CAIN / SATANIC SEED LINE
It has been brought to my attention many times, that there
are preachers and teachers in the world who don't recognize there are literal
children of Satan surviving in the world today. Since this is one of the central
themes of the Bible, the fight for supremacy between the children of Yahweh and
the children of Lucifer, I wonder what Bible these preachers and teachers are
reading and studying.
In these studies we will be using the proper name of our God,
which is Yahweh and Yahshua for Christ. For documentation read, "Who Is
The battle lines are drawn by Yahweh in Genesis 3:15,
where He states he is going to put enmity between the seed of the woman and the
seed of the serpent.
Let's start at the beginning; of course Satan wasn't a
serpent. The entity that deceived and seduced Eve wasn't a scaly thing wriggling
along on the ground. Serpent was translated from the word nachash, which
means enchanter or magician. A fallen angel, still retaining a lot
of his angelic powers, no doubt could be very much of an enchanter or magician.
Lucifer's children, and I do mean children not just
followers, through the centuries used a serpent as a symbol or emblem of their
ancestor, until they attached a secondary meaning of serpent to the word nachash.
In Genesis 3:1-3 Satan said to Eve, "Is it really true that Yahweh
said, You can't eat of any tree in the garden?"
As it reads in the Hebrew, Eve replied to Satan, "And the woman said
unto the enchanter, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden".
Now I am going to switch to the King James translation and I will correct it as
"Of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the
garden, God has said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye
die." Let's see what it actually said in the Hebrew. Fruit is the
Hebrew word pirchach, meaning progeny, brood, children or
descendants. Do you talk about the children of a walnut tree or an apple
tree? Of course you don't!
Of the pirchach, of the descendants of the
tree, which is in the midst of the garden, Yahweh has said, "Ye shall not
eat of it, neither shall ye touch it". That word touch is the
Hebrew word naga, which is a more polite expression meaning, to have
sexual intercourse with. Do you need to be warned not to have sexual intercourse
with an apple? Of course not, it isn't that kind of a tree.
Yahweh had millions of the pre Adamic, Asiatic and African
people around. If He just wanted somebody wide between the shoulders and narrow
between the eyes to spade up the garden, He had them. He didn't have to create a
special being for that purpose.
Satan had been the governor of this planet until he forfeited
the right to this position by rebellion. Yahweh sent Adam here and it is
recorded in Luke chapter 3 that Adam was the son of Yahweh. It doesn't
record that about any of these pre Adamic people mentioned in Genesis chapter
1. Adam was the son of Yahweh and Yahweh sent Adam here to take over by
force, kick Satan out and govern this planet. The trees in the Garden of Eden
were the family trees of nations and races.
Adam and Eve weren't supposed to intermingle with these
people. If Negroes and Asiatics were all that Yahweh wanted, He already had
them. What He created was a different and separate being who was to be a
different sort of person, whom the Negroes and Asiatics could never produce.
The Hebrew word Awdawm, which we translate Adam, means of a
rosy, fair complexion. Adam was the first person of a specifically created new
race. Adam and Eve were told not to mongrelize their race with these per Adamic
people that were in the world.
When you come to Genesis 3:13, Yahweh has called Adam,
Eve and Satan before Him to give an accounting of their misdeeds. According to
the King James Bible Eve said, "The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat
thereof". Here again is the Hebrew word nachash, meaning enchanter.
Then there is the use of the word beguiled; the Hebrew word there is nawshaw,
which means seduced.
Beguiled means no more than deceived. Somebody who sells you
some mining stock in a mine that doesn't have any good ore in it, beguiles you.
The word nawshaw means seduced, not in any way or sense can it
mean beguiled. "And Yahweh God said unto the woman, what is this thou hast
done? And the woman said, the enchanter seduced me." This is what it says
in the Hebrew and Cain was the product of this seduction.
In reply in Genesis 3:15 Yahweh says to Satan, "I
will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her
seed". The same word zehra was used for both the seed of Satan and
the seed of Eve. Zehra literally means seed; there is no other
meaning. It also could be used as grains of wheat but it is used throughout the
Bible as meaning the descendants of a person. Satan was to have just as literal
children in this world as Eve was to have. The same word zehra is used
for Satan's seed and Eve's seed.
The reply of the churchianity preachers is usually to quote Genesis
4:1. "And Adam knew his wife, and she conceived and bare Cain."
Notice that what is not said is more significant that what is said, the
Bible nowhere says Adam begat Cain. As you have read in the Old Testament, the
monotonous regularity with which it always says, and so and so begat whosis and
whosis begat what's his name and what's his name begat somebody else, and so on.
It was important to know your ancestry in those days, because you didn't get
your citizenship for two box tops and a dime. You got citizenship because your
ancestors, for over twenty generations, were Israelites and no other way.
So Adam knew his wife and she conceived. I can tell you
something and I can prove every bit of it by witnesses. I went to a movie one
night and the next morning the sun rose in the east. I didn't say the one caused
the other. I said two things happened, one happened first and the other happened
second. I never said they were cause and effect. The Bible never says there was
cause and effect here. If you want further proof of this, go right on to Genesis
chapter 5 where you will find the list of Adam's descendants. Cain's name is
nowhere to be found. Neither Cain nor Abel is mentioned among the descendants of
If you say Abel might have been omitted because he was
probably killed before he left any descendants of his own, we don't really know.
However, this isn't true of Cain because the Bible traces Cain's descendants for
six generations, naming them right down the line. Never once does it record that
Cain was a descendant of Adam, never in any way, shape, forms or manner. The
first time it records that Adam begat a child is Genesis 5:3. "And
Adam lived 130 years, and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image; and
called his name Seth." This child Adam begat was not named Cain it was
The satanic bloodline crept in through Cain, possibly
earlier, among the pre Adamic people. There were pre Adamic people who were not
necessarily satanic. There were some pre Adamic people into whom the satanic
bloodline came, and there were even some of the descendants of Adam who probably
mongrelized. In fact, it is evident they did mix their bloodline for the fact
that those living around Noah were wiped out by the flood. The Bible tells us
that Noah was perfect in his ancestry, with no mongrelization. He and his family
were the ones in the area that were still pure in their bloodlines.
This is why the flood wiped out the mongrelized Adamites
around Noah. As I documented in "Noah's Flood Was Not Worldwide", this
flood did not cover the whole earth as is falsely taught in the churches of
The pure descendants of Adam multiplied and then you come to
the fact of the satanic bloodline getting in there. Remember, Yahweh had
announced His purpose; He was going to take back the world from Satan's
domination. Yahweh was going to rule it according to His purposes. He was going
to rule it through His children, through the pure descendants of Adam.
What would be the obvious move on Satan's part to thwart this plan? The obvious
thing to do would be to mongrelize the descendants of Adam, then he could sneer
in Yahweh's face and say, "These are my children but where are yours? All
these have my blood in them." This is exactly what Satan set out to do.
Genesis 6:2 records, "The sons of God saw the
daughters of men (Adam) that they were fair; and they took them wives of all
they chose". You don't get the full significance of it in this translation,
"the sons of God" (beni-ha-elohim, also means sons of magistrates or
mighty men of the earth and angels).
A double race mixing took place here; both the rulers of the
pre Adamic races and the fallen angels took wives of the fair Adamic women. It
is written with obvious disapproval. The male descendants of Adam were not
allowed, by Yahweh's law, to marry anybody but the daughters descended from
Adam. If they were marrying within their own racial line in this instance, it
couldn't have been spoken of with disapproval. So the beni-ha-elohim are
evidently those of the pre Adamic darker races and the fallen angels who
followed Satan into rebellion. Greater details of this event are found in the
book of Enoch.
Go on to Genesis 6:4 where it is speaking of the same
subject, again it is botched up in the King James Bible. "There were giants
in the earth in those days, and also after that when the sons of God came in
unto the daughters of men and they bare children to them, the same became mighty
men which were of old, men (enowsh) of renown."
This is what it says in the Hebrew. "There were nephilim
(the fallen ones) in the earth in those days." They were fallen angels.
That is what the bible calls them in so many places. Jude 1:6 records,
"Angels who had not kept their first estate," who had fallen from
heaven and from their former powers. "When the sons of God", and again
it’s the beni-ha-elohim, "came in unto the daughters of Adam...”
so it's the same thing.
Here we have the spreading of the satanic bloodline. Genesis
chapter 6 goes on to trace many of these descendants of the fallen angels.
You find that all through Palestine, on both sides of the Jordan river, clear
down through Mount Seir, the rugged mountain range southeast of the Dead Sea
where Esau and his family lived, all through this area there are these various
people with the satanic blood in them.
There are two different places, one in Isaiah the other in
Ezekiel, where it speaks of what it calls a king or a prince. In the one case it
speaks of Babylon and the other case of Tyre. Nevertheless it speaks of him in
language, which could not possibly apply, to anybody except Satan. Therefore
this indicates that at some time or other, Satan had incarnated in the form of
these various kings, one king of Babylon and one king of Tyre.
Don't think this is so impossible because many times the Old
Testament tells of these angels appearing in very solid form. They came and
talked with Abraham on several occasions, one of them wrestled with Jacob almost
Another of these angels came when the people of Israel were
about to cross the Jordan River and take over Palestine. Joshua, making a
scouting trip around his camp, saw this armed man standing there in armor and
with a sword and Joshua asked, "Are you with us or for the enemy?" And
the man said, "I am the captain of the hosts of Yahweh".
Let's take Isaiah 14:12-21 and note that these verses
could not possibly apply to anyone except to Satan himself. We will quote from
the King James Bible. "How art thou fallen from the heaven, O Lucifer, son
of the morning! How art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the
nations: for thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will
exalt my throne above the stars of God. I will sit also upon the mount of the
congregation, in the sides of the north." Lucifer then said, "I'm
going to be the ruler over Israel (Yahweh's people). I will ascend above the
heights of the clouds; I will be like the Most High".
Yahweh our God then told Lucifer the devil, "Yet thou
shall be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit. They that see thee shall
narrowly look upon thee and consider thee saying, Is this the man that made the
earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms? That made the world a wilderness, and
destroyed the cities thereof, that opened not the house of his prisoners? All
the kings of the nations, even all of them lie in glory, every one in his own
house; but thou art cast out of thy grave like an abominable branch, and as the
raiment of those that are slain, thrust through with a sword, that go down to
the stones of the pit; as a carcass trodden under foot. Thou shalt not be joined
with them in burial, because thou hast destroyed thy land, and slain thy people;
the seed of evildoers shall never be renowned."
You could not say this about any kings of Babylon. The only
one, who may possibly have failed to get burial and an elaborate tomb, might
have been Belshazzar. Belshazzar was nothing but an incompetent drunkard and
nobody ever could say of him that he was the one who shook kingdoms and so on.
He didn't even rule Babylon, because he was drunk all the time.
These passages are speaking of none other than Lucifer. Note
how it goes on in Isaiah 14:21. "Prepare slaughter for his children
for the iniquity of their fathers; that they do not rise, nor possess the land,
nor fill the face of the world with cities." The word translated as children
is from the Hebrew word Beni meaning sons. Satan obviously was to have
children who could be slaughtered, to keep them from multiplying to the point
where they would take over and rule the world. Old Testament? Of course it is,
now let's see what the New Testament has to say about it.
Yahshua plainly says, in a number of places, that the devil
has children, not merely followers. Remember the parable of the tares and the
wheat. Yahshua spoke of the farmer who sowed good seed in his field and his
enemy came along during the nighttime and sowed these poisonous weeds, the tares
among the wheat. When the farmer's servants saw the tares growing among the
wheat they asked him if they should go and pull them up now.
The farmer said, "No, you might pull up some of the
wheat with them. Let them grow together until the time of the harvest, and then
the reapers will first gather the tares into bundles to be burned, and then put
the wheat in my barn".
Then Yahshua explains this parable to His disciples. In Matthew
13:38-39 Yahshua says, "The field is the world; the good seed are the
children of the kingdom (the Greek word used here in the plural is huios
meaning sons, the good seed are the sons of the kingdom); but the tares are the
children (huios) of the wicked one. Satan has just as true children in
the world as does Yahweh.
Speaking to the Pharisees, who as you know were Jews, Yahshua
said in Matthew 12:34 (the King James Bible botches this up to an extent
that seems to me often to be willful), "O generation of vipers, how can ye
being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth
The word is not generation at all. A generation is a
number of people of not too different an age, living at the same time. You, for
example, constitute one generation. Yahshua wasn't talking just about the people
living then. They weren't any more wicked than the generation that lived before
them or the generation that lived after them. What Yahshua said was, as we will
paraphrase it (it's the Greek word genema which means children or offspring):
"O children of vipers... sure all these centuries you Jews have used the
serpent as the emblem or symbol for your ancestor. All right, taking you at your
word, you children of serpents," right down the line they were vipers.
Yahshua knew who they were.
In Matthew 23:29-35 it is recorded, "Woe unto you
scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! Because ye build the tombs of the prophets,
and garnish the sepulchers of the righteous, and say, If we had been in the days
of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the
prophets. Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children
of them which killed the prophets." Here again is the Greek word huios.
"Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. Ye serpents, ye genema (ye
offspring, children) of vipers. How can ye escape the damnation of hell? That
upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of
righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias, son of Barachias, whom you slew
between the temple and the altar."
Was Yahshua so unjust that He was going to punish these Jews
for the murder of Abel, if they weren't descendants of Cain? Of course not.
Yahshua was tracing the children of the serpent, the enchanter
Satan, down through the centuries. Tracing those who had murdered the righteous,
including all the prophets, right down the line. So Yahshua said, "Upon you
(upon this race) these descendants of the serpent, will come the
responsibility for all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood
of righteous Abel even unto the blood of Zacharias."
Throughout the Bible it records the two seed lines, Yahweh
and Lucifer's. The Bible makes no reference as to what your religious point of
view may be; it is talking about literal descendants. Romans 8:16 tells
us, "The spirit itself bears witness, that we are the children of
God". The word children there, the Greek word teknon, means
one born a child, not adopted. Nothing is more fallacious than this
church doctrine about being adopted children of Yahweh.
Read what Paul said on this subject and nothing in it can
justify the mistranslation of that as adoption. Paul states that before
the coming of Christ we were held in bondage under the law. He then says the law
just like an heir under age strictly governed us. The heir has inherited from
his father, who has died, all the estate but he is still a minor and cannot take
control of it.
The heir is under the control of trustees and governors,
appointed guardians, appointed by his father, until he comes of age. Paul
continues that all the time the heir is owner of it all and yet he is controlled
as though he is just a servant. You couldn't say that about anybody who was
adopted. If you take somebody else's illegitimate child and decide you are going
to adopt him, is he already the owner of your property before you adopt him? Of
course not, Paul wasn't stupid enough to think he was. Only the churchmen are
stupid enough for that.
What Paul was talking about was the coming of age ceremony
by which they marked the fact that the heir had now become of full age and his
property was put into his hands to control as an adult. As I said before, Romans
8:16 tells us, "The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit that
we are the children of God", teknon, one born a child, not
Romans 9:26 reads (Paul is quoting from Hosea 1:10),
"And it shall come to pass, that in the place where it is said unto them,
Ye are not my people; there shall they be called the children of the living
God". It is the Greek word huioi, meaning sons. We are the born,
not adopted, children of Yahweh. As to the born, not adopted or
converted, children of the devil, read Acts 13:8-9. This tells about
a Jew sorcerer Elymas, who opposed Paul when Paul was trying to make some,
converts. "Then Saul (who was also called Paul) filled with the Holy Ghost,
set his eyes on him and said, O full of sublimity and mischief, thou son of
the devil (the same Greek word huios, meaning son), thou enemy of all
righteousness, wilt thou not cease to pervert the right ways of the Lord?"
The offspring of a cat is another cat, isn't it? The child of
a Negro is a Negro and a child of Yahweh is what? He is not as wise and not as
powerful or important as his Father, but nevertheless he partakes. Within his
limitations, of a godly nature. This is what the Bible tells us about and this
is exactly why we of Yahweh's people Israel are held to so much greater
responsibility than other people. After all, you can't expect a Negro to act
like anything but a Negro, but a child of Yahweh is expected to act like one.
The child of a devil is what, another devil isn't he? John
6:70-71 is part of a very important passage which began in this manner.
Yahshua asked His disciples who were all gathered together, "Whom do men
say that I am? And they said, Oh some say that you are this prophet or that one
who has been reincarnated and come back here. Then Christ said, Whom do you say
that I am? And Peter spoke up and said, Thou are the Christ, the Son of the
living God. Christ then said, Blessed art thou Simon, son of Jonah: because
flesh and blood didn't tell you that fact: it was My Father in heaven who told
you that. And He said, Upon this rock (petra, the solid bed rock of the earth) I
will found my church."
Yahshua didn't say He was going to found the church on Simon
Peter (petros), a little stone. In Greek petros means a little stone, just
barely bigger than a pebble. Was Yahshua going to found His church on a pebble
that anybody could kick out from under it? No, Yahshua said, "I will found
it upon petra." the solid bedrock of the earth.
Remember the example Yahshua gave, the parable wherein He
said one man had built his house on the sand and when the storm came along, the
flood washed the sand out from under it and it collapsed. Another man built his
house upon the rock (petra, bed rock) and the storm beat upon it and couldn't do
anything to it, because it was founded on a rock (petra).
If any of you have ever been to Yosemite Valley and have seen
that enormous cliff El Capitan, you have seen a good example of what the Greeks
meant by the word petra. You could build a castle on El Capitan and nothing
could blow it off or wash it away. "So upon this fact, that you have
recognized who I am: the Christ, the Son of the Living God; upon that I will
found My church, and the gates of death shall not prevail against it."
John 6:70-71 records, "Jesus answered them, Have
not I chosen you twelve, and one of you is a devil? He spoke of Judas
Escariot, (the son) of Simon, for he it was that would betray Him, being one of
the twelve". Our Savior was not just being vulgarly abusive by calling
people names He never did that. He denounced these Pharisees, He called them
hypocrites and they were. Yahshua wasn't abusing them with lying epithets, they
were hypocrites and He was accurate.
When Yahshua called these Jews children of serpents, they
acknowledged the statement was true, for that was the emblem they had used from
ancient times. When He said that one of them was a devil, He wasn't being
abusive, He was speaking the literal truth.
The First Epistle of John again states the existence
of these two seed lines. I John 2:29 tells us, "If ye know that he
is righteous, ye know that every one that does righteousness is born of
Him". I John 3:2 continues, "Beloved, now are we the sons of
God". Here we have the Greek word teknon meaning a born child,
not adopted, thus a child born of Yahweh. Let's continue with I John 5:9-10."Whosoever
is born of God does not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him; and he cannot
sin, because he is born of God."
By this John didn't mean that none of us commit any sins at
all. If that were the case, we wouldn't have needed the sacrifice of Yahshua on
the cross. We all have our sins but people are divided into two classes. There
are the one who are only sorry because they don't get a chance to sin more and
the others who are sorry because they have sinned only a little. What John means
is, whoever is born of Yahweh doesn't habitually sin. So John says in I John
3:10, "In this the children (teknon) of God are manifest, and
the children (teknon) of the devil". Remember, John has talked about
us as the born teknon of Yahweh and the others as the born teknon
of the devil.
I John 3:12 records that as for those that are our
brothers, not the children of Satan, we should love them and not be as Cain. The
King James Bible says, "...who was of that wicked one and slew his
brother." The people that have churchianity rather than Christianity say,
"Oh well, you know it doesn't say that he was a son, it just means that
Cain was morally associated with Satan and was bad and a reprobate and so
There weren't two separate Greek languages in those days.
There wasn't one language to write the Gospel according to Luke and a
different one to write the First Epistle of John. As you well know,
different languages have their different idioms. In many languages one word may
have a meaning that can only be expressed by a phrase of several English words.
I think nearly all of you have a King James translation of the Bible and you
know that in most editions of it, some words are printed in italics. Those words
in italics are the words which the translators added because they thought it was
necessary to give the English the same meaning the Hebrew or the Greek had,
without these added words.
Luke chapter 3 traces the genealogy of Yahshua,
starting with Yahshua and going all the way back to Adam. Let's start with Luke
3:23 as it is translated in the King James Bible. "And Jesus himself
began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of
Joseph, which was the son of Heli (the words "the son" are in
italics showing they were not in the Greek and the translators added them),
which was the son of Matthew (the son is in italics), which was the son
(italics) of Levi, which was the son (italics) of Melchi, which was the son
(italics) of Janna," and so forth. All "the son" were in italics
so were added.
Some people would read Luke 3:23-24 as follows:
"...the son of Joseph, who was as big a reprobate as Heli, who was morally
no better than Matthew, who was as bad as Levi..." Is this the way some
people think Luke wrote this? If this is not the meaning of the Greek here in
Luke, it is not the meaning of the same Greek phrase in John 3:12.
So where it says, "not as Cain who was of that wicked one", in
Greek it means he was the son of that wicked one.
In Greek, if you say John was of William, in English it would
read, John was the son of William. The better English translations recognize
this. For example in the Weymouth translation, this same verse, John 3:12
reads, "We are not to resemble Cain who was a child of the evil
one and killed his brother." Phillips' translation reads, "We are
none of us to have the spirit of Cain who was a son of the devil and
murdered his brother." The New English Bible, a magnificent job of
translation reads, "Unlike Cain who was a child of the evil one and
murdered his brother".
The verses that people use, as proof positive there isn't any
basis for the belief that the Jews are the descendants of Cain and therefore
from the devil, is John 8:31-33. Yahshua was talking to the Judeans who
were the people we know of as Jews today. It isn't simply that Yahshua was
behaving like a petulant spoiled child because somebody didn't believe in Him,
because it says, "those Judeans who believed in Him". Check Strong's
Concordance, the word Jew is mistranslated from the word meaning Judean. Yes so
called converted children of the devil.
Yahshua said to these Judeans (Jews), "If ye
continue in My doctrines indeed, then ye shall be My disciples; and you shall
know the truth and the truth shall make you free. They answered Him, We be
Abraham's seed, and were never in bondage to any man". Anybody that knows
their Bible knows that all of Abraham's children had been in bondage at one time
or another. Here is evidence that these people weren't descendants of Abraham.
Who is it who could say he was descended from Abraham and had never been in
bondage to any man?
If these Jews were of any of the twelve tribes of Israel at
all, they would have been in bondage the first time in Egypt. If they belonged
to the ten tribed northerly kingdom of Israel, they would have been in bondage
the second time in Assyria. If they belonged to the two tribed southern kingdom
of Judah, they would have been in bondage the second time in Babylon. Yet the
Jews admitted they had never been in bondage to any man, thus demonstrating they
weren't of Israel or Judah.
Who could say that 1,800 years earlier that Abraham was one
of his ancestors, Esau? Remember Esau and Jacob were twin brothers, born with
(presumably) the same bloodline. However, Esau married two Canaanite women in
violation of Yahweh's law. Esau couldn't leave anything but mongrelized satanic
descendants, because among these Hittite Canaanites there was the satanic
When the Bible records Esau selling his birthright to Jacob
for a bowl of lentil stew, this isn't when he lost his birthright. This was only
a formal ceremony by which he gave up any claim to it. Esau lost the birthright
when he did the thing that rendered it impossible for him to continue as the
head of the clan.
Esau's descendants from then on would be mongrelized.
Recognizing he was already out of the line for leadership, Esau sold his
inheritance for a bowl of stew. The Bible records that Esau and his two
Canaanite wives moved down to Mount Seir, a very rugged mountain range southeast
of the Dead Sea. Mount Seir is exactly where some of these people lived who were
descendants of the fallen angels. Read Genesis chapter 6, among the
people who had the blood line of the fallen angels were these Horites. They were
the cave dwellers who were known as Horim.
Suppose a white man married two Negresses here and then moved
to the interior of the Congo. For the next 18 centuries his descendants lived
there with nobody they could marry except the Negroes around them. Of course the
last trace of white blood would have vanished. Nevertheless, after 18 centuries
they could still say they had a white ancestor.
These weren't Negroes, they were satanic Canaanites, but the
principle is the same. These Jews talking with Yahshua had identified themselves
as Edomite Jews. Genesis 36:20-30 lists Esau's descendants. Listed are
all the various chieftains among the family of Seir, the Horite satanic line,
including his daughter Timna. Genesis 36:12 records that Timna was a
concubine to Esau's son Eliphaz and bore him a son Amalek. What a pestilential
lot the whole tribe of Amalek was, they all behaved according to their satanic
bloodline. You will find a good deal about this in Exodus 17:8-16 and Numbers
This same satanic conduct, on the part of the Edomites, was
repeated as the opportunity arose. Remember when the people of Israel came out
of Egypt in the exodus, they wanted to march up to Palestine, they were then
attacked by the Edomites. The Israelites were driven back so they had to detour
around, down through the wilderness, in the Sinai Peninsula.
When the Babylonians, under Nebuchadnezzar captured
Jerusalem, they looted and burned the city and massacred a lot of the
inhabitants. Then the Edomites came rushing in to help in the massacre and
plunder. The whole book of Obadiah is just one continuous condemnation of the
Edomites for the way they acted. This book also predicted their eventual
slaughter and punishment for what they did. Obadiah verse 10 records,
"For thy violence against thy brother Jacob shame shall cover thee, and
thou shalt be cut off forever".
Obadiah verse 15 continues, "For the day of
Yahweh is near upon all the heathen: as thou hast done, it shall be done unto
thee: thy reward shall return upon thine own head". Obadiah verse 18,
"And the house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame,
and the house of Esau for stubble, and they shall kindle in them, and devour
them; for there shall not be any remaining of the house of Esau; for Yahweh has
Exodus 17:14-16 continues, "And Yahweh said unto
Moses, Write this for a memorial in a book, and rehearse it in the ears of
Joshua: for I will utterly put out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven.
And Moses built an altar, and called the name of it Yahweh Nissi (Yahweh our
banner). For he said, Because Yahweh hath sworn that Yahweh will have war with
Amalek from generation to generation."
How did these satanic, mongrel, Edomite Jews get up there
into Judea? They came in two principle waves. During the time the southern
kingdom of Judah was practically empty during the Babylonian captivity, the
Edomites were driven out of Mount Seir by a heavy invasion by the Arab people,
the Nabateans from the east. So the Edomites were driven westward. They couldn't
go southwest or straight west, they would then be getting into Egyptian
territory and they weren't strong enough to fight the Egyptians. Consequently
they went slightly northwest and took over the southerly half of what had been
the kingdom of Judah and settled there.
When the small remnant of Judah came back from the Babylonian
captivity, the books of Ezra and Nehemiah record that 42,600, or something like
that, came back. It lists them by their families and when you run those down you
find that slightly over 8,000 of these people were not from any tribe of Israel
or Judah. Only 34,000 of the 42,000 that came back were Israelites of the tribes
of Judah, Benjamin and a few Levites among them.
Since they were too few to drive out these numerous and
warlike Edomites, all they could do was settle in the little territory left
vacant. To give you an idea of the size of this territory, the entire area of
the twelve tribed nation of Israel, before it broke up, picture it as follows.
If it were set down here in southern California, it would extend from the
Mexican border to the southern part of Los Angeles and inland from the coast it
was never more than 40 miles wide.
Now divide this into thirds, the northern two-thirds of that
comprised the kingdom of Israel, the ten tribed northern kingdom. Only the
southerly one-third of that was the kingdom of Judah. Of that one-third, take
out the southern half of that now occupied by the Edomites. This little strip of
land is all that remained for the true Judaites and Benjamenites to settle in.
Before the captivity, the tribe of Judah had been in the
south, the tribe of Benjamin in the north, with the city of Jerusalem lying
right on the boundary line between them. They sorted themselves out as well as
they could, the way they were before. Judah was in the south and Benjamin pushed
to the north. However, Benjamin couldn't just move up to the north a little bit,
because north of them was Samaria. Remember I said you divide this twelve tribed
territory into thirds, the middle third constituted Samaria.
Isaiah, Kings and Chronicles record that when the Assyrians
captured the northern kingdom of Israel and deported its entire people, they
brought other people from Assyria and settled them in Samaria. It purposely
failed to say the Assyrians settled anybody in Galilee, the northern most
portions, because they didn't, they left it vacant. Now the Judahites pushed the
Benjamenites to the north, as they returned from the captivity. They couldn't
just move up into Samaria that was fully settled. So Benjamin had to leapfrog
over Samaria to the vacant land of Galilee, to the north.
In Galilee was Yahshua's own hometown of Nazareth. He was
born in Bethlehem, down close to Jerusalem, but His family home was up in
Nazareth. Remember, Yahshua got almost all of His converts up in Galilee and of
the twelve disciples only Judas was a Jew. In Bible translations Judas is called
Judas Iscariot. There is no such word as Iscariot in any language known to man.
This is a corruption of the Hebrew word Ish Kerioth, meaning a man of
Kerioth. Kerioth was a little village in the southwestern portion of Judea, down
in the territory occupied by the Edomites. Judas was an Edomite Jew and the only
Jew of the twelve disciples. The other eleven were all Galileans, therefore
Benjamenites. If a Jew could walk with Yahshua for three years and still betray
Him, is there any Jew we can trust?
When Yahshua was arrested and taken into the high priest's
home for illegal questioning, Peter followed Him in. The servant said
"Well, you're one of them, you're a Galilean, your accent shows it".
You certainly don't have any trouble telling the southerners from a northern
Yankee here in this country do you. They speak English with a different accent
and the Galileans spoke the Aramaic of the day, with a little different accent
from the Judeans down around Jerusalem.
When the people were gathered at Pentecost, and the Holy
Spirit came upon the disciples, they were all there except Judas Escariot. The
disciples began speaking to this assembled multitude in a multitude of different
languages. How astonished the people were when they heard the disciples speaking
in all these different languages, which obviously they didn't know. The people
said, "Aren't these Galileans?" All the remaining disciples were.
Down to the south of what was left of the territory of Judah,
these Edomite Jews settled. They were always a pestiferous people and were
constantly raiding the southern boundary of Judea. Their descendants are raiding
the Arab's territory the same way today. A leopard doesn't change its spots. For
a long time, after the return from the Babylonian captivity, the people in Judea
were a conquered province of one empire or another, Syria, Egypt and finally
Rome. They got their little flare up of independence under the Maccabee kings
beginning about 150 B.C. and about 120 B.C.
John Hyrcanus, one of the Maccabee kings, who had by that
time a good disciplined army, got tired of these Edomite Jew raids on his
southern border. So, Hyrcanus marched down south and defeated these Jews
thoroughly. Saul, the first king of Israel, had been told by Yahweh, "You
go down there and absolutely exterminate these Edomites, don't you leave one of
them alive". Saul made a big mistake, as it is always a mistake to disobey
Yahweh's commands and instructions, he didn't exterminate these loathsome
people. When Saul came back the prophet Samuel said, "Because you have
disobeyed God, God has deposed you from being king, and He is going to put a
better man in your place".
Approximately 900 years later, John Hyrcanus made the same
mistake. After he had defeated the Edomites, he then decided he was going to be
a missionary; he would convert them to the religion of Judaism. He offered the
Edomites a choice; he would spare them if they would accept the religion of
Judaism. This was not the religion of the Old Testament ever; it was what was
brought back from Babylon with the Babylonian Talmud. The late Rabbi Stephen S.
Wise said it briefly and accurately; I have never been able to improve on his
The learned Rabbi said, "The return from Babylon and the
introduction of the Babylonian Talmud marked the end of Hebrewism and the
beginning of Judaism". The people of the Old Testament were real Hebrews
and the religion Yahweh had given them could well be called Hebrewism. This
Talmud/Judaism began as the Jews destroyed the religion of the Old Testament. In
Yahshua's time they had not yet given it the name of the Talmud, they called it
"the tradition of the elders". Remember how often Yahshua rebuked them
for following their tradition. "Why have ye by your tradition set
aside the laws of Yahweh?" Yahshua was referring to the Talmud.
So, John Hyrcanus was going to be the Billy Graham of his
day, he was going to make converts. Hyrcanus told them, "If you will adopt
the religion of Judaism, I will give you full citizenship in the kingdom of
Judea. If you don't, I will cut your throats". As you well know, this is
the most effective missionary technique that has ever been developed. Even Billy
Graham doesn't make converts that fast. Naturally the converts made by the sword
are of doubtful validity. So the Edomites adopted the religion of Judaism and
were accepted in full citizenship in the kingdom. You will find this described
in great detail in the one reliable history of that period, Josephus in his
history, "Antiquities of the Jews", book 13, chapter 9.
The second wave of Edomites came in when the Edomite
chieftain Herod conquered and became king of Judea, under the Roman Empire.
Herod was a very able and very evil scoundrel. He raised a large sum of money by
taxation and by raiding his neighbors. With this money he bribed Mark Anthony,
who was over in Egypt with the Roman legions at this time, to lend him a couple
of the Roman legions to add to his own Edomite troops, for the conquest of
Judea. With the Roman troops and his own, Herod did capture Judea.
In 40 B.C. the Romans recognized Herod as governor with the
title Ethnarch. In 37 B.C., Rome formally recognized Herod as the local king of
Judea. He was still subject to Roman foreign policy but he had complete
self-government at home. Herod had come in with a conquering army and his Jewish
Edomite followers came in with him for the sake of the plunder they could get,
they overran the area. They have also gone back to Germany for the same reason.
You can learn much about these events in Josephus' "Antiquities of the
Jews" books 14-18.
In his other history, the "Wars of the Jews", book
4 chapters 4-5, book 5 and chapter 6 and thereafter, Josephus writes of the
horrible conduct of these Edomite Jews within the besieged city of Jerusalem
while it was undergoing siege by Titus in the year 70 A.D. Their robbery and
massacre of the inhabitants inflicted probably more casualties than the Roman
army did. In the Jewish encyclopedia, the article "Edom" (in the
edition I used to look it up, it was Volume 5, page 41) the article
"Edom" concludes with these words: "The Edomites are found today
in modern Jewry".
These Edomites had come in the first time when John Hyrcanus
gave them full citizenship. The second time they came in was as a wave of
conquerors under Herod. This is the same Herod that tried to murder Yahshua as a
baby. They had overrun the land. They had control of the entire civil and
religious government until the death of Herod.
By will, Herod left the kingdom of Judea to his son Herod
Archelaus. The Romans were too wise to trust somebody with the kingdom when they
didn't know anything about him. The Romans gave the new Herod a trial period as
governor, under the title Ethnarch. For ten years he gave the country the most
miserable misrule that any nation ever had. The people finally petitioned Rome
to send a Roman to govern them.
The people didn't like the tyranny of Rome at all but
conditions were so bad, anything was better than what they had. When a Roman
would rather govern the people, you can understand how bad the situation was.
The Romans put Herod Archelaus on trial, found him guilty of misrule and
banished him to Vienne.
From that time on there were a series of Roman governors
called procurators, Pontius Pilate was number 6 in that series. The military
government was entirely in the hands of the Roman procurators. They were also in
full charge of the tax collections for Rome.
On the other hand, these Herodian Jews had control of the
entire religious government and the temple. They also had control of the civil
government, in all respects concerning purely local self government, could
collect their own taxes and so on.
When the priests were getting greatly upset about Yahshua's
teachings they said, "If we let Him alone, all men will believe on Him. The
Romans will take this kingdom away from us." The way the clergymen have
taught it, this is meaningless stupidity. The clergy picture Yahshua as a
whining, cringing milksop, going around whimpering to people they ought to be
good. If this was all Yahshua did, these Jews would not have bothered with
contempt for Him, much less worry about His teachings.
Yahshua was explaining to the people the utter evil of the
Jewish economic and religious system under which they were living. Let's
paraphrase what the Jews might have said, based on what is recorded in the
Bible. "Look, if we let Him alone, He is going to awaken the people to
these controls we have over them. They will petition Rome just as they did about
Herod Archelaus and the Romans will kick us out of here. We will lose control of
the money and might have to pay fair wages. The people might rebel against the
usury we charge them for use of their own money." This is what they were
Here were these Edomite Jews, who told Yahshua they were
descendants of Abraham. However, they revealed they really couldn't be true
Israel when they said they had never been in captivity to any man. They might
have had some Israelite ancestors but, no alien blood was allowed in those
called Israel. As we read in John 8:31-44, we will come to the place
where Yahshua tells these Jews they were the children of the devil. They would
do the lusts of their father who was a murderer from the beginning.
Yahshua recognized the two seed lines. He didn't say these
Jews had only adopted some of the bad principles of the devil, He said they were
the children of the devil. The Old Testament as well as the New Testament
recognizes the two seed lines. The Adamic seed line, Yahweh's children, came
down through a carefully selected best one in each generation from Abraham,
Isaac, Israel, then on down through the twelve tribes of Israel. So there are
the two seed lines, that of Yahweh's children through Israel and the children of
Satan, some of the most pestiferous of which have come through the line of Cain.
People have asked me if I thought the Jews know of their
descent from Cain. They certainly do, and here is how they proved they know. The
Jews have given the owner of the radio station on which I broadcast, a very bad
time. As some of you may know, a radio-broadcasting station license is good for
only three years. If it is renewed on a regular basis, you have a going money
making business of considerable value. If the license isn't renewed, all you
have is some used equipment. It makes a great deal of difference to the owner
whether he gets his license renewed or not.
The Jews put pressure on this radio station owner to put two
programs off the air. One of the programs was Richard Cotten, a conservative
commentator and the other program was mine. Much to the owner's credit, he
refused to take us off the air. His reply to the Jews was, "I have no
authority to censor any of these programs, besides, this is the United States of
America and I believe in free speech." They told him, "You've got to
put these programs off the air." The owner of the station answered them,
"If either one of them has said anything that you think is untrue, although
they are paying for their time, I will give you an equal amount of free time for
you to answer them."
Surprise, surprise, the Jews didn't take the station owner up
on his offer. Neither Richard Cotten nor I go off the deep end with any
statement we can't prove. The Jews still insisted the station owner put us off
the air. When he refused, the Jews filed objections to the renewal of his radio
station license, which came up for renewal about this time. They kept the matter
before the Federal Communications Commission for more than a year so the owner
operated his station on a day to day basis, not knowing if his license would be
renewed or not.
During this time the Jews terrorized the station owner into
to making an agreement. The agreement was the station owner would hire a Jew who
would censor my program and Richard Cotten's. This Jew could cut out whatever
material the Jews objected to.
I have never sent any cut and spliced tapes to the radio
station. When I am paying $100.00 an hour for broadcast time, tape is the
cheapest thing you use. While I have never known of one of my splices to come
apart, I don't take any chances on it. The tapes I send in for broadcast are
complete, without splices. When these tapes are returned to me, they are cut and
spliced in a number of places where this Jew censor has cut portions of them
I don't like a Jew, to remove matters of essential Christian
doctrine, can censor it one bit that a Christian broadcast. However, this
station owner doesn't have to carry my program. The owner of the station still
has to fight the Jews and this is three years later. He finally won before the
Federal Communications Commission. The Jews appealed to the U.S. District Court
of Appeals and the station owner won there also. The Jews then appealed to the
Supreme Court. This radio station owner undoubtedly has spent somewhere between
$50,000 and $100,000 in legal expenses fighting to retain his radio station
license and indirectly to preserve my right of free speech. If I make myself too
troublesome to him, he may just decide he doesn't want to carry my program any
further so I don't argue with him about it.
On one of my broadcast tapes, I quoted the Bible verses
telling that after Cain killed Abel, Cain had been a farmer up to that time,
Yahweh said, "Cursed is the ground for your sake. I will not hereafter
yield you its strength." Cain's reply was, "My punishment is greater
than I can bear. You have driven me off the face of the land, and I'll be a
wanderer and a vagabond." Then I went on to say that I suppose you have
noticed that the children of Cain are not farmers today. You find them in
financial and money lending institutions. I didn't use the forbidden word Jew, I
just said the children of Cain. Guess what the Jew censor cut out of my
tape! As a Jew he knew exactly whom I was talking about. Yes, they know who they
The Bible records Cain saying he was being driven out of the
land where the descendants of Adam would be. He complained that wherever he
went, whomever he met would kill him. In those days there were a lot of places
that weren't too hospitable to strangers. If, as the preachers teach, Adam and
Eve were the parents of the only people on earth who were these other people?
The only other child of Adam and Eve, at this time, was Abel and he was dead.
With Cain driven away from Adam and Eve, out into some other
part of the earth, who was Cain going to meet that would kill him? Remember, the
Bible records Cain very speedily found enough people that with them he built a
city. The Bible records these pre Adamite people. Yahweh told Cain He would put
a mark on him so the people would recognize him and not kill him. Just what was
that mark? Did Yahweh tattoo something on the sole of Cain's foot or where Cain
would sit down on it? No, long before any hidden mark could possibly be seen,
Cain would have been killed.
Yahweh had to put this mark where it was the first thing
others would see, He put it in the exact geometrical center of Cain's face. This
big Jew nose they have borne ever since, as the sculptured monuments of the
ancient empires show.
The ancient kings were extremely vain of the conquests they
had made. The pharaohs of Egypt, kings of Babylon, Assyria, and Persia, all left
elaborately carved monuments telling how they had captured this city or that.
They recorded the massacre of so many of its inhabitants and made slaves of the
others, plus how much loot they took and so forth.
In addition to the inscriptions, there was almost always a
carved panel illustrating this, showing some of the captives. Wherever any of
these panels showed an Israelite, it is invariably a straight nose, typical of
what we would call an Anglo Saxon, Scandinavian or Teutonic type of face. Where
it shows these Canaanite people, it is always a typical hook nosed Jew.
evidence of the Bible, and the evidence of archaeology all show one thing. There
is definitely two different seed lines, the satanic seed line and the other seed
line of Israel, Yahweh's own children.