Race Mixing A Social and Spiritual Disaster
Part 2 of 2

by Lt. Col. Gordon "Jack" Mohr, AUS Ret.

Miscegenation Is The Enemy's Blueprint For White Destruction!

Destruction of White Christian civilization is the major purpose of the present drive towards miscegenation. The enemy often openly admits this. They know that it has always been the White Aryan people who have been the bulwark of freedom. So in order to control the world, this faction must go. Historians and sociologists know that mongrel people are easier to control. History proves this, and our enemy, being Satanically inspired men know that every White civilization (and there have been some 25 of these in the sixty centuries of written history) which has practiced miscegenation, have destroyed themselves from within. The sands of history are covered with the dried bones of those who have tried "race mixing" and have found it was deadly poison for both races. Some in the Black race may dispute this, but history proves that Blacks have never been able to rule their own people justly, and the fables of great Black civilizations in Africa, are just that, "fairy tables." For centuries the Blacks in Africa walked over untold mineral riches without ever recognizing their worth for other than trinkets. I have been in places in the interior of Sudan, where they had never seen a white man, and where the Blacks were living as their aborigine ancestors did thousands of years ago, without the knowledge of a wheel, or how to make fire. As I have mentioned before, not one country in Africa, now under Black control, has bettered themselves, and in South Africa, where gullible Americans have been brainwashed about mistreatments of Blacks, the Black people live better than in any other country on the Dark Continent. It seems that our stupid liberals could see this, when vou consider that South Africa is the only country on the Continent with an immigration problem. This would hardly be possible, if this country was as suppressive of Blacks as we have been led to believe by the Jewish controlled media, which means the International Banker clique.

As a result of these international plans, the present public education towards miscegenation by the media and TV, does not happen by accident, or because people are interested in "equality for all," as is sometimes claimed. It is planned for control.

Plans have been in the mill for hundreds of years to destroy White Christian civilization. It has been underway ever since Jewish efforts were used to pressure the Roman Emperors into intense persecution of Christian communities in the Empire. It was inherent in Christ's Parable of the Vineyard in Mark 12, where the wicked men said of the King's son: "This is the heir: come let us kill Him and seize his inheritance." Mark 12:12, tells us that when Christ made this statement, the Pharisees understood that He was speaking about them.

They knew they were the wicked husbandmen, the usurpers, those "which say they are Jews and are not; but are of the synagogue of Satan," which the risen Christ spoke about in Revelation 2:9; 3:9.

Ever since that day when Jewish leaders "killed the heir," Jesus Christ, they have attempted to control the world. This plan can be found in many Jewi8h writings, where they openly boast about their plans. This world is Christ's inheritance. It was given to Him by His Father, God Almighty. He was ordained by God to rule this world as King of Kings, and Lord of Lords. But the International Zionists and their ilk will not have it so, and shout in the face of God Himself: "We will not have this Man to rule over us." (For the final outcome of their rebellion, read Malachi 2:2-4).

Many well-meaning Christian pastors and people have been "brainwashed" by enemy propaganda into believing that Christ's worst enemies are His Chosen. Others, who are not so naive, and know the truth; men such as Jerry Falwell, Jack Van Impe, David Webber, Billy Graham, and many others, know that the Jews are the "synagogue of Satan," yet they continue to support them for the monetary benefits which accure to them by so doing. Because of Jewish wealth and money control, it has now become profitable in America, to be a traitor to God and country.

We must remember that Judaism of today, is the Pharisaism of Jesus' day. Their leaders readily admit this. They openly brag about their plans to destroy Christianity. WE can see their plans in operation, as we see how they are behind the removing of prayers from public schools, the removing of Bible reading, the removing of Christian landmarks which have been present for generations. A little detective work will prove to you that almost 100% of these attacks against Christianity are initiated by Jews.

In his book L'ANTISEMITISME, p.350, Jewish author Bernard Lazare says: "The Jew is not satisfied with de-Christianizing, he Judaizes, he destroys the Catholic or Protestant faith, he provokes indiffernce, but he imposes his idea on the world of morals, and of life upon those whose faith he ruins; he works at his ago-old task, the annihilation of the religion of Christ".

Jesus said of the Pharisees (Matthrew 23:15) - "...ye compass (go over) sea and land to make one proselyte (convert), and when he is made ye make him two-fold more a child of hell than yourselves".

The so-called Christian pastors who support Judaism, are much more dangerous to the cause of Christ, than any anti-Christ Jew.

In 1902, Israel Cohen, a Jewish member of the American Communist Party, wrote a book titled A RACIAL PROGRAM FOR THE TWENTIETH CENTURY. It can be found in the 1957 Congressional Record, p.7557. Here in part is what he said:

"We must realize that our party's most powerful weapon is racial tension. By propounding the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries have been oppressed by whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory! While inflaming the Negro against the Whites, we will endeavor to instill in the Whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negros. We will aid the Negros to rise in prominence in every walk of life, the professions, in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to inter-marry with the Whites and bring about a process which will deliver America into our cause".

There you have it in black and white, straight from the horse's mouth.

This shows you how the International Jew, through their control of the media, television, the entertainment world of Hollywood, and sports, among other things, has brought about the moral climate in America, where miscegenation, the disease which always destroys, is now considered as popular and desirable.

As we study the facts, we can come to only one conclusion and that is that "race mixing" is a big part of the Talmudic plot to destroy White Christian Civilization, all the screaming of "racism and anti-Semitism" to the contrary. Somehow, the Zionist enemy MUST cover up these facts, if they are to succeed in their dream of world dominion.

In the Jewish/Communist textbook on PSYCHOPOLITICS, published in 1933, which is their blueprint for the destruction of Christian America, they openly state: "We have battled in America since the century's turn to bring to nothing, any and all Christian influence and we are succeeding. While we today seem to be kind to the Christian, remember that we have yet to influence the Christian world to our ends. When that is done, we will have an end to them everywhere." This is their avowed plan, and all the Judeo-Christian cries that they are the Chosen People, will not change the fact that they hate our God, His Son, and the freedom Christianity has brought to the world.

We know from the Bible (Amos 3:7) that God does nothing without first revealing it to His servants the prophets. Many in fundamental circles say that "prophesy" ended when Christ died on the cross, but Jesus Himself said: "...all things I have heard of My Father I have made known unto you." Search the scriptures, for even today, God reveals His will through Godly men who serve Him. They may not be prophets in the Old Testament sense, but wise men, from the Word of God, can and will discern the future. We must be sure that they come from God's Word, and that they are God's men - "By their fruits shall ye know them".

Herbert Spencer once said: "There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep men in everlasting ignorance." We often refer to this principle as "prejudice". Most people believe that criticism of another religion, or people who are different, is "prejudice". This makes it obvious they do not understand the meaning of the word. It is taken from the Latin word "praejudicium" which means: "preconceived judgment or opinion adverse to anything, which comes from unjust grounds, or without sufficient knowledge". So before you criticize, always have the facts. (This disease of "prejudice", is prevalent among Christian Fundamentalists and Evangelicals. It is the disease which kept me in spiritual darkness for over 45 years). The most vivid example of this that I can think of, was what happened to me when I went to my pastor (Independent Fundamental Baptist), after three months of study from history and the scriptures, which proved to me that today's Jews are not "true Israel," the Chosen People of the Bible, since they have none of the "fingerprints" which identify Israel in the closing out days of this age. I approached him by saying: "Brother Bob, I doubt that you will accept these facts, but I believe you need to know about them." Immediately, when he saw they were unfavorable to the Jews, he threw them in his waste basket with the angry and contemptuous remark: "You can't show me anything about the Jews. I already know what the Bible says and if you insist in bringing these things to our attention, the door of every Baptist church in this country will be slammed in your face." He wasn't far from wrong, for within two weeks of that meeting, he had turned the hearts of every Baptist minister in Mississippi against me, sometimes using methods which were neither Christian or honest. Fourteen week-long revivals which had been scheduled for the coming year, were cancelled immediately, on this grounds alone, that I no longer accepted the Jew as God's Chosen.

During the signing of the Declaration of Independence a strange thing occurred, which is not spoken of in the history books of the land, but which is recorded in our nation's history. When the Declaration was finished, men were hesitant to sign it, no one wanted to take the lead. Then a strange thing occurred, a stranger stood up in the balcony and spoke these words: "The words of this declaration will live in the world long after our bones are dust. Sign that parchment! Sign, if the next moment the gibbet's rope is draped around your neck! Sign, if the next minute this hall rings with the sound of clashing axes! Sign, by all your hopes in life and death! As men! As husbands! As fathers! Brothers! Sign your names to that parchment, or be accursed forever! Sign, and not only for yourselves, but for all ages, for that parchment will become the textbook of freedom, the Bible of the rights of men forever!

Nay, do not start and whisper with surprise! It is truth, your heart witnesses it! God proclaims it! Look at this strange band of exiles and outcasts, suddenly transformed into a people: Israel was to be born in a day, (Isaiah 66:8) a handful of men, weak in arms, but mighty in God-like faith; nay, look at your recent achievements, your Bunker Hill, your Lexington, and then tell me, if you can, that God has not given America to be free".

When he had finished speaking, they rushed to the table to sign and after it was over, they looked for the stranger to thank him for his inspired words, but he could not be found. He had vanished, though the doors were locked and he was never identified.

The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution which followed, became two of the greatest documents of freedom ever conceived by the minds of men, yet they were built on the scriptural basis of the Mayflower Compact, which took place more than 200 years before. Carlyle said of it: "The Mayflower carried the most precious cargo that ever sailed the seas," for it was the seeds of the Mayflower Compact, signed on November 21,1620, in the stuffy little cabin of a tiny ship, called the Mayflower, as it lay anchored off the shore of what is now Provincetown, Massachusetts, which was the basis for the freedom, God's enemies are now trying to take away from us through this disease of "miscegenation". The Pilgrim fathers wrnte: "In the name of God, Amen! We whose names are undersigned, having undertaken for the glory of God and the advancement of the Christian faith, a voyage to plant the first colony - do by these presents, solemnly and mutually, in the presence of God, combine ourselves into a body politic".

Daniel Webster called this compact the "seed corn of the Constitution". We who love God, know that these mighty documents were not penned unaided by the genius of men, but came about through the help and guidance of Almighty God. So no matter what our enemies say to the contrary, we KNOW that America was conceived as a Christian nation. This is what the Satanists of International Zionism are seeking to destroy through "race mixing". Only you and I, concerned Americans and Christians can stop it, and then only with aid from the King. It will be difficult, for we will be fighting against our own White "brainwashed" Christian people. Christ said that the time would come, when these would think they were doing God a favor by killing us. (John 16:2)

I realize that on the surface, our battle seems impossible, as the odds are stacked against us. I have been in this fight for a long time, and sometimes I suffer from "battle fatigue".

I'd like to stop fighting and do some of the things I enjoy. Men tell me: "We have gone downhill for too long; the enemy is too strong; there is no hope. Maybe we should give up and make the best deal possible with the enemy".

Do not talk to me of compromise or "making deals" with the enemy. I will have none of it, for experience shows that this always leads to disaster. I have hope and faith, founded on the promises of our God. I believe He will give us victory, if we are willing to obey Him. Our watchword MUST be OBEDIENCE TO GOD MUST COME BEFORE VICTORY!

A Christian lady once accused me of fighting against God, because I am trying to save a remnant in America. She said: "God has said in His Word that America will be destroyed and you are fighting it!" Not so! (When I asked her to show me this in the Bible, she couldn't and this made her angry). But in spite of every enemy effort made to destroy His White Israel people (and I use this term advisedly), God will give us victory if we obey and follow His FORMULA FOR SURVIVAL as found in 2nd Chronicles 7:14. But we MUST do more than give this "lip service". To have victory we must abandon "doing our own thing", to love our God, "with all our souls, and heart, and mind", which means making Him first in everything we do. He must come before self, before family, before race, before country. Redemption is available for America, if Christians want it badly enough.

- Annex -

The following information will be difficult for many Christians to assimilate. I am not sure I agree with it 100%, but it has merit and as Christians we should examine it in the light of God's Word, and let His Spirit be our guide in accepting or rejecting it. It will strengthen our argument against "race mixing - miscegenation," whatever you choose to call it.

This information was given to me by the VIRGINIA CHRISTIAN ISRAELITES, P.O. Box 109, Round Hill, Virginia 22141. If you have difficulty with it and want to ask questions, please address it to them. I do not know the name of the author.

This annex will be divided into four parts:

Part I - The Beasts of the Field!

When the word "beasts" is used in the scripture, it often simply means "a living creature." For example, in the book of Revelation (KJV) the term "beast" is used to identify certain heavenly creatures who serve God day and night before His throne. Thus, in Revelation 4:6, 8-11 we have the statement - "...and in the midst of the throne, and about the throne were four beasts . .

In connection with this, read Revelation 5:6, 8 and 6:1, 3, 5, 6, 7, where the word "beast" is used. I have quoted the above scriptures principally to show that there is nothing belittling, demeaning, or derogatory in the biblical use of the term "beast". It is as honorable as the term "angel" or "man".

The English word "beast" is translated from three different Hebrew words:

(1) "behema", meaning cattle or quadruped;

(2) "beir", meaning a brute beast; and,

(3) "chevyah", meaning a "living creature".

The Greek word translated "beast" is "zoon", and this is the word used in the passage quoted above, and in Revelation 7:11; 14:4; 15:7 and 19:4.

Many Bible translations, including the very reliable Revised Version, translated the Greek word "zoon" as "living creature", rather than "beast", and so it is used in all the aforementioned passages. The same should apply to the Hebrew word "chevyah", and does, according to Young's Analytical Concordance. Most translations, however, seem to prefer the expression "beast of the field," or "beast of the earth," to be the best translation of the Hebrew "chevyah". This is the word used in Genesis 3:1.

From this passage it becomes evident that two very definite and distinct types of living creatures are described in the scripture, one identified as "beast of the earth, or the field," while the other is described as the "beast before the throne". Very often the word "beast" is used without the phrase "of the field," or "of the earth".

There is a fundamental principle which every Bible student should remember. It is this: God never troubles to explain things which are not absolutely necessary for us to know. He states the factual truth as it is, and, because HE is completely incapable of untruth or error, He expects us to believe exactly what He says even when no details are given. It is here that faith and trust in the veracity of God always thrive. It is written: "In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth." That statement is true! You may ask ten thousand questions about it, such as: "Where did God come from?" How did He make the earth? Where did He get the materials? How did He make the stars? How long did it take Him to create it all? and many, many others which the wisest of men cannot answer.

The Lord did not say He wanted us to understand everything He does. He simply states the indisputable facts and leaves man to believe or disbelieve as he wishes.

The scriptures say that a certain man was named Peleg, for in his days the earth was divided (Genesis 10:25). God does not explain what method He used to divide the continents and islands, but in passing, the revealing statement is made: "In his (Peleg's) days the earth was divided". This answers a problem which has baffled the best scientific minds for centuries. If you believe it without explanation, it answers much. If you try and pry into it, you get hopelessly lost in the fog.

Thus, in Genesis 3:1, where the scripture says that the "serpent was more subtle than all the beasts of the field that the Lord had made," it becomes a baffling passage, yet wholly true.

We may ask a thousand questions about this passage. Who was the beast of the field who is here referred to as a serpent? Where did he come from? When was he made? If he was a beast, how come he could speak an understandable human language? But God leaves you and I to believe His Word and then discover its truth, "line upon line, precept on precept". Only then does it become understandable.

In Genesis 3:1, we have an introduction to this "living creature," called a "serpent". The English word for "serpent" as used here, comes from the Hebrew word "nachash". It makes sense, if we use it as a proper name as it was intended to be. Thus the text would read: "Now Nachash was more subtle than any beast of the field." The Hebrew word for "man" is ADAM, and the translators wisely left this word capitalized, naming this first White man as Adam. Why not use the same principle with Nachash?

It is universally admitted among Bible scholars, that the Hebrew word "Nachash" presents great difficulty when translated as "serpent". This difficulty disappears, however, when instead it is translated properly as "Nachash", and we leave it as a proper name, as it was intended to be. Dr. Adam Clark who has become known as the "prince of Bible commentators", has much to say on this subject. In his labors to solve this difficulty concerning Genesis 3, he said that this was "one of the most difficult, as well as the most important of all narratives in the whole book of God". "We are obliged," he said, to seek for some other word to designate the word Nachash in the text, rather than the word serpent, which in every view of the subject appears to me to be inefficient and inapplicable. In all this uncertainty it is natural for a serious inquirer after truth to look everywhere for information. In such an inquiry, the Arabic may be expected to afford some help from its great similarity to the Hebrew. A root in this language, very similar to that in the text, seems to cast considerable light on the subject. 'Ghanas, or Khansas', signifies that the (Nachash) 'departed, drew off, lay hid, seduced, slunk away.' From this Arabic root comes 'ahhnas, knanasa and khannoos', which all signify an 'ape', or a creature similar to an ape genus

Dr. Clark combats the idea that the tempter of Eve was of the serpent species maintaining that none of them were ever able to walk upright. The very word "serpent" comes from "serpo" which means "to crawl". For that class of reptiles, it would be neither a curse nor punishment to go on their bellies. Furthermore, serpents have no organs of speech nor any kind of articulate sound. They can only hiss.

Dr. Clark continues with this summary: In this account we find

(1) that whatever this Nachesh was, he stood at the head of all inferior animals as far as wisdom and understanding was concerned;

(2) that he walked erect, for this is necessarily implied by his punishment to crawl on his belly;

(3) that he was endued with the gift of speech, understandable to humans;

(4) that he was able to reason, and,

(5) that these things were common to this creature.

There is no doubt that Eve had seen him walk upright, talk and reason and therefore showed no surprise when he accosted her in the language of the text.

According to Genesis 3:1, Nachash posed his question as a challenge to God: "Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?" It is quite obvious that there was much more to the discussion between Eve and Nachash, than what is recorded, since the scriptural record seems to begin in the middle of their conversation. Eve reiterated what Nachash obviously already knew when she told him that she and Adam were allowed to eat of the fruit of every tree in the garden, except that of the "Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil," which was forbidden by God, on the pain of certain death.

From the little recorded of this conversation, it becomes evident that Nachash understood very well the disasterous consequences to Adam and Eve, should they disobey God, for he went about his seduction with artful cunning, which is not a characteristic of lower animals, and was no doubt inspired by Satan. (Some teach that the "serpent" was Satan himself, but there is no scriptural evidence of this).

It becomes evident that the Adversary of man, sometimes called the "devil" or "Satan", used Nachash as his willing tool in corrupting mankind. There is little doubt that Nachash was morally responsible for his action, for he was not of the lower order of animals without mind or consciousness towards God. He was one of the "beasts - the living creatures" of the field, and the wisest and smartest of them all. If he had not been morally responsible for his actions, God would not have judged him as He did. Notice in Genesis 3:14, that the curse against Nachash was directed against him as an individual and did not effect all members of his kind, as many teach. He was reduced from walking upright to a condition lower than that of cattle, going about on all fours as an ape and compelled to eat his food in the dust of the earth.

The judgment on Eve was:

(1) greatly increased conception;

(2) accompanied by sorrow and pain;

(3) her husband should rule over her;

(4) and her desire should be to him.

Adam was sentenced:
(1) to toil on cursed ground;

(2) in sorrow would he eat all the days of his life;

(3) thorns and thistles would come forth to fight the food he planted;

(4) and with the sweat of his brow he should eat his bread, until he died and returned to dust. The moment Adam and Eve disobeyed God, they began to die, thus fulfilling the curse.

With these thoughts in mind, it might be well for us to consider this seven fold proposition, all relative to the "beast of the field":
(1) It would be able to speak, reason and carry on an intelligible conversation with humans;

(2) It would be able to "fast", and "pray", and "bear responsibility before God";

(3) It would be able to wear clothing and put them on and take them off under its own power;

(4) It would be a biped, walking upright like a man, having hands and feet, rather than the paws and hooves of other lowly animals;

(5) That he would often associate with man;

(6) That he alone of all the animal family would be able to crossbreed with man and because of this, this cross-breeding was forbidden by God; and,

(7) He was not a nation and never had a civilization of his own.

The first proposition states that this "beast of the field" was not a dumb animal, but an intelligent being, able to speak, reason and carry on intelligent conversation with members of the human family. This proposition has been covered by examining the scriptural account of the conversation between Eve and Nachash. It is evident that Eve was not surprised by his ability to speak with her. Since he was more subtle, "clever" than any others of his species, it is very possible that he had been chosen by Adam to supervise other members of the Nachash and was responsible to Adam for helping him "dress the garden" Genesis 2:15). Evidently in this pristine setting it was a pleasant task. It is evident that Adam was the ruler in the garden, an overseer, but not a common laborer. Adam's authority was over all creatures on earth, in the seas, and under the earth. He was the master in every respect and every creature did his will. I believe that Nachash and other members of this "beast people" were his intelligent servants, who had been given this special task by God Himself. When Adam named every creature, he gave them names suitable to their usefulness and ministry and it was not until after his disobedience that man himself became a servant and slave with none to serve under him. He had to make his own way, with the sweat of his brow.

It would seem rather ridiculous for God to place Adam in the Garden of Eden to be it's caretaker, and place him in control of all creatures, and still neglect to give him intelligent living creatures to help carry out his duties. It was that way in the beginning, and will be that way when the Second Adam, Jesus Christ, comes back to rule in His restored kingdom.

In this way, Adam was first given dominion and rulership, but through disobedience was forced to do the work that his servants had previously done.

When the master became the slave, then Nachash and his race were reduced to nothingness, since they had no one to serve. For this reason the continent of Africa, became known as the "Black Continent," not because of the color of men's skin who lived there, but because of the darkness that had descended on Nachash and his people. For over 6,000 years they have waited in darkness, ignorance and poverty, for the day when they will once more assume their appointed tasks to the king, in His Kingdom.

In spite of all efforts by liberals and Black leaders to manufacture a great Black civilization in Africa, there has never been any.

We have abundantly proved that this Nachash was an intelligent creature, able to think, reason, and bear moral responsibility. He was not a snake, but an intelligent creation known in scripture as the "beast of the field". The rendering of the word "subtle," in the Ferrar Fenton translation indicates that it means: "imprudent, lacking in modesty, contemptuous, cocky, and capable of using his intelligence for deceptive purposes, to gain his own advantage".

The second proposition was that this being could "fast," "pray", and bear moral responsibility before God. If we can show this creature, variously described in scripture as "beast of the field," is simply "beast", is capable of fasting, prayer, and repentance. Then most certainly we are dealing with an intelligent being, possessing God-consciousness and far above the realm of serpents, who though often associated with man, is not man, or a descendant of Adam.

In the third chapter of Jonah we find an interesting story. (This is just another case where the Bible states the truth, as it is, but does not make any explanation). We should remember, that all Israelites of that time, understood the proper identity of the "beasts of the field". Jonah preached, on the order of God, that the city of Ninevah would be destroyed in forty days. The King of Ninevah evidently believed the prophet, and set about to seek God's mercy for his people. (Please accept the facts as they are recorded in God's Word without trying to make them fit into modern tradition, which is far more often wrong than right).

Note: "Word came unto the King of Ninevah (regarding Jonah's message) and he rose from his throne, and laid his robe from him, and covered himself with sackcloth (like burlap sacking, in those days a sign of sorrow or repentance), and sat in ashes. And he caused it to be proclaimed and published through Ninevah by the decree of the king and his nobles, saying: 'Let neither man nor BEAST, herd nor flock, taste anything: let them not feed, nor drink water...' (Now consider the following words very closely): 'But let man and BEAST be covered with sackcloth and cry mightily unto God.' "(Jonah 3:6-8). Read these words again! The herds and flocks, that is, all the lower animals were to be restrained from eating and drinking, but MAN and BEAST were to put on sackcloth and ashes and pray to God and repent! Be honest now, have you ever heard of a cow or horse, or monkey putting on sackcloth and praying to God for mercy?

Of course not! They are incapable of this. But the "beast of the field," could do this, so the Word says!

So let's start examining the question and see who this creature is who is called a BEAST, but who is capable of fasting, praying, and repenting, just as man can do. The BEAST mentioned here is without a doubt, of the same race as the BEAST mentioned in the Garden of Eden, who talked with Eve and tempted her. NAC HASH, the tempter of Genesis 3:1, was of the BEASTS of the field. (He WAS NOT SATAN! as some teach, although he no doubt was under Satan's control).

Note further, that not only was this being capable of fasting and prayer, but, along with man, he was commanded to turn from his evil way and from violence that was in his hands, (Jonah 3:8). Animals do not have hands! "BEASTS of the field" do! Lower animals are never guilty of violence that could be accounted as sin before God. So here we see several different points: First, these beings called BEASTS can pray; second, they can put on clothing (in this case sackcloth); third, they have hands and can walk erect; and fourth, and finally, like men, they are commanded to put away the violence in their hands. These are things animals cannot do, nor are they ever asked to do in scripture. Therefore we MUST conclude that the "beast of the field" is an intelligent, morally responsible creature, similar to man, although not man.

Our fourth proposition was that this creature was a biped, walking upright and having hands and feet, not hooves or paws. This proposition has been fairly well covered. But there are other passages which point out the moral responsibility of these BEASTS, and show they have hands and therefore walk erect.

At the time when the Law was given to Israel at Sinai, this command was given by God to Moses: "Take heed to yourselves, that ye go not up into the mount, or touch the border of it: whosoever toucheth the mount shall be put to death: there shall not any HAND touch it (please note) he shall surely be stoned or shot through, whether it be BEAST OR MAN, IT SHALL NOT LIVE..." (Exodus 19:12,13). Surely, no one reading this would be foolish enough to believe that this passage was speaking about animals. Dare we charge God with utter foolishness? When He speaks of the HAND of MAN and the HAND of BEAST, then these MUST possess the knowledge and responsibility to refrain from reaching out to touch the mountain. While we do not have time or space to explore this further, it should be accepted as it is given at the hands of two or more witnesses in the Word, and is therefore established!

In proposition five, we stated that the BEAST is closely associated with man. This we have already proven. He talked with Eve in the garden of Eden. He fasted and prayed with the men of Ninevah.

He was commanded, along with man, to refrain from putting his hands on the mountain. In the book of Daniel (Daniel 4:25) we have a further account of the BEASTS of the field, as they cared for King Nebuchadnezzar when he was driven from dwelling with men during the period of his insanity. God's word to the king was: "They shall drive thee (Nebuchadnezzar) from MEN, and thy dwelling shall be with the BEASTS OF THE FIELD, and they (the BEASTS of the field) shall make thee eat grass as an oxen and they shall wet thee with the dew of heaven". (Please note the words: "They shall make thee"). A domestic animal would have paid no attention to the king, let alone care about what he ate. But the BEASTS OF THE FIELD caused him to eat grass and sleep in the dew. No known lower animal has ever been known to do things such as this, but remember, the BEASTS OF THE FIELD are not lower animals.

There is one more thing we MUST mention, for it is of surpassing importance in our day and ties in closely with the theme of this book on miscegenation. These commands, found in God's Word are almost completely ignored because of a dreadful lack of understanding on the part of people, especially those who go by the name of Christian. In Leviticus 18:23, we find this definite command given to Israel by God: "neither shall he lie with any BEAST to defile thyself therewith: neither shall any woman stand before a BEAST to lie down thereto: It is confusion! And if a man lie with a BEAST, he shall surely be put to death: and ye shall slay the BEAST. And if a woman approach unto any BEAST, and lie down thereto, thou shalt kill the woman and the BEAST; they shall surely be put to death..." (Leviticus 20:15, 16). (Oh, how the Judeo-Christian crowd will cry about this command. They will no doubt say: "That was the harsh God of the Old Testament. The New Testament God is a God of love". Yet these hypocrites teach that "God never changes, and is the same yesterday, today and forever." If this is true, then His commands against sexual union between MAN and this BEAST [which is not an animal] is as true today as when it was written some 3500 years ago, Billy Graham not withstanding).

Any sexual relationship between MAN and this servant race known in the Bible as BEASTS, BEASTS OF THE FIELD, or BEASTS OF THE EARTH, is strictly forbidden. These two morally responsible parties, who cross this forbidden boundary, were to be put to death. (Not my words, but from God's Law, which was never changed in the New Testament).

We have reached a crucial point here. God has clearly ordered that KIND MUST BE AFTER HIS KIND! There MUST be no crossing over between MAN and BEAST (and remember, we are not speaking here about four footed animals, but about a being that walks upright, can reason, knows right from wrong, and is capable of sexual relations with man).

Any cross over between MAN and this BEAST is confusion and abomination to God according to Leviticus 18:3. The end results are so bad, that in Israel the guilty parties were immediately put to death, so there would be no possibility of a hybrid offspring. (Knowledgeable people know this would be impossible with any sexual union between man and lower animals. In fact, it is impossible for man and lower animals to cross-breed. There is only one being, other than man, who can do this and this is the BEAST OF THE FIELD, which we today know as the Black race). There is no other conclusion an intelligent person who believes the Word of God can make. (These were the men CREATED from nothing in Genesis 1:27, male and female, and are completely different from ADAM man FORMED from the dust of the earth, male only, in Genesis 2:7).

No animals crossbreed with man. (The Negro, or Black, as the "politically correct" would have us call them), is a perfectly honorable being, created by God for a distinct and glorious purpose, but he is not of Adam's race. He is closely related to man, but he is not descended from Adam. (Evidence proves that he was on earth before Adam was FORMED).

The seventh proposition was that this being is not a nation and never has had a civilization of his own. That the Negro in God's wise plan was created for the purpose of serving appears evident in the light of the fact that no Negro civilization, as such, has ever existed, in spite of all efforts by Blacks and liberals to prove otherwise. All races of mankind have had their civilizations. The Chinese, the East Indian, the Arab, the Ethiopian, the American Indian - all of these had their own civilization, some highly developed, but in spite of all efforts to prove otherwise, the Negro has never had a civilization as such. His native home, given to him by God is Africa. In his native state he plowed no fields, harnessed no oxen, developed no government, polished no gems, extracted no oil from the ground, and carried on no united projects with other tribes. Today, in areas where he has been untouched by White civilization, he lives the same as he has for the last 6,000 years, with no knowledge of the wheel, or the ability to start a fire. (I have seen this with my own eyes in Central Sudan - Ed. Mohr). The only civilization Blacks have enjoyed, have been those in association with other of earth's nations, primarily Whites. Thus, it will continue until the day when in the kingdom of God, the Black will be raised from his present status, to the place of service God intended for him to have.

This subject is not as complex as it is vast and because of this vastness and the abundance of evidence available, we must confine ourselves to only a few questions which will come to the minds of those of you who read this article, especially if you come from the Judeo-Christian churches which teach that all mankind came from Adam and Eve. If you are honest in your desire to know the truth, it can be found, as usual, in a close study of the Bible. (It will not come by going to your pastor and asking him for an explanation. For he will give you the answer he was taught in seminary).

Someone is sure to ask: "How did the Negro get through the flood?" The answer should be relatively simple to a thinking person. He came through the flood, inside Noah's ark, the same as all living creatures did. Though we have no scriptural record of it, I do not believe we would be far wrong if we said that he helped Noah and his sons with the tremendous task of taking care of the animals on the ark. Have you ever thought about this. It must have been a tremendous task, for these animals had to be fed, and cleaned up after. Any boy who has lived on a farm can understand this. When the flood was over, the Blacks came out of the ark, just like all the others and continued to propagate their race up to the present time. The only race totally destroyed by the flood, were the giants, who were the product of illicit union between the "sons of God" and the "daughters of men".

Part II - Where Did Cain Get His Wife?

This is a question that has bugged Christians and which they have avoided for centuries. Since Cain was banished to the land Nod, after his brother's murder, and before Eve gave birth to her third son Seth, (compare Genesis 4:8-17 with Genesis 4:25), then there was as yet only one descendant of Adam on earth, and this was the reprobate Cain. We know Cain had a wife, and evidence would indicate that he had taken a female from among the BEASTS OF THE FIELD, a Negress.

After the birth of his first son, Enoch, Cain built a city, (Genesis 4:17). There can be no city without inhabitants and those who inhabited the city which he built were inhabitants of the land of Nod, the same creation that had been given to Adam as servants in the garden of Eden. They were driven forth with Adam, and became wanderers, which is the meaning of the word NOD. These were a numerous people who had been CREATED (Genesis 1:27) before the FORMATION of Adam. The Negro rightly claims to pre-date Adam).

Before Cain was driven forth from the presence of God, he complained: "My punishment is greater than I can bear, Behold, Thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth; and from thy face shall I be hid; and I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond in the earth; and it shall come to pass that everyone that findeth me shall slay me". (Genesis 4:13,14)

A fugitive from whom? Certainly not his father and mother, Adam and Eve! From who then would he be forced to flee? And to whom did he refer when he spoke about "everyone that findeth me shall kill me"? It would be none other than the inhabitants of the land of Nod, and these inhabitants, I believe were Negroes, the BEAST OF THE FIELD.

So God put a mark upon Cain (we are not told what it was) and gave a command that whosoever slew Cain, his vengeance would fall seven fold. (Possibly Cain was made to resemble the people of Nod.) In any case, he was able to assemble enough people to build a city and the female he took as his wife, was not a descendant of Adam.

A very expressive term can be found in the book of Jude, in the New Testament, when he describes the great sin of Sodom as "going after strange flesh". That is a very descriptive term. The Sodomites were given to every imaginable sexual perversion, just as they are today (see Genesis 19:1-9), and it was for this filth that they were eliminated. These Sodomites were Canaanites (see Genesis 10:15-19). It is most significant that Cain, is mentioned in this context in Jude 11.

Note that Jude first mentions the angels which kept not their first estate. These may or may not have been the "sons of God who married daughters of men". (There is a great deal of argument on this among Bible scholars). Then Jude speaks of the Sodomites who were destroyed for the same wickedness - "going after strange flesh". These as brute BEASTS CORRUPT THEMSELVES, he says, and pronounces: "Woe unto them, because they have gone in the way of Cain". (Jude 6-11) Thus the wickedness of Cain, the wickedness of the Sodomites, all appear to be similar. All these filthy dreamers defiled themselves by filthy sexual intercourse with "strange flesh". (Verse 8) The civilization of Cain was very wicked and was completely wiped out by the flood. The fate of Sodom is known to every Bible reader.

When Jeremiah wrote concerning the Babylonian captivity of the Judahites, he said: "And now I have given all these lands into the hands of Nebuchadnezzar, the king of Babylon, My servant; and the BEASTS OF THE FIELD, have I given him also to SERVE him". (See Jeremiah 27:6). When prophesying of the destruction of Babylon, he wrote, "O Lord, Thou hast spoken against this place, to cut it off, that none shall remain in it, neither MAN or BEAST, but it shall be desolate forever", (Jeremiah 51:62). This prophecy was fulfilled ages ago, and it is most significant to find that the ancient ruins of Babylon abound with four-footed animals but that MEN, and the BEASTS OF THE FIELD, the Negro, are completely absent from this area.

From these facts, we can only conclude that the BEASTS OF THE FIELD are indeed a servant race, distinct and separate from the Adamic creation of God, but who have a special place and calling in God. They are vocal, intelligent, capable of prayer, and repentance. The pure Negro stock is a servant order, as are the angels in heaven.

Part III - The Living Creature!

There is a considerable mass of scripture which indicates that the Negro is not a member of the Adamic race. Since Christians have questions regarding this, I thought it good to set forth in writing certain evidences which lead me to believe that the Negro is not a descendant of Adam and as Adam was FORMED for the role of leadership, the Negro was CREATED for the role of service.

I am quite aware that such a statement will disturb many people, not because it is untrue, but because it is different and contradictory to long-standing tradition which has been handed down to Christians over the centuries of darkness.

But must truth remain forever silent because it is contrary to man's traditions, or because it is unpopular, and in this case almost punishable as an offense? NO! That will never do! It is far better to learn the truth and understand the wisdom of God in His creation, that we might see at least in part, some of the wonders of His plan.

Will any be so foolish as to take offense when I say that angels are not members of the Adamic race? Would any be offended should we say that angels, which are glorious in power and wisdom, are a separate creation from the Cherubim and Seraphim? No! For even though you may not believe, you would not be offended about it or even lightly reject it. And what will the angels say, those glorious beings whose chief attributes are wisdom and strength, when they are told that man who was made a little lower than they," was ordained by God to some day rule over them? And that this mystery is so great that the angels desire to inquire into it. No angel in heaven is angered and filled with resentment and wrath, because we set forth the scriptural belief that man in his completed state is ordained to be the lord and ruler of the universe and to judge the angels. Even now he is a partaker of the divine nature, when as a Christian he has escaped the corruption of the present world system.

Why, then, must Christians become so annoyed and upset when scriptural evidence is produced showing that the Adamic race was called by God to rule, while the Negro race was called to serve? (I am not a "racial supremest" as many of you know. For I believe Israel is to be the ambassador of God to other races and nations, showing them how God wants them to live. Only the OVERCOMERS, as shown in Revelation, will "rule and reign with Him". Just because you are White, doesn't mean that you qualify to be a "ruler" - Editor Mohr).

If God in wisdom chose to make the angels a ministering (serving) order of beings (in heaven), why should it be thought incredible that He should have a "servant order" on earth? Is there anything evil in this? Is it not true that our blessed Lord Jesus, to who all power is now given, once declared: "I am among you as He that serveth, (Luke 22:27).

Who can doubt that there are servants in the world to come? It is written in Revelation 22:3, "His servants shall serve Him". What a confused mess everything would be, if in this present world, everyone had the same ministry and calling! What would we do if all were great executives, or kings, or judges? What if all were doctors and there were none to serve? Let us not imagine that God dare not make a choice among His creatures - He who makes His angels spirits and His ministers a flame of fire.

He chose Abraham from among ALL the hosts of earth. He chose Isaac but rejected Ishmael. He chose Jacob and hated Esau (see Malachi 1:2; Romans 9:13). He chose the entire nation of Israel - not just the House of Judah, or the Jews - to be a special witness to His Name for the ages to come (see 1st Peter 2:9, written to Israel, not the church). I do not find any Oriental, or Indian, or Russian who is angry with God because He made that choice. Most are willing to accept the wisdom of God, if they are Christians, and take their proper place in God's plan of things.

When, therefore, it can be plainly seen how the Holy Bible clearly teaches that Adam's calling is to rule and eventually judge angels (1st Corinthians 6:3), must we not accept as truth, even though we do not understand, how the wisdom of God will bring this to pass?

And, if in God's wisdom He has called another race not of Adam's lineage to serve Him and serve Adam, dare we take issue with God or accuse Him of favoritism or lack of wisdom in His plan? (Yet this is what happens, when Christians refuse this scriptural truth - Editor Mohr).

Is it not the prerogative of the potter to make each vessel as it pleases him, and from the same lump of clay, to make vessels of honor and dishonor, as he sees fit? (Romans 9:21)

Paul said: "Judge nothing before the time until the Lord come, who will bring to light the hidden things of darkness, and then shall every man have praise of God". Every man? That is what it says! Pharaoh, and Nebuchadnezzar along with Moses and Daniel. Do not ask me how, because I do not know; but God once said to Pharaoh, "And in every deed for this cause have I raised thee up, for to show thee My power; and that My name may be declared throughout all the earth." (Exodus 9:16)

If, in this brief writing, I can point out the following seven facts, then I think that the reader should give special consideration to this work as a whole and to the truth it conveys (even though it may be contrary to the accepted teaching in the Judeo-Christian church - Editor Mohr). If it can be shown, from the Word, beyond the shadow of reasonable doubt that there is a creature in this world other than man who is:

1) Able to speak and reason and carry on an intelligent conversation,

2) Able to fast, pray and bear responsibility before God,

3) Able to wear clothing and put it on and off by himself,

4) A biped, walking upright as a man, having both hands and feet - not paws and hooves,

5) Who often associates with man,

6) Who alone of all beings is able to cross-breed with man, and because of this God has forbidden this cross-breeding.

7) Not a nation, and has never had a civilization of his own, if this were all
true, would you not say that it is our Christian duty to discover who this creature is, so that we may give him the honor and respect due to him of God? It does not take many marks of identification to identify a man from all other men.

Each order of life, whether animal or human, has its special place in God's plan of creation. As long as each species obeys His chey nd, that every kind should be after his kind, all is well. But the moment this barrier is crossed, then turmoil reigns, bringing down the wrath of God and dreadful destruction to the disobedient. (See the ancient history of our Israel people in the book of Judges, where it says that when they disobeyed God, "He sold them into the hands of their enemies", Editor Mohr).

The scripture records one loathsome act of disobedience that in itself was eventually responsible for the deluge of Noah's day, and the destruction of those who took part in this devilish scheme. In Genesis 6:1-4, we are told in no uncertain terms that the "sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair, and they took of them wives of all which they chose... And God saw the wickedness of man was great in the earth . .

We do not have time to explain who the "sons of God" were, but the salient point is that their inter-marriage was a forbidden and abortive relationship and the consequences of it was beyond human belief.

In this case, the beings called the "sons of God", mingled with the seed of men. This relationship was Satanic. It was a carefully devised scheme to ruin man's hope of ever fulfilling the high and holy plan God had in store for him. Martin Luther King, unconsciously made a very revealing statement when he said: "The Negro MUST ATTAIN HUMAN DIGNITY". This statement is tantamount to saying that the cow must attain bovine dignity. Why would anyone try and attain that which he already possessed?

As the sons of God left their habitation to descend to a lower plane that they might corrupt the man Adam, who God had FORMED, so the Negro is leaving his God-given estate, endeavoring to ascend and invade and destroy the realm given by God to Adam. The oblect of this invasion is the same - to corrupt Adam and gain the ascendency over him lest he fulfill God's purpose. The outcome will bring nothing but disaster, and that disaster is no less destructive for the black man than for the white. All who cross God's barrier will suffer! So it becomes necessary that we understand the ancestry of all people and recognize the special realm of activity assigned to each race.

Part IV - Difference In Blood!

C. R. Dickey, commenting on Acts 17:26 - "And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation..." says: "Without quoting the latter part of this verse, some people make an ado over the first clause and use it glibly to overthrow all previous Bible teaching concerning racial separation. The key word used to prove the oneness of mankind is BLOOD, yet, actually it proves nothing because the word BLOOD does not appear in any of the ancient manuscripts. The following is a literal translation from the Greek: "and He made of one every nation of men to dwell on all the face of the earth, fixing appointed seasons and the boundaries of the dwelling of them

The word BLOOD was added by translators.

Perhaps the most logical reading of this passage is provided by the Ferrar Fenton translation from the original language which reads: "Himself giving every one life and breath and all things; because He made by one (that is in Christ) every race of men to dwell upon the face of the earth". This agrees with the Revised Version, the Emphatic Diaglott, and others. Even Dr. Scofield in his translation footnotes, makes note of the fact that the word BLOOD is not found in the best translations.

Over thirty years ago, Dr. James Bonner, Professor of Biology at Cal Tech, writing in the Saturday Evening Post (4/26/61) stated: "A tremendous fact developed is that the human races are not the same, but particular kinds of living things. The blood of the white Caucasian differs in molecular construction and hereditary factors from that of the Negro. The physical evidence of this difference has been commonly known as 'sickle cell anemia', a child killer and responsible for causing invalidism in adults. The anemia is not a disease. It occurs in the blood of the Negro as a mutation from the normal and is an inherited characteristic. It can be and is transmitted to the white race by transfusion of Negro blood".

Professor Bonner remarks that a striking example of this is the enzyme found in victims of this hereditary condition which is characterized by abnormal hemoglobin of the red blood cells.

"Developments are gradually leaking out that the epidemics of hepatitus occu ring in hospitals the last few years are closely related to blood transfusions from different races of peoples. This is now being recognized by American blood banks". He goes on to say:

"The social engineers and misguided do-gooders, devoting their energies to race mixing as a basis for social adjustment, are now proven wrong from every scientific point of view. Race mixing is bound to result in racial suicide! The Red Cross and other blood banks, who have mixed blood of the races for transfusions, under pressure of minority groups, are guilty of a crime against humanity. The crime is not directed to the white Caucasian race alone, but there is much evidence that white blood given to a Negro has, in many instances, caused a much more serious result". Professor Bonner concludes: "This must not be continued in the face of scientific evidence that mixed blood transfusions may have fatal consequences".

NOTE: While medical authorities are cognizant of the difference in the blood composition between the races, this is not considered a proper subject for general discussion and while this information is available from medical reference sources, it is not something which is promulgated by the published or electronic media. In fact it is considered to be "verboten!" (Does it not seem strange, that this vital information has been kept a secret from the "brainwashed" Christians in the Judeo-Christian churches. Ask yourself, why? Editor Mohr)

In Conclusion

Both scripture and science collaborate in showing that "race mixing" is disasterous, and all one has to do to prove this is to look at the great civilizations which have existed in the past. Two things have been foremost in their destruction, Sodomy and race mixing. This in spite of anything that Zionist Christians such as Billy Graham say to the contrary. There are also distinct scientific differences between the blood of the "true Jew," and that of the Adamite, which explains why they have always been a "vampire" people who MUST live off others in order to survive. This is another subject for another time. I challenge you to check out these facts. Don't take them to your Judeo-Christian pastor, for you already know what he will say. Check them out for yourself in the Bible, using a good concordance and when you find this booklet has told the truth, publish it to Christians and others who need to know.

The End

Return to Jack Mohr's Web Page