56:10‑11: HIS WATCHMEN are blind: they are all ignorant, THEY ARE ALL DUMB DOGS, they cannot bark; sleeping, lying down, loving to slumber. YEA, THEY ARE GREEDY DOGS WHICH CAN NEVER HAVE ENOUGH, and THEY ARE SHEPHERDS THAT CANNOT UNDERSTAND: they all look to their own way, every one for his gain, from his quarter.”

It is so very clear here that the dogs are people that there needs be no explanation showing it.

Matthew 7:6: GIVE NOT THAT WHICH IS HOLY UNTO THE DOGS, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.”

This cannot be mistaken as anything else other than people, for why would or how could anyone give that which is holy, the Word of God, to a dog; what good would it do, for a four footed dog would have no need for it.

Matthew 15:22‑27: “And, behold, A WOMAN OF CANAAN (a Jewess) came out of the same coasts, and cried unto him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou Son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil. But he answered her not a word. And his disciples came and besought him, saying, Send her away; for she crieth after us. But he answered and said, I AM NOT SENT BUT UNTO THE LOST SHEEP OF THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL. Then came she and worshiped him, saying, Lord, help me. But HE ANSWERED AND SAID, IT IS NOT MEET TO TAKE THE CHILDREN’S BREAD, AND TO CAST IT TO DOGS. (Here Christ told the woman that she was a dog and what did she do?) And she said, TRUTH (She admitted that she was a dog), Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters' table.”

Philippians  3:2: BEWARE OF DOGS, beware of evil workers, beware of the concision (Not only are those of the concision {circumcision dogs but they are evil workers; he is speaking of the jews here}.

Here we are told to beware of the Jews, those of the “concision” circumcision and that they are dogs.

We could go on and on for many verses and show that dog and dogs does indeed describe people some of the time in the scriptures, but these few should suffice to prove our point


Ezekiel 17:23-24: “In the mountain of the height of Israel will I plant it: and it shall bring forth boughs, and bear fruit, and be a goodly cedar: and UNDER IT SHALL DWELL ALL FOWL OF EVERY WING (different races); in the shadow of the branches thereof shall they dwell. And all the trees of the field (Here we can see that the trees being spoken of here are people, for how would a tree know if Yahweh brought down the high tree and exalted the low) shall know that I the LORD have brought down the high tree, have exalted the low tree, have dried up the green tree, and have made the dry tree to flourish: I the LORD have brought down the high tree, have exalted the low tree, have dried up the green tree, and have made the dry tree to flourish: I the LORD have spoken and have done it.

Ezekiel 29:5-8: “And I will leave thee thrown into the wilderness, thee and all the fish of thy rivers: thou shalt fall upon the open fields; thou shalt not be brought together, nor gathered: I have given thee for meat to the BEASTS of the field and to the FOWLS of the heaven. And all the inhabitants of Egypt shall know that I am the LORD, because they have been a staff of reed to the house of Israel. When they took hold of thee by thy hand, thou didst break, and rend all their shoulder: and when they leaned upon thee, thou brakest, and madest all their loins to be at a stand. Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I will bring a sword upon thee, and cut off man and BEAST out of thee.”

Ezekiel 31:3-6: BEHOLD, THE ASSYRIAN WAS A CEDAR IN LEBANON WITH FAIR BRANCHES, and with a shadowing shroud, and of an high stature; and his top was among the thick boughs. The waters made him great, the deep set him up on high with her rivers running round about his plants, and sent out her little rivers unto all the trees of the field. Therefore his height was exalted above all the trees of the field, and his boughs were multiplied, and his branches became long because of the multitude of waters, when he shot forth. All the FOWLS of heaven made their nests in his boughs, and under his branches did all the BEASTS of the field bring forth their young, and under his shadow dwelt all great nations.”

Ezekiel 31:12-14: “And strangers, the terrible of the nations, have cut him off, and have left him: upon the mountains and in all the valleys his branches are fallen, and his boughs are broken by all the rivers of the land; and all the people of the earth are gone down from his shadow, and have left him. Upon his ruin shall all the FOWLS of the heaven remain, and all the BEASTS of the field shall be upon his branches: To the end that none of all the trees by the waters exalt themselves for their height, neither shoot up their top among the thick boughs, neither their trees stand up in their height, all that drink water: for they are all delivered unto death, to the nether parts of the earth, in the midst of the children of men, with them that go down to the pit.”

Ezekiel 32:2-13: “Son of man, take up a lamentation for Pharaoh king of Egypt, and say unto him, Thou art like a young lion of the nations, and thou art as a whale in the seas: and thou camest forth with thy rivers, and troubledst the waters with thy feet, and fouledst their rivers. Thus saith the Lord GOD; I will therefore spread out my net over thee with a company of many people; and they shall bring thee up in my net. Then will I leave thee upon the land, I will cast thee forth upon the open field, and will cause all the FOWLS of the heaven to remain upon thee, and I will fill the BEASTS of the whole earth with thee. And I will lay thy flesh upon the mountains, and fill the valleys with thy height. I will also water with thy blood the land wherein thou swimmest, even to the mountains; and the rivers shall be full of thee. And when I shall put thee out, I will cover the heaven, and make the stars thereof dark; I will cover the sun with a cloud, and the moon shall not give her light. All the bright lights of heaven will I make dark over thee, and set darkness upon thy land, saith the Lord GOD. I will also vex the hearts of many people, when I shall bring thy destruction among the nations, into the countries which thou hast not known. Yea, I will make many people amazed at thee, and their kings shall be horribly afraid for thee, when I shall brandish my sword before them; and they shall tremble at every moment, every man for his own life, in the day of thy fall. For thus saith the Lord GOD; The sword of the king of Babylon shall come upon thee. By the swords of the mighty will I cause thy multitude to fall, the terrible of the nations, all of them: and they shall spoil the pomp of Egypt, and all the multitude thereof shall be destroyed. I will destroy also all the BEASTS thereof from beside the great waters; neither shall the foot of man trouble them any more, nor the hoofs of BEASTS (Now this beast is obviously an animal, because it has hoofs and not feet) trouble them.

Ezekiel 38:20-22: So that the fishes of the sea, and the FOWLS of the heaven, and the BEASTS of the field, and all creeping things that creep upon the earth, and all the men that are upon the face of the earth, shall shake at my presence, and the mountains shall be thrown down, and the steep places shall fall, and every wall shall fall to the ground. And I will call for a sword against him throughout all my mountains, saith the Lord GOD: every man's sword shall be against his brother. And I will plead against him with pestilence and with blood; and I will rain upon him, and upon his bands, and upon the many people that are with him, an overflowing rain, and great hailstones, fire, and brimstone.”

Ezekiel 39:17: “And, thou son of man, thus saith the Lord GOD; Speak unto EVERY FEATHERED FOWL, AND TO EVERY BEAST OF THE FIELD, Assemble yourselves, and come; gather yourselves on every side to my sacrifice that I do sacrifice for you, even a great sacrifice upon the mountains of Israel, that ye may eat flesh, and drink blood.”

It should be clear to anyone that the Fowl and the Beasts mentioned in the above verses are people and not animals; as there would be no need to speak to them, for four footed animals would not understand what was being said to them). Therefore, we did not give explanation for them.

                                                           Unanswered Questions

There are certain statements in the Scriptures which have never been adequately explained by the theological approach to the study of the Bible. In fact, their context has been ignored and no analysis of the implications of words used has been made.

For example, in the Book of Jonah we are told that this prophet went to Nineveh and proclaimed in that city that in forty days it would be destroyed because of the wickedness of its inhabitants. Word of Jonah's preaching came to the king of Nineveh and he descended from his throne, put on sackcloth and issued a proclamation:

Jonah 3:7: LET NEITHER MAN NOR BEAST, herd nor flock, taste any thing: LET THEM NOT FEED, NOR DRINK WATER." This was a command to fast and all men, and their animals, were to obey. The proclamation continued:

Jonah 3:8-9: “But LET MAN AND BEAST BE COVERED WITH SACKCLOTH, AND CRY MIGHTILY UNTO GOD: yea, let them (man and beast) turn every one (man and beast) from HIS EVIL WAY, AND FROM THE VIOLENCE THAT IS IN THEIR HANDS. Who can tell if God will turn and repent, and turn away from his fierce anger, that we perish not?”

Both man and beast, as well as herds and flocks, were to refrain from eating and drinking. Notice, however, that the further stipulations of the proclamation were addressed only to "man and beast;" not to the herds and the flocks, i.e., the domestic animals. Man "and beast" were to put on sackcloth; both man "and beast" were to cry mightily unto God. Furthermore, both man "and beast" were to turn from their evil ways and refrain from the violence "in their hands."

If the results of comparative anatomy, which indicate the structural differences of the Negro, are not found conclusive -- if there is still insistence that he is a descendant of Adam -- FROM WHICH BRANCH OF THE ADAMIC FAMILY WOULD HE HAVE DESCENDED?

     If we were to accept the atheistical doctrine that the Negro and the White are blood brothers, from whence came all these physical and mental characteristics which so widely distinguish the White from the Negro?

1). What changes his complexion from the colorless White to the colorless Black?

2). What turned his smooth, silken hair to short, coarse, wooly hair and changed each hair of his head from cylindrical in  construction to flat?

 3). What wrought the change in the way his hair was inserted into the scalp, from the oblique to the vertical?

4). How was his cranium shortened and broadened, his skull thickened and his brain made another color?

5). What reduced the number and increased the size of the convolutions of his brain, thus simplifying and  approximating it to the anthropoid ape?

6). What made his brain lighter and smaller?

7). What broadened his jaw and extended it forward at the expense of the brain cavity; thickened his lips, sloped his front teeth, flattened his nose; shortened and thickened his neck, reduced his chest measurements and lung capacity?

8). What elongated his arms, reduced the size of his calves, placed them at a high elevation on the leg, lengthened and broadened his heel and flattened his foot?

9). Why does he have to have a larger dosage of medicine than the White?

These are only a few of the many fundamental differences that raise the most serious objections to the theory that White human beings and the Negroes are the descendants of  -- Adam and Eve.

                                                                  Man’s Station

The great tasks to which man was assigned in the Creator's plan were of such magnitude that their accomplishment would require ages of time for completion and demanded that man be endowed with a mind almost Godlike in its scope; a mind at once legislative, executive and judicial. History, tradition and the whole range of scientific research combine to teach us that man is so endowed.

This power is peculiar to man and it is this marvelous intellectual capacity that enables man to tower above the animal creation over which he was given dominion, just as the snow-crowned mountain towers above the brooklet at its base. Fresh from the hands of his Creator, Adam presented, in his physical, mental and spiritual organisms, the acme of human perfection.

Eve, also fresh from the hands of her Creator, presented, in her physical, mental and spiritual organisms, the most sublime specimen of her lovely sex; upon whose fair brow was stamped the image of her God. The scientists take up this theme.

Theodore Parker maintains: "THE WHITE DIFFERS FROM ALL OTHER RACES; he is humane; he is civilized and progressive. He conquers with his head as well as with his hands. It is intellect, after all, that conquers, not the strength of man's arm. The White has often been the master of other races never their slaves; except for brief periods when God was punishing them.

“He has carried his religion to other races -- but never taken theirs. All the great, limited forms of monarchies are White. Republics are White. All the great sciences are of White origin; all the inventions are White. Literature and romance come from the same stock; all great poets are of White origin. No other race can bring up to memory such celebrated names as the White race."

In his book, Moral and Intellectual Diversity of Races, De Gobineau states: “The White Race has great vigor, capacity and endurance. It has an intensity of will and desire which is controlled by intellectually.

“Great things are undertaken readily, but not blindly. It manifests a strong utilitarianism, united with a powerful imagination, which elevates, ennobles and idealizes its practical ideas. The Negro can only imitate, the Chinese only utilize, the work of the White, but the latter is abundantly capable of producing new work.

“He has as keen a sense of order as the yellow man; not from the love of repose, however, but from the desire to protect and preserve his acquisitions. He has a love of liberty far more intense than exists in the black and yellow races, and clings to life more earnestly. His high sense of honor is a faculty unknown to other races and springs from an exalted sentiment of which they show no indications. His sensations are less intense than in either the black or yellow, but his mentality is far more developed and energetic."

If space permitted further quotations, it would be shown by the highest authorities of the age that the pure-blooded White alone possesses the qualities of mind which are essential in the creature whom God designed to develop the resources of the earth and have dominion over fish, fowl, cattle, creeping thing and beast. It is significant that these exalted characteristics find their opposites in the Negro.

In "The Aryan Race," Morris says: "IT MAY BE REMARKABLE THAT ALL THE SAVAGE TRIBES OF THE EARTH BELONG TO THE NEGRO OR THE MONGOLIAN RACES. NO NEGRO CIVILIZATION HAS EVER APPEARED. No Mongolian one has ever greatly developed. On the other hand, the White is pre-eminently the man of civilization. No traveler or historian records a savage tribe of White stock."

                                                         Blood, The Liquid Of Life

                                                              by C.E. Allan Turner

Blood is a matter of life or death. Its kind determines the nature of the life, whether animal or human. Its quality decides health; its type, parentage. Its absence through loss, or destruction, or unavailability of suitable transfusion, spells death.

Absorption of poisons, injection of air or unacceptable material similarly terminates life. A stoppage of the flow will destroy the brain within fifteen minutes, even though circulation may be restarted. Conversely, the transfusion of blood into a patient will visibly renew his vitality.

In 1799, President George Washington died almost certainly as the result of bleeding by his medical advisors. He was probably the most prominent of the many who perished through several centuries in which mistaken practitioners deprived their patients of the very means of life. So demonstrably true is the Scripture verse, Leviticus 17:11, 14: “The life of the flesh is in the blood..."

This liquid provides the transport system of the body, propelled by the heart, itself dependent on blood; regulated by nerves, salts, and chemical secretions provided by organs that are themselves maintained by it.

Absorbing simple oxygen and air, together with very many complex chemicals from food, in health blood carries them to the numerous organs, depositing them in the right places, with accurate timing and in the correct proportions. At the same time it removes all waste substances and itself is being continually and frequently changed.

Thus it maintains the complexity and high quality of life; in the case of man, for his threescore years and ten or more. It is essentially the main agent in the body for the maintenance of equilibrium of temperature, fluids, acidity-alkalinity, food, salts, and general nutrition.

Yet such a liquid is regarded by the evolutionist as the result of chance, without cause, yet producing complex orderly effects. This vital fluid, with a specific gravity of 1.055 represents about nine percent of the total weight of a man, and amounts to some five liters or nine pints. The evolutionist will find no comfort from the fact that human blood contains three or four of these acids different from the gorilla and only one in common with fish. Truly Scripture states:

1 Corinthians 15:39: “All flesh is not the same flesh, but there is one flesh of man, another flesh of beasts, another of fishes and another of birds.”

In different races the proportion of individuals belonging to a particular blood group varies widely. (Source: Blood Transfusion in Clinical Medicine Blockwell Scientific Publications Table 5.3, p. 161)

Once again man has proven the Scriptures to be true. Once again man has proven that God exists because in ancient times He related in the Scriptures that there was life in the blood!

Leviticus 17:11, 14: “For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul. For it is the life of all flesh; the blood of it is for the life thereof: therefore I said unto the children of Israel, Ye shall eat the blood of no manner of flesh: for the life of all flesh is the blood thereof: whosoever eateth it shall be cut off."

Deuteronomy 12:23: “Only be sure that thou eat not the blood: for the blood is the life; and thou mayest not eat the life with the flesh.”

The red cells are the most numerous, numbering about five million in women and five and one- half million in men per cmm, totaling about 25x109 in the whole body, or ten times more than the platelets, and one thousand times more numerous than the leucocytes.

A red cell can travel from the heart to the brain and back in eight seconds, and to and from the toes in eighteen seconds. These cells are specially designed to carry oxygen from the lungs around the body to the tissues.

After the fall of man all creation suffered disorganization and disarrangement. The Bible recounts the life of Adam and Eve as the progenitors of the human race upon the earth after their expulsion from the Garden of Eden. The length of their lives was thereafter limited by Divine decree and the history and chronology of mankind began.

In the eighth chapter of the Book of Romans, however, the Apostle Paul envisions the renewal of the earth and the glorious hope of resurrection life to come, and he wrote:

Romans 8:22: “We know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now."  yearning toward the restoration which will become a reality according to the Divine promise.

How long the beast creation enjoyed an orderly culture of its own before the majority of its kind degenerated into voodooistic cultism need not be discussed here. We are now only concerned with the fact that when God created man in His own image, the beasts of the earth were to serve him as his helpers.

                                                         Consciousness And Mind

Consciousness, which made its first appearance in the material universe, was an element distinct from matter. It was not present in light, nor in the heavens, nor in the plants, nor in the luminaries.

Consciousness is the knowledge of sensations, or of what passes through the mind. Mind is an element also distinct from matter and consciousness is never found apart from mind. Hence, this new element, as present in the physical structure of the lower order of animal, the fish, was mind in its simplest form.

Following the introduction of the fish, God handled this combination of matter and mind on up through the different grades of matter and mind on up through the different grades of animals until the creation of man.

The evidence of this is found in the  fact that, although the higher order of fowls and beasts possess more highly developed physical and mental structures than the fish, the difference between them is merely one of degree. Animals possess the power to reason in varying degrees. The more the habits of some animals are studied by a naturalist, the more he attributes their actions to reasoning and less to unlearned instincts.

One could go on and on, but the comments above with the scriptures should be sufficient to show what we have been endeavored to do. And if it doesn’t then 10,000 pages would not be enough. Therefore, we will let the follow Scriptures speak for themselves.

Daniel 2:38: “And wheresoever the children of men dwell, the BEASTS of the field and the FOWLS of the heaven HATH HE GIVEN INTO THINE HAND, AND hath MADE THEE RULER OVER THEM ALL. Now what man has ever ruled over the animals and birds? There has been none, the Beasts and Fowls being spoken of here are people. The different races and peoples of the earth.

Thou art this head of gold.

Daniel 4:10-14: “Thus were the visions of mine head in my bed; I saw, and behold a tree in the midst of the earth, and the height thereof was great. The tree grew, and was strong, and the height thereof reached unto heaven, and the sight thereof to the end of all the earth: The leaves thereof were fair, and the fruit thereof much, and in it was meat for all: the BEASTS of the field had shadow under it, and the FOWLS of the heaven dwelt in the boughs thereof, and all flesh was fed of it. I saw in the visions of my head upon my bed, and, behold, a watcher and an holy one came down from heaven; He cried aloud, and said thus, Hew down the tree, and cut off his branches, shake off his leaves, and scatter his fruit: let the BEASTS get away from under it, and the FOWLS from his branches.”

Daniel 7:6-9: “After this I beheld, and lo another, like a leopard, which had upon the back of it four wings of a FOWL; the BEAST had also four heads; and dominion was given to it. After this I saw in the night visions, and behold a fourth BEAST, dreadful and terrible, and strong exceedingly; and it had great iron teeth: it devoured and brake in pieces, and stamped the residue with the feet of it: and it was diverse from all the BEASTS that were before it; and it had ten horns. I considered the horns, and, behold, there came up among them another little horn, before whom there were three of the first horns plucked up by the roots: and, behold, in this horn were eyes like the eyes of man, and a mouth speaking great things. I beheld till the thrones were cast down, and the Ancient of days did sit, whose garment was white as snow, and the hair of his head like the pure wool: his throne was like the fiery flame, and his wheels as burning fire.”

Here Daniel is describing the various kingdoms: 1). The Babylonian; 2) The Medo-Persian; 3) The Grecian; and 4) The Roman.

Hosea 2:18: “And in that day will I make a covenant for them with the BEASTS of the field, and with the FOWLS of heaven, and with the creeping things of the ground: and I will break the bow and the sword and the battle out of the earth, and will make them to lie down safely.”

When have Beasts and Fowls held a bow or a sword? They have not, therefore, this must be talking about people. It is just another analogy which is used so much in Scripture.

Hosea 4:3: “Therefore shall the land mourn, and every one that dwelleth therein shall languish, with the BEASTS of the field, and with the FOWLS of heaven; yea, the fishes of the sea also shall be taken away.”

Here we have the land mourning and “Every One” with the “Beasts” and the “Fowls” so here again we are faced with an obvious conclusion that this is talking about people, and not animals and birds.

Hosea 7:12: “When they shall go, I will spread my net upon them; I will bring them down as the FOWLS of the heaven; I WILL CHASTISE THEM, AS THEIR CONGREGATION HATH HEARD.

When have “Fowls” had “congregations” which is a gathering of people to worship, not birds. They do not gather into congregations to worship anything; not the God of heaven or any other thing or god.

Zephaniah 1:3-5: “I will consume man and BEAST; I will consume the FOWLS of the heaven, and the fishes of the sea, and the stumbling blocks with the wicked; and I will cut off man from off the land, saith the LORD. I will also stretch out mine hand upon Judah, and upon all the inhabitants of Jerusalem; and I WILL CUT OFF THE REMNANT OF BAAL FROM THIS PLACE, and the name of the Chemarims with the priests; And them that worship the host of heaven upon the housetops; and them that worship and that swear by the LORD, and that swear by Malcham.”

Here again “Beast” and “Fowls” must mean humans for why would Almighty God destroy them as with man who changed from worshiping the True God to an idol or some other such thing.

He would not do so, for the animals would have no conception as to why they were being destroyed. And since they don’t have the laws of God given to them they would have no sin, and therefore God would be destroying the innocent and that He would not do.


Here Christ is saying that He spoke in parables so the jews would not know what He was talking about, so that they would understand and He would have to heal them of their sins, and be saved. No Christ never intended the jews to be saved, for they are the children of the devil.

Mark 4:1-41: “And he began again to teach by the sea side: and there was gathered unto him a great multitude, so that he entered into a ship, and sat in the sea; and the whole multitude was by the sea on the land. AND HE TAUGHT THEM MANY THINGS BY PARABLES, AND SAID UNTO THEM IN HIS DOCTRINE...”


Genesis 1:30: “And to every BEAST of the earth, and to every FOWL of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so.”

Genesis 2:19-20: “And out of the ground the LORD God formed every BEAST of the field, and every FOWL of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof. And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the FOWL of the air, and to every BEAST of the field; but for Adam there was not found an help meet for him.”

We know that it has been taught from time immemorial that Adam was giving the name to all the four footed animals and etc., but that is no correct because there are so many different species that he would never have seen all of them, much less had a name for them also. No these were different races and peoples that is being described here.

Genesis 3:1: “Now the serpent was more subtil than any BEAST of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath Go.”

Now what beast has vocal cords and has enough intelligents to talk to the woman? There is none, nor are there any serpent that can do so either. This BEAST had to be a person, a human being.


"Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he {serpent} said unto the woman {Eve}, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden." (Genesis 3:1)

(1) Snakes are to be feared, and it is not abnormal to fear them. To prove that even such Godly men as Moses were/are afraid of snakes, we present the following from the Book of Exodus. We begin with Moses standing before the burning bush: "...the Lord said unto him, What is that in thine hand? And he {Moses} said, A rod. And He {God} said, Cast it on the ground. And he cast it on the ground, and it became a serpent; and Moses FLED from before it." (Exodus 4:2‑3)

(2) So we can see that even Moses fled before a serpent/snake! It scared him and he fled from it. Because man has a natural fear of them. Yet here in Genesis Chapter Three, we have Eve having a discourse with a serpent/snake! With no fear. I do not believe it for a minute. I don't know about you, but I do not believe that Eve was having a conversation with a literal snake! Not for a minute. That is simply to far‑ fetched to be believed literally.

(3) If a snake had come up to Eve she would have ran for Adam to protect her from it. She would not have simply stood or sat there and had a casual conversation with it. No! A thousand times No!!! She would not have just sat there and said: "Hello how are you?" or some such nonsense. She simply would not have done that at all.

(4) Serpent is a strange word when we look at it in the scriptures. It is translated from many different words, but it is used 38 times in the Old Testament. And is translated, basically, from four different words.

But let's only deal with one #5175 in Strong's Concordance. It appears 31 times and every time it is translated serpent. Now keep in mind there are three other words that are also translated serpent in the Scriptures. And the total words are used some 71 times in all the Scriptures.  38 times as serpent and about 24 times as dragons.

(5) What is a dragon, you ask. Well this presentation is about serpents not dragons and to get into a long discussion about dragons would take us away from our intended subject. So we shall leave that for others to contemplate. This is because we have a problem here in Genesis 3:1 with Eve talking with this thing called a serpent.

(6) Now the scriptures say the serpent was more subtil. Well what does this word mean. To arrive at a proper answer we will turn to Strong's Concordance again. Which says the word "serpent" is "Nachas" or "naw‑khawsh" (#5175).

Which is a non‑ Israelite name according to (#5176) ‑‑ "Nachash;" the same as #5175; the name of two persons appar. non‑Isr. It also means according to #5175 a snake (from its hiss): serpent. From the #5172 which means to hiss, i.e. whisper a (magic) spell; gen. to prognosticate ‑‑ enchanter, learn by experience, diligently observe.

(7) Also, we find the following from the Second College Edition, New World Dictionary of the American Language, p. 1300: 1. A snake, esp. a large or poisonous one. 2. A sly, sneaking, treacherous person. 3. Bible Satan, in the form he assumed to tempt Eve. 4. Music an obsolete, coiled, brass wind instrument of wood covered with leather. The American Dictionary of the English Language, by Noah Webster 1828, Facsimile First Edition, published by the Foundation For American Christian Education relates that serpent means among others: a subtil or malicious person.

(8) The word prognosticate means to: 1. To foretell or predict, esp. from signs or indications. 2. To indicate beforehand. (Second College Edition, New World Dictionary of the American Language, p. 1135). The 1828 American Dictionary relates: 1. To foreshow; to indicate a future event by present signs. A clear sky at sunset prognosticates a fair day. 2. To foretell by means of present signs; to predict. "I neither will nor can prognosticate To the young gaping heir his father's fate." So now we can see that the word "nachash" is linked to foretelling things. Or its linked to witchcraft (whisper a magic spell) and humanism. It's linked to anything, other than the Word of God.

(9) Now let's look again at this word serpent, and we will see that every time it appears in the Bible, it does not mean a serpent/snake. That sometimes it means either a person or a nation. For example when Jacob/Israel was relating the gifts which were given to the various tribes of Israel we find the following: "Dan shall be a SERPENT by the way, an ADDER {snake} in the path, that biteth the horse heels..." (Genesis 49:17)

(10) Is someone going to try to convince us that Dan was to become a snake. I don't think so. Do you? It is merely a figure of speech. It means that the tribe of Dan would, or the people of the tribe of Dan would display the attributes of being sly, cunning, deceitful.

(11) The wicked are described as serpents/snakes: "THE WICKED are estranged from the womb: they go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies. Their poison is like the poison of a SERPENT: They are like THE DEAF ADDER that stoppeth her ear." (Psalm 58:3‑4)

(12) Evil and violent men are described as serpents: "Deliver me, O Lord, from THE EVIL MAN: preserve me from THE VIOLENT MAN; Which imagine mischiefs in their heart; continually are they gathered together for war. THEY have sharpened their tongues LIKE A SERPENT; ADDERS' poison is under their lips. Selah." (Psalm 140:1‑3)

Thus we can see by these verses, anyone who is evil or wicked is described as being a serpent or snake.

(13) Now let's examine nations because they are also very important to this presentation. Turn to the Book of Isaiah where we find: "In that day the Lord with His sore and great and strong sword shall punish leviathan the piercing SERPENT, even leviathan that crooked SERPENT; and He shall slay the dragon that is in the sea." (Isaiah 27:1)

(14) We see here that the Leviathan is a crooked and piercing serpent. It appears this is an allegory, talking about the enemies of Israel.

(15) The nations that came against Israel are compared to this thing which is also described as a serpent. And it appears that this would be a reference to the Grecian, Turkish and Roman Empires of that day. This is generally accepted when one looks at the narratives of the Bible.

(16) Now let's look at Jeremiah 8:17 for another: "For, behold, I will send SERPENTS, cockatrices, among you, which will not be charmed, and they shall bite you, saith the Lord."

(17) Here again we are not talking about actual serpents/snakes. Not at all. We are talking about nations which will becoming against Israel. They will not be charmed and they will bite you. At this point some will ask what do you mean they will not be charmed.

(18) For an answer turn to the Book of Second Kings Chapter Seventeen we find Assyria came against what was left of Israel, and they told the Assyrians they would pay them a ransom if they would not come in and harm them. That's charming them is it not?

But if they will not be charmed, then they will not accept their money, gold, silver or other valuables. They will come in and bite you and destroy you. That is what Jeremiah is telling them. So we can clearly see, THEY ARE NOT SERPENTS AT ALL, they are the enemy of Israel, who will come against them.

(19) There is another like story in Amos 9:3 and another in Isaiah 14:29. Those are good stories and you should read them very carefully.

(20) We find allegories being used all through the Scriptures. No one has a problem with Judah being called a lion's whelp (Genesis 49:9); Zebulun as a foal and an ass's colt (Genesis 49:11); Issachar as a strong ass (Genesis 49:14); Naphtali as a hind {A red deer ‑‑ one that is fully grown} (Genesis 49:21); Joseph as a bough {branch or limb of a tree} (Genesis 49:22); Benjamin as a wolf (Genesis 49:27); All the tribes as a lion (Numbers 23:24; 24:9); Gad as a lion (Deut. 33:20); Dan as a lion's whelp (Deut. 33:22); Jesus as a Lamb (Throughout the Book of Revelation); Israel as a speckled bird (Jeremiah 12:9; A nation of the East as a ravenous bird (Isaiah 46:11); Preachers as fishers (Jeremiah 16:16); Pharaoh King of Egypt as a young lion and a whale (Ezekiel 32:2); a flock as men (Ezekiel:34:30-31) and Herod as a fox (Luke 13:32). When the word "lion" is used for Judah, we are trying to really emphasize the strength of Judah. And when we use the word "serpent" we think of something sly, wicked, evil, cunning, something that hides from us, has venom, that is strong and dangerous. And that is why the word serpent is used many times as an allegory in the Scriptures.

(21) There are many more allegories which could be presented but we believe this should suffice. Was any of these men such an animal or thing? Of course not! It is simply a description of the characteristics of these separate individuals.

(22) Then we have the false doctrine of the Pharisees, Sadducees and Herod described as Leaven (Matthew 16:12).

(23) Thus we can clearly see that it is not at all unusual for a word to be used to illustrate something more impressively. And that is what we are talking about.

(24) Most Christians do not have any trouble with any of these in the various verses of Scriptures until we get to Genesis 3:1. For example if we go a little further we find: "...thou shalt bruise His heel." Everyone knows that Scripture. And we find another one "...It shall bruise thy head..." and no one has any problem relating that to our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ and the evil one {which most people believe to be Satan}. Nobody has a problem with that.

(25) Then: Why is it a problem when someone comes along and says THE SERPENT IS NOT A SNAKE! To some people that is a real problem ‑‑ THEY WANT THAT SERPENT TO BE A SNAKE!!! And they will scream and rant like a spoiled child if someone disagrees with them.

(26) In our opinion that SERPENT NEVER WAS A SNAKE! In my opinion that serpent was a live flesh and blood person. In my opinion it was no spiritual being, and that is not meant to refute the Satan doctrine at all. We are simply saying that this thing we had in the flesh, in the body, in the Garden of Eden, WAS NOT AN INVISIBLE, NEGATIVE ENTITY. IT WAS NOT A SNAKE THAT WALKED ON TWO FEET. It was a humanoid. Just like you and I.

(27) Let's look at some of the characteristics of this particular serpent in Chapter Three Verse One. One of the things we know, is that it is more wise than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. Is that not what it says? There word is subtil but we will deal with that a little later.

(28) What is wisdom a trait of? Can you show us any animal in the animal kingdom which can be wise, that can be sly, that can be crafty? They only do what they do by instinct, they do not do it from reason. No animal operates from reason.

(29) Now one can condition response them, by exposing them to altering good with bad conditions depending upon what they do in response to the stimuli given them. But that is merely training them, that is not teaching them wisdom, that is not teaching them to reason.

(30) Oh, the experiments with monkeys, where some scientists say they have taught a monkey to talk ‑‑ but again that is only the animal being taught to make certain sounds as a result of varying stimuli given them. That is not the same thing. That is

not the same thing as being born with the ability to think and reason.

(31) Another thing about this serpent that everybody agrees upon, is that it walked erect like a man. This is a natural human trait. It is not the natural reaction or trait of any animal, much less a snake. You cannot find this ability in snakes.

(32) They do not stand up. Oh there may be some species which have small legs or the semblance of legs but more than likely, if the scientists would be honest, they are a species of lizard and not a specie of snake. There are some snakes which can raise their heads up quite a bit, but still, they cannot stand erect.

(33) It has been said that apes are a form of the erectus, but that is simply not true. They spend most of their time moving about on both their (hands) and feet.

Oh they can stand erect for short periods of time but their natural position is on all fours. And even when they are standing erect they are bent over, they have a slight hump to their back because that is not their normal stance.

(34) And besides that, can you imagine Eve standing or sitting in the Garden of Eden and a great harry ape suddenly dropping out of a tree beside her and speaking to her. She would have been gone like a bolt of lightening. She would not have stayed there with such an animal.

(35) Now the third thing about this serpent was the ability to talk. To speak like a man. Well things are getting worse all the time for those who want that serpent to be a snake.

There has NEVER been a snake with the ability to talk ‑‑ not then and not now, nor at any time in the foreseeable future. They simply cannot do so. They do not even have any vocal cords. Oh some will say what about the ass which spoke to Balaam. Well let's look at it for just a moment.

"And Balaam rose up in the morning, and saddled his ASS, and went with the princes of Moab. And God's anger was kindled because he went: and the Angel of the Lord stood in the way for an adversary against him. Now he was riding upon his ASS, and his two servants were with him. And the ASS saw the Angel of the Lord standing in the way..." (Numbers 22:21‑23)

(36) According to Strong's Concordance the word "ass" or "attuwn" #860 which is the same as "eythan" or "ethan" which means: "from an unused root (mean, to continue); permanence; hence (coner) permanent; spec. A CHIEFTAIN: ‑‑ hard, mighty, rough, strength, strong."

(37) So Balaam was riding upon a strong Chieftain. Not a Jackass as we know. We also find that the word "ass" can also mean a #2544 "chamowr" or "Canaanite." As black men were used to carry burdens and people in ancient times; and some of the Canaanites were black, it is quite possible that Balaam was being carried by a strong black Canaanite Chieftain. Which would explain the "ass'" ability to talk.

(38) Now if we are going to attribute the talking in Genesis Chapter Three of a snake, then it would appear that in this respect Satan has more power than God in that he was able to make a serpent, who has no vocal cords, nor any organs capable of making or forming words, speak.

(39) The fourth thing about this serpent, was his gift of reason; which is expressed by his statement "...hath God said." That's reasoning. That's questioning. That's showing an ability to think, to reason. Thus, the serpent had four attributes:

(1) He was wiser {more subtil} than any beast of the field,

(2) He could walk erect,

(3) He could speak, and

(4) He had the ability to think and to reason.

(40) One does not find those things in snakes: Not then and not now. Those traits cannot be found in any animal or snake which has ever existed upon the face of the earth. They are found, only in what we call today, the humanoid species.

(41) Then there is the problem of a snake or an ape coming up to Eve and speaking to her without her running away. It is simply more than we can accept. It could not, it did not happen that way. But he was, whatever he was, more cunning and wiser than any beast of the field. Or any other species of beast.

(42) We can solve all these problems if we recognize that Adam and Eve were the first of the White Race {which we will explain later}. Which would not preclude the existence of other so‑called humanoids existing along with them.

With this, the problem simply goes away. It does not exist any more, because it would make it possible for another humanoid to exist at the same time as Adam and Eve. This would also make it possible for someone to appear before Eve and not frighten her away. Because she has seen him before, and has probably talked to him before. It would not be a mystery to her, it would be no surprise either.

(43) Suppose that Adam and Eve were the only two people in the whole world and Eve walks around a tree and there is someone there. And it's not Adam! What is she going to do. She is going to scream for Adam and tell him; Adam you are not going to believe what I have found. She would be concerned. No matter what it was, unless it was someone she had seen before.

(44) Now if we assume that the serpent is another humanoid and not a snake, then the problem goes away. Because the other races of the world can walk, talk, think, reason and have wisdom.

The only thing left is what does the word "subtil" mean. Once again let's turn to Strong's Concordance for an explanation. It is #6175 "aruwm" or "aw‑room" and means: cunning (usually in a bad sense), crafty, prudent, subtil. This word "aruwm" has been translated only one time as subtil (Genesis 3:1) and the other ten times it has been translated as crafty or prudent.

(45) Webster's gives a little different spelling, it spells "subtil" as "subtle" and gives the following definitions:

(1) Thin, rare; tenuous; not dense or heavy [a subtle gas].

(2) a) Capable of making or noticing fine distinctions in meaning, etc. [a subtle thinker].

b) Marked by or requiring mental keenness [subtle reasoning].

(3) Delicately skillful or clever; deft or ingenious [a subtle filigree].

(4) Not open or direct; crafty; sly.

(5) Delicately suggestive; not grossly obvious [a subtle hint].

(6) Working insidiously; not easily detected [a subtle poison]. (New World     Dictionary of the American Language, Second College Edition, p. 1420‑21)

(46) Webster's 1828 Christian Dictionary gives the following:

(1) Thin; not dense or gross; as subtil air; subtil vapor; a subtil medium.

(2) Nice; fine; delicate. "I do distinguish plain Each subtil line of her immortal face."

(3) Acute; piercing; as subtil pain.

(4) Sly; artful; cunning; crafty; insinuating; as a subtil person; a subtil ADVERSARY.

(5) Planned by art; deceitful; as a subtil scheme.

(6) Deceitful; treacherous.

(7) Refined; fine, acute; as a subtil argument.

(47) Had Eve come into an adversary situation. You bet your boots she did. She had met with a wise adversary; a deceitful and treacherous adversary.

Genesis 3:14: “And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every BEAST of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life.”

If this had been a snake, why would God have cursed it? A woman would never have let a literal snake have sex with her, and how would it do it in the first place. For a snake does not have a penis in which the penetrate a woman with. No this “serpent” was another human being or an angel.

Genesis 6:5-7: “And GOD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart. And the LORD said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and BEAST, and the creeping thing, and the FOWLS of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them.”

No matter how angry God got at humankind there would be no reason, nor would He have destroyed all the four footed animals. No the “Beasts” and “Fowls” were people who could sin, not an animal who could not.

Genesis 7:2: “Of every clean BEAST thou shalt take to thee by sevens, the male and his female: and of BEASTS that are not clean by two, the male and his female.”

Genesis 7:14: “They, and every BEAST after his kind, and all the cattle after their kind, and every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind, and every FOWL after his kind, every bird of every sort.”

Why would God tell us that every FOWL after his kind, and then say it a second time “every bird of every sort?” This is silly, therefore, one can use his/her common sense to see that this is speaking of FOWL as people, another race, and then points to the birds in the air.

Genesis 7:21-23: “And all flesh died that moved upon the earth, both of FOWL, and of cattle, and of BEAST, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man: All in whose nostrils was the breath of life, of all that was in the dry land, died. And every living substance was destroyed which was upon the face of the ground, both man, and cattle, and the creeping things, and the FOWL of the heaven; and they were destroyed from the earth: and Noah only remained alive, and they that were with him in the ark.”

Now we know for certain that the flood did not cover the entire planet earth, but was confined to a limited area in scope, therefore, for the “Beasts” and “Fowls” to be destroyed they had to be people, because the “Fowls” would simply have flown to safety, and the “Beasts” would have fled, because of their natural instincts to a safe place.

Now with all the four footed animals that did go on the ark Noah would have needed some help for he and his three sons would not have been able to do the job. So it is very obvious that many of the “Beasts” and “Fowls” that went on the ark were people.

Genesis 9:1-6: “And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth. And the fear of you and the dread of you shall be upon every BEAST of the earth, and upon every FOWL of the air, upon all that moveth upon the earth, and upon all the fishes of the sea; into your hand are they delivered.Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things. But flesh with the life thereof, which is the blood thereof, shall ye not eat. And surely your blood of your lives will I require; AT THE HAND OF EVERY BEAST (again we ask the question, what animal has hands? For there are none, they have paws or feet, not hands. Not even the gorallia has hands although it has paws that are very much like hands) will I require it, and at the hand of man; at the hand of every man's brother will I require the life of man. Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man.”

What animal has hands? There are none, even the appendages of the apes are called paws not hands.

Genesis 9:9-17: “And I, behold, I establish my covenant with you, and with your seed after you; And with every living creature that is with you, of the FOWL, of the cattle, and of every BEAST of the earth with you; from all that go out of the ark, to every BEAST of the earth. And I will establish my covenant with you; neither shall all flesh be cut off any more by the waters of a flood; neither shall there any more be a flood to destroy the earth. And God said, This is the token of the covenant which I make between me and you and every living creature that is with you, for perpetual generations: I do set my bow in the cloud, and it shall be for a token of a covenant between me and the earth. And it shall come to pass, when I bring a cloud over the earth, that the bow shall be seen in the cloud: And I will remember my covenant, which is between me and you and every living creature of all flesh; and the waters shall no more become a flood to destroy all flesh. And the bow shall be in the cloud; and I will look upon it, that I may remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature of all flesh that is upon the earth. And God said unto Noah, This is the token of the covenant, which I have established between me and all flesh that is upon the earth.”

A “covenant” is mentioned several times in these verses, and at the last it says “I may remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature of all flesh that is upon the earth.

Now for Yahweh to make a covenant with all the various four footed animals would have been silly and stupid. And since He is neither silly nor stupid, the covenant was not made with the animals, or the birds, they were made with people, namely the Adamite people who had the Spirit of God breathed into them.

Exodus 9:9-10: “And it shall become small dust in all the land of Egypt, and shall be a boil breaking forth with blains upon man, and upon BEAST, throughout all the land of Egypt. And they took ashes of the furnace, and stood before Pharaoh; and Moses sprinkled it up toward heaven; and it became a boil breaking forth with blains upon man, and upon BEAST.

You can be sure God was not punishing four legged BEASTS by afflicting them with boils

Exodus 9:19-20: “Send therefore now, and gather thy cattle, and all that thou hast in the field; for upon every man AND BEAST which shall be found in the field, and shall not be brought home, the hail shall come down upon them, and they shall die. He that feared the word of the LORD among THE SERVANTS of Pharaoh made his servants and his cattle flee into the houses.”

Here it is very obvious that the BEAST are people, SERVANTS.

Exodus 9:21-25: “And he that regarded not the word of the LORD left his servants and his cattle in the field. And the LORD said unto Moses, Stretch forth thine hand toward heaven, that there may be hail in all the land of Egypt, upon man, and upon BEAST, and upon every herb of the field, throughout the land of Egypt. And Moses stretched forth his rod toward heaven: and the LORD sent thunder and hail, and the fire ran along upon the ground; and the LORD rained hail upon the land of Egypt. So there was hail, and fire mingled with the hail, very grievous, such as there was none like it in all the land of Egypt since it became a nation. And the hail smote throughout all the land of Egypt all that was in the field, both man and BEAST; and the hail smote every herb of the field, and brake every tree of the field.”

Here it is obvious that the “Beast” is a person, and not an animal. Oh we know that many who read this study will not understand and see that the “Beast,” “Fowls,” and “Dogs” are people because they have no spiritual discernment. They are only make believe Christians and are not truly followers of Yahweh and Yahshua.

Exodus 11:5: “And all the firstborn in the land of Egypt shall die, from the firstborn of Pharaoh that sitteth upon his throne, even unto the firstborn of the maidservant that is behind the mill; and all the firstborn of BEASTS.

Now why would Yahweh require the death of the firstborn of four footed animals? He would not, therefore it is clearly obvious that the “Beasts” are people and would know who their firstborn were.

Exodus 11:7: “But against any of the children of Israel SHALL NOT A DOG move his tongue, against man OR BEAST: that ye may know how that the LORD doth put a difference between the Egyptians and Israel.”

We mentioned this verse again, because it is so very clear and we want you to really make Note: If these dogs were the four legged kind, they would bark at anything that was not human, an animal whether the master wanted them to or not. Therefore, these dogs must be something else other than the four legged kind. And since we have found and will continue to find that the BEASTS spoken of in many of the scriptures are people, and not animals, we know that these dogs were also people.

Exodus 12:12: “For I will pass through the land of Egypt this night, and will smite all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, both man AND BEAST; and against all the gods of Egypt I will execute judgment: I am the LORD.”

This makes no sense at all. Why would God smite or kill the first born of the BEAST for Pharaoh not doing what God wanted to do. The animals would have no knowledge of the doings of man nor understand what was happening to them, neither would they observe and take notice of the FIRST BORN being killed.

Exodus 13:2: “Sanctify unto me all the firstborn, whatsoever openeth the womb among the children of Israel, both of man and of BEAST: it is mine.”

Here again, we have a statement that makes no sense if what is being talked about are actual animals or BEASTS; “whatsoever openeth the womb...of BEAST.

Exodus 13:12: “That thou shalt set apart unto the LORD all that openeth the matrix, and every firstling that cometh of a BEAST which thou hast; the males shall be the LORD's.”

Exodus 13:15: “And it came to pass, when Pharaoh would hardly let us go, that the LORD slew all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, both the firstborn of man, and THE FIRSTBORN OF BEAST: therefore I sacrifice to the LORD all that openeth the matrix, being males; but all the firstborn of my children I redeem.”

Why would God kill the firstborn of the BEAST, if they were animals like we are so fond of thinking. He wouldn’t for they, as I have said before, have no knowledge nor concern for any actions of man, except what a man does directly to them. FOLKS WE HAVE TO USE OUR MINDS WHEN WE STUDY THE SCRIPTURES, THAT IS WHY YAHWEH GAVE US THE ABILITY TO THINK IN THE FIRST PLACE. For we have already found that the JudeoChristian clergy, who are nothing more than priests of Baal, in the pulpits of the whore houses called churches in America.

Exodus 19:13: THERE SHALL NOT AN HAND TOUCH IT, BUT HE SHALL SURELY BE STONED, OR SHOT THROUGH; WHETHER IT BE BEAST or man, it shall not live: when the trumpet soundeth long, they shall come up to the mount.”

Here again, we are faced with the statement “not an hand touch it... whether it be BEAST...” Once more we ask what BEAST has hands. There are none. Also why would an animal that could not speak nor understand a man’s speech be killed because it touched the mountain. No God would not have killed an animal, therefore, it is clearly obvious that this “Beast” was a person.

Exodus 22:19: “Whosoever lieth with a BEAST shall surely be put to death.”

Now it a well known fact that both women and men have had sex with dogs, horses and etc., but why would a dumb animal be killed because it had sex with a woman or man; as it would not know better, and would be only responding to the stimulation that the man or woman was giving it.

Exodus 23:10-11: “And six years thou shalt sow thy land, and shalt gather in the fruits thereof: But the seventh year thou shalt let it rest and lie still; that the poor of thy people may eat: and what they leave the BEASTS of the field shall eat. In like manner thou shalt deal with thy vineyard, and with thy oliveyard.”

If wild or even domesticated animals were BEASTS of the field, just picture what would happen to your gardens and vineyards. Note the distinction God makes here between the BEASTS "poor of thy people" and the BEASTS "BEASTS of the field" the poor of thy people shall eat first.

Exodus 23:29: “I will not drive them out from before thee in one year; lest the land become desolate, and the BEAST of the field multiply against thee.”

What animal that is dangerous to man would multiply in such numbers that they would become a threat. No the “Beast” were people, probably blacks for they populate very heavily and could become, in a few years, a threat to the Israelites coming into the land.

Leviticus 5:2: “Or if a soul touch any unclean thing, whether it be a carcase of an unclean BEAST, or a carcase of unclean cattle, or the carcase of unclean creeping things, and if it be hidden from him; he also shall be unclean, and guilty.”

Many animals are scavengers, they eat dead animals, humans, birds and etc., there for God would not deem them guilty of touching a dead body. Only a man would He do that with.

Leviticus 11:46: THIS IS THE LAW OF THE BEASTS, AND OF THE FOWL, and of every living creature that moveth in the waters, and of every creature that creepeth upon the earth.”

Why would there be a law for animals or birds? Of course there would not be, at least not that would be understood by both man and BEAST; unless the BEASTS and fowls were humans who could understand them.

Leviticus 18:22-23: “Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination. Neither shalt thou lie with any BEAST to defile thyself therewith: neither shall any woman stand before a BEAST to lie down thereto: it is confusion.”

Here again this is speaking of lying down with someone of another race, not a four footed animal.

Leviticus 20:15-16: “And if a man lie with a BEAST, he shall surely be put to death: and ye shall slay the BEAST. And if a woman approach unto any BEAST, and lie down thereto, thou shalt kill the woman, and the BEAST: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.”

This certainly could not be a four legged BEAST that a man or woman could lie with. If it were, God would not demand the death penalty for a dumb animal with no reasoning power.

Numbers 3:13: “Because all the firstborn are mine; for on the day that I smote all the firstborn in the land of Egypt I hallowed unto me all the firstborn in Israel, both man and BEAST: mine shall they be: I am the LORD.”

Numbers 8:17: “For all the firstborn of the children of Israel are mine, both man and BEAST: on the day that I smote every firstborn in the land of Egypt I sanctified them for myself.”

Numbers 31:26-30: “Take the sum of the prey that was taken, both of man and of BEAST, thou, and Eleazar the priest, and the chief fathers of the congregation: And divide the prey into two parts; between them that took the war upon them, who went out to battle, and between all the congregation: And levy a tribute unto the LORD of the men of war which went out to battle: one soul of five hundred, both of the persons, and of the beeves, and of the asses, and of the sheep: Take it of their half, and give it unto Eleazar the priest, for an heave offering of the LORD. And of the children of Israel's half, thou shalt take one portion of fifty, of the persons, of the beeves, of the asses, and of the flocks, of all manner of BEASTS, and give them unto the Levites.”

Here we have cattle, asses flocks and all manner of “Beasts” described. Why would the “Beast” be described separately if it were merely another animal?

Numbers 31:47: “Even of the children of Israel's half, Moses took one portion of fifty, both of man and of BEAST, and gave them unto the Levites, which kept the charge of the tabernacle of the LORD; as the LORD commanded Moses.”

Here we have “Beasts” to have charge of keeping the tabernacle of the Lord. Which “Beasts” has the capability of keeping a structure, even a tent clean and take care of it?

Numbers 35:3: “And the cities shall they have to dwell in; and the suburbs of them shall be for their cattle, and for their goods, and for all their BEASTS.

Why would the suburbs of a city be the habitation of BEASTS if they were animals; only people would do that.

Deuteronomy 7:22: “And the LORD thy God will put out those nations before thee by little and little: thou mayest not consume them at once, lest the BEASTS of the field increase upon thee.”

If the “Beasts” mentioned here were merely four footed animals what difference if they increased in numbers for the men could quickly dispatch them with their swords. But if the “Beasts” were people, then they could not be so easily defeated, and they could cause the Israelites all sorts of trouble.

Deuteronomy 27:21: “Cursed be he that lieth with any manner of BEAST. And all the people shall say, Amen.”

Judges 20:48: “And the men of Israel turned again upon the children of Benjamin, and smote them with the edge of the sword, as well the men of every city, as the BEAST, and all that came to hand: also they set on fire all the cities that they came to.”

If these “Beasts” were four footed animals why would the Children of Israel kill them because they lived in the land of Benjamin where so many had become Queers? They would not have taken time to kill the dogs, cats, and etc., for they were hunting men who could kill them.

2 Kings 14:9: “And Jehoash the king of Israel sent to Amaziah king of Judah, saying, The thistle that was in Lebanon sent to the cedar that was in Lebanon, saying, Give thy daughter to my son to wife: and there passed by a wild BEAST that was in Lebanon, and trode down the thistle.”

2 Chronicles 25:18: “And Joash king of Israel sent to Amaziah king of Judah, saying, The thistle that was in Lebanon sent to the cedar that was in Lebanon, saying, Give thy daughter to my son to wife: and there passed by a wild BEAST that was in Lebanon, and trode down the thistle.”

We can see clearly that this verse is a duplicate of 2 Kings 14:9. And because it is presented twice it behooves us to examine it very closely. We have seen in other scriptures that when the cedar that was in Lebanon is being talked about that it means people, not wooden trees as one would quickly think.

Therefore, if a wild BEAST, an animal, were to trode down the thistle, why would that be worthy of being placed in the scriptures. Therefore, we know that there is more to it than first meets the eye.

It is obvious that this wild BEAST is a human and that the thistle are also humans, and the wild BEAST trode them down, or cut them down, so the BEAST was killing people in Lebanon.

2 Chronicles 25:20: “Thou sayest, Lo, thou hast smitten the Edomites; and thine heart lifteth thee up to boast: abide now at home; why shouldest thou meddle to thine hurt, that thou shouldest fall, even thou, and Judah with thee?”

Apparently the wild BEAST was trampling down the Edomites. They have gained the victory and are told to stay home, and not undertake to fight the Edomites again, or they would face defeat.

Job 5:22-23: “At destruction and famine thou shalt laugh: neither shalt thou be afraid of the BEASTS of the earth. For thou shalt be in league with the stones of the field: and THE BEASTS OF THE FIELD SHALL BE AT PEACE WITH THEE.

What sort of animals would be at peace with men? They would not be at peace with men; they would only be subservient to them.


What information would animals have that they could or would impart to man? Which of the FOWLS and BEASTS have voice boxes so as to be able to talk. Oh some will say that a Parrot can talk and a Crow can be trained to say a few words; but that is not telling man anything; or passing on information or wisdom.

Job 18:2-3: “How long will it be ere ye make an end of words? mark, and afterwards we will speak.  Wherefore are we counted as BEASTS, and reputed vile in your sight?”

Job 35:11-12: “Who teacheth us more than the BEASTS of the earth, and maketh us wiser than the FOWLS of heaven? There they cry, but none giveth answer, because of the pride of evil men.”

Again, what can beats teach man? Man is far wiser than any bird that flies through the air; so this statement makes no sense unless the FOWLS are also people.

Psalm 36:6: “Thy righteousness is like the great mountains; thy judgments are a great deep: O LORD, thou preservest man and BEAST.

How would God’s Laws, Statutes, and Judgments benefit the animals? They would not in the common sense of helping them, but it would benefit the “Beasts” if they were people because it would cause the Israelites to treat them better than they would an animal.

Psalm 49:12: “Nevertheless man being in honour abideth not: he is like the BEASTS that perish.”

Here is a verse that appears to tell us that the “Beasts” perish and cannot be saved.

Psalm 49:16-20: “Be not thou afraid when one is made rich, when the glory of his house is increased; For when he dieth he shall carry nothing away: his glory shall not descend after him. Though while he lived he blessed his soul: and men will praise thee, when thou doest well to thyself. He shall go to the generation of his fathers; they shall never see light. Man that is in honour, and understandeth not, is like the BEASTS that perish.”

Here we are told that those who are fantastically rich will perish like the “Beasts,” in other words they cannot be saved either, but will be destroyed.

Psalm 73:22: “So foolish was I, and ignorant: I was as a BEAST before thee.”

This is David describing himself as a BEAST therefore once again we are shown that the word BEAST does not mean an animal.

“Who smote the firstborn of Egypt, both of man and BEAST. (Psalm 135:8)

This is speaking of God who had the death angel to take the first born of the Egyptians because they would not set His Israel people free.

“A righteous man regardeth the life of his BEAST: but the tender mercies of the wicked are cruel.” (Proverbs 12:10)

“I said in mine heart concerning the estate of the sons of men, that God might manifest them, and that they might see that they themselves are BEASTS. For that which befalleth the sons of men befalleth BEASTS; even one thing befalleth them: as the one dieth, so dieth the other; yea, they have all one breath; so that a man hath no preeminence above a BEAST: for all is vanity.” (Ecclesiastes 3:18-19)

Here a man, an Israelite is compared to that of a “Beast” and that they both die. That they both breathe and when they die they both stop breathing.

“Who knoweth the spirit of man that goeth upward, and the spirit of the BEAST that goeth downward to the earth?” (Ecclesiastes 3:21)

Here we are told by the prophet that when a “Beast” dies, his soul is destroyed and that he does not have a spirit like that of an Israelite because God did not breath His Spirit into them as He did the Adamites.

“But wild BEASTS of the desert shall lie there; and their houses shall be full of doleful creatures; and owls shall dwell there, and satyrs shall dance there. And the wild BEASTS of the islands SHALL CRY IN THEIR DESOLATE HOUSES (what animal is it that has houses?), AND DRAGONS IN THEIR PLEASANT PALACES (what dragons have palaces, no these are people who are called dragons for their evil): and her time is near to come, and her days shall not be prolonged.” (Isaiah 13:21-22)

Here we have “Beasts” living in houses, and also doleful creatures and owls therefore, they also must be people who are described as “Beasts.” We also have mention of satyrs which Strong’s Concordance says were goats, but this is obviously wrong for goats do not dance.

“The burden of THE BEASTS OF THE SOUTH: into the land of trouble and anguish, from whence come the young and old lion, the viper and fiery flying serpent, they will carry their riches upon the shoulders of young asses, AND THEIR TREASURES UPON THE BUNCHES OF CAMELS, TO A PEOPLE THAT SHALL NOT PROFIT THEM. (Isaiah 30:6)

What people are south of Palestine and south of Egypt, it is the blacks of Africa. What treasures would the BEASTS have unless they are humans?

“The BEAST of the field shall honour me, the dragons and the owls: because I give waters in the wilderness, and rivers in the desert, to give drink to my people, my chosen.” (Isaiah 43:20)

Now what “Beast” gives honor to a human being. They do not do that in any manner at all. They may obey a few of mans commands, but that is because they have been trained to do so, not because of their intelligence.

“Bel boweth down, Nebo stoopeth, their idols were upon the BEASTS, and upon the cattle: your carriages were heavy loaden; they are a burden to the weary BEAST.” (Isaiah 46:1)

The carriages were heavy and therefore were a burden upon the backs of the “Beasts,” who where a slave people to the Egyptians.

“The children gather wood, and the fathers kindle the fire, and the women knead their dough, to make cakes to the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto other gods, that they may provoke me to anger. Do they provoke me to anger? saith the LORD: do they not provoke themselves to the confusion of their own faces? Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, mine anger and my fury shall be poured out upon this place, upon man, and upon BEAST, and upon the trees of the field, and upon the fruit of the ground; and it shall burn, and shall not be quenched.” (Jeremiah 7:18-20)

Why would Yahweh have anger against the BEAST and upon the trees if His anger was at Israel because they were worshiping other gods? He would not, take His anger out upon dumb four legged BEASTS, because they would not have taken notice of what man was doing, nor would the trees. Therefore, there is only one conclusion that we can draw here that both the BEASTS and the trees were also people.

“How long shall the land mourn, and the herbs of every field wither, for the wickedness of them that dwell therein? the BEASTS are consumed, and the birds; because they said, He shall not see our last end.” (Jeremiah 12:4)

Here we have “Beasts” and “Birds” talking and saying “He shall not see our last end.” Again and again we must ask what “Beast” and what “Birds - Fowls” have vocal cords to enable them to speak.

“Mine heritage is unto me as a speckled bird, the birds round about are against her; come ye, assemble all the BEASTS of the field, come to devour. Many pastors have destroyed my vineyard, they have trodden my portion under foot, they have made my pleasant portion a desolate wilderness. They have made it desolate, and being desolate it mourneth unto me; the whole land is made desolate, because no man layeth it to heart. The spoilers are come upon all high places through the wilderness: for the sword of the LORD shall devour from the one end of the land even to the other end of the land: no flesh shall have peace. They have sown wheat, but shall reap thorns: they have put themselves to pain, but shall not profit: and they shall be ashamed of your revenues because of the fierce anger of the LORD. THUS SAITH THE LORD AGAINST ALL MINE EVIL NEIGHBOURS, THAT TOUCH THE INHERITANCE WHICH I HAVE CAUSED MY PEOPLE ISRAEL TO INHERIT; BEHOLD, I WILL PLUCK THEM OUT OF THEIR LAND, AND PLUCK OUT THE HOUSE OF JUDAH FROM AMONG THEM. And it shall come to pass, after that I have plucked them out I will return, and have compassion on them, and will bring them again, every man to his heritage, and every man to his land.”

This is a description of the evil that the false JudeoChristian clergy has brought upon the Children of Israel; by siding with the Jews who are the spoilers of Israel. They have stolen much property, gold and silver from them; but it will not profit them because Yahweh will pluck them out of their land and from the House of Judah. Then they will be thrown into the fire as is described in many verses of scripture.

“And I myself will fight against you with an outstretched hand and with a strong arm, even in anger, and in fury, and in great wrath. And I will smite the inhabitants of this city, both man and BEAST: they shall die of a great pestilence.” (Jeremiah 21:5-6)

We know from science that there are few diseases that affect both man and animals; but there are diseases that affect Israelites and the other races.

“And now have I given all these lands unto the hand of Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon, my servant; and the BEASTS of the field have I given him also to serve him.” (Jeremiah 27:6)

Here the JudeoChristian ministers and clergy would have you believe that the “Beasts” of the field were animals, when it is obvious that this is speaking of people; not animals.

“For thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel; I have put a yoke of iron upon the neck of all these nations, that they may serve Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon; and they shall serve him: and I have given him the BEASTS of the field also.” (Jeremiah 28:14)


Here we have definite proof that the BEASTS are other human beings, otherwise how could the SEED of man be sown with the seed of BEAST. For we know that it is not possible for animals to impregnate a woman nor a man to impregnate an animal.

“And fields shall be bought in this land, whereof ye say, It is desolate without man or BEAST; it is given into the hand of the Chaldeans.” (Jeremiah 32:43)

No matter what wars men might fight or how ferrous they might be, there will always be animals, scavengers around to eat the carcases that are left out in the open and not buried. Therefore, once again, we must draw the conclusion that the BEAST are other humans.

“Thus saith the LORD; Again there shall be heard in this place, which ye say shall be desolate without man and without BEAST, even in the cities of Judah, and in the streets of Jerusalem, that are desolate, without man, and without inhabitant, and without BEAST. The voice of joy, and the voice of gladness, the voice of the bridegroom, and the voice of the bride, the voice of them that shall say, Praise the LORD of hosts: for the LORD is good; for his mercy endureth for ever: and of them that shall bring the sacrifice of praise into the house of the LORD. For I will cause to return the captivity of the land, as at the first, saith the LORD. Thus saith the LORD of hosts; Again in this place, which is desolate without man and without BEAST, and in ALL THE CITIES THEREOF, SHALL BE AN HABITATION OF SHEPHERDS CAUSING THEIR FLOCKS TO LIE DOWN. (Jeremiah 33:10-12)

How much chance would it be that there would be no dogs, cats and other animals running the streets of a city even if all the men and women in it were taken captive and carried away. No the enemy would not take time to round up the four legged animals. Also we are told that the cities would be the habitation of shepherds and their flocks. So we must once again come to the conclusion that the BEASTS are humans.

“And thou shalt say to Jehoiakim the king of Judah, Thus saith the LORD; Thou hast burned this roll, saying, Why hast thou written therein, saying, The king of Babylon shall certainly come and destroy this land, and shall cause to cease from thence man and BEAST? (Jeremiah 36:29)

Why would the king of Babylon take concern for animals so much so that he would remove all the animals from the land? He wouldn’t unless the BEASTS were other than animals; humans.

“For out of the north there cometh up a nation against her, which shall make her land desolate, and none shall dwell therein: they shall remove, they shall depart, both man and BEAST. (Jeremiah 50:3)

This is describing the coming war between the forces of evil who come upon the United States the New Jerusalem and New Zion as spoken of in the scriptures.

“Therefore the wild BEASTS of the desert with the wild BEASTS of the islands shall dwell there, and the owls shall dwell therein: and it shall be no more inhabited for ever; neither shall it be dwelt in from generation to generation.” (Jeremiah 50:39)

“Then shalt thou say, O LORD, thou hast spoken against this place, to cut it off, that none shall remain in it, neither man nor BEAST, but that it shall be desolate for ever.” (Jeremiah 51:62)

Now we know when we use our minds like God gave them to us, we know that animals such as bobcats, lions, dogs, and etc., would always be in the land and just because there were no men there would not prevent them from occupying the land. And would always be there whether there were men in it or not.

“Son of man, when the land sinneth against me by trespassing grievously (this is the people of the land, Israelites, who sin and trespass against Yahweh not the ground itself), then will I stretch out mine hand upon it, and will break the staff of the bread thereof, and will send famine upon it, and will cut off man and BEAST from it: Though these three men, Noah, Daniel, and Job, were in it, they should deliver but their own souls by their righteousness, saith the Lord GOD.

If I cause noisome BEASTS to pass through the land, and they spoil it, so that it be desolate, that no man may pass through because of the BEASTS.” (Ezekiel 14:13-15)

Now if this were speaking of animals a man could pass through because he could kill them with his sword. But if the “Beasts” were other human beings then they would not be able to pass through.

It should not be necessary to point out every single one of the cases where the word “Beast” is used in the place of people, therefore we will just present one verse after another for your review.

“Or if I bring a sword upon that land, and say, Sword, go through the land; so that I cut off man and BEAST from it: Though these three men were in it, as I live, saith the Lord GOD, they shall deliver neither sons nor daughters, but they only shall be delivered themselves.

Or if I send a pestilence into that land, and pour out my fury upon it in blood, to cut off from it man and BEAST. (Ezekiel 14:17-19)

“For thus saith the Lord GOD; How much more when I send my four sore judgments upon Jerusalem, the sword, and the famine, and the noisome BEAST, and the pestilence, to cut off from it man and BEAST? (Ezekiel 14:21)

“Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD; I will also stretch out mine hand upon Edom, and will cut off man and BEAST from it; and I will make it desolate from Teman; and they of Dedan shall fall by the sword.” (Ezekiel 25:13)

“Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I will bring a sword upon thee, and cut off man and BEAST out of thee. And the land of Egypt shall be desolate and waste; and they shall know that I am the LORD: because he hath said, The river is mine, and I have made it. Behold, therefore I am against thee, and against thy rivers, and I will make the land of Egypt utterly waste and desolate, from the tower of Syene even unto the border of Ethiopia. NO FOOT OF MAN shall pass through it, NOR FOOT OF BEAST shall pass through it, neither shall it be inhabited forty years.” (Ezekiel 29:8-11)

“All the FOWLS of heaven made their nests in his boughs, and under his branches did all the BEASTS of the field bring forth their young, and under his shadow dwelt all great nations.” (Ezekiel 31:6)

“Thus was he fair in his greatness, in the length of his branches: for his root was by great waters. The cedars in the garden of God could not hide him: the fir trees were not like his boughs, and the chestnut trees were not like his branches; nor any tree in the garden of God was like unto him in his beauty. I have made him fair by the multitude of his branches: so that all the trees of Eden, that were in the garden of God, envied him. Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD; Because thou hast lifted up thyself in height, and he hath shot up his top among the thick boughs, and his heart is lifted up in his height; I have therefore delivered him into the hand of the mighty one of the heathen; he shall surely deal with him: I have driven him out for his wickedness. And strangers, the terrible of the nations, have cut him off, and have left him: upon the mountains and in all the valleys his branches are fallen, and his boughs are broken by all the rivers of the land; and all the people of the earth are gone down from his shadow, and have left him. Upon his ruin shall all the FOWLS of the heaven remain, and all the BEASTS of the field shall be upon his branches.” (Ezekiel 31:7-13)

“And they were scattered, because there is no shepherd: and they became meat to all the BEASTS of the field, when they were scattered.” (Ezekiel 34:5)

“As I live, saith the Lord GOD, surely because my flock became a prey, and my flock became meat to every BEAST of the field, because there was no shepherd, neither did my shepherds search for my flock, but the shepherds fed themselves, and fed not my flock.” (Ezekiel 34:8)

Time after time in this one verse Yahweh describes His Israel people as a “Flock,” which could be descriptive of a “Flock” of sheep as His Israel people are called in many many places, and it could also be descriptive as a “Flock” of birds, which also represent His Israel people.

“And they shall no more be a prey to the heathen, neither shall the BEAST of the land devour them; but they shall dwell safely, and none shall make them afraid.” (Ezekiel 34:28)

What BEAST would man fear? What BEAST would be able make the people of the land a prey? There are none, they would of course feed on the carcases of the dead but animals would not make the live in fear.

“And I will multiply upon you man and BEAST; and they shall increase and bring fruit: and I will settle you after your old estates, and will do better unto you than at your beginnings: and ye shall know that I am the LORD.” (Ezekiel 36:11)

Now why would Yahweh multiply the BEAST, and what BEAST would bring fruit?

“And wheresoever the children of men dwell, the BEASTS of the field and the FOWLS of the heaven hath he given into thine hand, and hath made thee ruler over them all. Thou art this head of gold.” (Daniel 2:38)

“And he was driven from the sons of men; and his heart was made like the BEASTS, and his dwelling was with the wild asses: they fed him with grass like oxen, and his body was wet with the dew of heaven; till he knew that the most high God ruled in the kingdom of men, and that he appointeth over it whomsoever he will.” (Daniel 5:21)

“And behold another BEAST, a second, like to a bear, and it raised up itself on one side, and it had three ribs in the mouth of it between the teeth of it: and they said thus unto it, Arise, devour much flesh. After this I beheld, and lo another, like a leopard, which had upon the back of it four wings of a FOWL; the BEAST had also four heads; and dominion was given to it. After this I saw in the night visions, and behold a fourth BEAST, dreadful and terrible, and strong exceedingly; and it had great iron teeth: it devoured and brake in pieces, and stamped the residue with the feet of it: and it was diverse from all the BEASTS that were before it; and it had ten horns.” (Daniel 7:5-7)

“I beheld then because of the voice of the great words which the horn spake: I beheld even till the BEAST was slain, and his body destroyed, and given to the burning flame.  As concerning the rest of the BEASTS, they had their dominion taken away: yet their lives were prolonged for a season and time.” (Daniel 7:11-12)

“Then I would know the truth of the fourth BEAST, which was diverse from all the others, exceeding dreadful, whose teeth were of iron, and his nails of brass; which devoured, brake in pieces, and stamped the residue with his feet.” (Daniel 7:19)

We know from a study of the scriptures that this is describing a government of men, not animals.

“Thus he said, The fourth BEAST shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth, which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces.” (Daniel 7:23)

“I will meet them as a bear that is bereaved of her whelps, and will rend the caul of their heart, and there will I devour them like a lion: the wild BEAST shall tear them.” (Hosea 13:8)

“Be not afraid, ye BEASTS of the field: for the pastures of the wilderness do spring, for the tree beareth her fruit, the fig tree and the vine do yield their strength.” (Joel 2:22)

“And he caused it to be proclaimed and published through Nineveh by the decree of the king and his nobles, saying, Let neither man nor BEAST, herd nor flock, taste any thing: let them not feed, nor drink water: But let man and BEAST be covered with sackcloth, and cry mightily unto God: yea, let them turn every one from his evil way, and from the violence that is in their hands.” (Jonah 3:7-8)

“I will consume man and BEAST; I will consume the FOWLS of the heaven, and the fishes of the sea, and the stumbling blocks with the wicked; and I will cut off man from off the land, saith the LORD.” (Zephaniah 1:3)

“For before these days there was no hire for man, nor any hire for BEAST; neither was there any peace to him that went out or came in because of the affliction: for I set all men every one against his neighbour.” (Zechariah 8:10)

“And so shall be the plague of the horse, of the mule, of the camel, and of the ass, and of all the BEASTS that shall be in these tents, as this plague.” (Zechariah 14:15)

“If after the manner of men I have fought with BEASTS at Ephesus, what advantageth it me, if the dead rise not? let us eat and drink; for to morrow we die.” (1 Corinthians 15:32)

“One of themselves, even a prophet of their own, said, The Cretians are alway liars, evil BEASTS, slow bellies.” (Titus 1:12)

“For they could not endure that which was commanded, And if so much as a BEAST touch the mountain, it shall be stoned, or thrust through with a dart.” (Hebrews 12:20)


Here we can clearly see that the Beats are people, whom it would appear to be the Jews are made to be destroyed.

“But these speak evil of those things which they know not: but what they know naturally, as brute BEASTS, in those things they corrupt themselves. Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Core. These are spots in your feasts of charity, when they feast with you, feeding themselves without fear: clouds they are without water, carried about of winds; trees whose fruit withereth, without fruit, twice dead, plucked up by the roots;

Raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own shame; wandering stars, to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness for ever.” (Jude 10-13)

This refers to the Jews who are deluding the Negro by promising them things they can never achieve, in order to destroy the White Race trough miscegenation.

The great boast of modern civilization is its unparalleled degree of enlightenment when compared with preceding ages. While marvelous advances have been made in the realm of many sciences, in other respects we are still groping about in a clouded maze of misconceptions. Colleges and universities have been taken over by aliens and are teaching as truth philosophies which have no substance in actual fact. For example, because the doctrines of the atheistic school of natural development are accepted as the acme of scholarship, specifically the theory of the evolution of the species, the door to understanding has been fastened shut in regard to the true origin of the races.

The Bible stands as an impregnable bulwark against Christendom's modern slogan that all men, regardless of color, are blood brothers. The patriarchs of the Bible, the prophets of old, the apostles of the early Christian Church, do not support this view.

Nevertheless, under the operation of the Law of the Lord, all are entitled to equality of justice and righteousness in judgment. The simple truth regarding the origin of the races demonstrates conclusively that the Negroes and the White Race do not have a common ancestry.

A full grasp of this fact will go a long way toward solving racial problems which are menacing the entire world today. When the undeniable truth is known and acted upon, it will bring about an abrupt and complete cessation of the present attempt to elevate the colored races or Jews to positions of authority over those whom the Lord instructed: “Thou mayest not set a stranger over thee, which is not thy brother.” (Deuteronomy 17:15)

So we respectfully ask that you bring to this study an open mind in search of truth. And we feel that if you do you will find that a careful weighing of the evidence presented herein will result in an astounding comprehension of aspects of the story the Bible tells which has long been hidden from view.

“And before the throne there was a sea of glass like unto crystal: and in the midst of the throne, and round about the throne, were four BEASTS full of eyes before and behind. And the first BEAST was like a lion, and the second BEAST like a calf, and the third BEAST had a face as a man, and the fourth BEAST was like a flying eagle. And the four BEASTS had each of them six wings about him; and they were full of eyes within: and they rest not day and night, saying, Holy, holy, holy, Lord God Almighty, which was, and is, and is to come. And when those BEASTS give glory and honour and thanks to him that sat on the throne, who liveth for ever and ever.” (Revelation 4:6-9)

“And I beheld, and, lo, in the midst of the throne and of the four BEASTS, and in the midst of the elders, stood a Lamb as it had been slain, having seven horns and seven eyes, which are the seven Spirits of God sent forth into all the earth. And he came and took the book out of the right hand of him that sat upon the throne. And when he had taken the book, the four BEASTS and four and twenty elders fell down before the Lamb, having every one of them harps, and golden vials full of odours, which are the prayers of saints.” (Revelation 5:6-8)

“And the first BEAST was like a lion, and the second BEAST like a calf, and the third BEAST had a face as a man, and the fourth BEAST was like a flying eagle. And the four BEASTS had each of them six wings about him; and they were full of eyes within: and they rest not day and night, saying, Holy, holy, holy, Lord God Almighty, which was, and is, and is to come. And when those BEASTS give glory and honour and thanks to him that sat on the throne, who liveth for ever and ever.” (Revelation 4:7-9)

“And I beheld, and I heard the voice of many angels round about the throne and the BEASTS and the elders: and the number of them was ten thousand times ten thousand, and thousands of thousands; Saying with a loud voice, Worthy is the Lamb that was slain to receive power, and riches, and wisdom, and strength, and honour, and glory, and blessing. And every creature which is in heaven, and on the earth, and under the earth, and such as are in the sea, and all that are in them, heard I saying, Blessing, and honour, and glory, and power, be unto him that sitteth upon the throne, and unto the Lamb for ever and ever. And the four BEASTS said, Amen. And the four and twenty elders fell down and worshiped him that liveth for ever and ever.” (Revelation 5:11-14)

“And I saw when the Lamb opened one of the seals, and I heard, as it were the noise of thunder, one of the four BEASTS saying, Come and see.” (Revelation 6:1)

“And when he had opened the second seal, I heard the second BEAST say, Come and see. And there went out another horse that was red: and power was given to him that sat thereon to take peace from the earth, and that they should kill one another: and there was given unto him a great sword. And when he had opened the third seal, I heard the third BEAST say, Come and see. And I beheld, and lo a black horse; and he that sat on him had a pair of balances in his hand.” (Revelation 6:3-5)

“And I heard a voice in the midst of the four BEASTS say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and see thou hurt not the oil and the wine.” (Revelation 6:6)

“And all the angels stood round about the throne, and about the elders and the four BEASTS, and fell before the throne on their faces, and worshiped God, Saying, Amen: Blessing, and glory, and wisdom, and thanksgiving, and honour, and power, and might, be unto our God for ever and ever. Amen.” (Revelation 7:11-12)

Here we have in many verses “Beasts” talking, praising and worshiping Yahweh.

“And when they shall have finished their testimony, the BEAST that ascendeth out of the bottomless pit shall make war against them, and shall overcome them, and kill them.”

“And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a BEAST rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy. And the BEAST which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority. And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the BEAST. And they worshiped the dragon which gave power unto the BEAST: and they worshiped the BEAST, saying, Who is like unto the BEAST? who is able to make war with him?” (Revelation 13:1-4)

“And I beheld another BEAST coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon. And he exerciseth all the power of the first BEAST before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first BEAST, whose deadly wound was healed. And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men, And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the BEAST; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the BEAST, which had the wound by a sword, and did live. And he had power to give life unto the image of the BEAST, that the image of the BEAST should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the BEAST should be killed. And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the BEAST, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the BEAST: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six..”

“And they sung as it were a new song before the throne, and before the four BEASTS, and the elders: and no man could learn that song but the hundred and forty and four thousand, which were redeemed from the earth.” (Revelation 14:3)

“And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the BEAST and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand, The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb.” (Revelation 14:9-10)

“And I saw as it were a sea of glass mingled with fire: and them that had gotten the victory over the BEAST, and over his image, and over his mark, and over the number of his name, stand on the sea of glass, having the harps of God.” (Revelation 15:2)

“And one of the four BEASTS gave unto the seven angels seven golden vials full of the wrath of God, who liveth for ever and ever.” (Revelation 15:7)

“And the first went, and poured out his vial upon the earth; and there fell a noisome and grievous sore upon the men which had the mark of the BEAST, and upon them which worshiped his image.” (Revelation 16:2)

“And the fifth angel poured out his vial upon the seat of the BEAST; and his kingdom was full of darkness; and they gnawed their tongues for pain, And blasphemed the God of heaven because of their pains and their sores, and repented not of their deeds. And the sixth angel poured out his vial upon the great river Euphrates; and the water thereof was dried up, that the way of the kings of the east might be prepared. And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the BEAST, and out of the mouth of the false prophet.” (Revelation 16:10-13)

Think about it? What “Beast” has a kingdom; which must consist of people, land, laws and etc., to be a kingdom?

“So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured BEAST, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns. And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication: And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH. And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus: and when I saw her, I wondered with great admiration. And the angel said unto me, Wherefore didst thou marvel? I will tell thee the mystery of the woman, and of the BEAST that carrieth her, which hath the seven heads and ten horns. The BEAST that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the BEAST that was, and is not, and yet is. And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth. And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space. And the BEAST that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition. And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the BEAST. These have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the BEAST. These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful. And he saith unto me, The waters which thou sawest, where the whore sitteth, are peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues. And the ten horns which thou sawest upon the BEAST, these shall hate the whore, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and burn her with fire. For God hath put in their hearts to fulfil his will, and to agree, and give their kingdom unto the BEAST, until the words of God shall be fulfilled.” (Revelation 17:3-17)

“And the four and twenty elders and the four BEASTS fell down and worshiped God that sat on the throne, saying, Amen; Alleluia.” (Revelation 19:4)

“And I saw the BEAST, and the kings of the earth, and their armies, gathered together to make war against him that sat on the horse, and against his army. And the BEAST was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the BEAST, and them that worshiped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone.” (Revelation 19:19-20)

“And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshiped the BEAST, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years. But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection. Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years. And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison, And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle: the number of whom is as the sand of the sea. And they went up on the breadth of the earth, and compassed the camp of the saints about, and the beloved city: and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them. AND THE DEVIL THAT DECEIVED THEM WAS CAST INTO THE LAKE OF FIRE AND BRIMSTONE, WHERE THE BEAST AND THE FALSE PROPHET ARE, AND SHALL BE TORMENTED DAY AND NIGHT FOR EVER AND EVER. (Revelation 20:4-10)


IS THIS MAN CONIAH A DESPISED BROKEN IDOL? is he a vessel wherein is no pleasure? wherefore are they cast out, he and his seed, and are cast into a land which they know not?” (Jeremiah 22:28)

Here we have a man, Coniah, described as an idol. Thus proving that not all idols spoken of in the scriptures are stone, silver, gold, or wooden idols carved with at the hands of man.

WOE TO THE IDOL SHEPHERD THAT LEAVETH THE FLOCK! the sword shall be upon his arm, and upon his right eye: his arm shall be clean dried up, and his right eye shall be utterly darkened.” (Zechariah 11:1)

This is a perfect description of a JudeoChristian clergyman/woman. They leave the flock to be destroyed while they go after money and material goods offered to them by the antichrist jews.

“The burden of Egypt. Behold, the LORD rideth upon a swift cloud, and shall come into Egypt: and THE IDOLS OF EGYPT SHALL BE MOVED AT HIS PRESENCE, and the heart of Egypt shall melt in the midst of it.” (Isaiah 19:1)

This is a little hard to see, but with study of the surrounding scriptures it can be seen that the idols in question are human ones, not of stone, gold and etc.

“And the spirit of Egypt shall fail in the midst thereof; and I will destroy the counsel thereof: and THEY SHALL SEEK TO THE IDOLS, AND TO THE CHARMERS, AND TO THEM THAT HAVE FAMILIAR SPIRITS, AND TO THE WIZARDS. (Isaiah


Here we can clearly see that the idols are people, and are being compared to “charmers,” those who have “Familiar Spirits,” in other words fortune tellers; and to “The Wizards.” Some more who clam to be able to forecast the future and etc.

“Bel boweth down, Nebo stoopeth, THEIR IDOLS WERE UPON THE BEASTS, and upon the cattle: your carriages were heavy loaden; they are a burden to the weary beast.” (Isaiah 46:1)

Here we have idols being carried by the “Beasts” and “Cattle” therefore we know these idols were also people because idols do not ride upon the backs of “Beasts” or “Cattle.”

“Ephraim shall say, What have I to do any more with idols? I HAVE HEARD HIM, AND OBSERVED HIM: I am like a green fir tree. From me is thy fruit found.” (Hosea 14:8)

Here we have idols that speak to the Israelites and they heard them; and they observed the idol in its actions.

FOR THE IDOLS HAVE SPOKEN VANITY, and the diviners have seen a lie, and have told false dreams; they comfort in vain: therefore they went their way as a flock, they were troubled, because there was no shepherd.” (Zechariah 10:1)

Here once again we have idols speaking to the people. Now what wood, stone, gold, or silver idol has ever had the power to speak?

In conclusion, it is very clear that “Dogs,” “Beasts,” “Fowls,” and “Idols,” are many times used to describe people and not animals, birds, or idols. So as you study the scriptures be sure that you study the verse carefully, thoroughly and completely. For all is not as it seems in many places, and it is only with real honest study and prayer and Yahweh will show you what the scriptures actually mean. Don’t just read it and go away; STUDY it.

Reference Materials