He Could Not Have Been A Jew!
(Exploding the false theology which states that Jesus was a Jew,
and that the Jews are the Chosen People of the Book)
Lt. Col. Gordon "Jack" Mohr AUS Ret.
"Am I therefore become your enemy because I tell you the truth!" (Galatians 4:16)
Strangely enough, during the Twentieth Century, there has been a deliberate drive, emanating from the seminaries of most churches, to attribute nationality and specific racial characteristics to our Savior, the Son of God. Many have tried to make Him into a Jew. (Any person with an iota of intelligence, should be able to see where those who promote this idea, are the one's who curse His name, and call Him a "bastard, conceived by a Jewish whore during menstruation").
At the Council of Nicea in 350 A.D., 300 church bishops and learned Christian teachers formed what has become known as the Nicean Creed. This creed declares Jesus Christ to be "God of God, the very God!"
Nowhere in scripture, Old or New, can you find where an angel, a prophet of God, a disciple, or an Apostle, ever referred to Jesus as a JEW. He is called the "Son of God", the "Son of David", the "Son of man" and "Jesus of Nazareth" but nowhere is He referred to as being a JEW!
In a book titled FACTS ARE FACTS, Dr. Benjamin Freedman, who was "born again", and who had been advisor to eight Presidents, and was friends of top Jewish leaders such as Bernard Baruch, wrote his book as a letter to another Jew, Dr. David Goldstein, LL.D., who had converted from Judaism and joined the Roman Catholic church.
On page 10 of this book, Dr. Freedman says: "The utterance by the Christian clergy which confuses Christians the most is the constantly repeated utterance that Jesus was a Jew. That also appears to be your favorite theme. This misrepresentation and distortion of an incontestable historic fact is uttered by the Christian clergy on the slightest pretext. They utter it constancy, almost without provocation. They appear to be 'trigger happy' to utter it. They never miss an opportunity to do so. Informed Christians cannot reconcile this truly unwarranted misrepresentation and distortion of an incontestable historic fact by the Christian clergy with information known by them now which comes to them from sources believed by them to be equally reliable.
"This poses a serious problem today for the Christian clergy. They can extricate themselves from their present predicament now only by resorting to 'the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth'. That is the only formula by which the Christian clergy can recapture the lost confidence of Christians. As effective spiritual leaders, they cannot function without this lost confidence. They should make this their first order of business.
"My dear Dr. Goldstein, you are a theologian of high rank and a historian of note. Of necessity you also should agree with other outstanding authorities as whether 'Jesus was a Jew'. These leading authorities agree today, that there is no foundation in fact for the implications, inferences and the innuendoes resulting from the incorrect belief that 'Jesus was a Jew'.
"Without any fear of contradiction based upon the fact the most competent and best qualified authorities all agree today that Jesus Christ was not a so-called, or self-styled JEW. They now confirm that during His lifetime, He was known as a JUDEAN, by His contemporaries, and not as a JEW, and that Jesus referred to Himself as a JUDEAN and not as a JEW.
"Contemporary theologians of Jesus time, whose competence to pass upon this subject cannot be challenged by anyone today, also referred to Jesus during his lifetime on earth as a JUDEAN and not a JEW.
"Inscribed upon the cross when Jesus was crucified were the Latin words IESUS NAZARENUS REX IUDEORUM. Pontius Pilate was the author of this infamous inscription. Latin was Pilate's mother tongue. No one will question the fact that Plate was well able to accurately express his own ideas in his own mother tongue. The authorities competent to pass upon the correct translation into English of this Latin title, agree that it is rendered JESUS THE NAZARENE RULER OF THE JUDEANS. There is no disagreement upon that by any of them.
"During His lifetime here on earth, Jesus was not regarded by Pontius Pilate nor by the Judeans among whom He dwelt as KING OF THE JEWS. The inscription on the cross upon which Jesus was crucified has been incorrectly translated into the English language only since the 18th century. Pontius Pilate was being sarcastic when he ordered this inscription in Latin... Pilate was well aware at the time that Jesus had been denounced, defied, and denied by the Judeans who alas, finally brought about His crucifixion as related by history.
"Except for His few followers at the time (most of whom were Israelites from Galilee; only the traitor Judas was a Jew), in Judea, all other Judeans abhorred Him and detested His teachings and the things for which He stood. That deplorable fact cannot be erased from history by time. Pontius Pilate was himself the ruler of the Judeans when he had this inscription placed on the cross. The ironic and sarcastic reference by Pilate to Jesus as RULER OF THE JUDEANS, can hardly be accepted as recognition by Pilate of Jesus as RULER, or KING OF THE JEWS. This is inconceivable by any interpretation.
"At the time of the crucifixion, Pontius Pilate was Administrator in Judea for the Roman Empire. It was part of the Roman Empire. As far as Pilate was concerned officially, or personally, the inhabitants of Judea were JUDEANS not JEWS. They were not called JEWS until the 18th century. There was no religious, national, or racial group in JUDEA known as JEWS, nor had there been any group so identified anywhere else in the world at this time.
"During the lifetime of Jesus, it was very apparent to Pilate that Jesus was the last Person in Judea the JUDEANS would have selected as their ruler, or leader.
"It is an incontestable fact that the word JEW did not come into existence until the year 1775. Prior to this the word JEW did not exist in any language. It was introduced into the English for the first time when Sheridan used it in his play THE RIVALS, II,i: "She shall have a skin like a mummy, and the heard of a Jew." Shakespeare never used the word JEW in any of his works. In his Merchant of Venice, V.111. i.61, he wrote: "what is the reason? I am a IEWE, hath not an IEWE eyes?"
"The best known 18th century editions of the New Testament in English are the Rheims (Douai-Roman Catholic) Edition, and the King James Authorized Edition. The Rheims translation was first printed in English in 1582. The word JEW did not appear in it. The King James Authorized Version was begun in 1604 and published in 1611. The word JEW did not appear in it either." (UNQ.)
During the 18th century, under pressure from Jewish sources, many who had infiltrated the Christian publishing houses, the word JEW began to appear in the English translations of the Bible.
Thousands of copies of the revised 18th century editions of both the Rheims and King James translations were distributed to the clergy and the people throughout the English speaking world. They did not know, and cared less for the origin of the English word now used as JEW. They accepted it without question. How could they know otherwise, when their religious leaders, those who knew, refused to tell them the truth?
"If the generally accepted understanding of the word JEW and JUDEAN were correct in the Christian world, there would be no problem. But since the middle of the Nineteenth Century in particular, millions of dollars have been spent in propaganda by the Jewish world leaders, trying to convince Christians that their Lord was a Jew, and that Christianity is an offspring of Judaism. This is where the term Judeo-Christian was coined. Along with this, the Christian world has been oriented to the falsehood that today's Jews are the Chosen People of the Bible, the descendants of Abraham, and that to cross them in any way will bring about God's curse of Gen. 12:3. God speaking to Abraham promised him: "And I will bless them that bless thee (Abraham), and curse him that curseth thee; and in thee shall all the nations of the earth be blessed." Religious leaders are very careful to keep from their people the fact that this promise was made to Abraham, not his descendants, and that there were no people named JEWS in the Bible, until 1200 years after his death. (They first appear in 2 Kings 16:6, in the Revised King James Version, and are fighting against Israel.)
Why is it today, that our religious leaders, especially those of the evangelical and fundamentalist groups, can give no sensible answer to the Jewish Question? Why do most of them constantly seek to exonerate the evilness of Jewish leaders and make these Christ haters, therefore God haters, (John 15:23 "He that hateth Me (Jesus), hateth My Father also", into God's Chosen People, who MUST be treated with special respect, and of course supported!
The Jewish religion of Talmudism, so different from the old Israelite religion of Hebrewism, cannot bring salvation to anyone. The Old Testament tells us that God gave His "oracles" (revelations) to JUDAH, and it was said that "Judah was His sanctuary and Israel His dominion". This sanctuary was taken away from Judah, who was under the leadership of pseudo-Jews, the same one's mentioned by our Lord in Rev. 2:9; 3:9, in Matt. 21:43. Jesus said to the Jewish leaders: "Therefore say I unto you. The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation (not the church) bringing forth the fruits thereof." Surely the people who curse His name, and call Him all manner of blasphemous things; who say their aim is to destroy His church and His people, cannot possibly be the "true Israel" of God, or His "special people."
Many of the Jewish rulers, and the Pharisees of Jesus day, had none of Judah's or Israel's blood flowing in their veins, as is true with 90% of the Jews today. According to John 8:33, they were related to Abraham through Esau/Edom and you can see the outcome of this relationship in Mal. 1:2-4 - "I have loved you (Israel) saith the Lord. Yet ye say, wherein hast Thou loved us? Was not Esau Jacob's brother? saith the Lord; yet I loved Jacob and hated Es au, and laid his mountains and heritage waste... Whereas Edom saith, We are impoverished, hut we will return and build the desolate places; (what the Jews are attempting to do in Palestine today) thus saith the Lord. They shall build, but I will throw down; and they (Israel) shall call them (the Jews) the border of wickedness, and, the people against who the Lord hath indignation forever." (In spite of what men like Hal Lindsey and Jack Van Impe say to the contrary, watch and see what happens to the Israeli's in Palestine!)
It is extremely important that Christians are able to "pin point" the enemies who are making a mockery of the Christian faith today, for the souls of millions of Christians are uneasy about the state of the Christian faith in 1996. The minds of thousands of Christian clergy are troubled by mysterious pressures from above, which often prevent them from exercising sound judgment in the running of their church, or in the contents of the message they preach.
A month seldom goes by, that I do not receive a letter from the pastor of a denominational church, as I did recently from a young Baptist minister in Washington State. He said: "What is this strange pressure coming from my church headquarters, which hinders me from preaching the 'whole counsel' of God's Word?" This pressure and those behind it MUST be identified and stopped, if the church is to survive. If we give our people the truth, the church will stand like the Rock of Gibraltar against all enemies who come against her. If they are not given the truth, they will crumble and become the Laodicean church of Rev. 3:14-22.
The Christian clergy in America are primarily, if not solely responsible for the internal anti-Christ forces within Christianity, which today are attacking our Christian principles. We can no longer afford to "pussy-foot" around, because telling the truth may upset some of our people. The consequences will be too drastic!
There is a move underway in both fundamental and evangelical Christianity, and even within the Kingdom Movement, to downgrade the Divinity of Jesus Christ. This is the basis for teaching that He was a Jew, whether those who teach this are willing to admit it or not! For if Jesus was a Jew, and is admitted as part of the Godhead, then of necessity His Father MUST also be a Jew, and anyone with normal intelligence can see the fallacy in this thinking.
Truly, the Jesus we worship, was much more than mortal man, although He did take on the mantle of flesh, and become as one of us. From the fall of Adam, to the birth of Christ, the White race, culminating in Abraham's family, which was ultimately called Israel, waited for a promised Redeemer, and the whole world longed for a Savior.
In the First Century A.D. the Apostle Paul tells us in Rom. 8:22 - "For we KNOW that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now." Then in vs. 23, he explains this: ...even we ourselves (Christians) groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body". (Which will come for the redeemed at the resurrection).
This Savior the world waited for would be the Lamb of God, slain as it were from before the foundation of the world was laid; a Lamb without spot or blemish, who would be offered as the Perfect, once and for all sacrifice for the sins of His people. (See Matt. 15:24). This sacrifice was not that of "mere" man, born of an issue between man and woman, since all flesh had come under the corruption of sin. This Savior was to be a "second Adam," sent by God, a perfect human being in all respects.
The writer of Hebrews (10:5) declared that God created the body of Christ (not Christ himself, His spiritual being, but His physical body): "Wherefore when He (Christ) cometh into the world, He saith 'sacrifice and offering thou wouldest not, but a body, Thou (God) prepared for Me'
John 1:14 declares that this Second Adam had a perfect body created by God: "And the WORD was made flesh, and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory as of the only Begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth."
Both Adams, the First and the Second were God FORMED. The Word tells us so and it took the perfect Second Adam, (since the first fell through disobedience. Gen. 3:6) to redeem the world from the effects of First Adam's sin.
Certainly the Virgin Mary was not a mother in the normal sense of the word. There is no indication from the scriptures that she suffered the normal, pangs of child birth or that she had a midwife to attend her. She was the "human tabernacle" in which Christ, the Son of God was contained, until His appearance was due. He was not conceived through the normal cohabitation between man and woman, but through the Holy Spirit. If God had cohabited with her, as some teach, she could rightly have been considered the wife of God and that is Israel's position. If God had had a physical union with Mary, He would have broken His own law, since she was betrothed to Joseph at the time of Christ's conception, and in the eyes of the law, was as good as married to him.
In spite of what our friends in The Roman Catholic church say, the Bible indicates she had no other children. She was not a "perpetual virgin," as they teach, and she recognized herself as a sinner, she was not without "original sin," as can be seen in her "magnificat", Luke 1:47, when she said: "And my spirit hath rejoiced in GOD MY SAVIOR," (Emphasis mine).
It is sheer nonsense on the part of Christian leaders, when they attempt to make Jesus into a half-man, half God being. In Jer. 31:32, Jeremiah prophesied: ...for the Lord bath created a new thing in the earth, a woman has compassed a man". The English word COMPASSED, comes from the Greek CABAB, which means "to surround." So what we have in the birth of Christ, is no ordinary conception, but a Divine act! The same Jews who claim Jesus is one of them, state that His conception took place when his mother Mary, a Jewish prostitute, had an affair with a Roman soldier during menstruation.
One great Bible scholar, Dr. William L. Pettingill, writing in THE PILOT, stated: "According to the record, what He (God) did was create (FORM) a body for His Son and place it in the womb of a virgin, just as in the first creation He created a body for the first Adam and placed it in the Garden of Eden. So should it be thought incredible that God should do these things? The real difficulty with those who reject the testimony of this Book, is that they have a wrong concept of who God is, and what He can do."
I agree fully with Dr. Pettingill, if he would change the word CREATE to FORM. For that is what God did with the First Adam. In Gen. 1:27 we see where He CREATED beings, male and female, but He FORMED ADAM, male only from the "dust of the earth", in Gen. 2:7, and did something He did not do with His CREATION. He "breathed into Adam's nostrils the "breath of life, and man (Adam) became a living soul." This sets him apart spiritually from all other human beings. It does not make him SUPERIOR, but makes him a "peculiar peoplentio1 Peter 2:9) (set aside for a special purpose).
From a biological viewpoint there can be no such thing as the "seed of a woman", as "seed" is always provided by the man.
This is confirmed in Gal. 3:16, I believe, where the Apostle Paul writes: "Now to Abraham and his SEED were the promises made, He saith not, And to SEEDS, as to many (Abraham was the father of many nations, but in Israel was his seed called), but as one, and to thy SEED, which is CHRIST."
Doesn't it seem strange to you, that the Jews who proclaim they are the creators of the New Testament and that Christianity is the "child of Judaism," are the one's who are openly seeking to destroy it?
The reason, I believe, is that the TALMUDIC-JUDAISTS, realize that this section (the New Testament) of Holy Writ, plainly indicates and accuses them for what they really are, the "spiritual children of Satan," John 8:44. Some called SEEDLINERS, believe they are the "literal children of Satan."
If a modern preacher, or writer, such as myself, were to use the same words Jesus used in condemning the Jews, he would be hounded out of the country as the worst kind of "anti-Semite hate monger." They dare not do this with Christ, as of yet. Jesus in no way softened His condemnation of these evil people, because it might cause a political or religious "fuss."
There MUST be some definite reason why, from the very opening of the Gospel according to Matthew, through the dosing book of Revelation, the Lord and His Apostles, exposed the wickedness of Judaism, and especially that of the Jewish leaders.
In John 2:13-21, we have a vivid account of how Jesus overthrew the tables of the money changers in the Temple, and formed a whip with which He literally drove them out, as He accused them of turning God's house into a "den of thieves." Can you imagine the reaction today, if someone approached a televangelist on his TV program and accused him of the same thing? Yet they do the same thing, in their gaudy TV programs which are designed not so much to praise God, and draw men to Him, as a tool to raise money. Take some time and honestly evaluate a religious program such as that put on by Paul Crouch and his Trinity Broadcasting System.
In an opening speech to a hand picked group of 47 American college students, (43 of whom were Jews), as they attended the Lenin School of Psychological War-fare at the University of Moscow in 1933, Nicolai Lenin told them: "You MUST work until every teacher of psychology unknowingly or knowingly teaches only Communist (Zionist) doctrine under the guise of psychology.
"You MUST dominate as respected men the fields of psychiatry and psychology (note how many of these professionals are Jews). You MUST dominate the hospitals and universities. Use the courts, use the judges, use the Constitution of the country, use it's medical societies and it's laws to further our cause. When you succeed, you will now discover you can effect your own legislation at will and you can, by careful organization, by a constant campaign of terror, cause the capitalist (Christian-goyim) by his own appropriations, to finance a large portion of the quiet conquest of his country."
On page 52, of their handbook on PSYCHOPOLITICS, which is the "blueprint" for the TALMUDIC/COMMUNIST takeover of Christian America, they state: "You MUST recruit every agency in the nation marked for slaughter, into a foaming hatred of the Christian religion. You MUST suborn district attorneys and judges into an intense belief ... that Christian practice ... is vicious, bad, insanity causing, public hated and intolerable." This is why today, the Christian man or woman who loves God, their people, their family and their country, enough to fight and die for them, are held up in the Jewish owned press as a danger to the rest of the country.
In Jesus' many encounters with the Pharisees of His day, they brought pressure against the families of those who He had healed. We have documented evidence that the Jewish controlled American Medical Association has persecuted Christian physicians who have practiced "preventative medicine," such as "chelation therapy" for cancer, and other forms of natural cures which have done much more to alleviate the suffering of cancer patients, than the quackery of modern medicine, which sucks billions of dollars yearly out of American pockets, while making very little headway against the disease. There is much evidence that these men do not want a cure, as there is too much money to be made in treating the disease, and in the drugs which are sold. This is the moral makeup of Judaism at its best!
Whenever the teachings of our Lord came at cross purposes with Judaism, the Jews organized against Him. This is true today, as we see an "unregistered, illegal agency of the Israeli government, the ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE OF THE JEWISH B'NAI B'RITH, as they try and remove prayer and Bible reading from our school system, promote sexual excess among our yo speand destroy every vestige of Christianity in the country. They have even gone so far as to try and forbid the shipping of the Bible in the mails, labeling it as "hate literature." These are the people you are backing in your church, under the guise of being God's Chosen People.
While railing against the Christian New Testament, they hypocritically promote the filth and anti-Christ teachings of their Talmud until today, Jewish politicians are taking their oath of office with their hands on the heathen Talmud, rather than the Christian Bible. How can we trust these men, when under their religion, every year on the Day of Atonement, they take the Kol Nidre Oath, which states that all "promises and oaths they make during the coming year are to be null and void?"
Today these charlatans are attempting to destroy the Word of God, by clever underhanded means. One of these is an organization of scholars calling themselves the JESUS SEMINAR who are seducing Christians by impressing them with their prestigious degrees, into believing that they are Bible scholars, when in reality they are trying to destroy the scriptures. (Many of them are Jews, or Christian-Zionists).
Here is part of an article which appeared in the November 8, 1993, U.S. NEWS AND WORLD REPORT, page 75:
The Bible may be sacred, but apparently is not sacrosanct. (inviolable). Not to members of the Jesus Seminar anyway. The controversial panel of biblical scholars - which earlier concluded that Jesus spoke only a fraction of words attributed to Him - has begun a radical revision of the New Testament that it says will provide a more accurate account of Christianity's origins. (They completely ignore that the scriptural accounts of Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Peter and Paul, were written in the most part by men who lived with Jesus for three years and knew Him intimately. These are discounted as "nobodies", JM).
In a process that may take years and is already stirring up opposition, the seminar last week completed the first phase of a plan to redefine the New Testament canon - the collection of ancient writings that includes the four Gospels, the Acts of the Apostles, 21 Apostolic letters, and the Book of Revelation. The panel - about 70 liberal scholars who since 1985 have been examining the historicity of the Gospels - will likely recommend that at least some of the 27 books be jettisoned (they have already recommended this for the Gospel of John, because of Christ's many violent reactions to the Jewish Pharisees - JM). "The Christian movement hasn't seriously examined the question of canon since the 1 5th century," says Robert Funk, head of the seminar's Westar Institute in Sonoma, Calif. "It's time for academic scholars to raise the issue."
Behind the move says Funk, is the modern discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls and a gnostic library at Mag Hammadi, Egypt, written during Christianity's formative years. Almost certain to be added by the scholars, are such writings as the Gospel of Thomas, a first-century collection of Jesus' sayings found at Mag Hammadi, and the Signs Gospel, a reconstructed text of what some scholars think is the lost account of the miracles of Jesus.
The authenticity of some New Testament books have come under renewed attack, (this is a good word to use in this case, for this is what this group are doing. Attacking the authenticity of God's Word. But it is interesting to note, that this attack, from the same Judaic background, has been going on for 20 centuries, and the Old Ship of Zion, though somewhat scarred by the shots of the adversary, still sails gallantly along, flying from her masthead, the flag which says: "By this sign we conquer!" JM)
To return to the U.S. News and World Report. Whatever the authority, to redefine the Bible is to strike at the heart of sacred tradition. For most of official Christendom, the canon has been closed since the fourth century, when church councils approved what they viewed as the only authoritative documents. According to church tradition virtually all of these were written during the first century A.D., either by apostles or close associates of Christ.
When the Jesus Seminar met in October 1992, some members rightfully argued that altering the canon was not an appropriate task for academicians. "We are neither qualified nor commissioned to make these kind of decisions," declared Stephen Patterson, professor of New Testament at the Eden Theological Seminary in St. Louis. "What constitutes scripture is a question for communities of faith to decide". But Funk argues that since the Bible is a "cultural artifact", that biblical scholars have the "moral responsibility to determine what belongs to the cultural legacies of Christianity and Judaism
"These liberal scholars have no ecclesiastical authority," says Donald Hagner, professor of New Testament at Fuller Theological Seminary in Pasadena, Calif. "They can scheme away until they are blue in the face, but they are not going to change the church". But they have changed the church; they are in the process of destroying it, and very few of them will admit that this is the purpose of the Jesus Seminar, and all Judaic efforts to destroy the authenticity of the New Testament. They are a vital part of the New World Order scheme, which must destroy the fundamental faith of White Christianity in particular, before they can take over ultimate control. While these attacks go on, the Judeo-Christian church, often in silence, cowers before these Judaic attacks, while at the same time insisting that their founder was a Jew, and that Christianity came from the rotten roots of Talmudic Judaism. It is indeed a strange enigma! If the National Conference of Christians and Jews are genuinely interested in "interfaith brotherhood", do you not think that they might start by having the Jews expunge from the Talmud the many anti-Christian, anti-Christ passages, as they want to remove from the New Testament, Jesus' remarks directed at the Pharisees?
The Jews of today cannot truthfully described themselves as JEWS because they are in no sense JUDEANS. They cannot correctly identify themselves by their religious belief. The origin of the word JEW, does not have it's roots in JUDAISM. The words JEW and JEWISH were unknown until introduced by Judaism in the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries. It took millions of dollars to "brainwash" gullible Christians to accept these words, along with the falsehood that Jesus was a Jew, and that Christianity came from this heathen cesspool.
When a pastor or priest boasts to his church audience about his "Jewish blood," (and he is a converted Jew), be also refers to Jesus as being of "Jewish blood," His Mother Mary as being of "Jewish blood," and the early disciples, being of "Jewish blood." What is Jewish blood? What happens to so-called Jewish blood when a Jew is converted to Christianity? Does it remain the same? How is Jewish blood biologically different from the blood of other faiths and races? Especially when the Jews come from an Ashkenazi, Turco-Mongolian background. Is their blood the same as that of a Jew who can actually trace his blood back to Abraham? If the Jew can do this, than why can't we Christians refer to our "Christian blood?" Even though we come from many different races.
Why do we find female Jews, when there are none in other religions. Have you ever heard of a female Protestant, Catholic, Hindu, or Moslem. Yet why do our preachers refer to Christ's mother as a JEWESS?
In like manner, the popular use of the word Judeo-Christianity presents a strange combination. When you use the term "Judeo" are you referring to "Pharisaism," or "Talmudism?", or so-called JUDAISM? How can there be a Judeo-Christian anything, when they are diametric opposites? It makes as much sense as to say that something is "hot-cold;" "young-old;" "wet-dry." These are antonyms, not synonyms as Jews would like to have Christians believe.
According to Dr. Freedman, the word "anti-Semitism" has no place in the English language and serves only one purpose today, that of a "smear word". When a Jew feels that anyone opposes their objectives, they immediately apply the term "anti-Semitic" to their victims. "When Jews in 1946, were unable to disprove my statements regarding the situation in Palestine, they spent millions of dollars to "smear" me as an "anti-Semite," hoping to discredit me in the eyes of the public who were interested in what I had to say. Until 1946, I was a "little saint" in the eyes of the Jews. When I disagreed with them publicly on the Zionist intentions in Palestine, suddenly I was "Anti-Semite Number One!"
"It is a disgrace to see Christian clergy take up the use of this word. They should know better. They know that it is a meaningless word. They know that the correct word would be "Judneophobe." Anti-Semitic was developed as a smear word, because it is associated with Jesus in the minds of most Christians today. Christians become accessories to the destruction of the Christian faith when they tolerate and use this smear word." (UNQ)
We know that our nation's standards have sunk to a new low, in spite of the fact that there are supposed to be 50-million "born again Christians" in America. Where is their influence? Have they become the "salt" Jesus mentioned in Matt. 5:13, which has lost it's "savor," it's ability to act as salt and hold back corruption? The moral standards of a nation are the crucible in which the nation's character is refined and molded. I cringe when I hear some stupid person say. "The moral life of the President doesn't matter. That's his private affair." No it's not? It's a matter of concern for the entire nation, for we are judged by our leadership. If it is rotten and treasonous, then our country will follow in it's footsteps! The end product can never be better than it's ingredients!"
Those of us who have studied the conspiracy, know that the guidance and control of this nation has fallen by default into the bands of those persons least worthy of trusteeship. One of their greatest achievements had been their ability to gain "in am Christian prostitutes" to front for them. (A "male prostitute"), is a man whom offers the faculties of his anatomy from the neck up for hire to anyone who will pay the "asking price", just as the female of the species offers her body from the waist down. There are thousands of these "male prostitutes" in Christianity, who walk unnoticed pandering pernicious propaganda for profit and political power. The corroding effect of their subtle intrigue, is slowly disintegrating the moral fiber of this nation and threatening the very fiber of Christianity.
The scripture warns of them. In 2 Peter 2:18, be warns of those "who speak great swelling words of vanity, they allure through the lusts of the flesh, through much wantonness, those that were clean escaped from them who live in error". In vs. 2 of this same chapter he says: "But there were false prophets among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them." 2 Timothy 3:1 says: "This know that perilous times shall come," and then lists some of the perils we see prevalent in America today.
Dr. Freedman further states: "The 150 million Christians in the United States were high pressured' by the Christian clergy to give their unqualified support for the Zionist program in Palestine. We sowed the wind; now we are about to reap the whirlwind'. Christians were exhorted to regard the self-styled Jews" of Eastern Europe as God's 'Chosen People', and Palestine as their Promised Land. They knew better and this was a case of cupidity, not stupidity" (UNQ).
The Christian people in America are entitled to hear the truth, and it MUST come from their pastors. Yet, unfortunately, there are few pastors in America today, who will tell their people the truth about Judaism and it's conspiracy to destroy them and everything they stand for. In order to remain free, we must preach the whole truth, not a selfish anemic message of "personal salvation," which leaves Christ in the cold as far as His Lordship is concerned. Our pastors lie, because the "people would have it so." The average Christian does not want to know the truth, because it "scares hell out of them!" Whether our Christian leaders are guilty through ignorance, indifference, or deliberately will make little difference in the long run, for the "Zero Hour" of the Christian faith has arrived! No institution can survive when it is erected on a false foundation. The deterioration, disintegration and final destruction of Christianity and our freedom, will be accelerated in the direct ratio to the distortions and misrepresentations we allow to creep in. We MUST allow no substitutes for the truth. Referring once more to Dr. Freedman, be said: "For every ounce of good you do through conversion of a self-styled Jew to Christianity, you do a ton of harm to the Christian faith. For regardless of what anyone, anywhere, at anytime may say, events of recent years have established beyond the shadow of a doubt that the Christian faith today is standing with one foot in the grave, and the other on a banana peel.
"If the day ever arrives when Christians can no longer profess Christ, as we do in the Free World today, then we will see the beginning of the last days. What we need today is a spiritual Paul Revere who will ride across this land, warning Christians that our enemies are closing in on us". (UNQ).
Return to Jack Mohr's Web Page